Unmet needs and barriers in venous thromboembolism education and awareness among people living with cancer: A global survey

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major preventable cause of morbidity, disability, and mortality in subjects with cancer. A global appraisal of cancer-associated VTE education and awareness is not available.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate VTE-related education, awareness, and unmet needs from the perspective of people living with cancer using a quantitative and qualitative approach.

PATIENTS/METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from an online-based survey covering multidimensional domains of cancer-associated VTE. Data are presented descriptively. Potential differences across participant subgroups were explored.

RESULTS

Among 2262 patients with cancer from 42 countries worldwide, 55.3% received no VTE education throughout their cancer journey, and an additional 8.2% at the time of VTE diagnosis only, leading to 63.5% receiving none or inappropriately delayed education. When education was delivered, only 67.8% received instructions to seek medical attention in case of VTE suspicion, and 36.9% reported scarce understanding. One third of participants (32.4%) felt psychologically distressed when becoming aware of the potential risks and implications connected with cancer-associated VTE. Most responders (78.8%) deemed VTE awareness highly relevant, but almost half expressed concerns on the quality of education received. While overall consistent, findings in selected survey domains appeared to numerically differ across age groups, ethnicity, continent of residence, educational level, metastatic status, and VTE history.

CONCLUSIONS

This study involving a large and diverse population of individuals living with cancer identifies important unmet needs in VTE-related education, awareness, and support across healthcare systems globally. These findings unveil multilevel opportunities to expedite patient-centered care in cancer-associated VTE prevention and management.

IL-1 blockade in cardiovascular disease: an appraisal of the evidence across different inflammatory paradigms

Pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest a role for inflammation in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular (CV) diseases. The NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome is activated during tissue injury and releases interleukin-1β (IL-1β). We describe three paradigms in which the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β contribute to CV diseases. During acute myocardial infarction (AMI), necrotic cell debris, including IL-1α, induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation and further damage the myocardium contributing to heart failure (HF) (acute injury paradigm). In chronic HF, IL-1β is induced by persistent myocardial overload and injury, neurohumoral activation and systemic comorbidities favoring infiltration and activation of immune cells into the myocardium, microvascular inflammation, and a pro-fibrotic response (chronic inflammation paradigm). In recurrent pericarditis, an autoinflammatory response triggered by cell injury and maintained by the NLRP3 inflammasome/IL-1β axis is present (autoinflammatory disease paradigm). Anakinra, recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist, inhibits the acute inflammatory response in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and acute HF. Canakinumab, IL-1β antibody, blunts systemic inflammation and prevents complications of atherosclerosis in stable patients with prior AMI. In chronic HF, anakinra reduces systemic inflammation and improves cardiorespiratory fitness. In recurrent pericarditis, anakinra and rilonacept, a soluble IL-1 receptor chimeric fusion protein blocking IL-1α and IL-1β, treat and prevent acute flares. In conclusion, the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1 contribute to the pathophysiology of CV diseases, and IL-1 blockade is beneficial with different roles in the acute injury, chronic inflammation and autoinflammatory disease paradigms. Further research is needed to guide the optimal use of IL-1 blockers in clinical practice.

NLRP3 inflammasome and interleukin-1 contributions to COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and immunothrombosis

Immunothrombosis-immune-mediated activation of coagulation-is protective against pathogens, but excessive immunothrombosis can result in pathological thrombosis and multiorgan damage, as in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The NACHT-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome produces major proinflammatory cytokines of the interleukin (IL)-1 family, IL-1β and IL-18, and induces pyroptotic cell death. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway also promotes immunothrombotic programs including release of neutrophil extracellular traps and tissue factor by leukocytes, and prothrombotic responses by platelets and the vascular endothelium. NLRP3 inflammasome activation occurs in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. In preclinical models, NLRP3 inflammasome pathway blockade restrains COVID-19-like hyperinflammation and pathology. Anakinra, recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist, showed safety and efficacy and is approved for the treatment of hypoxaemic COVID-19 patients with early signs of hyperinflammation. The non-selective NLRP3 inhibitor colchicine reduced hospitalization and death in a subgroup of COVID-19 outpatients but is not approved for the treatment of COVID-19. Additional COVID-19 trials testing NLRP3 inflammasome pathway blockers are inconclusive or ongoing. We herein outline the contribution of immunothrombosis to COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, and review preclinical and clinical evidence suggesting an engagement of the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway in the immunothrombotic pathogenesis of COVID-19. We also summarize current efforts to target the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway in COVID-19, and discuss challenges, unmet gaps, and the therapeutic potential that inflammasome-targeted strategies may provide for inflammation-driven thrombotic disorders including COVID-19.

Inflammasome Signaling, Thromboinflammation, and Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major health burden despite anticoagulation advances, suggesting incomplete management of pathogenic mechanisms. The NLRP3 (NACHT-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome, interleukin (IL)-1, and pyroptosis are emerging contributors to the inflammatory pathogenesis of VTE. Inflammasome pathway activation occurs in patients with VTE. In preclinical models, inflammasome signaling blockade reduces venous thrombogenesis and vascular injury, suggesting that this therapeutic approach may potentially maximize anticoagulation benefits, protecting from VTE occurrence, recurrence, and ensuing post-thrombotic syndrome. The nonselective NLRP3 inhibitor colchicine and the anti-IL-1β agent canakinumab reduce atherothrombosis without increasing bleeding. Rosuvastatin reduces primary venous thrombotic events at least in part through lipid-lowering independent mechanisms, paving the way to targeted anti-inflammatory strategies in VTE. This review outlines recent preclinical and clinical evidence supporting a role for inflammasome pathway activation in venous thrombosis, and discusses the, yet unexplored, therapeutic potential of modulating inflammasome signaling to prevent and manage VTE.

How to treat isolated distal deep vein thrombosis

Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is a frequent manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE), accounting for up to 50% cases of lower‑extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). As compared with proximal DVT, IDDVT is more frequently associated with transient risk factors and less often occurs unprovoked or in the presence of permanent risk factors. IDDVT generally carries a significantly lower risk of proximal extension, post‑thrombotic syndrome, and recurrence than proximal DVT. Nevertheless, some patient subgroups, such as those with active cancer, other predisposing permanent risk factors, prior VTE, unprovoked IDDVT, persistently restricted mobility, and trifurcation or bilateral involvement, exhibit a non‑negligible recurrence risk. Unlike in proximal DVT, the optimal therapeutic management of IDDVT remains uncertain. In clinical practice, the vast majority of IDDVT patients are managed with anticoagulation rather than with surveillance serial compression ultrasonography, which tends to be reserved to individuals at a high bleeding risk. Available data seem to favor anticoagulant therapy over no anticoagulation, thanks to a significant reduction in the risk for proximal extension and recurrence, without increased bleeding risk. Recent results of the RIDTS (Rivaroxaban for the Treatment of Symptomatic Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis) randomized clinical trial with rivaroxaban further support the use of anticoagulant therapy for 3 months over shorter durations (eg, ≤6 weeks). In this review, we offer an updated overview of the epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical course of IDDVT, with a focus on the therapeutic management in light of current guideline recommendations and most recent evidence. We also present real‑life clinical cases of IDDVT with proposed therapeutic approaches, and highlight major challenges and gaps in this field.

Anamnestic frailty phenotype and adverse outcomes in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: Validation and comparative performance with frailty phenotype

AIMS

The anamnestic frailty phenotype (AFP) is a quick, instrument-free tool derived from frailty phenotype (FP). We prospectively evaluated the discriminative capacity and prognostic value of AFP in ambulatory patients receiving DOACs for atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE), and compared AFP performance with that of FP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), were estimated for bleeding, thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated in frail versus non-frail patients. Of 236 patients (median age 78 years), 98 (42%) and 89 (38%) were classified as frail according to FP and AFP, respectively (Kappa= 0.76). Frailty, as assessed by AFP, was associated with higher risk of bleeding (RR 2.3; 95%CI, 1.2 to 4.6), and mortality (RR 4.4; 95%CI, 1.3 to 19.7). Similarly, to FP, AFP exhibited modest sensitivity and specificity, but high NPV that was 91% (95%CI, 85 to 95) for bleeding, 98% (95%CI, 94 to 100) for thromboembolism, and 98% (95%CI, 94 to 100) for mortality.

CONCLUSION

Among patients receiving DOACs for AF or VTE, AFP was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. AFP exhibited modest sensitivity and specificity, but excellent NPV. If confirmed, these findings suggest that AFP may represent a rapid, easy-to-use and unexpensive tool that may potentially help identify patients at lower risk for adverse outcomes and tailor anticoagulation management.

Venous thromboembolism secondary to hospitalization for COVID-19: patient management and long-term outcomes

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a complication of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. Little information is available on long-term outcomes of VTE in this population.

Objectives

We aimed to compare the characteristics, management strategies, and long-term clinical outcomes between patients with COVID-19-associated VTE and patients with VTE provoked by hospitalization for other acute medical illnesses.

Methods

This is an observational cohort study, with a prospective cohort of 278 patients with COVID-19-associated VTE enrolled between 2020 and 2021 and a comparison cohort of 300 patients without COVID-19 enrolled in the ongoing START2-Register between 2018 and 2020. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, other indications to anticoagulant treatment, active cancer, recent (<3 months) major surgery, trauma, pregnancy, and participation in interventional studies. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months after treatment discontinuation. Primary end point was the occurrence of venous and arterial thrombotic events.

Results

Patients with VTE secondary to COVID-19 had more frequent pulmonary embolism without deep vein thrombosis than controls (83.1% vs 46.2%, P <.001), lower prevalence of chronic inflammatory disease (1.4% and 16.3%, P <.001), and history of VTE (5.0% and 19.0%, P <.001). The median duration of anticoagulant treatment (194 and 225 days, P = 0.9) and the proportion of patients who discontinued anticoagulation (78.0% and 75.0%, P = 0.4) were similar between the 2 groups. Thrombotic event rates after discontinuation were 1.5 and 2.6 per 100 patient-years, respectively (P = 0.4).

Conclusion

The risk of recurrent thrombotic events in patients with COVID-19-associated VTE is low and similar to the risk observed in patients with VTE secondary to hospitalization for other medical diseases.

Apixaban thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer and obesity: Insights from the AVERT trial

BACKGROUND

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients is uncertain. It is unclear if body mass index (BMI) affects the safety and efficacy of DOACs for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer. We sought to determine the outcomes associated with the use of apixaban for the primary prevention of cancer-associated VTE according to BMI.

METHODS

The randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled AVERT trial evaluated apixaban thromboprophylaxis in intermediate-to-high risk ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. For this post-hoc analysis, the primary efficacy and safety outcomes were objectively confirmed VTE and clinically relevant bleeding (major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding), respectively. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m².

RESULTS

Among 574 patients randomized, 217 (37.8 %) patients had BMI ≥30 kg/m². Obese patients were overall younger, more likely to be female, had higher creatinine clearance and hemoglobin, lower platelet count, and better ECOG performance status. Compared to placebo, apixaban thromboprophylaxis was associated with reduced VTE in both obese (hazard ratio [HR] 0.26; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.46; p < 0.0001) and non-obese (HR 0.54; 95%CI, 0.29-1.00; p = 0.049) patients. The HR for clinically relevant bleeding (apixaban vs. placebo) was numerically higher in obese (2.09; 95%CI, 0.96-4.51; p = 0.062) than non-obese subjects (1.23; 95%CI, 0.71-2.13; p = 0.46), but overall in line with the risks observed in the general trial population.

CONCLUSIONS

In the AVERT trial enrolling ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, we found no substantial differences in the efficacy or safety of apixaban thromboprophylaxis across obese and non-obese subjects.

Age- versus clinical pretest probability-adjusted D-dimer to rule out lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis in ambulatory patients with active cancer

BACKGROUND

In patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), D-dimer thresholds adjusted to age or clinical pretest probability (CPTP) increase the proportion of patients in whom DVT can be safely excluded compared to a standard approach using a fixed D-dimer threshold. Performance of these diagnostic strategies among cancer patients is uncertain.

AIM

To compare the performance of age- and CPTP-adjusted D-dimer approaches among cancer outpatients with clinically suspected DVT, and derive a cancer-specific CPTP rule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive ambulatory patients with active cancer and clinically suspected DVT of the lower extremity underwent CPTP assessment using the Wells rule, D-dimer testing, and whole-leg compression ultrasonography. Patients with normal ultrasonography were followed-up for 3 months for the occurrence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Upon referral, DVT was diagnosed in 48 of 239 (20.1 %) patients. The age-adjusted approach showed higher specificity and efficiency than the standard approach. Compared to the standard and age-adjusted strategies, the CPTP-adjusted approach had 35 % and 21 % higher specificity, and 34 % and 21 % higher efficiency, respectively. Failure rate, sensitivity, and predictive values were similar across strategies. A simplified CPTP score derived from the Wells rule reduced unnecessary imaging with similar accuracy and efficiency, but higher failure rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective cohort of ambulatory cancer patients with clinically suspected DVT, the CPTP-adjusted D-dimer approach held the highest specificity and efficiency, potentially safely reducing unnecessary ultrasonography examinations compared to other approaches. Additional studies are warranted to evaluate the use of a simplified clinical prediction rule in this setting.

Use of placebo in clinical trials in COVID-19 pandemic times: considerations on pros, cons, challenges and limitations

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed tremendous strain on health systems throughout the world. This has led to many clinical trials being launched in order to try to find ways to combat the disease. The unprecedented nature of the pandemic has been reflected in the methods used in some of these trials. Placebo-controlled randomized trials are considered the gold-standard, however, there are inherent challenges in the use of placebo, especially during COVID-19. We herein review the pros, cons, challenges and limitations of using placebo in clinical trials investigating treatments for COVID-19. We also discuss the importance of viewing research critically, examining the potential impact of placebo use or lack thereof, on blinding and possible biases. This becomes important as we assess the responses to the pandemic in preparation for a future pandemic. Although placebo-controlled clinical trials are the gold standard for clinical research, they may not be practically or ethically feasible during a pandemic. Choices accomplished to design many COVID-19 trials might reflect the unprecedently trying environment in which they were made. However, critical evaluation of the methodology and practice of scientific research remains a crucial part of the scientific process. Even when conducted as randomized double-blind studies, residual biases may exist and interfere with the study conduct and interpretation of the data. A critical review of all data remains essential to thoroughly assess the impact of a research study.

Awareness of venous thromboembolism among patients with cancer: Preliminary findings from a global initiative for World Thrombosis Day

BACKGROUND

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) has detrimental impact on patients' clinical outcomes and quality of life. Data on CAT education, communication, and awareness among the general cancer population are scanty.

METHODS

We present the preliminary results of an ongoing patient-centered survey including 27 items covering major spheres of CAT. The survey, available in 14 languages, was promoted and disseminated online through social networks, email newsletters, websites, and media.

RESULTS

As of September 20, 2022, 749 participants from 27 countries completed the survey. Overall, 61.8% (n = 460) of responders were not aware of their risk of CAT. Among those who received information on CAT, 26.2% (n = 56) were informed only at the time of CAT diagnosis. Over two thirds (69.1%, n = 501) of participants received no education on signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism (VTE); among those who were educated about the possible clinical manifestations, 58.9% (n = 119) were given instructions to seek consultation in case of VTE suspicion. Two hundred twenty-four respondents (30.9%) had a chance to discuss the potential use of primary thromboprophylaxis with health-care providers. Just over half (58.7%, n = 309) were unaware of the risks of bleeding associated with anticoagulation, despite being involved in anticoagulant-related discussions or exposed to anticoagulants. Most responders (85%, n = 612) valued receiving CAT education as highly relevant; however, 51.7% (n = 375) expressed concerns about insufficient time spent and clarity of education received.

CONCLUSIONS

This ongoing survey involving cancer patients with diverse ethnic, cultural, and geographical backgrounds highlights important patient knowledge gaps. These findings warrant urgent interventions to improve education and awareness, and reduce CAT burden.

Frailty phenotype as a predictor of bleeding and mortality in ambulatory patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Limited prospective data exist about the clinical relevance of frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether frailty phenotype identifies DOAC-treated patients at higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive, adult outpatients treated with DOACs for AF or VTE were prospectively enrolled. Patients were classified as frail, pre-frail, or non-frail according to frailty phenotype. Study outcomes were clinically relevant bleeding, including major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding, arterial and venous thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

236 patients (median age 78 years, 44% females) were included, of whom 156 (66%) had AF and 80 (34%) VTE. Ninety-eight (41%) patients were frail, 115 (49%) pre-frail, and 23 (10%) non-frail. Inappropriately high or low dose DOAC was used in 33% of frail and in 20% of non-frail or pre-frail patients. Over a median follow-up of 304 days, the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding, thromboembolism, and mortality were 20%, 4%, 9% in frail, and 10%, 3%, and 2% in pre-frail, respectively, while no study outcome occurred among non-frail patients. Risk ratios (95% confidence intervals) for these outcomes in frail versus pre-frail and non-frail patients were respectively 2.5 (1.8, 3.7), 1.9 (0.9, 4.0), and 6.3 (2.9, 13.6).

CONCLUSION

In a prospective cohort of ambulatory patients receiving DOAC treatment for AF or VTE, frailty phenotype identified patients at higher risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality. Frailty assessment could be valuable to guide targeted interventions potentially improving patient prognosis.

Interleukin-1 and the NLRP3 inflammasome in COVID-19: Pathogenetic and therapeutic implications

A hyperinflammatory response during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection crucially worsens clinical evolution of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) triggers the activation of the NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome. Enhanced inflammasome activity has been associated with increased disease severity and poor prognosis. Evidence suggests that inflammasome activation and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) release aggravate pulmonary injury and induce hypercoagulability, favoring progression to respiratory failure and widespread thrombosis eventually leading to multiorgan failure and death. Observational studies with the IL-1 blockers anakinra and canakinumab provided promising results. In the SAVE-MORE trial, early treatment with anakinra significantly shortened hospital stay and improved survival in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. In this review, we summarize current evidence supporting the pathogenetic role of the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β in COVID-19, and discuss clinical trials testing IL-1 inhibition in COVID-19.

Diabetes mellitus and heart failure: an update on pathophysiology and therapy

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is frequent among heart failure (HF) patients with a further projected increase in prevalence in next years. DM promotes the development of both HF with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) through different mechanisms. As the general prevalence of both DM and HF is growing worldwide, it is important to define the pathophysiologic mechanisms driving the development of HF in DM patients. These include changes in the cardiac metabolism, mitochondrial dysfunction, impairment in insulin signaling, maladaptive inflammation, coronary microvascular dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy suppression, and structural changes, among the main ones. In recent years, novel glucose-lowering treatments, especially sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), have shown a strikingly positive impact on the natural history of HF. This has led to a progressive change in choosing SGLT-2is in DM patients at high risk for CV disease, supported by recent guidelines. The knowledge about novel pathophysiological mechanisms linking DM and HF may open the way to the development of new targeted therapies in the future. In this review, we will summarize general aspects dealing with incidence, prevalence, and pathophysiology of DM in HF patients. As well, we discuss the therapeutic targets to reduce the disease burden and the current evidence of glucose-lowering drugs in patients with DM and HF.

Extended venous thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) that may persist beyond the currently recommended period of 6 to 14 days of thromboprophylaxis. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of extended venous thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched up to December 2020 for randomized controlled trials comparing extended versus standard venous thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke. The efficacy outcome was a composite of asymptomatic or symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, and VTE-related death. The safety outcome was major bleeding. Summary risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials enrolling 33718 patients were included. Of 4330 (12.8%) patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke, 2152 (49.7%) received extended thromboprophylaxis for four to five weeks with betrixaban (n = 405, 18.8%), enoxaparin (n = 198, 9.2%), or rivaroxaban (n = 1549, 72.0%), and 2178 (50.3%) received standard venous thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin. VTE risk was lower in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving extended thromboprophylaxis (RR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.04; 13 fewer per 1000), whereas the increase in major bleeding seemed trivial when compared with standard prophylaxis (RR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.31 to 3.95; 1 more per 1000).

CONCLUSION

In patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke, the net clinical benefit may favor extended venous thromboprophylaxis for four to five weeks over standard thromboprophylaxis.

Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome in cardiovascular diseases

The NACHT, leucine-rich repeat (LRR), and pyrin domain (PYD)-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is an intracellular sensing protein complex that plays a major role in innate immunity. Following tissue injury, activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome results in cytokine production, primarily interleukin(IL)-1β and IL-18, and, eventually, inflammatory cell death - pyroptosis. While a balanced inflammatory response favors damage resolution and tissue healing, excessive NLRP3 activation causes detrimental effects. A key involvement of the NLRP3 inflammasome has been reported across a wide range of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Several pharmacological agents selectively targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome system have been developed and tested in animals and early phase human studies with overall promising results. While the NLRP3 inhibitors are in clinical development, multiple randomized trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of IL-1 blockade in atherothrombosis, heart failure and recurrent pericarditis. Furthermore, the non-selective NLRP3 inhibitor colchicine has been recently shown to significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary disease. In this review, we will outline the mechanisms driving NLRP3 assembly and activation, and discuss the pathogenetic role of the NLRP3 inflammasome in CVDs, providing an overview of the current and future therapeutic approaches targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome.

Direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels in hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not recommended in COVID-19 patients receiving dexamethasone because of potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions affecting anticoagulant concentration and activity. To evaluate short- and long-term pharmacokinetic interactions, serial through and peak DOAC plasma levels were prospectively measured during and after dexamethasone therapy, as well as during the acute phase and after recovery from COVID-19 in hospitalized, non-critically ill patients undergoing treatment with DOACs. Thirty-three (18 males, mean age 79 years) consecutive patients received DOACs (17 apixaban, 12 rivaroxaban, 4 edoxaban) for atrial fibrillation (n = 22), venous thromboembolism (n = 10), and acute myocardial infarction (n = 1). Twenty-six patients also received dexamethasone at a dose of 6 mg once daily for a median of 14 days. Trough DOAC levels on dexamethasone were within and below expected reference ranges respectively in 87.5 and 8.3% of patients, with no statistically significant differences at 48–72 h and 14–21 days after dexamethasone discontinuation. Peak DOAC levels on dexamethasone were within expected reference ranges in 58.3% of patients, and below ranges in 33.3%, of whom over two thirds had low values also off dexamethasone. No significant differences in DOAC levels were found during hospitalization and after resolution of COVID-19. Overall, 28 patients were discharged alive, and none experienced thrombotic or bleeding events. In this study, dexamethasone administration or acute COVID-19 seemed not to affect DOAC levels in hospitalized, non-critically ill COVID-19 patients.

The role of IL-6 and IL-6 blockade in COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces a dysregulated hyperinflammatory response.

AREAS COVERED

Authors review evidence on IL-6 and IL-6 blockade in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and discuss the pathophysiological and prognostic roles of this cytokine and the clinical impact of pharmacological blockade of IL-6 . The material includes original articles and reviews published from March 2020 to March 2021 and searched on PubMed, medRxiv, and bioRxiv.

EXPERT OPINION

IL-6 is one of the most prominent pro-inflammatory cytokines. Increased levels are recorded in COVID-19 patients, especially those with severe-to-critical disease. Evidence is accumulating on the relevance of IL-6 as a prognostic marker in COVID-19. Since IL-6 is a druggable target for several inflammatory diseases, pharmacological blockers of the IL-6 signaling pathway were repurposed to blunt the abnormal SARS-CoV-2-induced cytokine release. Data are limited to few randomized controlled trials that reported encouraging, though not conclusive, results, indicating the usefulness of IL-6 blockade early in the course of the disease in patients with hyperinflammation and no or limited organ damage. Further research is warranted to explore the role of IL-6 in different COVID-19 phenotypes and identify subgroups of patients who may mostly benefit from IL-6 pathway inhibition.

Management of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: an updated review of the literature

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) represents about 5-10% of all cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with a steadily increasing incidence mostly due to the high prevalence of cancer and frequent use of intravascular devices such as central venous catheters and pacemaker. In primary UEDVT, the venous outflow obstruction and subsequent thrombosis are related to congenital or acquired anatomical abnormalities, whereas secondary UEDVT is often associated with malignancy or indwelling lines. A considerable proportion of patients with UEDVT develops serious complications such as recurrent thrombosis, post-thrombotic syndrome, and pulmonary embolism, therefore timely diagnosis and adequate treatment are of crucial importance. Despite sharing many similarities with lower extremity DVT, UEDVT has distinctive features requiring specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The present review discusses the latest evidence on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of UEDVT, and provides management indications which may help guide clinical decision making.

Interleukin-6 receptor blockade with subcutaneous tocilizumab improves coagulation activity in patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Many COVID-19 patients develop a hyperinflammatory response which activates blood coagulation and may contribute to the occurrence of thromboembolic complications. Blockade of interleukin-6, a key cytokine in COVID-19 pathogenesis, may improve the hypercoagulable state induced by inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of subcutaneous tocilizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor on coagulation parameters.

METHODS

Hospitalized adult patients with laboratory-confirmed moderate to critical COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation, who received a single 324 mg subcutaneous dose of tocilizumab on top of standard of care were enrolled in this analysis. Coagulation parameters were measured before tocilizumab and at day 1, 3, and 7 after treatment. All patients were followed-up for 35 days after admission or until death.

RESULTS

70 patients (mean age 60 years, interquartile range 52-75) were included. Treatment with tocilizumab was associated with a reduction in D-dimer levels (-56%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -68% to -44%), fibrinogen (-48%; 95%CI, -60% to -35%), C-reactive protein (-93%; 95%CI, -99% to -87%), prothrombin time (-4%; 95%CI,-9% to 0.8%), and activated thromboplastin time (-4%; 95%CI,-8.7% to 0.8%), and an increase in platelet count (34%; 95%CI, 23% to 45%). These changes occurred already one day after treatment with sustained reductions throughout day 7. The improvement in coagulation was consistently observed in patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic dose anticoagulants, and was paralleled by a rapid improvement in respiratory function.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous tocilizumab was associated with significant improvement of blood coagulation parameters independently of thromboprophylaxis dose.

Low-dose subcutaneous tocilizumab to prevent disease progression in patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of low-dose tocilizumab (TCZ), to prevent disease progression, subcutaneously administered to patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation.

Methods

Clinical characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively analysed of patients – with laboratory-confirmed bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia, hyperinflammation (C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥20 mg/dL), no hypoxaemia (oxygen saturation >90%), and no contraindications to TCZ – who were treated with subcutaneous TCZ (324 mg) administered within 48 h from hospitalization on top of standard of care (SOC). They were compared with matched controls treated with SOC only before TCZ was available at the institution. Clinical data were available for all patients until death or until day 35 for those discharged from hospital.

Findings

Ten consecutive patients (six males, median age 55 years) treated with TCZ on top of SOC, and ten patients (six males, median age 56 years) treated with SOC only were included. TCZ was well-tolerated with no clinically relevant adverse events. TCZ was associated with a reduction in CRP at day 1 (–50%, IQR –28 to –80) and day 3 (–89%, IQR –79 to –96; p =  0.005 for within-group), whereas there was no significant change in CRP values in the SOC group (p <  0.001 for between-group comparisons at both time points). TCZ resulted in a parallel improvement in oxygenation, as assessed by the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F) ratio, which increased at day 1 (+11%, IQR +6 to +16; p =  0.005 for within-group and p =  0.006 for between-group comparisons), and day 3 (+23%, IQR +16 to +34; p =  0.005 for within-group and p = 0.003 for between-group comparisons). None of the TCZ-treated patients had disease progression, defined as requirement of oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation, whereas progression occurred in five (50%) patients among the SOC group.

Conclusions

Low-dose subcutaneous TCZ may be a safe and promising therapeutic option administered on top of SOC to prevent disease progression in hospitalised patients with moderate COVID-19 and hyperinflammation.

Acute complications and mortality in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of acute complications and mortality associated with COVID-19 remains poorly characterized. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to summarize the evidence on clinically relevant outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and medRxiv were searched up to April 20, 2020, for studies including hospitalized symptomatic adult patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The secondary outcomes included acute cardiac or kidney injury, shock, coagulopathy, and venous thromboembolism. The main analysis was based on data from peer-reviewed studies. Summary estimates and the corresponding 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were obtained through meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 44 peer-reviewed studies with 14,866 COVID-19 patients were included. In general, risk of bias was high. All-cause mortality was 10% overall (95% PI, 2 to 39%; 1687/14203 patients; 43 studies), 34% in patients admitted to intensive care units (95% PI, 8 to 76%; 659/2368 patients; 10 studies), 83% in patients requiring invasive ventilation (95% PI, 1 to 100%; 180/220 patients; 6 studies), and 75% in patients who developed ARDS (95% PI, 35 to 94%; 339/455 patients; 11 studies). On average, ARDS occurred in 14% of patients (95% PI, 2 to 59%; 999/6322 patients; 23 studies), acute cardiac injury in 15% (95% PI, 5 to 38%; 452/2389 patients; 10 studies), venous thromboembolism in 15% (95% PI, 0 to 100%; patients; 3 studies), acute kidney injury in 6% (95% PI, 1 to 41%; 318/4682 patients; 15 studies), coagulopathy in 6% (95% PI, 1 to 39%; 223/3370 patients; 9 studies), and shock in 3% (95% PI, 0 to 61%; 203/4309 patients; 13 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality was very high in critically ill patients based on very low-quality evidence due to striking heterogeneity and risk of bias. The incidence of clinically relevant outcomes was substantial, although reported by only one third of the studies suggesting considerable underreporting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration ID for this study is CRD42020177243 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=177243 ).

Effects of Obesity and Thrombophilia on the Risk of Abortion in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is associated with a higher risk of abortion in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Whether thrombophilia amplifies this risk is currently unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of thrombophilia on the risk of abortion in obese women treated with IVF.

METHODS

Patient characteristics, presence of inherited or acquired thrombophilia, and comorbidities were prospectively collected before the procedure in consecutive women undergoing IVF. The primary outcome was the incidence of abortion among women who achieved a clinical pregnancy.

RESULTS

A total of 633 non-obese and 49 obese Caucasian women undergoing IVF were included. 204 (32%) women achieved clinical pregnancy, of whom six had an ectopic pregnancy and 63 experienced an abortion. The incidence of abortion was higher in obese women compared to non-obese women after adjusting for age (64.3% vs. 29.3%, odds ratio [OR] 4.41; 95% CI 1.41 to 13.81). Women with one or more thrombophilia were at increased risk of abortion relative to those without thrombophilia (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.34 to 5.45), and the risk seemed to be higher with hereditary (OR 5.12; 95% CI 1.77 to 14.8) than acquired thrombophilia (OR 1.92; 95% CI 0.52 to 5.12; p for interaction 0.194). Among obese women, the presence of one or more thrombophilia seemed associated with a substantially increased risk of abortion (unadjusted OR 14.00; 95% CI 0.94 to 207.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Obese women undergoing IVF have a high risk of abortion which seems further amplified by the concomitant presence of thrombophilia.

Prevalence and Severity of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Among Caregivers of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Cirrhosis

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease, affecting nearly 1 in 3 Americans.¹ Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the clinically aggressive variant of NAFLD, has a propensity of fibrosis progression and increased risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. NASH-related cirrhosis is now the most rapidly growing indication for liver transplantation (LT).² Disease recurrence and progression to advanced fibrosis after LT are high³; however, the key contributors of these are unknown. We hypothesized that patients with NASH cirrhosis reside in a microenvironment conducive to not only development of NASH but also fibrosis progression, which likely persist after LT and contribute to disease recurrence. The hypothesis was tested by performing vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) in primary caregivers and cohabitants of patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting LT.

Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1 in Cardiac Inflammation and Infarct Healing

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) leads to myocardial cell death and ensuing sterile inflammatory response, which represents an attempt to clear cellular debris and promote cardiac repair. However, an overwhelming, unopposed or unresolved inflammatory response following AMI leads to further injury, worse remodeling and heart failure (HF). Additional therapies are therefore warranted to blunt the inflammatory response associated with ischemia and reperfusion and prevent long-term adverse events. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) is a ubiquitous endocytic cell surface receptor with the ability to recognize a wide range of structurally and functionally diverse ligands. LRP1 transduces multiple intracellular signal pathways regulating the inflammatory reaction, tissue remodeling and cell survival after organ injury. In preclinical studies, activation of LRP1-mediated signaling in the heart with non-selective and selective LRP1 agonists is linked with a powerful cardioprotective effect, reducing infarct size and cardiac dysfunction after AMI. The data from early phase clinical studies with plasma-derived α1-antitrypsin (AAT), an endogenous LRP1 agonist, and SP16 peptide, a synthetic LRP1 agonist, support the translational value of LRP1 as a novel therapeutic target in AMI. In this review, we will summarize the cellular and molecular bases of LRP1 functions in modulating the inflammatory reaction and the reparative process after injury in various peripheral tissues, and discuss recent evidences implicating LRP1 in myocardial inflammation and infarct healing.