1
|
Castenmiller C, Nagy NA, Kroon PZ, Auger L, Desgagnés R, Martel C, Mirande L, Morel B, Roberge J, Stordeur V, Tropper G, Vézina LP, van Ree R, Gomord V, de Jong EC. A novel peanut allergy immunotherapy: Plant-based enveloped Ara h 2 Bioparticles activate dendritic cells and polarize T cell responses to Th1. World Allergy Organ J 2023; 16:100839. [PMID: 38020282 PMCID: PMC10679945 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction As the only market-authorized allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for peanut allergy is accompanied by a high risk of side effects and mainly induces robust desensitization without sustained efficacy, novel treatment options are required. Peanut-specific plant-derived eBioparticles (eBPs) surface expressing Ara h 2 at high density have been shown to be very hypoallergenic. Here, we assessed the dendritic cell (DC)-activating and T cell polarization capacity of these peanut-specific eBPs. Methods Route and kinetics of eBP uptake were studied by (imaging) flow cytometry using monocyte-derived DCs incubated with fluorescently-labelled Ara h 2 eBPs or natural Ara h 2 (nAra h 2) in the presence or absence of inhibitors that block pathways involved in macropinocytosis, phagocytosis, and/or receptor-mediated uptake. DC activation was monitored by flow cytometry (maturation marker expression) and ELISA (cytokine production). T cell polarization was assessed by co-culturing DCs exposed to Ara h 2 eBPs or nAra h 2 with naïve CD4+ T cells, followed by flow cytometry assessment of intracellular IFNγ+ (Th1) and IL-13+ (Th2), and CD25+CD127-Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). The suppressive activity of Tregs was tested using a suppressor assay. Results Ara h 2 eBPs were taken up by DCs through actin-dependent pathways. They activated DCs demonstrated by an induced expression of CD83 and CD86, and production of TNFα, IL-6, and IL-10. eBP-treated DCs polarized naïve CD4+ T cells towards Th1 cells, while reducing Th2 cell development. Furthermore, eBP-treated DCs induced reduced the frequency of Foxp3+ Tregs but did not significantly affect T cell IL-10 production or T cells with suppressive capacity. In contrast, DC activation and Th1 cell polarization were not observed for nAra h 2. Conclusion Ara h 2 eBPs activate DCs that subsequently promote Th1 cell polarization and reduce Th2 cell polarization. These characteristics mark Ara h 2 eBPs as a promising novel candidate for peanut AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Castenmiller
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Noémi Anna Nagy
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pascal Zion Kroon
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ronald van Ree
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Esther Christina de Jong
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the literature pertaining to the use of MicroCrystalline Tyrosine (MCT) in the immunotherapy with an emphasis on recent developments. RECENT FINDINGS In addition to significant effectiveness and safety profiles, additional aspects of interest such as booster immunotherapy concepts, sustained clinical effects, long-term efficacy and disease-modifying effects are being focused on in the recently published studies. The depot adjuvant MCT also shows potential in promising disease-challenge models such as for malaria and melanoma. SUMMARY MCT-adsorbed immunotherapy products have been shown to provide convincing overall safety, tolerability and efficacy outcomes, as well in vulnerable groups such as children and asthmatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helal Al Saleh
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria
| | - Ralph Mösges
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gerth van Wijk R, Dahl R. Pros and cons: Should allergen immunotherapy be considered in all patients with allergic asthma? Allergy 2022; 77:1070-1072. [PMID: 34608654 DOI: 10.1111/all.15123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roy Gerth van Wijk
- Section of Allergology and Clinical Immunology Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Allergen Immunotherapy: Current and Future Trends. Cells 2022; 11:cells11020212. [PMID: 35053328 PMCID: PMC8774202 DOI: 10.3390/cells11020212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the sole disease-modifying treatment for allergic rhinitis; it prevents rhinitis from progressing to asthma and lowers medication use. AIT against mites, insect venom, and certain kinds of pollen is effective. The mechanism of action of AIT is based on inducing immunological tolerance characterized by increased IL-10, TGF-β, and IgG4 levels and Treg cell counts. However, AIT requires prolonged schemes of administration and is sometimes associated with adverse reactions. Over the last decade, novel forms of AIT have been developed, focused on better allergen identification, structural modifications to preserve epitopes for B or T cells, post-traductional alteration through chemical processes, and the addition of adjuvants. These modified allergens induce clinical-immunological effects similar to those mentioned above, increasing the tolerance to other related allergens but with fewer side effects. Clinical studies have shown that molecular AIT is efficient in treating grass and birch allergies. This article reviews the possibility of a new AIT to improve the treatment of allergic illness.
Collapse
|
5
|
León B, Ballesteros-Tato A. Modulating Th2 Cell Immunity for the Treatment of Asthma. Front Immunol 2021; 12:637948. [PMID: 33643321 PMCID: PMC7902894 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.637948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
It is estimated that more than 339 million people worldwide suffer from asthma. The leading cause of asthma development is the breakdown of immune tolerance to inhaled allergens, prompting the immune system's aberrant activation. During the early phase, also known as the sensitization phase, allergen-specific T cells are activated and become central players in orchestrating the subsequent development of allergic asthma following secondary exposure to the same allergens. It is well-established that allergen-specific T helper 2 (Th2) cells play central roles in developing allergic asthma. As such, 80% of children and 60% of adult asthma cases are linked to an unwarranted Th2 cell response against respiratory allergens. Thus, targeting essential components of Th2-type inflammation using neutralizing antibodies against key Th2 modulators has recently become an attractive option for asthmatic patients with moderate to severe symptoms. In addition to directly targeting Th2 mediators, allergen immunotherapy, also known as desensitization, is focused on redirecting the allergen-specific T cells response from a Th2-type profile to a tolerogenic one. This review highlights the current understanding of the heterogeneity of the Th2 cell compartment, their contribution to allergen-induced airway inflammation, and the therapies targeting the Th2 cell pathway in asthma. Further, we discuss available new leads for successful targeting pulmonary Th2 cell responses for future therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz León
- Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Andre Ballesteros-Tato
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dorofeeva Y, Shilovskiy I, Tulaeva I, Focke‐Tejkl M, Flicker S, Kudlay D, Khaitov M, Karsonova A, Riabova K, Karaulov A, Khanferyan R, Pickl WF, Wekerle T, Valenta R. Past, present, and future of allergen immunotherapy vaccines. Allergy 2021; 76:131-149. [PMID: 32249442 PMCID: PMC7818275 DOI: 10.1111/all.14300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is an allergen-specific form of treatment for patients suffering from immunoglobulin E (IgE)-associated allergy; the most common and important immunologically mediated hypersensitivity disease. AIT is based on the administration of the disease-causing allergen with the goal to induce a protective immunity consisting of allergen-specific blocking IgG antibodies and alterations of the cellular immune response so that the patient can tolerate allergen contact. Major advantages of AIT over all other existing treatments for allergy are that AIT induces a long-lasting protection and prevents the progression of disease to severe manifestations. AIT is cost effective because it uses the patient´s own immune system for protection and potentially can be used as a preventive treatment. However, broad application of AIT is limited by mainly technical issues such as the quality of allergen preparations and the risk of inducing side effects which results in extremely cumbersome treatment schedules reducing patient´s compliance. In this article we review progress in AIT made from its beginning and provide an overview of the state of the art, the needs for further development, and possible technical solutions available through molecular allergology. Finally, we consider visions for AIT development towards prophylactic application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulia Dorofeeva
- Division of ImmunopathologyDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Igor Shilovskiy
- National Research Center, Institute of immunology, FMBA of RussiaMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Inna Tulaeva
- Division of ImmunopathologyDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of Clinical Immunology and AllergyLaboratory of ImmunopathologySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Margarete Focke‐Tejkl
- Division of ImmunopathologyDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Sabine Flicker
- Division of ImmunopathologyDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Dmitriy Kudlay
- National Research Center, Institute of immunology, FMBA of RussiaMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Musa Khaitov
- National Research Center, Institute of immunology, FMBA of RussiaMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Antonina Karsonova
- Department of Clinical Immunology and AllergyLaboratory of ImmunopathologySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Ksenja Riabova
- Department of Clinical Immunology and AllergyLaboratory of ImmunopathologySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Alexander Karaulov
- Department of Clinical Immunology and AllergyLaboratory of ImmunopathologySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Roman Khanferyan
- Department of Immunology and AllergyRussian People’s Friendship UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Winfried F. Pickl
- Institute of ImmunologyCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Thomas Wekerle
- Section of Transplantation ImmunologyDepartment of SurgeryMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Rudolf Valenta
- Division of ImmunopathologyDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- National Research Center, Institute of immunology, FMBA of RussiaMoscowRussian Federation
- Department of Clinical Immunology and AllergyLaboratory of ImmunopathologySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kirtland ME, Tsitoura DC, Durham SR, Shamji MH. Toll-Like Receptor Agonists as Adjuvants for Allergen Immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2020; 11:599083. [PMID: 33281825 PMCID: PMC7688745 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.599083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are essential components of innate immunity and provide defensive inflammatory responses to invading pathogens. Located within the plasma membranes of cells and also intracellular endosomes, TLRs can detect a range of pathogen associated molecular patterns from bacteria, viruses and fungi. TLR activation on dendritic cells can propagate to an adaptive immune response, making them attractive targets for the development of both prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines. In contrast to conventional adjuvants such as aluminium salts, TLR agonists have a clear immunomodulatory profile that favours anti-allergic T lymphocyte responses. Consequently, the potential use of TLRs as adjuvants in Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) for allergic rhinitis and asthma remains of great interest. Allergic Rhinitis is a Th2-driven, IgE-mediated disease that occurs in atopic individuals in response to exposure to otherwise harmless aeroallergens such as pollens, house dust mite and animal dander. AIT is indicated in subjects with allergic rhinitis whose symptoms are inadequately controlled by antihistamines and nasal corticosteroids. Unlike anti-allergic drugs, AIT is disease-modifying and may induce long-term disease remission through mechanisms involving upregulation of IgG and IgG4 antibodies, induction of regulatory T and B cells, and immune deviation in favour of Th1 responses that are maintained after treatment discontinuation. This process takes up to three years however, highlighting an unmet need for a more efficacious therapy with faster onset. Agonists targeting different TLRs to treat allergy are at different stages of development. Synthetic TLR4, and TLR9 agonists have progressed to clinical trials, while TLR2, TLR5 and TLR7 agonists been shown to have potent anti-allergic effects in human in vitro experiments and in vivo in animal studies. The anti-allergic properties of TLRs are broadly characterised by a combination of enhanced Th1 deviation, regulatory responses, and induction of blocking antibodies. While promising, a durable effect in larger clinical trials is yet to be observed and further long-term studies and comparative trials with conventional AIT are required before TLR adjuvants can be considered for inclusion in AIT. Here we critically evaluate experimental and clinical studies investigating TLRs and discuss their potential role in the future of AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max E Kirtland
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daphne C Tsitoura
- Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alvaro-Lozano M, Akdis CA, Akdis M, Alviani C, Angier E, Arasi S, Arzt-Gradwohl L, Barber D, Bazire R, Cavkaytar O, Comberiati P, Dramburg S, Durham SR, Eifan AO, Forchert L, Halken S, Kirtland M, Kucuksezer UC, Layhadi JA, Matricardi PM, Muraro A, Ozdemir C, Pajno GB, Pfaar O, Potapova E, Riggioni C, Roberts G, Rodríguez Del Río P, Shamji MH, Sturm GJ, Vazquez-Ortiz M. EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy User's Guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2020; 31 Suppl 25:1-101. [PMID: 32436290 PMCID: PMC7317851 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of allergic children. The clinical efficiency relies on a well-defined immunologic mechanism promoting regulatory T cells and downplaying the immune response induced by allergens. Clinical indications have been well documented for respiratory allergy in the presence of rhinitis and/or allergic asthma, to pollens and dust mites. Patients who have had an anaphylactic reaction to hymenoptera venom are also good candidates for allergen immunotherapy. Administration of allergen is currently mostly either by subcutaneous injections or by sublingual administration. Both methods have been extensively studied and have pros and cons. Specifically in children, the choice of the method of administration according to the patient's profile is important. Although allergen immunotherapy is widely used, there is a need for improvement. More particularly, biomarkers for prediction of the success of the treatments are needed. The strength and efficiency of the immune response may also be boosted by the use of better adjuvants. Finally, novel formulations might be more efficient and might improve the patient's adherence to the treatment. This user's guide reviews current knowledge and aims to provide clinical guidance to healthcare professionals taking care of children undergoing allergen immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland.,Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Mubeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Cherry Alviani
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight, UK.,Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Elisabeth Angier
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Pediatric Allergology Unit, Department of Pediatric Medicine, Bambino Gesù Children's research Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Lisa Arzt-Gradwohl
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Domingo Barber
- School of Medicine, Institute for Applied Molecular Medicine (IMMA), Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain.,RETIC ARADYAL RD16/0006/0015, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raphaëlle Bazire
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Niño Jesús, ARADyAL RD16/0006/0026, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ozlem Cavkaytar
- Department of Paediatric Allergy and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pasquale Comberiati
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Paediatrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,the MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - Aarif O Eifan
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Leandra Forchert
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Halken
- Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Max Kirtland
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Umut C Kucuksezer
- Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Immunology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Janice A Layhadi
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,the MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.,Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paolo Maria Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonella Muraro
- The Referral Centre for Food Allergy Diagnosis and Treatment Veneto Region, Department of Women and Child Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Cevdet Ozdemir
- Institute of Child Health, Department of Pediatric Basic Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ekaterina Potapova
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Riggioni
- Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Service, Institut de Reserca Sant Joan de Deú, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Graham Roberts
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Paediatric Allergy and Respiratory Medicine (MP803), Clinical & Experimental Sciences & Human Development in Health Academic Units University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine & University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,the MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - Gunter J Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jensen‐Jarolim E, Bachmann MF, Bonini S, Jacobsen L, Jutel M, Klimek L, Mahler V, Mösges R, Moingeon P, O´Hehir RE, Palomares O, Pfaar O, Renz H, Rhyner C, Roth‐Walter F, Rudenko M, Savolainen J, Schmidt‐Weber CB, Traidl‐Hoffmann C, Kündig T. State-of-the-art in marketed adjuvants and formulations in Allergen Immunotherapy: A position paper of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI). Allergy 2020; 75:746-760. [PMID: 31774179 DOI: 10.1111/all.14134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Since the introduction of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) over 100 years ago, focus has been on standardization of allergen extracts, with reliable molecular composition of allergens receiving the highest attention. While adjuvants play a major role in European AIT, they have been less well studied. In this Position Paper, we summarize current unmet needs of adjuvants in AIT citing current evidence. Four adjuvants are used in products marketed in Europe: aluminium hydroxide (Al(OH)3 ) is the most frequently used adjuvant, with microcrystalline tyrosine (MCT), monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) and calcium phosphate (CaP) used less frequently. Recent studies on humans, and using mouse models, have characterized in part the mechanisms of action of adjuvants on pre-existing immune responses. AIT differs from prophylactic vaccines that provoke immunity to infectious agents, as in allergy the patient is presensitized to the antigen. The intended mode of action of adjuvants is to simultaneously enhance the immunogenicity of the allergen, while precipitating the allergen at the injection site to reduce the risk of anaphylaxis. Contrasting immune effects are seen with different adjuvants. Aluminium hydroxide initially boosts Th2 responses, while the other adjuvants utilized in AIT redirect the Th2 immune response towards Th1 immunity. After varying lengths of time, each of the adjuvants supports tolerance. Further studies of the mechanisms of action of adjuvants may advise shorter treatment periods than the current three-to-five-year regimens, enhancing patient adherence. Improved lead compounds from the adjuvant pipeline are under development and are explored for their capacity to fill this unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Jensen‐Jarolim
- Institute of Pathophysiology & Allergy Research Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- The Interuniversity Messerli Research Institute University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna Medical University of Vienna University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Martin F. Bachmann
- Institute of Immunology Inselspital University of Berne Bern Switzerland
| | - Sergio Bonini
- Institute of Translational Pharmacology Italian National Research Council Rome Italy
| | - Lars Jacobsen
- ALC, Allergy Learning & Consulting Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology Wroclaw Medical University Wrocław Poland
- ALL‐MED Medical Research Institute Wroclaw Poland
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center of Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
| | - Vera Mahler
- Division of Allergology Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines Langen Germany
| | - Ralph Mösges
- CRI‐Clinical Research International Ltd Hamburg Germany
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics University of Cologne Cologne Germany
| | - Philippe Moingeon
- Center for Therapeutic Innovation – Immuno‐Inflammatory Disease Servier Suresnes France
| | - Robyn E. O´Hehir
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Research) Central Clinical School Monash University and Alfred Hospital Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Oscar Palomares
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Chemistry School Complutense University of Madrid Madrid Spain
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital MarburgPhilipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Harald Renz
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC) German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Philipps Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Claudio Rhyner
- SIAF – Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research Davos Switzerland
| | - Franziska Roth‐Walter
- The Interuniversity Messerli Research Institute University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna Medical University of Vienna University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | | | - Johannes Savolainen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Clinical Allergology University of Turku and Turku University Hospital Turku Finland
| | - Carsten B. Schmidt‐Weber
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM) German Center of Lung Research (DZL) and Helmholtz I&I Initiative Technical University, and Helmholtz Center Munich Munich Germany
| | - Claudia Traidl‐Hoffmann
- Institute of Environmental Medicine (IEM) Technical University Munich and Helmholtz Center Munich Munich Germany
| | - Thomas Kündig
- Department of Dermatology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hartmann D, Fischl A, Herrmann E, Schulze J, Schubert R, Zielen S. Prospective comparison of a nonmodified and a modified mite extract for immunotherapy in children and adolescents. Immunotherapy 2019; 11:1015-1029. [PMID: 31319714 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2019-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: This prospective study compares nonmodified and modified house dust mite extracts for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) in pediatric patients with allergic asthma. Materials & methods: Total 95 patients underwent bronchial allergen provocation (BAP). AIT was recommended to 62 patients. Complete datasets of 54 subjects were obtained. Primary aim was the comparison of treatment success defined by BAP between two extracts after 1 year. Secondary parameters were laboratory parameters and clinical symptoms. Results: Significant improvement (p < 0.001) was measured by BAP in both treatment groups. No change was seen in the controls. Both extracts exerted comparable effects on all parameters. Conclusion: After 1 year of AIT, the extracts were equally efficient, with significant improvements in 70.0% (nonmodified) and 72.2% (modified) of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desireé Hartmann
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Anna Fischl
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Eva Herrmann
- Department of Biostatistics, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Schulze
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ralf Schubert
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefan Zielen
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Allergenspezifische Immuntherapie bei IgE-vermittelten Erkrankungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s00112-018-0448-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
12
|
Worm M, Higenbottam T, Pfaar O, Mösges R, Aberer W, Gunawardena K, Wessiepe D, Lee D, Kramer MF, Skinner M, Lees B, Zielen S. Randomized controlled trials define shape of dose response for Pollinex Quattro Birch allergoid immunotherapy. Allergy 2018; 73:1812-1822. [PMID: 29779247 PMCID: PMC6175210 DOI: 10.1111/all.13478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Birch Allergoid, Tyrosine Adsorbate, Monophosphoryl Lipid A (POLLINEX® Quattro Plus 1.0 ml Birch 100%) is an effective, well-tolerated short course subcutaneous immunotherapy. We performed 2 phase II studies to determine its optimal cumulative dose. METHODS The studies were conducted in Germany, Austria and Poland (EudraCT numbers: 2012-004336-28 PQBirch203 and 2015-000984-15 PQBirch204) using a wide range of cumulative doses. In both studies, subjects were administered 6 therapy injections weekly outside the pollen season. Conjunctival Provocation Tests were performed at screening, baseline and 3-4 weeks after completing treatment, to quantify the reduction in Total Symptom Scores (as the primary endpoint) with each cumulative dose. Multiple Comparison Procedure and Modeling analysis was used to test for the dose response, shape of the curve and estimation of the median effective dose (ED50 ), a measure of potency. RESULTS Statistically significant dose responses (P < .01 & .001) were seen, respectively. The highest cumulative dose in PQBirch204 (27 300 standardized units [SU]) approached a plateau. Potency of the PQBirch was demonstrated by an ED50 2723 SU, just over half the current dose. Prevalence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for active doses, most being short-lived and mild. Compliance was over 85% in all groups. CONCLUSION Increasing the cumulative dose of PQBirch 5.5-fold from 5100 to 27 300 SU achieved an absolute point difference from placebo of 1.91, a relative difference 32.3% and an increase in efficacy of 50%, without compromising safety. The cumulative dose response was confirmed to be curvilinear in shape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Worm
- Department Campus Charité Mitte; Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | | | - O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; University of Medicine, Mannheim, Germany; Medical Faculty Mannheim; Heidelberg University; Mannheim Germany
- Centre for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - R. Mösges
- Hospital of the University of Cologne; Cologne Germany
| | - W. Aberer
- University Hospital Clinic; Graz Austria
| | | | - D. Wessiepe
- Metronomia Clinical Research GmbH; Muenchen Germany
| | - D. Lee
- Bencard Allergie; München Germany
| | | | | | - B. Lees
- Allergy Therapeutics; Worthing UK
| | - S. Zielen
- Clinic for Child and Adolescent Medicine, Allergology, Pneumonology and Cystic Fibrosis; Goethe University Frankfurt am Main; Frankfurt Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gamazo C, D'Amelio C, Gastaminza G, Ferrer M, Irache JM. Adjuvants for allergy immunotherapeutics. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2018; 13:2416-2427. [PMID: 28825867 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1348447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergic diseases are reaching epidemic proportions in developed countries. In particular, food allergy is increasing in prevalence and severity, thus becoming an important socioeconomic burden. Numerous cell types and cell populations, which form an intricate and balanced network, are involved in an immune response. This balance is occasionally disturbed, leading to the onset of different diseases, such as allergic diseases. Antihistamines and corticosteroids provide some degree of relief from the symptoms of allergic conditions. However, the only treatment that can revert the disease is immunotherapy. Nevertheless, specific immunotherapy has at least 2 major drawbacks: it is time-consuming, and it can produce local and even systemic allergic side effects. Immunotherapy's potential goes beyond our current knowledge of the immune response; nevertheless, we can still design strategies to reach a safer immune modulation for treating allergies. This review deals with the use of adjuvants to reduce the undesirable side effects associated with specific allergen immunotherapy. For example, nanoparticles used as immunoadjuvants are offering promising results in preclinical assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Gamazo
- a Dept. Microbiology , Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (Idisna), University of Navarra , Pamplona , Spain
| | - Carmen D'Amelio
- b Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology , Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Pamplona , Pamplona , Spain
| | - Gabriel Gastaminza
- c Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology , Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Pamplona , Pamplona , Spain
| | - Marta Ferrer
- d Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology , Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Pamplona , Pamplona , Spain
| | - Juan M Irache
- e Dept. Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology , University of Navarra , Pamplona , Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kurzfassung zur allergenspezifischen Immuntherapie bei IgE-vermittelten Erkrankungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s00112-018-0478-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
15
|
Rajakulendran M, Tham EH, Soh JY, Van Bever HP. Novel strategies in immunotherapy for allergic diseases. Asia Pac Allergy 2018; 8:e14. [PMID: 29732290 PMCID: PMC5931921 DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2018.8.e14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Conventional immunotherapy (IT) for optimal control of respiratory and food allergies has been fraught with concerns of efficacy, safety, and tolerability. The development of adjuvants to conventional IT has potentially increased the effectiveness and safety of allergen IT, which may translate into improved clinical outcomes and sustained unresponsiveness even after cessation of therapy. Novel strategies incorporating the successful use of adjuvants such as allergoids, immunostimulatory DNA sequences, monoclonal antibodies, carriers, recombinant proteins, and probiotics have now been described in clinical and murine studies. Future approaches may include fungal compounds, parasitic molecules, vitamin D, and traditional Chinese herbs. More robust comparative clinical trials are needed to evaluate the safety, clinical efficacy, and cost effectiveness of various adjuvants in order to determine ideal candidates in disease-specific and allergen-specific models. Other suggested approaches to further optimize outcomes of IT include early introduction of IT during an optimal window period. Alternative routes of administration of IT to optimize delivery and yet minimize potential side effects require further evaluation for safety and efficacy before they can be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohana Rajakulendran
- Khoo Teck Puat - National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore 119229
| | - Elizabeth Huiwen Tham
- Khoo Teck Puat - National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore 119229.,Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119229
| | - Jian Yi Soh
- Khoo Teck Puat - National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore 119229.,Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119229
| | - H P Van Bever
- Khoo Teck Puat - National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore 119229.,Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119229
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang W, Lin C, Sampath V, Nadeau K. Impact of allergen immunotherapy in allergic asthma. Immunotherapy 2018; 10:579-593. [PMID: 29569506 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2017-0138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Although traditional pharmacological approaches improve outcomes in disease management for allergic asthma, these fail to modify the underlying immune responses. Allergen immunotherapy remains the only etiological therapy for the treatment of respiratory allergies for which clinical efficacy has been demonstrated through several well-controlled studies. In this review, we examine evidence from the past 5 years regarding the impact of allergen immunotherapy on allergic asthma to inform practitioners and stimulate further discussion and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenming Zhang
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy & Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Chunrong Lin
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy & Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Vanitha Sampath
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy & Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Kari Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy & Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zielen S, Gabrielpillai J, Herrmann E, Schulze J, Schubert R, Rosewich M. Long-term effect of monophosphoryl lipid A adjuvanted specific immunotherapy in patients with grass pollen allergy. Immunotherapy 2018; 10:529-536. [PMID: 29562801 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2018-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultra-short course pollen immunotherapy adjuvanted with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) is attractive to conventional allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). Long term efficacy of MPL-AIT has not been evaluated. METHODS 68 patients (age 16.75 ± 5.3 years) with allergic rhinitis to grass pollen were investigated. Group 1: 21 controls; Group 2: 19 after complete AIT, and Group 3: 28 with AIT and treatment cessation: 4 years range 3-6 years ago. RESULTS The clinical symptoms (running nose, sneezing, conjunctivitis and the weekly overall score) were significantly reduced in patients group 2 and 3 compared with controls without AIT p < 0.0001. T-regulatory cells and TH1/TH2 cytokine pattern did not differ between patient groups. CONCLUSION The patients in our trial with grass pollen allergy exhibited significant and long-lasting improvements after MPL-AIT, however larger trials are needed to support this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Zielen
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Children's Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jennis Gabrielpillai
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Children's Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Eva Herrmann
- Department of Biostatistics, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Schulze
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Children's Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ralf Schubert
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Children's Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Martin Rosewich
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Children's Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thomas WR. Broad perspectives of allergen specific immunotherapy. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017; 13:2385-2389. [PMID: 28933669 PMCID: PMC5647984 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1374522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne Robert Thomas
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia , Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|