1
|
Pérez-Alfocea F, Borghi M, Guerrero JJ, Jiménez AR, Jiménez-Gómez JM, Fernie AR, Bartomeus I. Pollinator-assisted plant phenotyping, selection, and breeding for crop resilience to abiotic stresses. Plant J 2024. [PMID: 38581375 DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
Food security is threatened by climate change, with heat and drought being the main stresses affecting crop physiology and ecosystem services, such as plant-pollinator interactions. We hypothesize that tracking and ranking pollinators' preferences for flowers under environmental pressure could be used as a marker of plant quality for agricultural breeding to increase crop stress tolerance. Despite increasing relevance of flowers as the most stress sensitive organs, phenotyping platforms aim at identifying traits of resilience by assessing the plant physiological status through remote sensing-assisted vegetative indexes, but find strong bottlenecks in quantifying flower traits and in accurate genotype-to-phenotype prediction. However, as the transport of photoassimilates from leaves (sources) to flowers (sinks) is reduced in low-resilient plants, flowers are better indicators than leaves of plant well-being. Indeed, the chemical composition and amount of pollen and nectar that flowers produce, which ultimately serve as food resources for pollinators, change in response to environmental cues. Therefore, pollinators' preferences could be used as a measure of functional source-to-sink relationships for breeding decisions. To achieve this challenging goal, we propose to develop a pollinator-assisted phenotyping and selection platform for automated quantification of Genotype × Environment × Pollinator interactions through an insect geo-positioning system. Pollinator-assisted selection can be validated by metabolic, transcriptomic, and ionomic traits, and mapping of candidate genes, linking floral and leaf traits, pollinator preferences, plant resilience, and crop productivity. This radical new approach can change the current paradigm of plant phenotyping and find new paths for crop redomestication and breeding assisted by ecological decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Juan José Guerrero
- Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Murcia, Spain
| | | | | | - Alisdair R Fernie
- Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology (MPIMP), Postdam-Golm, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buche L, Bartomeus I, Godoy O. Multitrophic Higher-Order Interactions Modulate Species Persistence. Am Nat 2024; 203:458-472. [PMID: 38489780 DOI: 10.1086/729222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
AbstractEcologists increasingly recognize that interactions between two species can be affected by the density of a third species. How these higher-order interactions (HOIs) affect species persistence remains poorly understood. To explore the effect of HOIs stemming from multiple trophic layers on a plant community composition, we experimentally built a mesocosm with three plants and three pollinator species arranged in a fully nested and modified network structure. We estimated pairwise interactions among plants and between plants and pollinators, as well as HOIs initiated by a plant or a pollinator affecting plant species pairs. Using a structuralist approach, we evaluated the consequences of the statistically supported HOIs on the persistence probability of each of the three competing plant species and their combinations. HOIs substantially redistribute the strength and sign of pairwise interactions between plant species, promoting the opportunities for multispecies communities to persist compared with a non-HOI scenario. However, the physical elimination of a plant-pollinator link in the modified network structure promotes changes in per capita pairwise interactions and HOIs, resulting in a single-species community. Our study provides empirical evidence of the joint importance of HOIs and network structure in determining species persistence within diverse communities.
Collapse
|
3
|
Domínguez-Garcia V, Molina FP, Godoy O, Bartomeus I. Interaction network structure explains species' temporal persistence in empirical plant-pollinator communities. Nat Ecol Evol 2024; 8:423-429. [PMID: 38302580 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02314-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Despite clear evidence that some pollinator populations are declining, our ability to predict pollinator communities prone to collapse or species at risk of local extinction is remarkably poor. Here, we develop a model grounded in the structuralist approach that allows us to draw sound predictions regarding the temporal persistence of species in mutualistic networks. Using high-resolution data from a six-year study following 12 independent plant-pollinator communities, we confirm that pollinator species with more persistent populations in the field are theoretically predicted to tolerate a larger range of environmental changes. Persistent communities are not necessarily more diverse, but are generally located in larger habitat patches, and present a distinctive combination of generalist and specialist species resulting in a more nested structure, as predicted by previous theoretical work. Hence, pollinator interactions directly inform about their ability to persist, opening the door to use theoretically informed models to predict species' fate within the ongoing global change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Oscar Godoy
- Departamento de Biología, Instituto Universitario de Ciencias del Mar (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, Puerto Real, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Velado-Alonso E, Kleijn D, Bartomeus I. Reassessing science communication for effective farmland biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 2024:S0169-5347(24)00032-6. [PMID: 38395670 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Integrating biodiversity conservation into agriculture is a pressing challenge promoted by conservationists. Although biodiversity can also provide important benefits to farmers, the adoption of biodiversity-enhancing measures is lagging behind the scientific evidence. This may partially be related to the way scientists position themselves. If scientists do not convincingly communicate about the implications of their evidence, other interested stakeholders will drive the conversations. To increase societal impact, scientists must understand the complex communication environment and take an informed and strategic position. We describe the prevailing conservation and farming narratives, highlighting how the term 'biodiversity' can be used to start dialogues between parties with conflicting demands and exemplifying how scientists can build effective narratives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Velado-Alonso
- Ecology and Evolution Department, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain; Functional Agrobiodiversity & Agroecology Group, Department of Crop Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
| | - David Kleijn
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Ecology and Evolution Department, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lanuza JB, Collado MÁ, Sayol F, Sol D, Bartomeus I. Brain size predicts bees' tolerance to urban environments. Biol Lett 2023; 19:20230296. [PMID: 38016644 PMCID: PMC10684341 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The rapid conversion of natural habitats to anthropogenic landscapes is threatening insect pollinators worldwide, raising concern regarding the negative consequences on their fundamental role as plant pollinators. However, not all pollinators are negatively affected by habitat conversion, as certain species find appropriate resources in anthropogenic landscapes to persist and proliferate. The reason why some species tolerate anthropogenic environments while most find them inhospitable remains poorly understood. The cognitive buffer hypothesis, widely supported in vertebrates but untested in insects, offers a potential explanation. This theory suggests that species with larger brains have enhanced behavioural plasticity, enabling them to confront and adapt to novel challenges. To investigate this hypothesis in insects, we measured brain size for 89 bee species, and evaluated their association with the degree of habitat occupancy. Our analyses revealed that bee species mainly found in urban habitats had larger brains relative to their body size than those that tend to occur in forested or agricultural habitats. Additionally, urban bees exhibited larger body sizes and, consequently, larger absolute brain sizes. Our results provide the first empirical support for the cognitive buffer hypothesis in invertebrates, suggesting that a large brain in bees could confer behavioural advantages to tolerate urban environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose B. Lanuza
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), 41092 Seville, Spain
- Spatial Interaction Ecology, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
| | - Miguel Á. Collado
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), 41092 Seville, Spain
- Departamento de Ciencias de la Computación e Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
| | - Ferran Sayol
- Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Daniel Sol
- Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain
- Department of Ecology, CSIC, Spanish National Research Council, CREAF-UAB, Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Allen-Perkins A, García-Callejas D, Bartomeus I, Godoy O. Structural asymmetry in biotic interactions as a tool to understand and predict ecological persistence. Ecol Lett 2023; 26:1647-1662. [PMID: 37515408 DOI: 10.1111/ele.14291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
A universal feature of ecological systems is that species do not interact with others with the same sign and strength. Yet, the consequences of this asymmetry in biotic interactions for the short- and long-term persistence of individual species and entire communities remains unclear. Here, we develop a set of metrics to evaluate how asymmetric interactions among species translate to asymmetries in their individual vulnerability to extinction under changing environmental conditions. These metrics, which solve previous limitations of how to independently quantify the size from the shape of the so-called feasibility domain, provide rigorous advances to understand simultaneously why some species and communities present more opportunities to persist than others. We further demonstrate that our shape-related metrics are useful to predict short-term changes in species' relative abundances during 7 years in a Mediterranean grassland. Our approach is designed to be applied to any ecological system regardless of the number of species and type of interactions. With it, we show that is possible to obtain both mechanistic and predictive information on ecological persistence for individual species and entire communities, paving the way for a stronger integration of theoretical and empirical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Allen-Perkins
- Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica, Automática y Física Aplicada, ETSIDI, Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - David García-Callejas
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | | | - Oscar Godoy
- Departamento de Biología, Instituto Universitario de Ciencias del Mar (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, Puerto Real, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Scheper J, Badenhausser I, Kantelhardt J, Kirchweger S, Bartomeus I, Bretagnolle V, Clough Y, Gross N, Raemakers I, Vilà M, Zaragoza-Trello C, Kleijn D. Biodiversity and pollination benefits trade off against profit in an intensive farming system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2212124120. [PMID: 37399410 PMCID: PMC10334771 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2212124120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Agricultural expansion and intensification have boosted global food production but have come at the cost of environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Biodiversity-friendly farming that boosts ecosystem services, such as pollination and natural pest control, is widely being advocated to maintain and improve agricultural productivity while safeguarding biodiversity. A vast body of evidence showing the agronomic benefits of enhanced ecosystem service delivery represent important incentives to adopt practices enhancing biodiversity. However, the costs of biodiversity-friendly management are rarely taken into account and may represent a major barrier impeding uptake by farmers. Whether and how biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service delivery, and farm profit can go hand in hand is unknown. Here, we quantify the ecological, agronomic, and net economic benefits of biodiversity-friendly farming in an intensive grassland-sunflower system in Southwest France. We found that reducing land-use intensity on agricultural grasslands drastically enhances flower availability and wild bee diversity, including rare species. Biodiversity-friendly management on grasslands furthermore resulted in an up to 17% higher revenue on neighboring sunflower fields through positive effects on pollination service delivery. However, the opportunity costs of reduced grassland forage yields consistently exceeded the economic benefits of enhanced sunflower pollination. Our results highlight that profitability is often a key constraint hampering adoption of biodiversity-based farming and uptake critically depends on society's willingness to pay for associated delivery of public goods such as biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen Scheper
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AAWageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Badenhausser
- Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Prairies Plantes Fourragères, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, F-86600Lusignan, France
| | - Jochen Kantelhardt
- Institute of Agricultural and Forestry Economics, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, 1180Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Kirchweger
- Studienzentrum für Internationale Analysen–Schlierbach, Studienzentrum für Internationale Analysen, 4553Schlierbach, Austria
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana – Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, E-41092Sevilla, Spain
| | - Vincent Bretagnolle
- Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR7372, Centre national de la recherche scientifique & Université de La Rochelle, F-79360Villiers-en-Bois, France
- Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research platform « Zone Atelier Plaine & Val de Sèvre », 79360Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - Yann Clough
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Science, Lund University, 22362Lund, Sweden
| | - Nicolas Gross
- Université Clermont Auvergne, l’Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement, VetAgro Sup, Unité Mixte de Recherche 212 Ecosystème Prairial, F-63000Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Ivo Raemakers
- Independent amateur entomologist, 6247CGGronsveld, The Netherlands
| | - Montserrat Vilà
- Estación Biológica de Doñana – Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, E-41092Sevilla, Spain
- Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Facultad de Biología, University of Sevilla, 41012Sevilla, Spain
| | - Carlos Zaragoza-Trello
- Estación Biológica de Doñana – Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, E-41092Sevilla, Spain
| | - David Kleijn
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AAWageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
García-Callejas D, Godoy O, Buche L, Hurtado M, Lanuza JB, Allen-Perkins A, Bartomeus I. Non-random interactions within and across guilds shape the potential to coexist in multi-trophic ecological communities. Ecol Lett 2023; 26:831-842. [PMID: 36972904 DOI: 10.1111/ele.14206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Theory posits that the persistence of species in ecological communities is shaped by their interactions within and across trophic guilds. However, we lack empirical evaluations of how the structure, strength and sign of biotic interactions drive the potential to coexist in diverse multi-trophic communities. Here, we model community feasibility domains, a theoretically informed measure of multi-species coexistence probability, from grassland communities comprising more than 45 species on average from three trophic guilds (plants, pollinators and herbivores). Contrary to our hypothesis, increasing community complexity, measured either as the number of guilds or community richness, did not decrease community feasibility. Rather, we observed that high degrees of species self-regulation and niche partitioning allow for maintaining larger levels of community feasibility and higher species persistence in more diverse communities. Our results show that biotic interactions within and across guilds are not random in nature and both structures significantly contribute to maintaining multi-trophic diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David García-Callejas
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain
- Instituto Universitario de Ciencias del Mar (INMAR), Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Cádiz, E-11510, Puerto Real, Spain
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, 8140, Christchurch, Private Bag 4800, New Zealand
| | - Oscar Godoy
- Instituto Universitario de Ciencias del Mar (INMAR), Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Cádiz, E-11510, Puerto Real, Spain
| | - Lisa Buche
- Instituto Universitario de Ciencias del Mar (INMAR), Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Cádiz, E-11510, Puerto Real, Spain
| | - María Hurtado
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain
- Instituto Universitario de Ciencias del Mar (INMAR), Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Cádiz, E-11510, Puerto Real, Spain
| | - Jose B Lanuza
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain
| | - Alfonso Allen-Perkins
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain
- Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica, Automática y Física Aplicada, ETSIDI, Technical University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lanuza JB, Allen-Perkins A, Bartomeus I. The non-random assembly of network motifs in plant-pollinator networks. J Anim Ecol 2023; 92:760-773. [PMID: 36700304 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Ecological processes leave distinct structural imprints on the species interactions that shape the topology of animal-plant mutualistic networks. Detecting how direct and indirect interactions between animals and plants are organised is not trivial since they go beyond pairwise interactions, but may get blurred when considering global network descriptors. Recent work has shown that the meso-scale, the intermediate level of network complexity between the species and the global network, can capture this important information. The meso-scale describes network subgraphs representing patterns of direct and indirect interactions between a small number of species, and when these network subgraphs differ statistically from a benchmark, they are often referred to as 'network motifs'. Although motifs can capture relevant ecological information of species interactions, they remain overlooked in natural plant-pollinator networks. By exploring 60 empirical plant-pollinator networks from 18 different studies with wide geographical coverage, we show that some network subgraphs are consistently under- or over-represented, suggesting the presence of worldwide network motifs in plant-pollinator networks. In addition, we found a higher proportion of densely connected network subgraphs that, based on previous findings, could reflect that species relative abundances are the main driver shaping the structure of the meso-scale on plant-pollinator communities. Moreover, we found that distinct subgraph positions describing species ecological roles (e.g. generalisation and number of indirect interactions) are occupied by different groups of animal and plant species representing their main life-history strategies (i.e. functional groups). For instance, we found that the functional group of 'bees' was over-represented in subgraph positions with a lower number of indirect interactions in contrast to the rest of floral visitors groups. Finally, we show that the observed functional group combinations within a subgraph cannot be retrieved from their expected probabilities (i.e. joint probability distributions), indicating that plant and floral visitor associations within subgraphs are not random either. Our results highlight the presence of common network motifs in plant-pollinator communities that are formed by a non-random association of plants and floral visitors functional groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose B Lanuza
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.,Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain
| | - Alfonso Allen-Perkins
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain.,Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica, Automática y Física Aplicada, ETSIDI, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Arroyo-Correa B, Jordano P, Bartomeus I. Intraspecific variation in species interactions promotes the feasibility of mutualistic assemblages. Ecol Lett 2023; 26:448-459. [PMID: 36688287 DOI: 10.1111/ele.14163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Patterns of resource use observed at the species level emerge from the way individuals exploit the range of available resources. Hence, accounting for interindividual differences in resource use, such as pollinator use by plants, is essential to advance our understanding of community assembly and persistence. By using finely resolved data on plant-pollinator interactions, we evaluated how interindividual plant variation in pollinator use scales up to affect community structure and dynamics. All co-occurring plant species comprised specialists interacting with proper subsets of pollinators that visited generalists, and differences in interaction patterns were driven by among-individual trait variation. Furthermore, the nested structure and feasibility of plant-pollinator communities were maximised at higher levels of interindividual plant variation in traits and pollinator use. Our study sheds light on how pervasive properties of community structure arise from individual-level processes and contributes to elucidate the importance of preserving intraspecific variation in traits and resource use within populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blanca Arroyo-Correa
- Integrative Ecology Group, Estación Biológica de Doñana, EBD-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Pedro Jordano
- Integrative Ecology Group, Estación Biológica de Doñana, EBD-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.,Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Integrative Ecology Group, Estación Biológica de Doñana, EBD-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alejandre EM, Scherer L, Guinée JB, Aizen MA, Albrecht M, Balzan MV, Bartomeus I, Bevk D, Burkle LA, Clough Y, Cole LJ, Delphia CM, Dicks LV, Garratt MP, Kleijn D, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Mandelik Y, Paxton RJ, Petanidou T, Potts S, Sárospataki M, Schulp CJ, Stavrinides M, Stein K, Stout JC, Szentgyörgyi H, Varnava AI, Woodcock BA, van Bodegom PM. Characterization Factors to Assess Land Use Impacts on Pollinator Abundance in Life Cycle Assessment. Environ Sci Technol 2023; 57:3445-3454. [PMID: 36780611 PMCID: PMC9979645 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c05311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
While wild pollinators play a key role in global food production, their assessment is currently missing from the most commonly used environmental impact assessment method, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). This is mainly due to constraints in data availability and compatibility with LCA inventories. To target this gap, relative pollinator abundance estimates were obtained with the use of a Delphi assessment, during which 25 experts, covering 16 nationalities and 45 countries of expertise, provided scores for low, typical, and high expected abundance associated with 24 land use categories. Based on these estimates, this study presents a set of globally generic characterization factors (CFs) that allows translating land use into relative impacts to wild pollinator abundance. The associated uncertainty of the CFs is presented along with an illustrative case to demonstrate the applicability in LCA studies. The CFs based on estimates that reached consensus during the Delphi assessment are recommended as readily applicable and allow key differences among land use types to be distinguished. The resulting CFs are proposed as the first step for incorporating pollinator impacts in LCA studies, exemplifying the use of expert elicitation methods as a useful tool to fill data gaps that constrain the characterization of key environmental impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M. Alejandre
- Institute
of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden
University, P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Delft
University of Technology, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Laura Scherer
- Institute
of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden
University, P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen B. Guinée
- Institute
of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden
University, P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marcelo A. Aizen
- Grupo
de Ecología de la Polinización, INIBIOMA, Universidad
Nacional del Comahue-CONICET, Quintral 1250, 8400 Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
| | - Matthias Albrecht
- Agroecology
and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mario V. Balzan
- Institute
of Applied Sciences, Malta College of Arts,
Science and Technology (MCAST), PLA9032 Paola, Malta
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación
Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, E-41092 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Danilo Bevk
- National
Institute of Biology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Laura A. Burkle
- Department
of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717, United States
| | - Yann Clough
- Centre
for Environmental and Climate Science, Lund
University, Sölvegatan
37, 22362 Lund Sweden
| | - Lorna J. Cole
- Integrated Land Management, SRUC, JF Niven Building, Auchincruive
Estate, KA6 5HW AYR, U.K.
| | - Casey M. Delphia
- Montana Entomology Collection, Montana
State University, Room 50 Marsh
Laboratory, Bozeman, Montana 59717, United States
| | - Lynn V. Dicks
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EJ Cambridge U.K.
- School of Biological Sciences, University
of East Anglia, Norwich
Research Park, NR4 7TJ Norwich U.K.
| | | | - David Kleijn
- Plant Ecology
and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen
University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki
- Centre
for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Alkotmány str. 2-4, H-2163 Vácrátót, Hungary
| | - Yael Mandelik
- Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture
Food and Environment, The Hebrew University
of Jerusalem, P.O.Box 12, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel
| | - Robert J. Paxton
- Institute for Biology, Martin
Luther University
Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Hoher Weg 8, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
- German
Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Puschstrasse 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Theodora Petanidou
- Laboratory
of Biogeography and Ecology, Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, 81100 Mytilene, Greece
| | - Simon Potts
- University
of Reading, RG6 6AR Reading, U.K.
| | - Miklós Sárospataki
- Department of Zoology and Ecology, Institute
for Wildlife
Management and Nature Conservation, Hungarian
University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. u. 1., H2100 Gödöllő, Hungary
| | - Catharina J.E. Schulp
- Department of Environmental Geography,
Institute for
Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Menelaos Stavrinides
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, Cyprus
University of Technology, Arch. Kyprianos 30, 3036 Lemesos, Cyprus
| | - Katharina Stein
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Department of Botany
and Botanical Garden, University of Rostock, Wismarsche Strasse 45, 18051 Rostock, Germany
| | - Jane C. Stout
- Trinity College Dublin, College Green, D02
PN40 Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi
- Department
of Plant Ecology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian
University, ul. Gronostajowa
3, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
| | - Androulla I. Varnava
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, Cyprus
University of Technology, Arch. Kyprianos 30, 3036 Lemesos, Cyprus
| | - Ben A. Woodcock
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, U.K.
| | - Peter M. van Bodegom
- Institute
of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden
University, P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Saavedra S, Bartomeus I, Godoy O, Rohr RP, Zu P. Correction to: 'Towards a system-level causative knowledge of pollinator communities' 2022 by Saavedra et al.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2023; 378:20220453. [PMID: 36571140 PMCID: PMC9791474 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
13
|
Kendall LK, Mola JM, Portman ZM, Cariveau DP, Smith HG, Bartomeus I. The potential and realized foraging movements of bees are differentially determined by body size and sociality. Ecology 2022; 103:e3809. [PMID: 35792515 PMCID: PMC9786665 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Reversing biodiversity declines requires a better understanding of organismal mobility, as movement processes dictate the scale at which species interact with the environment. Previous studies have demonstrated that species foraging ranges, and therefore, habitat use increases with body size. Yet, foraging ranges are also affected by other life-history traits, such as sociality, which influence the need of and ability to detect resources. We evaluated the effect of body size and sociality on potential and realized foraging ranges using a compiled dataset of 383 measurements for 81 bee species. Potential ranges were larger than realized ranges and increased more steeply with body size. Highly eusocial species had larger realized foraging ranges than primitively eusocial or solitary taxa. We contend that potential ranges describe species movement capabilities, whereas realized ranges depict how foraging movements result from interactions between species traits and environmental conditions. Furthermore, the complex communication strategies and large colony sizes in highly eusocial species may facilitate foraging over wider areas in response to resource depletion. Our findings should contribute to a greater understanding of landscape ecology and conservation, as traits that influence movement mediate species vulnerability to habitat loss and fragmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam K. Kendall
- Centre for Environmental and Climate ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - John M. Mola
- U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science CenterFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | | | | | - Henrik G. Smith
- Centre for Environmental and Climate ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden,Department of BiologyLund UniversityLundSweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Magrach A, Giménez‐García A, Allen‐Perkins A, Garibaldi LA, Bartomeus I. Increasing crop richness and reducing field sizes provides higher yields to pollinator‐dependent crops. J Appl Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ainhoa Magrach
- Basque Centre for Climate Change‐BC3, Edif. Sede 1, 1°, Parque Científico UPV‐EHU, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa Spain
- IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, María Díaz de Haro 3, 48013 Bilbao Spain
| | - Angel Giménez‐García
- Basque Centre for Climate Change‐BC3, Edif. Sede 1, 1°, Parque Científico UPV‐EHU, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa Spain
| | - Alfonso Allen‐Perkins
- Estación Biológica de Doñana, EBD‐CSIC Sevilla Spain
- Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica, Automática y Física Aplicada, ETSIDI, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid Spain
| | - Lucas A. Garibaldi
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kleijn D, Potts S, Öckinger E, Herzog F, Schaller LL, Bartomeus I, Häfner K, Bretagnolle V, Sapundzhieva A. Showcasing synergies between agriculture, biodiversity and ecosystem services to help farmers capitalising on native biodiversity (SHOWCASE). RIO 2022. [DOI: 10.3897/rio.8.e90079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The slow adoption by the agricultural sector of practices to promote biodiversity are thought to originate from three interrelated issues. First, we know little about which incentives effectively motivate farmers to integrate biodiversity into daily farm management. Second, few studies so far have produced evidence that biodiversity-based approaches produce benefits in terms of key variables for farmers (yield, profit). Third, there is a large communication gap between the scientists investigating biodiversity-based farming practices and the farmers who have to implement them. To overcome these barriers, SHOWCASE will review and test the effectiveness of a range of economic and societal incentives to implement biodiversity management in farming operations and examine farmer and public acceptance. Focus will be on three promising approaches: (i) result-based incentives, (ii) involvement in citizen science biodiversity monitoring and (iii) biodiversity-based business models. SHOWCASE will co-produce together with stakeholders solid interdisciplinary evidence for the agro-ecological and socio-economic benefits of biodiversity management in 10 contrasting farming systems across Europe. SHOWCASE will also design communication strategies that are tailor-made to farmers and other key stakeholders operating in different socio-economic and environmental conditions.
SHOWCASE will develop a multi-actor network of 10 Experimental Biodiversity Areas in contrasting European farming systems that will be used for in-situ research on biodiversity incentives and evidence for benefits as well as knowledge exchange. This network will be used to identify and test biodiversity indicators and targets relevant to all stakeholders and use them in a learning-by-doing approach to improve benefits of biodiversity management on farms, both within the network and beyond.
Collapse
|
16
|
Saavedra S, Bartomeus I, Godoy O, Rohr RP, Zu P. Towards a system-level causative knowledge of pollinator communities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2022; 377:20210159. [PMID: 35491588 PMCID: PMC9058529 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Pollination plays a central role in both crop production and maintaining biodiversity. However, habitat loss, pesticides, invasive species and larger environmental fluctuations are contributing to a dramatic decline of pollinators worldwide. Different management solutions require knowledge of how ecological communities will respond following interventions. Yet, anticipating the response of these systems to interventions remains extremely challenging due to the unpredictable nature of ecological communities, whose nonlinear behaviour depends on the specific details of species interactions and the various unknown or unmeasured confounding factors. Here, we propose that this knowledge can be derived by following a probabilistic systems analysis rooted on non-parametric causal inference. The main outcome of this analysis is to estimate the extent to which a hypothesized cause can increase or decrease the probability that a given effect happens without making assumptions about the form of the cause-effect relationship. We discuss a road map for how this analysis can be accomplished with the aim of increasing our system-level causative knowledge of natural communities. This article is part of the theme issue 'Natural processes influencing pollinator health: from chemistry to landscapes'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serguei Saavedra
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Av., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), 41092, Isla de la Cartuja, Seville, Spain
| | - Oscar Godoy
- Departamento de Biología, Instituto Universitario de Ciencias del Mar (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, Royal Port E-11510, Spain
| | - Rudolf P. Rohr
- Department of Biology - Ecology and Evolution, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, Fribourg CH-1700, Switzerland
| | - Penguan Zu
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Schmelzbergstrasse 9, Zurich CH-8092, Switzerland,Department Fish Ecology and Evolution, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Seestrasse 79, Kastanienbaum CH-6047, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Allen-Perkins A, Magrach A, Dainese M, Garibaldi LA, Kleijn D, Rader R, Reilly JR, Winfree R, Lundin O, McGrady CM, Brittain C, Biddinger DJ, Artz DR, Elle E, Hoffman G, Ellis JD, Daniels J, Gibbs J, Campbell JW, Brokaw J, Wilson JK, Mason K, Ward KL, Gundersen KB, Bobiwash K, Gut L, Rowe LM, Boyle NK, Williams NM, Joshi NK, Rothwell N, Gillespie RL, Isaacs R, Fleischer SJ, Peterson SS, Rao S, Pitts-Singer TL, Fijen T, Boreux V, Rundlöf M, Viana BF, Klein AM, Smith HG, Bommarco R, Carvalheiro LG, Ricketts TH, Ghazoul J, Krishnan S, Benjamin FE, Loureiro J, Castro S, Raine NE, de Groot GA, Horgan FG, Hipólito J, Smagghe G, Meeus I, Eeraerts M, Potts SG, Kremen C, García D, Miñarro M, Crowder DW, Pisanty G, Mandelik Y, Vereecken NJ, Leclercq N, Weekers T, Lindstrom SAM, Stanley DA, Zaragoza-Trello C, Nicholson CC, Scheper J, Rad C, Marks EAN, Mota L, Danforth B, Park M, Bezerra ADM, Freitas BM, Mallinger RE, da Silva FO, Willcox B, Ramos DL, da Silva E Silva FD, Lázaro A, Alomar D, González-Estévez MA, Taki H, Cariveau DP, Garratt MPD, Nabaes Jodar DN, Stewart RIA, Ariza D, Pisman M, Lichtenberg EM, Schüepp C, Herzog F, Entling MH, Dupont YL, Michener CD, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Burns KLW, Vilà M, Robson A, Howlett B, Blechschmidt L, Jauker F, Schwarzbach F, Nesper M, Diekötter T, Wolters V, Castro H, Gaspar H, Nault BA, Badenhausser I, Petersen JD, Tscharntke T, Bretagnolle V, Chan DSW, Chacoff N, Andersson GKS, Jha S, Colville JF, Veldtman R, Coutinho J, Bianchi FJJA, Sutter L, Albrecht M, Jeanneret P, Zou Y, Averill AL, Saez A, Sciligo AR, Vergara CH, Bloom EH, Oeller E, Badano EI, Loeb GM, Grab H, Ekroos J, Gagic V, Cunningham SA, Åström J, Cavigliasso P, Trillo A, Classen A, Mauchline AL, Montero-Castaño A, Wilby A, Woodcock BA, Sidhu CS, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vogiatzakis IN, Herrera JM, Otieno M, Gikungu MW, Cusser SJ, Nauss T, Nilsson L, Knapp J, Ortega-Marcos JJ, González JA, Osborne JL, Blanche R, Shaw RF, Hevia V, Stout J, Arthur AD, Blochtein B, Szentgyorgyi H, Li J, Mayfield MM, Woyciechowski M, Nunes-Silva P, de Oliveira RH, Henry S, Simmons BI, Dalsgaard B, Hansen K, Sritongchuay T, O'Reilly AD, García FJC, Parra GN, Pigozo CM, Bartomeus I. CropPol: a dynamic, open and global database on crop pollination. Ecology 2021; 103:e3614. [PMID: 34921678 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Seventy five percent of the world's food crops benefit from insect pollination. Hence, there has been increased interest in how global change drivers impact this critical ecosystem service. Because standardized data on crop pollination are rarely available, we are limited in our capacity to understand the variation in pollination benefits to crop yield, as well as to anticipate changes in this service, develop predictions, and inform management actions. Here, we present CropPol, a dynamic, open and global database on crop pollination. It contains measurements recorded from 202 crop studies, covering 3,394 field observations, 2,552 yield measurements (i.e. berry weight, number of fruits and kg per hectare, among others), and 47,752 insect records from 48 commercial crops distributed around the globe. CropPol comprises 32 of the 87 leading global crops and commodities that are pollinator dependent. Malus domestica is the most represented crop (32 studies), followed by Brassica napus (22 studies), Vaccinium corymbosum (13 studies), and Citrullus lanatus (12 studies). The most abundant pollinator guilds recorded are honey bees (34.22% counts), bumblebees (19.19%), flies other than Syrphidae and Bombyliidae (13.18%), other wild bees (13.13%), beetles (10.97%), Syrphidae (4.87%), and Bombyliidae (0.05%). Locations comprise 34 countries distributed among Europe (76 studies), Northern America (60), Latin America and the Caribbean (29), Asia (20), Oceania (10), and Africa (7). Sampling spans three decades and is concentrated on 2001-05 (21 studies), 2006-10 (40), 2011-15 (88), and 2016-20 (50). This is the most comprehensive open global data set on measurements of crop flower visitors, crop pollinators and pollination to date, and we encourage researchers to add more datasets to this database in the future. This data set is released for non-commercial use only. Credits should be given to this paper (i.e., proper citation), and the products generated with this database should be shared under the same license terms (CC BY-NC-SA). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Allen-Perkins
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, Sevilla, Spain.,Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica, Automática y Física Aplicada, ETSIDI, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ainhoa Magrach
- Basque Centre for Climate Change-BC3, Edif. Sede 1, 1°, Parque Científico UPV-EHU, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940, Leioa, Spain.,IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, María Díaz de Haro 3, 48013, Bilbao, Spain
| | | | - Lucas A Garibaldi
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Río Negro, Argentina.,Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Río Negro, Argentina
| | - David Kleijn
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Romina Rader
- School of Environment and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, Australia
| | - James R Reilly
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Rachael Winfree
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Ola Lundin
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Carley M McGrady
- Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Claire Brittain
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - David J Biddinger
- Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University Fruit Research and Extension Center, Biglerville, PA, USA
| | - Derek R Artz
- USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, UT, USA
| | - Elizabeth Elle
- Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - George Hoffman
- Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - James D Ellis
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jaret Daniels
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jason Gibbs
- Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Joshua W Campbell
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,USDA Agricultural Research Service, Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, Sidney, MT, USA
| | - Julia Brokaw
- Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Julianna K Wilson
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Keith Mason
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Kimiora L Ward
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.,National Park Service, Yosemite National Park, CA, USA
| | - Knute B Gundersen
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Kyle Bobiwash
- Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.,Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Larry Gut
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Logan M Rowe
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Natalie K Boyle
- USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, UT, USA.,Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Neal M Williams
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Neelendra K Joshi
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
| | - Nikki Rothwell
- Northwest Michigan Horticultural Research Center, Michigan State University, Traverse City, MI, USA
| | - Robert L Gillespie
- Agriculture and Natural Resource Program, Wenatchee Valley College, Wenatchee, WA, USA
| | - Rufus Isaacs
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Shelby J Fleischer
- Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | | | - Sujaya Rao
- Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | | | - Thijs Fijen
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Virginie Boreux
- ETH Zürich - Institute for Terrestrial Ecosystems - Ecosystem Management - Universitaetstrasse 16, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Freiburg - Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology - Tennenbacher Str. 4, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maj Rundlöf
- Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Blandina Felipe Viana
- Biology Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.,National Institute of Science and Technology in Inter and Transdisciplinary Studies in Ecology and Evolution - INCT IN-TREE, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Alexandra-Maria Klein
- University of Freiburg - Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology - Tennenbacher Str. 4, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Henrik G Smith
- Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Riccardo Bommarco
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Luísa G Carvalheiro
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.,Ecology Department, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Brasil
| | - Taylor H Ricketts
- Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.,Rubenstein School for Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Jaboury Ghazoul
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Smitha Krishnan
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, Zurich, Switzerland.,Bioversity International, Bangalore, India
| | - Faye E Benjamin
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - João Loureiro
- FLOWer Lab, Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Sílvia Castro
- FLOWer Lab, Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Nigel E Raine
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Finbarr G Horgan
- EcoLaverna Integral Restoration Ecology, Kildinan, Co. Cork, Ireland.,Universidad Católica del Maule, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Escuela de Agronomía, Casilla 7-D, Curicó, Chile
| | - Juliana Hipólito
- Coordination of Research in Biodiversity - COBIO, 2936 André Araújo Ave, Petrópolis, National Institute for Research in the Amazon (INPA), Manaus, AM, Brazil
| | - Guy Smagghe
- Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Plant and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ivan Meeus
- Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Plant and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maxime Eeraerts
- Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Plant and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Simon G Potts
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Claire Kremen
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, 137 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Daniel García
- Universidad de Oviedo y Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Biodiversidad (CSIC-Uo-, PA, Spain
| | - Marcos Miñarro
- Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Spain
| | | | | | | | - Nicolas J Vereecken
- Agroecology Lab, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) , Boulevard du Triomphe CP 264/02, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Leclercq
- Agroecology Lab, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) , Boulevard du Triomphe CP 264/02, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Timothy Weekers
- Agroecology Lab, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) , Boulevard du Triomphe CP 264/02, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sandra A M Lindstrom
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Swedish Rural Economy and Agricultural Society, SE-291 09, Kristianstad, Sweden
| | - Dara A Stanley
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Carlos Zaragoza-Trello
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Charlie C Nicholson
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Jeroen Scheper
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Rad
- Composting Research Group UBUCOMP, Universidad de Burgos, Faculty of Sciences, Pl. Misael Bañuelos s/n, 09001, Burgos, Spain
| | - Evan A N Marks
- BETA Technological Center, University of Vic-University of Central Catalonia, Carrer de la Laura 13, Vic, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Lucie Mota
- FLOWer Lab, Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | | | - Antônio Diego M Bezerra
- Universidade Federal do Ceará, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Zootecnia, Campus Universitário do Pici, Bloco 808, Caixa Postal 12168, CEP 60356-000, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - Breno M Freitas
- Universidade Federal do Ceará, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Zootecnia, Campus Universitário do Pici, Bloco 808, Caixa Postal 12168, CEP 60356-000, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | | | - Fabiana Oliveira da Silva
- National Institute of Science and Technology in Inter and Transdisciplinary Studies in Ecology and Evolution - INCT IN-TREE, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.,Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
| | - Bryony Willcox
- School of Environment and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, Australia
| | | | | | - Amparo Lázaro
- Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados (UIB-CSIC). Global Change Research Group. C/ Miquel Marquès 21, 09190, Esporles, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | | | - Miguel A González-Estévez
- Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados (UIB-CSIC). Global Change Research Group. C/ Miquel Marquès 21, 09190, Esporles, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | - Hisatomo Taki
- Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Daniel P Cariveau
- Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Michael P D Garratt
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Diego N Nabaes Jodar
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Río Negro, Argentina
| | - Rebecca I A Stewart
- Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Daniel Ariza
- Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Plant and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Matti Pisman
- Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Plant and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elinor M Lichtenberg
- Department of Entomology, Washington State University.,Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas
| | - Christof Schüepp
- iES Landau Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-, Landau, Germany
| | - Felix Herzog
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin H Entling
- iES Landau Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-, Landau, Germany
| | - Yoko L Dupont
- Dept. of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 8410 Roende, Denmark
| | - Charles D Michener
- Entomology Division, Natural History Museum, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.,Deceased
| | - Gretchen C Daily
- Center for Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Paul R Ehrlich
- Center for Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Katherine L W Burns
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Montserrat Vilà
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, Sevilla, Spain.,Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, University of Seville, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Andrew Robson
- Applied Agricultural Remote Sensing Centre (AARSC), University of New England, Armidale, Australia
| | - Brad Howlett
- The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd
| | - Leah Blechschmidt
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frank Jauker
- Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Franziska Schwarzbach
- Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Maike Nesper
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Volkmar Wolters
- Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Helena Castro
- FLOWer Lab, Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Hugo Gaspar
- FLOWer Lab, Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Isabelle Badenhausser
- INRAE, Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Prairies Plantes Fourragères, Lusignan, France.,UMR 7372, Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Université de la Rochelle & CNRS, Villiers en Bois, France
| | | | | | | | - D Susan Willis Chan
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Georg K S Andersson
- Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Jonathan F Colville
- The Centre for Statistics in Ecology, the Environment and Conservation, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
| | | | | | - Felix J J A Bianchi
- Farming Systems Ecology, Wageningen University and Research, AK, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Louis Sutter
- Plant-Production Systems, Agroscope, Route des Eterpys 18, CH-1964, Conthey, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Albrecht
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Jeanneret
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Yi Zou
- Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Anne L Averill
- Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Agustin Saez
- INIBIOMA (CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Comahue) Bariloche - Rio Negro, Argentina
| | - Amber R Sciligo
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, 137 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Carlos H Vergara
- Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Cholula, Pue., Mexico
| | - Elias H Bloom
- Department of Entomology, Washington State University
| | | | - Ernesto I Badano
- División de Ciencias Ambientales, Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, A.C., Mexico
| | - Gregory M Loeb
- Department of Entomology, Cornell Agritech, Cornell University
| | - Heather Grab
- School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University
| | - Johan Ekroos
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Vesna Gagic
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.,Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ecosciences Precinct, QLD, 4001, Australia
| | - Saul A Cunningham
- Fenner School of Environment and Society, the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | | | - Pablo Cavigliasso
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia. Programa Nacional Apicultura (PNAPI), Argentina
| | - Alejandro Trillo
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Alice Classen
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg
| | - Alice L Mauchline
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Ana Montero-Castaño
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Wilby
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, UK
| | | | - C Sheena Sidhu
- San Mateo Resource Conservation District, California, UK
| | | | | | - José M Herrera
- Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal
| | - Mark Otieno
- Department of Agricultural Resource Management, University of Embu, Kenya
| | - Mary W Gikungu
- Department of Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Thomas Nauss
- Environmental Informatics, Faculty of Geography, University of Marburg
| | - Lovisa Nilsson
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jessica Knapp
- Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, UK
| | - Jorge J Ortega-Marcos
- Social-ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - José A González
- Social-ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juliet L Osborne
- Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, UK
| | | | - Rosalind F Shaw
- Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, UK
| | - Violeta Hevia
- Social-ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Betina Blochtein
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Río Negro, Argentina.,Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução da Biodiversidade, Escola de Ciência, Pontifícia Univ Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil
| | | | | | - Margaret M Mayfield
- The School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michał Woyciechowski
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University
| | - Patrícia Nunes-Silva
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução da Biodiversidade, Escola de Ciência, Pontifícia Univ Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil
| | - Rosana Halinski de Oliveira
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução da Biodiversidade, Escola de Ciência, Pontifícia Univ Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil
| | | | - Benno I Simmons
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, UK
| | - Bo Dalsgaard
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Katrine Hansen
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Tuanjit Sritongchuay
- Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla, Yunnan Province, China
| | - Alison D O'Reilly
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Fermín José Chamorro García
- Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Abejas (LABUN), Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá.,Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Ceará. Fortaleza-, CE, Brazil
| | - Guiomar Nates Parra
- Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Abejas (LABUN), Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá
| | | | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Civantos-Gómez I, García-Algarra J, García-Callejas D, Galeano J, Godoy O, Bartomeus I. Fine scale prediction of ecological community composition using a two-step sequential Machine Learning ensemble. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1008906. [PMID: 34871304 PMCID: PMC8675934 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Prediction is one of the last frontiers in ecology. Indeed, predicting fine-scale species composition in natural systems is a complex challenge as multiple abiotic and biotic processes operate simultaneously to determine local species abundances. On the one hand, species intrinsic performance and their tolerance limits to different abiotic pressures modulate species abundances. On the other hand, there is growing recognition that species interactions play an equally important role in limiting or promoting such abundances within ecological communities. Here, we present a joint effort between ecologists and data scientists to use data-driven models to predict species abundances using reasonably easy to obtain data. We propose a sequential data-driven modeling approach that in a first step predicts the potential species abundances based on abiotic variables, and in a second step uses these predictions to model the realized abundances once accounting for species competition. Using a curated data set over five years we predict fine-scale species abundances in a highly diverse annual plant community. Our models show a remarkable spatial predictive accuracy using only easy-to-measure variables in the field, yet such predictive power is lost when temporal dynamics are taken into account. This result suggests that predicting future abundances requires longer time series analysis to capture enough variability. In addition, we show that these data-driven models can also suggest how to improve mechanistic models by adding missing variables that affect species performance such as particular soil conditions (e.g. carbonate availability in our case). Robust models for predicting fine-scale species composition informed by the mechanistic understanding of the underlying abiotic and biotic processes can be a pivotal tool for conservation, especially given the human-induced rapid environmental changes we are experiencing. This objective can be achieved by promoting the knowledge gained with classic modelling approaches in ecology and recently developed data-driven models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Icíar Civantos-Gómez
- Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Madrid, Spain
- Complex Systems Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - David García-Callejas
- Departamento de Biología, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, Puerto Real, Spain
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain
| | - Javier Galeano
- Complex Systems Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Oscar Godoy
- Departamento de Biología, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, Puerto Real, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
García-Callejas D, Bartomeus I, Godoy O. The spatial configuration of biotic interactions shapes coexistence-area relationships in an annual plant community. Nat Commun 2021; 12:6192. [PMID: 34702825 PMCID: PMC8548393 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26487-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The increase of species richness with area is a universal phenomenon on Earth. However, this observation contrasts with our poor understanding of how these species-area relationships (SARs) emerge from the collective effects of area, spatial heterogeneity, and local interactions. By combining a structuralist approach with five years of empirical observations in a highly-diverse Mediterranean grassland, we show that spatial heterogeneity plays a little role in the accumulation of species richness with area in our system. Instead, as we increase the sampled area more species combinations are realized, and they coexist mainly due to direct pairwise interactions rather than by changes in single-species dominance or by indirect interactions. We also identify a small set of transient species with small population sizes that are consistently found across spatial scales. These findings empirically support the importance of the architecture of species interactions together with stochastic events for driving coexistence- and species-area relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David García-Callejas
- Estación Biológica de Doñana, C/Américo Vespucio 26, 41092, Seville, Spain.
- Departamento de Biología, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, E-11510, Puerto Real, Spain.
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana, C/Américo Vespucio 26, 41092, Seville, Spain
| | - Oscar Godoy
- Departamento de Biología, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, E-11510, Puerto Real, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Carvalheiro LG, Bartomeus I, Rollin O, Timóteo S, Tinoco CF. The role of soils on pollination and seed dispersal. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2021; 376:20200171. [PMID: 34365822 PMCID: PMC8349634 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Ongoing environmental changes are affecting physical, chemical and biological soil components. Evidence of impacts of soil changes on pollinators' and seed dispersers' behaviour, fitness and density is scarce, but growing. Here, we reviewed information on such impacts and on a number of mechanisms that may explain its propagation, taking into account the full range of resources required by the large and diverse number of species of these two important functional groups. We show that while there is substantial evidence on the effects of soil nitrogen enrichment and changes in soil water content on the quality and quantity of floral and fruit resources, little is known on the effects of changes of other soil properties (e.g. soil pH, soil structure, other nutrients). Also, the few studies showing correlations between soil changes and pollinator and seed disperser foraging behaviour or fitness do not clearly identify the mechanisms that explain such correlation. Finally, most studies (including those with nitrogen and water) are local and limited to a small number of species, and it remains unclear how variable such effects are across time and geographical regions, and the strength of interactive effects between soil properties. Increasing research on this topic, taking into consideration how impacts propagate through species interaction networks, will provide essential information to predict impacts of ongoing environmental changes and help guide conservation plans that aim to minimize impacts on ecosystem functioning. This article is part of the theme issue 'The role of soils in delivering Nature's Contributions to People'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luísa G. Carvalheiro
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74001-970 Goiânia, Brasil
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Orianne Rollin
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Sérgio Timóteo
- Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Carla Faleiro Tinoco
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74001-970 Goiânia, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Garibaldi LA, Pérez-Méndez N, Cordeiro GD, Hughes A, Orr M, Alves-Dos-Santos I, Freitas BM, Freitas de Oliveira F, LeBuhn G, Bartomeus I, Aizen MA, Andrade PB, Blochtein B, Boscolo D, Drumond PM, Gaglianone MC, Gemmill-Herren B, Halinski R, Krug C, Maués MM, Piedade Kiill LH, Pinheiro M, Pires CSS, Viana BF. Negative impacts of dominance on bee communities: Does the influence of invasive honey bees differ from native bees? Ecology 2021; 102:e03526. [PMID: 34467526 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Invasive species can reach high abundances and dominate native environments. One of the most impressive examples of ecological invasions is the spread of the African subspecies of the honey bee throughout the Americas, starting from its introduction in a single locality in Brazil. The invasive honey bee is expected to more negatively impact bee community abundance and diversity than native dominant species, but this has not been tested previously. We developed a comprehensive and systematic bee sampling scheme, using a protocol deploying 11,520 pan traps across regions and crops for three years in Brazil. We found that invasive honey bees are now the single most dominant bee species. Such dominance has not only negative consequences for abundance and species richness of native bees but also for overall bee abundance (i.e., strong "numerical" effects of honey bees). Contrary to expectations, honey bees did not have stronger negative impacts than other native bees achieving similar levels of dominance (i.e., lack of negative "identity" effects of honey bees). These effects were markedly consistent across crop species, seasons and years, and were independent from land-use effects. Dominance could be a proxy of bee community degradation and more generally of the severity of ecological invasions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas A Garibaldi
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Mitre 630, San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, 8400, Argentina.,Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Mitre 630, San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, 8400, Argentina
| | | | - Guaraci D Cordeiro
- Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Kapitelgasse 4/6, Salzburg, 5020, Austria
| | - Alice Hughes
- Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, 666303, China
| | - Michael Orr
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Isabel Alves-Dos-Santos
- Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, trav. 14, n° 321, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, 05508-090, Brazil
| | - Breno M Freitas
- Departamento de Zootecnia, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Laboratório de Abelhas, Campus do Pici - R. Cinco, 100 - Pres. Kennedy, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60455-970, Brazil
| | - Favízia Freitas de Oliveira
- Laboratório de Bionomia, Biogeografia e Sistemática de Insetos, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, n° 668, Campus Universitário de Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-115, Brazil.,Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Estudos Inter e Transdisciplinares em Ecologia e Evolução, 1154, R. Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-115, Brazil
| | - Gretchen LeBuhn
- San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave, San Francisco, California, 94132, USA
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC, Cartuja TA-10, Edificio I, C. Américo Vespucio, s/n, Sevilla, 41092, Spain
| | - Marcelo A Aizen
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medio Ambiente, Universidad Nacional del Comahue-CONICET, Quintral 1250, San Carlos de Bariloche, Rio Negro, 8400, Argentina
| | - Patricia B Andrade
- Departamento de Zootecnia, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Laboratório de Abelhas, Campus do Pici - R. Cinco, 100 - Pres. Kennedy, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60455-970, Brazil
| | - Betina Blochtein
- Escola de Ciências da Saúde e da Vida, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Ipiranga, 6681, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90619-900, Brazil
| | - Danilo Boscolo
- Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Estudos Inter e Transdisciplinares em Ecologia e Evolução, 1154, R. Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-115, Brazil.,Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900 Vila Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-900, Brazil
| | - Patricia M Drumond
- Embrapa Mid-North, Av. Duque de Caxias n 5650 Buenos Aires, Teresina, Piauí, C.P 001 - 64008-780, Brazil
| | - Maria Cristina Gaglianone
- Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000 - Parque California, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, 28013-602, Brazil
| | | | - Rosana Halinski
- Escola Politécnica, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Ipiranga, 6681 - Prédio 30 - Partenon, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90619-900, Brazil
| | - Cristiane Krug
- Centro de Pesquisa Agroflorestal, Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental, Rodovia AM 010 Km 29 Estrada Manau/Itacoatiara, Manaus, Amazonas, 69010-970, Brazil
| | - Márcia Motta Maués
- Laboratório de Entomologia, Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Trav. Dr. Enéas Pinheiro, s/n°, Bairro do Marco, Belém, Pará, 66095-100, Brazil
| | - Lucia H Piedade Kiill
- Embrapa Tropical Semi-Arid, Rodovia BR-428, Km 152, Zona Rural, Petrolina, Pernambuco, 56302-970, Brazil
| | - Mardiore Pinheiro
- Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, R. Major Antônio Cardoso 590, Cerro Largo, Rio Grande do Sul, 97900-000, Brazil
| | - Carmen S S Pires
- Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, PqEB, Av. W5 Norte (final), Brasília, Distrito Federal, 70770-917, Brazil
| | - Blandina Felipe Viana
- Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Estudos Inter e Transdisciplinares em Ecologia e Evolução, 1154, R. Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-115, Brazil.,Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 1154, R. Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-115, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zaragoza-Trello C, Vilà M, Bartomeus I. Interaction between warming and landscape foraging resource availability on solitary bee reproduction. J Anim Ecol 2021; 90:2536-2546. [PMID: 34143425 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Solitary bees comprise around 90% of bee species, playing an essential role in both wild and crop plant pollination. Bee populations are jeopardized by different global change pressures such as climate change and landscape transformation. However, the interactive effects of global change components have been little explored, especially for solitary bees. We conducted a factorial experiment using artificial nest-traps to analyse the combined effect of climate warming and landscape transformation on Osmia bicornis reproduction and offspring body size. The number of bee cocoons increased with temperature and flower abundance in the landscape. However, the sex ratio was biased towards males with warming, especially at low flower abundances. Male body size increased with temperature. Conversely, female body sizes showed strong interactive responses, increasing in size with high flower abundance in the landscape, but only at low temperatures. The abortion rate of larvae and parasitization were not significantly affected by neither flower abundance nor temperature. Because the body size of females in O. bicornis is key for the next generation's progeny success, our results indicate that the simultaneous exposure to a shortage of floral resources and high temperatures may have adverse direct fitness effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Montserrat Vilà
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain.,Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Collado MÁ, Montaner CM, Molina FP, Sol D, Bartomeus I. Brain size predicts learning abilities in bees. R Soc Open Sci 2021; 8:201940. [PMID: 34017597 PMCID: PMC8131939 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
When it comes to the brain, bigger is generally considered better in terms of cognitive performance. While this notion is supported by studies of birds and primates showing that larger brains improve learning capacity, similar evidence is surprisingly lacking for invertebrates. Although the brain of invertebrates is smaller and simpler than that of vertebrates, recent work in insects has revealed enormous variation in size across species. Here, we ask whether bee species that have larger brains also have higher learning abilities. We conducted an experiment in which field-collected individuals had to associate an unconditioned stimulus (sucrose) with a conditioned stimulus (coloured strip). We found that most species can learn to associate a colour with a reward, yet some do so better than others. These differences in learning were related to brain size: species with larger brains-both absolute and relative to body size-exhibited enhanced performance to learn the reward-colour association. Our finding highlights the functional significance of brain size in insects, filling a major gap in our understanding of brain evolution and opening new opportunities for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Á. Collado
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avd. Americo Vespucio 26, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
- Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF-UAB), Campus de Bellaterra, Edifici C, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain
| | - Cristina M. Montaner
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avd. Americo Vespucio 26, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Francisco P. Molina
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avd. Americo Vespucio 26, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
- Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF-UAB), Campus de Bellaterra, Edifici C, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain
| | - Daniel Sol
- Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF-UAB), Campus de Bellaterra, Edifici C, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avd. Americo Vespucio 26, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Martyn TE, Stouffer DB, Godoy O, Bartomeus I, Pastore AI, Mayfield MM. Identifying "Useful" Fitness Models: Balancing the Benefits of Added Complexity with Realistic Data Requirements in Models of Individual Plant Fitness. Am Nat 2021; 197:415-433. [PMID: 33755538 DOI: 10.1086/713082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
AbstractDirect species interactions are commonly included in individual fitness models used for coexistence and local diversity modeling. Though widely considered important for such models, direct interactions alone are often insufficient for accurately predicting fitness, coexistence, or diversity outcomes. Incorporating higher-order interactions (HOIs) can lead to more accurate individual fitness models but also adds many model terms, which can quickly result in model overfitting. We explore approaches for balancing the trade-off between tractability and model accuracy that occurs when HOIs are added to individual fitness models. To do this, we compare models parameterized with data from annual plant communities in Australia and Spain, varying in the extent of information included about the focal and neighbor species. The best-performing models for both data sets were those that grouped neighbors based on origin status and life form, a grouping approach that reduced the number of model parameters substantially while retaining important ecological information about direct interactions and HOIs. Results suggest that the specific identity of focal or neighbor species is not necessary for building well-performing fitness models that include HOIs. In fact, grouping neighbors by even basic functional information seems sufficient to maximize model accuracy, an important outcome for the practical use of HOI-inclusive fitness models.
Collapse
|
25
|
Collado MÁ, Menzel R, Sol D, Bartomeus I. Innovation in solitary bees is driven by exploration, shyness and activity levels. J Exp Biol 2021; 224:jeb232058. [PMID: 33443044 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.232058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Behavioural innovation and problem solving are widely considered to be important mechanisms by which animals respond to novel environmental challenges, including those induced by human activities. Despite their functional and ecological relevance, much of our current understanding of these processes comes from studies in vertebrates. Understanding of these processes in invertebrates has lagged behind partly because they are not perceived to have the cognitive machinery required. This perception is, however, challenged by recent evidence demonstrating sophisticated cognitive capabilities in insects despite their small brains. Here, we studied innovation, defined as the capacity to solve a new task, of a solitary bee (Osmia cornuta) in the laboratory by exposing naive individuals to an obstacle removal task. We also studied the underlying cognitive and non-cognitive mechanisms through a battery of experimental tests designed to measure associative learning, exploration, shyness and activity levels. We found that solitary bees can innovate, with 11 of 29 individuals (38%) being able to solve a new task consisting of lifting a lid to reach a reward. However, the propensity to innovate was uncorrelated with the measured learning capacity, but increased with exploration, boldness and activity. These results provide solid evidence that non-social insects can solve new tasks, and highlight the importance of interpreting innovation in the light of non-cognitive processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Á Collado
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avd. Americo Vespucio 26, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
- CREAF (Centre for Ecological Research and Applied Forestries), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia E-08193, Spain
| | - Randolf Menzel
- Freire Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie - Neurobiologie, Königin-Luise-Str. 28/30, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Sol
- CREAF (Centre for Ecological Research and Applied Forestries), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia E-08193, Spain
- CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia E-08193, Spain
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avd. Americo Vespucio 26, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lami F, Bartomeus I, Nardi D, Beduschi T, Boscutti F, Pantini P, Santoiemma G, Scherber C, Tscharntke T, Marini L. Species-habitat networks elucidate landscape effects on habitat specialisation of natural enemies and pollinators. Ecol Lett 2020; 24:288-297. [PMID: 33201599 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Measuring habitat specialisation is pivotal for predicting species extinctions and for understanding consequences on ecosystem functioning. Here, we sampled pollinator and natural enemy communities in all major habitat types occurring across multiple agricultural landscapes and used species-habitat networks to determine how habitat specialisation changed along gradients in landscape composition and configuration. Although it is well known that landscape simplification often causes the replacement of specialists with generalists, our study provided evidence for intraspecific variation in habitat specialisation, highlighting how a large number of arthropod species adapted their way of selecting habitat resources depending on the landscape structure. Groups with higher diet specialisation and limited foraging flexibility appeared to have a reduced ability to respond to landscape changes, indicating that some arthropod taxa are better able than others to adapt to an increasingly broad set of resources and persist in highly impacted landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Lami
- DAFNAE, University of Padova, Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy.,Di4A-Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, 33100, Italy
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Dpto. Ecologia Integrativa, Estación Biológica de Dõnana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, 41092, Spain
| | - Davide Nardi
- DAFNAE, University of Padova, Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| | - Tatiane Beduschi
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Francesco Boscutti
- Di4A-Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, 33100, Italy
| | - Paolo Pantini
- Museo Civico di Scienze Naturali "E. Caffi" di Bergamo, Piazza Cittadella 10, Bergamo, 24129, Italy
| | | | - Christoph Scherber
- Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, Bonn, 53113, Germany.,Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Münster, 48149, Germany
| | - Teja Tscharntke
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Lorenzo Marini
- DAFNAE, University of Padova, Padova, Legnaro, 35020, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Botías C, Jones JC, Pamminger T, Bartomeus I, Hughes WOH, Goulson D. Multiple stressors interact to impair the performance of bumblebee Bombus terrestris colonies. J Anim Ecol 2020; 90:415-431. [PMID: 33084067 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Bumblebees are constantly exposed to a wide range of biotic and abiotic stresses which they must defend themselves against to survive. Pathogens and pesticides represent important stressors that influence bumblebee health, both when acting alone or in combination. To better understand bumblebee health, we need to investigate how these factors interact, yet experimental studies to date generally focus on only one or two stressors. The aim of this study is to evaluate how combined effects of four important stressors (the gut parasite Nosema ceranae, the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam, the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin and the EBI fungicide tebuconazole) interact to affect bumblebees at the individual and colony levels. We established seven treatment groups of colonies that we pulse exposed to different combinations of these stressors for 2 weeks under laboratory conditions. Colonies were subsequently placed in the field for 7 weeks to evaluate the effect of treatments on the prevalence of N. ceranae in inoculated bumblebees, expression levels of immunity and detoxification-related genes, food collection, weight gain, worker and male numbers, and production of worker brood and reproductives. Exposure to pesticide mixtures reduced food collection by bumblebees. All immunity-related genes were upregulated in the bumblebees inoculated with N. ceranae when they had not been exposed to pesticide mixtures, and bumblebees exposed to the fungicide and the pyrethroid were less likely to have N. ceranae. Combined exposure to the three-pesticide mixture and N. ceranae reduced bumblebee colony growth, and all treatments had detrimental effects on brood production. The groups exposed to the neonicotinoid insecticide produced 40%-76% fewer queens than control colonies. Our findings show that exposure to combinations of stressors that bumblebees frequently come into contact with have detrimental effects on colony health and performance and could therefore have an impact at the population level. These results also have significant implications for current practices and policies for pesticide risk assessment and use as the combinations tested here are frequently applied simultaneously in the field. Understanding the interactions between different stressors will be crucial for improving our ability to manage bee populations and for ensuring pollination services into the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Botías
- Instituto Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario y Forestal de Castilla La Mancha (IRIAF), CIAPA de Marchamalo, Guadalajara, Spain.,School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Julia C Jones
- School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.,School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tobias Pamminger
- School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.,BASF SE, APD/EE-Li 425, Limburgerhof, Germany
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Dpto. Ecología Integrativa, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Dave Goulson
- School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zaragoza‐Trello C, Vilà M, Botías C, Bartomeus I. Interactions among global change pressures act in a non‐additive way on bumblebee individuals and colonies. Funct Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Montserrat Vilà
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC) Sevilla Spain
- Department of Plant Biology and Ecology University of Seville Seville Spain
| | - Cristina Botías
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC) Sevilla Spain
- Bee Pathology Laboratory Centro de Investigación Apícola y Agroambiental (CIAPA‐IRIAF)Junta de Comunidades de Castilla‐La Mancha Marchamalo Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Garibaldi LA, Oddi FJ, Miguez FE, Bartomeus I, Orr MC, Jobbágy EG, Kremen C, Schulte LA, Hughes AC, Bagnato C, Abramson G, Bridgewater P, Carella DG, Díaz S, Dicks LV, Ellis EC, Goldenberg M, Huaylla CA, Kuperman M, Locke H, Mehrabi Z, Santibañez F, Zhu C. Working landscapes need at least 20% native habitat. Conserv Lett 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas A. Garibaldi
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
| | - Facundo J. Oddi
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
| | | | | | - Michael C. Orr
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution Institute of Zoology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
| | - Esteban G. Jobbágy
- IMASL—Grupo de Estudios Ambientales Universidad Nacional de San Luis & CONICET San Luis Argentina
- South American Institute for Resilience and Sustainability Studies SARAS Bella Vista Maldonado Uruguay
| | - Claire Kremen
- Department of Zoology, Biodiversity Research Centre, Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability The University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
| | - Lisa A. Schulte
- Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Bioeconomy Institute Iowa State University Ames Iowa
| | - Alice C. Hughes
- Centre for Integrated Conservation Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Menglun Yunnan China
| | - Camilo Bagnato
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
| | - Guillermo Abramson
- Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro (CNEA) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina
| | - Peter Bridgewater
- Institute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Canberra Australia
- Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Dulce Gomez Carella
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
| | - Sandra Díaz
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) Córdoba Argentina
- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Córdoba Argentina
| | - Lynn V. Dicks
- Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- School of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich UK
| | - Erle C. Ellis
- Department of Geography & Environmental Systems University of Maryland Baltimore County Baltimore Maryland
| | - Matías Goldenberg
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
| | - Claudia A. Huaylla
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
| | - Marcelo Kuperman
- Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro (CNEA) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina
| | - Harvey Locke
- Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative Canmore Alberta Canada
| | - Zia Mehrabi
- Department of Zoology, Biodiversity Research Centre, Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability The University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
- The UBC School of Public Policy and Global Affairs University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Fernanda Santibañez
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Río Negro Argentina
| | - Chao‐Dong Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution Institute of Zoology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sayol F, Collado MÁ, Garcia-Porta J, Seid MA, Gibbs J, Agorreta A, San Mauro D, Raemakers I, Sol D, Bartomeus I. Feeding specialization and longer generation time are associated with relatively larger brains in bees. Proc Biol Sci 2020; 287:20200762. [PMID: 32933447 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite their miniature brains, insects exhibit substantial variation in brain size. Although the functional significance of this variation is increasingly recognized, research on whether differences in insect brain sizes are mainly the result of constraints or selective pressures has hardly been performed. Here, we address this gap by combining prospective and retrospective phylogenetic-based analyses of brain size for a major insect group, bees (superfamily Apoidea). Using a brain dataset of 93 species from North America and Europe, we found that body size was the single best predictor of brain size in bees. However, the analyses also revealed that substantial variation in brain size remained even when adjusting for body size. We consequently asked whether such variation in relative brain size might be explained by adaptive hypotheses. We found that ecologically specialized species with single generations have larger brains-relative to their body size-than generalist or multi-generation species, but we did not find an effect of sociality on relative brain size. Phylogenetic reconstruction further supported the existence of different adaptive optima for relative brain size in lineages differing in feeding specialization and reproductive strategy. Our findings shed new light on the evolution of the insect brain, highlighting the importance of ecological pressures over social factors and suggesting that these pressures are different from those previously found to influence brain evolution in other taxa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferran Sayol
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Miguel Á Collado
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Joan Garcia-Porta
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
| | - Marc A Seid
- Biology Department, Neuroscience Program, The University of Scranton, Scranton, PA, USA
| | - Jason Gibbs
- Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ainhoa Agorreta
- Department of Biodiversity, Ecology, and Evolution, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego San Mauro
- Department of Biodiversity, Ecology, and Evolution, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Daniel Sol
- CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain.,CSIC, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Crall JD, Bartomeus I. The secret life of the “other” bees: Book review of The Solitary Bees: Biology, Evolution, Conservation. Bryan N.Danforth, Robert L.Minckley, and John L.Neff. Evolution 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/evo.14067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James D. Crall
- Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts 02138
- Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Affiliation(s)
- David García‐Callejas
- Estación Biológica de Doñana Sevilla Spain
- Departamento de Biología Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR)Universidad de Cádiz Puerto Real Spain
| | - Oscar Godoy
- Departamento de Biología Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR)Universidad de Cádiz Puerto Real Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas A. Garibaldi
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Universidad Nacional de Río Negro San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina
| | - Agustín Sáez
- Grupo de Ecología de la Polinización INIBIOMA, CONICET—Universidad Nacional del Comahue San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina
| | - Marcelo A. Aizen
- Grupo de Ecología de la Polinización INIBIOMA, CONICET—Universidad Nacional del Comahue San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina
| | - Thijs Fijen
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Department of Integrative Ecology Estación Biológica de Doñana, EBD‐CSIC Seville Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cole LJ, Kleijn D, Dicks LV, Stout JC, Potts SG, Albrecht M, Balzan MV, Bartomeus I, Bebeli PJ, Bevk D, Biesmeijer JC, Chlebo R, Dautartė A, Emmanouil N, Hartfield C, Holland JM, Holzschuh A, Knoben NTJ, Kovács‐Hostyánszki A, Mandelik Y, Panou H, Paxton RJ, Petanidou T, Pinheiro de Carvalho MAA, Rundlöf M, Sarthou J, Stavrinides MC, Suso MJ, Szentgyörgyi H, Vaissière BE, Varnava A, Vilà M, Zemeckis R, Scheper J. A critical analysis of the potential for EU Common Agricultural Policy measures to support wild pollinators on farmland. J Appl Ecol 2020; 57:681-694. [PMID: 32362684 PMCID: PMC7188321 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Agricultural intensification and associated loss of high-quality habitats are key drivers of insect pollinator declines. With the aim of decreasing the environmental impact of agriculture, the 2014 EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) defined a set of habitat and landscape features (Ecological Focus Areas: EFAs) farmers could select from as a requirement to receive basic farm payments. To inform the post-2020 CAP, we performed a European-scale evaluation to determine how different EFA options vary in their potential to support insect pollinators under standard and pollinator-friendly management, as well as the extent of farmer uptake.A structured Delphi elicitation process engaged 22 experts from 18 European countries to evaluate EFAs options. By considering life cycle requirements of key pollinating taxa (i.e. bumble bees, solitary bees and hoverflies), each option was evaluated for its potential to provide forage, bee nesting sites and hoverfly larval resources.EFA options varied substantially in the resources they were perceived to provide and their effectiveness varied geographically and temporally. For example, field margins provide relatively good forage throughout the season in Southern and Eastern Europe but lacked early-season forage in Northern and Western Europe. Under standard management, no single EFA option achieved high scores across resource categories and a scarcity of late season forage was perceived.Experts identified substantial opportunities to improve habitat quality by adopting pollinator-friendly management. Improving management alone was, however, unlikely to ensure that all pollinator resource requirements were met. Our analyses suggest that a combination of poor management, differences in the inherent pollinator habitat quality and uptake bias towards catch crops and nitrogen-fixing crops severely limit the potential of EFAs to support pollinators in European agricultural landscapes. Policy Implications. To conserve pollinators and help protect pollination services, our expert elicitation highlights the need to create a variety of interconnected, well-managed habitats that complement each other in the resources they offer. To achieve this the Common Agricultural Policy post-2020 should take a holistic view to implementation that integrates the different delivery vehicles aimed at protecting biodiversity (e.g. enhanced conditionality, eco-schemes and agri-environment and climate measures). To improve habitat quality we recommend an effective monitoring framework with target-orientated indicators and to facilitate the spatial targeting of options collaboration between land managers should be incentivised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna J. Cole
- Integrated Land ManagementScotland’s Rural CollegeAyrUK
| | - David Kleijn
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Lynn V. Dicks
- University of East AngliaNorwichUK
- Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | | | - Simon G. Potts
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental ResearchSchool of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentReading UniversityReadingUK
| | | | - Mario V. Balzan
- Institute of Applied SciencesMalta College of Arts, Science and Technology (MCAST)PaolaMalta
| | | | | | - Danilo Bevk
- National Institute of BiologyLjubljanaSlovenia
| | - Jacobus C. Biesmeijer
- Naturalis Biodiversity CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Institute for Environmental Sciences (CML)Universiteit LeidenLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Róbert Chlebo
- Department of Poultry Science and Small Farm AnimalsSlovak University of AgricultureNitraSlovakia
| | | | - Nikolaos Emmanouil
- Department of Crop ScienceLaboratory of Agricultural Zoology & EntomologyAgricultural University of AthensAthensGreece
| | | | | | - Andrea Holzschuh
- Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, BiocenterUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | | | - Anikó Kovács‐Hostyánszki
- Lendület Ecosystem Services Research GroupInstitute of Ecology and BotanyMTA Centre for Ecological ResearchVácrátótHungary
| | - Yael Mandelik
- Department of EntomologyThe Hebrew University of JerusalemRehovotIsrael
| | - Heleni Panou
- Department of Crop ScienceLaboratory of Agricultural Zoology & EntomologyAgricultural University of AthensAthensGreece
| | - Robert J. Paxton
- General ZoologyInstitute for BiologyMartin Luther University Halle‐WittenbergHalle (SaaleGermany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Theodora Petanidou
- Laboratory of Biogeography & EcologyDepartment of GeographyUniversity of the AegeanMytileneGreece
| | | | - Maj Rundlöf
- Department of BiologyLund UniversityLundSweden
| | | | - Menelaos C. Stavrinides
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food ScienceCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus
| | - Maria Jose Suso
- Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (IAS‐CSIC)CórdobaSpain
| | | | | | - Androulla Varnava
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food ScienceCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus
| | | | | | - Jeroen Scheper
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
- Animal Ecology TeamWageningen Environmental ResearchWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dainese M, Martin EA, Aizen MA, Albrecht M, Bartomeus I, Bommarco R, Carvalheiro LG, Chaplin-Kramer R, Gagic V, Garibaldi LA, Ghazoul J, Grab H, Jonsson M, Karp DS, Kennedy CM, Kleijn D, Kremen C, Landis DA, Letourneau DK, Marini L, Poveda K, Rader R, Smith HG, Tscharntke T, Andersson GKS, Badenhausser I, Baensch S, Bezerra ADM, Bianchi FJJA, Boreux V, Bretagnolle V, Caballero-Lopez B, Cavigliasso P, Ćetković A, Chacoff NP, Classen A, Cusser S, da Silva e Silva FD, de Groot GA, Dudenhöffer JH, Ekroos J, Fijen T, Franck P, Freitas BM, Garratt MPD, Gratton C, Hipólito J, Holzschuh A, Hunt L, Iverson AL, Jha S, Keasar T, Kim TN, Kishinevsky M, Klatt BK, Klein AM, Krewenka KM, Krishnan S, Larsen AE, Lavigne C, Liere H, Maas B, Mallinger RE, Martinez Pachon E, Martínez-Salinas A, Meehan TD, Mitchell MGE, Molina GAR, Nesper M, Nilsson L, O'Rourke ME, Peters MK, Plećaš M, Potts SG, Ramos DDL, Rosenheim JA, Rundlöf M, Rusch A, Sáez A, Scheper J, Schleuning M, Schmack JM, Sciligo AR, Seymour C, Stanley DA, Stewart R, Stout JC, Sutter L, Takada MB, Taki H, Tamburini G, Tschumi M, Viana BF, Westphal C, Willcox BK, Wratten SD, Yoshioka A, Zaragoza-Trello C, Zhang W, Zou Y, Steffan-Dewenter I. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Sci Adv 2019; 5:eaax0121. [PMID: 31663019 PMCID: PMC6795509 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/22/2019] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Human land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield-related ecosystem services can be maintained by a few dominant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 studies (with 1475 locations), we partition the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination; biological pest control; and final yields in the context of ongoing land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services in addition to and independent of abundance and dominance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Dainese
- Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bozen/Bolzano, Italy
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Emily A. Martin
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marcelo A. Aizen
- Grupo de Ecología de la Polinización, INIBIOMA, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, CONICET, 8400 Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
| | - Matthias Albrecht
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Integrative Ecology, E-41092 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Riccardo Bommarco
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Luisa G. Carvalheiro
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Goias (UFG), Goiânia, Brazil
- Faculdade de Ciencias, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Vesna Gagic
- CSIRO, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
| | - Lucas A. Garibaldi
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD), Sede Andina, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN) y CONICET, Mitre 630, CP 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
| | - Jaboury Ghazoul
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Heather Grab
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Mattias Jonsson
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Daniel S. Karp
- Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Christina M. Kennedy
- Global Lands Program, The Nature Conservancy, 117 E. Mountain Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| | - David Kleijn
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen 6708 PB, Netherlands
| | - Claire Kremen
- IRES and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of Entomology and Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, 204 CIPS, 578 Wilson Ave, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Deborah K. Letourneau
- Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Lorenzo Marini
- DAFNAE, University of Padova, viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy
| | - Katja Poveda
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Romina Rader
- School of Environment and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
| | - Henrik G. Smith
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
- Department of Biology, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Teja Tscharntke
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Georg K. S. Andersson
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Isabelle Badenhausser
- USC1339 INRA-CNRS, CEBC UMR 7372, CNRS and Université de La Rochelle, Beauvoir sur Niort 79360, France
- INRA, Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Prairies et Plantes Fourragères (URP3F), Lusignan 86600, France
| | - Svenja Baensch
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
- Functional Agrobiodiversity, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Felix J. J. A. Bianchi
- Farming Systems Ecology, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Virginie Boreux
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Vincent Bretagnolle
- LTSER Zone Atelier Plaine and Val de Sevre, CEBC UMR 7372, CNRS and Université de La Rochelle, Beauvoir sur Niort 79360, France
| | | | - Pablo Cavigliasso
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Concordia, Estacion Yuqueri y vias del Ferrocarril s/n, 3200 Entre Rios, Argentina
| | - Aleksandar Ćetković
- Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Natacha P. Chacoff
- Instituto de Ecología Regional (IER), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, CONICET, 4107 Yerba Buena, Tucumán, Argentina
| | - Alice Classen
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Cusser
- W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA
| | - Felipe D. da Silva e Silva
- Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso, Campus of Barra do Garças/MT, 78600-000, Brazil
- Center of Sustainable Development, University of Brasília (UnB)—Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasília-DF 70910-900, Brazil
| | - G. Arjen de Groot
- Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan H. Dudenhöffer
- Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME44TB, UK
| | - Johan Ekroos
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Thijs Fijen
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen 6708 PB, Netherlands
| | - Pierre Franck
- INRA, UR 1115, Plantes et Systèmes de culture Horticoles, 84000 Avignon, France
| | - Breno M. Freitas
- Departamento de Zootecnia–CCA, Universidade Federal do Ceará, 60.356-000 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - Michael P. D. Garratt
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Reading University, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
| | - Claudio Gratton
- Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Juliana Hipólito
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD), Sede Andina, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN) y CONICET, Mitre 630, CP 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
- Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), CEP 69.067-375 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
| | - Andrea Holzschuh
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lauren Hunt
- Human-Environment Systems, Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA
| | - Aaron L. Iverson
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Shalene Jha
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 205 W 24th Street, 401 Biological Laboratories, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Tamar Keasar
- Department of Biology and Environment, University of Haifa, Oranim, Tivon 36006, Israel
| | - Tania N. Kim
- Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, 125 Waters Hall, Manhattan, KS 66503, USA
| | - Miriam Kishinevsky
- Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, 3498838 Haifa, Israel
| | - Björn K. Klatt
- Department of Biology, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alexandra-Maria Klein
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kristin M. Krewenka
- Institute for Plant Science and Microbiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Smitha Krishnan
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
- Bioversity International, Bangalore 560 065, India
- Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Bangalore, India
| | - Ashley E. Larsen
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5131, USA
| | - Claire Lavigne
- INRA, UR 1115, Plantes et Systèmes de culture Horticoles, 84000 Avignon, France
| | - Heidi Liere
- Department of Environmental Studies, Seattle University, 901 12th Avenue, Seattle, WA 9812, USA
| | - Bea Maas
- Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Rachel E. Mallinger
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, 1881 Natural Area Drive, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA
| | | | - Alejandra Martínez-Salinas
- Agriculture, Livestock and Agroforestry Program, Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE), Cartago, Turrialba 30501, Costa Rica
| | | | - Matthew G. E. Mitchell
- Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gonzalo A. R. Molina
- Cátedra de Avicultura, Cunicultura y Apicultura, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CABA C1417DSE, Argentina
| | - Maike Nesper
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lovisa Nilsson
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Megan E. O'Rourke
- School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
| | - Marcell K. Peters
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Milan Plećaš
- Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Simon G. Potts
- Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Davi de L. Ramos
- Department of Ecology, UnB—Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília-DF 70910-900, Brazil
| | - Jay A. Rosenheim
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Maj Rundlöf
- Department of Biology, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Adrien Rusch
- INRA, UMR 1065 Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble, ISVV, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, F-33883 Villenave d’Ornon Cedex, France
| | - Agustín Sáez
- INIBIOMA, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, CONICET, Quintral 1250, 8400 Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
| | - Jeroen Scheper
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen 6708 PB, Netherlands
- Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Matthias Schleuning
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Julia M. Schmack
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Amber R. Sciligo
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Colleen Seymour
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, South Africa
| | - Dara A. Stanley
- School of Agriculture and Food Science and Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Rebecca Stewart
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Jane C. Stout
- School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Louis Sutter
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mayura B. Takada
- Institute for Sustainable Agro-ecosystem Services, School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 188-0002 Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisatomo Taki
- Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8687, Japan
| | - Giovanni Tamburini
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Tschumi
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Blandina F. Viana
- Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 40170-210 Salvador, Brazil
| | - Catrin Westphal
- Functional Agrobiodiversity, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bryony K. Willcox
- School of Environment and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
| | - Stephen D. Wratten
- Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Akira Yoshioka
- Fukushima Branch, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 963-770 Fukushima, Japan
| | | | - Wei Zhang
- Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005, USA
| | - Yi Zou
- Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong–Liverpool University, 215123, Suzhou, China
| | - Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Khoury CK, Kisel Y, Kantar M, Barber E, Ricciardi V, Klirs C, Kucera L, Mehrabi Z, Johnson N, Klabin S, Valiño Á, Nowakowski K, Bartomeus I, Ramankutty N, Miller A, Schipanski M, Gore MA, Novy A. Science-graphic art partnerships to increase research impact. Commun Biol 2019; 2:295. [PMID: 31396575 PMCID: PMC6684576 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0516-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Graphics are becoming increasingly important for scientists to effectively communicate their findings to broad audiences, but most researchers lack expertise in visual media. We suggest collaboration between scientists and graphic designers as a way forward and discuss the results of a pilot project to test this type of collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin K. Khoury
- International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Km 17, Recta Cali-Palmira, Apartado Aéreo 6713, 763537 Cali, Colombia
| | | | - Michael Kantar
- Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Science, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 3190 Malie Way, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
| | - Ellie Barber
- Aspen Global Change Institute, 104 Midland Ave #205, Basalt, CO 81621 USA
| | - Vincent Ricciardi
- The Institute for Resources, Environment, and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, 429-2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada
- School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, 251-1855 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2 Canada
| | - Carni Klirs
- World Resources Institute, 10G Street, NE Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20002 USA
| | - Leah Kucera
- SERVIR Science Coordination Office, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, National Space Science & Technology Center, 320 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35805 USA
| | - Zia Mehrabi
- The Institute for Resources, Environment, and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, 429-2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada
- School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, 251-1855 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2 Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Integrative Ecology Department, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avenida Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, Sevilla, E-41092 Spain
| | - Navin Ramankutty
- The Institute for Resources, Environment, and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, 429-2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada
- School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, 251-1855 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2 Canada
| | - Allison Miller
- St. Louis University, Department of Biology, 3507 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63103 USA
- Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 North Warson Road, St. Louis, MO 63132 USA
| | - Meagan Schipanski
- Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170 USA
| | - Michael A. Gore
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
| | - Ari Novy
- San Diego Botanic Garden, 230 Quail Gardens Drive, Encinitas, CA 92024 USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Stavert JR, Bartomeus I, Beggs JR, Gaskett AC, Pattemore DE. Plant species dominance increases pollination complementarity and plant reproductive function. Ecology 2019; 100:e02749. [PMID: 31339564 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2018] [Revised: 03/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Worldwide, anthropogenic change is causing biodiversity loss, disrupting many critical ecosystem functions. Most studies investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning focus on species richness, predominantly within the context of productivity-related functions. Consequently, there is limited understanding of how other biodiversity measures, such as species evenness (the distribution of abundance among species), affect complex multitrophic functions such as pollination. We explore the effect of species evenness on the ecosystem function of pollination using a controlled experiment with selected plants and insects in flight cages. We manipulated the relative abundances of plant and pollinator species, while holding species richness, composition, dominance order, and total abundance constant. Then, we tested how numerical species evenness affected network structure and consequently, seed production, in our artificial communities. Contrary to our expectation, numerical dominance in plant communities increased complementarity in pollinator use (reduced pollinator sharing) among plant species. As predicted by theory, this increased complementarity resulted in higher seed production for the most dominant and rare plant species in our cages. Our results show that in a controlled experimental setting, numerical species evenness can alter important aspects of plant-pollinator networks and plant reproduction, irrespective of species richness, composition, and total abundance. Extending this understanding of how species evenness affects ecosystem functioning to natural systems is crucial as anthropogenic disturbances continue to alter species' abundances, likely disrupting ecosystem functions long before extinctions occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie R Stavert
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England (UNE), Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Integrative Ecology Department, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avenida Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, Sevilla, E-41092, Spain
| | - Jacqueline R Beggs
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Anne C Gaskett
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - David E Pattemore
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Hamilton, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Martin EA, Dainese M, Clough Y, Báldi A, Bommarco R, Gagic V, Garratt MPD, Holzschuh A, Kleijn D, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Marini L, Potts SG, Smith HG, Al Hassan D, Albrecht M, Andersson GKS, Asís JD, Aviron S, Balzan MV, Baños-Picón L, Bartomeus I, Batáry P, Burel F, Caballero-López B, Concepción ED, Coudrain V, Dänhardt J, Diaz M, Diekötter T, Dormann CF, Duflot R, Entling MH, Farwig N, Fischer C, Frank T, Garibaldi LA, Hermann J, Herzog F, Inclán D, Jacot K, Jauker F, Jeanneret P, Kaiser M, Krauss J, Le Féon V, Marshall J, Moonen AC, Moreno G, Riedinger V, Rundlöf M, Rusch A, Scheper J, Schneider G, Schüepp C, Stutz S, Sutter L, Tamburini G, Thies C, Tormos J, Tscharntke T, Tschumi M, Uzman D, Wagner C, Zubair-Anjum M, Steffan-Dewenter I. The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe. Ecol Lett 2019; 22:1083-1094. [PMID: 30957401 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Revised: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Managing agricultural landscapes to support biodiversity and ecosystem services is a key aim of a sustainable agriculture. However, how the spatial arrangement of crop fields and other habitats in landscapes impacts arthropods and their functions is poorly known. Synthesising data from 49 studies (1515 landscapes) across Europe, we examined effects of landscape composition (% habitats) and configuration (edge density) on arthropods in fields and their margins, pest control, pollination and yields. Configuration effects interacted with the proportions of crop and non-crop habitats, and species' dietary, dispersal and overwintering traits led to contrasting responses to landscape variables. Overall, however, in landscapes with high edge density, 70% of pollinator and 44% of natural enemy species reached highest abundances and pollination and pest control improved 1.7- and 1.4-fold respectively. Arable-dominated landscapes with high edge densities achieved high yields. This suggests that enhancing edge density in European agroecosystems can promote functional biodiversity and yield-enhancing ecosystem services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Martin
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matteo Dainese
- Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100, Bozen/Bolzano, Italy
| | - Yann Clough
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, 22362, Lund, Sweden
| | - András Báldi
- MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Institute for Ecology and Botany, Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Alkotmány u. 2-4, 2163, Vácrátót, Hungary
| | - Riccardo Bommarco
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Vesna Gagic
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael P D Garratt
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Reading University, RG6 6AR, UK
| | - Andrea Holzschuh
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany
| | - David Kleijn
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki
- MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Institute for Ecology and Botany, Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Alkotmány u. 2-4, 2163, Vácrátót, Hungary
| | - Lorenzo Marini
- DAFNAE, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020, Legnaro (Padova), Italy
| | - Simon G Potts
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Reading University, RG6 6AR, UK
| | - Henrik G Smith
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, 22362, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
| | - Diab Al Hassan
- UMR 6553 Ecobio, CNRS, Université de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042, Rennes Cedex, France
| | - Matthias Albrecht
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Georg K S Andersson
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, 22362, Lund, Sweden
| | - Josep D Asís
- Departamento de Biología Animal (Área de Zoología), Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Mario V Balzan
- Institute of Applied Sciences, Malta, College of Arts, Science and Technology (MCAST), Paola, Malta.,Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, I-56127, Pisa, Italy
| | - Laura Baños-Picón
- Departamento de Biología Animal (Área de Zoología), Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), E-41092, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Péter Batáry
- MTA ÖK Lendület Landscape and Conservation Ecology Research Group, Alkotmány u. 2-4, 2163, Vácrátót, Hungary
| | - Francoise Burel
- UMR 6553 Ecobio, CNRS, Université de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042, Rennes Cedex, France
| | - Berta Caballero-López
- Department of Arthropods, Natural Sciences Museum of Barcelona, Castell dels Tres Dragons, Picasso Av, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena D Concepción
- Department of Biogeography and Global Change, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Spanish National Research Council (BGC-MNCN-CSIC), C/Serrano 115 bis, E-28006, Madrid, Spain
| | - Valérie Coudrain
- Mediterranean Institute of Marine and Terrestrial Biodiversity and Ecology (IMBE), Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, IRD, Univ. Avignon, 13545, Aix-en-Provence, France
| | - Juliana Dänhardt
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, 22362, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mario Diaz
- Department of Biogeography and Global Change, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Spanish National Research Council (BGC-MNCN-CSIC), C/Serrano 115 bis, E-28006, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tim Diekötter
- Department of Landscape Ecology, Kiel University, Olshausenstrasse 75, 24118, Kiel, Germany
| | - Carsten F Dormann
- Biometry& Environmental System Analysis, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rémi Duflot
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Martin H Entling
- Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstr. 7, 76829, Landau, Germany
| | - Nina Farwig
- Department of Conservation Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Philipps-University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch Str. 8, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Christina Fischer
- Restoration Ecology, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universität München, 85354, Freising, Germany
| | - Thomas Frank
- University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Zoology, Gregor Mendel Straße 33, A-1180, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lucas A Garibaldi
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD), Sede Andina, Universidad, Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Mitre 630, CP 8400, San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
| | - John Hermann
- Department of Landscape Ecology, Kiel University, Olshausenstrasse 75, 24118, Kiel, Germany
| | - Felix Herzog
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Diego Inclán
- Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, INABIO - Facultad de Ciencias Agícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, 170129, Ecuador
| | - Katja Jacot
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Frank Jauker
- Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, D-35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Philippe Jeanneret
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marina Kaiser
- Faculty of Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, Belgrade, 11 000, Serbia
| | - Jochen Krauss
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Violette Le Féon
- INRA, UR 406 Abeilles et Environnement, Site Agroparc, 84914, Avignon, France
| | | | - Anna-Camilla Moonen
- Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, I-56127, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gerardo Moreno
- INDEHESA, Forestry School, Universidad de Extremadura, Plasencia, 10600, Spain
| | - Verena Riedinger
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maj Rundlöf
- Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
| | - Adrien Rusch
- INRA, UMR 1065 SAVE, ISVV, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, F-33883, Villenave d'Ornon, France
| | - Jeroen Scheper
- Animal Ecology Team, Wageningen Environmental Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gudrun Schneider
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Christof Schüepp
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sonja Stutz
- CABI, Rue des Grillons 1, 2800, Delémont, Switzerland
| | - Louis Sutter
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Tamburini
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Carsten Thies
- Natural Resources Research Laboratory, Bremer Str. 15, 29308, Winsen, Germany
| | - José Tormos
- Departamento de Biología Animal (Área de Zoología), Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Teja Tscharntke
- Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstrasse 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Matthias Tschumi
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Deniz Uzman
- Department of Crop Protection, Geisenheim University, Von-Lade-Str. 1, 65366, Geisenheim, Germany
| | - Christian Wagner
- LfL, Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Institut für Ökologischen Landbau, Bodenkultur und Ressourcenschutz, Lange Point 12, 85354, Freising, Germany
| | - Muhammad Zubair-Anjum
- Department of Zoology & Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Á. Collado
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC) Sevilla Spain
- CREAF Catalonia Spain
| | - Daniel Sol
- CREAF Catalonia Spain
- CSIC Catalonia Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kendall LK, Rader R, Gagic V, Cariveau DP, Albrecht M, Baldock KCR, Freitas BM, Hall M, Holzschuh A, Molina FP, Morten JM, Pereira JS, Portman ZM, Roberts SPM, Rodriguez J, Russo L, Sutter L, Vereecken NJ, Bartomeus I. Pollinator size and its consequences: Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects. Ecol Evol 2019; 9:1702-1714. [PMID: 30847066 PMCID: PMC6392396 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Revised: 11/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Body size is an integral functional trait that underlies pollination-related ecological processes, yet it is often impractical to measure directly. Allometric scaling laws have been used to overcome this problem. However, most existing models rely upon small sample sizes, geographically restricted sampling and have limited applicability for non-bee taxa. Allometric models that consider biogeography, phylogenetic relatedness, and intraspecific variation are urgently required to ensure greater accuracy. We measured body size as dry weight and intertegular distance (ITD) of 391 bee species (4,035 specimens) and 103 hoverfly species (399 specimens) across four biogeographic regions: Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. We updated existing models within a Bayesian mixed-model framework to test the power of ITD to predict interspecific variation in pollinator dry weight in interaction with different co-variates: phylogeny or taxonomy, sexual dimorphism, and biogeographic region. In addition, we used ordinary least squares regression to assess intraspecific dry weight ~ ITD relationships for ten bees and five hoverfly species. Including co-variates led to more robust interspecific body size predictions for both bees and hoverflies relative to models with the ITD alone. In contrast, at the intraspecific level, our results demonstrate that the ITD is an inconsistent predictor of body size for bees and hoverflies. The use of allometric scaling laws to estimate body size is more suitable for interspecific comparative analyses than assessing intraspecific variation. Collectively, these models form the basis of the dynamic R package, "pollimetry," which provides a comprehensive resource for allometric pollination research worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam K. Kendall
- School of Environmental and Rural ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleNew South WalesAustralia
- CSIRO AgricultureBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Romina Rader
- School of Environmental and Rural ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Vesna Gagic
- CSIRO AgricultureBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | | | | | | | - Breno M. Freitas
- Departamento de Zootecnia—CCAUniversidade Federal do CearáFortalezaBrazil
| | - Mark Hall
- School of Environmental and Rural ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Andrea Holzschuh
- Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, BiocenterUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Francisco P. Molina
- Dpto. Ecología IntegrativaEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC)SevillaSpain
| | - Joanne M. Morten
- School of Biological Sciences & Cabot InstituteUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Janaely S. Pereira
- Departamento de Zootecnia—CCAUniversidade Federal do CearáFortalezaBrazil
| | | | | | - Juanita Rodriguez
- Australian National Insect Collection, CSIROCanberraAustralian Capital TerritoryAustralia
| | - Laura Russo
- Botany DepartmentTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Louis Sutter
- Agroscope, Agroecology and EnvironmentZürichSwitzerland
| | - Nicolas J. Vereecken
- Interfaculty School of Bioengineers, Université Libre de BruxellesBruxellesBelgium
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Dpto. Ecología IntegrativaEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC)SevillaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Dpto. Ecologia Integrativa Estacion Biologica de Dõnana (EBD‐CSIC) Sevilla Spain
| | - Romina Rader
- Ecosystem Management School of Environment and Rural Sciences University of New England Armidale NSW Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cariveau DP, Nayak GK, Bartomeus I, Zientek J, Ascher JS, Gibbs J, Winfree R. Correction: The Allometry of Bee Proboscis Length and Its Uses in Ecology. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0207900. [PMID: 30452475 PMCID: PMC6242683 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151482.].
Collapse
|
43
|
Bartomeus I, Stavert JR, Ward D, Aguado O. Historical collections as a tool for assessing the global pollination crisis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2018; 374:rstb.2017.0389. [PMID: 30455207 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There is increasing concern about the decline of pollinators worldwide. However, despite reports that pollinator declines are widespread, data are scarce and often geographically and taxonomically biased. These biases limit robust inference about any potential pollinator crisis. Non-structured and opportunistic historical specimen collection data provide the only source of historical information which can serve as a baseline for identifying pollinator declines. Specimens historically collected and preserved in museums not only provide information on where and when species were collected, but also contain other ecological information such as species interactions and morphological traits. Here, we provide a synthesis of how researchers have used historical data to identify long-term changes in biodiversity, species abundances, morphology and pollination services. Despite recent advances, we show that information on the status and trends of most pollinators is absent. We highlight opportunities and limitations to progress the assessment of pollinator declines globally. Finally, we demonstrate different approaches to analysing museum collection data using two contrasting case studies from distinct geographical regions (New Zealand and Spain) for which long-term pollinator declines have never been assessed. There is immense potential for museum specimens to play a central role in assessing the extent of the global pollination crisis.This article is part of the theme issue 'Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
| | - J R Stavert
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - D Ward
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - O Aguado
- Andrena Iniciativas y Estudios Medio Ambientales, Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Winfree R, Reilly JR, Bartomeus I, Cariveau DP, Williams NM, Gibbs J. Species turnover promotes the importance of bee diversity for crop pollination at regional scales. Science 2018; 359:791-793. [PMID: 29449491 DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Ecologists have shown through hundreds of experiments that ecological communities with more species produce higher levels of essential ecosystem functions such as biomass production, nutrient cycling, and pollination, but whether this finding holds in nature (that is, in large-scale and unmanipulated systems) is controversial. This knowledge gap is troubling because ecosystem services have been widely adopted as a justification for global biodiversity conservation. Here we show that, to provide crop pollination in natural systems, the number of bee species must increase by at least one order of magnitude compared with that in field experiments. This increase is driven by species turnover and its interaction with functional dominance, mechanisms that emerge only at large scales. Our results show that maintaining ecosystem services in nature requires many species, including relatively rare ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Winfree
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
| | - James R Reilly
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.,Doñana Biological Station-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Seville, Spain
| | - Daniel P Cariveau
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.,Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Neal M Williams
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Jason Gibbs
- Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lanuza JB, Bartomeus I, Godoy O. Opposing effects of floral visitors and soil conditions on the determinants of competitive outcomes maintain species diversity in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecol Lett 2018; 21:865-874. [PMID: 29607600 DOI: 10.1111/ele.12954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 01/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Theory argues that both soil conditions and aboveground trophic interactions have equivalent potential to limit or promote plant diversity. However, it remains unexplored how they jointly modify the niche differences stabilising species coexistence and the average fitness differences driving competitive dominance. We conducted a field study in Mediterranean annual grasslands to parameterise population models of six competing plant species. Spatially explicit floral visitor assemblages and soil salinity variation were characterised for each species. Both floral visitors and soil salinity modified species population dynamics via direct changes in seed production and indirect changes in competitive responses. Although the magnitude and sign of these changes were species-specific, floral visitors promoted coexistence at neighbourhood scales, while soil salinity did so over larger scales by changing the superior competitors' identity. Our results show how below and aboveground interactions maintain diversity in heterogeneous landscapes through their opposing effects on the determinants of competitive outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose B Lanuza
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, 2350, NSW, Australia
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estacion Biologica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), C/Americo Vespucio 26, E-41092, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Oscar Godoy
- Instituto de Recursos Naturales y de Agrobiología de Sevilla (IRNAS-CSIC), Avda. Reina Mercedes 10, E-41012, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Godoy O, Bartomeus I, Rohr RP, Saavedra S. Towards the Integration of Niche and Network Theories. Trends Ecol Evol 2018; 33:287-300. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 01/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
47
|
Stavert JR, Pattemore DE, Bartomeus I, Gaskett AC, Beggs JR. Exotic flies maintain pollination services as native pollinators decline with agricultural expansion. J Appl Ecol 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie R. Stavert
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity; School of Biological Sciences; The University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | - David E. Pattemore
- The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited; Hamilton New Zealand
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Integrative Ecology Department; Sevilla Spain
| | - Anne C. Gaskett
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity; School of Biological Sciences; The University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | - Jacqueline R. Beggs
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity; School of Biological Sciences; The University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Stavert JR, Pattemore DE, Gaskett AC, Beggs JR, Bartomeus I. Exotic species enhance response diversity to land-use change but modify functional composition. Proc Biol Sci 2018; 284:rspb.2017.0788. [PMID: 28794218 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Two main mechanisms may buffer ecosystem functions despite biodiversity loss. First, multiple species could share similar ecological roles, thus providing functional redundancy. Second, species may respond differently to environmental change (response diversity). However, ecosystem function would be best protected when functionally redundant species also show response diversity. This linkage has not been studied directly, so we investigated whether native and exotic pollinator species with similar traits (functional redundancy) differed in abundance (response diversity) across an agricultural intensification gradient. Exotic pollinator species contributed most positive responses, which partially stabilized overall abundance of the pollinator community. However, although some functionally redundant species exhibited response diversity, this was not consistent across functional groups and aggregate abundances within each functional group were rarely stabilized. This shows functional redundancy and response diversity do not always operate in concert. Hence, despite exotic species becoming increasingly dominant in human-modified systems, they cannot replace the functional composition of native species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie R Stavert
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - David E Pattemore
- The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Anne C Gaskett
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jacqueline R Beggs
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Department of Integrative Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio s/n, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bartomeus I, Cariveau DP, Harrison T, Winfree R. On the inconsistency of pollinator species traits for predicting either response to land-use change or functional contribution. OIKOS 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/oik.04507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel P. Cariveau
- Dept of Ecology; Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers Univ., The State Univ. of New Jersey; New Brunswick NJ 08901 USA
- Dept of Entomology; Univ. of Minnesota; Saint Paul MN USA
| | - Tina Harrison
- Dept of Ecology; Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers Univ., The State Univ. of New Jersey; New Brunswick NJ 08901 USA
| | - Rachael Winfree
- Dept of Ecology; Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers Univ., The State Univ. of New Jersey; New Brunswick NJ 08901 USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Winsa M, Öckinger E, Bommarco R, Lindborg R, Roberts SPM, Wärnsberg J, Bartomeus I. Sustained functional composition of pollinators in restored pastures despite slow functional restoration of plants. Ecol Evol 2017; 7:3836-3846. [PMID: 28616180 PMCID: PMC5468136 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Habitat restoration is a key measure to counteract negative impacts on biodiversity from habitat loss and fragmentation. To assess success in restoring not only biodiversity, but also functionality of communities, we should take into account the re-assembly of species trait composition across taxa. Attaining such functional restoration would depend on the landscape context, vegetation structure, and time since restoration. We assessed how trait composition of plant and pollinator (bee and hoverfly) communities differ between abandoned, restored (formerly abandoned) or continuously grazed (intact) semi-natural pastures. In restored pastures, we also explored trait composition in relation to landscape context, vegetation structure, and pasture management history. Abandoned pastures differed from intact and restored pastures in trait composition of plant communities, and as expected, had lower abundances of species with traits associated with grazing adaptations. Further, plant trait composition in restored pastures became increasingly similar to that in intact pastures with increasing time since restoration. On the contrary, the trait composition of pollinator communities in both abandoned and restored pastures remained similar to intact pastures. The trait composition for both bees and hoverflies was influenced by flower abundance and, for bees, by connectivity to other intact grasslands in the landscape. The divergent responses across organism groups appeared to be mainly related to the limited dispersal ability and long individual life span in plants, the high mobility of pollinators, and the dependency of semi-natural habitat for bees. Our results, encompassing restoration effects on trait composition for multiple taxa along a gradient in both time (time since restoration) and space (connectivity), reveal how interacting communities of plants and pollinators are shaped by different trait-environmental relationships. Complete functional restoration of pastures needs for more detailed assessments of both plants dispersal in time and of resources available within pollinator dispersal range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Winsa
- Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
| | - Erik Öckinger
- Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
| | - Riccardo Bommarco
- Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
| | - Regina Lindborg
- Department of Physical GeographyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
| | - Stuart P. M. Roberts
- School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentCentre for Agri‐Environmental ResearchUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
| | - Johanna Wärnsberg
- Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
- Dpto. Ecología IntegrativaEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC)Isla de la CartujaSevillaSpain
| |
Collapse
|