High-density versus low-density mapping in ablation of atypical atrial flutter

PURPOSE

Ablation of atypical atrial flutter (AAFL) can be challenging. High-density (HD) mapping of ablation targets may potentially increase procedural success and freedom from recurrent AAFL. The objective of the present study was to explore whether employing HD mapping leads to a more favorable outcome in ablation of AAFL.

METHODS

We compared baseline and procedural characteristics, procedural success, safety and outcome of mapping and ablation of atypical flutter in three groups. (1) HD Grid catheter + the high-density electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system EnSite Precision; (2) standard 10-pole circular mapping catheter (CMC) + EnSite Precision; (3) CMC + the low-density EnSite Velocity EAM. Voltage and propagation maps were constructed.

RESULTS

Mapping of 142 AAFL in 82 patients was performed. Acute ablation success was 78%, 68%, and 51% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.037 between group 1 and 3, non-significant between groups otherwise). Moreover, 8%, 27%, and 36% of flutters were unmappable in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.05 between group 1 and both groups 2 and 3). AAFL recurrence at 1-year FU was 26%, 36%, and 62% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.007 between groups 1 and 3, p = 0.05 between groups 2 and 3). AAFL-free survival was significantly higher in patients mapped with Precision than with Velocity (p = 0.011). No strokes or mortality occurred within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute procedural success of ablation of atypical atrial flutter is higher and the number of unmappable flutters is lower using the HD Grid mapping catheter in combination with the high-density EnSite Precision system, as compared to a decapolar circular mapping catheter and the low-density EnSite Velocity EAM system. This may lead to increased freedom from recurrent AAFL at 1 year. HD mapping is safe.

Subsequent Event Risk in Individuals With Established Coronary Heart Disease

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

The Genetics of Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease (GENIUS-CHD) consortium was established to facilitate discovery and validation of genetic variants and biomarkers for risk of subsequent CHD events, in individuals with established CHD.

Methods:

The consortium currently includes 57 studies from 18 countries, recruiting 185 614 participants with either acute coronary syndrome, stable CHD, or a mixture of both at baseline. All studies collected biological samples and followed-up study participants prospectively for subsequent events.

Results:

Enrollment into the individual studies took place between 1985 to present day with a duration of follow-up ranging from 9 months to 15 years. Within each study, participants with CHD are predominantly of self-reported European descent (38%–100%), mostly male (44%–91%) with mean ages at recruitment ranging from 40 to 75 years. Initial feasibility analyses, using a federated analysis approach, yielded expected associations between age (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.14–1.16) per 5-year increase, male sex (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.13–1.21) and smoking (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.35–1.51) with risk of subsequent CHD death or myocardial infarction and differing associations with other individual and composite cardiovascular endpoints.

Conclusions:

GENIUS-CHD is a global collaboration seeking to elucidate genetic and nongenetic determinants of subsequent event risk in individuals with established CHD, to improve residual risk prediction and identify novel drug targets for secondary prevention. Initial analyses demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of a federated analysis approach. The consortium now plans to initiate and test novel hypotheses as well as supporting replication and validation analyses for other investigators.

Mechanisms and mitigating factors for venous thromboembolism in chronic kidney disease: the REGARDS study

Essentials Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with procoagulant and inflammatory biomarkers. We studied the association of CKD and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a case-cohort study. Factor VIII, D-dimer and C-reactive protein appeared to explain the association of CKD and VTE. Statin use was protective against VTE in those with and without CKD.

SUMMARY

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk via unknown mechanisms. Whether factors associated with reduced VTE risk in the general population might also be associated with reduced VTE risk in CKD patients is unknown. Objectives To determine whether thrombosis biomarkers attenuate VTE risk, and whether factors associated with reduced VTE risk are similarly effective in CKD patients. Methods Baseline biomarkers were measured in a cohort (294 VTE cases; 939 non-cases) from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, a nationwide prospective cohort study of 30 239 persons aged ≥45 years with 4.3 years of follow-up. The hazard ratio (HR) of VTE per 10 mL min-1 1.73 m-2 decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the percentage attenuation of this HR by each biomarker, were calculated. Associations of protective factors (physical activity, lower body mass index [BMI], and aspirin, warfarin and statin use) with VTE were estimated in those with and without CKD. Results The HR for VTE with lower eGFR was 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.25), and VTE risk was attenuated by 23% (95% CI 5-100) by D-dimer, by 100% (95% CI 50-100) by factor VIII, and by 15% (95% CI 2-84) by C-reactive protein. Normal BMI was associated with lower VTE risk in those without CKD (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.70), but not in those with CKD (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.51-2.22). Statin use, physical activity and warfarin use were associated with lower VTE risk in both groups. Conclusions Procoagulant and inflammatory biomarkers mediated the association of eGFR with VTE. Higher physical activity, statin use and warfarin use mitigated VTE risk in those with CKD and those without CKD, but normal BMI did not mitigate VTE risk in CKD patients.

Insulin resistance and risk of venous thromboembolism: results of a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an established risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), but it is uncertain how this is mediated. Insulin resistance has a central role in the pathophysiology of the metabolic effects of obesity.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate whether insulin resistance is a risk factor for VTE.

METHODS

For this analysis we used the PREVEND prospective community-based observational cohort study. Insulin resistance was measured as HOMA-IR (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance) and fasting insulin. VTE was assessed using databases of the national registries of hospital discharge diagnoses, death certificates and the regional anticoagulation clinic.

RESULTS

Out of 7393 subjects, 114 developed VTE during a median follow-up of 10.5 years. High HOMA-IR was associated with increased risk of VTE after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, CRP and markers of endothelial dysfunction (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.09-1.75; P=0.007). When body mass index (BMI) was added to the model, BMI was a strong risk predictor for VTE (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.24-1.88; P<0.001) whereas HOMA-IR no longer showed such an association (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.85-1.43; P=0.45). Results were similar for fasting insulin.

CONCLUSION

Our population-based cohort study shows an increased risk of VTE in subjects with increasing insulin resistance but not independently of BMI.

The impact of antiproteinuric therapy on the prothrombotic state in patients with overt proteinuria

BACKGROUND

Overt proteinuria is a strong risk factor for thromboembolism, owing to changes in the levels of various coagulation proteins and urinary antithrombin loss. The described coagulation disturbances in these patients are based on outdated studies conducted primarily in the 1970s and 1980s. Whether these coagulation disturbances resolve with antiproteinuric therapy has yet to be studied.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with overt proteinuria (median, 3.7 g day(-1) ; interquartile range, 1.5-5.6) were enrolled in this intervention crossover trial designed to assess optimal antiproteinuric therapy with sodium restriction, losartan, and diuretics. Levels of various procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins, and parameters of two thrombin generation assays (calibrated automated thrombogram [CAT] and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2) were compared between the placebo period and the maximum antiproteinuric treatment period. As a secondary analysis, coagulation measurements of the placebo period in these patients were compared with those of 32 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

Median proteinuria was significantly lower during the maximum treatment period (median, 0.9 g day(-1) ; interquartile range, 0.6-1.4; P < 0.001) than during the placebo period. Similarly, levels of various liver-synthesized procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins, activated protein C resistance and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 levels were significantly lower during the maximum treatment period than during the placebo period. However, von Willebrand factor and factor VIII levels were similar. On the basis of the higher levels of procoagulant proteins (fibrinogen, FV, FVIII, and von Willebrand factor) and both thrombin generation assays, patients were substantially more prothrombotic than healthy controls (P < 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

 Antiproteinuric therapy ameliorates the prothrombotic state. Proteinuric patients are in a more prothrombotic state than healthy controls.

Chronic kidney disease stages 1-3 increase the risk of venous thrombosis

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease has been associated with venous thrombosis (VT). However, the risk of VT in the early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate whether CKD patients with stage 1-3 disease are at increased risk of VT.

METHODS

Eight thousand four hundred and ninety-five subjects were included in a prospective cohort study, in which renal function and albuminuria were assessed, starting in 1997-1998, and were followed for the occurrence of VT until 1 June 2007. CKD patients were staged according to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines, on the basis of 24-h urine albumin excretion and estimated glomerular filtration rates. Objectively verified symptomatic VT was considered to be the endpoint.

RESULTS

Of the 8495 subjects, 243 had CKD stage 1, 856 CKD stage 2, and 491 CKD stage 3. During a median follow-up period of 9.2 years, 128 individuals developed VT. The hazard ratios (HRs) for CKD stages 1, 2 and 3 were, respectively, 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-5.1], 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-3.1) and 1.6 (95% CI 0.9-2.8) relative to those without CKD after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, malignancy, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Subjects with CKD stage 3 and albuminuria (≥ 30 mg d(-1)) had an adjusted HR of 3.0, and subjects with CKD stage 3 without albuminuria had an adjusted HR of 1.0.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD stages 1 and 2, and CKD stage 3 in the presence of albuminuria, are risk factors for VT. The risk of VT is more related to albuminuria than to impaired glomerular filtration rate.

A prospective cohort study on the absolute risks of venous thromboembolism and predictive value of screening asymptomatic relatives of patients with hereditary deficiencies of protein S, protein C or antithrombin

BACKGROUND

Absolute risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in protein S-, protein C-, or antithrombin-deficient subjects are mainly based on retrospective data. Screening asymptomatic relatives of these patients is disputed, though studies addressing this issue have yet to be conducted.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 382 relatives of 84 probands. Participants were assessed for other thrombophilic defects and occurrence of exogenous risk factors (i.e. surgery/trauma/immobilization, malignancies, use of systemic estrogens, and pregnancy/puerperium). After screening, deficient subjects were advised to use thromboprophylaxis during exogenous risk factors; use of oral contraceptives was discouraged.

RESULTS

Overall annual incidence of VTE was 1.53% (95% CI, 1.00-2.34) in deficient vs. 0.29% (0.13-0.64) in non-deficient relatives; adjusted hazard ratio, 7.0 (95% CI, 2.7-18.0). Annual incidence of unprovoked VTE was 0.95% in deficient vs. 0.05% in non-deficient subjects; age-adjusted hazard ratio, 22.3 (P = 0.003). In contrast, annual incidence of provoked VTE was 0.58% vs. 0.24%; age-adjusted hazard ratio, 2.8 (P = 0.08). Fifty-five (37%) deficient and 80 (34%) non-deficient subjects experienced 91 and 143 exogenous risk factors, respectively, during which six vs. five VTEs (6.6% vs 3.5% per risk-period) occurred, despite the higher compliance with recommended thromboprophylaxis use in deficient (51%) vs. non-deficient (22%) subjects. In deficient subjects all provoked VTEs occurred when thromboprophylaxis was not used.

CONCLUSIONS

Protein S, protein C or antithrombin deficiencies confer high absolute risk of VTE. Screening and subsequent augmentation of thromboprophylaxis use may result in reduction of provoked VTE, whereas risk of unprovoked VTE could not be affected by screening.