1
|
Jankowiak S, Rossnagel K, Bauer J, Schulz A, Liebers F, Latza U, Romero Starke K, Seidler A, Nübling M, Riechmann-Wolf M, Letzel S, Wild P, Arnold N, Beutel M, Pfeiffer N, Lackner K, Münzel T, Schulze A, Hegewald J. Night shift work and cardiovascular diseases among employees in Germany: five-year follow-up of the Gutenberg Health Study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2024; 50:142-151. [PMID: 38258536 PMCID: PMC11006091 DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine if there is an increased risk of incident cardiovascular diseases (CVD) resulting from cumulative night shift work in the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS). METHODS We examined working participants of the GHS at baseline and after five years. Cumulative night shift work in the 10 years before baseline was assessed and categorized as low (1-220 nights ≙ up to 1 year), middle (221-660 nights ≙ 1-3 years), and high (>660 nights ≙ more than 3 years) night shift exposure. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for incident "quality-assured CVD events" using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS At baseline, 1092 of 8167 working participants performed night shift work. During the follow-up, 202 incident cardiovascular events occurred. The crude incidence rates for CVD per 1000 person-years were 6.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.80-9.55] for night shift workers and 5.19 (95% CI 4.44-6.04) for day workers. Cumulative incidence curves showed a higher cumulative incidence in workers exposed to night shift work compared to day workers after five years. The adjusted HR for incident CVD events were 1.26 (95% CI 0.68-2.33), 1.37 (95% CI 0.74-2.53) and 1.19 (95% CI 0.67-2.12) for employees in the low, middle and high night shift categories compared to employees without night shift work, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The observed tendencies indicate that night shift work might be negatively associated with cardiovascular health. We expect the continued follow-up will clarify the long-term impact of night shift work.
Collapse
|
2
|
Riechmann-Wolf M, Hegewald J, Jankowiak S, Prigge M, Rossnagel K, Drössler S, Nübling M, Romero Starke K, Seidler A, Schulz A, Zahn D, Münzel T, Pfeiffer N, Wild PS, Beutel ME, Gianicolo E, Lackner KJ, Letzel S. Fühlen sich Beschäftigte bei ihrer beruflichen
Rückkehr nach längerer Arbeitsunfähigkeit von ihrem
Arbeitgeber unterstützt? Welche Rolle spielt die
Unternehmensgröße? Ergebnisse aus einer Pilotbefragung innerhalb
der Gutenberg-Gesundheitsstudie. Das Gesundheitswesen 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1753706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Riechmann-Wolf
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Institut für Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Mainz,
Deutschland
| | - J Hegewald
- Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Berlin,
Deutschland
| | - S Jankowiak
- Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Berlin,
Deutschland
| | - M Prigge
- Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Berlin,
Deutschland
| | - K Rossnagel
- Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Berlin,
Deutschland
| | - S Drössler
- Technische Universität Dresden Medizinische Fakultät,
Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin (IPAS), Dresden,
Deutschland
| | - M Nübling
- Freiburger Forschungsstelle für Arbeitswissenschaften GmbH
(FFAW), Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - K Romero Starke
- Technische Universität Dresden Medizinische Fakultät,
Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin (IPAS), Dresden,
Deutschland
| | - A Seidler
- Technische Universität Dresden Medizinische Fakultät,
Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin (IPAS), Dresden,
Deutschland
| | - A Schulz
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - D Zahn
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - T Münzel
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - N Pfeiffer
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - PS Wild
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - ME Beutel
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - E Gianicolo
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - KJ Lackner
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - S Letzel
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Institut für Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Mainz,
Deutschland
- UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, Präv. Kardiologie und Med. Prävention, Zentrum
für Kardiologie, Mainz, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nuebling M, Hegewald J, Starke KR, Lincke HJ, Jankowiak S, Liebers F, Latza U, Letzel S, Riechmann-Wolf M, Gianicolo E, Beutel M, Pfeiffer N, Lackner K, Münzel T, Wild PS, Seidler A. The Gutenberg health study: a five-year prospective analysis of psychosocial working conditions using COPSOQ (Copenhagen psychosocial Questoinnaire) and ERI (effort-reward imbalance). BMC Public Health 2022; 22:24. [PMID: 34991529 PMCID: PMC8740453 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12240-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Psychosocial working conditions were previously analyzed using the first recruitment wave of the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) cohort (n = 5000). We aimed to confirm the initial analysis using the entire GHS population at baseline (N = 15,010) and at the five-year follow-up. We also aimed to determine the effects of psychosocial working conditions at baseline on self-rated outcomes measured at follow-up. Methods At baseline, working GHS participants were assessed with either the Effort-Reward-Imbalance questionnaire (ERI) (n = 4358) or with the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) (n = 4322); participants still working after five years received the same questionnaire again (ERI n = 3142; COPSOQ n = 3091). We analyzed the association between working conditions and the outcomes job satisfaction, general health, burnout, and satisfaction with life at baseline, at follow-up and also prospectively from baseline to follow-up using linear regression models. We examined the outcome variance explained by the models (R2) to estimate the predictive performance of the questionnaires. Results The models’ R2 was comparable to the original baseline analyses at both t0 and t1 (R2 range: ERI 0.10–0.43; COPSOQ 0.10–0.56). However, selected scales of the regression models sometimes changed between assessment times. The prospective analysis showed weaker associations between baseline working conditions and outcomes after five years (R2 range: ERI 0.07–0.19; COPSOQ 0.07–0.24). This was particularly true for job satisfaction. After adjusting for the baseline levels of the outcomes, fewer scales still explained some of the variance in the distribution of the outcome variables at follow-up. The models using only data from t0 or t1 confirmed the previous baseline analysis. We observed a loss of explained variance in the prospective analysis models. This loss was greatest for job satisfaction, suggesting that this outcome is most influenced by short-term working conditions. Conclusions Both the COPSOQ and ERI instruments show good criterion validity and adequately predict contemporaneously measured self-reported measurements of health and (occupational) well-being. However, the COPSOQ provides a more detailed picture of working conditions and might be preferable for improvment strategies in workplaces. Additional prospective research with shorter follow-up times would be beneficial for estimating dose-response relationships. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-12240-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Nuebling
- FFAW: Freiburg Research Centre for Occupational Sciences, Bertoldstr. 63, D-79098, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Janice Hegewald
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Karla Romero Starke
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hans-Joachim Lincke
- FFAW: Freiburg Research Centre for Occupational Sciences, Bertoldstr. 63, D-79098, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sylvia Jankowiak
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health BAuA, Berlin, Germany
| | - Falk Liebers
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health BAuA, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute Latza
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health BAuA, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Letzel
- Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Merle Riechmann-Wolf
- Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Institute for Teachers' Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Emilio Gianicolo
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy
| | - Manfred Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Norbert Pfeiffer
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Klaus Lackner
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Münzel
- Center of Thrombosis and Hemostatis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Center for Cardiology - Cardiology I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp S Wild
- Center of Thrombosis and Hemostatis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Seidler
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hegewald J, Starke KR, Garthus-Niegel S, Schulz A, Nübling M, Latza U, Jankowiak S, Liebers F, Rossnagel K, Riechmann-Wolf M, Letzel S, Arnold N, Beutel M, Gianicolo E, Pfeiffer N, Lackner K, Münzel T, Wild P, Seidler A. Correction: Work-life conflict and cardiovascular health: 5-year follow-up of the Gutenberg Health Study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258075. [PMID: 34570815 PMCID: PMC8476000 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
5
|
Riechmann-Wolf M, Jankowiak S, Schulz A, Hegewald J, Starke KR, Liebers F, Rossnagel K, Poplawski A, Arnold N, Nübling M, Seidler A, Beutel M, Pfeiffer N, Lackner K, Münzel T, Bogner K, Wild PS, Latza U, Letzel S. Correction to: Self‑reported cardiovascular health of teachers: results from the 5‑year follow‑up of the Gutenberg Health Study cohort. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2021; 94:2021. [PMID: 34331127 PMCID: PMC9172730 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-021-01747-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Merle Riechmann-Wolf
- Institute for Teachers' Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Kupferbergterrasse 17-19, 55116, Mainz, Germany. .,Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Sylvia Jankowiak
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Schulz
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Janice Hegewald
- IPAS Dresden: Institute and Polyclinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Karla Romero Starke
- IPAS Dresden: Institute and Polyclinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Falk Liebers
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Rossnagel
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Natalie Arnold
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Matthias Nübling
- FFAW: The Freiburg Research Center for Occupational Sciences, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Seidler
- IPAS Dresden: Institute and Polyclinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Manfred Beutel
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Norbert Pfeiffer
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Karl Lackner
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Münzel
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kathrin Bogner
- Institute for Teachers' Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Kupferbergterrasse 17-19, 55116, Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp S Wild
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ute Latza
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Letzel
- Institute for Teachers' Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Kupferbergterrasse 17-19, 55116, Mainz, Germany.,Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hegewald J, Romero Starke K, Garthus-Niegel S, Schulz A, Nübling M, Latza U, Jankowiak S, Liebers F, Rossnagel K, Riechmann-Wolf M, Letzel S, Arnold N, Beutel M, Gianicolo E, Pfeiffer N, Lackner K, Münzel T, Wild P, Seidler A. Work-life conflict and cardiovascular health: 5-year follow-up of the Gutenberg Health Study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251260. [PMID: 33961688 PMCID: PMC8104925 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Work-life conflicts (WLC) may impact health, but few studies prospectively consider the impact of WLC on objective outcomes such as cardiovascular disease. Using data from the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS), we examined if WLC at baseline was associated with an increased five-year incidence of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarct, stroke, atrial fibrillation, peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, sudden cardiac death). We also considered if WLC was associated with incident hypertension and arterial stiffness and if the effects of WLC on cardiovascular health differ for men and women. METHODS A working subsample of the 15,010 GHS cohort participants completed the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire, which included five "work-privacy conflict" questions at baseline and at the five-year follow-up. Relative risks for incident hypertension due to increased WLC at baseline (WLC scores exceeding 60 out of 100) were estimated with Poisson regression in the subgroup of participants without hypertension at baseline (n = 2426). Categories of WLC at baseline and follow-up were also used to examine the risk of hypertension due to chronic/recurrent WLC. In this subgroup, we also examined the association between WLC as a continuous score ranging from 0 to 100 with change to arterial stiffness after five years using linear regression. Hazard ratios were estimated for incident cardiovascular events in a larger subsample of participants without prevalent cardiovascular disease at baseline (n = 3698) using Cox regression. We used various multivariable regression models to adjust for sex, age, socioeconomic status, occupational, household, and cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS We found no association between WLC and incident hypertension or increased arterial stiffness. The fully-adjusted relative risk for WLC >60 at baseline and hypertension was 0.93 (95% 0.74-1.17). The risk of hypertension due to chronic/recurrent WLC >60 was increased but not statistically significant (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.83-1.54). Overall, hazard ratios for incident cardiovascular events were also not increased. However, stratifying the results by sex resulted in a hazard ratio of 1.47 (95% CI 0.54-3.98) for incident cardiovascular disease among women in the fully adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS Although our results were not statistically significant, they indicate that WLC is negatively impacting the cardiovascular health of women. While these results need to be confirmed with additional research and a longer follow-up, interventions to prevent WLC will promote health and could be especially beneficial for women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice Hegewald
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Sociology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, TU Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Karla Romero Starke
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Sociology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, TU Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Susan Garthus-Niegel
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
- Department of Child Health and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Schulz
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Matthias Nübling
- FFAW: The Freiburg Research Centre for Occupational Sciences, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ute Latza
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Berlin, Germany
| | - Sylvia Jankowiak
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Berlin, Germany
| | - Falk Liebers
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Rossnagel
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Berlin, Germany
| | - Merle Riechmann-Wolf
- Institute for Teachers’ Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Stephan Letzel
- Institute of Occupational, Social, Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Natalie Arnold
- Center for Cardiology I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Medicine 2, Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Center for Translational Vascular Biology (CTVB), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manfred Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Emilio Gianicolo
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy
| | - Norbert Pfeiffer
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Karl Lackner
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Münzel
- Center for Cardiology I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Center for Translational Vascular Biology (CTVB), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp Wild
- Department of Medicine 2, Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Center for Translational Vascular Biology (CTVB), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany
- Center of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Seidler
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Riechmann-Wolf M, Jankowiak S, Schulz A, Hegewald J, Romero Starke K, Liebers F, Rossnagel K, Poplawski A, Arnold N, Nübling M, Seidler A, Beutel M, Pfeiffer N, Lackner K, Münzel T, Bogner K, Wild PS, Latza U, Letzel S. Self-reported cardiovascular health of teachers: results from the 5-year follow-up of the Gutenberg Health Study cohort. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2020; 94:251-259. [PMID: 33106930 PMCID: PMC8332549 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-020-01576-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Following an exploratory approach, we examined cardiovascular disease risk factors at baseline and the 5-year incidence proportion of self-reported doctor-diagnosed cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in teachers and other occupational groups of the Gutenberg Health Study. Methods Study participants lived in the region of Mainz, Germany. Data from 6510 working participants without prevalent CVD at baseline (2007–2012) were analyzed. Participants were teachers (n = 215), other professionals from the health, social or educational (HSE) fields (n = 1061) or worked outside the HSE fields (n = 5234). For occupational comparisons, we estimated prevalence ratios (PR) for each CVD risk factor at baseline with robust Poisson regression analyses. We calculated crude CVD incidence rates based on the observed 5-year CVD cumulative incidence at follow-up and estimated age-weighted incidence proportions. All analyses were stratified by sex. Results Male non-HSE workers showed a higher prevalence of smoking and physical inactivity than male teachers (PR 2.26; 95%-CI: 1.06–4.82/PR 1.89; 95%-CI: 1.24–2.87). In contrast, non-HSE workers and other HSE professionals were less likely to have reported an unhealthy alcohol intake than teachers. Differences were attenuated after SES-adjustment. We did not detect occupational group-specific differences in CVD incidence. However, there were only two cases of CVD among the teachers. Conclusion Particularly male teachers showed a healthier lifestyle regarding physical inactivity and smoking. Nevertheless, occupational-medical care practitioners and researchers need to be aware of the relatively heightened prevalence of unhealthy alcohol intake in female and male teachers, and in absolute terms, the high hypertension prevalence in male teachers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merle Riechmann-Wolf
- Institute for Teachers' Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Kupferbergterrasse 17-19, 55116, Mainz, Germany. .,Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Sylvia Jankowiak
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Schulz
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Janice Hegewald
- IPAS Dresden: Institute and Polyclinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Karla Romero Starke
- IPAS Dresden: Institute and Polyclinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Falk Liebers
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Rossnagel
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Natalie Arnold
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Matthias Nübling
- FFAW: The Freiburg Research Center for Occupational Sciences, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Seidler
- IPAS Dresden: Institute and Polyclinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Manfred Beutel
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Norbert Pfeiffer
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Karl Lackner
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Münzel
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kathrin Bogner
- Institute for Teachers' Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Kupferbergterrasse 17-19, 55116, Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp S Wild
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ute Latza
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Letzel
- Institute for Teachers' Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Kupferbergterrasse 17-19, 55116, Mainz, Germany.,Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Romero Starke K, Hegewald J, Schulz A, Garthus-Niegel S, Nübling M, Wild PS, Arnold N, Latza U, Jankowiak S, Liebers F, Rossnagel K, Riechmann-Wolf M, Letzel S, Beutel M, Pfeiffer N, Lackner K, Münzel T, Seidler A. Cardiovascular health outcomes of mobbing at work: results of the population-based, five-year follow-up of the Gutenberg health study. J Occup Med Toxicol 2020; 15:15. [PMID: 32536961 PMCID: PMC7291638 DOI: 10.1186/s12995-020-00266-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to determine if there is an increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) resulting from workplace mobbing measured with two mobbing instruments in the Gutenberg Health Study. Methods In this prospective study, we examined working persons younger than 65 years for the presence of mobbing at baseline and at a 5-year follow-up using a single-item and a 5-item instrument. We used multivariate models to investigate the association between mobbing and incident CVD, hypertension, and change in arterial stiffness and further stratified the models by sex. Results After adjustment for confounders, mobbed workers appeared to have a higher risk of incident CVD than those not mobbed (single-item HR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.73–2.24; 5-item HR = 1.57, 95% CI 0.96–2.54). With the 5-item instrument, men who reported mobbing had a higher risk of incident CVD (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.01–3.09), while no association was observed for women (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.38–2.91). There was no difference in risks between men and women with the single-item instrument. No association between mobbing and incident hypertension and arterial stiffness was seen. Conclusions Our results show an indication of an increased risk of incident CVD for those mobbed at baseline when using the whole study population. Differences in risks between men and women when using the five-item instrument may be due to the instrument itself. Still, it is essential to detect or prevent workplace mobbing, and if present, to apply an intervention to halt it in order to minimize its adverse effects on CVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karla Romero Starke
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.,Institute for Sociology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Janice Hegewald
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.,Institute for Sociology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schulz
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Susan Garthus-Niegel
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Matthias Nübling
- FFAW: The Freiburg Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Philipp S Wild
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhein-Main, Mainz, Germany.,Center of Thrombosis and Hemostatis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Natalie Arnold
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ute Latza
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sylvia Jankowiak
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA, Berlin, Germany
| | - Falk Liebers
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Rossnagel
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, BAuA, Berlin, Germany
| | - Merle Riechmann-Wolf
- Institute for Teachers' Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Stephan Letzel
- Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manfred Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Norbert Pfeiffer
- Deparment of Ophtalmology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Karl Lackner
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Münzel
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhein-Main, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Seidler
- Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kersten N, Jankowiak S. Wirkung physischer und psychischer Arbeitsbelastung auf die reduzierte Norwegian Function Assessment Scale (NFAS-23). Das Gesundheitswesen 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N Kersten
- Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - S Jankowiak
- Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jankowiak S, Rose U, Kersten N. Application of the ICF based Norwegian function assessment scale to employees in Germany. J Occup Med Toxicol 2018; 13:3. [PMID: 29344078 PMCID: PMC5765624 DOI: 10.1186/s12995-017-0183-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background At the interface of the occupational setting and rehabilitation, normative values for functional ability are desirable and worthwhile. The Norwegian Function Assessment Scale (NFAS) is a 39 item self-report instrument based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). As the questionnaire was not used in a working population, we aimed to obtain functional levels of employees in Germany as measured through the NFAS. Methods The NFAS was included in the Study on Mental Health at Work (S-MGA) 2011/12, a representative German survey of employees aged 31 to 60 years. For descriptive analyses, 95% confidence intervals were applied through bootstrap estimation to the skewed data of the NFAS (range from 1 = 'no difficulty' to 5 = 'could not do it'). The data were analysed by age decades, professional qualification, and by disabilities, congenital diseases and accidents, stratified by sex. Linear regression analyses were conducted to estimate adjusted effects of age, professional qualification, and health limitations. Results The NFAS total score was 1.17 (95% CI = 1.15-1.17). Thirty-five percent of the employees' (1378 out of 3937 participants) reported the best possible functional ability (NFAS total score of 1.00). Managing and walking/standing were the NFAS' most affected domains with a score of 1.26 (95% CI = 1.23-1.27), respectively. The regression analysis confirmed more functional difficulties for elder employees, females, employees with low professional qualification, and for employees suffering from disability and accidents. Conclusions The study presents normative values of functional ability for the workforce. The results are useful for score interpretation in rehabilitation and return-to-work processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Jankowiak
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Safety and Health (BAuA), Noeldnerstr. 40/42, D-10317 Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Rose
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Safety and Health (BAuA), Noeldnerstr. 40/42, D-10317 Berlin, Germany
| | - Norbert Kersten
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Safety and Health (BAuA), Noeldnerstr. 40/42, D-10317 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kersten N, Jankowiak S. Norwegian Function Assessment Scale: Functional ability among employees with and without impairment. Eur J Public Health 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx189.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- N Kersten
- National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Jankowiak
- National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ritter S, Dannenmaier J, Jankowiak S, Kaluscha R, Krischak G. [Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Utilization of Postoperative Rehabilitation]. REHABILITATION 2017; 57:248-255. [PMID: 28561255 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-102135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After total hip and knee arthroplasty, patients have different options of subsequent treatment: an early postoperative rehabilitation, with or without a period at home, or only outpatient services. The aim of this study was to identify factors predicting the utilization of an early postoperative rehabilitation. METHODS This cross-sectoral analysis is based on claims data of AOK Baden-Württemberg (Statutory Health Insurance), Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund and Deutsche Rentenversicherung Baden-Württemberg (German Pension Insurance). Predictors for participation in an early postoperative rehabilitation and for an interim period were determined using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS 82.6% of 9 232 patients were going to an early postoperative rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty. After total knee arthroplasty, 83.9% of 7 656 patients were utilizing postoperative rehabilitation. Moreover, there was less utilization of postoperative rehabilitation in young, male and foreign patients. The analysis shows that the utilization of post-acute rehabilitation was significantly predicted by sociodemographic variables (age, sex, nationality) as well as comorbidity, outpatient treatment and medication. CONCLUSION The results provide an indication of higher severity of patients in group "postoperative rehabilitation without a period at home". Nevertheless there are some indications for under-utilization of certain patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ritter
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm, Bad Buchau
| | - J Dannenmaier
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm, Bad Buchau
| | - S Jankowiak
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm, Bad Buchau
| | - R Kaluscha
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm, Bad Buchau
| | - G Krischak
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm, Bad Buchau.,Abteilung Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Federseeklinik, Bad Buchau
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Holstiege J, Kaluscha R, Jankowiak S, Krischak G. Zusammenhänge zwischen dem Erwerbsstatus in den ersten 2 Jahren nach Rehabilitation und langfristigen Erwerbsverläufen: Implikationen für die Outcome-Messung. REHABILITATION 2017; 56:31-37. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-123240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J. Holstiege
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm, Bad Buchau
| | - R. Kaluscha
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm, Bad Buchau
| | - S. Jankowiak
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm, Bad Buchau
| | - G. Krischak
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm, Bad Buchau
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dannenmaier J, Jankowiak S, Kaluscha R, Müller G, Krischak G. [Effects of a Combined Orthopedic and Psychosomatic Rehabilitation Concept]. REHABILITATION 2016; 55:276-283. [PMID: 27728933 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-112101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Effects of a combined orthopedic and psychosomatic rehabilitation (VOP) concept are evaluated in contrast to psychosomatic and orthopedic rehabilitation. Therefore both mental and physical health of rehabilitants are compared. Methods: A prospective case-control study was performed in order to gather psychic strain and bodily constitution. Covariance analysis was conducted to expose significant differences between groups. Results: An equal clinically relevant reduction of psychological distress could be achieved with psychosomatic rehabilitation (N=322) and VOP (N=511). Moreover, bodily constitution could be increased by the same amount through VOP and orthopedic rehabilitation (N=135). In conclusion the therapy concept is successful in patients with both somatic and psychic problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Dannenmaier
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm (IFR Ulm), Bad Buchau
| | - S Jankowiak
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm (IFR Ulm), Bad Buchau
| | - R Kaluscha
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm (IFR Ulm), Bad Buchau
| | - G Müller
- Abteilung Psychosomatik, Schlossklinik Bad Buchau
| | - G Krischak
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm (IFR Ulm), Bad Buchau
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jankowiak S, Backé E, Liebers F, Schulz A, Hegewald J, Garthus-Niegel S, Nübling M, Blankenberg S, Pfeiffer N, Lackner KJ, Beutel M, Blettner M, Münzel T, Wild PS, Seidler A, Letzel S, Latza U. Current and cumulative night shift work and subclinical atherosclerosis: results of the Gutenberg Health Study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2016; 89:1169-1182. [PMID: 27379667 PMCID: PMC5052298 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-016-1150-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study examines the association between exposure to current and cumulative night shift work and subclinical parameters of atherosclerosis. METHODS Participants of a population-based cohort study (the Gutenberg Health Study, N = 15,010) aged 35-64 years were examined at baseline (2007-2012). Investigations included measurements of arterial stiffness, vascular function [reactive hyperaemia (RH) index], and intima media thickness (IMT). Also, a complete job history (including up to 15 periods), occupational exposures, a variety of lifestyle, and dispositional variables were enquired. RESULTS Night shift work was performed by 1071 out of 8065 currently employed individuals. The strongest association after adjustment for age, sex, job complexity level, being a manager, overtime work, and noise appeared for more than 660 night shifts within the last 10 years and a significantly increased arterial stiffness of 0.33 m/s. This reflects a 4 % flow velocity increase for individuals with more than 660 night shifts compared to non-night workers. Regarding the entire professional life, night shift workers showed a significantly decreased vascular function by -0.054 RH index points by using the same adjustment. IMT values did not differ statistically from non-night workers. Lifestyle and dispositional factors showed an influence on all used subclinical atherosclerosis parameters. CONCLUSIONS The cross-sectional results demonstrate an association between night work and detrimental changes in the atherosclerotic process. The association is more pronounced with more years in night shift and is partly explained by lifestyle and dispositional factors. Longitudinal analyses are necessary to confirm the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Jankowiak
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Noeldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany
| | - E Backé
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Noeldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany
| | - F Liebers
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Noeldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Schulz
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine 2, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Hegewald
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - S Garthus-Niegel
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatics and Health Behaviour, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0403, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Nübling
- FFAS, Freiburg Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine, Bertoldstr. 27, 79098, Freiburg, Germany
| | - S Blankenberg
- Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
| | - N Pfeiffer
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - K J Lackner
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - M Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - M Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - T Münzel
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine 2, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhein-Main, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - P S Wild
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine 2, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhein-Main, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.,Center of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - A Seidler
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - S Letzel
- Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - U Latza
- Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Noeldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schmid L, Jankowiak S, Kaluscha R, Krischak G. [Recommendations for the Stepwise Occupational Reintegration: Can the Characteristic of the Patients Explain the Differences Between the Rehabilitation Centers?]. REHABILITATION 2016; 55:167-74. [PMID: 27119497 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-102737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first step to initiate a stepwise occupational reintegration (SOR) is the recommendation of the rehabilitation centers. Therefore rehabilitation centers have a significant impact on the use of SOR. There is evidence that the recommendation rate between the rehabilitation centers differs clearly. The present survey therefore analyses in detail the differences of the recommendation rate and examines which patient-related factors could explain the differences. METHODS This study is based on analysis of routine data provided by the German pension insurance in Baden-Württemberg (Rehabilitationsstatistikdatenbasis 2013; RSD). In the analyses rehabilitation measures were included if they were conducted by employed patients (18-64 years) with a muscular-skeletal system disease or a disorder of the connective tissue. Logistic regression models were performed to explain the differences in the recommendation rate of the rehabilitation centers. RESULTS The data of 134 853 rehabilitation measures out of 32 rehabilitation centers were available. The recommendation rate differed between the rehabilitation centers from 1.36-18.53%. The logistic regression analysis showed that the period of working incapacity 12 month before the rehabilitation and the working capacity on the current job were the most important predictors for the recommendation of a SOR by the rehabilitation centers. Also the rehabilitation centers themselves have an important influence. DISCUSSION The results of this survey indicate that the characteristic of the patients is an important factor for the recommendation of SOR. Additionally the rehabilitation centers themselves have an influence on the recommendation of SOR. The results point to the fact that the rehabilitation centers use different criteria by making a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Schmid
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm (IFR Ulm), Bad Buchau
| | - S Jankowiak
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm (IFR Ulm), Bad Buchau
| | - R Kaluscha
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm (IFR Ulm), Bad Buchau
| | - G Krischak
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universität Ulm (IFR Ulm), Bad Buchau
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jankowiak S, Kaluscha R, Krischak G. Evaluation von Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen mittels Kombination von Befragungs- und Routinedaten – Spiegelt sich die subjektive Einschätzung in objektiven Daten wider? Gesundheitswesen 2015. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1563317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
18
|
Ritter S, Jankowiak S, Kaluscha R, Krischak G. Wie beurteilen Pädiater Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen? Gesundheitswesen 2015. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1563072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
19
|
Jankowiak S, Dannenmaier J, Kaluscha R, Krischak G. Zeitliche Trends sowie regionale Besonderheiten bei der Inanspruchnahme von Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Gesundheitswesen 2015. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1563073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
20
|
Garthus-Niegel S, Nübling M, Letzel S, Hegewald J, Wagner M, Wild PS, Blettner M, Zwiener I, Latza U, Jankowiak S, Liebers F, Seidler A. Development of a mobbing short scale in the Gutenberg Health Study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2015; 89:137-46. [PMID: 25987317 PMCID: PMC4700086 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-015-1058-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2014] [Accepted: 05/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite its highly detrimental potential, most standard questionnaires assessing psychosocial stress at work do not include mobbing as a risk factor. In the German standard version of COPSOQ, mobbing is assessed with a single item. In the Gutenberg Health Study, this version was used together with a newly developed short scale based on the Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of these two measures, to compare them and to test their differential impact on relevant outcome parameters. METHODS This analysis is based on a population-based sample of 1441 employees participating in the Gutenberg Health Study. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and reliability analyses were used to assess the mobbing scale. To determine their predictive validities, multiple linear regression analyses with six outcome parameters and log-binomial regression models for two of the outcome aspects were run. RESULTS Factor analyses of the five-item scale confirmed a one-factor solution, reliability was α = 0.65. Both the single-item and the five-item scales were associated with all six outcome scales. Effect sizes were similar for both mobbing measures. CONCLUSION Mobbing is an important risk factor for health-related outcomes. For the purpose of psychosocial risk assessment in the workplace, both the single-item and the five-item constructs were psychometrically appropriate. Associations with outcomes were about equivalent. However, the single item has the advantage of parsimony, whereas the five-item construct depicts several distinct forms of mobbing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Garthus-Niegel
- Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Institute and Polyclinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. .,Department of Psychosomatics and Health Behavior, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Matthias Nübling
- FFAS, Freiburg Research Center for Occupational and Social Medicine, Bertoldstr. 27, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Stephan Letzel
- Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Janice Hegewald
- Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Institute and Polyclinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Mandy Wagner
- Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Institute and Polyclinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Philipp S Wild
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. .,Department of Medicine 2, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. .,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Isabella Zwiener
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Ute Latza
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Sylvia Jankowiak
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Falk Liebers
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Andreas Seidler
- Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Institute and Polyclinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liebers F, Jankowiak S, Latza U. Ungleichheit in der Verteilung von Risikofaktoren für Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen in Abhängigkeit vom Komplexitätsgrad der aktuellen Tätigkeit. Gesundheitswesen 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1386945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
22
|
Nuebling M, Seidler A, Garthus-Niegel S, Latza U, Wagner M, Hegewald J, Liebers F, Jankowiak S, Zwiener I, Wild PS, Letzel S. The Gutenberg Health Study: measuring psychosocial factors at work and predicting health and work-related outcomes with the ERI and the COPSOQ questionnaire. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:538. [PMID: 23734632 PMCID: PMC3707767 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2012] [Accepted: 05/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several instruments have been developed to assess psychosocial workload. We compared two of these instruments, the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) model and the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) with regard to congruent validity and internal validity. Methods This analysis is based on a population-based sample of the baseline examination of 2,783 employees from the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS). About half of the participants completed the ERI questionnaire (n = 1,342), the other half completed the COPSOQ (n = 1,441). First, the two samples were compared and descriptive analyses were carried out calculating mean values for both instruments in general, then separately for age, gender and main occupational groups. Second, we analyzed the relationship between ERI and COPSOQ scales on the workplace situation and on the workplace outcomes: job satisfaction, general health, burnout, satisfaction with life, by applying stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results and discussion For the majority of occupations, high effort as reflected by the ERI corresponded with high demands as reflected by the COPSOQ. Comparably, high reward (according to ERI) yielded a good agreement with high “influence and development” (according to COPSOQ). However, we could also find differences between ERI and COPSOQ concerning the intensity of psychosocial workload in some occupations (e.g., physicians/pharmacists or warehouse managers/warehousemen/transport workers). These differences point to differing theoretical concepts of ERI and COPSOQ. When the ability of ERI and COPSOQ was examined to determine the associations with health and work outcomes, burnout could be better predicted by the COPSOQ; this might be due to the fact that COPSOQ comprises the constructs “work-privacy conflict” and “emotional demand”, which are closely related to burnout. However, methodological differences between these instruments limit their direct comparability. Conclusions The ERI and COPSOQ instrument yielded similar results for most occupational groups. The slightly stronger association between psychosocial workload as assessed by COPSOQ and burnout might be explained by its broader approach. The ability of the ERI and COPSOQ instrument to reflect relevant risk factors for clinically manifest disorders (e.g., coronary heart disease) will be derived from subsequent prospective analyses of the GHS with the follow-up data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Nuebling
- FFAS, Freiburg Research Center for Occupational and Social Medicine, Bertoldstr, 27, D-79098 Freiburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jankowiak S, Böhm A. Computer- und Glücksspielverhalten Brandenburger Jugendlicher. Eine vergleichende Betrachtung zum Substanzkonsum. Gesundheitswesen 2010. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1266713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
24
|
Abstract
When auditory stimulation contains infrequent task-irrelevant changes (deviants), behavioral responses to task-relevant aspects of the stimulation are prolonged. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) show that deviants elicit mismatch negativity (MMN), P3a, and reorienting negativity (RON). Here, we examine whether distraction effects can also be elicited within fixed auditory sequences with deviant probabilities of 0.25, 0.33, and 0.5. Deviants varied either in pitch, loudness, or sound source location. In all conditions MMN and P3a were elicited, suggesting that an automatic detection of and an attentional allocation to the change occurred. With relative frequencies of 25% and 33%, deviants also yielded a RT prolongation and a RON, suggesting reorientation to the relevant task. Our study demonstrates the ability to detect frequent and predictable changes automatically and shows behavioral effects in two conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Jankowiak
- Department of Psychology, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Markowska J, Tomaszkiewicz T, Simm S, Jankowiak S. [Immunity in patients with malignant ovarian neoplasms]. Ginekol Pol 1981; 52:729-37. [PMID: 6975740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
|