1
|
Qureshi Z, Khanzada M, Safi A, Fatima E, Altaf F, Vittorio TJ. Hypercholesterolemia: a literature review on management using tafolecimab: a novel member of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024; 86:2818-2827. [PMID: 38694324 PMCID: PMC11060207 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000001945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) persist as the leading cause of mortality globally, with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including hypercholesterolaemia, being a significant contributor. Hyperlipidemia management includes various lipid-lowering drugs, including statins, Bempedoic acid, inclisiran, Lomitapide, ANGPTL3 inhibitors, and PCSK9 inhibitors. Statins have traditionally dominated lipid management therapies; however, a subset of patients remains unresponsive or intolerant to this therapy, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches. Tafolecimab, a promising and novel PCSK9 monoclonal antibody, demonstrated significant LDL-C reduction and a favourable safety profile in clinical trials. Objective This review aimed to discuss the role and efficacy of Tafolecimab in the management of hypercholesterolaemia. Methods The authors searched online databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, for articles related to talofecimab. Discussion The efficacy of Tafolecimab in diverse patient populations, including those with comorbid conditions and various lipid disorders, has been explored. Ongoing trials, such as CREDIT-1, CREDIT-2, and CREDIT-4, have provided valuable insights into Tafolecimab's potential as a lipid-lowering agent. Moreover, the drug's extended dosing interval may enhance patient compliance and reduce treatment costs. It has also been found that Tafolecimab has more affinity for PCSK9 and a longer duration of LDL-C reduction than other monoclonal antibody drugs such as evolocumab. Thus, this review focuses on Tafolecimab, a novel PCSK9 monoclonal antibody, its mechanism of action, clinical trial outcomes, safety profile, and potential role in hypercholesterolaemia management. Despite its assuring potential, the long-term impact of Tafolecimab on cardiovascular outcomes remains to be fully elucidated, necessitating further research. Regulatory authorities like the FDA and EMA should also evaluate Tafolecimab's risks and benefits. Conclusion In conclusion, Tafolecimab shows potential as an innovative therapeutic option for hypercholesterolaemia, particularly in patients with specific risk factors, but warrants additional research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaheer Qureshi
- The Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, Bridgeport, CT
| | - Mikail Khanzada
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lahore Medical & Dental College
| | - Adnan Safi
- Department of Medicine, Lahore General Hospital
| | - Eeshal Fatima
- Department of Medicine, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Faryal Altaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/BronxCare Health System
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Berman AN, Ginder C, Sporn ZA, Tanguturi V, Hidrue MK, Shirkey LB, Zhao Y, Blankstein R, Turchin A, Wasfy JH. Natural Language Processing for the Ascertainment and Phenotyping of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy on Echocardiogram Reports. Am J Cardiol 2023; 206:247-253. [PMID: 37714095 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
Extracting and accurately phenotyping electronic health documentation is critical for medical research and clinical care. We sought to develop a highly accurate and open-source natural language processing (NLP) module to ascertain and phenotype left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) diagnoses from echocardiogram reports within a diverse hospital network. After the initial development on 17,250 echocardiogram reports, 700 unique reports from 6 hospitals were randomly selected from data repositories within the Mass General Brigham healthcare system and manually adjudicated by physicians for 10 subtypes of LVH and diagnoses of HCM. Using an open-source NLP system, the module was formally tested on 300 training set reports and validated on 400 reports. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated to assess the discriminative accuracy of the NLP module. The NLP demonstrated robust performance across the 10 LVH subtypes, with the overall sensitivity and specificity exceeding 96%. In addition, the NLP module demonstrated excellent performance in detecting HCM diagnoses, with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 93%. In conclusion, we designed a highly accurate NLP module to determine the presence of LVH and HCM on echocardiogram reports. Our work demonstrates the feasibility and accuracy of NLP to detect diagnoses on imaging reports, even when described in free text. This module has been placed in the public domain to advance research, trial recruitment, and population health management for patients with LVH-associated conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam N Berman
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Curtis Ginder
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | | | - Varsha Tanguturi
- Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Michael K Hidrue
- Division of Performance Analysis and Improvement, Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Linnea B Shirkey
- Division of Performance Analysis and Improvement, Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Yunong Zhao
- Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Ron Blankstein
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Alexander Turchin
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason H Wasfy
- Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park JK, Balarbar N, Agarwala A. Bempedoic Acid: A Contemporary Review of Its Pharmacology, Efficacy, and Safety Profile, Including Recent Data from the CLEAR Outcomes Clinical Trial. Curr Cardiol Rep 2023; 25:969-978. [PMID: 37405598 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-023-01911-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an updated review of bempedoic acid's clinical application in lowering LDL-C in the setting of statin intolerance and the recent findings in the CLEAR Outcomes trial as well as summarize and synthesize the current state of knowledge regarding bempedoic acid while providing an in-depth analysis of the drug's pharmacological properties, mechanism of action, clinical trials, safety, and efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS The CLEAR Outcomes trial has provided evidence to support bempedoic acid as a viable alternative to statins for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Bempedoic acid is a promising treatment option for patients with hypercholesterolemia who are unable to tolerate statin therapy or require additional LDL-C reduction in the treatment of cardiovascular disease, with the newest lipid-lowering cardiovascular outcomes trials expanding on their generalizability particularly in the inclusion of women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Kun Park
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Noah Balarbar
- Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Baylor Scott and White Health Heart Hospital Baylor Plano, Plano, TX, USA
| | - Anandita Agarwala
- Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Baylor Scott and White Health Heart Hospital Baylor Plano, Plano, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Newman CB, Tobert JA. Targeting PCSK9 With Antibodies and Gene Silencing to Reduce LDL Cholesterol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 108:784-790. [PMID: 36469793 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The discovery of PCSK9 and its role in regulating the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor, and the effect of loss-of-function mutations of its gene, identified it as a therapeutic target in 2006. Fully humanized monoclonal antibodies to PCSK9 (alirocumab and evolocumab) proved effective for lowering LDL cholesterol and subsequently for reducing atherosclerotic events in large outcome trials. Suppressing PCSK9 synthesis via gene silencing using inclisiran, a small interfering RNA, is another approach that effectively reduces LDL cholesterol, and a cardiovascular outcome trial is in progress. These treatments are given subcutaneously on a background of maximally tolerated statin treatment and are long-lasting: dosing is once or twice a month, self-administered, for alirocumab and evolocumab, and every 6 months for inclisiran, in the clinic, with an extra dose at 3 months in the initial year of therapy. These 3 agents produce mean LDL reductions of about 55% with no important adverse effects detectable to date. They are indicated in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease or familial hypercholesterolemia who cannot achieve LDL cholesterol targets with maximally tolerated statin treatment. Such therapy can produce very low plasma LDL cholesterol and PCSK9, but there is no evidence this is harmful. Introduction into clinical practice has been impeded by economic considerations. The barrier to their use has not been scientific or medical, but rather the impact on healthcare resources. Prices have been reduced, but whether they are now cost-effective varies from country to country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connie B Newman
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Jonathan A Tobert
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nissen SE, Lincoff AM, Brennan D, Ray KK, Mason D, Kastelein JJP, Thompson PD, Libby P, Cho L, Plutzky J, Bays HE, Moriarty PM, Menon V, Grobbee DE, Louie MJ, Chen CF, Li N, Bloedon L, Robinson P, Horner M, Sasiela WJ, McCluskey J, Davey D, Fajardo-Campos P, Petrovic P, Fedacko J, Zmuda W, Lukyanov Y, Nicholls SJ. Bempedoic Acid and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Statin-Intolerant Patients. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1353-1364. [PMID: 36876740 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2215024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 217] [Impact Index Per Article: 217.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bempedoic acid, an ATP citrate lyase inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and is associated with a low incidence of muscle-related adverse events; its effects on cardiovascular outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving patients who were unable or unwilling to take statins owing to unacceptable adverse effects ("statin-intolerant" patients) and had, or were at high risk for, cardiovascular disease. The patients were assigned to receive oral bempedoic acid, 180 mg daily, or placebo. The primary end point was a four-component composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization. RESULTS A total of 13,970 patients underwent randomization; 6992 were assigned to the bempedoic acid group and 6978 to the placebo group. The median duration of follow-up was 40.6 months. The mean LDL cholesterol level at baseline was 139.0 mg per deciliter in both groups, and after 6 months, the reduction in the level was greater with bempedoic acid than with placebo by 29.2 mg per deciliter; the observed difference in the percent reductions was 21.1 percentage points in favor of bempedoic acid. The incidence of a primary end-point event was significantly lower with bempedoic acid than with placebo (819 patients [11.7%] vs. 927 [13.3%]; hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 0.96; P = 0.004), as were the incidences of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal stroke, or nonfatal myocardial infarction (575 [8.2%] vs. 663 [9.5%]; hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96; P = 0.006); fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction (261 [3.7%] vs. 334 [4.8%]; hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.91; P = 0.002); and coronary revascularization (435 [6.2%] vs. 529 [7.6%]; hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.92; P = 0.001). Bempedoic acid had no significant effects on fatal or nonfatal stroke, death from cardiovascular causes, and death from any cause. The incidences of gout and cholelithiasis were higher with bempedoic acid than with placebo (3.1% vs. 2.1% and 2.2% vs. 1.2%, respectively), as were the incidences of small increases in serum creatinine, uric acid, and hepatic-enzyme levels. CONCLUSIONS Among statin-intolerant patients, treatment with bempedoic acid was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization). (Funded by Esperion Therapeutics; CLEAR Outcomes ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02993406.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven E Nissen
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - A Michael Lincoff
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Danielle Brennan
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Kausik K Ray
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Denise Mason
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - John J P Kastelein
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Paul D Thompson
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Peter Libby
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Leslie Cho
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Jorge Plutzky
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Harold E Bays
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Patrick M Moriarty
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Venu Menon
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Diederick E Grobbee
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Michael J Louie
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Chien-Feng Chen
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Na Li
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - LeAnne Bloedon
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Paula Robinson
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Maggie Horner
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - William J Sasiela
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Jackie McCluskey
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Deborah Davey
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Pedro Fajardo-Campos
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Predrag Petrovic
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Jan Fedacko
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Witold Zmuda
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Yury Lukyanov
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| | - Stephen J Nicholls
- From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.E.N., A.M.L., D.B., D.M., L.C., V.M., J.M., D.D.); Imperial College London, London (K.K.R.); University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.K.), and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (D.E.G.) - both in the Netherlands; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (P.D.T.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.L., J.P.); Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY (H.E.B.); University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (P.M.M.); Esperion Therapeutics, Ann Arbor, MI (M.J.L., C.-F.C., N.L., L.B., P.R., M.H., W.J.S.); Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y Metabólica, Tijuana, Mexico (P.F.-C.); General Hospital Sveti Luka, Smederevo, Serbia (P.P.); Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research Medipark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia (J.F.); Medicome, Oświęcim, Poland (W.Z.); Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.L.); and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.J.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fu S, Wang L, Moon S, Zong N, He H, Pejaver V, Relevo R, Walden A, Haendel M, Chute CG, Liu H. Recommended practices and ethical considerations for natural language processing-assisted observational research: A scoping review. Clin Transl Sci 2023; 16:398-411. [PMID: 36478394 PMCID: PMC10014687 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of studies have reported using natural language processing (NLP) to assist observational research by extracting clinical information from electronic health records (EHRs). Currently, no standardized reporting guidelines for NLP-assisted observational studies exist. The absence of detailed reporting guidelines may create ambiguity in the use of NLP-derived content, knowledge gaps in the current research reporting practices, and reproducibility challenges. To address these issues, we conducted a scoping review of NLP-assisted observational clinical studies and examined their reporting practices, focusing on NLP methodology and evaluation. Through our investigation, we discovered a high variation regarding the reporting practices, such as inconsistent use of references for measurement studies, variation in the reporting location (reference, appendix, and manuscript), and different granularity of NLP methodology and evaluation details. To promote the wide adoption and utilization of NLP solutions in clinical research, we outline several perspectives that align with the six principles released by the World Health Organization (WHO) that guide the ethical use of artificial intelligence for health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunyang Fu
- Department of AI and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Liwei Wang
- Department of AI and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sungrim Moon
- Department of AI and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nansu Zong
- Department of AI and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Huan He
- Department of AI and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Vikas Pejaver
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rose Relevo
- The National Center for Data to Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Anita Walden
- The National Center for Data to Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Melissa Haendel
- Center for Health AI, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Hongfang Liu
- Department of AI and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Warden BA, Guyton JR, Kovacs AC, Durham JA, Jones LK, Dixon DL, Jacobson TA, Duell PB. Assessment and management of statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS): A clinical perspective from the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol 2023; 17:19-39. [PMID: 36115813 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are the most common form of statin intolerance and are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events that manifest from statin underutilization and discontinuation. The reported frequencies of SAMS are divergent in the literature. The writing group estimates the prevalence of SAMS, namely all muscle symptoms temporally related to statin use but without regard to causality, to be about 10% (range 5% to 25%), and the prevalence of pharmacological SAMS, specifically muscle symptoms resulting from pharmacological properties of the statin, to be about 1-2% (range 0.5% to 4%). In clinical practice, SAMS are likely to result from a combination of pharmacological and nonpharmacological effects, however this does not make the symptoms any less clinically relevant. Regardless of the etiology, SAMS need to be addressed in accordance with patients' preferences and experiences. This clinical perspective reviews the epidemiology and underlying pathophysiology of SAMS, and the cardiovascular consequences resulting from statin discontinuation. We present patient-centered clinical and communication strategies to mitigate SAMS and improve medication adherence and outcomes among statin users. Treatment strategies include 1) optimizing lifestyle interventions, 2) modulating risk factors that may contribute to muscle symptoms, 3) optimizing statin tolerability by dose reduction, decreased dosing frequency, or use of an alternate statin with more favorable pharmacokinetic properties, and 4) use of non-statins, emphasizing those with evidence for atherosclerotic risk reduction, either in combination with or in place of statin therapy depending on the patient's circumstances. The focus of this clinical perspective is sustainable lipoprotein goal achievement, which is important for cardiovascular risk reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce A Warden
- Center for Preventive Cardiology, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (Dr Warden), (Dr. Duell).
| | - John R Guyton
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA (Dr Guyton).
| | - Adrienne C Kovacs
- CPsych, Equilibria Psychological Health, Toronto, ON, Canada (Dr Kovacs).
| | | | - Laney K Jones
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger; Danville, PA, USA (Dr Jones).
| | - Dave L Dixon
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, Richmond, VA, United States (Dr Dixon).
| | - Terry A Jacobson
- Department of Medicine, Lipid Clinic and CVD Risk Reduction Program, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States (Dr Jacobson).
| | - P Barton Duell
- Center for Preventive Cardiology, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (Dr Warden), (Dr. Duell); Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Golder S, Weissenbacher D, O’Connor K, Hennessy S, Gross R, Hernandez GG. Patient-Reported Reasons for Switching or Discontinuing Statin Therapy: A Mixed Methods Study Using Social Media. Drug Saf 2022; 45:971-981. [PMID: 35933649 PMCID: PMC9402720 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01212-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Statin discontinuation can have major negative health consequences. Studying the reasons for discontinuation can be challenging as traditional data collection methods have limitations. We propose an alternative approach using social media. Methods We used natural language processing and machine learning to extract mentions of discontinuation of statin therapy from an online health forum, WebMD (http://www.webmd.com). We then extracted data according to themes and identified key attributes of the people posting for themselves. Results We identified 2121 statin reviews that contained information on discontinuing at least one named statin. Sixty percent of people posting declared themselves as female and the most common age category was 55–64 years. Over half the people taking statins did so for < 6 months. By far the most common reason given (90%) was patient experience of adverse events, the most common of which were musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders. The rank order of adverse events reported in WebMD was largely consistent with those reported to regulatory agencies in the US and UK. Data were available on age, sex, duration of statin use, and, in some instances, adverse event resolution and rechallenge. In some instances, details were presented on resolution of the adverse event and rechallenge. Conclusion Social media may provide data on the reasons for switching or discontinuation of a medication, as well as unique patient perspectives that may influence continuation of a medication. This information source may provide unique data for novel interventions to reduce medication discontinuation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-022-01212-0.
Collapse
|
9
|
A microRNA Signature for the Diagnosis of Statins Intolerance. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23158146. [PMID: 35897722 PMCID: PMC9330734 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Western societies. Statins are the first-choice therapy for dislipidemias and are considered the cornerstone of ASCVD. Statin-associated muscle symptoms are the main reason for dropout of this treatment. There is an urgent need to identify new biomarkers with discriminative precision for diagnosing intolerance to statins (SI) in patients. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as evolutionarily conserved molecules that serve as reliable biomarkers and regulators of multiple cellular events in cardiovascular diseases. In the current study, we evaluated plasma miRNAs as potential biomarkers to discriminate between the SI vs. non-statin intolerant (NSI) population. It is a multicenter, prospective, case-control study. A total of 179 differentially expressed circulating miRNAs were screened in two cardiovascular risk patient cohorts (high and very high risk): (i) NSI (n = 10); (ii) SI (n = 10). Ten miRNAs were identified as being overexpressed in plasma and validated in the plasma of NSI (n = 45) and SI (n = 39). Let-7c-5p, let-7d-5p, let-7f-5p, miR-376a-3p and miR-376c-3p were overexpressed in the plasma of SI patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis supported the discriminative potential of the diagnosis. We propose a three-miRNA predictive fingerprint (let-7f, miR-376a-3p and miR-376c-3p) and several clinical variables (non-HDLc and years of dyslipidemia) for SI discrimination; this model achieves sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 83.67%, 88.57 and 89.10, respectively. In clinical practice, this set of miRNAs combined with clinical variables may discriminate between SI vs. NSI subjects. This multiparametric model may arise as a potential diagnostic biomarker with clinical value.
Collapse
|
10
|
Penson PE, Bruckert E, Marais D, Reiner Ž, Pirro M, Sahebkar A, Bajraktari G, Mirrakhimov E, Rizzo M, Mikhailidis DP, Sachinidis A, Gaita D, Latkovskis G, Mazidi M, Toth PP, Pella D, Alnouri F, Postadzhiyan A, Yeh HI, Mancini GBJ, von Haehling S, Banach M, Al‐Khnifsawi M, Alnouri F, Amar F, Atanasov AG, Bajraktari G, Banach M, Bhaskar S, Bytyçi I, Bjelakovic B, Bruckert E, Cafferata A, Ceska R, Cicero AF, Collet X, Daccord M, Descamps O, Djuric D, Durst R, Ezhov MV, Fras Z, Gaita D, Hernandez AV, Jones SR, Jozwiak J, Kakauridze N, Kallel A, Katsiki N, Khera A, Kostner K, Kubilius R, Latkovskis G, Mancini GJ, Marais AD, Martin SS, Martinez JA, Mazidi M, Mikhailidis DP, Mirrakhimov E, Miserez AR, Mitchenko O, Mitkovskaya NP, Moriarty PM, Nabavi SM, Nair D, Panagiotakos DB, Paragh G, Pella D, Penson PE, Petrulioniene Z, Pirro M, Postadzhiyan A, Puri R, Reda A, Reiner Ž, Radenkovic D, Rakowski M, Riadh J, Richter D, Rizzo M, Ruscica M, Sahebkar A, Sattar N, Serban M, Shehab AM, Shek AB, Sirtori CR, Stefanutti C, Tomasik T, Toth PP, Viigimaa M, Valdivielso P, Vinereanu D, Vohnout B, von Haehling S, Vrablik M, Wong ND, Yeh H, Zhisheng J, Zirlik A. Step-by-step diagnosis and management of the nocebo/drucebo effect in statin-associated muscle symptoms patients: a position paper from the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP). J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2022; 13:1596-1622. [PMID: 35969116 PMCID: PMC9178378 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Statin intolerance is a clinical syndrome whereby adverse effects (AEs) associated with statin therapy [most commonly statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS)] result in the discontinuation of therapy and consequently increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, complete statin intolerance occurs in only a small minority of treated patients (estimated prevalence of only 3-5%). Many perceived AEs are misattributed (e.g. physical musculoskeletal injury and inflammatory myopathies), and subjective symptoms occur as a result of the fact that patients expect them to do so when taking medicines (the nocebo/drucebo effect)-what might be truth even for over 50% of all patients with muscle weakness/pain. Clear guidance is necessary to enable the optimal management of plasma in real-world clinical practice in patients who experience subjective AEs. In this Position Paper of the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP), we present a step-by-step patient-centred approach to the identification and management of SAMS with a particular focus on strategies to prevent and manage the nocebo/drucebo effect and to improve long-term compliance with lipid-lowering therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter E Penson
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.,Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Liverpool, UK
| | - Eric Bruckert
- Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital and Sorbonne University, Cardio metabolic Institute, Paris, France
| | - David Marais
- Chemical Pathology Division of the Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town Health Science Faculty, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Željko Reiner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Matteo Pirro
- Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Amirhossein Sahebkar
- Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.,Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.,Clinic of Cardiology, University Clinical Centre of Kosova, Medical Faculty, University of Prishtina, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | - Gani Bajraktari
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Department of Internal Disease, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
| | - Erkin Mirrakhimov
- Department of Atherosclerosis and Coronary Heart Disease, National Center of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
| | - Manfredi Rizzo
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences Maternal and Infantile Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.,Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Dimitri P Mikhailidis
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University College London Medical School, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Alexandros Sachinidis
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences Maternal and Infantile Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.,2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dan Gaita
- Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Victor Babes, Timisoara, Romania.,Clinica de Cardiologie, Institutul de Boli Cardiovasculare Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Gustavs Latkovskis
- Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.,University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Mohsen Mazidi
- Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter P Toth
- CGH Medical Center, Sterling, IL, USA.,Cicarrone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Pella
- 2nd Department of Cardiology of the East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Disease and Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovak Republic
| | - Fahad Alnouri
- Cardiovascular Prevention Unit, Adult Cardiology Department, Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Arman Postadzhiyan
- Department of General Medicine, Emergency University Hospital 'St. Anna', Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Hung-I Yeh
- Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - G B John Mancini
- Department of General Medicine, Emergency University Hospital 'St. Anna', Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Stephan von Haehling
- Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Heart Center, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Maciej Banach
- Polish Moother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute (PMMHRI), Lodz, Poland.,Department of Preventive Cardiology and Lipidology, Medical University of Lodz (MUL), Lodz, Poland.,Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Gora, Poland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu Y, Zhu X, Ning Z. Efficacy of statins combined with amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis. EUR J INFLAMM 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/1721727x221094426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in clinics with a high mortality rate. Recently, statins combined with amiodarone and amiodarone alone were used in the treatment of AF. This systematic review study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy and usefulness of statins combined with amiodarone and amiodarone alone in treating AF. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were used to search for the relevant studies and full-text articles involved in evaluating statin-amiodarone versus amiodarone alone for AF. All included articles were quality assessed, and the data analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.4. Results: Eight (8) relevant studies with 758 AF patients were included in this analysis. In the Meta-analysis, Statin-amiodarone treatment reduced AF recurrence (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50–0.75; p < 0.00001), C-reactive protein (CRP) level (MD, 0.96; 95%CI, 0.64–1.29, p < 0.00001) and Left atrial diameter (LAD) (MD, 0.81; 95%CI, 0.06–1.56; p = 0.03) compared with amiodarone alone for AF. However, no difference was observed for change of total cholesterol (TC) (MD, 1.32; 95%CI, −0.24–2.88; p = 0.10). Conclusion: Statin-amiodarone effectively reduced CRP level, LAD and reduced the recurrence of AF than amiodarone alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingbiao Wu
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Zhu
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhongping Ning
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Laufs U, Ballantyne CM, Banach M, Bays H, Catapano AL, Duell PB, Goldberg AC, Gotto AM, Leiter LA, Ray KK, Bloedon LT, MacDougall D, Zhang Y, Mancini GBJ. Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid in patients not receiving statins in phase 3 clinical trials. J Clin Lipidol 2022; 16:286-297. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
13
|
Plutzky J, Benson MD, Chaney K, Bui TV, Kraft M, Matta L, McPartlin M, Zelle D, Cannon CP, Dodek A, Gaziano TA, Desai AS, MacRae CA, Scirica BM. Population health management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol via a remote, algorithmic, navigator-executed program. Am Heart J 2022; 243:15-27. [PMID: 34481756 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation of guideline-directed cholesterol management remains low despite definitive evidence establishing such measures reduce cardiovascular (CV) events, especially in high atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) risk patients. Modern electronic resources now exist that may help improve health care delivery. While electronic medical records (EMR) allow for population health screening, the potential for coupling EMR screening to remotely delivered algorithmic population-based management has been less studied as a way of overcoming barriers to optimal cholesterol management. METHODS In an academically affiliated healthcare system, using EMR screening, we sought to identify 1,000 high ASCVD risk patients not meeting guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) goals within specific system-affiliated primary care practices. Contacted patients received cholesterol education and were offered a remote, guideline-directed, algorithmic cholesterol management program executed by trained but non-licensed "navigators" under professional supervision. Navigators used telephone, proprietary software and internet resources to facilitate algorithm-driven, guideline-based medication initiation/titration, and laboratory testing until patients achieved LDL-C goals or exited the program. As a clinical effectiveness program for cholesterol guideline implementation, comparison was made to those contacted patients who declined program-based medication management, and received education only, along with their usual care. RESULTS 1021 patients falling into guideline-defined high ASCVD risk groups warranting statin therapy (ASCVD, type 2 diabetes, LDL ≥ 190 mg/dL, calculated 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5%) and not achieving guideline-defined target LDL-C levels and/or therapy were identified and contacted. Among the 698 such patients who opted for program medication management, significant LDL-C reductions occurred in the total cohort (mean -65.4 mg/dL, 45% decrease), and each high ASCVD risk subgroup: ASCVD (-57.2 mg/dL, -48.0%); diabetes mellitus (-53.1 mg/dL, -40.0%); severe hypercholesterolemia (-76.3 mg/dL, -45.7%); elevated ASCVD 10-year risk (-62.8 mg/dL, -41.1%) (P<0.001 for all), without any significant complications. Among 20% of participants with reported statin intolerance, average LDL-C decreased from baseline 143 mg/dL to 85 mg/dL using mainly statins and ezetimibe, with limited PCSK9 inhibitor use. In comparison, eligible high ASCVD risk patients who were contacted but opted for education only, a 17% LDL-C decrease occurred over a similar timeframe, with 80% remaining with an LDL-C over 100 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS A remote, algorithm-driven, navigator-executed cholesterol management program successfully identified high ASCVD risk undertreated patients using EMR screening and was associated with significantly improved guideline-directed LDL-C control, supporting this approach as a novel strategy for improving health care access and delivery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Target Populations and Treatment Cost for Bempedoic Acid and PCSK9 Inhibitors: A Simulation Study in a Contemporary CAD Cohort. Clin Ther 2021; 43:1583-1600. [PMID: 34462126 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The lowered LDL-C treatment goal of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology dyslipidemia guidelines results in a significant increase in the projected need for cost-intensive proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. Addition of bempedoic acid (BA) to established oral lipid-lowering medication (LLM) has the potential to enable affordable LDL-C goal attainment, particularly in patients with statin intolerance (SI). The goal of this study was to quantify the target populations for BA and PCSK9 inhibitors as well as the related treatment costs to achieve the LDL-C goal of <55 mg/dL and a ≥50% reduction assuming the addition of BA to LLM. METHODS This study included 1922 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) from the contemporary observational cohort study INTERCATH. A Monte Carlo simulation incorporating an algorithm adding sequentially a statin, ezetimibe, optionally BA, and a PCSK9 inhibitor was applied to achieve the LDL-C treatment goal, with consideration of both partial and total SI. Two scenarios were simulated for both a moderate (2% full and 10% partial) and a high (12% full) rate of SI: (1) without BA; and (2) with BA. FINDINGS Patients' mean age was 69.3 years, and the median baseline LDL-C level was 86.0 mg/dL. The need for a PCSK9 inhibitor would be 41.4% for a moderate rate of SI and 46.1% for a high rate of SI. Addition of BA would: (1) reduce the need for a PCSK9 inhibitor to 25.3% and 29.4%, thus lowering the annual overall treatment cost incurred through PCSK9 inhibitor ± BA per 1 million patients with CAD by 13.3% and 10.5%; (2) lower the cost per prevented event in the entire cohort (-5.0% and -6.3%), although at the price of fewer prevented events (-8.7% and -4.5%); and (3) reduce the cost per prevented event (-6.8% for both rates of SI) while preventing more events (7.6% and 6.9%) in the subpopulation of patients with full SI. IMPLICATIONS Use of BA is projected to reduce the need for PCSK9 inhibitors as well as the treatment cost for add-on LLM. The subpopulation of patients with full SI might profit particularly.
Collapse
|
15
|
Berman AN, Biery DW, Ginder C, Hulme OL, Marcusa D, Leiva O, Wu WY, Cardin N, Hainer J, Bhatt DL, Di Carli MF, Turchin A, Blankstein R. Natural language processing for the assessment of cardiovascular disease comorbidities: The cardio-Canary comorbidity project. Clin Cardiol 2021; 44:1296-1304. [PMID: 34347314 PMCID: PMC8428009 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Accurate ascertainment of comorbidities is paramount in clinical research. While manual adjudication is labor‐intensive and expensive, the adoption of electronic health records enables computational analysis of free‐text documentation using natural language processing (NLP) tools. Hypothesis: We sought to develop highly accurate NLP modules to assess for the presence of five key cardiovascular comorbidities in a large electronic health record system. Methods: One‐thousand clinical notes were randomly selected from a cardiovascular registry at Mass General Brigham. Trained physicians manually adjudicated these notes for the following five diagnostic comorbidities: hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and stroke/transient ischemic attack. Using the open‐source Canary NLP system, five separate NLP modules were designed based on 800 “training‐set” notes and validated on 200 “test‐set” notes. Results: Across the five NLP modules, the sentence‐level and note‐level sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value was always greater than 85% and was most often greater than 90%. Accuracy tended to be highest for conditions with greater diagnostic clarity (e.g. diabetes and hypertension) and slightly lower for conditions whose greater diagnostic challenges (e.g. myocardial infarction and embolic stroke) may lead to less definitive documentation. Conclusion: We designed five open‐source and highly accurate NLP modules that can be used to assess for the presence of important cardiovascular comorbidities in free‐text health records. These modules have been placed in the public domain and can be used for clinical research, trial recruitment and population management at any institution as well as serve as the basis for further development of cardiovascular NLP tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam N Berman
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David W Biery
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Curtis Ginder
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Olivia L Hulme
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel Marcusa
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Orly Leiva
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wanda Y Wu
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nicholas Cardin
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jon Hainer
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marcelo F Di Carli
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexander Turchin
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ron Blankstein
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brunette CA, Vassy JL. The role of SLCO1B1 genotyping in lowering cardiovascular risk. Pharmacogenomics 2021; 22:649-656. [PMID: 34196599 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2021-0075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Charles A Brunette
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA.,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Jason L Vassy
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Population Precision Health, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Insani WN, Whittlesea C, Alwafi H, Man KKC, Chapman S, Wei L. Prevalence of adverse drug reactions in the primary care setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252161. [PMID: 34038474 PMCID: PMC8153435 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a major cause of iatrogenic morbidity and mortality in patient care. While a substantial body of work has been undertaken to characterise ADRs in the hospital setting, the overall burden of ADRs in the primary care remains unclear. OBJECTIVES To investigate the prevalence of ADRs in the primary care setting and factors affecting the heterogeneity of the estimates. METHODS Studies were identified through searching of Medline, Embase, CINAHL and IPA databases. We included observational studies that reported information on the prevalence of ADRs in patients receiving primary care. Disease and treatment specific studies were excluded. Quality of the included studies were assessed using Smyth ADRs adapted scale. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimate. Potential source of heterogeneity, including age groups, ADRs definitions, ADRs detection methods, study setting, quality of the studies, and sample size, were investigated using sub-group analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS Thirty-three studies with a total study population of 1,568,164 individuals were included. The pooled prevalence of ADRs in the primary care setting was 8.32% (95% CI, 7.82, 8.83). The percentage of preventable ADRs ranged from 12.35-37.96%, with the pooled estimate of 22.96% (95% CI, 7.82, 38.09). Cardiovascular system drugs were the most commonly implicated medication class. Methods of ADRs detection, age group, setting, and sample size contributed significantly to the heterogeneity of the estimates. CONCLUSION ADRs constitute a significant health problem in the primary care setting. Further research should focus on examining whether ADRs affect subsequent clinical outcomes, particularly in high-risk therapeutic areas. This information may better inform strategies to reduce the burden of ADRs in the primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Widya N. Insani
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Center of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Cate Whittlesea
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hassan Alwafi
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kenneth K. C. Man
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Sarah Chapman
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Li Wei
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zheng S, Huang H, Li Y, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Liang J, Zhang S, Liu M, Fang Z. Yin-xing-tong-mai decoction attenuates atherosclerosis via activating PPARγ-LXRα-ABCA1/ABCG1 pathway. Pharmacol Res 2021; 169:105639. [PMID: 33932607 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Atherosclerosis is now the major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Formation of macrophage-derived foam cells is a hallmark of atherosclerosis, which is regulated by cholesterol uptake, intracellular metabolism, and efflux. PPARγ-LXRα-ABCA1/ABCG1 pathway plays an important part in regulating cholesterol efflux and this pathway could be a promising target for treating atherosclerosis. However, due to undesirable systemic effects, PPARγ agonist therapy for atherosclerosis remains challenging. Many traditional Chinese medicine has been well accepted and applied in atherosclerosis treatment. Yin-xing-tong-mai decoction (YXTMD) has been applied for treating atherosclerosis for decades. However, the mechanism remains to be explored. Here, we showed that YXTMD effectively attenuated atherosclerosis in ApoE-/- mice. YXTMD increased cholesterol efflux of foam cell by upregulation of ABCA1 and ABCG1 in vivo and in vitro. Through bioinformatic analysis and experimental validation, we found that PPARγ was an important downstream effector of YXTMD in macrophages. Reduction of PPARγ significantly decreased LXRα, ABCA1, and ABCG1 expression in macrophages, with reduced cholesterol efflux. In conclusion, these findings confirmed that YXTMD attenuated atherosclerosis by activating the PPARγ-LXRα- ABCA1/ABCG1 pathway to enhance cholesterol efflux.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shasha Zheng
- Institute of Hypertension, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hong Huang
- Institute of Hypertension, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yizhuo Li
- Institute of Hypertension, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ye Wang
- Institute of Hypertension, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yawei Zheng
- Institute of Hypertension, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Junya Liang
- Institute of Hypertension, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Siqi Zhang
- Institute of Hypertension, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Institute of Hypertension, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Zhuyuan Fang
- Institute of Hypertension, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
A Combination of Lactoplantibacillus plantarum Strains CECT7527, CECT7528, and CECT7529 Plus Monacolin K Reduces Blood Cholesterol: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13041206. [PMID: 33917503 PMCID: PMC8067491 DOI: 10.3390/nu13041206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Dietary supplements have been proposed to help manage blood cholesterol, including red yeast rice (RYR) extracts, plant sterols and stanols, beta-glucans, and some probiotics. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of RYR (containing 10 mg of monacolin K) combined with 109 CFU of three Lactoplantibacillus plantarum strains (CECT7527, CECT7528, and CECT7529). Methods: A 12-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted. In total, 39 adult patients were enrolled, having total cholesterol (TC) ≥200 mg/dL, and being statin-naïve or having recently stopped statin treatment because of intolerance. Active product or placebo were taken once daily, and subjects were evaluated at baseline, 6, and 12 weeks. Results: Study groups were comparable at baseline, except for history of recent hypercholesterolemia treatment (81% in active vs. 22% in placebo). Changes in LDL cholesterol and TC became significant compared to placebo (mean difference between groups and standard error of the mean = 23.6 ± 1.5 mg/dL, p = 0.023 and 31.4 ± 1.9 mg/dL, p = 0.011, respectively) upon adjusting for the baseline imbalance in hypercholesterolemia treatment. No adverse effects were noted during the study. Conclusion: This combination of 10 mg of monacolin K and L. plantarum strains was well tolerated and achieved a statistically significant greater reduction in LDL-C and TC in the intervention group compared to the placebo, once adjusting for recent history of hypercholesterolemia treatment.
Collapse
|
20
|
Herrett E, Williamson E, Brack K, Perkins A, Thayne A, Shakur-Still H, Roberts I, Prowse D, Beaumont D, Jamal Z, Goldacre B, van Staa T, MacDonald TM, Armitage J, Moore M, Hoffman M, Smeeth L. The effect of statins on muscle symptoms in primary care: the StatinWISE series of 200 N-of-1 RCTs. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-62. [PMID: 33709907 DOI: 10.3310/hta25160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uncertainty persists about whether or not statins cause symptomatic muscle adverse effects (e.g. pain, stiffness and weakness) in the absence of severe myositis. OBJECTIVES To establish the effect of statins on all muscle symptoms, and the effect of statins on muscle symptoms that are perceived to be statin related. DESIGN A series of 200 double-blinded N-of-1 trials. SETTING Participants were recruited from 50 general practices in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS Patients who were considering discontinuing statin use and those who had discontinued statin use in the last 3 years because of perceived muscle symptoms. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomised to a sequence of six 2-month treatment periods during which they received 20 mg of atorvastatin daily or a matched placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was self-reported muscle symptoms rated using a visual analogue scale on the last week of each treatment period. Secondary outcomes included the participant's belief about the cause of their muscle symptoms, the site of muscle symptoms, how the muscle symptoms affected the participant, any other symptoms they experienced, adherence to medication, the participant's decision about statin treatment following the trial, and whether or not they found their own trial result helpful. RESULTS A total of 151 out of 200 (75.5%) randomised participants provided one or more visual analogue scale measurements in a placebo period and one or more measurements in a statin period, and were included in the primary analysis. There was no evidence of a difference in muscle symptom scores between statin and placebo periods (mean difference statin minus placebo -0.11, 95% confidence interval -0.36 to 0.14; p = 0.398). Withdrawals, adherence and missing data were similar during the statin periods and the placebo periods. CONCLUSIONS Among people who previously reported severe muscle symptoms while taking statins, this series of randomised N-of-1 trials found no overall effect of statins on muscle symptoms compared with the placebo. The slight difference in withdrawals due to muscle symptoms suggests that statins may contribute to symptoms in a small number of patients. The results are generalisable to patients who are considering discontinuing or have already discontinued statins because of muscle symptoms, and who are willing to re-challenge or participate in their own N-of-1 trial. FUTURE WORK We recommend that additional statins and doses are explored using N-of-1 trials. More broadly, N-of-1 trials present a useful tool for exploring transient symptoms with other medications. LIMITATIONS This study used 20-mg doses of atorvastatin only. Furthermore, a dropout rate of 43% was observed, but this was accounted for in the power calculations. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN30952488 and EudraCT 2016-000141-31. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Herrett
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Williamson
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kieran Brack
- Liver Research, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alexander Perkins
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Andrew Thayne
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Ian Roberts
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Danielle Prowse
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Danielle Beaumont
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Zahra Jamal
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ben Goldacre
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tjeerd van Staa
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Thomas M MacDonald
- Medicines Monitoring Unit, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Jane Armitage
- Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- School of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Liam Smeeth
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Herrett E, Williamson E, Brack K, Beaumont D, Perkins A, Thayne A, Shakur-Still H, Roberts I, Prowse D, Goldacre B, van Staa T, MacDonald TM, Armitage J, Wimborne J, Melrose P, Singh J, Brooks L, Moore M, Hoffman M, Smeeth L. Statin treatment and muscle symptoms: series of randomised, placebo controlled n-of-1 trials. BMJ 2021; 372:n135. [PMID: 33627334 PMCID: PMC7903384 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish the effect of statins on muscle symptoms in people who had previously reported muscle symptoms when taking statins. DESIGN Series of randomised, placebo controlled n-of-1 trials. SETTING Primary care across 50 sites in the United Kingdom, December 2016 to April 2018. PARTICIPANTS 200 participants who had recently stopped or were considering stopping treatment with statins because of muscle symptoms. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomised to a sequence of six double blinded treatment periods (two months each) of atorvastatin 20 mg daily or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES At the end of each treatment period, participants rated their muscle symptoms on a visual analogue scale (0-10). The primary analysis compared symptom scores in the statin and placebo periods. RESULTS 151 participants provided symptoms scores for at least one statin period and one placebo period and were included in the primary analysis. Overall, no difference in muscle symptom scores was found between the statin and placebo periods (mean difference statin minus placebo -0.11, 95% confidence interval -0.36 to 0.14; P=0.40)). Withdrawals because of intolerable muscle symptoms were 18 participants (9%) during a statin period and 13 (7%) during a placebo period. Two thirds of those completing the trial reported restarting long term treatment with statins. CONCLUSIONS No overall effect of atorvastatin 20 mg on muscle symptoms compared with placebo was found in participants who had previously reported severe muscle symptoms when taking statins. Most people completing the trial intended to restart treatment with statins. N-of-1 trials can assess drug effects at the group level and guide individual treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN30952488, EUDRACT 2016-000141-31, NCT02781064.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Herrett
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Williamson
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kieran Brack
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Danielle Beaumont
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Alexander Perkins
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Andrew Thayne
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Haleema Shakur-Still
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ian Roberts
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Danielle Prowse
- Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ben Goldacre
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tjeerd van Staa
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Jane Armitage
- Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jon Wimborne
- Bay Medical Practice, York Bridge Surgery, Morecambe, UK
| | - Paula Melrose
- Bay Medical Practice, York Bridge Surgery, Morecambe, UK
| | | | - Lucy Brooks
- Keats and Hampstead Group Practice, London, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- School of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Maurice Hoffman
- Patient member of the trial steering committee appointed by NIHR, London, UK
| | - Liam Smeeth
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pulipati VP, Davidson MH. How I treat statin-associated side effects in an outpatient setting. Future Cardiol 2021; 17:1249-1260. [PMID: 33464124 DOI: 10.2217/fca-2020-0153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Dyslipidemia promotes atherosclerosis and causes cardiovascular diseases. Statins are potent lipid-lowering medications with a cardiovascular mortality benefit. They are generally safe and well tolerated but sometimes can be associated with side effects of variable severity. The most common side effect is statin-associated muscle symptoms. Uncommon side effects include new-onset diabetes mellitus and elevation in liver enzymes. These effects can lead to noncompliance and premature discontinuation of the medication. Hence, it is crucial to identify patients with true statin-associated side effects (SASE) to ensure optimal statin use. The appropriate evaluation of the patient before starting statins and proactive utilization of available diagnostic tests to rule out alternate etiologies mimicking adverse effects are essential for accurate diagnosis of SASE. In patients with true SASE, timely intervention with modified statin or non-statins is beneficial. Herein, we discuss key clinical trial data on statins and non-statins, and describe our center's approach toward patients with SASE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishnu Priya Pulipati
- Preventive Cardiology, Section of Cardiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC 6080 B-608A, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Michael H Davidson
- Preventive Cardiology, Section of Cardiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC 6080 B-608A, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wu J, Morrison F, Zhao Z, Haynes G, He X, Ali AK, Shubina M, Malmasi S, Ge W, Peng X, Turchin A. Reasons for discontinuing insulin and factors associated with insulin discontinuation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a real-world evidence study. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol 2021; 7:1. [PMID: 33402226 PMCID: PMC7786496 DOI: 10.1186/s40842-020-00115-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that insulin therapy of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is frequently discontinued. However, the reasons for discontinuing insulin and factors associated with insulin discontinuation in this patient population are not well understood. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with T2DM prescribed insulin between 2010 and 2017 at Partners HealthCare. Reasons for discontinuing insulin and factors associated with insulin discontinuation were studied using electronic medical records (EMR) data. Natural language processing (NLP) was applied to identify reasons from unstructured clinical notes. Factors associated with insulin discontinuation were extracted from structured EMR data and evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Among 7009 study patients, 2957 (42.2%) discontinued insulin within 12 months after study entry. Most patients who discontinued insulin (2121 / 71.7%) had reasons for discontinuation documented. The most common reasons were improving blood glucose control (33.2%), achieved weight loss (18.5%) and initiation of non-insulin diabetes medications (16.7%). In multivariable analysis adjusted for demographics and comorbidities, patients were more likely to discontinue either basal or bolus insulin if they were on a basal-bolus regimen (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8; p < 0.001) or were being seen by an endocrinologist (OR 2.6; 95% CI 2.2 to 3.0; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this large real-world evidence study conducted in an area with a high penetration of health insurance, insulin discontinuation countenanced by healthcare providers was common. In most cases it was linked to achievement of glycemic control, achieved weight loss and initiation of other diabetes medications. Factors associated with and stated reasons for insulin discontinuation were different from those previously described for non-adherence to insulin therapy, identifying it as a distinct clinical phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianmin Wu
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Fritha Morrison
- Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | | | | | - Xuanyao He
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Ayad K Ali
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Maria Shubina
- Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Shervin Malmasi
- Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wendong Ge
- Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Alexander Turchin
- Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Statins, toxicity, and their adverse effects via oxidative imbalance. Toxicology 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-819092-0.00026-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
25
|
Pharmacist-administered long-acting injectable PCSK9 service: A solution to improve patient access and adherence. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2020; 61:e83-e85. [PMID: 33384242 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
In 2015, 2 proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, alirocumab and evolocumab, were approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Both therapies reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by approximately 60% and reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in patients with established ASCVD when added to background statin therapy. The initial cost of these medications was approximately $15,000 per year, which made them largely cost-prohibitive for many patients and the overall health care system. In recent years, the cost of both agents has been reduced by 60%, and they are no longer only available through specialty pharmacies. In addition, a third PCSK9-modulating therapy, inclisiran, is nearing FDA approval. Ongoing inclisiran therapy only requires biannual subcutaneous administration and achieves LDL-C reductions of approximately 50%. As the use of PCSK9-modulating therapies increases, models that improve adherence and persistence over time will be critical to ensure patient access and maximize their value. Community pharmacists can play an important role helping patients not only obtain access to these therapies by navigating previous authorization requests but also adhere to therapy by offering administration. Community pharmacists can also provide therapeutic monitoring using point-of-care lipid testing to ensure efficacy over time. Such a service could potentially be sustained through reimbursement for administration and point-of-care lipid testing. Given the cost of these therapies, innovative models involving community pharmacists will be necessary to ensure patient access to these preventive therapies and minimize overall costs to the health care system.
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen Z, Liu X, Hogan W, Shenkman E, Bian J. Applications of artificial intelligence in drug development using real-world data. Drug Discov Today 2020; 26:1256-1264. [PMID: 33358699 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been actively promoting the use of real-world data (RWD) in drug development. RWD can generate important real-world evidence reflecting the real-world clinical environment where the treatments are used. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence (AI), especially machine- and deep-learning (ML/DL) methods, have been increasingly used across many stages of the drug development process. Advancements in AI have also provided new strategies to analyze large, multidimensional RWD. Thus, we conducted a rapid review of articles from the past 20 years, to provide an overview of the drug development studies that use both AI and RWD. We found that the most popular applications were adverse event detection, trial recruitment, and drug repurposing. Here, we also discuss current research gaps and future opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoyi Chen
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0177, USA
| | - Xiong Liu
- AI Innovation Center, Novartis, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - William Hogan
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0177, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shenkman
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0177, USA
| | - Jiang Bian
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0177, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Blaum C, Seiffert M, Goßling A, Kröger F, Bay B, Lorenz T, Braetz J, Graef A, Zeller T, Schnabel R, Clemmensen P, Westermann D, Blankenberg S, Brunner FJ, Waldeyer C. The need for PCSK9 inhibitors and associated treatment costs according to the 2019 ESC dyslipidaemia guidelines vs. the risk-based allocation algorithm of the 2017 ESC consensus statement: a simulation study in a contemporary CAD cohort. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2020; 28:47-56. [PMID: 33580772 DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recently updated European Society of Cardiology (ESC) dyslipidaemia guidelines recommend a lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal of <55 mg/dL for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), with a concomitant Class IA upgrade for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) for patients not reaching their LDL-C goal under conventional lipid-lowering therapy. AIMS We aim to quantify the need for PCSK9i and the related costs to achieve the revised LDL-C goal in ASCVD patients compared to former ESC recommendations, in particular the risk-based 2017 ESC consensus update. METHODS AND RESULTS We included patients with ASCVD from an observational cohort study ongoing since 2015. A Monte Carlo simulation incorporating a treatment algorithm adding sequentially a statin, ezetimibe, and a PCSK9i was applied with consideration of partial and total statin intolerance. The need for PCSK9i was calculated for three different ESC recommendations (2019 guidelines, 2016 guidelines, 2017 consensus update). Preventable events and treatment costs due to PCSK9i were calculated for a range of annual event rates from 2% to 8% and annual treatment costs of ca. 6050 €. We included 1780 patients (mean age 69.5 years). Median LDL-C at baseline was 85.0 mg/dL, with 61% of patients taking lipid-lowering medication. The need for PCSK9i was simulated to be 42.0% (ESC 2019), 31.9% (ESC 2016), and 5.0% (ESC 2017). The LDL-C goals were achieved in 97.9%, 99.1%, and 60.9% of patients, respectively. Annual treatment cost for PCSK9i per 1 000 000 ASCVD patients would be 2.54 billion € (ESC 2019) compared to 0.30 billion € (ESC 2017). Costs per prevented event due to PCSK9i initiation differed widely, e.g. 887 000 € for an event rate of 3% and a treatment goal of <55 mg/dL compared to 205 000 € for an event rate of 7% and risk-based use of PCSK9i. CONCLUSION The revised LDL-C treatment goals increase the projected need for PCSK9i with a substantial increase in associated treatment cost. An allocation strategy based on residual LDL-C and clinical or angiographic risk factors leads to a more tailored target population for PCSK9i with a reasonable benefit/cost ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Blaum
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Seiffert
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e. V.), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alina Goßling
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Friederike Kröger
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Bay
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thiess Lorenz
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julian Braetz
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Annika Graef
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Zeller
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e. V.), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Renate Schnabel
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e. V.), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Clemmensen
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e. V.), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e. V.), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e. V.), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fabian J Brunner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Waldeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e. V.), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Enright C, Peterson A, Eickhoff J, Dodge A. Statin adherence and LDL-C reduction in a pediatric population. PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2020.101210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
29
|
Penson PE, Banach M. Natural compounds as anti-atherogenic agents: Clinical evidence for improved cardiovascular outcomes. Atherosclerosis 2020; 316:58-65. [PMID: 33340999 DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Atherosclerosis, a chronic progressive inflammatory condition characterized by the formation of lipid-laden lesions in arterial walls, is associated with substantial morbidity (including ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction) and mortality. Risk factors for atherosclerosis are well understood and can be ameliorated by evidence-based and guideline-directed pharmaceutical agents (e.g. the reduction of circulating concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by statins). Additionally, many natural products (usually food derivatives) and 'nutraceuticals' (pharmaceutical formulations prepared from components of foods) have been shown to have favourable effects on risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This literature review summarises the evidence for anti-atherogenic natural compounds. The article focuses on agents which are discussed in international guidelines and are supported by extensive high-quality randomized-controlled trial (RCT) data. We focus on micronutrients (compounds present in food in small quantities) and nutraceuticals, in particular, phytosterols, polyunsaturated ω-3 fatty acids and red-yeast rice. We conclude that the 'nutraceutical approach' (identify the active ingredients in natural products; produce high-quality products according to Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines; evaluate them in long-term outcomes trials) is the mechanism by which the domains of natural product research and evidence-based medicine can move closer together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter E Penson
- School of Pharmacy & Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK; Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Liverpool, UK
| | - Maciej Banach
- Department of Hypertension, Chair of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland; Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute (PMMHRI), Lodz, Poland; Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Gora, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Reston JT, Buelt A, Donahue MP, Neubauer B, Vagichev E, McShea K. Interventions to Improve Statin Tolerance and Adherence in Patients at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease : A Systematic Review for the 2020 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Guidelines for Management of Dyslipidemia. Ann Intern Med 2020; 173:806-812. [PMID: 32956601 DOI: 10.7326/m20-4680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Strategies to improve patients' tolerance of and adherence to statins may enhance the effectiveness of dyslipidemia treatment in those at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). PURPOSE To assess the benefits and harms of interventions to improve statin adherence in patients at risk for CVD. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library from December 2013 through May 2019 (English language only). STUDY SELECTION Systematic reviews (SRs), randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cohort studies that addressed interventions for improving statin tolerance and adherence. DATA EXTRACTION One investigator abstracted data and assessed study quality, and a second investigator checked abstractions and assessments for accuracy. DATA SYNTHESIS One SR, 1 RCT, and 4 cohort studies were included. The SR found that intensified patient care improved adherence and decreased levels of total serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at 6 months or more of follow-up. Compared with statin treatment discontinuation, nondaily statin dosing lowered total cholesterol and LDL-C levels. One large cohort study suggested that more than 90% of patients who discontinued statin treatment could be rechallenged with the same or a different statin and be adherent 1 year after a statin-related adverse event led to discontinuation. Two small cohort studies reported that more than 90% of patients who were previously intolerant to statins and who had low baseline levels of vitamin D were able to adhere to statins 1 year after vitamin D supplementation. LIMITATION This is a qualitative synthesis of new evidence with existing meta-analyses, and studies had several methodological shortcomings. CONCLUSION Although the strength of evidence for most interventions was low or very low, intensified patient care and rechallenge with the same or a different statin (or a lower dose) seem to be favorable options for improving statin adherence. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James T Reston
- ECRI, Center for Clinical Evidence and Guidelines, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania (J.T.R.)
| | - Andrew Buelt
- Bay Pines VA Healthcare System, Bay Pines, Florida (A.B.)
| | - Mark P Donahue
- Duke University Medical Center and Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (M.P.D.)
| | - Brian Neubauer
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland (B.N.)
| | - Elena Vagichev
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (E.V.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hickson RP, Robinson JG, Annis IE, Killeya-Jones LA, Fang G. It's Not Too Late to Improve Statin Adherence: Association Between Changes in Statin Adherence from Before to After Acute Myocardial Infarction and All-Cause Mortality. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 8:e011378. [PMID: 30929542 PMCID: PMC6509715 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.118.011378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Many older patients have a change in statin adherence-either an increase or a decrease-from before to after an acute myocardial infarction ( AMI ), but its association with mortality is unknown. Methods and Results Using Medicare administrative claims, a cohort of patients ≥66 years old with an AMI hospitalization from 2008 to 2010 was assembled. Statin adherence was measured for 180 days pre- AMI and 180 days post- AMI and categorized as severely nonadherent, moderately nonadherent, or adherent. Categorical change in statin adherence from pre- to post- AMI was assessed. Patients were then followed for up to 18 months for all-cause mortality. A Cox proportional hazards model was applied to estimate the effects of statin adherence change on all-cause mortality, adjusted for patient baseline characteristics. Of 101 011 eligible patients, 20% had a categorical increase in adherence, 16% decreased, and 14% remained nonadherent both pre- and post- AMI . Compared with patients who were always severely nonadherent (both pre- and post- AMI ), patients whose adherence increased from severely nonadherent to adherent (hazard ratio=0.83; 95% CI : 0.75-0.92) and patients who were always adherent (hazard ratio=0.88; 95% CI : 0.82-0.94) were less likely to die; patients whose adherence decreased from moderately nonadherent to severely nonadherent were more likely to die (hazard ratio=1.11; 95% CI : 1.01-1.22). Conclusions After an AMI , patients with decreased statin adherence had the worst mortality outcomes. However, patients with increased statin adherence had a similar risk of mortality compared with continuously adherent patients, suggesting that, even after an AMI , it is not too late to improve statin adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan P Hickson
- 1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC.,2 Department of Epidemiology UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC
| | - Jennifer G Robinson
- 3 Department of Epidemiology College of Public Health University of Iowa Iowa City IA.,4 Department of Internal Medicine Carver College of Medicine University of Iowa Iowa City IA
| | - Izabela E Annis
- 1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC
| | - Ley A Killeya-Jones
- 1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC
| | - Gang Fang
- 1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Terry C, Neal EB, Daly K, Skupien D, Griffith ML. Vanderbilt Health Affiliated Network Statin Outreach Service. Clin Diabetes 2020; 38:295-299. [PMID: 32699480 PMCID: PMC7364451 DOI: 10.2337/cd19-0099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Quality Improvement Success Stories are published by the American Diabetes Association in collaboration with the American College of Physicians and the National Diabetes Education Program. This series is intended to highlight best practices and strategies from programs and clinics that have successfully improved the quality of care for people with diabetes or related conditions. Each article in the series is reviewed and follows a standard format developed by the editors of Clinical Diabetes. The following article describes the design and implementation of a pharmacist-led program to improve rates of statin use among appropriate patients in high-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Terry
- Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt Health, Vanderbilt Health Affiliated Network, Nashville, TN
| | - Erin B. Neal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt Health, Vanderbilt Health Affiliated Network, Nashville, TN
| | - Katelyn Daly
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Michelle L. Griffith
- Department of Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Assessing the clinical impact of CYP2C9 pharmacogenetic variation on phenytoin prescribing practice and patient response in an integrated health system. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2020; 29:192-199. [PMID: 31461080 DOI: 10.1097/fpc.0000000000000383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of CYP2C9 variation on phenytoin patient response and clinician prescribing practice where genotype was unknown during treatment. METHODS A retrospective analysis of Resource on Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging cohort participants who filled a phenytoin prescription between 1996 and 2017. We used laboratory test results, medication dispensing records, and medical notes to identify associations of CYP2C9 genotype with phenytoin blood concentration, neurologic side effects, and medication dispensing patterns reflecting clinician prescribing practice and patient response. RESULTS Among 993 participants, we identified 69% extensive, 20% high-intermediate, 10% low-intermediate, and 2% poor metabolizers based on CYP2C9 genotypes. Compared with extensive metabolizer genotype, low-intermediate/poor metabolizer genotype was associated with increased dose-adjusted phenytoin blood concentration [21.3 pg/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): 13.6-29.0 pg/mL; P < 0.01] and increased risk of neurologic side effects (hazard ratio: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.24-4.64; P < 0.01). Decreased function CYP2C9 genotypes were associated with medication dispensing patterns indicating dose decrease, use of alternative anticonvulsants, and worse adherence, although these associations varied by treatment indication for phenytoin. CONCLUSION CYP2C9 variation was associated with clinically meaningful differences in clinician prescribing practice and patient response, with potential implications for healthcare utilization and treatment efficacy.
Collapse
|
34
|
Bruckert E, Parhofer KG, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Nordestgaard B, Arca M, Giovas P, Ray K. Proportion of High-Risk/Very High-Risk Patients in Europe with Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Target According to European Guidelines: A Systematic Review. Adv Ther 2020; 37:1724-1736. [PMID: 32200537 PMCID: PMC7467492 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01285-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective Assess achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines. Design Systematic literature review. Data Sources Medline, EMBASE, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Eligibility Criteria Observational studies reporting LDL-C levels/target attainment, measured between 1 August 2006 to 31 August 2017, in European adults with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes with target organ damage, familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) or 10-year risk of fatal CVD ≥ 5% (assessed by Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation [SCORE]). Data Extraction and Synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted relevant studies and assessed study quality using the Risk of Bias for Non-Randomised Studies–Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C targets in the 2011/2016 ESC/EAS guidelines. Where available, patient characteristics were presented as means weighted by sample size. The proportions of patients achieving LDL-C targets in the 5 years before and after publication of the 2011 guidelines were compared using a chi-square test. Results Across 81 eligible studies (303,534 patients), achievement of LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L was poor among patients with established CVD (16%; range 9–56%) and at very high risk of CVD (SCORE ≥ 10% [18%; 14–25%]). In individuals with FH, SCORE 5–10%, or diabetes and target organ damage, LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L was achieved by 15% (9–22%), 46% (21–55%) and 13% (6–34%), respectively. Comparing the 5 years before/after publication of the 2011 guidelines, target achievement increased significantly over time but remained suboptimal (LDL-C < 1.8, 22% versus 15%; LDL-C < 2.5, 68% versus 61%; both p < 0.001; established CVD group only). Conclusions These data show suboptimal LDL-C control among European patients at high risk of CVD. Those at greatest overall risk (clinically established CVD or at least a 10% 10-year risk of fatal CVD) had the lowest achievement of 2011/2016 EAS/ESC LDL-C targets. With lower LDL-C targets advocated in 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, this unmet need will increase. Protocol Registration PROSPERO registration number; CRD77844 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01285-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Bruckert
- Endocrinologie Métabolisme et Prévention Cardiovasculaire, Institut E3M et IHU Cardiométabolique (ICAN), Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
| | - Klaus Georg Parhofer
- Medizinische Klinik IV-Grosshadern, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Børge Nordestgaard
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marcello Arca
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, UOS Atherosclerosis Center, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Kausik Ray
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Imperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pergolizzi JV, Coluzzi F, Colucci RD, Olsson H, LeQuang JA, Al-Saadi J, Magnusson P. Statins and muscle pain. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2020; 13:299-310. [PMID: 32089020 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2020.1734451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Statins remain among the most frequently prescribed drugs and constitute a cornerstone in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, muscle symptoms are often reported from patients on statins. Muscle symptoms are frequently reported as adverse events associated with statin therapy.Areas covered: In the present narrative review, statin-associated muscle pain is discussed. It elucidates potential mechanisms and possible targets for management.Expert opinion: In general, the evidence in support of muscle pain caused by statins is in some cases equivocal and not particularly strong. Reported symptoms are difficult to quantify. Rarely is it possible to establish a causal link between statins and muscle pain. In randomized controlled trials, statins are well tolerated, and muscle-pain related side-effects is similar to placebo. There are also nocebo effects of statins. Exchange of statin may be beneficial although all statins have been associated with muscle pain. In some patients reduction of dose is worth trying, especially in primary prevention Although the benefits of statins outweigh potential risks in the vast majority of cases, careful clinical judgment may be necessary in certain cases to manage potential side effects on an individual basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Flaminia Coluzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Unit of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Robert D Colucci
- NEMA Research, Inc., Naples, FL, USA.,Colucci & Associates, LLC, Newtown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Hanna Olsson
- Centre for Research and Development, Region Gävleborg/Uppsala University, Gävle, Sweden
| | | | - Jonathan Al-Saadi
- Centre for Research and Development, Region Gävleborg/Uppsala University, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Peter Magnusson
- Centre for Research and Development, Region Gävleborg/Uppsala University, Gävle, Sweden.,Cardiology Research Unit, Institution of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dong OM, Wheeler SB, Cruden G, Lee CR, Voora D, Dusetzina SB, Wiltshire T. Cost-Effectiveness of Multigene Pharmacogenetic Testing in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:61-73. [PMID: 31952675 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multigene testing (CYP2C19, SLCO1B1, CYP2C9, VKORC1) compared with single-gene testing (CYP2C19) and standard of care (no genotyping) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from Medicare's perspective. METHODS A hybrid decision tree/Markov model was developed to simulate patients post-PCI for ACS requiring antiplatelet therapy (CYP2C19 to guide antiplatelet selection), statin therapy (SLCO1B1 to guide statin selection), and anticoagulant therapy in those that develop atrial fibrillation (CYP2C9/VKORC1 to guide warfarin dose) over 12 months, 24 months, and lifetime. The primary outcome was cost (2016 US dollar) per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% per year. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) varied input parameters (event probabilities, prescription costs, event costs, health-state utilities) to estimate changes in the cost per QALY gained. RESULTS Base-case-discounted results indicated that the cost per QALY gained was $59 876, $33 512, and $3780 at 12 months, 24 months, and lifetime, respectively, for multigene testing compared with standard of care. Single-gene testing was dominated by multigene testing at all time horizons. PSA-discounted results indicated that, at the $50 000/QALY gained willingness-to-pay threshold, multigene testing had the highest probability of cost-effectiveness in the majority of simulations at 24 months (61%) and over the lifetime (81%). CONCLUSIONS On the basis of projected simulations, multigene testing for Medicare patients post-PCI for ACS has a higher probability of being cost-effective over 24 months and the lifetime compared with single-gene testing and standard of care and could help optimize medication prescribing to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia M Dong
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Center for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Currently at the Center for Applied Genomics & Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Gracelyn Cruden
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Craig R Lee
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Center for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Deepak Voora
- Center for Applied Genomics & Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Tim Wiltshire
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Center for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Newman CB, Preiss D, Tobert JA, Jacobson TA, Page RL, Goldstein LB, Chin C, Tannock LR, Miller M, Raghuveer G, Duell PB, Brinton EA, Pollak A, Braun LT, Welty FK. Statin Safety and Associated Adverse Events: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2019; 39:e38-e81. [PMID: 30580575 DOI: 10.1161/atv.0000000000000073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 375] [Impact Index Per Article: 75.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
One in 4 Americans >40 years of age takes a statin to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other complications of atherosclerotic disease. The most effective statins produce a mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 55% to 60% at the maximum dosage, and 6 of the 7 marketed statins are available in generic form, which makes them affordable for most patients. Primarily using data from randomized controlled trials, supplemented with observational data where necessary, this scientific statement provides a comprehensive review of statin safety and tolerability. The review covers the general patient population, as well as demographic subgroups, including the elderly, children, pregnant women, East Asians, and patients with specific conditions such as chronic disease of the kidney and liver, human immunodeficiency viral infection, and organ transplants. The risk of statin-induced serious muscle injury, including rhabdomyolysis, is <0.1%, and the risk of serious hepatotoxicity is ≈0.001%. The risk of statin-induced newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus is ≈0.2% per year of treatment, depending on the underlying risk of diabetes mellitus in the population studied. In patients with cerebrovascular disease, statins possibly increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke; however, they clearly produce a greater reduction in the risk of atherothrombotic stroke and thus total stroke, as well as other cardiovascular events. There is no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between statins and cancer, cataracts, cognitive dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, or tendonitis. In US clinical practices, roughly 10% of patients stop taking a statin because of subjective complaints, most commonly muscle symptoms without raised creatine kinase. In contrast, in randomized clinical trials, the difference in the incidence of muscle symptoms without significantly raised creatinine kinase in statin-treated compared with placebo-treated participants is <1%, and it is even smaller (0.1%) for patients who discontinued treatment because of such muscle symptoms. This suggests that muscle symptoms are usually not caused by pharmacological effects of the statin. Restarting statin therapy in these patients can be challenging, but it is important, especially in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events, for whom prevention of these events is a priority. Overall, in patients for whom statin treatment is recommended by current guidelines, the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Loss-of-function variants in PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9) are associated with lower lifetime risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) events. Confirmation of these genetic observations in large, prospective clinical trials in participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease has provided guidance on risk stratification and enhanced our knowledge on hitherto unresolved and contentious issues concerning the efficacy and safety of markedly lowering LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol). PCSK9 has a broad repertoire of molecular effects. Furthermore, clinical trials with PCSK9 inhibitors demonstrate that reductions in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events are more effective in patients with recent myocardial infarction, multiple myocardial infarctions, multivessel coronary artery disease, and lower extremity arterial disease. The potent LDL-C lowering efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors provides the opportunity for more aggressive LDL-lowering strategies in high-risk patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and supports the notion that there is no lower limit for LDL-C. Aggressive LDL-C lowering with fully human PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies has been associated by a safety profile superior to that of other classes of LDL-lowering agents. These clinical trials provide evidence that LDL lowering with PCSK9 inhibitors is an effective therapy for lowering cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with LDL-C levels ≥70 mg/dL on maximally tolerated oral therapies, including statins and ezetimibe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Rosenson
- From the Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (R.S.R.)
| | - Robert A Hegele
- Department of Medicine and Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wolfgang Koenig
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (W.K.).,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany (W.K.).,Institute of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulm, Germany (W.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Roh JW, Chun KH, Kang M, Lee CJ, Oh J, Shim CY, Ahn CM, Kim JS, Kim BK, Park S, Chang HJ, Hong GR, Ko YG, Kang SM, Choi D, Ha JW, Hong MK, Jang Y, Lee SH. PRavastatin Versus FlUVastatin After Statin Intolerance: The PRUV-Intolerance Study With Propensity Score Matching. Am J Med 2019; 132:1320-1326.e1. [PMID: 31278931 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2019] [Revised: 06/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data are available on the relapse of statin intolerance after resumption of statins. We aimed to evaluate the relapse rates of statin intolerance in patients who subsequently received pravastatin or fluvastatin and to identify associated factors. METHODS This retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study screened data obtained from a tertiary university hospital between 2006 and 2015. Of 8073 patients screened, 488 with statin intolerance who received pravastatin or fluvastatin with regular follow-up were enrolled. After propensity score matching of patients, 384 were finally analyzed. The primary outcome variables were relapse of statin intolerance and stopping (ie, discontinuation or switching to other statins) rate for the 2 statins. RESULTS During the median follow-up period of 37 months, the rate of relapse of intolerance was 10.4% and 18.2% among users of pravastatin and fluvastatin, respectively (P = 0.04). However, the log-rank test showed no difference in the relapse-free rates between the 2 groups (P = 0.34). The stopping rates of the 2 statins were 36.5% and 42.2% (P = 0.30), respectively, for various reasons, including low efficacy of the drugs. After adjustment, chronic kidney disease (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, P = 0.03) and previous creatine kinase elevation (HR 3.13, P = 0.001) were identified as independent determinants of relapse. Older age (HR 1.03, P = 0.057) and female sex (HR 1.70, P = 0.059) were associated, but not significantly, with relapse. CONCLUSION Although a small proportion of patients taking pravastatin or fluvastatin experienced a relapse of intolerance, many patients eventually discontinued or changed these agents. Chronic kidney disease and history of creatine kinase elevation were independent determinants of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Woong Roh
- Division of Cardiology, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Kyeong-Hyeon Chun
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Moonjong Kang
- Department of Biostatistics and Computing, the Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Joo Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaewon Oh
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chi-Young Shim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul-Min Ahn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Sun Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byeong-Keuk Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sungha Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyuk-Jae Chang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Geu-Ru Hong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Guk Ko
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Min Kang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Donghoon Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Won Ha
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myeong-Ki Hong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yangsoo Jang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang-Hak Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Virani SS, Kennedy KF, Akeroyd JM, Morris PB, Bittner VA, Masoudi FA, Stone NJ, Petersen LA, Ballantyne CM. Variation in Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use in Patients With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2019; 11:e004652. [PMID: 29748356 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.118.004652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL are at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. Treatment guidelines recommend intensive treatment in these patients. Variation in the use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in these patients in a national sample of cardiology practices is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS Using data from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence registry, we assessed the proportion of patients with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (n=49 447) receiving statin, high-intensity statin, LLT associated with ≥50% LDL-C lowering, ezetimibe, or a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitor between January 2013 and December 2016. We assessed practice-level rates and variation in LLT use using median rate ratio (MRR) adjusted for patient and practice characteristics. MRRs represent the likelihood that 2 random practices would differ in treatment of identical patients with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL. The proportion of patients receiving a statin, high-intensity statin, LLT associated with ≥50% LDL-C reduction, ezetimibe, or PCSK9 inhibitor were 58.5%, 31.9%, 34.6%, 8.5%, and 1.5%, respectively. Median practice-level rates and adjusted MRR for statin (56% [interquartile range, 47.3%-64.8%]; MRR, 1.20 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.23]), high-intensity statin (30.2% [interquartile range, 12.1%-41.1%]; MRR, 2.31 [95% CI, 2.12-2.51]), LLT with ≥50% LDL-C lowering (31.8% [interquartile range, 15.3%-45.5%]; MRR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.95-2.28]), ezetimibe (5.8% [interquartile range, 2.8%-9.8%]; MRR, 2.42 [95% CI, 2.21-2.63]), and PCSK9 inhibitors (0.16% [interquartile range, 0%-1.9%]; MRR, 2.38 [95% CI, 2.04-2.72]) indicated significant gaps and >200% variation in receipt of several of these medications for patients across practices. Among those without concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, even larger treatment gaps were noted (proportion of patients on a statin, high-intensity statin, LLT with ≥50% LDL-C reduction, ezetimibe, or PCSK9 inhibitor were 50.8%, 25.25%, 26.8%, 4.9%, and 0.74%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Evidence-based LLT use remains low among patients with elevated LDL-C with significant variation in care. System-level interventions are needed to address these gaps and reduce variation in care of these high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salim S Virani
- Health Policy, Quality and Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX (S.S.V., J.M.A., L.A.P.) .,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine (S.S.V., J.M.A., L.A.P.).,Section of Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine (S.S.V., C.M.B.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.,Section of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX (S.S.V.).,Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX (S.S.V., C.M.B.).,Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan (S.S.V.)
| | - Kevin F Kennedy
- Mid America Heart Institute, Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO (K.F.K.)
| | - Julia M Akeroyd
- Health Policy, Quality and Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX (S.S.V., J.M.A., L.A.P.).,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine (S.S.V., J.M.A., L.A.P.)
| | | | - Vera A Bittner
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama, Birmingham (V.A.B.)
| | - Frederick A Masoudi
- Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (F.A.M.)
| | - Neil J Stone
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (N.J.S.)
| | - Laura A Petersen
- Health Policy, Quality and Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX (S.S.V., J.M.A., L.A.P.).,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine (S.S.V., J.M.A., L.A.P.)
| | - Christie M Ballantyne
- Section of Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine (S.S.V., C.M.B.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.,Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX (S.S.V., C.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Libby P, Buring JE, Badimon L, Hansson GK, Deanfield J, Bittencourt MS, Tokgözoğlu L, Lewis EF. Atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5:56. [PMID: 31420554 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1434] [Impact Index Per Article: 286.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Atherosclerosis, the formation of fibrofatty lesions in the artery wall, causes much morbidity and mortality worldwide, including most myocardial infarctions and many strokes, as well as disabling peripheral artery disease. Development of atherosclerotic lesions probably requires low-density lipoprotein, a particle that carries cholesterol through the blood. Other risk factors for atherosclerosis and its thrombotic complications include hypertension, cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus. Increasing evidence also points to a role of the immune system, as emerging risk factors include inflammation and clonal haematopoiesis. Studies of the cell and molecular biology of atherogenesis have provided considerable insight into the mechanisms that link all these risk factors to atheroma development and the clinical manifestations of this disease. An array of diagnostic techniques, both invasive (such as selective coronary arteriography) and noninvasive (such as blood biomarkers, stress testing, CT and nuclear scanning), permit assessment of cardiovascular disease risk and targeting of therapies. An expanding armamentarium of therapies that can modify risk factors and confer clinical benefit is available; however, we face considerable challenge in providing equitable access to these treatments and in maximizing adherence. Yet, the clinical application of the fruits of research has advanced preventive strategies, enhanced clinical outcomes in affected individuals, and improved their quality of life. Rapidly accelerating knowledge and continued research promise to provide further progress in combating this common chronic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Libby
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Julie E Buring
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lina Badimon
- Centre d'Investigació Cardiovascular CSIC-ICCC, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Göran K Hansson
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - John Deanfield
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Márcio Sommer Bittencourt
- Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Faculdade Israelita de Ciencias da Saude Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.,DASA, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Eldrin F Lewis
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Brunham LR, Baker S, Mammen A, Mancini GBJ, Rosenson RS. Role of genetics in the prediction of statin-associated muscle symptoms and optimization of statin use and adherence. Cardiovasc Res 2019; 114:1073-1081. [PMID: 29878063 DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvy119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Statin therapy reduces cardiovascular events in patients with, or at risk of, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, statins are underutilized in patients for whom they are indicated and are frequently discontinued. Discontinuation may be the result of statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), which encompass a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes from myalgia to severe myopathy. As with many adverse drug reactions (ADRs), inter-individual variability in susceptibility to SAMS is due, at least in part, to differences in host genetics. The genetic basis for SAMS has been investigated in candidate gene studies, genome-wide association studies, and, more recently, studies of multi-omic networks, including at the transcriptome level. In this article, we provide a systematic review of the pharmacogenetic basis of SAMS, focusing on how an understanding of the genetic and molecular determinants of SAMS can be considered in a personalized approach to reduce the incidence of this ADR, optimize statin adherence, and reduce the risk for cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam R Brunham
- Department of Medicine, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, Rm 166 - 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Steven Baker
- Department of Medicine, Neuromuscular Disease Clinic, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Mammen
- Muscle Disease Unit, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - G B John Mancini
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert S Rosenson
- Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Virani SS, Akeroyd JM, Ahmed ST, Krittanawong C, Martin LA, Slagle J, Gobbel GT, Matheny ME, Ballantyne CM, Petersen LA. The use of structured data elements to identify ASCVD patients with statin-associated side effects: Insights from the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Clin Lipidol 2019; 13:797-803.e1. [PMID: 31501043 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate identification of patients with statin-associated side effects (SASEs) is critical for health care systems to institute strategies to improve guideline-concordant statin use. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine whether adverse drug reaction (ADR) entry by clinicians in the electronic medical record can accurately identify SASEs. METHODS We identified 1,248,214 atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients seeking care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Using an ADR data repository, we identified SASEs in 15 major symptom categories. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed using a chart review of 256 ASCVD patients with identified SASEs, who were not on high-intensity statin therapy. RESULTS We identified 171,189 patients (13.71%) with documented SASEs over a 15-year period (9.9%, 2.7%, and 1.1% to 1, 2, or >2 statins, respectively). Statin use, high-intensity statin use, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were 72%, 28.1%, 99 mg/dL, and 129 mg/dL among those with vs 81%, 31.1%, 84 mg/dL, and 111 mg/dL among those without SASEs. Progressively lower statin and high-intensity statin use, and higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were noted among those with SASEs to 1, 2, or >2 statins. Two-thirds of SASEs were related to muscle symptoms. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV compared with manual chart review were 63.4%, 100%, 100%, and 85.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION A strategy of using ADR entry in the electronic medical record is feasible to identify SASEs with modest sensitivity and NPV but high specificity and PPV. Health care systems can use this strategy to identify ASCVD patients with SASEs and operationalize efforts to improve guideline-concordant lipid-lowering therapy use in such patients. The sensitivity of this approach can be further enhanced by the use of unstructured text data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salim S Virani
- Health Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Julia M Akeroyd
- Health Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarah T Ahmed
- Health Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chayakrit Krittanawong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai St. Luke's and Mount Sinai West, NY, New York, USA
| | - Lindsey A Martin
- Health Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason Slagle
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Veterans Affairs, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Glenn T Gobbel
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Michael E Matheny
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Christie M Ballantyne
- Section of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura A Petersen
- Health Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lotteau S, Ivarsson N, Yang Z, Restagno D, Colyer J, Hopkins P, Weightman A, Himori K, Yamada T, Bruton J, Steele D, Westerblad H, Calaghan S. A Mechanism for Statin-Induced Susceptibility to Myopathy. JACC Basic Transl Sci 2019; 4:509-523. [PMID: 31468006 PMCID: PMC6712048 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to identify a mechanism for statin-induced myopathy that explains its prevalence and selectivity for skeletal muscle, and to understand its interaction with moderate exercise. Statin-associated adverse muscle symptoms reduce adherence to statin therapy; this limits the effectiveness of statins in reducing cardiovascular risk. The issue is further compounded by perceived interactions between statin treatment and exercise. This study examined muscles from individuals taking statins and rats treated with statins for 4 weeks. In skeletal muscle, statin treatment caused dissociation of the stabilizing protein FK506 binding protein (FKBP12) from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) calcium (Ca2+) release channel, the ryanodine receptor 1, which was associated with pro-apoptotic signaling and reactive nitrogen species/reactive oxygen species (RNS/ROS)-dependent spontaneous SR Ca2+ release events (Ca2+ sparks). Statin treatment had no effect on Ca2+ spark frequency in cardiac myocytes. Despite potentially deleterious effects of statins on skeletal muscle, there was no impact on force production or SR Ca2+ release in electrically stimulated muscle fibers. Statin-treated rats with access to a running wheel ran further than control rats; this exercise normalized FKBP12 binding to ryanodine receptor 1, preventing the increase in Ca2+ sparks and pro-apoptotic signaling. Statin-mediated RNS/ROS-dependent destabilization of SR Ca2+ handling has the potential to initiate skeletal (but not cardiac) myopathy in susceptible individuals. Importantly, although exercise increases RNS/ROS, it did not trigger deleterious statin effects on skeletal muscle. Indeed, our results indicate that moderate exercise might benefit individuals who take statins.
Collapse
Key Words
- Ca2+, calcium
- FDB, flexor digitorum brevis
- FKBP12, FK506 binding protein (calstabin)
- GAS, gastrocnemius
- HADHA, hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase/enoyl-CoA hydratase
- HMG CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A
- L-NAME, N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
- NOS, nitric oxide synthase
- PGC1α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ co-activator 1α
- RNS, reactive nitrogen species
- ROS, reactive oxygen species
- RyR, ryanodine receptor
- SOD, superoxide dismutase
- SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum
- TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling
- calcium leak
- exercise
- myopathy
- ryanodine receptor
- statin
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Lotteau
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Niklas Ivarsson
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Zhaokang Yang
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Damien Restagno
- VetAgro Sup, APCSe, Université de Lyon, Marcy l’Etoile, France
| | - John Colyer
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Hopkins
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Weightman
- School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Koichi Himori
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yamada
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Joseph Bruton
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Derek Steele
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Håkan Westerblad
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sarah Calaghan
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella-Tommasino J, Forman DE, Goldberg R, Heidenreich PA, Hlatky MA, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones D, Lopez-Pajares N, Ndumele CE, Orringer CE, Peralta CA, Saseen JJ, Smith SC, Sperling L, Virani SS, Yeboah J. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019; 139:e1082-e1143. [PMID: 30586774 PMCID: PMC7403606 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1117] [Impact Index Per Article: 223.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Scott M Grundy
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Neil J Stone
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Alison L Bailey
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Craig Beam
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Kim K Birtcher
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Roger S Blumenthal
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Lynne T Braun
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Sarah de Ferranti
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Joseph Faiella-Tommasino
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Daniel E Forman
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Ronald Goldberg
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Paul A Heidenreich
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Mark A Hlatky
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Daniel W Jones
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Donald Lloyd-Jones
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Nuria Lopez-Pajares
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Chiadi E Ndumele
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Carl E Orringer
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Carmen A Peralta
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Joseph J Saseen
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Sidney C Smith
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Laurence Sperling
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Salim S Virani
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| | - Joseph Yeboah
- ACC/AHA Representative. †AACVPR Representative. ‡ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. §Prevention Subcommittee Liaison. ‖PCNA Representative. ¶AAPA Representative. **AGS Representative. ††ADA Representative. ‡‡PM Representative. §§ACPM Representative. ‖‖NLA Representative. ¶¶APhA Representative. ***ASPC Representative. †††ABC Representative
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Grundy SM, Stone NJ. 2018 Cholesterol Clinical Practice Guidelines: Synopsis of the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Multisociety Cholesterol Guideline. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170:779-783. [PMID: 31132793 DOI: 10.7326/m19-0365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
DESCRIPTION In November 2018, the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) released a new clinical practice guideline on cholesterol management. It was accompanied by a risk assessment report on primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). METHODS A panel of experts free of recent and relevant industry-related conflicts was chosen to carry out systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined cardiovascular outcomes. High-quality observational studies were used for estimation of ASCVD risk. An independent panel systematically reviewed RCT evidence about the benefits and risks of adding nonstatin medications to statin therapy compared with receiving statin therapy alone in persons who have or are at high risk for ASCVD. RECOMMENDATION The guideline endorses a heart-healthy lifestyle beginning in childhood to reduce lifetime risk for ASCVD. It contains several new features compared with the 2013 guideline. For secondary prevention, patients at very high risk may be candidates for adding nonstatin medications (ezetimibe or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 [PCSK9] inhibitors) to statin therapy. In primary prevention, a clinician-patient risk discussion is still strongly recommended before a decision is made about statin treatment. The AHA/ACC risk calculator first triages patients into 4 risk categories. Those at intermediate risk deserve a focused clinician-patient discussion before initiation of statin therapy. Among intermediate-risk patients, identification of risk-enhancing factors and coronary artery calcium testing can assist in the decision to use a statin. Compared with the 2013 guideline, the new guideline gives more attention to percentage reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a treatment goal and to long-term monitoring of therapeutic efficacy. To simplify monitoring, nonfasting lipid measurements are allowed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott M Grundy
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (S.M.G.)
| | - Neil J Stone
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (N.J.S.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella-Tommasino J, Forman DE, Goldberg R, Heidenreich PA, Hlatky MA, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones D, Lopez-Pajares N, Ndumele CE, Orringer CE, Peralta CA, Saseen JJ, Smith SC, Sperling L, Virani SS, Yeboah J. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73:e285-e350. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1113] [Impact Index Per Article: 222.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
49
|
Cannon CP, Sanchez RJ, Klimchak AC, Khan I, Sasiela WJ, Reynolds MR, Rosenson RS. Simulation of the Impact of Statin Intolerance on the Need for Ezetimibe and/or Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitor for Meeting Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goals in a Population With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Am J Cardiol 2019; 123:1202-1207. [PMID: 30736965 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
In a population with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, previous research indicated that approximately 86% can achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of <70 mg/dL with oral lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) only, whereas 14% would require a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor. We aim to estimate these values accounting for varying levels of statin intolerance. A simulation model described previously was used to estimate the utilization of LLT needed to achieve LDL-C <70 mg/dL via an intensification algorithm which maximized statins before adding ezetimibe or a PCSK9 inhibitor. The current analysis took into account varying background rates of statin intolerance. We defined statin intolerance as either partial (inability to tolerate high-intensity statin) or full (inability to tolerate any statin). With treatment intensification and 10% of patients having partial statin intolerance, the use of ezetimibe (± statin ± PCSK9 inhibitor) increased from 32.7% to 34.9%, and the need for a PCSK9 inhibitor (+ ezetimibe ± statin) increased from 14.0% to 15.5%. If, instead, 10% were fully statin intolerant, the use of ezetimibe (± statin ± PCSK9 inhibitor) increased from 32.7% to 38.5%, and the use of a PCSK9 inhibitor (+ ezetimibe ± statin) increased from 14.0% to 19.7%. In conclusion, in our simulation-based study, partial statin intolerance increased the need for nonstatins only modestly (by an absolute 2.2%), whereas having 10% of patients with full statin intolerance increased the need for PCSK9 inhibitors from 14% overall to approximately 20%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cannon
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | | | | | | | | | - Matthew R Reynolds
- Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, Massachusetts; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Robert S Rosenson
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Harrison TN, Hsu JWY, Rosenson RS, Levitan EB, Muntner P, Cheetham TC, Wei R, Scott RD, Reynolds K. Unmet Patient Need in Statin Intolerance: the Clinical Characteristics and Management. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2019; 32:29-36. [PMID: 29417422 DOI: 10.1007/s10557-018-6775-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A substantial percentage of patients report intolerance or side effects of statin treatment leading to treatment changes or discontinuation. The purpose of this study was to examine statin therapy changes and subsequent effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among patients with statin intolerance (SI). METHODS We identified 45,037 adults from Kaiser Permanente Southern California with SI documented between 2006 and 2012. Changes in statin therapy in the year before and after the SI index date were examined. We categorized patients into those who initiated statin therapy, discontinued, up-titrated, down-titrated, or did not switch therapy. We calculated the percentage change in LDL-C from the year before to the year after SI, and the percentage of patients attaining LDL-C < 100 and < 70 mg/dL. RESULTS In the year prior to the SI date, 77.8% of patients filled a statin prescription. Following SI, 44.6% had no treatment change, 25.5% discontinued, and 30.0% altered their statin therapy. Of those who altered statin therapy, 52.6% down-titrated and 17.2% up-titrated their dose. Rhabdomyolysis was documented in < 1% of the cohort. The largest changes in LDL-C were experienced by patients who were on a high-intensity statin then discontinued treatment (35.6% increase) and those who initiated a high-intensity statin (25.5% decrease). The proportion of patients achieving LDL-C < 100 mg/dL and LDL-C < 70 mg/dL was the lowest among those who discontinued therapy. CONCLUSIONS Although adjustments to the statin dosage may be appropriate upon documentation of SI, many of these patients will have high LDL-C. Strategies for LDL-C reduction in patients with SI may be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa N Harrison
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles, 2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA
| | - Jin-Wen Y Hsu
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles, 2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA
| | - Robert S Rosenson
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily B Levitan
- School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Paul Muntner
- School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Rong Wei
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles, 2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA
| | - Ronald D Scott
- West Los Angeles Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kristi Reynolds
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles, 2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
| |
Collapse
|