1
|
Adams PJ, Gregan MJ. Moral jeopardy, conflicts of interest and the integrity of public health research. Int J Epidemiol 2024; 53:dyae023. [PMID: 38374718 PMCID: PMC10877091 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyae023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Adams
- Centre for Addiction Research, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Melissa-Jade Gregan
- Centre for Addiction Research, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hatchard J, Buykx P, Wilson L, Brennan A, Gillespie D. Mapping alcohol and tobacco tax policy interventions to inform health and economic impact analyses: A United Kingdom based qualitative framework analysis. Int J Drug Policy 2023; 122:104247. [PMID: 37939433 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol and tobacco have different policy regimes and there is little understanding of how changes to policy on each commodity might combine to affect the same outcomes or to affect people who both drink and smoke. The aim of this study was to deepen understanding of the policy objectives of UK alcohol and tobacco tax options being considered at the time of the interviews with a set of UK policy participants in 2018, and the factors affecting the implementation and outcomes of the policy options discussed. METHODS Ten tax policy experts were recruited from government arms-length organisations and advocacy groups in England and Scotland (4 alcohol, 4 tobacco, 2 alcohol and tobacco). Alcohol and tobacco experts were interviewed together in pairs and asked to discuss alcohol and tobacco tax policy objectives, options, and the mechanisms of effect. Interviews were semi-structured, supported by a briefing document and topic guide, audio-recorded, transcribed and then analysed deductively using framework analysis. RESULTS Alcohol and tobacco tax policy share objectives of health improvement and there is a common set of policy options: increasing duty rates, duty escalators, multi-rate tax structures, industry levies and the hypothecation of tax revenue for investment in societal benefits. However, participants agreed that the harms caused by alcohol and tobacco and their industries are viewed differently, and that this influences the impacts that are prioritised in tax policymaking. Working-out how alcohol and tobacco taxes could work synergistically to reduce health inequalities was seen as desirable. Participants also highlighted the importance of avoiding the combined effects of price increases on alcohol and tobacco widening economic inequalities. CONCLUSIONS Impact analyses should consider the combined effects of alcohol and tobacco tax policies on health and economic inequalities, and how the effects of changes to the tax on each commodity might trade-off.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Hatchard
- Tobacco Control Research Group, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Penny Buykx
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; School of Humanities, Creative Industries and Social Science, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke Wilson
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Brennan
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; SPECTRUM consortium, United Kingdom
| | - Duncan Gillespie
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; SPECTRUM consortium, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van den Akker A, Fabbri A, Alardah DI, Gilmore AB, Rutter H. The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:69. [PMID: 37415182 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Participatory systems mapping is increasingly used to gain insight into the complex systems surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors. OBJECTIVES To identify and synthesize studies that used participatory systems mapping in the context of non-communicable diseases. DESIGN Scoping review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2022. STUDY SELECTION Studies that focused on NCDs and/or related risk factors, and included participants at any stage of their system's mapping process, were included. CATEGORIES FOR ANALYSIS The main categories for analysis were: (1) problem definition and goal-setting, (2) participant involvement, (3) structure of the mapping process, (4) validation of the systems map, and (5) evaluation of the mapping process. RESULTS We identified 57 studies that used participatory systems mapping for a variety of purposes, including to inform or evaluate policies or interventions and to identify potential leverage points within a system. The number of participants ranged from 6 to 590. While policymakers and professionals were the stakeholder groups most often included, some studies described significant added value from including marginalized communities. There was a general lack of formal evaluation in most studies. However, reported benefits related mostly to individual and group learning, whereas limitations described included a lack of concrete actions following from systems mapping exercises. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of this review, we argue that research using participatory systems mapping would benefit from considering three different but intertwined actions: explicitly considering how different participants and the power imbalances between them may influence the participatory process, considering how the results from a systems mapping exercise may effectively inform policy or translate into action, and including and reporting on evaluation and outcomes of the process, wherever possible.
Collapse
|
4
|
Scott LJ, Nobles J, Sillero-Rejon C, Brockman R, Toumpakari Z, Jago R, Cummins S, Blake S, Horwood J, de Vocht F. Advertisement of unhealthy commodities in Bristol and South Gloucestershire and rationale for a new advertisement policy. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1078. [PMID: 37277744 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15995-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bristol City Council introduced a new advertisement policy in 2021/2022 which included prohibiting the advertising of unhealthy food and drink (HFSS), alcohol, gambling and payday loans across council-owned advertising spaces. This mixed methods study is part of the BEAR study, and aimed to explore the rationale and the barriers and facilitators to implementing the policy, and describe the perceived advertising environment prior to implementation. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were carried out with seven stakeholders involved in the design and implementation of the advertising policy. A stakeholder topic guide was developed before interviews took place to help standardise the lines of inquiry between interviewees. A resident survey was developed to collect socio-demographic data and, for the purpose of this study, information regarding observations of advertising for HFSS products, alcohol and gambling. RESULTS Fifty-eight percent of respondents residing in Bristol and South Gloucestershire reported seeing advertisements for unhealthy commodities in the week prior to completing the survey. This was highest for HFSS products (40%). 16% of residents reported seeing HFSS product advertisements specifically appealing to children. For HFSS products in particular, younger people were more likely to report seeing adverts than older people, as were those who were from more deprived areas. An advertisement policy that restricts the advertisement of such unhealthy commodities, and in particular for HFSS products, has the potential to reduce health inequalities. This rationale directly influenced the development of the advertisement policy in Bristol. Implementation of the policy benefitted from an existing supportive environment following the 'health in all policies' initiative and a focus on reducing health inequalities across the city. CONCLUSIONS Unhealthy product advertisements, particularly for unhealthy food and drinks, were observed more by younger people and those living in more deprived areas. Policies that specifically restrict such advertisements, therefore, have the potential to reduce health inequalities, as was the hope when this policy was developed. Future evaluation of the policy will provide evidence of any public health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren J Scott
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - James Nobles
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Obesity Institute, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Carlos Sillero-Rejon
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rowan Brockman
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Zoi Toumpakari
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Russell Jago
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Steven Cummins
- Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sarah Blake
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Bristol, UK
| | - Jeremy Horwood
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Frank de Vocht
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Bristol, UK.
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scott LJ, Toumpakari Z, Nobles J, Sillero-Rejon C, Jago R, Cummins S, Blake S, Horwood J, Vocht FD. Assessing exposure to outdoor advertisement for products high in fat, salt and sugar (HFSS); is self-reported exposure a useful exposure metric? BMC Public Health 2023; 23:668. [PMID: 37041569 PMCID: PMC10088263 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15567-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure to advertising of unhealthy commodities such as fast-food and gambling is recognised as a risk factor for developing non-communicable diseases. Assessment of the impact of such advertisement and the evaluation of the impact of any policies to restrict such advertisements on public health are reliant on the quality of the exposure assessment. A straightforward method for assessing exposure is to ask people whether they noticed any such advertisements in their neighbourhoods. However, the validity of this method is unclear. We assessed the associations between measured exposure to outdoor advertising, self-reported exposure, and self-reported consumption. METHODS We collected exposure information in January-March 2022 using two methods: (i) through a resident survey investigating advertising and consumption of unhealthy products, distributed across Bristol and neighbouring South Gloucestershire, and (ii) through in-person auditing. Self-reported exposure was obtained from the resident survey (N = 2,560) and measured exposure from photos obtained for all Council owned advertisement sites (N = 973 bus stops). Both data sources were geographically linked at lower-super-output-area level. Reporting ratios (RRs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and Cohen's kappas, are presented. RESULTS 24% of advertisements displayed food and/or drink advertising. Bristol respondents in neighbourhoods displaying food/drink adverts were more likely to also report seeing these adverts compared to those in neighbourhoods without food/drink adverts (59% vs. 51%, RR = 1.15, 95%CI 1.01-1.31). There was no such association in South Gloucestershire (26% vs. 32%, RR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.58-1.14). Respondents in both Bristol and South Gloucestershire who recalled seeing advertising for unhealthy food and drink products were more likely to consume them (e.g. for fast-food: 22% vs. 11%, RR = 2.01, 95%CI 1.68-2.42). There was no such association between measured food and drink adverts in respondents' local areas and self-reported consumption of HFSS product (90.1% vs. 90.7%, RR = 0.99, 95%CI 0.96-1.03). CONCLUSIONS Self-reported outdoor advertisement exposure is correlated with measured exposure, making this a useful methodology for population studies. It has the added advantage that it correlates with consumption. However, given that measurement error can be significant and self-reported exposure is known to be susceptible to various biases, inferences from studies using this exposure metric should be made with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren J Scott
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Population health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Zoi Toumpakari
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - James Nobles
- Obesity Institute, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Carlos Sillero-Rejon
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Population health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Russell Jago
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Population health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Steven Cummins
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and tropical medicine, London, UK
| | - Sarah Blake
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeremy Horwood
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Population health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Frank de Vocht
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
- Population health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
- NIHR ARC West, 9th Floor, Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Robertson T, Jepson R, Lambe K, Olsen JR, Thornton LE. Socio-economic patterning of food and drink advertising at public transport stops in Edinburgh, UK. Public Health Nutr 2021; 25:1-9. [PMID: 34886922 PMCID: PMC7612707 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980021004766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Outdoor advertisements for food and drink products form a large part of the food environment and they disproportionately promote unhealthy products. However, less is known about the social patterning of such advertisements. The main aim of this study was to explore the socio-economic patterning of food and drink advertising at bus stops in Scotland's capital city, Edinburgh. DESIGN Bus stop advertisements were audited to identify food/drink adverts and classify them by food/drink category (i.e. 'advert category'). This data were then linked to area-based deprivation and proximity measures. Neighbourhood deprivation was measured using the bus stop x/y co-ordinates, which were converted to postcodes to identify the matching 2012 deprivation level via the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. Distance to schools and leisure centres were also collected using location data. Generalised estimating equations and linear regression analyses were used to assess associations between the promotion of advert categories and deprivation and proximity to schools/leisure centres, respectively. SETTING Edinburgh city, United Kingdom. RESULTS 561 food/drink advertisements were identified across 349 bus stops, with 8 advertisement categories noted and included in the final analysis, including alcohol, fast food outlets and confectionary. The majority of adverts were for 'unhealthy' food and drink categories, however there was no evidence for any socio-economic patterning of these advertisements. There was no evidence of a relationship between advertisements and proximity to schools and leisure centres. CONCLUSIONS While there is no evidence for food and drink advertising being patterned by neighbourhood deprivation, the scale of unhealthy advertising is an area for policy evaluations and interventions on the control of such outdoor advertising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Robertson
- Biological and Environmental Sciences, Cottrell Building, University of Stirling, StirlingFK9 4LA, UK
| | - Ruth Jepson
- Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kyle Lambe
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jonathan R Olsen
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Lukar E Thornton
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ralston R. The informal governance of public-private partnerships in UK obesity policy: Collaborating on calorie reduction or reducing effectiveness? Soc Sci Med 2021; 289:114451. [PMID: 34673355 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Collaboration between governments and non-state actors has emerged as the dominant mode of policy making to address a wide range of public and global health issues, particularly via public-private partnerships and multi-stakeholder platforms. Despite its paradigmatic status in contemporary health governance, political claims and promises of partnership approaches as more effective than state regulation have received limited attention. This study addresses this gap by tracing negotiations over a calorie reduction 'pledge' within the Public Health Responsibility Deal: a public-private partnership between the UK Department of Health, food industry and civil society organisations focusing on obesity policy. It demonstrates how political claims-making by the Department of Health that a public-private partnership as an effective substitute for legislation, contrasted with protracted and conflictual negotiations with food industry business associations. Employing Erving Goffman's distinction between frontstage and backstage interaction and the concept of informal governance, this study traces a shift to informal back stage governance as a mechanism to cope with acute tensions between economic interests and nutrition policy goals. The study illustrates how this shift to the back stage had substantive public health implications, privileging commercial sector perspectives and marginalising civil society participation. Informalization served to reframe calorie reduction from industry-focused to personal responsibility for lifestyle behaviours, in the process reducing its effectiveness. The results suggest that, while partnership and multi-stakeholder approaches are widely promoted as a legitimate tool in health governance, visible tensions between commercial sector and public health interests challenge political claims about public-private collaboration as consensus-oriented and effective. Informal governance, when used as a coping mechanism to manage tensions public health and commercial sector interests, may be symptomatic of wider dysfunctions and conflicts of interest in partnership approaches. This suggests that there may be limited scope for effective policy innovations where commercial sector actors perceive core interests as threatened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Ralston
- Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, UK; SPECTRUM Consortium (Shaping Public Health Policies to Reduce Inequalities and Harm), UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Horton M, Perman-Howe PR, Angus C, Bishop J, Bogdanovica I, Brennan A, Britton J, Brose LS, Brown J, Collin J, Dockrell M, Fitzgerald N, Friel S, Gillespie D, Gilmore AB, Hill SE, Knai C, Langley T, Martin S, McNeill A, Moore G, Munafò MR, Murray RL, Opazo Breton M, Pearce J, Petticrew M, Reid G, Robson D, Rutter H, Shahab L, Shortt N, Smith K, Syrett K, Bauld L. The SPECTRUM Consortium: a new UK Prevention Research Partnership consortium focussed on the commercial determinants of health, the prevention of non-communicable diseases, and the reduction of health inequalities. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 6:6. [PMID: 33693062 PMCID: PMC7931256 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16318.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The main causes of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), health inequalities and health inequity include consumption of unhealthy commodities such as tobacco, alcohol and/or foods high in fat, salt and/or sugar. These exposures are preventable, but the commodities involved are highly profitable. The economic interests of 'Unhealthy Commodity Producers' (UCPs) often conflict with health goals but their role in determining health has received insufficient attention. In order to address this gap, a new research consortium has been established. This open letter introduces the SPECTRUM ( S haping Public h Ealth poli Cies To Reduce ineq Ualities and har M)Consortium: a multi-disciplinary group comprising researchers from 10 United Kingdom (UK) universities and overseas, and partner organisations including three national public health agencies in Great Britain (GB), five multi-agency alliances and two companies providing data and analytic support. Through eight integrated work packages, the Consortium seeks to provide an understanding of the nature of the complex systems underlying the consumption of unhealthy commodities, the role of UCPs in shaping these systems and influencing health and policy, the role of systems-level interventions, and the effectiveness of existing and emerging policies. Co-production is central to the Consortium's approach to advance research and achieve meaningful impact and we will involve the public in the design and delivery of our research. We will also establish and sustain mutually beneficial relationships with policy makers, alongside our partners, to increase the visibility, credibility and impact of our evidence. The Consortium's ultimate aim is to achieve meaningful health benefits for the UK population by reducing harm and inequalities from the consumption of unhealthy commodities over the next five years and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Horton
- Population Health Analysis, Health Intelligence, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Parvati R. Perman-Howe
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Colin Angus
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Julie Bishop
- Health Improvement Division, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ilze Bogdanovica
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alan Brennan
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Britton
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Leonie S. Brose
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jamie Brown
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK
| | - Jeff Collin
- Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Martin Dockrell
- Health Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Niamh Fitzgerald
- Institute for Social Marketing & Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Sharon Friel
- Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Duncan Gillespie
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anna B. Gilmore
- Tobacco Control Research Group, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Sarah E. Hill
- Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Cecile Knai
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Tessa Langley
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sancha Martin
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ann McNeill
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Graham Moore
- DECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Marcus R. Munafò
- School of Psychological Science and MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachael L. Murray
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Jamie Pearce
- Centre for Research on Environment, Society & Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark Petticrew
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Garth Reid
- Public Health Science Directorate, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Deborah Robson
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Harry Rutter
- Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Lion Shahab
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK
| | - Niamh Shortt
- Centre for Research on Environment, Society & Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Katherine Smith
- School of Social Work & Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Keith Syrett
- Centre for Health, Law, and Society, School of Law, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Linda Bauld
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|