1
|
Sherman SM, Allerton-Price C, Lingley-Heath N, Lai J, Bedford H. UK healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the introduction of varicella vaccine into the routine childhood vaccination schedule and their preferences for administration. Vaccine 2024; 42:2621-2627. [PMID: 38480101 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Varicella (chickenpox) is a highly contagious disease caused by the varicella-zoster virus. Although typically mild, varicella can cause complications leading to severe illness and even death. Safe and effective varicella vaccines are available. The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation has reviewed the evidence and recommended the introduction of varicella vaccine into the UK's routine childhood immunisation schedule. OBJECTIVES To explore UK healthcare professionals' (HCPs) knowledge and attitudes towards varicella vaccination, its introduction to the UK routine childhood immunisation schedule, and their preferences for how it should be delivered. DESIGN We conducted an online cross-sectional survey exploring HCPs' attitudes towards varicella, varicella vaccine, and their preferences for delivery of the vaccine between August and September 2022 prior to the recommendation that varicella vaccine should be introduced. PARTICIPANTS 91 HCPs working in the UK (81 % nurses/health visitors, 9 % doctors, 10 % researcher/other, mean age 48.7 years). RESULTS All respondents agreed or strongly agreed that vaccines are important for a child's health. However, only 58% agreed or strongly agreed that chicken pox was a disease serious enough to warrant vaccination. Gaps in knowledge about varicella were revealed: 21.0% of respondents disagreed or were unsure that chickenpox can cause serious complications, while 41.8% were unsure or did not believe chickenpox was serious enough to vaccinate against. After receiving some basic information about chickenpox and the vaccine, almost half of the HCPs (47.3%) in our survey would prefer to administer the varicella vaccine combined with MMR. CONCLUSIONS Given the positive influence of HCPs on parents' decisions to vaccinate their children, it is important to understand HCPs' views regarding the introduction of varicella vaccine into the routine schedule. Our findings highlighted areas for training and HCPs' preferences which will have implications for policy and practice when the vaccine is introduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jasmine Lai
- Division of Biosciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Helen Bedford
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adella GA, Ambaw Kassie G, Yosef Gebrekidan A, Atnafu Gebeyehu N, Mesele Gesese M, Chekol Abebe E, Asmamaw Mengstie M, Abdu Seid M, Dagnaw Tegegne K, Fenta Feleke S, Asmamaw Dejenie T, Bantie B, Moges N, Solomon Y, Aderajew Zemene M, Mengist Dessie A, Tenaw Anley D. Knowledge and attitude towards Covid-19 vaccine in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2179224. [PMID: 36882983 PMCID: PMC10026859 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2179224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The biggest threat to the effectiveness of vaccination initiatives is a lack of information about and trust in immunization. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of knowledge of and positive attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine in Ethiopia. PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and the Ethiopian University online library were searched. To look for heterogeneity, I2 values were computed and an overall estimated analysis was carried out. Although 2108 research articles were retrieved, only 12 studies with a total of 5,472 participants met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled estimates of participants with good knowledge of and positive attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine were found to be 65.06% (95% CI: 56.69-73.44%; I2 = 82.3%) and 60.15% (95% CI: 45.56-74.74%; I2 = 89.4%), respectively, revealing that there is a gap in knowledge of and positive attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine in Ethiopia. A holistic and multi-sectoral partnership is necessary for a successful COVID-19 vaccination campaign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Getachew Asmare Adella
- School of Public Health, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Gizachew Ambaw Kassie
- School of Public Health, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Amanuel Yosef Gebrekidan
- School of Public Health, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Natnael Atnafu Gebeyehu
- School of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Molalegn Mesele Gesese
- School of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Endeshaw Chekol Abebe
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Misganaw Asmamaw Mengstie
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Mohammed Abdu Seid
- Unit of Physiology, Department of Biomedical Science, College of Health Science, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Kirubel Dagnaw Tegegne
- Department of nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Sefineh Fenta Feleke
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
| | - Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Berihun Bantie
- Department of Comprehensive Nursing, College of Health sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Natnael Moges
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Yenealem Solomon
- Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Melkamu Aderajew Zemene
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Anteneh Mengist Dessie
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Denekew Tenaw Anley
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu J, Wei Z, Yang Y, Sun X, Zhan S, Jiang Q, Fu C. Gap between cognitions and behaviors among children's guardians of influenza vaccination: The role of social influence and vaccine-related knowledge. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2166285. [PMID: 36703498 PMCID: PMC9980667 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2166285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The seasonal influenza vaccine coverage remains suboptimal among children even though guardians expressed high willingness to vaccinate their children. This study aimed to determine the association between vaccine hesitancy and uptake to facilitate vaccination; thus, bridging the gap. A cross-sectional design, using stratified cluster random sampling, was conducted among guardians of 0-59-month-old Chinese children from July to October in 2019. A structural equation model was applied to explore the interrelationships between factors including vaccine hesitancy, vaccination, social influence, and relative knowledge among guardians. Of the 1,404 guardians, 326 were highly hesitant to vaccinate their children, 33.13% (108/326) of whom had vaccinated their children. Moreover, 517 and 561 guardians had moderate and low vaccine hesitancy, with corresponding vaccine coverage of 42.75% (221/517) and 47.95% (269/516). Guardians' gender, age, and education level were demographic variables with significant moderating effects. Social influence considered impact of communities, family members, friends, neighbors, healthcare workers, bad vaccination experience and sense on price. Actual vaccine uptake was negatively significantly associated with hesitancy (β = -0.11, p < .001) with positive association with social influence (β = 0.61, p < .001). Vaccine hesitancy was negatively significantly associated with relative knowledge (β = -2.14, p < .001) and social influence (β = -1.09, p < .001). A gap is noted between cognitions and behaviors among children's guardians regarding influenza vaccination. A comprehensive strategy including emphasizing benefits of the influenza vaccination, risk of infection, and ensuring high vaccine confidence among healthcare workers can help transform the willingness to engage in the behavior of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wu
- From the Institute of Infectious Disease and Vaccine, School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zheng Wei
- From the Institute of Infectious Disease and Vaccine, School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yingying Yang
- From the Institute of Infectious Disease and Vaccine, School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiu Sun
- From the Institute of Infectious Disease and Vaccine, School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Siyi Zhan
- From the Institute of Infectious Disease and Vaccine, School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qijing Jiang
- From the Institute of Infectious Disease and Vaccine, School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chuanxi Fu
- From the Institute of Infectious Disease and Vaccine, School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bianchi FP, Stefanizzi P, Di Lorenzo A, De Waure C, Boccia S, Daleno A, Migliore G, Tafuri S. Attitudes toward influenza vaccination in healthcare workers in Italy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2265587. [PMID: 37849235 PMCID: PMC10586073 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2265587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Healthcare workers (HCWs) are among the at-risk groups for whom influenza vaccination is strongly recommended. To assess the proportion of Italian HCWs with positive attitudes toward influenza vaccination, we conducted a systematic review of relevant literature and a meta-analysis. Our focus was on the influenza seasons from 2017/18 to 2021/22. The prevalence of favorable attitudes toward vaccination varied, ranging from 12% during the 2017/18 influenza season to 59% in the 2020/21 season. The significant increase in the 2020/21 season can be attributed to adaptations necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. During the 2021/22 influenza season, there was a decline in vaccination coverage (37%), likely due to the absence of a robust preventive culture. Various strategies have been employed to enhance HCWs' attitudes to achieve higher vaccination rates, but none of them have demonstrated satisfactory results. Policymakers should consider implementing a policy of mandatory vaccination to ensure elevated vaccination coverage among HCWs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Paolo Bianchi
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
- Health Direction, University-General Hospital Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Stefanizzi
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Lorenzo
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Chiara De Waure
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, University Cattolica of Sacred Hearth, Rome, Italy
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health - Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Daleno
- Health Direction, University-General Hospital Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Giovanni Migliore
- Health Direction, University-General Hospital Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Silvio Tafuri
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy
- Health Direction, University-General Hospital Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porreca A, Di Nicola M. Flu vaccination coverage in Italy in the COVID-19 era: A fuzzy functional k-means (FFKM) approach. J Infect Public Health 2023; 16:1742-1749. [PMID: 37738690 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Europe, flu vaccination coverage has decreased, and there are complex barriers to overcome to vaccinate against flu. Many studies have been conducted to estimate vaccination coverage. The COVID-19 pandemic threatens to disrupt immunization programs in many countries, including Italy, where vaccination against the flu is recommended but not mandatory. This paper aims to understand changes in flu vaccine uptake in Italian regions. METHODS Using functional data analysis and fuzzy functional k-means clustering, we investigated changes in flu vaccine coverage in Italian regions before (2010-2019) and after (2020-2022) the COVID-19 vaccination period. RESULTS The period of COVID-19 pandemic brought an increase in vaccine coverage globally. Elbow's method determined that the optimal number of clusters in vaccination uptake is 2. Apulia, Basilicata, Emilia Romagna, Liguria, Molise, Tuscany, and Umbria in 2019 belong less to the group with low flu vaccination uptake (G1) but increase their tendency to belong to this group over time: they decrease their propensity to be vaccinated for flu. For others, it seems that COVID-19 served as a push to increase flu vaccination coverage rates. Sicily appears to be the region that has responded best to the pandemic, changing its membership value from 2019 to 2022. CONCLUSION The present study highlights that the COVID-19 era has resulted in a higher flu vaccination coverage rate. Moreover, the regional level's improvement or worsening in flu vaccination coverage rate is not affected by the historical gap and socio-cultural and economic differences prevailing among Italian regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamaria Porreca
- Department Of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Marta Di Nicola
- Department Of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaur M, Coppeta L, Olesen OF. Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers in Europe: A Systematic Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1657. [PMID: 38005989 PMCID: PMC10675787 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11111657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
This study analyzes vaccine hesitancy (VH) among healthcare workers (HCWs) in 15 European countries. We have undertaken a systematic review by synthesizing data from 46 articles (between 2015 and 2022) encompassing 55,612 subjects. Despite the heterogeneity of the methods in the various studies, we found that physicians had consistently higher vaccination rates than nurses across different countries and different vaccines. Physicians' average vaccination rate was 79% across a selection of vaccines, while that of nurses was 62%. Concerns regarding vaccine safety, information gaps, and the responsibility of healthcare authorities in managing VH are highlighted by qualitative insights. This research contributes to our comprehension of the ways in which VH among HCWs is impacted by healthcare roles, vaccine types, and regional disparities. The insights gleaned from this analysis can serve as a guide for targeted interventions aimed at increasing vaccine acceptance and coverage in Europe, ultimately strengthening public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandeep Kaur
- European Vaccine Initiative, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg (Heidelberg University Hospital), Voßstraße 2, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Luca Coppeta
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Ole F. Olesen
- European Vaccine Initiative, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg (Heidelberg University Hospital), Voßstraße 2, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fenta ET, Tiruneh MG, Delie AM, Kidie AA, Ayal BG, Limenh LW, Astatkie BG, Workie NK, yigzaw ZA, Bogale EK, Anagaw TF. Health literacy and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance worldwide: A systematic review. SAGE Open Med 2023; 11:20503121231197869. [PMID: 37823070 PMCID: PMC10563502 DOI: 10.1177/20503121231197869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Health literacy helps an individual to have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information to make appropriate health decisions. This study aimed to review the association between health literacy and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Method This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses steps. Databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, World Health Organization libraries, and Google Scholar were used to search all published articles in the area of health literacy and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance until August 1, 2022. Result In this review, 1348 articles were retrieved. Finally, 13 articles were included in the review after the removal of duplicates that did not meet our inclusion criteria. In all, 10 articles showed that health literacy was significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. This review also showed that positive perception of the vaccine, vaccine hesitancy, adverse reaction from vaccines, residence, socioeconomic status, level of education, younger age, being a health worker, and positive belief have associations with health literacy and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. There was significant heterogeneity in the study population and measurement tools used for health literacy and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Conclusion This systematic review provides comprehensive evidence on health literacy and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance globally. There was significant heterogeneity in the study population and measurement tools used for health literacy and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Most studies reported that health literacy is significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Therefore, investing in health literacy using different vaccine promotion strategies may improve COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and health decision-making to decrease the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eneyew Talie Fenta
- Department of Public Health, College Medicine Health Science, Injibara University, Injibara, Ethiopia
| | - Misganaw Guadie Tiruneh
- Department of Public Health, College Medicine Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
| | - Amare Mebrate Delie
- Department of Public Health, College Medicine Health Science, Injibara University, Injibara, Ethiopia
| | - Atitegeb Abera Kidie
- Department of Public Health, College Medicine Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
| | - Birtukan Gizachew Ayal
- Department of Public Health, College Medicine Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
| | - Liknaw Workie Limenh
- Department of Public Health, Gamby Medical and Business College, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
- Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | | | - Nigus Kassie Workie
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Dire Dawa University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
| | - Zeamanuel Anteneh yigzaw
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | - Eyob ketema Bogale
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | - Tadele Fentabil Anagaw
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Montuori P, Gentile I, Fiorilla C, Sorrentino M, Schiavone B, Fattore V, Coscetta F, Riccardi A, Villani A, Trama U, Pennino F, Triassi M, Nardone A. Understanding Factors Contributing to Vaccine Hesitancy in a Large Metropolitan Area. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1558. [PMID: 37896961 PMCID: PMC10610669 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11101558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy has become a major global concern, leading to a significant decrease in the vaccination rate, with the World Health Organization recognizing it as one of the top ten threats to public health. Moreover, the health cost generated is evaluated to be 27 billion dollars per year in the US alone. To investigate the association between demographic variables and knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours related to vaccination, a survey-based cross-sectional study was conducted with 1163 individuals. Three models were used to perform a multiple linear regression analysis. In Model I, knowledge about vaccinations was found to be associated with smoking habits, education, and marital status. In Model II, attitudes towards vaccinations were significantly associated with sex, smoking habits, education, marital status, and knowledge. In Model III, behaviours related to vaccination were associated with sex, smoking habits, having children, knowledge, and attitudes. One potential solution to improve behaviours related to vaccinations in the general population is to implement specific public health programs, which can be a cost-effective intervention. This study provides valuable insights into the determinants of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours related to vaccinations in the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Montuori
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Immanuela Gentile
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorilla
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Sorrentino
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Benedetto Schiavone
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Valerio Fattore
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Fabio Coscetta
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandra Riccardi
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Villani
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Ugo Trama
- General Directorate of Health, Campania Region, Centro Direzionale C3, 80143 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Pennino
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Triassi
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Nardone
- Department of Public Health, "Federico II" University, Via Sergio Pansini nº 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sheikh NS, Touseef M, Sultan R, Cheema KH, Cheema SS, Sarwar A, Siddique HZ. Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of confidence, convenience, and complacency; A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289678. [PMID: 37585457 PMCID: PMC10431607 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Vaccine hesitancy is a big obstacle for vaccination programs, as is anticipated for the COVID-19 vaccination program, resulting in low uptake of vaccines thereby hindering the process of reaching herd immunity. Bearing this in mind the current study was aimed to explore the determinants of vaccine hesitancy amongst the Pakistani population. METHODOLOGY A cross-sectional study was carried out from November 2020 to March 2021. The conceptual framework of the study was based on the 3Cs (Confidence, Convenience, Complacency) model. The google-forms-based questionnaire was disseminated amongst the general population. Data collected were entered into SPSS version 26 and analyzed. RESULTS Of the 421 participants, 68.4% were women. Non-healthcare workers were 55.8% of respondents. Of vaccine-hesitant individuals, 26.13% reported they were very unlikely to get vaccinated. Perception of COVID-19 vaccine was explored, which revealed 12.6% of individuals agreed the vaccine was not safe as it came out too fast, 50.6% were worried about experiencing side-effects, 18% believed the vaccine will not offer protection and 5.9% believed the vaccine would cause death. Low Practice of standard operating procedure (SOP) in non-Healthcare workers was the strongest contributor to vaccine hesitancy (OR: 5.338, p = 0.040, 95% CI: 1.082-26.330) followed by High complacency (p = 0.026) and Moderate Complacency (OR: 0.212, p = 0.007, 95% CI: 0.069-0.654) towards COVID-19 vaccination. In Healthcare workers the strongest contributor to vaccine hesitancy was having a Moderate Confidence (OR: 0.323, p = 0.042, 95% CI: 0.109-0.958) in the vaccine followed by Moderate Convenience (OR: 0.304, p = 0.049, 95% CI: 0.093-0.993) for vaccination. CONCLUSION Campaigning and communication strategies to reaffirm confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine and educating the general population about the vaccine could lead to increased perception of vaccine safety and effectiveness thereby restoring confidence in vaccine and decreasing vaccine hesitancy. Likewise, working to increase vaccine convenience and decreasing complacency towards the COVID-19 vaccine would translate into high vaccine uptake. MESH WORDS Vaccine hesitancy; vaccination intention, COVID-19 vaccine, vaccine confidence, complacency, convenience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Siddique Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (NUMS), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Mumtaz Touseef
- Department of Pathology, CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (NUMS), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Riddah Sultan
- Department of Pathology, CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (NUMS), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Kanwal Hassan Cheema
- Department of Pathology, CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (NUMS), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Sidra Shafiq Cheema
- Department of Pathology, CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (NUMS), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Afia Sarwar
- Department of Pathology, CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (NUMS), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Haniya Zainab Siddique
- Institute of Environmental Science and Engineering (IESE), National University Of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Islamabad Capital Territory, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Di Martino G, Mazzocca R, Camplone L, Cedrone F, Di Giovanni P, Staniscia T. Attitudes and Beliefs towards Rotavirus Vaccination in a Sample of Italian Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1041. [PMID: 37376430 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Rotavirus is the leading cause of severe diarrhea and dehydration in infants and young children worldwide. Despite the proven benefits of vaccination, vaccine hesitancy and refusal remains a significant barrier to achieving high vaccination coverage in many countries, such as Italy. (2) Methods: An online survey was conducted among women aged between 18 and 50 years from Abruzzo Region, Italy. The survey was composed of two main sections: demographic characteristics and attitudes and knowledge about rotavirus vaccination, based on a five-point Likert scale. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with willingness to get the rotavirus vaccination. (3) Results: A total of 414 women were enrolled in the study. Women who were unaware of rotavirus more frequently had a lower education level (university degree 62.5% vs. 78.7%, p = 0.004) and reported having no children (p < 0.001). About half of the enrolled women thought that rotavirus infection is dangerous (190, 55.6%) and that rotavirus can cause a serious illness (201, 58.8%). Regarding associated factors, women informed by a physician were more likely get a vaccination compared to women informed by friends or relatives (OR 34.35, 95% CI 7.12-98.98, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The present study showed low levels of knowledge and attitudes towards rotavirus vaccination. These results highlight the need for developing and improving additional public education programs for parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Di Martino
- Department of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Unit of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Public Health, Local Health Authority of Pescara, 65100 Pescara, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mazzocca
- School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Laura Camplone
- School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Cedrone
- Hospital Management, Local Health Authority of Pescara, 65100 Pescara, Italy
| | - Pamela Di Giovanni
- Department of Pharmacy, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Tommaso Staniscia
- Department of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ledda C, Rapisarda V, Maltezou HC. COVID-19 vaccination refusal and suspension of work among healthy healthcare personnel in Italy: A cross-sectional study of their knowledge and attitudes toward vaccinations. Vaccine X 2023; 13:100275. [PMID: 36819213 PMCID: PMC9918318 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the initial optimistic projections from various countries and the evidence that vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reduces the associated hospitalization rates and mortality, vaccine hesitancy and refusal among healthcare personnel (HCP) became a major public health concern globally. The aim of this survey was to estimate the knowledge about the Italian Vaccination Plan for HCP and attitudes about occupational vaccinations for HCP among Italian HCP who refused COVID-19 vaccination and were suspended from work. A total of 52 HCP participated in the study. Nurses were the prevalent profession among vaccination refusers. About COVID-19, 24 (26.2%) of all responders have been involved in COVID-19 care and 21 (40.4%) had a history of COVID-19. None had received influenza and pneumococcus vaccination in the past. Knowledge of vaccinations recommended for HCP was high, ranging from 75% to 98% by vaccine. Instead, all HCP were against any mandatory vaccination policy for all HCP. Finally, most HCP questioned the expected benefits and safety of vaccines in general, raised issues of mistrust of information provided for authorities and of compliance with their HCP' vaccination recommendations. Our study indicates good knowledge of occupational vaccinations but strong anti-vaccination beliefs among Italian HCP who refused COVID-19 vaccination and were suspended from work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Ledda
- Occupational Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Corresponding author.
| | - Venerando Rapisarda
- Occupational Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Occupational Medicine Unit, “G. Rodolico-San Marco” University Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Helena C. Maltezou
- Directorate for Research, Studies and Documentation, National Public Health Organization, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Riccio M, Marte M, Imeshtari V, Vezza F, Barletta VI, Shaholli D, Colaprico C, Di Chiara M, Caresta E, Terrin G, Papoff P, La Torre G. Analysis of Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours of Health Care Workers towards Vaccine-Preventable Diseases and Recommended Vaccinations: An Observational Study in a Teaching Hospital. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11010196. [PMID: 36680040 PMCID: PMC9867139 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11010196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Recommended vaccinations are the cheapest and most effective measure to reduce the risk of transmission and related complications, especially in high-risk healthcare settings. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of HCWs in relation to national recommendations. Methods: A transversal study was conducted through administration of a questionnaire by personal interview. The following care units were involved: Paediatric, Neonatal, Cardiac Surgery and General Intensive Care Units and Infectious Diseases Unit. Results: The study sample comprised 308 HCWs. Half the sample were aware of the vaccination recommendations, with occupation and age found to be predictive factors (OR = 9.38, 95%CI: 2.07−42.41; OR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.22−0.60). A higher percentage defined the diseases as a risk for their patients’ health, although this perception was lower in the over-40 age group. In several cases, there were statistically significant differences between the care units (p < 0.001). Around three-quarters of the sample agreed that vaccination should be mandatory; willingness to undergo a future booster vaccination was statistically correlated with the variables of age and care unit (p < 0.001, p = 0.03). Conclusion: The protection of health in the workplace can be achieved through some strategic actions, such as the implementation of educational strategies, and protocols for the monitoring of immunocompetence and the improvement of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Riccio
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Marte
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Valentin Imeshtari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Vezza
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Vanessa India Barletta
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - David Shaholli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado Colaprico
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Di Chiara
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Caresta
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Umberto I Policlinico, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Terrin
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Papoff
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Umberto I Policlinico, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe La Torre
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-06-49970978
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jabbour D, Masri JE, Nawfal R, Malaeb D, Salameh P. Social media medical misinformation: impact on mental health and vaccination decision among university students. Ir J Med Sci 2023; 192:291-301. [PMID: 35119644 PMCID: PMC8814778 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-02936-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need of social media as a medium for gathering health-related information. Simultaneously, a slew of false information, primarily about COVID-19's origin, dissemination, prevention, treatment, and fatality surfaced, making it difficult to distinguish fake from genuine material. However, the possible effects on mental health and the extent to which this influences our decisions, particularly regarding vaccination, are unknown. AIM The purpose of this questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was to examine Lebanese University students' perceptions of social media influence during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to measure the impact of misinformation on respondents' mental health and vaccination decisions. METHODS In total, 440 students took part and were asked to complete an online survey that included questions on social media trust, the "general health questionnaire index" (GHQ-12), and a scale measuring "attitude towards vaccination". RESULTS Our data demonstrated a low frequency of mental health disorders among Lebanese University students, which was correlated to frequent social media exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings suggested that students are more aware of misinformation and had lower rates of despair and anxiety than the general population. Furthermore, Facebook use was associated with worse attitude and behaviour towards vaccination (p = 0.001), but a better mental health. Twitter had the inverse effect (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION It is a necessity to use social media correctly in health-related topics, to push governments and platforms towards making decisions about false and invalidated posts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Jabbour
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath Campus, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jad El Masri
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath Campus, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rashad Nawfal
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath Campus, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Diana Malaeb
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Pascale Salameh
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon ,INSPECT-LB, Institut National de Santé Publique, Épidémiologie Clinique Et Toxicologie-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon ,Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pavlovic D, Sahoo P, Larson HJ, Karafillakis E. Factors influencing healthcare professionals' confidence in vaccination in Europe: a literature review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2041360. [PMID: 35290160 PMCID: PMC9009961 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2041360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Health-care professionals (HCPs) have a fundamental role in vaccination, their own beliefs and attitudes affecting both their uptake and recommendation of vaccines. This literature review (n = 89) summarises evidence on HCPs’ perceptions of the risks and benefits of vaccination, trust, and perceptions of mandatory vaccination in Europe. HCPs across studies believed that vaccination is important to protect themselves and their patients. However, beliefs that some diseases such as influenza are less risky were reported by some HCPs as a reason for not getting vaccinated. Concerns about both short- and long-term side effects were identified among HCPs in most studies, such as those affecting the immune or neurological system. Mistrust toward health authorities and pharmaceutical industry was reported in some studies. The question of mandatory vaccination revealed mixed opinions, with some favoring self-determination and others viewing vaccination as a duty. This review highlights key factors influencing HCPs’ confidence in vaccination in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Pavlovic
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - P Sahoo
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - H J Larson
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - E Karafillakis
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alasmari A, Larson HJ, Karafillakis E. A mixed methods study of health care professionals’ attitudes towards vaccination in 15 countries. Vaccine X 2022; 12:100219. [PMID: 36193232 PMCID: PMC9526144 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health care professionals are widely considered to be the most trusted source of information on vaccine-related topics. However, several are reporting their own hesitancy around certain vaccines, influencing their intention to vaccinate themselves as well as influencing their recommendations to their patients and target population. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used including an online survey (n = 1,504) in 15 countries which aimed to determine drivers of HCPs vaccine confidence and examine how these drivers vary across nations. Thirty in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 HCPs in a subset of three countries (France, Greece and Hungry) to explore barriers to HCPs vaccine uptake and their role in addressing vaccine hesitancy among patients. Findings. The survey’s regression analysis identified that nurses/midwives and HCPs from Hungary, Italy, Romania and Switzerland were less confident in the safety, importance or effectiveness of vaccines in general. Morocco (35%), Turkey (53%) and Greece (69%) reported the lowest influenza vaccination coverage among HCPs. Morocco also reported the lowest rates of HCPs who were “highly likely” to recommend MMR vaccine (34%), HPV vaccine (31%) and Covid-19 vaccines (29%). More than third of HCPs reported a lack of trust in health authorities and in the information they provide. Thematic analysis revealed that concerns over the risk of side-effects associated with vaccines, preference for natural immunity, whether it was necessary to be vaccinated against influenza every year, not having any chronic disease risk factors, and vaccines mandates as the key barriers to HCPs vaccination against influenza and Covid-19. Conclusion HCPs have an important role in vaccination and their confidence in vaccination and health authorities must be improved as this may affect their uptake of vaccines and influence their recommendations to their patients. Investigating the impact of political, socio-economic and cultural contexts on concerns about vaccination among HCPs is also necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrar Alasmari
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Corresponding author.
| | - Heidi J. Larson
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Emilie Karafillakis
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Balgovind P, Mohammadnezhad M. Factors affecting childhood immunization: Thematic analysis of parents and healthcare workers' perceptions. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2137338. [PMID: 36494999 PMCID: PMC9746479 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2137338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunization against common childhood diseases is an important strategy as it is critical for reducing the global child morbidity and mortality. This review explores the perceptions of parents and HCWs toward childhood immunization. The PRISMA guideline was used to search and include the studies. Relevant electronic databases were systemically searched for the years ranging from 2000 to 2021 to identify studies reported in English. Themes were then identified using thematic analysis. A total of 44 studies met the review criteria and were summarized and categorized into 4 themes: barriers to immunization, parental knowledge, attitude and behavior (KAB), health system factors and HCWs' KAB. This review found that immunization decision-making is a complex process. Parental KAB leads to immunization decisions. HCWs were also noted to be the trusted sources of immunization information. Further research can be conducted on how to improve parents' perceptions of immunization and immunization practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preeti Balgovind
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji Islands
| | - Masoud Mohammadnezhad
- School of Nursing and Healthcare Leadership, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK,CONTACT Masoud Mohammadnezhad School of Nursing and Healthcare Leadership, University of Bradford, Bradford, West YorkshireBD7 1DP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Globevnik Velikonja V, Verdenik I, Erjavec K, Kregar Velikonja N. Influence of Psychological Factors on Vaccination Acceptance among Health Care Workers in Slovenia in Three Different Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1983. [PMID: 36560393 PMCID: PMC9782158 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10121983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among healthcare workers (HCWs) is very important to control the pandemic and to ensure the safety of HCWs and patients. As psychological factors may affect the decision to be vaccinated, the aim of this study was to investigate the influence of psychological factors on vaccination acceptance in different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional study using a web-based survey was conducted among HCWs in Slovenia at the beginning of the pandemic (N = 851), one month later (N = 86), and one year later (N = 145) when vaccines were already available. The results showed that the influence of psychological factors (anxiety, psychological burden, perceived infectability, and germ aversion) was specific for each survey period. At the beginning of the pandemic, vaccination intention was positively associated with anxiety. In the third survey period, anxiety was not exposed as a predictive factor for vaccination intention. However, comparison of vaccination status among groups with different levels of anxiety revealed an interesting distinction within those in favour of vaccination; in the group with minimal levels of anxiety, there was a relatively high share of respondents that were already vaccinated, whereas in the group with severe anxiety, most individuals intended to be vaccinated but hesitated to take action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vislava Globevnik Velikonja
- Division for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Šlajmerjeva 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Novo Mesto, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia
| | - Ivan Verdenik
- Division for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Šlajmerjeva 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Novo Mesto, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia
| | - Karmen Erjavec
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Novo Mesto, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bianchi FP, Stefanizzi P, De Maria L, Martinelli A, Diella G, Larocca AMV, Vimercati L, Tafuri S. Vaccination Offer during the Occupational Health Surveillance Program for Healthcare Workers and Suitability to Work: An Italian Retrospective Cohort Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10101633. [PMID: 36298499 PMCID: PMC9610769 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10101633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The active immunization of health care workers (HCWs) is a crucial measure to avoid nosocomial infection; nevertheless, vaccine coverage (VC) among health personnel in Italy is unsatisfactory. To improve VC in the healthcare set, the Hygiene and Occupational Medicine departments of Bari Policlinico General University Hospital applied a specific program. The operative procedure demands that in the context of the occupational medical examination, all workers are evaluated for susceptibility to vaccine-preventable diseases (VDPs), with immunization prophylaxis offered to those determined to be susceptible. This study analyzed data from workers who attended the biological risk assessment protocol from December 2017 to October 2021 (n = 1477), who were evaluated for the immune status for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella. Among the enrolled subjects, non-protective antibody titers were higher for measles and mumps (13%), followed by rubella (11%) and varicella (8%). Appropriate vaccinations were offered to all susceptible HCWs, and HCWs were re-tested one month after immunization. The seroconversion rate after the administration of one or more booster dose(s) was over 80%. Overall, 2.5% of the subjects refused the offered vaccine(s); the main determinant of immunization compliance was younger age (aOR = 0.86; 95%CI = 0.80–0.92). Especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, VPDs may still present a hazard in nosocomial environment. Our experience suggests that, despite hospital procedures and dedicated human assets, satisfactory VC cannot be reached without the provision of federal regulations. Nevertheless, public health policymakers have to improve the promotion of vaccine prophylaxis and education to reach higher VC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pasquale Stefanizzi
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Luigi De Maria
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Martinelli
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Giusy Diella
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Vimercati
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Silvio Tafuri
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-80-5478473; Fax: +39-80-5478472
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
La Torre G, Marte M, Imeshtari V, Colaprico C, Ricci E, Shaholli D, Barletta VI, Serruto P, Gaeta A, Antonelli G. Susceptibility towards Chickenpox, Measles and Rubella among Healthcare Workers at a Teaching Hospital in Rome. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10101573. [PMID: 36298438 PMCID: PMC9612096 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10101573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunization is the best protection against chickenpox, measles and rubella. It is important to identify and immunize susceptible healthcare workers to prevent and control hospital infections. Our aim was to estimate the susceptibility level of healthcare workers at a Teaching Hospital in Rome concerning these diseases and the factors associated to the susceptibility. Methods: a cross sectional study was carried out at the Department of Occupational Medicine of the Umberto I General Hospital of Rome. Participants were recruited during routine occupational health surveillance. As far as inclusion criteria, the following professionals were considered: doctors, nurses, laboratory technicians and other health professionals. Concerning the exclusion criteria, patients with HIV, cancer and diseases of the immune system, and acute illness or fever more than 38.5 °C, were not included in the study. A blood sample was tested for the presence of antibodies against measles, rubella and chicken pox. Results: 1106 healthcare professionals were involved in the study (41.8% nurses, 30.4% doctors, 12.3% laboratory technicians, 15.1% other health professionals): 25 (2.3%), 73 (6.6%) and 35 (3.2%) of these were susceptible to measles, rubella and chicken pox, respectively. The only variable associated with susceptibility of measles was age (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was evidence of an association between various susceptibilities, particularly between measles and chickenpox (OR: 4.38). Conclusion: this study showed that even if the majority of our healthcare professionals are immunized for MRV, it is necessary not to underestimate the seronegativity of non-immune ones. All health professionals should be vaccinated to ensure safety for patients, especially the weakest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe La Torre
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Mattia Marte
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Valentin Imeshtari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado Colaprico
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Ricci
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - David Shaholli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Vanessa India Barletta
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Serruto
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Aurelia Gaeta
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Guido Antonelli
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Virology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bianchi FP, Stefanizzi P, Brescia N, Lattanzio S, Martinelli A, Tafuri S. COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in Italian healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Vaccines 2022; 21:1289-1300. [PMID: 35757890 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2093723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As for other vaccines, vaccination hesitancy may be a determining factor in the success (or otherwise) of the COVID-19 immunization campaign in healthcare workers (HCWs). AREAS COVERED To estimate the proportion of HCWs in Italy who expressed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, we conducted a systematic review of the relevant literature and a meta-analysis. Determinants of vaccine compliance and options suggested by these studies to address vaccine hesitancy among HCWs were also analyzed. Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis and systematic review, selected from scientific articles available in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus databases between January 1, 2020 and January 25, 2022. The vaccine hesitancy rate among HCWs was 13.1% (95%CI: 6.9-20.9%). The vaccine hesitancy rate among HCWs investigated before and during the vaccination campaign was 18.2% (95%CI=12.8-24.2%) and 8.9% (95%CI=3.4-16.6%), respectively. That main reasons for vaccine hesitation were lack of information about vaccination, opinion that the vaccine is unsafe, and fear of adverse events. EXPERT OPINION Despite strategies to achieve a greater willingness to immunize in this category, mandatory vaccination appears to be one of the most important measures that can guarantee the protection of HCWs and the patients they care for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pasquale Stefanizzi
- Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari
| | - Nazario Brescia
- Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari
| | - Sabrina Lattanzio
- Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari
| | - Andrea Martinelli
- Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari
| | - Silvio Tafuri
- Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yin H, You Q, Wu J, Jin L. Factors Influencing the Knowledge Gap regarding Influenza and Influenza Vaccination in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10060957. [PMID: 35746565 PMCID: PMC9228307 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10060957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic, promoting influenza knowledge and vaccine helps reduce the risk of dual pandemics and relieve the pressure on healthcare systems. Due to the low rate of influenza vaccination in China, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate whether a knowledge gap regarding influenza and influenza vaccine exists between Chinese groups of different socioeconomic statuses and then explore the possible factors influencing knowledge level. A total of 951 valid questionnaires were collected online in this study. Variance analysis shows a knowledge gap regarding influenza and influenza vaccination between different socioeconomic status groups. Correlation analysis shows that internet media, social media, public communication, and interpersonal communication are positively associated with the knowledge level. Multilevel regression analysis shows a significant interaction between internet media and educational level. This study finds that internet media use helps narrow the knowledge gap between groups with different education levels. This article recommends a multi-channel promotion of influenza and vaccine knowledge and better pertinence between contents and readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huimin Yin
- School of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China
| | - Qingqing You
- School of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China
| | - Jing Wu
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Lianji Jin
- Law School, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bianchi FP, Stefanizzi P, Trerotoli P, Tafuri S. Sex and age as determinants of the seroprevalence of anti-measles IgG among European healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 2022; 40:3127-3141. [PMID: 35491343 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The international literature shows good evidence of a significant rate of measles susceptibility among healthcare workers (HCWs). As such, they are an important public health issue. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of susceptible HCWs in EU/EEA countries and in the UK and to explore the characteristics (sex and age differences) and management of those found to be susceptible. RESULTS Nineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of measles-susceptible HCWs was 13.3% (95 %CI: 10.0-17.0%). In a comparison of serosusceptible female vs. male HCWs, the RR was 0.92 (95 %CI = 0.83-1.03), and in a comparison of age classes (born after vs. before 1980) the RR was 2.78 (95 %CI = 2.20-3.50). The most recent studies proposed the mandatory vaccination of HCWs. DISCUSSION According to our meta-analysis, the prevalence of serosusceptible European HCWs is 13%; HCWs born in the post-vaccination era seem to be at higher risk. Healthcare professionals susceptible to measles are a serious epidemiological concern. Greater efforts should therefore be made to identify those who have yet to be vaccinated and actively encourage their vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pasquale Stefanizzi
- Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Trerotoli
- Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Italy
| | - Silvio Tafuri
- Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rania N, Coppola I, Brucci M, Lagomarsino F. Attitudes and Beliefs of the Italian Population towards COVID-19 Vaccinations. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19106139. [PMID: 35627676 PMCID: PMC9141803 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19106139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: Despite the numerous campaigns to encourage vaccination against COVID-19, the public debate and often conflicting information have left many individuals uncertain about the decision to make on whether or not to vaccinate. Methods: This research aims to analyze the attitudes and beliefs of the Italian population towards COVID-19 and other vaccinations through a quantitative methodology. In all, 500 adults (Age M = 39.52) participated in this exploratory study with an online questionnaire conducted in April 2021. Results: most participants believe vaccination is necessary to defeat COVID-19; there is an age-related difference in getting vaccinations, and women were more afraid of unexpected future effects than men; older participants have expressed a greater willingness to pay to be vaccinated against COVID-19 (4). Conclusion: In light of these results, it is necessary to pay greater attention to the perplexity and fears expressed by the population, especially women and youth, in relation to vaccinations; in fact, it would help to achieve a wider adherence to the tools designed to contain the spread of viruses at the base of severe health crises.
Collapse
|
24
|
Aci OS, Kackin O, Karaaslan S, Ciydem E. Qualitative examination of the attitudes of healthcare workers in Turkey regarding COVID-19 vaccines. Int J Nurs Knowl 2022; 33:136-146. [PMID: 34357685 PMCID: PMC8441789 DOI: 10.1111/2047-3095.12342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The attitudes of healthcare workers toward COVID-19 vaccines ensure that health services are able to run without interruption and potentially have a role in the messaging about vaccination that they convey to the public. Hence, healthcare workers' attitudes ultimately have a significant role in controlling the pandemic. This study aimed to qualitatively investigate the attitudes of healthcare workers in Turkey in relation to COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS The study used the phenomenological approach. The sample consisted of 36 healthcare workers who were employed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected online using focus group interviews. A total of four focus group interviews were conducted. FINDINGS Following analysis of the data, the attitudes of healthcare workers in Turkey toward the COVID-19 vaccine were divided into three themes: "influencing factors," "priority group" and "trust." CONCLUSIONS Vaccination was found to create negative emotions among some of the healthcare workers. Their opinions about the COVID-19 vaccines were affected by the negative emotions and burnout they experienced during the pandemic. In addition, they saw the vaccination process as impacted by contraindications and uncertainty about the duration of the protection, the balance of the benefits and harm of the vaccines, and by vaccine myths and prejudices about the country where the vaccine was developed. Healthcare professionals expressed the need for trust to be established in the whole vaccination process. They suggested that different vaccine options should be offered, that the appointment and process notification system for vaccination should be improved, that evidence-based information about vaccines should be provided and that a safe environment should be created. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Vaccine hesitancy can be addressed by careful attention to the application of vaccination programs, correct and effective use of social media, transparent, and precise management of political processes, and the provision of evidence-based information about the vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozgur Sema Aci
- PhD in Mental Health and Psychiatric NursingIndependent ResearcherAtasehirIstanbulTurkey
| | - Ozlem Kackin
- Research Assistant, Istanbul University‐Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Nursing Faculty, Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric NursingOffice Istanbul University‐Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of NursingSisliIstanbulTurkey
| | - Selver Karaaslan
- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Health SciencesVan Yuzuncu Yil University, School of Health, Department of NursingVanTurkey
| | - Emre Ciydem
- Research Assistant, Florence Nightingale Nursing Faculty, Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric NursingIstanbul University‐Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of NursingSisliIstanbulTurkey
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Verger P, Botelho-Nevers E, Garrison A, Gagnon D, Gagneur A, Gagneux-Brunon A, Dubé E. Vaccine hesitancy in health-care providers in Western countries: a narrative review. Expert Rev Vaccines 2022; 21:909-927. [PMID: 35315308 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2056026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is a leading cause of suboptimal vaccine uptake rates worldwide. The interaction between patients and health-care providers (HCPs) is the keystone in addressing VH. However, significant proportions of HCPs, including those who administer vaccines, are personally and professionally vaccine-hesitant. AREAS COVERED This narrative review sought to characterize the nature, extent, correlates, and consequences of VH among HCPs. We included 39 quantitative and qualitative studies conducted in Western countries, published since 2015, that assessed VH among HCPs in general, for several vaccines. Studies were reviewed using the WHO 3Cs model - (lack of) confidence, complacency, and (lack of) convenience. EXPERT OPINION Despite the lack of validated tools and substantial heterogeneity in the methods used to measure VH among HCPs, this review confirms its presence in this population, at frequencies that vary by country, profession type, setting, and level of medical education. Lack of knowledge and mistrust in health authorities/pharmaceutical industry/experts were among its principal drivers. Improving the content about vaccination in HCPs' training programs, facilitating access to reliable information for use during consultations, and developing and validating instruments to measure HCPs' VH and its determinants are key to addressing VH among HCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Verger
- ORS Paca, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory, Marseille, France.,Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.,CIRI - Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Lyon, France.,Univ Lyon, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.,Chair PreVacCi, Presage Institut, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Amanda Garrison
- ORS Paca, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory, Marseille, France.,Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Dominique Gagnon
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Arnaud Gagneur
- Department of Pediatrics, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Quebec, Canada.,Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Département de pédiatrie, Université de Sherbrooke-Campus de la Santé, Quebec, Canada
| | - Amandine Gagneux-Brunon
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.,CIRI - Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Lyon, France.,Univ Lyon, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.,Chair PreVacCi, Presage Institut, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.,CIC INSERM Vaccinology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Eve Dubé
- Deptartment of Anthropology, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Asmare Adella G. Knowledge and attitude toward the second round of COVID-19 vaccines among teachers working at southern public universities in Ethiopia. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2018895. [PMID: 35172683 PMCID: PMC8986266 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.2018895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
About 1.9 million people in Ethiopia have received a first dose of COVID-19 vaccine, which are given to frontline health care workers and university instructors through a campaign. After healthcare workers, teachers at all levels in Ethiopia are assumed to be at a higher risk of exposure to COVID-19. An institution-based cross-sectional study design was used. Simple random sampling was used to select participants. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was conducted for all variables, and a p-value < 0.05 at 95% CI was considered statistically significant. Overall, 60.8% and 79.7% of participants had good knowledge of and positive attitudes toward a second round of COVID-19 vaccines, respectively. Age (AOR = 1.51 [95% CI = 1.003–3.63]), profession (AOR = 1.402 [95% CI = 1.107–3.003]), work experience (AOR = 1.509 [95% CI = 1.151–2.283]), and chronic diseases (AOR = 2.142 [95% CI = 1.337–3.092]) were predictor variables for knowledge about the second round of COVID-19 vaccines. Sex (AOR = 1.386 [95% CI = 1.018–2.763]), marital status (AOR = 4.180 [95% CI = 2.397–6.989]), profession (AOR = 1.102 [95% CI = 1.008–3.123]), work experience (AOR = 1.211 [95% CI = 1.029–2.877]), and chronic diseases (AOR = 6.110 [95% CI = 4.892–10.661]) were predictor variables for attitudes toward a second round of COVID-19 vaccines. Generally, knowledge and attitudes toward the second round of COVID-19 vaccines among instructors were low. Thus, health education and communication are very crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Getachew Asmare Adella
- Department of Reproductive Health and Nutrition, School of Public Health, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Liu M, Cui T, Wang Q, Han Y, Han Y, Yang L, Shi N, Yi Y, Jin H. Using an extended protection motivation theory to explain vaccine hesitancy: a cross-sectional study among Chinese adults. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2026136. [PMID: 35103578 PMCID: PMC8993063 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2026136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccine hesitancy was listed as one of the top 10 issues threatening global health in 2019. The objectives of this study were to (a) use an extended protection motivation theory (PMT) with an added trust component to identify predictors of vaccine hesitancy and (b) explore the predictive ability of vaccine hesitancy on vaccination behavior. Methods We conducted an online questionnaire from February 9 to April 9, 2021, in China. The target population was Chinese residents aged 18 and over. A total of 14,236 responses were received. Structural equation modeling was used to test the extended PMT model hypotheses. Results A total of 10,379 participants were finally included in this study, of whom 52.0% showed hesitancy toward vaccination. 2854 (27.5%) participants reported that they got flu shots in the past year, and 2561 (24.7%) participants were vaccinated against COVID-19. 2857 (27.5%) participants engaged in healthcare occupation. The model explained 85.7% variance of vaccine hesitancy. Self-efficacy was the strongest predictor, negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy (β = −0.584; p < .001). Response efficacy had a negative effect on vaccine hesitancy (β = −0.372; p < .001), while threat appraisal showed a positive effect (β = 0.104; p < .001). Compared with non-health workers, health workers showed more vaccine hesitancy, and response efficacy was the strongest predictor (β = −0.560; p < .001). Vaccine hesitancy had a negative effect on vaccination behavior (β = −0.483; p < .001), and the model explained 23.4% variance of vaccination behavior. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the extended PMT model is efficient in explaining vaccine hesitancy. However, the predictive ability of vaccine hesitancy on vaccination behavior is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minqi Liu
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University Nanjing, PR China
| | - Tingting Cui
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University Nanjing, PR China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University Nanjing, PR China
| | - Ying Han
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University Nanjing, PR China
| | - Yue Han
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University Nanjing, PR China
| | - Liuqing Yang
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University Nanjing, PR China
| | - Naiyang Shi
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University Nanjing, PR China
| | - Youqin Yi
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University Nanjing, PR China
| | - Hui Jin
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education School of Public Health Southeast University Nanjing, PR China.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University Nanjing, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Elkhayat MR, Hashem MK, Helal AT, Shaaban OM, Ibrahim AK, Meshref TS, Elkhayat H, Moustafa M, Mohammed MNA, Ezzeldin AM, Rashed HG, Bazeed A, Ibrahim IH, Mahmoud AM, Mohamed MEA, Sayad R, Elghazally SA. Determinants of Obtaining COVID-19 Vaccination among Health Care Workers with Access to Free COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 10:vaccines10010039. [PMID: 35062700 PMCID: PMC8780084 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10010039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite global efforts to contain the illness, COVID-19 continues to have severe health, life, and economic repercussions; thus, maintaining vaccine development is mandatory. Different directions concerning COVID-19 vaccines have emerged as a result of the vaccine's unpredictability. AIMS To study the determinants of the attitudes of healthcare workers (HCWs) to receiving or refusing to receive the vaccine. METHODS The current study adopted an interviewed questionnaire between June and August 2021. A total of 341 HCWs currently working at Assiut University hospitals offered to receive the vaccine were included. RESULTS Only half of the HCWs (42%) accepted the COVID-19 vaccine. The most common reason that motivated the HCWs was being more susceptible than others to infection (71.8%). On other hand, the common reasons for refusing included: previously contracted the virus (64.8%); did not have time (58.8%); warned by a doctor not to take it (53.8%). Nearly one-third of nonaccepting HCWs depended on television, the Internet, and friends who refused the vaccine for information (p < 0.05). In the final multivariate regression model, there were six significant predictors: sex, job category, chronic disease, being vaccinated for influenza, and using Assiut University hospital staff and the Ministry of Health as sources of information (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Misinformation and negative conceptions are still barriers against achieving the desired rate of vaccination, especially for vulnerable groups such as HCWs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam R. Elkhayat
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine Department, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt; (A.B.); (S.A.E.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Maiada K. Hashem
- Chest Disease Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt;
| | - Ahmed T. Helal
- Social Casework Department, Faculty of Social Work, Assiut University, Assiut 71514, Egypt;
- Sociology and Social Work Department, College of Arts and Social Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman
| | - Omar M. Shaaban
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut 71526, Egypt;
| | - Ahmed K. Ibrahim
- Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt;
| | - Taghreed S. Meshref
- Critical Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt;
| | - Hussein Elkhayat
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt;
| | - Mohamed Moustafa
- Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt;
| | | | - Azza M. Ezzeldin
- Clinical Pathology Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut 71526, Egypt; (A.M.E.); (H.G.R.)
| | - Hebatallah G. Rashed
- Clinical Pathology Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut 71526, Egypt; (A.M.E.); (H.G.R.)
| | - Alaa Bazeed
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine Department, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt; (A.B.); (S.A.E.)
| | - Islam H. Ibrahim
- Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt; (I.H.I.); (A.M.M.); (M.E.A.M.); (R.S.)
| | - Ahmed Mokhtar Mahmoud
- Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt; (I.H.I.); (A.M.M.); (M.E.A.M.); (R.S.)
| | | | - Reem Sayad
- Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt; (I.H.I.); (A.M.M.); (M.E.A.M.); (R.S.)
| | - Shimaa A. Elghazally
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine Department, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt; (A.B.); (S.A.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sezgin D, Dost A, Esin MN. Experiences and perceptions of Turkish intensive care nurses providing care to Covid-19 patients: A qualitative study. Int Nurs Rev 2021; 69:305-317. [PMID: 34962292 DOI: 10.1111/inr.12740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM To describe the experiences of intensive care nurses who provided care to Covid-19 patients and their perceptions towards the disease and their work conditions during the pandemic. INTRODUCTION Identification of experiences and perceptions of intensive care nurses towards disease, care and their workplace conditions when providing care to Covid-19 patients will inform decision-makers about improvements that can be implemented. BACKGROUND The Covid-19 pandemic has led to increased strain and workplace-related health risks to intensive care nurses, but it has also provided a unique experience and opportunities for learning and development. METHODS A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 10 intensive care unit nurses working in seven hospitals in Istanbul, Turkey. Snowball sampling method was used, and the data were collected by semistructured online interviews. A thematic analysis was performed. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research were followed. FINDINGS Five major themes were identified: 'death and fear of death', 'impact on family and social lives', 'nursing care of Covid-19 patients', 'changing perceptions of their own profession: empowerment and dissatisfaction', and 'experiences and perceptions of personal protective equipment and other control measures'. DISCUSSION Intensive care nurses experience an increased risk of infection and psychological burden, and they lack a sense of professional satisfaction. Improvements to working conditions are needed to support nurses caring for patients during the pandemic. CONCLUSION The pandemic increased the workload and responsibilities of intensive care nurses and led to increases in their work-related health risks and challenges with care. However, it also increased nurses' awareness about the importance of their professional roles. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE AND POLICIES There is a need to improve working conditions and develop nursing standards for the care of Covid-19 patients in intensive care units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duygu Sezgin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway City, Ireland
| | - Ayşe Dost
- School of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Melek N Esin
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
A K, Lu X, Wang J, Hu L, Li B, Lu Y. Association between Adult Vaccine Hesitancy and Parental Acceptance of Childhood COVID-19 Vaccines: A Web-Based Survey in a Northwestern Region in China. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:1088. [PMID: 34696196 PMCID: PMC8539638 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9101088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
China has initiated the COVID-19 vaccination for children aged 15-17 years since late July 2020. This study aimed to determine the association between adult vaccine hesitancy and parental acceptance of childhood COVID-19 vaccines in a multi-ethnicity area of northwestern China. A web-based investigation was performed with a convenience sampling strategy to recruit the parents aged 20-49 years. In a total of 13,451 valid respondents, 66.1% had received the COVID-19 vaccination, 26.6% were intent to receive, while 7.3% were not intent, with an increasing vaccine hesitancy (p < 0.001). Moreover, vaccination uptake of four common vaccines in their children remained low (29.0% for influenza vaccine, 17.9% for pneumonia vaccine, 10.9% for rotavirus vaccine, 8.0% for Enterovirus-71 vaccine), while overall parental acceptance of childhood COVID-19 vaccines was 50.0% (32.7% for those aged 0-5, 46.6% for 6-10, 73.3% for 11-18; p < 0.001). Vaccination uptake of these four vaccines and parental acceptance of childhood COVID-19 vaccine were negatively associated with adult vaccine hesitancy. In addition, respondents mostly preferred childhood COVID-19 vaccines with weak mild common adverse events (β = 1.993) and no severe adverse events (β = 1.731), demonstrating a positive association with adult vaccine hesitancy. Thus, it warrants specific countermeasures to reduce adult vaccine hesitancy and improve strategies for childhood vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kezhong A
- Institute of Immunization, Qinghai Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xining 810007, China;
| | - Xinyue Lu
- Department of Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; (X.L.); (L.H.); (B.L.)
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China;
| | - Linjie Hu
- Department of Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; (X.L.); (L.H.); (B.L.)
| | - Bingzhe Li
- Department of Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; (X.L.); (L.H.); (B.L.)
| | - Yihan Lu
- Department of Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; (X.L.); (L.H.); (B.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bertoncello C, Nicolli A, Maso S, Fonzo M, Crivellaro M, Mason P, Trevisan A. Uptake of Non-Mandatory Vaccinations in Future Physicians in Italy. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:1035. [PMID: 34579272 PMCID: PMC8473324 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9091035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2017 in Italy, a number of vaccinations became mandatory or started to be recommended and offered free of charge. In this study, we aimed at assessing the coverage rates for those vaccinations in the pre-mandatory era among students at the School of Medicine of Padua University studying the degree course in medicine and surgery (future physicians) on the basis of the vaccination certificates presented during health surveillance. The vaccinations considered were those against pertussis, rubella, mumps, measles, varicella, Haemophilus influenzae type b (which became mandatory in 2017), pneumococcus, meningococcus C and meningococcus B (only suggested and offered for free since 2017). The study enrolled 4706 students of medicine and surgery. High vaccine uptake was observed, especially in younger students (born after 1990), with vaccines against pertussis, rubella, mumps and measles. Good completion for Haemophilus influenzae type b and meningococcus C was also observed. Very low coverage rates (all under 10%) for vaccination against varicella, pneumococcus and meningococcus B were observed. In conclusion, uptake for some non-mandatory vaccines was below the recommended threshold, although younger generations showed a higher uptake, possibly as a results of policy implemented at the national level. Our findings support the idea to consider health surveillance visits also as an additional opportunity to overcome confidence and convenience barriers and offer vaccine administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrea Trevisan
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy; (C.B.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (M.F.); (M.C.); (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wang C, Wang Y, Han B, Zhao TS, Liu B, Liu H, Chen L, Xie M, Zheng H, Zhang S, Zeng J, Huang NH, Du J, Liu Y, Lu QB, Cui F. Willingness and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Coverage among Healthcare Workers in China: A Nationwide Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:993. [PMID: 34579230 PMCID: PMC8472967 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9090993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine has been widely rolled out globally in the general populations. However, specific data on vaccination confidence, willingness or coverage among health care workers (HCWs) has been less reported. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted to specify the basic data and patterns of vaccination confidence, willingness and coverage among HCWs nationwide. Results: In total, 2386 out of 2583 (92.4%) participants were enrolled for analysis, and the rates of confidence in vaccine, professional institutes and government were 75.1%, 85.2% and 85.4%, respectively. The overall vaccination coverage rate was 63.6% which was adjusted as 82.8% for participants under current medical conditions or having contraindications. Confidence in vaccine safety was shown to be the most related factor to willingness among doctors, nurses, medical technicians and hospital administrators, while confidence in vaccine effectiveness as well as trust in government played the key role in formulating public health employees' willingness. 130 (7.1% of 1833) participants reporting willingness still not been vaccinated regardless of contraindications. Multivariate analysis among willingness participants showed that males, aged over 30 years, public health employees and higher vaccination confidence had significantly higher vaccination rates with ORs (95% confidence intervals) as 1.64 (1.08-2.49), 3.14 (2.14-4.62), 2.43 (1.46-4.04) or 2.31 (1.24-4.33). Conclusions: HCWs' confidence, willingness and coverage rates to the vaccine were generally at high levels. Heterogeneity among HCWs should be considered for future vaccination promotion strategies. The population's confidence in vaccination is not only the determinant to their willingness, but also guarantees their actual vaccine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Wang
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Bingfeng Han
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Tian-Shuo Zhao
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Bei Liu
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Hanyu Liu
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Linyi Chen
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Mingzhu Xie
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Hui Zheng
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Sihui Zhang
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Jing Zeng
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
| | - Ning-Hua Huang
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
| | - Juan Du
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
| | - Yaqiong Liu
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
| | - Qing-Bin Lu
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Fuqiang Cui
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; (C.W.); (Y.W.); (B.H.); (T.-S.Z.); (B.L.); (H.L.); (L.C.); (M.X.); (H.Z.); (S.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.-H.H.); (J.D.); (Y.L.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ahmed MH, Siraj SS, Klein J, Ali FY, Kanfe SG. Knowledge and Attitude Towards Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose Among Health Professionals Working at Public Health Facilities in a Low Income Country. Infect Drug Resist 2021; 14:3125-3134. [PMID: 34408455 PMCID: PMC8366936 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s327954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several vaccines have been approved in a lot of countries to combat coronavirus disease and distributed throughout the world. Health professional’s knowledge and attitude towards a second COVID-19 vaccine dose were poorly implemented and understood in Ethiopia's health facilities. The main purpose of conducting this study was to investigate health professionals’ knowledge and attitude towards the second COVID-19 vaccine dose at public hospitals in Ethiopia. Methods A cross-sectional study design was conducted from January to March, 2021 to assess the knowledge and attitude towards second COVID-19 vaccine dose among health professionals working at public health facilities in Ethiopia. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors that correlate with knowledge and attitude towards a second COVID-19 vaccine dose with a P-value<0.05 as a cut-off point for statistical significance at 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Four hundred and nine study subjects participated, with a response rate of 96.7%. In this study, more than half of the respondents had high knowledge towards second COVID-19 vaccine doses. Similarly, 95.6% of respondents had a favorable attitude towards second COVID-19 vaccine doses. Educational status (AOR=1.82, 95% CI=1.1–2.2), age (AOR=2.01, 95% CI=1.76–3.01), and profession (AOR=2.32, 95% CI=1.42–3.01) were variables associated with knowledge towards second COVID-19 vaccine doses. Educational status (AOR=5.42, 95% CI=4.1–6.7), age (AOR=12.4, 95% CI=10.54–15.8), professionals (AOR=4.33, 95% CI=2.32–6.87), working experience (AOR=4.33, 95% CI=2.32–6.87), marital status (AOR=2.47, 95% CI=1.33–5.95), risk degree (AOR=2.33, 95% CI=1.31–4.11) and gender (AOR=3.42, 95% CI=2.91–4.98) were determinant factors of attitude towards the second COVID-19 vaccine dose. Conclusion Addressing problems related with risk degree, educational status, and socio-demographic factors will help to increase the overall knowledge and attitude towards second COVID-19 vaccine doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shuayib Shemsu Siraj
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mettu University, Mettu, Ethiopia
| | - Jorn Klein
- University of South-Eastern Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway
| | - Fedila Yassin Ali
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia
| | - Shuma Gosha Kanfe
- Department of Health Informatics, College of Health Sciences, Mettu University, Mettu, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Riccò M, Ferraro P, Peruzzi S, Balzarini F, Ranzieri S. Mandate or Not Mandate: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Italian Occupational Physicians towards SARS-CoV-2 Immunization at the Beginning of Vaccination Campaign. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:889. [PMID: 34452014 PMCID: PMC8402502 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9080889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccinations used to prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-are critical in order to contain the ongoing pandemic. However, SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccination rates have only slowly increased since the beginning of the vaccination campaign, even with at-risk workers (e.g., HCWs), presumptively because of vaccine hesitancy. Vaccination mandates are considered instrumental in order to rapidly improve immunization rates (but they minimize the impact of vaccination campaigns). In this study, we investigated the acceptance (i.e., knowledge, attitudes, and practices) from occupational physicians (OPs)) in regard to SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccination mandates. A total of 166 OPs participated in an internet-based survey by completing structured questionnaires. Adequate, general knowledge of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 was found in the majority of OPs. High perception of SARS-CoV-2 risk was found in around 80% of participants (79.5% regarding its occurrence, 81.9% regarding its potential severity). SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccination was endorsed by 90.4% of respondents, acceptance for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was quite larger for mRNA formulates (89.8%) over adenoviral ones (59.8%). Endorsement of vaccination mandates was reported by 60.2% of respondents, and was more likely endorsed by OPs who exhibited higher concern for SARS-CoV-2 infection occurrence (odds ratio 3.462, 95% confidence intervals 1.060-11.310), who were likely to accept some sort of payment/copayment for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccination (3.896; 1.607; 9.449), or who were more likely to believe HCWs not vaccinates against SARS-CoV-2 as unfit for work (4.562; 1.935; 10.753). In conclusion, OPs exhibited wide acceptance of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccinations, and the majority endorsed vaccination mandates for HCWs, which may help improve vaccination rates in occupational settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Riccò
- Servizio di Prevenzione e Sicurezza Negli Ambienti di Lavoro (SPSAL), AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, I-42122 Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy
| | - Pietro Ferraro
- Hospital S Camillo De Lellis, Occupational Health and Safety Service, ASL Foggia, I-41121 Foggia, FG, Italy;
| | - Simona Peruzzi
- Laboratorio Analisi Chimico Cliniche e Microbiologiche, Ospedale Civile di Guastalla, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, I-42016 Guastalla, RE, Italy;
| | - Federica Balzarini
- Dipartimento P.A.A.P.S.S., Servizio Autorizzazione e Accreditamento, Agenzia di Tutela della Salute (ATS) di Bergamo, I-24121 Bergamo, BG, Italy;
| | - Silvia Ranzieri
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, I-43126 Parma, PR, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Liu D, Luo L, Xie F, Yu Z, Ma ZF, Wang Y, Wan Z. Factors associated with the willingness and acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine from adult subjects in China. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:2405-2414. [PMID: 33759691 PMCID: PMC8475565 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1899732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: We aimed to investigate factors affecting the willingness and acceptance of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among adults in China and sources of knowledge about the vaccine.Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted from September 8th to 15th, 2020, comprising of 23 questions. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to examine factors associated with vaccination willingness and acceptance.Results: A total of 983 questionnaires were included and 81.3% of the participants were willing to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. With a "bachelor degree or above" (OR = 0.56, p = 0.020) and believing that the vaccine would not cause SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR = 0.50, p = 0.003) were associated with an increased willingness. Aged :30 years (OR = 0.38, p = 0.001), and believing that the vaccine would not cause SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR = 0.52, p = 0.004) were associated with higher acceptance; while from Henan province (OR = 2.49, p < 0.001), not willing to vaccinate (OR = 3.86, p < 0.001), not suffering from chronic diseases (OR = 2.25, p = 0.013), and thinking it was not safe and effective in preventing COVID-19 (OR = 1.94, p = 0.001) were correlated with a lower acceptance.Conclusions: In conclusion, age, education, and vaccine perception might be key factors affecting the vaccine willingness and acceptance. Triggering positive perception of vaccine, especially by targeting those aged <30 years, or those with below bachelor degree, or without chronic diseases might be key approaches for improving the willingness and acceptance of vaccine in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Liu
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Lan Luo
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Fangfei Xie
- Physical Examination Center, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zengli Yu
- College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zheng Feei Ma
- Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yun Wang
- Physical Examination Center, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zhongxiao Wan
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ahmed MH, Kanfe SG, Jarso MH. Intention to receive vaccine against COVID-19 and associated factors among health professionals working at public hospitals in resource limited settings. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254391. [PMID: 34252143 PMCID: PMC8274862 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS Health professionals are among the frontline of COVID-19 pandemic exposure and identified as a priority target group that need to receive COVID-19 vaccines. However, intention to receive vaccine is still matters the extent of COVID-19 vaccinations among health professionals. This study aimed to assess intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine and the factors that will determine their intention among health professionals working at public hospitals of Illu Aba Bora and Buno Bedelle zone hospitals. METHODS A cross-sectional study design was applied to assess the intention to receive COVID-19 vaccines among health professionals working in public health hospitals of Illu Aba Bora and Buno Bedelle zone hospitals. Self-administered questionnaire were used for assessing intention to receive COVID-19 Vaccine. Multiple linear regressions were performed to identify factors associated with intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine with p-value< 0.05 as cutoff point for statistical significance at 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULT In this study, almost half of respondents 217(53.1% [95.0%: CI 49.3-58.9]) of study participants scored above the mean. Attitude (β = 0.54, 95% CI: [0.49, 0.63], p<0.01), knowledge (β = 0.27, 95% CI: [0.21, 0.35], p<0.01, perception (β = 0.43, 95% CI: [0.39, 0.56], p = 0.02 and age (β = 0.64, 95% CI: [0.51, 0.72], p<0.01 were variables associated with intention to receive vaccine against COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS This study result indicated that the overall magnitude of intention to receive COVID-19 is low. increasing attitudes, knowledge and perception among health professionals related to COVID-19 vaccine will helps to increase the overall intention to receive vaccine against COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammedjud Hassen Ahmed
- Department of Health Informatics, College of Health Sciences, Mettu University, Metu Zuria, Ethiopia
| | - Shuma Gosha Kanfe
- Department of Health Informatics, College of Health Sciences, Mettu University, Metu Zuria, Ethiopia
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wang J, Zhang Y, Long S, Fu X, Zhang X, Zhao S, Xiu S, Wang X, Lu B, Jin H. Non-EPI Vaccine Hesitancy among Chinese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9070772. [PMID: 34358188 PMCID: PMC8310190 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9070772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is paramount to curtailing the pandemic. However, the impact of the Non-Expanded Program on Immunization (non-EPI) and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy on vaccine uptake among Chinese adults remain unclear. This study was an online survey performed in Eastern, Central, and Western China between February 2021 and March 2021 using proportional sampling (n = 7381). Adults aged ≥ 18 years were included, especially younger people (aged < 65). Vaccine hesitancy was assessed using the 3C model and relative scales; logistic regression was used to explore the factors affecting vaccination uptake; structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the correlations between variables. Overall, 67.6% and 24.7% of adults reported vaccine hesitancy toward the non-EPI and COVID-19 vaccines, respectively. Participants (66.3%) reported taking the vaccine mainly based on recommendations from medical staff. Vaccine-hesitant participants (60.5%) reported a fear of side effects as the deciding factor in vaccine rejection. Vaccine hesitancy interacted negatively with confidence (β = −0.349, p < 0.001) and convenience (β = −0.232, p < 0.001), and positively with complacence (β = 0.838, p < 0.001). Nonmedical personnel, adults who had previously received the influenza vaccine, and older people had lower vaccine hesitancy than their counterparts. Most Chinese adults have non-EPI but not COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine safety remains a concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianli Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (S.L.); (X.F.); (X.Z.); (S.Z.)
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (S.L.); (X.F.); (X.Z.); (S.Z.)
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Sigui Long
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (S.L.); (X.F.); (X.Z.); (S.Z.)
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Xin Fu
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (S.L.); (X.F.); (X.Z.); (S.Z.)
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Xiaoxuan Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (S.L.); (X.F.); (X.Z.); (S.Z.)
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Shuangyu Zhao
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (S.L.); (X.F.); (X.Z.); (S.Z.)
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Shixin Xiu
- Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi 214023, China; (S.X.); (X.W.); (B.L.)
| | - Xuwen Wang
- Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi 214023, China; (S.X.); (X.W.); (B.L.)
| | - Bing Lu
- Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi 214023, China; (S.X.); (X.W.); (B.L.)
| | - Hui Jin
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (S.L.); (X.F.); (X.Z.); (S.Z.)
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210009, China
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-025-8327-2572; Fax: +86-825-83272561
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a Representative Education Sector Population in Qatar. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9060665. [PMID: 34207012 PMCID: PMC8235273 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9060665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Even though vaccination programs have now started in earnest across the globe and in Qatar, vaccine hesitancy remains a barrier to effectively tackling the pandemic. Many factors influence willingness to take vaccines including safety, efficacy, and side effects. Given their proximity to research and education, university students and employees represent an interesting cohort in which to investigate vaccine hesitancy. The aim of this study was to assess the attitudes of Qatar University employees and students towards the COVID-19 vaccine. In total, 231 employees and 231 students participated in an online cross-sectional study in February 2021. Of the sample, 62.6% were willing to take a vaccine against COVID-19. Participants with or taking postgraduate degrees were more willing to take the vaccine compared to participants with or taking a diploma or bachelor’s degree (p < 0.001). Males had a higher rate of vaccine acceptance (p < 0.001). In the group that regarded flu vaccination as important, 13% were unwilling to take COVID-19 vaccine. There were no associations between willingness to vaccinate and vaccine/virus knowledge and social media use. Participants showed a high level of concern regarding vaccine side effects in themselves or their children. Two-thirds agreed or strongly agreed that they would take the vaccine if it was mandatory for international travel. Our participants were neutral to the origin of vaccine development. These findings, which represent data collected after the start of the national vaccination program, show that vaccine hesitancy persists in the Qatari population and that some groups, such as undergraduate students, could benefit from specific, targeted public health campaigns.
Collapse
|
39
|
Fakonti G, Kyprianidou M, Toumbis G, Giannakou K. Attitudes and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Nurses and Midwives in Cyprus: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Front Public Health 2021; 9:656138. [PMID: 34222170 PMCID: PMC8244901 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.656138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Healthcare workers are at the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic and have been identified as a priority target group for COVID-19 vaccines. This study aimed to determine the COVID-19 vaccination intention among nurses and midwives in Cyprus and reveal the influential factors that affected their decision. An Internet-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between December 8 and 28, 2020. Data collection was accomplished using a self-administered questionnaire with questions about socio-demographic characteristics, questions assessing general vaccination-related intentions and behaviors, and the intention to accept COVID-19 vaccination. A sample of 437 responders answered the survey, with 93% being nurses and 7% midwives. A small proportion of the participants would accept a vaccine against COVID-19, while 70% could be qualified as "vaccine hesitant." The main reasons for not receiving the COVID-19 vaccine were concerns about the vaccine's expedited development and fear of side effects. More females, individuals with a larger median age, and a higher number of years of working experience, intended to accept the COVID-19 vaccination, compared with those not intended to accept and undecided groups (p < 0.01). Having a seasonal flu vaccination in the last 5 years, receiving the vaccines recommended for health professionals, and working in the private sector were associated with a higher probability of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance. A considerable rate of nurses and midwives in Cyprus reported unwillingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine due to vaccine-related concerns. Our findings highlight the need for forthcoming vaccination campaigns and programs to tackle coronavirus vaccine hesitancy barriers to achieve the desirable vaccination coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Fakonti
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Maria Kyprianidou
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
- Cyprus International Institute for Environmental and Public Health, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Giannos Toumbis
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Konstantinos Giannakou
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Alle YF, Oumer KE. Attitude and associated factors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among health professionals in Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North Central Ethiopia; 2021: cross-sectional study. Virusdisease 2021; 32:272-278. [PMID: 34222565 PMCID: PMC8231083 DOI: 10.1007/s13337-021-00708-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Control of coronavirus disease through vaccination is not merely dependent on vaccine efficacy and safety. Professional and general public acceptance is vital for the successful control of the virus. This study aimed (1) to assess health professionals' attitude towards COVID-19 vaccine acceptance; (2) to identify factors associated with health professional's attitude towards COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. An Institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted on health professionals working at Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. A structured questionnaire containing 16 items was used to assess the attitude of health professionals on vaccine acceptance. Bivariable and multivariable logistic analysis was done to identify factors associated with the attitude of health professionals. In this study, 42.3% [95% CI (36.7-47.6)] participants had positive attitude to COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Age 30-39 years [AOR 2.23; (CI 1.23-4.04)] and ≥ 40 years [AOR 5.51; (CI 2.47-12.30)] of respondents have positive attitude than their counterparts. Also physicians [AOR 3.67; (CI 1.90-7.09)], pharmacists [AOR 4.27; (CI 1.39-13.09)] and laboratory professionals [AOR 4.56; (CI 1.34-15.39)] have higher attitude to COVID vaccine acceptance than nurses. In conclusion, the attitude level of health professionals on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was poor. Age and profession were factors significantly associated with the attitude level of health professionals for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yewlsew Fentie Alle
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Debre Tabor University, P.O. Box: 272, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Keder Essa Oumer
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Debre Tabor University, P.O. Box: 272, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Trabucco Aurilio M, Mennini FS, Gazzillo S, Massini L, Bolcato M, Feola A, Ferrari C, Coppeta L. Intention to Be Vaccinated for COVID-19 among Italian Nurses during the Pandemic. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9050500. [PMID: 34066068 PMCID: PMC8151959 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9050500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally, health systems are overwhelmed by both direct and indirect mortality from other treatable conditions. COVID-19 vaccination was crucial to preventing and eliminating the disease, so vaccine development for COVID-19 was fast-tracked worldwide. Despite the fact that vaccination is commonly recognized as the most effective approach, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), vaccine hesitancy is a global health issue. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of nurses in four different regions in Italy between 20 and 28 December 2020 to obtain data on the acceptance of the upcoming COVID-19 vaccination in order to plan specific interventions to increase the rate of vaccine coverage. RESULTS A total of 531 out of the 5000 nurses invited completed the online questionnaire. Most of the nurses enrolled in the study (73.4%) were female. Among the nurses, 91.5% intended to accept vaccination, whereas 2.3% were opposed and 6.2% were undecided. Female sex and confidence in vaccine efficacy represent the main predictors of vaccine intention among the study population using a logistic regression model, while other factors including vaccine safety concerns (side effects) were non-significant. CONCLUSIONS Despite the availability of a safe and effective vaccine, intention to be vaccinated was suboptimal among nurses in our sample. We also found a significant number of people undecided as to whether to accept the vaccine. Contrary to expectations, concerns about the safety of the vaccine were not found to affect the acceptance rate; nurses' perception of vaccine efficacy and female sex were the main influencing factors on attitudes toward vaccination in our sample. Since the success of the COVID-19 immunization plan depends on the uptake rate, these findings are of great interest for public health policies. Interventions aimed at increasing employee awareness of vaccination efficacy should be promoted among nurses in order to increase the number of vaccinated people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Trabucco Aurilio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (M.T.A.); (L.M.)
| | - Francesco Saverio Mennini
- EEHTA-CEIS, DEF Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy; (F.S.M.); (S.G.)
- Institute for Leadership and Management in Health, Kingston University, London KT1 2EE, UK
| | - Simone Gazzillo
- EEHTA-CEIS, DEF Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy; (F.S.M.); (S.G.)
| | - Laura Massini
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (M.T.A.); (L.M.)
| | - Matteo Bolcato
- Legal Medicine, University of Padua, Via G. Falloppio 50, 35121 Padua, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-049-9941096
| | - Alessandro Feola
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Luciano Armanni 5, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Cristiana Ferrari
- Department of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy; (C.F.); (L.C.)
| | - Luca Coppeta
- Department of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy; (C.F.); (L.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Spinewine A, Pétein C, Evrard P, Vastrade C, Laurent C, Delaere B, Henrard S. Attitudes towards COVID-19 Vaccination among Hospital Staff-Understanding What Matters to Hesitant People. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9050469. [PMID: 34066476 PMCID: PMC8148217 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9050469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Hospital staff are a priority target group in the European COVID-19 vaccination strategy. Measuring the extent of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and understanding the reasons behind it are essential to be able to tailor effective communication campaigns. Using the Health Belief Model (HBM) as a theoretical framework, a survey was conducted among staff members of a Belgian three-site hospital center between 6 and 20 January 2021. Multivariable logistic ordinal regression was performed to assess determinants of the attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination. Reasons for and against COVID-19 vaccination and the need for information were explored among hesitant staff members. Among the respondents (N = 1132), 58% and 4.9% said that they would certainly and certainly not get vaccinated, respectively; 37.1% were hesitant, with different degrees of certainty. A positive attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination was associated with being older, being a physician, being vaccinated against seasonal flu, and with several HBM factors (including perceived benefits and cues to actions). Among hesitant staff, concerns about potential side effects and the impression that the vaccine was developed too quickly were the main reasons against COVID-19 vaccination. The key factors in the decision process were data on vaccine efficacy and safety, and knowing that vaccination went well in others. These data are helpful to further tailor the communication campaign and ensure sufficient vaccination coverage among hospital staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Spinewine
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (C.P.); (P.E.); (S.H.)
- Pharmacy Department, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-2-764-73-52
| | - Catherine Pétein
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (C.P.); (P.E.); (S.H.)
| | - Perrine Evrard
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (C.P.); (P.E.); (S.H.)
| | - Christelle Vastrade
- Nursing Department and Infection Control Unit, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium;
| | - Christine Laurent
- Infection Control Unit, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium;
| | - Bénédicte Delaere
- Infectious Disease Department, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium;
| | - Séverine Henrard
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (C.P.); (P.E.); (S.H.)
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
KURTULUŞ Ş, CAN R. What Do Health Care Professionals Think About Covid-19 Vaccine Applications: A University Example. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021. [DOI: 10.35440/hutfd.908043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
44
|
Trevisan A, Mason P, Nicolli A, Maso S, Scarpa B, Moretto A, Scapellato ML. Vaccination and Immunity toward Measles: A Serosurvey in Future Healthcare Workers. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:377. [PMID: 33924547 PMCID: PMC8069293 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9040377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Measles is a very contagious infectious disease, and vaccination is the only medical aid to counter the spread of the infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of vaccination schedule and type of vaccine, number of doses, and sex on the immune response. In a population of Italian medical students (8497 individuals born after 1980 with certificate of vaccination and quantitative measurement of antibodies against measles), the prevalence of positive antibodies to measles and antibody titer was measured. Vaccination schedule such as number of doses and vaccine type (measles alone or combined as measles, mumps and rubella (MMR)) and sex were the variables considered to influence the immune response. The vaccination schedule depends on the year of birth: students born before 1990 were prevalently vaccinated once and with measles vaccine alone (not as MMR). One dose of vaccine induces a significantly (p < 0.0001) higher positive response and antibody titer than two doses, in particular when measles alone is used (p < 0.0001). Females have a significantly higher percentage of positive response (p = 0.0001) than males but only when the MMR formulation was used. Multiple linear regression confirms that sex significantly influences antibody titer when only MMR is used, after one (p = 0.0002) or two (p = 0.0060) doses. In conclusion, vaccination schedule and, partially, sex influence immune response to measles vaccination. Most notably, the measles vaccine alone (one dose) is more effective than one and two doses of MMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Trevisan
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (P.M.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (A.M.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Paola Mason
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (P.M.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (A.M.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Annamaria Nicolli
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (P.M.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (A.M.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Stefano Maso
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (P.M.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (A.M.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Bruno Scarpa
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy;
- Department of Mathematics “Tullio Levi-Civita”, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Angelo Moretto
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (P.M.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (A.M.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Maria Luisa Scapellato
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (P.M.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (A.M.); (M.L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vaccine Hesitancy: COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccine Willingness among Parents in Wuxi, China-A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9040342. [PMID: 33916277 PMCID: PMC8066309 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9040342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to (1) assess parental hesitancy about category A (Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI)) and B (non-EPI) vaccines, (2) assess parental willingness for COVID-19 and influenza vaccinations, and (3) explore the association of vaccination hesitancy of parents and healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods: The study was performed in Wuxi, eastern China between 21 September 2020 and 17 October 2020. Parents of children aged <18 years and HCWs were recruited from the selected immunization clinics. Vaccine hesitancy was assessed using the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) vaccine hesitancy survey (VHS) by summing the total score for 10 items (maximum 50 points). Results: A total of 3009 parents and 86 HCWs were included in the analysis. The category A VHS scores were significantly higher than the category B VHS scores (p = 0.000). Overall, 59.3% and 52.4% of parents reported willingness to avail COVID-19 and influenza vaccination for their children, respectively; 51.2% of the HCWs wanted to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Parental category B VHS scores were associated with HCW category B VHS scores (r = 0.928, p = 0.008). Conclusions: In China, parents are more hesitant about category B vaccines than category A vaccines. More than 40% of parents showed hesitancy and a refusal to use COVID-19 and influenza vaccines.
Collapse
|
46
|
Attitude and Behaviors towards SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination among Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study from Poland. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9030218. [PMID: 33806641 PMCID: PMC8000513 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9030218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Healthcare workers are particularly exposed to biological risk during their daily occupational activities. Nowadays, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become one of the most widespread infectious agents. In the current study, we performed a survey on the attitude and behavior of Polish healthcare workers (HCW), which comprise physicians (MD) and administrative healthcare assistants (HA) towards the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Our study involved 2300 subjects (42.17% female; 10.96% MD; 5.87% HA). The evaluation was conducted using a Google Forms survey based on original questions and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 Items questionnaire. HCW significantly more often demonstrated their willingness to get vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 as compared to the control group (82.95% vs. 54.31%, respectively). The main concern, as regards all groups, was the development of long-term side effects after getting COVID-19 vaccine. The study revealed that depression significantly affects the willingness to get vaccinated. The readiness was significantly strengthened by positive medical history of recommended vaccinations, fear of catching COVID-19, as well as fear of passing on the disease to the relatives. Overall, the percentage of HCW, who want to be vaccinated against COVID-19 remains unsatisfactory. Further works exploring this subject are needed to take a step closer to achieving the herd immunity in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
|
47
|
Machida M, Nakamura I, Kojima T, Saito R, Nakaya T, Hanibuchi T, Takamiya T, Odagiri Y, Fukushima N, Kikuchi H, Amagasa S, Watanabe H, Inoue S. Acceptance of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:210. [PMID: 33802285 PMCID: PMC8002097 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9030210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccination could be a key protective measure against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and it is important to understand the acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine among the general public. However, there is no study on the acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in Japan. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy situation in Japan and assess the factors associated with such issues. This was a cross-sectional study based on an internet survey completed by 2956 people. Participants were asked to indicate how likely they were to get vaccinated for COVID-19. In addition, the participants responded to questions regarding sociodemographic factors, attitudes, and beliefs regarding COVID-19 infection and vaccination. The proportion of participants with a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine was 62.1%. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that vaccine acceptance was lower among several sociodemographic groups, such as women, adults aged 20-49 years, and those with a low-income level. Several psychological factors, especially the perceived effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine, and willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated, were associated with vaccine acceptance. Our results indicate that the perceived effectiveness of the vaccine and willingness to protect others may play an important role in the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Machida
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan; (M.M.); (T.T.); (Y.O.); (N.F.); (H.K.); (S.A.)
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (I.N.); (H.W.)
| | - Itaru Nakamura
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (I.N.); (H.W.)
| | - Takako Kojima
- Department of International Medical Communications, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan;
| | - Reiko Saito
- Division of International Health (Public Health), Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8510, Japan;
| | - Tomoki Nakaya
- Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, Miyagi 980-0845, Japan; (T.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Tomoya Hanibuchi
- Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, Miyagi 980-0845, Japan; (T.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Tomoko Takamiya
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan; (M.M.); (T.T.); (Y.O.); (N.F.); (H.K.); (S.A.)
| | - Yuko Odagiri
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan; (M.M.); (T.T.); (Y.O.); (N.F.); (H.K.); (S.A.)
| | - Noritoshi Fukushima
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan; (M.M.); (T.T.); (Y.O.); (N.F.); (H.K.); (S.A.)
| | - Hiroyuki Kikuchi
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan; (M.M.); (T.T.); (Y.O.); (N.F.); (H.K.); (S.A.)
| | - Shiho Amagasa
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan; (M.M.); (T.T.); (Y.O.); (N.F.); (H.K.); (S.A.)
| | - Hidehiro Watanabe
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan; (I.N.); (H.W.)
| | - Shigeru Inoue
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan; (M.M.); (T.T.); (Y.O.); (N.F.); (H.K.); (S.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Santangelo OE, Cedrone F, Gentile L, Provenzano S, Dallagiacoma G, Armetta F, Gianfredi V. Reasons behind flu vaccine acceptance and suggested interventions to promote flu vaccination acceptance among healthcare workers. J Infect Prev 2020; 22:132-135. [PMID: 34239611 DOI: 10.1177/1757177420976804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The flu vaccination rate is still too low, both among healthcare providers (HCPs) and among health sciences university students. This study aims to assess the reasons of past and future flu vaccination acceptance among health sciences university students, and second, to identify what interventions would be helpful to foster acceptance of the flu vaccination among HCPs. A multicentre cross-sectional study was performed, using a validated questionnaire administered to health sciences students enrolled in 14 Italian universities. A multivariable logistic regression model was used. A total of 3131 questionnaires were collected. The statement that mandatory vaccination is required to increase adhesions to vaccinations (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.25-1.97), being in favour of this obligation (aOR = 7.91; 95% CI = 2.50-25.02) and considering themselves as people at risk of infection (aOR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.46-2.64), are associated with having received the vaccination in the past flu season; on the other hand, planning to be vaccinated for the next season to avoid infecting patients is protective (aOR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.38-0.70). This study shows which beliefs are associated with having joined the previous vaccination campaign in a large sample of HCPs. The acceptance of vaccination is an outcome behaviour resulting from a complex decision-making process. In order to implement coverage of the influenza vaccination in HCPs, it is necessary to implement awareness campaigns and provide specific information for this category of workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fabrizio Cedrone
- Postgraduate School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Leandro Gentile
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.,Dipartimento di sanità pubblica medicina sperimentale e forense, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Sandro Provenzano
- Department of Health Promotion, Maternal-Infant, Internal Medicine and Specialization of Excellence "G. D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giulia Dallagiacoma
- Department Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesco Armetta
- Department of Health Promotion, Maternal-Infant, Internal Medicine and Specialization of Excellence "G. D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Caffarelli C, Santamaria F, Santoro A, Procaccianti M, Castellano F, Nastro FF, Villani A, Bernasconi S, Corsello G. Best practices, challenges and innovations in pediatrics in 2019. Ital J Pediatr 2020; 46:176. [PMID: 33256810 PMCID: PMC7703504 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-020-00941-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper runs through key progresses in epidemiology, pathomechanisms and therapy of various diseases in children that were issued in the Italian Journal of Pediatrics at the end of last year. Novel research and documents that explore areas such as allergy, critical care, endocrinology, gastroenterology, infectious diseases, neonatology, neurology, nutrition, and respiratory tract illnesses in children have been reported. These observations will help to control childhood illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Caffarelli
- Clinica Pediatrica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, Parma, Italy.
| | - Francesca Santamaria
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Angelica Santoro
- Clinica Pediatrica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, Parma, Italy
| | - Michela Procaccianti
- Clinica Pediatrica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabio Castellano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Villani
- UOC di Pediatria Generale e Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Corsello
- Department of Sciences for Health Promotion and Mother and Child Care "G. D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Grech V, Gauci C, Agius S. Withdrawn: Vaccine hesitancy among Maltese Healthcare workers toward influenza and novel COVID-19 vaccination. Early Hum Dev 2020:105213. [PMID: 33032879 PMCID: PMC7528734 DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.
Collapse
|