1
|
Allen A, Schembri M, Parvataneni R, Waetjen LE, Varon S, Salamat-Saberi N, Tassone S, Williams N, Kho KA, Jacoby VL. Pregnancy Outcomes After Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation of Uterine Leiomyomas Compared With Myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:612-618. [PMID: 38422502 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and myomectomy. METHODS The ULTRA (Uterine Leiomyoma Treatment With Radiofrequency Ablation) study is an ongoing multicenter prospective cohort study with longitudinal follow-up up to 5 years comparing outcomes of radiofrequency ablation with myomectomy in premenopausal women older than age 21 years with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. Participants were queried every 6 months after surgery to assess the incidence of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS Among 539 women enrolled in ULTRA, a total of 37 participants (mean age at first pregnancy 35.0±4.7 years) conceived 43 times as of March 2023 (22 radiofrequency ablation, 21 myomectomy). The average length of follow-up time after all procedures was 2.5±1.0 years. The baseline miscarriage rate in the study population was 33.3%. In participants who underwent radiofrequency ablation, 9 of 22 pregnancies (40.9%, 95% CI, 20.3-61.5%) ended in first-trimester miscarriage, 11 resulted in live births (50.0%, 95% CI, 29.1-70.9%), one resulted fetal death at 30 weeks of gestation, and one resulted in uterine rupture during miscarriage treatment with misoprostol 10 weeks after radiofrequency ablation. Among the live births in the radiofrequency ablation group, 45.5% were by vaginal delivery. In the myomectomy group, 9 of 21 pregnancies (42.9%, 95% CI, 21.7-64.0%) ended in first-trimester miscarriage and 12 resulted in live births (57.1%, 95% CI, 36.0-78.3%). There were no significant differences in the likelihood of live birth or miscarriage between the study groups. CONCLUSION Full-term pregnancy and vaginal delivery are achievable after radiofrequency ablation of leiomyomas. However, in this interim analysis, the miscarriage rate in both radiofrequency ablation and myomectomy groups was higher than expected for women in this age group. Long-term data collection in the ongoing ULTRA study aims to further understand pregnancy outcomes after radiofrequency ablation compared with myomectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT0210094.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette Allen
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, University of California, Davis, University of California, San Diego, and University of California, Irvine, and the University of California Fibroid Network, California; Tassone Advanced ObGyn, Round Rock, Texas; the Gynecological Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Metz TD, Clifton RG, Gallagher R, Gross RS, Horwitz LI, Jacoby VL, Martin-Herz SP, Peralta-Carcelen M, Reeder HT, Beamon CJ, Chan J, Chang AA, Costantine MM, Fitzgerald ML, Foulkes AS, Gibson KS, Güthe N, Habli M, Hackney DN, Hoffman MK, Hoffman MC, Hughes BL, Katz SD, Laleau V, Mallett G, Mendez-Figueroa H, Monzon V, Palatnik A, Palomares KTS, Parry S, Pettker CM, Plunkett BA, Poppas A, Reddy UM, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Sandoval GJ, Schlater SM, Sciurba FC, Simhan HN, Skupski DW, Sowles A, Thaweethai T, Thomas GL, Thorp JM, Tita AT, Weiner SJ, Weigand S, Yee LM, Flaherman VJ. Researching COVID to enhance recovery (RECOVER) pregnancy study: Rationale, objectives and design. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285351. [PMID: 38128008 PMCID: PMC10734909 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Pregnancy induces unique physiologic changes to the immune response and hormonal changes leading to plausible differences in the risk of developing post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), or Long COVID. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy may also have long-term ramifications for exposed offspring, and it is critical to evaluate the health outcomes of exposed children. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Multi-site Observational Study of PASC aims to evaluate the long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in various populations. RECOVER-Pregnancy was designed specifically to address long-term outcomes in maternal-child dyads. METHODS RECOVER-Pregnancy cohort is a combined prospective and retrospective cohort that proposes to enroll 2,300 individuals with a pregnancy during the COVID-19 pandemic and their offspring exposed and unexposed in utero, including single and multiple gestations. Enrollment will occur both in person at 27 sites through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Health Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network and remotely through national recruitment by the study team at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF). Adults with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy are eligible for enrollment in the pregnancy cohort and will follow the protocol for RECOVER-Adult including validated screening tools, laboratory analyses and symptom questionnaires followed by more in-depth phenotyping of PASC on a subset of the overall cohort. Offspring exposed and unexposed in utero to SARS-CoV-2 maternal infection will undergo screening tests for neurodevelopment and other health outcomes at 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months of age. Blood specimens will be collected at 24 months of age for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, storage and anticipated later analyses proposed by RECOVER and other investigators. DISCUSSION RECOVER-Pregnancy will address whether having SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy modifies the risk factors, prevalence, and phenotype of PASC. The pregnancy cohort will also establish whether there are increased risks of adverse long-term outcomes among children exposed in utero. CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT05172011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torri D. Metz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Hospitals and Clinics, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Rebecca G. Clifton
- Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Richard Gallagher
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Rachel S. Gross
- Department of Pediatrics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Leora I. Horwitz
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Vanessa L. Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Susanne P. Martin-Herz
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Developmental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Myriam Peralta-Carcelen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Harrison T. Reeder
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Carmen J. Beamon
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, WakeMed Health and Hospitals, Raleigh, NC, United States of America
| | - James Chan
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - A. Ann Chang
- Women’s Health Research Clinical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Maged M. Costantine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Megan L. Fitzgerald
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Andrea S. Foulkes
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Kelly S. Gibson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Nick Güthe
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Mounira Habli
- Division Maternal Fetal Medicine, Trihealth Good Samaritan Hospital Maternal Fetal Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
| | - David N. Hackney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center: UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Matthew K. Hoffman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, United States of America
| | - M. Camille Hoffman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Brenna L. Hughes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Stuart D. Katz
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, NY, United States of America
| | - Victoria Laleau
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Gail Mallett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Hector Mendez-Figueroa
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas McGovern Medical School: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston John P. and Katherine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Vanessa Monzon
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Anna Palatnik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America
| | - Kristy T. S. Palomares
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America
| | - Samuel Parry
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Christian M. Pettker
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Beth A. Plunkett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States of America
| | - Athena Poppas
- Division of Cardiology, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Uma M. Reddy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States of America
| | - Dwight J. Rouse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - George R. Saade
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States of America
| | - Grecio J. Sandoval
- Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States of America
| | - Shannon M. Schlater
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Frank C. Sciurba
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Hyagriv N. Simhan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Daniel W. Skupski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Amber Sowles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Hospitals and Clinics, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Tanayott Thaweethai
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Gelise L. Thomas
- Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - John M. Thorp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UNC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Alan T. Tita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women’s Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Steven J. Weiner
- Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Samantha Weigand
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, United States of America
| | - Lynn M. Yee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Valerie J. Flaherman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anchan RM, Spies JB, Zhang S, Wojdyla D, Bortoletto P, Terry K, Disler E, Milne A, Gargiulo A, Petrozza J, Brook O, Srouji S, Morton CC, Greenberg J, Wegienka G, Stewart EA, Nicholson WK, Thomas L, Venable S, Laughlin-Tommaso S, Diamond MP, Maxwell GL, Marsh EE, Myers ER, Vines AI, Wise LA, Wallace K, Jacoby VL. Long-term health-related quality of life and symptom severity following hysterectomy, myomectomy, or uterine artery embolization for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 229:275.e1-275.e17. [PMID: 37244458 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have directly compared different surgical procedures for uterine fibroids with respect to long-term health-related quality of life outcomes and symptom improvement. OBJECTIVE We examined differences in change from baseline to 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up in health-related quality of life and symptom severity among patients who underwent abdominal myomectomy, laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy, or uterine artery embolization. STUDY DESIGN The COMPARE-UF registry is a multiinstitutional prospective observational cohort study of women undergoing treatment for uterine fibroids. A subset of 1384 women aged 31 to 45 years who underwent either abdominal myomectomy (n=237), laparoscopic myomectomy (n=272), abdominal hysterectomy (n=177), laparoscopic hysterectomy (n=522), or uterine artery embolization (n=176) were included in this analysis. We obtained demographics, fibroid history, and symptoms by questionnaires at enrollment and at 1, 2, and 3 years posttreatment. We used the UFS-QoL (Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life) questionnaire to ascertain symptom severity and health-related quality of life scores among participants. To account for potential baseline differences across treatment groups, a propensity score model was used to derive overlap weights and compare total health-related quality of life and symptom severity scores after enrollment with a repeated measures model. For this health-related quality of life tool, a specific minimal clinically important difference has not been determined, but on the basis of previous research, a difference of 10 points was considered as a reasonable estimate. Use of this difference was agreed upon by the Steering Committee at the time when the analysis was planned. RESULTS At baseline, women undergoing hysterectomy and uterine artery embolization reported the lowest health-related quality of life scores and highest symptom severity scores compared with those undergoing abdominal myomectomy or laparoscopic myomectomy (P<.001). Those undergoing hysterectomy and uterine artery embolization reported the longest duration of fibroid symptoms with a mean of 6.3 years (standard deviation, 6.7; P<.001). The most common fibroid symptoms were menorrhagia (75.3%), bulk symptoms (74.2%), and bloating (73.2%). More than half (54.9%) of participants reported anemia, and 9.4% women reported a history of blood transfusion. Across all modalities, total health-related quality of life and symptom severity score markedly improved from baseline to 1-year with the largest improvement in the laparoscopic hysterectomy group (Uterine Fibroids Symptom and Quality of Life: delta= [+] 49.2; symptom severity: delta= [-] 51.3). Those undergoing abdominal myomectomy, laparoscopic myomectomy, and uterine artery embolization also demonstrated significant improvement in health-related quality of life (delta= [+]43.9, [+]32.9, [+]40.7, respectively) and symptom severity (delta= [-]41.4, [-] 31.5, [-] 38.5, respectively) at 1 year, and the improvement persisted from baseline for uterine-sparing procedures during second (Uterine Fibroids Symptom and Quality of Life: delta= [+]40.7, [+]37.4, [+]39.3 SS: delta= [-] 38.5, [-] 32.0, [-] 37.7 and third year (Uterine Fibroids Symptom and Quality of Life: delta= [+] 40.9, [+]39.9, [+]41.1 and SS: delta= [-] 33.9, [-]36.5, [-] 33.0, respectively), posttreatment intervals, however with a trend toward decline in degree of improvement from years 1 and 2. Differences from baseline were greatest for hysterectomy; however, this may reflect the relative importance of bleeding in the Uterine Fibroids Symptom and Quality of Life, rather than clinically meaningful symptom recurrence among women undergoing uterus-sparing treatments. CONCLUSION All treatment modalities were associated with significant improvements in health-related quality of life and symptom severity reduction 1-year posttreatment. However, abdominal myomectomy, laparoscopic myomectomy and uterine artery embolization indicated a gradual decline in symptom improvement and health-related quality of life by third year after the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond M Anchan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven CT.
| | - James B Spies
- Department of Radiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Shuaiqi Zhang
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Daniel Wojdyla
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Pietro Bortoletto
- The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Kathryn Terry
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Emily Disler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ankrish Milne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Antonio Gargiulo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - John Petrozza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Olga Brook
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Serene Srouji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cynthia C Morton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA; Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - James Greenberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ganesa Wegienka
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Elizabeth A Stewart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Wanda K Nicholson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Center for Women's Health Research, and Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Laine Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Shannon Laughlin-Tommaso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Michael P Diamond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Erica E Marsh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Evan R Myers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Anissa I Vines
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Lauren A Wise
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Kedra Wallace
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS
| | - Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Horwitz LI, Thaweethai T, Brosnahan SB, Cicek MS, Fitzgerald ML, Goldman JD, Hess R, Hodder SL, Jacoby VL, Jordan MR, Krishnan JA, Laiyemo AO, Metz TD, Nichols L, Patzer RE, Sekar A, Singer NG, Stiles LE, Taylor BS, Ahmed S, Algren HA, Anglin K, Aponte-Soto L, Ashktorab H, Bassett IV, Bedi B, Bhadelia N, Bime C, Bind MAC, Black LJ, Blomkalns AL, Brim H, Castro M, Chan J, Charney AW, Chen BK, Chen LQ, Chen P, Chestek D, Chibnik LB, Chow DC, Chu HY, Clifton RG, Collins S, Costantine MM, Cribbs SK, Deeks SG, Dickinson JD, Donohue SE, Durstenfeld MS, Emery IF, Erlandson KM, Facelli JC, Farah-Abraham R, Finn AV, Fischer MS, Flaherman VJ, Fleurimont J, Fonseca V, Gallagher EJ, Gander JC, Gennaro ML, Gibson KS, Go M, Goodman SN, Granger JP, Greenway FL, Hafner JW, Han JE, Harkins MS, Hauser KSP, Heath JR, Hernandez CR, Ho O, Hoffman MK, Hoover SE, Horowitz CR, Hsu H, Hsue PY, Hughes BL, Jagannathan P, James JA, John J, Jolley S, Judd SE, Juskowich JJ, Kanjilal DG, Karlson EW, Katz SD, Kelly JD, Kelly SW, Kim AY, Kirwan JP, Knox KS, Kumar A, Lamendola-Essel MF, Lanca M, Lee-lannotti JK, Lefebvre RC, Levy BD, Lin JY, Logarbo BP, Logue JK, Longo MT, Luciano CA, Lutrick K, Malakooti SK, Mallett G, Maranga G, Marathe JG, Marconi VC, Marshall GD, Martin CF, Martin JN, May HT, McComsey GA, McDonald D, Mendez-Figueroa H, Miele L, Mittleman MA, Mohandas S, Mouchati C, Mullington JM, Nadkarni GN, Nahin ER, Neuman RB, Newman LT, Nguyen A, Nikolich JZ, Ofotokun I, Ogbogu PU, Palatnik A, Palomares KTS, Parimon T, Parry S, Parthasarathy S, Patterson TF, Pearman A, Peluso MJ, Pemu P, Pettker CM, Plunkett BA, Pogreba-Brown K, Poppas A, Porterfield JZ, Quigley JG, Quinn DK, Raissy H, Rebello CJ, Reddy UM, Reece R, Reeder HT, Rischard FP, Rosas JM, Rosen CJ, Rouphael NG, Rouse DJ, Ruff AM, Saint Jean C, Sandoval GJ, Santana JL, Schlater SM, Sciurba FC, Selvaggi C, Seshadri S, Sesso HD, Shah DP, Shemesh E, Sherif ZA, Shinnick DJ, Simhan HN, Singh U, Sowles A, Subbian V, Sun J, Suthar MS, Teunis LJ, Thorp JM, Ticotsky A, Tita ATN, Tragus R, Tuttle KR, Urdaneta AE, Utz PJ, VanWagoner TM, Vasey A, Vernon SD, Vidal C, Walker T, Ward HD, Warren DE, Weeks RM, Weiner SJ, Weyer JC, Wheeler JL, Whiteheart SW, Wiley Z, Williams NJ, Wisnivesky JP, Wood JC, Yee LM, Young NM, Zisis SN, Foulkes AS. Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) adult study protocol: Rationale, objectives, and design. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286297. [PMID: 37352211 PMCID: PMC10289397 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in ongoing, relapsing, or new symptoms or other health effects after the acute phase of infection; termed post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), or long COVID. The characteristics, prevalence, trajectory and mechanisms of PASC are ill-defined. The objectives of the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Multi-site Observational Study of PASC in Adults (RECOVER-Adult) are to: (1) characterize PASC prevalence; (2) characterize the symptoms, organ dysfunction, natural history, and distinct phenotypes of PASC; (3) identify demographic, social and clinical risk factors for PASC onset and recovery; and (4) define the biological mechanisms underlying PASC pathogenesis. METHODS RECOVER-Adult is a combined prospective/retrospective cohort currently planned to enroll 14,880 adults aged ≥18 years. Eligible participants either must meet WHO criteria for suspected, probable, or confirmed infection; or must have evidence of no prior infection. Recruitment occurs at 86 sites in 33 U.S. states, Washington, DC and Puerto Rico, via facility- and community-based outreach. Participants complete quarterly questionnaires about symptoms, social determinants, vaccination status, and interim SARS-CoV-2 infections. In addition, participants contribute biospecimens and undergo physical and laboratory examinations at approximately 0, 90 and 180 days from infection or negative test date, and yearly thereafter. Some participants undergo additional testing based on specific criteria or random sampling. Patient representatives provide input on all study processes. The primary study outcome is onset of PASC, measured by signs and symptoms. A paradigm for identifying PASC cases will be defined and updated using supervised and unsupervised learning approaches with cross-validation. Logistic regression and proportional hazards regression will be conducted to investigate associations between risk factors, onset, and resolution of PASC symptoms. DISCUSSION RECOVER-Adult is the first national, prospective, longitudinal cohort of PASC among US adults. Results of this study are intended to inform public health, spur clinical trials, and expand treatment options. REGISTRATION NCT05172024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leora I. Horwitz
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Tanayott Thaweethai
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Shari B. Brosnahan
- Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Mine S. Cicek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Megan L. Fitzgerald
- Patient Led Research Collaboration on COVID-19, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Jason D. Goldman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Providence Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Rachel Hess
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - S. L. Hodder
- Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America
| | - Vanessa L. Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Michael R. Jordan
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Jerry A. Krishnan
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Adeyinka O. Laiyemo
- Department of Medicine, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Torri D. Metz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Lauren Nichols
- Body Politic COVID-19 Support Group, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Rachel E. Patzer
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Health Services Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Anisha Sekar
- Patient Led Research Collaboration on COVID-19, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Nora G. Singer
- Department of Medicine and Rheumatology, The MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Lauren E. Stiles
- Department of Neurology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America
| | - Barbara S. Taylor
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Infectious Diseases, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America
| | - Shifa Ahmed
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Heather A. Algren
- Swedish Center for Research and Innovation, Providence Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Khamal Anglin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco Institute of Global Health Sciences, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Lisa Aponte-Soto
- College of Science and Health, Department of Health Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Hassan Ashktorab
- Department of Medicine, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Ingrid V. Bassett
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Brahmchetna Bedi
- Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Nahid Bhadelia
- Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases Policy and Research, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Christian Bime
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Marie-Abele C. Bind
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Lora J. Black
- Department of Clinical Research, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States of America
| | - Andra L. Blomkalns
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Hassan Brim
- Department of Pathology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Mario Castro
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas City, United States of America
| | - James Chan
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Alexander W. Charney
- Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Benjamin K. Chen
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Li Qing Chen
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Peter Chen
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - David Chestek
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Lori B. Chibnik
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Dominic C. Chow
- Department of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America
| | - Helen Y. Chu
- Department of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Rebecca G. Clifton
- Department of Biostatistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Shelby Collins
- Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Maged M. Costantine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Sushma K. Cribbs
- Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Steven G. Deeks
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - John D. Dickinson
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Sarah E. Donohue
- Department of Research Services, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Matthew S. Durstenfeld
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology at Zuckerberg San Francisco General, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Ivette F. Emery
- MaineHealth Institute for Research, MaineHealth, Scarborough, Maine, United States of America
| | - Kristine M. Erlandson
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Julio C. Facelli
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Rachael Farah-Abraham
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Aloke V. Finn
- Department of Pathology, CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Melinda S. Fischer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Infectious Diseases, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America
| | - Valerie J. Flaherman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Judes Fleurimont
- Mile Square Health Center, University of Illinois Chicago, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Vivian Fonseca
- Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Emily J. Gallagher
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Jennifer C. Gander
- Center for Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente of Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Maria Laura Gennaro
- Public Health Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Kelly S. Gibson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Minjoung Go
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Steven N. Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Joey P. Granger
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States of America
| | - Frank L. Greenway
- Clinical Trials, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - John W. Hafner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, OSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Jenny E. Han
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Michelle S. Harkins
- Department of Internal Medicine University of New Mexico, Health Science Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Kristine S. P. Hauser
- Clinical Research Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - James R. Heath
- Department of Bioengineering, Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Carla R. Hernandez
- Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - On Ho
- Seattle Children’s Therapeutics, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Matthew K. Hoffman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, Delaware, United States of America
| | - Susan E. Hoover
- Department of Clinical Research, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States of America
| | - Carol R. Horowitz
- Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Harvey Hsu
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Priscilla Y. Hsue
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Brenna L. Hughes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Prasanna Jagannathan
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Judith A. James
- Department of Arthritis & Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America
| | - Janice John
- Department of Family Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Sarah Jolley
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - S. E. Judd
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America
| | - Joy J. Juskowich
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America
| | - Diane G. Kanjilal
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth W. Karlson
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Stuart D. Katz
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - J. Daniel Kelly
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Sara W. Kelly
- Department of Pediatrics & Department of Research Services, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Arthur Y. Kim
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - John P. Kirwan
- Department Integrated Physiology and Molecular Medicine, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Kenneth S. Knox
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Andre Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | | | - Margaret Lanca
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Joyce K. Lee-lannotti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Neurology, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - R. Craig Lefebvre
- Communications Practice Area, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Bruce D. Levy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Janet Y. Lin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Brian P. Logarbo
- Tulane Center for Clinical Research, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Jennifer K. Logue
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Michele T. Longo
- Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Carlos A. Luciano
- Department of Neurology, University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America
| | - Karen Lutrick
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Arizona, College of Medicine – Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Shahdi K. Malakooti
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Gail Mallett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Gabrielle Maranga
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Jai G. Marathe
- Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Vincent C. Marconi
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Department of Global Health, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Gailen D. Marshall
- Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States of America
| | - Christopher F. Martin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey N. Martin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Heidi T. May
- Department of Cardiology, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Grace A. McComsey
- Department of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Dylan McDonald
- Department of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Hector Mendez-Figueroa
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Lucio Miele
- Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Murray A. Mittleman
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Sindhu Mohandas
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Christian Mouchati
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Janet M. Mullington
- Department of Neurology and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Girish N. Nadkarni
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Erica R. Nahin
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Robert B. Neuman
- Division of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente of Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Lisa T. Newman
- Department of Social, Statistical and Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Amber Nguyen
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Janko Z. Nikolich
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Igho Ofotokun
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Princess U. Ogbogu
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Anna Palatnik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Kristy T. S. Palomares
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Tanyalak Parimon
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Samuel Parry
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Sairam Parthasarathy
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Thomas F. Patterson
- Department of Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ann Pearman
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Michael J. Peluso
- Division of HIV, Infectious Disease, and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Priscilla Pemu
- Department of Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Christian M. Pettker
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Beth A. Plunkett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Kristen Pogreba-Brown
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Athena Poppas
- Division of Cardiology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| | - J. Zachary Porterfield
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America
| | - John G. Quigley
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Davin K. Quinn
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Hengameh Raissy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico, Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Candida J. Rebello
- Department of Nutrition and Chronic Disease, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Uma M. Reddy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Rebecca Reece
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America
| | - Harrison T. Reeder
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Franz P. Rischard
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Johana M. Rosas
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Clifford J. Rosen
- MaineHealth Institute for Research, MaineHealth, Scarborough, Maine, United States of America
| | - Nadine G. Rouphael
- Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Dwight J. Rouse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| | - Adam M. Ruff
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas City, United States of America
| | - Christina Saint Jean
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Grecio J. Sandoval
- Department of Biostatistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Jorge L. Santana
- Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America
| | - Shannon M. Schlater
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Frank C. Sciurba
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Caitlin Selvaggi
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Sudha Seshadri
- Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer’s and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America
| | - Howard D. Sesso
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Dimpy P. Shah
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America
| | - Eyal Shemesh
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Zaki A. Sherif
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Daniel J. Shinnick
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Hyagriv N. Simhan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Upinder Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Amber Sowles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Vignesh Subbian
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona College of Engineering, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jun Sun
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Mehul S. Suthar
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Larissa J. Teunis
- Health Services Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - John M. Thorp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Amberly Ticotsky
- Department of Family Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Alan T. N. Tita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Center for Women’s Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America
| | - Robin Tragus
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America
| | - Katherine R. Tuttle
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, United States of America
| | - Alfredo E. Urdaneta
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - P. J. Utz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Timothy M. VanWagoner
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America
| | - Andrew Vasey
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Suzanne D. Vernon
- Department of Research, Bateman Horne Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Crystal Vidal
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Tiffany Walker
- Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Honorine D. Ward
- Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - David E. Warren
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Ryan M. Weeks
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Steven J. Weiner
- Department of Biostatistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Jordan C. Weyer
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Jennifer L. Wheeler
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Sidney W. Whiteheart
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Zanthia Wiley
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Natasha J. Williams
- Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Juan P. Wisnivesky
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - John C. Wood
- Department of Pediatrics and Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Lynn M. Yee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Natalie M. Young
- Swedish Center for Research and Innovation, Providence Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Sokratis N. Zisis
- Department of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Andrea S. Foulkes
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chan LN, Chen LM, Goldman M, Mak JS, Bauer DC, Boscardin J, Schembri M, Bae-Jump V, Friedman S, Jacoby VL. Changes in Bone Density in Carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants After Salpingo-Oophorectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2023; Publish Ahead of Print:00006250-990000000-00775. [PMID: 37290104 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) on change in bone mineral density (BMD) in women aged 34-50 years with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2). METHODS The PROSper (Prospective Research of Outcomes after Salpingo-oophorectomy) study is a prospective cohort of women aged 34-50 years with BRCA1 or two germline pathogenic variants that compares health outcomes after RRSO to a non-RRSO control group with ovarian conservation. Women aged 34-50 years, who were planning either RRSO or ovarian conservation, were enrolled for 3 years of follow-up. Spine and total hip BMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans obtained at baseline before RRSO or at the time of enrollment for the non-RRSO group, and then at 1 and 3 years of study follow-up. Differences in BMD between the RRSO and non-RRSO groups, as well as the association between hormone use and BMD, were determined by using mixed effects multivariable linear regression models. RESULTS Of 100 PROSper participants, 91 obtained DXA scans (RRSO group: 40; non-RRSO group: 51). Overall, total spine, and hip BMD decreased significantly from baseline to 12 months after RRSO (estimated percent change -3.78%, 95% CI -6.13% to -1.43% for total spine; -2.96%, 95% CI -4.79% to -1.14% for total hip) and at 36 months (estimated percent change -5.71%, 95% CI -8.64% to -2.77% for total spine; -5.19%, 95% CI -7.50% to -2.87% for total hip. In contrast, total spine and hip BMD were not significantly different from baseline for the non-RRSO group. The differences in mean percent change in BMD from baseline between the RRSO and non-RRSO groups were statistically significant at both 12 and 36 months for spine BMD (12-month difference -4.49%, 95% CI -7.67% to -1.31%; 36-month difference -7.06%, 95% CI -11.01% to -3.11%) and at 36 months for total hip BMD (12-month difference -1.83%, 95% CI -4.23% to 0.56%; 36-month difference -5.14%, 95% CI -8.11% to -2.16%). Across the study periods, hormone use was associated with significantly less bone loss at both the spine and hip within the RRSO group compared with no hormone use (P<.001 at both 12 months and 36 months) but did not completely prevent bone loss (estimated percent change from baseline at 36 months -2.79%, 95% CI -5.08% to -0.51% for total spine BMD; -3.93%, 95% CI -7.27% to -0.59% for total hip BMD). CONCLUSION Women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 who undergo RRSO before the age of 50 years have greater bone loss after surgery that is clinically significant when compared with those who retain their ovaries. Hormone use mitigates, but does not eliminate, bone loss after RRSO. These results suggest that women who undergo RRSO may benefit from routine screening for BMD changes to identify opportunities for prevention and treatment of bone loss. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01948609.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie N Chan
- School of Medicine, the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, the Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Department of Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; the Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gross R, Thaweethai T, Rosenzweig EB, Chan J, Chibnik LB, Cicek MS, Elliott AJ, Flaherman VJ, Foulkes AS, Witvliet MG, Gallagher R, Gennaro ML, Jernigan TL, Karlson EW, Katz SD, Kinser PA, Kleinman LC, Lamendola-Essel MF, Milner JD, Mohandas S, Mudumbi PC, Newburger JW, Rhee KE, Salisbury AL, Snowden JN, Stein CR, Stockwell MS, Tantisira KG, Thomason ME, Truong DT, Warburton D, Wood JC, Ahmed S, Akerlundh A, Alshawabkeh AN, Anderson BR, Aschner JL, Atz AM, Aupperle RL, Baker FC, Balaraman V, Banerjee D, Barch DM, Baskin-Sommers A, Bhuiyan S, Bind MAC, Bogie AL, Buchbinder NC, Bueler E, Bükülmez H, Casey B, Chang L, Clark DB, Clifton RG, Clouser KN, Cottrell L, Cowan K, D’Sa V, Dapretto M, Dasgupta S, Dehority W, Dummer KB, Elias MD, Esquenazi-Karonika S, Evans DN, Faustino EVS, Fiks AG, Forsha D, Foxe JJ, Friedman NP, Fry G, Gaur S, Gee DG, Gray KM, Harahsheh AS, Heath AC, Heitzeg MM, Hester CM, Hill S, Hobart-Porter L, Hong TK, Horowitz CR, Hsia DS, Huentelman M, Hummel KD, Iacono WG, Irby K, Jacobus J, Jacoby VL, Jone PN, Kaelber DC, Kasmarcak TJ, Kluko MJ, Kosut JS, Laird AR, Landeo-Gutierrez J, Lang SM, Larson CL, Lim PPC, Lisdahl KM, McCrindle BW, McCulloh RJ, Mendelsohn AL, Metz TD, Morgan LM, Müller-Oehring EM, Nahin ER, Neale MC, Ness-Cochinwala M, Nolan SM, Oliveira CR, Oster ME, Payne RM, Raissy H, Randall IG, Rao S, Reeder HT, Rosas JM, Russell MW, Sabati AA, Sanil Y, Sato AI, Schechter MS, Selvarangan R, Shakti D, Sharma K, Squeglia LM, Stevenson MD, Szmuszkovicz J, Talavera-Barber MM, Teufel RJ, Thacker D, Udosen MM, Warner MR, Watson SE, Werzberger A, Weyer JC, Wood MJ, Yin HS, Zempsky WT, Zimmerman E, Dreyer BP. Researching COVID to enhance recovery (RECOVER) pediatric study protocol: Rationale, objectives and design. medRxiv 2023:2023.04.27.23289228. [PMID: 37214806 PMCID: PMC10197716 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.27.23289228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Importance The prevalence, pathophysiology, and long-term outcomes of COVID-19 (post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 [PASC] or "Long COVID") in children and young adults remain unknown. Studies must address the urgent need to define PASC, its mechanisms, and potential treatment targets in children and young adults. Observations We describe the protocol for the Pediatric Observational Cohort Study of the NIH's RE searching COV ID to E nhance R ecovery (RECOVER) Initiative. RECOVER-Pediatrics is an observational meta-cohort study of caregiver-child pairs (birth through 17 years) and young adults (18 through 25 years), recruited from more than 100 sites across the US. This report focuses on two of five cohorts that comprise RECOVER-Pediatrics: 1) a de novo RECOVER prospective cohort of children and young adults with and without previous or current infection; and 2) an extant cohort derived from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study ( n =10,000). The de novo cohort incorporates three tiers of data collection: 1) remote baseline assessments (Tier 1, n=6000); 2) longitudinal follow-up for up to 4 years (Tier 2, n=6000); and 3) a subset of participants, primarily the most severely affected by PASC, who will undergo deep phenotyping to explore PASC pathophysiology (Tier 3, n=600). Youth enrolled in the ABCD study participate in Tier 1. The pediatric protocol was developed as a collaborative partnership of investigators, patients, researchers, clinicians, community partners, and federal partners, intentionally promoting inclusivity and diversity. The protocol is adaptive to facilitate responses to emerging science. Conclusions and Relevance RECOVER-Pediatrics seeks to characterize the clinical course, underlying mechanisms, and long-term effects of PASC from birth through 25 years old. RECOVER-Pediatrics is designed to elucidate the epidemiology, four-year clinical course, and sociodemographic correlates of pediatric PASC. The data and biosamples will allow examination of mechanistic hypotheses and biomarkers, thus providing insights into potential therapeutic interventions. Clinical Trialsgov Identifier Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT05172011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Gross
- Department of Pediatrics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tanayott Thaweethai
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erika B. Rosenzweig
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - James Chan
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lori B. Chibnik
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mine S. Cicek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy J. Elliott
- Avera Research Institute, Avera Health, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | - Valerie J. Flaherman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrea S. Foulkes
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Richard Gallagher
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Laura Gennaro
- Public Health Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Terry L. Jernigan
- Center for Human Development, Cognitive Science, Psychiatry, Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Stuart D. Katz
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Patricia A. Kinser
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Nursing, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Lawrence C. Kleinman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Population Health, Quality, and Implementation Sciences (POPQuIS), Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Joshua D. Milner
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center: Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sindhu Mohandas
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Praveen C. Mudumbi
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jane W. Newburger
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kyung E. Rhee
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Amy L. Salisbury
- School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jessica N. Snowden
- Departments of Pediatrics and Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Cheryl R. Stein
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hassenfeld Children’s Hospital at NYU Langone, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa S. Stockwell
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kelan G. Tantisira
- Division of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Moriah E. Thomason
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dongngan T. Truong
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Utah and Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David Warburton
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John C. Wood
- Department of Pediatrics and Radiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shifa Ahmed
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Almary Akerlundh
- Department of Pulmonary Research, Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Brett R. Anderson
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Judy L. Aschner
- Department of Pediatrics, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Andrew M. Atz
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Robin L. Aupperle
- Oxley College of Health Sciences, Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Fiona C. Baker
- Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Venkataraman Balaraman
- Department of Pediatrics, Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Dithi Banerjee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Deanna M. Barch
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Psychiatry, and Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Sultana Bhuiyan
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marie-Abele C. Bind
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda L. Bogie
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Natalie C. Buchbinder
- Center for Human Development, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Elliott Bueler
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hülya Bükülmez
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Rheumatology, The MetroHealth System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - B.J. Casey
- Department of Neuroscience and Behavior, Barnard College - Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Linda Chang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Duncan B. Clark
- Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Katharine N. Clouser
- Department of Pediatrics, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ, USA
| | - Lesley Cottrell
- Department of Pediatrics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Kelly Cowan
- Department of Pediatrics, Robert Larner M.D. College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Viren D’Sa
- Department of Pediatrics, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Mirella Dapretto
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Soham Dasgupta
- Department of Pediatrics, Norton Children’s Hospital, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Walter Dehority
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Kirsten B. Dummer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Matthew D. Elias
- Division of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shari Esquenazi-Karonika
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danielle N. Evans
- Arkansas Children’s Research Institute, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | - Alexander G. Fiks
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel Forsha
- Department of Cardiology, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Ward Family Heart Center, Kansas City, MO, USA, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - John J. Foxe
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Naomi P. Friedman
- Institute for Behavioral Genetics and Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Bolder, CO, USA
| | - Greta Fry
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center Clinic, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Sunanda Gaur
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Dylan G. Gee
- Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kevin M. Gray
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Ashraf S. Harahsheh
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Andrew C. Heath
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mary M. Heitzeg
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christina M. Hester
- Division of Practice-Based Research, Innovation, & Evaluation, American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, KS, USA
| | - Sophia Hill
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura Hobart-Porter
- Departments of Pediatrics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Section of Pediatric Rehabilitation, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Travis K.F. Hong
- Department of Pediatrics, Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Carol R. Horowitz
- Center for Health Equity and Community Engaged Research and Department of Population Health Science and Policy, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel S. Hsia
- Clinical Trials Unit, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Matthew Huentelman
- Division of Neurogenomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Kathy D. Hummel
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - William G. Iacono
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Katherine Irby
- Department of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Joanna Jacobus
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Vanessa L. Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pei-Ni Jone
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology, Lurie Children’s Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David C. Kaelber
- Departments of Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, and Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tyler J. Kasmarcak
- Department of Pediatric Clinical Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Matthew J. Kluko
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jessica S. Kosut
- Department of Pediatrics, Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Angela R. Laird
- Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jeremy Landeo-Gutierrez
- Department of Pediatrics, Respiratory Medicine Division, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sean M. Lang
- Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Christine L. Larson
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Peter Paul C. Lim
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Avera McKennan University Health Center, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | - Krista M. Lisdahl
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Brian W. McCrindle
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Labatt Family Heart Center, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Russell J. McCulloh
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Alan L. Mendelsohn
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Torri D. Metz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lerraughn M. Morgan
- Department of Pediatrics, Valley Children’s Healthcare, Department of Pediatrics, Madera, CA, Madera, CA, USA
| | | | - Erica R. Nahin
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael C. Neale
- Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Manette Ness-Cochinwala
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Sheila M. Nolan
- Department of Pediatrics, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Carlos R. Oliveira
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Matthew E. Oster
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - R. Mark Payne
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Hengameh Raissy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico, Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Isabelle G. Randall
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Suchitra Rao
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Harrison T. Reeder
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Johana M. Rosas
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark W. Russell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Arash A. Sabati
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Yamuna Sanil
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Alice I. Sato
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Disease, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Michael S. Schechter
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Rangaraj Selvarangan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Divya Shakti
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Kavita Sharma
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Lindsay M. Squeglia
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Michelle D. Stevenson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | | | - Maria M. Talavera-Barber
- Department of Pediatrics, Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | - Ronald J. Teufel
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Deepika Thacker
- Nemours Cardiac Center, Nemours Childrens Health, Delaware, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Mmekom M. Udosen
- RECOVER Neurocognitive and Wellbeing/Mental Health Team, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan R. Warner
- Department of Pulmonary Research, Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sara E. Watson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Alan Werzberger
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center: Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jordan C. Weyer
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Marion J. Wood
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - H. Shonna Yin
- Departments of Pediatrics and Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - William T. Zempsky
- Department of Pediatrics, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Emily Zimmerman
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benard P. Dreyer
- Department of Pediatrics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Metz TD, Clifton RG, Gallagher R, Gross RS, Horwitz LI, Jacoby VL, Martin-Herz SP, Peralta-Carcelen M, Reeder HT, Beamon CJ, Bind MA, Chan J, Chang AA, Chibnik LB, Costantine MM, Fitzgerald ML, Foulkes AS, Gibson KS, Güthe N, Habli M, Hackney DN, Hoffman MK, Hoffman MC, Hughes BL, Katz SD, Laleau V, Mallett G, Mendez-Figueroa H, Monzon V, Palatnik A, Palomares KT, Parry S, Peralta-Carcelen M, Pettker CM, Plunkett BA, Poppas A, Reddy UM, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Sandoval GJ, Schlater SM, Sciurba FC, Simhan HN, Skupski DW, Sowles A, Thaweethai T, Thomas GL, Thorp JM, Tita AT, Weiner SJ, Weigand S, Yee LM, Flaherman VJ. Researching COVID to enhance recovery (RECOVER) pregnancy study: Rationale, objectives and design. medRxiv 2023:2023.04.24.23289025. [PMID: 37162923 PMCID: PMC10168506 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.24.23289025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance Pregnancy induces unique physiologic changes to the immune response and hormonal changes leading to plausible differences in the risk of developing post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), or Long COVID. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy may also have long-term ramifications for exposed offspring, and it is critical to evaluate the health outcomes of exposed children. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Multi-site Observational Study of PASC aims to evaluate the long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in various populations. RECOVER- Pregnancy was designed specifically to address long-term outcomes in maternal-child dyads. Methods RECOVER-Pregnancy cohort is a combined prospective and retrospective cohort that proposes to enroll 2,300 individuals with a pregnancy during the COVID-19 pandemic and their offspring exposed and unexposed in utero, including single and multiple gestations. Enrollment will occur both in person at 27 sites through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Health Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network and remotely through national recruitment by the study team at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF). Adults with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy are eligible for enrollment in the pregnancy cohort and will follow the protocol for RECOVER-Adult including validated screening tools, laboratory analyses and symptom questionnaires followed by more in-depth phenotyping of PASC on a subset of the overall cohort. Offspring exposed and unexposed in utero to SARS-CoV-2 maternal infection will undergo screening tests for neurodevelopment and other health outcomes at 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months of age. Blood specimens will be collected at 24 months of age for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, storage and anticipated later analyses proposed by RECOVER and other investigators. Discussion RECOVER-Pregnancy will address whether having SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy modifies the risk factors, prevalence, and phenotype of PASC. The pregnancy cohort will also establish whether there are increased risks of adverse long-term outcomes among children exposed in utero. Registration NCT05172024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torri D. Metz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Hospitals and Clinics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Rebecca G. Clifton
- Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Richard Gallagher
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel S. Gross
- Department of Pediatrics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leora I. Horwitz
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vanessa L. Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Susanne P. Martin-Herz
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Developmental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Harrison T. Reeder
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carmen J. Beamon
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, WakeMed Health and Hospitals, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Marie-Abele Bind
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James Chan
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A. Ann Chang
- Women’s Health Research Clinical Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lori B. Chibnik
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maged M. Costantine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Megan L. Fitzgerald
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea S. Foulkes
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kelly S. Gibson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nick Güthe
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mounira Habli
- Division Maternal Fetal Medicine, Trihealth Good Samaritan Hospital Maternal Fetal Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - David N. Hackney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center: UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matthew K. Hoffman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA
| | - M. Camille Hoffman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Brenna L. Hughes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stuart D. Katz
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Victoria Laleau
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gail Mallett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hector Mendez-Figueroa
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas McGovern Medical School: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston John P and Katherine G McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vanessa Monzon
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anna Palatnik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kristy T.S. Palomares
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Samuel Parry
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Christian M. Pettker
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Beth A. Plunkett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Athena Poppas
- Division of Cardiology, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, PROVIDENCE, RI, USA
| | - Uma M. Reddy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Dwight J. Rouse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - George R. Saade
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Grecio J. Sandoval
- Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Shannon M. Schlater
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Frank C. Sciurba
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hyagriv N. Simhan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel W. Skupski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amber Sowles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Hospitals and Clinics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tanayott Thaweethai
- Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gelise L. Thomas
- Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John M. Thorp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UNC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alan T. Tita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women’s Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Steven J. Weiner
- Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Samantha Weigand
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA
| | - Lynn M. Yee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Valerie J. Flaherman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rubio EM, Hilton JF, Bent S, Parvataneni R, Oberman E, Saberi NS, Varon S, Schembri M, Waetjen LE, Jacoby VL. Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Women with Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2023; 32:546-552. [PMID: 37023398 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to examine complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among women with symptomatic uterine fibroids in the United States. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a multicenter, prospective cohort study of premenopausal women undergoing surgery for symptomatic fibroids and who enrolled in the Uterine Leiomyoma Treatment with Radiofrequency Ablation study from 2017 to 2019, we contrast women indicating use of at least one CAM modality specifically for fibroid symptoms against women using CAM for other reasons and CAM nonusers. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to identify participant characteristics independently associated with CAM use for fibroids. Results: Among 204 women, 55% were Black/African American and the mean age was 42 (standard deviation 6.6) years. CAM use was common (67%), with 42% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35%-49%) reporting use of CAM specifically to treat fibroid symptoms. Most commonly, CAM treatments used for fibroids were diet (62%) and herbs (52%), while CAM treatments for other reasons were exercise (80%) and massage (43%). On average, each participant who reported CAM use utilized three different types of CAM modalities. In a multivariable model, participants were more likely to use CAM for fibroids if they had pelvic pressure (odds ratio [OR] 2.50, 95% CI: 1.07-5.87, p = 0.04), a body-mass index lower than average (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60-0.97, p = 0.03), and a lower health-related quality of life score (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.46-0.81, p = 0.001). Conclusions: In this diverse sample of women with symptomatic fibroids, CAM use was highly prevalent. Our findings highlight the need for providers to query patients about CAM use and understand the role of CAM in fibroid management. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02100904.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elia Marina Rubio
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joan F Hilton
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Stephen Bent
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ram Parvataneni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- University of California Fibroid Network, USA
| | - Erica Oberman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- University of California Fibroid Network, USA
| | - Naghmeh Salamat Saberi
- University of California Fibroid Network, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Shira Varon
- University of California Fibroid Network, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Michael Schembri
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - L Elaine Waetjen
- University of California Fibroid Network, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California Fibroid Network, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Anchan RM, Wojdyla D, Bortoletto P, Terry K, Disler E, Milne A, Gargiulo A, Petrozza J, Brook O, Srouji S, Morton CC, Greenberg J, Wegienka G, Stewart EA, Nicholson WK, Thomas L, Venable S, Laughlin-Tommaso S, Diamond MP, Maxwell GL, Marsh EE, Myers ER, Vines AI, Wise LA, Wallace K, Jacoby VL, Spies JB. A Comparative Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life 1 Year Following Myomectomy or Uterine Artery Embolization: Findings from the COMPARE-UF Registry. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2023; 32:423-433. [PMID: 36637808 PMCID: PMC10079244 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To compare 12-month post-treatment health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and symptom severity (SS) changes among patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (SUF) not seeking fertility and undergo a hysterectomy, abdominal myomectomy (AM), or uterine artery embolization (UAE). Materials and Methods: The Comparing Options for Management: Patient-Centered Results for Uterine Fibroids (COMPARE-UF) Registry is a multi-institutional prospective observational cohort study of patients treated for SUF. A subset of 1465 women 31-45 years of age, who underwent either hysterectomy (n = 741), AM (n = 446), or UAE (n = 155) were included in this analysis. Demographics, fibroid history, and symptoms were obtained by baseline questionnaires and at 1 year post-treatment. Results were stratified by all treatments and propensity score weighting to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Results: Women undergoing UAE reported the lowest baseline HR-QoL and highest SS scores (mean = 40.6 [standard deviation (SD) = 23.8]; 62.3 [SD = 24.2]) followed by hysterectomy (44.3 [24.3]; 59.8 [SD = 24.1]). At 12 months, women who underwent a hysterectomy experienced the largest change in both HR-QoL (48.7 [26.2]) and SS (51.9 [25.6]) followed by other uterine-sparing treatments. Propensity score weighting revealed all treatments produced substantial improvement, with hysterectomy patients reporting the highest HR-QoL score (92.0 [17.8]) compared with myomectomy (86.7 [17.2]) and UAE (82.6 [21.5]) (p < 0.0001). Similarly, hysterectomy patients reported the lowest SS scores (8.2 [15.1]) compared with myomectomy (16.5 [15.1]) and UAE (19.6 [17.5]) (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: All procedures showed improvement in HR-QoL and reduction in SS score at 12 months, hysterectomy showing maximum improvement. Of importance, at 12 months, patients who underwent either a myomectomy or UAE reported comparable symptom relief and HR-QoL. Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier: NCT02260752.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond M. Anchan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel Wojdyla
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Pietro Bortoletto
- The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kathryn Terry
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Emily Disler
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ankrish Milne
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Antonio Gargiulo
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John Petrozza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Olga Brook
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Serene Srouji
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cynthia C. Morton
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - James Greenberg
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ganesa Wegienka
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Wanda K. Nicholson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Health Research, and Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laine Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Shannon Laughlin-Tommaso
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael P. Diamond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - G. Larry Maxwell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Erica E. Marsh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Evan R. Myers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anissa I. Vines
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lauren A. Wise
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kedra Wallace
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - Vanessa L. Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - James B. Spies
- Department of Radiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Altendahl MR, Xu L, Asiodu I, Boscardin J, Gaw SL, Flaherman VJ, Jacoby VL, Richards MC, Krakow D, Afshar Y. Patterns of Peripartum Depression and Anxiety During the Pre-Vaccine COVID-19 Pandemic. Res Sq 2022:rs.3.rs-2294673. [PMID: 36561172 PMCID: PMC9774217 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2294673/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Pregnant people are vulnerable to new or worsening mental health conditions. This study aims to describe prevalence and course of symptomatic depression and anxiety in pregnancy during the pre-vaccine COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This is a prospective cohort study of pregnant individuals with known or suspected COVID-19. Participants completed Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Generalized-Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaires at 34weeks gestational age, 6-8weeks postpartum, and 6months postpartum. Prevalence of symptomatic depression and anxiety at each visit was described. Univariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between demographic and clinical factors and symptomatic depression or anxiety. Results 317 participantswere included. The prevalence of antepartum depression was 14.6%, 10.3%, and 20.6% at 34weeks gestational age, 6-8weeks postpartum, and 6months postpartum, respectively. The rate of anxiety was 15.1%, 10.0%, and 17.3% at 34weeks gestational age, 6-8weeks postpartum, and 6months postpartum, respectively. A prior history of depression and/or anxiety (p's<0.03), as well as higher EPDS and GAD-7 scores at enrollment (p's<0.04) associated with depression and anxiety throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period. Quarantining during pregnancy was associated with symptomatic anxiety at 34weeks gestational age in univariate (P=0.027) analyses. COVID-19 diagnosis and hospitalization were not associated with depression or anxiety. Conclusions Depression and anxiety were prevalent throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period, particularly in those with prior depression and/or anxiety and who quarantined. Strategies that target social isolation may mitigate potential adverse consequences for pregnant people, and continued vigilance in recognition of depression and anxiety in pregnancy should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liwen Xu
- University of California, Los Angeles
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Matsui Y, Li L, Prahl M, Cassidy AG, Ozarslan N, Golan Y, Gonzalez VJ, Lin CY, Jigmeddagva U, Chidboy MA, Montano M, Taha TY, Khalid MM, Sreekumar B, Hayashi JM, Chen PY, Kumar GR, Warrier L, Wu AH, Song D, Jegatheesan P, Rai DS, Govindaswami B, Needens J, Rincon M, Myatt L, Asiodu IV, Flaherman VJ, Afshar Y, Jacoby VL, Murtha AP, Robinson JF, Ott M, Greene WC, Gaw SL. Neutralizing antibody activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants in gestational age-matched mother-infant dyads after infection or vaccination. JCI Insight 2022; 7:e157354. [PMID: 35579965 PMCID: PMC9309042 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.157354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy confers unique immune responses to infection and vaccination across gestation. To date, there are limited data comparing vaccine- and infection-induced neutralizing Abs (nAbs) against COVID-19 variants in mothers during pregnancy. We analyzed paired maternal and cord plasma samples from 60 pregnant individuals. Thirty women vaccinated with mRNA vaccines (from December 2020 through August 2021) were matched with 30 naturally infected women (from March 2020 through January 2021) by gestational age of exposure. Neutralization activity against the 5 SARS-CoV-2 spike sequences was measured by a SARS-CoV-2-pseudotyped spike virion assay. Effective nAbs against SARS-CoV-2 were present in maternal and cord plasma after both infection and vaccination. Compared with WT spike protein, these nAbs were less effective against the Delta and Mu spike variants. Vaccination during the third trimester induced higher cord-nAb levels at delivery than did infection during the third trimester. In contrast, vaccine-induced nAb levels were lower at the time of delivery compared with infection during the first trimester. The transfer ratio (cord nAb level divided by maternal nAb level) was greatest in mothers vaccinated in the second trimester. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection in pregnancy elicits effective nAbs with differing neutralization kinetics that are influenced by gestational time of exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Matsui
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
- Michael Hulton Center for HIV Cure Research at Gladstone, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lin Li
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and
- Center for Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mary Prahl
- Department of Pediatrics
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Global Health
| | | | - Nida Ozarslan
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and
- Center for Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Yarden Golan
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences
| | | | | | - Unurzul Jigmeddagva
- Center for Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Megan A. Chidboy
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and
- Center for Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mauricio Montano
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
- Michael Hulton Center for HIV Cure Research at Gladstone, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Taha Y. Taha
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mir M. Khalid
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Bharath Sreekumar
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jennifer M. Hayashi
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Pei-Yi Chen
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - G. Renuka Kumar
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Alan H.B. Wu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Dongli Song
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California, USA
| | - Priya Jegatheesan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California, USA
| | - Daljeet S. Rai
- Stanford-O’Connor Family Medicine Residency Program, Division of Family Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | - Jordan Needens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, West Virginia, USA
| | - Monica Rincon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Leslie Myatt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | - Yalda Afshar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | - Joshua F. Robinson
- Center for Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Melanie Ott
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
- Michael Hulton Center for HIV Cure Research at Gladstone, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, and
| | - Warner C. Greene
- Gladstone Institute of Virology, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
- Michael Hulton Center for HIV Cure Research at Gladstone, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, and
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Stephanie L. Gaw
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and
- Center for Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jacoby VL, Boscardin WJ. Reply: Selection bias in estimates of early pregnancy loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:161. [PMID: 34358477 PMCID: PMC8562936 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
13
|
Boyd BAJ, Winkelman WD, Mishra K, Vittinghoff E, Jacoby VL. Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225:405.e1-405.e7. [PMID: 33984303 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited literature identifying racial and ethnic health disparities among surgical modalities and outcomes in the field of urogynecology and specifically pelvic organ prolapse surgery. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the differences in surgical approach for apical vaginal prolapse and postoperative complications by race and ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing surgical repair for apical vaginal prolapse between 2014 and 2017 using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they underwent either vaginal colpopexy or abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy cases were further divided into those performed by laparotomy and those performed by laparoscopy. Multivariable logistic regression models that controlled for age, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and concurrent surgery were used to determine whether race and ethnicity are associated with the type of colpopexy (vaginal vs abdominal) or the surgical route of abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Similar models that also controlled for surgical approach were used to assess 30-day complications by race and ethnicity. RESULTS A total of 22,861 eligible surgical cases were identified, of which 12,337 (54%) were vaginal colpopexy and 10,524 (46%) were abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Among patients who had an abdominal sacrocolpopexy, 2262 (21%) were performed via laparotomy and 8262 (79%) via laparoscopy. The study population was 70% White, 9% Latina, 6% African American, 3% Asian, 0.6% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 0.4% American Indian or Alaska Native, and 11% unknown. In multivariable analysis, Asian and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander women were less likely to undergo abdominal sacrocolpopexy compared with White women (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.99, and odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.82, respectively). Among women who underwent an abdominal sacrocolpopexy, Latina women and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander women were less likely to undergo a laparoscopic approach compared with White women (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.79, and odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.56, respectively). Complication rates also differed by race and ethnicity. After a colpopexy, African American women were more likely to need a blood transfusion (odds ratio, 3.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-4.73; P≤.001) and have a deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-5.48; P=.028), but less likely to present with postoperative urinary tract infections (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.96; P=.028) than White women in multivariable regression models. Using the Clavien-Dindo classification system, Latina women had higher odds of developing grade II complications than White women in multivariable models (odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.51; P=.02). CONCLUSION There are racial and ethnic differences in the type and route of surgical repair for apical vaginal prolapse. In particular, Latina and Pacific Islander women were less likely to undergo a laparoscopic approach to abdominal sacrocolpopexy compared with White women. Although complications were uncommon, there were several complications including blood transfusions that were higher among African American and Latina women. Additional studies are needed to better understand and describe associated factors for these differences in care and surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittni A J Boyd
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
| | - William D Winkelman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kavita Mishra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Eric Vittinghoff
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hawkins M, Deutsch MB, Obedin-Maliver J, Stark B, Grubman J, Jacoby A, Jacoby VL. Endometrial findings among transgender and gender nonbinary people using testosterone at the time of gender-affirming hysterectomy. Fertil Steril 2021; 115:1312-1317. [PMID: 33583596 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe clinical characteristics and associated endometrial findings of transgender and gender nonbinary people using gender-affirming testosterone. DESIGN Retrospective case series. SETTING Academic medical center and public safety net hospital. PATIENT(S) Eighty-one patients using gender-affirming testosterone therapy undergoing hysterectomy for the indication of gender affirmation from 2000 to 2018. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Preoperative clinical characteristics and endometrium surgical pathology diagnoses. RESULT(S) Median age was 31 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27-40), and median body mass index 27 kg/m2 (IQR 24-30). Six patients (7%) were parous and 60 (74%) had amenorrhea. Thirty-three patients (40%) had proliferative and 40 (50%) atrophic endometrium. Endometrial polyps were found in nine patients (11%) of the sample. Endometrial findings were similar in the subgroup of 60 patients with preoperative amenorrhea. There were no cases of endometrial hyperplasia or malignancy. In bivariate analysis, those with proliferative endometrium were found to be, on average, 5.6 years younger than those with atrophic endometrium. There were no clinical factors associated with having proliferative versus atrophic endometrium in multivariable models. CONCLUSION(S) People using gender-affirming testosterone may have either proliferative or atrophic endometrium, including people who present with amenorrhea. Further study is needed to develop evidence-based guidelines for appropriate screening for endometrial hyperplasia or cancer in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitzi Hawkins
- San Francisco Veteran Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| | - Madeline B Deutsch
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Juno Obedin-Maliver
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Brett Stark
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jessica Grubman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Alison Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wegienka G, Stewart EA, Nicholson WK, Zhang S, Li F, Thomas L, Spies JB, Venable S, Laughlin-Tommaso S, Diamond MP, Anchan RM, Maxwell GL, Marsh EE, Myers ER, Vines AI, Wise LA, Wallace K, Jacoby VL. Black Women Are More Likely Than White Women to Schedule a Uterine-Sparing Treatment for Leiomyomas. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2021; 30:355-366. [PMID: 33524308 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To evaluate differences in the proportion of uterine fibroid (UF) treatments that are uterine-sparing between Black women and White women and identify factors that could explain disparities. Methods: Women at age 18-54 years who were enrolled from 10 clinical sites in the United States into the Comparing Options for Management: Patient-Centered Results for UFs (COMPARE-UF) treatment registry completed questionnaires before their UF procedure. UF symptoms and quality of life were assessed by questionnaires. Details on UF imaging and treatment (hysterectomy, myomectomy, or uterine artery embolization [UAE]) were collected from each patient's medical record. Random-effects logistic regression was used to assess the association between race and the odds of having a uterine-sparing procedure versus hysterectomy. Subgroup analyses compared each uterine-sparing procedure with hysterectomy. Results: In this cohort of 1141 White women and 1196 Black women, Black women tended to be younger (median 41.0 vs. 42.0 years) and report worse symptoms, pain, and function on every scale compared with White women. Black women were more likely to have had a prior UF treatment compared with White women (22.8% vs. 14.6%). White women had more hysterectomies (43.6% vs. 32.2%) and myomectomies (50.9% vs. 50.2%) versus Black women. Black women had more UAEs (15.1% vs. 4.7%) than White women. After adjusting for clinical site and other variables, Black women had greater odds than White women of having a myomectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.63-3.56) or a UAE versus hysterectomy (OR = 4.24, 95% CI = 2.41-7.46). Conclusion: In these participants, Black women were more likely to schedule a uterine-sparing UF treatment and a nonsurgical UF treatment than their White counterparts; this may not be true for all women. Longer comparative effectiveness studies are needed to inform women about the durability of UF treatments. Greater understanding of factors influencing treatment selection is needed as are studies that include women without access to tertiary care centers. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02260752 (enrollment start: November 2015).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesa Wegienka
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Stewart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Wanda K Nicholson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Health Research, and Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shuaiqi Zhang
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Fan Li
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laine Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - James B Spies
- Department of Radiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Shannon Laughlin-Tommaso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael P Diamond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Raymond M Anchan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - George Larry Maxwell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Erica E Marsh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Evan R Myers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anissa I Vines
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lauren A Wise
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kedra Wallace
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Flaherman VJ, Afshar Y, Boscardin J, Keller RL, Mardy A, Prahl MK, Phillips C, Asiodu IV, Berghella WV, Chambers BD, Crear-Perry J, Jamieson DJ, Jacoby VL, Gaw SL. Infant Outcomes Following Maternal Infection with SARS-CoV-2: First Report from the PRIORITY Study. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 73:e2810-e2813. [PMID: 32947612 PMCID: PMC7543372 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Infant outcomes after maternal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are not well described. In a prospective US registry of 263 infants, maternal SARS-CoV-2 status was not associated with birth weight, difficulty breathing, apnea, or upper or lower respiratory infection through 8 weeks of age.
Collapse
|
17
|
Wallace K, Zhang S, Thomas L, Stewart EA, Nicholson WK, Wegienka GR, Wise LA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Diamond MP, Marsh EE, Jacoby VL, Anchan RM, Venable S, Larry GM, Lytle B, Wang T, Myers ER. Comparative effectiveness of hysterectomy versus myomectomy on one-year health-related quality of life in women with uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril 2020; 113:618-626. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
18
|
Bent RE, Wilson MD, Jacoby VL, Varon S, Parvataneni R, Saberi N, Waetjen LE. Myoma Imaging by Gynecologic Surgeons Training in Intraoperative Ultrasound Technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26:1139-1143. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
19
|
Laughlin-Tommaso S, Barnard EP, AbdElmagied AM, Vaughan LE, Weaver AL, Hesley GK, Woodrum DA, Jacoby VL, Kohi MP, Price TM, Nieves A, Miller MJ, Borah BJ, Moriarty JP, Gorny KR, Leppert PC, Severson AL, Lemens MA, Stewart EA. FIRSTT study: randomized controlled trial of uterine artery embolization vs focused ultrasound surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220:174.e1-174.e13. [PMID: 30696556 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Revised: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine leiomyomas (fibroid tumors) cause considerable symptoms in 30-50% of women and are the leading cause of hysterectomy in the United States. Women with uterine fibroid tumors often seek uterine-preserving treatments, but comparative effectiveness trials are lacking. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to report treatment effectiveness and ovarian function after uterine artery embolization vs magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery from the Fibroid Interventions: Reducing Symptoms Today and Tomorrow study. STUDY DESIGN The Fibroid Interventions: Reducing Symptoms Today and Tomorrow study, which is a randomized controlled trial of uterine artery embolization vs magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery, enrolled premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroid tumors; women who declined randomization were enrolled in a parallel observational cohort. A comprehensive cohort design was used for outcomes analysis. Our target enrollment was 220 women, of which we achieved 41% (n=91) in the randomized and parallel arms of the trial. Primary outcome was reintervention for uterine fibroid tumors within 36 months. Secondary outcomes were change in serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels and standardized measures of fibroid symptoms, quality of life, pain, and sexual function. RESULTS From 2010-2014, 83 women (mean age, 44.4 years) were treated in the comprehensive cohort design (43 for magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery [27 randomized]; 40 for uterine artery embolization [22 randomized]); baseline clinical and uterine characteristics were similar between treatment arms, except for higher fibroid load in the uterine artery embolization arm. The risk of reintervention was higher with magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery than uterine artery embolization (hazard ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-7.79). Uterine artery embolization showed a significantly greater absolute decrease in anti-Müllerian hormone levels at 24 months compared with magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Quality of life and pain scores improved in both arms but to a greater extent in the uterine artery embolization arm. Higher pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone level and younger age at treatment increased the overall risk of reintervention. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates a lower reintervention rate and greater improvement in symptoms after uterine artery embolization, although some of the effectiveness may come through impairment of ovarian reserve. Both pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone level and age are associated with risk of reintervention. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00995878, clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily P Barnard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Lisa E Vaughan
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amy L Weaver
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Maureen P Kohi
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Thomas M Price
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Angel Nieves
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Bijan J Borah
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - James P Moriarty
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Phyllis C Leppert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Maureen A Lemens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen A Matteson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.,Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Katina Robison
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.,Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barnard EP, AbdElmagied AM, Vaughan LE, Weaver AL, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Hesley GK, Woodrum DA, Jacoby VL, Kohi MP, Price TM, Nieves A, Miller MJ, Borah BJ, Gorny KR, Leppert PC, Peterson LG, Stewart EA. Periprocedural outcomes comparing fibroid embolization and focused ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial and comprehensive cohort analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216:500.e1-500.e11. [PMID: 28063909 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Revised: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 12/29/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine fibroids are a common problem for reproductive-aged women, yet little comparative effectiveness research is available to guide treatment choice. Uterine artery embolization and magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery are minimally invasive therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating symptomatic uterine fibroids. The Fibroid Interventions: Reducing Symptoms Today and Tomorrow study is the first randomized controlled trial to compare these 2 fibroid treatments. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to summarize treatment parameters and compare recovery trajectory and adverse events in the first 6 weeks after treatment. STUDY DESIGN Premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids seen at 3 US academic medical centers were enrolled in the randomized controlled trial (n = 57). Women meeting identical criteria who declined randomization but agreed to study participation were enrolled in a nonrandomized parallel cohort (n = 34). The 2 treatment groups were analyzed by using a comprehensive cohort design. All women undergoing focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization received the same postprocedure prescriptions, instructions, and symptom diaries for comparison of recovery in the first 6 weeks. Return to work and normal activities, medication use, symptoms, and adverse events were captured with postprocedure diaries. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test or χ2 test. Multivariable regression was used to adjust for baseline pain levels and fibroid load when comparing opioid medication, adverse events, and recovery time between treatment groups because these factors varied at baseline between groups and could affect outcomes. Adverse events were also collected. RESULTS Of 83 women in the comprehensive cohort design who underwent treatment, 75 completed postprocedure diaries. Focused ultrasound surgery was a longer procedure than embolization (mean [SD], 405 [146] vs 139 [44] min; P <.001). Of women undergoing focused ultrasound (n = 43), 23 (53%) underwent 2 treatment days. Immediate self-rated postprocedure pain was higher after uterine artery embolization than focused ultrasound (median [interquartile range], 5 [1-7] vs 1 [1-4]; P = .002). Compared with those having focused ultrasound (n = 39), women undergoing embolization (n = 36) were more likely to use outpatient opioid (75% vs 21%; P < .001) and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications (97% vs 67%; P < .001) and to have a longer median (interquartile range) recovery time (days off work, 8 [6-14] vs 4 [2-7]; P < .001; days until return to normal, 15 [10-29] vs 10 [10-15]; P = .02). There were no significant differences in the incidence or severity of adverse events between treatment arms; 86% of adverse events (42 of 49) required only observation or nominal treatment, and no events caused permanent sequelae or death. After adjustment for baseline pain and uterine fibroid load, uterine artery embolization was still significantly associated with higher opioid use and longer time to return to work and normal activities (P < .001 for each). Results were similar when restricted to the randomized controlled trial. CONCLUSION Women undergoing uterine artery embolization have longer recovery times and use more prescription medications, but women undergoing focused ultrasound have longer treatment times. These findings were independent of baseline pain levels and fibroid load.
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
AbdElmagied AM, Vaughan LE, Weaver AL, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Hesley GK, Woodrum DA, Jacoby VL, Kohi MP, Price TM, Nieves A, Miller MJ, Borah BJ, Gorny KR, Leppert PC, Lemens MA, Stewart EA. Fibroid interventions: reducing symptoms today and tomorrow: extending generalizability by using a comprehensive cohort design with a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215:338.e1-338.e18. [PMID: 27073063 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Revised: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine fibroids are an important source of morbidity for reproductive-aged women. Despite an increasing number of alternatives, hysterectomies account for about 75% of all fibroid interventional treatments. Evidence is lacking to help women and their health care providers decide among alternatives to hysterectomy. Fibroid Interventions: Reducing Symptoms Today and Tomorrow (NCT00995878, clinicaltrials.gov) is a randomized controlled trial to compare the safety, efficacy, and economics of 2 minimally invasive alternatives to hysterectomy: uterine artery embolization and magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Although randomized trials provide the highest level of evidence, they have been difficult to conduct in the United States for interventional fibroid treatments. Thus, contemporaneously recruiting women declining randomization may have value as an alternative strategy for comparative effectiveness research. OBJECTIVE We sought to compare baseline characteristics of randomized participants with nonrandomized participants meeting the same enrollment criteria and to determine whether combining the 2 cohorts in a comprehensive cohort design would be useful for analysis. STUDY DESIGN Premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids seeking interventional therapy at 3 US academic medical centers were randomized (1:1) in 2 strata based on calculated uterine volume (<700 and ≥700 cc(3)) to undergo embolization or focused ultrasound surgery. Women who met the same inclusion criteria but declined randomization were offered enrollment in a parallel cohort. Both cohorts were followed up for a maximum of 36 months after treatment. The measures addressed in this report were baseline demographics, symptoms, fibroid and uterine characteristics, and scores on validated quality-of-life measures. RESULTS Of 723 women screened, 57 were randomized and 49 underwent treatment (27 with focused ultrasound and 22 with embolization). Seven of the 8 women randomized but not treated were assigned to embolization. Of 34 women in the parallel cohort, 16 elected focused ultrasound and 18 elected embolization. Compared with nonrandomized participants, randomized participants had higher mean body mass index (28.7 vs 25.3 kg/m(2); P = .01) and were more likely to be gravid (77% vs 47%; P = .003) and smokers (42% vs 12%; P = .003). Age, race, uterine volume, number of fibroids, and baseline validated measures of general and disease-specific quality of life, pain, depression, and sexual function did not differ between the groups. When we performed a comprehensive cohort analysis and analyzed by treatment arm, the only baseline difference observed was a higher median McGill Pain Score among women undergoing focused ultrasound (10.5 vs 6; P = .03); a similar but nonsignificant trend was seen in visual analog scale scores for pain (median, 39.0 vs 24.0; P = .06). CONCLUSION Using a comprehensive cohort analysis of study data could result in additional power and greater generalizability if results are adjusted for baseline differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed M AbdElmagied
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women Health Hospital, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Lisa E Vaughan
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amy L Weaver
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - Vanessa L Jacoby
- Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Maureen P Kohi
- Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Thomas M Price
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Angel Nieves
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Bijan J Borah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Phyllis C Leppert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Maureen A Lemens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Leslee Subak
- Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences; Urology; and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
| | - L Elaine Waetjen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jacoby VL, Kohi MP, Poder L, Jacoby A, Lager J, Schembri M, Rieke V, Grady D, Vittinghoff E, Coakley FV. PROMISe trial: a pilot, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound for uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril 2015; 105:773-780. [PMID: 26658133 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2015] [Revised: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 11/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of a full-scale placebo-controlled trial of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for fibroids (MRgFUS) and obtain estimates of safety and efficacy. DESIGN Pilot, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING University medical center. PATIENT(S) Premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. INTERVENTION(S) Participants randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive MRgFUS or placebo procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) PRIMARY OUTCOME change in fibroid symptoms from baseline to 4 and 12 weeks after treatment assessed by the Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life Questionnaire (UFS-QOL); secondary outcome: incidence of surgery or procedures for recurrent symptoms at 12 and 24 months. RESULT(S) Twenty women with a mean age of 44 years (±standard deviation 5.4 years) were enrolled, and 13 were randomly assigned to MRgFUS and 7 to placebo. Four weeks after treatment, all participants reported improvement in the UFS-QOL: a mean of 10 points in the MRgFUS group and 9 points in the placebo group (for difference in change between groups). By 12 weeks, the MRgFUS group had improved more than the placebo group (mean 31 points and 13 points, respectively). The mean fibroid volume decreased 18% in the MRgFUS group with no decrease in the placebo group at 12 weeks. Two years after MRgFUS, 4 of 12 women who had a follow-up evaluation (30%) had undergone another fibroid surgery or procedure. CONCLUSION(S) Women with fibroids were willing to enroll in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of MRgFUS. A placebo effect may explain some of the improvement in fibroid-related symptoms observed in the first 12 weeks after MRgFUS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01377519.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| | - Maureen P Kohi
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Liina Poder
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Alison Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jeanette Lager
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Michael Schembri
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Viola Rieke
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Deborah Grady
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Eric Vittinghoff
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Fergus V Coakley
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jacoby VL, Jacoby A, Learman LA, Schembri M, Gregorich SE, Jackson R, Kuppermann M. Use of medical, surgical and complementary treatments among women with fibroids. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 182:220-5. [PMID: 25445104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2014] [Revised: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the use of medical management, uterus-preserving surgery (UPS), and complementary treatments among women with uterine fibroids. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study of 933 premenopausal women ages 31-54 years with symptomatic fibroids who participated in the Study of Pelvic Problems, Hysterectomy, and Intervention Alternatives (SOPHIA) for an average of 4.3 years (SD 2.5 years). Incident use of fibroid treatments was determined through annual interviews. Linear regression models were used to compare changes in fibroid-related symptoms among women who underwent UPS versus those who did not undergo surgery. RESULTS Participants were racially and ethnically diverse, with a mean age of 43 years. During study follow-up, 531 participants (57%) did not undergo UPS or hysterectomy, 250 (27%) had at least one UPS, and 152 (16%) underwent hysterectomy. Complementary and alternative treatments were commonly used, including exercise (45%), diet (34%), herbs (37%), and acupuncture (16%): participants reported significant symptom improvement and few side effects with these interventions. In multivariable linear regression models, women who did not undergo surgery during the study reported improvement in dyspareunia (p<.001), pelvic pain (p<.001), and menstrual cramps (p<.001). However, women who underwent UPS reported greater overall resolution of "pelvic problems" compared with women who did not have surgical treatment (difference in change score 1.18 on a four-point Likert scale, p<.001). CONCLUSION UPS are effective treatments for women with fibroids, but many women use hormonal or complementary treatments and report significant symptom improvement without surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, 1635 Divisadero St, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Alison Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, 1635 Divisadero St, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lee A Learman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Michael Schembri
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, 1635 Divisadero St, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Steven E Gregorich
- Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rebecca Jackson
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, 1635 Divisadero St, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA, USA; Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Miriam Kuppermann
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, 1635 Divisadero St, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA, USA; Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mannis GN, Fehniger JE, Creasman JS, Jacoby VL, Beattie MS. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening in 1077 women after BRCA testing. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173:96-103. [PMID: 23247828 PMCID: PMC4989513 DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For women at potentially increased risk for ovarian cancer, data regarding screening and risk reduction are limited. Previous studies have reported on the behaviors of BRCA mutation carriers, but less is known about the behaviors of non- BRCA carriers. We surveyed a large cohort of women after BRCA testing to identify the prevalence and posttest predictors of risk-reducing and screening interventions. METHODS A median of 3.7 years after BRCA testing, 1447 women who received genetic counseling and BRCA testing at 2 hospital sites were surveyed, with a 77.6% response rate. We analyzed data from 1077 survey respondents. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify predictors of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), screening transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS), and screening serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125). RESULTS Among the respondents, 201 women (18.7%) received positive test results for a deleterious mutation, 103 women (9.6%) received true-negative results, and 773 women (71.8%) received uninformative results. Overall, 19.1% of eligible women underwent RRSO and 39.6% used screening procedures. A positive BRCA result predicted RRSO (odds ratio [OR], 28.1; 95% CI, 16.2-48.6), TVUS (9.5 [4.3-21.0]), and serum CA-125 (13.0 [5.5-29.0]). Similarly, a true-negative BRCA result reduced the OR for RRSO (0.1 [0.0-0.6]), TVUS (0.2 [0.1-0.5]), and serum CA-125 (0.3 [0.1-0.7]). Of the 71.8% of women who received uninformative results after BRCA testing, 12.3% subsequently underwent RRSO, 33.8% reported ever having undergone screening serum CA-125 since BRCA testing, and 37.3% reported ever having undergone screening TVUS since BRCA testing. CONCLUSIONS Results of BRCA testing strongly predict RRSO and ovarian cancer screening. Use of RRSO and ovarian screening was reported in a sizable percentage of non- BRCA carriers despite insufficient data to determine the effectiveness of these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel N Mannis
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M1286, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jacoby VL, Grady D, Wactawski-Wende J, Manson JE, Allison MA, Kuppermann M, Sarto GE, Robbins J, Phillips L, Martin LW, O'Sullivan MJ, Jackson R, Rodabough RJ, Stefanick ML. Oophorectomy vs ovarian conservation with hysterectomy: cardiovascular disease, hip fracture, and cancer in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 171:760-8. [PMID: 21518944 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elective bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is routinely performed with hysterectomy for benign conditions despite conflicting data on long-term outcomes. METHODS This is a prospective cohort of 25 448 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study who had a history of hysterectomy and BSO (n = 14 254 [56.0%]) or hysterectomy with ovarian conservation (n = 11 194 [44.0%]) and no family history of ovarian cancer. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the effect of BSO on incident cardiovascular disease, hip fracture, cancer, and death. RESULTS Current or past use of estrogen and/or progestin was common irrespective of BSO status (78.6% of cohort). In multivariable analyses, BSO was not associated with an increased risk of fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease (hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.18]), coronary artery bypass graft/percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (0.95 [0.82-1.10]), stroke (1.04 [0.87-1.24]), total cardiovascular disease (0.99 [0.91-1.09]), hip fracture (0.83 [0.63-1.10]), or death (0.98 [0.87-1.10]). Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy decreased incident ovarian cancer (0.02% in the BSO group; 0.33% in the ovarian conservation group; number needed to treat, 323) during a mean (SD) follow-up of 7.6 (1.6) years, but there were no significant associations for breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS In this large prospective cohort study, BSO decreased the risk of ovarian cancer compared with hysterectomy and ovarian conservation, but incident ovarian cancer was rare in both groups. Our findings suggest that BSO may not have an adverse effect on cardiovascular health, hip fracture, cancer, or total mortality compared with hysterectomy and ovarian conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Jacoby
- Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Stein JC, Jacoby VL, Vittinghoff E, Wang R, Kwan E, Reynolds T, McAlpine I, Gonzales R. Differential use of diagnostic ultrasound in u.s. Emergency departments by time of day. West J Emerg Med 2011; 12:90-5. [PMID: 21691478 PMCID: PMC3088381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2010] [Revised: 04/06/2010] [Accepted: 04/19/2010] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survey data over the last several decades suggests that emergency department (ED) access to diagnostic ultrasound performed by the radiology department is unreliable, particularly outside of regular business hours. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between the time of day of patient presentation and the use of diagnostic ultrasound services in United States (U.S.) EDs. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of ED patient visits using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for the years 2003 to 2005. Our main outcome measure was the use of diagnostic ultrasound during the ED patient visit as abstracted from the medical record. We performed multivariate analyses to identify any association between ultrasound use and time of presentation for all patients, as well as for two subgroups who are more likely to need ultrasound as part of their routine workup: patients at risk of deep venous thrombosis, and patients at risk for ectopic pregnancy. RESULTS During the three-year period, we analyzed 110,447 patient encounters, representing 39 million national visits. Of all ED visits, 2.6% received diagnostic ultrasound. Presenting to the ED "off hours" (defined as Monday through Friday 7pm to 7am and weekends) was associated with a lower rate of ultrasound use independent of potential confounders (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 - 0.82). Patients at increased risk of deep venous thrombosis who presented to the ED during "off hours" were also less likely to undergo diagnostic ultrasound (OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15 - 0.79). Similarly, patients at increased risk of ectopic pregnancy received fewer diagnostic ultrasounds during "off hours" (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35 - 0.91). CONCLUSION In U.S. EDs, ultrasound use was lower during "off hours," even among patient populations where its use would be strongly indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C. Stein
- Address for Correspondence: John Stein, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143. Email
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Stein JC, Wang R, Adler N, Boscardin J, Jacoby VL, Won G, Goldstein R, Kohn MA. Emergency Physician Ultrasonography for Evaluating Patients at Risk for Ectopic Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 56:674-83. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.06.563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2010] [Revised: 06/03/2010] [Accepted: 06/28/2010] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
31
|
Jacoby VL, Fujimoto VY, Giudice LC, Kuppermann M, Washington AE. Racial and ethnic disparities in benign gynecologic conditions and associated surgeries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:514-21. [PMID: 20430357 PMCID: PMC4625911 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2009] [Revised: 01/24/2010] [Accepted: 02/15/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Common gynecologic conditions and surgeries may vary significantly by race or ethnicity. Uterine fibroid tumors are more prevalent in black women, and black women may have larger, more numerous fibroid tumors that cause worse symptoms and greater myomectomy complications. Some, but not all, studies have found a higher prevalence of endometriosis among Asian women. Race and ethnicity are also associated with hysterectomy rate, route, and complications. Overall, the current literature has significant deficits in the identification of racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of fibroid tumors, endometriosis, and hysterectomy. Further research is needed to better define racial and ethnic differences in these conditions and to examine the complex mechanisms that may result in associated health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dehlendorf C, Bryant AS, Huddleston HG, Jacoby VL, Fujimoto VY. Health disparities: definitions and measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:212-3. [PMID: 20207236 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2009] [Accepted: 12/03/2009] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
33
|
Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:1041-1048. [PMID: 20168105 PMCID: PMC4640820 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181b9d222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 196] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine factors associated with undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy or vaginal hysterectomy. METHODS This is a cross-sectional analysis of the 2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. All women aged 18 years or older who underwent hysterectomy for a benign condition were included. Multivariable analyses were used to examine demographic, clinical, and health-system factors associated with each hysterectomy route. RESULTS Among 518,828 hysterectomies, 14% were laparoscopic, 64% abdominal, and 22% vaginal. Women older than 35 years had lower rates of laparoscopic than abdominal (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.94 for age 45-49 years) or vaginal hysterectomy (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.540.69 for age 45-49 years). The odds of laparoscopic compared with abdominal hysterectomy were higher in the West than in the Northeast (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.2-2.62). African-American, Latina, and Asian women had 40-50% lower odds of laparoscopic compared with abdominal hysterectomy (P<.001). Women with low income, Medicare, Medicaid, or no health insurance were less likely to undergo laparoscopic than either vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy (P<.001). Women with leiomyomas (P<.001) and pelvic infections (P<.001) were less likely to undergo laparoscopic than abdominal hysterectomy. Women with leiomyomas (P<.001), endometriosis (P<.001), or pelvic infections (P<.001) were more likely to have laparoscopic than vaginal hysterectomy. Laparoscopic hysterectomy had the highest mean hospital charges ($18,821, P<.001) and shortest length of stay (1.65 days, P<.001). CONCLUSION In addition to age and clinical diagnosis, nonclinical factors such as race/ethnicity, insurance status, income, and region appear to affect use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Jacoby
- From the University of California, San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jacoby VL, Vittinghoff E, Nakagawa S, Jackson R, Richter HE, Chan J, Kuppermann M. Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:1259-1267. [PMID: 19461420 PMCID: PMC4670026 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181a66c42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify possible factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) at the time of hysterectomy among women with benign conditions. METHODS This was a cross-sectional analysis using the 2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Women aged 18 years or older who underwent hysterectomy with BSO or hysterectomy only for a benign condition were included. We examined a broad range of factors associated with undergoing BSO in multivariable analyses. RESULTS Fifty-two percent of 461,321 hysterectomies included BSO, with a mean age of 49 years compared with 43 years in the hysterectomy-only group (P<.001). The odds of BSO were two times higher in the Midwest and South and 1.67 times higher in the West as compared with the Northeast (P<.001). Women who were uninsured or had Medicaid were more likely to undergo BSO compared with those with private insurance (odds ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.14-3.04 for "no charge/charity," odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.35 for Medicaid) Although BSO was more common among white women than African-American, Latina, and Asian women (P<.001), lower income was associated with BSO among African-American and white women only, not among Asian and Latina women (P=.007 for test for interaction). BSO was eight times as likely with a laparoscopic hysterectomy and 12 times as likely with an abdominal hysterectomy compared with a vaginal approach (P<.001). Women who had endometriosis, pelvic infection, or an ovarian cyst were more likely to undergo BSO (P<.001) compared with women who did not have these diagnoses. CONCLUSION There is significant nationwide variation in the practice of BSO. Age, route of hysterectomy, and diagnosis at surgery affect BSO rates. Nonclinical factors such as race or ethnicity, insurance status, income, and geographic location are also associated with BSO practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Jacoby
- From the Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Stein JC, River G, Kalika I, Hebig A, Price D, Jacoby VL, Filly R. A survey of bedside ultrasound use by emergency physicians in California. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28:757-763. [PMID: 19470816 DOI: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.6.757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the current practice of emergency physician-performed bedside ultrasound examinations in California and to assess differences between academic and community practice. METHODS We queried all emergency departments (EDs) in California to determine whether bedside ultrasound was used by emergency physicians. Among EDs that were using bedside ultrasound, we administered a survey to assess use patterns, credentialing criteria, and quality assurance (QA) programs. RESULTS We contacted all eligible EDs (n = 293) by telephone and had a 100% response rate for our primary question: 101 EDs (34%) reported use of bedside ultrasound. Of these 101 EDs, 97 (96%) responded to the secondary survey, showing the following: (1) 48% of physicians at each site were credentialed to use ultrasound in at least 1 modality; (2) 70% of EDs used American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) criteria for credentialing guidelines; and (3) 33% had an ultrasound QA program. Comparing practice settings, 68% of academic departments used bedside ultrasound compared with 29% of community departments (difference, 39%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 23% to 54%; P < .0001). In academic departments, a mean of 60% of physicians were credentialed, compared with 41% in community EDs (difference, 19%; 95% CI, 2.5% to 35%; P = .036). CONCLUSIONS Most California EDs do not use bedside ultrasound. Although most EDs using ultrasound report that they follow ACEP emergency ultrasound guidelines, most do not have a QA program as recommended by these guidelines. Compared with community EDs, academic EDs are more likely to use bedside ultrasound, have physicians credentialed in ultrasound use, and have QA programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Stein
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California, 505 Parnassus Ave, Box 0208, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jacoby VL, Grady D, Sawaya GF. Oophorectomy as a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:140.e1-9. [PMID: 19019330 PMCID: PMC2770431 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2008] [Revised: 05/27/2008] [Accepted: 08/20/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to examine the relationship between bilateral oophorectomy (BSO) and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). STUDY DESIGN We searched PubMed, EMBASE, meeting abstracts, and reference lists for studies that compared women with BSO at the time of hysterectomy with: (1) women with hysterectomy and ovarian conservation, (2) naturally menopausal women, (3) premenopausal women, or (4) women with no history of hysterectomy or BSO but unreported menopausal status. The primary outcome was fatal or nonfatal CHD. RESULTS We reviewed 1956 citations. Seven observational studies met inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity among studies precluded formal metaanalysis. Four studies reported BSO increases risk for CHD but only in some subgroups of women or not in fully adjusted multivariate models. Three studies found no increased risk of CHD following BSO, but these studies had significant limitations. CONCLUSION The existing evidence is inconclusive to determine the effect of BSO on risk of CHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the prevalence, natural history, and predictors of hot flushes in older postmenopausal women. METHODS Prevalence, severity, and 3-year change in severity of hot flushes were assessed by questionnaire in 3167 older postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Logistic regression was used to identify characteristics associated with symptoms at baseline and after 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS At baseline, 375 women (11.8%) reported bothersome hot flushes. Women were more likely to have baseline symptoms if they were less educated (odds ratio [OR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.53 per 4-year decrease), more recently menopausal (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.34-1.56 per 5-year decrease), had previously used estrogen (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.23-2.00), or had undergone hysterectomy (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.14-1.99). Hot flushes were also associated with higher body mass index (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.38 per 1 SD), higher follicle-stimulating hormone levels (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.20-1.51 per 1 SD), lower high-density lipoprotein levels (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.34 per 1 SD decrease), vaginal dryness (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.19-1.93), and trouble sleeping (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.94-3.16), but not estradiol levels. Of the 375 women with baseline symptoms, 278 contributed 3-year data, and 157 (56.5%) of these women reported persistent symptoms after 3 years. Fewer years since menopause (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.32 per 5-year decrease) and trouble sleeping (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.19-3.26) were associated with symptom persistence. CONCLUSIONS For a substantial minority of women, hot flushes are a persistent source of discomfort into the late postmenopausal years. Identification of risk factors for hot flushes may help guide evaluation and treatment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison J Huang
- Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|