1
|
Jansen NEJ, Schiphof D, Runhaar J, Oei EHG, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Middelkoop MV. Planned or recent first consultation with the general practitioner for knee complaints: Is it indicative of early-stage knee osteoarthritis? OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2024; 6:100493. [PMID: 38966077 PMCID: PMC11223112 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective No established definition for early-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is available, nor classification criteria. Identifying the characteristics of individuals presenting with early-stage KOA symptoms can enhance diagnosis to prevent progression. This study aimed to describe clinical and structural features of individuals presenting with knee complaints within two years after their first consultation, while exploring differences in the duration of knee complaints. Method Baseline data was used from the LITE randomized controlled trial, assessing the effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention for individuals with knee complaints and overweight in primary care. Baseline assessments included questionnaires, clinical assessment, and MRI of the most symptomatic knee. Differences between groups with varying durations of knee complaints (<12, ≥12-<24, ≥24 months) were evaluated. Results Participants (N = 218, 65% female, mean age 59 ± 6 years, mean BMI 32 ± 5 kg/m2) had a median knee complaint duration of 14 months, with an average KOOS pain score of 60 ± 17.46% reported their symptoms as unacceptable. Structural MRI-defined KOA was observed in 71% of participants. There were no significant differences in clinical or structural MRI features between different durations of knee complaints. Conclusion Within 24 months of initial consultation, over two-thirds of participants displayed MRI-defined structural KOA, and nearly half reported unacceptable symptom states. This study found no association between the duration of knee complaints and symptoms severity or structural KOA presence, underscoring the complexity of identifying stages of KOA among individuals with overweight. Future studies should explore additional features beyond current considerations to facilitate early-stage KOA diagnosis, specifically for individuals with overweight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria EJ. Jansen
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dieuwke Schiphof
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jos Runhaar
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Edwin HG. Oei
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marienke van Middelkoop
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Campbell TM, Laneuville O, Trudel G. Association of Knee Osteoarthritis and Flexion Contracture With Localized Tibial Articular Cartilage Loss: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative. J Rheumatol 2024; 51:285-290. [PMID: 38101919 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether a knee flexion contracture (FC) was associated with localized tibial articular cartilage loss over a 1-year period using Osteoarthritis Initiative quantitative data. METHODS Five hundred seventy-eight participants from a previously established nested case-control study of people with radiographic knee OA with or without progression, based on radiographs and symptoms, had their knee range of extension measured at baseline and received magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 1 year. The tibial articular cartilage of the medial and lateral condyles was segmented into anterior, center, and posterior regions. We tested for associations between knee FC (defined as lack of extension to 0°), and localized changes in tibial articular cartilage thickness or percent of denuded bone (0 mm thickness) after 1 year relative to baseline using ANOVA, controlling for baseline MRI outcomes and clinical factors. RESULTS Knee FC was associated with denuded bone in the medial condyle center (β 0.44, 95% CI 0.02-0.86) and preserved cartilage thickness in the medial condyle posterior (β 0.01, 95% CI 0.002-0.03) regions. CONCLUSION Knee FC unloading the tibial center region and loading the posterior region was associated with localized articular cartilage loss centrally and preserved articular cartilage posteriorly. These findings are consistent with knee FC negatively affecting unloaded tibial articular cartilage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Mark Campbell
- T.M. Campbell, MD, MSc, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Elisabeth Bruyère Hospital, and Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Ottawa Hospital;
| | - Odette Laneuville
- O. Laneuville, PhD, Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and Department of Biology, University of Ottawa
| | - Guy Trudel
- G. Trudel, MD, MSc, Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fournier J, Trudel G, Feibel RJ, Uhthoff H, McGonagle D, Campbell TM. Asymmetric Flexion Contracture is Associated With Leg Length Inequality in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2023; 104:2067-2074. [PMID: 37209935 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether knee flexion contracture (FC) was associated with leg length inequality (LLI) and/or morbidity in knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN We accessed 2 databases: (1) the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort, including participants with, or at-risk of OA, and (2) the Ottawa Knee Osteoarthritis cross-sectional database (OKOA), including participants with primary advanced knee OA. Both included demographics, radiographic data, knee range of motion, leg length, pain, and function scales. SETTING Tertiary care academic rheumatology and orthopedic clinics. PARTICIPANTS Patients with or at-risk of primary OA. We included 881 OAI and 72 OKOA participants (N=953). INTERVENTION Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome tested the association between the difference in knee extensions of the OA and contralateral knees (the knee extension difference, or KExD) and LLI. This was evaluated using bivariate regression, followed by a multivariable linear regression model. RESULTS OAI participants had less severe knee OA [Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) score 1.9±1.3] vs OKOA (KL score 3.4±0.6). The KExD correlated with LLI for both databases (OAI: R=0.167; P≤.001; OKOA: R=0.339; P=.004). Multivariable regression showed an effect of KExD on LLI in both databases (OAI: β=0.37[0.18,0.57]; P<.001, OKOA: β=0.73[0.20,1.26]; P=.007). When broken down by subgroup, the OAI moderate-severe OA group showed a significant effect of KExD on LLI (β=0.60 [0.34,0.85]; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS OA-related loss of knee extension was associated with LLI for those with moderate-severe OA. Because LLI correlates with worse knee OA symptoms, discovering an FC should cue clinicians to evaluate for LLI, an easily-treatable finding that may help reduce OA-associated morbidity for those approaching the need for arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Fournier
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Guy Trudel
- Bone and Joint Lab, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Medicine, Division of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Robert J Feibel
- The Ottawa Hospital, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Hans Uhthoff
- Bone and Joint Lab, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Dennis McGonagle
- University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK
| | - T Mark Campbell
- Bone and Joint Lab, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Elisabeth Bruyère Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun JN, Shan YZ, Wu LX, Li N, Xu FH, Kong XR, Zhang B. Preoperative high-intensity strength training combined with balance training can improve early outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:692. [PMID: 37715204 PMCID: PMC10504716 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04197-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the effect of preoperative high-intensity strength training combined with balance training on the knee function of end-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS A prospective study was conducted on end-stage KOA patients awaiting TKA. The patients were divided into an experimental group and a control group according to whether they received a preoperative training intervention. The differences in knee flexor-extensor strength, knee range of motion (ROM), timed up and go (TUG) test result, stair ascend/descend test result, Knee Society score (KSS) and Berg balance scale (BBS) score were assessed in both groups at baseline (T1), before operation (T2), 3 months after operation (T3), and 1 year after operation (T4). RESULTS After high-intensity strength training and balance training, the knee flexor-extensor strength, TUG test result, stair ascend/descend test result, and KSS were all significantly improved at T2 in the experimental group over the control group. At T3, the knee ROM, knee flexor-extensor strength, TUG test result, BBS score, and KSS clinical and functional scores were all significantly superior in the experimental group. The experimental group enjoyed a superiority in KSS clinical and functional scores until T4. Group × time and between-group interactions were found in all assessment indicators in both groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Preoperative high-intensity strength training combined with balance training can enhance the knee flexor-extensor strength and balance of patients with end-stage KOA in the short term and help improve early outcomes after KOA. Trial registration ChiCTR2000032857, 2020-05-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Ning Sun
- Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group Suqian Hospital, Suqian, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Suqian hospital affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, China
| | - Yu-Zhou Shan
- Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group Suqian Hospital, Suqian, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Suqian hospital affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, China
| | - Li-Xia Wu
- Research Center, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group Suqian Hospital, Suqian, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Suqian hospital affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, China
| | - Fei-Hu Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group Suqian Hospital, Suqian, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Suqian hospital affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, China
| | - Xiang-Ru Kong
- Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group Suqian Hospital, Suqian, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Suqian hospital affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, China
| | - Bei Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group Suqian Hospital, Suqian, China.
- Department of Orthopedics, Suqian hospital affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Henriksen M, Christensen R, Kristensen LE, Bliddal H, Bartholdy C, Boesen M, Ellegaard K, Guldberg-Møller J, Hunter DJ, Altman R, Bandak E. Exercise and education vs intra-articular saline for knee osteoarthritis: a 1-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2023; 31:627-635. [PMID: 36657659 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the longer-term effect of the Good Life with osteoarthritis in Denmark (GLAD) exercise and education program relative to open-label placebo (OLP) on changes from baseline in core outcomes in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS In this 1-year follow-up of an open-label, randomized trial, patients with symptomatic and radiographically confirmed knee OA were monitored after being randomized to either the 8-week GLAD program or OLP given as 4 intra-articular saline injections over 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire (KOOS) pain subscale after 1 year in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary outcomes were the KOOS function and quality of life subscales, and Patients' Global Assessment of disease impact. RESULTS 206 adults were randomly assigned: 102 to GLAD and 104 to OLP, of which only 137 (63/74 GLAD/OLP) provided data at 1 year. At one year the mean changes in KOOS pain were 8.4 for GLAD and 7.0 for OLP (Difference: 1.5 points; 95% CI -2.6 to 5.5). There were no between-group differences in any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In this 1-year follow-up of individuals with knee OA, the 8-week GLAD program and OLP both provided minor longer-term benefits with no group difference. These results require confirmation given the significant loss to follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03843931.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Henriksen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Denmark.
| | - R Christensen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Denmark; Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - L E Kristensen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - H Bliddal
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - C Bartholdy
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - M Boesen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - K Ellegaard
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - J Guldberg-Møller
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - D J Hunter
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Australia; Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Altman
- Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - E Bandak
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Henriksen M, Nielsen SM, Christensen R, Kristensen LE, Bliddal H, Bartholdy C, Boesen M, Ellegaard K, Hunter DJ, Altman R, Bandak E. Who are likely to benefit from the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLAD) exercise and education program? An effect modifier analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2023; 31:106-114. [PMID: 36089229 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify contextual factors that modify the treatment effect of the 'Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark' (GLAD) exercise and education programme compared to open-label placebo (OLP) on knee pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS Secondary effect modifier analysis of a randomised controlled trial. 206 participants with symptomatic and radiographic knee OA were randomised to either the 8-week GLAD programme (n = 102) or OLP given as 4 intra-articular saline injections over 8 weeks (n = 104). The primary outcome was change from baseline to week 9 in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire (KOOS) pain subscale (range 0 (worst) to 100 (best)). Subgroups were created based on baseline information: BMI, swollen study knee, bilateral radiographic knee OA, sports participation as a young adult, sex, median age, a priori treatment preference, regular use of analgesics (NSAIDs or paracetamol), radiographic disease severity, and presence of constant or intermittent pain. RESULTS Participants who reported use of analgesics at baseline seem to benefit from the GLAD programme over OLP (subgroup contrast: 10.3 KOOS pain points (95% CI 3.0 to 17.6)). Participants with constant pain at baseline also seem to benefit from GLAD over OLP (subgroup contrast: 10.0 points (95% CI 2.8 to 17.2)). CONCLUSIONS These results imply that patients who take analgesics or report constant knee pain, GLAD seems to yield clinically relevant benefits on knee pain when compared to OLP. The results support a stratified recommendation of GLAD as management of knee OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03843931. EudraCT number 2019-000809-71.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Henriksen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Denmark.
| | - S M Nielsen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Denmark; Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - R Christensen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Denmark; Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - L E Kristensen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - H Bliddal
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - C Bartholdy
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - M Boesen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - K Ellegaard
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - D J Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Australia; Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Altman
- Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - E Bandak
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jansen NEJ, Schiphof D, Oei E, Bosmans J, van Teeffelen J, Feleus A, Runhaar J, van Meurs J, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, van Middelkoop M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a combined lifestyle intervention compared with usual care for patients with early-stage knee osteoarthritis who are overweight (LITE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059554. [PMID: 35246425 PMCID: PMC8900023 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Obesity is the most important modifiable risk factor for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Especially in an early stage of the disease, weight loss is important to prevent further clinical and structural progression. Since 2019, general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands can refer eligible patients to a combined lifestyle intervention (GLI) to promote physical activity, healthy nutrition and behavioural change. However, GPs scarcely refer patients with KOA to the GLI potentially due to a lack of evidence about the (cost-)effectiveness. The aim of this study is to determine the (cost-)effectiveness of the GLI for patients with early-stage KOA in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS For this pragmatic, multi-centre randomised controlled trial, 234 participants (aged 45-70 years) with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline diagnosis of clinical KOA and a body mass index above 25 kg/m2 will be recruited using a range of online and offline strategies and from general practices in the Netherlands. Participants will receive nine 3-monthly questionnaires. In addition, participants will be invited for a physical examination, MRI assessment and blood collection at baseline and at 24-month follow-up. After the baseline assessment, participants are randomised to receive either the 24-month GLI programme in addition to usual care or usual care only. Primary outcomes are self-reported knee pain over 24 months, structural progression on MRI at 24 months, weight loss at 24 months, as well as societal costs and Quality-Adjusted Life-Years over 24-month follow-up. Analyses will be performed following the intention-to-treat principle using linear mixed-effects regression models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained through the Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands (MEC-2020-0943). All participants will provide written informed consent. The results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at international conferences and among study participants and healthcare professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Netherlands Trial Registry (NL9355).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria E J Jansen
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dieuwke Schiphof
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Oei
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jolande van Teeffelen
- Dietician Practice in Primary Care, Diëtistenpraktijk HRC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anita Feleus
- Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos Runhaar
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce van Meurs
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kolaczko JG, Haase L, Kaufman M, Calcei J, Karns MR. Predictors of Occult Chondral Injury Sustained After a Primary Patellar Dislocation. Cureus 2022; 14:e22516. [PMID: 35345742 PMCID: PMC8949808 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Primary patellar dislocations can concomitantly involve osteochondral injuries for which prompt recognition is paramount for joint preservation. These injuries can be missed on radiographs, necessitating MRI examinations. In this study, we aimed to identify patient parameters that correlate with occult osteochondral injuries. Methods Patients were retrospectively identified between 2015 and 2020 through a chart review. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients diagnosed with a primary patellar dislocation with three radiographic views and an MRI of the injured knee. Demographic and radiographic data were evaluated. Results A total of 61 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant demographic differences between patients with osteochondral injuries and those without (p>0.05). Seven knees (88%) with an osteochondral lesion and 20 (38%) without had an effusion (p=0.02). There was no association in terms of ligamentous laxity (p=0.49), Caton-Deschamps index (CDI) (p=0.68), sulcus angle (SA) (p=0.68), congruence angle (CA) (p=0.56), and lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA) (p=0.25) between patients with and without an occult osteochondral injury. Conclusion Among the parameter examined, the presence of an effusion was the only one that correlated with the presence of occult osteochondral injury in our cohort.
Collapse
|
9
|
de Leeuw MJ, Oppewal A, Elbers RG, Knulst MWEJ, van Maurik MC, van Bruggen MC, Hilgenkamp TIM, Bindels PJE, Maes-Festen DAM. Healthy Ageing and Intellectual Disability study: summary of findings and the protocol for the 10-year follow-up study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053499. [PMID: 35193910 PMCID: PMC8867312 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Healthy Ageing and Intellectual Disability (HA-ID) study is a prospective multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands that started in 2008, including 1050 older adults (aged ≥50) with intellectual disabilities (ID). The study is designed to learn more about the health and health risks of this group as they age. Compared with the amount of research in the general population, epidemiological research into the health of older adults with ID is still in its infancy. Longitudinal data about the health of this vulnerable and relatively unhealthy group are needed so that policy and care can be prioritised and for guiding clinical decision making about screening, prevention and treatment to improve healthy ageing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This article presents a summary of the previous findings of the HA-ID study and describes the design of the 10-year follow-up in which a wide range of health data will be collected within five research themes: (1) cardiovascular disease; (2) physical activity, fitness and musculoskeletal disorders; (3) psychological problems and psychiatric disorders; (4) nutrition and nutritional state; and (5) frailty. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for the 10-year follow-up measurements of the HA-ID study has been obtained from the Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam (MEC-2019-0562). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This cohort study is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR number NL8564) and has been conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marleen J de Leeuw
- Department of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alyt Oppewal
- Department of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Roy G Elbers
- Department of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mireille W E J Knulst
- Department of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco C van Maurik
- Department of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marjoleine C van Bruggen
- Department of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thessa I M Hilgenkamp
- Department of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| | - Patrick J E Bindels
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dederieke A M Maes-Festen
- Department of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bandak E, Christensen R, Overgaard A, Kristensen LE, Ellegaard K, Guldberg-Møller J, Bartholdy C, Hunter DJ, Altman R, Bliddal H, Henriksen M. Exercise and education versus saline injections for knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 81:537-543. [PMID: 34844929 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of an exercise and education programme with open-label placebo given as intra-articular injections of inert saline on pain and function in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, we recruited adults aged ≥50 years with symptomatic and radiographically confirmed knee OA in Denmark. Participants were randomised 1:1 to undergo an 8-week exercise and education programme or four intra-articular saline injections over 8 weeks. Primary outcome was change from baseline to week 9 in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire pain subscale (range 0 (worst)-100 (best)). Prespecified equivalence margins of ±8 KOOS pain points were chosen for the demonstration of comparable efficacy. Key secondary outcomes were the KOOS function and quality of life subscales, and patients' global assessment of disease impact. RESULTS 206 adults were randomly assigned: 102 to exercise and education and 104 to intra-articular saline injections. For the primary outcome, the least squares mean changes in KOOS pain were 10.0 for exercise and education and 7.3 for saline injections (difference 2.7 points, 95% CI -0.6 to 6.0; test for equivalence p=0.0008). All group differences in the key secondary outcomes respected the predefined equivalence margins. Adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION In individuals with knee OA, an 8-week exercise and education programme provided efficacy for symptomatic and functional improvements equivalent to that of four open-label intra-articular saline injections over 8 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03843931.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Bandak
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Robin Christensen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Overgaard
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Erik Kristensen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karen Ellegaard
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Guldberg-Møller
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Bartholdy
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - David J Hunter
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Roy Altman
- Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Henning Bliddal
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marius Henriksen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Campbell TM, McGonagle D. Flexion contracture is a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis incidence, progression and earlier arthroplasty: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 64:101439. [PMID: 33065299 DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knee joint osteoarthritis (OA) is often accompanied by flexion contracture (FC), but the impact of FC on important outcomes across the spectrum of OA, such as the incidence, progression and need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), is not well established. OBJECTIVE We evaluated whether the presence and/or severity of knee FC were risk factors for worse OA clinical outcomes, radiographic incidence and progression as well as time to TKA. METHODS We evaluated longitudinal 9-year data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database for 3 sub-cohorts: at-risk of knee OA (n=3284), radiographically established knee OA (n=1390), and low-risk controls (n=122). We classified knee FC as none, mild, moderate or severe based on knee extension at enrolment. Knee OA outcomes were extracted from the database. RESULTS FC was present in 32.4% of knees. Participants with FC had increased knee OA incidence with joint space narrowing in the definition (corrected odds ratio 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.64]). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores for pain, stiffness and function were worse with than without FC at nearly all times (p<0.001). Effect estimates were significant for all 3 WOMAC sub-scales comparing FC to no FC (pain: 0.15 [95% CI 0.02-0.28], stiffness: 0.11 [0.05-0.18], function: 0.49 [0.05-0.93]). Individuals with knee FC had higher Kellgren and Lawrence grade (effect size 0.31 [95% CI 0.25-0.37]) and were more likely to undergo TKA (corrected odds ratio 1.37 [95% CI 1.10-1.71]) than those without FC. All outcomes were worse with increasing FC severity. CONCLUSION The presence of knee FC at enrolment was a risk factor for radiographic OA incidence including joint space narrowing, worse clinical outcomes, radiographic progression and the need for early TKA. Treatment of knee FC may represent an option across the OA spectrum. Further research is needed to evaluate the pathophysiology, joint structure alterations and longitudinal impact of treating FC in individuals with knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Mark Campbell
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Elisabeth Bruyère Hospital-Ottawa, 43 Bruyère St, K1N 5C8 Ontario, ON, Canada.
| | - Dennis McGonagle
- University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mahmoudian A, Lohmander LS, Jafari H, Luyten FP. Towards classification criteria for early-stage knee osteoarthritis: A population-based study to enrich for progressors. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 51:285-291. [PMID: 33433364 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To facilitate a greater likelihood of favorable response to new disease-modifying therapies, recruitment of patients at an earlier stage of their disease into clinical trials may be an attractive strategy. Hence, there is a need to develop widely accepted classification criteria for early-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). We have proposed a set of classification criteria for early-stage knee OA (2018 classification criteria) now being further refined. Here, we test the draft criteria for enrichment for clinical and structural progression. DESIGN Performance of the 2018 classification criteria for early stage knee OA was tested using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). The OAI comprises data of 4796 men and women aged 45-79 years with or at risk for knee OA at baseline. Based on the 2018 classification criteria, a knee with Kellgren & Lawrence (K&L) grade of 0-I, two out of four Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales equal or less than 85, and presence of at least one of joint line tenderness or crepitus, was considered as early-stage knee OA. Knees with K&L grade 0-I that did not fulfill the 2018 criteria, were considered as controls. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the criteria set for structural as well as clinical progression. We further explored the discriminatory capability of criteria by including the average KOOS4 score, and relevant clinical examination findings such as the presence of effusion and/or Heberden's nodes. RESULTS We identified 1315 (27%) knees from OAI fulfilling the 2018 early-stage knee OA classification criteria. The female to male ratio was higher in the early knee OA group compared to controls. The early-stage knee OA group were on average slightly younger and had higher body mass index vs controls (mean [SD] age: 59.2 [8.9] years vs. 60.2 [9.1] and mean [SD] BMI 28.3 [7.0] vs. 26.8 [6.0]). By applying the 2018 criteria, there was a substantial enrichment compared to controls at 48 and 96 months for both structural (OR=1.1-1.4, and AUC=0.72-0.74) and clinical progressors (OR=2.1-2.5, 95% and AUC=0.66). Expanding the clinical examination findings by including joint effusion and/or Heberden's nodes improved the enrichment for both structural and clinical progressors (OR=4.2, 95% confidence interval=3.2-5.5 and OR=3.3, 95% confidence interval=2.8-3.5, respectively). Replacing scoring of the 4 separate KOOS domains by a KOOS4 score performed comparably. CONCLUSIONS The proposed 2018 early-stage knee OA classification criteria showed encouraging performance characteristics with regard to an enrichment for structural and clinical progression using longitudinal OAI data. Our results indicate that the addition of clinical findings improves the performance of previous criteria to define early-stage disease and risk for progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - L Stefan Lohmander
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hassan Jafari
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychology Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - Frank P Luyten
- Department of Development & Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Campbell TM, Ramsay T, Trudel G. Knee Flexion Contractures Are Associated with Worse Pain, Stiffness, and Function in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. PM R 2020; 13:954-961. [DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T Mark Campbell
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Elisabeth Bruyère Hospital Ottawa ON Canada
| | - Tim Ramsay
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa ON Canada
| | - Guy Trudel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine The Ottawa Hospital Ottawa ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Webster KE, Karlsson J, Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, Meredith SJ, Rauer T, Irrgang JJ, Spindler KP, Ma CB, Musahl V. Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group. J ISAKOS 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
15
|
Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Webster KE, Karlsson J, Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, Meredith SJ, Rauer T, Irrgang JJ, Spindler KP, Ma CB, Musahl V, The Panther Symposium Acl Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group, Fu FH, Ayeni OR, Della Villa F, Della Villa S, Dye S, Ferretti M, Getgood A, Järvelä T, Kaeding CC, Kuroda R, Lesniak B, Marx RG, Maletis GB, Pinczewski L, Ranawat A, Reider B, Seil R, van Eck C, Wolf BR, Yung P, Zaffagnini S, Hao Zheng M. Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8:2325967120934751. [PMID: 32754624 PMCID: PMC7378729 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120934751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect of establishing evidence-based
clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. To
establish a standardized assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a
consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at
the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, in
June 2019. The aim was to establish a consensus on what data should be reported
when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should
be used, and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed. The group
reached consensus on 9 statements by using a modified Delphi method. In general,
outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into 4 robust categories: early
adverse events, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), ACL graft failure/recurrent
ligament disruption, and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A
comprehensive assessment after ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete
overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of
outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years
with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive
assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained reinjuries,
validated knee-specific PROs, and health-related quality of life questionnaires.
In the midterm to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be
evaluated. This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the
aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the
preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL
treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonor Svantesson
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eric Hamrin Senorski
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kate E Webster
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jón Karlsson
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Theresa Diermeier
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Benjamin B Rothrauff
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sean J Meredith
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas Rauer
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James J Irrgang
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Volker Musahl
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Freddie H Fu
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olufemi R Ayeni
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Francesco Della Villa
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Stefano Della Villa
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Scott Dye
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mario Ferretti
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alan Getgood
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Timo Järvelä
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher C Kaeding
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ryosuke Kuroda
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bryson Lesniak
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gregory B Maletis
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leo Pinczewski
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anil Ranawat
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bruce Reider
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Romain Seil
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carola van Eck
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Patrick Yung
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Stefano Zaffagnini
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ming Hao Zheng
- Investigation performed at UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maricar N, Parkes MJ, Callaghan MJ, Felson DT, O'Neill TW. Do Clinical Correlates of Knee Osteoarthritis Predict Outcome of Intraarticular Steroid Injections? J Rheumatol 2020; 47:431-440. [PMID: 30936283 PMCID: PMC10563584 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether clinical correlates of knee osteoarthritis (OA) affect the outcome of intraarticular steroid injections (IASI) in symptomatic knee OA. METHODS Men and women aged ≥ 40 years with painful knee OA who participated in an open-label trial of IASI completed questionnaires and clinical examination. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) criteria were used to assess response to therapy in the short term (within 2 weeks). Among those who initially responded, those whose pain had not returned to within 20% of the baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain score at 6 months were characterized as longer-term responders. Log-binomial regression was used to examine factors associated with outcome. RESULTS One hundred ninety-nine participants were included, of whom 146 (73.4%) were short-term and 40 (20.1%) longer-term responders. Compared to short-term nonresponders, participants with these characteristics were more likely to be short-term responders: medial joint line tenderness [relative risk (RR) 1.42, 95% CI 1.10-1.82], medial and lateral joint line tenderness (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03-1.84), patellofemoral tenderness (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.55), anserine tenderness (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06-1.52), and a belief that treatment would be effective [RR/unit increase (range 0-10) = 1.05 (1.01-1.09)]. Aspiration of joint fluid (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.95) and previous ligament/meniscus injury (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.91) were associated with a reduced risk of being a short-term responder. Compared to initial nonresponders and those whose pain recurred within 6 months, participants with a higher number of pain sites [RR/unit increase (range 0-10) = 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.97], chronic widespread pain (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10-0.98), perceived chronicity of disease [RR/unit increase (range 0-10) = 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.94], and a higher depression score [RR/unit increase (range 0-21) = 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.99] were less likely to be longer-term responders. CONCLUSION Among patients with symptomatic knee OA, tenderness around the knee was associated with better short-term outcome of IASI. However, clinical-related factors did not predict longer-term response, while those with chronic widespread pain and depressive symptoms were less likely to obtain longer-term benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasimah Maricar
- From the Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; Department of Physiotherapy, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University; Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
- N. Maricar, PhD, MSc, BSc(Hons), Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Physiotherapy, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; M.J. Parkes, BSc(Hons), Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; M.J. Callaghan, Dip. in Physiotherapy, M.Phil, PhD, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University; D.T. Felson, AB, MD, MPH, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine; T.W. O'Neill, MD, MSc, FRCP(I), FFPH, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust.
| | - Matthew J Parkes
- From the Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; Department of Physiotherapy, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University; Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- N. Maricar, PhD, MSc, BSc(Hons), Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Physiotherapy, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; M.J. Parkes, BSc(Hons), Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; M.J. Callaghan, Dip. in Physiotherapy, M.Phil, PhD, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University; D.T. Felson, AB, MD, MPH, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine; T.W. O'Neill, MD, MSc, FRCP(I), FFPH, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Michael J Callaghan
- From the Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; Department of Physiotherapy, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University; Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- N. Maricar, PhD, MSc, BSc(Hons), Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Physiotherapy, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; M.J. Parkes, BSc(Hons), Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; M.J. Callaghan, Dip. in Physiotherapy, M.Phil, PhD, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University; D.T. Felson, AB, MD, MPH, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine; T.W. O'Neill, MD, MSc, FRCP(I), FFPH, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
| | - David T Felson
- From the Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; Department of Physiotherapy, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University; Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- N. Maricar, PhD, MSc, BSc(Hons), Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Physiotherapy, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; M.J. Parkes, BSc(Hons), Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; M.J. Callaghan, Dip. in Physiotherapy, M.Phil, PhD, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University; D.T. Felson, AB, MD, MPH, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine; T.W. O'Neill, MD, MSc, FRCP(I), FFPH, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Terence W O'Neill
- From the Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; Department of Physiotherapy, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University; Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- N. Maricar, PhD, MSc, BSc(Hons), Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Physiotherapy, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; M.J. Parkes, BSc(Hons), Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; M.J. Callaghan, Dip. in Physiotherapy, M.Phil, PhD, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University; D.T. Felson, AB, MD, MPH, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine; T.W. O'Neill, MD, MSc, FRCP(I), FFPH, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28:2415-2434. [PMID: 32767052 PMCID: PMC7429530 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06061-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect for establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. The aim of this consensus statement was to establish what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed. METHODS To establish a standardized approach to assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA; USA, in June 2019. The group reached consensus on nine statements by using a modified Delphi method. RESULTS In general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into four robust categories-early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment following ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained re-injuries, validated knee-specific PROs and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires. In the mid- to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated. CONCLUSION This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V.
Collapse
|
18
|
Wu YR, Kuang GY, Lu FG, Wang HX, Lu M, Zhou Q. Pathological Relationship between Intestinal Flora and Osteoarthritis and Intervention Mechanism of Chinese Medicine. Chin J Integr Med 2019; 25:716-720. [PMID: 31650488 DOI: 10.1007/s11655-019-3224-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Chinese medicine (CM) has a good clinical effect on osteoarthritis (OA), but the mechanism is not very clear. Evidence-based medicine researches have shown that intestinal flora plays a role in the pathogenesis and succession of OA. Intestinal flora affects the efficacy of CM, and CM can affect the balance of intestinal flora. This paper focuses on the relationship between intestinal flora, intestinal microenvironment, brain-gut axis, metabolic immunity and OA, and preliminarily expound the significance of intestinal flora in the pathogenesis of OA and the mechanism of CM intervention. The above discussion will be of great significance in the prevention and treatment of OA by CM from the perspective of intestinal flora.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Rong Wu
- TAN Xin-hua Famous Medical Studio, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410007, China
| | - Gao-Yan Kuang
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410007, China
| | - Fang-Guo Lu
- Department of Medical College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China
| | - Heng-Xin Wang
- Hinye Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Changsha, 410331, China
| | - Min Lu
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410007, China
| | - Qing Zhou
- TAN Xin-hua Famous Medical Studio, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410007, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cibere J, Guermazi A, Nicolaou S, Esdaile JM, Thorne A, Singer J, Wong H, Kopec JA, Sayre EC. Association of Knee Effusion Detected by Physical Examination With Bone Marrow Lesions: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses of a Population-Based Cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 71:39-45. [PMID: 29648685 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the association of effusion detected by physical examination with the prevalence of bone marrow lesions (BMLs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the incidence/progression of BMLs over 3 years in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS A population-based cohort with knee pain (n = 255) was assessed for effusion on physical examination. On MRI, BMLs were graded 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, severe), and incidence/progression was defined as a worsening of the sum of BML scores over 6 surfaces by ≥1 grade. We analyzed the full cohort and a mild disease subsample with a Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade <3. Cross-sectional logistic and longitudinal exponential regression analyses were performed, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and pain. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for effusion detected by physical examination versus BMLs (prevalence and incidence/progression). RESULTS The weighted mean age was 56.7 years, the mean BMI was 26.5, 56.3% were women, 20.1% had effusion on physical examination, and 80.7% had a K/L grade <3. Effusion on physical examination was significantly associated with prevalent BMLs in the full cohort (odds ratio [OR] 6.10 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.77-13.44]) and in the K/L grade <3 cohort (OR 6.88 [95% CI 2.76-17.15]). In the full cohort, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 34.6, 92.5, 79.9, and 62.1%, respectively, and in the K/L <3 cohort 31.7, 94.0, 75.5, and 70.1%, respectively. Longitudinally, effusion on physical examination was not significantly associated with BML incidence/progression in the full cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83 [95% CI 0.95-3.52]) or in the K/L grade <3 cohort (HR 1.73 [95% CI 0.69-4.33]). In the two cohorts, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 32.0, 82.2, 42.2, and 74.9%, respectively, and 21.2, 85.6, 30.1, and 78.8% respectively. CONCLUSION BMLs on MRI can be predicted from physical examination effusion cross-sectionally, with a high PPV of 79.9%. Assessment for knee effusion on physical examination is useful for determining potential candidates with BMLs before costly MRI screening for recruitment into clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolanda Cibere
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ali Guermazi
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Savvas Nicolaou
- the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - John M Esdaile
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, and the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anona Thorne
- the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joel Singer
- the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hubert Wong
- the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jacek A Kopec
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eric C Sayre
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
The classification and monitoring of individuals with early knee osteoarthritis (OA) are important considerations for the design and evaluation of therapeutic interventions and require the identification of appropriate outcome measures. Potential outcome domains to assess for early OA include patient-reported outcomes (such as pain, function and quality of life), features of clinical examination (such as joint line tenderness and crepitus), objective measures of physical function, levels of physical activity, features of imaging modalities (such as of magnetic resonance imaging) and biochemical markers in body fluid. Patient characteristics such as adiposity and biomechanics of the knee could also have relevance to the assessment of early OA. Importantly, research is needed to enable the selection of outcome measures that are feasible, reliable and validated in individuals at risk of knee OA or with early knee OA. In this Perspectives article, potential outcome measures for early symptomatic knee OA are discussed, including those measures that could be of use in clinical practice and/or the research setting.
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang Y, Teichtahl AJ, Wluka AE, Pelletier JP, Abram F, Martel-Pelletier J, Cicuttini FM. Associations of Joint Line Tenderness and Patellofemoral Grind With Long-Term Knee Joint Outcomes: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 72:778-786. [PMID: 31008553 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine whether joint line tenderness and patellofemoral grind from physical examination were associated with cartilage volume loss, worsening of radiographic osteoarthritis, and the risk of total knee replacement. METHODS This study examined 4,353 Osteoarthritis Initiative participants. For each measurement of joint line tenderness and patellofemoral grind, the patterns were defined as no (none at baseline and at 1 year), fluctuating (present at either time point), and persistent (present at both time points). Cartilage volume loss and worsening of radiographic osteoarthritis over 4 years were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging and radiographs, and total knee replacement over 6 years was assessed. RESULTS A total of 35.0% of participants had joint line tenderness, and 15.8% had patellofemoral grind. Baseline patellofemoral grind, but not joint line tenderness, was associated with increased cartilage volume loss (1.08% per year versus 0.96% per year; P = 0.02) and an increased risk of total knee replacement (odds ratio [OR] 1.55 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.11-2.17]; P = 0.01). While the patterns of joint line tenderness were not significantly associated with joint outcomes, participants with persistent patellofemoral grind had an increased rate of cartilage volume loss (1.30% per year versus 0.90% per year; P < 0.001) and an increased risk of total knee replacement (OR 2.10 [95% CI 1.30-3.38]; P = 0.002) compared with those participants without patellofemoral grind. CONCLUSION Patellofemoral grind, but not joint line tenderness, may represent a clinical marker associated with accelerated cartilage volume loss over 4 years and an increased risk of total knee replacement over 6 years. This simple clinical examination may provide clinicians with an inexpensive way to identify those at higher risk of disease progression who should be targeted for surveillance and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanyuan Wang
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew J Teichtahl
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anita E Wluka
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Flavia M Cicuttini
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Magnetic resonance imaging of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: intertester reliability and associations with knee pain and function. Clin Rheumatol 2019; 38:1469-1476. [PMID: 30617597 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-04414-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Revised: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We examined the intertester reliability of patellofemoral compartment (PFC) osteoarthritis (OA) severity using magnetic resonance images (MRI) and a modified Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) system. Second, we determined if these grades were associated with clinical tests of PFC involvement or self-reported pain/difficulty with stair climbing. Third, we assessed the association between PFC OA severity and knee pain or disability, after accounting for potential confounders including tibiofemoral OA severity. METHOD We examined the 9-year Osteoarthritis Initiative data from 114 subjects in the year prior to undergoing knee arthroplasty. The weighted kappa (κw) was used to determine intertester reliability, and the Pearson chi-square was used to assess associations among PFC OA scores and clinical tests. Multiple regressions were used to determine independent associations between self-reported pain/function and PFC OA. RESULTS Reliability was substantial (κw = 0.73 (SE = 0.05)). Chi-square associations between PFC OA severity and clinical tests were not significant (p > 0.05). Multiple regression models between PFC OA and self-reported pain or function scores were not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS MRI-based measures of PFC OA were highly reliable indicating that musculoskeletal radiologists can reliably grade the PFCs of subjects using MRI. The extent of PFC OA is not associated with either clinical tests of PFC involvement or activities associated with PFC pain in persons with moderate to severe symptomatic tibiofemoral and PFC OA.
Collapse
|
23
|
Berlinberg A, Ashbeck EL, Roemer FW, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ, Westra J, Trost J, Kwoh CK. Diagnostic performance of knee physical exam and participant-reported symptoms for MRI-detected effusion-synovitis among participants with early or late stage knee osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2019; 27:80-89. [PMID: 30244165 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate the diagnostic performance of knee physical exam findings and participant-reported symptoms for MRI-detected effusion-synovitis (ES) among knees with early and late-stage osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) is a longitudinal study of participants with or at risk for knee OA. Two samples with MRI readings were available: 344 knees with early OA (312 participants) and 216 with late-stage OA (186 participants). Trained examiners performed bulge sign (BS) and patellar tap (PT) exams, and participants reported on knee swelling and pain with leg straightening. Effusion-synovitis on 3T non-contrast MRI was scored using the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS). Diagnostic performance of physical exam findings and symptoms was estimated with bootstrapped confidence intervals. RESULTS For the early OA sample, the highest sensitivity for medium/large effusion-synovitis was achieved with a positive finding for any of the physical exam maneuvers and/or participant-reported symptoms (81.0 [95% CI: 70.0, 91.3]). Both knee symptoms in combination had a prevalence of 11.7% and yielded the highest estimated positive predictive value (PPV) (50.0 [95% CI: 34.2, 66.7]) and likelihood ratio positive (LR+) (5.2 [95% CI: 2.9, 9.7]). In late-stage OA knees, exam findings and symptoms provided minimal information beyond the prevalence. CONCLUSION Patient report of both symptoms, or at least one positive exam finding and at least one symptom, could be used to identify knees at increased risk of effusion-synovitis in knees with early stage OA, either for screening purposes in clinical evaluation, or for study sample enrichment with an inflammatory phenotype; diagnostic performance was not sufficiently high for clinical diagnostic purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Berlinberg
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - E L Ashbeck
- Arizona Arthritis Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - F W Roemer
- Department of Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Quantitative Imaging Center (QIC), Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A Guermazi
- Quantitative Imaging Center (QIC), Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - D J Hunter
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J Westra
- Arizona Arthritis Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - J Trost
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - C K Kwoh
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Arizona Arthritis Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Performance of distinct knee osteoarthritis classification criteria in the ELSA-Brasil musculoskeletal study. Clin Rheumatol 2018; 38:793-802. [PMID: 30382545 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-4347-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of different knee osteoarthritis (OA) classification criteria in a subsample of subjects of ELSA-Brasil Musculoskeletal cohort (ELSA-Brasil MSK) in comparison with the clinical-radiographic evaluation of an experienced rheumatologist. METHOD A cross-sectional study of the diagnostic accuracy of different knee OA classification criteria: radiographic OA, symptomatic OA, clinical and clinical-radiographic criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), and the definition proposed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), UK. The study also evaluated some alternative definitions of OA including a combination of criteria. In total, 250 subjects participated. Only one knee per subject was included. When both or none of the knees were affected, one knee was randomly selected for analysis. OA prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were presented (CI 95%; α = 5%). RESULTS The mean age was 56.1 years (SD = 8.7), 48.8% female, and 39.2% presented knee OA according to the rheumatologist. The sensitivity and the specificity of radiographic OA were 51% and 96.7%, respectively, while the NICE definition showed 57.0% and 76.3%, respectively. The other OA criteria showed good levels of specificity, but the levels of sensitivity were below 30%. Considering NICE and/or X-ray result in combination, the sensitivity increased (73.4%), while the specificity reduced slightly (73.0%) in relation to the original NICE definition. CONCLUSIONS Radiographic OA showed the best performance, followed by NICE definition, especially in combination with X-ray results.
Collapse
|
25
|
Parsons C, Fuggle NR, Edwards MH, Goulston L, Litwic AE, Jagannath D, van der Pas S, Cooper C, Dennison EM. Concordance between clinical and radiographic evaluations of knee osteoarthritis. Aging Clin Exp Res 2018; 30:17-25. [PMID: 29101670 PMCID: PMC5785611 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-017-0847-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant correlation has been previously demonstrated between radiographic and clinical diagnoses of knee osteoarthritis (OA); however, the specific findings on clinical examination that relate best to a radiographic diagnosis have not been fully elicited. AIMS We aimed to explore the relationship between clinical symptoms and physical findings with radiographic diagnoses of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA. METHODS This study was based on 409 individuals from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, born between 1931 and 1939. Antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken of both knees. The presence of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA was defined according to the Kellgren and Lawrence score. Clinical symptoms, assessed using WOMAC, and physical findings were ascertained by examination. Relationships were assessed using multilevel univariate logistic regression. RESULTS In the 775 knees studied, the prevalence of physical findings was crepitus (25%), tibiofemoral tenderness (15%), bony swelling (12%), and pain on flexion (10%). Thirty-one percent (n = 238) knees demonstrated tibiofemoral OA, 28% (n = 220) showed patellofemoral OA, and 16% demonstrated OA in both locations. A global clinical symptom score was associated with increased risk of tibiofemoral OA (OR 12.5, 95% CI 5.4-29.0) and patellofemoral OA (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.3-13.1). On clinical examination, the presence of crepitus, tibiofemoral tenderness, bony swelling, and pain on flexion was associated with increased risk of tibiofemoral OA; however, only tenderness was found to be associated with patellofemoral OA. CONCLUSION Global clinical symptom score was associated with radiographic tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA. However, individual clinical signs were more strongly associated with tibiofemoral than patellofemoral OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Parsons
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Nicholas R Fuggle
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Mark H Edwards
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Lyndsey Goulston
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Anna E Litwic
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Darshan Jagannath
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Suzan van der Pas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
| | - Elaine M Dennison
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Décary S, Fallaha M, Frémont P, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP, Feldman DE, Sylvestre MP, Vendittoli PA, Desmeules F. Diagnostic Validity of Combining History Elements and Physical Examination Tests for Traumatic and Degenerative Symptomatic Meniscal Tears. PM R 2017; 10:472-482. [PMID: 29111463 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2017] [Revised: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current approach to the clinical diagnosis of traumatic and degenerative symptomatic meniscal tears (SMTs) proposes combining history elements and physical examination tests without systematic prescription of imaging investigations, yet the evidence to support this diagnostic approach is scarce. OBJECTIVE To assess the validity of diagnostic clusters combining history elements and physical examination tests to diagnose or exclude traumatic and degenerative SMT compared with other knee disorders. DESIGN Prospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTINGS Patients were recruited from 2 orthopedic clinics, 2 family medicine clinics, and from a university community. PATIENTS A total of 279 consecutive patients who underwent consultation for a new knee complaint. METHODS Each patient was assessed independently by 2 evaluators. History elements and standardized physical examination tests performed by a physiotherapist were compared with the reference standard: an expert physicians' composite diagnosis including a clinical examination and confirmatory magnetic resonance imaging. Participating expert physicians were orthopedic surgeons (n = 3) or sport medicine physicians (n = 2). Penalized logistic regression (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) was used to identify history elements and physical examination tests associated with the diagnosis of SMT and recursive partitioning was used to develop diagnostic clusters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+/-) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Eighty patients had a diagnosis of SMT (28.7%), including 35 traumatic tears and 45 degenerative tears. The combination a history of trauma during a pivot, medial knee pain location, and a positive medial joint line tenderness test was able to diagnose (LR+ = 8.9; 95% CI 6.1-13.1) or exclude (LR- = 0.10; 95% CI 0.03-0.28) a traumatic SMT. Combining a history of progressive onset of pain, medial knee pain location, pain while pivoting, absence of valgus or varus knee misalignment, or full passive knee flexion was able to moderately diagnose (LR+ = 6.4; 95% CI 4.0-10.4) or exclude (LR- = 0.10; 95% CI 0.03-0.31) a degenerative SMT. Internal validation estimates were slightly lower for all clusters but demonstrated positive LR superior to 5 and negative LR inferior to 0.2 indicating moderate shift in posttest probability. CONCLUSION Diagnostic clusters combining history elements and physical examination tests can support the differential diagnosis of SMT. These results represent the initial derivation of the clusters and external validation is mandatory. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Décary
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Social Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michel Fallaha
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Social Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre Frémont
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Social Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Johanne Martel-Pelletier
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Social Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Pierre Pelletier
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Social Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Debbie E Feldman
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Social Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Pierre Sylvestre
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Social Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pascal-André Vendittoli
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Social Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Desmeules
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; and Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Social Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec; and Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|