Patient-reported outcomes to assess symptoms in patients with metastatic breast cancer: Pilot implementation project

177

Background: Use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to evaluate symptoms improves clinical outcomes. Best practices for implementing PROs into routine care may vary according to clinical scenario, site-specific resources and programmatic goals. Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often experience a variety of symptoms. Methods: As a quality improvement project, we are pilot testing incorporation of a battery of PRO measures into routine care for patients with MBC at Johns Hopkins in order to gain experience that will guide future broader implementation of PROs across our program. Participants complete the PROs on paper at baseline (BL), 3, and 6 months (mo). Measures include NCCN Distress Thermometer (BL only), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), PRO-CTCAE Insomnia questions and a modified version of the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (r-ESAS) questionnaire with 3 extra symptom domains. Project team members alert clinicians by email of scores that exceed severity thresholds as follows – Distress: ≥4, PHQ-8: ≥8, GAD-7: ≥10, any item on r-ESAS: ≥4 and PRO-CTCAE Insomnia: severe/very severe or quite a bit/very much. Results: From May 29, 2020 and April 5, 2021, 67 patients were approached for participation, and 40 (59.7%) completed the BL PROs. Median age was 64 (range 36-85). Most participants were White (70%), non-Hispanic (90%) and had hormone receptor-positive (93%) MBC. At BL, 22 (55%) had visceral disease and most were receiving endocrine-based regimens [21 (53%)] or chemotherapy [16 (40%)]. 27 (68%) participants had ≥1 BL alert. The most common BL alerts were for symptoms on the r-ESAS [23 participants (58%)]. The most frequent items on the r-ESAS for which participants had BL alerts were pain, tiredness, well-being, tingling/numbness and rash. Other BL alerts were: Distress [9 participants (23%)], PRO-CTCAE Insomnia [5 participants (13%)], PHQ-8 [4 participants (10%)] and GAD-7 [2 participants (5%)]. To date, 24 of 35 (69%) and 15 of 28 (54%) participants who have reached the 3 and 6 mo time points have completed the respective follow-up (FU) PROs. Most common FU alerts to date are on the r-ESAS [3 mo: 14 participants (58%), 6 mo: 9 participants (60%)]. The project team has successfully notified providers of all alerts to date. Clinical actions (phone calls, provider visits and/or referrals) have been taken within 30 days of notification for > 75% of alerts. Conclusions: Implementation of a PRO battery for patients receiving routine care for MBC led to detection of a range of symptoms, the majority of which were clinically actionable. Restrictions on in-person interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to low rates of PRO completion in this pilot project. Prior to broader implementation, we will consider strategies such as an electronic platform and a shorter battery to enhance patient engagement.

A randomized intervention involving family to improve communication in breast cancer care

We examined the effects of a communication intervention to engage family care partners on patient portal (MyChart) use, illness understanding, satisfaction with cancer care, and symptoms of anxiety in a single-blind randomized trial of patients in treatment for breast cancer. Patient-family dyads were recruited and randomly assigned a self-administered checklist to clarify the care partner role, establish a shared visit agenda, and facilitate MyChart access (n = 63) or usual care (n = 55). Interviews administered at baseline, 3, 9 (primary endpoint), and 12 months assessed anxiety (GAD-2), mean FAMCARE satisfaction, and complete illness understanding (4 of 4 items correct). Time-stamped electronic interactions measured MyChart use. By 9 months, more intervention than control care partners registered for MyChart (77.8 % vs 1.8%; p < 0.001) and logged into the patient’s account (61.2% vs 0% of those registered; p < 0.001), but few sent messages to clinicians (6.1% vs 0%; p = 0.247). More intervention than control patients viewed clinical notes (60.3% vs 32.7%; p = 0.003). No pre-post group differences in patient or care partner symptoms of anxiety, satisfaction, or complete illness understanding were found. Intervention patients whose care partners logged into MyChart were more likely to have complete illness understanding at 9 months (changed 70.0% to 80.0% vs 69.7% to 54.6%; p = 0.03); symptoms of anxiety were numerically lower (16.7% to 6.7% vs 15.2% to 15.2%; p = 0.24) and satisfaction numerically higher (15.8–16.2 vs 18.0–17.4; p = 0.25). A brief, scalable communication intervention led to greater care partner MyChart use and increased illness understanding among patients with more engaged care partners (NCT03283553).

Management of Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Stage- and Subtype-Specific Approach

The COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly changed delivery of cancer care. Many nonurgent surgeries are delayed to preserve hospital resources, and patient visits to health care settings are limited to reduce exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Providers must carefully weigh risks and benefits of delivering immunosuppressive therapy during the pandemic. For breast cancer, a key difference is increased use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy due to deferral of many breast surgeries during the pandemic. In some cases, this necessitates increased use of genomic tumor profiling on core biopsy specimens to guide neoadjuvant therapy decisions. Breast cancer treatment during the pandemic requires multidisciplinary input and varies according to stage, tumor biology, comorbidities, age, patient preferences, and available hospital resources. We present here the Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program approach to breast cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic. We include algorithms based on tumor biology and extent of disease that guide management decisions during the pandemic. These algorithms emphasize medical oncology treatment decisions and demonstrate how we have operationalized the general treatment recommendations during the pandemic proposed by national groups, such as the COVID-19 Pandemic Breast Cancer Consortium. Our recommendations can be adapted by other institutions and medical oncology practices in accordance with local conditions and resources. Guidelines such as these will be important as we continue to balance treatment of breast cancer against risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure and infection until approval of a vaccine.

Sharing in care: engaging care partners in the care and communication of breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Family is often overlooked in cancer care. We developed a patient-family agenda setting intervention to engage family in cancer care communication.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT03283553) of patients on active treatment for breast cancer and their family "care partner." Intervention dyads (n = 69) completed a self-administered checklist to clarify care partner roles, establish a shared visit agenda, and facilitate MyChart patient portal access. Control dyads (n = 63) received usual care. We assessed intervention acceptability and initial effects from post-visit surveys and MyChart utilization at 6 weeks.

RESULTS

At baseline, most patients (89.4%) but few care partners (1.5%) were registered for MyChart. Most patients (79.4%) wanted their care partner to have access to their records and 39.4% of care partners reported accessing MyChart. In completing the checklist, patients and care partners endorsed active communication roles for the care partner and identified a similar visit agenda: most (> 90%) reported the checklist was easy, useful, and recommended it to others. At 6 weeks, intervention (vs control) care partners were more likely to be registered for MyChart (75.4% vs 1.6%; p < 0.001), to have logged in (43.5% vs 0%; p < 0.001) and viewed clinical notes (30.4% vs 0%; p < 0.001), but were no more likely to exchange direct messages with clinicians (1.5% vs 0%; p = 0.175). No differences in patients' MyChart use were observed, but intervention patients more often viewed clinical notes (50.7% vs 9.5%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A patient-family agenda setting intervention was acceptable and affected online practices of cancer patients and care partners.

A phase II study evaluating the efficacy of zoledronic acid in prevention of aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal symptoms: the ZAP trial

PURPOSE

Aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS) are common adverse events of AIs often leading to drug discontinuation. We initiated a prospective clinical trial to evaluate whether bisphosphonates are associated with reduced incidence of AIMSS.

METHODS

In the single-arm trial, the Zoledronic Acid Prophylaxis (ZAP) trial, we compared the incidence of AIMSS against historical controls from the Exemestane and Letrozole Pharmacogenomics (ELPh) trial. Eligible women were postmenopausal with stage 0-III breast cancer planning to receive adjuvant AIs. AIMSS was assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale over 12 months in both trials. Participants in the ZAP trial received zoledronic acid prior to initiating letrozole and after 6 months; ELPh participants included in the analysis were taking letrozole but not bisphosphonates. We analyzed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and bone density in the ZAP trial using mixed-effects linear regression models and paired t tests, respectively.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2013, 59 postmenopausal women enrolled in ZAP trial. All 59 (100%) women received baseline and 52 (88%) received 6-month zoledronic acid, and had similar characteristics to historical controls from the ELPh trial (n = 206). Cumulatively during the first year of AI, 37 and 67% of ZAP and ELPh participants reported AIMSS (p < 0.001), respectively. Within the ZAP trial, we did not observe significant changes in other PROs; however, we report improvements in bone mineral density.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to historical controls, zoledronic acid administered concomitantly with adjuvant AIs was associated with a reduced incidence of AIMSS. A randomized controlled trial is required to confirm these findings.

Combination Epigenetic Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer with 5-Azacitidine and Entinostat: A Phase II National Cancer Institute/Stand Up to Cancer Study

Purpose: In breast cancer models, combination epigenetic therapy with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor and a histone deacetylase inhibitor led to reexpression of genes encoding important therapeutic targets, including the estrogen receptor (ER). We conducted a multicenter phase II study of 5-azacitidine and entinostat in women with advanced hormone-resistant or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Experimental Design: Patients received 5-azacitidine 40 mg/m² (days 1-5, 8-10) and entinostat 7 mg (days 3, 10) on a 28-day cycle. Continuation of epigenetic therapy was offered with the addition of endocrine therapy at the time of progression [optional continuation (OC) phase]. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in each cohort. We hypothesized that ORR would be ≥20% against null of 5% using Simon two-stage design. At least one response was required in 1 of 13 patients per cohort to continue accrual to 27 per cohort (type I error, 4%; power, 90%).Results: There was one partial response among 27 women with hormone-resistant disease (ORR = 4%; 95% CI, 0-19), and none in 13 women with TNBC. One additional partial response was observed in the OC phase in the hormone-resistant cohort (n = 12). Mandatory tumor samples were obtained pre- and posttreatment (58% paired) with either up- or downregulation of ER observed in approximately 50% of posttreatment biopsies in the hormone-resistant, but not TNBC cohort.Conclusions: Combination epigenetic therapy was well tolerated, but our primary endpoint was not met. OC phase results suggest that some women benefit from epigenetic therapy and/or reintroduction of endocrine therapy beyond progression, but further study is needed. Clin Cancer Res; 23(11); 2691-701. ©2016 AACR.

Optimizing the Use of Gene Expression Profiling in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Purpose Gene expression profiling assays are frequently used to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer. We hypothesized that the clinical value of these new tools would be more fully realized when appropriately integrated with high-quality clinicopathologic data. Hence, we developed a model that uses routine pathologic parameters to estimate Oncotype DX recurrence score (ODX RS) and independently tested its ability to predict ODX RS in clinical samples. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed ordered ODX RS and pathology reports from five institutions (n = 1,113) between 2006 and 2013. We used locally performed histopathologic markers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and Elston grade) to develop models that predict RS-based risk categories. Ordering patterns at one site were evaluated under an integrated decision-making model incorporating clinical treatment guidelines, immunohistochemistry markers, and ODX. Final locked models were independently tested (n = 472). Results Distribution of RS was similar across sites and to reported clinical practice experience and stable over time. Histopathologic markers alone determined risk category with > 95% confidence in > 55% (616 of 1,113) of cases. Application of the integrated decision model to one site indicated that the frequency of testing would not have changed overall, although ordering patterns would have changed substantially with less testing of estimated clinical risk-high or clinical risk-low cases and more testing of clinical risk-intermediate cases. In the validation set, the model correctly predicted risk category in 52.5% (248 of 472). Conclusion The proposed model accurately predicts high- and low-risk RS categories (> 25 or ≤ 25) in a majority of cases. Integrating histopathologic and molecular information into the decision-making process allows refocusing the use of new molecular tools to cases with uncertain risk.

TBCRC 008: early change in 18F-FDG uptake on PET predicts response to preoperative systemic therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary operable breast cancer

Epigenetic modifiers, including the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat, may sensitize tumors to chemotherapy and enhance outcomes. We conducted a multicenter randomized phase II neoadjuvant trial of carboplatin and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (CP) with vorinostat or placebo in women with stage II/III, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, in which we also examined whether change in maximum standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL(max)) on (18)F-FDG PET predicted pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast and axillary lymph nodes.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to 12 wk of preoperative carboplatin (area under the curve of 2, weekly) and nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2) weekly) with vorinostat (400 mg orally daily, days 1-3 of every 7-d period) or placebo. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG PET and research biopsy at baseline and on cycle 1 day 15. The primary endpoint was the pCR rate. Secondary objectives included correlation of change in tumor SUL(max) on (18)F-FDG PET by cycle 1 day 15 with pCR and correlation of baseline and change in Ki-67 with pCR.

RESULTS

In an intent-to-treat analysis (n = 62), overall pCR was 27.4% (vorinostat, 25.8%; placebo, 29.0%). In a pooled analysis (n = 59), we observed a significant difference in median change in SUL(max) 15 d after initiating preoperative therapy between those achieving pCR versus not (percentage reduction, 63.0% vs. 32.9%; P = 0.003). Patients with 50% or greater reduction in SUL(max) were more likely to achieve pCR, which remained statistically significant in multivariable analysis including estrogen receptor status (odds ratio, 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-22.7; P = 0.023). Differences in baseline and change in Ki-67 were not significantly different between those achieving pCR versus not.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CP with vorinostat or placebo is associated with similar pCR rates. Early change in SUL(max) on (18)F-FDG PET 15 d after the initiation of preoperative therapy has potential in predicting pCR in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer. Future studies will further test (18)F-FDG PET as a potential treatment-selection biomarker.

Phase III comparison of tamoxifen versus tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (E-3193, INT-0142): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

The effects of ovarian function suppression (OFS) on survival and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated in a phase III trial in which premenopausal women were randomly assigned to tamoxifen with or without OFS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Premenopausal women with axillary node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer tumors measuring ≤ 3 cm were randomly assigned to tamoxifen alone versus tamoxifen plus OFS; adjuvant chemotherapy was not permitted. Primary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included toxicity and patient-reported outcomes. Patient-reported outcome data included health-related quality of life, menopausal symptoms, and sexual function. These were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually for up to 5 years after registration.

RESULTS

In all, 345 premenopausal women were enrolled: 171 on tamoxifen alone and 174 on tamoxifen plus OFS. With a median follow-up of 9.9 years, there was no significant difference between arms for DFS (5-year rate: 87.9% v 89.7%; log-rank P = .62) or OS (5-year rate: 95.2% v 97.6%; log-rank P = .67). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was more common in the tamoxifen plus OFS arm (22.4% v 12.3%; P = .004). Patients treated with tamoxifen plus OFS had more menopausal symptoms, lower sexual activity, and inferior health-related quality of life at 3-year follow-up (P < .01 for all). Differences diminished with further follow-up.

CONCLUSION

When added to tamoxifen, OFS results in more menopausal symptoms and sexual dysfunction, which contributes to inferior self-reported health-related quality of life. Because of early closure, this study is underpowered for drawing conclusions about the impact on survival when adding OFS to tamoxifen.

Structured approach to improving wait times and overall customer service in an oncology outpatient phlebotomy department

77

Background: Demands on the Johns Hopkins phlebotomy service have increased exponentially over the past several years leading to increased patient (pt) waiting times and reduced patient and staff satisfaction. Methods: The goal of our project was to reduce waiting times for outpatient phlebotomy to <30 mins for 90% of pts by May 2013 using a multi-disciplinary lean sigma approach. The following interventions were implemented - Two weekly multidisciplinary lean sigma meetings; Move to set appointment times; Twice daily staff "huddles" to plan the work schedule; Ensure a minimum of 8 phlebotomists on duty daily; Expand training for clinical assistants (CAs) to access VADs; Introduce pager system for pts to reduce needless waiting; Introduce leadership positions among phlebotomy and CA staff to manage change. Results: Within 6 months of these concerted efforts wait times have reduced to <30 mins and patient satisfaction scores for >90% of pts are very good or excellent. Conclusions: Difficult problems such as increasing patient demand with constrained resources can be ameliorated with a multidisciplinary structured approach. The project as outlined may serve as a template for other oncology services dealing with the increasing demands of an aging population in a time of increasingly limited resources.

Fixed-dose capecitabine is feasible: results from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic study in metastatic breast cancer

The pro-drug capecitabine is approved for treatment of anthracycline- and paclitaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer. However, toxicity and large interpatient pharmacokinetic variability occur despite body surface area (BSA)-dosing. We hypothesized that a fixed-dose schedule would simplify dosing and provide an effective and safe alternative to BSA-based dosing. We conducted an open label, single-arm, two-stage study of oral capecitabine with fixed starting dose (3,000 mg total daily dose in two divided doses × 14 days q21 days) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. We correlated pharmacodynamic endpoints [e.g., efficacy (response) per RECIST and toxicity], adherence and pharmacokinetics/pharmacogenetics. Sample size of 45 patients was required to detect a 25 % response rate from null response rate of 10 % using a Simon two-stage design. Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the first-stage and 21 were evaluable after a median of four cycles of capecitabine. Two thirds of patients received either the same dose or a dose 500 mg lower than what would have been administered with a commonly used 2,000 mg/m(2) BSA-dosing schedule. Eight patients had stable disease but progressed after a median of seven cycles. Despite a clinical benefit rate of 19 %, no RECIST responses were observed following the first stage and the study was closed. Dose-reductions were required for grade 2 hand-foot syndrome (28 %) and vomiting (5 %). Adherence was similar when using both patient-reported and Medication Event Monitoring System methods. High interpatient variability was observed for capecitabine and metabolite pharmacokinetics, but was not attributed to observed pharmacogenetic or BSA differences. Single agent activity of capecitabine was modest in our patients with estrogen receptor-positive or -negative metastatic breast cancer and comparable to recent studies. BSA was not the main source of pharmacokinetic variability. Fixed-dose capecitabine is feasible, and simplifies dosing.

GATA3 expression in breast carcinoma: utility in triple-negative, sarcomatoid, and metastatic carcinomas

GATA3 plays an integral role in breast luminal cell differentiation and is implicated in breast cancer progression. GATA3 immunohistochemistry is a useful marker of breast cancer; however, its use in specific subtypes is unclear. Here, we evaluate GATA3 expression in 86 invasive ductal carcinomas including triple-negative, Her-2, and luminal subtypes, in addition to 13 metaplastic carcinomas and in 34 fibroepithelial neoplasms. In addition, we report GATA3 expression in matched primary and metastatic breast carcinomas in 30 patients with known estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Her-2 status, including 5 with ER and/or PR loss from primary to metastasis. Tissue microarrays containing 5 to 10 cores per tumor were stained for GATA3, scored as follows: 0 (0-5%), 1+ (6%-25%), 2+ (26%-50%), 3+ (51%-75%), and 4+ (>75%). GATA3 labeling was seen in 67% (66/99) of primary ductal carcinomas including 43% of triple-negative and 54% of metaplastic carcinomas. In contrast, stromal GATA3 labeling was seen in only 1 fibroepithelial neoplasm. GATA3 labeling was seen in 90% (27/30) of primary breast carcinomas in the paired cohort, including 67% of triple-negative carcinomas. GATA3 labeling was overwhelmingly maintained in paired metastases. Notably, GATA3 was maintained in all "luminal loss" metastases, which showed ER and/or PR loss. In conclusion, GATA3 expression is maintained between matched primary and metastatic carcinomas including ER-negative cases. GATA3 can be particularly useful as a marker for metastatic breast carcinoma, especially triple-negative and metaplastic carcinomas, which lack specific markers of mammary origin. Finally, GATA3 labeling may help distinguish metaplastic carcinoma from malignant phyllodes tumors.

Utilization of intensive care resources due to better communication of end-of-life issues

1

Background: Advanced life support resources are required for optimal care of patients undergoing curative therapy, but their use in patients with terminal disease does not improve patient outcomes. In 2007, our cancer center established the Duffey Pain and Palliative Care team, and one important goal was to help our physicians improve at discussing end-of-life issues with patients. We hypothesized that if this effort was effective, it would result in less utilization of intensive care unit (ICU) management among patients who die in the center. Methods: All inpatient deaths were systematically tabulated and code status displayed at the multidisciplinary Morbidity and Mortality review twice per quarter, beginning in July 2006. Utilization of ICU care, defined as ventilator or dialysis support, was identified from billing data and confirmed by chart review. Survival to discharge among patients who received ICU care was monitored as a component of our patient safety dashboard. Results: From 2008 through 2011, 525 oncology patients died while hospitalized in the cancer center. During this period, among patients who died, there was a gradual increase in no-code status, election of comfort care, or withdrawal of ICU support, from 81% to 95% (OR 1.14 per quarter, p<0.0001). Although the proportion of patients who received any ICU care during their terminal hospitalization did not change, the duration of such care decreased: the proportion with mechanical ventilation for over 14 days decreased from 10% to 5% (OR 0.93 per quarter, p<0.05). There was no decrease in the survival-to-discharge of patients who received ICU care. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary team approach to improve discussion of end-of-life issues, combined with regular feedback to cancer center staff regarding code status at death, resulted in significant changes in patient and family decisions about management at the end of life over a four-year interval. These changes have reduced utilization of ICU care during terminal hospitalizations with no reduction in the survival-to-discharge of all patients who receive ICU care. We propose appropriate establishment of code status and survival-to-discharge of ICU patients as measures of quality oncology care.

Survival in patients with metastatic recurrent breast cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: little evidence of improvement over the past 30 years

BACKGROUND

Population-based studies have shown improved survival for patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer over time, presumably because of the availability of new and more effective therapies. The objective of the current study was to determine whether survival improved for patients who developed distant recurrence of breast cancer after receiving adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Adjuvant chemotherapy trials coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group that accrued patients between 1978 and 2002 were reviewed. Survival after distant disease recurrence was estimated for progressive time periods, and adjusted for baseline covariates in a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 13,785 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy in 11 trials, 3447 (25%) developed distant disease recurrence; the median survival after recurrence was 20 months (95% confidence interval, 19 months-21 months). Factors associated with inferior survival included a shorter distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), estrogen receptor-negative and progesterone receptor-negative disease, the number of positive axillary lymph nodes present at the time of diagnosis, and black race (P < .0001 for all). When the time period of recurrence was added to the model, it was not found to be significantly associated with survival for the general population with disease recurrence. Survival improved over time only in those patients with hormone receptor-negative disease with a DRFI ≤ 3 years, both among the 5 most recent and the entire trial data sets (P = .01 and P = .05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to reports from population-based studies, no general improvement in survival was observed over the last 30 years for patients who developed distant disease recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy after adjusting for DRFI. Improved survival for patients with hormone receptor-negative disease with a short DRFI suggests a benefit from trastuzumab.

Androgen receptor expression is usually maintained in initial surgically resected breast cancer metastases but is often lost in end-stage metastases found at autopsy

Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in approximately 70% of primary breast carcinomas (PBCs) and is a promising therapeutic target for metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC). Here, we examine AR expression in a population of initial surgically resected metastases and a separate cohort of end-stage metastases harvested at autopsy compared with their matched PBCs. Tissue microarrays of matched PBC and MBC were labeled by immunohistochemistry for AR, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Her2 and classified into the following previously described categories: luminal (ER/PR+/Her2-), triple negative (ER/PR/Her2-), Her2 (ER/PR-/Her2+), and luminal loss (ER/PR loss from primary to metastasis). In the cohort of surgically resected metastases (n = 16), AR was expressed in 12 of 16 PBC and maintained in 11 of 12 corresponding MBCs. Of these, 36% showed stronger AR labeling in the metastases and none showed a decrease. In the cohort of metastases harvested at autopsy (n = 16), AR was expressed in 11 of 16 primary carcinomas and maintained in only 5 of 11 corresponding metastases. Of these, none showed increased AR and 80% showed decreased AR labeling. AR expression is overwhelmingly concordant between matched PBC and MBC at initial presentation. These findings validate AR as a therapeutic target in MBC and suggest that AR may need to be reevaluated in metastases even if the primary is negative. However, similar to ER/PR, AR expression is often decreased with a trend toward complete loss in end-stage metastases, suggesting a shift of AR expression between initial and end-stage metastases. This suggests an opportunity for targeted antiandrogen therapy at an earlier stage of disease progression.

Early change in 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) to predict response to preoperative systemic therapy (PST) in HER2-negative primary operable breast cancer: Translational breast cancer research consortium (TBCRC008)

10509

Background: PST allows for improved surgical outcomes and response assessment without compromising long term outcomes. PST is an attractive model for assessing surrogate markers of response to therapy. We hypothesized that changes in tumor standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL) max on FDG- PET by cycle 1 day 15 (C1D15) of therapy would predict pathological complete response (pCR) to PST in women with stage 2-3, grade 2-3, HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods: TBCRC008 is a multicenter placebo-controlled trial that investigates pCR following 12 weeks of preoperative carboplatin and albumin-bound paclitaxel with or without vorinostat. FDG-PET followed by tumor biopsies were performed at baseline and C1D15. We correlated % reduction in SULmax on FDG-PET (PERCIST 1.0; Wahl RL, J Nuc Med 2009) with pCR (no invasive cancer in breast/axilla). We compared % reduction in SULmax between responders (pCR) and non responders (no pCR) using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. We explored association of % reduction in SULmax at pre-specified cutoff with response using Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression. We correlated baseline, C1D15, and % change in Ki67 at C1D15 with pCR. Results: Accrual is complete. Of 62 women enrolled (10/2009-11/2011), 40 have completed study PST and surgery (median age 47.5 [range 30-68], ER-positive 67%). Overall pCR was 26%. In an intent to treat analysis (n=39), we observed a significant difference in median % reduction in SULmax between responders vs not (66.6% vs 32.4%, p <0.001). We observed a higher proportion of reduction in SULmax ≥ 60% in responders vs not (80% vs 3.5%, p <0.001). The differences in baseline, C1D15 and % change in Ki67 were not significant between responders and non-responders. Conclusions: Change in SULmax on FDG-PET 15 days after initiating PST was significantly greater in patients with pCR versus no pCR. Future studies will determine whether altering therapy based on early changes in SULmax will improve pCR. Unblinded data from all participants will be presented at the meeting.

Phase I/II trial of partial breast irradiation (PBI) with various concurrent chemotherapy regimens

1128

Background: Potential benefits of concurrent chemo-radiation include: shorter duration of treatment, smaller interval between surgery and adjuvant therapies, and synergistic effects. We have previously shown that PBI with concurrent dose dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC) is well tolerated (Zellars JCO 2009). We performed a follow-up feasibility trial of PBI delivered concurrently with other various chemotherapy regimens. Methods: Women with T1-2, N0-1 breast cancer s/p lumpectomy with ≥2 mm margins were eligible. Chemotherapy regimen was at the discretion of the medical oncologist (Table). PBI (40.5 Gy in 15 daily 2.7 Gy fractions) was delivered within the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events manual (v. 3.0). Results: Thirty-four patients enrolled with median f/u of 19.2 mos. (4.0 - 38.6). Mean tumor size was 1.8 cm (+/- 0.7 cm), 71% pN0, 68% HR +, 18% Her2 +. All patients completed concurrent chemo-radiation. Three patients had a 3-8 day delay in chemotherapy (1 grade 2 thrombocytopenia; 1 Grade 2 liver enzymes; 1 T desensitization). There was 1 local (DCIS) and no regional/distant recurrences or deaths. Toxicity: 2 grade 4 neutropenia (ddAC, TCarboH); 1 grade 3 neutropenia (post-AC paclitaxel); 1 Grade 3 hyponatremia and DVT (TC); 1 syncope (TAC). None had > grade 2 radiation dermatitis. Conclusions: PBI and concurrent chemotherapy is associated with minimal toxicity and appears to be well tolerated. These results deserve further investigation. Funded by The Breast Cancer Research Foundation. [Table: see text]

A short-term biomarker modulation study of simvastatin in women at increased risk of a new breast cancer

Observational studies have demonstrated a decreased incidence of cancers among users of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and a reduced risk of recurrence among statin users diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. We initiated a prospective study to identify potential biomarkers of simvastatin chemopreventive activity that can be validated in future trials. The contralateral breast of women with a previous history of breast cancer was used as a high-risk model. Eligible women who had completed all planned treatment of a prior stage 0-III breast cancer received simvastatin 40 mg orally daily for 24-28 weeks. At baseline and end-of-study, we measured circulating concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), estrogens, and fasting lipids; breast density on contralateral breast mammogram; and quality of life by Rand Short Form 36-Item health survey. Fifty women were enrolled with a median age of 53 years. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, and hsCRP fell significantly during the study (P values < 0.001, <0.001, 0.003, and 0.05, respectively). Estrone sulfate concentrations decreased with simvastatin treatment (P = 0.01 overall), particularly among post-menopausal participants (P = 0.006). We did not observe a significant change in circulating estradiol or estrone concentrations, contralateral mammographic breast density, or reported physical functioning or pain scores. This study demonstrates the feasibility of short-term biomarker modulation studies using the contralateral breast of high-risk women. Simvastatin appears to modulate estrone sulfate concentrations and its potential chemopreventive activity in breast cancer warrants further investigation.

Changes in breast density and circulating estrogens in postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant anastrozole

Factors associated with an increased risk of breast cancer include prior breast cancer, high circulating estrogens, and increased breast density. Adjuvant aromatase inhibitors are associated with a reduction in incidence of contralateral breast cancer. We conducted a prospective, single-arm, single-institution study to determine whether use of anastrozole is associated with changes in contralateral breast density and circulating estrogens. Eligible patients included postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer who had completed local therapy, had an intact contralateral breast, and were recommended an aromatase inhibitor as their only systemic therapy. Participants received anastrozole 1 mg daily for 12 months on study. We assessed contralateral breast density and serum estrogens at baseline, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was change in contralateral percent breast density from baseline to 12 months. Secondary endpoints included change in serum estrone sulfate from baseline to 12 months. Fifty-four patients were accrued. At 12 months, compared with baseline, there was a nonstatistically significant reduction in breast density (mean change: -16%, 95% CI: -30 to 2, P = 0.08) and a significant reduction in estrone sulfate (mean change: -93%, 95% CI: -94 to -91, P < 0.001). Eighteen women achieved 20% or greater relative reduction in contralateral percent density at 12 months compared with baseline; however, no measured patient or disease characteristics distinguished these women from the overall population. Large trials are required to provide additional data on the relationship between aromatase inhibitors and breast density and, more importantly, whether observed changes in breast density correlate with meaningful disease-specific outcomes.

Docetaxel metabolism is not altered by imatinib: findings from an early phase study in metastatic breast cancer

Docetaxel is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 and susceptible to alterations in clearance by CYP3A4 inhibition and induction. Imatinib is a CYP3A4 inhibitor. A phase I study of docetaxel and imatinib in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was conducted to test the hypothesis that imatinib decreased docetaxel clearance. Docetaxel was administered weekly × 3 with daily imatinib, repeated every 28 days; during cycle 1, imatinib was started on day 8. Docetaxel and imatinib pharmacokinetics, and hepatic CYP3A4 activity (erythromycin breath test) were evaluated during cycles 1 and 2. Toxicity and efficacy were assessed. Twelve patients were enrolled to three docetaxel/imatinib dose levels: 20 mg/m(2)/600 mg (DL1), 25 mg/m(2)/600 mg (DL2), and 25 mg/m(2)/400 mg (DL2a). Median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range, 0-8). Toxicities were primarily observed at DL2; dose-limiting toxicities were Grade 3 transaminase elevations and diarrhea, and 5 patients had grade 2 nausea. Two patients had partial responses (7 months); two stable disease (2 and 4 months); five had progressive disease. Despite a 42% decrease in CYP3A4 activity after 3 weeks of imatinib co-administration, docetaxel clearance was unchanged. Mean ± standard deviation steady-state imatinib trough concentration (2.6 ± 1.2 μg/ml) was approximately 2.6-fold higher than previously observed in other cancer populations, and likely contributed to the poor tolerability of the combination in MBC. In conclusion, imatinib inhibited CYP3A4 but did not affect docetaxel clearance. Clinically, further investigation of this combination in MBC is not warranted due to excessive toxicities. However, these unexpected pharmacokinetic findings support further investigation of mechanisms underlying docetaxel elimination pathways.

Pathologic complete response to preoperative sequential doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and single-agent taxane with or without trastuzumab in stage II/III HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Four major clinical trials have established that trastuzumab added to adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for women with HER2+ breast cancer significantly improves disease-free and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone. We evaluated pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and cardiac safety of preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by a taxane with or without trastuzumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed pCR rate and change in left ventricular ejection fraction in women with operable HER2+ breast cancer (defined as immunohistochemical 3+ or fluorescence in situ hybridization ratio > or = 2.2) who were treated between 2002 and 2008 with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by a taxane with or without trastuzumab before definitive breast surgery.

RESULTS

We identified 33 patients, of whom 42.4% received preoperative chemotherapy without trastuzumab and 57.6% of whom received trastuzumab with chemotherapy. The pCR rates were 28.6% and 52.6% in the group that received chemotherapy alone or with trastuzumab, respectively (odds ratio, 2.78; 95% CI, 0.64-12.1; P = .173). Severe cardiac events or treatment delays as a result of cardiac toxicity were not observed. With a median follow-up time of 14 months, 21.4% of patients in the non-trastuzumab group and 10.5% in the trastuzumab group had disease recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Sequential administration of preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by a taxane and trastuzumab combination is safe in women with primary operable HER2+ breast cancer and is associated with a high pCR rate. Large randomized phase III clinical trials are evaluating the role of preoperative trastuzumab when added to anthracycline- and/or taxane-based regimens.

Timed sequential treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and an allogeneic granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-secreting breast tumor vaccine: a chemotherapy dose-ranging factorial study of safety and immune activation

PURPOSE

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) -secreting tumor vaccines have demonstrated bioactivity but may be limited by disease burdens and immune tolerance. We tested the hypothesis that cyclophosphamide (CY) and doxorubicin (DOX) can enhance vaccine-induced immunity in patients with breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a 3 x 3 factorial (response surface) dose-ranging study of CY, DOX, and an HER2-positive, allogeneic, GM-CSF-secreting tumor vaccine in 28 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients received three monthly immunizations, with a boost 6 to 8 months from study entry. Primary objectives included safety and determination of the chemotherapy doses that maximize HER2-specific immunity.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients received at least one immunization, and 16 patients received four immunizations. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. HER2-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity developed in most patients who received vaccine alone or with 200 mg/m(2) CY. HER2-specific antibody responses were enhanced by 200 mg/m(2) CY and 35 mg/m(2) DOX, but higher CY doses suppressed immunity. Analyses revealed that CY at 200 mg/m(2) and DOX at 35 mg/m(2) is the combination that produced the highest antibody responses.

CONCLUSION

First, immunotherapy with an allogeneic, HER2-positive, GM-CSF-secreting breast tumor vaccine alone or with CY and DOX is safe and induces HER2-specific immunity in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Second, the immunomodulatory activity of low-dose CY has a narrow therapeutic window, with an optimal dose not exceeding 200 mg/m(2). Third, factorial designs provide an opportunity to identify the most active combination of interacting drugs in patients. Further investigation of the impact of chemotherapy on vaccine-induced immunity is warranted.

Feasibility trial of partial breast irradiation with concurrent dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

Anthracyclines and concurrent whole-breast irradiation result in prohibitive cutaneous toxicity. We hypothesized that anthracycline-based chemotherapy and concurrent partial breast irradiation (PBI) is safe and conducted a single-arm feasibility trial testing this hypothesis with dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with T1-2, N0-1 breast cancer with > or = 3 mm lumpectomy margins received PBI (40.5 Gy, 15 daily 2.7-Gy fractions) concurrently with the first two of four cycles of ddAC (60 and 600 mg/m2 of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, respectively, every 14 days with colony-stimulating support). Primary end points were local and systemic toxicity. Additional systemic therapy was given at the physician's discretion.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients enrolled between November 2004 and January 2007, but two patients did not receive protocol therapy (one found with additional local disease and one withdrew consent). Twenty-five women completed all planned PBI. Four (16%) of 25 did not complete all ddAC (febrile neutropenia [FN], n = 2; diverticulitis and neutropenia, n = 1; and social/economic reasons, n = 1). Four among the remaining 21 who completed all ddAC had a cycle delayed (FN, n = 1; acute respiratory illness, n = 1; foot blisters, n = 1; perianal dermatitis, n = 1). There was no grade 3 to 4 anemia or thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities (none grade 4) occurred in 28% (seven of 25) of patients (nausea/vomiting, n = 3; stomatitis, n = 2; contralateral breast abscess, n = 1; fatigue, n = 1; and cough/bronchospasms, n = 1). The observed rate of > or = grade 2 skin toxicity was 0% (0 of 25; one-sided 95% CI, 0% to 11%).

CONCLUSION

PBI with concurrent ddAC is feasible, and local/systemic toxicity is acceptable. Larger studies are warranted to assess long-term locoregional control and late toxicities.

A Phase II study of the polyamine analog N1,N11-diethylnorspermine (DENSpm) daily for five days every 21 days in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Polyamines are ubiquitous intracellular polycationic molecules essential for cell growth and differentiation. Polyamine analogs down-regulate ornithine decarboxylase, induce spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase, deplete natural polyamine pools, inhibit growth, and induce programmed cell death in breast cancer models. This study evaluated the activity of the first-generation analog DENSpm in women with metastatic breast cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The overall accrual goal was 34 patients (30 evaluable) in a two-stage design. The second stage of accrual was to proceed if > or =2 among first 15 evaluable patients were progression free at 4 months. The primary objective was to determine whether > or =20% of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with DENSpm as second- or third-line therapy remained progression free after 4 months.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (median age, 52 years; range, 34-65; median performance status, 1; range, 0-1) enrolled in the first stage received 43 cycles (median, 2; range, 1-6) of 100 mg/m2 DENSpm as a 15-min infusion i.v. on days 1-5 every 21 days. All 16 patients were evaluable for toxicity; 15 were evaluable for response. All patients had disease progression by 4 months, and the study closed after the first stage of accrual. The main toxicities included grade 1-2 abdominal pain, transient perioral numbness, nausea, and grade 1 thrombocytopenia. Two patients had grade 3 abdominal pain during cycle 2 infusion: one was hospitalized, and another was subsequently retreated at 80% dose without pain recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this dose and administration schedule of DENSpm was quite tolerable, no evidence of clinical activity was detected. Encouraging preclinical activity of polyamine analogs alone and in combination with cytotoxic drugs supports the continued evaluation of newer-generation polyamine analogs for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

A phase I toxicity and feasibility trial of sequential dose-dense induction chemotherapy with doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and 5-fluorouracil followed by high dose consolidation for high-risk primary breast cancer

PURPOSE

We studied sequential dose-dense doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and 5-fluorouracil (A-T-F) before high dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous peripheral blood stem cell support (PBSCT). Our aims were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU in the dose-dense regimen and to determine the impact of dose-dense chemotherapy on HDC/PBSCT.

METHODS

Patients with Stage IIIB or Stage II or IIIA breast cancer with > or = 4 involved ipsilateral lymph nodes were treated with nine cycles of chemotherapy at 14-day intervals. The regimen was doxorubicin at 80 mg/m2 x 3, followed by paclitaxel at 140 mg/m2 over 96 h x 3, then 5-FU at doses of 1285, 1470, or 1655 mg/m2 by continuous intravenous infusion over 72 h x 3. Patients then underwent a G-CSF-stimulated peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis prior to receiving HDC with autologous PBSCT.

RESULTS

We identified 1285 mg/m2 as the MTD of 5-FU in this regimen. 5-FU-related DLTs included hand-foot syndrome, mucositis, and facial edema with somnolence. Unexpectedly, 3/19 treated patients developed congestive heart failure that prevented planned HDC. Compared to standard dose doxorubicin-containing adjuvant therapy, the dose-dense regimen also decreased CD34+ PBSC yields by about 40% (p = 0.049), requiring that 50% of patients have a supplemental bone marrow harvest. There was no difference in time to neutrophil, platelet, and red blood cell recovery after HDC.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen resulted in an unacceptably high rate of cardiac toxicity and is not recommended for further testing. It may be feasible to use a different schedule of 5-FU-containing dose-dense chemotherapy, particularly for the induction therapy of high-risk primary breast cancer prior to novel targeted therapies.

A prospective pharmacologic evaluation of age-related toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer

Despite increasing evidence of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, older women with breast cancer are commonly given less aggressive treatment than younger patients. Conflicting prior data regarding age-related toxicity prompted this prospective study. Forty-four women (aged 35-79 years) with early-stage breast cancer were treated with four cycles of adjuvant therapy with doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 i.v. every 21 days. They were monitored for myelosuppression, cardiotoxicity, and decrease in quality of life. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed using cycle 1 plasma samples. Bone marrow granulocyte and macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) were assayed in vitro for dose response to 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide and doxorubicin before cycle 1. There was moderate evidence of age-related decrease in nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) when age was viewed as a continuous variable. On average there was a 10/microliter drop in cycle 1 nadir ANC for every year increase in age (p = 0.02). However, when age was viewed as a categorical variable (age < 65 vs. > or = 65 years), a similar proportion of women in each group reached an ANC < 100 (18% vs. 19%). Neither neutropenic complications, alteration in cardiac function, nor change in quality of life scores were significantly age related (p > 0.12). Pharmacokinetic analyses did not demonstrate age-related differences in the clearance of either doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide (p > 0.8). Pharmacodynamic analysis of individual patient bone marrow progenitor cell sensitivity did not reveal any correlation with age (p > 0.48). In women undergoing adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, no clinically significant age-related trends in toxicity were observed. These data suggest that older age alone should not exclude patients from receiving adjuvant therapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.

Quality of life and quality adjusted survival for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)

PURPOSE

The objective was to compare health related quality of life (QOL) in hormone receptor negative, node-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy to determine whether a more intensive chemotherapy regimen has an adverse effect upon QOL that is not balanced by improvements in disease control or survival. Increased physical symptoms, including fatigue and the inconvenience of the dose intensive 16-week regimen, were expected to have a negative impact on QOL.

DESIGN

QOL was measured in 163 patients, randomized to either a standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and 5-flurouracil (CAF) or a 16-week multidrug regimen, using the Breast Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ). The 30 item BCQ was self-administered prior to therapy, during therapy, and 4 months post treatment.

RESULTS

BCQ scores decreased (worsened) more during therapy on the 16-week regimen, median change -1.4, than on CAF, median change -0.8 (p < 0.001). By 4 months post treatment, BCQ scores were higher than pre-treatment and equal in the two arms (CAF: 8.1 and 16 weeks: 8.2, p = 0.6). Over a period of 48 months, patients on the 16-week regimen averaged 1.4 fewer months of treatment with toxicity, 4.0 more months without symptoms and 0.7 fewer months post recurrence compared to patients on the CAF regimen. Given typical values for these health states, the gain in Q-TWiST observed for the CAF regimen during treatment shifted to the 16-week regimen after 1 year, with a gain of 2.0 to 2.4 months after 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypothesized negative impact of the dose intensive 16-week regimen was confirmed by the BCQ assessments. However, Q-TWiST analysis suggests a small gain for the 16-week regimen. The later results should be interpreted with caution with the limited follow-up of 4 years.

A phase I/II study of vinorelbine, doxorubicin, and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of vinorelbine when used in combination with doxorubicin and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue in women with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Enrolled in the study were 23 women with metastatic breast cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients treated at the first dose level received vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 on day 1, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1, methotrexate 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and leucovorin 20 mg orally every 6 h for six doses beginning on day 2. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. The vinorelbine dose was escalated by 5 mg/m2 for patients treated at subsequent dose levels. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which fewer than one-third of patients enrolled experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). When the MTD of vinorelbine had been determined, the doxorubicin dose was then escalated by 10 mg/m2 with the vinorelbine dose held at its MTD.

RESULTS

total of 98 courses of treatment (median of 4 per patient, range 2-8) were administered. The MTD of this regimen was found to be vinorelbine 25 mg/m2, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2, and methotrexate 100 mg/m2 with leucovorin rescue. At higher doses of vinorelbine, neutropenia, fatigue, arm pain, malaise, nausea and vomiting were dose-limiting. Higher doses of doxorubicin resulted in universal dose limiting neutropenia, and frequent nonhematologic DLT consisting of arm pain, malaise, stomatitis, nausea and vomiting. Amongst the 20 patients with measurable disease, there were 3 complete responses (15%, 95% confidence interval 3%-38%), 5 partial responses (25%, 95% confidence interval 9%-49%) and an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval 19%-64%). The median survival was estimated to be 25 months from the start of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Vinorelbine at 25 mg/m2 can be safely administered with doxorubicin at 40 mg/m2 and methotrexate at 100 mg/m2 with leucovorin rescue. Response rates observed with this regimen suggest that this combination of chemotherapeutic agents may not be more effective than the combination of vinorelbine and doxorubicin.

Long term follow-up of women treated with 16-week, dose-intensive adjuvant chemotherapy for high risk breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A Phase II study was performed evaluating the disease free and overall survival rates associated with a dose-intensive, 16-week, doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in women with breast carcinoma and > or = 10 involved axillary lymph nodes.

METHODS

Eligible patients underwent staging with computed tomography and bone scanning and were treated with a 16-week, dose-intensive chemotherapy regimen, comprised of 8 2-week courses of cyclophosphamide, 100 mg/m2 orally, on Days 1-7; doxorubicin, 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.), on Day 1; methotrexate, 100 mg/m2 i.v., on Day 1 with leucovorin rescue, 10 mg/m2, every 6 hours for 6 doses orally on Day 2; vincristine, 1 mg i.v. on Day 1; 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 600 mg/m2 i.v., on Day 2 over 2 hours; and 5-FU, 300 mg/m2/day continuous i.v. on Days 8 and 9. Tamoxifen, 20 mg daily, was administered to patients with estrogen receptor positive tumors treated after October 1988. All patients were offered locoregional radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty-four women were treated on protocol. The median follow-up of 27 surviving patients was > 8 years at last follow-up. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The median time to progression was 54 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of event free survival at 5 years was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-56%), and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival at 5 years was 57% (95% CI, 44-69%). At 98 months the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from recurrence was 31% (95% CI, 19-43%) and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival at 111 months was 36% (95% CI, 23-49%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the use of dose-intensive, doxorubicin-based, adjuvant chemotherapy, and intensive staging prior to study entry, the results of the current study are similar to those of previous reports for standard dose chemotherapy and appear inferior to those reported for high dose therapy.

Sixteen-week multidrug regimen versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy for node-positive, receptor-negative breast cancer: an Intergroup study

PURPOSE

The Intergroup conducted this breast cancer adjuvant trial to compare an investigational 16-week regimen with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (5-FU; CAF). The 16-week regimen features greater doxorubicin and 5-FU dose-intensity than CAF and improved scheduling of antimetabolites with sequential methotrexate and 5-FU, as well as infusion 5-FU.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 646 node-positive, receptor-negative patients were randomly assigned to receive either the 1 6-week regimen or six cycles of CAF. Breast cancer outcomes included recurrence as well as disease-free and overall survival. Toxicity was evaluated by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Treatment-related quality of life was assessed by the Breast Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ) before, during, and 4 months after treatment in 163 patients. The trial was designed to use one-sided tests of significance for power calculations, but is now reported with both one-sided and the traditional two-sided tests of significance.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the estimated 4-year recurrence-free survival rate was 67.5% with the 16-week regimen versus 62.7% with CAF (P = .19, two-sided; P = .095, one-sided). The estimated 4-year survival rate was 78.1% with the 16-week regimen versus 71.4% with CAF (P = .10, two-sided; P = .05, one-sided). CAF produced significantly higher grades of leukopenia, granulocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia, as well as liver and cardiac toxicity, whereas the 16-week regimen produced significantly higher grades of anemia, nausea, stomatitis, and weight loss, as well as skin and neurotoxicity. There were three treatment-related deaths with CAF but none with the 16-week regimen. During treatment, quality of life declined significantly more with the 16-week regimen than CAF, but by 4 months posttreatment, there was no difference.

CONCLUSION

The 16-week regimen produced marginally better breast cancer outcomes than CAF with similar toxicity but a greater reduction in during-treatment quality of life. The 16-week regimen should not be used instead of a standard-dose regimen without careful consideration of the 16-week regimen's pros and cons, which include its complicated schedule. It should probably not be tested further, but its antimetabolite schedules and frequent drug administration (ie, dose density) should be considered in the development of new regimens.

The effect of aging on the utilization of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a population-based study

Older women (i.e., > or = 65 years of age) receive less adjuvant chemotherapy than younger women, in part because chemotherapy has been less effective in postmenopausal than premenopausal women in clinical trials. Metastatic breast cancer, however, does not respond differently to chemotherapy by age. Therefore, to evaluate further the effect of age on chemotherapy utilization, we conducted a population-based study of the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Patients (n = 132) were identified by cross-tabulating death certificates from 1984 to 1991 with breast cancer cases in the Washington County Cancer Registry. Treatment information was obtained from the Tumor Registry of the Washington Country Hospital and Hospital medical records. Forty patients (74%) < 65 years old received chemotherapy compared to 11 (42%) 65-74 and 6 (12%) > or = 75 (p < 0.0001). Adjusting for other medical conditions and whether or not the patient saw a medical oncologist, there was still a significant effect of age in patients > or = 75 (p < 0.001) and a trend (p = 0.17) for patients 65-74. The different patterns of chemotherapy utilization were not associated with survival differences. Radiation therapy was also utilized significantly less frequently in older than younger patients, but the age effect was not as pronounced as with chemotherapy. There was no age effect on the utilization of hormonal therapy. Less frequent utilization of chemotherapy in older patients is probably caused by a combination of patient and physician factors and may result in less effective palliation for older patients.

Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: the American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. The Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

PURPOSE

Dissemination of use of the hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) is unprecedented in oncology, with almost all physicians having experience with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) shortly after the drugs received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 1991. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Committee sought to assess patterns of use of CSFs before dissemination of its first-ever publication of ASCO guidelines.

METHODS

A questionnaire describing clinical scenarios was mailed to American oncologists and hematologists who practice medical oncology. In each scenario, the physician was asked whether he would prefer to use a CSF to prevent or treat neutropenia.

RESULTS

The response rate to the mailed survey was 49% (N = 475). Most physicians preferred to use CSFs for secondary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy at rates of 44% to 85%, rather than reduce doses. Patterns of use did not differ for palliative, curative, or adjuvant chemotherapy. While the majority of CSF patterns of care were similar to those recommended in the ASCO guidelines, more than half of the physicians chose to use CSFs in the treatment of febrile neutropenia, an area not supported in the subsequent guidelines. In general, physicians at academic medical centers and in Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) practices were more likely to prefer dose-reduction strategies over addition of CSFs, while fee-for-service physicians preferred the opposite strategies.

CONCLUSION

Variations in CSF preferences for use were related to differences in clinical characteristics (history of afebrile v febrile neutropenia), drug characteristics (G-CSF or GM-CSF), and physician practice characteristics (HMO or fee-for-service setting). However, before dissemination of the guidelines, the majority of American oncologists preferred strategies that were subsequently included in the ASCO CSF guidelines. CSF guidelines would be most likely to reduce CSF use for treatment of afebrile and uncomplicated febrile neutropenia.

Prevalence of menopausal symptoms among women with a history of breast cancer and attitudes toward estrogen replacement therapy

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence and severity of vasomotor, gynecologic, and other symptoms among breast cancer patients, their health concerns, beliefs about estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), and willingness to take estrogen under medical supervision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire was mailed to 320 women aged 40 to 65 years and diagnosed with in situ or invasive locoregional breast cancer in the years 1988 to 1992.

RESULTS

Of 222 eligible respondents, 190 were postmenopausal. The prevalence of symptoms among the postmenopausal women was as follows: hot flashes, 65%; night sweats, 44%; vaginal dryness, 48%; dyspareunia, 26%; difficulty sleeping, 44%; and feeling depressed, 44%. The latter two symptoms increased in frequency with increasing severity of vasomotor symptoms (P for trend < or = .001). Forty-one percent of menopausal women perceived that they had experienced, since their breast cancer diagnosis, a physical or emotional problem related to menopause. Of these women, 50% felt they needed treatment. Overall, 31% of postmenopausal women would consider taking estrogen. Those who perceived that they had experienced a menopausal problem were more likely to consider estrogen than those who did not (42% v 22%, P = .003). The proportions willing to take estrogen increased with increasing severity of symptoms, particularly feelings of depression and sleep disturbance (P for trend = .008 and .007, respectively). Awareness that estrogen decreases the risks of heart disease and osteoporosis was not associated with an increased willingness to take it. However, beliefs that estrogen increases the risks of recurrent breast cancer and uterine cancer were associated with a decreased willingness to take it (P = .003 and .08, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Vasomotor symptoms have a significant impact on the quality of life of breast cancer patients. Clinical trials to determine the safest and the most effective ways to relieve these symptoms are needed.

A stopping rule for standard chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: lessons from a survey of Maryland medical oncologists

The sequential administration of standard chemotherapy regimens to treat metastatic breast cancer may keep patients and oncologists from considering other important, but more psychologically difficult, issues such as the patient's declining health or approaching death. This practice also utilizes health care resources for ever-decreasing individual patient benefit. If generally agreed-upon rules or guidelines were developed about stopping standard chemotherapy after a limited number of regimens, oncologists could recommend treatment discontinuation with greater confidence. Also, resources could be redirected. To inform the development of guidelines on when to stop chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, we surveyed fully trained Maryland medical oncologists about their knowledge and beliefs about chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. The survey instrument included open-ended questions and clinical vignettes. There was consensus about the value of first-line chemotherapy. Even though oncologists employed second-line chemotherapy, they were unenthusiastic about it. The frequent utilization of second-line regimens probably reflects an effort to offer marginal regimens to patients who want them. Based on these data, it is suggested that standard chemotherapy be stopped after breast cancer fails to stabilize or respond on a standard regimen. Patients who wish further treatment could be referred for investigational therapy if it is available and if they are eligible.

Sixteen week dose intense chemotherapy for inoperable, locally advanced breast cancer

Up to 15% of women with breast cancer have locally advanced disease at diagnosis. The poor response of these patients to local therapy alone and the frequent development of disseminated disease suggest that early intensive systemic therapy may benefit these women. Twenty-four patients with non-metastatic, locally advanced, primarily inflammatory, inoperable breast cancer were treated with a 16-week dose-intense chemotherapy regimen as induction therapy. Treatment consisted of 8 repetitive 2-week cycles consisting of 100 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide orally D1-7, 40 mg/m2 doxorubicin intravenously (IV) D1, 1 mg vincristine IV D1, 100 mg/m2 methotrexate IV D1, 10 mg/m2 leucovorin every 6 hours for six oral doses D2-3, and 600 mg/m2 5-FU IV over 2 hours D2. A continuous infusion of 300 mg/m2 5-FU per day was given IV D8-9 of each 2-week cycle. After induction all patients had at least a partial clinical response and were operable; 9/24 (37%) achieved a clinical complete response. All patients underwent at least a simple mastectomy. Pathologic examination revealed no evidence of gross macroscopic tumor in 11/24 patients (46%) and no evidence of microscopic disease in 4/24 patients (17%). Seven of 24 patients (29%) had no microscopic disease in the breast. At a median follow-up of 45 months, there have been 10 relapses in the 24 patients treated with this induction regimen. The actuarial relapse-free survival at 5 years is 58%. Actuarial overall survival at 5 years is 75%. We conclude that this regimen is safe and well-tolerated and that the results of this therapy are sufficiently promising to warrant further study of this regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Offering the option of randomized clinical trials to cancer patients who overestimate their prognoses with standard therapies

We have shown that cancer patients' routine (and understandable) overestimations of their prognoses with standard therapy may inhibit their accrual to randomized clinical trials for which standard therapies are the alternative. Patients' appreciation of the rationale for a trial, and the potential benefit of trial participation, can only be enhanced if they understand their prognoses with standard therapy. However, clinical investigators may be reluctant to provide specific information that deflates patients' estimates of their prognoses. The routine withholding of information regarding the modest benefits of standard therapies may avoid patient distress, but such physician behavior is paternalistic and may deleteriously affect trial accrual. On the other hand, the routine communication of prognostic information will cause significant distress among patients and will perhaps be destabilizing to that minority of patients who would otherwise shun this information or truly cannot psychologically tolerate it. A middle ground between these extremes is the stepwise disclosure of potentially distressing information, wherein specific prognostical information is offered by physicians to patients and actually provided or communicated only after patients first understand the nature of it and then indicate their interest in receiving it. A practical disadvantage of this approach is its additional demand on physicians' time. Therefore, if impracticality is to be avoided and yet the approach fostered, clinical investigators might consider developing trial-specific, written or audiovisual materials for patient education about general background information. These could be employed prior to patient-physician dialogue and so enable physicians to focus on more sensitive subjects, such as prognosis with standard therapy.

Noradrenergic activity in anticipatory nausea

Two studies were conducted to examine the hypothesis that noradrenergic activity is a cause of the anticipatory nausea associated with cancer chemotherapy. In the first study concentrations of plasma 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl-glycol (MHPG) on day 1 of cycle 5 of initial chemotherapy were significantly higher in patients with than without anticipatory nausea. To determine whether elevated MHPG reflected a clinically significant causative role for noradrenergic activity in anticipatory nausea, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of clonidine for anticipatory nausea. At a dose of clonidine that produced significant side effects and reductions of plasma MHPG, anticipatory nausea was improved only marginally. These studies do not support a causative role for noradrenergic activity in anticipatory nausea that can be reduced by clonidine with an acceptable therapeutic index.

Psychosocial aspects of breast cancer

In the past year, there have been timely and important reports on psychosocial aspects of breast cancer screening. Noteworthy papers have also been published on the psychologic sequelae of mastectomy compared with breast conservation, quality-of-life-adjusted survival analysis with breast cancer adjuvant therapy, and the relative importance to patients with metastatic breast cancer of quality-of-life dimensions.

Factors affecting treatment decisions for a life-threatening illness: the case of medical treatment of breast cancer

Despite notions that patients are now playing a more proactive role in directing their own health care, our study of breast cancer patients considering adjuvant therapy indicates that, at least for a life-threatening illness, patients still rely heavily on their physicians to make treatment decisions. Out of 100 patients, 80.0% accepted their physician's primary treatment recommendation. Using behavioral decision-making theory we examined why some patients chose to disregard the physician's treatment recommendation despite its importance within the decision-making process. The discriminant function analysis performed to examine the factors influencing acceptance or rejection of a physician's treatment recommendation identified two sets of factors. Factors related to the amount and specificity of information about treatments conveyed to the patients, and the strength of the treatment recommendation itself. Patients who did not accept their physician's treatment recommendation were told in more specific terms what the benefits of treatment would be; they also rated side effects of treatment to be more probable and more severe than patients who did concur with the physician's treatment recommendation. These patients also rated their physicians' treatment recommendations as less strong than other physicians'. Nonacceptor patients were also better educated and were more likely to be risk takers. This study supports the findings of other studies that patients want more specific disease and treatment information, but suggests that the provision of this information might lead to therapy decisions which diverge from physicians' recommendations.

Effect of patients' expectations of benefit with standard breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy on participation in a randomized clinical trial: a clinical vignette study

Patients frequently overestimate the benefit of standard breast cancer adjuvant therapy. This is due in part to vague doctor-patient communication. To examine how the doctor's description and patient's expectations of the benefit of standard therapy affect clinical trial participation, we randomized 282 female cancer patients to one of two versions of a clinical vignette describing a choice between standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (5FU) (CMF) and a randomized trial comparing CMF with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5FU (CAF). The vignettes differed only on whether results with CMF were described verbally or numerically in terms of disease-free survival (DFS). After selecting CMF or the trial, patients estimated their 10-year DFS with CMF. Patients were randomized 3:1 to the verbal vignette. The trial was selected by 110 of 210 (52.4%) verbal vignette patients versus 25 of 72 (34.7%) numeric vignette patients (P = .01). Estimates of 10-year DFS with CMF varied considerably; many were inaccurate. When patients in the verbal vignette group were divided into thirds according to DFS estimate, 22 of 64 (34.4%) in the top third selected the trial versus 38 of 64 (59.4%) and 38 of 65 (58.5%) in the middle and bottom third, respectively (P = .005). Younger age, college education, and previous participation in a trial also predicted trial selection. Multivariate logistic regression suggested that the benefit expected from CMF was more important than how benefit was described in treatment selection. Assuring realistic patient expectations of standard adjuvant therapy benefit is likely to be important during discussion of clinical trials.

Phase II trial of menogaril as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Eighteen women with metastatic breast cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy were entered on a phase II trial of intravenous menogaril, a new anthracycline derivative. Treatment was given at 140 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each 28 day cycle. The most common toxicities were leukopenia in all patients and burning and phlebitis at infusion sites in 72%. Serial assessment of cardiac function by resting and stress gated blood pool scans showed temporary decrements in ejection fraction in only 2 patients (11%). The response rate to the therapy was 19% [95% CI 0-38%] including 1 complete and 2 partial responses. The median time to relapse among responders was 6.5 months. Mean survival in all patients entered was 15.8 months from date of entry. Menogaril at this dose and schedule has modest activity as first line therapy for metastatic breast cancer but also has significant marrow and local toxicity.