1
|
Buur LE, Bekker HL, Rodkjær LØ, Kvist A, Kristensen JB, Søndergaard H, Kannegaard M, Madsen JK, Khatir DS, Finderup J. Decisional needs in people with kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals about end-of-life care options: A qualitative interview study. J Adv Nurs 2024; 80:3345-3358. [PMID: 38186058 DOI: 10.1111/jan.16037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the decisional needs in Denmark of people with kidney failure, relatives, and health professionals when planning end-of-life care. DESIGN A qualitative interview study. METHODS Individual semi-structured interviews were carried out with people with kidney failure, relatives and health professionals from November 2021 to June 2022. Malterud's systematic text condensation was used to analyse transcripts. RESULTS A total of 13 patients, 10 relatives, and 12 health professionals were interviewed. Overall, four concepts were agreed on: (1) Talking about end of life is difficult, (2) Patients and relatives need more knowledge and information, (3) Health professionals need more tools and training, and (4) Experiencing busyness as a barrier to conversations about end of life. CONCLUSION People with kidney failure, relatives, and health professionals shared certain decisional needs while also having some different decisional needs about end-of-life care. To meet these various needs, end-of-life conversations should be systematic and organized according to the patients' needs and wishes. IMPACT Non-systematic end-of-life care decision-making processes limit patients' involvement. Patients and relatives need more knowledge about end-of-life care, and health professionals need more competences and time to discuss decisional needs. A shared decision-making intervention for people with kidney failure when making end-of-life care decisions will be developed. REPORTING METHOD This empirical qualitative research is reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients, relatives, and health professionals have been involved throughout the research process as part of the research team and advisory board. The patients are people with kidney failure and the relatives are relatives of a person with kidney failure. For this study, the advisory board has particularly contributed to the validation of the invitation letter for participation, the interview guides and the preparation of the manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Engelbrecht Buur
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hilary Louise Bekker
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lotte Ørneborg Rodkjær
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne Kvist
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | - Dinah Sherzad Khatir
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adoli LK, Campeon A, Chatelet V, Couchoud C, Lobbedez T, Bayer F, Vabret E, Daugas E, Vigneau C, Jais JP, Bayat-Makoei S. Experience of Chronic Kidney Disease and Perceptions of Transplantation by Sex. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2424993. [PMID: 39083269 PMCID: PMC11292447 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The pathway to kidney transplantation (KT) begins with the patient's acceptance of this surgical procedure after discussion with the nephrologist. The patients' perceptions of the disease and of KT may influence their willingness to undergo transplantation. Objective To describe patients' experiences of kidney disease and their perceptions of KT and the nephrologists' perceptions of the patient experience. Design, Setting, and Participants This qualitative study collected data through semistructured interviews with patients with chronic kidney disease and nephrologists in the Bretagne, Île-de-France and Normandie regions, France. Researchers involved in the study in each region purposely selected 99 patients with chronic kidney disease who initiated dialysis in 2021, based on their age, sex, dialysis facility ownership, and also 45 nephrologists, based on their sex and years of experience. Data analysis was performed from January to October 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Themes were identified using inductive thematic analysis. Specific characteristics of men and women as well as the nephrologist's views for each theme were described. Results This study included 42 men and 57 women (56 [57%] aged 60 years or older) who started dialysis in 2021 and 45 nephrologists (23 women and 22 men). Six major themes were identified: (1) burden of chronic kidney disease on patients and their families, (2) health care professional-patient relationship and other factors that modulate chronic kidney disease acceptance, (3) dialysis perceived as a restrictive treatment, (4) patients' representation of the kidney graft, (5) role of past experiences in KT perception, and (6) dualistic perception of KT. In some cases, women and nephrologists indicated that women's perceptions and experiences were different than men's; for example, the disease's psychological impact and the living donor KT refusal were mainly reported by 8 women. Conclusions and Relevance Patients' past experience of chronic kidney disease in general and of KT in particular, as well as their relationship with their family and nephrologist, were substantial determinants of KT perception in this qualitative study. Targeted policies on these different factors might help to improve access to KT, and more research is needed to understand whether there are sex-based disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Latame Komla Adoli
- Univ Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, INSERM, Arènes – UMR 6051, RSMS – U1309, Rennes, France
| | | | - Valérie Chatelet
- U1086 INSERM, Anticipe, Centre De Lutte Contre Le Cancer François Baclesse, Centre Universitaire Des Maladies Rénales, Caen, France
| | - Cécile Couchoud
- Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) Registry, Biomedecine Agency, Saint-Denis-La-Plaine, France
| | - Thierry Lobbedez
- U1086 INSERM, Anticipe, Centre De Lutte Contre Le Cancer François Baclesse, Centre Universitaire Des Maladies Rénales, Caen, France
| | - Florian Bayer
- Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) Registry, Biomedecine Agency, Saint-Denis-La-Plaine, France
| | - Elsa Vabret
- Univ Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, INSERM, Arènes – UMR 6051, RSMS – U1309, Rennes, France
| | - Eric Daugas
- Inserm U1149 Université Paris Cité Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris Service De Néphrologie Hôpital Bichat- Paris, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Vigneau
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, EHESP, IRSET (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) – UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Jais
- Unité de Biostatistique, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP; Institut Imagine; Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Sahar Bayat-Makoei
- Univ Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, INSERM, Arènes – UMR 6051, RSMS – U1309, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dahm MR, Raine SE, Slade D, Chien LJ, Kennard A, Walters G, Spinks T, Talaulikar G. Older patients and dialysis shared decision-making. Insights from an ethnographic discourse analysis of interviews and clinical interactions. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 122:108124. [PMID: 38232671 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe and analyse the perspectives and communication practices of kidney clinicians and older patients (aged 60 +) during collaborative education and decision-making about dialysis. METHODS This qualitative study drew on pluralistic data sources and analytical approaches investigating elicited semi-structured interviews (n = 31) with doctors (n = 8), nurses (n = 8) and patients (n = 15), combined with ethnographic observations, written artefacts and audio-recorded naturally-occurring interactions (n = 23, education sessions n = 4; consultations n = 19) in a tertiary Australian kidney outpatient clinic. Data were analysed for themes and linguistic discourse features. RESULTS Five themes were identified across all data sources: 1) lost opportunity in education; 2) persistent disease knowledge gaps; 3) putting up with dialysis; 4) perceived and real involvement in decision-making and 5) complex role of family as decision-making brokers. CONCLUSION As the first study to complement interviews with evidence from naturally-occurring kidney interactions, this study balances the perspectives of how older patients and their clinicians view chronic kidney disease education, with how decision-making about dialysis is reflected in practice. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The study provides suggestions for contextualized, multi-perspectives formal and informal training for improving decision-making about dialysis, spanning from indications to boost communication efficiency, to reducing unexplained jargon, incorporating patient navigators and exploring different dialysis modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria R Dahm
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
| | - Suzanne Eggins Raine
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Diana Slade
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Laura J Chien
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Alice Kennard
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Giles Walters
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Tony Spinks
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
| | - Girish Talaulikar
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adenwalla SF, O'Halloran P, Faull C, Murtagh FEM, Graham-Brown MPM. Advance care planning for patients with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis: narrative review of the current evidence, and future considerations. J Nephrol 2024; 37:547-560. [PMID: 38236475 PMCID: PMC11150316 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01841-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have a high symptom-burden and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite this, evidence has shown that this patient group does not have timely discussions to plan for deterioration and death, and at the end of life there are unmet palliative care needs. Advance care planning is a process that can help patients share their personal values and preferences for their future care and prepare for declining health. Earlier, more integrated and holistic advance care planning has the potential to improve access to care services, communication, and preparedness for future decision-making and changing circumstances. However, there are many barriers to successful implementation of advance care planning in this population. In this narrative review we discuss the current evidence for advance care planning in patients on dialysis, the data around the barriers to advance care planning implementation, and interventions that have been trialled. The review explores whether the concepts and approaches to advance care planning in this population need to be updated to encompass current and future care. It suggests that a shift from a problem-orientated approach to a goal-orientated approach may lead to better engagement, with more patient-centred and satisfying outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S F Adenwalla
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
- John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
| | - P O'Halloran
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - C Faull
- Leicestershire and Rutland Organisation for the Relief of Suffering (LOROS) Hospice, Leicester, UK
| | - F E M Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - M P M Graham-Brown
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
- John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rodrigues AC, David F, Guedes R, Rocha C, Oliveira HM. Fim de vida na doença renal terminal: fatores associados ao local de óbito num programa de cuidados paliativos. J Bras Nefrol 2024; 46:93-97. [DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2023-0015pt] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Resumo Introdução: Os cuidados de fim de vida em doentescom doença renal terminal (DRT) podem ser desafiantes e necessitar do apoio de uma equipa especializada em cuidados paliativos (ECP). Objetivo: Caracterizar a população de doentes com DRT encaminhada à ECP e avaliar os determinantes para um fim de vida planeado no domicílio. Métodos: Realizámos um estudo de coorte observacional retrospectivo dos doentes com DRT encaminhados à ECP entre janeiro/2014 e dezembro/2021 (n = 60) e caracterizámos aqueles com DRT previamente conhecida relativamente ao local de fim de vida (n = 53). Resultados: A maioria dos pacientes eram mulheres comidade mediana de 84 anos. Metade dos doentes encontrava-se em tratamento conservador, 43% em hemodiálise crónica e os restantes suspenderam diálise iniciada agudamente. Daqueles com DRT previamente conhecida, 18% morreram em casa. Não foi objetivada associação entre género, idade, cognição, status funcional, comorbilidades, etiologia da DRC ou modalidade de tratamento da DRT e o local de óbito. A anúria e a menor sobrevida após suspensão de diálise associaram-se a um fim de vida no hospital e verificámos uma tendência para o fim de vida em casa nos doentes com mais tempo de acompanhamento pela ECP. Conclusão: O fim de vida no domicílio é possível num programa domiciliário de cuidados paliativos, independentemente de idade, sexo, etiologia da DRC, principais comorbilidades e modalidade de tratamento. A anúria e o menor tempo de sobrevida após suspensão da TRS podem ser fatores limitantes. Um acompanhamento mais longo em cuidados paliativos pode favorecer o fim de vida no domicílio.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gazaway S, Gutierrez O, Wells R, Nix‐Parker T, Lyas C, Daniel S, Lang‐Lindsey K, Bryant T, Knight R, Odom JN. Exploring the health-related decision-making experiences of people with chronic kidney disease and their caregivers: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13907. [PMID: 37926914 PMCID: PMC10757106 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to explore the decision-making experience of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their caregivers. METHODS This was a qualitative descriptive study of the decision-making experiences of individuals with stage 3-end-stage CKD and their family caregivers. One-on-one, semistructured interviews were conducted using a guide developed and approved by a community advisory group. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Three themes were identified: (1) decisions triggered by declining health and broad in scope, (2) challenges to decision-making and (3) factors influencing decision-making. Participants' experiences with health-related decision-making demonstrated that decisions were triggered when health declined. Yet, decisions that impact disease progression were being made in stage 3. Decision-making was made difficult due to lack of information, complex co-morbidities, and poor resource utilization. However, the structure and nature of the medical appointment, supportive caregivers, and resources served to remove challenges. CONCLUSION Decision-support interventions must train patients and caregivers to be empowered participants in answer-seeking behaviours upstream of advanced illness. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS This work was conducted in full collaboration with a community advisory board consisting of patients with CKD, caregivers and clinicians. These members are noted in the acknowledgement section, and those who worked with the team to develop the interview guide, study protocols, and manuscript preparation are included as authors. As part of their role, advisory members met monthly, providing input on recruitment, study progress, inclusion of diverse voices and added relevance to study findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shena Gazaway
- Division Family, Commuity, & Health Systems, School of NursingUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
- Center for Palliative and Supportive CareUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
- Nephrology Training and Research CenterUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Orlando Gutierrez
- Nephrology Training and Research CenterUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
- Division of Nephrology, Heersink School of MedicineUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Rachel Wells
- Center for Palliative and Supportive CareUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
- Division‐Acute, Chronic & Continuing Care, School of NursingUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Tamara Nix‐Parker
- School of NursingUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Claretha Lyas
- Division of Nephrology, Heersink School of MedicineUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Shawona Daniel
- Division‐Acute, Chronic & Continuing Care, School of NursingUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Katina Lang‐Lindsey
- Department of Social Work, Psychology and CounselingAlabama A&M UniversityHuntsvilleAlabamaUSA
| | | | | | - James N. Odom
- Center for Palliative and Supportive CareUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
- Division‐Acute, Chronic & Continuing Care, School of NursingUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sampath R, Seshadri S, Phan T, Allen R, Duberstein PR, Saeed F. Uncovering Patient and Caregiver Goals for Goal-Concordant Care in Kidney Therapy Decisions. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024:10499091241227242. [PMID: 38196280 PMCID: PMC11231053 DOI: 10.1177/10499091241227242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT In kidney therapy (KT) decisions, goal-concordant decision-making is recognized to be important, yet alignment with patients' goals during dialysis initiation is not always achieved. OBJECTIVES To explore older patients' and caregivers' hopes, goals, and fears related to KT and communication of these elements with members of their health care team. METHODS The study included patients aged ≥75 years with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤25 mL/min/1.73 m2 and their caregivers enrolled in a palliative care intervention for KT decision-making. Patients and caregivers were asked open-ended questions about their hopes, goals, and fears related to KT decisions. A survey assessed if patients shared their goals with members of their health care team. Qualitative data underwent content analysis, supplemented by demographic descriptive statistics. RESULTS The mean age of patients (n = 26) was 82.7 (±5.7) years, and caregivers (n = 15) had a mean age of 66.4 (±13.7) years. Among the participants, 13 patients and 11 caregivers were women, and 20 patients and 12 caregivers were White. Four themes emerged: (1) Maintaining things as good as they are by avoiding dialysis-related burdens; (2) seeking longevity while avoiding dialysis; (3) avoiding pain, symptoms, and body disfigurement; and (4) deferring decision-making. Patients rarely had shared their goals with the key members of their health care team. CONCLUSION Patients and caregivers prioritize maintaining quality of life, deferring decision-making regarding dialysis, and avoiding dialysis-related burdens. These goals are often unshared with their family and health care teams. Given our aging population, urgent action is needed to educate clinicians to actively explore and engage with patient goals in KT decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramya Sampath
- Department of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sandhya Seshadri
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Tramanh Phan
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health, Divisions of Nephrology and Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Fahad Saeed
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health, Divisions of Nephrology and Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rodrigues AC, David F, Guedes R, Rocha C, Oliveira HM. Dying with end stage kidney disease: factors associated with place of death on a palliative care program. J Bras Nefrol 2024; 46:93-97. [PMID: 37870397 PMCID: PMC10962416 DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2023-0015en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION End of life care of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) may be particularly challenging and requires the intervention of a specialized palliative care team (PCT). OBJECTIVE To characterize the population of ESKD patients referred to a PCT and evaluate the determinants of planned dying at home. METHODS We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of all patients with ESKD referred to our PCT between January 2014 and December 2021 (n = 60) and further characterized those with previously known ESKD regarding place of death (n = 53). RESULTS The majority of the patients were female and the median age was 84 years. Half of the patients were on conservative treatment, 43% were on chronic hemodialysis, and the remainder underwent hemodialysis on a trial basis and were subsequently suspended. Of those with previously known ESKD, 18% died at home and neither gender, age, cognition, performance status, comorbidities, CKD etiology, or treatment modality were associated with place of death. Anuria was significantly associated with dying at the hospital as was shorter time from dialysis suspension and death. Although not reaching statistical significance, we found a tendency towards a longer duration of palliative care follow-up in those dying at home. CONCLUSION Dying at home is possible in a palliative domiciliary program regardless of age, gender, etiology of CKD, major comorbidities, and treatment modality. Anuria and shorter survival from RRT withdrawal may be limiting factors for planned dying at home. A longer follow-up by palliative care may favor dying at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rita Guedes
- Hospital Pedro Hispano, Equipa de Cuidados Paliativos, Matosinhos,
Portugal
| | - Céu Rocha
- Hospital Pedro Hispano, Equipa de Cuidados Paliativos, Matosinhos,
Portugal
| | - Hugo M. Oliveira
- Hospital Pedro Hispano, Equipa de Cuidados Paliativos, Matosinhos,
Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saeed F, Eneanya A, Allen RJ, Tamura MK, Fiscella KA. Addressing Racial Injustice, Developing Cultural Humility, and Fostering Rapport-Building Communication Skills to Improve Disparities in End-of-Life Planning. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 66:e451-e453. [PMID: 37355055 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Departments of medicine and Public Health, Divisions of Nephrology and Palliative Care (F.S.), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
| | - Amaka Eneanya
- Fresenius Medical Care, Global Medical Office (A.E.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rebecca J Allen
- School of Behavior and Natural Science (R.J. A.), Mount St. Joseph University, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Manjula K Tamura
- Division of Nephrology (M.K.T.), Stanford University and Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center Veterans Affairs Palo Alto, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Kevin A Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research (K.A.F.), University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu J, Purtell L, Bonner A. Kidney Supportive Care for Working-Age Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Profile of Characteristics and Symptom Burden. Nephron Clin Pract 2023; 148:34-42. [PMID: 37429259 DOI: 10.1159/000531872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects people across their lifespan. Kidney supportive care (KSC) is typically offered for older people for symptom management, education, and/or advance care planning (ACP). However, younger people may also benefit from KSC. This study sought to explore characteristics of working-age adults with CKD accessing KSC. METHODS Using a cross-sectional design, working-age adults (18-64 years) with CKD referred to a KSC service from February 2016 to July 2021 were included. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from patients' hospital records. Self-reported symptoms (Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale renal [IPOS-renal]) and health-related quality of life (European quality of life [EQ-5D-5L]) were assessed. Reasons for referral to KSC, kidney replacement therapy (KRT) pathway at referral, and comorbidity calculated using the Charlson Comorbidity Index were also assessed. RESULTS One Hundred Fifty-six working-age adults attended the KSC service. Median age was 57 years, with more than half receiving KRT. Weakness (92.2%), poor mobility (83.3%), and pain (82.5%) were the most prevalent and severe symptoms. The majority were referred for symptom management (n = 83, 53.2%) and 27% for ACP (n = 42). The ACP completion rate was low (28.9%). Those on dialysis had significantly higher symptom scores than those not receiving dialysis (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Working-age adults with CKD experience a significant and debilitating symptom burden and need to consider options for treatment. This study provides new understanding about working-age adults with CKD that may help provide the specific support needed to meet their end-of-life care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayi Liu
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health and Hospital Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Louise Purtell
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
- Kidney Health Service, Metro North Health and Hospital Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ann Bonner
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
- Kidney Health Service, Metro North Health and Hospital Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kazi BS, Duberstein PR, Kluger BM, Epstein RM, Fiscella KA, Kazi ZS, Dahl SK, Allen RJ, Saeed F. Prevalence and Correlates of Preference-Concordant Care Among Hospitalized People Receiving Maintenance Dialysis. KIDNEY360 2023; 4:e751-e758. [PMID: 37143194 PMCID: PMC10371368 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000000000000131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Key Points A large proportion of hospitalized patients receiving dialysis report not receiving preference-concordant care. Hospitalized patients on dialysis desiring a comfort-oriented medical plan were likely to report receiving preference-concordant care. Background Preference-concordant care is a cornerstone of high-quality medical decision-making, yet the prevalence and correlates of preference-concordant care have not been well-studied in patients receiving dialysis. We surveyed hospitalized people receiving maintenance dialysis to estimate the prevalence and correlates of preference-concordant care among this population. Methods We assessed preference concordance by asking participants (223/380, 59% response rate), “How strongly do you agree or disagree that your current treatment plan meets your preference?” We assessed treatment plan preference by asking whether patients preferred a plan that focused on (1 ) extending life or (2 ) relieving pain and discomfort. We assessed shared dialysis decision-making using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire. We examined the differences between those reporting lack of preference-concordant care and those reporting receipt of preference-concordant care using chi-squared analyses. We also studied whether patients' treatment plan preferences or shared dialysis decision-making scores were correlated with their likelihood of receiving preference-concordant care. Results Of the 213 respondents who provided data on preference concordance, 90 (42.3%) reported that they were not receiving preference-concordant care. Patients who preferred pain and discomfort relief over life extension were less likely (odds ratio, 0.15 [95% confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.28] P = <0.0001) to report receiving preference-concordant care; patients with higher shared decision-making scores were more likely (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.03], P = 0.02) to report preference-concordant care. Conclusions A substantial proportion of this sample of hospitalized people receiving maintenance dialysis reported not receiving preference-concordant care. Efforts to improve symptom management and enhance patient engagement in dialysis decision-making may improve the patients' perceptions of receiving preference-concordant care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basil S Kazi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Paul R Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
| | - Benzi M Kluger
- Department of Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Ronald M Epstein
- Department of Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Kevin A Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Zain S Kazi
- Institute of Advanced Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
| | - Spencer K Dahl
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Rebecca J Allen
- School of Behavioral and Natural Sciences, Mount St. Joseph University, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Fahad Saeed
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Department of Nephrology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wong SPY, Prince DK, Kurella Tamura M, Hall YN, Butler CR, Engelberg RA, Vig EK, Curtis JR, O’Hare AM. Value Placed on Comfort vs Life Prolongation Among Patients Treated With Maintenance Dialysis. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183:462-469. [PMID: 36972031 PMCID: PMC10043804 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Importance Patients receiving maintenance dialysis experience intensive patterns of end-of-life care that might not be consistent with their values. Objective To evaluate the association of patients' health care values with engagement in advance care planning and end-of-life care. Design, Setting, and Participants Survey study of patients who received maintenance dialysis between 2015 and 2018 at dialysis centers in the greater metropolitan areas of Seattle, Washington, and Nashville, Tennessee, with longitudinal follow-up of decedents. Logistic regression models were used to estimate probabilities. Data analysis was conducted between May and October 2022. Exposures A survey question about the value that the participant would place on longevity-focused vs comfort-focused care if they were to become seriously ill. Main Outcomes and Measures Self-reported engagement in advance care planning and care received near the end of life through 2020 using linked kidney registry data and Medicare claims. Results Of 933 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.6 [14.0] years; 525 male patients [56.3%]; 254 [27.2%] identified as Black) who responded to the question about values and could be linked to registry data (65.2% response rate [933 of 1431 eligible patients]), 452 (48.4%) indicated that they would value comfort-focused care, 179 (19.2%) that they would value longevity-focused care, and 302 (32.4%) that they were unsure about the intensity of care they would value. Many had not completed an advance directive (estimated probability, 47.5% [95% CI, 42.9%-52.1%] of those who would value comfort-focused care vs 28.1% [95% CI, 24.0%-32.3%] of those who would value longevity-focused care or were unsure; P < .001), had not discussed hospice (estimated probability, 28.6% [95% CI, 24.6%-32.9%] comfort focused vs 18.2% [95% CI, 14.7%-21.7%] longevity focused or unsure; P < .001), or had not discussed stopping dialysis (estimated probability, 33.3% [95% CI, 29.0%-37.7%] comfort focused vs 21.9% [95% CI, 18.2%-25.8%] longevity focused or unsure; P < .001). Most respondents wanted to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (estimated probability, 78.0% [95% CI, 74.2%-81.7%] comfort focused vs 93.9% [95% CI, 91.4%-96.1%] longevity focused or unsure; P < .001) and mechanical ventilation (estimated probability, 52.0% [95% CI, 47.4%-56.6%] comfort focused vs 77.9% [95% CI, 74.0%-81.7%] longevity focused or unsure; P < .001). Among decedents, the percentages of participants who received an intensive procedure during the final month of life (estimated probability, 23.5% [95% CI, 16.5%-31.0%] comfort focused vs 26.1% [95% CI, 18.0%-34.5%] longevity focused or unsure; P = .64), discontinued dialysis (estimated probability, 38.3% [95% CI, 32.0%-44.8%] comfort focused vs 30.2% [95% CI, 23.0%-37.8%] longevity focused or unsure; P = .09), and enrolled in hospice (estimated probability, 32.2% [95% CI, 25.7%-38.7%] comfort focused vs 23.3% [95% CI, 16.4%-30.5%] longevity focused or unsure; P = .07) were not statistically different. Conclusions and Relevance This survey study found that there appeared to be a disconnect between patients' expressed values, which were largely comfort focused, and their engagement in advance care planning and end-of-life care, which reflected a focus on longevity. These findings suggest important opportunities to improve the quality of care for patients receiving dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yoshio N. Hall
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | | | | | - J. Randall Curtis
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ann M. O’Hare
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Saeed F, Ladwig S, Allen RJ, Eneanya ND, Tamura MK, Fiscella KA. Racial Disparities in Health Beliefs and Advance Care Planning Among Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 65:318-325. [PMID: 36521766 PMCID: PMC10103744 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Among people receiving maintenance dialysis, little is known about racial disparities in the occurrence of prognostic discussions, beliefs about future health, and completion of advance care planning (ACP) documents. OBJECTIVES We examined whether Black patients receiving maintenance dialysis differ from White patients in prognostic discussions, beliefs about future health, and completion of ACP-related documents. METHODS We surveyed adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis from seven dialysis units in Cleveland, Ohio, and hospitalized patients at a tertiary care hospital in Cleveland. Of the 450 patients who were asked to participate in the study, 423 (94%) agreed. We restricted the current secondary analyses to include only Black (n=285) and White (n=114) patients. The survey assessed patients' knowledge of their kidney disease, attitudes toward chronic kidney disease (CKD) treatment, preferences for end-of-life (EoL) care, the patient-reported occurrence of prognostic discussions, experiences with kidney therapy decision making, sentiments of dialysis regret, beliefs about health over the next 12 months, and advance care planning. We used stepwise logistic regression to determine if race was associated with the occurrence of prognostic discussions, beliefs about future health, and completion of an ACP-related document, while controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS We found no significant difference in the frequency of prognostic discussions between Black (11.9%) versus White patients (7%) (P=0.15). However, Black patients (19%) had lower odds of believing that their health would worsen over the next 12 months (OR 0.22, CI 0.12, 0.44) and reporting completion of any ACP-related document (OR 0.5, CI 0.32, 0.81) compared to White patients CONCLUSION: Racial differences exist in beliefs about future health and completion of ACP-related documents. Systemic efforts to investigate differences in health beliefs and address racial disparities in the completion of ACP-related documents are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology (F.S.), University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; Division of Palliative Care (F.S., S.L.), University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
| | - Susan Ladwig
- Division of Palliative Care (F.S., S.L.), University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Rebecca Jane Allen
- Mount St. Joseph University, School of Behavior and Natural Science (R.J.A.), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Nwamaka D Eneanya
- Fresenius Medical Care, Global Medical Office, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Manjula Kurella Tamura
- Division of Nephrology (MKT), Stanford University and Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center Veterans Affairs Palo Alto, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Kevin A Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research (K.A.F.), University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wong SPY, Oestreich T, Prince DK, Curtis JR. A Patient Decision Aid About Conservative Kidney Management in Advanced Kidney Disease: A Randomized Pilot Trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2023:S0272-6386(23)00065-3. [PMID: 36740038 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Available decision aids for patients about treatment of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) often lack information on conservative kidney management (CKM). We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a decision aid on CKM among patients with advanced CKD and their family members. STUDY DESIGN Randomized pilot trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Patients aged≥75 years with stage 4 or 5 CKD and their family members at 4 medical centers in the greater Seattle area between August 2020 and December 2021. INTERVENTIONS Usual care with or without a decision aid on CKM. OUTCOME Acceptability was assessed by attrition rates between the initial study visit (T1) and the 3-month follow-up evaluation (T3). The primary outcome and measure of feasibility was the proportion of participants who discussed CKM with a health care provider between T1 and T3. RESULTS We randomized 92 patients of whom 86 (55.8% male; age 82±6 years; 82.6% White) completed T1-42 in the usual care arm and 44 in the usual care plus decision aid arm-and 56 family members of whom 53 (18.9% male; age 71±11 years; 86.8% White) completed T1-20 in usual care arm and 33 in the usual care plus decisions aid arm. The attrition rates were 21% versus 21% (P=1.0) for patients, and 10% versus 18% (P=0.46) for family members in the usual care versus usual care plus decisions aid arms. Receipt of the decision aid significantly increased discussion of CKM with a health care provider for patients (26.4% vs 3.0%, P=0.007) and family members (26.9% vs 0, P=0.02). LIMITATIONS Possible limited generalizability because participants were a relatively homogenous group. The decision aid focuses on CKM and may be less applicable to those with limited knowledge of kidney replacement therapies. CONCLUSIONS A CKM decision aid was feasible and acceptable, and increased discussion of this treatment option with health care providers. This aid may serve as a useful adjunct to the currently available educational tools on treatments for advanced CKD. FUNDING Grant from a not-for-profit entity (National Palliative Care Research Center). TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT04919941.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P Y Wong
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Taryn Oestreich
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - David K Prince
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Murakami N, Reich AJ, Pavlakis M, Lakin JR. Conservative Kidney Management in Kidney Transplant Populations. Semin Nephrol 2023; 43:151401. [PMID: 37499572 PMCID: PMC10543459 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Conservative kidney management (CKM) has been increasingly accepted as a therapeutic option for seriously ill patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. CKM is active medical management of advanced chronic kidney disease without dialysis, with a focus on delaying the worsening of kidney disease and minimizing symptom burden. CKM may be considered a suitable option for kidney transplant recipients with poorly functioning and declining allografts, defined as patients with low estimated glomerular filtration rate (<20 mL/min per 1.73 m2) who are approaching allograft failure. CKM may be a fitting option for transplant patients facing high morbidity and mortality with or without dialysis resumption, and it should be offered as a choice for this patient population. In this review, we describe clinical considerations in caring for patients with poorly functioning and declining kidney allografts, especially the unique decision-making process around kidney replacement therapies. We discuss ways to incorporate CKM as an option for these patients. We also discuss financial and policy considerations in providing CKM for this population. Patients with poorly functioning and declining kidney allografts should be supported throughout transitions of care by an interprofessional and multidisciplinary team attuned to their unique challenges. Further research on when, who, and how to integrate CKM into existing care structures for patients with poorly functioning and declining kidney allografts is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoka Murakami
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Martha Pavlakis
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua R Lakin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Saeed F, Schell JO. Shared Decision Making for Older Adults: Time to Move Beyond Dialysis as a Default. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:129-130. [PMID: 36534979 PMCID: PMC10101214 DOI: 10.7326/m22-3431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Divisions of Nephrology and Palliative Care, Departments of Medicine and Public Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Jane O Schell
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, and Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Frazier R, Levine S, Porteny T, Tighiouart H, Wong JB, Isakova T, Koch-Weser S, Gordon EJ, Weiner DE, Ladin K. Shared Decision Making Among Older Adults With Advanced CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2022; 80:599-609. [PMID: 35351579 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) face difficult decisions about dialysis initiation. Although shared decision making (SDM) can help align patient preferences and values with treatment options, the extent to which older patients with CKD experience SDM remains unknown. STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional analysis of patient surveys examining decisional readiness, treatment options education, care partner support, and SDM. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 70 years or older from Boston, Chicago, San Diego, or Portland (Maine) with nondialysis advanced CKD. PREDICTORS Decisional readiness factors, treatment options education, and care partner support. OUTCOMES Primary: SDM measured by the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) instrument, with higher scores reflecting greater SDM. Exploratory: Factors associated with SDM. ANALYTICAL APPROACH We used multivariable linear regression models to examine the associations between SDM and predictors, controlling for demographic and health factors. RESULTS Among 350 participants, mean age was 78 ± 6 years, 58% were male, 13% identified as Black, and 48% had diabetes. Mean SDM-Q-9 score was 52 ± 28. SDM item agreement ranged from 41% of participants agreeing that "my doctor and I selected a treatment option together" to 73% agreeing that "my doctor told me that there are different options for treating my medical condition." In multivariable analysis adjusted for demographic characteristics, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and diabetes, being "well informed" and "very well informed" about kidney treatment options, having higher decisional certainty, and attendance at a kidney treatment options class were independently associated with higher SDM-Q-9 scores. LIMITATIONS The cross-sectional study design limits the ability to make temporal associations between SDM and the predictors. CONCLUSIONS Many older patients with CKD do not experience SDM when making dialysis decisions, emphasizing the need for greater access to and delivery of education for individuals with advanced CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Frazier
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Center for Translational Metabolism and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Jesse Brown Veterans Administration Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Sarah Levine
- William B. Schwartz MD Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thalia Porteny
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab) and Departments of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| | - Hocine Tighiouart
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John B Wong
- Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tamara Isakova
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Center for Translational Metabolism and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Susan Koch-Weser
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Department of Surgery-Division of Transplantation, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniel E Weiner
- William B. Schwartz MD Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Keren Ladin
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab) and Departments of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rizzolo K, Al-Rousan T, Cervantes L. Dialysis Decision Making and the Patient Experience: Lessons From Pakistan. Kidney Med 2022; 4:100556. [PMID: 36353649 PMCID: PMC9637990 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Rizzolo
- Department of Renal Medicine and Hypertension, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Address for Correspondence: Katherine Rizzolo, MD, Department of Renal Medicine and Hypertension, University of Colorado, Aurora 80045, CO.
| | - Tala Al-Rousan
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Lilia Cervantes
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wong SPY, Foglia MB, Cohen J, Oestreich T, O'Hare AM. The VA Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: A qualitative analysis of veterans with advanced kidney disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:2517-2529. [PMID: 35435246 PMCID: PMC9790645 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Documentation of patients' goals of care is integral to promoting goal-concordant care. In 2017, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched a system-wide initiative to standardize documentation of patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatments (LST) and related goals-of-care conversations (GoCC) that included using a note template in its national electronic medical record system. We describe implementation of the LST note based on documentation in the medical records of patients with advanced kidney disease, a group that has traditionally experienced highly intensive patterns of care. METHODS We performed a qualitative analysis of documentation in the VA electronic medical record for a national random sample of 500 adults with advanced kidney disease for whom at least one LST note was completed between July 2018 and March 2019 to identify prominent themes pertaining to the content and context of LST notes. RESULTS During the observation period, a total of 723 (mean 1.5, range 1-6) LST notes were completed for this cohort. Two themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Reactive approach: LST notes were largely completed in response to medical crises, in which they focused on short-term goals and preferences rather than patients' broader health and goals, or certain clinical encounters designated by the initiative as "triggering events" for LST note completion; (2) Practitioner-driven: Documentation suggested that practitioners would attempt to engage patients/surrogates in GoCC to lay out treatment options in order to move care forward, but patients/surrogates sometimes appeared reluctant to engage in GoCC and had difficulty communicating in ways that practitioners could understand. CONCLUSIONS Standardized documentation of patients' treatment preferences and related GoCC was used to inform in-the-moment decision-making during acute illness and certain junctures in care. There is opportunity to expand standardized documentation practices and related GoCC to address patients'/surrogates' broader health concerns and goals and to enhance their engagement in these processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P. Y. Wong
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Mary Beth Foglia
- VA National Center for Ethics in Health CareSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Jennifer Cohen
- VA National Center for Ethics in Health CareSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Taryn Oestreich
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Ann M. O'Hare
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dialysis Decision-Making, Dialysis Experiences, and Illness Perceptions: A Qualitative Study of Pakistani Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis. Kidney Med 2022; 4:100550. [PMID: 36353650 PMCID: PMC9637991 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective The incidence and prevalence of patients with kidney failure requiring dialysis are increasing in Pakistan. However, in-depth perspectives on kidney care from Pakistani people requiring maintenance dialysis are lacking. Study Design Qualitative interview study. Setting & Participants Between September 2020 and January 2021, we interviewed 20 adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis in 2 outpatient dialysis units in Pakistan. We asked open-ended questions to explore their experiences with various aspects of kidney care. Analytical Approach We recorded, transcribed, and then, using a phenomenological approach, thematically analyzed interviews. Results We observed the following 6 main themes: (1) Patients perceived various supernatural phenomena as causes of their illness and chose traditional medicine for chronic kidney disease (CKD) treatment. (2) Patients expressed dissatisfaction with their physicians' communication. They felt poorly informed and resented their decision to initiate dialysis. (3) Family members tried to dissuade patients away from dialysis but also provided support once dialysis was initiated. (4) Patients and families found it challenging to afford dialysis and transplantation and also to arrange for transportation. (5) Women found it challenging to fulfill their obligations as wives and mothers while receiving maintenance dialysis. (6) Patients seemed reluctant to discuss end-of-life care. Limitations We collected data from only 2 hospitals in neighboring cities. Additionally, patients on peritoneal dialysis were not included. Conclusions Our findings shed light on patients' perspectives on kidney care in Pakistan and call for financially feasible solutions to raise kidney disease awareness and improve patients' experiences with dialysis. Physician training in communication and shared dialysis decision making along with the development of culturally adapted decision aids are needed to improve CKD knowledge and shared decision making. Although financial challenges preclude many from receiving long-term dialysis, cost-effective strategies to improve the availability of other options (eg, supportive kidney care, peritoneal dialysis, and transplantation) are still warranted.
Collapse
|
21
|
So S, Li K, Hoffman AT, Josland E, Brown MA. Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Managed with or without Dialysis: An Observational Study. KIDNEY360 2022; 3:1890-1898. [PMID: 36514416 PMCID: PMC9717644 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0001602022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Background Emerging research suggests that quality of life (QOL) outcomes, such as maintenance of independence, rather than length of life, are the main priority for many patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). There is therefore a need to focus on whether QOL for older patients on dialysis differs significantly from conservative kidney management (CKM). This study aimed to describe the QOL trajectory for patients with ESKD, comparing CKM to dialysis and transplantation. Methods This retrospective, observational study included all patients who attended the Kidney Supportive Care Clinic at St. George Hospital and had one or more EuroQOL (EQ5D5L) questionnaires between July 2014 and May 2020. Kruskal-Wallis tests compared QOL scores between groups at baseline and 12 months. Wilcoxon signed rank tests compared QOL scores from baseline to 18 months within groups. Chi-squared tests compared proportions of patients reporting problems with QOL "domains" between the groups at baseline and 12 months. McNemar's tests compared changes in proportions of patients reporting problems with QOL "domains" within groups from baseline to 12 months. Results A total of 604 patients had an initial survey. At baseline, patients who were managed conservatively reported more problems with mobility, self-care, and ability to perform usual activities. However, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression were no higher in the conservative population. CKM patients reported no significant decline in mobility, self-care, ability to perform their usual activities, pain/discomfort, or anxiety/depression after 12 months or in QOL scores after 18 months compared with the other groups. Conclusions QOL scores or symptom burdens did not change significantly in patients receiving CKM compared with dialysis, suggesting that appropriately supported CKM can maintain patients' QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah So
- Department of Palliative Care, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, Australia,Department of Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Sydney, Australia,The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kelly Li
- The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia,Department of Renal Medicine, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anna T. Hoffman
- Department of Renal Medicine, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Josland
- Department of Renal Medicine, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark A. Brown
- The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia,Department of Renal Medicine, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chan K, Wong FKY, Tam SL, Kwok CP, Fung YP, Wong PN. Effectiveness of a brief hope intervention for chronic kidney disease patients on the decisional conflict and quality of life: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Nephrol 2022; 23:209. [PMID: 35701732 PMCID: PMC9195369 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02830-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients often experience decisional conflict when faced with the selection between the initiation of dialysis and conservative care. The study examined the effects of a brief hope intervention (BHI) on the levels of hope, decisional conflict and the quality of life for stage 5 CKD patients. Methods This is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03378700). Eligible patients were recruited from the outpatient department renal clinic of a regional hospital. They were randomly assigned to either the intervention or the control group (intervention: n = 35; control: n = 37). All participants underwent a customized pre-dialysis education class, while the intervention group received also BHI. Data were collected prior to the intervention, immediately afterwards, and one month following the intervention. The Generalized Estimating Equation was used to measure the effects in the level of hope, decisional conflict scores (DCS) and Kidney Disease Quality of life (KDQOL-36) scores. Estimated marginal means and standard errors with 95% confidence intervals of these scores were also reported to examine the within group and between group changes. Results An increase of the hope score was found from time 1 (29.7, 1.64) to time 3 (34.4, 1.27) in the intervention group. The intervention had a significant effect on the KDQOL-36 sub-scores Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Wald χ2 = 6.763, P = 0.009) and effects of kidney disease (Wald χ2 = 3.617, P = 0.004). There was a reduction in decisional conflict in both arms on the DCS total score (Wald χ2 = 7.885, P = 0.005), but the reduction was significantly greater in the control group (effect size 0.64). Conclusions The BHI appeared to increase the level of hope within the intervention arm. Nonetheless, differences across the intervention and control arms were not significant. The KDQOL-36 sub-scores on MCS and Effects of kidney disease were found to have increased and be higher in the intervention group. The DCS total score also showed that hope was associated with reducing decisional conflict. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration, NCT03378700. Registered July 12 2017. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02830-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kitty Chan
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.
| | - Frances Kam Yuet Wong
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Suet Lai Tam
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Ching Ping Kwok
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuen Ping Fung
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Nam Wong
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wong SP, Oestreich T, Chandler B, Curtis JR. Using Human-Centered Design Principles to Create a Decision Aid on Conservative Kidney Management for Advanced Kidney Disease. KIDNEY360 2022; 3:1242-1252. [PMID: 35919540 PMCID: PMC9337892 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000392022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Background Most patients are unaware of approaches to treating advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) other than dialysis. Methods We developed a dedicated decision aid on conservative kidney management using human-centered design principles in three phases: (1) discovery: engagement of informants to understand their needs and preferences; (2) design: multiple rapid cycles of ideation, prototyping, and testing of a decision aid with a small group of informants; and (3) implementation: testing the decision aid in real-world settings with attention to how the decision aid can be further refined. Informants included a national patient advisory committee on kidney diseases, 50 patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD and 35 of their family members, and 16 clinicians recruited from the greater Seattle area between June 2019 and September 2021. Results Findings from the discovery phase informed an initial prototype of the decision aid, which included five sections: a description of kidney disease and its signs and symptoms, an overview of conservative kidney management and the kinds of supports provided, self-reflection exercises to elicit patients' values and goals, the pros and cons of conservative kidney management, and the option of changing one's mind about conservative kidney management. The prototype underwent several rounds of iteration during its design phase, which resulted in the addition of an introductory section describing the intended audience and more detailed information in other sections. Findings from its implementation phase led to the addition of examples of common questions that patients and family members had about conservative kidney management and a final section on other related educational resources. Conclusions Human-centered design principles supported a systematic and collaborative approach between researchers, patients, family members, and clinicians for developing a decision aid on conservative kidney management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P.Y. Wong
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington,University of Washington, School of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Seattle, Washington
| | - Taryn Oestreich
- University of Washington, School of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bridgett Chandler
- University of Washington, School of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Seattle, Washington
| | - J. Randall Curtis
- University of Washington, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Allen RJ, Saeed F. Dialysis Organization Online Information on Kidney Failure Treatments: A Content Analysis Using Corpus Linguistics. Kidney Med 2022; 4:100462. [PMID: 35620083 PMCID: PMC9127690 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Dialysis organizations’ websites may influence patient decision making, but the websites have received almost no consideration. We investigated how/whether these websites present all kidney replacement therapy options and how the quality of life of these options is portrayed. Study Design Content analysis using corpus linguistics (computer-assisted language analysis). Setting Website content aimed at patients from the 2 major dialysis organizations’ websites, totaling 226,968 words. The analysis took place from November 12, 2020, to March 30, 2021. Analytical Approach We used linguistic software (AntConc) to document the frequencies of words needed to present treatment options and quality of life information. Results Over both sites, dialysis mentions outstripped transplantation mentions. Organization A did not appear to reference conservative kidney management. Organization B mentioned dialysis more often than conservative management, at a ratio of 34:1. Organization A did not attribute symptoms to dialysis, whereas organization B had 12 mentions of dialysis-induced symptoms out of 87 total symptom references. Both organizations framed life on dialysis optimistically, suggesting that patients can continue to engage in “work,” “sex,” or “travel”; organization A referenced sex, work, and/or travel 123 times and organization B referenced these 262 times. Limitations We used quantitative analysis and linked ideas with certain keywords. We did not conduct a detailed qualitative inquiry. Conclusions The websites emphasized dialysis as a treatment for kidney failure, and the quality of life on dialysis was framed very optimistically. Qualitative studies of treatment modalities and the quality of life on dialysis in the patient-targeted material of dialysis organizations are needed.
Collapse
|
25
|
Gelfand SL, Fitchett G, Moss AH. Recognizing the Potential Importance of Religion and Spirituality in the Care of Black Americans with Kidney Failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 33:1255-1257. [PMID: 35304429 PMCID: PMC9257821 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2021101367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha L Gelfand
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - George Fitchett
- Department of Religion, Health and Human Values, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alvin H Moss
- Section of Nephrology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.,Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.,Center for Health Ethics and Law, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Saeed F, Murad HF, Wing RE, Li J, Schold JD, Fiscella KA. Outcomes Following In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in People Receiving Maintenance Dialysis. Kidney Med 2022; 4:100380. [PMID: 35072044 PMCID: PMC8767126 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Previous studies showing poor cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcomes in the dialysis population have largely been derived from claims data and are somewhat limited by a lack of detailed characterization of CPR events. We aimed to analyze CPR-related outcomes in individuals receiving maintenance dialysis. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective chart review. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Using electronic medical records from a single academic health care system, we identified all hospitalized adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis who had undergone in-hospital CPR between 2006 and 2014. EXPOSURE Initial in-hospital CPR. OUTCOMES Overall survival, predictors of unsuccessful CPR, predictors of death during the same hospitalization among initial survivors, predictors of discharge-to-home status. ANALYTICAL APPROACH We provide descriptive statistics for the study variables and used t tests, χ2 tests, or Fisher exact tests to compare differences between the groups. We built multivariable logistic regression models to examine the CPR-related outcomes. RESULTS A total of 184 patients received in-hospital CPR: 51 (28%) did not survive the initial CPR event, and 77 CPR survivors died (additional 42%) later during the same hospitalization (overall mortality 70%). Only 18 (10%) were discharged home, with the remaining 32 (17%) discharged to a rehabilitation facility or a nursing home. In the multivariable model, the only predictor of unsuccessful CPR was CPR duration (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.24-1.61; P < 0.001). Predictors of death during the same hospitalization after surviving the initial CPR event were CPR duration (OR, 1.15; 95% CI 1.04-1.27; P = 0.007) and older age (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.23-2.2; P < 0.001). Older people also had lower odds of discharge-to-home status (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.54; P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS Retrospective study design, single-center study, no information on functional status. CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving maintenance dialysis experience high mortality following in-hospital CPR and only 10% are discharged home. These data may help clinicians provide useful prognostic information while engaging in goals of care conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
- Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Haris F. Murad
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Richard E. Wing
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Jianbo Li
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jesse D. Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Center for Populations Health Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Kevin A. Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Alzayer H, Geraghty AM, Sebastian KK, Panesar H, Reddan DN. Dialysis Patients’ Preferences on Resuscitation: A Cross-Sectional Study Design. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2022; 9:20543581221113383. [PMID: 35923181 PMCID: PMC9340425 DOI: 10.1177/20543581221113383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: End-stage kidney disease is associated with a 10- to 100-fold increase in
cardiovascular mortality compared with age-, sex-, and race-matched
population. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in this cohort has poor
outcomes and leads to increased functional morbidity. Objective: The aim of this study is to assess patients’ preferences toward CPR and
advance care planning (ACP). Design: cross-sectional study design. Setting: Two outpatient dialysis units. Patients: Adults undergoing dialysis for more than 3 months were included. Exclusion
criteria were severe cognitive impairment or non-English-speaking
patients. Measurements: A structured interview with the use of Willingness to Accept Life-Sustaining
Treatment (WALT) tool. Methods: Demographic data were collected, and baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment,
Patient Health Questionnaire–9, Duke Activity Status Index, Charlson
comorbidity index, and WALT instruments were used. Descriptive analysis,
chi-square, and t test were performed along with
probability plot for testing hypotheses. Results: Seventy participants were included in this analysis representing a 62.5%
response rate. There was a clear association between treatment burden,
anticipated clinical outcome, and the likelihood of that outcome with
patient preferences. Low-burden treatment with expected return to baseline
was associated with 98.5% willingness to accept treatment, whereas
high-burden treatment with expected return to baseline was associated with
94.2% willingness. When the outcome was severe functional or cognitive
impairment, then 45.7% and 28.5% would accept low-burden treatment,
respectively. The response changed based on the likelihood of the outcome.
In terms of resuscitation, more than 75% of the participants would be in
favor of receiving CPR and mechanical ventilation at their current health
state. Over 94% of patients stated they had never discussed ACP, whereas
59.4% expressed their wish to discuss this with their primary
nephrologist. Limitations: Limited generalizability due to lack of diversity. Unclear decision stability
due to changes in health status and patients’ priorities. Conclusions: ACP should be incorporated in managing chronic kidney disease (CKD) to
improve communication and encourage patient involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Husam Alzayer
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Galway, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin
| | | | - Kuruvilla K. Sebastian
- Department of Renal Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Ireland
- Department of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway
- Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Dublin
| | - Hardarsh Panesar
- Department of Renal Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Ireland
- Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Donal N. Reddan
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Galway, Ireland
- Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Dublin
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Saeed F, Butler CR, Clark C, O’Loughlin K, Engelberg RA, Hebert PL, Lavallee DC, Vig EK, Tamura MK, Curtis JR, O’Hare AM. Family Members' Understanding of the End-of-Life Wishes of People Undergoing Maintenance Dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 16:1630-1638. [PMID: 34507967 PMCID: PMC8729422 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.04860421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES People receiving maintenance dialysis must often rely on family members and other close persons to make critical treatment decisions toward the end of life. Contemporary data on family members' understanding of the end-of-life wishes of members of this population are lacking. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Among 172 family members of people undergoing maintenance dialysis, we ascertained their level of involvement in the patient's care and prior discussions about care preferences. We also compared patient and family member responses to questions about end-of-life care using percentage agreement and the κ-statistic. RESULTS The mean (SD) age of the 172 enrolled family members was 55 (±17) years, 136 (79%) were women, and 43 (25%) were Black individuals. Sixty-seven (39%) family members were spouses or partners of enrolled patients. A total of 137 (80%) family members had spoken with the patient about whom they would want to make medical decisions, 108 (63%) had spoken with the patient about their treatment preferences, 47 (27%) had spoken with the patient about stopping dialysis, and 56 (33%) had spoken with the patient about hospice. Agreement between patient and family member responses was highest for the question about whether the patient would want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (percentage agreement 83%, κ=0.31), and was substantially lower for questions about a range of other aspects of end-of-life care, including preference for mechanical ventilation (62%, 0.21), values around life prolongation versus comfort (45%, 0.13), preferred place of death (58%, 0.07), preferred decisional role (54%, 0.15), and prognostic expectations (38%, 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Most surveyed family members reported they had spoken with the patient about their end-of-life preferences but not about stopping dialysis or hospice. Although family members had a fair understanding of patients' cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences, most lacked a detailed understanding of their perspectives on other aspects of end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Department of Medicine and Public Health, Divisions of Nephrology and Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Catherine R. Butler
- Division of Nephrology and Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development and Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Carlyn Clark
- Division of Nephrology and Kidney Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kristen O’Loughlin
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Ruth A. Engelberg
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul L. Hebert
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development and Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Danielle C. Lavallee
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
- British Columbia Academic Health Science Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elizabeth K. Vig
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development and Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Geriatrics and Extended Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Manjula Kurella Tamura
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
- Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto, Palo Alto, California
| | - J. Randall Curtis
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ann M. O’Hare
- Division of Nephrology and Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development and Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
House TR, Wightman A, Rosenberg AR, Sayre G, Abdel-Kader K, Wong SPY. Challenges to Shared Decision Making About Treatment of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study of Patients and Clinicians. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 79:657-666.e1. [PMID: 34673161 PMCID: PMC9016096 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE Greater understanding of the challenges to shared decision-making about treatment of advanced CKD is needed to support implementation of shared decision-making in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Patients aged ≥65 years with advanced CKD and their clinicians recruited from 3 medical centers participated in semi-structured interviews. In-depth review of patients' electronic medical records was also performed. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Interview transcripts and medical record notes were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients (age 73±6 years, 66% male, 59% Caucasian) and 10 of their clinicians (age 52±12 years, 30% male, 70% Caucasian) participated in interviews. Four themes emerged from qualitative analysis: 1) Competing priorities - patients and their clinicians tended to differ on when to prioritize CKD and dialysis planning above other personal or medical problems; 2) Focusing on present or future -patients were more focused on living well now while clinicians were more focused on preparing for dialysis and future adverse events; 3) Standardized versus individualized approach to CKD - although clinicians tried to personalize care recommendations to their patients, patients perceived their clinicians as taking a monolithic approach to CKD that was predicated on clinical practice guidelines and medical literature rather than patients' lived experiences with CKD and personal values and goals; and 4) Power dynamics - while patients described cautiously navigating a power differential in their therapeutic relationship with their clinicians, clinicians seemed less attuned to these power dynamics. LIMITATIONS Thematic saturation was based on patient interviews. Themes presented might incompletely reflect clinicians' perspectives. CONCLUSIONS Efforts to improve shared decision-making for treatment of advanced CKD will likely need to explicitly address differences in approaches to decision-making about treatment of advanced CKD between patients and their clinicians and perceived power imbalances in the therapeutic relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor R House
- Pediatric Nephrology Fellow, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sandpoint Way NE, O.C. 9.820, Seattle, WA 98105.
| | - Aaron Wightman
- Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital
| | - Abby R Rosenberg
- Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington
| | - George Sayre
- Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, HSR&D Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System
| | | | - Susan P Y Wong
- Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Washington, VA Puget Sound Health Care System
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Saeed F, Shah AY, Allen RJ, Epstein RM, Fiscella KA. Communication principles and practices for making shared decisions about renal replacement therapy: a review of the literature. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2021; 30:507-515. [PMID: 34148978 PMCID: PMC8373782 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview of the skill set required for communication and person-centered decision making for renal replacement therapy (RRT) choices, especially conservative kidney management (CKM). RECENT FINDINGS Research on communication and decision-making skills for shared RRT decision making is still in infancy. We adapt literature from other fields such as primary care and oncology for effective RRT decision making. SUMMARY We review seven key skills: (1) Announcing the need for decision making (2) Agenda Setting (3) Educating patients about RRT options (4) Discussing prognoses (5) Eliciting patient preferences (6) Responding to emotions and showing empathy, and (7) Investing in the end. We also provide example sentences to frame the conversations around RRT choices including CKM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Nephrology
- Division of Palliative Care
- University of Rochester School of Medicine, National University of Medical Sciences
| | - Amna Yousaf Shah
- Rawalpindi, Pakistan; CITE Center, Department of Behavioral and Natural Sciences
| | | | - Ronald M Epstein
- Division of Palliative Care
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Kevin A Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Scherer JS, Milazzo KC, Hebert PL, Engelberg RA, Lavallee DC, Vig EK, Kurella Tamura M, Roberts G, Curtis JR, O'Hare AM. Association Between Self-reported Importance of Religious or Spiritual Beliefs and End-of-Life Care Preferences Among People Receiving Dialysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2119355. [PMID: 34347059 PMCID: PMC8339933 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although people receiving maintenance dialysis have limited life expectancy and a high burden of comorbidity, relatively few studies have examined spirituality and religious beliefs among members of this population. OBJECTIVE To examine whether there is an association between the importance of religious or spiritual beliefs and care preferences and palliative care needs in people who receive dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among adults who were undergoing maintenance dialysis at 31 facilities in Seattle, Washington, and Nashville, Tennessee, between April 22, 2015, and October 2, 2018. The survey included a series of questions assessing patients' knowledge, preferences, values, and expectations related to end-of-life care. Data were analyzed from February 12, 2020, to April 21, 2021. EXPOSURES The importance of religious or spiritual beliefs was ascertained by asking participants to respond to this statement: "My religious or spiritual beliefs are what really lie behind my whole approach to life." Response options were definitely true, tends to be true, tends not to be true, or definitely not true. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASUREMENTS Outcome measures were based on self-reported engagement in advance care planning, resuscitation preferences, values regarding life prolongation, preferred place of death, decision-making preference, thoughts or discussion about hospice or stopping dialysis, prognostic expectations, and palliative care needs. RESULTS A total of 937 participants were included in the cohort, of whom the mean (SD) age was 62.8 (13.8) years and 524 (55.9%) were men. Overall, 435 (46.4%) participants rated the statement about religious or spiritual beliefs as definitely true, 230 (24.6%) rated it as tends to be true, 137 (14.6%) rated it as tends not to be true, and 135 (14.4%) rated it as definitely not true. Participants for whom these beliefs were more important were more likely to prefer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (estimated probability for definitely true: 69.8% [95% CI, 66.5%-73.2%]; tends to be true: 60.8% [95% CI, 53.4%-68.3%]; tends not to be true: 61.6% [95% CI, 53.6%-69.6%]; and definitely not true: 60.6% [95% CI, 52.5%-68.6%]; P for trend = .003) and mechanical ventilation (estimated probability for definitely true: 42.6% [95% CI, 38.1%-47.0%]; tends to be true: 33.5% [95% CI, 25.9%-41.2%]; tends not to be true: 35.1% [95% CI, 27.2%-42.9%]; and definitely not true: 27.9% [95% CI, 19.6%-36.1%]; P for trend = .002) and to prefer a shared role in decision-making (estimated probability for definitely true: 41.6% [95% CI, 37.7%-45.5%]; tends to be true: 35.4% [95% CI, 29.0%-41.8%]; tends not to be true: 36.0% [95% CI, 26.7%-45.2%]; and definitely not true: 23.8% [95% CI, 17.3%-30.3%]; P for trend = .001) and were less likely to have thought or spoken about stopping dialysis. These participants were no less likely to have engaged in advance care planning, to value relief of pain and discomfort, to prefer to die at home, to have ever thought or spoken about hospice, and to have unmet palliative care needs and had similar prognostic expectations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The finding that religious or spiritual beliefs were important to most study participants suggests the value of an integrative approach that addresses these beliefs in caring for people who receive dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Scherer
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Kaylin C Milazzo
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York
- Department of Spiritual Care, NYU Langone Health, New York
| | - Paul L Hebert
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle
- US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Danielle C Lavallee
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle
- British Columbia Academic Health Science Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elizabeth K Vig
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Geriatrics and Extended Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Manjula Kurella Tamura
- Division of Nephrology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
- Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center and Division of Nephrology, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | - Glenda Roberts
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Hospital Specialty and Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ladin K, Neckermann I, D’Arcangelo N, Koch-Weser S, Wong JB, Gordon EJ, Rossi A, Rifkin D, Isakova T, Weiner DE. Advance Care Planning in Older Adults with CKD: Patient, Care Partner, and Clinician Perspectives. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 32:1527-1535. [PMID: 33827902 PMCID: PMC8259659 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020091298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients with advanced CKD are at high risk for serious complications and death, yet few discuss advance care planning (ACP) with their kidney clinicians. Examining barriers and facilitators to ACP among such patients might help identify patient-centered opportunities for improvement. METHODS In semistructured interviews in March through August 2019 with purposively sampled patients (aged ≥70 years, CKD stages 4-5, nondialysis), care partners, and clinicians at clinics in across the United States, participants described discussions, factors contributing to ACP completion or avoidance, and perceived value of ACP. We used thematic analysis to analyze data. RESULTS We conducted 68 semistructured interviews with 23 patients, 19 care partners, and 26 clinicians. Only seven of 26 (27%) clinicians routinely discussed ACP. About half of the patients had documented ACP, mostly outside the health care system. We found divergent ACP definitions and perspectives; kidney clinicians largely defined ACP as completion of formal documentation, whereas patients viewed it more holistically, wanting discussions about goals, prognosis, and disease trajectory. Clinicians avoided ACP with patients from minority groups, perceiving cultural or religious barriers. Four themes and subthemes informing variation in decisions to discuss ACP and approaches emerged: (1) role ambiguity and responsibility for ACP, (2) questioning the value of ACP, (3) confronting institutional barriers (time, training, reimbursement, and the electronic medical record, EMR), and (4) consequences of avoiding ACP (disparities in ACP access and overconfidence that patients' wishes are known). CONCLUSIONS Patients, care partners, and clinicians hold discordant views about the responsibility for discussing ACP and the scope for it. This presents critical barriers to the process, leaving ACP insufficiently discussed with older adults with advanced CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keren Ladin
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health, Medford, Massachusetts,Departments of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| | - Isabel Neckermann
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health, Medford, Massachusetts
| | - Noah D’Arcangelo
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health, Medford, Massachusetts
| | - Susan Koch-Weser
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John B. Wong
- Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elisa J. Gordon
- Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ana Rossi
- Piedmont Transplant Institute, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Dena Rifkin
- Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California,Nephrology Section, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Tamara Isakova
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois,Center for Translational Metabolism and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniel E. Weiner
- William B Schwartz MD Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rao IR, Vallath N, Anupama YJ, Gupta KL, Rao KS. Decision-making around Commencing Dialysis. Indian J Palliat Care 2021; 27:S6-S10. [PMID: 34188372 PMCID: PMC8191747 DOI: 10.4103/ijpc.ijpc_61_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The decision regarding dialysis initiation is complex. Awareness that renal replacement therapy should not be regarded as default therapy for every patient with advanced renal failure is necessary. Decision to initiate dialysis and modality should be individualized in a shared decision-making process involving the treating nephrologist and the patient. Patients should receive predialysis education early in the course of chronic kidney disease so as to help prepare them well in advance for this eventuality. Withholding dialysis may be a reasonable option in a certain subset of patients, especially elderly patient with multiple co-morbid illnesses. Comprehensive conservation care should be offered in all patients where the decision to not dialyze is taken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indu Ramachandra Rao
- Department of Nephrology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Nandini Vallath
- Division of Palliative Care, National Cancer Grid, India.,Department of Palliative Care, BARC Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.,Department of Palliative Care and Division of Medical Humanities, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Y J Anupama
- Department of Nephrology, Nanjappa Hospital, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India
| | - Krishan Lal Gupta
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Krithika S Rao
- Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Beckwith HKS, Adwaney A, Appelbe M, Gaffney HT, Hill P, Moabi D, Prout VL, Salisbury E, Webster P, Tomlinson JAP, Brown EA. Perceptions of Illness Severity, Treatment Goals, and Life Expectancy: The ePISTLE Study. Kidney Int Rep 2021; 6:1558-1566. [PMID: 34169196 PMCID: PMC8207314 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction A better understanding of factors influencing perceived life expectancy (PLE), interactions between patient prognostic beliefs, experiences of illness, and treatment behavior is urgently needed. Methods Case-notes at 3 hemodialysis units were screened: patients with ≥20% 1-year mortality risk were included. Patients and their health care professionals (HCPs) were invited to complete a structured interview or mixed-methods questionnaire. Four hundred eleven patient notes were screened. Seventy-seven eligible patients were approached and 51 were included. Results Patients predicted significantly higher life expectancies than HCPs (P < 0.0001). Documented cognitive impairment, gender, or increasing age did not affect 1- or 5-year PLE. PLE influenced priorities of care: one-fifth of patients who estimated themselves to have >95% 1-year survival preferred “care focusing on relieving pain and discomfort,” compared with nearly three-quarters of those reporting a ≤50% chance of 1-year survival. Twenty of 51 (39%) patients believed transplantation was an option for them, despite only 4 being waitlisted at the time of the interview. Patients who thought they were transplant candidates were significantly more confident they would be alive at 1 and 5 years and to want resuscitation attempted. Cognitive impairment had no effect on perceived transplant candidacy. A high symptom burden was present and underrecognized by HCPs. High symptom burden was associated with significantly lower PLE at both 1 and 5 years, increased anxiety/depression scores, and treatment choices more likely to prioritize relief of suffering. Conclusion There is a disparity between patient PLE and those of their HCPs. Severity of symptom burden and beliefs regarding PLE or transplant candidacy affect patient treatment preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah K S Beckwith
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Renal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anamika Adwaney
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maura Appelbe
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen T Gaffney
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Hill
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dihlabelo Moabi
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Virginia L Prout
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Salisbury
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Phil Webster
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - James A P Tomlinson
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Edwina A Brown
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Renal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Stallings TL, Temel JS, Klaiman TA, Paasche-Orlow MK, Alegria M, O'Hare A, O'Connor N, Dember LM, Halpern SD, Eneanya ND. Integrating Conservative kidney management Options and advance care Planning Education (COPE) into routine CKD care: a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e042620. [PMID: 33619188 PMCID: PMC7903110 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Predialysis education for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) typically focuses narrowly on haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis as future treatment options. However, patients who are older or seriously ill may not want to pursue dialysis and/or may not benefit from this treatment. Conservative kidney management, a reasonable alternative treatment, and advance care planning (ACP) are often left out of patient education and shared decision-making. In this study, we will pilot an educational intervention (Conservative Kidney Management Options and Advance Care Planning Education-COPE) to improve knowledge of conservative kidney management and ACP among patients with advanced CKD who are older and/or have poor functional status. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a single-centre pilot randomised controlled trial at an academic centre in Philadelphia, PA. Eligible patients will have: age ≥70 years and/or poor functional status (as defined by Karnofsky Performance Index Score <70), advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate<20 mL/min/1.73 m2), prefer to speak English during clinical encounters and self-report as black or white race. Enrolled patients will be randomised 1:1, with stratification by race, to receive enhanced usual care or usual care and in-person education about conservative kidney management and ACP (COPE). The primary outcome is change in knowledge of CKM and ACP. We will also explore intervention feasibility and acceptability, change in communication of preferences and differences in the intervention's effects on knowledge and communication of preferences by race. We will assess outcomes at baseline, immediately post-education and at 2 and 12 weeks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Pennsylvania. We will obtain written informed consent from all participants. The results from this work will be presented at academic conferences and disseminated through peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT03229811.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor L Stallings
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tamar A Klaiman
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael K Paasche-Orlow
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Margarita Alegria
- Department of Medicine and Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ann O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nina O'Connor
- Palliative and Hospice Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laura M Dember
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Scott D Halpern
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nwamaka D Eneanya
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sloan CE, Zhong J, Mohottige D, Hall R, Diamantidis CJ, Boulware LE, Wang V. Fragmentation of care as a barrier to optimal ESKD management. Semin Dial 2020; 33:440-448. [PMID: 33128300 DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Caring for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the United States is challenging, due in part to the complex epidemiology of the disease's progression as well as the ways in which care is delivered. As CKD progresses toward ESKD, the number of comorbidities increases and care involves multiple healthcare providers from multiple subspecialties. This occurs in the context of a fragmented US healthcare delivery system that is traditionally siloed by provider specialty, organization, as well as systems of payment and administration. This article describes the role of care fragmentation in the delivery of optimal ESKD care and identifies research gaps in the evidence across the continuum of care. We then consider the impact of care fragmentation on ESKD care from the patient and health system perspectives and explore opportunities for system-level interventions aimed at improving care for patients with ESKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline E Sloan
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Judy Zhong
- Duke University Trinity College of Arts & Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Rasheeda Hall
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Clarissa J Diamantidis
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Leight E Boulware
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Virginia Wang
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bazargan M, Cobb S, Assari S. End-of-Life Wishes Among Non-Hispanic Black and White Middle-Aged and Older Adults. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2020; 8:1168-1177. [PMID: 33078334 PMCID: PMC10173885 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-020-00873-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although some research has been done on end-of-life (EOL) preferences and wishes, our knowledge of racial differences in the EOL wishes of non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black middle-aged and older adults is limited. Previous studies exploring such racial differences have focused mainly on EOL decision-making as reflected in advance healthcare directives concerning life-sustaining medical treatment. In need of examination are aspects of EOL care that are not decision-based and therefore not normally covered by written advance healthcare directives. This study focuses on racial differences in non-decision-based aspects of EOL care, that is, EOL care that incorporates patients' beliefs, culture, or religion. AIM To test the combined effects of race, socioeconomic status, health status, spirituality, perceived discrimination and medical mistrust on the EOL non-decision-based desires and wishes of a representative sample of non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black older California adults. METHODS This cross-sectional study used data from the Survey of California Adults on Serious Illness and End-of-Life 2019. To perform data analysis, we used multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS Non-Hispanic Blacks reported more EOL non-decision-based desires and wishes than non-Hispanic Whites. In addition to gender, age, and education other determinants of EOL non-decision-based medical desires and wishes included perceived and objective health status, spirituality, and medical trust. Poverty level, perceived discrimination did not correlate with EOL medical wishes. CONCLUSION Non-Hispanic Blacks desired a closer relationship with their providers as well as a higher level of respect for their cultural beliefs and values from their providers compared with their White counterparts. Awareness, understanding, and respecting the cultural beliefs and values of older non-Hispanic Black patients, that usually are seen by non-Hispanic Black providers, is the first step for meaningful relationship between non-Hispanic Black patients and their providers that directly improve the end-of-life quality of life for this segment of our population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohsen Bazargan
- Department of Family Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Family Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Sharon Cobb
- School of Nursing, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shervin Assari
- Department of Family Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hong YA, Chung S, Park WY, Bae EJ, Yang JW, Shin DH, Kim SW, Shin SJ. Nephrologists' Perspectives on Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment and Palliative Care at End of Life: A Questionnaire Survey in Korea. J Palliat Med 2020; 24:527-535. [PMID: 32996855 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Nephrologists commonly engage in decision making regarding the withholding or withdrawal of dialysis and palliative care in patients at end of life (EoL). However, these issues remain an unsolved dilemma for nephrologists. Objective: To explore nephrologists' perceptions on the decision-making process about withholding or withdrawing dialysis and palliative care in Korea. Design: A nationwide 25-item questionnaire online survey via e-mail. Setting/Subjects: A total of 369 Korean nephrologists completed the survey. Results: The proportions of respondents who stated that withholding or withdrawing dialysis at EoL is ethically appropriate were 87.3% and 86.2%, respectively. A total of 72.4% respondents thought that withdrawal of dialysis in a maintenance dialysis patient is ethically appropriate. Responses regarding patient features that should be considered to withhold or withdraw dialysis were as follows: dialysis intolerance (84.3%), poor performance status (74.8%), patient's active request (47.2%), age (28.7%), very severe dementia (27.1%), and several comorbidities (16.5%). Among those nephrologists who responded to the question about the minimum age, at which dialysis should be withheld or withdrawn, most specified an age between 80 and 90 years (94.3%). Fifty-eight percent of respondents stated that terminally ill dialysis patients should be allowed to use palliative care facilities. In addition, a number of nephrologists thought that adequate palliative care facilities, specific treatment guidelines, enough time to manage patients, financial support, and adequate medical experts are necessary. Conclusions: Korean nephrologists thought that withholding or withdrawing dialysis at EoL is ethically appropriate, even in maintenance dialysis patients. Therefore, consensus guidelines for palliative care after withholding or withdrawal of dialysis are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Ah Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sungjin Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Yeong Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Jin Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Won Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Ho Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Wook Kim
- Gwangmyeong Soo Clinic Center, Gwangmyeong, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Joon Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Tavares APDS, Santos CGDS, Tzanno-Martins C, Barros Neto J, Silva AMMD, Lotaif L, Souza JVL. Kidney supportive care: an update of the current state of the art of palliative care in CKD patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 43:74-87. [PMID: 32897286 PMCID: PMC8061961 DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2020-0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become a public health burden worldwide for its increasing incidence and prevalence, high impact on the health related quality of life (HRQoL) and life expectancy, and high personal and social cost. Patients with advanced CKD, in dialysis or not, suffer a burden from symptoms very similar to other chronic diseases and have a life span not superior to many malignancies. Accordingly, in recent years, renal palliative care has been recommended to be integrated in the traditional care delivered to this population. This research provides an updated overview on renal palliative care from the relevant literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alze Pereira Dos Santos Tavares
- Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, Comitê de Cuidados Paliativos, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Cássia Gomes da Silveira Santos
- Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, Comitê de Cuidados Paliativos, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Universidade Federal do Paraná, Hospital das Clínicas, Curitiba, PR, Brasil
| | - Carmen Tzanno-Martins
- Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, Comitê de Cuidados Paliativos, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Clínica de Hemodiálise, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - José Barros Neto
- Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, Comitê de Cuidados Paliativos, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia Mineira, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.,Felício Rocho Hospital, Departamento de Nefrologia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | | | - Leda Lotaif
- Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, Comitê de Cuidados Paliativos, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Nefrologia e Hipertensão e Pós-Graduação, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,HCor, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Scherer JS, O'Hare AM. Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders among Patients with ESKD Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Bird's Eye View. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31:2232-2234. [PMID: 32866110 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020081160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Scherer
- Division of Nephrology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.,Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington .,Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bernacki GM, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR, Kurella Tamura M, Brumback LC, Lavallee DC, Vig EK, O’Hare AM. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Preferences of People Receiving Dialysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2010398. [PMID: 32833017 PMCID: PMC7445594 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Whether the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) preferences of patients receiving dialysis align with their values and other aspects of end-of-life care is not known. OBJECTIVE To describe the CPR preferences of patients receiving dialysis and how these preferences are associated with their responses to questions about other aspects of end-of-life care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional survey study of a consecutive sample of patients receiving dialysis at 31 nonprofit dialysis facilities in 2 US metropolitan areas (Seattle, Washington, and Nashville, Tennessee) between April 22, 2015, and October 2, 2018. Analyses for this article were conducted between December 2018 and April 2020. EXPOSURES Participants were asked to respond to the question "If you had to decide right now, would you want CPR if your heart were to stop beating?" Those who indicated they would probably or definitely want CPR were categorized as preferring CPR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES This study examined the association between preference for CPR and other treatment preferences, engagement in advance care planning, values, desired place of death, expectations about prognosis, symptoms, and palliative care needs. RESULTS Of the 1434 individuals invited to complete the survey, 1009 agreed to participate, and 876 were included in the analytic cohort (61.1%). The final cohort had a mean (SD) age of 62.6 (14.0) years; 492 (56.2%) were men, and 528 (60.3%) were White individuals. Among 738 of 876 participants (84.2%) who indicated that they would definitely or probably want CPR (CPR group), 555 (75.2%) wanted mechanical ventilation vs 13 of 138 (9.4%) of those who did not want CPR (do not resuscitate [DNR] group) (P < .001). A total of 249 of 738 participants (33.7%) in the CPR group vs 84 of 138 (60.9%) in the DNR group had documented treatment preferences (P < .001). In terms of values about future care, 171 participants (23.2%) in the CPR group vs 5 of 138 (3.6%) in the DNR group valued life prolongation (P < .001); 320 in the CPR group (43.4%) vs 109 of 138 in the DNR group (79.0%) valued comfort (P < .001); and 247 participants (33.5%) in the CPR group vs 24 of 138 (17.4%) in the DNR group were unsure about their wishes for future care (P < .001). In the CPR group, 207 (28.0%) had thought about stopping dialysis vs 62 of 138 (44.9%) in the DNR group (P < .001), and 181 (24.5%) vs 58 of 138 (42.0%) had discussed stopping dialysis (P = .001). No statistically significant associations were observed between CPR preference and documentation of a surrogate decision maker, thoughts or discussion of hospice, preferred place of death, expectations about prognosis, reported symptoms, or palliative care needs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The CPR preferences of patients receiving dialysis were associated with some, but not all, other aspects of end-of-life care. How participants responded to questions about these other aspects of end-of-life care were not always aligned with their CPR preference. More work is needed to integrate discussions about code status with bigger picture conversations about patients' values, goals, and preferences for end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwen M. Bernacki
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ruth A. Engelberg
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - J. Randall Curtis
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Manjula Kurella Tamura
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
- Division of Nephrology, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | | | | | - Elizabeth K. Vig
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Geriatrics, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ann M. O’Hare
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Saeed F, Sardar M, Rasheed K, Naseer R, Epstein RM, Davison SN, Mujtaba M, Fiscella KA. Dialysis Decision Making and Preferences for End-of-Life Care: Perspectives of Pakistani Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:336-345. [PMID: 32201311 PMCID: PMC7375006 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Previous studies from the U.S. and Canada report deficiencies in informed decision making and a need to improve end-of-life (EoL) care in patients undergoing dialysis. However, there is a paucity of literature on these issues in Pakistani dialysis patients, who differ from Western patients in culture, religion, and available health care services. OBJECTIVES To study informed dialysis decision-making and EoL attitudes and beliefs in Pakistani patients receiving dialysis. METHODS We used convenience sampling to collect 522 surveys (90% response rate) from patients in seven different dialysis units in Pakistan. We used an existing dialysis survey tool, translated into Urdu, and backtranslated to English. A facilitator distributed the survey, explained questions, and orally administered it to patients unable to read. RESULTS Less than one-fourth of the respondents (23%) felt informed about their medical condition, and 45% were hopeful that their condition would improve in the future. More than half (54%) wished to know their prognosis, and 80% reported having no prognostic discussion. Almost 63% deemed EoL planning important, but only 5% recalled discussing EoL decisions with a doctor during the last 12 months. Nearly 62% of the patients regretted their decision to start dialysis. Patients' self-reported knowledge of hospice (5%) and palliative care (7.9%) services was very limited, yet 46% preferred a treatment plan focused on comfort and symptom management rather than life extension. CONCLUSION Pakistani patients reported a need for better informed dialysis decision making and EoL care and better access to palliative care services. These findings underscore the need for palliative care training of Pakistani physicians and in other developing countries to help address communication and EoL needs of their dialysis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
| | - Muhammad Sardar
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tuscan, Arizona, USA
| | - Khalid Rasheed
- Department of Medicine, Shifa medical Center, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Raza Naseer
- The Wright Center for Community Health, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ronald M Epstein
- Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Sara N Davison
- Division of Nephrology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Muhammad Mujtaba
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Kevin A Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Saeed F, Ladwig SA, Epstein RM, Monk RD, Duberstein PR. Dialysis Regret: Prevalence and Correlates. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:957-963. [PMID: 32499230 PMCID: PMC7341783 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.13781119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although some patients regret the decision to start dialysis, modifiable factors associated with regret have rarely been studied. We aimed to identify factors associated with patients' regret to initiate dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS A 41-item questionnaire was administered to adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis in seven dialysis units located in Cleveland, Ohio, and its suburbs. Of the 450 patients asked to participate in the study, 423 agreed and 397 provided data on decisional regret. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of regret, which was assessed using a single item, "Do you regret your decision to start dialysis?" We report adjusted odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the following candidate predictors: knowledge of CKD, attitudes toward CKD treatment, and preference for end-of-life care. RESULTS Eighty-two of 397 respondents (21%) reported decisional regret. There were no significant demographic correlates of regret. Regret was more common when patients reported choosing dialysis to please doctors or family members (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 4.31; P<0.001). Patients who reported having a prognostic discussion about life expectancy with their doctors (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.98; P=0.03) and those who had completed a living will (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.95; P=0.03) were less likely to report regret with dialysis initiation. CONCLUSIONS Dialysis regret was common in this sample. Demographic factors (age, sex, marital status, race, or educational attainment) were not significantly associated with regret, but modifiable care processes were. PODCAST This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_06_09_CJN13781119.mp3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Department of Medicine, School of Public Health, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Susan A. Ladwig
- Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Ronald M. Epstein
- Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
- Departments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine, and Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Rebeca D. Monk
- Department of Medicine, School of Public Health, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Paul R. Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Eneanya ND, Labbe AK, Stallings TL, Percy S, Temel JS, Klaiman TA, Park ER. Caring for older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and considering their needs: a qualitative study. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:213. [PMID: 32493235 PMCID: PMC7271389 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01870-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease often do not understand treatment options for renal replacement therapy, conservative kidney management, and advance care planning. It is unclear whether both clinicians and patients have similar perspectives on these treatments and end-of-life care. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore clinician and patient/caregiver perceptions of treatments for end-stage renal disease and advance care planning. METHODS This was a qualitative interview study of nephrologists (n = 8), primary care physicians (n = 8), patients (n = 10, ≥ 65 years and estimated glomerular filtration rate < 20), and their caregivers (n = 5). Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Transcripts were transcribed using TranscribeMe. Using Nvivo 12, we identified key themes via narrative analysis. RESULTS We identified three key areas in which nephrologists', primary care physicians', and patients' expectations and/or experiences did not align: 1) dialysis discussions; 2) dialysis decision-making; and 3) processes of advance care planning. Nephrologist felt most comfortable specifically managing renal disease whereas primary care physicians felt their primary role was to advocate for patients and lead advance care planning discussions. Patients and caregivers had many concerns about the impact of dialysis on their lives and did not fully understand advance care planning. Clinicians' perspectives were aligned with each other but not with patient/caregivers. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the differences in experiences and expectations between clinicians, patients, and their caregivers regarding treatment decisions and advance care planning. Despite clinician agreement on their responsibilities, patients and caregivers were unclear about several aspects of their care. Further research is needed to test feasible models of patient-centered education and communication to ensure that all stakeholders are informed and feel engaged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nwamaka D Eneanya
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 307 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Allison K Labbe
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Taylor L Stallings
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shananssa Percy
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tamar A Klaiman
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elyse R Park
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kumarasinghe AP, Chakera A, Chan K, Dogra S, Broers S, Maher S, Inderjeeth C, Jacques A. Incorporating the Clinical Frailty Scale into routine outpatient nephrology practice: an observational study of feasibility and associations. Intern Med J 2020; 51:1269-1277. [PMID: 32390289 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an unmet need for routine and accurate prognostication of older adults with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and subsequently inadequate advance care planning. Frailty, a clinical syndrome of increased vulnerability, is predictive of adverse health outcomes in the renal population. We propose the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) as a feasible tool for routine use in the nephrology outpatient setting to address this unmet need. AIMS To assess feasibility and associations of incorporating CFS assessment into routine outpatient nephrology practice in the pre-dialysis setting. METHODS CFS was integrated into the outpatient nephrology clinic proforma. A convenience sample of 138 patients aged >50 years, with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , attending the outpatient service between September 2018 and April 2019 was included. RESULTS Eighty-one CFS assessments were completed by nephrologists, nephrology advanced trainees and clinical nurse specialists. CFS completion rates were 79% from the multidisciplinary Low Clearance Clinic and 41% from nurse-led Pre-dialysis Education Clinic. Planned modality of ESKD management varied with degree of frailty (P < 0.001). 21% of patients who had CFS completed were planned for Conservative Management of ESKD, in contrast to only 5% of those who did not have CFS assessment completed (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Frailty assessment via CFS was feasible in outpatient practice when integrated into routine clinical assessment in a dedicated clinic. Planned ESKD management varied with the degree of frailty. Completion of frailty assessment, when compared with non-completion, appears to be associated with increased planned conservative management of ESKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuttara Panchali Kumarasinghe
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.,Curtin Medical School, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Aron Chakera
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Nephrology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kien Chan
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sharan Dogra
- Department of Nephrology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sally Broers
- Department of Nephrology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sean Maher
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Charles Inderjeeth
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Nephrology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Angela Jacques
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
O'Hare AM, Kurella Tamura M, Lavallee DC, Vig EK, Taylor JS, Hall YN, Katz R, Curtis JR, Engelberg RA. Assessment of Self-reported Prognostic Expectations of People Undergoing Dialysis: United States Renal Data System Study of Treatment Preferences (USTATE). JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179:1325-1333. [PMID: 31282920 PMCID: PMC6618699 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Prognostic understanding can shape patients' treatment goals and preferences. Patients undergoing dialysis in the United States have limited life expectancy and may receive end-of-life care directed at life extension. Little is known about their prognostic expectations. OBJECTIVE To understand the prognostic expectations of patients undergoing dialysis and how these relate to care planning, goals, and preferences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional survey study of 996 eligible patients treated with regular dialysis at 31 nonprofit dialysis facilities in 2 metropolitan areas (Seattle, Washington, and Nashville, Tennessee) between April 2015 and October 2018. After a pilot phase, 1434 eligible patients were invited to participate (response rate, 69.5%). To provide a context for interpreting survey participants' prognostic estimates, United States Renal Data System standard analysis files were used to construct a comparison cohort of 307 602 patients undergoing in-center hemodialysis on January 1, 2006, and followed for death through July 31, 2017. Final analyses for this study were conducted between November 2018 and March 2019. EXPOSURES Responses to the question "How long would you guess people your age with similar health conditions usually live?" (<5 years, 5-10 years, >10 years, or not sure). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Self-reported (1) documentation of a surrogate decision-maker, (2) documentation of treatment preferences, (3) values around life prolongation, (4) preferences for receipt of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation, and (5) desired place of death. RESULTS Of the 996 survey respondents, the mean (SD) age was 62.7 (13.9) years, and 438 (44.0%) were women. Overall, 112 (11.2%) survey respondents selected a prognosis of fewer than 5 years, 150 (15.1%) respondents selected 5 to 10 years, 330 (33.1%) respondents selected more than 10 years, and 404 (40.6%) were not sure. By comparison, 185 427 (60.3%) prevalent US in-center patients undergoing hemodialysis died within 5 years, 58 437 (19.0%) died within 5 to 10 years, and 63 738 (20.7%) lived more than 10 years. In analyses adjusted for participant characteristics, survey respondents with a prognostic expectation of more than 10 years (vs <5 years) were less likely to report documentation of a surrogate decision-maker (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9) and treatment preferences (aOR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6) and to value comfort over life extension (aOR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.04-0.3), and were more likely to want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (aOR, 5.3; 95% CI, 3.2-8.7) and mechanical ventilation (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.7). The respondents who reported that they were not sure about prognosis had similar associations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Uncertain and overly optimistic prognostic expectations may limit the benefit of advance care planning and contribute to high-intensity end-of-life care in patients undergoing dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M O'Hare
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle.,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Manjula Kurella Tamura
- Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California.,Division of Nephrology, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | | | - Elizabeth K Vig
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Yoshio N Hall
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ronit Katz
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|