1
|
van der Schee L, Haasnoot KJC, Elias SG, Gijsbers K, Alderlieste YA, Backes Y, van Berkel AM, Boersma F, Ter Borg F, Breekveldt ECH, Kessels K, Koopman M, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Leerdam ME, Rasschaert G, Schreuder RM, Schrauwen RWM, Seerden TCJ, Spanier MBW, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Tuynman J, Vink GR, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Vleggaar FP, Lacle MM, Moons LM. Oncological outcomes of screen-detected and non-screen-detected T1 colorectal cancers. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38325403 DOI: 10.1055/a-2263-2841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS The incidence of T1 colorectal cancers (CRC) has increased with the implementation of CRC screening programs. It is unknown if outcomes and and risk models for T1 CRC patients, based on non-screen-detected cases, can be extrapolated to screen-detected T1 CRC. This study aims to compare stage distribution and oncological outcomes of T1 CRC patients within and outside the screening program. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from T1 CRC patients diagnosed between 2014-2017 were collected from 12 hospitals in the Netherlands. The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) at diagnosis was compared between screen-detected and non-screen-detected patients using multivariable logistic regression. Cox proportional hazard regression was employed to analyze differences in time to recurrence (TTR), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Additionally, the performance of conventional risk factors for LNM was evaluated in both groups. RESULTS 1803 patients were included, of which 1114 (62%) were screen-detected. Median follow-up was 51 months (IQR 30). The proportion of LNM did not significantly differ between screen- and non-screen-detected patients (12.6% vs 8.9%; OR 1.41; 95% CI 0.89-2.23), and a prediction model for LNM performed equally in both groups. Three and 5-year TTR, MFS, and CSS were similar for patients within and outside the screening program. However, OS was significantly higher in screen-detected T1 CRC patients (adjusted HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.38-0.68). CONCLUSIONS Screen-detected and non-screen-detected T1 CRCs have similar stage distributions and oncological outcomes and can therefore be treated equally. However, screen-detected T1 CRC patients exhibit a lower rate of non-CRC-related mortality, resulting in higher OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa van der Schee
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Kim Gijsbers
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Y A Alderlieste
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Beatrixziekenhuis, Gorinchem, Netherlands
| | - Yara Backes
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Femke Boersma
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, Netherlands
| | - F Ter Borg
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Koen Kessels
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - R W M Schrauwen
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Bernhoven Hospital Location Uden, Uden, Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jurriaan Tuynman
- Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - M M Lacle
- Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leon Mg Moons
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hanevelt J, Huisman JF, Leicher LW, Lacle MM, Richir MC, Didden P, Geesing JMJ, Smakman N, Sive Droste JST, Ter Borg F, Talsma AK, Schrauwen RWM, van Wely BJ, Schot I, Vermaas M, Bos P, Sietses C, Hazen WL, Wasowicz DK, Ploeg DE, Ramsoekh D, Tuynman JB, Alderlieste YA, Renger RJ, Schreuder RM, Bloemen JG, van Lijnschoten I, Consten ECJ, Sikkenk DJ, Schwartz MP, Vos A, Burger JPW, Spanier BWM, Knijn N, Cappel WHDVTN, Moons LMG, van Westreenen HL. Correction: Limited wedge resection for T1 colon cancer (LIMERIC-II trial) - rationale and study protocol of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:256. [PMID: 37501070 PMCID: PMC10375605 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02905-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Hanevelt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, Isala, Zwolle, 28025 AB, The Netherlands.
| | - Jelle F Huisman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, Isala, Zwolle, 28025 AB, The Netherlands
| | - Laura W Leicher
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, Isala, Zwolle, 28025 AB, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Milan C Richir
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels Smakman
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - A Koen Talsma
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud W M Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Bob J van Wely
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Schot
- Department of Gastroenter ology & Hepatology, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capellle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Bos
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Colin Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Dareczka K Wasowicz
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - David E Ploeg
- Department of Pathology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Dewkoemar Ramsoekh
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yasser A Alderlieste
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Beatrixziekenhuis - Rivas, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Renger
- Department of Surgery, Beatrixziekenhuis - Rivas, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Ramon-Michel Schreuder
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johanne G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Daan J Sikkenk
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Annelotte Vos
- Department of Pathology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Jordy P W Burger
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Nikki Knijn
- Pathology DNA, Location Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hanevelt J, Huisman JF, Leicher LW, Lacle MM, Richir MC, Didden P, Geesing JMJ, Smakman N, Droste JSTS, Ter Borg F, Talsma AK, Schrauwen RWM, van Wely BJ, Schot I, Vermaas M, Bos P, Sietses C, Hazen WL, Wasowicz DK, van der Ploeg DE, Ramsoekh D, Tuynman JB, Alderlieste YA, Renger RJ, Schreuder RM, Bloemen JG, van Lijnschoten I, Consten ECJ, Sikkenk DJ, Schwartz MP, Vos A, Burger JPW, Spanier BWM, Knijn N, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Moons LMG, van Westreenen HL. Limited wedge resection for T1 colon cancer (LIMERIC-II trial) - rationale and study protocol of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:214. [PMID: 37337197 PMCID: PMC10278298 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02854-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The sole presence of deep submucosal invasion is shown to be associated with a limited risk of lymph node metastasis. This justifies a local excision of suspected deep submucosal invasive colon carcinomas (T1 CCs) as a first step treatment strategy. Recently Colonoscopy-Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resection (CAL-WR) has been shown to be able to resect pT1 CRCs with a high R0 resection rate, but the long term outcomes are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and long-term oncological outcomes of CAL-WR as primary treatment for patients with suspected superficial and also deeply-invasive T1 CCs. METHODS In this prospective multicenter clinical trial, patients with a macroscopic and/or histologically suspected T1 CCs will receive CAL-WR as primary treatment in order to prevent unnecessary major surgery for low-risk T1 CCs. To make a CAL-WR technically feasible, the tumor may not include > 50% of the circumference and has to be localized at least 25 cm proximal from the anus. Also, there should be sufficient distance to the ileocecal valve to place a linear stapler. Before inclusion, all eligible patients will be assessed by an expert panel to confirm suspicion of T1 CC, estimate invasion depth and subsequent advise which local resection techniques are possible for removal of the lesion. The primary outcome of this study is the proportion of patients with pT1 CC that is curatively treated with CAL-WR only and in whom thus organ-preservation could be achieved. Secondary outcomes are 1) CAL-WR's technical success and R0 resection rate for T1 CC, 2) procedure-related morbidity and mortality, 3) 5-year overall and disease free survival, 4) 3-year metastasis free survival, 5) procedure-related costs and 6) impact on quality of life. A sample size of 143 patients was calculated. DISCUSSION CAL-WR is a full-thickness local resection technique that could also be effective in removing pT1 colon cancer. With the lack of current endoscopic local resection techniques for > 15 mm pT1 CCs with deep submucosal invasion, CAL-WR could fill the gap between endoscopy and major oncologic surgery. The present study is the first to provide insight in the long-term oncological outcomes of CAL-WR. TRIAL REGISTRATION CCMO register (ToetsingOnline), NL81497.075.22, protocol version 2.3 (October 2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Hanevelt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 28025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
| | - Jelle F Huisman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 28025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Laura W Leicher
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 28025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Milan C Richir
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels Smakman
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - A Koen Talsma
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud W M Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Bob J van Wely
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Schot
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capellle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Bos
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Colin Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Dareczka K Wasowicz
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - Dewkoemar Ramsoekh
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yasser A Alderlieste
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Beatrixziekenhuis - Rivas, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Renger
- Department of Surgery, Beatrixziekenhuis - Rivas, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Ramon-Michel Schreuder
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johanne G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Daan J Sikkenk
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Annelotte Vos
- Department of Pathology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Jordy P W Burger
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Nikki Knijn
- Pathology DNA, Location Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Verweij ME, Tanaka MD, Kensen CM, van der Heide UA, Marijnen CAM, Janssen T, Vijlbrief T, van Grevenstein WMU, Moons LMG, Koopman M, Lacle MM, Braat MNGJA, Chalabi M, Maas M, Huibregtse IL, Snaebjornsson P, Grotenhuis BA, Fijneman R, Consten E, Pronk A, Smits AB, Heikens JT, Eijkelenkamp H, Elias SG, Verkooijen HM, Schoenmakers MMC, Meijer GJ, Intven M, Peters FP. Towards Response ADAptive Radiotherapy for organ preservation for intermediate-risk rectal cancer (preRADAR): protocol of a phase I dose-escalation trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e065010. [PMID: 37321815 PMCID: PMC10277084 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Organ preservation is associated with superior functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. Only 10% of patients are eligible for organ preservation following short-course radiotherapy (SCRT, 25 Gy in five fractions) and a prolonged interval (4-8 weeks) to response evaluation. The organ preservation rate could potentially be increased by dose-escalated radiotherapy. Online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is anticipated to reduce radiation-induced toxicity and enable radiotherapy dose escalation. This trial aims to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of dose-escalated SCRT using online adaptive MRgRT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The preRADAR is a multicentre phase I trial with a 6+3 dose-escalation design. Patients with intermediate-risk rectal cancer (cT3c-d(MRF-)N1M0 or cT1-3(MRF-)N1M0) interested in organ preservation are eligible. Patients are treated with a radiotherapy boost of 2×5 Gy (level 0), 3×5 Gy (level 1), 4×5 Gy (level 2) or 5×5 Gy (level 3) on the gross tumour volume in the week following standard SCRT using online adaptive MRgRT. The trial starts on dose level 1. The primary endpoint is the MTD based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) per dose level. DLT is a composite of maximum one in nine severe radiation-induced toxicities and maximum one in three severe postoperative complications, in patients treated with TME or local excision within 26 weeks following start of treatment. Secondary endpoints include the organ preservation rate, non-DLT, oncological outcomes, patient-reported QoL and functional outcomes up to 2 years following start of treatment. Imaging and laboratory biomarkers are explored for early response prediction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. The primary and secondary trial results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER WHO International Clinical Trials Registry (NL8997; https://trialsearch.who.int).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike E Verweij
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Max D Tanaka
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chavelli M Kensen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tomas Janssen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke Vijlbrief
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon N G J A Braat
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Myriam Chalabi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge L Huibregtse
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Remond Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Apollo Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht Zeist Doorn, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anke B Smits
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Joost T Heikens
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, The Netherlands
| | - Hidde Eijkelenkamp
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gert J Meijer
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Intven
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Femke P Peters
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huisman JF, Dang H, Moons LMG, Backes Y, Dik VK, Groen JN, Ter Borg F, van Bergeijk JD, Geesing JMJ, Spanier BWM, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Overwater A, van Lelyveld N, Kessels K, Lacle MM, Offerhaus GJA, Brohet RM, Knijn N, Vleggaar FP, van Westreenen HL, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Boonstra JJ. Diagnostic value of radiological staging and surveillance for T1 colorectal carcinomas: A multicenter cohort study. United European Gastroenterol J 2023. [PMID: 37300377 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of radiological staging and surveillance imaging is under debate for T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) as the risk of distant metastases is low and imaging may lead to the detection of incidental findings. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield of radiological staging and surveillance imaging for T1 CRC. METHODS In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, all patients of 10 Dutch hospitals with histologically proven T1 CRC who underwent radiological staging in the period 2000-2014 were included. Clinical characteristics, pathological, endoscopic, surgical and imaging reports at baseline and during follow-up were recorded and analyzed. Patients were classified as high-risk T1 CRC if at least one of the histological risk factors (lymphovascular invasion, poor tumor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion or positive resection margins) was present and as low-risk when all risk factors were absent. RESULTS Of the 628 included patients, 3 (0.5%) had synchronous distant metastases, 13 (2.1%) malignant incidental findings and 129 (20.5%) benign incidental findings at baseline staging. Radiological surveillance was performed among 336 (53.5%) patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence, malignant and benign incidental findings were 2.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1%-5.4%), 2.5% (95% CI: 0.6%-10.4%) and 18.3% (95% CI: 13.4%-24.7%), respectively. No distant metastatic events occurred among low-risk T1 CRC patients. CONCLUSION The risk of synchronous distant metastases and distant recurrence in T1 CRC is low, while there is a substantial risk of detecting incidental findings. Radiological staging seems unnecessary prior to local excision of suspected T1 CRC and after local excision of low-risk T1 CRC. Radiological surveillance should not be performed in patients with low-risk T1 CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelle F Huisman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yara Backes
- Department. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent K Dik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal, Harderwijk, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen D van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - B W Marcel Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | | | - Anouk Overwater
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Niels van Lelyveld
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Koen Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard M Brohet
- Departmentof Epidemiology and Statistics, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Nikki Knijn
- Department of Pathology-DNA, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Didden P, van Eijck van Heslinga RAH, Schwartz MP, Arensman LR, Vleggaar FP, de Graaf W, Koch AD, Doukas M, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. Relevance of polyp size for primary endoscopic full-thickness resection of suspected T1 colorectal cancers. Endoscopy 2022; 54:1062-1070. [PMID: 35255517 DOI: 10.1055/a-1790-5539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND En bloc local excision of suspected T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) provides optimal tumor risk assessment with curative intent. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) with an over-the-scope device has emerged as a local excision technique for T1 CRCs, but data on the upper size limit for achieving a histological complete (R0) resection are lacking. We aimed to determine the influence of polyp size on the R0 rate. METHODS eFTR procedures for suspected T1 CRCs performed between 2015 and 2021 were selected from the endoscopy databases of three tertiary centers. The main outcome was R0 resection, defined as tumor- and dysplasia-free margins (≥ 0.1 mm) for both the deep and lateral resection margins. Regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for R1/Rx resection, mainly focusing on endoscopically estimated polyp size. RESULTS 136 patients underwent eFTR for suspected T1 CRC (median size 15 mm [IQR 13-18 mm]; 83.1 % cancer). The rates of technical success and R0 resection were 87.5 % (119/136; 95 %CI 80.9 %-92.1 %) and 79.7 % (106/136; 95 %CI 72.1 %-85.7 %), respectively. Increasing polyp size was significantly associated with R1/Rx resection (risk ratio 2.35 per 5-mm increase, 95 %CI 1.80-3.07; P < 0.001). The R0 rate was 89.9 % (80/89) for polyps ≤ 15 mm, 71.4 % (25/35) for 16-20 mm, and 11.1 % (1/9) for those > 20 mm. CONCLUSIONS eFTR is associated with a 90 % R0 rate for T1 CRCs of ≤ 15 mm. Performing eFTR for polyps 16-20 mm should depend on access, their mobility, and the availability of alternative resection techniques. eFTR for > 20-mm polyps results in a high R1 rate and should not be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - L R Arensman
- Department of Pathology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wilmar de Graaf
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peters NA, Constantinides A, Ubink I, van Kuik J, Bloemendal HJ, van Dodewaard JM, Brink MA, Schwartz TP, Lolkema MP, Lacle MM, Moons LM, Geesing J, van Grevenstein WM, Roodhart JML, Koopman M, Elias SG, Borel Rinkes IH, Kranenburg O. Consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4)-targeted therapy in primary colon cancer: A proof-of-concept study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:969855. [PMID: 36147916 PMCID: PMC9486194 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.969855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundMesenchymal Consensus Molecular Subtype 4 (CMS4) colon cancer is associated with poor prognosis and therapy resistance. In this proof-of-concept study, we assessed whether a rationally chosen drug could mitigate the distinguishing molecular features of primary CMS4 colon cancer.MethodsIn the ImPACCT trial, informed consent was obtained for molecular subtyping at initial diagnosis of colon cancer using a validated RT-qPCR CMS4-test on three biopsies per tumor (Phase-1, n=69 patients), and for neoadjuvant CMS4-targeting therapy with imatinib (Phase-2, n=5). Pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were analyzed by RNA-sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Imatinib-induced gene expression changes were associated with molecular subtypes and survival in an independent cohort of 3232 primary colon cancer.ResultsThe CMS4-test classified 52/172 biopsies as CMS4 (30%). Five patients consented to imatinib treatment prior to surgery, yielding 15 pre- and 15 post-treatment samples for molecular analysis. Imatinib treatment caused significant suppression of mesenchymal genes and upregulation of genes encoding epithelial junctions. The gene expression changes induced by imatinib were associated with improved survival and a shift from CMS4 to CMS2.ConclusionImatinib may have value as a CMS-switching drug in primary colon cancer and induces a gene expression program that is associated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niek A. Peters
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Alexander Constantinides
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Inge Ubink
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Joyce van Kuik
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Haiko J. Bloemendal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine/Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Menno A. Brink
- Department of Gastroenterology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - Thijs P. Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | | | - Miangela M. Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leon M. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Joost Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wilhelmina M.U. van Grevenstein
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jeanine M. L. Roodhart
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G. Elias
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes, ; Onno Kranenburg,
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes, ; Onno Kranenburg,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nass KJ, van der Schaar PJ, van der Vlugt M, Ledeboer M, van Esch AAJ, van der Beek S, Lacle MM, van Leerdam ME, Ouwendijk RJT, Spaander MCW, Wouters MWJM, Fockens P, Dekker E. Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry. Endoscopy 2022; 54:488-495. [PMID: 34293811 DOI: 10.1055/a-1556-5914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To optimize colonoscopy quality, several performance measures have been developed. These are usually assessed without distinction between the indications for colonoscopy. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of linking two national registries (one for colonoscopy and one for adverse events of gastrointestinal endoscopies in the Netherlands), and to describe the results of colonoscopy quality per indication. METHODS This retrospective study was conducted with prospectively collected data of the Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit (DGEA) and the Dutch Registration of Complications in Endoscopy (DRCE). Data between 01-01-2016 and 01-01-2019 were analyzed. To calculate adverse event rates, data were linked at the level of endoscopy service. RESULTS During the 3-year study period, 266 981 colonoscopies were recorded in DGEA. Of all indications, cecal intubation rate was highest in fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive screening colonoscopies (97.1 %), followed by surveillance (93.2 %), diagnostic (90.7 %), and therapeutic colonoscopies (83.1 %). The highest rate of adequate bowel preparation was observed in FIT-positive screening colonoscopies (97.1 %). A total of 1540 colonoscopy-related adverse events occurred (0.58 % of all colonoscopies). Bleeding and perforation and rates were highest for therapeutic (1.56 % and 0.51 %, respectively) and FIT-positive screening (0.72 % and 0.06 %, respectively) colonoscopies. The colonoscopy-related mortality was 0.006 %. CONCLUSION This study describes the first results of the Dutch national colonoscopy registry, which was successfully linked to data from the national registry for adverse events of gastrointestinal endoscopies. In this large dataset, performance varied between indications. Our results emphasize the importance of defining benchmarks per indication in future guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlijn J Nass
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter J van der Schaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Manon van der Vlugt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Ledeboer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Aura A J van Esch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Sander van der Beek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rivierenland Hospital, Tiel, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rob J T Ouwendijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Goes/Vlissingen, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dang H, van Pelt GW, Haasnoot KJC, Backes Y, Elias SG, Seerden TCJ, Schwartz MP, Spanier BWM, de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Bergeijk JD, Kessels K, Geesing JMJ, Groen JN, ter Borg F, Wolfhagen FHJ, Seldenrijk CA, Raicu MG, Milne AN, van Lent AUG, Brosens LAA, Johan A. Offerhaus G, Siersema PD, Tollenaar RAEM, Hardwick JCH, Hawinkels LJAC, Moons LMG, Lacle MM, Mesker WE, Boonstra JJ. Tumour-stroma ratio has poor prognostic value in non-pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer: A multi-centre case-cohort study. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 9:2050640620975324. [PMID: 33210982 PMCID: PMC8259249 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620975324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current risk stratification models for early invasive (T1) colorectal cancer are not able to discriminate accurately between prognostic favourable and unfavourable tumours, resulting in over-treatment of a large (>80%) proportion of T1 colorectal cancer patients. The tumour-stroma ratio (TSR), which is a measure for the relative amount of desmoplastic tumour stroma, is reported to be a strong independent prognostic factor in advanced-stage colorectal cancer, with a high stromal content being associated with worse prognosis and survival. We aimed to investigate whether the TSR predicts clinical outcome in patients with non-pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer. METHODS Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tumour tissue slides from a retrospective multi-centre case cohort of patients with non-pedunculated surgically treated T1 colorectal cancer were assessed for TSR by two independent observers who were blinded for clinical outcomes. The primary end point was adverse outcome, which was defined as the presence of lymph node metastasis in the resection specimen or colorectal cancer recurrence during follow-up. RESULTS All 261 patients in the case cohort had H&E slides available for TSR scoring. Of these, 183 were scored as stroma-low, and 78 were scored as stroma-high. There was moderate inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.42). In total, 41 patients had lymph node metastasis, 17 patients had recurrent cancer and five had both. Stroma-high tumours were not associated with an increased risk for an adverse outcome (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.18; p = 0.163). CONCLUSIONS Our study emphasises that existing prognosticators may not be simply extrapolated to T1 colorectal cancers, even though their prognostic value has been widely validated in more advanced-stage tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Gabi W. van Pelt
- Department of SurgeryLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Krijn J. C. Haasnoot
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G. Elias
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary CareUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Tom C. J. Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAmphia HospitalBredaThe Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P. Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMeander Medical CentreAmersfoortThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Koen Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologySint Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | - Joost M. J. Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDiakonessenhuisUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - John N. Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologySint JansdalHarderwijkThe Netherlands
| | - Frank ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDeventer HospitalDeventerThe Netherlands
| | - Frank H. J. Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAlbert Schweitzer HospitalDordrechtThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Anya N. Milne
- Pathology DNASint Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | - Anja U. G. van Lent
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyOnze Lieve Vrouwe GasthuisAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A. A. Brosens
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - G. Johan A. Offerhaus
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Peter D. Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | - James C. H. Hardwick
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Lukas J. A. C. Hawinkels
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Leon M. G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Miangela M. Lacle
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Wilma E. Mesker
- Department of SurgeryLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J. Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stathonikos N, van Varsseveld NC, Vink A, van Dijk MR, Nguyen TQ, Leng WWJD, Lacle MM, Goldschmeding R, Vreuls CPH, van Diest PJ. Digital pathology in the time of corona. J Clin Pathol 2020; 73:706-712. [PMID: 32699117 PMCID: PMC7588598 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The 2020 COVID-19 crisis has had and will have many implications for healthcare, including pathology. Rising number of infections create staffing shortages and other hospital departments might require pathology employees to fill more urgent positions. Furthermore, lockdown measures and social distancing cause many people to work from home. During this crisis, it became clearer than ever what an asset digital diagnostics is to keep pathologists, residents, molecular biologists and pathology assistants engaged in the diagnostic process, allowing social distancing and a ‘need to be there’ on-the-premises policy, while working effectively from home. This paper provides an overview of our way of working during the 2020 COVID-19 crisis with emphasis on the virtues of digital pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Aryan Vink
- Pathology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke R van Dijk
- Pathology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tri Q Nguyen
- Pathology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy W J de Leng
- Pathology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Pathology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Goldschmeding
- Pathology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Celien P H Vreuls
- Pathology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Pathology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
de Neree Tot Babberich MPM, Ledeboer M, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, van Esch AAJ, Ouwendijk RJ, van der Schaar PJ, van der Beek S, Lacle MM, Seegers PA, Wouters MWJM, Fockens P, Dekker E. Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit: automated extraction of colonoscopy data for quality assessment and improvement. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:154-162.e1. [PMID: 32057727 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The importance of having quality assessment, assurance, and improvement tools in health care is increasingly recognized. However, the additional associated administration burden progressively interferes with the structural implementation and adoption of such tools, especially when it concerns high-volume procedures such as colonoscopies. The development of the Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit (DGEA), a registry with automated extraction of colonoscopy quality data, and its first results are described. METHODS In close cooperation with commercial endoscopy reporting systems and a national histopathology database, healthcare professionals performing colonoscopies initiated a quality registry that extracts data from its core hospital resource or histology database without manual interference of the healthcare providers. Data extracted consisted of patient age, gender, indication of the colonoscopy, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Boston Bowel Preparation Score, and cecal intubation; for the colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test in the colorectal cancer screening program, other data were polyp detection rate, which was available for all 48 hospitals or endoscopy centers, and adenoma detection rate, which was available for 26 hospitals or endoscopy centers. RESULTS Between January 1, 2016 and March 31, 2019, 48 hospitals or endoscopy centers voluntarily participated in the DGEA, and 275,017 unique patients with 313,511 colonoscopies were registered. Overall missing values were limited to <1%. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study demonstrate that it is feasible to deploy a quality registry collecting uniform data without additional administration burden for healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michiel Ledeboer
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aura A J van Esch
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Rob J Ouwendijk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, the Netherlands
| | - Peter J van der Schaar
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Sander van der Beek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rivierenland Hospital, Tiel, the Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoendervangers S, Burbach JPM, Lacle MM, Koopman M, van Grevenstein WMU, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM. Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4319-4336. [PMID: 32524461 PMCID: PMC7497700 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with better survival, less local recurrence, and less distant failure. Furthermore, pCR indicates that the rectum may have been preserved. This meta-analysis gives an overview of available neoadjuvant treatment strategies for LARC and analyzes how these perform in achieving pCR as compared with the standard of care. Methods Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central bibliographic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials in which patients received neoadjuvant treatment for MRI-staged nonmetastatic resectable LARC were included. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0N0. A meta-analysis of studies comparing an intervention with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (CRT) was performed. Results Of the 17 articles included in the systematic review, 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based CRT resulted in significantly more pCR compared with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT only (OR 1.46), but at the expense of more ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Other treatment strategies, including consolidation/induction chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), did not improve pCR rates. None of the included trials reported a benefit in local control or OS. Five-year DFS was significantly worse after SCRT-delay compared with CRT (59% vs. 75.1%, HR 1.93). Conclusions All included trials fail to deliver high-level evidence to show an improvement in pCR compared with standard fluoropyrimidine-based CRT. The addition of oxaliplatin might result in more pCR but at the expense of more toxicity. Furthermore, this benefit does not translate into less local recurrence or improved survival. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hoendervangers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - J P M Burbach
- Department of Surgery, MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - M M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Backes Y, Seerden TCJ, van Gestel RSFE, Kranenburg O, Ubink I, Schiffelers RM, van Straten D, van der Capellen MS, van de Weerd S, de Leng WWJ, Siersema PD, Offerhaus GJA, Morsink FH, Ramphal W, Terhaar Sive Droste J, van Lent AUG, Geesing JMJ, Vleggaar FP, Elias SG, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. Tumor Seeding During Colonoscopy as a Possible Cause for Metachronous Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:1222-1232.e4. [PMID: 31419435 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In patients who have undergone surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC), 3% have recurrence of (metachronous) CRC. We investigated whether tumor seeding during colonoscopy (iatrogenic implantation of tumor cells in damaged mucosa) increases risk for metachronous CRC. METHODS In a proof of principle study, we collected data from the Dutch National Pathology Registry for patients with a diagnosis of CRC from 2013 through 2015, with a second diagnosis of CRC within 6 months to 3.5 years after surgery. We reviewed pathology reports to identify likely metachronous CRC (histologically proven adenocarcinoma located elsewhere in the colon or rectum from the surgical anastomosis). For 22 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, we ascribed the most likely etiology to tumor seeding when endoscopic manipulations, such as biopsies or polypectomy, occurred at the location where the metachronous tumor was subsequently detected, after endoscopic manipulation of the primary tumor. We collected clinical data from patients and compared molecular profiles of the primary and metachronous colorectal tumors using next-generation sequencing. We then examined the source of seeded tumor. We tested whether tumor cells stay behind in the working channel of the endoscope after biopsies of colorectal tumors, and whether these cells maintain viability in organoid cultures. RESULTS In total, tumor seeding was suspected as the most likely etiology of metachronous CRC in 5 patients. Tumor tissues were available from 3 patients. An identical molecular signature was observed in the primary and metachronous colorectal tumors from all 3 patients. In 5 control cases with a different etiology of metachronous CRC, the molecular signature of the primary and metachronous tumor were completely different. Based on review of 2147 patient records, we estimated the risk of tumor seeding during colonoscopy to be 0.3%-0.6%. We demonstrated that the working channel of the colonoscope becomes contaminated with viable tumor cells during biopsy collection. Subsequent instruments introduced through this working channel also became contaminated. These cells were shown to maintain their proliferative potential. CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of primary and secondary tumors from patients with metachronous CRC, we found that primary tumor cells might be seeded in a new location after biopsy of the primary tumor. Although our study does not eliminate other possibilities of transmission, our findings and experiments support the hypothesis that tumor seeding can occur during colonoscopy via the working channel of the endoscope. The possibility of iatrogenic seeding seems low. However, our findings compel awareness on this potentially preventable cause of metachronous CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Rosanne S F E van Gestel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Ubink
- Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond M Schiffelers
- Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Demian van Straten
- Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Malu S van der Capellen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Simone van de Weerd
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy W J de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert H Morsink
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Winesh Ramphal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anja U G van Lent
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Moelans CB, de Ligt J, van der Groep P, Prins P, Besselink NJM, Hoogstraat M, Ter Hoeve ND, Lacle MM, Kornegoor R, van der Pol CC, de Leng WWJ, Barbé E, van der Vegt B, Martens J, Bult P, Smit VTHBM, Koudijs MJ, Nijman IJ, Voest EE, Selenica P, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS, van der Wall E, Cuppen E, van Diest PJ. The molecular genetic make-up of male breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2019; 26:779-794. [PMID: 31340200 PMCID: PMC6938562 DOI: 10.1530/erc-19-0278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Male breast cancer (MBC) is extremely rare and accounts for less than 1% of all breast malignancies. Therefore, clinical management of MBC is currently guided by research on the disease in females. In this study, DNA obtained from 45 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) MBCs with and 90 MBCs (52 FFPE and 38 fresh-frozen) without matched normal tissues was subjected to massively parallel sequencing targeting all exons of 1943 cancer-related genes. The landscape of mutations and copy number alterations was compared to that of publicly available estrogen receptor (ER)-positive female breast cancers (smFBCs) and correlated to prognosis. From the 135 MBCs, 90% showed ductal histology, 96% were ER-positive, 66% were progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, and 2% HER2-positive, resulting in 50, 46 and 4% luminal A-like, luminal B-like and basal-like cases, respectively. Five patients had Klinefelter syndrome (4%) and 11% of patients harbored pathogenic BRCA2 germline mutations. The genomic landscape of MBC to some extent recapitulated that of smFBC, with recurrent PIK3CA (36%) and GATA3 (15%) somatic mutations, and with 40% of the most frequently amplified genes overlapping between both sexes. TP53 (3%) somatic mutations were significantly less frequent in MBC compared to smFBC, whereas somatic mutations in genes regulating chromatin function and homologous recombination deficiency-related signatures were more prevalent. MDM2 amplifications were frequent (13%), correlated with protein overexpression (P = 0.001) and predicted poor outcome (P = 0.007). In conclusion, despite similarities in the genomic landscape between MBC and smFBC, MBC is a molecularly unique and heterogeneous disease requiring its own clinical trials and treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy B Moelans
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joep de Ligt
- Department of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Petra van der Groep
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pjotr Prins
- Department of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolle J M Besselink
- Department of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlous Hoogstraat
- Department of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Natalie D Ter Hoeve
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Kornegoor
- Department of Pathology, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Appeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen C van der Pol
- Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy W J de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ellis Barbé
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert van der Vegt
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - John Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Bult
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marco J Koudijs
- Department of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isaac J Nijman
- Department of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Cuppen
- Department of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Cancer Genomics.nl, Center for Molecular Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Berendse K, Koot BGP, Klouwer FCC, Engelen M, Roels F, Lacle MM, Nikkels PGJ, Verheij J, Poll-The BT. Hepatic symptoms and histology in 13 patients with a Zellweger spectrum disorder. J Inherit Metab Dis 2019; 42:955-965. [PMID: 31150129 DOI: 10.1002/jimd.12132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 05/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Patients with a Zellweger spectrum disorder (ZSD) have a defect in the assembly or maintenance of peroxisomes, leading to a multisystem disease with variable outcome. Liver disease is an important feature in patients with severe and milder phenotypes and a frequent cause of death. However, the course and histology of liver disease in ZSD patients are ill-defined. We reviewed the hepatic symptoms and histological findings of 13 patients with a ZSD in which one or several liver biopsies have been performed (patient age 0.2-39 years). All patients had at least some histological liver abnormalities, ranging from minor fibrosis to cirrhosis. Five patients demonstrated significant disease progression with liver failure and early death. In others, liver-related symptoms were absent, although some still silently developed cirrhosis. Patients with peroxisomal mosaicism had a better prognosis. In addition, we show that patients are at risk to develop a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as one patient developed a HCC at the age of 36 years and one patient a precancerous lesion at the age of 18 years. Thus, regular examination to detect fibrosis or cirrhosis should be included in the standard care of ZSD patients. In case of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis expert consultation and HCC screening should be initiated. This study further delineates the spectrum and significance of liver involvement in ZSDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Berendse
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Amsterdam UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart G P Koot
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke C C Klouwer
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Amsterdam UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Engelen
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Amsterdam UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Roels
- Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter G J Nikkels
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Backes Y, Schwartz MP, Ter Borg F, Wolfhagen FHJ, Groen JN, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Bergeijk J, Geesing JMJ, Spanier BWM, Didden P, Vleggaar FP, Lacle MM, Elias SG, Moons LMG. Multicentre prospective evaluation of real-time optical diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer in large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps using narrow band imaging (the OPTICAL study). Gut 2019; 68:271-279. [PMID: 29298873 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Revised: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the preresection accuracy of optical diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) in large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). DESIGN In this multicentre prospective study, endoscopists predicted the histology during colonoscopy in consecutive patients with LNPCPs using a standardised procedure for optical assessment. The presence of morphological features assessed with white light, and vascular and surface pattern with narrow-band imaging (NBI) were recorded, together with the optical diagnosis, the confidence level of prediction and the recommended treatment. A risk score chart was developed and validated using a multivariable mixed effects binary logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection (LASSO) model. RESULTS Among 343 LNPCPs, 47 cancers were found (36 T1 CRCs and 11 ≥T2 CRCs), of which 11 T1 CRCs were superficial invasive T1 CRCs (23.4% of all malignant polyps). Sensitivity and specificity for optical diagnosis of T1 CRC were 78.7% (95% CI 64.3 to 89.3) and 94.2% (95% CI 90.9 to 96.6), and 63.3% (95% CI 43.9 to 80.1) and 99.0% (95% CI 97.1 to 100.0) for optical diagnosis of endoscopically unresectable lesions (ie, ≥T1 CRC with deep invasion), respectively. A LASSO-derived model using white light and NBI features discriminated T1 CRCs from non-invasive polyps with a cross-validation area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.90). This model was validated in a temporal validation set of 100 LNPCPs (AUC of 0.81; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.96). CONCLUSION Our study provides insights in the preresection accuracy of optical diagnosis of T1 CRC. Sensitivity is still limited, so further studies will show how the risk score chart could be improved and finally used for clinical decision making with regard to the type of endoresection to be used and whether to proceed to surgery instead of endoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR5561.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Backes Y, Elias SG, Groen JN, Schwartz MP, Wolfhagen FHJ, Geesing JMJ, Ter Borg F, van Bergeijk J, Spanier BWM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Kessels K, Seldenrijk CA, Raicu MG, Drillenburg P, Milne AN, Kerkhof M, Seerden TCJ, Siersema PD, Vleggaar FP, Offerhaus GJA, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. Histologic Factors Associated With Need for Surgery in Patients With Pedunculated T1 Colorectal Carcinomas. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:1647-1659. [PMID: 29366842 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Revised: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Most patients with pedunculated T1 colorectal tumors referred for surgery are not found to have lymph node metastases, and were therefore unnecessarily placed at risk for surgery-associated complications. We aimed to identify histologic factors associated with need for surgery in patients with pedunculated T1 colorectal tumors. METHODS We performed a cohort-nested matched case-control study of 708 patients diagnosed with pedunculated T1 colorectal tumors at 13 hospitals in The Netherlands, from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2014, followed for a median of 44 months (interquartile range, 20-80 months). We identified 37 patients (5.2%) who required surgery (due to lymph node, intramural, or distant metastases). These patients were matched with patients with pedunculated T1 colorectal tumors without a need for surgery (no metastases, controls, n = 111). Blinded pathologists analyzed specimens from each tumor, stained with H&E. We evaluated associations between histologic factors and patient need for surgery using univariable conditional logistic regression analysis. We used multivariable least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO; an online version of the LASSO model is available at: http://t1crc.com/calculator/) regression to develop models for identification of patients with tumors requiring surgery, and tested the accuracy of our model by projecting our case-control data toward the entire cohort (708 patients). We compared our model with previously developed strategies to identify high-risk tumors: conventional model 1 (based on poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, or Haggitt level 4) and conventional model 2 (based on poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, Haggitt level 4, or tumor budding). RESULTS We identified 5 histologic factors that differentiated cases from controls: lymphovascular invasion, Haggitt level 4 invasion, muscularis mucosae type B (incompletely or completely disrupted), poorly differentiated clusters and tumor budding, which identified patients who required surgery with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.90). When we used a clinically plausible predicted probability threshold of ≥4.0%, 67.5% (478 of 708) of patients were predicted to not need surgery. This threshold identified patients who required surgery with 83.8% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 68.0%-93.8%) and 70.3% specificity (95% confidence interval, 60.9%-78.6%). Conventional models 1 and 2 identified patients who required surgery with lower AUC values (AUC, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74; P = .002 and AUC, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.58-0.70; P < .001, respectively) than our LASSO model. When we applied our LASSO model with a predicted probability threshold of ≥4.0%, the percentage of missed cases (tumors mistakenly assigned as low risk) was comparable (6 of 478 [1.3%]) to that of conventional model 1 (4 of 307 [1.3%]) and conventional model 2 (3 of 244 [1.2%]). However, the percentage of patients referred for surgery based on our LASSO model was much lower (32.5%, n = 230) than that for conventional model 1 (56.6%, n = 401) or conventional model 2 (65.5%, n = 464). CONCLUSIONS In a cohort-nested matched case-control study of 708 patients with pedunculated T1 colorectal carcinomas, we developed a model based on histologic features of tumors that identifies patients who require surgery (due to high risk of metastasis) with greater accuracy than previous models. Our model might be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal, Harderwijk, the Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koen Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flevo Hospital, Almere, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mihaela G Raicu
- Pathology DNA, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Anya N Milne
- Department of Pathology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marjon Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Overwater A, Kessels K, Elias SG, Backes Y, Spanier BWM, Seerden TCJ, Pullens HJM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van den Blink A, Offerhaus GJA, van Bergeijk J, Kerkhof M, Geesing JMJ, Groen JN, van Lelyveld N, Ter Borg F, Wolfhagen F, Siersema PD, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. Endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 colorectal carcinoma prior to surgical resection has no adverse effect on long-term outcomes. Gut 2018; 67:284-290. [PMID: 27811313 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2015] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is difficult to predict the presence of histological risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) before endoscopic treatment of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, endoscopic therapy is propagated to obtain adequate histological staging. We examined whether secondary surgery following endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 CRC does not have a negative effect on patients' outcomes compared with primary surgery. DESIGN Patients with T1 CRC with one or more histological risk factors for LNM (high risk) and treated with primary or secondary surgery between 2000 and 2014 in 13 hospitals were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Additional data were collected from hospital records, endoscopy, radiology and pathology reports. A propensity score analysis was performed using inverse probability weighting (IPW) to correct for confounding by indication. RESULTS 602 patients were eligible for analysis (263 primary; 339 secondary surgery). Overall, 34 recurrences were observed (5.6%). After adjusting with IPW, no differences were observed between primary and secondary surgery for the presence of LNM (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.93; p=0.940) and recurrence during follow-up (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.41 to 2.34; p=0.954). Further adjusting for lymphovascular invasion, depth of invasion and number of retrieved lymph nodes did not alter this outcome. CONCLUSIONS Our data do not support an increased risk of LNM or recurrence after secondary surgery compared with primary surgery. Therefore, an attempt for an en-bloc resection of a possible T1 CRC without evident signs of deep invasion seems justified in order to prevent surgery of low-risk T1 CRC in a significant proportion of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Overwater
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - K Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Flevohospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Y Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - T C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - H J M Pullens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - A van den Blink
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G J A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - M Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - J M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, St. Jansdal Harderwijk, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - N van Lelyveld
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - F Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - F Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M M Lacle
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - L M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Backes Y, Kappelle WFW, Berk L, Koch AD, Groen JN, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Schwartz MP, Kerkhof M, Siersema PD, Schröder R, Tan TG, Lacle MM, Vleggaar FP, Moons LMG. Colorectal endoscopic full-thickness resection using a novel, flat-base over-the-scope clip: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2017; 49:1092-1097. [PMID: 28753696 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-114730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Background and study aims We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new, flat-based over-the-scope clip (Padlock Clip) for colorectal endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR). Patients and methods We prospectively included 26 patients with lesions < 20 mm. Indications for eFTR were re-resection of the scar of a low risk malignant polyp (n = 11), recurrent adenoma in a non-lifting scar (n = 10), non-lifting polyp (n = 4), and an adenoma located in a diverticulum (n = 1). Results Technical success rate and full-thickness resection rate were 100 % (26/26) and 92 % (24/26), respectively. Median procedure time was 43 minutes (IQR 27 - 56). No complications occurred during the procedure; 3 complications (12 %) occurred within 48 hours, of which one was a perforation requiring laparoscopic suturing. Specimen volumes from eFTR of scar tissue where the original polyp had been ≥ 20 mm (n = 13) were smaller compared with those from non-scar resections or scars where the original polyps had been < 20 mm (n = 13) (median 0.8 vs. 1.5 cm3, P = 0.03). Conclusions In this first series of colorectal eFTR using the Padlock Clip, feasibility was demonstrated. It was relatively safe in view of surgery as the alternative treatment, but could still benefit from technical refinement. Future studies should explore for which indication this technique is most suitable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NTR5562 (Dutch Trial Register).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter F W Kappelle
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk Berk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Fransciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Jansdal, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | | | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Schröder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - T G Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Center de Veluwe, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Backes Y, Elias SG, Bhoelan BS, Groen JN, van Bergeijk J, Seerden TCJ, Pullens HJM, Spanier BWM, Geesing JMJ, Kessels K, Kerkhof M, Siersema PD, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Lelyveld N, Wolfhagen FHJ, Ter Borg F, Offerhaus GJA, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. The prognostic value of lymph node yield in the earliest stage of colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. BMC Med 2017; 15:129. [PMID: 28705200 PMCID: PMC5512847 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0892-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) the number of surgically retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) is associated with prognosis, resulting in a minimum of 10-12 retrieved LNs being recommended for this stage. Current guidelines do not provide a recommendation regarding LN yield in T1 CRC. Studies evaluating LN yield in T1 CRC suggest that such high LN yields are not feasible in this early stage, and a lower LN yield might be appropriate. We aimed to validate the cut-off of 10 retrieved LNs on risk for recurrent cancer and detection of LN metastasis (LNM) in T1 CRC, and explored whether this number is feasible in clinical practice. METHODS Patients diagnosed with T1 CRC and treated with surgical resection between 2000 and 2014 in thirteen participating hospitals were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Medical records were reviewed to collect additional information. The association between LN yield and recurrence and LNM respectively were analyzed using 10 LNs as cut-off. Propensity score analysis using inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed to adjust for clinical and histological confounding factors (i.e., age, sex, tumor location, size and morphology, presence of LNM, lymphovascular invasion, depth of submucosal invasion, and grade of differentiation). RESULTS In total, 1017 patients with a median follow-up time of 49.0 months (IQR 19.6-81.5) were included. Four-hundred five patients (39.8%) had a LN yield ≥ 10. Forty-one patients (4.0%) developed recurrence. LN yield ≥ 10 was independently associated with a decreased risk for recurrence (IPW-adjusted HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.67; P = 0.009). LNM were detected in 84 patients (8.3%). LN yield ≥ 10 was independently associated with increased detection of LNM (IPW-adjusted OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.39-3.69; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective observational study, retrieving < 10 LNs was associated with an increased risk of CRC recurrence, advocating the importance to perform an appropriate oncologic resection of the draining LNs and diligent LN search when patients with T1 CRC at high-risk for LNM are referred for surgical resection. Given that both gastroenterologists, surgeons and pathologists will encounter T1 CRCs with increasing frequency due to the introduction of national screening programs, awareness on the consequences of an inadequate LN retrieval is of utmost importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bibie S Bhoelan
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrikus J M Pullens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Niels van Lelyveld
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Backes Y, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Bergeijk J, Ter Borg F, Schwartz MP, Spanier BWM, Geesing JMJ, Kessels K, Kerkhof M, Groen JN, Wolfhagen FHJ, Seerden TCJ, van Lelyveld N, Offerhaus GJA, Siersema PD, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. Risk for Incomplete Resection after Macroscopic Radical Endoscopic Resection of T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112:785-796. [PMID: 28323275 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The decision to perform secondary surgery after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) depends on the risk of lymph node metastasis and the risk of incomplete resection. We aimed to examine the incidence and risk factors for incomplete endoscopic resection of T1 CRC after a macroscopic radical endoscopic resection. METHODS Data from patients treated between 2000 and 2014 with macroscopic complete endoscopic resection of T1 CRC were collected from 13 hospitals. Incomplete resection was defined as local recurrence at the polypectomy site during follow-up or malignant tissue in the surgically resected specimen in case secondary surgery was performed. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to analyze factors associated with incomplete resection. RESULTS In total, 877 patients with a median follow-up time of 36.5 months (interquartile range 16.0-68.3) were included, in whom secondary surgery was performed in 358 patients (40.8%). Incomplete resection was observed in 30 patients (3.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-4.6%). Incomplete resection rate was 0.7% (95% CI 0-2.1%) in low-risk T1 CRC vs. 4.4% (95% CI 2.7-6.5%) in high-risk T1 CRC (P=0.04). Overall adverse outcome rate (incomplete resection or metastasis) was 2.1% (95% CI 0-5.0%) in low-risk T1 CRC vs. 11.7% (95% CI 8.8-14.6%) in high-risk T1 CRC (P=0.001). Piecemeal resection (adjusted odds ratio 2.60; 95% CI 1.20-5.61, P=0.02) and non-pedunculated morphology (adjusted odds ratio 2.18; 95% CI 1.01-4.70, P=0.05) were independent risk factors for incomplete resection. Among patients in whom no additional surgery was performed, who developed recurrent cancer, 41.7% (95% CI 20.8-62.5%) died as a result of recurrent cancer. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of histological high-risk factors, a 'wait-and-see' policy with limited follow-up is justified. Piecemeal resection and non-pedunculated morphology are independent risk factors for incomplete endoscopic resection of T1 CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - J van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - F Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - M P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - B W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - J M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - K Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - M Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - J N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - F H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - N van Lelyveld
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - G J A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Backes Y, Moons LM, Novelli MR, van Bergeijk JD, Groen JN, Seerden TC, Schwartz MP, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Spanier BW, Geesing JM, Kessels K, Kerkhof M, Siersema PD, Offerhaus GJA, Milne AN, Lacle MM. Diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer in pedunculated polyps in daily clinical practice: a multicenter study. Mod Pathol 2017; 30:104-112. [PMID: 27713422 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Revised: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
T1 colorectal cancer can be mimicked by pseudo-invasion in pedunculated polyps. British guidelines are currently one of the few which recommend diagnostic confirmation of T1 colorectal cancer by a second pathologist. The aim of this study was to provide insights into the accuracy of histological diagnosis of pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer in daily clinical practice. A sample of 128 cases diagnosed as pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer between 2000 and 2014 from 10 Dutch hospitals was selected for histological review. Firstly, two Dutch expert gastrointestinal pathologists reviewed all hematoxylin-eosin stained slides. In 20 cases the diagnosis T1 colorectal cancer was not confirmed (20/128; 16%). The discordant cases were subsequently discussed with a third Dutch gastrointestinal pathologist and a consensus diagnosis was agreed. The revised diagnoses were pseudo-invasion in 10 cases (10/128; 8%), high-grade dysplasia in 4 cases (4/128; 3%), and equivocal in 6 cases (6/128; 5%). To further validate the consensus diagnosis, the discordant cases were reviewed by an independent expert pathologist from the United Kingdom. A total of 39 cases were reviewed blindly including the 20 cases with a revised diagnosis and 19 control cases where the Dutch expert panel agreed with the original reporting pathologists diagnosis. In 19 of the 20 cases with a revised diagnosis the British pathologist agreed that T1 colorectal cancer could not be confirmed. Additionally, amongst the 19 control cases the British pathologist was unable to confirm T1 colorectal cancer in a further 4 cases and was equivocal in 3 cases. In conclusion, both generalist and expert pathologists experience diagnostic difficulty distinguishing pseudo-invasion and high-grade dysplasia from T1 colorectal cancer. In order to prevent overtreatment, review of the histology of pedunculated T1 colorectal cancers by a second pathologist should be considered with discussion of these cases at a multidisciplinary meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon Mg Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marco R Novelli
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Jansdal, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Cj Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joost Mj Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anya N Milne
- Department of Pathology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van der Pol CC, Lacle MM, Witkamp AJ, Kornegoor R, Miao H, Bouchardy C, Borel Rinkes I, van der Wall E, Verkooijen HM, van Diest PJ. Prognostic models in male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 160:339-346. [PMID: 27671991 PMCID: PMC5065611 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3991-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2016] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer in men is uncommon; it accounts for 1 % of all patients with primary breast cancer. Its treatment is mostly extrapolated from its female counterpart. Accurate predictions are essential for adjuvant systemic treatment decision-making and informing patients. Several predictive models are available for female breast cancer (FBC) including the Morphometric Prognostic Index (MPI), Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), Adjuvant! Online and Predict. The aim of this study was to examine and compare the prognostic performance of these models for male breast cancer (MBC). METHODS The population of this study consists of 166 MBC patients. The prognostic scores of the patients are categorized by good, (moderate) and poor, defined by the test itself (MPI and NPI) or based on tertiles (Adjuvant! Online and Predict). Survival according to prognostic score was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis and differences were tested by logRank. The prognostic performances were evaluated with C-statistics. Calibration was done with the aim to estimate to what extent the survival rates predicted by Predict were similar to the observed survival rates. RESULTS All prediction models were capable of discriminating between good, moderate and poor survivors. P-values were highly significant. Comparison between the models using C-statistics (n = 88) showed equal performance of MPI (0.67), NPI (0.68), Adjuvant! Online (0.69) and Predict (0.69). Calibration of Predict showed overestimation for MBC patients. CONCLUSION In conclusion, MPI, NPI, Adjuvant! and Predict prognostic models, originally developed and validated for FBC patients, also perform quite well for MBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen C van der Pol
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Kornegoor
- Department of Pathology, Gelre Ziekenhuis, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Hui Miao
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christine Bouchardy
- Geneva Cancer Registry, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Inne Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Goey KK, Elias SG, van Tinteren H, Lacle MM, Willems SM, de Leng WW, Strengman E, Vreuls C, Creemers GJ, Van Der Velden A, Punt CJA, Koopman M. Predictive value of KRAS mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with capecitabine and bevacizumab (CAP-B) maintenance treatment vs observation in the phase III CAIRO3 study. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.3525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn K.H. Goey
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G. Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Harm van Tinteren
- Department of Statistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Miangela M. Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Stefan M. Willems
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wendy W.J. de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Eric Strengman
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Celien Vreuls
- Department of Pathology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis J. A. Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Biesma HD, Schouten PC, Lacle MM, Sanders J, Brugman W, Kerkhoven R, Mandjes I, van der Groep P, van Diest PJ, Linn SC. Copy number profiling by array comparative genomic hybridization identifies frequently occurring BRCA2-like male breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2015; 54:734-44. [DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2015] [Accepted: 06/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hedde D. Biesma
- Department of Molecular Pathology; Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Philip C. Schouten
- Department of Molecular Pathology; Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M. Lacle
- Department of Pathology; University Medical Center Utrecht; The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology; Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Wim Brugman
- Genomics Core Facility, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Ron Kerkhoven
- Genomics Core Facility, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Mandjes
- Data Center, Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul J. van Diest
- Department of Pathology; University Medical Center Utrecht; The Netherlands
| | - Sabine C. Linn
- Department of Molecular Pathology; Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology; University Medical Center Utrecht; The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology; Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Haverkamp L, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, Gisbertz SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Wijnhoven BPL, van Lanschot JJB, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Stoot JHMB, Hulsewé KWE, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, Rütter JE, Kouwenhoven EA, van Det MJ, van der Peet DL, Daams F, Draaisma WA, Broeders IAMJ, van Stel HF, Lacle MM, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a multicenter prospectively randomized controlled trial (LOGICA-trial). BMC Cancer 2015. [PMID: 26219670 PMCID: PMC4518687 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1551-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background For gastric cancer patients, surgical resection with en-bloc lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of curative treatment. Open gastrectomy has long been the preferred surgical approach worldwide. However, this procedure is associated with considerable morbidity. Several meta-analyses have shown an advantage in short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy compared to open procedures, with similar oncologic outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether the results of these Asian studies can be extrapolated to the Western population. In this trial from the Netherlands, patients with resectable gastric cancer will be randomized to laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. Methods The study is a non-blinded, multicenter, prospectively randomized controlled superiority trial. Patients (≥18 years) with histologically proven, surgically resectable (cT1-4a, N0-3b, M0) gastric adenocarcinoma and European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 are eligible to participate in the study after obtaining informed consent. Patients (n = 210) will be included in one of the ten participating Dutch centers and are randomized to either laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. The primary outcome is postoperative hospital stay (days). Secondary outcome parameters include postoperative morbidity and mortality, oncologic outcomes, readmissions, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Discussion In this randomized controlled trial laparoscopic and open gastrectomy are compared in patients with resectable gastric cancer. It is expected that laparoscopic gastrectomy will result in a faster recovery of the patient and a shorter hospital stay. Secondly, it is expected that laparoscopic gastrectomy will be associated with a lower postoperative morbidity, less readmissions, higher cost-effectiveness, better postoperative quality of life, but with similar mortality and oncologic outcomes, compared to open gastrectomy. The study started on 1 December 2014. Inclusion and follow-up will take 3 and 5 years respectively. Short-term results will be analyzed and published after discharge of the last randomized patient. Trial registration NCT02248519
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Haverkamp
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Hylke J F Brenkman
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Maarten F J Seesing
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Misha D P Luyer
- Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Erasmus Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jan J B van Lanschot
- Erasmus Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wobbe O de Steur
- Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
| | - Karel W E Hulsewé
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Jeroen E Rütter
- Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815AD , Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Ewout A Kouwenhoven
- ZGT Hospitals, location Almelo, Zilvermeeuw 1, 7609 PP, Almelo, The Netherlands.
| | - Marc J van Det
- ZGT Hospitals, location Almelo, Zilvermeeuw 1, 7609 PP, Almelo, The Netherlands.
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Freek Daams
- VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Werner A Draaisma
- Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| | - Ivo A M J Broeders
- Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| | - Henk F van Stel
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
vanderPol CC, Lacle MM, Witkamp AJ, Kornegoor R, Hui M, Bouchardy C, vanderWall E, Verkooijen HM, vanDiest PJ. Abstract P4-11-36: Prognostic models in male breast cancer. Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-p4-11-36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease and its treatment is largely extrapolated from its female counterpart.
Accurate prognostication is essential for advising on adjuvant systemic treatment and informing patients. Several predictive models are available for female breast cancer (FBC) including, subsequently, the Morphometric Prognostic Index (MPI), Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), Adjuvant! and Predict. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the prognostic performance of these models in a group of 166 early MBC patients.
The MPI describes a "good"- (MPI<0,60) and a "poor" prognostic group (MPI>=0,60) by using a formula with mitotic activity index, tumour size and lymph node status. The NPI is calculated by a formula including size, number of lymph nodes with metastases and tumour grade and divides patients into three groups; "good-" (NPI <= 3,4), "intermediate-" (3,4<NPI>=5,4) and "poor" prognosis (NPI>5,4). For the programs Adjuvant!Online and Predict, similar groups with "good"-, "intermediate"- and "poor" prognosis were defined by using tertiles. The prognostic performance of each test was studied by using the logrank-test and comparison between the models was done by using C-statistics.
The mean age was 66,4 years old and the median survival was 4,6 years with a mean of 5,8 years overall survival.
Survival of the highest predicted group was higher (MPI: 87%, NPI: 90%, Adjuvant!Online: 91% and Predict: 88%) than for the moderate groups (NPI: 76%, Adjuvant!Online: 77% and Predict: 75%) and lowest for the poor predicted groups (MPI: 51%, NPI: 43%, Adjuvant!Online: 45% and Predict: 42%), with p-values that were highly statistically significant.
In terms of discrimination, all models were moderately able to discriminate between good and poor survivors (C-statistics; MPI; 0,674, NPI; 0,678, Adjuvant!Online; 0,717 and Predict; 0,711).
In conclusion, the MPI, NPI, Adjuvant! and Predict, prognostic models that were originally developed and validated for FBC, perform fairly well for MBC. These models may therefore help in MBC prognostication and decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy.
Citation Format: Carmen C vanderPol, Miangela M Lacle, Arjen J Witkamp, Robert Kornegoor, Miao Hui, Christine Bouchardy, Elsken vanderWall, Helena M Verkooijen, Paul J vanDiest. Prognostic models in male breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-36.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Miao Hui
- 3Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lacle MM, Moelans CB, Kornegoor R, van der Pol C, Witkamp AJ, van der Wall E, Rueschoff J, Buerger H, van Diest PJ. Chromosome 17 copy number changes in male breast cancer. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2015; 38:237-45. [PMID: 25906114 PMCID: PMC4445249 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-015-0227-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overall, HER2-amplified female breast cancer (FBC) is associated with a high grade, an aggressive phenotype and a poor prognosis. In male breast cancer (MBC) amplification of HER2, located on chromosome 17, occurs at a lower frequency than in FBC, where it is part of complex rearrangements. So far, only few studies have addressed the occurrence of chromosome 17 alterations in small MBC cohorts. METHODS Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to detect and characterize copy number changes on chromosome 17 in a cohort of 139 MBC. The results obtained were compared to those in FBC, and were correlated with clinicopathological features and patient outcome data. RESULTS We observed a lower frequency of chromosome 17 copy number changes with less complex rearrangement patterns in MBC compared to FBC. Chromosome 17 changes in MBC included gains of 17q and losses of 17p. Whole chromosome 17 polyploidies were not encountered. Two recurrent chromosome 17 amplicons were detected: on 17q12 (encompassing the NEUROD2, HER2, GRB7 and IKZF3 gens) and on 17q23.1 (encompassing the MIR21 and RPS6KB1 genes). Whole arm copy number gains of 17q were associated with decreased 5 year survival rates (p = 0.010). Amplification of HER2 was associated with a high tumor grade, but did not predict patient survival. Although copy number gains of HER2 and NEUROD2 were associated with a high tumor grade, a high mitotic count and a decreased 5 year survival rate (p = 0.015), only tumor size and NEUROD2 copy number gains emerged as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS In MBC chromosome 17 shows less complex rearrangements and fewer copy number changes compared to FBC. Frequent gains of 17q, encompassing two distinct amplicons, and losses of 17p were observed, but no whole chromosome 17 polyploidies. Only NEUROD2 gains seem to have an independent prognostic impact. These results suggest different roles of chromosome 17 aberrations in male versus female breast carcinogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miangela M. Lacle
- />Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy B. Moelans
- />Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Kornegoor
- />Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen van der Pol
- />Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen J. Witkamp
- />Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- />Department of Division of Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Horst Buerger
- />Institute of Pathology Paderborn/Höxter and Brustzentrum, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Paul J. van Diest
- />Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lacle MM, van Diest PJ, Goldschmeding R, van der Wall E, Nguyen TQ. Expression of connective tissue growth factor in male breast cancer: clinicopathologic correlations and prognostic value. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0118957. [PMID: 25738829 PMCID: PMC4349856 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2014] [Accepted: 01/26/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) is a member of the CCN family of secreted proteins that are believed to play an important role in the development of neoplasia. In particular, CTGF has been reported to play an important role in mammary tumorigenesis and to have prognostic value in female breast cancer (FBC). The aim of the present study was to investigate clinicopathologic correlations and prognostic value of CTGF in male breast cancer (MBC) and to compare these findings with FBC. For this, we studied CTGF protein expression by immunohistochemistry in 109 MBC cases and 75 FBC cases. In MBC, stromal CTGF expression was seen in the majority of the cases 78% (85/109) with high expression in 31/109 cases (28.4%), but expression in tumor cells was only seen in 9.2% (10/109) of cases. High stromal CTGF expression correlated with high grade and high proliferation index (>15%) assessed by MIB-1 immunohistochemical staining. CTGF expression in tumor epithelial cells did not correlate with any of the clinicopathologic features. In FBC, stromal CTGF expression positively correlated with mitotic count and tumor CTGF expression was associated with triple negative status of the tumor (p = 0.002). Neither stromal nor tumor epithelial cell CTGF expression had prognostic value in MBC and FBC. In conclusion, stromal CTGF expression was seen in a high percentage of MBC and was correlated with high grade and high proliferation index. In view of the important role of the microenvironment in cancer progression, this might suggest that stromal CTGF could be an interesting target for novel therapies and molecular imaging. However, the lack of association with prognosis warrants caution. The potential role of CTGF as a therapeutic target for triple negative FBC deserves to be further studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miangela M. Lacle
- Departments of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J. van Diest
- Departments of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Roel Goldschmeding
- Departments of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tri Q. Nguyen
- Departments of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lacle MM, van der Pol C, Witkamp A, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ. Prognostic value of mitotic index and Bcl2 expression in male breast cancer. PLoS One 2013; 8:e60138. [PMID: 23573235 PMCID: PMC3613416 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2012] [Accepted: 02/21/2013] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of male breast cancer (MBC) is rising. Current treatment regimens for MBC are extrapolated from female breast cancer (FBC), based on the assumption that FBC prognostic features and therapeutic targets can be extrapolated to MBC. However, there is yet little evidence that prognostic features that have been developed and established in FBC are applicable to MBC as well. In a recent study on FBC, a combination of mitotic index and Bcl2 expression proved to be of strong prognostic value. Previous papers on Bcl2 expression in MBC were equivocal, and the prognostic value of Bcl2 combined with mitotic index has not been studied in MBC. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the prognostic value of Bcl2 in combination with mitotic index in MBC. Immunohistochemical staining for Bcl2 was performed on tissue microarrays of a total of 151 male breast cancer cases. Mitotic index was scored. The prognostic value of Bcl2 expression and Bcl2/mitotic index combinations was evaluated studying their correlations with clinicopathologic features and their prediction of survival. The vast majority of MBC (94%) showed Bcl2 expression, more frequently than previously described for FBC. Bcl2 expression had no significant associations with clinicopathologic features such as tumor size, mitotic count and grade. In univariate survival analysis, Bcl2 had no prognostic value, and showed no additional prognostic value to tumor size and histological grade in Cox regression. In addition, the Bcl2/mitotic index combination as opposed to FBC did not predict survival in MBC. In conclusion, Bcl2 expression is common in MBC, but is not associated with major clinicopathologic features and, in contrast to FBC, does not seem to have prognostic value, also when combined with mitotic index.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Breast Neoplasms, Male/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms, Male/mortality
- Breast Neoplasms, Male/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/secondary
- Humans
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate
- Lymphatic Metastasis
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Mitotic Index
- Prognosis
- Proportional Hazards Models
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/metabolism
- Tissue Array Analysis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miangela M. Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen van der Pol
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J. van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|