Complementary effects of dapagliflozin and lobeglitazone on metabolism in a diet-induced obese mouse model

Thiazolidinedione, an insulin sensitizer, has beneficial effects on glucose metabolism; however, there are concerns regarding weight gain and heart failure. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors can reduce body weight, increase diuresis, and play a protective role in heart failure. We examined the complementary effects of dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, and lobeglitazone, a thiazolidinedione, in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mice. We treated HFD-induced obese mice with vehicle, dapagliflozin, lobeglitazone, and their combination for 12 weeks. Oral glucose tolerance and insulin tolerance tests were performed after 12-week treatment, and body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before and after treatment. We analyzed oxygen consumption rate (OCR) using 3T3-L1 cells after treatment of β-hydroxybutyrate and/or lobeglitazone. Treatment with a combination of dapagliflozin and lobeglitazone resulted in a significant decrease in postprandial hyperglycemia compared with dapagliflozin monotherapy, but not compared with lobeglitazone monotherapy. The addition of dapagliflozin to lobeglitazone treatment did not attenuate weight gain compared with lobeglitazone monotherapy in this study. However, this combination prevented the increase of organ weight of liver and heart, and OCR in 3T3-L1 cells was increased after treatment with a combination of β-hydroxybutyrate and lobeglitazone compared to lobeglitazone monotherapy. We confirmed the beneficial effect of lobeglitazone on glucose metabolism; however, we did not find any beneficial effect of dapagliflozin on body weight in HFD-induced obese mice. However, the protective effects of dapagliflozin and lobeglitazone combined therapy on the liver, heart, energy consumption, and β-cell senescence are worth investigating in clinical trials.

Comparison of therapeutic efficacy and safety of sitagliptin, dapagliflozin, or lobeglitazone adjunct therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on sulfonylurea and metformin: Third agent study

AIMS

Compare the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin, dapagliflozin, and lobeglitazone in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, despite metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.

METHODS

The study randomized patients into three groups, receiving sitagliptin 100 mg, dapagliflozin 10 mg, or lobeglitazone 0.5 mg daily (n = 26 each) and monitored changes in biochemical parameters and body composition for 24 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was changes in HbA1c at 24 months.

RESULTS

The mean change in HbA1c in the sitagliptin, dapagliflozin, and lobeglitazone groups was -0.81 ± 0.21%, -1.05 ± 0.70%, and -1.08 ± 0.98%, after 24 months. Dapagliflozin treatment significantly lowered systolic blood pressure by 5.5 mmHg and alanine aminotransferase levels. Dapagliflozin and lobeglitazone treatment significantly reduced proteinuria and insulin resistance. Dapagliflozin decreased whole body fat percentage by 1.2%, whereas sitagliptin and lobeglitazone increased it by 1.1% and 1.8%, respectively. Whole body muscle percentage increased in the dapagliflozin group and decreased in the lobeglitazone group. The safety profiles of the three treatments were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

All three drugs displayed good glucose-lowering efficacy and comparable safety profiles. However, dapagliflozin therapy produced favorable changes in body composition. Dapagliflozin may be a suitable adjunct therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes seeking to improve their body composition.

Efficacy and Safety of Novel Thiazolidinedione Rivoglitazone in Type-2 Diabetes a Meta-Analysis

No meta-analysis has analyzed the safety and efficacy of rivoglitazone in type-2 diabetes (T2DM). We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving T2DM patients receiving rivoglitazone in the intervention arm, and placebo/active comparator in the control arm. The primary outcome was to evaluate changes in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in glucose, lipids, and adverse events. From initially screened 24 articles, data from 3 RCTs (3591 patients) that fulfilled all criteria was analzsed. HbA1c was significantly lower with standard-dose (1 mg/d) [MD-0.86% (95%CI:-1.11--0.61); P < 0.01; I2 = 87%] and high-dose (1.5-2 mg/d) [MD-0.97%(95%CI:-1.03--0.90); P < 0.01; I2 = 19%] rivoglitazone compared to placebo. When compared to pioglitazone (30-45 mg/d), HbA1c lowering was comparable with standard-dose [MD 0.05%(95%CI:-0.01 - 0.11); P = 0.08; I2 = 11%], but superior with high-dose [MD -0.11%(95%CI:-0.18- -0.04); P < 0.01; I2 = 0%] rivoglitazone. Triglycerides were significantly lower with standard-dose [MD-17.95 mg/dl (95%CI:-34.23--1.66); P = 0.03; I2 = 0%] and high-dose [MD-40.41 mg/dl (95%CI:-72.90- -7.93);P = 0.01;I2 = 71%] rivoglitazone compared to placebo. Adiponectin significantly improved with standard-dose [MD 7.94 ng/ml (95%CI: 5.48-10.39); P < 0.01;I2 = 98%] and high-dose [MD 13.82 ng/ml (95%CI: 8.16-19.48); P < 0.01; I2 = 100%] rivoglitazone compared to placebo. hsCRP was significantly lower with standard-dose [MD -1.00 mg/L (95% CI: -1.20 - -0.80); P < 0.01; I2 = 6%] and high-dose [MD -1.50 mg/L (95%CI:-1.59- -1.40); P < 0.01; I2 = 0%] rivoglitazone compared to placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events with standard-dose [Risk ratio (RR) 1.16 (95%CI: 0.84 -1.60); P = 0.38; I2 = 0%] and high-dose [RR1.34 (95%CI: 0.99-1.83); P = 0.06; I2 = 0%] rivoglitazone was comparable to placebo. Severe adverse events with standard-dose [RR1.88 (95%CI: 0.69-5.12);P = 0.22;I2 = 0%] and high-dose [RR 1.27 (95% CI: 0.45 - 3.59); P = 0.68; I2 = 0%] rivoglitazone was comparable to placebo. This meta-analysis highlights the good glycaemic efficacy and safety of both standard and high-dose rivoglitazone, and appears to be better than lobeglitazone in T2DM.

Lobeglitazone, a novel thiazolidinedione, for secondary prevention in patients with ischemic stroke: a nationwide nested case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Ischemic stroke patients with diabetes are at high risk for recurrent stroke and cardiovascular complications. Pioglitazone, a type of thiazolidinedione, has been shown to reduce cardiovascular complications in patients with ischemic stroke and type 2 diabetes (T2D) or insulin resistance. Lobeglitazone is a novel thiazolidinedione agent that improves insulin resistance and has similar glycemic efficacy to pioglitazone. Using population-based health claims data, we evaluated whether lobeglitazone has secondary cardiovascular preventive effects in patients with ischemic stroke and T2D.

METHODS

This study has a nested case-control design. From nationwide health claims data in Korea, we identified patients with T2D admitted for acute ischemic stroke in 2014-2018. Cases were defined who suffered the primary outcome (a composite of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death) before December 2020. Three controls were selected by incidence density sampling for each case from those who were at risk at the time of their case occurrence with exact matching on sex, age, the presence of comorbidities, and medications. As a safety outcome, we also evaluated the risk of heart failure (HF) according to the use of lobeglitazone.

RESULTS

From the cohort of 70,897 T2D patients with acute ischemic stroke, 20,869 cases and 62,607 controls were selected. In the multivariable conditional logistic regression, treatment with lobeglitazone (adjusted OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.90; p = 0.002) and pioglitazone (adjusted OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.64-0.78; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with a lower risk for the primary outcome. In a safety outcome analysis for HF, treatment with lobeglitazone did not increase the risk of HF (adjusted OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.66-1.22; p = 0.492).

CONCLUSIONS

In T2D patients with ischemic stroke, lobeglitazone reduced the risk of cardiovascular complications similar to that of pioglitazone without an increased risk of HF. There is a need for further studies on the cardioprotective role of lobeglitazone, a novel thiazolidinedione.

Will lobeglitazone rival pioglitazone? A systematic review and critical appraisal

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lobeglitazone (LGZ), a newly researched thiazolidinedione (TZD) thought to have lesser side effects compared with pioglitazone (PGZ), has been recently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in India. We aim to conduct an updated systematic review of LGZ to critically appraise its efficacy and safety in the context of PGZ.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out in the electronic database of PubMed until Jan 15, 2023, using specific keywords and MeSH terms. All studies which evaluated LGZ in people with T2D were retrieved and data were synthesized with regard to its efficacy and safety. A comparative critical appraisal was additionally made in the context of PGZ in T2D.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled, one prospective observational, and two real-world studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of LGZ against placebo or active comparators either as monotherapy or in combination therapy. HbA1c reduction with LGZ 0.5 mg was superior to the placebo but similar to PGZ 15 mg and sitagliptin (SITA) 100 mg. Weight gain with LGZ was significantly higher compared to placebo and SITA but similar to PGZ. Edema was more frequently observed with LGZ compared to placebo, PGZ, and SITA.

CONCLUSION

No substantial evidence is yet available that suggests LGZ could be a better alternative to PGZ both in the context of glycemic or extra-glycemic effects. At least in the short-term, adverse events of LGZ are indifferent from PGZ. More data is additionally needed to claim any advantage of LGZ over PGZ.

Efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone, a new Thiazolidinedione, as compared to the standard of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone as compared to the standard of care (SOC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

Databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the comparison of the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level after 24 weeks. Pooled mean differences and odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Of 267 studies that were screened, four were included. Treatment with adjunct lobeglitazone showed a reduction in the HbA1C level [mean difference: -0.23% (95% CI: -0.62 to 0.16); p = 0.24; i²: 87%; moderate GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and. Evaluation) of evidence], fasting blood glucose level [mean difference: -7.12 mg/dl (95% CI: -20.09 to 5.85); p = 0.28; i²: 87%; moderate GRADE of evidence], and lipid profile as compared to those following treatment with the SOC; however, the changes were not statistically significant. The risk of hypoglycemia was significantly lower [odds ratio: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.70); p < 0.05; i²: 0%; moderate GRADE of evidence] without any significant difference in the risk of drug-related adverse events [odds ratio: 1.59 (95% CI: 0.87 to 2.93); p = 0.13; i²: 0%; moderate GRADE of evidence] following treatment with lobeglitazone as compared to those following treatment with the SOC.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with adjunct lobeglitazone showed changes in the blood glycemic status and lipid profile similar to SOC in patients with T2DM, and the results were not statistically significant. Lobeglitazone was well tolerated; its safety profile was comparable to SOC.

Efficacy and safety of novel thiazolidinedione lobeglitazone for managing type-2 diabetes a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

No meta-analysis has analysed the safety and efficacy of lobeglitazone in type-2 diabetes (T2DM). We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge-gap.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving type-2 diabetes patients receiving lobeglitazone in intervention arm, and placebo/active comparator in control arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate changes in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in glucose, lipids and adverse events.

RESULTS

From initially screened 65 articles, data from 4 RCTs (828 patients) which fulfilled all criteria was analysed. Over 24 weeks, when compared to sitagliptin 100 mg/d and half maximal pioglitazone dose (15 mg/d), lobeglitazone 0.5 mg/day had comparable impact on HbA1c [MD 0.03% (95%CI: 0.11-0.17); P = 0.65; I2 = 0%], fasting glucose [MD 1.47 mg/dl (95%CI: 4.66-7.60); P = 0.64; I2 = 0%], triglycerides [MD-9.96 mg/dl (95%CI: 43.55-23.62); P = 0.56; I2 = 81%], LDL-cholesterol [MD0.74 mg/dl (95%CI: 4.60-6.09); P = 0.79; I2 = 0%] and HDL-cholesterol [MD1.55 mg/dl (95%CI: 3.72-6.82); P = 0.56]. Occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) [RR 1.07 (95% CI:0.78-1.47); P = 0.67; I2 = 0%] and severe AEs [RR 1.05(95%CI: 0.42-2.65); P = 0.91; I2 = 0%] were similar. Edema and weight gain were significantly higher with lobeglitazone compared to controls [RR 2.58 (95%CI: 1.08-6.17); P = 0.03; I2 = 0%]. Lobeglitazone 0.5 mg/d compared to half-maximal pioglitazone (15 mg/d), had similar edema and weight gain [RR 1.65 95% CI: 0.78-1.47)]. BMD percent changes at neck of femur was comparable in both groups [MD 0.07% (95%CI: 0.19-0.33); P = 0.60; I2 = 91%]. Low dose lobeglitazone (0.25 mg/d) was inferior to high dose lobeglitazone (0.5 mg/d) with regards to glycaemic efficacy with advantage of lower weight gain and edema.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence makes lobeglitazone unlikely to replace pioglitazone as the preferred thiazolidinedione in T2DM.

A Real-World Study of Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Lobeglitazone in Korean Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have been associated with various safety concerns including weight gain, bladder cancer, and congestive heart failure (CHF). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone, a novel TZD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in real practice.

METHODS

In this non-interventional, multi-center, retrospective, and observational study conducted at 15 tertiary or secondary referral hospitals in Korea, a total of 2,228 patients with T2DM who received lobeglitazone 0.5 mg for more than 1 year were enrolled.

RESULTS

Overall adverse events (AEs) occurred in 381 patients (17.10%) including edema in 1.97% (n=44). Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases were identified in 0.81% (n=18) and 0.81% (n=18), respectively. One case of CHF was reported as an AE. Edema occurred in 1.97% (n=44) of patients. Hypoglycemia occurred in 2.47% (n=55) of patients. Fracture occurred in 1.17% (n=26) of all patients. Lobeglitazone significantly decreased HbA1c level, resulting in a mean treatment difference of -1.05%± 1.35% (P<0.001), and decreased total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, it increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, regardless of statin administration. The patients who received lobeglitazone 0.5 mg showed an apparent reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline during the first 6 months of treatment. The HbA1c levels remained stable between months 6 and 42.

CONCLUSION

Lobeglitazone has long-term safety profile, good glycemic-lowering effect and long-term durability of glycemic control in real-world clinical settings.

Lobeglitazone attenuates fibrosis in corneal fibroblasts by interrupting TGF-beta-mediated Smad signaling

PURPOSE

Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) is an important cytokine released after ocular surface injury to promote wound healing. However, its persistence at the injury site triggers a fibrotic response that leads to corneal scarring and opacity. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are synthetic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) ligands used to regulate glucose and lipid metabolism in the management of type 2 diabetes. Studies have also showed TZDs have antifibrotic effect. In this study, we investigated the antifibrotic effect of the TZD lobeglitazone on TGF-β1-induced fibrosis in corneal fibroblasts.

METHODS

Human primary corneal fibroblasts were cultivated and treated with TGF-β1 (5 ng/mL) to induce fibrosis, with or without pre-treatments with different concentrations of lobeglitazone. Myofibroblast differentiation and extracellular matrix (ECM) protein expression was evaluated by western blotting, immunofluorescence, real-time PCR, and collagen gel contraction assay. The effect of lobeglitazone on TGF-β1-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation was evaluated by DCFDA-cellular ROS detection assay kit. Signaling proteins were evaluated by western blotting to determine the mechanism underlying the antifibrotic effect.

RESULTS

Our results showed lobeglitazone attenuated TGF-β1-induced ECM synthesis and myofibroblast differentiation of corneal fibroblasts. This antifibrotic effect appeared to be independent of PPAR signaling and rather due to the inhibition of the TGF-β1-induced Smad signaling. Lobeglitazone also blocked TGF-β1-induced ROS generation and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (Nox) 4 transcription.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that lobeglitazone may be a promising therapeutic agent for corneal scarring. KEY MESSAGES.

Effect of lobeglitazone on motor function in rat model of Parkinson's disease with diabetes co-morbidity

Parkinson's disease (PD) and diabetes mellitus share similar pathophysiological characteristics, genetic and environmental factors. It has been reported that people with diabetes mellitus appear to have a remarkable higher incidence of PD than age matched non diabetic individuals. Evidences suggest that use of antidiabetic glitazone is associated with a diminished risk of PD incidence in patients with diabetes. This study examined the effect of lobeglitazone, a member of thiazolidinedione class, in rat model of Parkinson's disease with diabetes co-morbidity. Rats received either rotenone and/or a combination of streptozocin and a high calorie diet for disease induction and they were treated with different doses of lobeglitazone or its vehicle. Behavioral tests comprising rotarod, bar test and rearing test were conducted to evaluate the motor function. Changes in the level tyrosine hydroxylase, TNF-α and NF-κB were analyzed using ELISA. In the same brain regions the possible changes in PPAR-γ receptor level were evaluated. Findings showed that although lobeglitazone tends to reverse the effect of rotenone in animals with diabetes, it was just able to prevent partly the motor defect in rearing test. Furthermore, lobeglitazone (1 mg/kg) reversed, in substantia nigra and striatum, the changes in tyrosine hydroxylase, TNF-α, NF-κB and PPAR-γ receptor content induced by rotenone in rats with diabetic condition. Although other preclinical studies are needed, these findings suggest that lobeglitazone is a promising neuroprotective candidate for clinical trials for PD patients with diabetes co-morbidity.

Lobeglitazone: A Novel Thiazolidinedione for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction. Among available oral antidiabetic agents, only the thiazolidinediones (TZDs) primarily target insulin resistance. TZDs improve insulin sensitivity by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone have been used widely for T2DM treatment due to their potent glycemic efficacy and low risk of hypoglycemia. However, their use has decreased because of side effects and safety issues, such as cardiovascular concerns and bladder cancer. Lobeglitazone (Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation), a novel TZD, was developed to meet the demands for an effective and safe TZD. Lobeglitazone shows similar glycemic efficacy to pioglitazone, with a lower effective dose, and favorable safety results. It also showed pleiotropic effects in preclinical and clinical studies. In this article, we summarize the pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, and clinical characteristics of lobeglitazone.

The antidiabetic drug lobeglitazone has the potential to inhibit PTP1B activity

Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) is considered a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), since this enzyme plays a significant role to down-regulate insulin and leptin signalling and its over expression has been implicated in the development of insulin resistance, T2DM and obesity. Some thiazolidinediones (TZD) derivatives have been reported as promising PTP1B inhibitors with anti hyperglycemic effects. Recently, lobeglitazone, a new TZD, was described as an antidiabetic drug that targets the PPAR-γ (peroxisome γ proliferator-activated receptor) pathway, but no information on its effects on PTP1B have been reported to date. We investigated the effects of lobeglitazone on PTP1B activity in vitro. Surprisingly, lobeglitazone led to moderate inhibition on PTP1B (IC₅₀ 42.8 ± 3.8 µM) activity and to a non-competitive reversible mechanism of action. As lobeglitazone inhibits PTP1B activity in vitro, we speculate that it could also target PTP1B signalling pathway in vivo and thus contribute to potentiate its antidiabetic effects.

An Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Lobeglitazone and Sitagliptin After Multiple Oral Administrations in Healthy Men

PURPOSE

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus require strict blood glucose control, and combination therapy with a thiazolidinedione and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, such as lobeglitazone and sitagliptin, is one of the recommended treatments. The objective of this study was to investigate a possible pharmacokinetic interaction between lobeglitazone and sitagliptin after multiple oral administrations in healthy Korean men.

METHODS

Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-way crossover studies were conducted simultaneously in healthy men. In study 1, men were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 sequences, and 1 of the following treatments was administered in each period: 1 tablet of lobeglitazone sulfate (0.5 mg) once daily for 5 days and or 1 tablet each of lobeglitazone sulfate (0.5 mg) and sitagliptin (100 mg) once daily for 5 days. In study 2, men were also randomly assigned to 1 of 2 sequences and the treatments were as follows: 1 tablet of sitagliptin (100 mg) once daily for 5 days or 1 tablet each of sitagliptin (100 mg) and lobeglitazone sulfate (0.5 mg) once daily for 5 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 h after dosing on the fifth day. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including C_max,ss and AUC_0-τ , were determined by noncompartmental analysis. The geometric least-square mean (GLSM) ratios and associated 90% CIs of log-transformed C_max,ss and AUC_0-τ for separate or coadministration were calculated to evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions.

FINDINGS

Nineteen men from study 1 and 17 from study 2 completed the pharmacokinetic sampling and were included in the analyses. The GLSM ratios of C_max,ss and AUC_0-τ were 0.9494 (95% CI, 0.8798-1.0243) and 1.0106 (95% CI, 0.9119-1.1198) for lobeglitazone (from study 1) and 1.1694 (95% CI, 1.0740-1.2732) and 1.0037 (95% CI, 0.9715-1.0369) for sitagliptin (from study 2), respectively.

IMPLICATIONS

Except for the slight 17% increase in the sitagliptin C_max,ss value, the pharmacokinetic parameters of lobeglitazone and sitagliptin met the pharmacokinetic equivalent criteria when administered separately or in combination. The increase in C_max of sitagliptin when coadministered with lobeglitazone would not be clinically significant in practice. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02824874 and NCT02827890.

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Lobeglitazone and Dapagliflozin at Steady State

PURPOSE

Coadministration of lobeglitazone and dapagliflozin is expected to result in a blood glucose-lowering effect, followed by a gradual increase, in clinical usage; however, combining drugs could cause negative interactions. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the coadministration of lobeglitazone and dapagliflozin on their individual pharmacokinetic properties at steady state in healthy male volunteers in the fasted state.

METHODS

This study consisted of 2 parts, each of which was a randomized, open-labeled, multiple-dose, 2-way crossover study in 20 healthy male volunteers in each part. Blood samples were taken periodically over a 48-h period after dosing to derive total plasma lobeglitazone and dapagliflozin pharmacokinetic properties; safety profile was evaluated throughout the study.

FINDINGS

When the pharmacokinetic properties of dapagliflozin were evaluated following its administration alone and in combination with lobeglitazone, point estimate and 90% CI of the geometric mean ratio of dapagliflozin AUC_τ were entirely within the conventional bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. However, although it was not clinically meaningful, its C_ss,max was ~8% lower in subjects receiving multiple doses of dapagliflozin and lobeglitazone than that in those administered dapagliflozin alone. The pharmacokinetic properties of lobeglitazone were evaluated following its administration alone and in combination with dapagliflozin. The geometric mean ratios and 90% CIs of the lobeglitazone C_ss,max and AUC_τ were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 80%-125%.

IMPLICATIONS

Coadministration of lobeglitazone and dapagliflozin had no apparent clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetic properties of either drug. Based on these findings, it is anticipated that lobeglitazone and dapagliflozin can be coadministered without dose adjustment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03616392.

The direct effect of lobeglitazone, a new thiazolidinedione, on pancreatic beta cells: A comparison with other thiazolidinediones

AIMS

The direct effects of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) on pancreatic beta cells have been controversial. The aim of this study was to find out whether a novel TZD, lobeglitazone, has beneficial effects on pancreatic beta cells and db/db mice compared to those of other TZDs.

METHODS

INS-1 cells were incubated at a high-glucose concentration with various concentrations of troglitazone, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and lobeglitazone. Apoptosis and proliferation of beta cells, markers for ER stress and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) were assessed. In addition, C57BL/6 db/db mice were treated with pioglitazone or lobeglitazone for 4 weeks, and metabolic parameters and the configuration of pancreatic islets were also examined.

RESULTS

Lobeglitazone and other TZDs decreased INS-1 cell apoptosis in high-glucose conditions. Lobeglitazone and other TZDs significantly decreased hyperglycemia-induced increases in ER stress markers and increased GSIS. Metabolic parameters showed greater improvement in db/db mice treated with pioglitazone and lobeglitazone than in control mice. Islet size, cell proliferation, and beta cell mass were increased, and collagen surrounding the islets was decreased in treated mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Lobeglitazone showed beneficial effects on beta cell survival and function against hyperglycemia. The prosurvival and profunction effects of lobeglitazone were comparable to those of other TZDs.

Therapeutic Effects of Targeted PPARɣ Activation on Inflamed High-Risk Plaques Assessed by Serial Optical Imaging In Vivo

Rationale: Atherosclerotic plaque is a chronic inflammatory disorder involving lipid accumulation within arterial walls. In particular, macrophages mediate plaque progression and rupture. While PPARγ agonist is known to have favorable pleiotropic effects on atherogenesis, its clinical application has been very limited due to undesirable systemic effects. We hypothesized that the specific delivery of a PPARγ agonist to inflamed plaques could reduce plaque burden and inflammation without systemic adverse effects.

Methods: Herein, we newly developed a macrophage mannose receptor (MMR)-targeted biocompatible nanocarrier loaded with lobeglitazone (MMR-Lobe), which is able to specifically activate PPARγ pathways within inflamed high-risk plaques, and investigated its anti-atherogenic and anti-inflammatory effects both in in vitro and in vivo experiments.

Results: MMR-Lobe had a high affinity to macrophage foam cells, and it could efficiently promote cholesterol efflux via LXRα-, ABCA1, and ABCG1 dependent pathways, and inhibit plaque protease expression. Using in vivo serial optical imaging of carotid artery, MMR-Lobe markedly reduced both plaque burden and inflammation in atherogenic mice without undesirable systemic effects. Comprehensive analysis of en face aorta by ex vivo imaging and immunostaining well corroborated the in vivo findings.

Conclusion: MMR-Lobe was able to activate PPARγ pathways within high-risk plaques and effectively reduce both plaque burden and inflammation. This novel targetable PPARγ activation in macrophages could be a promising therapeutic strategy for high-risk plaques.

Effects of Lobeglitazone, a Novel Thiazolidinedione, on Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus over 52 Weeks

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was to examine the effect of lobeglitazone, a novel thiazolidinedione, on the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A 24-week, double-blinded phase was followed by a 28-week, open-label phase, in which the placebo group also started to receive lobeglitazone. A total of 170 patients aged 34 to 76 years were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive lobeglitazone 0.5 mg or a matching placebo orally, once daily. BMD was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at week 24 and at the end of the study (week 52).

RESULTS

During the double-blinded phase, the femur neck BMD showed decreasing patterns in both groups, without statistical significance (-0.85%±0.36% and -0.78%±0.46% in the lobeglitazone and placebo groups, respectively). The treatment difference between the groups was 0.07%, which was also not statistically significant. Further, minimal, nonsignificant decreases were observed in both groups in the total hip BMD compared to values at baseline, and these differences also did not significantly differ between the groups. During the open-label phase, the BMD was further decreased, but not significantly, by -0.32% at the femur neck and by -0.60% at the total hip in the lobeglitazone group, and these changes did not significantly differ compared with the original placebo group switched to lobeglitazone.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that treatment with lobeglitazone 0.5 mg over 52 weeks showed no detrimental effect on the BMD compared to the placebo.

Effects of Lobeglitazone, a New Thiazolidinedione, on Osteoblastogenesis and Bone Mineral Density in Mice

BACKGROUND

Bone strength is impaired in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus despite an increase in bone mineral density (BMD). Thiazolidinedione (TZD), a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ agonist, promotes adipogenesis, and suppresses osteoblastogenesis. Therefore, its use is associated with an increased risk of fracture. The aim of this study was to examine the in vitro and in vivo effects of lobeglitazone, a new TZD, on bone.

METHODS

MC3T3E1 and C3H10T1/2 cells were cultured in osteogenic medium and exposed to lobeglitazone (0.1 or 1 μM), rosiglitazone (0.4 μM), or pioglitazone (1 μM) for 10 to 14 days. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, Alizarin red staining, and osteoblast marker gene expression were analyzed. For in vivo experiments, 6-month-old C57BL/6 mice were treated with vehicle, one of two doses of lobeglitazone, rosiglitazone, or pioglitazone. BMD was assessed using a PIXImus2 instrument at the baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

As expected, in vitro experiments showed that ALP activity was suppressed and the mRNA expression of osteoblast marker genes RUNX2 (runt-related transcription factor 2) and osteocalcin was significantly attenuated after rosiglitazone treatment. By contrast, lobeglitazone at either dose did not inhibit these variables. Rosiglitazone-treated mice showed significantly accelerated bone loss for the whole bone and femur, but BMD did not differ significantly between the lobeglitazone-treated and vehicle-treated mice.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that lobeglitazone has no detrimental effects on osteoblast biology and might not induce side effects in the skeletal system.

Lobeglitazone, a Novel Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Agonist, Attenuates Renal Fibrosis Caused by Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction in Mice

BACKGROUND

Renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis is a common feature of the final stage of nearly all cause types of chronic kidney disease. Although classic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) agonists have a protective effect on diabetic nephropathy, much less is known about their direct effects in renal fibrosis. This study aimed to investigate possible beneficial effects of lobeglitazone, a novel PPARγ agonist, on renal fibrosis in mice.

METHODS

We examined the effects of lobeglitazone on renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis in unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) induced renal fibrosis mice. We further defined the role of lobeglitazone on transforming growth factor (TGF)-signaling pathways in renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis through in vivo and in vitro study.

RESULTS

Through hematoxylin/eosin and sirius red staining, we observed that lobeglitazone effectively attenuates UUO-induced renal atrophy and fibrosis. Immunohistochemical analysis in conjunction with quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis revealed that lobeglitazone treatment inhibited UUO-induced upregulation of renal Smad-3 phosphorylation, α-smooth muscle actin, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, and type 1 collagen. In vitro experiments with rat mesangial cells and NRK-49F renal fibroblast cells suggested that the effects of lobeglitazone on UUO-induced renal fibrosis are mediated by inhibition of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that lobeglitazone has a protective effect on UUO-induced renal fibrosis, suggesting that its clinical applications could extend to the treatment of non-diabetic origin renal disease.

Safety and efficacy of lobeglitazone monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over 52 weeks: An open-label extension study

We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of lobeglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes over 52 weeks through 28-week extension study. Clinical benefits in terms of glycemic and lipid control were maintained for 52 weeks. Lobeglitazone showed a favorable balance of efficacy and safety during the extension study.