866 A Lateral Approach Is More Likely to Be Successful Than A Posterior Approach for An Injection to Reach the Subacromial Space

Background

Subacromial injections are common for diagnosis and therapy of shoulder impingement secondary to subacromial bursitis. We evaluated the likelihood of a successful subacromial injection from both the posterior and lateral injection sites.

Method

We reviewed 100 MRI scans of the shoulder and recorded measurements in both the sagittal (representative of posterior injection) and coronal (representative of lateral injection) orientations. We compared these to the lengths of standard needles.

Multiple measurements were taken:

Results

Measuring along the angle of the acromion demonstrated shorter mean distances from the lateral injection site. The distance from skin to mid-point of the acromion) provided mean values of 51.4mm for posterior and 40.1mm for lateral. A standard 40mm (green) needle would reach the midpoint of the acromion in 58% of lateral measurements and 23% from posterior.

Conclusions

Injections are more likely to enter the subacromial space from a lateral rather than a posterior entry point.

Opt-out screening strategy for HIV infection among patients attending emergency departments: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

International health agencies have promoted nontargeted universal (opt-out) HIV screening tests in different settings, including emergency departments (EDs). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the testing uptake of strategies (opt-in targeted, opt-in nontargeted and opt-out) to detect new cases of HIV infection in EDs.

METHODS

We searched the Pubmed and Embase databases, from 1984 to April 2015, for opt-in and opt-out HIV diagnostic strategies used in EDs. Randomized controlled or quasi experimental studies were included. We assessed the percentage of positive individuals tested for HIV infection in each programme (opt-in and opt-out strategies). The mean percentage was estimated by combining studies in a random-effect meta-analysis. The percentages of individuals tested in the programmes were compared in a random-effect meta-regression model. Data were analysed using stata version 12. Quality assessments were performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Of the 90 papers identified, 28 were eligible for inclusion. Eight trials used opt-out, 18 trials used opt-in, and two trials used both to detect new cases of HIV infection. The test was accepted and taken by 75 155 of 172 237 patients (44%) in the opt-out strategy, and 73 581 of 382 992 patients (19%) in the opt-in strategy. The prevalence of HIV infection detected by the opt-out strategy was 0.40% (373 cases), that detected by the opt-in nontargeted strategy was 0.52% (419 cases), and that detected by the opt-in targeted strategy was 1.06% (52 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, the testing uptake of the opt-out strategy was not different from that of the opt-in strategy to detect new cases of HIV infection in EDs.