1
|
Wheat CL, Wong ES, Gray KE, Stockdale SE, Nelson KM, Reddy A. Factors Associated With Use of the Preventive Health Inventory in US Veterans. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e242717. [PMID: 38497962 PMCID: PMC10949100 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant declines in the quality of preventive and chronic disease care. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) used the Preventive Health Inventory (PHI), a multicomponent care management intervention, to catch up on care disrupted by the pandemic. Objective To identify key factors associated with PHI use. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study of veterans receiving primary care used administrative data from national VHA primary care clinics for February 1, 2021, through February 1, 2022. Exposure Patient PHI receipt. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were patient, practitioner, and clinic factors associated with PHI receipt. Binomial generalized linear models with fixed effects for clinic were used to analyze factors associated with receipt of PHI. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator procedures were used for variable selection. Results A total of 4 358 038 veterans (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [16.0] years; 90% male; 76% non-Hispanic White) formed the study cohort, of whom 389 757 (9%) received the PHI. Veterans who received the PHI had higher mean Care Assessment Need (CAN) scores, which indicate the likelihood of hospitalization or death within 1 year (mean [SD], 51.9 [28.6] vs 47.2 [28.6]; standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.16). They were also more likely to live in urban areas (77% vs 64%; SMD, 0.28) and have a shorter drive distance to primary care (mean [SD], 13.2 [12.4] vs 15.7 [14.6] miles; SMD, 0.19). The mean outpatient use was higher among PHI recipients compared with non-PHI recipients (mean [SD], 18.4 [27.8] vs 15.1 [24.1] visits; SMD, -0.13). In addition, veterans with primary care practitioners with higher caseloads were more likely to receive the PHI (mean [SD], 778 [231] vs 744 [249] patients; SMD, -0.14), and they were more likely to be seen at larger clinics (mean [SD], 9670 [6876] vs 8786 [6892] patients; SMD, -0.13). Prior outpatient use and CAN score were associated with PHI receipt in the final model. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of the VHA's PHI, patients with higher CAN scores and more outpatient use in the previous year were more likely to receive the PHI. This study identifies potential intervention points to improve care coordination for veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelle L. Wheat
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Edwin S. Wong
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Kristen E. Gray
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Susan E. Stockdale
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, California
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles
| | - Karin M. Nelson
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ashok Reddy
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Apaydin EA, Rose DE, McClean MR, Mohr DC, Yano EM, Shekelle PG, Nelson KM, Guo R, Yoo CK, Stockdale SE. Burnout, employee engagement, and changing organizational contexts in VA primary care during the early COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1306. [PMID: 38012726 PMCID: PMC10683139 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10270-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic involved a rapid change to the working conditions of all healthcare workers (HCW), including those in primary care. Organizational responses to the pandemic, including a shift to virtual care, changes in staffing, and reassignments to testing-related work, may have shifted more burden to these HCWs, increasing their burnout and turnover intent, despite their engagement to their organization. Our objectives were (1) to examine changes in burnout and intent to leave rates in VA primary care from 2017-2020 (before and during the pandemic), and (2) to analyze how individual protective factors and organizational context affected burnout and turnover intent among VA primary care HCWs during the early months of the pandemic. METHODS We analyzed individual- and healthcare system-level data from 19,894 primary care HCWs in 139 healthcare systems in 2020. We modeled potential relationships between individual-level burnout and turnover intent as outcomes, and individual-level employee engagement, perceptions of workload, leadership, and workgroups. At healthcare system-level, we assessed prior-year levels of burnout and turnover intent, COVID-19 burden (number of tests and deaths), and the extent of virtual care use as potential determinants. We conducted multivariable analyses using logistic regression with standard errors clustered by healthcare system controlled for individual-level demographics and healthcare system complexity. RESULTS In 2020, 37% of primary care HCWs reported burnout, and 31% reported turnover intent. Highly engaged employees were less burned out (OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.52-0.63) and had lower turnover intent (OR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.57-0.68). Pre-pandemic healthcare system-level burnout was a major predictor of individual-level pandemic burnout (p = 0.014). Perceptions of reasonable workload, trustworthy leadership, and strong workgroups were also related to lower burnout and turnover intent (p < 0.05 for all). COVID-19 burden, virtual care use, and prior year turnover were not associated with either outcome. CONCLUSIONS Employee engagement was associated with a lower likelihood of primary care HCW burnout and turnover intent during the pandemic, suggesting it may have a protective effect during stressful times. COVID-19 burden and virtual care use were not related to either outcome. Future research should focus on understanding the relationship between engagement and burnout and improving well-being in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Apaydin
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd. (151), Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA.
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
| | - Danielle E Rose
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd. (151), Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
| | - Michael R McClean
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd. (151), Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
| | - David C Mohr
- National Center for Organization Development, Veterans Health Administration, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Yano
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd. (151), Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul G Shekelle
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd. (151), Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karin M Nelson
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rong Guo
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd. (151), Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
| | - Caroline K Yoo
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd. (151), Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd. (151), Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O’Hanlon CE, Walling AM, McClean M, Chu K, Lindvall C, Lee M, Stockdale SE, Leung LB. Depression care quality among patients with solid tumor cancers detected to have depression in Veterans Health Administration primary care clinics. Psychol Serv 2023; 20:764-769. [PMID: 37616079 PMCID: PMC10843783 DOI: 10.1037/ser0000795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
Patients with cancer, especially advanced cancer, experience depression at high rates. We aimed to evaluate the quality of depression care received by patients with solid tumor cancer and advanced solid tumor cancer in Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients seen in 82 VA primary care clinics who newly screened positive for depression on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). Outcomes included timely follow-up within 84 or 180 days (3+ mental health specialty, 3+ psychotherapy, or 3+ primary care visits with depression diagnosis codes) and minimum treatment within 1 year (60+ days antidepressants prescribed, 4+ mental health specialty visits, or 3+ psychotherapy visits). 608,042 individuals were seen in VA primary care clinics during this period; 49,839 patients (8.2%) had solid tumor cancer and 9,278 (1.5%) had advanced or poor-prognosis solid tumor cancer. For 686 observations of patients with cancer and new depression, rates of appropriate follow-up were 22.3% within 84 days and 38.2% within 180 days. For 73 observations of patients with advanced or poor-prognosis cancer and new depression, rates of appropriate follow-up were 21.9% within 84 days and 34.3% within 180 days. Rates of minimum treatment within 1 year were 68.4% and 64.4% for patients with cancer and patients with advanced or poor-prognosis cancer, respectively. Quality of timely depression management is low in patients with solid tumor cancers. Even in health systems with well-integrated mental health services, care gaps remain for patients with cancer and depression. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E. O’Hanlon
- Veterans Affairs Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy
| | - Anne M. Walling
- Veterans Affairs Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, UCLA Department of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research
| | - Michael McClean
- Veterans Affairs Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy
| | - Karen Chu
- Veterans Affairs Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (POPC), Brigham and Women’s Hospital Department of Medicine
| | - Martin Lee
- Veterans Affairs Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy
| | - Susan E. Stockdale
- Veterans Affairs Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy
| | - Lucinda B. Leung
- Veterans Affairs Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, UCLA Department of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bergman AA, Stockdale SE, Zulman DM, Katz ML, Asch SM, Chang ET. Types of Engagement Strategies to Engage High-Risk Patients in VA. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:3288-3294. [PMID: 37620722 PMCID: PMC10681963 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08336-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many healthcare systems seek to improve care for complex high-risk patients, but engaging such patients to actively participate in their healthcare can be challenging. OBJECTIVE To identify and describe types of patient engagement strategies reported as successfully deployed by providers/teams and experienced by patients in a Veterans Health Administration (VA) intensive primary care (IPC) pilot program. METHODS We conducted semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews with 29 VA IPC staff (e.g., physicians, nurses, psychologists) and 51 patients who had at least four IPC team encounters. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically using a combination a priori/inductive approach. RESULTS The engagement strategies successfully deployed by the IPC providers/teams could be considered either more "facilitative," i.e., facilitated by and dependent on staff actions, or more "self-sustaining," i.e., taught to patients, thus cultivating their ongoing patient self-care. Facilitative strategies revolved around enhancing patient access and coordination of care, trust-building, and addressing social determinants of health. Self-sustaining strategies were oriented around patient empowerment and education, caregiver and/or community support, and boundaries and responsibilities. When patients described their experiences with the "facilitative" strategies, many discussed positive proximal outcomes (e.g., increased access to healthcare providers). Self-sustaining strategies led to positive (self-reported) longer-term clinical outcomes, such as behavior change. CONCLUSION We identified two categories of strategies for successfully engaging complex, high-risk patients: facilitative and self-sustaining. Intensive primary care program leaders may consider thoughtfully building "self-sustaining" engagement strategies into program development. Future research can confirm their effectiveness in improving health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia A Bergman
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Donna M Zulman
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Marian L Katz
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Steven M Asch
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Evelyn T Chang
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leung LB, Yoo CK, Rose DE, Jackson NJ, Stockdale SE, Apaydin EA. Telework Arrangements and Physician Burnout in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2340144. [PMID: 37889491 PMCID: PMC10611990 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
This survey study of physicians in the Veterans Health Administration examines the association of burnout with various telework arrangements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda B. Leung
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
- Division of General Internal Medicine-Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Caroline K. Yoo
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Danielle E. Rose
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nicholas J. Jackson
- Division of General Internal Medicine-Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Susan E. Stockdale
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Eric A. Apaydin
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rose DE, Leung LB, McClean M, Nelson KM, Curtis I, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, Stockdale SE. Associations Between Primary Care Providers and Staff-Reported Access Management Challenges and Patient Perceptions of Access. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:2870-2878. [PMID: 37532877 PMCID: PMC10593665 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08172-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Optimizing patients' access to primary care is critically important but challenging. In a national survey, we asked primary care providers and staff to rate specific care processes as access management challenges and assessed whether clinics with more of these challenges had worse access outcomes. METHODS Study design: Cross sectional. National Primary Care Personnel Survey (NPCPS) (2018) participants included 6210 primary care providers (PCPs) and staff in 813 clinics (19% response rate) and 158,645 of their patients. We linked PCP and staff ratings of access management challenges to veterans' perceived access from 2018-2019 Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients-Patient Centered Medical Home (SHEP-PCMH) surveys (35.6% response rate). MAIN MEASURES The NPCPS queried PCPs and staff about access management challenges. The mean overall access challenge score was 28.6, SD 6.0. The SHEP-PCMH access composite asked how often veterans reported always obtaining urgent appointments same/next day; routine appointments when desired and having medical questions answered during office hours. ANALYTIC APPROACH We aggregated PCP and staff responses to clinic level, and use multi-level, multivariate logistic regressions to assess associations between clinic-level access management challenges and patient perceptions of access. We controlled for veteran-, facility-, and area-level characteristics. KEY RESULTS Veterans at clinics with more access management challenges (> 75th percentile) had a lower likelihood of reporting always receiving timely urgent care appointments (AOR: .86, 95% CI: .78-.95); always receiving routine appointments (AOR: .74, 95% CI: .67-.82); and always reporting same- or next-day answers to telephone questions (AOR: .79, 95% CI: .70-.90) compared to veterans receiving care at clinics with fewer (< 25th percentile) challenges. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Findings show a strong relationship between higher levels of access management challenges and worse patient perceptions of access. Addressing access management challenges, particularly those associated with call center communication, may be an actionable path for improved patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle E Rose
- VA Los Angeles HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Lucinda B Leung
- VA Los Angeles HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael McClean
- VA Los Angeles HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karin M Nelson
- VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth M Yano
- VA Los Angeles HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- VA Los Angeles HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rubenstein LV, Curtis I, Wheat CL, Grembowski DE, Stockdale SE, Kaboli PJ, Yoon J, Felker BL, Reddy AS, Nelson KM. Learning from national implementation of the Veterans Affairs Clinical Resource Hub (CRH) program for improving access to care: protocol for a six year evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:790. [PMID: 37488518 PMCID: PMC10367243 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09799-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Veterans Affairs (VA) Clinical Resource Hub (CRH) program aims to improve patient access to care by implementing time-limited, regionally based primary or mental health staffing support to cover local staffing vacancies. VA's Office of Primary Care (OPC) designed CRH to support more than 1000 geographically disparate VA outpatient sites, many of which are in rural areas, by providing virtual contingency clinical staffing for sites experiencing primary care and mental health staffing deficits. The subsequently funded CRH evaluation, carried out by the VA Primary Care Analytics Team (PCAT), partnered with CRH program leaders and evaluation stakeholders to develop a protocol for a six-year CRH evaluation. The objectives for developing the CRH evaluation protocol were to prospectively: 1) identify the outcomes CRH aimed to achieve, and the key program elements designed to achieve them; 2) specify evaluation designs and data collection approaches for assessing CRH progress and success; and 3) guide the activities of five geographically dispersed evaluation teams. METHODS The protocol documents a multi-method CRH program evaluation design with qualitative and quantitative elements. The evaluation's overall goal is to assess CRH's return on investment to the VA and Veterans at six years through synthesis of findings on program effectiveness. The evaluation includes both observational and quasi-experimental elements reflecting impacts at the national, regional, outpatient site, and patient levels. The protocol is based on program evaluation theory, implementation science frameworks, literature on contingency staffing, and iterative review and revision by both research and clinical operations partners. DISCUSSION Health systems increasingly seek to use data to guide management and decision-making for newly implemented clinical programs and policies. Approaches for planning evaluations to accomplish this goal, however, are not well-established. By publishing the protocol, we aim to increase the validity and usefulness of subsequent evaluation findings. We also aim to provide an example of a program evaluation protocol developed within a learning health systems partnership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa V Rubenstein
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
- Geffen School of Medicine and Fielding School of Public Health at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Idamay Curtis
- Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Chelle L Wheat
- Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David E Grembowski
- The Department of Health Systems and Population Health in the School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Peter J Kaboli
- Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jean Yoon
- Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Department of General Internal Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bradford L Felker
- Mental Health Service Line, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ashok S Reddy
- Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karin M Nelson
- Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Burnett K, Stockdale SE, Yoon J, Ragan A, Rogers M, Rubenstein LV, Wheat C, Jaske E, Rose DE, Nelson K. The Clinical Resource Hub Initiative: First-Year Implementation of the Veterans Health Administration Regional Telehealth Contingency Staffing Program. J Ambul Care Manage 2023; 46:228-239. [PMID: 37079357 PMCID: PMC10213110 DOI: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
Health care systems face challenges providing accessible health care across geographically disparate sites. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) developed regional telemedicine service focusing initially on primary care and mental health services. The objective of this study is to describe the program and progress during the early implementation. In its first year, the Clinical Resource Hub program provided 244 515 encounters to 95 684 Veterans at 475 sites. All 18 regions met or exceeded minimum implementation requirements. The regionally based telehealth contingency staffing hub met early implementation goals. Further evaluation to review sustainability and impact on provider experience and patient outcomes is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kedron Burnett
- National Clinical Resource Hub, Office of Primary Care, Washington, District of Columbia (Ms Burnett, Dr Ragan, and Mr Rogers); Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA HSR&D, Washington, District of Columbia (Drs Stockdale and Rose); VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, California (Dr Stockdale); VHA Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Dr Yoon); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Rubenstein); UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California (Dr Rubenstein); UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California (Dr Rubenstein); Primary Care Analytics Team (PCAT), VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington (Dr Wheat and Ms Jaske); and University of Washington School of Medicine, VHA Puget Sound Primary Care, Seattle HSR&D COIN (Dr Nelson)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wheat CL, Gunnink EJ, Rojas J, Shah A, Nelson KM, Wong ES, Gray KE, Stockdale SE, Rosland AM, Chang ET, Reddy A. Changes in Primary Care Quality Associated With Implementation of the Veterans Health Administration Preventive Health Inventory. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e238525. [PMID: 37067799 PMCID: PMC10111181 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions in primary care delivery. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) launched the Preventive Health Inventory (PHI) program-a multicomponent care management intervention, including a clinical dashboard and templated electronic health record note-to support primary care in delivering chronic disease care and preventive care that had been delayed by the pandemic. Objectives To describe patient, clinician, and clinic correlates of PHI use in primary care clinics and to examine associations between PHI adoption and clinical quality measures. Design, Setting, and Participants This quality improvement study used VHA administrative data from February 1, 2021, through February 28, 2022, from a national cohort of 216 VHA primary care clinics that have implemented the PHI. Participants comprised 829 527 veterans enrolled in primary care in clinics with the highest and lowest decile of PHI use as of February 2021. Exposure Templated electronic health record note documenting use of the PHI. Main Outcomes and Measures Diabetes and blood pressure clinical quality measures were the primary outcomes. Interrupted time series models were applied to estimate changes in diabetes and hypertension quality measures associated with PHI implementation. Low vs high PHI use was stratified at the facility level to measure whether systematic differences in uptake were associated with quality. Results A total of 216 primary clinics caring for 829 527 unique veterans (mean [SD] age, 64.1 [16.9] years; 755 158 of 829 527 [91%] were men) formed the study cohort. Use of the PHI varied considerably across clinics. The clinics in the highest decile of PHI use completed a mean (SD) of 32 997.4 (14 019.3) notes in the electronic health record per 100 000 veterans compared with 56.5 (35.3) notes per 100 000 veterans at the clinics in the lowest decile of use (P < .001). Compared with the clinics with the lowest use of the PHI, clinics with the highest use had a larger mean (SD) clinic size (12 072 [7895] patients vs 5713 [5825] patients; P < .001), were more likely to be urban (91% vs 57%; P < .001), and served more non-Hispanic Black veterans (16% vs 5%; P < .001) and Hispanic veterans (14% vs 4%; P < .001). Staffing did not differ meaningfully between high- and low-use clinics (mean [SD] ratio of full-time equivalent staff to clinician, 3.4 [1.2] vs 3.4 [0.8], respectively; P < .001). After PHI implementation, compared with the clinics with the lowest use, those with the highest use had fewer veterans with a hemoglobin A1c greater than 9% or missing (mean [SD], 6577 [3216] per 100 000 veterans at low-use clinics; 9928 [4236] per 100 000 veterans at high-use clinics), more veterans with an annual hemoglobin A1c measurement (mean [SD], 13 181 [5625] per 100 000 veterans at high-use clinics; 8307 [3539] per 100 000 veterans at low-use clinics), and more veterans with adequate blood pressure control (mean [SD], 20 582 [12 201] per 100 000 veterans at high-use clinics; 12 276 [6850] per 100 000 veterans at low-use clinics). Conclusions and Relevance This quality improvement study of the implementation of the VHA PHI suggests that higher use of a multicomponent care management intervention was associated with improved quality-of-care metrics. The study also found significant variation in PHI uptake, with higher uptake associated with clinics with more racial and ethnic diversity and larger, urban clinic sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelle L. Wheat
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Eric J. Gunnink
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jorge Rojas
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ami Shah
- Office of Primary Care, Veterans Health Affairs, Washington, DC
| | - Karin M. Nelson
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Edwin S. Wong
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Kristen E. Gray
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Susan E. Stockdale
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ann-Marie Rosland
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Evelyn T. Chang
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ashok Reddy
- Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Medich M, Rose D, McClean M, Nelson K, Stewart G, Ganz DA, Yano EM, Stockdale SE. Predictors of VA Primary Care Clerical Staff Burnout Using the Job Demands-Resources Model. J Ambul Care Manage 2022; 45:321-331. [PMID: 35943358 PMCID: PMC9422767 DOI: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Primary care clerical staff may experience burnout if not adequately prepared and supported for patient-facing customer service tasks. Guided by the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, we use national survey data from 707 primary care clerks at 349 VA clinics (2018; response rate: 12%) to evaluate associations between clerks' perceptions of tasks, work environment, training, and burnout. We found challenges with customer-facing tasks contribute to higher burnout, and supportive work environment was associated with lower burnout. Although perceptions of training were not associated with burnout, our results combined with the JD-R model suggest that customer service training may protect against burnout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Medich
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California (Drs Medich, Rose, Ganz, Yano, and Stockdale and Mr McClean); Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound South Health Care System, Tacoma, Washington (Dr Nelson); Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Nelson), and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health (Dr Nelson), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Stewart); Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health (Dr Yano), David Geffen School of Medicine (Drs Ganz and Yano), and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Dr Stockdale), University of California Los Angeles; and RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Ganz)
| | - Danielle Rose
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California (Drs Medich, Rose, Ganz, Yano, and Stockdale and Mr McClean); Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound South Health Care System, Tacoma, Washington (Dr Nelson); Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Nelson), and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health (Dr Nelson), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Stewart); Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health (Dr Yano), David Geffen School of Medicine (Drs Ganz and Yano), and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Dr Stockdale), University of California Los Angeles; and RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Ganz)
| | - Michael McClean
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California (Drs Medich, Rose, Ganz, Yano, and Stockdale and Mr McClean); Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound South Health Care System, Tacoma, Washington (Dr Nelson); Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Nelson), and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health (Dr Nelson), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Stewart); Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health (Dr Yano), David Geffen School of Medicine (Drs Ganz and Yano), and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Dr Stockdale), University of California Los Angeles; and RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Ganz)
| | - Karin Nelson
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California (Drs Medich, Rose, Ganz, Yano, and Stockdale and Mr McClean); Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound South Health Care System, Tacoma, Washington (Dr Nelson); Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Nelson), and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health (Dr Nelson), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Stewart); Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health (Dr Yano), David Geffen School of Medicine (Drs Ganz and Yano), and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Dr Stockdale), University of California Los Angeles; and RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Ganz)
| | - Gregory Stewart
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California (Drs Medich, Rose, Ganz, Yano, and Stockdale and Mr McClean); Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound South Health Care System, Tacoma, Washington (Dr Nelson); Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Nelson), and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health (Dr Nelson), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Stewart); Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health (Dr Yano), David Geffen School of Medicine (Drs Ganz and Yano), and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Dr Stockdale), University of California Los Angeles; and RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Ganz)
| | - David A. Ganz
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California (Drs Medich, Rose, Ganz, Yano, and Stockdale and Mr McClean); Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound South Health Care System, Tacoma, Washington (Dr Nelson); Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Nelson), and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health (Dr Nelson), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Stewart); Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health (Dr Yano), David Geffen School of Medicine (Drs Ganz and Yano), and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Dr Stockdale), University of California Los Angeles; and RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Ganz)
| | - Elizabeth M. Yano
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California (Drs Medich, Rose, Ganz, Yano, and Stockdale and Mr McClean); Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound South Health Care System, Tacoma, Washington (Dr Nelson); Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Nelson), and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health (Dr Nelson), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Stewart); Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health (Dr Yano), David Geffen School of Medicine (Drs Ganz and Yano), and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Dr Stockdale), University of California Los Angeles; and RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Ganz)
| | - Susan E. Stockdale
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California (Drs Medich, Rose, Ganz, Yano, and Stockdale and Mr McClean); Primary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound South Health Care System, Tacoma, Washington (Dr Nelson); Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Nelson), and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health (Dr Nelson), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Stewart); Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health (Dr Yano), David Geffen School of Medicine (Drs Ganz and Yano), and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Dr Stockdale), University of California Los Angeles; and RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Ganz)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stockdale SE, Rose DE, McClean M, Rosland AM, Chang ET, Zulman DM, Stewart G, Nelson KM. Factors Associated With Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams' Use of Resources for Identifying and Approaches for Managing Patients With Complex Needs. J Ambul Care Manage 2022; 45:171-181. [PMID: 35612388 PMCID: PMC9178911 DOI: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Using data from a Veterans Health Administration national primary care survey, this study identified the most highly rated tools and care approaches for patients with complex needs and how preferences varied by professional role, staffing, and training. Nurses were significantly more likely to rate most tools as very important as compared with primary care providers. Having a fully staffed team was also significantly associated with a very important rating on all tools. Nurses and fully staffed teams reported a greater likeliness to use most care approaches, and those with perceived need for training reporting a lower likeliness to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Stockdale
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California (Drs Stockdale, Rose, and Chang and Mr McClean); Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Dr Stockdale), and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine (Dr Chang), University of California, Los Angeles; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Rosland); Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Rosland); Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (Dr Chang); Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, California (Dr Zulman); Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California (Dr Zulman); Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Stewart); HSR&D Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (Dr Nelson); and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Nelson)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hulen E, Laliberte AZ, Katz ML, Giannitrapani KF, Chang ET, Stockdale SE, Eng JA, Jimenez E, Edwards ST. Patient selection strategies in an intensive primary care program. Healthc (Amst) 2022; 10:100627. [PMID: 35421803 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensive primary care programs have had variable impacts on clinical outcomes, possibly due to a lack of consensus on appropriate patient-selection. The US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) piloted an intensive primary care program, known as Patient Aligned Care Team Intensive Management (PIM), in five medical centers. We sought to describe the PIM patient selection process used by PIM teams and to explore perspectives of PIM team members regarding how patient selection processes functioned in context. METHODS This study employs an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. We analyzed qualitative interviews with 21 PIM team and facility leaders and electronic health record (EHR) data from 2,061 patients screened between July 2014 and September 2017 for PIM enrollment. Qualitative data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive/deductive approach. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of 1,887 patients identified for PIM services using standardized criteria, over half were deemed inappropriate for PIM services, either because of not having an ambulatory care sensitive condition, living situation, or were already receiving recommended care. Qualitative analysis found that team members considered standardized criteria to be a useful starting point but too broad to be relied on exclusively. Additional data collection through chart review and communication with the current primary care team was needed to adequately assess patient complexity. Qualitative analysis further found that differences in conceptualizing program goals led to conflicting opinions of which patients should be enrolled in PIM. CONCLUSIONS A combined approach that includes clinical judgment, case review, standardized criteria, and targeted program goals are all needed to support appropriate patient selection processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Hulen
- Center to Improve Veteran to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Avery Z Laliberte
- Center to Improve Veteran to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Marian L Katz
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karleen F Giannitrapani
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Evelyn T Chang
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jessica A Eng
- Geriatrics, Palliative, and Extended Care Service, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elvira Jimenez
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Behavioral Neurology, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Samuel T Edwards
- Center to Improve Veteran to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA; School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Section of General Internal Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Apaydin EA, Rose DE, Yano EM, Shekelle PG, Stockdale SE, Mohr DC. Gender Differences in the Relationship Between Workplace Civility and Burnout Among VA Primary Care Providers. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:632-636. [PMID: 33904049 PMCID: PMC8858347 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06818-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Civility, or politeness, is an important part of the healthcare workplace, and its absence can lead to healthcare provider and staff burnout. Lack of civility is well-documented among mostly female nurses, but is not well-described among the gender-mixed primary care provider (PCP) workforce. Understanding civility and its relationship to burnout among male and female PCPs could help lead to tailored interventions to improve civility and reduce burnout in primary care. OBJECTIVE To analyze gender differences in civility, burnout, and the relationship between civility and burnout among male and female PCPs. DESIGN Multi-level logistic regression analysis of a cross-sectional national survey. PARTICIPANTS A total of 3216 PCP respondents (1946 women and 1270 men) in 135 medical centers from a 2019 national Veterans Health Administration (VA) survey. MAIN MEASURES Outcomes: burnout; predictors: workplace civility and gender; controls: race, ethnicity, VA tenure, and supervisory status. KEY RESULTS Workplace civility was rated higher (p<0.001) among male (mean = 4.07, standard deviation [SD] = 0.36, range 1-5) compared to female (mean = 3.88, SD = 0.33) PCPs. Almost half of the sample reported burnout (47.6%), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.73) between the genders. Higher workplace civility was significantly related to lower burnout among female PCPs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31 to 0.69), but not among male PCPs (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.42 to 1.22). Interactions between civility and other demographic variables (race, ethnicity, VA tenure, or supervisory status) were not significantly related to burnout. CONCLUSION Female PCPs report lower workplace civility than male PCPs. An inverse relationship between civility and burnout is present for women but not men. More research is needed on this phenomenon. Interventions tailored to gender- and primary care-specific needs should be employed to increase civility and reduce burnout among PCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Apaydin
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
| | - Danielle E Rose
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Yano
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Health Policy and Management, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul G Shekelle
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David C Mohr
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wong MS, Luger TM, Katz ML, Stockdale SE, Ewigman NL, Jackson JL, Zulman DM, Asch SM, Ong MK, Chang ET. Outcomes that Matter: High-Needs Patients' and Primary Care Leaders' Perspectives on an Intensive Primary Care Pilot. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:3366-3372. [PMID: 33987789 PMCID: PMC8606366 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06869-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantitative evaluations of the effectiveness of intensive primary care (IPC) programs for high-needs patients have yielded mixed results for improving healthcare utilization, cost, and mortality. However, IPC programs may provide other value. OBJECTIVE To understand the perspectives of high-needs patients and primary care facility leaders on the effects of a Veterans Affairs (VA) IPC program on patients. DESIGN A total of 66 semi-structured telephone interviews with high-needs VA patients and primary care facility leaders were conducted as part of the IPC program evaluation. PARTICIPANTS High-needs patients (n = 51) and primary care facility leaders (n = 15) at 5 VA pilot sites. APPROACH We used content analysis to examine interview transcripts for both a priori and emergent themes about perceived IPC program effects. KEY RESULTS Patients enrolled in VA IPCs reported improvements in their experience of VA care (e.g., patient-provider relationship, access to their team). Both patients and leaders reported improvements in patient motivation to engage with self-care and with their IPC team, and behaviors, especially diet, exercise, and medication management. Patients also perceived improvements in health and described receiving assistance with social needs. Despite this, patients and leaders also outlined patient health characteristics and contextual factors (e.g., chronic health conditions, housing insecurity) that may have limited the effectiveness of the program on healthcare cost and utilization. CONCLUSIONS Patients and primary care facility leaders report benefits for high-needs patients from IPC interventions that translated into perceived improvements in healthcare, health behaviors, and physical and mental health status. Most program evaluations focus on cost and utilization, which may be less amenable to change given this cohort's numerous comorbid health conditions and complex social circumstances. Future IPC program evaluations should additionally examine IPC's effects on quality of care, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and patient health behaviors other than utilization (e.g., engagement, self-efficacy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle S Wong
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles HSR&D, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Tana M Luger
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles HSR&D, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Covenant Health Network, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Marian L Katz
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles HSR&D, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles HSR&D, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey L Jackson
- Department of Medicine, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Donna M Zulman
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Steven M Asch
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Michael K Ong
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles HSR&D, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Evelyn T Chang
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles HSR&D, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chang ET, Yoon J, Esmaeili A, Zulman DM, Ong MK, Stockdale SE, Jimenez EE, Chu K, Atkins D, Denietolis A, Asch SM. Outcomes of a randomized quality improvement trial for high-risk Veterans in year two. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 1:1045-1056. [PMID: 34145564 PMCID: PMC8515223 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) conducted a randomized quality improvement evaluation to determine whether augmenting patient-centered medical homes with Primary care Intensive Management (PIM) decreased utilization of acute care and health care costs among patients at high risk for hospitalization. PIM was cost-neutral in the first year; we analyzed changes in utilization and costs in the second year. DATA SOURCES VHA administrative data for five demonstration sites from August 2013 to March 2019. DATA SOURCES Administrative data extracted from VHA's Corporate Data Warehouse. STUDY DESIGN Veterans with a risk of 90-day hospitalization in the top 10th percentile and recent hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visit were randomly assigned to usual primary care vs primary care augmented by PIM. PIM included interdisciplinary teams, comprehensive patient assessment, intensive case management, and care coordination services. We compared the change in mean VHA inpatient and outpatient utilization and costs (including PIM expenses) per patient for the 12-month period before randomization and 13-24 months after randomization for PIM vs usual care using difference-in-differences. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Both PIM patients (n = 1902) and usual care patients (n = 1882) had a mean of 5.6 chronic conditions. PIM patients had a greater number of primary care visits compared to those in usual care (mean 4.6 visits/patient/year vs 3.7 visits/patient/year, p < 0.05), but ED visits (p = 0.45) and hospitalizations (p = 0.95) were not significantly different. We found a small relative increase in outpatient costs among PIM patients compared to those in usual care (mean difference + $928/patient/year, p = 0.053), but no significant differences in mean inpatient costs (+$245/patient/year, p = 0.97). Total mean health care costs were similar between the two groups during the second year (mean difference + $1479/patient/year, p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS Approaches that target patients solely based on the high risk of hospitalization are unlikely to reduce acute care use or total costs in VHA, which already offers patient-centered medical homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn T. Chang
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare InnovationImplementation and Policy (CSHIIP)Los AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Department of MedicineVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Department of MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jean Yoon
- VA Health Economics Resource Center (HERC)Menlo ParkCaliforniaUSA
- Department of General Internal MedicineUCSF School of MedicineSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Aryan Esmaeili
- VA Health Economics Resource Center (HERC)Menlo ParkCaliforniaUSA
| | - Donna M. Zulman
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to ImplementationMenlo ParkCaliforniaUSA
- Division of Primary Care and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineMenlo ParkCaliforniaUSA
| | - Michael K. Ong
- Department of MedicineVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Department of MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementFielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Susan E. Stockdale
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare InnovationImplementation and Policy (CSHIIP)Los AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Elvira E. Jimenez
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare InnovationImplementation and Policy (CSHIIP)Los AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Behavioral NeurologyGeffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Karen Chu
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare InnovationImplementation and Policy (CSHIIP)Los AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - David Atkins
- VA Health Services Research and DevelopmentWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | | | - Steven M. Asch
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to ImplementationMenlo ParkCaliforniaUSA
- Division of Primary Care and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineMenlo ParkCaliforniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stockdale SE, Katz ML, Bergman AA, Zulman DM, Denietolis A, Chang ET. What Do Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Teams Need to Improve Care for Primary Care Patients with Complex Needs? J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:2717-2723. [PMID: 33511564 PMCID: PMC8390729 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06563-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensive primary care (IPC) programs for patients with complex needs do not generate cost savings in most settings. Strengthening existing patient-centered medical homes (PCMH) to address the needs of these patients in primary care is a potential high-value alternative. OBJECTIVES Explore PCMH team functioning and characteristics that may impact their ability to perform IPC tasks; identify the IPC components that could be incorporated into PCMH teams' workflow; and identify additional resources, trainings, and staff needed to better manage patients with complex needs in primary care. METHODS We interviewed 44 primary care leaders, PCMH team members (providers, nurses, social workers), and IPC program leaders at 5 VA IPC sites and analyzed a priori themes using a matrix analysis approach. RESULTS Higher-functioning PCMH teams were described as already performing most IPC tasks, including panel management and care coordination. All sites reported that PCMH teams had the knowledge and skills to perform IPC tasks, but not with the same intensity as specialized IPC teams. Home visits/assessments and co-attending appointments were perceived as not feasible to perform. Key stakeholders identified 6 categories of supports and capabilities that PCMH teams would need to better manage complex patients, with care coordination/management and fully staffed teams as the most frequently mentioned. Many thought that PCMH teams could make better use of existing VA and non-VA resources, but might need training in identifying and using those resources. CONCLUSIONS PCMH teams can potentially offer certain clinic-based services associated with IPC programs, but tasks that are time intensive or require physical absence from clinic might require collaboration with community service providers and better use of internal and external healthcare system resources. Future studies should explore the feasibility of PCMH adoption of IPC tasks and the impact on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Stockdale
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Marian L Katz
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA
| | - Alicia A Bergman
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA
| | - Donna M Zulman
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Evelyn T Chang
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Division of General Internal Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Apaydin EA, Rose DE, McClean MR, Yano EM, Shekelle PG, Nelson KM, Stockdale SE. Association between care coordination tasks with non-VA community care and VA PCP burnout: an analysis of a national, cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:809. [PMID: 34384398 PMCID: PMC8361617 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06769-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The scope of care coordination in VA primary care increased with the launch of the Veterans Choice Act, which aimed to increase access through greater use of non-VA Community Care. These changes may have overburdened already busy providers with additional administrative tasks, contributing to provider burnout. Our objective was to understand the role of challenges with care coordination in burnout. We analyzed relationships between care coordination challenges with Community Care reported by VA primary care providers (PCPs) and VA PCP burnout. METHODS Our cross-sectional survey contained five questions about challenges with care coordination. We assessed whether care coordination challenges were associated with two measures of provider burnout, adjusted for provider and facility characteristics. Models were also adjusted for survey nonresponse and clustered by facility. Trainee and executive respondents were excluded. 1,543 PCPs in 129 VA facilities nationwide responded to our survey (13 % response rate). RESULTS 51 % of our sample reported some level of burnout overall, and 46 % reported feeling burned out at least once a week. PCPs were more likely to be burned out overall if they reported more than average challenges with care coordination (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.58 to 2.63). These challenges include managing patients with outside prescriptions or obtaining outside tests or records. CONCLUSIONS VA primary care providers who reported greater than average care coordination challenges were more likely to be burned out. Interventions to improve care coordination could help improve VA provider experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Apaydin
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., MC 152, Bldg. 206 Rm. 252, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA.
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
| | - Danielle E Rose
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., MC 152, Bldg. 206 Rm. 252, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
| | - Michael R McClean
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., MC 152, Bldg. 206 Rm. 252, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Yano
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., MC 152, Bldg. 206 Rm. 252, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul G Shekelle
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., MC 152, Bldg. 206 Rm. 252, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karin M Nelson
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., MC 152, Bldg. 206 Rm. 252, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Apaydin EA, Rose DE, Yano EM, Shekelle PG, McGowan MG, Antonini TL, Valdez CA, Peacock M, Probst L, Stockdale SE. Burnout Among Primary Care Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Occup Environ Med 2021; 63:642-645. [PMID: 33990531 PMCID: PMC8327767 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To measure the prevalence of burnout among healthcare workers (HCWs) in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic and to understand the association between burnout, job-person fit, and perceptions of the pandemic. METHODS We surveyed 147 HCWs (73% response rate) in two clinics in the summer of 2020 on their burnout, job-person fit, perceptions of the pandemic, and demographic/job characteristics. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore relationships between these variables. RESULTS Forty-three percent of HCWs reported burnout. Lower HCW burnout was associated with better job-person fit in the areas of recognition or appreciation at work (odds ratio [OR] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10 to 0.67) and congruent worker-organization goals and values (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.76). CONCLUSIONS Working environments with better job-person fit may be key to reducing HCW burnout even after the current crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Apaydin
- Department of Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California (Dr Apaydin, Dr Rose, Dr Yano, Dr Shekelle, Mr McGowan, and Dr Stockdale); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Dr Apaydin); Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (Dr Yano); Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (Dr Yano and Dr Shekelle); Northern Arizona VA Healthcare System, Prescott, Arizona (Ms Antonini); New Mexico VA Healthcare System, Albuquerque, New Mexico (Dr Valdez, Ms Peacock, and Dr Probst); Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (Dr Stockdale)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nelson K, Reddy A, Stockdale SE, Rose D, Fihn S, Rosland AM, Stewart G, Denietolis A, Curtis I, Mori A, Rubenstein L. The Primary Care Analytics Team: Integrating research and clinical care within the Veterans Health Administration Office of Primary Care. Healthc (Amst) 2021; 8 Suppl 1:100491. [PMID: 34175100 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
By designing and evaluating health system improvements and providing evidence to clinical decision-makers, embedded researchers are a critical part of a Learning Health System (LHS). In this article, we describe the evolution and mission of the Primary Care Analytics Team (PCAT), an integrated research team within the Veterans Health Administration Office of Primary Care. We discuss challenges and strategies for success in working with clinical operations partners and provide recommendations for other Learning Health Systems units embedded in large integrated health care organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Nelson
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA; HSR&D Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Ashok Reddy
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA; HSR&D Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Danielle Rose
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA
| | - Stephan Fihn
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ann-Marie Rosland
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Gregory Stewart
- Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Angela Denietolis
- Office of Primary Care, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Alaina Mori
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lisa Rubenstein
- The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Moreau JL, Hamilton AB, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, Stockdale SE. The Impact of Job Role on Health-Care Workers' Definitions of Patient-Centered Care. J Patient Exp 2021; 7:1634-1641. [PMID: 33457624 PMCID: PMC7786758 DOI: 10.1177/2374373520910335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
While patient-centered care (PCC) is a widely accepted aspect of health-care quality, its definition is still the subject of debate. We investigated health-care workers’ definitions of PCC by level of patient contact in job roles. Our qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with key stakeholder employees (n = 66) at 6 Veterans’ Affairs health-care locations in Southern California. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded for definitions of PCC, and analyzed by participants’ self-described level of patient contact. Stakeholders whose role primarily involved patient contact tended to define PCC through: patient as a person, patient preferences, and shared decision-making. Stakeholders whose role did not primarily involve patient contact tended to define PCC through: patient-centered redesign, customer service, and access to services. Stakeholders with more patient contact emphasized patient-level and interpersonal concepts, while those with less patient contact emphasized system-level and business-oriented concepts. The focus on PCC-as-access may reflect influence of changing institutional climate on definitions of PCC for some stakeholders. To facilitate successful PCC efforts, health-care systems may need to leverage differing but complementary definitions of PCC within its workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Moreau
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System at Sepulveda, North Hills, CA, USA
| | - Alison B Hamilton
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System at Sepulveda, North Hills, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Yano
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System at Sepulveda, North Hills, CA, USA.,Department of Health Policy & Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- Department of Health Policy & Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System at Sepulveda, North Hills, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yoon J, Leung LB, Rubenstein LV, Nelson K, Rose DE, Chow A, Stockdale SE. Greater patient-centered medical home implementation was associated with lower attrition from VHA primary care. Healthc (Amst) 2020; 8:100429. [PMID: 32553525 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-centered medical home models such as the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) model aim to improve primary care through accessible, comprehensive, continuous team-based care. Practices that adhere to patient-centered medical home principles have been found to exhibit higher patient satisfaction, possibly leading to higher retention of patients longitudinally and reducing attrition from care. We examined whether greater PACT implementation was related to lower attrition from VHA primary care. METHODS A national cohort of 1.5 million nonelderly patients with chronic conditions and using VHA primary care in the baseline year (fiscal year 2015) was identified. Attrition was measured as not receiving primary care over two subsequent years. PACT implementation in 863 VHA primary care practices was measured by the PACT Implementation Progress Index (Pi2) across 8 domains. RESULTS Overall, the attrition rate was 4.4%. Predicted attrition was highest for patients treated in practices with the lowest PACT implementation scores (4.8%) compared to 4.0% among patients in practices with the highest PACT implementation scores (difference = -0.8 (95% CI: -1.3, -0.2)). Better performance on most PACT domains was significantly associated with lower attrition. CONCLUSIONS Primary care practices that facilitate easier access to providers as well as provide more seamless care coordination, better communication with providers, and support for self-management appear to positively affect patients' decisions to stay in VHA care. IMPLICATIONS Provision of accessible, comprehensive, team-based primary care, as measured in this study, is likely to be a determinant of patient retention in VHA care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Yoon
- VA Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA; Department of General Internal Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Lucinda B Leung
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA; Department of Health Policy & Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karin Nelson
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation in Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danielle E Rose
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Adam Chow
- VA Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Noël PH, Barnard JM, Barry FM, Simon A, Lee ML, Olmos-Ochoa TT, Chawla N, Rose DE, Stockdale SE, Finley EP, Penney LS, Ganz DA. Patient experience of health care system hassles: Dual-system vs single-system users. Health Serv Res 2020; 55:548-555. [PMID: 32380578 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare health care system problems or "hassles" experienced by Veterans receiving VA health care only versus those receiving dual care from both VA and non-VA community providers. DATA SOURCES We collected survey data in 2017-2018 from 2444 randomly selected Veterans with four or more primary care visits in the prior year at one of 12 VA primary care clinics located in four geographically diverse regions of the United States. STUDY DESIGN We used baseline surveys from the Coordination Toolkit and Coaching quality improvement project to explore Veterans' experience of hassles (dependent variable), source of health care, self-rated physical and mental health, and sociodemographics. DATA COLLECTION Participants responded to mailed surveys by mail, telephone, or online. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The number of reported hassles ranged from 0 to 16; 79 percent of Veterans reported experiencing one or more hassles. Controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and self-rated physical and mental health, zero-inflated negative binominal regression indicated that dual care users experienced more hassles than VA-only users (adjusted predicted average 5.5 [CI: 5.2, 5.8] vs 4.3 [CI: 4.1, 4.6] hassles [P < .0001]). CONCLUSIONS Anticipated increases in Veterans accessing community-based care may require new strategies to help VA primary care teams optimize care coordination for dual care users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Polly H Noël
- Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Jenny M Barnard
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California
| | - Frances M Barry
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California.,David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alissa Simon
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California
| | - Martin L Lee
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California.,Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tanya T Olmos-Ochoa
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California
| | - Neetu Chawla
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California.,Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Danielle E Rose
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Erin P Finley
- Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas.,Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Lauren S Penney
- Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas.,Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - David A Ganz
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California.,David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stockdale SE, Hamilton AB, Bergman AA, Rose DE, Giannitrapani KF, Dresselhaus TR, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV. Assessing fidelity to evidence-based quality improvement as an implementation strategy for patient-centered medical home transformation in the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci 2020; 15:18. [PMID: 32183873 PMCID: PMC7079486 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-0979-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effective implementation strategies might facilitate patient-centered medical home (PCMH) uptake and spread by targeting barriers to change. Evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) is a multi-faceted implementation strategy that is based on a clinical-researcher partnership. It promotes organizational change by fostering innovation and the spread of those innovations that are successful. Previous studies demonstrated that EBQI accelerated PCMH adoption within Veterans Health Administration primary care practices, compared with standard PCMH implementation. Research to date has not documented fidelity to the EBQI implementation strategy, limiting usefulness of prior research findings. This paper develops and assesses clinical participants’ fidelity to three core EBQI elements for PCMH (EBQI-PCMH), explores the relationship between fidelity and successful QI project completion and spread (the outcome of EBQI-PCMH), and assesses the role of the clinical-researcher partnership in achieving EBQI-PCMH fidelity. Methods Nine primary care practice sites and seven across-sites, topic-focused workgroups participated (2010–2014). Core EBQI elements included leadership-frontlines priority-setting for QI, ongoing access to technical expertise, coaching, and mentoring in QI methods (through a QI collaborative), and data/evidence use to inform QI. We used explicit criteria to measure and assess EBQI-PCMH fidelity across clinical participants. We mapped fidelity to evaluation data on implementation and spread of successful QI projects/products. To assess the clinical-researcher partnership role in EBQI-PCMH, we analyzed 73 key stakeholder interviews using thematic analysis. Results Seven of 9 sites and 3 of 7 workgroups achieved high or medium fidelity to leadership-frontlines priority-setting. Fidelity was mixed for ongoing technical expertise and data/evidence use. Longer duration in EBQI-PCMH and higher fidelity to priority-setting and ongoing technical expertise appear correlated with successful QI project completion and spread. According to key stakeholders, partnership with researchers, as well as bi-directional communication between leaders and QI teams and project management/data support were critical to achieving EBQI-PCMH fidelity. Conclusions This study advances implementation theory and research by developing measures for and assessing fidelity to core EBQI elements in relationship to completion and spread of QI innovation projects or tools for addressing PCMH challenges. These results help close the gap between EBQI elements, their intended outcome, and the finding that EBQI-PCMH resulted in accelerated adoption of PCMH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Stockdale
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street (152), Sepulveda, CA, 91343-2039, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Alison B Hamilton
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street (152), Sepulveda, CA, 91343-2039, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alicia A Bergman
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street (152), Sepulveda, CA, 91343-2039, USA
| | - Danielle E Rose
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street (152), Sepulveda, CA, 91343-2039, USA
| | - Karleen F Giannitrapani
- HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth M Yano
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street (152), Sepulveda, CA, 91343-2039, USA.,Department of Health Policy & Management Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- Department of Health Policy & Management Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.,RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Giannitrapani KF, Rodriguez H, Huynh AK, Hamilton AB, Kim L, Stockdale SE, Needleman J, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV. How middle managers facilitate interdisciplinary primary care team functioning. Healthcare (Basel) 2019; 7:10-15. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Revised: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|
25
|
Zulman DM, Chang ET, Wong A, Yoon J, Stockdale SE, Ong MK, Rubenstein LV, Asch SM. Effects of Intensive Primary Care on High-Need Patient Experiences: Survey Findings from a Veterans Affairs Randomized Quality Improvement Trial. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34:75-81. [PMID: 31098977 PMCID: PMC6542922 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04965-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensive primary care programs aim to coordinate care for patients with medical, behavioral, and social complexity, but little is known about their impact on patient experience when implemented in a medical home. OBJECTIVE Determine how augmenting the VA's medical home (Patient Aligned Care Team, PACT) with a PACT-Intensive Management (PIM) program influences patient experiences with care coordination, access, provider relationships, and satisfaction. DESIGN Cross-sectional analysis of patient survey data from a five-site randomized quality improvement study. PARTICIPANTS Two thousand five hundred sixty-six Veterans with hospitalization risk scores ≥ 90th percentile and recent acute care. INTERVENTION PIM offered patients intensive care coordination, including home visits, accompaniment to specialists, acute care follow-up, and case management from a team staffed by primary care providers, social workers, psychologists, nurses, and/or other support staff. MAIN MEASURES Patient-reported experiences with care coordination (e.g., health goal assessment, test and appointment follow-up, Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC)), access to healthcare services, provider relationships, and satisfaction. KEY RESULTS Seven hundred fifty-nine PIM and 768 PACT patients responded to the survey (response rate 60%). Patients randomized to PIM were more likely than those in PACT to report that they were asked about their health goals (AOR = 1.26; P = 0.046) and that they have a VA provider whom they trust (AOR = 1.35; P = 0.005). PIM patients also had higher mean (SD) PACIC scores compared with PACT patients (2.91 (1.31) vs. 2.75 (1.25), respectively; P = 0.022) and were more likely to report 10 out of 10 on satisfaction with primary care (AOR = 1.25; P = 0.048). However, other effects on coordination, access, and satisfaction did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Augmenting VA's patient-centered medical home with intensive primary care had a modestly positive influence on high-risk patients' experiences with care coordination and provider relationships, but did not have a significant impact on most patient-reported access and satisfaction measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna M Zulman
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. .,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| | - Evelyn T Chang
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ava Wong
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Jean Yoon
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.,VA Health Economics Resource Center, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael K Ong
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,RAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Steven M Asch
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kim LY, Giannitrapani KF, Huynh AK, Ganz DA, Hamilton AB, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, Stockdale SE. What makes team communication effective: a qualitative analysis of interprofessional primary care team members' perspectives. J Interprof Care 2019; 33:836-838. [PMID: 30724679 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1577809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Although numerous scholars have emphasized the need for effective communication between members of interprofessional teams, few studies provide a clear understanding of what constitutes effective team communication in primary care settings, specifically where patient-centered medical home (PCMH) teams have been implemented. This paper describes the elements of effective communication as perceived by members of interprofessional PCMH primary care teams, and identifies elements of effective communication that have persisted over time. Using transcribed text from 75 semi-structured interviews, we applied the grounded theory method of constant comparison to categorize emergent themes relating to elements of team communication. Interprofessional PCMH team members described the elements of effective communication as: 1) shared knowledge, 2) situation/goal awareness, 3) problem-solving, 4) mutual respect; and communication that is 5) transparent, 6) timely, 7) frequent, 8) consistent, and 9) parsimonious. Parsimony is an emergent theme that may be especially relevant for interprofessional PCMH teams challenged with structured clinic schedules. Future work could focus on understanding how to teach and sustain effective parsimonious communication. Comprehensive quality improvement efforts incorporating a variety of strategies, including team communication training, information and communication technologies, and standardized communication tools may facilitate communication of pertinent patient information in a brief and concise manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Y Kim
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karleen F Giannitrapani
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Alexis K Huynh
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David A Ganz
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alison B Hamilton
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Yano
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ganz DA, Barnard JM, Smith NZY, Miake-Lye IM, Delevan DM, Simon A, Rose DE, Stockdale SE, Chang ET, Noël PH, Finley EP, Lee ML, Zulman DM, Cordasco KM, Rubenstein LV. Development of a web-based toolkit to support improvement of care coordination in primary care. Transl Behav Med 2018; 8:492-502. [PMID: 29800397 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Promising practices for the coordination of chronic care exist, but how to select and share these practices to support quality improvement within a healthcare system is uncertain. This study describes an approach for selecting high-quality tools for an online care coordination toolkit to be used in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care practices. We evaluated tools in three steps: (1) an initial screening to identify tools relevant to care coordination in VA primary care, (2) a two-clinician expert review process assessing tool characteristics (e.g. frequency of problem addressed, linkage to patients' experience of care, effect on practice workflow, and sustainability with existing resources) and assigning each tool a summary rating, and (3) semi-structured interviews with VA patients and frontline clinicians and staff. Of 300 potentially relevant tools identified by searching online resources, 65, 38, and 18 remained after steps one, two and three, respectively. The 18 tools cover five topics: managing referrals to specialty care, medication management, patient after-visit summary, patient activation materials, agenda setting, patient pre-visit packet, and provider contact information for patients. The final toolkit provides access to the 18 tools, as well as detailed information about tools' expected benefits, and resources required for tool implementation. Future care coordination efforts can benefit from systematically reviewing available tools to identify those that are high quality and relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Ganz
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA.,David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Jenny M Barnard
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA
| | - Nina Z Y Smith
- School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isomi M Miake-Lye
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA
| | - Deborah M Delevan
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA
| | - Alissa Simon
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA
| | - Danielle E Rose
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Evelyn T Chang
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA.,David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Polly H Noël
- Veterans Evidence-based Research Dissemination and Implementation Center (VERDICT), South Texas VA Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.,University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Erin P Finley
- Veterans Evidence-based Research Dissemination and Implementation Center (VERDICT), South Texas VA Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.,University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Martin L Lee
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA
| | - Donna M Zulman
- HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kristina M Cordasco
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA.,David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, California, USA.,David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Belin TR, Jones A, Tang L, Chung B, Stockdale SE, Jones F, Wright A, Sherbourne CD, Perlman J, Pulido E, Ong MK, Gilmore J, Miranda J, Dixon E, Jones L, Wells KB. Maintaining Internal Validity in Community Partnered Participatory Research: Experience from the Community Partners in Care Study. Ethn Dis 2018; 28:357-364. [PMID: 30202188 DOI: 10.18865/ed.28.s2.357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective With internal validity being a central goal of designed experiments, we seek to elucidate how community partnered participatory research (CPPR) impacts the internal validity of public health comparative-effectiveness research. Methods Community Partners in Care (CPIC), a study comparing a community-coalition intervention to direct technical assistance for disseminating depression care to vulnerable populations, is used to illustrate design choices developed with attention to core CPPR principles. The study-design process is reviewed retrospectively and evaluated based on the resulting covariate balance across intervention arms and on broader peer-review assessments. Contributions of the CPIC Council and the study's design committee are highlighted. Results CPPR principles contributed to building consensus around the use of randomization, creating a sampling frame, specifying geographic boundaries delimiting the scope of the investigation, grouping similar programs into pairs or other small blocks of units, collaboratively choosing random-number-generator seeds to determine randomized intervention assignments, and addressing logistical constraints in field operations. Study protocols yielded samples that were well-balanced on background characteristics across intervention arms. CPIC has been recognized for scientific merit, has drawn attention from policymakers, and has fueled ongoing research collaborations. Conclusions Creative and collaborative fulfillment of CPPR principles reinforced the internal validity of CPIC, strengthening the study's scientific rigor by engaging complementary areas of knowledge and expertise among members of the investigative team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Belin
- UCLA Department of Biostatistics, Center for Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA.,UCLA Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Los Angeles, CA.,UCLA Semel Institute Center for Health Services and Society, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrea Jones
- Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Lingqi Tang
- UCLA Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Los Angeles, CA.,UCLA Semel Institute Center for Health Services and Society, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Bowen Chung
- UCLA Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Los Angeles, CA.,UCLA Semel Institute Center for Health Services and Society, Los Angeles, CA.,Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- UCLA Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Los Angeles, CA.,Greater Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Sepulveda, CA
| | - Felica Jones
- Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Aziza Wright
- Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Michael K Ong
- Greater Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Sepulveda, CA.,UCLA Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Jeanne Miranda
- UCLA Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Los Angeles, CA.,UCLA Semel Institute Center for Health Services and Society, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Loretta Jones
- Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Kenneth B Wells
- UCLA Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Los Angeles, CA.,UCLA Semel Institute Center for Health Services and Society, Los Angeles, CA.,RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.,UCLA Department of Health Policy and Management, Center for Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Meredith LS, Batorsky B, Cefalu M, Darling JE, Stockdale SE, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV. Long-term impact of evidence-based quality improvement for facilitating medical home implementation on primary care health professional morale. BMC Fam Pract 2018; 19:149. [PMID: 30170541 PMCID: PMC6119243 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0824-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Poor morale among primary care providers (PCPs) and staff can undermine the success of patient-centered care models such as the patient-centered medical home that rely on highly coordinated inter-professional care teams. Medical home literature hypothesizes that participation in quality improvement can ease medical home transformation. No studies, however, have assessed the impact of quality improvement participation on morale (e.g., burnout or dissatisfaction) during transformation. The objective of this study is to examine whether primary care practices participating in evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) during medical home transformation reduced burnout and increased satisfaction over time compared to non-participating practices. Methods We used a longitudinal quasi-experimental design to examine the impact of EBQI (vs. no EBQI), a multi-level, interdisciplinary approach for engaging frontline primary care practices in developing evidence-based improvement innovations and tools for spread on PCP and staff morale following the 2010 national implementation of the medical home model in the Veterans Health Administration. The sample included 356 primary care employees (107 primary care providers and 249 staff) from 23 primary care practices (6 intervention and 17 comparison) within one Veterans Health Administration region. Three intervention practices began EBQI in 2011 (early) and three more began EBQI in 2012 (late). Three waves of surveys were administered across 42 months beginning in November 2011 and ending in January 2016 approximately 2 years 18 months apart. We used repeated measures analysis of the survey data on medical home teams. Main outcome measures were the emotional exhaustion subscale from the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and job satisfaction. Results Six of 26 approved EBQI innovations directly addressed provider and staff morale; all 26 addressed medical home implementation challenges. Survey rates were 63% for baseline and 48% for both follow-up waves. Age was associated with lower burnout among PCPs (p = .039) and male PCPs had higher satisfaction (p = .037). Controlling for practice and PCP/staff characteristics, burnout increased by 5 points for PCPs in comparison practices (p = .024) and decreased by 1.4 points for early and 6.8 points (p = .039) for the late EBQI practices. Conclusions Engaging PCPs and staff in EBQI reduced burnout over time during medical home transformation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0824-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa S Meredith
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA. .,VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | - Matthew Cefalu
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA
| | - Jill E Darling
- USC Center for Economic and Social Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Yano
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,UCLA Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Giannitrapani KF, Leung L, Huynh AK, Stockdale SE, Rose D, Needleman J, Yano EM, Meredith L, Rubenstein LV. Interprofessional training and team function in patient-centred medical home: Findings from a mixed method study of interdisciplinary provider perspectives. J Interprof Care 2018; 32:735-744. [PMID: 30156933 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1509844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Transitioning from profession-specific to interprofessional (IP) models of care requires major change. The Veterans Assessment and Improvement Laboratory (VAIL), is an initiative based in the United States that supports and evaluates the Veterans Health Administration's (VAs) transition of its primary care practices to an IP team based patient-centred medical home (PCMH) care model. We postulated that modifiable primary care practice organizational climate factors impact PCMH implementation. VAIL administered a survey to 322 IP team members in primary care practices in one VA administrative region during early implementation of the PCMH and interviewed 79 representative team members. We used convergent mixed methods to study modifiable organizational climate factors in relationship to IP team functioning. We found that leadership support and job satisfaction were significantly positively associated with team functioning. We saw no association between team functioning and either role readiness or team training. Qualitative interview data confirmed survey findings and explained why the association with IP team training might be absent. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate the importance of leadership support and individual job satisfaction in producing highly functioning PCMH teams. Based on qualitative findings, we hypothesize interprofessional training is important, however, inconsistencies in IP training delivery compromise its potential benefit. Future implementation efforts should improve standardization of training process and train team members together. Interprofessional leadership coordination of interprofessional training is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karleen F Giannitrapani
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Lucinda Leung
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexis K Huynh
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Danielle Rose
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jack Needleman
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Yano
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa Meredith
- Pardee RAND Graduate School, RAND Corporationt, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chang ET, Zulman DM, Asch SM, Stockdale SE, Yoon J, Ong MK, Lee M, Simon A, Atkins D, Schectman G, Kirsh SR, Rubenstein LV. An operations-partnered evaluation of care redesign for high-risk patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA): Study protocol for the PACT Intensive Management (PIM) randomized quality improvement evaluation. Contemp Clin Trials 2018; 69:65-75. [PMID: 29698772 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-centered medical homes have made great strides providing comprehensive care for patients with chronic conditions, but may not provide sufficient support for patients at highest risk for acute care use. To address this, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) initiated a five-site demonstration project to evaluate the effectiveness of augmenting the VA's Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) medical home with PACT Intensive Management (PIM) teams for Veterans at highest risk for hospitalization. METHODS/DESIGN Researchers partnered with VHA leadership to design a mixed-methods prospective multi-site evaluation that met leadership's desire for a rigorous evaluation conducted as quality improvement rather than research. We conducted a randomized QI evaluation and assigned high-risk patients to participate in PIM and compared them with high-risk Veterans receiving usual care through PACT. The summative evaluation examines whether PIM: 1) decreases VHA emergency department and hospital use; 2) increases satisfaction with VHA care; 3) decreases provider burnout; and 4) generates positive returns on investment. The formative evaluation aims to support improved care for high-risk patients at demonstration sites and to inform future initiatives for high-risk patients. The evaluation was reviewed by representatives from the VHA Office of Research and Development and the Office of Research Oversight and met criteria for quality improvement. DISCUSSION VHA aims to function as a learning organization by rapidly implementing and rigorously testing QI innovations prior to final program or policy development. We observed challenges and opportunities in designing an evaluation consistent with QI standards and operations priorities, while also maintaining scientific rigor. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on April 3, 2017: NCT03100526. Protocol v1, FY14-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn T Chang
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Donna M Zulman
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, CA, United States; Division of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
| | - Steven M Asch
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, CA, United States; Division of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Jean Yoon
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, CA, United States; VA Health Economics Resource Center, Menlo Park, CA, United States.
| | - Michael K Ong
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Martin Lee
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, United States; Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Alissa Simon
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - David Atkins
- VA Office of Health Services Research and Development, Washington, DC, United States.
| | | | - Susan R Kirsh
- VA Office of Primary Care, Washington, DC, United States; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; RAND, Santa Monica, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kim LY, Rose DE, Soban LM, Stockdale SE, Meredith LS, Edwards ST, Helfrich CD, Rubenstein LV. Primary Care Tasks Associated with Provider Burnout: Findings from a Veterans Health Administration Survey. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33:50-56. [PMID: 28948450 PMCID: PMC5756167 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4188-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a primary care delivery model predicated on shared responsibility for patient care among members of an interprofessional team. Effective task sharing may reduce burnout among primary care providers (PCPs). However, little is known about the extent to which PCPs share these responsibilities, and which, if any, of the primary care tasks performed independently by the PCPs (vs. shared with the team) are particularly associated with PCP burnout. A better understanding of the relationship between these tasks and their effects on PCP burnout may help guide focused efforts aimed at reducing burnout. OBJECTIVE To investigate (1) the extent to which PCPs share responsibility for 14 discrete primary care tasks with other team members, and (2) which, if any, of the primary care tasks performed by the PCPs (without reliance on team members) are associated with PCP burnout. DESIGN Secondary data analysis of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) survey data from two time periods. PARTICIPANTS 327 providers from 23 VA primary care practices within one VHA regional network. MAIN MEASURES The dependent variable was PCP report of burnout. Independent variables included PCP report of the extent to which they performed 14 discrete primary care tasks without reliance on team members; team functioning; and PCP-, clinic-, and system-level variables. KEY RESULTS In adjusted models, PCP reports of intervening on patient lifestyle factors and educating patients about disease-specific self-care activities, without reliance on their teams, were significantly associated with burnout (intervening on lifestyle: b = 4.11, 95% CI = 0.39, 7.83, p = 0.03; educating patients: b = 3.83, 95% CI = 0.33, 7.32, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Performing behavioral counseling and self-management education tasks without relying on other team members for assistance was associated with PCP burnout. Expanding the roles of nurses and other healthcare professionals to assume responsibility for these tasks may ease PCP burden and reduce burnout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Y Kim
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Greater Los Angeles (GLA) Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Danielle E Rose
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Greater Los Angeles (GLA) Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynn M Soban
- Department of Nursing Research, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Greater Los Angeles (GLA) Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa S Meredith
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Greater Los Angeles (GLA) Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Samuel T Edwards
- Section of General Internal Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.,Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Christian D Helfrich
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Greater Los Angeles (GLA) Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chang ET, Raja PV, Stockdale SE, Katz ML, Zulman DM, Eng JA, Hedrick KH, Jackson JL, Pathak N, Watts B, Patton C, Schectman G, Asch SM. What are the key elements for implementing intensive primary care? A multisite Veterans Health Administration case study. Healthc (Amst) 2017; 6:231-237. [PMID: 29102480 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2017] [Revised: 09/22/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Many integrated health systems and accountable care organizations have turned to intensive primary care programs to improve quality of care and reduce costs for high-need high-cost patients. How best to implement such programs remains an active area of discussion. In 2014, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented five distinct intensive primary care programs as part of a demonstration project that targeted Veterans at the highest risk for hospitalization. We found that programs evolved over time, eventually converging on the implementation of the following elements: 1) an interdisciplinary care team, 2) chronic disease management, 3) comprehensive patient assessment and evaluation, 4) care and case management, 5) transitional care support, 6) preventive home visits, 7) pharmaceutical services, 8) chronic disease self-management, 9) caregiver support services, 10) health coaching, and 11) advanced care planning. The teams also found that including social workers and mental health providers on the interdisciplinary teams was critical to effectively address psychosocial needs of these complex patients. Having a central implementation coordinator facilitated the convergence of these program features across diverse demonstration sites. In future iterations of these programs, VHA intends to standardize staffing and key features to develop a scalable program that can be disseminated throughout the system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn T Chang
- Department of General Internal Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Pushpa V Raja
- Department of Psychiatry, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Marian L Katz
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Donna M Zulman
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, CA, USA; Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
| | - Jessica A Eng
- Geriatrics, Palliative, and Extended Care Service line, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States; Division of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
| | - Kathy H Hedrick
- W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC, United States.
| | - Jeffrey L Jackson
- Department of Medicine, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, United States; Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
| | - Neha Pathak
- Department of Medicine, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, United States; Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
| | - Brook Watts
- Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States; Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
| | - Carrie Patton
- VA Office of Primary Care Services, Washington, DC, United States.
| | - Gordon Schectman
- VA Office of Primary Care Services, Washington, DC, United States.
| | - Steven M Asch
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, CA, USA; Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Helfrich CD, Sylling PW, Gale RC, Mohr DC, Stockdale SE, Joos S, Brown EJ, Grembowski D, Asch SM, Fihn SD, Nelson KM, Meredith LS. The facilitators and barriers associated with implementation of a patient-centered medical home in VHA. Implement Sci 2016; 11:24. [PMID: 26911135 PMCID: PMC4766632 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0386-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a team-based, comprehensive model of primary care. When effectively implemented, PCMH is associated with higher patient satisfaction, lower staff burnout, and lower hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. However, less is known about what factors contribute to (or hinder) PCMH implementation. We explored the associations of specific facilitators and barriers reported by primary care employees with a previously validated, clinic-level measure of PCMH implementation, the Patient Aligned Care Team Implementation Progress Index (Pi(2)). METHODS We used a 2012 survey of primary care employees in the Veterans Health Administration to perform cross-sectional, respondent-level multinomial regressions. The dependent variable was the Pi(2) categorized as high implementation (top decile, 54 clinics, 235 respondents), medium implementation (middle eight deciles, 547 clinics, 4537 respondents), and low implementation (lowest decile, 42 clinics, 297 respondents) among primary care clinics. The independent variables were ordinal survey items rating 19 barriers to patient-centered care and 10 facilitators of PCMH implementation. For facilitators, we explored clinic Pi(2) score decile both as a function of respondent-reported availability of facilitators and of rating of facilitator helpfulness. RESULTS The availability of five facilitators was associated with higher odds of a respondent's clinic's Pi(2) scores being in the highest versus lowest decile: teamlet huddles (OR = 3.91), measurement tools (OR = 3.47), regular team meetings (OR = 2.88), information systems (OR = 2.42), and disease registries (OR = 2.01). The helpfulness of four facilitators was associated with higher odds of a respondent's clinic's Pi(2) scores being in the highest versus lowest decile. Six barriers were associated with significantly higher odds of a respondent's clinic's Pi(2) scores being in the lowest versus highest decile, with the strongest associations for the difficulty recruiting and retaining providers (OR = 2.37) and non-provider clinicians (OR = 2.17). Results for medium versus low Pi(2) score clinics were similar, with fewer, smaller significant associations, all in the expected direction. CONCLUSIONS A number of specific barriers and facilitators were associated with PCMH implementation, notably recruitment and retention of clinicians, team huddles, and local education. These findings can guide future research, and may help healthcare policy makers and leaders decide where to focus attention and limited resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Helfrich
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 1660 Columbian Way, S-152, Seattle, 98108, WA, USA.
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Philip W Sylling
- Office of Analytics and Business Intelligence, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Randall C Gale
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VHA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - David C Mohr
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VHA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, North Hills, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sandra Joos
- Portland VHA Medical Center, VISN 20 Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) Demonstration Laboratory, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Brown
- Center for Evaluation of Patient Aligned Care Teams (CEPACT), Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, USA
- The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - David Grembowski
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Steven M Asch
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VHA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Stephan D Fihn
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 1660 Columbian Way, S-152, Seattle, 98108, WA, USA
- Office of Analytics and Business Intelligence, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karin M Nelson
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 1660 Columbian Way, S-152, Seattle, 98108, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lisa S Meredith
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Khodyakov D, Stockdale SE, Smith N, Booth M, Altman L, Rubenstein LV. Patient engagement in the process of planning and designing outpatient care improvements at the Veterans Administration Health-care System: findings from an online expert panel. Health Expect 2016; 20:130-145. [PMID: 26914249 PMCID: PMC5217877 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT There is a strong interest in the Veterans Administration (VA) Health-care System in promoting patient engagement to improve patient care. METHODS We solicited expert opinion using an online expert panel system with a modified Delphi structure called ExpertLens™ . Experts reviewed, rated and discussed eight scenarios, representing four patient engagement roles in designing and improving VA outpatient care (consultant, implementation advisor, equal stakeholder and lead stakeholder) and two VA levels (local and regional). Rating criteria included desirability, feasibility, patient ability, physician/staff acceptance and impact on patient-centredness and care quality. Data were analysed using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method for determining consensus. FINDINGS Experts rated consulting with patients at the local level as the most desirable and feasible patient engagement approach. Engagement at the local level was considered more desirable than engagement at the regional level. Being an equal stakeholder at the local level received the highest ratings on the patient-centredness and health-care quality criteria. CONCLUSIONS Our findings illustrate expert opinion about different approaches to patient engagement and highlight the benefits and challenges posed by each. Although experts rated local consultations with patients on an as-needed basis as most desirable and feasible, they rated being an equal stakeholder at the local level as having the highest potential impact on patient-centredness and care quality. This result highlights a perceived discrepancy between what is most desirable and what is potentially most effective, but suggests that routine local engagement of patients as equal stakeholders may be a desirable first step for promoting high-quality, patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan E Stockdale
- VISN 22 Veterans Assessment and Improvement PACT Demonstration Laboratory, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (152), Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nina Smith
- Center for Implementation Practice and Research Support (CIPRS), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (152), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Lisa Altman
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (GLA), Office of Healthcare Transformation and Innovation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,The David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.,VISN 22 Veterans Assessment and Improvement PACT Demonstration Laboratory, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (152), Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Center for Implementation Practice and Research Support (CIPRS), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (152), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Stockdale SE, Tang L, Pudilo E, Lucas-Wright A, Chung B, Horta M, Masongsong Z, Jones F, Belin TR, Sherbourne C, Wells K. Sampling and Recruiting Community-Based Programs Using Community-Partnered Participation Research. Health Promot Pract 2015; 17:254-64. [PMID: 26384926 DOI: 10.1177/1524839915605059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The inclusion of community partners in participatory leadership roles around statistical design issues like sampling and randomization has raised concerns about scientific integrity. This article presents a case study of a community-partnered, participatory research (CPPR) cluster-randomized, comparative effectiveness trial to examine implications for study validity and community relevance. Using study administrative data, we describe a CPPR-based design and implementation process for agency/program sampling, recruitment, and randomization for depression interventions. We calculated participation rates and used cross-tabulation to examine balance by intervention status on service sector, location, and program size and assessed differences in potential populations served. We achieved 51.5% agency and 89.6% program participation rates. Programs in different intervention arms were not significantly different on service sector, location, or program size. Participating programs were not significantly different from eligible, nonparticipating programs on community characteristics. We reject claims that including community members in research design decisions compromises scientific integrity. This case study suggests that a CPPR process can improve implementation of a community-grounded, rigorous randomized comparative effectiveness trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Stockdale
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lingqi Tang
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA UCLA Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Esmeralda Pudilo
- UCLA Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anna Lucas-Wright
- Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA, USA Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bowen Chung
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | | | - Zoe Masongsong
- UCLA Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Felica Jones
- Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Thomas R Belin
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA UCLA Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Kenneth Wells
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA UCLA Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA UCLA Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Edwards ST, Rubenstein LV, Meredith LS, Hackbarth NS, Stockdale SE, Cordasco KM, Lanto AB, Roos PJ, Yano EM. Who is responsible for what tasks within primary care: Perceived task allocation among primary care providers and interdisciplinary team members. Healthcare (Basel) 2015; 3:142-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Revised: 05/11/2015] [Accepted: 05/12/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
38
|
Zuchowski JL, Rose DE, Hamilton AB, Stockdale SE, Meredith LS, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, Cordasco KM. Challenges in referral communication between VHA primary care and specialty care. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30:305-11. [PMID: 25410884 PMCID: PMC4351287 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3100-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2014] [Revised: 10/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/29/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists is a significant problem and a detriment to effective care coordination. Inconsistency in the quality of primary-specialty communication persists even in environments with integrated delivery systems and electronic medical records (EMRs), such as the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to measure ease of communication and to characterize communication challenges perceived by PCPs and primary care personnel in the VHA, with a particular focus on challenges associated with referral communication. DESIGN The study utilized a convergent mixed-methods design: online cross-sectional survey measuring PCP-reported ease of communication with specialists, and semi-structured interviews characterizing primary-specialty communication challenges. PARTICIPANTS 191 VHA PCPs from one regional network were surveyed (54% response rate), and 41 VHA PCPs and primary care staff were interviewed. MAIN MEASURES/APPROACH PCP-reported ease of communication mean score (survey) and recurring themes in participant descriptions of primary-specialty referral communication (interviews) were analyzed. KEY RESULTS Among PCPs, ease-of-communication ratings were highest for women's health and mental health (mean score of 2.3 on a scale of 1-3 in both), and lowest for cardiothoracic surgery and neurology (mean scores of 1.3 and 1.6, respectively). Primary care personnel experienced challenges communicating with specialists via the EMR system, including difficulty in communicating special requests for appointments within a certain time frame and frequent rejection of referral requests due to rigid informational requirements. When faced with these challenges, PCPs reported using strategies such as telephone and e-mail contact with specialists with whom they had established relationships, as well as the use of an EMR-based referral innovation called "eConsults" as an alternative to a traditional referral. CONCLUSIONS Primary-specialty communication is a continuing challenge that varies by specialty and may be associated with the likelihood of an established connection already in place between specialty and primary care. Improvement in EMR systems is needed, with more flexibility for the communication of special requests. Building relationships between PCPs and specialists may also facilitate referral communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Zuchowski
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rubenstein LV, Stockdale SE, Sapir N, Altman L, Dresselhaus T, Salem-Schatz S, Vivell S, Ovretveit J, Hamilton AB, Yano EM. A patient-centered primary care practice approach using evidence-based quality improvement: rationale, methods, and early assessment of implementation. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29 Suppl 2:S589-97. [PMID: 24715397 PMCID: PMC4070240 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2703-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare systems and their primary care practices are redesigning to achieve goals identified in Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) models such as Veterans Affairs (VA)'s Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT). Implementation of these models, however, requires major transformation. Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) is a multi-level approach for supporting organizational change and innovation spread. OBJECTIVE To describe EBQI as an approach for promoting VA's PACT and to assess initial implementation of planned EBQI elements. DESIGN Descriptive. PARTICIPANTS Regional and local interdisciplinary clinical leaders, patient representatives, Quality Council Coordinators, practicing primary care clinicians and staff, and researchers from six demonstration site practices in three local healthcare systems in one VA region. INTERVENTION EBQI promotes bottom-up local innovation and spread within top-down organizational priorities. EBQI innovations are supported by a research-clinical partnership, use continuous quality improvement methods, and are developed in regional demonstration sites. APPROACH We developed a logic model for EBQI for PACT (EBQI-PACT) with inputs, outputs, and expected outcomes. We describe implementation of logic model outputs over 18 months, using qualitative data from 84 key stakeholders (104 interviews from two waves) and review of study documents. RESULTS Nearly all implementation elements of the EBQI-PACT logic model were fully or partially implemented. Elements not fully achieved included patient engagement in Quality Councils (4/6) and consistent local primary care practice interdisciplinary leadership (4/6). Fourteen of 15 regionally approved innovation projects have been completed, three have undergone initial spread, five are prepared to spread, and two have completed toolkits that have been pretested in two to three sites and are now ready for external spread. DISCUSSION EBQI-PACT has been feasible to implement in three participating healthcare systems in one VA region. Further development of methods for engaging patients in care design and for promoting interdisciplinary leadership is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa V Rubenstein
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, VA Greater Los Angeles, 16111 Plummer Street, North Hills, CA, 91343, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study explored whether racial and ethnic disparities in the treatment of depression and anxiety are associated with provider-level factors. METHODS This study analyzed 58,826 office-based adult outpatient visits to primary care physicians and psychiatrists. Data were from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2003-2007. Outcomes included counseling and referral for counseling, antidepressant prescription, and any care for depression or anxiety. The analyses of treatment outcomes were not limited to visits with a depression or anxiety diagnosis. RESULTS Compared with visits to primary care physicians by whites, such visits by blacks and Hispanics were less likely to result in antidepressant prescription or in any care for depression or anxiety; primary care visits by Hispanics were also less likely to result in counseling. Compared with visits to psychiatrists by whites, such visits by blacks were less likely to result in an antidepressant prescription. The majority of visits to both primary care physicians and psychiatrists by blacks and Hispanics were to practices serving a high percentage of nonwhite patients. However, racial and ethnic disparities in care that were especially evident in primary care settings persisted after the analyses controlled for whether visits were to settings with a high or low percentage of nonwhite patients. CONCLUSIONS Disparities in care for depression and anxiety in primary care continue and are not fully accounted for by less care being provided in settings that nonwhites frequent. Physician bias, resource issues, and patient factors may all play a role in the diagnosis and treatment of depression and anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel T. Lagomasino
- Department of Psychiatry, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Susan E. Stockdale
- Center for Health Services and Society, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), 10920 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90291 (). She is also with the Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior, Department of Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles
| | - Jeanne Miranda
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fox SA, Heritage J, Stockdale SE, Asch SM, Duan N, Reise SP. Cancer screening adherence: does physician-patient communication matter? Patient Educ Couns 2009; 75:178-184. [PMID: 19250793 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2008] [Revised: 09/03/2008] [Accepted: 09/14/2008] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine the separate contributions of patients and physicians to their communication regarding cancer screening. RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of survey data collected from 63 community-based primary care physicians and 904 of their female patients in Los Angeles. RESULTS Patients who perceived their physicians to be enthusiastic (at any level) in their discussions of mammography or fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) were significantly more likely to report a recent test than patients who reported no discussions. CONCLUSION Physician discussions of cancer screening are important and effective even when, as in the case of mammography, screening rates are already high, or, as in the case of FOBT, rates have tended to remain low. The value of communication about screening should be taught and promoted to primary care physicians who serve as gatekeepers to screening. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Those who train physicians in communication skills should take into account our finding that the communication style of physicians (e.g., enthusiasm for screening) was the only patient or physician variable that both influenced screening adherence and that could be taught.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Fox
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Box 951736, 911 Broxton, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Stockdale SE, Wells KB, Tang L, Belin TR, Zhang L, Sherbourne CD. The importance of social context: neighborhood stressors, stress-buffering mechanisms, and alcohol, drug, and mental health disorders. Soc Sci Med 2007; 65:1867-81. [PMID: 17614176 PMCID: PMC2151971 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2006] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
This study examines the relationship among neighborhood stressors, stress-buffering mechanisms, and likelihood of alcohol, drug, and mental health (ADM) disorders in adults from 60 US communities (n=12,716). Research shows that larger support structures may interact with individual support factors to affect mental health, but few studies have explored buffering effects of these neighborhood characteristics. We test a conceptual model that explores effects of neighborhood stressors and stress-buffering mechanisms on ADM disorders. Using Health Care for Communities with census and other data, we found a lower likelihood of disorders in neighborhoods with a greater presence of stress-buffering mechanisms. Higher neighborhood average household occupancy and churches per capita were associated with a lower likelihood of disorders. Cross-level interactions revealed that violence-exposed individuals in high crime neighborhoods are vulnerable to depressive/anxiety disorders. Likewise, individuals with low social support in neighborhoods with high social isolation (i.e., low-average household occupancy) had a higher likelihood of disorders. If replicated by future studies using longitudinal data, our results have implications for policies and programs targeting neighborhoods to reduce ADM disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kenneth B. Wells
- UCLA Semel Institute Health Service Research Center and the RAND Corp.,
| | - Lingqi Tang
- UCLA Semel Institute Health Services Research Center,
| | | | - Lily Zhang
- UCLA Semel Institute Health Services Research Center,
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Stockdale SE, Tang L, Zhang L, Belin TR, Wells KB. The effects of health sector market factors and vulnerable group membership on access to alcohol, drug, and mental health care. Health Serv Res 2007; 42:1020-41. [PMID: 17489902 PMCID: PMC1955264 DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00636.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study adapts Andersen's Behavioral Model to determine if health sector market conditions affect vulnerable subgroups' use of alcohol, drug, and mental health services (ADM) differently than the general population, focusing specifically on community-level predisposing and enabling characteristics. DATA SOURCES Wave 2 data (2000-2001) from the Health Care for Communities study, supplemented with cases from wave 1 (1997-1998), were merged with area characteristics taken from Census, Area Resource File (ARF), and other data sources. STUDY DESIGN The study used four-level hierarchical logistic regression to examine access to ADM care from any provider and specialty ADM access. Interactions between community-level predisposing and enabling vulnerability characteristics with individual race/ethnicity, age, income category, and insurance type were explored. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Nonwhites, the poor, uninsured, and elderly had lower likelihoods of service use, but interactions between race/ethnicity, income, age and insurance status with community-level vulnerability factors were not statistically significant for any service use. For ADM specialty care, those with Medicare, Medicaid, private fully managed, and private partially managed insurance, the likelihood of utilization was higher in areas with higher HMO penetration. However, for those with other insurance or no insurance plan, the likelihood of utilization was lower in areas with higher HMO penetration. CONCLUSIONS Community-level enabling factors explain part of the effect of disadvantaged status but, with the exception of the effect of HMO penetration on the relationship between insurance and specialty care use, do not modify any of the residual individual-level effects of disadvantage. Interventions targeting both structural and individual levels may be necessary to address the problem of health disparities. More research with longitudinal data is necessary to sort out the causal direction of social context and ADM access outcomes, and whether policy interventions to change health sector market conditions can shift ADM treatment utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Stockdale
- UCLA Semel Institute Health Services Research Center, 10920 Wilshire Blvd., Ste 300 Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
To address the widening disparity between Whites and non-Whites for influenza vaccination rates, this study employed the Health Belief Model to examine these rates in five racial ethnic groups (White, Latino, African American, Filipino American, and Japanese American) to identify modifiable determinants of vaccination by race/ethnicity. A 2004 telephone survey of parishioners of faith-based congregations aged 50-75 years in Los Angeles and Honolulu assessed influenza vaccination rate, perceived susceptibility to influenza, perceived severity of illness, and the self-reported main barrier to influenza vaccination. Logistic regression models for each race/ethnic group predicting vaccination dependent upon perceived susceptibility to influenza, perceived severity of illness, and sociodemographic characteristics were estimated. Model parameters were used to generate standardized predictions of vaccination rates by race/ethnic group. In the multivariate models, Whites and African Americans who were very concerned about getting the flu were significantly more likely to be vaccinated (96% and 91%, respectively), compared with those who were not concerned (45% and 33%). However, vaccination rates among Latinos who were very concerned about getting the flu (54%), although significantly higher than Latinos who were not concerned (34%), were lower than for Whites and African Americans. Examination of the main barriers to vaccination revealed that Latinos were more likely to report access and cost barriers, while African Americans were more likely to raise issues of mistrust such as concern that the vaccine causes influenza. Distinct barriers to influenza vaccination exist among racial/ethnic groups. Vaccination programs may benefit from addressing these specific and unique concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy Y Chen
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 911 Broxton Ave, 3rd floor, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stockdale SE, Mendel P, Jones L, Arroyo W, Gilmore J. Assessing organizational readiness and change in community intervention research: framework for participatory evaluation. Ethn Dis 2006; 16:S136-45. [PMID: 16681136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper describes a study currently underway that uses a collaborative approach to assess organizational capacity to form partnerships around mental health and substance abuse care. Employing many of the principles of community-based participatory research, the study's primary objective is to collaboratively develop a conceptual understanding and generalizable, practical measures of organizational capacity. The intent of this collaborative approach is to increase the rigor and relevance of the assessment framework while strengthening the ability of health partnerships and stakeholders to understand and track community organizational capacity. The study investigators developed an initial model of community dissemination based on the research literatures on organizations and the diffusion of innovations. Through the collaborative process, the specific goals of the project shifted substantially to match the partnership interests and concerns of community agencies. One of the benefits of a collaborative approach has been to use researchers' academic knowledge to catalogue potential factors and the wealth of community coinvestigators' experiential knowledge of interagency dynamics to identify specific relevant dimensions of capacity. This initial exploratory study represents a first step toward developing a general approach to conceptualizing and tracking the organizational capacity of communities. The model and measurement framework may have wider applicability to capacities to partner around and implement a variety of health-related interventions within communities.
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Use of longitudinal data can help clarify the extent of persistent need for services or persistent problems in gaining access to services. This study examined the level of transient and persistent need and unmet need over time among respondents to a national survey and whether need was met by provision of mental health services or resolved without treatment. METHODS Data from the longitudinal Health Care for Communities (HCC) household telephone survey were used to produce joint distributions of need status and care for two periods (wave 1 data collected in 1997 to 1998 and wave 2 data collected in 2000 to 2001; N=6,659). Perceived need was measured as self-report of need for help with a mental or substance use problem. Probable clinical need was assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey. RESULTS High levels of persistent unmet need for care (44 to 52 percent) were found among respondents who had probable clinical need in wave 1. Although a majority of those with need received some care, an equal proportion (about 30 percent) of those with perceived need only or probable clinical need in wave 1 did not receive any care. A substantial portion of need (22 to 26 percent) appears to have resolved without treatment, which may suggest high levels of transient need. CONCLUSIONS Persistent patterns of unmet need represent important targets for policy and programs that can improve utilization, including outreach, education, and improved insurance coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Stockdale
- Health Services Research Center, Semel Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 10920 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 300, Los Angeles, California 90024, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Stockdale SE, Keeler E, Duan N, Derose KP, Fox SA. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening. Health Serv Res 2000; 35:1037-57. [PMID: 11130802 PMCID: PMC1089182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the costs of implementing a church-based, telephone-counseling program for increasing mammography use, and to identify the components of costs and the likely cost-effectiveness in hypothetical communities with varying characteristics. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING An ethnically and socioeconomically diverse sample of 1,443 women recruited from 45 churches participating in the Los Angeles Mammography Promotion (LAMP) program were followed from 1995 to 1997. STUDY DESIGN Churches were stratified into blocks and randomized into three intervention arms-telephone counseling, mail counseling, and control. We surveyed participants before and after the intervention to collect data on mammography use and demographic characteristics. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We used call records, activity reports, and interviews to collect data on the time and materials needed to organize and carry out the intervention. We constructed a standard model of costs and cost-effectiveness based on these data and the Year One results of the LAMP program. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The cost in materials and overhead to the church site was $10.89 per participant and $188 per additional screening. However, when the estimated cost for church volunteers' time was included, the cost of the intervention increased substantially. CONCLUSIONS A church-based program to promote the use of mammography would be feasible for many churches with the use of volunteer labor and resources.
Collapse
|
48
|
Gresenz CR, Stockdale SE, Wells KB. Community effects on access to behavioral health care. Health Serv Res 2000; 35:293-306. [PMID: 10778816 PMCID: PMC1089102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the effects of community-level factors on access to any behavioral health care and specialty behavioral health care. DATA Healthcare for Communities household survey data, merged to supplemental data from the 1990 Census Area Resource File, 1995 U.S. Census Bureau Small Area Estimates, and 1994 HMO enrollment data. STUDY DESIGN We use a random intercept model to estimate the influences of community-level factors on access to any outpatient care, any behavioral health care conditional on having received outpatient care, and any specialty behavioral health care conditional on having received behavioral health care. DATA COLLECTION HCC data were collected in 1997 from about 10,000 households nationwide but clustered in 60 sites. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Individuals in areas with greater HMO presence have better overall access to care, which in turn affects access to behavioral health care; individuals in poorer communities have less access to specialty care compared to individuals in wealthier communities. CONCLUSIONS Our findings of lower access to specialty care among those in poor communities raises concerns about the appropriateness and quality of the behavioral health care they are receiving. More generally, the findings suggest the importance of considering the current status and expected evolution of HMO penetration and the income level in a community when devising health care policy.
Collapse
|