Meta-analyses of the efficacy of pharmacotherapies and sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablets for allergic rhinitis in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis (SAR/PAR) include pharmacotherapies and allergy immunotherapy. These meta-analyses evaluated the efficacy of pharmacotherapies and sublingual immunotherapy tablets (SLIT-tablets) versus placebo on nasal symptoms associated with SAR and PAR.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were identified from systematic PubMED/EMBASE searches through 7/18/2019 (PROSPERO protocol CRD42018105632). The primary outcome was mean numerical difference in total nasal symptom score (TNSS; 0-12) between active treatment and placebo at the end of the assessment period. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated the mean difference for each medication group weighted by the inverse of the trial variance. Publication bias assessments and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Rescue symptom-relieving pharmacotherapy was prohibited in most pharmacotherapy trials but was allowed in all SLIT-tablet trials. For adult/adolescent SAR, the mean numerical difference (95% CI) in TNSS versus placebo was: intranasal corticosteroids (INCS)=1.38 (1.18, 1.58; 39 trials); combination intranasal antihistamine/INCS=1.34 (1.15, 1.54; 4 trials); intranasal antihistamines=0.72 (0.56, 0.89; 13 trials); oral antihistamine=0.62 (0.35, 0.90; 18 trials); SLIT-tablets=0.57 (0.41, 0.73; 4 trials); and montelukast=0.48 (0.36, 0.60; 10 trials). For adult/adolescent PAR, mean difference in TNSS versus placebo (95% CI) was: INCS=0.82 (0.66, 0.97; 14 trials); SLIT-tablets=0.65 (0.42, 0.88; 3 trials); and oral antihistamine=0.27 (0.11, 0.42; 3 trials). The number of eligible trials limited meta-analyses for pediatric SAR/PAR.

CONCLUSIONS

All treatments significantly improved nasal symptoms versus placebo. SLIT-tablets provided improvement in TNSS despite access to rescue symptom-relieving pharmacotherapy. Extensive trial heterogeneity and strong indications of publication bias preclude the comparison of treatment effects among treatment classes.

Correlation between work impairment, scores of rhinitis severity and asthma using the MASK-air® App

BACKGROUND

In allergic rhinitis, a relevant outcome providing information on the effectiveness of interventions is needed. In MASK-air (Mobile Airways Sentinel Network), a visual analogue scale (VAS) for work is used as a relevant outcome. This study aimed to assess the performance of the work VAS work by comparing VAS work with other VAS measurements and symptom-medication scores obtained concurrently.

METHODS

All consecutive MASK-air users in 23 countries from 1 June 2016 to 31 October 2018 were included (14 189 users; 205 904 days). Geolocalized users self-assessed daily symptom control using the touchscreen functionality on their smart phone to click on VAS scores (ranging from 0 to 100) for overall symptoms (global), nose, eyes, asthma and work. Two symptom-medication scores were used: the modified EAACI CSMS score and the MASK control score for rhinitis. To assess data quality, the intra-individual response variability (IRV) index was calculated.

RESULTS

A strong correlation was observed between VAS work and other VAS. The highest levels for correlation with VAS work and variance explained in VAS work were found with VAS global, followed by VAS nose, eye and asthma. In comparison with VAS global, the mCSMS and MASK control score showed a lower correlation with VAS work. Results are unlikely to be explained by a low quality of data arising from repeated VAS measures.

CONCLUSIONS

VAS work correlates with other outcomes (VAS global, nose, eye and asthma) but less well with a symptom-medication score. VAS work should be considered as a potentially useful AR outcome in intervention studies.

ARIA 2016: Care pathways implementing emerging technologies for predictive medicine in rhinitis and asthma across the life cycle

The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) initiative commenced during a World Health Organization workshop in 1999. The initial goals were (1) to propose a new allergic rhinitis classification, (2) to promote the concept of multi-morbidity in asthma and rhinitis and (3) to develop guidelines with all stakeholders that could be used globally for all countries and populations. ARIA—disseminated and implemented in over 70 countries globally—is now focusing on the implementation of emerging technologies for individualized and predictive medicine. MASK [MACVIA (Contre les Maladies Chroniques pour un Vieillissement Actif)-ARIA Sentinel NetworK] uses mobile technology to develop care pathways for the management of rhinitis and asthma by a multi-disciplinary group and by patients themselves. An app (Android and iOS) is available in 20 countries and 15 languages. It uses a visual analogue scale to assess symptom control and work productivity as well as a clinical decision support system. It is associated with an inter-operable tablet for physicians and other health care professionals. The scaling up strategy uses the recommendations of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing. The aim of the novel ARIA approach is to provide an active and healthy life to rhinitis sufferers, whatever their age, sex or socio-economic status, in order to reduce health and social inequalities incurred by the disease.

Scaling up strategies of the chronic respiratory disease programme of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (Action Plan B3: Area 5)

Action Plan B3 of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA) focuses on the integrated care of chronic diseases. Area 5 (Care Pathways) was initiated using chronic respiratory diseases as a model. The chronic respiratory disease action plan includes (1) AIRWAYS integrated care pathways (ICPs), (2) the joint initiative between the Reference site MACVIA-LR (Contre les MAladies Chroniques pour un VIeillissement Actif) and ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma), (3) Commitments for Action to the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing and the AIRWAYS ICPs network. It is deployed in collaboration with the World Health Organization Global Alliance against Chronic Respiratory Diseases (GARD). The European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing has proposed a 5-step framework for developing an individual scaling up strategy: (1) what to scale up: (1-a) databases of good practices, (1-b) assessment of viability of the scaling up of good practices, (1-c) classification of good practices for local replication and (2) how to scale up: (2-a) facilitating partnerships for scaling up, (2-b) implementation of key success factors and lessons learnt, including emerging technologies for individualised and predictive medicine. This strategy has already been applied to the chronic respiratory disease action plan of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing.

Roflumilast for asthma: Safety findings from a pooled analysis of ten clinical studies

BACKGROUND

The safety profile of roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has been extensively researched in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Adverse events (AEs) including headache, diarrhoea and weight loss have been reported. Much less is known about the safety of roflumilast treatment in patients with bronchial asthma.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of roflumilast using safety data from one open-label and ten pooled placebo-controlled phase II and III clinical studies completed between 1997 and 2005.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The studies were conducted at sites in Europe, North and South America, Africa, Australasia and Asia and study length varied from 4 to 40 weeks. Data for 5169 patients between 12 and 70 years of age, of whom 2851 received roflumilast at doses of 125, 250 and 500 μg, were analyzed. At randomization patients had a forced expiratory flow of 45-100%.

RESULTS

Headache was the most frequent AE with an incidence rate of 50 and 29.2 per 100 patient-years in the 500 μg roflumilast and placebo groups, respectively. Gastrointestinal AEs were common. Nausea and diarrhoea occurred in 28.7 and 28.3 per 100 patient-years in the 500 μg roflumilast and placebo groups, respectively. The extent of weight loss in roflumilast-treated patients was small. AEs reported in 465 patients in the 4-week open-label follow-up study reflected those of the pooled studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity and incidence of AEs reported from this pooled safety analysis confirm that roflumilast is generally well tolerated by patients with asthma. This reflects the general safety profile reported previously in patients with COPD. All studies were funded by Takeda. Trial registration numbers available on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00073177, NCT00076076, NCT00163527.

MACVIA-ARIA Sentinel NetworK for allergic rhinitis (MASK-rhinitis): the new generation guideline implementation

Several unmet needs have been identified in allergic rhinitis: identification of the time of onset of the pollen season, optimal control of rhinitis and comorbidities, patient stratification, multidisciplinary team for integrated care pathways, innovation in clinical trials and, above all, patient empowerment. MASK-rhinitis (MACVIA-ARIA Sentinel NetworK for allergic rhinitis) is a simple system centred around the patient which was devised to fill many of these gaps using Information and Communications Technology (ICT) tools and a clinical decision support system (CDSS) based on the most widely used guideline in allergic rhinitis and its asthma comorbidity (ARIA 2015 revision). It is one of the implementation systems of Action Plan B3 of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA). Three tools are used for the electronic monitoring of allergic diseases: a cell phone-based daily visual analogue scale (VAS) assessment of disease control, CARAT (Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test) and e-Allergy screening (premedical system of early diagnosis of allergy and asthma based on online tools). These tools are combined with a clinical decision support system (CDSS) and are available in many languages. An e-CRF and an e-learning tool complete MASK. MASK is flexible and other tools can be added. It appears to be an advanced, global and integrated ICT answer for many unmet needs in allergic diseases which will improve policies and standards.

Clinical development of an advanced intranasal delivery system of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate

There is no shortage of pharmacologic treatments available for the management of allergic rhinitis (AR), but none regularly provide full relief from all symptoms. MP29-02 (Dymista®) is a novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and fluticasone propionate (FP), benefiting from an enhanced formulation and improved device characteristics compared to marketed intranasal corticosteroid (INS) formulations. Results from large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, head-to-head trials versus first-line therapies, confirmed MP29-02 as the evidence-based drug-of-choice for AR treatment. MP29-02 was twice as effective as AZE or FP for nasal and ocular symptom relief in moderate to severe seasonal AR patients, with superiority documented regardless of season, and in more severe patients. More MP29-02-treated patients experienced clinically relevant responses (i.e., halving of nasal symptom burden and complete/near-to-complete relief) days faster than those on INS or intranasal antihistamine monotherapy. MP29-02's efficacy was sustained long-term versus FP (up to 52 weeks) in chronic rhinitis patients (perennial AR or nonallergic rhinitis), with 7 out of 10 patients first becoming symptom-free following 1 month's treatment with MP29-02, and days faster than with the INS. These results confirm MP29-02's superiority over the historical gold-standard therapy for AR (i.e., INS), and position it now as first-line treatment for moderate to severe AR patients, the majority of whom are uncontrolled on existing medications.

Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA): achievements in 10 years and future needs

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma represent global health problems for all age groups. Asthma and rhinitis frequently coexist in the same subjects. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) was initiated during a World Health Organization workshop in 1999 (published in 2001). ARIA has reclassified AR as mild/moderate-severe and intermittent/persistent. This classification closely reflects patients' needs and underlines the close relationship between rhinitis and asthma. Patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals are confronted with various treatment choices for the management of AR. This contributes to considerable variation in clinical practice, and worldwide, patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals are faced with uncertainty about the relative merits and downsides of the various treatment options. In its 2010 Revision, ARIA developed clinical practice guidelines for the management of AR and asthma comorbidities based on the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. ARIA is disseminated and implemented in more than 50 countries of the world. Ten years after the publication of the ARIA World Health Organization workshop report, it is important to make a summary of its achievements and identify the still unmet clinical, research, and implementation needs to strengthen the 2011 European Union Priority on allergy and asthma in children.

Severe chronic allergic (and related) diseases: a uniform approach--a MeDALL--GA2LEN--ARIA position paper

Concepts of disease severity, activity, control and responsiveness to treatment are linked but different. Severity refers to the loss of function of the organs induced by the disease process or to the occurrence of severe acute exacerbations. Severity may vary over time and needs regular follow-up. Control is the degree to which therapy goals are currently met. These concepts have evolved over time for asthma in guidelines, task forces or consensus meetings. The aim of this paper is to generalize the approach of the uniform definition of severe asthma presented to WHO for chronic allergic and associated diseases (rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic urticaria and atopic dermatitis) in order to have a uniform definition of severity, control and risk, usable in most situations. It is based on the appropriate diagnosis, availability and accessibility of treatments, treatment responsiveness and associated factors such as comorbidities and risk factors. This uniform definition will allow a better definition of the phenotypes of severe allergic (and related) diseases for clinical practice, research (including epidemiology), public health purposes, education and the discovery of novel therapies.

Mometasone furoate/formoterol reduces asthma deteriorations and improves lung function

This study evaluated the effect of mometasone furoate (MF)/formoterol (F) versus its monocomponents, each administered via metered-dose inhaler, on asthma deteriorations and lung function. This 26-week, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included subjects aged ≥12 yrs with not well-controlled asthma on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. After a 2-3-week open-label run-in (MF 100 μg b.i.d.), 746 subjects were randomised to receive placebo, F 10 μg, MF 100 μg or MF/F 100/10 μg b.i.d. Co-primary end-points were time to first asthma deterioration (MF/F versus F to assess effect of MF) and change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) area under the curve of serial spirometry measurements over the 12-h period following the morning dose (AUC(0-12h)) (baseline to week 12; MF/F versus MF to assess effect of F). The therapeutic effect of MF in the combination was demonstrated by a reduction in asthma deterioration incidence with MF/F versus F and a delayed time to first asthma deterioration (p<0.001). Asthma deterioration incidence was also reduced with MF/F versus MF (p=0.006). The therapeutic effect of F in the combination was demonstrated by MF/F versus MF in FEV(1) AUC(0-12h) change (4.00 versus 2.53 L·h, respectively; p=0.001). MF/F treatment also resulted in a marked improvement in health-related quality of life. MF/F 100/10 μg b.i.d. treatment showed greater clinical efficacy than its individual components or placebo; both components contributed to the efficacy of MF/F.

Development and implementation of guidelines in allergic rhinitis – an ARIA-GA2LEN paper

The links between asthma and rhinitis are well characterized. The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines stress the importance of these links and provide guidance for their prevention and treatment. Despite effective treatments being available, too few patients receive appropriate medical care for both diseases. Most patients with rhinitis and asthma consult primary care physicians and therefore these physicians are encouraged to understand and use ARIA guidelines. Patients should also be informed about these guidelines to raise their awareness of optimal care and increase control of the two related diseases. To apply these guidelines, clinicians and patients need to understand how and why the recommendations were made. The goal of the ARIA guidelines is to provide recommendations about the best management options for most patients in most situations. These recommendations should be based on the best available evidence. Making recommendations requires the assessment of the quality of available evidence, deciding on the balance between benefits and downsides, consideration of patients’ values and preferences, and, if applicable, resource implications. Guidelines must be updated as new management options become available or important new evidence emerges. Transparent reporting of guidelines facilitates understanding and acceptance, but implementation strategies need to be improved.

Molecular and clinical pharmacology of intranasal corticosteroids: clinical and therapeutic implications

Intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) are effective treatments for allergic rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, and nasal polyposis. In recent years, increased understanding of corticosteroid and glucocorticoid receptor pharmacology has enabled the development of molecules designed specifically to achieve potent, localized activity with minimal risk of systemic exposure. Pharmacologic potency studies using affinity and other assessments have produced similar rank orders of potency, with the most potent being mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, and its modification, fluticasone furoate. The furoate and propionate ester side chains render these agents highly lipophilic, which may facilitate their absorption through nasal mucosa and uptake across phospholipid cell membranes. These compounds demonstrate negligible systemic absorption. Systemic absorption rates are higher among the older corticosteroids (flunisolide, beclomethasone dipropionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and budesonide), which have bioavailabilities in the range of 34-49%. Studies, including 1-year studies with mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, and budesonide that evaluated potential systemic effects of INSs in children have generally found no adverse effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function or growth. Clinical data suggest no significant differences in efficacy between the INSs. Theoretically, newer agents with lower systemic availability may be preferable, and may come closer to the pharmacokinetic/pharmacologic criteria for the ideal therapeutic choice.

Pill swallowing ability and training in children 6 to 11 years of age

Despite the widespread view that children have difficulty swallowing pills, data are limited. In an observational cohort study, pill swallowing ability (small oral tablet) was assessed in children age 6 to 11 years. A total of 113 of 124 subjects (91%) swallowed a tablet using an ordinary cup or a patented pill cup. All 57 subjects who initially said they could swallow a pill were capable. Forty-seven learned with an ordinary cup and nine with the pill cup. Eleven did not learn. The majority of children (91%) age 6 to 11 years were able to successfully swallow a small oral tablet.

Pharmacologic and anti-IgE treatment of allergic rhinitis ARIA update (in collaboration with GA2LEN)

The pharmacologic treatment of allergic rhinitis proposed by ARIA is an evidence-based and step-wise approach based on the classification of the symptoms. The ARIA workshop, held in December 1999, published a report in 2001 and new information has subsequently been published. The initial ARIA document lacked some important information on several issues. This document updates the ARIA sections on the pharmacologic and anti-IgE treatments of allergic rhinitis. Literature published between January 2000 and December 2004 has been included. Only a few studies assessing nasal and non-nasal symptoms are presented as these will be discussed in a separate document.

Nasal allergies and beyond: a clinical review of the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of mometasone furoate

Mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS; Nasonex, Schering-Plough Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) is an effective and well-tolerated intranasal corticosteroid approved for the prophylactic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, and the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. MFNS is a potent molecule with a rapid onset of action and excellent safety and efficacy profiles. Having recently received approval for the treatment of nasal polyposis, data indicate that MFNS may also be effective in rhinosinusitis.

Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period

BACKGROUND

Proinflammatory mediators such as the cysteinyl leukotrienes are important in the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, given once daily in the morning for treatment of seasonal (fall) allergic rhinitis for 4 weeks.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind trial with a placebo run-in and a 4-week treatment period. Patients (n = 1079) with a history of allergic rhinitis and a positive skin test to seasonal pollen allergens were assigned to placebo, montelukast 10 mg, or loratadine 10 mg. Symptoms were assessed with a daily diary.

RESULTS

Montelukast was more effective than placebo in improving scores for the primary endpoint of daytime nasal symptoms (P = 0.003) and the secondary endpoints of night-time, composite, and daytime eye symptoms, patient's and physician's global evaluations of allergic rhinitis, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life (P </= 0.006). The positive control loratadine also improved scores for the primary endpoint (P </= 0.001) and the majority of the secondary endpoints (P < 0.03). When analyzed by week, the treatment effect of montelukast was more persistent than loratadine over all 4 weeks of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Montelukast provided effective relief of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms when given once daily in the morning, showed significant and sustained improvement in symptoms of allergic rhinitis over 4 weeks of treatment, and was well-tolerated.

Safety of fexofenadine in children treated for seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of allergic rhinitis in children is increasing.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of fexofenadine HCI in children ages 6 through 11 years for treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Two large, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel studies with identical protocols included patients with a positive skin test to fall allergen(s) and allergic rhinitis symptoms. Patients were randomized to receive fexofenadine 15, 30, or 60 mg or placebo twice daily for 2 weeks after a 1-week placebo lead-in. Safety was evaluated through adverse event reporting, electrocardiograms, and pre- and posttreatment laboratory panels and physical examinations.

RESULTS

A total of 875 patients from both studies were eligible for safety analyses. Ten patients (5 on placebo, 5 on fexofenadine) discontinued because of an adverse event; no event that resulted in discontinuation was judged to be caused by study medication. Incidence of adverse events was similar in active and placebo groups, and did not increase with increasing fexofenadine dose: 36.2% (83 of 229) in the placebo group versus 35.3% (79 of 224), 36.8% (77 of 209), and 34.7% (74 of 213) in the 15, 30, and 60 mg twice-daily fexofenadine groups, respectively. Headache was the most commonly reported adverse event (6.6%, 8.0%, 7.2%, and 9.4% in the placebo, 15, 30, 60 mg twice-daily fexofenadine groups, respectively). Clinical, vital sign, electrocardiogram, and laboratory measures were similar in active and placebo groups. There was no statistically significant mean change from baseline in any electrocardiogram parameter after fexofenadine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Fexofenadine, 15, 30, and 60 mg twice daily, was safe and well tolerated in this large pediatric patient population.

Quality of life in adults and children with allergic rhinitis

Quality of life, when referring to an individual's health, is called health-related quality of life (HRQL). HRQL focuses on patients' perceptions of their disease and measures impairments that have significant impact on the patient. Similar symptoms may vary in their effect on different individuals; the goal of therapy should be to reduce impairments that patients consider important. HRQL can be measured with generic or specific questionnaires. Specific questionnaires may be more sensitive and are much more likely to detect clinically important changes in patients' impairments. Specific questionnaires used to assess HRQL in rhinitis are the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Adolescent Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire. HRQL issues in adult rhinitis patients include fatigue, decrease in energy, general health perception, and social function; impairment of HQRL generally increases with increasing degree of symptoms and severity of disease. In children, HRQL issues include learning impairment, inability to integrate with peers, anxiety, and family dysfunction. Comorbid disorders often associated with rhinitis, including sinusitis, otitis media, and frequent respiratory infections, can further compromise HRQL. Pharmacologic treatments can have both positive and negative effects on HRQL. Agents that have troublesome adverse effects such as sedation can have a negative impact, whereas nonsedating antihistamines and intranasal cortico-steroids can significantly improve HRQL in patients of all ages with rhinitis.

Desloratadine: A new, nonsedating, oral antihistamine

Desloratadine is a new, selective, H(1)-receptor antagonist that also has anti-inflammatory activity. In vitro studies have shown that desloratadine inhibits the release or generation of multiple inflammatory mediators, including IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-13, PGD(2), leukotriene C(4), tryptase, histamine, and the TNF-alpha-induced chemokine RANTES. Desloratadine also inhibits the induction of cell adhesion molecules, plateletactivating factor-induced eosinophil chemotaxis, TNF-alpha-induced eosinophil adhesion, and spontaneous and phorbol myristate acetate-induced superoxide generation in vitro. In animals desloratadine had no effect on the central nervous, cardiovascular, renal, or gastrointestinal systems. Desloratadine is rapidly absorbed, has dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, and has a half-life of 27 hours. The absorption of desloratadine is not affected by food, and the metabolism and elimination are not significantly affected by the subject's age, race, or sex. There are no clinically relevant interactions between desloratadine and erythromycin, ketoconazole, or grapefruit juice. Desloratadine is not a significant substrate of the P-glycoprotein transport system. Once daily administration of desloratadine rapidly reduces the nasal and nonnasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis, including congestion. In patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and concomitant asthma, desloratadine treatment was also associated with significant reductions in total asthma symptom score and use of inhaled beta(2)-agonists. Use of desloratadine in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria was associated with significant reductions in pruritus, number of hives, size of the largest hive, and interference with sleep and daily activities. Clinical experience in over 2300 patients has shown that the adverse event profile of desloratadine is similar to that of placebo; desloratadine has no clinically relevant effects on electrocardiographic parameters, does not impair wakefulness or psychomotor performance, and does not exacerbate the psychomotor impairment associated with alcohol use.

Onset of therapeutic effect of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of fluticasone propionate (FP) aqueous nasal spray in the treatment of rhinitis has been demonstrated in multiple controlled clinical studies. The onset of therapeutic effect of FP in these clinical trials appears to occur within 12 hours after administration of the initial dose.

OBJECTIVE

This article presents an analysis from previous clinical trials that examined the efficacy of intranasal FP in patients with rhinitis to ascertain whether the time to onset of the therapeutic effect of this medication could be determined.

METHODS

Completed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with FP were evaluated to determine whether onset of effect could be evaluated based on the study designs. A study was deemed acceptable for evaluation of onset of effect if at least one evaluation of the intensity of nasal symptoms was completed within 12 hours after the initial dose of study medication and daily evaluations were made thereafter. Adult patients were included in the onset analysis if they received an initial FP dose of 200 microg. Pediatric patients who received an initial FP dose of 100 microg were also included. Onset of effect was evaluated by 1) examining the timepoints at which statistically significant differences were observed between FP and placebo in mean change from baseline for total nasal symptom score (TNSS); and by 2) using a binary probability model of success/failure to determine statistically significant differences from placebo.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the criteria to evaluate onset of therapeutic effect; 3,605 patients with rhinitis received FP and 2,271 patients received placebo. This database represents the largest compilation of data ever assembled to determine the onset of therapeutic effect of a corticosteroid nasal spray. Two studies used a "park design" to examine onset of effect; statistically significant differences in TNSS favoring FP were achieved at hours 2 to 4 and at hour 12, respectively. Using a binary probability model of success/failure for analysis of TNSS in the remaining 20 studies not specifically designed to evaluate onset of effect, numerically greater improvements in TNSS for FP compared with placebo were found in 19 of the 20 studies within 12 hours of the administration of the first dose (P < .001). Pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant improvement for TNSS within 12 hours postdose in five of the studies for FP compared with placebo and in none for placebo compared with FP.

CONCLUSIONS

Onset of therapeutic effect occurs within 12 hours, and as early as 2 to 4 hours in some patients, after administration of the first dose of FP aqueous nasal spray.

Increasing asthma knowledge and changing home environments for Latino families with asthmatic children

We tested an asthma education program in 204 underserved Latino families with an asthmatic child. The education program consisted of one or two sessions delivered in each family's home in the targeted participant's preferred language by a bilingual, bicultural educator. We encouraged, but did not require, attendance by the child. The curriculum was culturally-tailored, and all participants received education on understanding asthma, preventing asthma attacks, and managing asthma. Outcomes included change in asthma knowledge and change in home environment asthma management procedures. Asthma knowledge increased significantly (39 to 50% correct from pre- to post-test, P < 0.001) and participants made significant changes to the child's bedroom environment (mean number of triggers decreased from 2.4 to 1.8, P < 0.001; mean number of controllers increased from 0.7 to 0.9, P < 0.001). The results support the value of asthma education and its importance in the national agenda to reduce health disparities among minorities.

Quality of life in patients with allergic rhinitis

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Reading this article will familiarize the practitioner with ongoing efforts to measure the effects of allergic rhinitis symptoms and its treatments on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients. The reader will learn about instruments used to collect HRQOL data, results of studies showing the burden of illness and the effects of treatments on HRQOL, and efforts to interpret the clinical relevance of changes in HRQOL status.

DATA SOURCES

Information was gleaned from articles listed in MEDLINE regarding HRQOL in allergic rhinitis between 1966 and 2000 (English language only), and from the personal experiences of the authors.

STUDY SELECTION

Questionnaire validation studies and representative controlled trials employing measures to assess the effects of allergic rhinitis symptoms and its treatments on HRQOL are described. RESULTS FROM THIS REVIEW: Allergic rhinitis symptoms can have detrimental effects on the physical, psychologic, and social aspects of patients' lives. Clinical trial data suggest a variety of pharmacologic therapies can significantly improve HRQOL in patients with allergic rhinitis. Validated questionnaires are now available that can easily be used in clinical practice to measure the effects of interventions on HRQOL for individual patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluating the effects of interventions on HRQOL may be particularly important in a non-life-threatening condition such as rhinitis. Health-related quality of life measures can be used to indicate the risk/benefit and the cost/benefit ratios of competing treatment options. Clinicians and policy makers are already using HRQOL data to evaluate results of medical interventions to guide patient management and reimbursement decisions.

Added relief in the treatment of acute recurrent sinusitis with adjunctive mometasone furoate nasal spray. The Nasonex Sinusitis Group

BACKGROUND

Intranasal glucocorticoids are effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Their effectiveness as an anti-inflammatory adjunct in the treatment of acute recurrent sinusitis has not been adequately established in a controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that intranasal corticosteroid treatment produces additional relief in the treatment of acute sinusitis with oral antibiotics.

METHODS

Patients who were 12 years old and older with a history of recurrent sinusitis were treated while experiencing a new episode of acute sinusitis, which was diagnosed by symptoms and confirmed by computed tomography scan of the paranasal sinuses. Patients were treated for 21 days with amoxicillin clavulanate potassium and randomized to receive concurrent mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS; Nasonex [400 microg, twice daily]; n = 200 patients) or placebo spray (twice daily; n = 207 patients). Symptom scores for headache, facial pain, congestion, purulent rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and cough were recorded at baseline and throughout treatment.

RESULTS

Baseline symptom scores showed a moderate level of symptom severity comparable in both groups. Patient-recorded twice daily symptom scores showed that adjunctive treatment with MFNS caused a significantly greater decrease in total symptom score (primary efficacy variable) and in individual scores of inflammatory symptoms associated with the obstruction process (headache, congestion, and facial pain) compared with placebo. Symptoms associated with the secretory processes were improved to a lesser degree. Therapy-related local adverse events were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

The addition of intranasal corticosteroid, MFNS 400 microg twice daily, to antibiotics significantly reduces symptoms of acute sinusitis compared with antibiotic treatment alone.

Concomitant montelukast and loratadine as treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Nasal challenge studies have suggested histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes are important proinflammatory mediators in allergic rhinitis. This study was designed to determine the efficacy of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, administered alone or concomitantly with loratadine, an H(1)-receptor antagonist, in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of concomitant use of montelukast and loratadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

In this multicenter (N = 12) double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled 2-week trial, 460 men and women, aged 15 to 75 years, with spring seasonal allergic rhinitis were randomly allocated to receive 1 of the following 5 treatments: montelukast 10 or 20 mg, loratadine 10 mg, montelukast 10 mg with loratadine 10 mg, or placebo, once daily in the evening. The primary end point was daytime nasal symptoms score (average of congestion, rhinorrhea, itching, and sneezing). Other end points were eye symptoms, nighttime symptoms, individual daytime nasal symptoms, global evaluations (patient's and physician's), and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life scores.

RESULTS

Concomitant montelukast with loratadine improved the primary end point significantly (P <.001) compared with placebo and each agent alone. Compared with placebo, montelukast with loratadine also significantly improved eye symptoms, nighttime symptoms, individual daytime nasal symptoms, global evaluations, and quality of life. Montelukast alone and loratadine alone caused modest improvements in rhinitis end points. All treatments were similarly well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant montelukast with loratadine provided effective treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis and associated eye symptoms with a safety profile comparable with placebo.

Onset-of-action for antihistamine and decongestant combinations during an outdoor challenge

BACKGROUND

Medications containing a combination antihistamine-decongestant are commonly used for allergic rhinitis yet onset-of-action comparisons for symptom relief after a single dose have not been performed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the onset of symptom relief and efficacy of antihistamine-decongestant medications (acrivastine-pseudoephedrine and loratadine-pseudoephedrine) compared with placebo in an outdoor park.

METHODS

This study was conducted during the spring of 1997 using a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Patients completed baseline rhinitis symptom diaries from 7:30 to 9:30 AM. Subjects with qualifying symptom scores received one dose of either acrivastine-pseudoephedrine, loratadine-pseudoephedrine, or placebo at 10:00 AM. Symptom diaries were recorded for the next 4 hours.

RESULTS

Of 593 patients randomized to treatment, 592 were included in efficacy analysis. Acrivastine-pseudoephedrine and loratadine-pseudoephedrine demonstrated a mean onset-of-action by 45 and 30 minutes respectively for total symptom and rhinitis symptom scores for the five sites. Onset-of-action for nasal congestion scores was 45 minutes for both medications. Sites having higher pollen exposure (>100 pollen grains over 6 hours) demonstrated a difference between the antihistamine combinations: acrivastine-pseudoephedrine had an onset of action at 45 minutes for total symptom and rhinitis symptom scores, and 15 minutes for nasal congestion scores whereas loratadine-pseudoephedrine had onset-of-action for nasal congestion score of 105 minutes but failed to reach significance at any timepoint for total symptom and rhinitis symptom scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Both antihistamine-decongestant combinations demonstrate an onset-of-action within 60 minutes of administration but under conditions of higher pollen exposure, the acrivastine combination was more effective for total symptoms, rhinitis symptoms, and nasal congestion with an onset-of-action within 45 minutes for rhinitis symptoms and 15 minutes for congestion.

Role for cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist therapy in asthma and their potential role in allergic rhinitis based on the concept of "one linked airway disease"

OBJECTIVE

This review focuses on the shared pathophysiology of asthma and allergic rhinitis. The similarities illustrate the "one linked airway disease" concept, a unifying theory of these upper and lower airway inflammatory disorders. Since leukotrienes are mediators in both conditions, studies have been performed to assess the potential therapeutic role of cysteinyl leukotriene antagonists. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the accumulating data concerning these agents in treating asthma and allergic rhinitis.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant publications obtained from a literature review.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant publications on the topics of leukotrienes, leukotriene receptor antagonists, asthma, and allergic rhinitis were critically evaluated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Studies to date have documented the efficacy of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonists for asthma. The pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis and its similarities to asthma suggest that these agents could play a significant therapeutic role in managing this upper airway disorder. Because the leukotriene antagonists are oral agents, they may be valuable in treating not only either condition but also both at the same time when they coexist. They appear to be beneficial when prescribed as the initial medicine and when used in conjunction with other therapies.

Detection of growth suppression in children during treatment with intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate

OBJECTIVE

Intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has generally been considered to have no systemic activity at recommended doses, but the potential for long-term effects on growth has not previously been evaluated. This study was undertaken to assess the effects of 1 year of treatment with intranasal BDP on growth in children.

STUDY DESIGN

In this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 100 prepubertal children 6 to 9 years old with perennial allergic rhinitis were treated with aqueous BDP 168 microg twice daily (n = 51) or placebo (n = 49) for 1 year. Subjects' baseline heights were required to be between the 5th and 95th percentile, and skeletal age as determined by left wrist radiograph was required to be within 2 years of chronological age. Washout periods for medications known to affect growth, including other forms of corticosteroids, were established, and these medications were prohibited during the study. However, short courses of oral prednisolone lasting no more than 7 days, and short courses of dermatologic corticosteroids lasting no more than 10 days, were allowed. Height was measured with a stadiometer after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months of treatment. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis was assessed by measurements of 8 AM basal cortisol concentrations and response to. 25 mg cosyntropin stimulation. The primary safety parameter was the rate of change in standing height. Statistical analyses were based on all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of medication (intent-to-treat principle). The rate of change in standing height was analyzed for all subjects who entered the study and for those completing the full 12 months of treatment (n = 80). The rate of change in standing height over the 1-year study was calculated as the slope of a linear regression line fitted to each subject's height measurements over time. Because there was a statistically significant between-group difference in standing height at baseline, an analysis of covariance was performed for all analyses of standing height data.

RESULTS

Of the 100 subjects enrolled, 90 completed the study. The 2 treatment groups were generally comparable at baseline; however, at baseline, mean age and mean height were significantly greater in the BDP treatment group that the in placebo treatment group. In both analyses, overall growth rate was significantly slower in BDP-treated subjects than placebo-treated subjects. The mean change in standing height after 1 year was 5.0 cm in the BDP-treated subjects compared with 5.9 cm in the placebo-treated subjects. The difference in growth rates was evident as early as the 1-month treatment visit, suggesting that the effect on growth occurred initially. The growth-suppressive effect of BDP remained consistent across all age and gender subgroups, and among subjects with and without a previous history of corticosteroid use. Use of additional exogenous corticosteroids during the study was similar in both groups and did not affect the results. Because there was a baseline imbalance in height, a supplemental analysis of the differences in prestudy growth rates was performed. This analysis found no baseline imbalance in prestudy growth rates. To determine whether the difference in growth rates during the study could be attributed to preexisting growth rates, a z score analysis was performed. The heights of both groups were normalized at baseline and at the end of the study using the US National Center for Health Statistics data for mean and standard deviations of height. This analysis confirmed that the difference in growth rates between the 2 groups was primarily attributable to the treatment rather than to any preexisting difference in growth. Additional analyses confirmed that the results were not influenced by outlier values. No significant between-group difference were found in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis assessments. No unusual adverse events were observed. (ABSTRACT

Involuntary smoking and asthma

Involuntary smoking is the third leading preventable cause of death, and among children it causes lower respiratory infections, middle ear disease, sudden infant death syndrome, and asthma. Half the world's children may be exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), exacerbating symptoms in 20% of children with asthma. Recent studies have reinforced previous conclusions that ETS exposure causes onset of childhood asthma and exacerbation of symptoms throughout life. The exact mechanisms by which this is accomplished are still unclear, as are the relative contributions of prenatal versus postnatal exposure. However, favorable health outcomes can be attained with reduced exposure. Among the few studies of ETS exposure reduction interventions, low-intensity advice methods appeared ineffective, and counseling parent smokers appeared successful. Direct counseling of school-aged children to avoid ETS has yet to be tested. Community norms may need to shift further in favor of protecting children and others from ETS before minimal interventions can be successful. This will require combined and ongoing efforts of the medical and public health establishments, in concert with legislation mandating tobacco-free public places and with ETS-related media campaigns.

A step approach to the clinical management of allergic rhinitis: prescription and over-the-counter therapeutic reference summary

Allergic rhinitis is a debilitating condition. Successful clinical management requires patient education, allergen avoidance, and individualized pharmacotherapy. Immunotherapy may also be valuable for specific patients. With recent changes in the prescription of pharmacotherapies for allergic rhinitis symptoms, physicians or pharmacists may recommend over-the-counter (OTC) therapies. In an effort to develop a comprehensive therapeutic reference guide and a step approach to the clinical management of allergic rhinitis, a panel concluded the use of OTC agents, as either self-directed or parent-directed treatment, based on self-initiative or consultation with health care providers, may result in health care cost savings for both patient and health care provider, as well as reduced risks of overmedication and drug interaction with prescription medications for the patient.

Impact of cetirizine on the burden of allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

The goals of this article include the reporting of the epidemiology, economic and medical impact of allergic rhinitis. In addition, the pharmacology and clinical profile of the therapeutic agent cetirizine are reviewed.

DATA SOURCES

A detailed literature search was conducted. References are limited to the English language and human subjects and tissues. Studies considered relevant and important over the past 20 years are highlighted.

STUDY SELECTION

Prevalence and morbidity data were chosen from more recent assessments. Because cetirizine is a relatively new compound, studies from the past several years from peer-reviewed journals have been emphasized.

RESULTS

Allergic rhinitis affects between 15% and 25% of the US general population. It shares common pathophysiologic mechanisms with conjunctivitis and asthma and predisposes to nasal infections, otitis media, sinusitis, nasal polyposis, and orthodontic malocclusions. Direct medical care costs amount to up to 3 billion dollars every year. In addition, the quality of life of affected individuals is substantially compromised. Cetirizine is a potent H1-receptor antagonist and has anti-inflammatory properties. It does not interact with concomitantly administered medications, has no cardiac adverse effects, and does not appear to be associated with teratogenicity. Impairment of CNS function is comparable to other low-sedating antihistamines at the recommended dose of 10 mg daily for adults. Its clinical efficacy for allergic respiratory diseases has been established in numerous trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergic rhinitis causes considerable suffering. Cetirizine, with a fine risk-benefit ratio, can be a most valuable therapeutic option.

Once-daily fexofenadine HCl improves quality of life and reduces work and activity impairment in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Fexofenadine HCl (Allegra, Telfast) is approved in the US for twice-daily dosing for treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of once-daily fexofenadine HCl on patient-reported quality of life and impairment at work, in the classroom, and in daily activities due to seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms.

METHODS

This placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study included patients aged 12 to 65 years with moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms. Outcomes were assessed using self-administered questionnaires at baseline, week 1, and week 2. Outcome measures included change from baseline in: overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) score; individual RQLQ domain scores; work, classroom, and daily activity impairment measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) instrument; and ratings in 3 generic health domains from the SF-36 Health Survey.

RESULTS

Intent to treat efficacy analyses included 845 patients from 40 sites. Patients receiving either 120 or 180 mg QD fexofenadine HCl reported significantly greater improvement (P < or = .006) in overall RQLQ score than patients receiving placebo. Similarly, both fexofenadine treatment groups reported significantly greater reductions in overall work impairment and daily activity impairment compared with the placebo group (P < or = .004). There was a trend for improvement in classroom impairment with fexofenadine treatment, although differences from placebo were not statistically significant. Generic health measures demonstrated fexofenadine HCl treatment had a positive effect on general health.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily fexofenadine HCl, 120 or 180 mg, significantly improved patient-reported quality of life and reduced performance impairment in work and daily activities due to seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms compared with placebo.

Comparison of ipratropium bromide 0.03% with beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of perennial rhinitis in children

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of ipratropium bromide 0.03% (IB) with beclomethasone dipropionate 0.042% (BDP) in the treatment of perennial rhinitis in children.

METHODS

Thirty-three children with nonallergic perennial rhinitis (NAPR) and 113 with allergic perennial rhinitis (APR) were randomly assigned to either IB or BDP for 6 months in a single-blind, multicenter protocol in which the physician was blinded to treatment. At each visit, patients and physicians rated symptom control of rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and sneezing. Patients also completed quality of life questionnaires at baseline and after 6 months of therapy.

RESULTS

Both treatments showed a significant improvement in control of rhinorrhea, congestion, and sneezing compared with baseline over the 6 months of treatment (P < .05). Only for the control of sneezing was BDP consistently better than IB (P < .05). Among the patients given IB, 61% to 73% assessed the control of rhinorrhea as good or excellent on different study visit days, 43% to 60% similarly rated the control of nasal congestion, and 39% to 43% the control of sneezing. The results for BDP were 68% to 78% for the control of rhinorrhea, 55% to 72% for the control of nasal congestion, and 54% to 68% for the control of sneezing. Quality of life assessment documented that both drugs significantly reduced interference with daily activities and disturbance of mood due to rhinorrhea compared with baseline (P < .05). Both treatments were well tolerated with IB causing less nasal bleeding and irritation than BDP.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipratropium bromide was safe and effective in controlling rhinorrhea and diminishing the interference by rhinorrhea in school attendance, concentration on school work, and sleep. Ipratropium bromide was as effective as BDP in the control of rhinorrhea and showed a relatively good effect on congestion. Patient and physician assessment favored BDP in the control of sneezing.

A dose-ranging study of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray (MFNS; Nasonex) 200 microg once daily for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and treatment of perennial rhinitis have been demonstrated in adults. However, the dose response of MFNS in pediatric patients has not yet been characterized.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine the dose-response relationship of 3 different doses of MFNS in a pediatric population.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study of 679 children 6 to 11 years of age with histories of SAR and documented positive skin test responses. Patients were randomized to one of the following treatment groups for 4 weeks: MFNS 25 microgram once daily, MFNS 100 microgram once daily, MFNS 200 microgram once daily, beclomethasone dipropionate 84 microgram twice daily (168 microgram/day), or placebo. Physician evaluations were performed at days 4, 8, 15, and 29, and patient evaluations were analyzed for days 1 to 15 and 16 to 29.

RESULTS

The mean reduction from baseline in physician-evaluated total nasal symptom scores at day 8 (the primary efficacy variable) was significantly greater in the MFNS and beclomethasone dipropionate groups than in the placebo group (P </=.02). No significant differences were observed among the 3 MFNS groups. However, as treatment continued, symptoms in patients treated with MFNS 100 or 200 microgram once daily continued to improve, whereas those treated with MFNS 25 microgram once daily demonstrated little further improvement. By day 29, MFNS 100 and 200 microgram once daily both were significantly more effective than MFNS 25 microgram once daily in relieving symptoms of SAR, but MFNS 200 microgram provided no additional benefit over MFNS 100 microgram. All doses of MFNS were well tolerated, and cosyntropin stimulation tests performed before and after treatment found no evidence of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the most appropriate therapeutic dosage of MFNS in the treatment of SAR in children 6 to 11 years of age is 100 microgram once daily. In addition, MFNS at doses up to 200 microgram once daily for 4 weeks was well tolerated and had no detectable effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function.

Clinical and antiinflammatory effects of intranasal budesonide aqueous pump spray in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Intranasal corticosteroids are among the most effective treatments for perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). Some individuals unable to tolerate aerosols may prefer an aqueous nasal spray.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy, safety, and antiinflammatory effects of an intranasal aqueous pump spray formulation of budesonide.

METHODS

Four hundred seventy-eight patients [257 adults, 221 children (6 to 17 years)] with PAR were randomized to budesonide aqueous pump spray (Rhinocort Aqua) 32, 64, 128, or 256 microg, or placebo once daily for 6 weeks. Patients recorded nasal/ocular symptom severity daily. Nasal cytology was evaluated at baseline and end of treatment. The study was powered only to evaluate the overall population for significance.

RESULTS

Following 6 weeks of treatment, significant differences from baseline in nasal index score (NIS)--sum of blocked nose, runny nose, and sneezing scores--were observed in the 32-, 64-, and 256-microg aqueous budesonide groups compared with placebo (P < or = .031). No dose response was found for changes in NIS. Significant reductions from baseline NIS were observed with 256-microg aqueous budesonide compared with placebo in the first 24 hours following treatment (P = .004). Aqueous budesonide also significantly reduced individual nasal symptoms in two or more of the active treatment groups (P < or = .035). Patients' overall treatment efficacy assessments showed significantly greater symptom control with aqueous budesonide (P < or = .006), and overall quality of life improved. Significantly greater decreases in eosinophils and basophils were found in aqueous budesonide-treated groups (P < or = .007). The frequency of adverse events was similar among all treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Once daily aqueous budesonide is well tolerated and effective in relieving nasal symptoms and inflammation associated with PAR.

Subjective and objective assessments in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: effects of therapy with mometasone furoate nasal spray

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of topical nasal steroid therapy for allergic rhinitis is usually evaluated by patient and clinician assessments of subjective symptom changes in diaries and at clinical interviews.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to complement the subjective measures with objective measures of nasal cytology, biochemistry, and function.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized study patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) 12 years of age or older received 200 microg mometasone furoate nasal spray (n = 80) or placebo spray (n = 41) once daily for 2 weeks. Subjective assessments by clinician and patient comprised symptom/sign scores and overall therapeutic response evaluations. Objective measures included nasal cytology, nasal biochemistry, nasal airway resistance (NAR), mucociliary clearance, and olfactory functions.

RESULTS

Mometasone furoate produced a significantly greater decrease than placebo in subjective measures of SAR for total symptom score (-46% vs -30%, p < 0.05), total nasal score (-47% vs -30%, p < 0.024), individual nasal symptom scores, and overall therapeutic response. The objective measures of eosinophil, basophil, and neutrophil counts and mucociliary clearance were significantly better in mometasone furoate- than in placebo-treated patients. Similarly, within-treatment statistically significant improvements were produced by mometasone furoate but not by placebo sprays for levels of eosinophilic cationic protein, tryptase and albumin, NAR, and odor identification. Significant positive correlations were found between NAR and nasal stuffiness and between eosinophils, basophils, and neutrophils and both eosinophilic cationic protein and albumin.

CONCLUSION

Subjective measures of SAR were significantly improved in the mometasone furoate group by comparison with placebo-treated patients. Objective assessments supported the subjective findings because within-treatment measures were frequently significantly improved after mometasone furoate treatment but not after placebo treatment.

Pharmacological treatment options for allergic rhinitis and asthma

The inflammatory response that results in allergic rhinitis and asthma is complex and involves numerous cell types, such as lymphocytes, mast cells, and eosinophils, and mediators, such as histamine, arachidonic acid metabolites, toxic proteins, and cytokines. Therefore, many different classes of pharmacological agents, acting at various discrete points, can influence the symptoms induced by this process. The various classes of agents include antihistamines, decongestants, anticholinergics, leukotriene antagonists, beta-adrenoceptor agonists, theophylline, sodium cromoglycate and corticosteroids. In this article the mechanism of action of each of these classes is discussed, together with their use in allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Treatment options for the child with allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis is extremely common in pediatric populations. Its symptoms can interfere markedly with everyday life; moreover, untreated allergic rhinitis can predispose patients toward more serious respiratory diseases. Therapy focuses both on reducing the causes (avoidance, immunotherapy) and on controlling manifest symptoms (pharmacotherapy). Antihistamines, decongestants, anticholinergic agents, mast cell stabilizers, and intranasal corticosteroids constitute the pharmacotherapy arsenal. Of these, the intranasal corticosteroids most effectively control the major symptoms; many studies have found that their efficacy in persistent allergic rhinitis is greater than that of decongestants, antihistamines, and cromolyn sodium. Moreover, unlike systemic corticosteroids, they are generally free from adverse side effects. Thus, with appropriate attention to education and formulations most tolerable to children, they should be a wise choice for many pediatric patients.

Azelastine nasal spray as adjunctive therapy to azelastine tablets in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Azelastine rhinitis medications (nasal spray and tablets) have been shown to relieve the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Nevertheless, many rhinitic subjects suffer from acute exacerbations of symptoms that sometimes require additional treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of azelastine nasal spray as adjunctive therapy to azelastine tablets in the management of symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis in subjects who remain symptomatic despite the oral medication.

METHODS

A 2-day, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Two hundred thirty-three subjects with symptomatic allergic rhinitis received azelastine tablets (0.5 mg bid) for a minimum of seven days prior to receiving either azelastine nasal spray (2 sprays per nostril bid) or placebo nasal spray as adjunctive therapy. Efficacy was determined by improvement in rhinitis symptoms that were grouped according to total and major symptom complex severity scores.

RESULTS

Mean percent improvements in the total symptom complex severity scores for azelastine were statistically significant (P < or = .05) or showed a trend toward statistical significance (.05 < or = P < .10) versus placebo from the second through the first ten hours after the initial dose and for each of the last five hours of the second day, demonstrating a rapid onset of action and sustained efficacy over the 2-day study period. Azelastine was well tolerated, and no subject discontinued therapy with azelastine due to an adverse experience.

CONCLUSION

Azelastine nasal spray can be effectively administered as adjunctive therapy, in an outdoor environment in which subjects are exposed to pollen and other aeroallergens.

Pilot study of bronchodilator response to inhaled albuterol delivered by metered-dose inhaler and a novel dry powder inhaler

BACKGROUND

The metered-dose inhaler is currently one of the most prescribed methods of delivering drugs to the lungs. In the United States, most currently marketed metered dose inhalers use chlorofluorocarbons as the system propellant and require patient breath coordination. These factors lead to the need for a delivery system that is independent of propellants and patient coordination.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the magnitude and time course of bronchodilation between albuterol delivered by Ventolin metered dose inhaler and albuterol sulfate powder (Rotacaps) delivered by a novel dry powder inhaler that generates a respirable drug aerosol over a range of inspiratory flow rates.

METHODS

A single-center, single-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled, partial-blind, 3-way crossover study was conducted in an outpatient asthma Clinical Research Center. Twelve mild to moderate asthmatic patients 12 to 36 years of age participated in this study that involved three treatments, each separated by three to eight days, consisting of 2 puffs (90 micrograms/puff) albuterol by Ventolin metered-dose inhaler, two inhalations (100 micrograms/puff) albuterol sulfate powder (Rotacaps) by dry powder inhaler, and two inhalations (12.5 mg/inhalation) lactose powder by dry powder inhaler. Spirometry, blood pressure, and heart rate were measured at 30 minutes, 15 minutes, and immediately before treatment and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 300 minutes after each treatment. Serum potassium and glucose, and electrocardiograms were measured at 30 minutes before, and 30, 60, 90, and 180 minutes after each treatment. Endpoints were compared with analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Five patients (one metered-dose inhaler and four dry powder inhaler) did not respond with > 15% FEV1 increase over baseline within 30 minutes. Metered-dose inhaler and dry powder inhaler mean FEV1 results, respectively, for 11 and 8 responders were 15 minutes in onset, 202.9 and 185.4 minutes in duration, 24.8% and 25.1% maximum change, and 18.6 and 18.2 area-under-FEV1-bronchodilation-curve. Statistical analysis of all patients and responders-only revealed both active treatments to be different from placebo (P = .0018), but not different from each other (P = .1291). No safety endpoints were significantly different among all three treatments (P > .10 for all safety endpoints).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the dry powder inhaler safely and effectively delivered a commercially available albuterol sulfate powder (Rotacaps) into human lungs with bronchodilation comparable to Ventolin metered-dose inhaler.

Ipratropium nasal spray in children with perennial rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium nasal spray and placebo administered twice each day for 4 weeks in pediatric patients with perennial rhinitis who had rhinorrhea as a major complaint.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blind, parallel group study. Patients aged 6 to 18 years with symptoms of perennial nonallergic (PNAR) or perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) were randomized to receive ipratropium (42 micrograms per nostril) or placebo nasal spray, double-blind, twice each day for 4 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated by nasal symptoms, especially anterior rhinorrhea, and quality of life. Previous caregivers for rhinitis and medications used in the past were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients were empanelled, 162 with PAR, 40 with PNAR; of these 151 with mild-severe rhinorrhea were evaluated for efficacy. Treatment with ipratropium reduced symptoms of rhinorrhea primarily in patients with PNAR. In patients with PAR this response was less pronounced, and was seen as a modest decrease in the severity of rhinorrhea noted in the first 2 weeks of treatment. Quality of life assessments confirmed that rhinorrhea was bothersome to these pediatric patients, and suggested that treatment with ipratropium nasal spray was associated with an improvement, especially in the patients with PNAR. There were few adverse events; these were similar in the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipratropium nasal spray 0.03% administered at a dose of 42 micrograms/nostril bid is a safe and effective new therapy for control of anterior rhinorrhea in pediatric patients with PNAR. Twice daily administration is adequate for patients with PNAR, but patients with PAR might benefit from more frequent administration (e.g., tid).

Considerations in pharmaceutical conversion: focus on antihistamines

The practice of pharmaceutical conversion, which encompasses three types of drug interchange (generic, brand, and therapeutic substitution), is increasing in managed care settings. Pharmaceutical conversion has numerous implications for managed care organizations, their healthcare providers, and their customers. Although drug cost may be a driving consideration in pharmaceutical conversion, a number of other considerations are of equal or greater importance in the decision-making process may affect the overall cost of patient care. Among these considerations are clinical, psychosocial, and safety issues; patient adherence; patient satisfaction; and legal implications of pharmaceutical conversion. Patient-centered care must always remain central to decisions about pharmaceutical conversion. This article discusses the issues related to, and implications of, pharmaceutical conversion utilizing the antihistamines class of drugs as the case situation.