Efficacy and Safety of Iloperidone in Bipolar Mania: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Objective: To determine if iloperidone, a second-generation antipsychotic, reduces symptoms of bipolar mania.

Methods: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in adults with bipolar mania at 27 US and international sites between April 2021 and September 2022. Participants were randomized 1:1 to iloperidone (up to 24 mg/d given twice daily) or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 4 in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score versus placebo. Secondary efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity and Clinical Global Impression of Change scales.

Results: Altogether, 414 participants were randomized and administered at least 1 dose of study medication (iloperidone, n = 206; placebo, n = 208). Overall, 139 (67.1%) iloperidone patients and 153 (72.9%) placebo patients completed the study. Iloperidone demonstrated significant improvement versus placebo at week 4 for the primary and secondary endpoints. Differences in the least-squares mean (95% CI; P value) of change from baseline for YMRS total scores were -4.0 (-5.70 to -2.25; adjusted P = .000008). The most encountered adverse events with iloperidone were tachycardia, dizziness, dry mouth, alanine aminotransferase increased, nasal congestion, increased weight, and somnolence. The incidence of akathisia and extrapyramidal symptom-related treatment-emergent adverse events was low.

Conclusions: Iloperidone is effective in treating patients with bipolar mania. The tolerability and safety profile of iloperidone in bipolar mania is consistent with previous clinical studies of patients with schizophrenia, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04819776; EudraCT: 2020-000405-83.

Treatment-resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is common and associated with multiple serious public health implications. A consensus definition of TRD with demonstrated predictive utility in terms of clinical decision-making and health outcomes does not currently exist. Instead, a plethora of definitions have been proposed, which vary significantly in their conceptual framework. The absence of a consensus definition hampers precise estimates of the prevalence of TRD, and also belies efforts to identify risk factors, prevention opportunities, and effective interventions. In addition, it results in heterogeneity in clinical practice decision-making, adversely affecting quality of care. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have adopted the most used definition of TRD (i.e., inadequate response to a minimum of two antidepressants despite adequacy of the treatment trial and adherence to treatment). It is currently estimated that at least 30% of persons with depression meet this definition. A significant percentage of persons with TRD are actually pseudo-resistant (e.g., due to inadequacy of treatment trials or non-adherence to treatment). Although multiple sociodemographic, clinical, treatment and contextual factors are known to negatively moderate response in persons with depression, very few factors are regarded as predictive of non-response across multiple modalities of treatment. Intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine (co-administered with an antidepressant) are established as efficacious in the management of TRD. Some second-generation antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, quetiapine XR) are proven effective as adjunctive treatments to antidepressants in partial responders, but only the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination has been studied in FDA-defined TRD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is established as effective and FDA-approved for individuals with TRD, with accelerated theta-burst TMS also recently showing efficacy. Electroconvulsive therapy is regarded as an effective acute and maintenance intervention in TRD, with preliminary evidence suggesting non-inferiority to acute intravenous ketamine. Evidence for extending antidepressant trial, medication switching and combining antidepressants is mixed. Manual-based psychotherapies are not established as efficacious on their own in TRD, but offer significant symptomatic relief when added to conventional antidepressants. Digital therapeutics are under study and represent a potential future clinical vista in this population.

Adjunctive agents to antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a systematic umbrella review and recommendations for amino acids, hormonal therapies and anti-inflammatory drugs

QUESTION

This umbrella review and guidelines aimed to provide evidence to support the rational choice of selected adjunctive therapies for schizophrenia.

STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP)-grading recommendations, 63 randomised control trials (RCTs) (of which 4219 unique participants have completed the RCTs) and 29 meta-analyses were analysed.

FINDINGS

Provisional recommendations (WFSBP-grade 1) could be made for two molecules in augmentation to antipsychotics: (1) N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC, 1200-3600 mg/day, for >12 consecutive weeks) in improving negative symptoms, general psychopathology (positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenia (PANSS) general psychopathology factor (G)-G subscale), with the RCTs with the longer duration showing the most robust findings; (2) polyunsaturated fatty acids (3000 mg/day of eicosapentaenoic acid, for >12 weeks) in improving general psychopathology. Weaker recommendations (ie, WFSBP-grade 2) could be drawn for sarcosine (2 g/day) and minocycline (200-300 mg/day) for improving negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia (not early schizophrenia), and NAC for improving positive symptoms and cognition. Weak recommendations are not ready for clinical practice. There is provisional evidence that oestrogens and raloxifene are effective in some patients, but further research is needed to determine their benefit/risk ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this umbrella review should be interpreted with caution as the number of RCTs included in the meta-analyses was generally small and the effect sizes were weak or medium. For NAC, two RCTs with low risk of bias have provided conflicting results and the WFSBP-grade recommendation included also the results of meta-analyses. These drugs could be provisionally prescribed for patients for whom no other treatments have been effective, but they should be discontinued if they prove ineffective.

Esmethadone-HCl (REL-1017): a promising rapid antidepressant

This review article presents select recent studies that form the basis for the development of esmethadone into a potential new drug. Esmethadone is a promising member of the pharmacological class of uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonists that have shown efficacy for major depressive disorder (MDD) and other diseases and disorders, such as Alzheimer's dementia and pseudobulbar affect. The other drugs in the novel class of NMDAR antagonists with therapeutic uses that are discussed for comparative purposes in this review are esketamine, ketamine, dextromethorphan, and memantine. We present in silico, in vitro, in vivo, and clinical data for esmethadone and other uncompetitive NMDAR antagonists that may advance our understanding of the role of these receptors in neural plasticity in health and disease. The efficacy of NMDAR antagonists as rapid antidepressants may advance our understanding of the neurobiology of MDD and other neuropsychiatric diseases and disorders.

Neuropsychiatric Function Improvement in Pediatric Patients with Phenylketonuria

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effects of sapropterin dihydrochloride on blood phenylalanine (Phe) and symptoms of neuropsychiatric impairment in children and adolescents with phenylketonuria (PKU).

STUDY DESIGN

PKU subjects 8-17 years of age (n = 86) were randomized to double-blind treatment with sapropterin (n = 43) or placebo (n = 43) for 13 weeks, then all received open-label sapropterin therapy for an additional 13 weeks. Blood Phe and symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV [ADHD RS-IV]), executive functioning (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function), depression (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression), and anxiety (Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety) were assessed.

RESULTS

Following the 13-week randomization phase, the sapropterin and placebo groups had mean changes in blood Phe of -20.9% and +2.9%, respectively. Corresponding least square mean differences in ADHD RS-IV scores were significantly greater for the sapropterin vs the placebo group: Total (-3.2 points, P = .02), Inattention subscale (-1.8 points, P = .04), and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale (-1.6 points, P = .02). Forest plots favored sapropterin treatment over placebo for all ADHD RS-IV and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function indices. There were no significant differences in reported problems with attention or executive function between the 2 groups at baseline or at week 26 following the 13-week open-label treatment period. Anxiety and depression scores did not differ significantly between cohorts at any time. Sapropterin was well tolerated, with a favorable safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Sapropterin reduced blood Phe and was associated with significant improvement in parent-reported symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, and executive functioning in children and adolescents with PKU.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01114737. Registered 27 April 2010, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01114737.

Comparing the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of antipsychotics: Choosing an antipsychotic and dosing a long-acting injectable

In this paper, we will discuss the pharmacologic properties of antipsychotics, including those that are the same in structure and those that differentiate one from another. We will bring to you how differential pharmacologic properties can explain differential efficacy and differential tolerability. We will review how to use plasma drug levels and long-acting injectables to enhance compliance early in the illness, and to manage both forms of treatment resistance (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic failures). Through inadequate pharmacokinetic processes (poor absorption, rapid metabolism, enzymatic polymorphisms, etc.), antipsychotic plasma levels do not reach sufficient concentration. Pharmacodynamic treatment failure (receptor binding and sensitivity, post-receptor effects, etc.) is the inability to provide a significant effect on psychotic symptoms despite therapeutic plasma levels. Long-Acting Injectable (LAI) antipsychotics employ technology that can provide a useful treatment tool in the armamentarium of a modern psychopharmacologist. The pharmacologic properties of antipsychotics differentiate one from another and can help explain differences in efficacy and tolerability. Utilizing plasma drug levels can enhance understanding of treatment failures and lead to specific patient management strategies for best outcomes. This kind of personalized approach to antipsychotic dosage would mean a big shift in the treatment of psychiatric patients.

Screening for Bipolar I Disorder and the Rapid Mood Screener: Results of a Nationwide Health Care Provider Survey

Objective: Effective screening for bipolar I disorder can lead to enhanced assessment, improved diagnosis, and better patient outcomes. The Rapid Mood Screener (RMS), a new bipolar I disorder screening tool, was evaluated in a nationwide survey of health care providers (HCPs).

Methods: Eligible HCPs were asked to describe their opinions/current use of screening tools, assess the RMS, and evaluate the RMS versus the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ). Results were stratified by primary care and psychiatric specialty. Findings were reported using descriptive statistics; statistical significance was reported at the 95% confidence level.

Results: Among respondents (N = 200), 82% used a tool to screen for major depressive disorder (MDD), while 32% used a tool for bipolar disorder. Most HCPs were aware of the MDQ (85%), but only 29% reported current use. According to HCPs, the RMS was significantly better than the MDQ on all screening tool attributes (eg, sensitivity/specificity, brevity, practicality, easy scoring; P < .05 for all). Significantly more HCPs reported that they would use the RMS versus the MDQ (81% vs 19%, P < .05); 76% reported that they would screen new patients with depressive symptoms, and 68% indicated they would rescreen patients with a depression diagnosis. Most HCPs (84%) said the RMS would have a positive impact on their practice, with 46% saying they would screen more patients for bipolar disorder.

Discussion: In our survey, the RMS was favorably evaluated by HCPs. A large percentage of respondents preferred the RMS over the MDQ and indicated that it would likely have a positive impact on clinicians' screening behavior.

The Efficacy of Lumateperone in Patients With Bipolar Depression With Mixed Features

Objective: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient study investigated efficacy of lumateperone 42 mg in patients with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder and experiencing a major depressive episode (MDE) stratified by the presence of mixed features.

Methods: Adults (18-75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing an MDE, defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria, were randomized 1:1 to 6-week oral lumateperone 42 mg/d or placebo (conducted November 2017-March 2019). Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score, Clinical Global Impression Scale-Bipolar Version-Severity (CGI-BP-S) total score, and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) were analyzed in patients (N = 376) categorized as having mixed features (Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS] score ≥ 4 and ≤ 12, 41.5%) or not having mixed features (YMRS < 4, 58.5%) at baseline. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) including mania/hypomania were assessed.

Results: At day 43, lumateperone significantly improved MADRS and CGI-BP-S total scores change from baseline compared with placebo for patients with mixed features (MADRS least squares mean difference [LSMD] = -4.4, P < .01; CGI-BP-S LSMD = -0.7, P < .05) and without mixed features (MADRS LSMD = -4.2, P < .001, CGI-BP-S LSMD = -1.0, P < .001). Q-LES-Q-SF percent score significantly improved at day 43 with lumateperone vs placebo in patients with mixed features (LSMD = 5.9, P < .05), with numerical improvements in patients without mixed features (LSMD = 2.6, P = .27). TEAEs of mania/hypomania were rare.

Conclusions: Lumateperone 42 mg significantly improved symptoms of depression and disease severity in patients with an MDE associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder, with or without mixed features.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03249376.

Do We Need a New Nomenclature for Atypical Antipsychotics? A Survey of Health Care Professionals and Patients

Objective: The current nomenclature for atypical antipsychotics does not indicate that they are used to treat nonpsychotic conditions (eg, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder), which could have negative implications for both health care providers (HCPs) and patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate how the atypical antipsychotic class name affects HCPs who treat bipolar disorder and patients who receive the diagnosis.

Methods: Nationwide surveys of primary care and psychiatric HCPs (n = 200) and patients with bipolar disorder (n = 200) were conducted to assess perspectives regarding current atypical antipsychotic nomenclature. HCP opinion about a change in class name was also evaluated. The self-administered electronic surveys were completed by HCPs from May 22, 2020, to June 1, 2020, and by patients from August 25, 2020, to September 7, 2020.

Results: Compared with the mood stabilizer class name, the atypical antipsychotic name elicited stronger negative feelings from both HCPs and patients. Most HCPs avoided bringing up the atypical antipsychotic name with patients (72%), often due to fear of negative reactions. Despite being approved for bipolar mania and depression, only 48% and 39% of HCPs indicated that atypical antipsychotics were appropriate for these disorders, respectively. If an appropriate alternative for the term atypical antipsychotic was available for bipolar disorder, 71% of HCPs said they were likely to change their class-related behaviors. Most patients had never heard of the atypical antipsychotic class name (69%). Significantly more patients had negative reactions (eg, worry, fear, confusion) to the idea of their HCP prescribing an atypical antipsychotic versus a mood stabilizer (25% vs 6%). Compared with mood stabilizers, patients were less likely to take an atypical antipsychotic immediately as prescribed.

Conclusions: Significantly more HCPs and patients had negative reactions to atypical antipsychotic nomenclature compared with mood stabilizer nomenclature for treating bipolar disorder. The broad descriptive atypical antipsychotic class name may not support the standard of care for the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Pharmacological Comparative Characterization of REL-1017 (Esmethadone-HCl) and Other NMDAR Channel Blockers in Human Heterodimeric N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors

Excessive Ca²⁺ currents via N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) have been implicated in many disorders. Uncompetitive NMDAR channel blockers are an emerging class of drugs in clinical use for major depressive disorder (MDD) and other neuropsychiatric diseases. The pharmacological characterization of uncompetitive NMDAR blockers in clinical use may improve our understanding of NMDAR function in physiology and pathology. REL-1017 (esmethadone-HCl), a novel uncompetitive NMDAR channel blocker in Phase 3 trials for the treatment of MDD, was characterized together with dextromethorphan, memantine, (±)-ketamine, and MK-801 in cell lines over-expressing NMDAR subtypes using fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR), automated patch-clamp, and manual patch-clamp electrophysiology. In the absence of Mg²⁺, NMDAR subtypes NR1-2D were most sensitive to low, sub-μM glutamate concentrations in FLIPR experiments. FLIPR Ca²⁺ determination demonstrated low μM affinity of REL-1017 at NMDARs with minimal subtype preference. In automated and manual patch-clamp electrophysiological experiments, REL-1017 exhibited preference for the NR1-2D NMDAR subtype in the presence of 1 mM Mg²⁺ and 1 μM L-glutamate. Tau off and trapping characteristics were similar for (±)-ketamine and REL-1017. Results of radioligand binding assays in rat cortical neurons correlated with the estimated affinities obtained in FLIPR assays and in automated and manual patch-clamp assays. In silico studies of NMDARs in closed and open conformation indicate that REL-1017 has a higher preference for docking and undocking the open-channel conformation compared to ketamine. In conclusion, the pharmacological characteristics of REL-1017 at NMDARs, including relatively low affinity at the NMDAR, NR1-2D subtype preference in the presence of 1 mM Mg²⁺, tau off and degree of trapping similar to (±)-ketamine, and preferential docking and undocking of the open NMDAR, could all be important variables for understanding the rapid-onset antidepressant effects of REL-1017 without psychotomimetic side effects.

The prescriber's guide to classic MAO inhibitors (phenelzine, tranylcypromine, isocarboxazid) for treatment-resistant depression

This article is a clinical guide which discusses the "state-of-the-art" usage of the classic monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) antidepressants (phenelzine, tranylcypromine, and isocarboxazid) in modern psychiatric practice. The guide is for all clinicians, including those who may not be experienced MAOI prescribers. It discusses indications, drug-drug interactions, side-effect management, and the safety of various augmentation strategies. There is a clear and broad consensus (more than 70 international expert endorsers), based on 6 decades of experience, for the recommendations herein exposited. They are based on empirical evidence and expert opinion-this guide is presented as a new specialist-consensus standard. The guide provides practical clinical advice, and is the basis for the rational use of these drugs, particularly because it improves and updates knowledge, and corrects the various misconceptions that have hitherto been prominent in the literature, partly due to insufficient knowledge of pharmacology. The guide suggests that MAOIs should always be considered in cases of treatment-resistant depression (including those melancholic in nature), and prior to electroconvulsive therapy-while taking into account of patient preference. In selected cases, they may be considered earlier in the treatment algorithm than has previously been customary, and should not be regarded as drugs of last resort; they may prove decisively effective when many other treatments have failed. The guide clarifies key points on the concomitant use of incorrectly proscribed drugs such as methylphenidate and some tricyclic antidepressants. It also illustrates the straightforward "bridging" methods that may be used to transition simply and safely from other antidepressants to MAOIs.

Psilocybin in neuropsychiatry: a review of its pharmacology, safety, and efficacy

Psilocybin is a tryptamine alkaloid found in some mushrooms, especially those of the genus Psilocybe. Psilocybin has four metabolites including the pharmacologically active primary metabolite psilocin, which readily enters the systemic circulation. The psychoactive effects of psilocin are believed to arise due to the partial agonist effects at the 5HT2A receptor. Psilocin also binds to various other receptor subtypes although the actions of psilocin at other receptors are not fully explored. Psilocybin administered at doses sufficient to cause hallucinogenic experiences has been trialed for addictive disorders, anxiety and depression. This review investigates studies of psilocybin and psilocin and assesses the potential for use of psilocybin and a treatment agent in neuropsychiatry. The potential for harm is also assessed, which may limit the use of psilocybin as a pharmacotherapy. Careful evaluation of the number needed to harm vs the number needed to treat will ultimately justify the potential clinical use of psilocybin. This field needs a responsible pathway forward.

Neuropsychiatric Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Synthetic Review from a Global Perspective

Some research suggests that distress, secondary to isolation and fear following COVID-19 infection, can negatively affect the long-term more than the COVID-19 infection itself. This narrative review aims to provide a global view on the neuropsychiatric consequences of COVID-19 that can be ascribed to several factors, ranging from the direct effect of infection, to the body's responses against the infection, or to the psychological sequelae of social isolation, unemployment, and fear for one's health and livelihood. Current findings show that the more severe the respiratory infection, the more likely are central nervous system (CNS) complications regarding the infection itself. The immune reactions to the infection may result in symptoms similar to chronic fatigue as well as neurocognitive deficits, which last long after the infection is gone. An increase in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and trauma-related stress may also follow upon economic fears and isolation from friends and family. The consequences of the pandemic are not limited to adults; children learning remotely and away from classmates and routine activities may develop adjustment disorders, acute stress disorder, and a variety of manifestations of grief. A summary of case reports suggests that COVID-19-related stress, economic recession, and political unrest increase the risk of suicidal behaviors and acts of violence. However, it is unknown whether manifestations of mental disorders result from social causes or whether CNS complications may be responsible.

The effect of first- and second-generation antipsychotics on brain morphology in schizophrenia: A systematic review of longitudinal magnetic resonance studies with a randomized allocation to treatment arms

Schizophrenia manifests as loss of brain volume in specific areas in a progressive nature and an important question concerns whether long-term treatment with medications contributes to this. The aim of the current PRISMA systematic review was to search for prospective studies involving randomization to treatment. PROSPERO ID: CRD42020197874. The MEDLINE/PUBMED was searched and it returned 2638 articles; 3 were fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A fourth was published later; they included 359 subjects, of whom 86 were healthy controls, while the rest were first-episode patients, with 91 under olanzapine, 93 under haloperidol, 48 under risperidone, 5 under paliperidone, 6 under ziprasidone, and 30 under placebo. Probably one-third of patients were suffering from a psychotic disorder other than schizophrenia. The consideration of their results suggested that there is no significant difference between these medications concerning their effects on brain structure and also in comparison to healthy subjects. There does not seem to be any strong support to the opinion that medications that treat psychosis cause loss of brain volume in patients with schizophrenia. On the contrary, the data might imply the possible presence of a protective effect for D2, 5-HT2, and NE alpha-2 antagonists (previously called SGAs). However, the literature is limited and focused research in large study samples is essential to clarify the issue, since important numerical differences do exist. The possibility of the results and their heterogeneity to be artifacts secondary to a modification of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal by antipsychotics should not be easily rejected until relevant data are available.

How and when to treat the most common adverse effects of antipsychotics: Expert review from research to clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

As most treatment guidelines for antipsychotics focus on clinical efficacy, we will instead focus on adverse effects and how to manage them. In this review, we aim to provide an up-to-date clinical resource for providers who prescribe antipsychotics and have included here "what's new" and "what to do" for numerous antipsychotic-induced adverse effects.

METHODS

A review was performed of relevant literature, studies, randomized clinical trials, and systematic reviews. This information was combined with the clinical experience of the authors to formulate a practical guide for treating adverse effects of antipsychotics with an emphasis on metabolic and movement disorder adverse effects and brief mention of some others (sedation and sexual dysfunction).

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotics are an integral part of psychiatric care and are often prescribed lifelong. When choosing an antipsychotic, special consideration must be given to adverse effects which have an undeniable impact on quality of life and can often be the deciding factor in patients' medication compliance. While patients may respond well to one specific medication, they may still experience adverse effects that lead them to discontinue it or switch to a more tolerable but less effective option. However, strategies do exist for managing and treating adverse effects, especially metabolic and movement adverse effects, allowing better personalization of antipsychotic choice.

New Medications for Neuropsychiatric Disorders

This article seeks to summarize the mechanisms of action, clinical trials, and FDA approval status of several psychiatric medications that are either newly available or in the FDA approval process. This article highlights medications that demonstrate novel mechanisms of action, examines nonpsychiatric medications that are being used to augment existing psychiatric treatments, and elucidates treatments for illnesses that have not previously received FDA indications.

Psychopharmacology and ethnicity: A comparative study on Senegalese and Italian men

Objectives: Ethnicity represents a crucial factor in influencing response to psychotropic drugs. Some data indicate that functional polymorphisms of two candidate genes of the serotonin (5-HT) transporter (SERT) may affect the response to selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The present study aimed to compare the platelet SERT, through the specific [³H]paroxetine ([³H]Par) binding, and plasma oxytocin (OT) levels in 20 Senegalese and in 20 Italian men.Methods: No subjects had family or personal history of any major psychiatric disorder, or had ever regularly taken psychotropic drugs, or were suffering from any physical illness.Results: Senegalese men showed statistically significant higher density (B_max, fmol/mg protein, mean ± SD) of [³H]Par binding sites (2105.00 ± 473.15 vs 1139.85 ± 213.58, P < 0.001), as well as more elevated plasma OT levels (pg/ml, mean ± SD) (OT: 18.08 ± 4.46 vs 6.62 ± 2.91) than Italian men.Conclusions: These differences, possibly due to genetic or dietary reasons, or even to gender, might affect the response to psychopharmacological compounds. Our findings would suggest specific caution when administering psychotropic compounds to non-European individuals, and the need of further studies in this emerging field of neuropsychopharmacology.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Mixed States

Despite the relatively high prevalence of mixed symptoms and features among patients with mood disorders, the current literature supporting the specific efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics and mood stabilizers for the treatment of mixed symptoms is limited. Several studies have demonstrated that acute affective episodes with mixed symptoms or features tend to respond unsatisfactory to treatments that are usually more effective for the management of other affective phases. There is clearly a need for clinical trials in order to determine the more adequate pharmacologic option for the treatment of individuals suffering from affective episodes with mixed features.

Cariprazine as a treatment across the bipolar I spectrum from depression to mania: mechanism of action and review of clinical data

Cariprazine is one of the newest dopamine-serotonin partial agonists, also known as 'atypical' second generation antipsychotics. Originally approved for acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia as well as for acute mania and mixed mania/depression, cariprazine has now been approved for bipolar I depression. Additionally, post hoc analyses of bipolar I depressed subjects show that both those with and those without concurrent manic features were improved following treatment with cariprazine. Maintenance studies are in progress in bipolar disorder, as are studies to augment antidepressants in unipolar major depressive episodes insufficiently responsive to treatment. Here, we review specifically the efficacy and safety data of cariprazine in bipolar I disorder and discuss the hypothesized mechanism of action of cariprazine and how it could theoretically be linked to caprazine's broad therapeutic actions across the mood disorder spectrum.

Deuterium Tetrabenazine for Tardive Dyskinesia

Tardive dyskinesia remains a significant, potentially stigmatizing or crippling adverse effect for any patient treated with an antipsychotic medication. While second- and third-generation antipsychotics have exhibited lower annual incidence rates for tardive dyskinesia than classic or first-generation agents, 3.9% versus 5.5%, the estimated incidence rate is only modestly lower. When coupled with the fact that second- and third-generation antipsychotic medications have come to be employed in treating a wider range of disorders (e.g., autism spectrum disorders, mood disorders, personality disorders, etc.), it is clear that the population of patients exposed to the risk of tardive dyskinesia has expanded. On April 3, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a deuterated version of tetrabenazine (Xenozine®) for the treatment of the involuntary choreic movements associated with Huntington's disease. More recent data, however, have indicated that deuterium tetrabenazine or deutetrabenazine (Austedo®) is effective in treating tardive dyskinesia. Moreover, like the other derivative of tetrabenazine, valbenazine (Ingrezza®), deutetrabenazine offers less frequent dosing and a better short-term adverse effect profile than that of tetrabenazine. Longer use in a broader range of patients, however, will be required to identify risks and benefits not found in short-term trials, as well as optimal use parameters for treatment of tardive dyskinesia.

Flibanserin - the female Viagra?

This article provides a clinically relevant review of the first medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in premenopausal women. In this short piece, the human sexual response cycle and its relevance to HSDD will be described as well as the pharmacological mechanism of action of flibanserin. Finally, efficacy and safety data of this new medication will be summarised.

The pharmacodynamic effects of combined administration of flibanserin and alcohol

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Flibanserin is a serotonin 5-HT_1A agonist and 5-HT_2A antagonist approved for the treatment of acquired, generalized hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in premenopausal women. Because of the increased risk of hypotension- and syncope-related adverse events (AEs) observed with coadministration of flibanserin and alcohol, alcohol use is contraindicated. To provide a more comprehensive understanding of the interaction between flibanserin and alcohol, the results of a dedicated phase 1 alcohol-interaction study and a pooled analysis of phase 3 studies of premenopausal women with HSDD are presented.

METHODS

In the phase 1 study, healthy participants (males [n=23] and females [n=2]) were randomly assigned to one of five sequence groups, which determined the order in which they were to receive flibanserin 100 mg or placebo, with or without ethanol 0.4 g/kg or 0.8 g/kg. Change from baseline in seated blood pressure, orthostatic vital signs, AEs and visual analogue scale sedation outcomes were examined. Blood samples were collected at baseline and for up to 4 hours after dosing to determine flibanserin area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUC_0-4 ). Pooled data from five phase 3 studies of patients receiving flibanserin 100 mg once daily (n=1543), or placebo (n=1905), were analysed.

RESULTS

In the phase 1 study, the incidence of hypotension and syncope increased when flibanserin was coadministered with ethanol. Sedation increased 20% and 27% from baseline with flibanserin plus ethanol 0.4 g/kg and 0.8 g/kg, respectively, at 4 hours post-dose. In the pooled analysis of phase 3 studies, 58.2% and 63.6% of participants receiving flibanserin or placebo, respectively, reported baseline alcohol use. In patients receiving flibanserin, fatigue and dizziness occurred more frequently in patients with vs. without alcohol use.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Results from this study suggest that increased incidence of hypotension- and syncope-related events may result from a pharmacodynamic interaction between flibanserin and alcohol, although the clinical significance of these interactions in real-world populations remains unclear.

Drug information update. Unconventional treatment strategies for schizophrenia: polypharmacy and heroic dosing

The majority of patients respond to antipsychotic monotherapy at standard doses, but a subset of patients will require more heroic measures that include antipsychotic polypharmacy and high-dose monotherapy. Indeed, research has shown that roughly 30% of patients with psychosis are prescribed multiple antipsychotic medications. We discuss the potential benefits and challenges of these approaches and provide a rationale for why and when they should be utilised.

Bottlenecks in the development of topical analgesics: molecule, formulation, dose-finding, and phase III design

Topical analgesics can be defined as topical formulations containing analgesics or co-analgesics. Since 2000, interest in such formulations has been on the rise. There are, however, four critical issues in the research and development phases of topical analgesics: 1) The selection of the active pharmaceutical ingredient. Analgesics and co-analgesics differ greatly in their mechanism of action, and it is required to find the most optimal fit between such mechanisms of action and the pathogenesis of the targeted (neuropathic) pain. 2) Issues concerning the optimized formulation. For relevant clinical efficacy, specific characteristics for the selected vehicle (eg, cream base or gel base) are required, depending on the physicochemical characteristics of the active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) to be delivered. 3) Well-designed phase II dose-finding studies are required, and, unfortunately, such trials are missing. In fact, we will demonstrate that underdosing is one of the major hurdles to detect meaningful and statistically relevant clinical effects of topical analgesics. 4) Selection of clinical end points and innovatively designed phase III trials. End point selection can make or break a trial. For instance, to include numbness together with tingling as a composite end point for neuropathic pain seems stretching the therapeutic impact of an analgesic too far. Given the fast onset of action of topical analgesics (usually within 30 minutes), enrichment designs might enhance the chances for success, as the placebo response might decrease. Topical analgesics may become promising inroads for the treatment of neuropathic pain, once sufficient attention is given to these four key aspects.

Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder: International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health (ISSWSH) Expert Consensus Panel Review

The objective of the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health expert consensus panel was to develop a concise, clinically relevant, evidence-based review of the epidemiology, physiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), a sexual dysfunction affecting approximately 10% of adult women. Etiologic factors include conditions or drugs that decrease brain dopamine, melanocortin, oxytocin, and norepinephrine levels and augment brain serotonin, endocannabinoid, prolactin, and opioid levels. Symptoms include lack or loss of motivation to participate in sexual activity due to absent or decreased spontaneous desire, sexual desire in response to erotic cues or stimulation, or ability to maintain desire or interest through sexual activity for at least 6 months, with accompanying distress. Treatment follows a biopsychosocial model and is guided by history and assessment of symptoms. Sex therapy has been the standard treatment, although there is a paucity of studies assessing efficacy, except for mindfulness-based cognitive behavior therapy. Bupropion and buspirone may be considered off-label treatments for HSDD, despite limited safety and efficacy data. Menopausal women with HSDD may benefit from off-label testosterone treatment, as evidenced by multiple clinical trials reporting some efficacy and short-term safety. Currently, flibanserin is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved medication to treat premenopausal women with generalized acquired HSDD. Based on existing data, we hypothesize that all these therapies alter central inhibitory and excitatory pathways. In conclusion, HSDD significantly affects quality of life in women and can effectively be managed by health care providers with appropriate assessments and individualized treatments.

Psychopharmacology of Persistent Violence and Aggression

Persistent violence not due to acute psychosis or mania can be managed only after appropriate characterization of the aggressive episodes (psychotic, impulsive, or predatory/planned/instrumental). The type of violence combined with the psychiatric diagnosis dictates the evidence-based pharmacologic approaches for psychotically motivated and impulsive aggression, whereas instrumental violence mandates forensic/behavioral strategies. For nonacute inpatients, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, traumatic brain injury, and dementia comprise the majority of individuals who are persistently aggressive, with impulsive actions the most common form of violence across all diagnoses. Neurobiological considerations combined with empirical data provide a comprehensive framework for systematic medication trials to manage persistently aggressive patients.

Dextromethorphan-quinidine-responsive pseudobulbar affect (PBA): psychopharmacological model for wide-ranging disorders of emotional expression?

The symptoms of emotional dysregulation associated with the syndrome known as pseudobulbar affect (PBA) can be effectively treated by the sigma, glutamate, and serotonergic agent dextromethorphan combined with quinidine. If the same brain circuits affected in PBA are also compromised in related disorders of emotional expression, dextromethorphan-quinidine and other novel sigma-glutamate-serotonin agents could prove to be novel psychopharmacologic treatments for these conditions as well.

Major Depressive Disorder: Understanding the Significance of Residual Symptoms and Balancing Efficacy with Tolerability

INTRODUCTION

Major depressive disorder is a complex and frequent psychiatric condition that poses significant challenges to both the patients who experience it and the physicians who treat them. The goal of therapy is for patients to achieve remission, which requires identifying and measuring symptoms at the outset and throughout treatment to document both response and resistance to treatment. A number of validated instruments are available both for diagnosis of and response to treatment. Many factors affect a patient's ability to achieve remission, but although many patients do achieve remission, a significant number continue to have residual symptoms that cause functional impairment.

METHODS

Review of the literature for treatment of major depression, including mechanisms of action, individualized treatment optimization, residual symptom reduction, and minimization of side effects.

RESULTS

For sustained remission, all symptoms must be treated until they are undetectable. Patients who do not achieve remission after adequate treatment trials should be evaluated for adherence to treatment, as well as comorbid psychiatric and medical disorders. In these cases, consideration should be given to changing therapy by switching, combining, or augmenting initial therapy, as well as referring some patients to a psychiatrist for treatment with specialized modalities. Linking symptoms with malfunctioning brain circuits and neurotransmitters provides a targeted approach for achieving sustained remission. Neurobiology also provides a rational basis for combination therapy in patients with treatment-resistant depression, because it can aid selection of different drugs with different mechanisms of action or of multifunctional/multimodal antidepressant drugs that target more than 1 molecular mechanism.

DISCUSSION

Recent advances and better understanding of neurobiology provide a rational basis for individualizing treatment of patients with major depression.

California State Hospital Violence Assessment and Treatment (Cal-VAT) guideline

Here we provide comprehensive guidelines for the assessment and treatment of violence and aggression of various etiologies, including psychotic aggression and impulsive aggression due to schizophrenia, mood disorders, ADHD, or trauma, and predatory aggression due to psychopathy and other personality disorders. These guidelines have been developed from a collection of prescribing recommendations, clinical trial results, and years of clinical experience in treating patients who are persistently violent or aggressive in the California Department of State Hospital System. Many of the recommendations provided in these guidelines employ off-label prescribing practices; thus, sound clinical judgment based on individual patient needs and according to institution formularies must be considered when applying these guidelines in clinical practice.

Effect of adjunctive L-methylfolate 15 mg among inadequate responders to SSRIs in depressed patients who were stratified by biomarker levels and genotype: results from a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Specific genetic or biological markers may predict inadequate response to therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of the current post hoc analysis was to evaluate the effect of specific biological and genetic markers on the antidepressant efficacy of adjunctive L-methylfolate 15 mg versus placebo from a trial of inadequate responders to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

METHOD

The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial used the sequential parallel comparison design. Outpatients with SSRI-resistant MDD (DSM-IV criteria) received L-methylfolate 15 mg/d for 60 days, placebo for 30 days followed by L-methylfolate 15 mg/d for 30 days, or placebo for 60 days. The effects of baseline levels of select biological and genetic markers individually and combined on treatment response to L-methylfolate versus placebo were evaluated; the primary response measure was the 28-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-28). The first patient was enrolled July 14, 2009, and the last patient completed April 28, 2011.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were enrolled. Patients with specific biological (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m², elevated plasma levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, low S-adenosylmethionine/S-adenosylhomocysteine ratio) and genetic markers at baseline had significantly (P ≤ .05) greater pooled mean change from baseline on the HDRS-28 with L-methylfolate versus placebo. Pooled mean change from baseline on the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale was significantly (P < .05) greater with L-methylfolate versus placebo for most genetic markers. Most combinations of baseline biological and genetic markers predicted significantly (P ≤ .05) greater reductions in pooled mean change from baseline in HDRS-28 scores with L-methylfolate versus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarkers associated with inflammation or metabolism and genomic markers associated with L-methylfolate synthesis and metabolism may identify patients with SSRI-resistant depression who are responsive to adjunctive therapy with L-methylfolate 15 mg. Confirmatory studies are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00955955.

A proposal for an updated neuropsychopharmacological nomenclature

Current psychopharmacological nomenclature remains wedded in an earlier period of scientific understanding, failing to reflect contemporary developments and knowledge, does not aid clinicians in selecting the best medication for a given patient, and tends to confuse patients by prescribing a drug that does not reflect their identified diagnosis (e.g. prescribe "antipsychotics" to depression). Four major colleges of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP, ACNP, Asian CNP, and CINP) proposed a new template comprising a multi-axial pharmacologically-driven nomenclature tested by four surveys. The template has five axes: 1-class (primary pharmacological target and relevant mechanism); 2-family (reflecting the relevant neurotransmitter and mechanism); 3-neurobiological activities; 4-efficacy and major side effects; and 5-approved indications. The results of the surveys suggest that the clinicians found the available indication-based nomenclature system dissatisfactory, non-intuitive, confusing, and doubt-inducing for them and the patients. The proposed five-axis template seeks to upend current usage by placing pharmacology rather than indication as the primary axes, with the proposed nomenclature relating primarily to Axis 1-the class, and usage of the other axes would largely depend upon the extent to which the clinician seeks to deepen the scientific and clinical base of his involvement. A significant proportion of the participants in the four surveys were in favour of the proposed system, a similar number wanted to consider the idea further, and only a small proportion (8.6%) were against it. The proposed five-axis pharmacology based nomenclature template is a system which might refresh and reflect the current scientific concepts of neuropsychopharmacology.

The diverse therapeutic actions of pregabalin: is a single mechanism responsible for several pharmacological activities?

Pregabalin is a specific ligand of the alpha2-delta (α2-δ) auxiliary subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. A growing body of evidence from studies of anxiety and pain indicate that the observed responses with pregabalin may result from activity at the α2-δ auxiliary protein expressed presynaptically, in several different circuits of the central nervous system (CNS). The disorders that appear to be effectively treated with pregabalin are thematically linked by neuronal dysregulation or hyperexcitation within the CNS. This review proposes how binding to the α2-δ protein target in different regions of the CNS may contribute to the observed clinical activity of pregabalin, as well as to the adverse event profile of the compound. Whether this compound regulates synaptic function via α2-δ in additional conditions is yet to be discovered. The potential of pregabalin to regulate neuronal hyperactivity involving other CNS circuits will require further exploration.

Effectiveness of lurasidone for patients with schizophrenia following 6 weeks of acute treatment with lurasidone, olanzapine, or placebo: a 6-month, open-label, extension study

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of lurasidone, a new atypical antipsychotic agent, in the longer-term treatment of schizophrenia (DSM-IV). Persistence of symptom improvement was assessed as a secondary outcome.

METHOD

Patients who completed a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of fixed doses of once-daily lurasidone (40 or 120 mg) or olanzapine 15 mg (to confirm assay sensitivity) were eligible to receive flexibly dosed lurasidone 40 to 120 mg/d in this 6-month, open-label extension study (conducted from March 2008 to December 2009). Assessments of safety and tolerability were conducted at open-label baseline, at day 10, and monthly thereafter.

RESULTS

Of 254 enrolled patients, 113 (44.5%) completed 6 months of open-label treatment. During the open-label study (month 6 observed cases), small decreases were observed in mean weight (-0.1 kg) and median lipid levels (total cholesterol, -6.5 mg/dL; low-density lipoprotein, 0.0 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein, 0.0 mg/dL; triglycerides, -8.5 mg/dL). Patients previously treated with olanzapine (n = 69) experienced decrease in weight and improvement in lipid levels, whereas patients previously treated with lurasidone (n = 115) or placebo (n = 62) experienced minimal changes. No clinically meaningful changes were observed in median prolactin levels. The 2 most commonly reported adverse events were akathisia (13.0%) and insomnia (11.0%). Persistent antipsychotic efficacy of lurasidone was shown for patients who had previously received lurasidone, olanzapine, or placebo; further reductions from open-label baseline to final visit were observed in mean PANSS total score (-8.7) for all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Open-label treatment with flexibly dosed lurasidone (40-120 mg/d) was generally safe, well tolerated, and effective over a 6-month period in patients who had completed a preceding 6-week, double-blind study.

Glutamate neurocircuitry: theoretical underpinnings in schizophrenia

The Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia is actively being challenged by the NMDA Receptor Hypofunctioning Hypothesis of Schizophrenia. The latter hypothesis may actually be the starting point in neuronal pathways that ultimately modifies dopamine pathways involved in generating both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia postulated by the former hypothesis. The authors suggest that even this latter, NMDA receptor-based, hypothesis is likely too narrow and offer a review of typical glutamate and dopamine-based neurocircuitry, propose genetic vulnerabilities impacting glutamate neurocircuitry, and provide a broad interpretation of a possible etiology of schizophrenia. In conclusion, there is a brief review of potential schizophrenia treatments that rely on the etiologic theory provided in the body of the paper.

The vasopressin V(1b) receptor antagonist SSR149415 in the treatment of major depressive and generalized anxiety disorders: results from 4 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies

OBJECTIVE

These studies were designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the first nonpeptide vasopressin V(1b) receptor antagonist, SSR149415, in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).

METHOD

Studies were randomized 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating 100- and 250-mg twice daily doses of SSR149415, placebo, and escitalopram 10 mg/day or paroxetine 20 mg/day, conducted from August 2006 through February 2008. Participants met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria for MDD or GAD. Baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) total scores were ≥ 24 and 18, respectively, and in the GAD trial baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) score was ≥ 22. Primary efficacy variables included changes from baseline in total score on HDRS or HARS and MADRS, and the secondary variable included changes in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness score (CGI-S). A 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of 100- and 250-mg twice daily doses of SSR149415 on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in MDD patients was also conducted.

RESULTS

In the GAD trial, SSR149415 did not separate from placebo on the primary (HARS-100 mg: P = .29; 250 mg: P = .21) and secondary (CGI-S-100 mg: P = .18; 250 mg: P = .24) outcome measures, while paroxetine demonstrated efficacy (HARS: P = .003; CGI-S: P = .01). In 2 MDD trials, SSR149415-treated patients did not show significant improvement from baseline on any outcome measure compared with placebo-treated patients (HDRS-100 mg: P = .21 and .48, respectively; 250 mg: P = .22 and P = .46, respectively; CGI-S-100 mg: P = .64 and P = .82, respectively; 250 mg: P = .33 and P = .08, respectively). In the third MDD study, SSR149415 250 mg (P = .04), but not escitalopram (P = .15), demonstrated significant improvement compared to placebo on the HDRS total score at week 8. SSR149415 had no deleterious effects on the HPA axis.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies demonstrate that SSR149415 may not be useful for the treatment of GAD and that its antidepressant potential needs to be further evaluated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00374166 (Sanofi ID number: DFI5880), NCT00361491 (Sanofi ID number: DFI5879), NCT00358631 (Sanofi ID number: DFI5878), NCT01606384 (Sanofi ID number: PDY5467).

Iloperidone, asenapine and lurasidone: a primer on their current status

INTRODUCTION

Three newer atypical antipsychotic drugs were FDA-approved in 2009 and 2010 in the following order: iloperidone, asenapine and lurasidone. The three drugs are indicated for the treatment of acute schizophrenia. Asenapine is also approved for treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder, for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia and as an adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate for the acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adults.

AREAS COVERED

This review compares and contrasts the current preclinical, clinical, safety and tolerability profiles of the three newer drugs, as reported in published preclinical and clinical studies, product labels, poster presentations and press releases.

EXPERT OPINION

Preclinical studies have reported that the three drugs have variable affinities for a wide range of neurotransmitter receptors, and are active in animal models predictive of antipsychotic activity. Asenapine is the first antipsychotic to be administered sublingually, whereas iloperidone requires titration to minimize orthostatic hypotension. Asenapine and lurasidone are associated with dose-related akathisia, whereas iloperidone is not. The three drugs appear to have relatively benign metabolic profiles. The availability of the three novel antipsychotics should provide additional options for improved treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.

TRPV1 Antagonists and Chronic Pain: Beyond Thermal Perception

In the last decade, considerable evidence as accumulated to support the development of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) antagonists for the treatment of various chronic pain conditions. Whereas there is a widely accepted rationale for the development of TRPV1 antagonists for the treatment of various inflammatory pain conditions, their development for indications of chronic pain, where conditions of tactical, mechanical and spontaneous pain predominate, is less clear. Preclinical localization and expression studies provide a firm foundation for the use of molecules targeting TRPV1 for conditions of bone pain, osteoarthritis and neuropathic pain. Selective TRPV1 antagonists weakly attenuate tactile and mechanical hypersensivity and are partially effective for behavioral and electrophysiological endpoints that incorporate aspects of spontaneous pain. While initial studies with TRPV1 antagonist in normal human subjects indicate a loss of warm thermal perception, clinical studies assessing allelic variants suggests that TRPV1 may mediate other sensory modalities under certain conditions. The focus of this review is to summarize the current perspectives of TRPV1 for the treatment of conditions beyond those with a primary thermal sensitivity.

Efficacy of iloperidone in the short-term treatment of schizophrenia: a post hoc analysis of pooled patient data from four phase III, placebo- and active-controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and tolerability characteristics of an antipsychotic are difficult to determine from a single registration study. We thus conducted an analysis that assessed key efficacy and tolerability outcomes post hoc from four pooled short-term (4-6 weeks) phase III studies that evaluated iloperidone versus placebo in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

METHODS

Patient-level data were pooled from four prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled, multicenter trials of iloperidone in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder aged 18-65 years. Iloperidone 4-8, 10-16, and 20-24 mg/day (all dosed twice daily) were compared with placebo. Active controls used for assay sensitivity included risperidone 4-8 mg/day, haloperidol 15 mg/day, and ziprasidone 160 mg/day. Outcomes of interest were change from baseline to endpoint in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (derived) (BPRSd), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-total (PANSS-T) score, and PANSS-positive (PANSS-P) and PANSS-negative (PANSS-N) subscale scores. An analysis of covariance (with treatment and study as factors, baseline as a covariate) was performed to compare changes between the iloperidone treatment groups versus placebo, on the basis of a last-observation-carried-forward approach for the intent-to-treat (ITT) populations. Tolerability outcomes were obtained from spontaneously reported adverse events (AEs), and number needed to harm was calculated for each antipsychotic versus placebo for the total population.

RESULTS

The ITT population included both schizoaffective and schizophrenia patients (N = 2401): n = 370, n = 494, and n = 424 for iloperidone 4-8, 10-16, and 20-24 mg/day, respectively; n = 294 for risperidone; n = 114 for haloperidol; n = 144 for ziprasidone; and n = 561 for placebo. Treatment with iloperidone 10-16 mg/day or 20-24 mg/day was associated with significantly improved BPRSd, PANSS-T, PANSS-P, and PANSS-N scores versus treatment with placebo. When only patients with schizophrenia were included (n = 1941), the pattern of results was essentially unchanged. The active controls confirmed assay sensitivity. Across all iloperidone dose groups, the incidences of extrapyramidal disorders and akathisia were similar to those observed with placebo. AEs for which the frequency was greater for iloperidone than placebo and for which the 95% confidence interval for number needed to harm did not contain infinity were dizziness, dry mouth, somnolence, nasal congestion, fatigue, sedation, and tachycardia; in general, for these AEs, frequency was higher with higher doses, resulting in a lower number needed to harm.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with product labeling, iloperidone 10-16 mg/day or 20-24 mg/day demonstrated significant improvement over placebo on BPRSd and PANSS-T scores, as well as on PANSS-P and PANSS-N subscale scores over 6 weeks of treatment in patients with schizophrenia and in the ITT population, which includes patients with schizoaffective disorder. Iloperidone did not differ from placebo in terms of extrapyramidal disorders and akathisia.