Breast Cancer Index and Prediction of Extended Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy Benefit in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer from the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42 Trial

PURPOSE

BCI (H/I) has been shown to predict extended endocrine therapy (EET) benefit. We examined BCI (H/I) for EET benefit prediction in NSABP B-42, which evaluated extended letrozole therapy (ELT) in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer after 5 years of ET.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A stratified Cox model was used to analyze RFI as the primary endpoint, with DR, BCFI, and DFS as secondary endpoints. Because of a nonproportional effect of ELT on DR, time-dependent analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The translational cohort included 2,178 patients (45% BCI (H/I)-High, 55% BCI (H/I)-Low). ELT showed an absolute 10-year RFI benefit of 1.6% (P = 0.10), resulting in an underpowered primary analysis (50% power). ELT benefit and BCI (H/I) did not show a significant interaction for RFI (BCI (H/I)-Low: 10 years absolute benefit 1.1% [HR, 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-1.12; P = 0.13]; BCI (H/I)-High: 2.4% [HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.55-1.26; P = 0.38]; Pinteraction = 0.56). Time-dependent DR analysis showed that after 4 years, BCI (H/I)-High patients had significant ELT benefit (HR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.69; P < 0.01), whereas BCI (H/I)-Low patients were less likely to benefit (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.33-1.39; P = 0.29; Pinteraction = 0.14). Prediction of ELT benefit by BCI (H/I) was more apparent in the HER2- subset after 4 years (ELT-by-BCI (H/I) Pinteraction = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

BCI (H/I)-High versus BCI (H/I)-Low did not show a statistically significant difference in ELT benefit for the primary endpoint (RFI). However, in time-dependent DR analysis, BCI (H/I)-High patients experienced statistically significant benefit from ELT after 4 years, whereas (H/I)-Low patients did not. Because BCI (H/I) has been validated as a predictive marker of EET benefit in other trials, additional follow-up may enable further characterization of BCI's predictive ability.

Ten-year update: NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-42 randomized trial: extended letrozole therapy in early-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-42 trial evaluated extended letrozole therapy (ELT) in postmenopausal breast cancer patients who were disease free after 5 years of aromatase inhibitor (AI)-based therapy. Seven-year results demonstrated a nonstatistically significant trend in disease-free survival (DFS) in favor of ELT. We present 10-year outcome results.

METHODS

In this double-blind, phase III trial, patients with stage I-IIIA hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, disease free after 5 years of an AI or tamoxifen followed by an AI, were randomly assigned to 5 years of letrozole or placebo. Primary endpoint was DFS, defined as time from random assignment to breast cancer recurrence, second primary malignancy, or death. All statistical tests are 2-sided.

RESULTS

Between September 2006 and January 2010, 3966 patients were randomly assigned (letrozole: 1983; placebo: 1983). Median follow-up time for 3923 patients included in efficacy analyses was 10.3 years. There was statistically significant improvement in DFS in favor of letrozole compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74 to 0.96; P  = .01; 10-year DFS: placebo = 72.6%, letrozole = 75.9%, absolute difference = 3.3%). There was no difference in the effect of letrozole on overall survival (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.15; P  = .74). Letrozole statistically significantly reduced breast cancer-free interval events (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.91; P = .003; absolute difference in cumulative incidence = 2.7%) and distant recurrences (HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.92; P = .01; absolute difference = 1.8%). The rates of osteoporotic fractures and arterial thrombotic events did not differ between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The beneficial effect of ELT on DFS persisted at 10 years. Letrozole also improved breast cancer-free interval and distant recurrences without improving overall survival. Careful assessment of potential risks and benefits is necessary for selecting appropriate candidates for ELT.

Current Challenges and Disparities in the Delivery of Equitable Breast Cancer Care in Canada

Recent exciting advances in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer have improved outcomes for Canadians diagnosed and living with breast cancer. However, the reach of this progress has been uneven; disparities in accessing care across Canada are increasingly being recognized and are at risk of broadening. Members of racial minority groups, economically disadvantaged individuals, or those who live in rural or remote communities have consistently been shown to experience greater challenges in accessing 'state of the art' cancer care. The Canadian context also presents unique challenges-vast geography and provincial jurisdiction of the delivery of cancer care and drug funding create significant interprovincial differences in the patient experience. In this commentary, we review the core concepts of health equity, barriers to equitable delivery of breast cancer care, populations at risk, and recommendations for the advancement of health equity in the Canadian cancer system.

Genomic characterisation of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer arising in very young women

BACKGROUND

Very young premenopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) have higher rates of recurrence and death for reasons that remain largely unexplained.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Genomic sequencing was applied to HR+HER2- tumours from patients enrolled in the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) to determine genomic drivers that are enriched in young premenopausal women. Genomic alterations were characterised using next-generation sequencing from a subset of 1276 patients (deep targeted sequencing, n = 1258; whole-exome sequencing in a young-age, case-control subsample, n = 82). We defined copy number (CN) subgroups and assessed for features suggestive of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Genomic alteration frequencies were compared between young premenopausal women (<40 years) and older premenopausal women (≥40 years), and assessed for associations with distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Younger women (<40 years, n = 359) compared with older women (≥40 years, n = 917) had significantly higher frequencies of mutations in GATA3 (19% versus 16%) and CN amplifications (CNAs) (47% versus 26%), but significantly lower frequencies of mutations in PIK3CA (32% versus 47%), CDH1 (3% versus 9%), and MAP3K1 (7% versus 12%). Additionally, they had significantly higher frequencies of features suggestive of HRD (27% versus 21%) and a higher proportion of PIK3CA mutations with concurrent CNAs (23% versus 11%). Genomic features suggestive of HRD, PIK3CA mutations with CNAs, and CNAs were associated with significantly worse DRFI and OS compared with those without these features. These poor prognostic features were enriched in younger patients: present in 72% of patients aged <35 years, 54% aged 35-39 years, and 40% aged ≥40 years. Poor prognostic features [n = 584 (46%)] versus none [n = 692 (54%)] had an 8-year DRFI of 84% versus 94% and OS of 88% versus 96%. Younger women (<40 years) had the poorest outcomes: 8-year DRFI 74% versus 85% and OS 80% versus 93%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results provide insights into genomic alterations that are enriched in young women with HR+HER2- EBC, provide rationale for genomic subgrouping, and highlight priority molecular targets for future clinical trials.

Abstract P1-02-01: Comparing the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors vs tamoxifen in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer: a systematic review and trial-level meta-analysis

Background: Five years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) including aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and tamoxifen (TAM) is considered the standard of care in hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor–negative (HR+/HER2−) early breast cancer (eBC). Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of an AI or TAM depending on menopausal status and clinical risk stratification. Although TAM is generally recommended and more commonly used in premenopausal women, there is mixed evidence for different clinical outcomes. Patient-level meta-analyses conducted by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) showed significantly lower rates of BC recurrence with AIs vs TAM. However, this was not specific to patients with HR+/HER2− eBC. This trial-level meta-analysis was conducted to compare AIs ± ovarian function suppression (OFS) vs TAM ± OFS in HR+/HER2−, pre- and postmenopausal patients with eBC. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using key literature databases, ie, Embase, PubMed, and MEDLINE In-Process (from database inception to March 2022) and key conferences (2019-2021). Studies selected for the SLR were those that included either ≥80% of patients with HR+/HER2− eBC in the mixed patient population or subgroup data provided specifically for patients with HR+/HER2− eBC. Of these, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating AI ± OFS vs TAM ± OFS and assessing disease-free survival (DFS) were included in the trial-level meta-analysis. This meta-analysis was conducted using the generic invariance method to obtain a pooled effect estimate (hazard ratio [HR]) together with its CI for DFS. This pooled estimate was calculated as a weighted average of the intervention effects estimated in the individual trials. Both fixed- and random-effect models (FEM, REM) were used to estimate the effect size. A base-case analysis was performed including all eligible trials. Three other scenario analyses were conducted: trials investigating only nonsteroidal AIs (NSAIs), assessing only premenopausal women, and assessing only postmenopausal women. Heterogeneity across the trials was assessed using I2 statistic. Results: A total of 5 RCTs comparing AI ± OFS vs TAM ± OFS were eligible for the meta-analysis (SOFT, HOBOE, BIG 1-98, N-SAS BC 03, Li 2019; additional information on rationale for exclusion of specific trials will be reported). Two studies assessing NSAI vs TAM included postmenopausal women, while 3 studies assessing AIs + OFS vs TAM ± OFS included premenopausal women. A total of 6623 patients were followed up for 34-97.2 months across these five trials. Heterogeneity was found to be low (I2 &lt; 40%) across all scenarios. The base-case results (including all studies) using FEM significantly favored AIs ± OFS over TAM ± OFS, with a 29% reduction in risk of recurrence or death (pooled HR, 0.71 [95%CI, 0.64-0.80]). Similar results were observed with NSAIs ± OFS vs TAM ± OFS (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.64-0.83]). Among premenopausal patients, the pooled HR for AIs + OFS vs TAM ± OFS was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54-0.79). For postmenopausal women, the HR was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65-0.87), favoring AIs over TAM. The findings for the base-case and different scenarios remained consistent when REM was used. Conclusions: This trial-level meta-analysis suggests significantly greater benefit with AIs than with TAM for HR+/HER2− eBC. Notably, AIs in combination with OFS are associated with a 34% reduction in risk of recurrence or death vs TAM ± OFS in premenopausal women; these results are aligned with the patient-level data findings of the EBCTCG. The findings indicate that AIs ± OFS are associated with a better DFS in the HR+/HER2− population, especially premenopausal women, than TAM ± OFS.

Citation Format: Wolfgang Janni, Michael Untch, Nadia Harbeck, Joseph Gilgorov, William Jacot, Stephen K. Chia, Jean-Francois Boileau, Sina Haftchenary, Rhea Gupta, Namita Mishra, Purnima Pathak, Giuseppe Curigliano. Comparing the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors vs tamoxifen in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer: a systematic review and trial-level meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-02-01.

Abstract OT2-16-05: Safety Analyses of NRG BR004: A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Trial of Taxane/Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab with Atezolizumab or Placebo in First-line HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)

Background: The CLEOPATRA trial established trastuzumab, pertuzumab and a taxane (THP) as a standard of care for first line metastatic, HER2-positve breast cancer with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 18.7 months and median OS of 57 months. NRG BR004 was a phase III, placebo-controlled trial designed to determine whether the addition of the PD-L1 inhibitor, atezolizumab, to THP would improve progression-free survival (PFS), relative to THP/placebo in patients with newly documented HER2-positive measurable metastatic breast cancer.

Methods: BR004 was designed to detect an improvement in the primary endpoint of PFS in patients with measurable disease from 16.5 to 22.5 months with addition of atezolizumab (HR 0.733). A sample size of 600 would provide 80% power with a type I error rate of 0.05 to detect such an improvement when 326 PFS events had been reported. Monthly accrual was projected at 30 patients per month with completion of accrual in 24 months. In addition to routine monitoring of safety data by the IDMC every 6 months, a formal analysis of the toxicity data was to be performed 16 weeks after the 100th patient had been randomized with review by the IDMC.

Results: First patient was randomized on May 1, 2019, and after 37 months 190 patients had been randomized. Several amendments were not successful in addressing the low accrual rate. The IDMC began regular monitoring of safety and accrual data in July 2020 and reviewed the formal safety analysis in February 2022. As of the February 2022 IDMC meeting, four Grade 5 adverse events (AEs) had been reported (2 occurring in 2020 and 2 in 2021), one of which occurred in a patient with evolving liver failure due to rapid disease progression at the start of therapy. The recommendation was to continue without modification, but notice was given the Grade 5 AEs had occurred on the same treatment arm without unblinding. When additional Grade 5 AEs occurred on 3/4/2022 and 4/27/2022 both on the same study arm with none reported on the other arm, accrual was held until the IDMC could review updated safety data, narratives of the Grade 5 AEs and the overall context of the trial. There was no evidence of clinically important imbalances between Grade 3 and Grade 4 AEs between the arms., Based on an uncertain but material safety signal, the ongoing accrual challenges, and determination that the clinical question being addressed was no longer sufficiently compelling, the IDMC recommended that the trial should be permanently closed to further enrollment. Summary safety data from 187 treated patients are provided in the Table. A decision was made to discontinue atezolizumab/placebo in patients receiving the investigational component of the trial therapy and unblind investigators and patients. The study will continue to collect information on PFS events, deaths and late immune AEs through April of 2024 when PFS and OS will be analyzed.

Conclusions: The imbalance in Grade 5 AEs which occurred on BR004 coupled with continued poor accrual and the changing landscape in HER2+ MBC resulted in early closure of enrollment and unblinding of patients. Follow-up continues to assess PFS, OS and monitor for delayed immune AEs.

Support: U10CA180868, -189867, -180822; U24CA196067; and Genentech.

Abstract P5-02-14: Identification of mechanisms of acquired resistance to ribociclib plus endocrine therapy using baseline and end-of-treatment circulating tumor DNA samples in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials

Background: Genetic alterations that contribute to resistance to therapy may be acquired during treatment (tx) for hormone receptor−positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor−negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). A previous pooled analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in MONALEESA (ML)-2, -3, and -7 identified potential predictive biomarkers for response and resistance to ribociclib (RIB) at baseline (BL). Here, we describe an analysis of paired BL and end of treatment (EOT) samples from ML-2, -3, and -7 to identify acquired mechanisms that may impact resistance to RIB + endocrine therapy (ET) vs placebo (PBO) + ET. Methods: ML-2 (NCT01958021), ML-3 (NCT02422615), and ML-7 (NCT02278120) evaluated efficacy and safety of RIB + ET vs PBO + ET in pre- and postmenopausal patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− ABC treated in first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) settings. Plasma samples were collected at cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1; prior to first therapy exposure) and at EOT (± 28 days of recorded progression). ctDNA was sequenced using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel of ≈550 genes. Genes with an alteration frequency of &gt;5% at EOT, regardless of their frequency at BL, were included. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was assessed by tx arm; a TMB cutoff of 10 mutations/MB was used to categorize pts as TMB high vs low. To assess differences in the presence of alterations, a McNemar test was performed on paired samples and adjusted (adj) for multiple testing using the false discovery rate (FDR). A Bayesian mixed effects model was used to account for ctDNA fraction and trial and to test for tx-specific resistance by including a tx × visit interaction term. Results: A total of 905 paired samples from ML-2, -3, and -7 were included in this analysis, 441 and 464 samples from pts treated with RIB + ET and PBO + ET, respectively. Overall, 17 genes had an alteration frequency of &gt;5% at EOT. The ctDNA fraction was higher at EOT vs C1D1 in both the RIB (P=.037) and PBO (P=.033) arms. The frequency of alterations in RB1 (10.4% vs 2.0%), ATM (11.3% vs 8.4%), FAT1 (4.8% vs 3.0%), and FAT3 (5.0% vs 2.5%) was higher at EOT vs C1D1 in the RIB arm (FDR-adj P&lt;.10). Alterations in ESR1 were also higher at EOT vs C1D1 in both the RIB (26.3% vs 9.1%) and PBO arms (28.9% vs 5.4%) (FDR-adj P&lt;.0001). Conversely, alterations in GATA3 were higher at EOT in the PBO arm (FDR-adj P=.11). These results were consistent after adjusting for ctDNA fraction. The most common ESR1 mutations were D538G, Y537S/N/C/D, E380Q, and L536H/P/R. Tx × visit interaction effects were observed for RB1 in the RIB arm and GATA3 in the PBO arm, suggesting tx-specific resistance. A tx × visit interaction for ESR1 was also observed, suggesting a larger relative increase in ESR1 mutations with PBO vs RIB. The percentage of pts with high TMB (&gt;10) at EOT increased from 1.1% to 5.7% in the RIB arm and from 1.7% to 3% in the PBO arm. After accounting for ctDNA fraction and trial, a larger numerical increase in TMB was observed for RIB (odds ratio [OR], 9.0; 95% CI, 2.9-32.7) vs PBO (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.7-6.5); however, the model did not support a differential tx effect. Conclusions: This comprehensive analysis of pooled samples from ML-2, -3, and -7 identified acquired gene alterations in pts with HR+/HER2− ABC treated with 1L or 2L RIB + ET or PBO + ET. The frequency of several genes known to contribute to resistance (ESR1, RB1, ATM, FAT1, and FAT3) was higher at EOT vs C1D1 in pts treated with RIB + ET, while ESR1 and GATA3 alterations were higher at EOT vs C1D1 in pts treated with PBO + ET. This paired dataset of BL and EOT samples from pts with HR+/HER2− ABC treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and ET is the largest to date and could be used to validate and confirm acquired resistance mechanisms with low alteration frequency.

Citation Format: Fabrice Andre, Nadia Solovieff, Faye Su, Aditya Bardia, Patrick Neven, Yoon-Sim Yap, Debu Tripathy, Yen-Shen Lu, Dennis Slamon, Stephen K. Chia, Mukta Joshi, Arunava Chakravartty, Agnes Lteif, Tetiana Taran, Carlos Arteaga. Identification of mechanisms of acquired resistance to ribociclib plus endocrine therapy using baseline and end-of-treatment circulating tumor DNA samples in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-14.

Abstract OT3-26-01: CCTG MA40: DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED PHASE III TRIAL OF FULVESTRANT AND IPATASERTIB FOR ADVANCED HER-2 NEGATIVE AND ESTROGEN RECEPTOR POSITIVE (ER+) BREAST CANCER POST FIRST LINE CDK 4/6 AND AROMATASE INHIBITOR THERAPY (FINER)

Background: The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is a rational target in the metastatic disease setting for hormone receptor positive breast cancer based on preclinical and clinical data demonstrating that pathway inhibition improves outcome (Baselga 2012, Andre 2019, Jones 2019). Combining fulvestrant and AKT inhibition demonstrated efficacy in pts with HR+aBC (Howell 2022). Ipatasertib is a potent, highly selective, small-molecule inhibitor of three isoforms of serine/threonine kinase AKT. We hypothesize that Ipatasertib plus fulvestrant will improve PFS compared to fulvestrant in the second line setting post disease progression on aromatase inhibitor (AI) + CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy. Methods: MA40 is a double blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with prior progression on AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. Patients are randomized to fulvestrant/ipatasertib 400 mg po days 1-21 every 28 day or fulvestrant/placebo. The primary objective is to compare Progression Free Survival (PFS) between arms (RECIST 1.1, investigator assessed). Secondary objectives include comparisons between arms: PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN altered cohort and non-altered cohorts; PFS by Blinded Central Radiology Review (all enrolled patients, PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN altered and non-altered cohorts), Response rate; Duration of Response; Clinical Benefit Rate; Overall Survival; Time to Commencement of Subsequent Line of Systemic Therapy or Death; Safety and Tolerability (CTCAE version 5.0); QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30, NCI PRO-CTCAE); Economic Evaluation, (healthcare utilization and health utilities(EQ-5D-5L)). Statistical Design: Allocation 1:1 balanced for: PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT1 mutation status (ctDNA analysis using FoundationOne®Liquid Platform) (altered vs wildtype/unknown); prior treatment duration with CDK4/6 inhibitor (&lt; 6 months vs &gt; 6 months) and centre. Sample size is 250 to detect a benefit in PFS with the addition of ipatasertib. Eligibility Criteria: Histologically and/or cytologically confirmed ER positive and HER-2 negative breast cancer by local assessment that is advanced; postmenopausal status; clinical and/or radiographic progression during treatment with or within 28 days after discontinuation of first line of treatment with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor and an AI; only one prior line of chemotherapy in the advanced setting. Conduct to Date: Enrollment is ongoing. Supported by Hoffmann-La Roche Limited, CCS

Citation Format: Stephen K. Chia, David W. Cescon, Andrew D. Redfern, Danielle Rodin, Christine Simmons, Jean-Pierre Ayoub, Haji Ibrahim Chalchal, Daniel Rayson, Moira Rushton-Marovac, Tracey Hay, Lisa Gallinaro, Bingshu Chen, Wendy Parulekar. CCTG MA40: DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED PHASE III TRIAL OF FULVESTRANT AND IPATASERTIB FOR ADVANCED HER-2 NEGATIVE AND ESTROGEN RECEPTOR POSITIVE (ER+) BREAST CANCER POST FIRST LINE CDK 4/6 AND AROMATASE INHIBITOR THERAPY (FINER) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-26-01.

Abstract GS1-01: Race and clinical outcomes in the RxPONDER Trial (SWOG S1007)

Introduction: Racial disparities in breast cancer (BC) outcomes continues to be a major health care challenge. The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) is an important tool to guide treatment (tx) decisions among women with early-stage BC. We report an analysis of clinical characteristics, survival outcomes and race in association with RS in participants (pts) in the RxPONDER trial.

Methods: We analyzed clinical outcomes with respect to race and ethnicity. Unreported race excluded 18.7% of the pts, with most due to privacy rules. The primary outcome was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) was also evaluated. Analyses adjusted for assigned tx arm, RS, and grade were performed. There were too few events to include Native American/Pacific Islander (NAPI) women in the survival analyses.

Results: A total of 4,048 trial women with Hormone Receptor positive, HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-) BC, 1-3 involved axillary lymph nodes (LNs), RS ≤ 25 and known race/ethnicity were included in this analysis including the following: 2,833 non-Hispanic (NH) White pts (70%), 248 NH Black pts (6.1%), 610 Hispanic pts (15.1%), 324 Asian pts (8.0%), and 33 NAPI pts (0.8%). Asian and Hispanic women were younger than NH Whites (by 7.1 and 2.4 years, respectively) but NH Blacks did not differ in age. RS distribution did not differ among all racial subgroups (p=0.49). There were also no significant differences in tumor size (p=0.10) or number of positive LNs (p=0.26) across all racial groups. However, tumor grade was found to be significantly different with grade 3 tumors higher for NH Blacks (18.0%), NH NAPI (21.1%), and Hispanics (14.5%) vs. NH Whites (10.4%) and Asians (6.5%) (p&lt; 0.001). Overall five-year IDFS was lower for NH Blacks (87.0%) compared to that for Asians (93.9%), NH Whites (91.5%), and Hispanics (91.4%) (Table 1). A multivariable Cox model adjusting for RS and tx arm showed worse IDFS for NH Blacks compared to NH Whites (HR=1.38; 95% CI 1.00-1.90; p=0.048), although Asian pts had better IDFS than NH Whites (HR=0.65; 95% CI 0.44-0.97; p=0.034). In a separate analysis by menopausal status the magnitude of the IDFS hazard ratios (HRs) for NH Blacks was similar, although no longer statistically significant (premenopausal HR=1.37; 95% CI 0.69-2.72; postmenopausal HR=1.38; 95% CI 0.96-1.98). While there was no statistically significant interaction between NH Blacks vs. NH Whites and tx arm for either premenopausal (p=0.99) or postmenopausal women (p=0.44), adjusting for RS, the small number of events in the NH Black cohort, particularly in premenopausal women (n = 9 IDFS events), limit power and inference about differences in chemotherapy benefit. Among postmenopausal women, NH Blacks had worse DRFS compared to NH Whites (HR=1.69; 95% CI 1.12-2.53; p=0.01), adjusting for tx and RS. A similar trend was seen among premenopausal women (HR=1.74; 95% CI 0.79-3.82; p=0.17), although not statistically significant. Data on tx adherence over 5 years was not mature, although NH Blacks were more likely to accept tx assignment compared to NH Whites at randomization (93% vs. 86%, p=0.004).

Conclusion: Black women with HR+/HER2- BC, 1-3 involved LNs and RS ≤ 25 have worse outcomes compared to White women despite similar RS results. There was no significant interaction between NH Blacks vs. NH Whites and tx arm, although this analysis was limited due to sample size. There remains an important need for novel approaches to improve clinical outcomes particularly for NH Black Women.

Table 1. IDFS by Race and Ethnicity.

Citation Format: Yara Abdou, William E. Barlow, Julie R. Gralow, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kathy S. Albain, Daniel F. Hayes, Nancy U. Lin, Edith A. Perez, Lori J. Goldstein, Stephen K. Chia, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Priya Rastogi, Emilio Alba, Suzette Delaloge, Anne F. Schott, Steven Shak, Priyanka Sharma, Danika L. Lew, Jieling Miao, Joseph M. Unger, Debu Tripathy, Lajos Pusztai, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Kevin Kalinsky. Race and clinical outcomes in the RxPONDER Trial (SWOG S1007) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-01.

Abstract PD17-08: Pooled gene expression analysis and association with treatment response in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials

Background: The Phase III MONALEESA (ML)-2, -3, and -7 trials showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with ribociclib (RIB) + endocrine therapy (ET) over placebo (PBO) + ET in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC); improvement in OS with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has been observed in some, but not all clinical trials. Gene expression analyses for each separate ML study were reported previously. Given the differences in CDK4 vs CDK6 inhibition between RIB and other CDK4/6i, we evaluated the association between cell cycle (CC)–related genes and outcomes based on pooled analysis of gene expression using tumor samples from the ML-2, -3, and -7 trials.

Methods: Gene expression data were generated from pre-treatment archival tumor samples (primary, 73%; metastatic, 27%) with a customized NanoString nCounter panel (781 genes) including genes involved in CC, other signaling pathways, and breast cancer biology. Samples were pooled from 1139 pre- and postmenopausal pts with HR+/HER2− ABC across the 3 ML studies, which included pts on first- and second-line therapy. Data were categorized into training (80%) and test (20%) datasets. The training dataset was used to analyze each gene (modeled continuously) individually for an association with PFS, and genes with a gene × treatment (tx) interaction P value &lt;.10 were evaluated in the test dataset. Genes or gene signatures were classified by tertiles based on expression level (low/medium/high). For each tertile, median (m) PFS was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) of tx benefit (RIB vs PBO) were estimated. A Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for clinical covariates was used. A machine learning approach (elastic net survival model with stability selection), which used available gene expression data and select clinical factors and their interactions with tx arms, was applied to predict PFS.

Results: This report focused on CC-related genes and signatures. Gene expression levels of CDKN2B and the expression ratio of CCND1/CDKN2A showed a predictive relationship with benefit from RIB in both training and test sets (Table). PFS benefit with RIB was consistent regardless of the CDK4/CDK6 expression ratio or level of expression of CCNE1, CDK2, RB1, combined CC-related genes, E2F gene signatures, RB gene signature, combined DNA-replication genes, or combined proliferation-related genes. A machine learning approach identified a clinico-genomic signature that was prognostic for PFS benefit with RIB. Selected variables included gene expression levels of FXBO5, PGR, RBBP8, and STC2 and several clinical features (tx arm, de novo disease, prior ET, and visceral disease). Pts with a low signature score had a longer mPFS vs pts with a high signature score, in the RIB (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.62) and PBO (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15-0.59) arms.

Conclusion: In the largest pooled analysis of the association of gene expression profile data with CDK4/6i tx response in pts with HR+/HER2− ABC, the PFS benefit with RIB + ET over ET alone was consistent irrespective of expression levels of most CC genes. Variation in magnitude of RIB benefit was observed, depending on CDKN2B expression levels, CCND1/CDKN2A expression ratio, and machine learning–derived signature scores. The clinico-genomic CDK4/6i signature requires validation in additional datasets.

Table 1: Progression-Free Survival by Gene Expression Subgroup

Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Faye Su, Nadia Solovieff, Fabrice Andre, Carlos Arteaga, Patrick Neven, Yoon-Sim Yap, Yen-Shen Lu, Stephen K. Chia, Dennis Slamon, Seock-Ah Im, Arunava Chakravartty, Agnes Lteif, Tetiana Taran, Debu Tripathy. Pooled gene expression analysis and association with treatment response in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD17-08.

Abstract P4-09-12: Baseline and End-of-Treatment Biomarkers in Patients With PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer From BYLieve Study Cohorts A and B

Introduction: Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) is mutated in ~40% of patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). PIK3CA mutations are associated with resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) and worse overall survival. Alpelisib (ALP), an α-selective PI3K inhibitor and degrader, is indicated in combination with fulvestrant (FUL) for pts with PIK3CA-mutated (mut) HR+, HER2− ABC following progression on/after ET-based treatments. In the Phase 2, open-label, 3-cohort, noncomparative BYLieve study, clinical benefit of ALP in combination with ET was observed in the post-cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) setting in pts with PIK3CA-mut, HR+, HER2− ABC. Here we report the results of a biomarker analysis using paired baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) and end-of-treatment (EOT) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples from pts in BYLieve Cohorts A and B.

Methods: In the BYLieve study, pts with PIK3CA-mut, HR+, HER2− ABC had CDK4/6i + aromatase inhibitor (Cohort A; N=127) or CDK4/6i + FUL (Cohort B; N=126) as treatment immediately prior to receiving ALP + FUL and ALP + letrozole, respectively. In this biomarker analysis, gene alterations were detected in ctDNA at baseline and EOT using next-generation sequencing (PanCancer V2 panel). Pts included in this interim analysis had confirmed PIK3CA mutations and matched baseline/EOT samples with enough sequencing coverage and ctDNA fraction to detect mutations at both time points. ctDNA fractions, tumor mutation burden (TMB) distributions, genomic landscapes, gain/loss of PIK3CA and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), chromosome 8/11 amplification profiles, and alterations in PI3K pathway and potential CDK4/6i resistance markers were assessed across time points. Sample sizes were small; results should thus be interpreted with caution.

Results: Forty-three pts were included in the Cohort A biomarker population and 40 pts were included in Cohort B. ctDNA fraction was numerically higher at EOT compared with baseline in both cohorts; further analyses will be presented. In Cohort A, no significant differences were observed in TMB at EOT compared with baseline (P=0.21). In Cohort B, TMB was higher at EOT compared with baseline (P=0.053). Chromosome 8/11 amplifications were consistent between baseline and EOT for both cohorts. Small variations were observed in ESR1/PIK3CA mutations between baseline and EOT on both cohorts (Table). The status of potential CDK4/6i resistance markers was relatively unchanged at EOT (Table). Loss-of-function mutations in PTEN, a known PI3K inhibitor resistance marker, increased from 9% at baseline to 14% at EOT in Cohort A and from 12% at baseline to 22% at EOT in Cohort B.

Conclusions: Between baseline and EOT, only small variations in gene alterations in PIK3CA-mutated HR+, HER2– ABC were observed in the post-CDK4/6i setting. As the disease progressed, increases in loss-of-function mutations in PTEN at EOT in both Cohorts A and B suggested loss of PTEN in PI3K pathway may drive resistance to ALP. Early intervention with ALP, when the tumor is particularly driven by PIK3CA oncogenic mutations and before it develops more genomic complexity, may potentially provide better clinical outcomes.

Table. Gene Alteration Gain/Loss at Baseline/EOT Across Cohorts A and B

Citation Format: Dejan Juric, Nicholas Turner, Sherene Loi, Fabrice Andre, Stephen K. Chia, Komal Jhaveri, Patrick Neven, Rebecca Dent, Eva Ciruelos, Mukta Joshi, Estelle Roux, Heather Patino, Murat Akdere, Hope Rugo. Baseline and End-of-Treatment Biomarkers in Patients With PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer From BYLieve Study Cohorts A and B [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-12.

Impact of sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response rate in HER2-negative breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Data exploring optimal sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer are limited and inconsistent. The objective of this study was to assess the real-world impact of sequence order on pathologic complete response (pCR) and clinical outcomes from NACT.

METHODS

Patients with HER2-negative breast cancer treated with NACT from May 2012 to April 2020 were identified from a prospectively collected institutional database. The primary endpoint was to compare rates of pCR (ypT0/isN0) between patients who received anthracyclines followed by taxanes (AC-T) to those who received taxanes followed by anthracyclines (T-AC). Additional endpoints of interest included clinical complete response, downstaging, Neo-Bioscore, conversion to breast-conserving surgery eligibility, relapse-free survival, and overall survival between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 283 patients who met eligibility criteria, 187 (66%) received AC-T and 96 (34%) received T-AC. Sequence order did not influence the primary endpoint of pCR rate (19% for AC-T vs. 21% for T-AC, p = 0.752). There were also no significant differences in secondary NACT efficacy outcomes between groups. In the overall cohort, pCR rate was higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (32% vs. 13% in hormone-positive cancer, p < 0.001) and grade 3 tumors (31% vs. 12% for grade 1-2 tumors, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world analysis of HER2-negative breast cancer patients, there was no differential impact on pCR rate or clinical outcomes from NACT with sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes. This supports the current variation in prescribing practice.

ESR1 Mutations and Overall Survival on Fulvestrant versus Exemestane in Advanced Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Combined Analysis of the Phase III SoFEA and EFECT Trials

PURPOSE

ESR1 mutations are acquired frequently in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer after prior aromatase inhibitors. We assessed the clinical utility of baseline ESR1 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in the two phase III randomized trials of fulvestrant versus exemestane.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The phase III EFECT and SoFEA trials randomized patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer who had progressed on prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy, between fulvestrant 250 mg and exemestane. Baseline serum samples from 227 patients in EFECT, and baseline plasma from 161 patients in SoFEA, were analyzed for ESR1 mutations by digital PCR. The primary objectives were to assess the impact of ESR1 mutation status on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a combined analysis of both studies.

RESULTS

ESR1 mutations were detected in 30% (151/383) baseline samples. In patients with ESR1 mutation detected, PFS was 2.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0-2.6] on exemestane and 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.0-6.0) on fulvestrant [hazard ratio (HR), 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89; P = 0.01). In patients without ESR1 mutations detected, PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.2) on exemestane and 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-5.5) on fulvestrant (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81-1.37; P = 0.69). There was an interaction between ESR1 mutation and treatment (P = 0.02). Patients with ESR1 mutation detected had 1-year OS of 62% (95% CI, 45%-75%) on exemestane and 80% (95% CI, 68%-87%) on fulvestrant (P = 0.04; restricted mean survival analysis). Patients without ESR1 mutations detected had 1-year OS of 79% (95% CI, 71%-85%) on exemestane and 81% (95% CI, 74%-87%) on fulvestrant (P = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of ESR1 mutations in baseline ctDNA is associated with inferior PFS and OS in patients treated with exemestane versus fulvestrant.

Abstract P1-13-02: Real world outcomes of adjuvant FECD, ddACT and ACT for the treatment of early stage breast cancer - A multicenter retrospective analysis

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy combining anthracyclines and taxanes for early stage breast cancer (ESBC) have demonstrated disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits. Among the 3rd generation regimens, 2 options have been favoured: FEC-Docetaxel (FECD) and AC-Paclitaxel (ACT). ACT may be delivered with dose-dense (ddACT) or weekly taxane scheduling (ddACWT), compared to traditional every 3-weekly (q3ACT) scheduling. Despite literature supporting both FECD and (dd)ACT regimens in the management of ESBC, no direct prospective trial has evaluated their comparative effectiveness.

Methods: A retrospective review of the BC Cancer Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit (BCOU) and the Alberta Health Services (AHS) databases was performed to identify patients with HER2 negative, stage 1-3 ESBC, who received adjuvant chemotherapy between 2007-2014. The primary endpoint was OS and the secondary endpoint was RFS, defined as freedom from local (invasive), regional or distant recurrence or breast cancer death. Outcome comparisons were made between FECD, ddACT/ddACWT and q3ACT using the Kaplan Meier method. Treatment arms were compared using a log-rank test for univariate analysis. A multivariate analysis was also conducted for OS comprising age, stage, grade, receptor status and type of chemotherapy received (FECD vs combined ACT group).

Results: A total of 4047 patients met inclusion criteria, including 2685 FECD, 1259 ddACT and 103 ACT. Median age was 53 (24-77) in the FECD group vs 52 (26-68) in the ddACT/ddACWT group and 58 (43-78) in the q3ACT group. The majority had stage 2 disease, 51.3%, 53.5% and 50.5% in the FECD, ddACT/ddACWT and q3ACT groups, respectively. Most were HR+, 84.5% in the FECD group vs 66.9% in both the ddACT/ddACWT and q3ACT groups. In the FECD group, 42.8% had a grade 2 tumour and 48.2% a grade 3 tumour vs 35.4% and 56.4% in the ddACT/ddACWT group and 35.0% and 58.3% in the q3ACT group. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was present in 40.7% of patients who received FECD vs 39.7% for ddACT/ddACWT and 26.2% for ACT. 5-year OS, for the FECD group was 90.3% (95%CI 89.1,91.4) vs 87.0% (95%CI 84.3,89.2) for the ddACT/ddACWT and 84.9% (95%CI 75.5,90.8) for the q3ACT groups, p=0.0907. 5-year RFS was 85.5% (95%CI 84.0-86.8) with FECD vs 84.4% (95% 81.9,86.6) for ddACT/ddACWT and 87.7% (95%CI 79.2,92.8) with q3ACT,p=0.4200. In multivariate analysis: age, stage and grade were significantly associated with OS whereas type of chemotherapy received (FECD vs ACT) was not (p=0.165). Finally, OS rates were compared across provinces and no significant differences were identified, 87.0% vs 88.0% (p=0.6294). Subgroup analyses by receptor type, comparing HR+ and TNBC are ongoing.

Conclusions: The use of FECD as compared to ACT based chemotherapy did not reveal significant differences in OS or RFS in this population-based study. Further, chemotherapy regimen was not associated with differences in overall survival, as compared to other well recognized prognostic factors. While the results were obtained from a retrospective analysis, conclusive prospective data is lacking. These results may therefore reassure physicians and patients alike on a comparable efficacy of these regimens in a real-life setting.

Citation Format: LeVasseur N, Veitch Z, Diocee RM, Gondara L, Cheung W, Khan O, Cossetti R, Gelmon KA, King K, Lupichuk S, Chia SK, Tang P, Simmons C. Real world outcomes of adjuvant FECD, ddACT and ACT for the treatment of early stage breast cancer - A multicenter retrospective analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-02.

Abstract OT1-12-01: Exploration of factors associated with imminent risk of late recurrence in hormone receptor positive breast cancer

Research objectives: To conduct a prospective observational study of patient and tumor-related factors in women with high risk hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) following at least 5 years of adjuvant hormonal therapy, in order to identify risk factors for imminent recurrence.

Rationale: Many of the life-threatening BC recurrences in women with HR+HER2- BC take place more than 5 years post-diagnosis, often after completion of adjuvant hormonal therapy. The identification of a biomarker(s) for late BC recurrence could lead to interventional trials to evaluate preventive therapies. We will evaluate whether the presence of blood-based biomarkers [(i) Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs), (ii) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), (iii) tumor markers (CA 15-3, CEA)] and patient factors may predict BC recurrence.

Trial design: A prospective cohort of eligible women with previously treated HR+HER2- BC who have not experienced a distant recurrence will be enrolled; patient and circulating factors will be measured annually until distant recurrence or study completion. Host factors (including BMI, lifestyle, medical illness, surgery, trauma and stress, as well as circulating PlGF, VEGF-1 and inflammatory markers) that may contribute to exit of BC cells from dormancy will also be assessed.

The primary outcome is distant BC recurrence. Any BC event, including loco-regional recurrence, new breast or other primary cancer will be evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Outcomes will be ascertained by regular self-report (via annual telephone calls) and/or physician report and confirmed by medical record review.

Key eligibility criteria: i) Diagnosis of ER and/or PR positive (either or both 10% positive), HER2 negative invasive BC, ii) predicted &gt;1.5-2% annual risk of recurrence (T2, T3 or T4 with any N+;T1 N2+; T2N0 or T1 N1 cancers with high risk genomic scores), iii) receipt of adjuvant endocrine therapy for at least 4 years, with discontinuation planned in the next 12 months or completion of endocrine therapy within the last 5 years, iv) prior adjuvant chemotherapy, targeted therapy and bone targeted therapies are allowed provided they have been completed.

Specific aims: 1) Determine if the presence of (i) CTCs, (ii) ctDNA, (iii) CA15-3 and CEA are associated with imminent risk (within 1-2 years) of distant recurrence in the study population. 2) Identify host factors associated with these blood-based biomarkers, as well as clinical outcomes.

Statistical methods: A matched case control design (matching for time since completion of adjuvant hormone therapy, baseline T, N and grade) will be used to investigate associations of key study variables with imminent risk of distant recurrence within the next 1-2 years. Measurements of patients who do versus do not recur will be compared over the 1-2 years prior to relapse. Each variable will be allocated one third of a study-wide type one error of 0.05 (2-sided). ROC analyses and multivariable modelling will be used to optimize sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV. Available questionnaire data will be summarized at all time-points to generate descriptive survivorship data.

Accrual: Starting in August 2018, we plan to recruit 1,000 patients over 2 years at selected Canadian cancer centres.

Citation Format: Jerzak KJ, Cescon DW, Chia SK, Bratman S, Ennis M, Stambolic V, Chang M, Dowling R, Goodwin PJ. Exploration of factors associated with imminent risk of late recurrence in hormone receptor positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-12-01.

Abstract P2-13-01: Efficacy of neratinib in hormone receptor-positive patients who initiated treatment within 1 year of completing trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in HER2+ early-stage breast cancer: Subgroup analyses from the phase III ExteNET trial

Background: The international, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III ExteNET trial showed that 1 year (yr) of neratinib 240 mg/day after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in 2840 patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer at 2 yr (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% CI 0.50–0.91; p=0.009) [Chan 2016] and 5 yr (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.92; p=0.008) [Martin 2017]. A prespecified subgroup analysis by hormone receptor (HR) status suggested enhanced efficacy with neratinib in patients with HR+ (2-yr hazard ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.33–0.77) vs. HR– tumors (2-yr hazard ratio 0.93; 95% CI 0.60–1.43). The efficacy of neratinib was also greater in patients who initiated treatment within 1 yr of prior trastuzumab compared with those who started neratinib later. The European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use recently recommended neratinib for use in patients with HR+ tumors who initiate treatment within 1 yr of completing trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy. Subgroup analyses from ExteNET examining iDFS benefits in this patient population are presented here.

Methods: Patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer who completed trastuzumab-based (neo)adjuvant therapy were assigned to oral neratinib 240 mg/day or placebo for 1 yr. Randomization was stratified by HR status (determined locally before trial entry), nodal status, and trastuzumab regimen. Endocrine therapy was allowed in patients with HR+ disease. The primary endpoint, iDFS, was tested by 2-sided log-rank test and hazard ratios (95% CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate iDFS rates. Secondary endpoints were DFS-DCIS, time to distant recurrence, distant DFS, and CNS recurrences. The primary analysis was conducted at 2 yr, and a sensitivity analysis conducted at 5 yr. Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT00878709.

Results: Of the 2840 patients (neratinib, n=1420; placebo, n=1420), 1631 (57%) had HR+ disease (neratinib, n=816; placebo, n=815). Most (93%) HR+ patients were receiving endocrine therapy at baseline. 1334 of 1631 (82%) patients with HR+ tumors were randomized to start neratinib within 1 yr of last trastuzumab dose (neratinib, n=670; placebo, n=664). iDFS benefits from neratinib in this population are shown in the table. Secondary endpoints were also improved with neratinib vs. placebo in this population. Safety data in this subset will be presented at the meeting.

Table. iDFS in patients with an interval between last trastuzumab dose and randomization of ≤1 yr

 HR+ population (N=1334)ITT population (N=2297)  Hazard ratiob  Hazard ratiob  Δ, %a(95% CI)P-valueΔ, %a(95% CI)P-value2-yr analysisc+4.50.490.002+2.90.630.006  (0.30–0.78)  (0.45–0.88) 5-yr analysisd+5.10.580.002+3.20.700.006  (0.41–0.82)  (0.54–0.90) aDifference in iDFS rates between neratinib vs. placebo; bNeratinib vs. placebo; cData cut-off: July 2014; dData cut-off: March 2017

Conclusions: Neratinib may have enhanced and sustained efficacy in patients with HR+ disease who initiate treatment within 1 yr of trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy.

Citation Format: Gnant M, Martin M, Holmes F-A, Jackisch C, Chia SK, Iwata H, Moy B, Martinez N, Mansi J, Morales S, Ruiz-Borrego M, von Minckwitz G, Buyse M, Delaloge S, Bhandari M, Murias Rosales A, Galeano T, Fujita T, Luczak A, Barrios CH, Saura C, Rugo HS, Chien J, Johnston SR, Spencer M, Xu F, Barnett B, Chan A, Ejlertsen B. Efficacy of neratinib in hormone receptor-positive patients who initiated treatment within 1 year of completing trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in HER2+ early-stage breast cancer: Subgroup analyses from the phase III ExteNET trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-01.

Abstract P1-16-05: Prognosis and survival in metastatic breast cancer – Ten years in review, a population-based analysis

Background: The rapidly evolving landscape of systemic treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) during the 1990s led to meaningful improvements in the overall survival (OS) of MBC patients[1]. Despite ongoing and expanded access to new treatments, it remains unclear if this has translated into further advances in survival. Moreover, the prognosis of MBC patients based on subtype, over time, are also important to differentiate.

Methods: The BC Cancer Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit (BCOU) database was utilized to identify patients referred to BC Cancer who were diagnosed with MBC during 3 time cohorts (cohort 1:2003-2005; cohort 2:2007-2009; cohort 3:2011-2013), to reflect changes in MBC treatment over these separate time periods. Baseline clinical and pathological criteria were compiled, in addition to adjuvant treatments received, as well as number of lines of treatment in the metastatic setting. OS was compared across time cohorts for all patients and then between subtypes using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

Results: A total of 3,953 patients met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 2,440 (61.7%) estrogen-receptor positive (ER+), 778 (19.7%) HER2 positive and 542 (13.7%) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. One hundred and ninety-three patients (4.9%) were unable to be subtyped and were therefore excluded from the analysis . A total of 2,205 (90.4%) ER+ patients received at least 1 line of systemic therapy, with 80.0% receiving at least 1 line of hormonal therapy. The median time on hormonal treatment was 8.9 months (range 0.03 - 156.7) for first-line and 6.1 months (range 0.1 – 173.3) for second-line. In the HER2+ group, 665 (85.5%) patients received at least 1 line of treatment, with a median of 2 lines of treatment (range 1-16). Median duration of anti-HER2 treatment was 6.7 months (range 0.03 - 163.8) with a median of 1 line of anti-HER2 directed treatment (range 1-5). For TNBC patients, 357 (65.9%) received at least 1 line of treatment, with a median of 2 (range 1-10). No significant differences in OS were observed between the 3 time cohorts, with a median overall survival (mOS) of 1.63 years, 1.37 years and 1.57 years in cohorts 1-3, respectively (p=0.12).When comparing across subtypes, the ER+ group faired best with a mOS of 1.96 years (95% CI 1.8-2.1), consistent across time cohorts (p=0.72). This was followed by the HER2+ group with a mOS of 1.53 years (95% CI 1.3-1.7), also consistent across time cohorts (p=0.31). The TNBC group faired worst, with a mOS of 0.67 years (95% CI 0.6-0.8) over time (p=0.87).

Conclusions: Despite advances in systemic therapy since the early 2000s, no meaningful improvements in overall survival were observed over time, regardless of subtype. It remains to be seen if developments since 2013 will lead to gains in overall survival for MBC patients, at a real life, population-based level.

[1]Chia SK, Speers CH, D'yachkova Y, et al. Cancer 2007;110:973-979.

Citation Format: LeVasseur N, Fiorino L, Speers CH, Aparicio M, Lohrisch C, Chia SK. Prognosis and survival in metastatic breast cancer – Ten years in review, a population-based analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-16-05.

Use of letrozole after aromatase inhibitor-based therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer (NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of extended therapy with aromatase inhibitors in patients with postmenopausal breast cancer is unknown. In the NSABP B-42 study, we aimed to determine whether extended letrozole treatment improves disease-free survival after 5 years of aromatase inhibitor-based therapy in women with postmenopausal breast cancer.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done in 158 centres in the USA, Canada, and Ireland. Postmenopausal women with stage I-IIIA hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, who were disease-free after about 5 years of treatment with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 5 years of letrozole (2·5 mg orally per day) or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by pathological node status, previous tamoxifen use, and lowest bone mineral density T score in the lumbosacral spine, total hip, or femoral neck. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, defined as time from randomisation to breast cancer recurrence, second primary malignancy, or death, and was analysed by intention to treat. To adjust for previous interim analyses, the two-sided statistical significance level for disease-free survival was set at 0·0418. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00382070, is active, and is no longer enrolling patients.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 28, 2006, and Jan 6, 2010, 3966 patients were randomly assigned to receive letrozole (n=1983) or placebo (n=1983). Follow-up information was available for 3903 patients for the analyses of disease-free survival. Median follow-up was 6·9 years (IQR 6·1-7·5). Letrozole treatment did not significantly improve disease-free survival (339 disease-free survival events were reported in the placebo group and 292 disease-free survival events were reported in the letrozole group; hazard ratio 0·85, 95% CI 0·73-0·999; p=0·048). 7-year disease-free survival estimate was 81·3% (95% CI 79·3-83·1) in the placebo group and 84·7% (82·9-86·4) in the letrozole group. The most common grade 3 adverse events were arthralgia (47 [2%] of 1933 patients in the placebo group vs 50 [3%] of 1941 patients in the letrozole group) and back pain (44 [2%] vs 38 [2%]). The most common grade 4 adverse event in the placebo group was thromboembolic event (eight [<1%]) and the most common grade 4 adverse events in the letrozole group were urinary tract infection, hypokalaemia, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (four [<1%] each).

INTERPRETATION

After 5 years of aromatase inhibitor-based therapy, 5 years of letrozole therapy did not significantly prolong disease-free survival compared with placebo. Careful assessment of potential risks and benefits is required before recommending extended letrozole therapy to patients with early-stage breast cancer.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute, Korea Health Technology R&D Project, Novartis.

TIM-3 expression in breast cancer

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are predominantly present in breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor negative tumors, among whom increasing levels correlate with favorable outcomes. Nevertheless, currently available immune checkpoint inhibitors appear to benefit only a small number of women with breast cancer. Upregulation of additional immune checkpoint markers is one mechanism of resistance to current inhibitors that might be amenable to targeting with newer agents. T-cell Immunoglobulin and Mucin domain-containing molecule 3 (TIM-3) is an immune checkpoint receptor that is an emerging target for cancer immunotherapy. We investigated TIM-3 immunohistochemical expression in 3,992 breast cancer specimens assembled into tissue microarrays, linked to detailed outcome, clinico-pathological parameters and biomarkers including CD8, PD-1, PD-L1 and LAG-3. We scored and reported absolute counts for TIM-3+ intra-epithelial and stromal TILs (iTILs and sTILs), and find that breast cancer patients with TIM-3+ iTILs (≥ 1) represent a minority of cases (11%), with a predilection for basal-like breast cancers (among which 28% had TIM-3+ iTILs). TIM-3+ sTILs (≥ 2) represented 20% of cases and included more non-basal cases. The presence of TIM-3+ iTILs highly correlates with hematoxylin and eosin-stained stromal TILs and with other immune checkpoint markers (PD-1+ iTILs, LAG-3+ iTILs and PD-L1+ tumors). In prognostic analyses, early breast cancer patients with TIM-3+ iTILs have significantly improved breast cancer-specific survival whereas TIM-3+ sTILs did not reach statistical significance. In multivariate analyses, the presence of TIM-3+ iTILs is an independent favorable prognostic factor in the whole cohort as well as among ER negative patients. Our study supports TIM-3 as a target for breast cancer immunotherapy.

Understanding adjuvant endocrine therapy persistence in breast Cancer survivors

Background

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) significantly decreases the risk of breast cancer recurrence and mortality. Notwithstanding the demonstrated efficacy of AET, 31–73% of breast cancer survivors do not persist with AET. The purpose of this study was to explore breast cancer survivors’ experiences and perspectives of persisting with AET and to identify the psychosocial and healthcare system factors that influence AET persistence.

Methods

Informed by interpretive descriptive methodology and relational autonomy theory, individual interviews were conducted with 22 women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer who had been prescribed AET. These participants also completed a demographic form and a survey that assessed their perceived risk of recurrence. Interviews were analysed using inductive thematic and constant comparative analysis to iteratively compare data and develop conceptualizations of the relationships among data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the quantitative data.

Results

The personal, social, and structural factors found to influence AET persistence included AET side effects, perception of breast cancer recurrence risk, medication and necessity beliefs, social support, the patient-provider relationship, and the continuity and frequency of follow-up care. For most women, over time, the decision-making process around AET persistence became a balancing act between quality of life and quantity of life. The interplay between the personal, social, and structural factors was complex and the weight women placed on some factors over others influenced their AET persistence or non-persistence.

Conclusion

Expanding our understanding of the factors affecting breast cancer survivors’ AET persistence from their perspective is the first step in developing efficacious, patient-centered interventions aimed at improving AET persistence. In order to improve AET persistence, enhanced symptom management is required, as well as the development of supportive care strategies that acknowledge the values and beliefs held by breast cancer survivors while reinforcing the benefits of AET, and addressing women’s reasons for non-persistence. Improved continuity of health care and patient-healthcare provider communication across oncology and primary care settings is also required. The development and evaluation of supportive care strategies that address the challenges associated with AET experienced by breast cancer survivors hold the potential to increase both women’s quality and quantity of life.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4644-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

LAG-3+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: clinical correlates and association with PD-1/PD-L1+ tumors

Background

Novel immune checkpoint blockade strategies are being evaluated in clinical trials and include targeting the lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) checkpoint, alone or in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. We investigated LAG-3 expression and its prognostic value in a large series of breast cancer patients, and correlated LAG-3 expression with key biomarkers including PD-1 and PD-L1.

Experimental design

LAG-3 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on two tissue microarray series incorporating 4322 breast cancer primary excision specimens (N = 330 in the training and N= 3992 in the validation set) linked to detailed clinicopathologic, biomarker and long-term clinical outcome data. PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions were also evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Stromal or intra-epithelial tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs or iTILs) expressing LAG-3 or PD-1 were assessed by absolute count. PD-L1 expression was evaluated as the percentage of positive carcinoma cells per core. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analyses.

Results

After locking down interpretation cut-offs on the training set, LAG-3+ iTILs were found in 11% of cases in the validation set. In both sets, LAG-3+ iTILs were significantly associated with negative prognostic factors: young age, large tumor size, high proliferation, HER2E and basal-like breast cancer subtypes. In multivariate analyses, breast cancer patients with LAG-3+ iTILs had a significantly improved breast cancer-specific survival [hazard ratio (HR): 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.90], particularly among estrogen receptor-negative patients (HR: 0.50, 95% CI 0.36-0.69). Furthermore, we found that 53% of PD-L1+ and 61% of PD-1+ cases were also positive for LAG-3+ iTILs. Concurrent infiltration of LAG-3+ and CD8+ iTILs was significantly associated with increased breast cancer-specific survival (HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.74).

Conclusion

LAG-3+ iTILs are enriched in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers and represent an independent favorable prognostic factor. In addition, a high proportion of PD-1/PD-L1+ tumors are co-infiltrated with LAG-3+ TILs, supporting potential immune checkpoint blockade combination strategies as a treatment option for breast cancer patients.

Phase I Study of ONT-380, a HER2 Inhibitor, in Patients with HER2+-Advanced Solid Tumors, with an Expansion Cohort in HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)

Purpose: ONT-380 (ARRY-380) is a potent and selective oral HER2 inhibitor. This Phase I study determined the MTD, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of ONT-380 in HER2-positive advanced solid tumors, with an expansion cohort of patients with HER2⁺ MBC.Experimental Design: ONT-380 was administered twice daily (BID) in continuous 28-day cycles. After a modified 3+3 dose-escalation design determined the MTD, the expansion cohort was enrolled. PK properties of ONT-380 and a metabolite were determined. Response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).Results: Fifty patients received ONT-380 (escalation = 33; expansion = 17); 43 patients had HER2⁺ MBC. Median prior anticancer regimens = 5. Dose-limiting toxicities of increased transaminases occurred at 800 mg BID, thus 600 mg BID was the MTD. Common AEs were usually Grade 1/2 in severity and included nausea (56%), diarrhea (52%), fatigue (50%), vomiting (40%) constipation, pain in extremity and cough (20% each). 5 patients (19%) treated at MTD had grade 3 AEs (increased transaminases, rash, night sweats, anemia, and hypokalemia). The half-life of ONT-380 was 5.38 hours and increases in exposure were approximately dose proportional. In evaluable HER2⁺ MBC (n = 22) treated at doses ≥ MTD, the response rate was 14% [all partial response (PR)] and the clinical benefit rate (PR + stable disease ≥ 24 weeks) was 27%.Conclusions: ONT-380 had a lower incidence and severity of diarrhea and rash than that typically associated with current dual HER2/EGFR inhibitors and showed notable antitumor activity in heavily pretreated HER2⁺ MBC patients, supporting its continued development. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14); 3529-36. ©2017 AACR.

A phase-I study of lapatinib in combination with foretinib, a c-MET, AXL and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-positive metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms of resistance to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2) therapies are unclear but may include the tyrosine-protein kinase Met (c-Met), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and AXL pathways. Foretinib is an inhibitor of c-Met, VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRB), AXL, Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), angiopoiten receptor (TIE-2), RET and RON kinases. This phase Ib study sought to establish the associated toxicities, pharmacokinetics (PK) and recommended phase II doses (RP2D) of foretinib and lapatinib in a cohort of HER-2-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS

Women with HER-2 positive MBC, Performance status (PS 0-2), and no limit on number of prior chemotherapies or lines of anti-HER-2 therapies were enrolled. A 3 + 3 dose escalation design was utilized. Four dose levels were intended with starting doses of foretinib 30 mg and lapatinib 750 mg orally once a day (OD) on a 4-weekly cycle. Assessment of c-MET status from the primary archival tissue was performed.

RESULTS

We enrolled 19 patients, all evaluable for toxicity assessment and for response evaluation. Median age was 60 years (34-86 years), 95% were PS 0-1, 53% were estrogen receptor-positive and 95% had at least one prior anti-HER-2-based regimen. The fourth dose level was reached (foretinib 45 mg/lapatinib 1250 mg) with dose-limiting toxicities of grade-3 diarrhea and fatigue. There was only one grade-4 non-hematological toxicity across all dose levels. There were no PK interactions between the agents. A median of two cycles was delivered across the dose levels (range 1-20) with associated progression-free survival of 3.2 months (95% CI 1.61-4.34 months). By immunohistochemical assessment with a specified cutoff, none of the 17 samples tested were classified as positive for c-Met.

CONCLUSIONS

The RP2D of the combined foretinib and lapatinib is 45 mg and 1000 mg PO OD, respectively. Limited activity was seen with this combination in a predominantly unselected cohort of HER-2-positive patients with MBC.

Enhancing Endocrine Therapy Combination Strategies for the Treatment of Postmenopausal HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women worldwide, with approximately two-thirds having hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors. New endocrine therapy (ET) strategies include combining ET agents as well as adding inhibitors targeting growth factors, angiogenesis, the mechanistic target of rapamycin, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), or cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 to ET. Level 1 evidence supports use of fulvestrant plus anastrozole or palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy for HR+/HER- advanced BC with special consideration for the former in ET-naïve patients, as well as everolimus plus exemestane or palbociclib plus fulvestrant as second-line therapy with special consideration in select first-line patients. Although the safety profiles of these combinations are generally predictable and manageable, both everolimus and palbociclib are associated with an increased risk of potentially serious or early-onset toxicities requiring individualized a priori adverse event risk stratification, earlier and more rigorous agent-specific monitoring, and patient education. Although each of these combinations improves progression-free survival, none with the exception of anastrazole plus fulvestrant have demonstrated improved overall survival. PI3K catalytic-α mutations assessed from circulating tumor DNA represent the first potentially viable serum biomarker for the selection of ET combinations, and new data demonstrate the feasibility of this minimally invasive technique as an alternative to traditional tissue analysis. Therapeutic ratios of select ET combinations support their use in first- and second-line settings, but optimal sequencing has yet to be determined.

THE ONCOLOGIST

2017;22:12-24 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Emerging data show that new endocrine therapy (ET) combinations can improve progression-free and overall survival outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER-) advanced breast cancer. Level 1 evidence supports consideration of dual ET regimens, particularly in ET-naïve patients, or palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy, as well as the addition of mTOR or CDK4/6 inhibitors to established ET in the second-line setting and in select first-line patients. Some combinations are associated with increased risk of class-specific toxicities that will require individualized risk stratification, earlier and more rigorous agent-specific monitoring, and patient education. Recent data on a noninvasive biomarker assay that predicts response to a phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor demonstrates the feasibility of this minimally invasive technique as an alternative to traditional tissue analysis.

Treatment algorithms for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: applying the results from recent clinical trials into daily practice—insights, limitations, and moving forward

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer is the most prevalent subtype of breast cancer in both early- and advanced-stage disease. Thus, the treatment of HR+ breast cancer has had the greatest global influence in improving clinical outcomes overall. Although the first-line metastatic breast cancer (MBC) trials comparing a third-generation aromatase inhibitor (AI) to tamoxifen have favored the AI, one of the challenges in translating these findings into clinical practice stems from the influence of prior adjuvant endocrine therapy, particularly the increasing use of adjuvant AIs today, on the choice of endocrine agent in the advanced setting because of the development of acquired resistance. Because the majority of patients enrolled into these studies were either endocrine-treatment naïve or exposed to tamoxifen only, the "real-life" applicability of the evidence is unclear. Because a superior dose of the selective estrogen receptor (ER) downregulator fulvestrant has now been established, its role as first-line therapy is being re-established. We are now starting to see the promise realized with blocking cross-talking growth factor pathways in addition to the ER pathway. The greatest efficacy is seen with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus in combination with exemestane and, perhaps to a lesser extent, anti-HER2-directed therapy in combination with an AI. Future gains will likely involve a greater understanding of the redundancy and compensation induced by blocking these pathways, trials involving blocking multiple pathways in addition to hormonal agents, and the molecular interrogation of the individual's tumor in search of predictive biomarkers and "actionable" genomic aberrations.

Investigating proteasome inhibitors as potential adjunct therapies for experimental cerebral malaria

Aside from antimalarials, there is currently no treatment for cerebral malaria, a fulminant neurological complication of P. falciparum infection that is a leading cause of death in African children. In the mouse model of cerebral malaria, cross-presentation of parasite antigens by brain endothelial cells is thought to be a crucial late step in pathogenesis. We have investigated three proteasome inhibitors as potential adjunct therapies: bortezomib, carfilzomib and ONX-0914. Only carfilzomib, an irreversible inhibitor of both constitutive proteasomes and immunoproteasomes, was able to inhibit cross-presentation of malaria antigen by murine brain endothelial cells in vitro. To mimic the clinical setting, carfilzomib was co-administered with artesunate only when infected mice exhibited neurological defects. However, there was no improvement in survival compared to artesunate monotherapy. The treatment failure was explained by the inability of daily or twice daily bolus doses of carfilzomib to inhibit cross-presentation by brain endothelial cells in vivo. We also report here that bortezomib, which has been associated with neurological adverse events, accelerated death in ECM-infected mice. Future investigations of proteasome inhibitors for modulating cross-presentation during malaria infection should focus on sustained and targeted delivery to brain endothelial cells.

Correlation of baseline biomarkers with clinical outcomes and response to fulvestrant with vandetanib or placebo in patients with bone predominant metastatic breast cancer: An OCOG ZAMBONEY sub-study

Background

Bone metastases are common in women with breast cancer and often result in skeletal related events (SREs). As the angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regulates osteoclast activity and is associated with more extensive bone metastases and SRE risk in metastatic breast cancer, we hypothesized that blockade of VEGF signaling could be a therapeutic strategy for inhibiting bone metastases progression and possibly prolonging overall (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). The Zamboney trial was a randomized placebo-controlled study designed to assess whether patients with bone predominant metastatic breast cancer benefited from addition of the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) targeting agent, vandetanib, to endocrine therapy with fulvestrant. As a companion study, evaluation of biomarkers and their potential association with response to vandetanib or SRE risk was performed.

Methods

Baseline overnight fasted serum from enrolled patients was analyzed for levels of various putative biomarkers including; VEGF-A, soluble (s)VEGFR2, sVEGFR3, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and activinA by ELISA. Spearman correlation coefficients and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to investigate potential relationships between biomarker values and baseline clinical parameters. Prognostic and predictive ability of each marker was investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustments for treatment and baseline strata of serum CTx (<400 versus ≥400 ng/L).

Results

Of 129 enrolled patients, serum was available for analysis in 101; 51 in vandetanib and 50 in placebo arm. Mean age amongst consenting patients was 59.8 years. Clinical characteristics were not significantly different between patients with or without serum biomarker data and serum markers were similar for patients by treatment arm. Baseline sVEGFR2 was prognostic for OS (HR=0.77, 95% CI=0.61–0.96, p=0.020), and although a modest association was observed, it was not significant for PFS (HR=0.90, 95% CI=0.80–1.01, p=0.085) nor time to first SRE (HR=0.82, 95% CI=0.66–1.02, p=0.079). When interaction terms were evaluated, sVEGFR2 was not found to be predictive of response to vandetanib, although a modest association remained with respect to PFS (interaction p=0.085). No other marker showed any significant prognostic or predictive ability with any measured outcome.

Conclusions

In this clinical trial, sVEGFR2 appeared prognostic for OS, hence validation of sVEGFR2 should be conducted. Moreover, the role of sVEGFR2 in breast cancer bone metastasis progression should be elucidated.

•

Baseline VEGF, sVEGFR3, TGF-β or activinA were not associated with clinical outcomes in patients treated with fulvestrant in conjunction with vandetanib or placebo.

•

Baseline sVEGFR2 was modestly associated with clinical outcomes including PFS, OS and time to first skeletal event.

•

Increased baseline sVEGFR2 was associated with improved clinical outcomes in this study sample.

•

These findings support the need for future studies of the role of sVEGFR2 in bone metastasis progression.

The Neoadjuvant Model Is Still the Future for Drug Development in Breast Cancer

The many improvements in breast cancer therapy in recent years have so lowered rates of recurrence that it is now difficult or impossible to conduct adequately powered adjuvant clinical trials. Given the many new drugs and potential synergistic combinations, the neoadjuvant approach has been used to test benefit of drug combinations in clinical trials of primary breast cancer. A recent FDA-led meta-analysis showed that pathologic complete response (pCR) predicts disease-free survival (DFS) within patients who have specific breast cancer subtypes. This meta-analysis motivated the FDA's draft guidance for using pCR as a surrogate endpoint in accelerated drug approval. Using pCR as a registration endpoint was challenged at ASCO 2014 Annual Meeting with the presentation of ALTTO, an adjuvant trial in HER2-positive breast cancer that showed a nonsignificant reduction in DFS hazard rate for adding lapatinib, a HER-family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to trastuzumab and chemotherapy. This conclusion seemed to be inconsistent with the results of NeoALTTO, a neoadjuvant trial that found a statistical improvement in pCR rate for the identical lapatinib-containing regimen. We address differences in the two trials that may account for discordant conclusions. However, we use the FDA meta-analysis to show that there is no discordance at all between the observed pCR difference in NeoALTTO and the observed HR in ALTTO. This underscores the importance of appropriately modeling the two endpoints when designing clinical trials. The I-SPY 2/3 neoadjuvant trials exemplify this approach.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy for HER2 Positive Disease

Since the initial description of the HER2 proto-oncogene as a poor prognostic factor in breast cancer in 1987, to the first randomized trial of a monoclonal antibody directed against HER2 in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer published in 2001, to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2005 Annual Meeting in which we saw the unprecedented collective presentations demonstrating the dramatic benefit of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting-the clinical landscape of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer has forever changed. More recently, there has been increasing use of preoperative chemotherapy and anti-HER2 targeted therapies in primary operable HER2 disease in the research domain and in clinical practice. In the next few years, we will see if dual adjuvant anti-HER2 antibody inhibition produces clinically significant improvements in outcome; understand if there is a role of small molecule inhibitors of the HER family of receptors either in combination or sequential to trastuzumab; further refine the relationship between pathologic complete response (pCR) and long-term clinical outcomes; and find predictive biomarkers to identify cohorts of patients that may need differential combinations and/or durations of anti-HER2 therapies.

Abstract P1-09-04: Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and outcomes in women 70 years and older with HER-2 positive or triple negative breast cancer

Background: Chemotherapy use decreases with increasing age. There is a stronger rationale for adjuvant chemotherapy in HER-2 positive (HER2+) and triple negative (TN) breast cancer (BC) due to a higher risk of recurrence, known benefit of trastuzumab with chemotherapy and lack of other systemic options.

Aims: 1) Compare outcomes of resected HER2+ and TN BC in older women (age ≥70) (OW) vs. younger women (age 50-69) (YW) 2) Determine chemotherapy use in OW vs. YW 3) Explore factors associated with chemotherapy use in women with HER2+ and TN BC and determine how these factors differ by age group (OW vs. YW)

Methods: Women ≥50 years old with newly diagnosed resected HER2+ or TN stage I-III BC in British Columbia from 2003-2006 were included. Data on comorbidity, performance status, and reason for no chemotherapy was gathered via chart review of OW. Kaplan-Meier curves for relapse-free survival (RFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Logistic regression was used to model the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy and Cox proportional hazards was used to model BCSS and OS.

Results: OW (n = 292) had larger tumors (p = 0.002), more often had mastectomy and less often had adjuvant radiation (p&lt;0.001) than YW (n = 946). There were no differences in nodal or receptor status.

OW vs. YW were less likely to receive chemotherapy (28.1 vs. 81.3%, p&lt;0.001); odds decreased with increasing age (OR 15.9 and 7.4 for women age 50-59 and 60-69 vs. ≥70, p&lt;0.001). Odds of receiving chemotherapy were higher in women with HER2+, ER/PR negative tumours than those with HER2+, ER/PR positive (OR 2.2) and TN tumours (OR 1.7) (p = 0.004). Some factors associated with chemotherapy use differed between YW and OW: tumour size (T2 vs. T1, OR 2.6, p = 0.059) and grade (high grade vs. low grade, OR 6.5, p = 0.02) were only associated with chemotherapy use in YW. OW with more comorbid conditions (CCI≥2) were less likely to receive chemotherapy than those with zero or one comorbid condition (OR 5.0 and 2.7 respectively, p = 0.009).

In OW, reasons cited for not administering chemotherapy included: patient refusal (45.2%), patient age (38.1%), perceived minimal benefit (36.7%), patient comorbidity (28.6%), and concern about chemotherapy toxicity (28.6%). Chemotherapy was not mentioned in almost 1 in 5 cases (17.6%).

OW had worse 5-year RFS (75.4 vs. 83.2%, p = 0.002), BCSS (79.5 vs. 88.1%, p&lt;0.001) and OS (63.7 vs. 85.8%, p&lt;0.001). After adjusting for known prognostic factors and treatment differences, increasing age was still significantly associated with poorer 5-year OS (HR 1.2, p = 0.003), but not with BCSS after adjusting for the competing risk of non-BC deaths. 5-year OS, but not BC-specific outcomes (RFS, BCSS), was significantly better in those who received chemotherapy compared to those who did not.

Conclusion: OW with HER2+/TN BC are less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy than YW. Factors associated with chemotherapy receipt differ in OW, with tumor size and grade only being influential in YW. Age was only independently associated with OS and not BCSS, suggesting inferior BCSS rates in OW may be due to the presence of larger tumors or differences in treatments received by OW.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-09-04.

A prospective clinical utility and pharmacoeconomic study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score® assay in oestrogen receptor positive node negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study was to measure the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score® result on systemic treatment recommendations and to perform a prospective health economic analysis in stage I-II, node-negative, oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer.

METHODS

Consenting patients with ER+ node negative invasive breast cancer and their treating medial oncologists were asked to complete questionnaires about treatment preferences, level of confidence in those preferences and a decisional conflict scale (patients only) after a discussion of their diagnosis and risk without knowledge of the Recurrence Score. At a subsequent visit, the assay result and final treatment recommendations were discussed prior to both parties completing a second set of questionnaires. A Markov health state transition model was constructed, simulating the costs and outcomes experienced by a hypothetical 'assay naïve' population and an 'assay informed' population.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-six patients across two cancer centres were enrolled. Of the 150 for whom successful assay results were obtained, physicians changed their chemotherapy recommendations in 45 cases (30%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22.8-38.0%); either to add (10%; 95% CI 5.7-16.0%) or omit (20%; 95% CI 13.9-27.3%) adjuvant chemotherapy. There was an overall significant improvement in physician confidence post-assay (p<0.001). Patient decisional conflict also significantly decreased following the assay (p<0.001). The simulation model found an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Canadian Dollars (CAD) $6630/quality-adjusted life years (QALY).

CONCLUSION

Within the context of a publicly funded health care system, the Recurrence Score assay significantly affects adjuvant treatment recommendations and is cost effective in ER+ node negative breast cancer.

Evaluation of the clinical benefits of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer in British Columbia

BACKGROUND

Altered formulations of taxanes may lack cross-resistance with standardly used solvent-based taxanes. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the clinical benefit of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with and without adjuvant taxane in British Columbia.

METHODS

The BC Cancer Agency Pharmacy data repository and Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit database were linked to identify all patients who received nab-paclitaxel in British Columbia since its introduction in 2007. Hormone receptor status, demographic characteristics, number of cycles prescribed, and time to treatment failure were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2011, 138 patients in British Columbia received nab-paclitaxel, with 122 patients available for analysis. Most (70.5%) received adjuvant chemotherapy; about a quarter (24.6%) received an adjuvant taxane. Patients who received adjuvant taxane were more likely to have node-positive (86.7% vs. 48.9%, p = 0.007), estrogen receptor-negative (46.7% vs. 13.0% p < 0.001) disease and to receive initial adjuvant radiotherapy (76.7% vs. 51.1%, p < 0.001). For the entire cohort, the median number of nab-paclitaxel cycles prescribed was 4.4 (range: 0.3-13). The median number of nab-paclitaxel cycles was greater when that agent was given as first- or second-line therapy than as third-line or greater therapy (5.0 cycles vs. 3.7 cycles respectively). The median time to treatment failure was 96 days in the prior adjuvant taxane group (range: 0-361) and 73.5 days in the no prior adjuvant taxane group (range: 0-1176).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study demonstrates potential clinical activity of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer regardless of whether patients had prior exposure to adjuvant taxanes.

Production of methanol from biomass waste via pyrolysis

The production of methanol from agricultural, forestry, livestock, poultry, and fishery waste via pyrolysis was investigated. Pyrolysis was conducted in a tube furnace at 450-500 °C. Sugarcane bagasse showed the methanol production (5.93 wt.%), followed by roots and sawdust with 4.36 and 4.22 wt.%, respectively. Animal waste offered the lowest content of methanol, as only 0.46, 0.80, and 0.61 wt.% were obtained from fishery, goat, and cow waste, respectively. It was also observed that the percentage of methanol increased with an increase in volatile compounds while the percentage of ethanol increased with the percentage of ash and fix carbon. The data indicate that, pyrolysis is a means for production of methanol and ethanol after further optimization of the process and sample treatment.

Treatment algorithms for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: applying the results from recent clinical trials into daily practice—insights, limitations, and moving forward

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer is the most prevalent subtype of breast cancer in both early- and advanced-stage disease. Thus, the treatment of HR+ breast cancer has had the greatest global influence in improving clinical outcomes overall. Although the first-line metastatic breast cancer (MBC) trials comparing a third-generation aromatase inhibitor (AI) to tamoxifen have favored the AI, one of the challenges in translating these findings into clinical practice stems from the influence of prior adjuvant endocrine therapy, particularly the increasing use of adjuvant AIs today, on the choice of endocrine agent in the advanced setting because of the development of acquired resistance. Because the majority of patients enrolled into these studies were either endocrine-treatment naïve or exposed to tamoxifen only, the "real-life" applicability of the evidence is unclear. Because a superior dose of the selective estrogen receptor (ER) downregulator fulvestrant has now been established, its role as first-line therapy is being re-established. We are now starting to see the promise realized with blocking cross-talking growth factor pathways in addition to the ER pathway. The greatest efficacy is seen with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus in combination with exemestane and, perhaps to a lesser extent, anti-HER2-directed therapy in combination with an AI. Future gains will likely involve a greater understanding of the redundancy and compensation induced by blocking these pathways, trials involving blocking multiple pathways in addition to hormonal agents, and the molecular interrogation of the individual's tumor in search of predictive biomarkers and "actionable" genomic aberrations.

Outcomes of women with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab

INTRODUCTION

Large randomized trials assessing the benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab in early-stage breast cancer positive for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2) have demonstrated a significant improvement in survival. The objective of the present study was to describe the outcomes of women who received adjuvant trastuzumab for her2-positive breast cancer in British Columbia since publicly funded population-based use was initiated in July 2005.

METHODS

Women from British Columbia, newly diagnosed with stage i-iii breast cancer between July 2004 and December 2006, who were positive for her2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (3+) or amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (ratio ≥ 2.0) were included in the study. Data were collected from the prospectively assembled BC Cancer Agency Outcomes Unit, with cases linked to the provincial pharmacy data repository to determine the proportion of women who received adjuvant trastuzumab.

RESULTS

Our retrospective study identified 703 her2-positive patients, of whom 480 (68%) received trastuzumab. In patients receiving trastuzumab, the 2-year relapse-free survival was 96.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 93.6% to 97.7%] and the overall survival was 99.3% (95% CI: 97.9% to 99.8%). Among node-negative and -positive patients, the 2-year relapse-free survival was 97.8% and 94.8% respectively (p = 0.09) for the trastuzumab-treated group and 90.9% and 77.3% (p = 0.01) for the group not receiving trastuzumab (n = 223). Site of first distant metastasis was the central nervous system in 19.5% of the entire cohort and in 37.5% of patients treated with trastuzumab.

DISCUSSION

This population-based analysis of adjuvant trastuzumab use among Canadian women demonstrates highly favorable outcomes at the 2-year follow-up.

A 50-gene intrinsic subtype classifier for prognosis and prediction of benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen

PURPOSE

Gene expression profiling classifies breast cancer into intrinsic subtypes based on the biology of the underlying disease pathways. We have used material from a prospective randomized trial of tamoxifen versus placebo in premenopausal women with primary breast cancer (NCIC CTG MA.12) to evaluate the prognostic and predictive significance of intrinsic subtypes identified by both the PAM50 gene set and by immunohistochemistry.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Total RNA from 398 of 672 (59%) patients was available for intrinsic subtyping with a quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) 50-gene predictor (PAM50) for luminal A, luminal B, HER-2-enriched, and basal-like subtypes. A tissue microarray was also constructed from 492 of 672 (73%) of the study population to assess a panel of six immunohistochemical IHC antibodies to define the same intrinsic subtypes.

RESULTS

Classification into intrinsic subtypes by the PAM50 assay was prognostic for both disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.0003) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.0002), whereas classification by the IHC panel was not. Luminal subtype by PAM50 was predictive of tamoxifen benefit [DFS: HR, 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.86 vs. HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.50-1.29 for nonluminal subtypes], although the interaction test was not significant (P = 0.24), whereas neither subtyping by central immunohistochemistry nor by local estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) status were predictive. Risk of relapse (ROR) modeling with the PAM50 assay produced a continuous risk score in both node-negative and node-positive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In the MA.12 study, intrinsic subtype classification by qRT-PCR with the PAM50 assay was superior to IHC profiling for both prognosis and prediction of benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen.

Controlling angiogenesis in breast cancer: a systematic review of anti-angiogenic trials

PURPOSE

Angiogenesis is critical for tumor growth and a promising therapeutic target. This review will summarize and analyze data from clinical trials of anti-angiogenic agents in the treatment of breast cancer (BC).

DESIGN

A systematic search of PubMed and conference databases was performed to identify reports of randomized clinical trials investigating specific anti-angiogenic agents in the treatment of BC.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Phase III trials in advanced BC have demonstrated a reduction in the risk of disease progression (22-52%), improved response rates and net improvements in progression-free survival of 1.2 to 5.5 months, but no significant improvements in overall survival with the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy. Results of phase III trials in early breast cancer have been inconsistent. Bevacizumab-containing regimens have also been associated with higher overall adverse event rates compared to chemotherapy alone. Phase III trials of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib were negative, while randomized phase II trials of sorafenib and pazopanib have improved some outcomes when combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy compared to controls. In addition to expected vascular class safety signals, tyrosine kinase inhibitors show "off-target" side effects. Ongoing clinical trials evaluating combinatorial strategies based on biological synergies and translational studies identifying biological predictors of response will be crucial to establish meaningful clinical benefits in selected BC populations.

CONCLUSION

Most trials of anti-angiogenic agents in BC have reported improved response rate and progression-free survival but no increase in overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone. Optimizing the therapeutic indices of these agents is a focus of ongoing research and will be critical to their future development.

Responsiveness of intrinsic subtypes to adjuvant anthracycline substitution in the NCIC.CTG MA.5 randomized trial

PURPOSE

Recent studies suggest that intrinsic breast cancer subtypes may differ in their responsiveness to specific chemotherapy regimens. We examined this hypothesis on NCIC.CTG MA.5, a clinical trial randomizing premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer to adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil) versus CEF (cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-fluorouracil) chemotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Intrinsic subtype was determined for 476 tumors using the quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR PAM50 gene expression test. Luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched (HER2-E), and basal-like subtypes were correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank testing. Multivariable Cox regression analyses determined significance of interaction between treatment and intrinsic subtypes.

RESULTS

Intrinsic subtypes were associated with RFS (P = 0.0005) and OS (P < 0.0001) on the combined cohort. The HER2-E showed the greatest benefit from CEF versus CMF, with absolute 5-year RFS and OS differences exceeding 20%, whereas there was a less than 2% difference for non-HER2-E tumors (interaction test P = 0.03 for RFS and 0.03 for OS). Within clinically defined Her2(+) tumors, 79% (72 of 91) were classified as the HER2-E subtype by gene expression and this subset was strongly associated with better response to CEF versus CMF (62% vs. 22%, P = 0.0006). There was no significant difference in benefit between CEF and CMF in basal-like tumors [n = 94; HR, 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6-2.1 for RFS and HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.5 for OS].

CONCLUSION

HER2-E strongly predicted anthracycline sensitivity. The chemotherapy-sensitive basal-like tumors showed no added benefit for CEF over CMF, suggesting that nonanthracycline regimens may be adequate in this subtype although further investigation is required.

Molecular alterations between the primary breast cancer and the subsequent locoregional/metastatic tumor

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast cancers have historically been presumed to have the same predictive biomarkers as the initial primary tumor. We compared the expression of these biomarkers in a large paired tissue microarray (TMA) series of primary and subsequent relapsed tumors.

METHODS

Using the British Columbia Cancer Agency Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit database, patients with biopsy-proven relapses were identified and linked to a large TMA series of primary breast cancers from 1986-1992. Charts were reviewed, and tissue blocks of the metastatic cancer were collected to create a separate TMA. Immunohistochemical assessment with the same antibodies and conditions was performed for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 on both the primary and relapsed tumors.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty cases were received that had tumor adequate for analyses. Of these, 71.9% had no changes in either the ER or PR status or HER-2 status. Of the 45 (28.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.2%-35.1%) tumors that did have changes in receptor status, 7.5% were in-breast recurrences or new breast primaries, 4.4% had changes in PR status only and were therefore deemed clinically irrelevant, and 19.4% (95% CI, 13.3%-25.5%) had changes in either the ER or HER-2 status from regional or distant relapses. Five percent of tumors had a receptor status change going from ER(+) or PR(+) to ER(-) or PR(-); 9.4% went from ER(-) or PR(-) to ER(+) or PR(+). With regard to HER-2 status, 3.8% of tumors went from positive to negative and 1.3% went from negative to positive. For all discordant cases, biopsies of the relapsed lesion were obtained prior to initiation of first-line treatment for metastatic disease. In the primary tumors that were ER(+), time to relapse was significantly shorter in the discordant relapsed cases than in the concordant ones (p = .0002). Changes in loss or gain of either biomarker were seen across the discordant cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of relapsed tumors had changes in either ER or HER-2 status, which would dramatically alter treatment recommendations and clinical behavior. This study suggests that biopsies of relapsed and metastatic breast cancers should be performed routinely in clinical practice.

P1-12-25: Evaluation of PTEN, EGFR and Ki67 Expression as Predictors of Response to a Trastuzumab-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen in a HER-2 Over-Expressing Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) Trial

Background: In patients with HER-2 over-expressing breast cancer, predictors of trastuzumab response and resistance remain unclear and unvalidated. In an exploratory analysis within a phase II trial, we evaluated various biologic markers as predictors of response or resistance to a trastuzumab containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen.

Methods: A tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples obtained prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 21 (from a total of 30) HER-2 positive stage II-III patients. Protocol treatment consisted of 4 cycles of 5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide (FEC100) followed by 4 cycles of Docetaxel, Carboplatin (AUC 6) and Trastuzumab (TCH). Immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER-2, Ki67, EGFR and PTEN were performed utilizing previously published protocols and cut-offs. HER-2 equivocal (2+) by IHC cases was confirmed by prior FISH analysis. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: 21 patients had sufficient tumour for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 49 years old, 67% were pre-menopausal, and biomarker expression was as follows: 43% ER positive, 29% PR positive, and 100% HER-2 positive. 14 patients (67%) had pathologic complete response (pCR) following the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab. In general, tumour samples showed high Ki67 (&gt;14%) staining (62%), low EGFR positivity (14%), and high PTEN expression (71%). Neither high Ki67 expression (p=0.65), any EGFR expression (p=0.26), nor PTEN loss (p=0.60) was associated with higher or lower rates of pCR respectively.

Conclusion: In our small cohort of locally advanced HER-2 over-expressing tumours, baseline expression of Ki67, EGFR and PTEN were not associated with pCR to a neoadjuvant sequential anthracycline and taxane/trastuzumab combination regimen. Additional biomarkers for an activated PI3K pathway and for p95 will be attempted.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-25.

P4-19-05: A Population-Based Study of Guideline-Based BRCA Screening in Male Breast Carcinoma

Purpose: The British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) Hereditary Cancer Program (HCP) is a publicly funded, centralized program that provides BRCA testing to patients with male breast cancer (MBC) who meet specified referral criteria (aimed at detecting a mutation in &gt; 10% of those tested). Criteria include: MBC with Ashkenazi heritage, MBC with one other family member with breast or ovarian cancer, MBC diagnosed at &lt; 35 years, Bilateral MBC with first diagnosed at &lt; 50 year. In this context, the purpose was to study referral patterns for hereditary counselling and outcomes of BRCA testing within a population-based study of male breast carcinoma.

Patients and Methods

Records of consecutive cases of invasive MBC diagnosed from 2000 to 2010 were reviewed. We documented any recorded personal and family history of cancer. For those meeting the HCP referral criteria we recorded whether a referral was made and the outcome of any genetic testing.

Results: Of 158 cases of MBC, 23 (14.6%) patients (21 met referral criteria; 2 did not) were seen for genetic counselling, of whom 21 were offered BRCA1/2 testing, and 19 accepted testing. Of 19 patients with BRCA1/2 genetic test results, 3 (16%) had a pathogenic mutation identified; one in the BRCA1 gene (c.1387_1390delinsGAAAG) and two in the BRCA2 gene (***c.755_758delACAG; c.1813dupA). In a further 4 cases (21%) an unclassified variant in BRCA1 was identified. In the remaining 12 cases (63%), testing was uninformative.

Conclusions: The BRCA1/2 mutation detection rate of 16% is in line with the expected rate of &gt;10% using established selection criteria. Expanding the criteria at this time to include all male breast cancers would be expected to decrease the detection rate below 10% with the potential to negatively impact on the publicly-funded and finite resources of the Hereditary Cancer Program and Cancer Genetics Laboratory.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-19-05.

Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer

Background

Gene expression profiling of breast cancer has identified two biologically distinct estrogen receptor (ER)-positive subtypes of breast cancer: luminal A and luminal B. Luminal B tumors have higher proliferation and poorer prognosis than luminal A tumors. In this study, we developed a clinically practical immunohistochemistry assay to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors and investigated its ability to separate tumors according to breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival.

Methods

Tumors from a cohort of 357 patients with invasive breast carcinomas were subtyped by gene expression profile. Hormone receptor status, HER2 status, and the Ki67 index (percentage of Ki67-positive cancer nuclei) were determined immunohistochemically. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the Ki67 cut point to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors. The prognostic value of the immunohistochemical assignment for breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival was investigated with an independent tissue microarray series of 4046 breast cancers by use of Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression.

Results

Gene expression profiling classified 101 (28%) of the 357 tumors as luminal A and 69 (19%) as luminal B. The best Ki67 index cut point to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors was 13.25%. In an independent cohort of 4046 patients with breast cancer, 2847 had hormone receptor–positive tumors. When HER2 immunohistochemistry and the Ki67 index were used to subtype these 2847 tumors, we classified 1530 (59%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 57% to 61%) as luminal A, 846 (33%, 95% CI = 31% to 34%) as luminal B, and 222 (9%, 95% CI = 7% to 10%) as luminal–HER2 positive. Luminal B and luminal–HER2-positive breast cancers were statistically significantly associated with poor breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival in all adjuvant systemic treatment categories. Of particular relevance are women who received tamoxifen as their sole adjuvant systemic therapy, among whom the 10-year breast cancer–specific survival was 79% (95% CI = 76% to 83%) for luminal A, 64% (95% CI = 59% to 70%) for luminal B, and 57% (95% CI = 47% to 69%) for luminal–HER2 subtypes.

Conclusion

Expression of ER, progesterone receptor, and HER2 proteins and the Ki67 index appear to distinguish luminal A from luminal B breast cancer subtypes.

Progesterone receptor is a significant factor associated with clinical outcomes and effect of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer patients

Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with response to hormonal therapy and clinical outcome. The additional value of progesterone receptor (PR) has remained controversial. We examine the value of PR for prognosis and response to tamoxifen on a population-based series of 4,046 invasive early stage breast cancer patients. Clinical information for age at diagnosis, stage, pathology, treatment and outcome was assembled for the study cohort; the median follow-up was 12.4 years. PR status was determined by immunohistochemistry using a rabbit monoclonal antibody on tissue microarrays built from breast tumor surgical excisions. Survival analyses, Kaplan-Meier functions and Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to assess the associations between PR and breast cancer specific survival. Progesterone receptor was positive in 51% of all cases and 67% of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) cases. Survival analyses for both the whole cohort and ER+ cases given tamoxifen therapy showed that patients with PR+ tumors had 24% higher relative probability for breast cancer specific survival as compared to PR- patients, adjusted for ER, HER2, age at diagnosis, grade, tumor size, lymph node status and lymphovascular invasion covariates. Higher PR expression showed stronger association with patient survival. Log-likelihood ratio tests of multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models demonstrated that PR was an independent statistically significant factor for breast cancer specific survival in both the whole cohort and among ER+ cases treated with tamoxifen. PR adds significant prognostic value in breast cancer beyond that obtained with estrogen receptor alone.