IL-27 induces an IFN-like signature in murine macrophages which in turn modulate colonic epithelium

Mucosal delivery of IL-27 has been shown to have a therapeutic benefit in murine models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The IL-27 effect was associated with phosphorylated STAT1 (pSTAT1), a product of IL27 receptor signaling, in bowel tissue. To determine whether IL-27 acted directly on colonic epithelium, murine colonoids and primary intact colonic crypts were shown to be unresponsive to IL-27 in vitro and to lack detectable IL-27 receptors. On the other hand, macrophages, which are present in inflamed colon tissue, were responsive to IL-27 in vitro. IL-27 induced pSTAT1 in macrophages, the transcriptome indicated an IFN-like signature, and supernatants induced pSTAT1 in colonoids. IL-27 induced anti-viral activity in macrophages and MHC Class II induction. We conclude that the effects of mucosal delivery of IL-27 in murine IBD are in part based on the known effects of IL27 inducing immunosuppression of T cells mediated by IL-10. We also conclude that IL-27 has potent effects on macrophages in inflamed colon tissue, generating mediators that in turn act on colonic epithelium.

Correlation between Type I Interferon Associated Factors and COVID-19 Severity

Antiviral type I interferons (IFN) produced in the early phase of viral infections effectively inhibit viral replication, prevent virus-mediated tissue damages and promote innate and adaptive immune responses that are all essential to the successful elimination of viruses. As professional type I IFN producing cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) have the ability to rapidly produce waste amounts of type I IFNs. Therefore, their low frequency, dysfunction or decreased capacity to produce type I IFNs might increase the risk of severe viral infections. In accordance with that, declined pDC numbers and delayed or inadequate type I IFN responses could be observed in patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), as compared to individuals with mild or no symptoms. Thus, besides chronic diseases, all those conditions, which negatively affect the antiviral IFN responses lengthen the list of risk factors for severe COVID-19. In the current review, we would like to briefly discuss the role and dysregulation of pDC/type I IFN axis in COVID-19, and introduce those type I IFN-dependent factors, which account for an increased risk of COVID-19 severity and thus are responsible for the different magnitude of individual immune responses to SARS-CoV-2.

Effect of Myd88 deficiency on gene expression profiling in salivary glands of female non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice

OBJECTIVES

Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammatory lesions in the salivary and lacrimal glands, which are caused by distinct lymphocytic infiltrates. Female non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice spontaneously develop inflammatory lesions of the salivary glands with SS-like pathological features. Previous studies have shown that MyD88, a crucial adaptor protein that activates innate immune signaling, affects lymphocytic infiltration, but its detailed role remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the role of MyD88 through gene expression profiling in the early phase of pathogenesis in the salivary glands of female NOD mice.

METHODS

Submandibular glands collected from 10-week-old female wild-type and Myd88-deficient NOD mice were used for RNA preparation, followed by microarray analysis. The microarray dataset was analyzed to identify Myd88-dependent differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Data generated were used for GO enrichment, KEGG pathway, STRING database, and INTERFEROME database analyses.

RESULTS

Myd88 deficiency was found to affect 230 DEGs, including SS-associated genes, such as Cxcl9 and Bpifa2. Most of the DEGs were identified as being involved in immunological processes. KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the DEGs were putatively involved in autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, the DEGs included 149 interferon (IFN)-regulated genes.

CONCLUSIONS

MyD88 is involved in the expression of specific genes associated with IFN-associated immunopathological processes in the salivary glands of NOD mice. Our findings are important for understanding the role of MyD88-dependent innate immune signaling in SS manifestation.

Type I interferons as key players in pancreatic β-cell dysfunction in type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by pancreatic islet inflammation (insulitis) and specific pancreatic β-cell destruction by an immune attack. Although the precise underlying mechanisms leading to the autoimmune assault remain poorly understood, it is well accepted that insulitis takes place in the context of a conflicting dialogue between pancreatic β-cells and the immune cells. Moreover, both host genetic background (i.e., candidate genes) and environmental factors (e.g., viral infections) contribute to this inadequate dialogue. Accumulating evidence indicates that type I interferons (IFNs), cytokines that are crucial for both innate and adaptive immune responses, act as key links between environmental and genetic risk factors in the development of T1D. This chapter summarizes some relevant pathways involved in β-cell dysfunction and death, and briefly reviews how enteroviral infections and genetic susceptibility can impact insulitis. Moreover, we present the current evidence showing that, in β-cells, type I IFN signaling pathway activation leads to several outcomes, such as long-lasting major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I hyperexpression, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, epigenetic changes, and induction of posttranscriptional as well as posttranslational modifications. MHC class I overexpression, when combined with ER stress and posttranscriptional/posttranslational modifications, might lead to sustained neoantigen presentation to immune system and β-cell apoptosis. This knowledge supports the concept that type I IFNs are implicated in the early stages of T1D pathogenesis. Finally, we highlight the promising therapeutic avenues for T1D treatment directed at type I IFN signaling pathway.

Primary Sjogren Syndrome: Focus on Innate Immune Cells and Inflammation

Primary Sjogren Syndrome (pSS) is a complex, multifactorial rheumatic disease that mainly targets salivary and lacrimal glands, inducing epithelitis. The cause behind the autoimmunity outbreak in pSS is still elusive; however, it seems related to an aberrant reaction to exogenous triggers such as viruses, combined with individual genetic pre-disposition. For a long time, autoantibodies were considered as the hallmarks of this disease; however, more recently the complex interplay between innate and adaptive immunity as well as the consequent inflammatory process have emerged as the main mechanisms of pSS pathogenesis. The present review will focus on innate cells and on the principal mechanisms of inflammation connected. In the first part, an overview of innate cells involved in pSS pathogenesis is provided, stressing in particular the role of Innate Lymphoid Cells (ILCs). Subsequently we have highlighted the main inflammatory pathways, including intra- and extra-cellular players. A better knowledge of such processes could determine the detection of new therapeutic targets that are a major need for pSS.

Innate immunity and interferons in the pathogenesis of Sjögren's syndrome

Primary SS (pSS) is a rheumatic disease characterized by an immune-mediated exocrinopathy, resulting in severe dryness of eyes and mouth. Systemic symptoms include fatigue and joint pain and a subset of patients develop more severe disease with multi-organ involvement. Accumulating evidence points to involvement of innate immunity and aberrant activity of the type I IFN system in both the initiation and propagation of this disease. Analysis of the activity of IFN-inducible genes has evidenced that more than half of pSS patients present with a so-called 'type I IFN signature'. In this review, we examine activation of the IFN system in pSS patients and how this may drive autoimmunity through various immune cells. We further discuss the clinical value of assessing IFN activity as a biomarker in pSS patients and review novel therapies targeting IFN signalling and their potential use in pSS.

IRF4 and IRGs Delineate Clinically Relevant Gene Expression Signatures in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Introduction: Overactivation of the type I interferon (IFN) signature has been observed in several systemic autoimmune conditions, such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) or Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Impaired control of Interferon-Responding Genes (IRGs) expression by their regulatory mechanisms, including Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs), may underlie these findings and it may explain the heterogeneity observed among these conditions. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the associations between IRF4 gene expression and those of IRGs in SLE and RA patients to gain insight about its links with the IFN signature as well as to explore the potential clinical relevance of these associations.

Methods: The gene expression of IRF4 and IRGs (IFI44, IFI44L, IFI6, and MX1) in peripheral blood was analyzed in 75 SLE patients, 98 RA patients, and 28 healthy controls. A group of 13 biological-naïve RA patients was prospectively followed upon TNFα-blockade. The associations among IRF4 and IRGs were evaluated by principal component analyses (PCA), correlations and network analyses. Publicly available datasets were used for replication.

Results: A broad activation of IRGs was observed in autoimmune patients, although certain heterogeneity can be distinguished, whereas IRF4 was only upregulated in RA. The differential expression of IRF4 in RA was then confirmed in publicly available gene expression datasets. PCA revealed different associations among IRF4 and IRGs in each condition, which was later confirmed by correlation and network analyses. Cluster analysis identified 3 gene expression signatures on the basis of IRF4 and IRGs expression which were differentially used by SLE and RA patients. Cluster III was associated with markers of disease severity in SLE patients. Cluster II, hallmarked by IRF4 upregulation, was linked to clinical stage and mild disease course in RA. TNFα-blockade led to changes in the association between IRF4 and IRGs, whereas increasing IRF4 expression was associated with a good clinical outcome in RA.

Conclusions: The differential expression of IRF4 and IRGs observed in SLE and RA can delineate gene expression signatures associated with clinical features and treatment outcomes. These results support a clinically-relevant phenomenon of shaping of the IFN signature by IRF4 in autoimmune patients.

Comparison of RT-qPCR and Nanostring in the measurement of blood interferon response for the diagnosis of type I interferonopathies

Type I interferonopathies are characterized by an increase of circulating type I interferon (IFN) concentration. Type I interferonopathies refer to rare Mendelian genetic disorders such as Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome (AGS) as well as more frequent and polygenic auto-immune diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Yet, detection of type I IFN in these patients remains challenging as its amount is usually very low in patients' sera. Thus, the detection of interferon-stimulating genes has been proposed as an alternative for the detection of this cytokine but sensitivy, specificity and predictive values of the assay have not been reported so far. In this study, we propose two different methods based on Nanostring or RT-qPCR to measure in the clinical routine the IFN response, defined as a set of transcripts that are systemically induced by IFNs. The IFN signature is composed of 6 IFN stimulated genes (ISGs) and has a strong predictive value for the diagnosis of type I interferonopathies. The use of this simple test might represent a gold standard for the evaluation of various autoimmune diseases. Moreover, this test could also be used to monitor patients treated with drugs targeting type I IFN pathway. When comparing both methods - Nanostring and qPCR - in terms of analytical performance, they provided similar results but Nanostring was quicker, easier to multiplex, and almost fully-automated, which represent a more reliable assay for the daily clinical practice.

Heterogeneity of the Type I Interferon Signature in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Potential Limitation for Its Use As a Clinical Biomarker

INTRODUCTION

An increased expression of interferon (IFN)-responding genes (IRGs), the so-called IFN signature, has been reported in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some controversy exists concerning its clinical relevance. The main aim of this study is to evaluate whether quantitative and qualitative differences in the activation of the IFN pathway may account for these findings.

METHODS

The expression of IFN-induced protein 44 (IFI44), IFN-induced protein 44 like (IFI44L), IFN alpha inducible protein 6, and MX dynamin-like GTPase 1 (MX1) was determined in peripheral blood in 98 RA patients (IFI6) and 28 controls. RA patients were classified into groups according to their clinical stage and treatments received: very early RA (VERA), biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) naive, and bDMARD. An additional group of 13 RA patients candidates for tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) blockade was also recruited. The associations among IRGs were evaluated by network and principal component analyses.

RESULTS

The expression of all IRGs was increased in RA to different levels. The IFN score was increased in all RA groups (VERA, bDMARD-naïve, and bDMARD), but important differences in their degree of activation and in the relationships among IRGs were observed. The IFN score correlated with the accumulated disease activity score 28-joints, and it was found to be a predictor of clinical outcome in VERA. No differences in the IFN score were observed between the bDMARD-naive and bDMARD groups, but opposite associations with the clinical parameters were noted. Interestingly, the correlations among IRGs delineate different pictures between these two groups. The IFN score at baseline predicted poor clinical outcome upon TNFα blockade. Although no absolute changes in the IFN score were found, TNFα-blockade shifted the associations among IRGs.

CONCLUSION

A certain heterogeneity within the IFN signature can be recognized in RA, depending on the clinical stage. The structure of the IFN signature may be a potential explanation for the controversy in this field and must be considered to decipher its clinical relevancein RA.

NK cell and IFN signatures are positive prognostic biomarkers for resectable pancreatic cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495:2058-2065. [PMID: 29253566 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.12.083]

To establish prognostic biomarkers and to identify potential novel therapeutic targets, we performed integrative immunomonitoring of blood and tumor in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Flow cytometry (FC) was employed for phenotyping immune cells, multiplex bead assays for plasma cytokine and chemokine determination, and RNA-Seq for the analysis of gene expression in the tumor. Nineteen pancreatic cancer patients were stratified into those with longer or shorter than median recurrence-free survival after surgery (median, 426 days). There were no significant differences between the two groups for clinical parameters including age, sex, surgical procedure, stage, or postoperative adjuvant therapy. However, we found that the percentages of NK cells as assessed by FC in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were higher in patients with late recurrence (P = .037). RNA-Seq data indicated no differences in the amount of immune cells or stromal cells between the two groups, although NK cells in the tumor did tend to be higher in patients with late recurrence (P = .058). Type I and II IFN signatures were enriched in late-recurring tumors (FDR q-value <0.001), while genes related to KRAS signaling and the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) were enriched in early recurrence. We conclude that tumor-intrinsic properties of metastasis and recurrence influence prognosis, whereas NK cells that might contribute to prevent metastasis are associated with longer recurrence-free survival. Therefore, enhancement of NK cell activity and inhibition of the EMT and KRAS signaling might represent appropriate therapeutic targets following surgical resection of pancreatic cancer.

Muscle myeloid type I interferon gene expression may predict therapeutic responses to rituximab in myositis patients

OBJECTIVE

To identify muscle gene expression patterns that predict rituximab responses and assess the effects of rituximab on muscle gene expression in PM and DM.

METHODS

In an attempt to understand the molecular mechanism of response and non-response to rituximab therapy, we performed Affymetrix gene expression array analyses on muscle biopsy specimens taken before and after rituximab therapy from eight PM and two DM patients in the Rituximab in Myositis study. We also analysed selected muscle-infiltrating cell phenotypes in these biopsies by immunohistochemical staining. Partek and Ingenuity pathway analyses assessed the gene pathways and networks.

RESULTS

Myeloid type I IFN signature genes were expressed at higher levels at baseline in the skeletal muscle of rituximab responders than in non-responders, whereas classic non-myeloid IFN signature genes were expressed at higher levels in non-responders at baseline. Also, rituximab responders have a greater reduction of the myeloid and non-myeloid type I IFN signatures than non-responders. The decrease in the type I IFN signature following administration of rituximab may be associated with the decreases in muscle-infiltrating CD19(+) B cells and CD68(+) macrophages in responders.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that high levels of myeloid type I IFN gene expression in skeletal muscle predict responses to rituximab in PM/DM and that rituximab responders also have a greater decrease in the expression of these genes. These data add further evidence to recent studies defining the type I IFN signature as both a predictor of therapeutic responses and a biomarker of myositis disease activity.