Stenius K, Storbjork J. Balancing welfare and market logics: Procurement regulations for social and health services in four Nordic welfare states.
Nordisk Alkohol Nark 2020;
37:6-31. [PMID:
32934590 PMCID:
PMC7434190 DOI:
10.1177/1455072519886094]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim:
In increasingly market-oriented welfare regimes, public procurement
is one of the most important instruments for influencing who
produces which services. This article analyses recent
procurement regulations in four Nordic countries from the point
of view of addiction treatment. The implementation of public
procurement in this field can be viewed as a domain struggle
between the market logic and the welfare logic. By comparing the
revision of the regulations after the 2014 EU directives in
Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, we identify factors
affecting the protection of a welfare logic in procurement. We
discuss the possible effects of different procurement
regulations for population welfare and health.
Data and theoretical perspective:
The study is based on the recently revised procurement laws in the
four countries, and adherent guidelines. The analysis is
inspired by institutional logics, looking at patterns of
practices, interests, actors, and procurement as rules for
practices.
Results:
Procurement regulations are today markedly different in the four
countries. The protection of welfare and public health aspects
in procurement – strongest in Norway – is not solely dependent
on party political support. Existing service providers and
established steering practices play a crucial role.
Conclusion:
In a situation where market steering has become an established
practice and private providers are strongly present, it can be
difficult to introduce strong requirements for protection of
welfare and population health in procurement of social
services.
Collapse