Revisiting cutaneous adverse reactions to pemetrexed

A low-dose pemetrexed-cisplatin combination regimen induces significant nephrotoxicity in mice

BACKGROUND

Pemetrexed is combined with cisplatin to treat cancer. Whether pemetrexed-cisplatin combination chemotherapy exacerbates cisplatin nephrotoxicity is unclear. Here, we investigated kidney injury in mice administered a non-lethal low-dose regimen of pemetrexed or cisplatin alone and compared it with a pemetrexed-cisplatin combination.

METHODS

Mice were randomly divided into four groups and administered intraperitoneally the experimental drugs solubilized in captisol (sulfobutylether β-cyclodextrin). Group 1 received captisol, Group 2 pemetrexed (10 mg/kg), Group 3 cisplatin (1 mg/kg), and Group 4 pemetrexed (10 mg/kg) plus cisplatin (1 mg/kg). The mice were treated every other day for two weeks, three times per week. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined on the third day after the last treatment, followed by a necropsy.

RESULTS

Whereas the relative kidney weight was comparable in the control vs. pemetrexed or cisplatin alone group, it was significantly increased in the combination group. Mice treated with cisplatin and pemetrexed-cisplatin combination exhibited reduced GFR. The pemetrexed-cisplatin combination caused significant increases in the plasma or urinary levels of kidney injury biomarkers, renal lipid peroxidation, and nitrosative stress compared with pemetrexed or cisplatin alone. Histopathology revealed that pemetrexed or cisplatin alone had minimal effects on the kidneys. By contrast, the pemetrexed-cisplatin combination caused tubular degeneration, dilatation, and granular casts. Live-cell imaging showed that the pemetrexed-cisplatin combination caused more severe apoptosis of primary renal epithelial cells than individual concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that combining pemetrexed and cisplatin causes oxidative kidney damage at individual doses that do not cause significant nephrotoxicity. Hence, the renal function of patients undergoing treatment with the pemetrexed-cisplatin combination needs extensive monitoring.

Case Report: Chemotherapy-Associated Systemic Sclerosis: Is DNA Damage to Blame?

Systemic sclerosis, also known as scleroderma, is an autoimmune disease characterized by cutaneous and visceral fibrosis, immune dysregulation, and vasculopathy. Generally, the degree of skin fibrosis is associated with an increased likelihood of visceral organ involvement. Its pathogenesis is poorly understood; however, it is clear that changes in both the innate and adaptive immune responses are associated with fibroblast dysfunction and vascular damage. Further, DNA damage has been postulated as one of the triggering factors in systemic sclerosis, although the association of DNA damage with the progression of this disease is more poorly established. Recently, abnormal DNA damage response repair pathways have also been identified in patients with systemic sclerosis, suggesting that cells from patients with this disease may be more susceptible to DNA damaging agents. Chemotherapeutic drugs and other DNA damaging agents have been associated with the development of systemic sclerosis, as these agents may provide additional "hits" that promote abnormal DNA damage responses and subsequent inflammatory changes. Herein, we present the case of a 39-year-old female who developed scleroderma after the treatment of her breast cancer with chemotherapeutic agents. Her scleroderma was subsequently successfully treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We also completed a literature review for previously published cases of chemotherapy associated with systemic sclerosis and highlighted a role of DNA damage in promoting the disease. Our case is the first case of chemotherapy associated with systemic sclerosis treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Mechanisms, Management and Prevention of Pemetrexed-Related Toxicity

Pemetrexed is a cytostatic antifolate drug and a cornerstone in the treatment of lung cancer. Although generally well tolerated, a substantial part of the patient population experiences dose-limiting or even treatment-limiting toxicities. These include mucositis, skin problems, fatigue, renal toxicity, and neutropenia. Several studies confirmed that pemetrexed pharmacokinetics can serve as a prognostic factor for the development of toxicity, especially for neutropenia. Preventing and managing toxicity of pemetrexed can help to ensure durable treatment. Several evidence-based strategies are already implemented in clinical care. With the introduction of standard vitamin supplementation and dexamethasone, the incidence of hematological toxicity and skin reactions substantially decreased. In the case of high risk for toxicity, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor can be used to prevent severe hematological toxicity. Moreover, high-dose folinic acid can resolve severe pemetrexed-induced toxicity. There are several experimental options to prevent or manage pemetrexed-related toxicity, such as the use of standard folinic acid, hemodialysis, antidotes such as thymidine, hypoxanthine, and glucarpidase, and the use of therapeutic drug monitoring. These strategies still need clinical evaluation before implementation, but could enable treatment with pemetrexed for patients who are at risk for toxicity, such as in renal impairment.

Atypical Skin Manifestations During Immune Checkpoint Blockage in Coronavirus Disease 2019-Infected Patients With Lung Cancer

A new coronavirus, named severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus-2 by the WHO, has rapidly spread around the world since its first reported case in late December of 2019 from Wuhan, the People’s Republic of China. As of mid-April 2020, this virus has affected more than 180 countries and territories, infecting more than 1,650,000 individuals and causing over 100,000 deaths. With approximately 20 million new cases globally per year, cancer affects a substantial portion of the population. Individuals affected by cancer are more susceptible to infections owing to coexisting chronic diseases (cardiovascular, pulmonary, and diabetes), overall poor health status, and systemic immunosuppressive states caused by both cancer and the anticancer treatment. As a consequence, patients with malignancies, especially those with lung cancer who develop coronavirus disease 2019, experience more difficult outcomes. A recent multicenter study carried out by the Hubei Anti-Cancer Association has also documented that patients with lung cancer had an increased risk of death, intensive care unit requirement, risk of presenting severe or critical symptoms, and use of invasive mechanical ventilation. Here, we present two representative cases of patients with lung cancer and coronavirus disease 2019 without respiratory compromise and with atypical and severe skin manifestations—findings that could be influenced by the long-term use of anti–programmed cell death protein 1 antibody.

Slowly developing toxic epidermal necrolysis-like reaction associated with pemetrexed and carboplatin

Most cutaneous adverse drug reactions reported in association with chemotherapy, such as a limited maculopapular rash, are considered mild and do not affect the continuation of the treatment. Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), however, is a life-threatening reaction that needs treatment discontinuation. The present case shows the slow progression from a pemetrexed and carboplatin-associated maculopapular rash to a TEN-like reaction.

Pemetrexed Induced Life-threatening Anaphylaxis

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death. The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recommends platinum based regimens as the first-line of treatment for NSCLC. Pemetrexed, an antifolate agent, has been approved by the ASCO for the treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC and has been shown to be efficient for first-line, maintenance and second- or third-line treatment in this subgroup. It is administered intravenously over 10 minutes and is usually well tolerated with a very few side effects. There have been a few cases of anaphylaxis reported with pemetrexed use and most of the patients presented only with cutaneous manifestations. We present a patient with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung who developed a severe life threatening anaphylactic reaction requiring ventilatory support after administration of pemetrexed.

Pemetrexed-induced radiation recall dermatitis in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma: case report and literature review

Radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) is an inflammatory reaction in a previously irradiated field subsequent to the administration of pharmacologic or promoting agents. Herein, we describe a 47-year-old man with NSCLC who was treated with radiotherapy and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy three years prior to developing RRD upon resumption of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. RRD with pemetrexed is rare and consists of five cases reported thus far. Although RRD is a rare phenomenon, it should be considered in any patient with dermatologic reactions that occur at the site of previous exposure to radiation therapy. When severe, RRD can pose a significant, and possibly life-threatening, impediment to the treatment and care of oncology patients. We discuss the time course, natural history, and management of this condition, as well as a connection to internal organ involvement, such as pneumonitis in thoracic oncology patients.