Nicotine stimulation of extracellular glutamate levels in the nucleus accumbens: neuropharmacological characterization

In the present study, we have characterized the neuropharmacological regulation of nicotine-induced increases in extracellular nucleus accumbens glutamate levels. Sprague-Dawley rats were stereotaxically implanted with 2 mm microdialysis probes in the nucleus accumbens and on the following day in vivo microdialysis experiments were performed in awake, freely moving animals. An acute dose of nicotine (0.3-0.6 mg/kg, s.c.) produced an increase in nucleus accumbens glutamate levels with a maximal increase of approximately 50% following the higher dose. No changes in nucleus accumbens aspartate levels were found. The increase in glutamate levels following nicotine (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) was blocked by mecamylamine (1 mg/kg, i.p. ) but not by haloperidol (0.2 mg/kg, i.p.) pretreatment. Local perfusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) without calcium did not alter nicotine (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) stimulation of glutamate levels. Local perfusion with a selective blocker for the GLT-1 glutamate transporter, dihydrokainic acid (DHKA) (10(-4) M), had no effect, while local perfusion with a nonselective glutamate transporter blocker, L-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid (PDC) (10(-4) M), blocked nicotine (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) stimulation of glutamate levels. In animals previously dopamine denervated by local injections of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the nucleus accumbens, nicotine (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) stimulation of glutamate levels was enhanced vs. sham-lesioned animals. These findings demonstrate a novel form of nucleus accumbens glutamate release that is dopamine- and calcium-independent. The ability of PDC to block the effects of nicotine suggest that a glutamate transporter may be involved in mediating the stimulation of glutamate release.

Behavioral and neurochemical effects of the dopamine transporter ligand 4-chlorobenztropine alone and in combination with cocaine in vivo

The current studies evaluated the novel diphenylmethoxytropane analog 4-chlorobenztropine (4-Cl-BZT), cocaine, and combinations of the two drugs for their abilities to stimulate locomotor activity, produce cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects, and elevate extracellular dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) as measured by in vivo microdialysis. Peripherally administered cocaine was approximately twice as efficacious as 4-Cl-BZT as a locomotor stimulant and was behaviorally active at a lower dose than was 4-Cl-BZT. Cocaine also was more efficacious than 4-Cl-BZT in producing discriminative-stimulus effects in rats trained to discriminate i.p. injections of 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline. The time course of behavioral activation differed markedly between the two drugs, with much shorter onset and duration of locomotor stimulant effects for cocaine relative to 4-Cl-BZT. Similarly, i.p. cocaine (10 and 40 mg/kg) induced a pronounced, rapid, and short-lived increase in DA in the NAc, whereas i.p. 4-Cl-BZT was effective only at the higher dose and produced a more gradual, modest, and sustained (>/=2 h) elevation in accumbens DA. In contrast to i.p. administration, local infusion of 4-Cl-BZT (1-100 microM) into the NAc through the microdialysis probe elevated extracellular DA to a much greater extent than did local cocaine (nearly 2000% of baseline maximally for 4-Cl-BZT versus 400% of baseline for cocaine) and displayed a much longer duration of action than cocaine. However, when microinjected bilaterally into the NAc at 30 or 300 nmol/side, cocaine remained a more efficacious locomotor stimulant than 4-Cl-BZT. Finally, pretreatment with i.p. 4-Cl-BZT dose dependently enhanced the locomotor stimulant, discriminative stimulus effects, and NAc DA response to a subsequent low-dose i.p. cocaine challenge. The diphenylmethoxytropane analog also facilitated the emergence of stereotyped behavior and convulsions induced by high-dose cocaine. The current results demonstrate that DA transporter ligands that do not share the neurochemical and behavioral profiles of cocaine nevertheless may enhance the effects of cocaine in vivo.

Necessary role for ventral tegmental area adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A in induction of behavioral sensitization to intraventral tegmental area amphetamine

In the present study, we investigated the effects of selective activation or inhibition of ventral tegmental area (VTA) adenylate cyclase (AC) and protein kinase A (PKA) on long-term sensitization induced by repeated intra-VTA or peripheral amphetamine (AMPH). Selective inhibition of AC by SQ 22,536 (9-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-9H-purin-6-amine; 100 nmol/side bilateral into VTA) had no effect on acute basal locomotion but attenuated the locomotor stimulation induced by acute i.p. AMPH (1.5 mg/kg). Coinjection of SQ 22,536 (100 nmol/side) fully blocked the sensitization induced by repeated intra-VTA AMPH (15 nmol/side) but had no detectable effect on the sensitization induced by repeated i. p. AMPH. Persistent activation of AC by intra-VTA cholera toxin (500 ng/side) modestly increased acute locomotion and induced a robust sensitization to i.p. AMPH challenge 10 days after the last of three repeated VTA microinjections. Selective inhibition of PKA by Rp-adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphothioate triethylamine (Rp-cAMPS; 25 nmol/side) had no effect on acute basal or AMPH-stimulated locomotion. Coinjection of Rp-cAMPS (25 nmol/side) fully blocked the sensitization induced by repeated intra-VTA AMPH but had no effect on sensitization induced by repeated i.p. AMPH. Intra-VTA microinjection of the selective PKA activator Sp-adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphothioate triethylamine (Sp-cAMPS; 25-100 nmol/side) dose-dependently stimulated acute locomotion and exerted synergistic effects on locomotor activity when coinfused into the VTA with AMPH but had no detectable effect on acute i.p. AMPH-induced locomotion. Repeated intra-VTA Sp-cAMPS did not induce sensitization to AMPH challenge but potentiated the sensitization induced by repeated i.p. AMPH. These results suggest that VTA cAMP signal transduction is necessary for the induction of persistent sensitization to intra-VTA amphetamine and that peripheral and intra-VTA AMPH may not induce behavioral sensitization by identical mechanisms.

Behavioral and neurochemical components of nicotine sensitization following 15-day pretreatment: studies on contextual conditioning

The effects of contextual conditioning on the induction of nicotine sensitization of locomotor activity, stereotypy and nucleus accumbens dopamine release were studied using a 15-day pretreatment regimen. Six groups of Sprague-Dawley rats were employed to test for the effects of drug pretreatment, conditioning and novelty. Groups 1-4 were treated with daily nicotine (0.6 mg/kg, s.c.) or saline injections that were either paired with the test chamber or given in the home cage, followed by saline injections in the home cage. Group 5 received saline in the test chamber followed by nicotine in the home cage (unpaired). Group 6 was naive to handling and drug treatment. Pretreated animals were implanted with 2 mm microdialysis probes, via chronic guide cannulae, after completing the 15th day of treatment, and were tested for their response to nicotine (0.6 mg/kg, s.c) or saline on day 16. Naive animals were implanted with microdialysis probes and tested in a similar manner. Nicotine-stimulated locomotor activity was sensitized in the paired, unpaired and homecage pretreatment groups whereas nicotine-stimulated stereotypy was sensitized only in the paired pretreatment group. Nicotine-stimulated nucleus accumbens dopamine release was sensitized in the paired and unpaired pretreatment groups. Saline-stimulated nucleus accumbens dopamine release, but not locomotor activity or stereotypy, was also found in the nicotine-pretreated, paired group. These findings demonstrate the development of sensitization to nicotine-induced locomotor activity, stereotypy and nucleus accumbens dopamine release after a 15-day pretreatment regimen. Each of these responses to nicotine were differentially modulated by contextual conditioning. It is suggested that nicotine-stimulated dopamine release in sensitized animals represents the conditioned component of nicotine sensitization.

Partial reversal of stress-induced behavioral sensitization to amphetamine following metyrapone treatment

Several studies indicate that blockade of stress-induced corticosterone secretion prevents the development of stress-induced sensitization to the behavioral effects of stimulants. The present study examined whether chronic blockade of corticosterone synthesis with metyrapone could reverse stress-induced amphetamine sensitization in rats. Restraint stress in cylindrical chambers, 2 times 30 min/day for 5 days over an 8-day schedule, was used as the stressor. Following completion of the stress protocol, animals were cannulated with microdialysis guide cannulae over the nucleus accumbens, and then treated with either metyrapone (50 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle (1 ml/kg) for 7 days. On the seventh day, animals were implanted with microdialysis probes in the nucleus accumbens, and on the following day, all animals were tested for their locomotor, stereotypy, and nucleus accumbens dopamine and DOPAC release responses to an injection of saline followed 60 min later by d-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Neither stress or metyrapone treatment had an effect on the behavioral or dopamine release response to saline. However, amphetamine-stimulated locomotion and stereotypy were strongly enhanced, while amphetamine-stimulated dopamine release response was slightly enhanced (significant only by drug x time interaction), in stressed animals. Metyrapone treatment reduced the stress-induced increase in the locomotor, but not stereotypy, response to amphetamine. In contrast, the dopamine release response to amphetamine was enhanced in metyrapone-treated animals, in both stressed and non-stressed groups, while DOPAC levels were unaffected by treatment group. This augmentation was particularly evident in the stressed-metyrapone-treated animals. Furthermore, non-stressed animals showed an increased locomotor and stereotypy response to amphetamine after treatment with metyrapone. These findings indicate that metyrapone treatment can reverse, or inhibit the expression of, stress-induced sensitization to the behavioral effects of amphetamine. However, the ability of metyrapone treatment to enhance the behavioral (in non-stressed animals) and dopamine release (in non-stressed and stressed animals) responses to amphetamine indicate that chronic metyrapone treatment will produce stimulant sensitization when given alone.

Evidence for dissociable mechanisms of amphetamine- and stress-induced behavioral sensitization: effects of MK-801 and haloperidol pretreatment

The present study examined the ability of pretreatment with MK-801 or haloperidol to block the induction of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine challenge by repeated immobilization stress in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Fifteen minutes before each of ten 30-min restraint sessions, rats were administered saline, MK-801 (0.01, 0.10 or 0.25 mg/kg i.p.) or haloperidol (0.10 or 0.25 mg/kg i.p.). Control rats received the same injection regimen without restraint. An additional experiment examined the ability of MK-801 to block the induction of sensitization by repeated d-amphetamine. In this experiment, rats were administered saline or MK-801 (0.25 mg/kg i.p.) 15 min before each of ten amphetamine injections (1.0 mg/kg i.p., administered under the same regimen as immobilization stress). Four days after the final immobilization or amphetamine injection, rats were tested for locomotor response to novelty, saline and d-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg i.p.). Exposure to repeated immobilization stress significantly enhanced the locomotor response to amphetamine challenge but not to saline challenge whether rats were pretreated with saline, MK-801 or haloperidol. Secondary analysis of dose effects in each pretreatment group revealed that at 0.25 mg/kg, repeated MK-801 in itself induced sensitization to the response to amphetamine in control rats and potentiated stress-induced sensitization in restrained rats. In contrast, the sensitization induced by repeated amphetamine was attenuated by MK-801 pretreatment. Neither dose of haloperidol affected the locomotor response to saline or amphetamine in control or stressed rats. These results indicate that the effects of MK-801 on the induction of sensitization are complex and suggest that amphetamine- and stress-induced behavioral sensitization may arise through different mechanisms.

Effects of environmental conditioning on the development of nicotine sensitization: behavioral and neurochemical analysis

We have investigated the effects of environmental conditioning on the induction of nicotine sensitization of locomotion, stereotypy and nucleus accumbens dopamine release. Sprague-Dawley rats, some of which had been previously implanted with a microdialysis guide cannula over the nucleus accumbens, were sensitized with 5 days of repeated nicotine (0.6 mg/kg per day, SC) or saline injections (1 ml/kg per day). During nicotine treatment the drug administration was either paired with the microdialysis/activity monitor testing chamber (conditioned) (n = 6) or with the animal's home cage (unconditioned) (n = 6) and after 60 min the animal was returned to home cage and received a second injection of saline 15 min later. A third group received saline in the testing apparatus followed by nicotine in the home cage (pseudo-conditioned) (n = 6). In the guide cannulated animals, 2 mm microdialysis probes were inserted after completing day 5 of treatment and all animals were tested for their response to nicotine (0.6 mg/kg, SC) on day 6. Both locomotor activity and nucleus accumbens dopamine release showed a larger response subsequent to nicotine challenge in the nicotine versus saline pretreated animals in the conditioned group, but not in the unconditioned group. In the pseudo-conditioned group there was an increase in the stereotypy responses to nicotine, however the locomotor and dopamine release responses were not significantly enhanced. The results from the conditioned group were confirmed in animals which were tested for behavioral activation and dopamine release simultaneously (n = 5). These findings indicate that nicotine sensitization of locomotor activity and nucleus accumbens dopamine release (using a 5-day pretreatment protocol) is dependent on conditioning the animal to the testing environment during nicotine pretreatment.

Evidence for involvement of ventral tegmental area cyclic AMP systems in behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants

The present study investigated the role of ventral tegmental area (VTA) cyclic AMP (cAMP) systems in the behavioral sensitivity to psychostimulants in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Bilateral microinjections of cholera toxin (CTX) into the VTA (50-500 ng/500 nl/side) dose-dependently sensitized animals to the locomotor stimulant effects of systemic d-amphetamine, cocaine and apomorphine, but were without effects on morphine-induced locomotion 24 hr after microinjection. The CTX-induced behavioral sensitization to amphetamine was even greater 72 hr after microinjection, but was no longer present 14 days after intra-VTA CTX pretreatment. Coadministration of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase inhibitor H8 into the VTA blocked CTX-induced sensitization to amphetamine, suggesting that the sensitization is dependent on phosphorylation events in the VTA mediated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Pretreatment with CTX did not enhance amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens relative to saline controls 24 hr after microinjection. A single bilateral injection of d-amphetamine into the VTA (5 micrograms/side) produced a significant sensitization to systemic amphetamine challenge 72 hr later, and this effect was also blocked by coadministration of H8 into the VTA. These results extend previous studies which have established the importance of the VTA in the development of behavioral sensitization and suggest that cAMP systems may play a crucial role in this neuroadaptive process.