Risk of developing high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or anal cancer after anal condylomata treatment in people living with HIV

AIM

To assess the risk and natural history of developing advanced anal disease after diagnosis of anal condyloma in people living with HIV (PLWH).

METHODS

This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study of PLWH and anal condyloma from 2001 to 2021. Patients who developed advanced anal disease (AAD; anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and/or anal cancer) were compared to those who did not progress (non-AAD). We assessed the potential association between AAD and condyloma location, recurrence, and treatment modality. AAD-free survival was calculated utilizing Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

A total of 118 PLWH and anal condyloma were included. Mean overall follow-up time was 9.3 years. A total of 31% of patients developed AAD (n = 37). Average time to AAD from condyloma diagnosis was 5.6 years. On multivariate analysis, risk for AAD development was associated with perianal location of condyloma (OR 4.39, p = 0.038) and increased time from initial condyloma diagnosis (OR 1.12, p = 0.008). Higher CD4/CD8 ratios were associated with lower risk of AAD (OR 0.15, p = 0.029). Condyloma recurrence and treatment type were not associated with development of AAD. AAD-free survival was longer in those with intra-anal only condyloma versus those with either perianal disease alone or combined intra-anal/perianal disease (mean survival times: 22.8 vs. 8.7 vs. 10.7 years, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the need for careful, long-term follow-up of PLWH and condyloma, particularly in the setting of perianal disease and low CD4/CD8 ratio. Risk of anal disease progression is present even in the setting of condyloma regression following treatment.

A comprehensive review of anal cancer-with a special focus on anal cytology

The diagnosis of anal cancer is relatively uncommon, but its incidence has been steadily increasing in high-risk populations. In the 2001 Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology, anal cytology was introduced as a component. Since then, it has been recognized as a potential tool for screening anal cancer, often in conjunction with high-resolution anoscopy. There are notable similarities between anal cancer and cervical cancer, including the causative role of human papillomavirus. However, there are also significant differences, particularly in terms of disease prevalence. Anal cytology may be used as a primary screening test, and in the event of abnormalities, patients are subsequently directed for high-resolution anoscopy. However, the best approach for anal cancer screening is yet to be determined and uniformly implemented. This comprehensive review article provides an in-depth analysis of the epidemiology and incidence of anal precursor and malignant lesions. It explores the various methods of sample procurement, preparation, interpretation (including sensitivity and specificity), and reporting terminology in anal cytology. The article also addresses the significance of concurrent high-risk human papillomavirus screening in anal cytology and its role in screening programs. Furthermore, it discusses the follow-up, prevention, and subsequent management strategies for anal cancers. By synthesizing current knowledge in these areas, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of anal cytology and its implications in the early detection, prevention, and management of anal neoplasia and cancer.

A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Anal Cancer Screenings in US Veterans Living with HIV

People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at high risk for anal cancer. Anal cancer screenings are recommended annually for US veterans with HIV. Screenings can identify treatable precursor lesions and prevent cancer development. In a previous study, we found screening rate to be only 15%. Semistructured interviews were conducted with Veterans Affairs (VA) providers who treat veterans living with HIV. Participants described their experiences with anal cancer screenings. Researchers developed a codebook based on Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and coded data using thematic analysis to identify barriers to anal cancer screenings. Twenty-three interviews were conducted with VA providers representing 10 regions. Barriers identified corresponded with five targetable TDF domains: Knowledge, Skills, Environmental Context/Resources, Professional Roles/Identities, and Social Influence. Many providers lacked knowledge of screening protocols. Knowledgeable providers often lacked needed resources, including swabs, clinic space, reliable pathology, access to high-resolution anoscopy, or leadership support to implement a screening program. Providers mentioned competing priorities in the care of veterans with HIV infection and lack of skilled/trained personnel to perform the tests. It was often unclear which provider specialty should "own" screening responsibilities. Additional factors included patient discomfort with screening exams. Anal cancer screening protocols are recommended but not widely adopted in VA. There is a critical need to address barriers to anal cancer screenings in veterans. The TDF domains identified align with five intervention domains to target, including education, training, resource/environment, delineation of provider roles, and improved counseling efforts. Targeting these barriers may help improve the uptake of anal cancer screenings within VA.

Concurrent anorectal and cervical cytology in women with positive and negative cervical smear test results: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Considering the exponentially growing concerns about the increase of anal cancer rates in women with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, the authors evaluated concurrent anorectal and cervical cytology in women with positive and negative cervical smear tests.

METHOD

The current investigation was designed as a cross-sectional study conducted in Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran, Iran, between November 2020 and November 2021. Cervical cytology, HPV test, and anal cytology samples were prepared. Then women with abnormal cervical cytology and/or positive high-risk HPV were referred to a colposcopy clinic for further evaluation.

RESULTS

Five hundred and forty-three women were recruited during the study period. These women were divided into two groups of positive cervical cytology (n = 161) and negative cervical cytology (n = 382). There were no cases of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in either group. Negative anal cytology was reported in 99 (61.5%) of participants with a positive cervical cytology and 254 (66.7%) of participants with a negative cervical cytology. A total of 62 (38.5%) anal samples in the positive group and 127 (33.3%) in the negative group were unsatisfactory for further evaluation.

CONCLUSION

We were unable to show any correlation between abnormal cervical cytology, dysplasia, or cervical high-risk HPV with anal abnormal cytology.

Conventional cytologic diagnosis of human papillomavirus-induced anal intraepithelial neoplasia: The experience of a referral center in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

BACKGROUND

Screening of anal cancer is rarely available or performed in Brazil. This study analyzes the diagnostic performance of conventional cytology (CC) in the prevention of anal cancer in a coloproctology and gynecology outpatient clinics in a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2017, 1066 conventional cytological samples were collected. We analyze the causes of unsatisfactory samples (11.3%) and compare the cytological diagnoses of 83 samples from persons living with HIV and persons not living with HIV and in specific situations, using as the gold standard high-resolution anoscopy or histopathology in cases biopsied within 6 months after cytology.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of cytology with diagnosis of ASC-US for detection of anal intraepithelial neoplasia of any grade was 85%, specificity was 41%, positive and negative predictive values were 64% and 75%, respectively, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.46 and 0.35, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Conventional cytology available in resource-limited settings is a simple, noninvasive, low-cost method that proved feasible for outpatient screening of precursor lesions of the anal canal.

Cytology and LGBT+ health: establishing inclusive cancer screening programs

There are substantial disparities in cancer screening for sexual minorities and gender non-conforming patients. In additional to patients having trauma due to negative experiences with the healthcare system, disparities may be heightened due to heteronormative and cisnormative design of screening programs and electronic medical record systems. Furthermore, there are morphologic challenges specific to certain specimen types from the LGBT + population, such as anal cytology samples, cervical cytology from transgender men taking testosterone, and neovaginal cytology samples. Men who have sex with men are at increased risk for anal cancer compared with the general population. While early detection of anal dysplasia decreases the risk of invasive carcinoma, screening programs are not widespread. Cervical cancer screening may be psychologically and physically challenging for transgender men and non-binary patients. The use of exogenous testosterone therapy causes atrophic changes in cervical cytology samples which mimic high-grade dysplasia. The rate of unsatisfactory samples are also increased in this population. Although HPV driven cancers have been reported in patients with neovaginas, there are currently no guidelines about appropriate screening for transgender women and intersex patients who have neovaginas. Cytopathologists can optimize the health of LGBT + patients in many ways including advocating for inclusive screening guidelines, validating self-collection for HPV and cytology samples, updating requisition forms to better capture the spectrum of gender expression, and recognizing the morphologic changes in cytology samples due to exogenous hormone use.

Prevalence of High-Grade Anal Dysplasia and Anal Cancer in Veterans Living With HIV and CD4/CD8 Ratio as a Marker For Increased Risk: A Regional Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The Department of Veterans Affairs cares for the largest population of patients with HIV of any healthcare system in the United States. Screening for anal dysplasia/cancer is recommended for all veterans with HIV. Exams are invasive, burdensome, and resource intensive. We currently lack markers of disease to tailor screening.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of advanced anal disease (high-grade dysplasia and anal cancer) and to determine whether CD4/CD8 ratio correlates with risk.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective regional cohort study of veterans with HIV.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at eight medical centers between 2001 and 2019.

PATIENTS

Patients with advanced disease were compared with patients with nonadvanced anal pathology.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Logistic regression modeling was used to estimate adjusted odds of disease as a function of CD4/CD8. Lowest (nadir) CD4/CD8 and nearest CD4/CD8 ratio in each cohort were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 2267 veterans were included. Fifteen percent had anal pathology (112 with advanced disease (37 cancer and 75 high-grade), 222 with nonadvanced disease). Nadir and nearest ratio were lower in patients with advanced disease versus nonadvanced (0.24 vs 0.45 (p < 0.001) and 0.50 vs 0.88 (p < 0.001)). In adjusted models, a 1-unit increase in nadir or nearest ratio conferred decreased risk of advanced disease (OR = 0.19 (95% CI, 0.07-0.53); p < 0.001; OR = 0.22 (95% CI, 0.12-0.43); p < 0.001). Using a minimum sensitivity analysis, a cutoff nadir ratio of 0.42 or nearest ratio of 0.76 could be used to risk stratify.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective analysis with a low screening rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In a regional cohort of veterans with HIV, 15% were formally assessed for anal dysplasia. Advanced anal disease was present in 33% of those screened, 5% of the HIV-positive population. A strong predictor of advanced disease in this cohort is the CD4/CD8 ratio, which is a promising marker to stratify screening practices. Risk stratification using CD4/CD8 has the potential to decrease burdensome invasive examinations for low-risk patients and to intensify examinations for those at high risk. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B528.

PREVALENCIA DE DISPLASIA ANAL DE ALTO GRADO Y CNCER ANAL EN VETERANOS QUE VIVEN CON EL VIH Y LA RELACIN CD / CD COMO MARCADOR DE MAYOR RIESGO UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE REGIONAL RETROSPECTIVE

ANTECEDENTES:El Departamento de Asuntos de Veteranos atiende a la población más grande de pacientes con el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) de cualquier sistema de salud en los Estados Unidos. Se recomienda la detección de displasia / cáncer anal para todos los veteranos con VIH. Los exámenes son invasivos, onerosos y requieren muchos recursos. Actualmente carecemos de marcadores de enfermedad para adaptar la detección.OBJETIVO:Establecer la prevalencia de enfermedad anal avanzada (displasia de alto grado y cáncer anal) y determinar si la relación CD4 / CD8 se correlaciona con el riesgo.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte regional retrospectivo de veteranos con VIH.AJUSTE:Ocho centros médicos entre 2001-2019.PACIENTES:Se comparó a pacientes con enfermedad avanzada con pacientes con patología anal no avanzada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se utilizó un modelo de regresión logística para estimar las probabilidades ajustadas de enfermedad en función de CD4 / CD8. Se evaluó la relación CD4 / CD8 más baja (nadir) y la relación CD4 / CD8 más cercana en cada cohorte.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 2267 veteranos. El 15% tenía patología anal (112 enfermedad avanzada (37 cáncer, 75 de alto grado), 222 enfermedad no avanzada). El nadir y el cociente más cercano fueron menores en los pacientes con enfermedad avanzada frente a los no avanzados (0,24 frente a 0,45 (p <0,001) y 0,50 frente a 0,88 (p <0,001)), respectivamente. En modelos ajustados, el aumento de una unidad en el nadir o el cociente más cercano confirió una disminución del riesgo de enfermedad avanzada (OR 0,19 (IC del 95%: 0,07, 0,53, p <0,001)) y (OR 0,22 (IC del 95%: 0,12, 0,43, p <0,001))), respectivamente. Utilizando un análisis de sensibilidad mínima, se podría utilizar un cociente del nadir de corte de 0,42 o el cociente más cercano de 0,76 para estratificar el riesgo.LIMITACIONES:Análisis retrospectivo con una tasa de detección baja.CONCLUSIONES:En una cohorte regional de veteranos con VIH, el 15% fueron evaluados formalmente por displasia anal. La enfermedad anal avanzada estuvo presente en el 33% de los examinados, el 5% de la población VIH +. Un fuerte predictor de enfermedad avanzada en esta cohorte es la relación CD4 / CD8, que es un marcador prometedor para estratificar las prácticas de detección. La estratificación del riesgo usando CD4 / CD8 tiene el potencial de disminuir los exámenes invasivos onerosos para los pacientes de bajo riesgo e intensificar los exámenes para los de alto riesgo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B528.

Anal cytology and high-risk human papilloma virus testing in atypical squamous categories: Value of concurrent testing in management of high-risk population

Anal squamous cell carcinoma is relatively rare, but its incidence and mortality have been increasing worldwide. While anal cytology is a sensitive cancer screening modality, its specificity is low, and data for concurrent high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) testing are limited. At our institution, anal cancer screening consists of combined anal cytology and high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) testing on all specimens. The aims of the study were to correlate results of atypical cytological diagnoses [atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H)] with HR-HPV testing and determine if co-testing may potentially influence management. A retrospective search over 24-months was performed for anal cytology specimens with diagnoses of ASCUS and ASC-H. Corresponding HR-HPV (HPV 16/18 and Other-31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68) results were retrieved, and concordance/discordance was recorded. Cytology results were correlated with anal biopsy diagnoses, when available. A total of 139 patients, including 127 with ASCUS and 12 with ASC-H, were identified. Of the ASCUS cases, 90/127 (70.9%) had HR-HPV, and a squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) was evident in 20/39 (51.2%) of biopsies. All 12/12 (100%) ASC-H were associated with HR-HPV and 3/6 (50%) biopsies had a SIL. Our study supports use of concurrent cytology and HR-HPV for anal cancer screening cytology. Co-testing improves specificity of atypical cytology diagnoses and can identify patients requiring further intervention.

Comparing Anal Cancer Screening Algorithms Using Cytology and HPV DNA Testing in Three High-risk Populations

BACKGROUND

Screening strategies for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-associated anal cancer are evolving. This study compares the screening performance of anal cytology to hrHPV DNA testing and two novel cytology/hrHPV cotesting algorithms among three high-risk populations.

METHODS

Anal cytology, hrHPV DNA testing, and high-resolution anoscopy (HRA)-guided biopsy results were analyzed from 1,837 participants comprising 1,504 HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM), 155 HIV-uninfected MSM, and 178 HIV-infected women. Screening performance to detect histological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL)/cancer was compared between four strategies with distinct HRA referral thresholds: cytology (ASCUS); hrHPV testing (any hrHPV+); algorithm A (benign cytology/HPV16/18+ or ASCUS/hrHPV+); and algorithm B (benign or ASCUS cytology/hrHPV+).

RESULTS

Histological HSIL/cancer was detected in 756 (41%) participants. Cytology alone had the lowest sensitivity (0.76-0.89) but the highest specificity (0.33-0.36) overall and for each subgroup. Algorithm B was the most sensitive strategy overall (0.97) and for MSM (HIV-infected 0.97; HIV-uninfected 1.00). For HIV-infected women, hrHPV testing and both algorithms yielded higher sensitivity than cytology (0.96, 0.98, and 0.96). Specificity was low for all strategies and subgroups (range 0.16-0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Screening algorithms that incoporate cytology and hrHPV testing significantly increased sensitivity and further decreased specificity to detect anal precancer/cancer among high-risk populations.

The Diagnostic Value of p16/Ki67 Dual Immunostaining for Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Meta-Analysis

The p16/Ki67 dual immunostaining was performed on anal cytology specimens; this is an anal cancer screening method. A literature search was performed in the BioMed Central, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, and PubMed electronic databases for relevant articles. We included studies that discussed the efficacy of p16/Ki67 dual immunostaining for detecting anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). Studies that calculated the diagnostic efficacy on a per-patient basis were included. We excluded review articles, case series, and studies that did not provide sufficient information. We extracted data on true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative from the included studies to generate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). All analyses were performed with a random-effects model using MetaDiSc 1.4 and MetaDTA. The meta-analysis produced a pooled sensitivity of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.86) and specificity of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.81) for p16/Ki67 dual immunostaining in detecting AIN. The pooled DOR was 3.26 (95% CI: −0.29, 6.82). A subgroup analysis of HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.96). p16/Ki67 dual immunostaining might have a higher sensitivity for detecting AIN in HIV-infected MSM. p16/Ki67 dual immunostaining might be more sensitive in HIV-infected MSM and has higher specificity compared to human papillomavirus testing among this high-risk group. p16/Ki67 dual immunostaining might be an adjuvant and potential triage test for anal cytology in anal cancer screening.

CD4/CD8 Ratio as a Novel Marker for Increased Risk of High-Grade Anal Dysplasia and Anal Cancer in HIV+ Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

People living with HIV are at risk for anal dysplasia/cancer. Screening/surveillance is costly and burdensome, and the frequency is not evidence based. Objective markers of increased risk of anal carcinogenesis are needed to tailor screening/surveillance. Low CD4/CD8 ratio is associated with increased overall cancer risk in people living with HIV but has yet to be examined for quantifying anal cancer risk.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that low CD4/CD8 ratios correlate with increased risk for high-grade anal dysplasia and cancer.

DESIGN

This is a single-institution, retrospective review of people living with HIV from 2002 to 2018.

SETTING

This study was conducted at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.

PATIENTS

Patients with advanced disease (high-grade anal dysplasia and/or anal cancer) were compared with patients with negative anal cytology.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The independent variables were lowest (nadir) CD4/CD8 and CD4/CD8 nearest to screening/diagnosis. Logistic regression modeling was used to estimate the adjusted odds of advanced disease.

RESULTS

A total of 377 people living with HIV were examined: 266 with negative cytology and 111 with advanced disease (16 cancer, 95 high-grade anal dysplasia). Mean nadir ratio and mean nearest ratio were lower in patients with advanced disease than in those with negative screening (0.26 vs 0.47 (p < 0.001) and 0.61 vs 0.87 (p < 0.001)). In adjusted analyses, increase in nadir ratio or nearest ratio of 1 unit conferred decreased risk of advanced disease (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.45; p = 0.002) and (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.83; p = 0.02). The optimal threshold for using CD4/CD8 ratio as a risk factor for advanced disease was 0.47 for nadir ratio (sensitivity 0.59 and specificity 0.91) and 0.95 for nearest ratio (sensitivity 0.56 and specificity 0.92).

LIMITATIONS

This is a retrospective, single-institution study.

CONCLUSIONS

Low CD4/CD8 ratio confers additional risk of high-grade anal dysplasia and anal cancer beyond the diagnosis of HIV, even when adjusting for known risks factors of anal cancer. Our data suggest that the CD4/CD8 ratio may be able to help identify people living with HIV who are at higher risk of anal cancer development. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B336. LA RELACIÓN CD4 / CD8 COMO UN MARCADOR NOVEDOSO PARA EL AUMENTO DEL RIESGO DE DISPLASIA ANAL DE ALTO GRADO Y CÁNCER ANAL EN PACIENTES VIH+: UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVO: Las personas que viven con el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana están en riesgo de displasia / cáncer anal. La detección / vigilancia es costosa, laboriosa y la frecuencia no se basa en evidencias. Se necesitan marcadores objetivos de mayor riesgo de carcinogénesis anal para adaptar la detección / vigilancia. La relación baja de CD4 / CD8 se asocia con un mayor riesgo general de cáncer en personas que viven con el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana, pero aún no se ha examinado para cuantificar el riesgo de cáncer anal.Hicimos la hipotesis de que la relación baja de CD4 / CD8 se correlacionan con un mayor riesgo de displasia anal de alto grado y cáncer.Revisión retrospectiva de una sola institución de personas que viven con el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana desde 2002 hasta 2018.Facultad de Medicina y Salud Pública de la Universidad de Wisconsin.Los pacientes con enfermedad avanzada (displasia anal de alto grado y / o cáncer anal) se compararon con pacientes con citología anal negativa.Las variables independientes más bajas fueron (nadir) CD4 / CD8 y la relación CD4 / CD8 más cercanas a la detección / diagnóstico. Se utilizó el modelo de regresión logística para estimar las probabilidades ajustadas de enfermedad avanzada.Se examinaron un total de 377 personas que viven con el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana, 266 con citología negativa y 111 con enfermedad avanzada (16 cáncer, 95 displasia anal de alto grado). La tasa nadir y la tasa media más cercana fueron más bajas en pacientes con enfermedad avanzada vs. aquellos con cribado negativo (0.26 v. 0.47 (p <0.001) y 0.61 v. 0.87 (p <0.001), respectivamente. En los análisis ajustados, el aumento en la tasa nadir o la tasa más cercana a una unidad confirió una disminución del riesgo de enfermedad avanzada (OR de 0,10 (IC del 95%: 0,02, 0,45, p = 0,002)) y (OR 0,31 (IC del 95%: 0,12, 0,83, p = 0.02)), respectivamente. El umbral óptimo para usar la relacion CD4 / CD8 como factor de riesgo de enfermedad avanzada fue 0,47 para la tasa nadir (sensibilidad 0,59 y especificidad 0,91) y 0,95 para la tasa más cercana (sensibilidad 0,56 y especificidad 0,92).Este es un estudio retrospectivo de una sola institución.La baja relación CD4 / CD8 confiere un riesgo adicional de displasia anal de alto grado y cáncer anal más allá del diagnóstico del virus de inmunodeficiencia humana, incluso cuando se ajustan los factores de riesgo conocidos de cáncer anal. Nuestros datos sugieren que la relación CD4/CD8 puede ayudar a identificar a las personas que viven con el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana que tienen un mayor riesgo de desarrollar cáncer anal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B336.

Correlation of anal cytology with follow-up histology and Human Papillomavirus genotyping: A 10-year experience from an academic medical center

BACKGROUND

Anal cytology (AC) is accepted as a practical screening modality for anal cancer. However, studies suggest that AC and anal biopsy dysplasia correlation is less robust than in cervicovaginal specimens. The current study goals were to look at our institutional experience in a subset of ACs and correlate with surgical pathology (SP), as well as evaluate their Human Papillomavirus (HPV) status.

METHODS

377 ACs from 169 patients (151 males and 18 females) from 2008 to 2017 were included. HPV genotyping (n = 47) and SP within one year of AC (n = 58) were reviewed.

RESULTS

AC/SP was discrepant in 22 cases (37.9%), with a tendency towards AC underestimating the degree of dysplasia. Specifically, any abnormality on AC was 93.8% sensitive for detecting high-grade dysplasia (HGD). However, when requiring a high-grade AC diagnosis, the sensitivity decreases to 12.5%. "Other high-risk HPV" was the most common genotype (57.4%). When considered with all AC with a high-grade diagnosis, co-testing with HPV improved the sensitivity for HGD to 56.3%. Sensitivity improved further to 87.5% when only considering cases with both AC and HPV testing, and were high-risk HPV positive. Furthermore, following review and consensus diagnosis, 8 cases changed from "Discrepant" to "Agreed", reducing the discrepancy rate to 24.1%. Remaining discrepancies were explained by sampling error.

CONCLUSION

Given the enhanced sensitivity of AC and HPV testing together, and sampling error seen with AC leading to underestimating dysplasia, we recommend AC and HPV co-testing, as well as describing confounding factors in AC reports and obtaining consensus opinion in equivocal cases.

The interpretation of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on anal cytology: a comparative analysis with the cervical Papanicolaou test

INTRODUCTION

Prior studies have shown that high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) tends to be underdiagnosed on anal cytology. Our study aims to decipher the interpretative challenges of HSIL that are more specific to anal cytology specimens by comparing them to cervical Papanicolaou tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred cases each of anal and cervical cytology specimens with HSIL interpretation and concordant histologic follow-up were retrieved and diagnostically confirmed. Patient demographic data were obtained from the electronic medical record. The cytologic specimens were reviewed and statistically compared in terms of proportion of HSIL cells, HSIL patterns and types, and cytoplasmic area of HSIL cells (with digital image analysis). A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the patients with anal HSIL, 97% were human immunodeficiency virus-positive and 60% were men who have sex with men. The anal cytology specimens significantly differed from the cervical ones in several respects: proportion of HSIL cells, cytoplasmic area of HSIL cells, cases with HSIL cells in syncytial groups (10 versus 57) and cases with keratinizing HSIL (45 versus 10). The P value was <0.0001 for all comparisons except for the proportion of HSIL cells (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anal cytologic HSIL, in contrast to its cervical counterpart, exhibits fewer abnormal cells and smaller size of the diagnostic cells with a higher percentage of keratinizing lesions. A careful scrutiny of the sample with an enhanced understanding of the morphology and better sampling may help improve the detection of anal HSIL on cytology.

Diagnosing Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions With and Without p16: An Interobserver Variability Study

OBJECTIVE

Morphologic diagnosis and grading of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (ASILs) are challenging. In this study, we investigated interobserver variability and p16 utility in accurately grading anal SIL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six pathologists evaluated the degree of SIL on hematoxylin and eosin slides from 146 anal biopsies, followed by the review of both p16 and hematoxylin and eosin slides in cases where p16 was previously performed. κ was calculated in the following 4 ways: (A) 4-tiered diagnosis (negative for SIL [NSIL], anal intraepithelial neoplasia [AIN 1, AIN 2, AIN 3]); (B) 3-tiered diagnosis (NSIL and AIN 1 [pooled], AIN 2, AIN 3); (A) 3-tiered diagnosis (NSIL, low-grade SIL, high-grade SIL [HSIL]); and (D) 2-tiered diagnosis (no HSIL, HSIL).

RESULTS

There is only moderate agreement with a 4-tiered diagnosis with or without p16 (κ = 0.48-0.57). There is substantial agreement when AIN 2 and AIN 3 are pooled as HSIL in cases with or without p16 review (κ = 0.71-0.78). There is almost perfect agreement with a 2-tiered diagnosis of negative for HSIL and HSIL both in cases where p16 was used and where p16 was not required, with the best agreement for a 2-tiered diagnosis with concurrent p16 review.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance of a judicious use of p16 for diagnosis. When there is no need for p16 by the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology guidelines, interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect with a 2-tiered diagnosis. However, when its use is indicated but it is not performed or reviewed, the agreement is much lower even with a 2-tiered diagnosis. Rational use of p16 will ensure diagnostic accuracy and the best possible patient care.

Importance of anal cytology and screening for anal dysplasia in individuals living with HIV with an emphasis on women

BACKGROUND

The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal has been increasing in high-risk populations. To the authors' knowledge, there is no international consensus regarding screening for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal, but screening is commonly comprised of a Papanicolaou (Pap) test in combination with digital anorectal examination followed by high-resolution anoscopy if necessary. The current study focused on individuals living with HIV and particularly on women living with HIV.

METHODS

In this 5-year retrospective study, the authors identified 5982 Pap tests, 1848 of which had follow-up biopsy within 6 months. The rate of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance was 42%, and approximately 38.1% of cases with this interpretation were diagnosed as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on follow-up biopsy. In addition, 82 women with anal cytology had long-term follow-up (>10 years) available.

RESULTS

The authors investigated a relationship between cervicovaginal human papillomavirus (HPV) results, cervical pathology, CD4 T-cell count, and CD4/8 ratio with the anal cytology interpretation. A statistical correlation was noted between the CD4 count and the CD4/8 ratio and the presence of anal dysplasia. Nearly one-half of the women without cervicovaginal HPV positivity presented with anal dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrated that, among women living with HIV, screening for anal dysplasia should not be eschewed, regardless of lower genital tract pathology and/or HPV status. To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the largest reported retrospective anal cytology cohort in individuals living with HIV.

Comparison of nylon-flocked swab and Dacron swab cytology for anal HSIL detection in transgender women and gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men

BACKGROUND

An anal histological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (hHSIL) is an anal cancer precursor. Experts recommend Dacron swab anal cytology as a primary screen for anal hHSILs, especially among human immunodeficiency virus-infected and -uninfected men who have sex with men (MSM). Studies have shown that Dacron cytology inaccurately predicts anal hHSILs and results in unnecessary diagnostic procedures. Nylon-flocked (NF) swabs have been shown to trap pathogens and cells well. Thus, this study compared test characteristics of anal cytology using NF and Dacron swab collection protocols to predict anal hHSILs.

METHODS

A single-visit, randomized clinical trial compared NF and Dacron swab anal cytology specimens to predict high-resolution anoscopy and biopsy-diagnosed anal hHSILs. Data for 326 gay men, bisexual men, other MSM, and male-to-female transgender women contributed descriptive and tabular statistics with which unadjusted and fully adjusted logistic regression models were constructed. The models estimated the odds of hHSILs, test accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]) and sensitivity, and specificity as well as the positive and negative predictive values of abnormal NF and Dacron cytology for predicting hHSILs.

RESULTS

In the fully adjusted model, the sensitivities for NF and Dacron cytology were nearly equal (48% vs 47%), but the specificity was higher with NF cytology (76% vs 69%). Comparisons of the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves showed that NF cytology alone predicted hHSILs better than the covariate model (AUC, 0.69 vs 0.63; P = .02), but NF and Dacron cytology comparisons showed no statistically significant differences (AUC, 0.69 vs 0.67; P = .3).

CONCLUSIONS

NF cytology and Dacron cytology provide modest sensitivity, but NF cytology has higher specificity and accuracy, and this is important for lowering the costs of population-based screening.

Raman-Enhanced Spectroscopy Distinguishes Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Serodiscordant Couples

HIV-positive individuals are at increased risk for precancerous anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). Anal cytology and digital rectal examination are performed as screening tools, but extensive training and appropriate instruments are required to follow up on an abnormal anal cytology. Thus, novel approaches to SIL evaluation could improve better health care follow-up by efficient and timely diagnosis to offer treatment options. Recently, Raman-enhanced spectroscopy (RESpect) has emerged as a potential new tool for early identification of SIL. RESpect is a noninvasive, label-free, laser-based technique that identifies molecular composition of tissues and cells. HIV-serodiscordant couples had anal biopsies obtained during high-resolution anoscopy. RESpect was performed on the specimens. Principal component analysis of the data identified differences between normal and abnormal tissue as well as HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals of each couple even with similar pathologies. RESpect has the potential to change the paradigm of anal pathology diagnosis and could provide insight into different pathways leading to SIL in HIV-serodiscordant couples.