1
|
Curigliano G, Dent R, Earle H, Modi S, Tarantino P, Viale G, Tolaney SM. Open questions, current challenges, and future perspectives in targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low breast cancer. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102989. [PMID: 38613914 PMCID: PMC11024577 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Approximately 60% of traditionally defined human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers express low levels of HER2 [HER2-low; defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH)-]. HER2-low breast cancers encompass a large percentage of both hormone receptor-positive (up to 85%) and triple-negative (up to 63%) breast cancers. The DESTINY-Breast04 trial established that HER2-low tumors are targetable, leading to the approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as the first HER2-directed therapy for the treatment of HER2-low breast cancer in the United States and Europe. This change in the clinical landscape results in a number of questions and challenges-including those related to HER2 assessment and patient identification-and highlights the need for careful assessment of HER2 expression to identify patients eligible for T-DXd. This review provides context for understanding how to identify patients with HER2-low breast cancer with respect to sample types, scoring and reporting HER2 status, and testing methods and assays. It also discusses management of important T-DXd-related adverse events. Available evidence supports the efficacy of T-DXd in patients with any history of IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH- scores; however, future research may further refine the population who could benefit from T-DXd or other HER2-directed therapies and identify novel methods for patient identification. Because HER2 expression can change with disease progression or treatment, and variability exists in scoring and interpretation of HER2 status, careful re-evaluation in certain scenarios may help to identify more patients who may benefit from T-DXd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - R Dent
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - H Earle
- Blogger at hannahincancerland.com, New Hampshire, USA; Patient at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - S Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - P Tarantino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - G Viale
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan
| | - S M Tolaney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saura C, Modi S, Krop I, Park YH, Kim SB, Tamura K, Iwata H, Tsurutani J, Sohn J, Mathias E, Liu Y, Cathcart J, Singh J, Yamashita T. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated survival results from a phase II trial (DESTINY-Breast01). Ann Oncol 2024; 35:302-307. [PMID: 38092229 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary analysis of the multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II DESTINY-Breast01 trial (median follow-up 11.1 months) demonstrated durable antitumor activity with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). We report updated cumulative survival outcomes with a median follow-up of 26.5 months (data cut-off 26 March 2021). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with HER2-positive mBC resistant or refractory to T-DM1 received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS The ORR by ICR was 62.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.5% to 69.0%] in patients who received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks (n = 184). Median OS was 29.1 months (95% CI 24.6-36.1 months). Median PFS and DoR were 19.4 months (95% CI 14.1-25.0 months) and 18.2 months (95% CI 15.0 months-not evaluable), respectively. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 183 patients (99.5%), and 99 patients (53.8%) had one or more grade ≥3 TEAEs. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis occurred in 15.8% of patients (n = 29), of which 2.7% (n = 5) were grade 5. CONCLUSIONS These updated results provide further evidence of sustained antitumor activity of T-DXd with a consistent safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive mBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Saura
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - S Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - I Krop
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA
| | | | - S-B Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - K Tamura
- Shimane University Hospital, Izumo
| | - H Iwata
- Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya
| | - J Tsurutani
- Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - J Sohn
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| | - E Mathias
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | - Y Liu
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | - J Cathcart
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | - J Singh
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Modi S, Feldman SS, Berner ES, Schooley B, Johnston A. Value of Electronic Health Records Measured Using Financial and Clinical Outcomes: Quantitative Study. JMIR Med Inform 2024; 12:e52524. [PMID: 38265848 PMCID: PMC10851116 DOI: 10.2196/52524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 was legislated to reduce health care costs, improve quality, and increase patient safety. Providers and organizations were incentivized to exhibit meaningful use of certified electronic health record (EHR) systems in order to achieve this objective. EHR adoption is an expensive investment, given the resources and capital that are invested. Due to the cost of the investment, a return on the EHR adoption investment is expected. OBJECTIVE This study performed a value analysis of EHRs. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between EHR adoption levels and financial and clinical outcomes by combining both financial and clinical outcomes into one conceptual model. METHODS We examined the multivariate relationships between different levels of EHR adoption and financial and clinical outcomes, along with the time variant control variables, using moderation analysis with a longitudinal fixed effects model. Since it is unknown as to when hospitals begin experiencing improvements in financial outcomes, additional analysis was conducted using a 1- or 2-year lag for profit margin ratios. RESULTS A total of 5768 hospital-year observations were analyzed over the course of 4 years. According to the results of the moderation analysis, as the readmission rate increases by 1 unit, the effect of a 1-unit increase in EHR adoption level on the operating margin decreases by 5.38%. Hospitals with higher readmission payment adjustment factors have lower penalties. CONCLUSIONS This study fills the gap in the literature by evaluating individual relationships between EHR adoption levels and financial and clinical outcomes, in addition to evaluating the relationship between EHR adoption level and financial outcomes, with clinical outcomes as moderators. This study provided statistically significant evidence (P<.05), indicating that there is a relationship between EHR adoption level and operating margins when this relationship is moderated by readmission rates, meaning hospitals that have adopted EHRs could see a reduction in their readmission rates and an increase in operating margins. This finding could further be supported by evaluating more recent data to analyze whether hospitals increasing their level of EHR adoption would decrease readmission rates, resulting in an increase in operating margins. Hospitals would incur lower penalties as a result of improved readmission rates, which would contribute toward improved operating margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shikha Modi
- The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, United States
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Sue S Feldman
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Eta S Berner
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | | | - Allen Johnston
- Department of Information Systems, Statistics, and Management Science, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patel S, Jenkins P, Zhong J, Liu W, Harborne K, Modi S, Joy C, Williams R, Haslam P. Better safe than so ray: national survey of radiation protection amongst interventional radiology trainees in the United Kingdom. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20230071. [PMID: 37493155 PMCID: PMC10461283 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish the provision and use of radiation personal protective equipment (PPE) and dosimetry amongst UK interventional radiology (IR) trainees and highlight areas of improvement in order to enhance the radiation safety. METHODS A survey questionnaire was designed by members of the British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR) trainee committee via survey monkey and distributed to UK IR trainees via the BSIR membership mailing list, local representatives and Twitter. The survey was open from 04/01/2021 to 20/02/2021. Only IR trainees in years ST4 and above were included. RESULTS Of the 73 respondents, 62 qualified for analysis. Respondents (81% male) spent a median of 5.5 sessions (half day list) per week in the angiography suite and 58% (n=36) had difficulty finding appropriately sized lead aprons at least once a week. Overall 53% (n=33) had concerns about their radiation PPE. Furthermore 56% of trainees (n=35) experienced back pain among other symptoms attributed to wearing the lead aprons available to them. 77% (n=48) regularly wore lead glasses. For trainees requiring prescription glasses (n=22) overfit goggles were provided however 17 (77%) of these trainees felt the goggles compromised their ability to perform the procedure. Eye and finger dosimeters were used by 50% and 52% of respondents respectively. Compliance with body dosimetry was 99%. CONCLUSION Provision of radiation PPE and dose monitoring for IR trainees is suboptimal, particularly access to adequate eye protection or suitably fitting leads. Based on the findings of this survey, recommendations have been made to promote the safety and radiation awareness of IR trainees. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Radiation protection practices for IR trainees nationally are poor. Provision of suitable eye protection and well fitting lead body protection is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - W Liu
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - K Harborne
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - C Joy
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - R Williams
- Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation, London, United Kingdom
| | - P Haslam
- Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tarantino P, Viale G, Press MF, Hu X, Penault-Llorca F, Bardia A, Batistatou A, Burstein HJ, Carey LA, Cortes J, Denkert C, Diéras V, Jacot W, Koutras AK, Lebeau A, Loibl S, Modi S, Mosele MF, Provenzano E, Pruneri G, Reis-Filho JS, Rojo F, Salgado R, Schmid P, Schnitt SJ, Tolaney SM, Trapani D, Vincent-Salomon A, Wolff AC, Pentheroudakis G, André F, Curigliano G. ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:645-659. [PMID: 37269905 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has recently emerged as a targetable subset of breast tumors, based on the evidence from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. This evolution has raised several biological and clinical questions, warranting the establishment of consensus to optimally treat patients with HER2-low breast tumors. Between 2022 and 2023, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process focused on HER2-low breast cancer. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of breast cancer from nine different countries. The aim of the consensus was to develop statements on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) biology of HER2-low breast cancer; (ii) pathologic diagnosis of HER2-low breast cancer; (iii) clinical management of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer; and (iv) clinical trial design for HER2-low breast cancer. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. A review of the relevant scientific literature was conducted in advance. Consensus statements were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This article presents the developed statements, including findings from the expert panel discussions, expert opinion, and a summary of evidence supporting each statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Tarantino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan
| | - G Viale
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M F Press
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - X Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Centre Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Bardia
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - A Batistatou
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - L A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - V Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes
| | - W Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - A K Koutras
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
| | - A Lebeau
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group/GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - S Modi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M F Mosele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - E Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust and NIH Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - G Pruneri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - J S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - F Rojo
- Department of Pathology, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital-CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Salgado
- Department of Pathology, ZAS, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P Schmid
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - S J Schnitt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - S M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Pathology, Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine Division, Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - A C Wolff
- The Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - F André
- INSERM U981 - Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, PRISM Center for Precision Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ali H, Fatemi Y, Hamasha M, Modi S. The Cost of Frontline Nursing: Investigating Perception of Compensation Inadequacy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Multidiscip Healthc 2023; 16:1311-1326. [PMID: 37193114 PMCID: PMC10183180 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s402761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Nursing professionals experienced greater levels of stress and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies examining stress and burnout have found a relationship between compensation and burnout. However, further studies are needed to examine the relationship between the mediating effects of supervisor and community support and coping strategies and the effects of burnout on compensation. Objective The purpose of this study is to build on previous burnout research by examining the mediation effects of supervisor and community support and coping strategies on the relationship between sources of stress and burnout on feelings of compensation inadequacy, or the desire for more compensation. Methods Using Qualtrics survey responses from 232 nurses, this study used correlation testing and mediation analyses of indirect, direct, and total effects to explore the relationships between critical factors influencing stress, burnout, nurses' use of coping skills, and the perception of supervisor and community support on perceived compensation inadequacy. Results This study found that the support domain has a significant and positive direct effect on compensation, with supervisor support increasing the desire for additional compensation. Support was also found to have a significant and positive indirect effect and a significant and positive total effect on the desire for additional compensation. This study's results also found that coping strategies had a significant, direct positive effect on the desire for additional compensation. While problem solving and avoidance increased the desire for additional compensation, transference had no significant relationship. Conclusion This study found evidence of the mediation effect of coping strategies on the relationship between burnout and compensation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haneen Ali
- Health Services Administration Program, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
- Correspondence: Haneen Ali, Health Services Administration Program, Auburn University, 351 W Thach Concourse, 7080 Haley Center, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA, Email
| | - Yasin Fatemi
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Mohammad Hamasha
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
| | - Shikha Modi
- Health Services Administration Program, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Korenblik R, van Zon JFJA, Olij B, Heil J, Dewulf MJL, Neumann UP, Olde Damink SWM, Binkert CA, Schadde E, van der Leij C, van Dam RM, van Baardewijk LJ, Barbier L, Binkert CA, Billingsley K, Björnsson B, Andorrà EC, Arslan B, Baclija I, Bemelmans MHA, Bent C, de Boer MT, Bokkers RPH, de Boo DW, Breen D, Breitenstein S, Bruners P, Cappelli A, Carling U, Robert MCI, Chan B, De Cobelli F, Choi J, Crawford M, Croagh D, van Dam RM, Deprez F, Detry O, Dewulf MJL, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Font JC, Davis R, Delle M, Fernando R, Fisher O, Fouraschen SMG, Fretland ÅA, Fundora Y, Gelabert A, Gerard L, Gobardhan P, Gómez F, Guiliante F, Grünberger T, Grochola LF, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess G, Hilal MA, Hoffmann M, Iezzi R, Imani F, Inmutto N, James S, Borobia FJG, Jovine E, Kalil J, Kingham P, Kollmar O, Kleeff J, van der Leij C, Lopez-Ben S, Macdonald A, Meijerink M, Korenblik R, Lapisatepun W, Leclercq WKG, Lindsay R, Lucidi V, Madoff DC, Martel G, Mehrzad H, Menon K, Metrakos P, Modi S, Moelker A, Montanari N, Moragues JS, Navinés-López J, Neumann UP, Nguyen J, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Olde Damink SWM, Qu X, Raptis DA, Ratti F, Ryan S, Ridouani F, Rinkes IHMB, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Serenari M, Salik A, Sallemi C, Sandström P, Martin ES, Sarría L, Schadde E, Serrablo A, Settmacher U, Smits J, Smits MLJ, Snitzbauer A, Soonawalla Z, Sparrelid E, Spuentrup E, Stavrou GA, Sutcliffe R, Tancredi I, Tasse JC, Teichgräber U, Udupa V, Valenti DA, Vass D, Vogl TJ, Wang X, White S, De Wispelaere JF, Wohlgemuth WA, Yu D, Zijlstra IJAJ. Resectability of bilobar liver tumours after simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization versus portal vein embolization alone: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6:6844022. [PMID: 36437731 PMCID: PMC9702575 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with bi-lobar liver tumours are not eligible for liver resection due to an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). To reduce the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure and the primary cause of death, regenerative procedures intent to increase the FLR before surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the available literature and outcomes on the effectiveness of simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization (PVE/HVE) versus portal vein embolization (PVE) alone. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to September 2022. The primary outcome was resectability and the secondary outcome was the FLR volume increase. RESULTS Eight studies comparing PVE/HVE with PVE and six retrospective PVE/HVE case series were included. Pooled resectability within the comparative studies was 75 per cent in the PVE group (n = 252) versus 87 per cent in the PVE/HVE group (n = 166, OR 1.92 (95% c.i., 1.13-3.25)) favouring PVE/HVE (P = 0.015). After PVE, FLR hypertrophy between 12 per cent and 48 per cent (after a median of 21-30 days) was observed, whereas growth between 36 per cent and 67 per cent was reported after PVE/HVE (after a median of 17-31 days). In the comparative studies, 90-day primary cause of death was similar between groups (2.5 per cent after PVE versus 2.2 per cent after PVE/HVE), but a higher 90-day primary cause of death was reported in single-arm PVE/HVE cohort studies (6.9 per cent, 12 of 175 patients). CONCLUSION Based on moderate/weak evidence, PVE/HVE seems to increase resectability of bi-lobar liver tumours with a comparable safety profile. Additionally, PVE/HVE resulted in faster and more pronounced hypertrophy compared with PVE alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remon Korenblik
- Correspondence to: R. K., Universiteigssingel 50 (room 5.452) 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: ); R. M. v. D., Maastricht UMC+, Dept. of Surgery, Level 4, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| | - Jasper F J A van Zon
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Olij
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,GROW—Department of Surgery, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jan Heil
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Maxime J L Dewulf
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany,NUTRIM—Department of Surgery, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christoph A Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Erik Schadde
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hirslanden Klink St. Anna Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
| | | | - Ronald M van Dam
- Correspondence to: R. K., Universiteigssingel 50 (room 5.452) 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: ); R. M. v. D., Maastricht UMC+, Dept. of Surgery, Level 4, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Modi S, Nguyen V, Al-Shaikhly T. A UNIQUE CASE OF ALLERGIC URTICARIA AND ANGIOEDEMA SECONDARY TO ICODEXTRIN. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.08.817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
9
|
Modi S, Feldman SS. The Value of Electronic Health Records Since the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act: Systematic Review. JMIR Med Inform 2022; 10:e37283. [PMID: 36166286 PMCID: PMC9555331 DOI: 10.2196/37283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Electronic health records (EHRs) are the electronic records of patient health information created during ≥1 encounter in any health care setting. The Health Information Technology Act of 2009 has been a major driver of the adoption and implementation of EHRs in the United States. Given that the adoption of EHRs is a complex and expensive investment, a return on this investment is expected. Objective This literature review aims to focus on how the value of EHRs as an intervention is defined in relation to the elaboration of value into 2 different value outcome categories, financial and clinical outcomes, and to understand how EHRs contribute to these 2 value outcome categories. Methods This literature review was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The initial search of key terms, EHRs, values, financial outcomes, and clinical outcomes in 3 different databases yielded 971 articles, of which, after removing 410 (42.2%) duplicates, 561 (57.8%) were incorporated in the title and abstract screening. During the title and abstract screening phase, articles were excluded from further review phases if they met any of the following criteria: not relevant to the outcomes of interest, not relevant to EHRs, nonempirical, and non–peer reviewed. After the application of the exclusion criteria, 80 studies remained for a full-text review. After evaluating the full text of the residual 80 studies, 26 (33%) studies were excluded as they did not address the impact of EHR adoption on the outcomes of interest. Furthermore, 4 additional studies were discovered through manual reference searches and were added to the total, resulting in 58 studies for analysis. A qualitative analysis tool, ATLAS.ti. (version 8.2), was used to categorize and code the final 58 studies. Results The findings from the literature review indicated a combination of positive and negative impacts of EHRs on financial and clinical outcomes. Of the 58 studies surveyed for this review of the literature, 5 (9%) reported on the intersection of financial and clinical outcomes. To investigate this intersection further, the category “Value–Intersection of Financial and Clinical Outcomes” was generated. Approximately 80% (4/5) of these studies specified a positive association between EHR adoption and financial and clinical outcomes. Conclusions This review of the literature reports on the individual and collective value of EHRs from a financial and clinical outcomes perspective. The collective perspective examined the intersection of financial and clinical outcomes, suggesting a reversal of the current understanding of how IT investments could generate improvements in productivity, and prompted a new question to be asked about whether an increase in productivity could potentially lead to more IT investments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shikha Modi
- Department of Political Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| | - Sue S Feldman
- Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ueno N, Jacot W, Yamashita T, Sohn J, Tokunaga E, Prat A, Tsurutani J, Park Y, Rugo H, Xu B, Cardoso F, Mitri Z, Mahtani R, Dunton K, Wang Y, Gambhire D, Cottone F, Harbeck N, Cameron D, Modi S. 217O Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from DESTINY-Breast04, a randomized phase III study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) vs treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
11
|
Korenblik R, Olij B, Aldrighetti LA, Hilal MA, Ahle M, Arslan B, van Baardewijk LJ, Baclija I, Bent C, Bertrand CL, Björnsson B, de Boer MT, de Boer SW, Bokkers RPH, Rinkes IHMB, Breitenstein S, Bruijnen RCG, Bruners P, Büchler MW, Camacho JC, Cappelli A, Carling U, Chan BKY, Chang DH, Choi J, Font JC, Crawford M, Croagh D, Cugat E, Davis R, De Boo DW, De Cobelli F, De Wispelaere JF, van Delden OM, Delle M, Detry O, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Fisher O, Fondevila C, Fretland Å, Borobia FG, Gelabert A, Gérard L, Giuliante F, Gobardhan PD, Gómez F, Grünberger T, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess GF, Hoffmann MH, Iezzi R, Imani F, Nguyen J, Jovine E, Kalff JC, Kazemier G, Kingham TP, Kleeff J, Kollmar O, Leclercq WKG, Ben SL, Lucidi V, MacDonald A, Madoff DC, Manekeller S, Martel G, Mehrabi A, Mehrzad H, Meijerink MR, Menon K, Metrakos P, Meyer C, Moelker A, Modi S, Montanari N, Navines J, Neumann UP, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Qu X, Raptis D, Ratti F, Ridouani F, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Ryan S, Sallemi C, Moragues JS, Sandström P, Sarriá L, Schnitzbauer A, Serenari M, Serrablo A, Smits MLJ, Sparrelid E, Spüntrup E, Stavrou GA, Sutcliffe RP, Tancredi I, Tasse JC, Udupa V, Valenti D, Fundora Y, Vogl TJ, Wang X, White SA, Wohlgemuth WA, Yu D, Zijlstra IAJ, Binkert CA, Bemelmans MHA, van der Leij C, Schadde E, van Dam RM. Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1391-1398. [PMID: 35790566 PMCID: PMC9458562 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03176-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
STUDY PURPOSE The DRAGON 1 trial aims to assess training, implementation, safety and feasibility of combined portal- and hepatic-vein embolization (PVE/HVE) to accelerate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. METHODS The DRAGON 1 trial is a worldwide multicenter prospective single arm trial. The primary endpoint is a composite of the safety of PVE/HVE, 90-day mortality, and one year accrual monitoring of each participating center. Secondary endpoints include: feasibility of resection, the used PVE and HVE techniques, FLR-hypertrophy, liver function (subset of centers), overall survival, and disease-free survival. All complications after the PVE/HVE procedure are documented. Liver volumes will be measured at week 1 and if applicable at week 3 and 6 after PVE/HVE and follow-up visits will be held at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the resection. RESULTS Not applicable. CONCLUSION DRAGON 1 is a prospective trial to assess the safety and feasibility of PVE/HVE. Participating study centers will be trained, and procedures standardized using Work Instructions (WI) to prepare for the DRAGON 2 randomized controlled trial. Outcomes should reveal the accrual potential of centers, safety profile of combined PVE/HVE and the effect of FLR-hypertrophy induction by PVE/HVE in patients with CRLM and a small FLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04272931 (February 17, 2020). Toestingonline.nl: NL71535.068.19 (September 20, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Korenblik
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - B Olij
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Ahle
- Deparment of Radiology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B Arslan
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - L J van Baardewijk
- Department of Radiology, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - I Baclija
- Department of Radiology, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Bent
- Department of Radiology, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, UK
| | - C L Bertrand
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M T de Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S W de Boer
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - I H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Breitenstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - R C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Bruners
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M W Büchler
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J C Camacho
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A Cappelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - U Carling
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - B K Y Chan
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D H Chang
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Choi
- Department of Surgery, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - J Codina Font
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - M Crawford
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - D Croagh
- Department of Surgery, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - E Cugat
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - R Davis
- Department of Radiology, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D W De Boo
- Department of Radiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - F De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - O M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Delle
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Detry
- Department of Surgery, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - R Díaz-Nieto
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Dili
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - J I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O Fisher
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - C Fondevila
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Å Fretland
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - F Garcia Borobia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
| | - A Gelabert
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - L Gérard
- Department of Radiology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - F Giuliante
- Department of Surgery, Gemelli University Hospital Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - F Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Grünberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Guitart
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Heil
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Herrero
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - G F Hess
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M H Hoffmann
- Department of Radiology, St. Clara Spital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - R Iezzi
- Department of Radiology, Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - F Imani
- Department of Radiology, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - J Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - E Jovine
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J C Kalff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T P Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J Kleeff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - O Kollmar
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - S Lopez Ben
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - V Lucidi
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A MacDonald
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D C Madoff
- Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - S Manekeller
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Martel
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - A Mehrabi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H Mehrzad
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - M R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - P Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - C Meyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - A Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Modi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - N Montanari
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Maggiore Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J Navines
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - U P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Peddu
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - J N Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - X Qu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - D Raptis
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - F Ratti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - F Ridouani
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Rogan
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - U Ronellenfitsch
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - S Ryan
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - C Sallemi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - J Sampere Moragues
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - L Sarriá
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - A Schnitzbauer
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Serenari
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - M L J Smits
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E Sparrelid
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Spüntrup
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - G A Stavrou
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - R P Sutcliffe
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Tancredi
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J C Tasse
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - V Udupa
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D Valenti
- Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - Y Fundora
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T J Vogl
- Department of Radiology, University Hosptital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - X Wang
- Department of Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - S A White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - W A Wohlgemuth
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - D Yu
- Department of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - I A J Zijlstra
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - M H A Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - C van der Leij
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Schadde
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - R M van Dam
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hurvitz S, Kalinsky K, Tripathy D, Sledge G, Gradishar W, O'Shaughnessy J, Modi S, Park H, McCartney A, Frentzas S, Shannon C, Cuff K, Eek R, Martin Jimenez M, Curigliano G, Jerusalem G, Huang C, Press M, Lu J. 273TiP ACE-Breast-03: A phase II study patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer whose disease is resistant or refractory to T-DM1, and/or T-DXd, and/or tucatinib-containing regimens treated with ARX788. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
13
|
Powell CA, Modi S, Iwata H, Takahashi S, Smit EF, Siena S, Chang DY, Macpherson E, Qin A, Singh J, Taitt C, Shire N, Camidge DR. Pooled analysis of drug-related interstitial lung disease and/or pneumonitis in nine trastuzumab deruxtecan monotherapy studies. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100554. [PMID: 35963179 PMCID: PMC9434416 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction This pooled analysis of nine phase I and II trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) monotherapy studies described drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis in patients treated with T-DXd. Methods Patients who received T-DXd across nine studies were included. Investigator-assessed ILD/pneumonitis events were retrospectively reviewed by an independent adjudication committee; events adjudicated as drug-related ILD/pneumonitis are summarized. Results The analysis included 1150 patients (breast cancer, 44.3%; gastric cancer, 25.6%; lung cancer, 17.7%; colorectal cancer, 9.3%; other cancer, 3.0%). Median treatment duration was 5.8 (range, 0.7-56.3) months, with a median of 4 (range, 1-27) prior lines of therapy. The overall incidence of adjudicated drug-related ILD/pneumonitis was 15.4% (grade 5, 2.2%). Most patients with ILD/pneumonitis experienced low-grade events (grade 1 or 2, 77.4%); 87.0% had their first event within 12 months [median, 5.4 (range, <0.1-46.8) months] of their first dose of T-DXd. Based on data review, adjudicated ILD/pneumonitis onset occurred earlier than identified by investigators for 53.2% of events [median difference in onset date, 43 (range, 1-499) days]. Stepwise Cox regression identified several baseline factors potentially associated with increased risk of adjudicated drug-related ILD/pneumonitis: age <65 years, enrollment in Japan, T-DXd dose >6.4 mg/kg, oxygen saturation <95%, moderate/severe renal impairment, presence of lung comorbidities, and time since initial diagnosis >4 years. Conclusions In this pooled analysis of heavily treated patients, the incidence of ILD/pneumonitis was 15.4%, with most being low grade and occurring in the first 12 months of treatment. The benefit–risk of T-DXd treatment is positive; however, some patients may be at increased risk of developing ILD/pneumonitis, and further investigation is needed to confirm ILD/pneumonitis risk factors. Close monitoring and proactive management of ILD/pneumonitis are warranted for all. Interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis is a significant adverse event related to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). This pooled analysis of nine T-DXd monotherapy studies evaluated ILD/pneumonitis risk in 1150 heavily pretreated patients. Overall incidence of adjudicated T-DXd-related ILD/pneumonitis was 15.4% (grade 1 or 2, 77.4%; grade 5, 2.2%). Within 12 months of their first T-DXd dose, 87.0% of patients had their first event [median, 5.4 (range, <0.1-46.8) months]. Proactive monitoring and prompt diagnosis and management are important to improving ILD/pneumonitis event outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Powell
- Catherine and Henry J. Gaisman Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
| | - S Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - H Iwata
- Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - S Takahashi
- Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Koto, Tokyo, Japan
| | - E F Smit
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Siena
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan; Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - D-Y Chang
- National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | | - A Qin
- Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | - J Singh
- Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | - C Taitt
- Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, USA
| | - N Shire
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Gaithersburg, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rizkallah G, Lee S, Mahmoud A, Handa I, Long J, Massella V, Modi S, Fun Ngan F, Rahman A, Elberm H. 335 Early Initiation of Biochemical Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Following Traumatic Spleen Injury Is Safe and Effectively Reduce VTE Events. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac039.221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
This study examines the safety and timing initiating VTE prophylaxis post traumatic splenic injuries (TSI).
Method
Patients with TSI were identified from prospectively maintained Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database from 2015–2020 in a single tertiary trauma centre. Clinical and radio-logical information were collected retrospectively. TSI were graded using American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) splenic injury scale. Chemical venous thromboprophylaxis initiation were categorised as not given, <48h and >48h following the injury.
Results
In total 102 patient were included out of 136 patients identified with TSI. 34 patients were excluded for lack of electronic data, palliative decision, or fatal condition on arrival. 12 patients out of 102 required operative management (OM) and 90 patients NOM. VTE prophylaxis was not given for 31 (30.4%). Medical reasons for this include severe brain injury and early discharge before 48 hours. VTE prophylaxis was initiated for 37 (36.3%) patients within 48 hours, and for 34 patients (33.3%) after 48 hours of admission. Seven patients developed thromboembolic events, majority of which (6/7) received VTE prophylaxis after 48 hours. Importantly, none of the patients who received VTE prophylaxis had rebleeding.
Conclusions
This study showed that early initiation of chemical VTE prophylaxis (<48h) is safe, resulted in lower incidence of DVTs/PEs without increasing the risk of bleeding. Results from this study supports recommendation from other studies 1 to initiate chemical VTE prophylaxis after TSI as early as 24h post injury with no other contra-indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. Rizkallah
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - S.L. Lee
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - A. Mahmoud
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - I. Handa
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - J. Long
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - V. Massella
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - S. Modi
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - F.S. Fun Ngan
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - A. Rahman
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - H. Elberm
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Siwach P, Arumugam P, Modi S, Ferreira LS, Maglione E. Proton emission study as a guide to astrophysical rp process. EPJ Web Conf 2022. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/202226011039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton emitters play an important role in deciding the path of the astrophysical rapid proton capture (rp) process. The lifetime of these nuclei depends on several factors, like the deformation, angular momentum of the emitted proton, residual interaction between valence proton and neutron (especially in case of odd-odd nuclei) and so on. Therefore, it is worth to investigate the structure of proton emitters to understand the rp process path. However, due to lack of data in this exotic region, the theoretical models should be robust and the dependence on the free parameters should be minimal. In this direction, we have developed the first microscopic approach to study the triaxially deformed odd-odd proton emitters. The application of the developed approach to 108I, a recently observed proton emitter to investigate the end cycle of the rp process, is discussed.
Collapse
|
16
|
Pencharz D, Modi S, Bandyopadhyay S, Alhun U, Marchbank N, Patel A, Wagner T. Absence of clinical benefit of FDG PET-CT in staging T1 part-solid lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Radiol 2021; 77:195-202. [PMID: 34953570 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the rates of nodal and metastatic disease and change in management when staging part-solid T1 lung adenocarcinomas using integrated 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) in a UK population. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective review of PET-CT examinations performed to stage radiologically suspected T1 part-solid lung adenocarcinoma (n=58) from two different centres. Rates of detection of nodal and metastatic disease, change in management, and final patient outcome were recorded. RESULTS PET-CT changed the stage in one patient from N0 to N1. It did not change final management in any patient. CONCLUSIONS In this UK population, PET-CT had minimal additional diagnostic benefit in staging patients with T1 part-solid lung adenocarcinoma. Especially given its cost, the inclusion of PET-CT for this indication in guidelines should be reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Pencharz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
| | - S Modi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK
| | - S Bandyopadhyay
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Brighton & Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, BN2 5BE, UK; Department of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Rd, Broomhall, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK
| | - U Alhun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Brighton & Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, BN2 5BE, UK; Department of General Practice, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - N Marchbank
- Department of Radiology, Brighton & Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, BN2 5BE, UK
| | - A Patel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK; Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK
| | - T Wagner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Raja MS, Dhuga Y, Modi S, Nagasubramony A, Sood S, Ahmed I. 1131 The Integration of Cardiothoracic Practical Skills Workshop in The Undergraduate Medical School Curriculum and Its Impact on Promoting Interest in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab259.895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Recently, a downward trend is seen in undergraduates wishing to pursue a career in cardiothoracic surgery(CTS). This is partly due to lack of clinical exposure and limited teaching during the undergraduate years; the focus being on cardiac ad vascular pathology.
Aim
Assess if WETLAB workshop encourages the engagement of medical students in CTS surgery
Method
We hosted a cardiac WETLAB workshop, led by a consultant cardiothoracic surgeon. Attendees were taught how to carry out an end-to-side anastomosis on animal tissue. We used pre-and -post exposure questionnaires composed of 10 items to assess the ability of the workshop to improve undergraduate interest in cardiothoracic surgery. The questionnaire included questions around students’ interest in the speciality, previous exposure to the speciality and whether students want to pursue a career in the speciality.
Results
Out of the 12 attendees, 10 completed both questionnaires. The workshop was well received with the overall satisfaction of 9.64 out of 10. It significantly increased respondents’ interest in CTS(z=-0.06, p = 0.01) but did not show any significant difference in encouraging them to pursue surgery. 100% of respondents agreed that specialised practical workshops should be incorporated within the medical school curriculum and that if the opportunity arises, they will attend another in the future.
Conclusions
Specialised practical workshops have the potential to play a significant role in the medical school curriculum in order to enhance exposure to the field of cardiothoracic surgery. This may lead to a positive impact on the number of doctors wishing to pursue this speciality in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Raja
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Y Dhuga
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - S Modi
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - A Nagasubramony
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - S Sood
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - I Ahmed
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pius C, Ahmad H, Snowdon R, Ashrafi R, Waktare J, Borbas Z, Luther V, Mahida S, Modi S, Hall M, Gupta D, Todd D. Assessing atrial fibrillation ablation priority during COVID-19 -does use of patient questionnaires help in stratification above physician assessment? Europace 2021. [PMCID: PMC8194591 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab116.292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is largely offered for symptomatic relief. The ORBIT registry has shown that patients with a higher EHRA class and lower quality of life (QoL) scores (AFEQT score <65.7) are more likely to suffer emergency hospital admissions. To help prevent unplanned AF admissions and to best utilise the reduced capacity for elective work during the COVID-19 pandemic, it has become even more important to prioritise the most symptomatic AF patients for ablation. Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of a subjective symptom-based clinician prioritisation schema compared to objective patient-completed quality of life (QoL) scores. Methods: In July 2020, all elective cases awaiting AF ablation at our institution were categorised by their cardiologist as either category 1 (C1-urgent), category 2 (C2–priority, procedure to be done during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic) or category 3 (C3–routine, procedure may be delayed until post pandemic). This categorisation was based on review of clinic letters where EHRA AF symptom class or PROMS are not routinely recorded. All patients in C2 and C3 were then posted an AF specific (AFEQT) and a generic (EQ5D) QoL questionnaire to complete. Physicians were blinded to patient responses on the QoL questionnaires. Results: Details of physician prioritisation and completed questionnaires were available for 85 patients (62 ± 10 years, PAF in 61%, males 66%). The 18 patients that had been categorised in C2 (priority) group were found to have a significantly lower AFEQT score (30.4, IQR 17.2-51.9) compared to the 67 patients classed in C3 (routine) group (56.5, IQR 32.1-74.1; p < 0.01)(Figure 1a). EQ5D scores also tended to be lower in the C2 patients (0.7, IQR 0.4-0.8) compared to C3 (0.8, IQR 0.6-0.9; p = 0.056) (Figure 1c). 16 (89%) patients in C2 had significant AF-related impact on QoL (as defined as AFEQT score <65.7) compared to 42 (63%) of patients in C3. However, there was significant overlap between groups (Figure 1b). 4 patients in C3 had unplanned AF related hospital admissions while awaiting ablation, as compared to none in C2. The median AFEQT score of these 4 patients was 23.3, indicating that they were highly symptomatic despite being classified in C3 by their cardiologist. Conclusion : Physician assessments are moderately accurate in prioritising patients awaiting AF ablation. The addition of formal patient-completed QoL assessment such as with AFEQT, helps to identify the most symptomatic patients at risk of emergency hospital admission, and physicians should consider using these as part of routine assessment, especially during the COVID pandemic.
Abstract Figure 1 ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Pius
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - H Ahmad
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - R Snowdon
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - R Ashrafi
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - J Waktare
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - Z Borbas
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - V Luther
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - S Mahida
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - S Modi
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - M Hall
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - D Gupta
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - D Todd
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Powell C, Modi S, Iwata H, Takahashi S, Nie K, Qin A, Singh J, Taitt C, Verma S, Camidge D. 92O Analysis of study drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
21
|
Maclean D, Vigneswaran G, Bryant T, Modi S, Hacking N. A retrospective cohort study comparing a novel, spherical, resorbable particle against five established embolic agents for uterine fibroid embolisation. Clin Radiol 2021; 76:452-457. [PMID: 33637311 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel, resorbable, spherical embolic agent compared with other established agents, by studying percentage fibroid infarction (the best indicator of long-term symptom improvement) in patients undergoing uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study examined six different embolic agents used for fibroid embolisation, including a new gelatin-based, fully resorbable, spherical agent. The primary effectiveness outcomes were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined dominant fibroid infarct percentage (DF%) and all fibroid percentage infarct (AF%) at 3 months post-embolisation. MRI-determined uterine artery patency rate was the secondary outcome. Chi-squared test (χ2), relative risk (RR) calculation (primary outcomes), and analysis of variance (ANOVA) (secondary outcome) were the statistical tests employed. RESULTS One hundred and twenty patients were treated with six embolic agents (20 consecutive patients per group, overall mean age 44.8±6.4, initial uterine volume 570±472 ml, dominant fibroid volume 249±324 ml). Fibroid infarctrates were similar between the cohorts with no significant difference between the new gelatin-based resorbable particle and other embolics in either DF% (χ2=3.92, p=0.56) or AF% (χ2=2.83, p=0.73). Complete DF% RR=1.07 (0.90-1.27) and AF% RR=1.09 (0.85-1.41) suggest non-inferiority of the resorbable particle (d=0.67, p<0.05). A favourable uterine artery patency rate was demonstrated for the resorbable particle compared with gelatin slurry (82.5% versus 27.5%, p<0.001 after Bonferroni adjustment). CONCLUSIONS This new gelatin-based, fully resorbable particle is an effective embolic agent for fibroid embolisation and achieves an infarct rate non-inferior to established embolics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Maclean
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 7AX, UK.
| | - G Vigneswaran
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 7AX, UK
| | - T Bryant
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 7AX, UK
| | - S Modi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 7AX, UK
| | - N Hacking
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 7AX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Feldman SS, Hikmet N, Modi S, Schooley B. Impact of Provider Prior Use of HIE on System Complexity, Performance, Patient Care, Quality and System Concerns. Inf Syst Front 2020; 24:121-131. [PMID: 32982572 PMCID: PMC7508630 DOI: 10.1007/s10796-020-10064-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
To date, most HIE studies have investigated user perceptions of value prior to use. Few studies have assessed factors associated with the value of HIE through its actual use. This study investigates provider perceptions on HIE comparing those who had prior experience vs those who had no experience with it. In so doing, we identify six constructs: prior use, system complexity, system concerns, public/population health, care delivery, and provider performance. This study uses a mixed methods approach to data collection. From 15 interviews of medical community leaders, a survey was constructed and administered to 263 clinicians. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance was used, along with Tukey HSD tests for multiple comparisons. Results indicated providers whom previously used HIE had more positive perceptions about its benefits in terms of system complexity (p = .001), care delivery (p = .000), population health (p = .003), and provider performance (p = .005); women providers were more positive in terms of system concerns (p = .000); patient care (p = .031), and population health (p = .009); providers age 44-55 were more positive than older and younger groups in terms of patient care (p = .032), population health (p = .021), and provider performance (p = .014); while differences also existed across professional license groups (physician, nurse, other license, admin (no license)) for all five constructs (p < .05); and type of organization setting (hospital, ambulatory clinic, medical office, other) for three constructs including system concerns (p = .017), population health (p = .018), and provider performance (p = .018). There were no statistically significant differences found between groups based on a provider's role in an organization (patient care, administration, teaching/research, other). Different provider perspectives about the value derived from HIE use exist depending on prior experience with HIE, age, gender, license (physician, nurse, other license, admin (no license)), and type of organization setting (hospital, ambulatory clinic, medical office, other). This study draws from the theory of planned behavior to understand factors related to physicians' perceptions about HIE value, serving as a departure point for more detailed investigations of provider perceptions and behavior in regard to future HIE use and promoting interoperability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue S. Feldman
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1716 9th Avenue So. SHPB 590K, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
| | - Neset Hikmet
- University of South Carolina, 550 Assembly Street, #1300, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
| | - Shikha Modi
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1716 9th Avenue So. SHPB 590K, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
| | - Benjamin Schooley
- University of South Carolina, 550 Assembly Street, #1300, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Powell C, Camidge D, Modi S, Qin A, Taitt C, Lee C, Hackshaw M, Singh J, Iwata H. 289P Risk factors for interstitial lung disease in patients treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan from two interventional studies. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
24
|
Bansal S, Kaushik RM, Kaushik R, Modi S, Raghuvanshi S, Kusum A. Primary hyperparathyroidism presenting as severe hypercalcemia with acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. Gynecol Endocrinol 2020; 36:469-472. [PMID: 31793366 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1698028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary hyperparathyroidism presenting first time with severe hypercalcemia is rare in pregnancy. We report a case of primary hyperparathyroidism due to a cystic parathyroid adenoma presenting as severe hypercalcemia with acute pancreatitis in second trimester of pregnancy. Acute pancreatitis was managed by conservative treatment. Hypercalcemia failed to respond to medical management and ultimately responded to ultrasound-guided ethanol ablation of parathyroid adenoma. The delivery was uneventful and patient continues to remain normocalcemic during follow up. As such, ethanol ablation of parathyroid adenoma may be considered during pregnancy in case of failure of response to medical management and when surgical removal of parathyroid adenoma is not safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bansal
- Department of General Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
| | - R M Kaushik
- Department of General Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
| | - R Kaushik
- Department of General Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
| | - S Modi
- Department of General Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
| | - S Raghuvanshi
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
| | - A Kusum
- Department of Pathology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ndakidemi E, Emerson C, Medley A, Ngowi B, Ng'eno B, Munuo G, Kohi W, Modi S. Health care worker perspectives on TB case finding and HIV services among pediatric TB patients in Tanzania. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2020; 23:811-816. [PMID: 31439112 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in children are of concern due to the high morbidity and mortality they engender. Tanzania is working to improve TB and HIV case identification and treatment, as well as linkage of TB and HIV care in pediatric patients.METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted in March 2016 at 10 high TB burden clinics in five districts of Tanzania to identify the barriers to pediatric TB diagnosis and HIV care. Health care workers (HCWs) at TB clinics who provided informed consent were administered interviews which were analyzed.RESULTS: Of 41 HCWs interviewed, 26 reported receiving pediatric TB training. Barriers to TB diagnosis included low community awareness, stigma and late presentation to the clinic. Barriers to HIV testing included children attending the TB clinic with someone who was not their parent/guardian and shortages of HIV rapid test kits. HCWs stressed the need for improved community education because it was perceived that some caregivers did not understand the importance of prompt TB and HIV treatment in children (although most were eager for a resolution of their child's illness).CONCLUSIONS: Efforts are needed to ensure effective TB and HIV diagnosis and treatment of children, provision of broader HCW and community education, enhanced TB-HIV contact tracing, and ensuring a continuous supply of HIV rapid test kits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Ndakidemi
- Infosmart Research and Consulting Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - C Emerson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - A Medley
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - B Ngowi
- National Institute for Medical Research Muhimbili Research Centre, Dar es Salaam
| | - B Ng'eno
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - W Kohi
- Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children; National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme, Tanzania Ministry of Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - S Modi
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Modi S. Abstract CS1-2: Emerging Therapies for HER2 Positive Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-cs1-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
HER2 targeted therapies have had a significant impact in improving clinical outcomes and survival for patients with HER2 positive breast cancer. However, new therapies for patients with refractory disease are still needed. Based on a greater understanding of the biology and mechanisms of resistance, a new generation of HER2 agents is evolving. Here we provide an overview of promising novel therapies, both proven and in development, for the treatment of refractory HER2 positive breast cancer. This will include a review of antibody drug conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune strategies as well as future combination therapies.
Citation Format: S Modi. Emerging Therapies for HER2 Positive Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr CS1-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Emerson C, Ng'eno B, Ngowi B, Pals S, Kohi W, Godwin M, Date A, Modi S. Assessment of routine screening of pediatric contacts of adults with tuberculosis disease in Tanzania. Public Health Action 2019; 9:148-152. [PMID: 32042606 DOI: 10.5588/pha.19.0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Setting Ten selected healthcare facilities in Tanzania, March-April 2016. Objective To assess the implementation of screening among pediatric contacts of adults with tuberculosis (TB) disease. Design Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a questionnaire study among sputum smear-positive adult TB patients and abstracted data from their patient cards to assess the implementation of a child contact management (CCM) intervention. We also conducted in-depth interviews with healthcare workers (HCWs) to solicit their views on clinical practices and challenges in CCM. Results A total of 141 adult smear-positive TB patients reported 396 children living in households; detailed information on 346 (87.4%) was available. Only 37 (10.7%) children were clinically assessed for TB, 5 (13.5%) were diagnosed with TB, and 22 started on isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) (59.0%). Of the 320 children whose caregivers responded to whether their children had undergone human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing, 55 (17.2%) had been tested and one (1.8%) was HIV-positive. Forty-one HCWs described passive CCM without use of contact or IPT registers. Conclusion We identified gaps in the implementation of TB screening, IPT provision, and HIV testing in pediatric contacts of adults with sputum smear-positive TB. Systematic efforts, including increasing HCW training and educating the community, may improve implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Emerson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - B Ng'eno
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - B Ngowi
- National Institute for Medical Research Muhimbili Research Centre, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - S Pals
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - W Kohi
- Tanzania Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children: National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - M Godwin
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - A Date
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - S Modi
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Modi S, Ozaydin B, Zengul F, Feldman SS. The emerging literature for the triad of health informatics, healthcare quality and safety, and healthcare simulation. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2019; 8:215-227. [PMID: 31839933 DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2019.1687263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The areas of health informatics, healthcare quality and safety, and healthcare simulation are often thought of as separate domains. The purpose of this position paper is to report on the interdependence that is emerging as an important triad across the healthcare/health system continuum. A qualitative review of 24 studies suggests the interdependence of health informatics, healthcare quality and safety, and healthcare simulation reaches much broader than traditional utilisation of simulation. We suggest ways that organisations can take advantage of the interdependence of this triad across a broader variety of healthcare environments, including teamwork, communication, and complex system relationships. In conclusion, the reviewed 24 studies suggest that the research in the triad focuses on simulation education and computerised simulation, and when coupled with health informatics, bears greater strength on quality improvement or patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shikha Modi
- Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Bunyamin Ozaydin
- Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Ferhat Zengul
- Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Sue S Feldman
- Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pathmanathan I, Ahmedov S, Pevzner E, Anyalechi G, Modi S, Kirking H, Cavanaugh JS. TB preventive therapy for people living with HIV: key considerations for scale-up in resource-limited settings. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2019; 22:596-605. [PMID: 29862942 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death for persons living with the human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV). TB preventive therapy (TPT) works synergistically with, and independently of, antiretroviral therapy to reduce TB morbidity, mortality and incidence among PLHIV. However, although TPT is a crucial and cost-effective component of HIV care for adults and children and has been recommended as an international standard of care for over a decade, it remains highly underutilized. If we are to end the global TB epidemic, we must address the significant reservoir of tuberculous infection, especially in those, such as PLHIV, who are most likely to progress to TB disease. To do so, we must confront the pervasive perception that barriers to TPT scale-up are insurmountable in resource-limited settings. Here we review available evidence to address several commonly stated obstacles to TPT scale-up, including the need for the tuberculin skin test, limited diagnostic capacity to reliably exclude TB disease, concerns about creating drug resistance, suboptimal patient adherence to therapy, inability to monitor for and prevent adverse events, a 'one size fits all' option for TPT regimen and duration, and uncertainty about TPT use in children, adolescents, and pregnant women. We also discuss TPT delivery in the era of differentiated care for PLHIV, how best to tackle advanced planning for drug procurement and supply chain management, and how to create an enabling environment for TPT scale-up success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Pathmanathan
- Division of Global HIV and TB, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - S Ahmedov
- Bureau for Global Health, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC
| | - E Pevzner
- Division of Global HIV and TB, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - G Anyalechi
- Division of Global HIV and TB, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - S Modi
- Division of Global HIV and TB, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - H Kirking
- Division of Global HIV and TB, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - J S Cavanaugh
- Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jhaveri K, Dunphy M, Wang R, Comen E, Fornier M, Moynahan ME, Bromberg J, Ma W, Patil S, Taldone T, Rodina A, Sterlin V, Khoshi S, Lewis J, Norton L, Chiosis G, Modi S. Abstract P6-20-03: Tumor epichaperome expression using 124I PU-H71 PET (PU-PET) as a biomarker of response for PU-H71 plus nab-paclitaxel in HER2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-20-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The epichaperome is a new cancer target required for tumor survival (Joshi et al. Nature Reviews Cancer 2018). PU-H71 is a synthetic, purine scaffold epichaperome inhibitor that binds to the ATP-binding site of HSP90 specifically when HSP90 is integrated into the epichaperome (Rodina et al. Nature 2016). It has demonstrated antitumor activity in multiple xenograft models. Furthermore, sequential administration of nab-paclitaxel and PU-H71 in TNBC xenograft models augmented epichaperome levels, and in turn resulted in super-synergistic drug action with ablation of xenografted tumors and cures in mice.
Methods: This is an open label phase1b study of PU-H71 + nab-paclitaxel in pts with HER2- MBC. Pts received nab-paclitaxel at a standard dose of 260mg/m2 IV Q 3weeks. PU-H71 was administered IV 6 hrs (+/-1 hr) post nab-paclitaxel Q3weeks in 2 escalating dose levels (225mg/m2 and 300 mg/m2). All pts underwent FDG PET/CT every 6 weeks. Additionally, patients had the option to enroll on a separate diagnostic PU-PET protocol to measure epichaperome expression prior to initiating treatment on the phase 1b study, wherein they received a single dose of up to 11mci of 124I-PU-H71 IV and underwent imaging at 3-4hrs and 20-24 hrs. Primary objective was to establish the MTD/RP2D of this regimen. Secondary objectives were to assess PK of PU-H71 + nab-paclitaxel and clinical efficacy. Exploratory analysis included correlation of epichaperome expression at baseline using PU-PET with tumor response.
Results: 12 patients (5 ER+/HER2- ; 7 TNBC) were enrolled (6 at 225mg/m2 of PU-H71 and 6 at 300mg/m2). Median Age: 54 yrs (range: 37-71). Median ECOG: 0. Median lines of therapy in the metastatic setting: 6 (range 1-11) including prior taxanes in 75% of pts. Most common toxicities included diarrhea G1 58%; G2 7%, G3 7%) that was easily managed with anti-diarrheal agents, G1 fatigue (25%), G1/2 peripheral neuropathy (17%), G1 hyperglycemia (67%), G1 increases in alk phos (58%), AST (50%) and ALT (42%). Hematological toxicities included G3 leukopenia (42%), G3/4 neutropenia (67%), G3 anemia (50%) and G2 thrombocytopenia (17%). There were no DLTs. 33% (4/12) had PR, 58% (7/12) achieved SD with only 1 PD at the time of first scan; 5 pts are currently ongoing including 2 TNBC pts with PR who have been on therapy > 7 months. PK data will be presented. 8/12 patients also underwent PU-PET at baseline. A higher tumor to muscle SUV ratio at 24 hrs on PU-PET predicted response and increased PU-H71 retention on PU-PET at 24 hrs correlated with a longer duration of response.
Conclusion: The RP2D of PU-H71 was 300mg/m2 with 260mg/m2 of nab-paclitaxel administered IV every 3 weeks. The regimen is well tolerated with promising clinical activity in this heavily pre-treated cohort. Tumor epichaperome expression at baseline using PU-PET has the potential to serve as a predictive biomarker of response. A Phase 2 trial of this combination along with baseline PU-PET is currently planned.
Citation Format: Jhaveri K, Dunphy M, Wang R, Comen E, Fornier M, Moynahan ME, Bromberg J, Ma W, Patil S, Taldone T, Rodina A, Sterlin V, Khoshi S, Lewis J, Norton L, Chiosis G, Modi S. Tumor epichaperome expression using 124I PU-H71 PET (PU-PET) as a biomarker of response for PU-H71 plus nab-paclitaxel in HER2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-20-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Jhaveri
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - M Dunphy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - R Wang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - E Comen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - M Fornier
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - ME Moynahan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - J Bromberg
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - W Ma
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - S Patil
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - T Taldone
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - A Rodina
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - V Sterlin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - S Khoshi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - J Lewis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - L Norton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - G Chiosis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| | - S Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Samus Therapeutics, 10 South Main Street Topsfield, MA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Powell CA, Camidge DR, Gemma A, Kusumoto M, Baba T, Kuwano K, Bankier A, Kiura K, Tamura K, Modi S, Tsurutani J, Doi T, Iwata H, Krop IE, Zhang L, Jasmeet S, Saito K, Shahidi J, Yver A, Takahashi S. Abstract P6-17-06: Characterization, monitoring and management of interstitial lung disease in patients with metastatic breast cancer: Analysis of data available from multiple studies of DS-8201a, a HER2-targeted antibody drug conjugate with a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-17-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Several classes of anti-cancer agents including certain immunotherapies, systemic chemotherapies, and targeted therapies including trastuzumab and T-DM1 increase the risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and fatal cases have been reported. For DS-8201a, interim efficacy and safety analyses of available data established a final recommended dose of 5.4 mg/kg IV q3wk in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). Based on preliminary clinical results, ILD was identified as an important risk for DS-8201a. A robust monitoring and management plan was established across all studies and an international, independent ILD adjudication committee (AC) reviews the cases reported as ILD on an ongoing basis.
Methods: All subjects (sbj) who received ≥1 dose of DS-8201a across 7 ongoing studies were included in this analysis. Reported ILD (standardized MedDRA Query terms) included the terms ILD, pneumonitis, and organizing pneumonia. ILD frequencies were calculated based on investigator's assessment and after adjudication. The analysis of potential risk factors associated with ILD is ongoing.
Results: As of 21 June 2018, 448 sbj received ≥1 dose of DS-8201a across multiple tumor types, including BC. Of the 321 sbj with BC, 173 (53.9%) were from Japan, 103 (32.1%) from the US, and 45 (14.0%) from 6 other countries (Spain, South Korea, Taiwan, Belgium, France, and Italy). These sbj received 1 of 7 doses of DS-8201a (0.8 mg/kg: 3 sbjs, 1.6 mg/kg: 1 sbj, 3.2 mg/kg: 3 sbjs, 5.4 mg/kg: 111 sbjs, 6.4 mg/kg: 178 sbj, 7.4 mg/kg: 20 sbj, 8.0 mg/kg: 5 sbj). Overall, 44 cases of potential ILD were reported by the investigators across all tumor types (44/448, 9.8%; Grade ≥3 10/448, 2.2%). In sbj with BC who received 5.4 mg/kg, any grade and Grade ≥3 investigator-reported ILD were 7.2% (8/111) and 0.9% (1/111), respectively. The ILD AC assessed 30 of 44 cases; 22 were considered drug-related ILD, 4 were ILD but not drug-related, and 4 were found not to be ILD. For adjudicated drug-related ILD cases, the median time to onset was 159 (range; 46-591) days from the time of first dose.
Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 All Grades All tumors, All doses (N=448) Investigator-reported20 (4.5)14 (3.1)4 (0.9)1 (0.2)5 (1.1)44 (9.8)Cases adjudicated13840530Adjudicated as drug-related ILD9 (2.0)6 (1.3)3 (0.7)04 (0.9)22 (4.9) BC, All doses (N=321) Investigator-reported17 (5.3)11 (3.4)3 (0.9)1 (0.3)4 (1.2)36 (11.2)Cases adjudicated11830426Adjudicated as drug-related ILD8 (2.5)6 (1.9)3 (0.9)04 (1.2)21 (6.5) BC, 5.4 mg/kg (N=111) Investigator-reported4 (3.6)3 (2.7)001 (0.9)8 (7.2)Cases adjudicated120014Adjudicated as drug-related ILD00001 (0.9)1 (0.9)n (%), except where noted
Conclusions: These analyses confirm that ILD is an important identified risk for DS-8201a. Further analyses are ongoing to better understand the potential risk factors associated with the incidence of on-treatment ILD. When ILD is suspected, early diagnosis through appropriate imaging, laboratory tests, and pulmonary consultation as well as prompt management with steroids are recommended.
Citation Format: Powell CA, Camidge DR, Gemma A, Kusumoto M, Baba T, Kuwano K, Bankier A, Kiura K, Tamura K, Modi S, Tsurutani J, Doi T, Iwata H, Krop IE, Zhang L, Jasmeet S, Saito K, Shahidi J, Yver A, Takahashi S. Characterization, monitoring and management of interstitial lung disease in patients with metastatic breast cancer: Analysis of data available from multiple studies of DS-8201a, a HER2-targeted antibody drug conjugate with a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CA Powell
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - DR Camidge
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - A Gemma
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Kusumoto
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Baba
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Kuwano
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - A Bankier
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Kiura
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Tamura
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Modi
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - J Tsurutani
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Doi
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - H Iwata
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - IE Krop
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - L Zhang
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Jasmeet
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Saito
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - J Shahidi
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - A Yver
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Takahashi
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan; Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Specht J, Pusztai L, Forero-Torres A, Mita M, Weise A, Krop I, Grosse-Wilde A, Wang Z, Li M, Hengel S, Garfin P, Means G, Onsum M, Modi S. Post-treatment biopsies show evidence of cell cycle arrest and immune cell infiltration into tumors of ladiratuzumab vedotin-treated advanced breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy272.278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
33
|
Yoshino T, Iwata H, Tamura K, Takahashi S, Redfern C, Modi S, Doi T, Kawakami H, Taniguchi H, Takashima A, Yamaguchi K, Fisher J, Li B, Saito K, Fujisaki Y, Sugihara M, Tsurutani J. Updated results of phase I study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) in HER2-expressing advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy281.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
34
|
Foley I, Ryan M, Modi S, Bearman G, Stevens M. Perceptions and Risk Factors for Zika Virus Infection at Two Sites in the Dominican Republic. Int J Infect Dis 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.04.3920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
35
|
Labban S, Sullivan S, Masroor N, Modi S, Cook J, Bearman G, Stevens M. Chlorine Levels in a Cistern-Based Water Distribution System in Rural Honduras. Int J Infect Dis 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.04.3910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
|
36
|
Denham N, Pearman CM, Ding WY, Waktare J, Gupta D, Snowdon R, Hall M, Cooper R, Modi S, Todd D, Mahida S. 4287Systematic re-evaluation of ion channel mutations associated with Brugada syndrome. Eur Heart J 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy563.4287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- N Denham
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - C M Pearman
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - W Y Ding
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - J Waktare
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - D Gupta
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - R Snowdon
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - M Hall
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - R Cooper
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - S Modi
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - D Todd
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - S Mahida
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schrag A, Modi S, Hotham S, Merritt R, Khan K, Graham L. Patient experiences of receiving a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 2018; 265:1151-1157. [PMID: 29546451 PMCID: PMC5937885 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-8817-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report patients' own experiences of receiving a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) and to identify factors influencing this experience. METHODS A survey by the European Parkinson's Disease Association in 11 European countries. RESULTS 1775 patients with an average age of 69.7 years participated of whom 54% were male. Those living in rural areas reported having waited longer to seek medical help (p < 0.05). A possible diagnosis of PD was made at the first appointment in a third of respondents. When the diagnosis was made, only 50% reported that the diagnosis was communicated sensitively. 38% of patients reported having been given enough time to ask questions and discuss concerns, but 29% did not. 98% of participants reported having been given information about PD at the time of diagnosis but 36% did not find the information given helpful. Patient satisfaction with the diagnostic consultation was positively associated with more sensitive delivery of diagnosis, the helpfulness and quantity of the information provided and time to ask questions (all p < 0.001). Where diagnosis was given by a specialist, participants reported greater perceived satisfaction with the diagnostic consultation, greater sensitivity of communicating the diagnosis, time to ask questions, provision and helpfulness of information, and earlier medication prescription (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS There is a need to improve how the diagnosis of PD is communicated to patients, the opportunity to ask questions soon after diagnosis, and the amount, timing and quality of life information provided, as this is associated with greater satisfaction with the diagnostic process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Schrag
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
| | - S Modi
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - S Hotham
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - R Merritt
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - K Khan
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - L Graham
- European Parkinson's Disease Association, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Modi S, Pusztai L, Forero A, Mita M, Miller KD, Weise A, Krop I, Burris H, Kalinsky K, Tsai M, Liu MC, Hurvitz SA, Wilks S, Ademuyiwa F, Diab S, Han HS, Kato G, Nanda R, O'Shaughnessy J, Kostic A, Li M, Specht J. Abstract PD3-14: Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd3-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
LIV-1, a transmembrane protein and downstream target of STAT3, is highly expressed in breast cancer cells. It is associated with lymph node involvement and metastatic progression. SGN-LIV1A is an anti-LIV-1 antibody conjugated via a protease-cleavable linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Upon binding to cell-surface LIV-1, SGN-LIV1A is internalized and releases MMAE, which disrupts microtubulin and induces apoptosis.
Methods
This ongoing, phase 1 study evaluates safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-LIV1A (q3wks IV) in women with LIV-1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC) (NCT01969643). Patients (pts) with measurable disease and ≥2 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC are eligible. Pts with ≥ Grade 2 neuropathy are excluded. Response is assessed per RECIST v1.1; pts with stable disease (SD) or better can continue treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. At completion of dose escalation in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) and triple-negative (TN) pts, expansion cohorts were opened to further evaluate safety and antitumor activity of monotherapy in TN pts. Tumor biopsies are evaluated for LIV-1 expression.
Results
To date, 69 pts (18 HR+/HER2–, 51 TN) have received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1–12) of SGN-LIV1A at doses of 0.5–2.8 mg/kg. Median age was 56 yrs. Pts had a median of 3 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC; 58 had visceral disease and 37 had bone metastases. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 19 DLT-evaluable pts; maximum tolerated dose was not exceeded at 2.8 mg/kg. Expansion cohorts of TN pts were opened at 2.0 and 2.5 mg/kg. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥25% of pts were fatigue (59%), nausea (51%), peripheral neuropathy (44%), alopecia (36%), decreased appetite (33%), constipation (30%), abdominal pain, diarrhea, and neutropenia (25% each). Most AEs were Grade 1/2; AEs ≥ Grade 3 included neutropenia (25%) and anemia (15%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 2 pts whose total dose exceeded 200 mg per cycle, including 1 treatment-related death due to sepsis. No other treatment-related deaths occurred on-study. Seven pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. In dose escalation, activity was observed in 17 efficacy evaluable (EE) HR+/HER2- pts, with a disease control rate (DCR= CR+PR+SD) of 59% (10 SD), including 1 pt with SD ≥24 wks. Among the 44 EE TN pts (dose escalation plus expansion cohorts), the objective response rate (ORR) was 32% (14 PR) with a confirmed PR rate of 21%, DCR was 64% (14 PR, 14 SD), and clinical benefit rate (CBR=CR+PR+SD ≥24 wks) was 36% (16 pts). For TN pts, median PFS was 11.3 wks (95% CI: 6.1, 17.1); 10 pts remain on treatment.
Of 631 MBC tumor samples of all clinical subtypes evaluated for LIV-1, 91% were positive; 75% had moderate-to-high expression (H-score ≥100).
Conclusions
LIV-1 is expressed in almost all MBC tumors. SGN-LIV1A monotherapy was generally well tolerated and showed encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated TN MBC, with a PR rate of 32%, confirmed PR rate of 21%, and CBR (≥24 wks) of 36%. Response duration data continue to evolve. Enrollment continues in the TN monotherapy expansion cohort.
Citation Format: Modi S, Pusztai L, Forero A, Mita M, Miller KD, Weise A, Krop I, Burris III H, Kalinsky K, Tsai M, Liu MC, Hurvitz SA, Wilks S, Ademuyiwa F, Diab S, Han HS, Kato G, Nanda R, O'Shaughnessy J, Kostic A, Li M, Specht J. Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated triple-negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - L Pusztai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Forero
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Mita
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - KD Miller
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Weise
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - I Krop
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - H Burris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - K Kalinsky
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Tsai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - MC Liu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - SA Hurvitz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - S Wilks
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - F Ademuyiwa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - S Diab
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - HS Han
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - G Kato
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - R Nanda
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Kostic
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - J Specht
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Ion transport during neuronal signalling utilizes the majority of the brain's energy supply. Mitochondria are key sites for energy provision through ATP synthesis and play other important roles including calcium buffering. Thus, tightly regulated distribution and function of these organelles throughout the intricate architecture of the neuron is essential for normal synaptic communication. Therefore, delineating mechanisms coordinating mitochondrial transport and function is essential for understanding nervous system physiology and pathology. While aberrant mitochondrial transport and dynamics have long been associated with neurodegenerative disease, they have also more recently been linked to major mental illness including schizophrenia, autism and depression. However, the underlying mechanisms have yet to be elucidated, due to an incomplete understanding of the combinations of genetic and environmental factors contributing to these conditions. Consequently, the DISC1 gene has undergone intense study since its discovery at the site of a balanced chromosomal translocation, segregating with mental illness in a Scottish pedigree. The precise molecular functions of DISC1 remain elusive. Reported functions of DISC1 include regulation of intracellular signalling pathways, neuronal migration and dendritic development. Intriguingly, a role for DISC1 in mitochondrial homeostasis and transport is fast emerging. Therefore, a major function of DISC1 in regulating mitochondrial distribution, ATP synthesis and calcium buffering may be disrupted in psychiatric disease. In this review, we discuss the links between DISC1 and mitochondria, considering both trafficking of these organelles and their function, and how, via these processes, DISC1 may contribute to the regulation of neuronal behavior in normal and psychiatric disease states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Norkett
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - S Modi
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - J T Kittler
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tsurutani J, Doi T, Iwata H, Takahashi S, Modi S, Tamura K, Shitara K, Taniguchi H, Taira S, Li B, Shimomura A, Sato Y, Akiyama K, Fujisaki Y, Lee C, Yver A, Nakagawa K. Updated results of phase 1 study of DS-8201a in patients with HER2 expressing non-breast, non-gastric malignancies. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx367.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
41
|
Iyengar N, Smyth L, Lake D, Gucalp A, Singh J, Traina T, Defusco P, Dickler M, Fornier M, Goldfarb S, Jhaveri K, Modi S, Troso-Sandoval T, Jack K, Ulaner G, Jochelson M, Baselga J, Norton L, Hudis C, Dang C. Phase II study of gemcitabine, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after prior pertuzumab-based therapy. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx365.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
42
|
Modi S, Mahajan A, Dharaiya D, Varelas P, Mitsias P. Burden of herpes simplex virus encephalitis in the United States. J Neurol 2017; 264:1204-1208. [PMID: 28516331 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-017-8516-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2017] [Revised: 04/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Herpes simplex virus encephalitis (HSVE) is a disease of public health concern, but its burden on the healthcare of United States has not been adequately assessed recently. We aimed to define the incidence, complications and outcomes of HSVE in the recent decade by analyzing data from a nationally representative database. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases were utilized to identify patients with primary discharge diagnosis of HSVE. Annual hospitalization rate was estimated and several preselected inpatient complications were identified. Regression analyses were used to identify mortality predictors. Key epidemiological factors were compared with those from other countries. Total 4871 patients of HSVE were included in our study. The annual hospitalization rate was 10.3 ± 2.2 cases/million in neonates, 2.4 ± 0.3 cases/million in children and 6.4 ± 0.4 cases/million in adults. Median age was 57 years and male:female incidence ratio was 1:1. Rates of some central nervous system complications were seizures (38.4%), status epilepticus (5.5%), acute respiratory failure (20.1%), ischemic stroke (5.6%) and intracranial hemorrhage (2.7%), all of which were significantly associated with mortality. In-hospital mortality in neonates, children and adults were 6.9, 1.2 and 7.7%, respectively. HSVE still remains a potentially lethal infectious disease with high morbidity and mortality. Most recent epidemiological data in this study may help understanding this public health disease, and the patient outcome data may have prognostic significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Modi
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Abhimanyu Mahajan
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
| | - D Dharaiya
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - P Varelas
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - P Mitsias
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Modi S, Yee R, Scholl D, Stirrat J, Wong JA, Lydell C, Kotha V, Gula LJ, Skanes AC, Leong-Sit P, McCarty D, Drangova M, White JA. Ventricular pacing site separation by cardiac computed tomography: validation for the prediction of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 33:1433-1442. [DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1120-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
44
|
Hannah R, Modi S, Bonaiuto J, Rothwell J. P160 Enhanced biasing effect of prior knowledge on perceptual decision processes following continuous theta burst stimulation of motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
45
|
Iyengar NM, Smyth L, Lake D, Gucalp A, Singh JC, Traina TA, DeFusco P, Dickler MN, Fornier MN, Goldfarb S, Jhaveri K, Modi S, Troso-Sandoval T, Argolo D, Jack K, Ulaner G, Jochelson M, Baselga J, Norton L, Hudis CA, Dang CT. Abstract P4-21-34: Phase II study of gemcitabine, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab for HER2-Positive metastatic breast cancer after prior pertuzumab-based therapy. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p4-21-34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The combination of taxanes with trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) for first line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment per physician's choice with anti-HER2 therapy after second line therapy is associated with a median PFS of 3 months. While continued use of H in therapeutic combinations after progression on H-based therapy is common, the efficacy of continuing HP-based treatment after progression on P-based therapy is unknown.
Methods: This is a single arm phase II trial of gemcitabine (G) with HP. Eligible patients had HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or FISH ≥ 2.0) MBC with prior HP-based treatment and ≤ 3 prior chemotherapies. Patients received G (1200 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of a q 3 week (w) cycle, and H (8 mg/kg load → 6 mg/kg) and P (840 mg load → 420 mg) q3w. The primary endpoint is PFS at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include OS, safety and tolerability. An exploratory endpoint is to compare PFS by RECIST criteria versus 18-F FDG-PET response criteria. Using a Simon optimal 2-stage design, 21 patients were enrolled in stage 1. The successful 3-month PFS rate for stage 1 was set at 57% to allow accrual to stage 2 for a total of 45 patients. The study therapy will be considered successful if at least 27/45 (60%) patients are progression free at 3 months.
Results: As of June 9, 2016, 28 patients are enrolled; 21 are evaluable at 3 months and 7 have not had 3-month evaluation. At 3 months, 16/21 (76%) are progression free; 5 patients have progressed. The 3 month-PFS results for evaluable patients will be updated. There are no cardiac or febrile neutropenic events to date. Initially, 5 of 22 (23%) patients required G dose reduction (4 due to grade 3 neutropenia and 1 due to grade 3 vomiting) and the study was amended to lower initial G dose to 1000 mg/m2.
Conclusions: The preliminary 3 month-PFS is 76% (95% CI 55% to 89%) in evaluable patients, and updated data will be presented. These findings suggest clinical benefit when P is continued beyond progression.
Citation Format: Iyengar NM, Smyth L, Lake D, Gucalp A, Singh JC, Traina TA, DeFusco P, Dickler MN, Fornier MN, Goldfarb S, Jhaveri K, Modi S, Troso-Sandoval T, Argolo D, Jack K, Ulaner G, Jochelson M, Baselga J, Norton L, Hudis CA, Dang CT. Phase II study of gemcitabine, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab for HER2-Positive metastatic breast cancer after prior pertuzumab-based therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-21-34.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- NM Iyengar
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - L Smyth
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - D Lake
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - A Gucalp
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - JC Singh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - TA Traina
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - P DeFusco
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - MN Dickler
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - MN Fornier
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - S Goldfarb
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - K Jhaveri
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - S Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - D Argolo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - K Jack
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - G Ulaner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - M Jochelson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J Baselga
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - L Norton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - CA Hudis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - CT Dang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Forero-Torres A, Modi S, Specht J, Miller K, Weise A, Burris H, Liu M, Krop I, Pusztai L, Kostic A, Li M, Mita M. Abstract P6-12-04: Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p6-12-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
LIV-1, a transmembrane protein and downstream target of STAT3, is highly expressed in breast cancer cells. It is associated with lymph node involvement and metastatic progression. SGN-LIV1A is an anti-LIV-1 antibody conjugated via a protease-cleavable linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Upon binding to cell-surface LIV-1, SGN-LIV1A is internalized and releases MMAE, which binds to tubulin and induces G2/M arrest and apoptosis.
Methods
This is an ongoing, phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluating safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-LIV1A (q3 wks IV) in women with LIV-1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC) (NCT01969643). Patients (pts) with measurable disease and ≥2 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC were eligible. Pts with ≥Grade 2 neuropathy were excluded. Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1; pts with stable disease (SD) or better could continue treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. At completion of dose escalation in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) and triple-negative (TN) pts, expansion cohorts were opened to further evaluate safety and antitumor activity of monotherapy in TN pts and combination therapy with trastuzumab (Tz) in HER2-positive (HER2+) pts. Pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were done to evaluate LIV-1 expression and other correlative endpoints.
Results
To date, 39 pts (18 HR+/HER2–, 21 TN) have received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1–10) of SGN-LIV1A monotherapy at doses of 0.5–2.8 mg/kg. Median age was 57 yrs (range, 33–79). At baseline, pts had a median of 4 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC (range, 2–8); 36 had visceral disease and 25 had bone involvement. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred in 19 DLT-evaluable pts; maximum tolerated dose was not exceeded at 2.8 mg/kg. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥30% of pts were: fatigue (64%), nausea (54%), alopecia (46%), decreased appetite (41%), constipation (39%), neutropenia (33%), and vomiting (31%). Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 9 pts (23%). Most AEs were Grade 1/2, except neutropenia (all ≥Grade 3). Four pts discontinued treatment due to AEs (acute respiratory distress syndrome, nausea, pneumonia, tachycardia). In dose escalation, modest activity was observed in 17 efficacy evaluable (EE) HR+/HER2- pts, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 59% (10 SD), including 1 pt with SD≥24 wks. Among the 17 EE TN pts (dose escalation plus cohort expansion), the overall response rate (ORR) was 41% (7 PR), DCR was 82% (7 PR, 7 SD) and clinical benefit rate (CBR=OR+SD≥24 wks) was 53% (9 pts). For TN pts, median PFS was 17.1 wks (95% CI: 6.0, 18.4); 6 pts remain on treatment.
Of 281 MBC tumor samples evaluated for LIV-1, 93% were positive; 81% had moderate-to-high expression (H-score ≥100).
Conclusions
LIV-1 is expressed in almost all MBC tumors. SGN-LIV1A monotherapy has been generally well tolerated and shown encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated TN MBC, with a PR rate of 41% and a CBR at ≥24 wks of 53%. Response duration data continue to evolve. Enrollment continues in the TN monotherapy expansion cohort and the HER2+ combination cohort with Tz.
Citation Format: Forero-Torres A, Modi S, Specht J, Miller K, Weise A, Burris III H, Liu M, Krop I, Pusztai L, Kostic A, Li M, Mita M. Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Forero-Torres
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - S Modi
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - J Specht
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - K Miller
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A Weise
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - H Burris
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Liu
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - I Krop
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - L Pusztai
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A Kostic
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Li
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Mita
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Okumu A, McCarthy K, Orwa J, Williamson J, Musau S, Alexander H, Cavanaugh S, Modi S, Cain K. Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex Yield and Contamination Rates using Lowenstein-Jensen with and without Antibiotics in Western Kenya. J Med Sci Clin Res 2017; 5:10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.86. [PMID: 35979512 PMCID: PMC9380436 DOI: 10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While molecular methods have been recently endorsed for diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), mycobacterial culture remains the gold standard. Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) is often used for the cultivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC); however contamination often renders a subset of cultures useless. We compared the MTBC yield and contamination rate of processed sputum inoculated on LJ with antibiotics (LJ PACT) to LJ without antibiotics (LJ). METHODOLOGY Sputum samples were obtained from people living with HIV enrolled in a TB screening study in western Kenya, processed using NALC/NaOH-Na citrate, then inoculated on LJ PACT and LJ media. Cultures were evaluated weekly with growth identified as acid-fast bacilli by Ziehl-Neelsen bright-field microscopy. MTBC and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) were identified by immunochromatographic and line probe assays. RESULTS A total of 700 sputum samples were cultured on both LJ PACT and LJ between March and June 2012. Of those cultured on LJ PACT, 29 (4.1%) grew MTBC, 613 (87.6%) were negative, 12 (1.7%) grew NTM, and 46 (6.6%) were contaminated; on LJ, 28 (4%) grew MTBC, 553 (79%) were negative, 9 (1.3%) grew NTM, and 110 (15.7%) were contaminated. The difference in contamination on LJ PACT and LJ was statistically significant (p<0.0001), while the difference in MTBC growth was not (p=0.566).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Okumu
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - K McCarthy
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination (DTBE), CDC, Atlanta, GA
| | - J Orwa
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - J Williamson
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria (DPDM), CDC, Atlanta, GA
| | - S Musau
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - H Alexander
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination (DTBE), CDC, Atlanta, GA
| | - S Cavanaugh
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination (DTBE), CDC, Atlanta, GA
| | - S Modi
- Division of Global HIV/AIDS (DGHA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA
| | - K Cain
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination (DTBE), CDC, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Raine D, Begg G, Moore J, Taylor E, Buck R, Honarbakhsh S, Yew Ding W, Redfearn D, Opel A, Opel A, Thomas D, Prakash K, Thomas D, Khokhar A, Honarbakhsh S, Tairova S, Getman N, McAloon C, Honarbakhsh S, Shah M, Al-Lawati K, Al-Lawati K, Ensam B, Collins G, Akbar S, Merghani A, Furniss G, Yones E, Vijayashankar SS, Vijayashankar SS, Shariat H, Moss A, Yeoh A, Sadiq A, Taylor R, Edwards T, Nizam ud Din K, Langley P, Shepherd E, Murray S, Lord S, Bourke J, Plein S, Lip G, Tayebjee MH, Owen N, White S, O'Neill M, Hughes L, Carroll S, Moss-Morris R, Baker V, Kirkby C, Patel K, Robinson G, Antoniou S, Richmond L, Ullah W, Hunter R, Finlay M, Earley M, Whitbread M, Schilling R, Cooper R, Modi S, Somani R, Ng A, Hobson N, Caldwell J, Hadjivassilev S, Ang R, Finlay M, Dhinoja M, Earley M, Sporton S, Schilling R, Hunter R, Hadjivassilev S, Earley M, Lambiase P, Turley A, Child N, Linker N, Owens W, James S, Milner J, Tayebjee M, Sibley J, Griffiths A, Meredith T, Basher Y, Betts T, Rajappan K, Lambiase P, Lowe M, Hunter R, Schilling R, Finlay M, Rakhimbaeva G, Akramova N, Getman T, Hamborg T, O'Hare J, Randeva H, Osman F, Srinivasan N, Kirkby C, Firman E, Tobin L, Murphy C, Lowe M, Hunter R, Finlay M, Schilling R, Lambiase P, Mohan P, Salahia G, Lim H, Lim HS, Batchvarov V, Brennan P, Cox A, Muir A, Behr E, Hamill S, Laventure C, Newell S, Gordon B, Bashir K, Chuen J, Foster W, Yusuf S, Osman F, Hayat S, Panagopoulos D, Davies E, Tomlinson D, Haywood G, Mullan J, Kelland N, Horwood A, Connell N, Odams S, Maloney J, Shetty A, Kyriacou A, Sahu J, Lee J, Uzun O, Wong A, Ashtekar S, Uzun O, Wong A, Ashtekar S, Hashemi J, Gazor S, Redfearn D, Song A, Jenkins J, Glancy J, Wilson D, Sammut E, Diab I, Cripps T, Gill A, Abbas S, Enye J, Wahab A, Elshafie S, Ling K, Carey P, Chatterjee D, Timbrell S, Tufail W, Why H, Martos R, Thornley A, James S, Turley A, Bates M, Linker N, Hassan E, Quick J, Cowell R, Ho E. POSTERS (1)59MULTIPOLAR CONTACT MAPPING GUIDED ABLATION OF TEMPORALLY STABLE HIGH FREQUENCY AND COMPLEX FRACTIONATED ATRIAL ELECTROGRAM SITES IN PATIENTS WITH PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION60INTRA-CARDIAC AND PERIPHERAL LEVELS OF BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF FIBROSES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CATHETER ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILATION61THE DON'T WAIT TO ANTICOAGULATE PROJECT (DWAC) BY THE WEST OF ENGLAND ACADEMIC HEALTH SCIENCE NETWORK (AHSN) OPTIMISES STROKE PREVENTION FOR PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) WITHIN PRIMARY CARE IN LINE WITH NICE CG180 IN THE WEST OF ENGLAND62ILLNESS AND TREATMENT REPRESENTATIONS, COPING AND DISTRESS: VICIOUS CYCLES OF EVERYDAY EXPERIENCES IN PATIENTS WITH PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION63THE NEEDS OF THE ADOLESCENT LIVING WITH AN INHERITED CARDIAC CONDITION: THE PATIENTS' PERSPECTIVE64SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PARAMEDIC TREATMENT OF REGULAR SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (PARA-SVT)65NATURAL PROGRESSION OF QRS DURATION FOLLOWING IMPLATABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS (ICD) - IMPLANTATION66COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF VOLTAGE DIRECTED CAVOTRICUSPID ISTHMUS ABLATION USING MINI VS CONVENTIONAL ELETRODES67CRYOBALLOON ABLATION (CRYO) FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) CANNOT BE GUIDED BY TEMPERATURE END-POINTS ALONE68MODERATOR BAND ECTOPY UNMASKED BY ADENOSINE AS A CAUSE OF ECTOPIC TRIGGERED IDIOPATHIC VF69EARLY CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH TARGETED SITE SELECTION FOR THE WiCS-LV ELECTRODE FOR CRT70DOES VECTOR MAPPING PRIOR TO IMPLANTABLE LOOP RECORDER INSERTION IMPROVE THE DETECTION OF ARRHYTHMIA?71THE ROLE OF SPECKLE TRACKING STRAIN IMAGING IN ASSESSING LEFT VENTRICULAR RESPONSE TO CARDIAC RESYNCHRONISATION THERAPY IN RESPONDERS AND NON-RESPONDERS72EVALUATING PATIENTS' EXPERIENCE AND SATISFACTION OF THE ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ABLATION PROCEDURE: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS73TROUBLESHOOTING LV LEAD IMPLANTATION - NOVEL “UNIRAIL TECHNIQUE”74SUBCLINICAL ATHEROSCELEROSIS AND COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT75EFFECT OF LOZARTANE ON DEVELOPMENT OF THE ELECTRICAL INSTABILITY OF THE MYOCARDIUM76THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN BODY COMPOSITION AND LEFT VENTRICULAR REMODELLING IN CARDIAC RESYNCHRONISATION THERAPY77FAMILY SCREENING IN IDIOPATHIC VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION78MANAGEMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN A LARGE TEACHING HOSPITAL79THE EFFECT OF LEFT VENTRICULAR LEAD POSITION ON SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH BINVENTRICULAR PACEMAKRS/DEFIBRILLATORS80ACUTE DEVICE IMPLANT-RELATED COMPLICATIONS DO NOT INCREASE LATE MORTALITY81ABORTED CARIDAC ARREST AS THE SENTINEL PRESENTATION IN A COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH THE CONCEALED BRUGADA PHENOTYPE82POST-CARDIAC DEVICE IMPLANTATION MOBILISATION ADVICE: A NATIONAL SURVEY83DO RISK SCORES DEVELOPED TO PROTECT ONE-YEAR MORTALITY ACTUALLY HELP IN ACCURATELY SELECTING PATIENTS RECEIVING PRIMARY PREVENTION ICD?84ATRIAL TACHYCARDIA ARISING FROM THE NON-CORONARY AORTIC CUSP85THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ABLATION STRATEGIES ON SURFACE ECG P WAVE DURATION86PRESCRIBING DRONEDARONE: HOW IS IT DONE ACROSS THE UK AND IS IT SAFE?87A CASE OF WIDE COMPLEX TACHYCARDIA88TRANSITION TO DEDICATED DAY CASE DEVICES - SAFETY AND EFFICACY IN A LARGE VOLUME CENTRE89SEQUENTIAL REGIONAL DOMINANT FREQUENCY MAPPING DURING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A NOVEL TEQUNIQUE90ELECTIVE CARDIOVERSION ENERGY PROTOCOLS: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF ESCALATION STRATEGIES91THE INCIDENCE OF CLINCALLY RELEVANT HAEMATOMAS WITH PERIOPERATIVE USE OF NEWER P2Y12 INHIBITORS AND INTERRUPTED NOAC THERAPY IN CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE INSERTION92AN AUDIT OF THE OUTCOMES FOR CHEMICAL AND DIRECT CURRENT CARDIOVERSION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AT OUR DGH OVER A 3 YEAR DURATION93REAL LIFE ACUTE MANAGEMET OF HAEMODYNAMICALLY TOLERATED MONOMORPHIC VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA. ARE WE MAKING EVIDENCE BASED ON DECISIONS?94A SERVICE EVALUATION TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NOVEL ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS VERSUS WARFARIN FOR ELECTIVE CARDIVERSION IN PATIENTS WITH NON VALVULAR AF IN A NURSE LED CARDIOVERSION SERVICE95PICK UP RATE OF IMPLANTED LOOP RECORDER AT A DISTRICT HOSPITAL. Europace 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
49
|
Furniss G, Opel A, Hussein A, Pearman C, Grace A, Connelly D, Orlowski A, Banerjee A, McNicholas T, Providencia R, Montañes M, Providencia R, Panagopoulos D, Tomlinson D, Dalrymple-Hay M, Haywood G, Butler A, Ang R, Ullah W, Schwartz R, Fannon M, Finlay M, Hunter R, Schilling R, Das M, Asfour I, Morgan M, Ronayne C, Shaw M, Snowdon R, Gupta D, Todd D, King R, Hall M, Modi S, Mediratta N, Gupta D, Reddy V, Neuzil P, Willems S, Verma A, Heck P, Schilling R, Lambiase P, Hall M, Nicholl B, McQueenie R, Jani BD, McKeag N, Gallacher K, Mair F, Heaton D, Macdonald J, Burnell J, Ryan R, Marshall T, Sutton C, O'Callaghan S, Kenny R, Karim N, Srinivasan N, Ferreira M, Goncalves L, Lambiase P, Toledano M, Field E, Walsh H, Maguire K, Cervi E, Kaski J, Perez Tome M, Pantazis A, Elliott P, Lambiase P, Segal O. ORAL ABSTRACTS (3)EP & Ablation31LEFT ATRIAL POSTERIOR WALL ISOLATION (THE “BOX LESION PATTERN”) IN THE TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE32DAY CASE CRYOBLATION (CRYO) FOR PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (pAF) IN THE DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IF DONE IN HIGH VOLUME WITH EXPERIENCED OPERATORS33ABLATION INDEX-GUIDED PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION MAY IMPROVE CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN COMPARISON TO CONTACT FORCE-GUIDED ABLATION34THE PROCEDURAL COMPLICATION RATES AND SHORT-TERM SUCCESS RATES OF THORACOSCOPIC AF ABLATION DURING THE INSTITUTIONAL LEARNING CURVE35INITIAL PROCEDURAL RESULTS FROM DDRAMATIC-SVT STUDY: DD MECHANISM IDENTIFICATION AND LOCALISATION USING DIPOLE DENSITY MAPPING TO GUIDE ABLATION STRATEGY36MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN MIDDLE-AGED INDIVIDUALS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: UK BIOBANK DATAClinical EP37THE GM AHSN AF LANDSCAPE TOOL: A SHARED PUBLIC DATA PLATFORM TO PROMOTE QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS AND IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES TO PREVENT AF-RELATED STROKE IN THE DEVOLVED GREATER MANCHESTER HEALTH SYSTEM38REAL WORLD PERSISTENCE, ADHERENCE AND SWITCH-OVER ACROSS ANTICOAGULANTS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION-A NATIONAL POPULATION-BASED STUDY39ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION AND ATRIAL FIBRILLATION40PREVALENCE OF SHORT QT AND CRITERIA OF SEVERITY IN A YOUNG ASYMPTOMATIC COHORT41SURFACE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND PREVALENCE OF ARRHYTHMIAS IN PAEDIATRIC FRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA42RISK STRATIFICATION OF TYPE 1 MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY: IS THE ECG ACCURATE ENOUGH TO SELECT PATIENTS AT RISK OF BRADYARRHYTHMIC EVENTS? Europace 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
50
|
Varanasi S, Wright I, Hussain W, Bowers R, Slater T, Sengupta A, Porter B, Hussein A, Chu G, Siddiqui M, Man S, Somani R, Sandilands A, Stafford P, Ng G, Luther V, Young Kim M, Benfield A, Tanner M, Lefroy D, Koa-Wing M, Lim P, Linton N, Davies D, Peters N, Kanagaratnam P, Moore P, Whinnett Z, Thakrar D, Iacovides S, Paisey J, Balasubramaniam R, Sopher SM, Saunderson C, Moyles C, Blackburn Y, Morley C, Jamil H, Schlosshan D, Kearney M, Witte K, Lambden C, Woodcock T, Matthew D, Hashmy S, Kaur M, Kaba A, Grant R, Unger-Graeber B, Khan S, Das M, Wynn G, Morgan M, Waktare J, Hall M, Modi S, Snowdon R, Todd D, Gupta D. MODERATED POSTERS (1)43P WAVE DURATION & SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF SIGNAL AVERAGED P WAVE: CAN THIS PREDICT RECURRENCE OF PARAOXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AFTER PULMONARY VEIN SIOLATION? A PROSPECTIVE STUDY44ATP INDUCED SLOW VF - A MECHANISM TO EXPLAIN THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ATP AND INCREASED MORTALITY45THE USE OF A HANDHELD DEVICE IN IDENTIFYING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PATIENTS DURING FLU VACCINATION CLINICS46DELIVERY OF A FULL EP SERVICE FROM A DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL SETTING: OUTCOMES FROM A SINGLE CENTRE47THE PREVALENCE OF SODIUM AND FLUID DEPLETION IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT SYNCOPE OF PRESUMED HYPOTENSIVE ORIGIN: A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE48ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND RISK STRATIFICATION FOR ICD IMPLANTATION AFTER ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION:OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT49THE QUALITY AND OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK DATA UNDERESTIMATES AF PREVALENCE AND OVERESTIMATES RATES OF APPROPRIATE THROMBOEMBOLIC PROPHYLAXIS50THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EFFECTIVE REFRACTORY PERIOD OF RECONNECTED PULMONARY VEINS AT REPEAT ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY STUDY AND RECURRENCE OF ATRIAL TACHYCARRHYTHMIA BEYOND ONE MONTH AFTER PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION. Europace 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|