1
|
Jayasooriya N, Saxena S, Blackwell J, Bottle A, Creese H, Petersen I, Pollok RCG. Associations between prior healthcare use, time to diagnosis, and clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease: a nationally representative population-based cohort study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2024; 11:e001371. [PMID: 38802264 PMCID: PMC11131120 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may improve clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE Examine associations between time to diagnosis, patterns of prior healthcare use, and clinical outcomes in IBD. DESIGN Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink we identified incident cases of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), diagnosed between January 2003 and May 2016, with a first primary care gastrointestinal consultation during the 3-year period prior to IBD diagnosis. We used multivariable Cox regression to examine the association of primary care consultation frequency (n=1, 2, >2), annual consultation intensity, hospitalisations for gastrointestinal symptoms, and time to diagnosis with a range of key clinical outcomes following diagnosis. RESULTS We identified 2645 incident IBD cases (CD: 782; UC: 1863). For CD, >2 consultations were associated with intestinal surgery (adjusted HR (aHR)=2.22, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.39) and subsequent CD-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.80, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.50). For UC, >2 consultations were associated with corticosteroid dependency (aHR=1.76, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.41), immunomodulator use (aHR=1.68, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.26), UC-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.43, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.95) and colectomy (aHR=2.01, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.27). For CD, hospitalisation prior to diagnosis was associated with CD-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.30, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.68) and intestinal surgery (aHR=1.71, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.58); for UC, it was associated with immunomodulator use (aHR=1.42, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.81), UC-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.36, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.95) and colectomy (aHR=1.54, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.34). For CD, consultation intensity in the year before diagnosis was associated with CD-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.19, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.28) and intestinal surgery (aHR=1.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.23); for UC, it was associated with corticosteroid use (aHR=1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.13), corticosteroid dependency (aHR=1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11), and UC-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.12, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.21). For CD, time to diagnosis was associated with risk of CD-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.68); for UC, it was associated with reduced risk of UC-related hospitalisation (aHR=0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.98) and colectomy (aHR=0.59, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80). CONCLUSION Electronic records contain valuable information about patterns of healthcare use that can be used to expedite timely diagnosis and identify aggressive forms of IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishani Jayasooriya
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK
- Division of Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Saxena
- Division of Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Blackwell
- Edinburgh Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alex Bottle
- Division of Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hanna Creese
- Division of Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Irene Petersen
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard C G Pollok
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK
- Division of Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Demb J, Kolb JM, Dounel J, Fritz CDL, Advani SM, Cao Y, Coppernoll-Blach P, Dwyer AJ, Perea J, Heskett KM, Holowatyj AN, Lieu CH, Singh S, Spaander MCW, Vuik FER, Gupta S. Red Flag Signs and Symptoms for Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2413157. [PMID: 38787555 PMCID: PMC11127127 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as a diagnosis at younger than age 50 years, is increasing, and so-called red flag signs and symptoms among these individuals are often missed, leading to diagnostic delays. Improved recognition of presenting signs and symptoms associated with EOCRC could facilitate more timely diagnosis and impact clinical outcomes. Objective To report the frequency of presenting red flag signs and symptoms among individuals with EOCRC, to examine their association with EOCRC risk, and to measure variation in time to diagnosis from sign or symptom presentation. Data Sources PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through May 2023. Study Selection Studies that reported on sign and symptom presentation or time from sign and symptom presentation to diagnosis for patients younger than age 50 years diagnosed with nonhereditary CRC were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently in duplicate for all included studies using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools were used to measure risk of bias. Data on frequency of signs and symptoms were pooled using a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes of interest were pooled proportions of signs and symptoms in patients with EOCRC, estimates for association of signs and symptoms with EOCRC risk, and time from sign or symptom presentation to EOCRC diagnosis. Results Of the 12 859 unique articles initially retrieved, 81 studies with 24 908 126 patients younger than 50 years were included. The most common presenting signs and symptoms, reported by 78 included studies, were hematochezia (pooled prevalence, 45% [95% CI, 40%-50%]), abdominal pain (pooled prevalence, 40% [95% CI, 35%-45%]), and altered bowel habits (pooled prevalence, 27% [95% CI, 22%-33%]). Hematochezia (estimate range, 5.2-54.0), abdominal pain (estimate range, 1.3-6.0), and anemia (estimate range, 2.1-10.8) were associated with higher EOCRC likelihood. Time from signs and symptoms presentation to EOCRC diagnosis was a mean (range) of 6.4 (1.8-13.7) months (23 studies) and a median (range) of 4 (2.0-8.7) months (16 studies). Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with EOCRC, nearly half of individuals presented with hematochezia and abdominal pain and one-quarter with altered bowel habits. Hematochezia was associated with at least 5-fold increased EOCRC risk. Delays in diagnosis of 4 to 6 months were common. These findings highlight the need to identify concerning EOCRC signs and symptoms and complete timely diagnostic workup, particularly for individuals without an alternative diagnosis or sign or symptom resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Demb
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Jennifer Moreno Veteran Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Jennifer M. Kolb
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jonathan Dounel
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | - Shailesh M. Advani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Yin Cao
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Andrea J. Dwyer
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora
| | - Jose Perea
- Molecular Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
- Surgery Department, Vithas Arturo Soria University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Karen M. Heskett
- UC San Diego Library, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Andreana N. Holowatyj
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Christopher H. Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
- Jennifer Moreno Veteran Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fanny E. R. Vuik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Samir Gupta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Jennifer Moreno Veteran Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Umar N, Harvey P, Adderley NJ, Haroon S, Trudgill N. The Time to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis for Patients Presenting with Abdominal Symptoms in Primary Care and its Association with Emergency Hospital Admissions and Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024:izae057. [PMID: 38563769 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izae057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) presenting to primary care may experience diagnostic delays. We aimed to evaluate this and assess whether time to diagnosis is associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS A retrospective cohort study using English primary care data from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, linked to hospital admission data was undertaken. Patients were followed from the first IBD-related presentation in primary care to IBD diagnosis. Associations of time to diagnosis exceeding a year were assessed using a Robust Poisson regression model. Associations between time to diagnosis and IBD-related emergency hospital admissions and surgery were assessed using Poisson and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. RESULTS Of 28 092 IBD patients, 60% had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 40% had Crohn's disease (CD). The median age was 43 (interquartile range, 30-58) years and 51.9% were female. Median time to diagnosis was 15.6 (interquartile range, 4.3-28.1) months. Factors associated with more than a year to diagnosis included female sex (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.21-1.26), older age (aRR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10; comparing >70 years of age with 18-30 years of age), obesity (aRR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06), smoking (aRR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08), CD compared with UC (aRR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11-1.16), and a fecal calprotectin over 500 μg/g (aRR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.95). The highest quartile of time to diagnosis compared with the lowest was associated with IBD-related emergency admissions (incidence rate ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11). CONCLUSION Longer times to IBD diagnoses were associated with being female, advanced age, obesity, smoking, and Crohn's disease. More IBD-related emergency admissions were observed in patients with a prolonged time to diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nosheen Umar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, West Bromwich, United Kingdom
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Phil Harvey
- Gastroenterology Department, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola J Adderley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Shamil Haroon
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Trudgill
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, West Bromwich, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hamilton W, Bailey SER. Colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients: How to improve the diagnostic pathway. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 66:101842. [PMID: 37852715 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Even in countries with national screening programmes for colorectal cancer, most cancers are identified after the patient has developed symptoms. The patients present these symptoms usually to primary care, or in some countries to specialist care. In either healthcare setting, the clinician has to consider cancer to be a possibility, then to perform triage investigations, followed by definitive investigation, usually by colonoscopy. This apparently simple pathway is not simple: most symptoms of colorectal cancer are more likely to represent benign disease than cancer, and each of these stages represents selection of patients into a higher-risk pool. This article summarises a symptom-based approach to selection and initial investigation of such patients in primary care. Some special groups need particular attention, including the younger patient, those with an inherited predisposition to cancer, and those with co-morbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Hamilton
- University of Exeter, College House, St. Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 1SR, UK.
| | - Sarah E R Bailey
- University of Exeter, College House, St. Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 1SR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hampton JS, Kenny RP, Rees CJ, Hamilton W, Eastaugh C, Richmond C, Sharp L. The performance of FIT-based and other risk prediction models for colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic patients: a systematic review. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 64:102204. [PMID: 37781155 PMCID: PMC10541467 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality are increasing internationally. Endoscopy services are under significant pressure with many overwhelmed. Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has been advocated to identify a high-risk population of symptomatic patients requiring definitive investigation by colonoscopy. Combining FIT with other factors in a risk prediction model could further improve performance in identifying those requiring investigation most urgently. We systematically reviewed performance of models predicting risk of CRC and/or advanced colorectal polyps (ACP) in symptomatic patients, with a particular focus on those models including FIT. Methods The review protocol was published on PROSPERO (CRD42022314710). Searches were conducted from database inception to April 2023 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane libraries, SCOPUS and CINAHL. Risk of bias of each study was assessed using The Prediction study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis based on the guidelines for Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis was performed due to study heterogeneity. Findings We included 62 studies; 23 included FIT (n = 22) or guaiac Faecal Occult Blood Testing (n = 1) combined with one or more other variables. Twenty-one studies were conducted solely in primary care. Generally, prediction models including FIT consistently had good discriminatory ability for CRC/ACP (i.e. AUC >0.8) and performed better than models without FIT although some models without FIT also performed well. However, many studies did not present calibration and internal and external validation were limited. Two studies were rated as low risk of bias; neither model included FIT. Interpretation Risk prediction models, including and not including FIT, show promise for identifying those most at risk of colorectal neoplasia. Substantial limitations in evidence remain, including heterogeneity, high risk of bias, and lack of external validation. Further evaluation in studies adhering to gold standard methodology, in appropriate populations, is required before widespread adoption in clinical practice. Funding National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) [Health Technology Assessment Programme (HTA) Programme (Project number 133852).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James S. Hampton
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Ryan P.W. Kenny
- Evidence Synthesis Group, The Catalyst, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, The Catalyst, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
| | - Colin J. Rees
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - William Hamilton
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Eastaugh
- Evidence Synthesis Group, The Catalyst, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, The Catalyst, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Richmond
- Evidence Synthesis Group, The Catalyst, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, The Catalyst, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
| | - COLOFIT Research Team
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
- Evidence Synthesis Group, The Catalyst, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, The Catalyst, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moon J, Garfinkle R, Zelkowitz P, Dell'Aniello S, Vasilevsky CA, Brassard P, Boutros M. Incidence and Factors Associated With Mental Health Disorders in Patients With Rectal Cancer Post-Restorative Proctectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:1203-1211. [PMID: 37399122 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with rectal cancer experience bowel symptoms post-restorative proctectomy. The incidence of mental health disorders post-restorative proctectomy and its association with bowel symptoms are unknown. OBJECTIVES This study aimed 1) to describe the incidence of mental health disorders in patients who underwent restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer and 2) to study the association between incident mental health disorders and bowel dysfunction after surgery. DESIGN This retrospective cohort study used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics databases. SETTINGS The databases were based in the United Kingdom. PATIENTS All adult patients who underwent restorative proctectomy for a rectal neoplasm between 1998 and 2018 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was an incident mental health disorder. The associations between bowel, sexual, and urinary dysfunctions and incident mental health disorders were studied using Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS In total, 2197 patients who underwent restorative proctectomy were identified. Of 1858 patients without preoperative bowel, sexual, or urinary dysfunction, 1455 had no preoperative mental health disorders. In this cohort, 466 patients (32.0%) developed incident mental health disorders following restorative proctectomy during 6333 person-years of follow-up. On multivariate Cox regression, female sex (adjusted HR 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.56), metastatic disease (adjusted HR 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.15), incident bowel dysfunction (adjusted HR 1.41, 95% CI, 1.13-1.77), and urinary dysfunction (adjusted HR 1.57; 95% CI, 1.16-2.14) were found to be associated with developing incident mental health disorders post-restorative proctectomy. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its observational study design and residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS Incident mental health disorders after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer are common. The presence of bowel and urinary functional impairment significantly increases the risk of poor psychological outcomes among rectal cancer survivors. CON LOS TRASTORNOS DE SALUD MENTAL EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE RECTO POSTERIOR A PROCTECTOMA RESTAURADORA ANTECEDENTES: La mayoría de los pacientes con cáncer de recto experimentan síntomas intestinales después de la proctectomía restauradora. Se desconoce la incidencia de trastornos de salud mental posteriores a la proctectomía restauradora y su asociación con síntomas intestinales.OBJETIVOS: Los objetivos de nuestro estudio son: a) describir la incidencia de trastornos de salud mental en pacientes sometidos a proctectomía restauradora por cáncer de recto; b) estudiar la asociación entre los trastornos de salud mental incidentes y la disfunción intestinal después de la cirugía.DISEÑO: Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que utilizó las bases de datos Clinical Practice Research Datalink y Hospital Episode Statistics.ENTORNO CLÍNICO: Las bases de datos se basaron en el Reino Unido.PACIENTES: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes adultos que se sometieron a una proctectomía restauradora por una neoplasia rectal entre 1998 y 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN: El resultado primario fue un trastorno de salud mental incidente. Las asociaciones entre la disfunción intestinal, sexual y urinaria y los trastornos de salud mental incidentes se estudiaron utilizando modelos de regresión de riesgos proporcionales de Cox.RESULTADOS: En total, se identificaron 2.197 pacientes que se sometieron a proctectomía restauradora. De 1.858 pacientes sin disfunción intestinal, sexual o urinaria preoperatoria, 1.455 personas tampoco tenían trastornos de salud mental preoperatorios. En esta cohorte, 466 (32,0 %) pacientes desarrollaron trastornos de salud mental incidentes después de la PR durante 6333 años-persona de seguimiento. En la regresión multivariada de Cox, sexo femenino (HRa 1,30, IC 95% 1,06-1,56), enfermedad metastásica (HRa 1,57, IC 95% 1,14-2,15) e incidencia intestinal (HRa 1,41, IC del 95 %: 1,13 a 1,77) y la disfunción urinaria (aHR 1,57, IC del 95 %: 1,16 a 2,14) se asociaron con el desarrollo de trastornos de salud mental incidentes después de la proctectomía restauradora.LIMITACIONES: Este estudio estuvo limitado por el diseño del estudio observacional y la confusión residual.CONCLUSIÓN: Los trastornos de salud mental incidentes después de la proctectomía restauradora para el cáncer de recto son comunes. La presencia de deterioro funcional intestinal y urinario aumenta significativamente el riesgo de malos resultados psicológicos entre los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto. (Traducción- Dr. Ingrid Melo ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeongyoon Moon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada. Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute-Jewish General Hospital; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rodríguez-Lago I, Blackwell J, Mateos B, Marigorta UM, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Pollok R. Recent Advances and Potential Multi-Omics Approaches in the Early Phases of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103418. [PMID: 37240524 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease leads to debilitating gastrointestinal symptoms and reduced quality of life, resulting in a significant burden on healthcare utilization and costs. Despite substantial advancements in diagnosis and treatment, there may still be considerable delays in diagnosing some patients. To reduce disease progression before the full disease spectrum appears and improve prognostic outcomes, several strategies have concentrated on early intervention and prevention. Recent evidence shows that initial immune response changes and endoscopic lesions may exist for years before diagnosis, implying the existence of a preclinical phase of inflammatory bowel disease comparable to findings in other immune-mediated disorders. In this review, we highlight the most relevant findings regarding preclinical inflammatory bowel disease and the prospective role of novel omics techniques in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iago Rodríguez-Lago
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Galdakao, 48960 Galdakao, Spain
- Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, 48960 Galdakao, Spain
- Deusto University, 48007 Bilbao, Spain
| | | | - Beatriz Mateos
- Integrative Genomics Lab, Center for Cooperative Research in Biosciences (CIC bioGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Bizkaia Technology Park, 48160 Derio, Spain
| | - Urko M Marigorta
- Integrative Genomics Lab, Center for Cooperative Research in Biosciences (CIC bioGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Bizkaia Technology Park, 48160 Derio, Spain
- IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Sciences, 48009 Bilbao, Spain
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Richard Pollok
- Gastroenterology Department, St George's University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Deputy M, Devanaboina R, Al Bakir I, Burns E, Faiz O. The role of faecal calprotectin in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. BMJ 2023; 380:e068947. [PMID: 36781182 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Deputy
- Surgical Epidemiology, Trials and Outcome Centre, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ibrahim Al Bakir
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
| | - Elaine Burns
- Surgical Epidemiology, Trials and Outcome Centre, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Surgical Epidemiology, Trials and Outcome Centre, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Medina-Lara A, Grigore B, Lewis R, Peters J, Price S, Landa P, Robinson S, Neal R, Hamilton W, Spencer AE. Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2021; 24:1-332. [PMID: 33252328 DOI: 10.3310/hta24660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tools based on diagnostic prediction models are available to help general practitioners diagnose cancer. It is unclear whether or not tools expedite diagnosis or affect patient quality of life and/or survival. OBJECTIVES The objectives were to evaluate the evidence on the validation, clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and availability and use of cancer diagnostic tools in primary care. METHODS Two systematic reviews were conducted to examine the clinical effectiveness (review 1) and the development, validation and accuracy (review 2) of diagnostic prediction models for aiding general practitioners in cancer diagnosis. Bibliographic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) in May 2017, with updated searches conducted in November 2018. A decision-analytic model explored the tools' clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in colorectal cancer. The model compared patient outcomes and costs between strategies that included the use of the tools and those that did not, using the NHS perspective. We surveyed 4600 general practitioners in randomly selected UK practices to determine the proportions of general practices and general practitioners with access to, and using, cancer decision support tools. Association between access to these tools and practice-level cancer diagnostic indicators was explored. RESULTS Systematic review 1 - five studies, of different design and quality, reporting on three diagnostic tools, were included. We found no evidence that using the tools was associated with better outcomes. Systematic review 2 - 43 studies were included, reporting on prediction models, in various stages of development, for 14 cancer sites (including multiple cancers). Most studies relate to QCancer® (ClinRisk Ltd, Leeds, UK) and risk assessment tools. DECISION MODEL In the absence of studies reporting their clinical outcomes, QCancer and risk assessment tools were evaluated against faecal immunochemical testing. A linked data approach was used, which translates diagnostic accuracy into time to diagnosis and treatment, and stage at diagnosis. Given the current lack of evidence, the model showed that the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tools in colorectal cancer relies on demonstrating patient survival benefits. Sensitivity of faecal immunochemical testing and specificity of QCancer and risk assessment tools in a low-risk population were the key uncertain parameters. SURVEY Practitioner- and practice-level response rates were 10.3% (476/4600) and 23.3% (227/975), respectively. Cancer decision support tools were available in 83 out of 227 practices (36.6%, 95% confidence interval 30.3% to 43.1%), and were likely to be used in 38 out of 227 practices (16.7%, 95% confidence interval 12.1% to 22.2%). The mean 2-week-wait referral rate did not differ between practices that do and practices that do not have access to QCancer or risk assessment tools (mean difference of 1.8 referrals per 100,000 referrals, 95% confidence interval -6.7 to 10.3 referrals per 100,000 referrals). LIMITATIONS There is little good-quality evidence on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tools. Many diagnostic prediction models are limited by a lack of external validation. There are limited data on current UK practice and clinical outcomes of diagnostic strategies, and there is no evidence on the quality-of-life outcomes of diagnostic results. The survey was limited by low response rates. CONCLUSION The evidence base on the tools is limited. Research on how general practitioners interact with the tools may help to identify barriers to implementation and uptake, and the potential for clinical effectiveness. FUTURE WORK Continued model validation is recommended, especially for risk assessment tools. Assessment of the tools' impact on time to diagnosis and treatment, stage at diagnosis, and health outcomes is also recommended, as is further work to understand how tools are used in general practitioner consultations. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017068373 and CRD42017068375. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 66. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonieta Medina-Lara
- Health Economics Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Bogdan Grigore
- Exeter Test Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Ruth Lewis
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Jaime Peters
- Exeter Test Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Sarah Price
- Primary Care Diagnostics, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Paolo Landa
- Health Economics Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Sophie Robinson
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Richard Neal
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - William Hamilton
- Primary Care Diagnostics, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Anne E Spencer
- Health Economics Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Galloway J, Barrett K, Irving P, Khavandi K, Nijher M, Nicholson R, de Lusignan S, Buch MH. Risk of venous thromboembolism in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a UK matched cohort study. RMD Open 2021; 6:rmdopen-2020-001392. [PMID: 32994362 PMCID: PMC7547545 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To describe the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and risk factors for VTE, in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) (ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease (CD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)), compared with a matched control population. Methods A total of 53 378 people with an IMID were identified over 1999–2019 in the UK Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) primary care database and were matched to 213 512 people without an IMID. The association between the presence of any IMID, and each IMID separately, and risk of VTE was estimated using unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. The prevalence of VTE risk factors, and associations between VTE risk factors and risk of VTE, were estimated in people with and without an IMID. Results People with an IMID were at increased risk of VTE (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.46, 95% CI 1.36,1.56), compared with matched controls. When assessing individual diseases, risk was increased for CD (aHR 1.74, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.08), ulcerative colitis (aHR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.45) and RA (aHR 1.54, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.70) but there was no evidence of an association for PsA (aHR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.52). In people with an IMID, independent risk factors for VTE included male sex, overweight/obese body mass index, current smoking, history of fracture, and, across study follow-up, abnormal platelet count. Conclusions VTE risk is increased in people with IMIDs. Routinely available clinical information may be helpful to identify individuals with an IMID at increased future risk of VTE. Observational study registration number Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03835780).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Galloway
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Peter Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Simon de Lusignan
- Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC), London, UK.,Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maya H Buch
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK .,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Herbert A, Rafiq M, Pham TM, Renzi C, Abel GA, Price S, Hamilton W, Petersen I, Lyratzopoulos G. Predictive values for different cancers and inflammatory bowel disease of 6 common abdominal symptoms among more than 1.9 million primary care patients in the UK: A cohort study. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003708. [PMID: 34339405 PMCID: PMC8367005 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnostic assessment of abdominal symptoms in primary care presents a challenge. Evidence is needed about the positive predictive values (PPVs) of abdominal symptoms for different cancers and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS AND FINDINGS Using data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) in the United Kingdom (2000-2017), we estimated the PPVs for diagnosis of (i) cancer (overall and for different cancer sites); (ii) IBD; and (iii) either cancer or IBD in the year post-consultation with each of 6 abdominal symptoms: dysphagia (n = 86,193 patients), abdominal bloating/distension (n = 100,856), change in bowel habit (n = 106,715), rectal bleeding (n = 235,094), dyspepsia (n = 517,326), and abdominal pain (n = 890,490). The median age ranged from 54 (abdominal pain) to 63 years (dysphagia and change in bowel habit); the ratio of women/men ranged from 50%:50% (rectal bleeding) to 73%:27% (abdominal bloating/distension). Across all studied symptoms, the risk of diagnosis of cancer and the risk of diagnosis of IBD were of similar magnitude, particularly in women, and younger men. Estimated PPVs were greatest for change in bowel habit in men (4.64% cancer and 2.82% IBD) and for rectal bleeding in women (2.39% cancer and 2.57% IBD) and lowest for dyspepsia (for cancer: 1.41% men and 1.03% women; for IBD: 0.89% men and 1.00% women). Considering PPVs for specific cancers, change in bowel habit and rectal bleeding had the highest PPVs for colon and rectal cancer; dysphagia for esophageal cancer; and abdominal bloating/distension (in women) for ovarian cancer. The highest PPVs of abdominal pain (either sex) and abdominal bloating/distension (men only) were for non-abdominal cancer sites. For the composite outcome of diagnosis of either cancer or IBD, PPVs of rectal bleeding exceeded the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE)-recommended specialist referral threshold of 3% in all age-sex strata, as did PPVs of abdominal pain, change in bowel habit, and dyspepsia, in those aged 60 years and over. Study limitations include reliance on accuracy and completeness of coding of symptoms and disease outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Based on evidence from more than 1.9 million patients presenting in primary care, the findings provide estimated PPVs that could be used to guide specialist referral decisions, considering the PPVs of common abdominal symptoms for cancer alongside that for IBD and their composite outcome (cancer or IBD), taking into account the variable PPVs of different abdominal symptoms for different cancers sites. Jointly assessing the risk of cancer or IBD can better support decision-making and prompt diagnosis of both conditions, optimising specialist referrals or investigations, particularly in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Herbert
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Meena Rafiq
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tra My Pham
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cristina Renzi
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gary A. Abel
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Price
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
| | - Willie Hamilton
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
| | - Irene Petersen
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wong SW, Ling DY, Yeow RQ, Chong RW, Aziz MRA, Aziz NA, Poh KS, Roslani AC. Clinicopathological patterns and survival outcomes of colorectal cancer among young adults in Malaysia: an institutional cohort study. Singapore Med J 2021; 62:636-641. [PMID: 34005846 DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2021051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological patterns and survival outcomes of young-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) in Malaysia. METHODS The study consisted of 206 patients with young-onset CRC (age < 50 years at diagnosis) and 1,921 patients with late-onset CRC (age ≥ 50 years at diagnosis) diagnosed during 2002-2016. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with young-onset CRC were compared with those of patients with late-onset CRC during 2009-2013. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in these patients. RESULTS The overall proportion of young-onset CRC was 10.7%. Mean age for young-onset CRC was 39.5 ± 7.4 years, with male-to-female ratio of 1.2:1.0. There were more Malay patients with young-onset CRC than late-onset CRC (44.0% vs. 19.9%, p = 0.004). Most CRC were diagnosed at advanced stage in both groups. However, young-onset CRC showed more aggressive tumour characteristics, such as poorer differentiation and mucinous subtype. Despite such differences, OS and DSS in both groups were similar (five-year OS for young-onset CRC vs. late-onset CRC: 44.2% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.40; five-year DSS for young-onset CRC vs. late-onset CRC: 48.8% vs. 57.6%, p = 0.53; mean survival of young-onset CRC vs. late-onset CRC: 4.9 years vs. 5.4 years, p = 0.15). Advanced stage at diagnosis and treatment modality were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION The unique ethnic and histological differences between patients with young- and late-onset CRC suggest that young-onset CRC may represent a distinct entity. However, despite such differences, prognosis between both groups were equivalent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sui-Weng Wong
- Department of Surgery, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Dao-Yao Ling
- Department of Surgery, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ri-Qi Yeow
- Department of Surgery, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ro-Wan Chong
- Department of Surgery, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Nora Abdul Aziz
- Department of Surgery, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Keat-Seong Poh
- Department of Surgery, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Metagenomic Analysis of Common Intestinal Diseases Reveals Relationships among Microbial Signatures and Powers Multidisease Diagnostic Models. mSystems 2021; 6:6/3/e00112-21. [PMID: 33947803 PMCID: PMC8269207 DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00112-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Common intestinal diseases such as Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) share clinical symptoms and altered gut microbes, necessitating cross-disease comparisons and the use of multidisease models. Here, we performed meta-analyses on 13 fecal metagenome data sets of the three diseases. We identified 87 species and 65 pathway markers that were consistently changed in multiple data sets of the same diseases. According to their overall trends, we grouped the disease-enriched marker species into disease-specific and disease-common clusters and revealed their distinct phylogenetic relationships; species in the CD-specific cluster were phylogenetically related, while those in the CRC-specific cluster were more distant. Strikingly, UC-specific species were phylogenetically closer to CRC, likely because UC patients have higher risk of CRC. Consistent with their phylogenetic relationships, marker species had similar within-cluster and different between-cluster metabolic preferences. A portion of marker species and pathways correlated with an indicator of leaky gut, suggesting a link between gut dysbiosis and human-derived contents. Marker species showed more coordinated changes and tighter inner-connections in cases than the controls, suggesting that the diseased gut may represent a stressed environment and pose stronger selection on gut microbes. With the marker species and pathways, we constructed four high-performance (including multidisease) models with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.87 and true-positive rates up to 90%, and explained their putative clinical applications. We identified consistent microbial alterations in common intestinal diseases, revealed metabolic capacities and the relationships among marker bacteria in distinct states, and supported the feasibility of metagenome-derived multidisease diagnosis. IMPORTANCE Gut microbes have been identified as potential markers in distinguishing patients from controls in colorectal cancer, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn’s disease individually, whereas there lacks a systematic analysis to investigate the exclusive microbial shifts of these enteropathies with similar clinical symptoms. Our meta-analysis and cross-disease comparisons identified consistent microbial alterations in each enteropathy, revealed microbial ecosystems among marker bacteria in distinct states, and demonstrated the necessity and feasibility of metagenome-based multidisease classifications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to construct multiclass models for these common intestinal diseases.
Collapse
|
14
|
Irving PM, de Lusignan S, Tang D, Nijher M, Barrett K. Risk of common infections in people with inflammatory bowel disease in primary care: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 8:bmjgast-2020-000573. [PMID: 33597152 PMCID: PMC7893652 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk of common infections in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease] compared with matched controls in a contemporary UK primary care population. DESIGN Matched cohort analysis (2014-2019) using the Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre primary care database. Risk of common infections, viral infections and gastrointestinal infections (including a subset of culture-confirmed infections), and predictors of common infections, were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS 18 829 people with IBD were matched to 73 316 controls. People with IBD were more likely to present to primary care with a common infection over the study period (46% vs 37% of controls). Risks of common infections, viral infections and gastrointestinal infections (including stool culture-confirmed infections) were increased for people with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease compared with matched controls (HR range 1.12-1.83, all p<0.001). Treatment with oral glucocorticoid therapy, immunotherapies and biologic therapy, but not with aminosalicylates, was associated with increased infection risk in people with IBD. Despite mild lymphopenia and neutropenia being more common in people with IBD (18.4% and 1.9%, respectively) than in controls (6.5% and 1.5%, respectively), these factors were not associated with significantly increased infection risk in people with IBD. CONCLUSION People with IBD are more likely to present with a wide range of common infections. Health professionals and people with IBD should remain vigilant for infections, particularly when using systemic corticosteroids, immunotherapies or biologic agents. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03835780).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Simon de Lusignan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC), London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Introduction Hemorrhoidal disease is a common problem that arises when hemorrhoidal structures become engorged and/or prolapse through the anal canal. Both conservative and invasive treatment options are diverse and guidance to their implementation is lacking. Methods A Delphi consensus process was used to review current literature and draft relevant statements. These were reconciliated until sufficient agreement was reached. The grade of evidence was determined. These guidelines were based on the published literature up to June 2020. Results Hemorrhoids are normal structures within the anorectal region. When they become engorged or slide down the anal canal, symptoms can arise. Every treatment for symptomatic hemorrhoids should be tailored to patient profile and expectations. For low-grade hemorrhoids, conservative treatment should consist of fiber supplements and can include a short course of venotropics. Instrumental treatment can be added case by case : infrared coagulation or rubber band ligation when prolapse is more prominent. For prolapsing hemorrhoids, surgery can be indicated for refractory cases. Conventional hemorrhoidectomy is the most efficacious intervention for all grades of hemorrhoids and is the only choice for non-reducible prolapsing hemorrhoids. Conclusions The current guidelines for the management of hemorrhoidal disease include recommendations for the clinical evaluation of hemorrhoidal disorders, and their conservative, instrumental and surgical management.
Collapse
|
16
|
de Lusignan S, Alexander H, Broderick C, Dennis J, McGovern A, Feeney C, Flohr C. Patterns and trends in eczema management in UK primary care (2009-2018): A population-based cohort study. Clin Exp Allergy 2020; 51:483-494. [PMID: 33176023 PMCID: PMC7984383 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite the high disease burden of eczema, a contemporary overview of the patterns and trends in primary care healthcare utilization and treatment is lacking. Objective To quantify primary care consultations, specialist referrals, prescribing, and treatment escalation, in children and adults with eczema in England. Methods A large primary care research database was used to examine healthcare and treatment utilization in people with active eczema (n = 411,931). Management trends and variations by age, sex, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity were described from 2009 to 2018 inclusive. Results Primary care consultation rates increased from 87.8 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 87.3–88.3) to 112.0 (95% CI 111.5–112.6) per 100 person‐years over 2009 to 2018. Specialist referral rates also increased from 3.8 (95% CI 3.7–3.9) to 5.0 (95% CI 4.9–5.1) per 100 person‐years over the same period. Consultation rates were highest in infants. Specialist referrals were greatest in the over 50s and lowest in people of lower socioeconomic status, despite a higher rate of primary care consultations. There were small changes in prescribing over time; emollients increased (prescribed to 48.5% of people with active eczema in 2009 compared to 51.4% in 2018) and topical corticosteroids decreased (57.3%–52.0%). Prescribing disparities were observed, including less prescribing of potent and very potent topical corticosteroids in non‐white ethnicities and people of lower socioeconomic status. Treatment escalation was more common with increasing age and in children of non‐white ethnicity. Conclusion and clinical relevance The management of eczema varies by sociodemographic status in England, with lower rates of specialist referral in people from more‐deprived backgrounds. There are different patterns of healthcare utilization, treatment, and treatment escalation in people of non‐white ethnicity and of more‐deprived backgrounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon de Lusignan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Royal College of General Practitioners, Research and Surveillance Centre, London, UK
| | - Helen Alexander
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Conor Broderick
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - John Dennis
- Momentum Data, Pendragon House, St. Albans, UK
| | | | | | - Carsten Flohr
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Grigore B, Lewis R, Peters J, Robinson S, Hyde CJ. Development, validation and effectiveness of diagnostic prediction tools for colorectal cancer in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:1084. [PMID: 33172448 PMCID: PMC7654186 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07572-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tools based on diagnostic prediction models are available to help general practitioners (GP) diagnose colorectal cancer. It is unclear how well they perform and whether they lead to increased or quicker diagnoses and ultimately impact on patient quality of life and/or survival. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the development, validation, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness, of cancer diagnostic tools for colorectal cancer in primary care. METHODS Electronic databases including Medline and Web of Science were searched in May 2017 (updated October 2019). Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-texts. Studies were included if they reported the development, validation or accuracy of a prediction model, or assessed the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tools based on prediction models to aid GP decision-making for symptomatic patients presenting with features potentially indicative of colorectal cancer. Data extraction and risk of bias were completed by one reviewer and checked by a second. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS Eleven thousand one hundred thirteen records were screened and 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-studies reported on the development, validation and/or accuracy of 13 prediction models: eight for colorectal cancer, five for cancer areas/types that include colorectal cancer. The Qcancer models were generally the best performing. Three impact studies met the inclusion criteria. Two (an RCT and a pre-post study) assessed tools based on the RAT prediction model. The third study looked at the impact of GP practices having access to RAT or Qcancer. Although the pre-post study reported a positive impact of the tools on outcomes, the results of the RCT and cross-sectional survey found no evidence that use of, or access to, the tools was associated with better outcomes. No study evaluated cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Many prediction models have been developed but none have been fully validated. Evidence demonstrating improved patient outcome of introducing the tools is the main deficiency and is essential given the imperfect classification achieved by all tools. This need is emphasised by the equivocal results of the small number of impact studies done so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogdan Grigore
- Exeter Test Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
| | - Ruth Lewis
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Jaime Peters
- Exeter Test Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Sophie Robinson
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Christopher J Hyde
- Exeter Test Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Blackmore T, Norman K, Kidd J, Cassim S, Chepulis L, Keenan R, Firth M, Jackson C, Stokes T, Weller D, Emery J, Lawrenson R. Barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer diagnosis in New Zealand: a qualitative study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:206. [PMID: 33003999 PMCID: PMC7530960 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01276-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Background New Zealand (NZ) has high rates of colorectal cancer but low rates of early diagnosis. Due to a lack of understanding of the pre-diagnostic experience from the patient’s perspective, it is necessary to investigate potential patient and health system factors that contribute to longer diagnostic intervals. Previous qualitative studies have discussed delays using The Model of Pathways to Treatment, but this has not been explored in the NZ context. This study aimed to understand the patient experience and perception of their general practitioner (GP) through the diagnostic process in the Waikato region of NZ. In particular, we sought to investigate potential barriers and facilitators that contribute to longer diagnostic intervals. Methods Ethical approval for this study was granted by the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee. Twenty-eight participants, diagnosed with colorectal cancer, were interviewed about their experience. Semi-structured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using The Model of Pathways to Treatment framework (intervals: appraisal, help-seeking, diagnostic). Results Participant appraisal of symptoms was a barrier to prompt diagnosis, particularly if symptoms were normalised, intermittent, or isolated in occurrence. Successful self-management techniques also resulted in delayed help-seeking. However if symptoms worsened, disruption to work and daily routines were important facilitators to seeking a GP consultation. Participants positively appraised GPs if they showed good technical competence and were proactive in investigating symptoms. Negative GP appraisals were associated with a lack of physical examinations and misdiagnosis, and left participants feeling dehumanised during the diagnostic process. However high levels of GP interpersonal competence could override poor technical competence, resulting in an overall positive experience, even if the cancer was diagnosed at an advanced stage. Māori participants often appraised symptoms inclusive of their sociocultural environment and considered the impact of their symptoms in relation to family. Conclusions The findings of this study highlight the importance of tailored colorectal cancer symptom communication in health campaigns, and indicate the significance of the interpersonal competence aspect of GP-patient interactions. These findings suggest that interpersonal competence be overtly displayed in all GP interactions to ensure a higher likelihood of a positive experience for the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Blackmore
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
| | - Kimberley Norman
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Jacquie Kidd
- Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Shemana Cassim
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Lynne Chepulis
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Rawiri Keenan
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Melissa Firth
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | - Tim Stokes
- Department of General Practice and Rural Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - David Weller
- Centre for Population Health Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Jon Emery
- Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ross Lawrenson
- Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Walker GJ, Lin S, Chanchlani N, Thomas A, Hendy P, Heerasing N, Moore L, Green HD, Chee D, Bewshea C, Mays J, Kennedy NA, Ahmad T, Goodhand JR. Quality improvement project identifies factors associated with delay in IBD diagnosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:471-480. [PMID: 32573819 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delay in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is common and contemporary UK studies are lacking. AIM To determine factors associated with, and the consequences of, a prolonged time to diagnosis in IBD. METHODS This quality improvement study included 304 adults with a new IBD diagnosis made between January 2014 and December 2017 across 49 general practices (GP) and gastroenterology secondary care services. Outcome measures were demographic, clinical and laboratory factors associated with a delayed time, defined as greater than upper quartile, to: (a) patient presentation (b) GP referral (c) secondary care diagnosis, and factors associated with a complicated disease course (hospitalisation and/or surgery and/or biologic treatment) in the year after diagnosis. RESULTS The median [IQR] diagnosis sub-intervals were: (a) patient = 2.1 months [0.9-5.1]; (b) GP = 0.3 months [0.0-0.9]; (c) secondary care = 1.1 months [0.5-2.1]. 50% of patients were diagnosed within 4 months and 92% were diagnosed within 2 years of symptom onset. Diagnostic delay was more common in Crohn's disease (7.6 months [3.1-15.0]) than ulcerative colitis (3.3 months [1.9-7.3]) (P < 0.001). Patients who presented as an emergency (P < 0.001) but not those with a delayed overall time to diagnosis (P = 0.35) were more likely to have a complicated disease course. CONCLUSION Time to patient presentation is the largest component of time to IBD diagnosis. Emergency presentation is common and, unlike a delayed time to diagnosis, is associated with a complicated disease course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth J Walker
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Simeng Lin
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Amanda Thomas
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Peter Hendy
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Neel Heerasing
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Lucy Moore
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK
| | - Harry D Green
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK
| | - Desmond Chee
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Claire Bewshea
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK
| | - Joseph Mays
- NHS Devon Clinical Commissioning Group, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - James R Goodhand
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Exeter, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Coelho MR, Romi MD, Ferreira DMTP, Zaltman C, Soares-Mota M. The Use of Curcumin as a Complementary Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. Nutrients 2020; 12:nu12082296. [PMID: 32751776 PMCID: PMC7468803 DOI: 10.3390/nu12082296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to verify the efficacy and safety of curcumin as a complementary therapy for the maintenance or induction of remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A comprehensive search was conducted by two independent authors in MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Lilacs, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, and ScienceDirect. The search terms “curcumin”, “curcuma”, “inflammatory bowel disease”, “proctocolitis”, “crohn disease”, and “inflammation” were combined to create search protocols. This study considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in any language before March 2020 that evaluated the effects of curcumin on inflammatory activity and the maintenance or remission of IBD patients. After duplicates were removed, 989 trials were identified, but only 11 met the eligibility criteria. Five of these were considered to be biased and were excluded. Therefore, six trials were considered in this review. All the studies included in the systematic review were placebo-controlled RCTs conducted on individuals with ulcerative colitis (UC). All the RCTs reported that curcumin was well tolerated and was not associated with any serious side effects. Studies show that curcumin may be a safe, effective therapy for maintaining remission in UC when administered with standard treatments. However, the same cannot be stated for Crohn’s disease due to the lack of low bias risk studies. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed before curcumin can be recommended as a complementary therapy for UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Roque Coelho
- Institute of Nutrition Josué de Castro, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 21941-971 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; (M.R.C.); (M.D.R.)
| | - Marcela Diogo Romi
- Institute of Nutrition Josué de Castro, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 21941-971 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; (M.R.C.); (M.D.R.)
| | | | - Cyrla Zaltman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 21941-913 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;
| | - Marcia Soares-Mota
- Institute of Nutrition Josué de Castro, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 21941-971 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; (M.R.C.); (M.D.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +55-(21)-99604-9934
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Blackwell J, Saxena S, Jayasooriya N, Bottle A, Petersen I, Hotopf M, Alexakis C, Pollok RC. Prevalence and duration of gastrointestinal symptoms before diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and predictors of timely specialist review: a population-based study. J Crohns Colitis 2020; 15:jjaa146. [PMID: 32667962 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Lack of timely referral and significant waits for specialist review amongst individuals with unresolved gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms can result in delayed diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). AIMS To determine the frequency and duration of GI symptoms and predictors of timely specialist review before the diagnosis of both Crohn's Disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS Case-control study of IBD matched 1:4 for age and sex to controls without IBD using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from 1998-2016. RESULTS We identified 19,555 cases of IBD, and 78,114 controls. 1 in 4 cases of IBD reported gastrointestinal symptoms to their primary care physician more than 6 months before receiving a diagnosis. There is a significant excess prevalence of GI symptoms in each of the 10 years before IBD diagnosis. GI symptoms were reported by 9.6% and 10.4% at 5 years before CD and UC diagnosis respectively compared to 5.8% of controls. Amongst patients later diagnosed with IBD, <50% received specialist review within 18 months from presenting with chronic GI symptoms. Patients with a previous diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome or depression were less likely to receive timely specialist review (IBS: HR=0.77, 95%CI 0.60-0.99, depression: HR=0.77, 95%CI 0.60-0.98). CONCLUSIONS There is an excess of GI symptoms 5 years before diagnosis of IBD compared to the background population which are likely attributable to undiagnosed disease. Previous diagnoses of IBS and depression are associated with delays in specialist review. Enhanced pathways are needed to accelerate specialist referral and timely IBD diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Blackwell
- Dept. Gastroenterology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, St George's University London, UK
| | - S Saxena
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - N Jayasooriya
- Dept. Gastroenterology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, St George's University London, UK
| | - A Bottle
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - I Petersen
- Dept. Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
- Dept. Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - M Hotopf
- Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Alexakis
- Dept. Gastroenterology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, St George's University London, UK
| | - R C Pollok
- Dept. Gastroenterology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, St George's University London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lyratzopoulos G, Abel GA. Assessing patients at risk of symptomatic-but-as-yet-undiagnosed cancer in primary care using information from patient records. Br J Cancer 2020; 122:1729-1731. [PMID: 32291393 PMCID: PMC7283330 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0828-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence arising from primary care electronic health records can help to assess the risk of symptomatic-but-as-yet-undiagnosed cancer. Existing evidence and methodological innovations in this field of study hold further promise for improving the diagnostic process and achieving earlier diagnosis in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
| | - Gary A Abel
- University of Exeter Medical School, Smeall Building, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2 LU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lamb CA, Kennedy NA, Raine T, Hendy PA, Smith PJ, Limdi JK, Hayee B, Lomer MCE, Parkes GC, Selinger C, Barrett KJ, Davies RJ, Bennett C, Gittens S, Dunlop MG, Faiz O, Fraser A, Garrick V, Johnston PD, Parkes M, Sanderson J, Terry H, Gaya DR, Iqbal TH, Taylor SA, Smith M, Brookes M, Hansen R, Hawthorne AB. British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut 2019; 68:s1-s106. [PMID: 31562236 PMCID: PMC6872448 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1240] [Impact Index Per Article: 248.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Andrew Lamb
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip Anthony Hendy
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Philip J Smith
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - Miranda C E Lomer
- King's College London, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gareth C Parkes
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Christian Selinger
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - R Justin Davies
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cathy Bennett
- Systematic Research Ltd, Quorn, UK
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Malcolm G Dunlop
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Aileen Fraser
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Miles Parkes
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jeremy Sanderson
- King's College London, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Daniel R Gaya
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tariq H Iqbal
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHSFoundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- University College London, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Melissa Smith
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Matthew Brookes
- Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
- University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Richard Hansen
- Royal Hospital for Children Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.
Collapse
|
25
|
McCulloch SM, Aziz I, Polster AV, Pischel AB, Stålsmeden H, Shafazand M, Block M, Byröd G, Lindkvist B, Törnblom H, Jonefjäll B, Simren M. The diagnostic value of a change in bowel habit for colorectal cancer within different age groups. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 8:211-219. [PMID: 32213069 DOI: 10.1177/2050640619888040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Change in bowel habit as a sole alarm symptom for colorectal cancer is disputed. OBJECTIVE We investigated the diagnostic value of change in bowel habit for colorectal cancer, particularly as a single symptom and within different age groups. METHODS This retrospective cohort study examined colorectal cancer fast track referrals and outcomes across four Swedish hospitals (April 2016-May 2017). Entry criteria constituted one or more of three alarm features: anaemia, visible rectal bleeding, or change in bowel habit for more than 4 weeks in patients over 40 years of age. Patients were grouped as having only change in bowel habit, change in bowel habit plus anaemia/bleeding or anaemia/bleeding only. RESULTS Of 628 patients, 22% were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. There were no cases of colorectal cancer in the only change in bowel habit group under 55 years, while this was 6% for 55-64 years, 8% for 65-74 years and 14% for 75 years and older. Among subjects under 55 years, 2% with anaemia/bleeding had colorectal cancer, this increased to 34% for 55 years and older (P < 0.0001). Change in bowel habit plus anaemia/bleeding gave a colorectal cancer prevalence of 16% in under 55 years and increased to 30% for 55 years and older (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION Change in bowel habit as the only alarm feature has a low diagnostic yield for colorectal cancer in patients under 55 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia M McCulloch
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Imran Aziz
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Annikka V Polster
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Mattias Block
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Östra Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Byröd
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Björn Lindkvist
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hans Törnblom
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Magnus Simren
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kelleher M, Singh R, O'Driscoll CM, Melgar S. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEACAM) family members and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2019; 47:21-31. [PMID: 31133507 DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2019.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic intestinal inflammatory condition with increasing incidence worldwide and whose pathogenesis remains largely unknown. The collected evidence indicates that genetic, environmental and microbial factors and a dysregulated immune response are responsible for the disease. IBD has an early onset and long term sufferers present a higher risk of developing colitis associated cancer (CAC). The carcinoembryonic antigen-related adhesion molecules (CEACAM) are a subgroup of the CEA family, found in a range of different cell types and organs including epithelial cells in the intestine. They can act as intercellular adhesions molecules for e.g. bacteria and soluble antigens. CEACAMs are involved in a number of different processes including cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and tumour suppression. Some CEACAMs such as CEACAM1, CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 are highly associated with cancer and are even recognised as valid clinical markers for certain cancer forms. However, their role in IBD pathogenesis is less understood. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of published literature on CEACAMs and intestinal inflammation (IBD). The interactions between CEACAMs and bacteria adhesion in relation to IBD pathophysiology will be addressed and potential new therapeutic and diagnostic opportunities will be identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maebh Kelleher
- APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, T12YT20, Ireland; Pharmacodelivery Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, T12YT20, Ireland.
| | - Raminder Singh
- APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, T12YT20, Ireland; Department of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, T12YT20, Ireland.
| | - Caitriona M O'Driscoll
- Pharmacodelivery Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, T12YT20, Ireland.
| | - Silvia Melgar
- APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, T12YT20, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chronic diarrhoea remains a diagnostic challenge, with numerous causes and few effective symptomatic treatments. This review focuses on new methods for diagnosis of common disorders and alerts readers to rarer causes through a systematic approach to the underlying mechanisms. RECENT FINDINGS New strategies are emerging to stratify the need for endoscopic investigation. Faecal immunochemical testing, combined with standard blood tests, shows promise in excluding colorectal cancers, adenoma and inflammatory bowel disease, challenging the current use of faecal calprotectin. Serum analysis for markers of bile acid synthesis has been refined, potentially streamlining diagnostic pathways of bile acid malabsorption for those who are unable to access nuclear medicine scans, but the positive predictive value of faecal elastase in low prevalence populations has been questioned. Novel markers such as volatile organic compounds and stool DNA analyses continue to develop. SUMMARY A systematic approach to investigation of chronic diarrhoea will ensure all relevant causes are considered and minimize the chance of a missed diagnosis. Combination of clinical features with noninvasive testing supports a judicious approach to endoscopic investigations but further innovation will be needed to resolve the diagnostic challenge that diarrhoea poses.
Collapse
|
28
|
Lyratzopoulos G. Electronic patient records research to aid diagnostic reasoning for possible cancer in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68:408-409. [PMID: 30166371 PMCID: PMC6104858 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18x698585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London and THIS (The Health Improvement Studies) Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Koo MM, von Wagner C, Abel GA, McPhail S, Hamilton W, Rubin GP, Lyratzopoulos G. The nature and frequency of abdominal symptoms in cancer patients and their associations with time to help-seeking: evidence from a national audit of cancer diagnosis. J Public Health (Oxf) 2018; 40:e388-e395. [PMID: 29385513 PMCID: PMC6166582 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Revised: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Raising awareness of possible cancer symptoms is important for timely help-seeking; recent campaigns have focused on symptom groups (such as abdominal symptoms) rather than individual alarm symptoms associated with particular cancer sites. The evidence base supporting such initiatives is still emerging however; understanding the frequency and nature of presenting abdominal symptoms among cancer patients could inform the design and evaluation of public health awareness campaigns. Methods We examined eight presenting abdominal symptoms (abdominal pain, change in bowel habit, bloating/distension, dyspepsia, rectal bleeding, dysphagia, reflux and nausea/vomiting) among 15 956 patients subsequently diagnosed with cancer in England. We investigated the cancer site case-mix and variation in the patient interval (symptom-onset-to-presentation) by abdominal symptom. Results Almost a quarter (23%) of cancer patients presented with abdominal symptoms before being diagnosed with one of 27 common and rarer cancers. The patient interval varied substantially by abdominal symptom: median (IQR) intervals ranged from 7 (0-28) days for abdominal pain to 30 (4-73) days for dysphagia. This variation persisted after adjusting for age, sex and ethnicity (P < 0.001). Conclusions Abdominal symptoms are common at presentation among cancer patients, while time to presentation varies by symptom. The need for awareness campaigns may be greater for symptoms associated with longer intervals to help-seeking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gary A Abel
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, UK
| | - Sean McPhail
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England Zone A, 2nd Floor, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London, UK
| | - William Hamilton
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, UK
| | - Greg P Rubin
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Walker GJ, Moore L, Heerasing N, Hendy P, Perry MH, McDonald TJ, Debenham T, Bethune R, Bewshea C, Hyde C, Heap GA, Singh A, Calvert C, Kennedy NA, Goodhand JR, Ahmad T. Faecal calprotectin effectively excludes inflammatory bowel disease in 789 symptomatic young adults with/without alarm symptoms: a prospective UK primary care cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018; 47:1103-1116. [PMID: 29508423 DOI: 10.1111/apt.14563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Revised: 12/16/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care faecal calprotectin testing distinguishes inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from functional gut disorder in young patients presenting with abdominal symptoms; however, previous evaluations have excluded patients with alarm symptoms. AIMS We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of calprotectin to distinguish IBD from functional gut disorder in young adults in whom general practitioners (GPs) suspected IBD; including patients reporting gastrointestinal alarm symptoms. We hypothesised that calprotectin would reduce secondary care referrals and healthcare costs. METHODS We undertook a prospective cohort study of 789 young adults (18-46 years old) presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms to 49 local general practices that had undergone calprotectin testing (1053 tests: between Jan 2014 and May 2016) because of suspected IBD. We considered calprotectin levels of ≥100 μg/g positive. Primary and secondary care records over 12 months from the point of calprotectin testing were used as the reference standard. RESULTS Overall, 39% (308/789) patients reported gastrointestinal alarm symptoms and 6% (50/789) tested patients were diagnosed with IBD. The positive and negative predictive values of calprotectin testing for distinguishing IBD from functional gut disorder in patients with gastrointestinal alarm symptoms were 50% (95% CI 36%-64%) and 98% (96%-100%): and in patients without gastrointestinal alarm symptoms were 27% (16%-41%) and 99% (98%-100%), respectively. We estimate savings of 279 referrals and £160 per patient. CONCLUSIONS Calprotectin testing of young adults with suspected IBD in primary care accurately distinguishes IBD from functional gut disorder, even in patients with gastrointestinal alarm symptoms and reduces secondary care referrals and diagnostic healthcare costs.
Collapse
|
31
|
Lyratzopoulos G, Mendonca SC, Gildea C, McPhail S, Peake MD, Rubin G, Singh H, Hamilton W, Walter FM, Roland M, Abel GA. Associations between diagnostic activity and measures of patient experience in primary care: a cross-sectional ecological study of English general practices. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68:e9-e17. [PMID: 29255108 PMCID: PMC5737322 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17x694097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower use of endoscopies and urgent referrals for suspected cancer has been linked to poorer outcomes for patients with cancer; it is important to examine potential predictors of variable use. AIM To examine the associations between general practice measures of patient experience and practice use of endoscopies or urgent referrals for suspected cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional ecological analysis in English general practices. METHOD Data were taken from the GP Patient Survey and the Cancer Services Public Health Profiles. After adjustment for practice population characteristics, practice-level associations were examined between the use of endoscopy and urgent referrals for suspected cancer, and the ability to book an appointment (used as proxy for ease of access), the ability to see a preferred doctor (used as proxy for relational continuity), and doctor/nurse communication skills. RESULTS Taking into account practice scores for the ability to book an appointment, practices rated higher for the proxy measure of relational continuity used urgent referrals and endoscopies less often (for example, 30% lower urgent referral and 15% lower gastroscopy rates between practices in the 90th/10th centiles, respectively). In contrast, practices rated higher for doctor communication skills used urgent referrals and endoscopies more often (for example, 26% higher urgent referral and 17% higher gastroscopy rates between practices in the 90th/10th centiles, respectively). Patients with cancer in practices that were rated higher for doctor communication skills were less likely to be diagnosed as emergencies (1.7% lower between practices in the 90th than in the 10th centile). CONCLUSION Practices where patients rated doctor communication highly were more likely to investigate and refer patients urgently but, in contrast, practices where patients could see their preferred doctor more readily were less likely to do so. This article discusses the possible implications of these findings for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK; Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Silvia C Mendonca
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carolynn Gildea
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Services, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Sean McPhail
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Services, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Michael D Peake
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Services, Public Health England, London, UK; Institute for Lung Health, Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Greg Rubin
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, UK
| | - Hardeep Singh
- Houston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, US
| | | | | | - Martin Roland
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
[Not Available]. MMW Fortschr Med 2017; 159:3. [PMID: 28417416 DOI: 10.1007/s15006-017-9500-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
|