1
|
Ares-Blanco S, Guisado-Clavero M, Lygidakis C, Fernández-García M, Petek D, Vinker S, Li D, Stadval A, Solves JJM, Del Rio LR, Larrondo IG, Fitzgerald L, Adler L, Assenova R, Bakola M, Bayen S, Brutskaya-Stempkovskaya E, Busneag IC, Divjak AĆ, Peña MD, Domeyer PR, Gjorgjievski D, Gómez-Johansson M, Hanževački M, Hoffmann K, Iлькoв O, Ivanna S, Jandrić-Kočić M, Karathanos VT, Kirkovski A, Knežević S, Korkmaz BÇ, Kostić M, Krztoń-Królewiecka A, Heleno B, Nessler K, Lingner H, Murauskienė L, Neves AL, López NP, Perjés Á, Petrazzuoli F, Petricek G, Sattler M, Saurek-Aleksandrovska N, Seifert B, Serafini A, Sentker T, Tiili P, Torzsa P, Valtonen K, Vaes B, van Pottebergh G, Gómez-Bravo R, Astier-Peña MP. Exploring the accessibility of primary health care data in Europe's COVID-19 response: developing key indicators for managing future pandemics (Eurodata study). BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:221. [PMID: 38902681 PMCID: PMC11188206 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02413-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary Health Care (PHC) plays a crucial role in managing the COVID-19 pandemic, with only 8% of cases requiring hospitalization. However, PHC COVID-19 data often goes unnoticed on European government dashboards and in media discussions. This project aims to examine official information on PHC patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe, with specific objectives: (1) Describe PHC's clinical pathways for acute COVID-19 cases, including long-term care facilities, (2) Describe PHC COVID-19 pandemic indicators, (3) Develop COVID-19 PHC activity indicators, (4) Explain PHC's role in vaccination strategies, and (5) Create a PHC contingency plan for future pandemics. METHODS A mixed-method study will employ two online questionnaires to gather retrospective PHC data on COVID-19 management and PHC involvement in vaccination strategies. Validation will occur through focus group discussions with medical and public health (PH) experts. A two-wave Delphi survey will establish a European PHC indicators dashboard for future pandemics. Additionally, a coordinated health system action plan involving PHC, secondary care, and PH will be devised to address future pandemic scenarios. ANALYSIS Quantitative data will be analysed using STATA v16.0 for descriptive and multivariate analyses. Qualitative data will be collected through peer-reviewed questionnaires and content analysis of focus group discussions. A Delphi survey and multiple focus groups will be employed to achieve consensus on PHC indicators and a common European health system response plan for future pandemics. The Eurodata research group involving researchers from 28 European countries support the development. DISCUSSION While PHC manages most COVID-19 acute cases, data remains limited in many European countries. This study collects data from numerous countries, offering a comprehensive perspective on PHC's role during the pandemic in Europe. It pioneers the development of a PHC dashboard and health system plan for pandemics in Europe. These results may prove invaluable in future pandemics. However, data may have biases due to key informants' involvement and may not fully represent all European GP practices. PHC has a significant role in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic, as most of the cases are mild or moderate and only 8% needed hospitalization. However, PHC COVID-19 activity data is invisible on governments' daily dashboards in Europe, often overlooked in media and public debates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ares-Blanco
- Federica Montseny Health Centre, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- SemFYC representative in EGPRN (European General Practitioner Research Network), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Guisado-Clavero
- Investigation Support Multidisciplinary Unit for Primary Health Care and Community North Area of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Charilaos Lygidakis
- World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA) Chief Executive Officer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - María Fernández-García
- Las Cortes Health Centre, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- semFYC Vice-Chair, Madrid, Spain
| | - Davorina Petek
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- EGPRN, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shlomo Vinker
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University and WONCA Europe President, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Donald Li
- World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA) Past president, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anna Stadval
- World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA) President, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Lourdes Ramos Del Rio
- Federica Montseny Health Centre, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ileana Gefaell Larrondo
- Fundación de Investigación e Innovación Biosanitaria de Atención Primaria (FIIBAP), Madrid, Spain
- Red de Investigación de Cronicidad, Atención Primaria y Promoción de la Salud (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Louise Fitzgerald
- Member of Irish College of General Practice (MICGP), Member of Royal College of Physician (MRCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Limor Adler
- Department of Family Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Radost Assenova
- Department Urology and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Maria Bakola
- Research Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Science, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Sabine Bayen
- Department of General Practice, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Iliana-Carmen Busneag
- Spiru Haret" University, Occupational Health Expert, Practicing family doctor, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Asja Ćosić Divjak
- Health Centre Zagreb West and Department of Family Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Maryher Delphin Peña
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Hôpitaux Robert Schuman, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | | | | | | | - Miroslav Hanževački
- Health Centre Zagreb West and Department of Family Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Kathryn Hoffmann
- General Practice and Primary Care, Med. University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Oкcaнa Iлькoв
- Department of Family Medicine and Outpatient Care, Medical Faculty 2, Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod, Ukraine
| | - Shushman Ivanna
- Department of Family Medicine and Outpatient Care, Medical Faculty 2, Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod, Ukraine
| | | | - Vasilis Trifon Karathanos
- Medical Department, Medical Education Unit, Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina- Greece. GHS, Larnaca, Cyprus
| | - Aleksandar Kirkovski
- Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | | | | | - Milena Kostić
- Dr Đorđe Kovačević Health Center, Lazarevac, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Bruno Heleno
- Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- USF das Conchas, Regional Health Administration Lisbon and Tagus Valley, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Katarzyna Nessler
- Department of Family Medicine, UJCM at Uniwersytet Jagielloński - Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland
| | - Heidrun Lingner
- Hannover Medical School, Center for Public Health and Healthcare, Hannover, OE, Germany
| | - Liubovė Murauskienė
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania
| | - Ana Luisa Neves
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Naldy Parodi López
- Närhälsan Kungshöjd Health Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ábel Perjés
- Department of Family Medicine at the University of Semmelweis, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ferdinando Petrazzuoli
- Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Goranka Petricek
- Health Centre Zagreb West and Department of Family Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | | | - Bohumil Seifert
- Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine, Institute of General Practice, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alicia Serafini
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Laboratorio EduCare, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Theresa Sentker
- Center for Public Health and Healthcare, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Paula Tiili
- Communicable Diseases and Infection Control Unit, City of Vantaa, Vantaa and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Péter Torzsa
- Department of Family Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Kirsi Valtonen
- Communicable Diseases and Infection Control Unit, City of Vantaa, Vantaa and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bert Vaes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gijs van Pottebergh
- Academisch Centrum voor Huisartsgeneeskunde KU Leuven Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raquel Gómez-Bravo
- CHNP, Rehaklinik, Ettelbruck, Luxembourg.
- Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, Research Group Self-Regulation and Health, Institute for Health and Behaviour, Faculty of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, Luxembourg University, WONCA SIGFV Executive, SSLMG Executive, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
| | - Maria Pilar Astier-Peña
- Universitas Health Centre, Public Health Service of Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain
- Chair of Patient Safety Working Group of Semfyc (Spanish Society for Family and Community Medicine) and and SECA (Spanish Society for Healthcare Quality) Board Member, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang J, Morley J, Gallifant J, Oddy C, Teo JT, Ashrafian H, Delaney B, Darzi A. Mapping and evaluating national data flows: transparency, privacy, and guiding infrastructural transformation. Lancet Digit Health 2023; 5:e737-e748. [PMID: 37775190 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00157-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
The importance of big health data is recognised worldwide. Most UK National Health Service (NHS) care interactions are recorded in electronic health records, resulting in an unmatched potential for population-level datasets. However, policy reviews have highlighted challenges from a complex data-sharing landscape relating to transparency, privacy, and analysis capabilities. In response, we used public information sources to map all electronic patient data flows across England, from providers to more than 460 subsequent academic, commercial, and public data consumers. Although NHS data support a global research ecosystem, we found that multistage data flow chains limit transparency and risk public trust, most data interactions do not fulfil recommended best practices for safe data access, and existing infrastructure produces aggregation of duplicate data assets, thus limiting diversity of data and added value to end users. We provide recommendations to support data infrastructure transformation and have produced a website (https://DataInsights.uk) to promote transparency and showcase NHS data assets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Zhang
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Jess Morley
- Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jack Gallifant
- Department of Intensive Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Chris Oddy
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - James T Teo
- London Medical Imaging and AI Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Neurology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK; Leeds University Business School, Leeds, UK
| | - Brendan Delaney
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
MacRae C, Morales D, Mercer SW, Lone N, Lawson A, Jefferson E, McAllister D, van den Akker M, Marshall A, Seth S, Rawlings A, Lyons J, Lyons RA, Mizen A, Abubakar E, Dibben C, Guthrie B. Impact of data source choice on multimorbidity measurement: a comparison study of 2.3 million individuals in the Welsh National Health Service. BMC Med 2023; 21:309. [PMID: 37582755 PMCID: PMC10426056 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02970-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurement of multimorbidity in research is variable, including the choice of the data source used to ascertain conditions. We compared the estimated prevalence of multimorbidity and associations with mortality using different data sources. METHODS A cross-sectional study of SAIL Databank data including 2,340,027 individuals of all ages living in Wales on 01 January 2019. Comparison of prevalence of multimorbidity and constituent 47 conditions using data from primary care (PC), hospital inpatient (HI), and linked PC-HI data sources and examination of associations between condition count and 12-month mortality. RESULTS Using linked PC-HI compared with only HI data, multimorbidity was more prevalent (32.2% versus 16.5%), and the population of people identified as having multimorbidity was younger (mean age 62.5 versus 66.8 years) and included more women (54.2% versus 52.6%). Individuals with multimorbidity in both PC and HI data had stronger associations with mortality than those with multimorbidity only in HI data (adjusted odds ratio 8.34 [95% CI 8.02-8.68] versus 6.95 (95%CI 6.79-7.12] in people with ≥ 4 conditions). The prevalence of conditions identified using only PC versus only HI data was significantly higher for 37/47 and significantly lower for 10/47: the highest PC/HI ratio was for depression (14.2 [95% CI 14.1-14.4]) and the lowest for aneurysm (0.51 [95% CI 0.5-0.5]). Agreement in ascertainment of conditions between the two data sources varied considerably, being slight for five (kappa < 0.20), fair for 12 (kappa 0.21-0.40), moderate for 16 (kappa 0.41-0.60), and substantial for 12 (kappa 0.61-0.80) conditions, and by body system was lowest for mental and behavioural disorders. The percentage agreement, individuals with a condition identified in both PC and HI data, was lowest in anxiety (4.6%) and highest in coronary artery disease (62.9%). CONCLUSIONS The use of single data sources may underestimate prevalence when measuring multimorbidity and many important conditions (especially mental and behavioural disorders). Caution should be used when interpreting findings of research examining individual and multiple long-term conditions using single data sources. Where available, researchers using electronic health data should link primary care and hospital inpatient data to generate more robust evidence to support evidence-based healthcare planning decisions for people with multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare MacRae
- Advanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Bio Cube 1, Edinburgh BioQuarter, 13 Little France Road, Edinburgh, UK.
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Daniel Morales
- Division of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Stewart W Mercer
- Advanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Bio Cube 1, Edinburgh BioQuarter, 13 Little France Road, Edinburgh, UK
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nazir Lone
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Andrew Lawson
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Emily Jefferson
- Division of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - David McAllister
- Public Health, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 9LX, UK
| | - Marjan van den Akker
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
- Department of Family Medicine, School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alan Marshall
- School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Chrystal Macmillan Building, Edinburgh, EH8 9LD, UK
| | - Sohan Seth
- School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anna Rawlings
- Swansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Campus, Swansea, UK
| | - Jane Lyons
- Swansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Campus, Swansea, UK
| | - Ronan A Lyons
- Swansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Campus, Swansea, UK
| | - Amy Mizen
- Swansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Campus, Swansea, UK
| | - Eleojo Abubakar
- Public Health, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 9LX, UK
| | - Chris Dibben
- University of Edinburgh Institute of Geography, Institute of Geography Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bruce Guthrie
- Advanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Bio Cube 1, Edinburgh BioQuarter, 13 Little France Road, Edinburgh, UK
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leung T, Eysenbach G, Brown TJ, Jopling H, Stevenson F, Lynch J. Contextual Factors That Impact the Implementation of Patient Portals With a Focus on Older People in Acute Care Hospitals: Scoping Review. JMIR Aging 2023; 6:e31812. [PMID: 36735321 PMCID: PMC9938437 DOI: 10.2196/31812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older people are the highest users of health services but are less likely to use a patient portal than younger people. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aimed to identify and synthesize the literature on contextual factors that impact the implementation of patient portals in acute care hospitals and among older people. METHODS A scoping review was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The following databases were searched from 2010 to June 2020: MEDLINE and Embase via the Ovid platform, CINAHL and PsycINFO via the EBSCO platform, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible reviews were published in English; focused on the implementation of tethered patient portals; included patients, health care professionals, managers, and budget holders; and aimed at identifying the contextual factors (ie, barriers and facilitators) that impact the implementation of patient portals. Review titles and abstracts and full-text publications were screened in duplicate. The study characteristics were charted by one author and checked for accuracy by a second author. The NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability) framework was used to synthesize the findings. RESULTS In total, 10 systematic reviews published between 2015 and 2020 were included in the study. Of these, 3 (30%) reviews addressed patient portals in acute care hospitals, and 2 (20%) reviews addressed the implementation of patient portals among older people in multiple settings (including acute care hospitals). To maximize the inclusion of the literature on patient portal implementation, we also included 5 reviews of systematic reviews that examined patient portals in multiple care settings (including acute care hospitals). Contextual factors influencing patient portal implementation tended to cluster in specific NASSS domains, namely the condition, technology, and value proposition. Certain aspects within these domains received more coverage than others, such as sociocultural factors and comorbidities, the usability and functionality aspects of the technology, and the demand-side value. There are gaps in the literature pertinent to the consideration of the provision of patient portals for older people in acute care hospitals, including the lack of consideration of the diversity of older adults and their needs, the question of interoperability between systems (likely to be important where care involves multiple services), the involvement of lay caregivers, and looking beyond short-term implementation to ways in which portal use can be sustained. CONCLUSIONS We identified important contextual factors that impact patient portal implementation and key gaps in the literature. Future research should focus on evaluating strategies that address disparities in use and promote engagement with patient portals among older people in acute care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tracey J Brown
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Helena Jopling
- Department of Public Health, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Bury St Edmunds, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Stevenson
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Lynch
- School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meeraus W, Fu Q, Mu G, Fry M, Frith L, Pimenta JM. Extending the data collection from a clinical trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study research cohort. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2023; 33:4. [PMID: 36650154 PMCID: PMC9845305 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-022-00322-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The Extended Salford Lung Study (Ext-SLS) is an extension of the Salford Lung Studies (SLS) in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) through retrospective and prospective collection of patient-level electronic health record (EHR) data. We compared the Ext-SLS cohort with the SLS intention-to-treat populations using descriptive analyses to determine if the strengths (e.g. randomization) of the clinical trial were maintained in the new cohort. Historical and patient-reported outcome data were captured from asthma-/COPD-specific questionnaires (e.g., Asthma Control Test [ACT]/COPD Assessment Test [CAT]). The Ext-SLS included 1147 participants (n = 798, SLS asthma; n = 349, SLS COPD). Of participants answering the ACT, 39% scored <20, suggesting poorly controlled asthma. For COPD, 61% of participants answering the CAT scored ≥21, demonstrating a high disease burden. Demographic/clinical characteristics of the cohorts were similar at SLS baseline. EHR data provided a long-term view of participants' disease, and questionnaires provided information not typically captured. The Ext-SLS cohort is a valuable resource for respiratory research, and ongoing prospective data collection will add further value and ensure the Ext-SLS is an important source of patient-level information on obstructive airways disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Qinggong Fu
- grid.418019.50000 0004 0393 4335GSK, Collegeville, PA USA
| | - George Mu
- grid.418019.50000 0004 0393 4335GSK, Collegeville, PA USA
| | | | - Lucy Frith
- grid.418236.a0000 0001 2162 0389GSK, Brentford, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lynam A, Curtis C, Stanley B, Heatley H, Worthington C, Roberts EJ, Price C, Carter V, Dennis J, McGovern A, Price D. Data-Resource Profile: United Kingdom Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Pragmat Obs Res 2023; 14:39-49. [PMID: 37138785 PMCID: PMC10150735 DOI: 10.2147/por.s395632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Electronic medical records (EMRs) maintained in primary care in the UK and collected and stored in EMR databases offer a world-leading resource for observational clinical research. We aimed to profile one such database: the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD). Methods and Participants The OPCRD, incepted in 2010, is a growing primary care EMR database collecting data from 992 general practices within the UK. It covers over 16.6 million patients across all four countries within the UK, and is broadly representative of the UK population in terms of age, sex, ethnicity and socio-economic status. Patients have a mean duration of 11.7 years' follow-up (SD 17.50), with a majority having key summary data from birth to last data entry. Data for the OPCRD are collected incrementally monthly and extracted from all of the major clinical software systems used within the UK and across all four coding systems (Read version 2, Read CTV3, SNOMED DM+D and SNOMED CT codes). Via quality-improvement programmes provided to GP surgeries, the OPCRD also includes patient-reported outcomes from a range of disease-specific validated questionnaires, with over 66,000 patient responses on asthma, COPD, and COVID-19. Further, bespoke data collection is possible by working with GPs to collect new research via patient-reported questionnaires. Findings to Date The OPCRD has contributed to over 96 peer-reviewed research publications since its inception encompassing a broad range of medical conditions, including COVID-19. Conclusion The OPCRD represents a unique resource with great potential to support epidemiological research, from retrospective observational studies through to embedded cluster-randomised trials. Advantages of the OPCRD over other EMR databases are its large size, UK-wide geographical coverage, the availability of up-to-date patient data from all major GP software systems, and the unique collection of patient-reported information on respiratory health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Lynam
- Momentum Data, Pendragon House, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, UK
| | | | - Brooklyn Stanley
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Heath Heatley
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Chloe Worthington
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Emma-Jane Roberts
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Christopher Price
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Victoria Carter
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - John Dennis
- Momentum Data, Pendragon House, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Andrew McGovern
- Momentum Data, Pendragon House, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, UK
- Correspondence: Andrew McGovern, Momentum Data, Pendragon House, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, UK, Email
| | - David Price
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Collinson M, Mason E, Kelley R, Griffiths A, Ashley L, Henry A, Inman H, Cowdell F, Hennell J, Jones L, Walsh M, Ogden M, Farrin A, Surr C. Characteristics and general practice resource use of people with comorbid cancer and dementia in England: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:281. [PMID: 36371194 PMCID: PMC9655793 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01882-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Cancer and dementia are common in older people and management of the conditions as comorbidities can be challenging, yet little is known about the size or characteristics of this group. We aimed to estimate the prevalence, characteristics and general practice resource usage of people living with both conditions in England. Methods Anonymised electronic healthcare records from 391 National Health Service general practices across England using the TPP SystmOne general practice system were obtained from ResearchOne. Data included demographic and clinical characteristics, and general practice healthcare useage (appointments, prescriptions, referrals and secondary care contacts) for people aged 50 and over with a cancer and/or dementia diagnosis consistent with the Quality and Outcomes Framework between 2005 and 2016. Multi-level negative binomial regression was used to analyse the association between having cancer and/or dementia and the number of general practice appointments. Results Data from 162,371 people with cancer and/or dementia were analysed; 3616 (2.2%) people were identified as having comorbid cancer and dementia. Of people with cancer, 3.1% also had dementia, rising to 7.5% (1 in 13 people) in those aged 75 and over. Fewer people with both conditions were female (50.7%) compared to those with dementia alone (65.6%) and those with comorbid cancer and dementia were older than those with cancer alone [mean ages 83 (sd = 7), 69 (sd = 12) respectively]. Those with both conditions were less likely to have lung cancer than those with cancer alone (7.5% vs. 10.3%) but more likely to have prostate cancer (20.9% vs. 15.8%). Additional comorbidities were more prevalent for those with both conditions than those with cancer or dementia alone (68.4% vs. 50.2% vs. 54.0%). In the year following the first record of either condition, people with cancer and dementia had 9% more general practice appointments (IRR:1.09, 95% CI:1.01–1.17) than those with cancer alone and 37% more appointments than those with dementia alone (IRR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.28–1.47). Conclusions A significant number of people are living with comorbid cancer and dementia in England. This group have additional comorbidity and higher general practice usage than those with cancer/dementia alone. The needs of this group should be considered in future general practice care planning and research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01882-w.
Collapse
|
8
|
Williamson K, Nimegeer A, Lean M. Navigating data governance approvals to use routine health and social care data to evidence the hidden population with severe obesity: a case study from a clinical academic's perspective. J Res Nurs 2022; 27:623-636. [PMID: 36405806 PMCID: PMC9669932 DOI: 10.1177/17449871221122040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Front-line professionals are uniquely placed to identify evidence gaps and the way routinely-collected data can help address them. This knowledge can enable incisive, clinically-relevant research. Aim To document an example of the real-world approvals journey within the current NHS/Higher Education regulatory landscape, from the perspective of an experienced nurse undertaking doctoral study as a clinical academic. Methods An instrumental case-study approach is used to explore the approvals process for a mixed-methods study. Relevant context is highlighted to aid understanding, including introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation and the integration of health and social care services. Results Formal approvals by nine separate stakeholders from four different organisations took nearly 3 years, including 15 initial or revised applications, assessments or agreements. Obstacles included: conflicting views on what constitutes 'research' or 'service evaluation'; isolated decision-making; fragmented data systems; multiple data controllers and a changing data governance environment. The dual perspectives of being both clinician and academic using routine data are explored. Conclusions Practitioners face a complex approvals process to use data they routinely collect, for research or evaluation purposes. Use of data during the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the need for streamlining of data governance processes. Practical recommendations are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kath Williamson
- Kath Williamson, School of Medicine, Dentistry and
Nursing, University of Glasgow, Level 2, New Lister Building, Royal Infirmary, 10-16
Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK.
| | - Amy Nimegeer
- Research Associate (MRC/CSO Social and Public Health
Sciences Unit), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mike Lean
- Professor of Human Nutrition, Department of Human
Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow,
UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee SI, Azcoaga-Lorenzo A, Agrawal U, Kennedy JI, Fagbamigbe AF, Hope H, Subramanian A, Anand A, Taylor B, Nelson-Piercy C, Damase-Michel C, Yau C, Crowe F, Santorelli G, Eastwood KA, Vowles Z, Loane M, Moss N, Brocklehurst P, Plachcinski R, Thangaratinam S, Black M, O'Reilly D, Abel KM, Brophy S, Nirantharakumar K, McCowan C. Epidemiology of pre-existing multimorbidity in pregnant women in the UK in 2018: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:120. [PMID: 35148719 PMCID: PMC8840793 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04442-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although maternal death is rare in the United Kingdom, 90% of these women had multiple health/social problems. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of pre-existing multimorbidity (two or more long-term physical or mental health conditions) in pregnant women in the United Kingdom (England, Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland). STUDY DESIGN Pregnant women aged 15-49 years with a conception date 1/1/2018 to 31/12/2018 were included in this population-based cross-sectional study, using routine healthcare datasets from primary care: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD, United Kingdom, n = 37,641) and Secure Anonymized Information Linkage databank (SAIL, Wales, n = 27,782), and secondary care: Scottish Morbidity Records with linked community prescribing data (SMR, Tayside and Fife, n = 6099). Pre-existing multimorbidity preconception was defined from 79 long-term health conditions prioritised through a workshop with patient representatives and clinicians. RESULTS The prevalence of multimorbidity was 44.2% (95% CI 43.7-44.7%), 46.2% (45.6-46.8%) and 19.8% (18.8-20.8%) in CPRD, SAIL and SMR respectively. When limited to health conditions that were active in the year before pregnancy, the prevalence of multimorbidity was still high (24.2% [23.8-24.6%], 23.5% [23.0-24.0%] and 17.0% [16.0 to 17.9%] in the respective datasets). Mental health conditions were highly prevalent and involved 70% of multimorbidity CPRD: multimorbidity with ≥one mental health condition/s 31.3% [30.8-31.8%]). After adjusting for age, ethnicity, gravidity, index of multiple deprivation, body mass index and smoking, logistic regression showed that pregnant women with multimorbidity were more likely to be older (CPRD England, adjusted OR 1.81 [95% CI 1.04-3.17] 45-49 years vs 15-19 years), multigravid (1.68 [1.50-1.89] gravidity ≥ five vs one), have raised body mass index (1.59 [1.44-1.76], body mass index 30+ vs body mass index 18.5-24.9) and smoked preconception (1.61 [1.46-1.77) vs non-smoker). CONCLUSION Multimorbidity is prevalent in pregnant women in the United Kingdom, they are more likely to be older, multigravid, have raised body mass index and smoked preconception. Secondary care and community prescribing dataset may only capture the severe spectrum of health conditions. Research is needed urgently to quantify the consequences of maternal multimorbidity for both mothers and children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siang Ing Lee
- Institute of Applied Health Research, IOEM Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Utkarsh Agrawal
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | | | - Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Holly Hope
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anuradhaa Subramanian
- Institute of Applied Health Research, IOEM Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Astha Anand
- Institute of Applied Health Research, IOEM Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Beck Taylor
- Institute of Applied Health Research, IOEM Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | | | - Christine Damase-Michel
- Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
- INSERM, Centre for Epidemiology and Research in Population Health (CERPOP), CIC 1436, Toulouse, France
| | - Christopher Yau
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Health Data Research, London, UK
| | - Francesca Crowe
- Institute of Applied Health Research, IOEM Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | | | - Kelly-Ann Eastwood
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
- St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Zoe Vowles
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Loane
- The Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK
| | - Ngawai Moss
- Patient and Public Representative, London, UK
| | - Peter Brocklehurst
- Institute of Applied Health Research, IOEM Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | | | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mairead Black
- Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Science and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Dermot O'Reilly
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Kathryn M Abel
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sinead Brophy
- Data Science, Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
- Institute of Applied Health Research, IOEM Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Colin McCowan
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mathew M, van Vlymen J, Meza-Torres B, Hinton W, Delanerolle G, Yonova I, Feher M, Fan X, Liyanage H, Joy M, Carinci F, de Lusignan S. Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on glycaemic monitoring and other processes of care in Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a retrospective cohort study (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 11:e35971. [PMID: 35417404 PMCID: PMC9037615 DOI: 10.2196/35971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Social distancing and other nonpharmaceutical interventions to reduce the spread of COVID-19 infection in the United Kingdom have led to substantial changes in delivering ongoing care for patients with chronic conditions, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Clinical guidelines for the management and prevention of complications for people with T2DM delivered in primary care services advise routine annual reviews and were developed when face-to-face consultations were the norm. The shift in consultations from face-to-face to remote consultations caused a reduction in direct clinical contact and may impact the process of care for people with T2DM. Objective The aim of this study is to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic’s first year on the monitoring of people with T2DM using routine annual reviews from a national primary care perspective in England. Methods A retrospective cohort study of adults with T2DM will be performed using routinely collected primary care data from the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC). We will describe the change in the rate of monitoring of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) and the preceding year (2019). We will also report any change in the eight checks that make up the components of these reviews. The change in HbA1c monitoring rates will be determined using a multilevel logistic regression model, adjusting for patient and practice characteristics, and similarly, the change in a composite measure of the completeness of all eight checks will be modeled using ordinal regression. The models will be adjusted for the following patient-level variables: age, gender, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, COVID-19 shielding status, duration of diabetes, and comorbidities. The model will also be adjusted for the following practice-level variables: urban versus rural, practice size, Quality and Outcomes Framework achievement, the National Health Service region, and the proportion of face-to-face consultations. Ethical approval was provided by the University of Oxford Medical Sciences Interdivisional Research Ethics Committee (September 2, 2021, reference R77306/RE001). Results The analysis of the data extract will include 3.96 million patients with T2DM across 700 practices, which is 6% of the available Oxford-RCGP RSC adult population. The preliminary results will be submitted to a conference under the domain of primary care. The resulting publication will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal on diabetes and endocrinology. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the delivery of care, but little is known about the process of caring for people with T2DM. This study will report the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these processes of care. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/35971
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mekha Mathew
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy van Vlymen
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Bernardo Meza-Torres
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - William Hinton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Gayathri Delanerolle
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ivelina Yonova
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Feher
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Xuejuan Fan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Harshana Liyanage
- Field Service, UK Health Security Agency, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Joy
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Fabrizio Carinci
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simon de Lusignan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
- Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Akter N, Kulinskaya E, Steel N, Bakbergenuly I. The effect of hormone replacement therapy on the survival of UK women: a retrospective cohort study 1984-2017. BJOG 2021; 129:994-1003. [PMID: 34773357 PMCID: PMC9298998 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the effect of estrogen-only and combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on the hazards of overall and age-specific all-cause mortality in healthy women aged 46-65 at first prescription. DESIGN Matched cohort study. SETTING Electronic primary care records from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database, UK (1984-2017). POPULATION 105 199 HRT users (cases) and 224 643 non-users (controls) matched on age and general practice. METHODS Weibull-Double-Cox regression models adjusted for age at first treatment, birth cohort, type 2 diabetes, hypertension and hypertension treatment, coronary heart disease, oophorectomy, hysterectomy, body mass index, smoking and deprivation status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES All-cause mortality. RESULTS A total of 21 751 women died over an average of 13.5 years follow-up per participant, of whom 6329 were users and 15 422 non-users. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of overall all-cause mortality in combined HRT users was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94), and in estrogen-only users was 0.99 (0.93-1.07), compared with non-users. Age-specific adjusted HRs for participants aged 46-50, 51-55, 56-60 and 61-65 years at first treatment were 0.98 (0.92-1.04), 0.87 (0.82-0.92), 0.88 (0.82-0.93) and 0.92 (0.85-0.98) for combined HRT users compared with non-users, and 1.01 (0.84-1.21), 1.03 (0.89-1.18), 0.98 (0.86-1.12) and 0.93 (0.81-1.07) for estrogen-only users, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Combined HRT was associated with a 9% lower risk of all-cause mortality and estrogen-only formulation was not associated with any significant changes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Estrogen-only HRT is not associated with all-cause mortality and combined HRT reduces the risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Akter
- School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - E Kulinskaya
- School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N Steel
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - I Bakbergenuly
- School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aggarwal M, Katz A, Oandasan I. Current State of Quantitative Data Available for Examining the Work of Family Physicians in Canada. Healthc Policy 2021; 17:48-57. [PMID: 34543176 PMCID: PMC8437254 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
In Canada, there is no single source of data describing the number, distribution and work of family physicians (FPs). This study examines the state of national and provincial/territorial data sources for FPs in comparison with the College of Family Physicians of Canada's Family Medicine Professional Profile. Data sources were assessed through key informant interviews and document analysis. Findings indicate that there is significant variability on what is measured across jurisdictions, resulting in comparability challenges. A measurement framework that accurately describes the number, distribution and work of FPs with a pan-Canadian data collection strategy is urgently needed for effective health human resource planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Aggarwal
- Assistant Professor, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Alan Katz
- Professor, Departments of Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - Ivy Oandasan
- Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Use of Primary Care Data in Research and Pharmacovigilance: Eight Scenarios Where Prescription Data are Absent. Drug Saf 2021; 44:1033-1040. [PMID: 34296384 PMCID: PMC8297607 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01093-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The use of primary care databases has been integral in pharmacoepidemiological studies and pharmacovigilance. Primary care databases derive from electronic health records and offer a comprehensive description of aggregate patient data, from demography to medication history, and good sample sizes. Studies using these databases improve our understanding of prescribing characteristics and associated risk factors to facilitate better patient care, but there are limitations. We describe eight key scenarios where study data outcomes can be affected by absent prescriptions in UK primary care databases: (1) out-of-hours, urgent care and acute care prescriptions; (2) specialist-only prescriptions; (3) alternative community prescribing, such as pharmacy, family planning clinic or sexual health clinic medication prescriptions; (4) newly licensed medication prescriptions; (5) medications that do not require prescriptions; (6) hospital inpatient and outpatient prescriptions; (7) handwritten prescriptions; and (8) private pharmacy and private doctor prescriptions. The significance of each scenario is dependent on the type of medication under investigation, nature of the study and expected outcome measures. We recommend that all researchers using primary care databases be aware of the potential for missing prescribing data and be sensitive to how this can vary substantially between items, drug classes, patient groups and over time. Close liaison with practising primary care clinicians in the UK is often essential to ensure awareness of nuances in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
14
|
Singh BM, Bateman J, Viswanath A, Klaire V, Mahmud S, Nevill A, Dunmore SJ. Risk of COVID-19 hospital admission and COVID-19 mortality during the first COVID-19 wave with a special emphasis on ethnic minorities: an observational study of a single, deprived, multiethnic UK health economy. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046556. [PMID: 33597146 PMCID: PMC7893203 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to describe variations in COVID-19 outcomes in relation to local risks within a well-defined but diverse single-city area. DESIGN Observational study of COVID-19 outcomes using quality-assured integrated data from a single UK hospital contextualised to its feeder population and associated factors (comorbidities, ethnicity, age, deprivation). SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Single-city hospital with a feeder population of 228 632 adults in Wolverhampton. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Hospital admissions (defined as COVID-19 admissions (CA) or non-COVID-19 admissions (NCA)) and mortality (defined as COVID-19 deaths or non-COVID-19 deaths). RESULTS Of the 5558 patients admitted, 686 died (556 in hospital); 930 were CA, of which 270 were hospital COVID-19 deaths, 47 non-COVID-19 deaths and 36 deaths after discharge; of the 4628 NCA, there were 239 in-hospital deaths (2 COVID-19) and 94 deaths after discharge. Of the 223 074 adults not admitted, 407 died. Age, gender, multimorbidity and black ethnicity (OR 2.1 (95% CI 1.5 to 3.2), p<0.001, compared with white ethnicity, absolute excess risk of <1/1000) were associated with CA and mortality. The South Asian cohort had lower CA and NCA, lower mortality compared with the white group (CA, 0.5 (0.3 to 0.8), p<0.01; NCA, 0.4 (0.3 to 0.6), p<0.001) and community deaths (0.5 (0.3 to 0.7), p<0.001). Despite many common risk factors for CA and NCA, ethnic groups had different admission rates and within-group differing association of risk factors. Deprivation impacted only the white ethnicity, in the oldest age bracket and in a lesser (not most) deprived quintile. CONCLUSIONS Wolverhampton's results, reflecting high ethnic diversity and deprivation, are similar to other studies of black ethnicity, age and comorbidity risk in COVID-19 but strikingly different in South Asians and for deprivation. Sequentially considering population and then hospital-based NCA and CA outcomes, we present a complete single health economy picture. Risk factors may differ within ethnic groups; our data may be more representative of communities with high Black, Asian and minority ethnic populations, highlighting the need for locally focused public health strategies. We emphasise the need for a more comprehensible and nuanced conveyance of risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baldev M Singh
- New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
- School of Medicine & Clinical Practice, Faculty of Science & Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - James Bateman
- New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Ananth Viswanath
- New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Vijay Klaire
- New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Sultan Mahmud
- New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
- Faculty of Health, Education & Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alan Nevill
- Faculty of Education Health & Wellbeing, Walsall Campus, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Simon J Dunmore
- School of Medicine & Clinical Practice, Faculty of Science & Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Harries TH, White P. Spotlight on primary care management of COPD: Electronic health records. Chron Respir Dis 2021; 18:1479973120985594. [PMID: 33455426 PMCID: PMC7816527 DOI: 10.1177/1479973120985594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
16
|
Powell G, Logan J, Kiri V, Borghs S. Trends in antiepileptic drug treatment and effectiveness in clinical practice in England from 2003 to 2016: a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e032551. [PMID: 31848168 PMCID: PMC6936987 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the evolution of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment patterns and seizure outcomes in England from 2003 to 2016. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study of electronic medical records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink and National Health Service Digital Hospital Episode Statistics databases. Patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy were identified and followed until end of data availability. Three eras were defined starting 1 April 2003 (first National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline); 1 September 2007 (Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs publication); and 1 January 2012 (second NICE guideline). OUTCOME MEASURES Time from diagnosis to first AED; AED sequence; time from first AED to first 1-year remission period (no new AED attempts and no seizure-related healthcare events); time from first AED to refractoriness (third AED attempt regardless of reason); Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event variables. RESULTS 4388 patients were included (mean follow-up: 6.8, 4.2 and 1.7 years by era). 84.6% of adults (≥16 years), 75.5% of children (<16) and 89.1% of elderly subgroup (65+) received treatment within 1 year; rates were generally stable over time. Treatment trends included reduced use of carbamazepine (adult first line, era 1: 34.9%; era 3: 10.7%) and phenytoin, earlier line and increased use of levetiracetam (adult first line, era 1: 2.6%; era 3: 26.2%) and lamotrigine (particularly in adults and elderly subgroup), and a larger number of different AEDs used. Valproate use shifted somewhat to later lines. Rates of 1-year remission within 2 years of starting treatment increased in adults (era 1: 71.9%; era 3: 81.4%) and elderly (era 1: 76.1%; era 3: 81.7%). Overall, 55.5% of patients relapsed after achieving 1-year remission. Refractoriness rates remained stable over time (~26% of adults within 5 years). CONCLUSION Treatment trends often were not aligned with era-relevant guidance. However, our results suggest a slight improvement in epilepsy treatment outcomes over the 13-year period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham Powell
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|