1
|
Olague S, Boyle H, Ahmed I, Buchh B, Truong GST, Reyburn B, DeLeon C, Lin GC, Ahmad KA, Carr B, Singhal M, Althouse M, Castro R, Rudine A, Rider E, Macomber-Estill ML, Doles B, Ferry JF, Pierantoni H, Sutherland S, Clark RH, Blackwell CK, Smith PB, Benjamin DK, Greenberg RG. Direct-to-participant recruitment of mothers and infants: A strategic approach during challenging pandemic times. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2024; 38:101261. [PMID: 38298915 PMCID: PMC10825472 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Under traditional circumstances, most clinical trials rely on in-person operations to identify, recruit, and enroll study participants and to complete study-related visits. During unusual circumstances, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the typical clinical trial model is challenged and forced to explore alternative approaches to implementing study recruitment, participant enrollment, and data collection strategies. One such alternative is a direct-to-participant approach which leverages electronic resources and relevant technological devices (e.g., smart phones) available to researchers and patients. This approach functions under the assumption that a participant has access to a device that connects to the internet such as a smart phone, tablet, or computer. Researchers are then able to transition a typical paper-based, in-person model to an electronic-based, siteless, remote study. This article describes the challenges clinicians and researchers faced when implementing a direct-to-participant study approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. The lessons learned during this study of infant populations could help increase efficiency of future trials, specifically, by lessening the burden on participants and clinicians as well as streamlining the process for enrollment and data collection. While direct-to-adult participant recruitment is not a novel approach, our findings suggest that studies attempting to recruit the infant population may benefit from such a direct-to-participant approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefany Olague
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Helen Boyle
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Brent Reyburn
- North Central Baptist Hospital, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - Barbara Carr
- Saint Luke's Health System, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Evelyn Rider
- Providence Alaska Medical Center, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Reese H. Clark
- The MEDNAX Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety, Sunrise, FL, USA
| | | | - P. Brian Smith
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Balevic SJ, Benjamin DK, Powderly WG, Smith PB, Gonzalez D, McCarthy MW, Shaw LK, Lindsell CJ, Bozzette S, Williams D, Linas BP, Blamoun J, Javeri H, Hornik CP. Abatacept Pharmacokinetics and Exposure Response in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: A Secondary Analysis of the ACTIV-1 IM Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e247615. [PMID: 38662372 PMCID: PMC11046337 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The pharmacokinetics of abatacept and the association between abatacept exposure and outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 are unknown. Objective To characterize abatacept pharmacokinetics, relate drug exposure with clinical outcomes, and evaluate the need for dosage adjustments. Design, Setting, and Participants This study is a secondary analysis of data from the ACTIV-1 (Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines) Immune Modulator (IM) randomized clinical trial conducted between October 16, 2020, and December 31, 2021. The trial included hospitalized adults who received abatacept in addition to standard of care for treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia. Data analysis was performed between September 2022 and February 2024. Exposure Single intravenous infusion of abatacept (10 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 1000 mg). Main Outcomes and Measures Mortality at day 28 was the primary outcome of interest, and time to recovery at day 28 was the secondary outcome. Drug exposure was assessed using the projected area under the serum concentration time curve over 28 days (AUC0-28). Logistic regression modeling was used to analyze the association between drug exposure and 28-day mortality, adjusted for age, sex, and disease severity. The association between time to recovery and abatacept exposure was examined using Fine-Gray modeling with death as a competing risk, and was adjusted for age, sex, and disease severity. Results Of the 509 patients who received abatacept, 395 patients with 848 serum samples were included in the population pharmacokinetic analysis. Their median age was 55 (range, 19-89) years and most (250 [63.3%]) were men. Abatacept clearance increased with body weight and more severe disease activity at baseline. Drug exposure was higher in patients who survived vs those who died, with a median AUC0-28 of 21 428 (range, 8462-43 378) mg × h/L vs 18 262 (range, 9628-27 507) mg × h/L (P < .001). Controlling for age, sex, and disease severity, an increase of 5000 units in AUC0-28 was associated with lower odds of mortality at day 28 (OR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.35-0.79]; P = .002). For an AUC0-28 of 19 400 mg × h/L or less, there was a higher probability of recovery at day 28 (hazard ratio, 2.63 [95% CI, 1.70-4.08] for every 5000-unit increase; P < .001). Controlling for age, sex, and disease severity, every 5000-unit increase in AUC0-28 was also associated with lower odds of a composite safety event at 28 days (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.33-0.63]; P < .001). Using the dosing regimen studied in the ACTIV-1 IM trial, 121 of the 395 patients (30.6%) would not achieve an abatacept exposure of at least 19 400 mg × h/L, particularly at the extremes of body weight. Using a modified, higher-dose regimen, only 12 patients (3.0%) would not achieve the hypothesized target abatacept exposure. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, patients who were hospitalized with severe COVID-19 and achieved higher projected abatacept exposure had reduced mortality and a higher probability of recovery with fewer safety events. However, abatacept clearance was high in this population, and the current abatacept dosing (10 mg/kg intravenously with a maximum of 1000 mg) may not achieve optimal exposure in all patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04593940.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J. Balevic
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - William G. Powderly
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - P. Brian Smith
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Linda K. Shaw
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Sam Bozzette
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Benjamin P. Linas
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John Blamoun
- Department of Critical Care, MyMichigan Health, Midland
| | - Heta Javeri
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio
| | - Christoph P. Hornik
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khan S, Kilpatrick R, Benjamin DK, Kolnik SE, Greenberg RG, Clark R, Zimmerman KO, Puia-Dumitrescu M. Morbidity and mortality of twins and triplets compared to singleton infants delivered between 26-34 weeks gestation in the United States. J Perinatol 2024; 44:231-238. [PMID: 37989884 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01822-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe in-hospital morbidities and mortality among twins and triplets delivered at ≥26 to ≤34 weeks gestational age (GA) while controlling for prematurity and growth restriction. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of inborn infants discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group between 2010 and 2018. RESULT Among 247 437 infants included, 27.4% were multiples. Adjusted for GA and other factors typically known prior to delivery, in-hospital morbidities varied by plurality and generally were more common in singletons. The odds of death prior to discharge were less for twins at 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67-0.83) and triplets at 0.69 (95% CI: 0.51-0.92) compared to singletons. CONCLUSION Singletons experience greater morbidity and mortality compared to twins and triplets born ≥26 weeks to ≤34 weeks GA, except PDA requiring procedural intervention, ROP requiring treatment, and longer length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Khan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Ryan Kilpatrick
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Sarah E Kolnik
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Reese Clark
- Center for Research, Education, Quality, and Safety, Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc, Sunrise, FL, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mihai Puia-Dumitrescu
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heyward EB, Clark RH, Smith PB, Benjamin DK, Zimmerman KO, Ahmad KA, Blackwell CK, Won H, Ssengonzi R, Belbase A, Ndalama CO, An J, Nwaezeigwe O, Greenberg RG. Trends in COVID-19 diagnoses and outcomes in infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2024; 44:35-39. [PMID: 37452116 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01725-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Characterize the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis among mothers with infants hospitalized in 294 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and demographics and outcomes of infants with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure in utero. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study of infants discharged from NICUs 01/2020-09/2021. We defined groups based on infant diagnosis, infant testing, and maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection status. We compared demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. RESULTS Of 150,924 infants, 94% had no COVID-related diagnosis or test; 247 (0.2%) infants tested positive for COVID-19 and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation. Infants with unknown maternal status and negative testing were more commonly premature, outborn, and had longer hospitalizations. CONCLUSION In this large cohort of hospitalized infants, most had no known exposure to COVID-19. Adverse outcomes and mortality were rare. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects of COVID-19 in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Reese H Clark
- Pediatrix Center for Research, Education, Quality, and Safety, Sunrise, FL, USA
| | - P Brian Smith
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kaashif A Ahmad
- Pediatrix Center for Research, Education, Quality, and Safety, Sunrise, FL, USA
- Pediatrix Neonatology of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
- Pediatrix Neonatology of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Courtney K Blackwell
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hannah Won
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Avi Belbase
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Jennifer An
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thakkar PV, Sutton KF, Detwiler CAB, Henegar JG, Narayan JR, Perez-Romero M, Strausser CM, Clark RH, Benjamin DK, Zimmerman KO, Goldberg RN, Younge N, Tanaka D, Brian Smith P, Greenberg RG, Kilpatrick R. Risk factors and epidemiology of spontaneous intestinal perforation among infants born at 22-24 weeks' gestational age. J Perinatol 2024; 44:94-99. [PMID: 37759034 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01782-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the epidemiology, risk factors, and timing of spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) among infants born at 22-24 weeks' gestational age (GA). STUDY DESIGN Observational cohort study among infants born at 22-24 weeks' GA in 446 neonatal intensive care units. RESULTS We identified 9712 infants, of whom 379 (3.9%) developed SIP. SIP incidence increased with decreasing GA (P < 0.001). Antenatal magnesium (odds ratio (OR) 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.85), antenatal indomethacin (OR 1.40; 95% CI, 1.06-1.85), postnatal indomethacin (OR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.23-2.11), and postnatal hydrocortisone exposure (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.50-2.73) were associated with SIP. Infants who lost 15-20% (OR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.28-2.44) or >20% (OR 2.04; 95% CI, 1.46-2.85) of birth weight had higher odds of SIP than infants with weight loss <10%. CONCLUSIONS Antenatal magnesium exposure, antenatal indomethacin exposure, postnatal hydrocortisone exposure, postnatal indomethacin exposure, and weight loss ≥15% were associated with SIP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavan V Thakkar
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Chloe-Ann B Detwiler
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Julia G Henegar
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jai R Narayan
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Melanie Perez-Romero
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ciara M Strausser
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Reese H Clark
- Pediatrix Center for Research Education, Quality, and Safety, Sunrise, FL, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ronald N Goldberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Noelle Younge
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David Tanaka
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - P Brian Smith
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Ryan Kilpatrick
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thakkar PV, Scott Z, Hoffman M, Delarosa J, Hickerson J, Boutzoukas AE, Benjamin DK, Brookhart MA, Zimmerman KO, Moorthy GS. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pediatric Preventive Health Care Among North Carolina Children Enrolled in Medicaid. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:S14-S19. [PMID: 38146859 PMCID: PMC10750309 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piad061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children enrolled in private insurance had reduced preventive health care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the impact of the pandemic on children enrolled in Medicaid has been minimally described. METHODS We used an administrative claims database from North Carolina Medicaid to evaluate the rates of well-child visits and immunization administration for children ≤14 months of age, and used a quasi-Poisson regression model to estimate the rate ratio (RR) of each outcome during the pandemic period (3/15/2020 through 3/15/2021) compared with the pre-pandemic period (3/15/2019 through 3/14/2020). RESULTS We included 83 442 children during the pre-pandemic period and 96 634 children during the pandemic period. During the pre-pandemic period, 405 295 well-child visits and 715 100 immunization administrations were billed; during the pandemic period, 287 285 well-child visits and 457 144 immunization administrations were billed. The rates of well-child visits (RR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.64-0.64) and vaccine administration (RR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.55-0.55) were lower during the pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period. CONCLUSIONS The rates of well-child visits and immunization administrations among North Carolina children enrolled in public insurance substantially decreased during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavan V Thakkar
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zeni Scott
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Molly Hoffman
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jesse Delarosa
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jesse Hickerson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angelique E Boutzoukas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - M Alan Brookhart
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ganga S Moorthy
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Speier RL, Cotten CM, Benjamin DK, Lewis K, Keeler K, Kidimbu G, Roberts W, Clark RH, Zimmerman KO, Stark A, Greenberg RG. Late-Onset Sepsis Evaluation and Empiric Therapy in Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:S37-S43. [PMID: 38146858 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piad068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about late-onset sepsis (LOS) evaluations in extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs). We describe frequencies of LOS evaluation in ELGANs, infant characteristics, and empiric therapy choices during evaluations. METHODS Cohort study of infants 22-28 weeks gestational age (GA) discharged from 243 centers from 2009 to 2018, excluding infants with congenital anomalies, discharged or deceased prior to postnatal day (PND) 2, or admitted after PND 2. A new LOS evaluation was defined as the first blood culture obtained between PND 3 and 90, or one obtained ≥1 day following a negative culture and ≥10 days from prior positive cultures. We determined numbers of evaluations and percentage positive by GA, center, and over time. We described characteristics associated with positive evaluations, infants with LOS, and empiric antimicrobials. We calculated descriptive and comparative statistics using Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher's exact, or Pearson chi-square tests, as appropriate. RESULTS Of 47,187 included infants, 67% had ≥1 LOS evaluation and 21% of evaluated infants had ≥1 LOS (culture positive) episode; 1.6 evaluations occurred per infant and 10% were positive. The percentage of infants evaluated and positive for LOS was higher at earlier GA. LOS was associated with inotrope support (15% vs. 9%; p < .001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (66% vs. 51%; p < .001). Infants with positive cultures were more likely than infants with negative cultures to receive empiric antimicrobials during the LOS evaluation (95% vs. 73%; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Among ELGANs, earlier GA and postnatal age were associated with LOS evaluation and positive cultures. Most infants undergoing evaluation were started on empiric antimicrobials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kelsey Lewis
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Reese H Clark
- Pediatrix Center for Research, Education, Quality, and Safety, Sunrise, FL, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Stark
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Benjamin DK. Duke STAR Program. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:S1-S2. [PMID: 38146856 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piad096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel K Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sielaty R, Boutzoukas AE, Zimmerman KO, Caison B, Charles CO, CoyneSmith T, Darden T, Overman RA, Benjamin DK, Brookhart MA. Trends in Pediatric Emergency and Inpatient Healthcare Use for Mental and Behavioral Health Among North Carolinians During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:S20-S27. [PMID: 38146861 PMCID: PMC10750307 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piad092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Widespread school closures and health care avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic led to disruptions in access to pediatric mental health care. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of emergency and inpatient administrative claims from privately insured children aged 6-20 years in North Carolina between January 2019 and December 2020. We compared rates of emergency department (ED) visits (per 100 000 person-days) and risks of hospitalizations (per 100 000 persons) with diagnosis codes in each category (mental/behavioral health; suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and intentional self-harm [SI/SA/ISH]; and social issues) across 3 time periods (pre-pandemic, lockdown, and reopening). We calculated the proportion and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of total ED visits and total hospitalizations attributable to mental/behavioral health and SI/SA/ISH across the 3 time periods. RESULTS Rates of all categories of ED visits decreased from pre-pandemic to the lockdown period; from pre-pandemic to the reopening period, mental/behavioral health visits decreased but rates of SI/SA/ISH visits were unchanged. The proportion of ED visits attributable to mental/behavioral health increased from 3.5% (95% CI 3.2%-3.7%) pre-pandemic to 4.0% (95% CI 3.7%-4.3%) during reopening, and the proportion of SI/SA/ISH diagnoses increased from 1.6% (95% CI 1.4%-1.8%) pre-pandemic to 2.4% (95% CI 2.1%-2.7%) during the reopening period. Emergency care use for social issues and hospital admissions for mental/behavioral health and SI/SA/ISH diagnoses were unchanged across the study periods. CONCLUSIONS In the early pandemic, pediatric mental health care and acute suicidal crises accounted for increased proportions of emergency care. During pandemic recovery, understanding the populations most impacted and increasing access to preventative mental health care is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angelique E Boutzoukas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Bria Caison
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Toni Darden
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - M Alan Brookhart
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moreda E, Al-Dhalimy H, Ha M, Nwanaji-Enwerem E, Nguyen A, Pieters K, Alan Brookhart M, Hickerson J, Benjamin DK, Zimmerman KO, Boutzoukas AE. Leveraging School Infection Data to Address Community COVID-19 Data Gaps. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:S3-S8. [PMID: 38146860 PMCID: PMC10750306 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piad091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At-home COVID-19 tests became available in the USA in April 2021 with widespread use by January 2022; however, the lack of infrastructure to report test results to public health agencies created a gap in public health data. Kindergarten through grade 12 (K-12) schools often tracked COVID-19 cases among students and staff; leveraging school data may have helped bridge data gaps. METHODS We examined infection rates reported by school districts to ABC Science Collaborative with corresponding community rates from March 15, 2021 to June 3, 2022. We computed weekly ratios of community-to-district-reported rates (reporting ratios) across 3 study periods (spring 2021, fall 2021, and spring 2022) and estimated the difference and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in the average reporting ratio between study periods. RESULTS In spring 2021, before approval or widespread use of at-home testing, the community-reported infection rate was higher than the school-reported infection rate (reporting ratio: 1.40). In fall 2021 and spring 2022, as at-home testing rapidly increased, school-reported rates were higher than community-reported rates (reporting ratios: 0.82 and 0.66). Average reporting ratios decreased between spring 2021 and fall 2021 (-0.58, 95% CI -0.84, -0.32) and spring 2021 and spring 2022 (-0.73, 95% CI -0.96, -0.48); there was no significant change between fall 2021 and spring 2022 (-0.15, 95% CI -0.36, 0.06). CONCLUSIONS At-home COVID-19 testing resulted in significant data gaps; K-12 data could have supplemented community data. In future public health emergencies, reporting of school data could minimize data gaps, but requires additional resources including funding to track infections and standardized data reporting methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eba Moreda
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Mary Ha
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Anh Nguyen
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - M Alan Brookhart
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jesse Hickerson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angelique E Boutzoukas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kumar KR, Shah SJ, Fayyad RM, Turla TM, O'Sullivan LM, Wallace B, Clark RH, Benjamin DK, Greenberg RG, Hornik CP. Association Between Hypoglycemia and the Occurrence of Early Onset Sepsis in Premature Infants. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:S28-S36. [PMID: 38146863 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piad067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined the association between hypoglycemia and the occurrence of early onset sepsis (EOS) in premature infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS We included infants discharged from 358 NICUs between 1997 and 2020 with gestational age <34 weeks, ≥1 culture collected in the first 3 days of life, and ≥1 serum glucose value recorded on the day of or day prior to culture collection. We used multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW) and constructed models for three definitions of hypoglycemia: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Pediatric Endocrine Society, and a definition based on neurodevelopmental studies. We performed subgroup analysis in EOS episodes caused by Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms. RESULTS Of the 62,178 infants and 64,559 cultures that met study inclusion criteria, 739 (1%) cultures were positive. The median (25th, 75th percentile) glucose value was 75 mg/dL (50, 106) on the day of or day prior to a positive culture versus 70 mg/dL (50, 95) on the day of or day prior to a negative culture. We found that hypoglycemia was not associated with the occurrence of EOS for all organisms and Gram-positive organisms, whereas there was a small but significant association between the lower AAP glucose cutoff value and EOS due to Gram-negative organisms (logistic regression: risk difference [RD] 0.24% [95% CI, 0.01-0.47]; IPW: RD 0.22% [95% CI, 0.00-0.43]). CONCLUSIONS Hypoglycemia may be an early marker of EOS, particularly in episodes caused by Gram-negative organisms and when using a stricter definition of hypoglycemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karan R Kumar
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sonam J Shah
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rawan M Fayyad
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Toby M Turla
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura M O'Sullivan
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Beatriz Wallace
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Reese H Clark
- Pediatrix Center for Research, Education, Quality, and Safety, Sunrise, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christoph P Hornik
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stark A, Benjamin DK, Kajencki A, Mann K, Rodriguez N, Troan I, Hill L, Boutzoukas AE, Zimmerman KO. School Absenteeism as a Marker for Community COVID-19 Rates. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:S9-S13. [PMID: 38146857 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piad072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reported community transmission rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may not be accurate, particularly since at-home testing has become widely available. School absenteeism may serve as a marker of broader community COVID-19 transmission. METHODS We performed an observational study of North Carolina kindergarten through 12th grade schools participating in the ABC Science Collaborative that offered in-school instruction, and contributed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 data for at least 2 of 4 weeks monthly for the 2021-2022 academic year. Additionally, we analyzed publicly available databases including the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Data Repository, and National Center for Education Statistics. We described community and school COVID-19 infection rates compared with student monthly absenteeism rates to determine if the relationship between community COVID-19 infection rates and student absenteeism varied over time. RESULTS We included 500 192 students from 27 school districts. For the 2021-2022 academic year, the student and community COVID-19 infection rates did not show a significant difference (P > .05) across each month of comparison. Student absenteeism rates and community COVID-19 infection rates by month showed a similar trend across the academic year. For every 1% increase in community infection percentage, we found a 1.68% (1.12-2.25%) increase in absenteeism (P < .001); for every 1 month change in time, we found a 0.12% (0.01-0.24%) increase in absenteeism (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Student absenteeism and infection rates may be a useful marker of COVID-19 community infection rates when testing frequency and results reporting are inconsistent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Stark
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anthony Kajencki
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Katelyn Mann
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Natalie Rodriguez
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian Troan
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Larry Hill
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angelique E Boutzoukas
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lamb AE, Rent S, Brannon AJ, Greer JL, Ndey-Bongo NP, Cho SH, Greenberg RG, Benjamin DK, Clark RH, Kumar KR. Diagnostic Utility of Cerebrospinal Fluid White Blood Cell Components for the Identification of Bacterial Meningitis in Infants. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:S44-S52. [PMID: 38146862 PMCID: PMC10750308 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piad087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the diagnostic and predictive utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell (WBC) components in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis in infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS We identified a cohort of infants discharged from a Pediatrix NICU between 1997 and 2020 who did not have an immunodeficiency, had at least 1 CSF culture collected within the first 120 days of life, and at least 1 CSF laboratory specimen obtained on the day of culture collection. We only included an infant's first CSF culture and excluded cultures from CSF reservoirs and those growing contaminants or nonbacterial organisms. We examined the utility of CSF WBC components to diagnose or predict bacterial meningitis by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) at different cutoff values for each parameter. We performed subgroup analysis excluding infants treated with antibiotics the day before CSF culture collection. RESULTS Of the 20 756 infants that met the study inclusion criteria, 320 (2%) were diagnosed with bacterial meningitis. We found (AUC [95% CI]) CSF WBC count (0.76 [0.73-0.79]), CSF neutrophil count (0.74 [0.70-0.78]), and CSF neutrophil percent (0.71 [0.67-0.75]) had the highest predictive values for bacterial meningitis, even when excluding infants with early antibiotic administration. CONCLUSIONS No single clinical prediction rule had the optimal discriminatory power for predicting culture-proven bacterial meningitis, and clinicians should be cautious when interpreting CSF WBC parameters in infants with suspected meningitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley E Lamb
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sharla Rent
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Asia J Brannon
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - Stephen H Cho
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Reese H Clark
- Pediatrix-Obstetrix Center for Research and Education, Sunrise, Florida, USA
| | - Karan R Kumar
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Palm ME, Edwards TL, Wieber C, Kay MT, Marion E, Boone L, Nanni A, Jones M, Pham E, Hildreth M, Lane K, McBee N, Benjamin DK, Bernard GR, Dean JM, Dwyer JP, Ford DE, Hanley DF, Harris PA, Wilkins CH, Selker HP. Development, implementation, and dissemination of operational innovations across the trial innovation network. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e251. [PMID: 38229905 PMCID: PMC10790103 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Improving the quality and conduct of multi-center clinical trials is essential to the generation of generalizable knowledge about the safety and efficacy of healthcare treatments. Despite significant effort and expense, many clinical trials are unsuccessful. The National Center for Advancing Translational Science launched the Trial Innovation Network to address critical roadblocks in multi-center trials by leveraging existing infrastructure and developing operational innovations. We provide an overview of the roadblocks that led to opportunities for operational innovation, our work to develop, define, and map innovations across the network, and how we implemented and disseminated mature innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisha E. Palm
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Terri L. Edwards
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Cortney Wieber
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marie T. Kay
- University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Eve Marion
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Leslie Boone
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Angeline Nanni
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michelle Jones
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Eilene Pham
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Meghan Hildreth
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Karen Lane
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nichol McBee
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gordon R. Bernard
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Jamie P. Dwyer
- University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Utah Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daniel E. Ford
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel F. Hanley
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paul A. Harris
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Biostatistics, and Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Consuelo H. Wilkins
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Harry P. Selker
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zimmerman KO, Westreich D, Funk MJ, Benjamin DK, Turner D, Stürmer, T. Comparative Effectiveness of Dual- Versus Mono-Sedative Therapy on Opioid Administration, Sedative Administration, and Sedation Level in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Children. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2023; 28:409-416. [PMID: 38130497 PMCID: PMC10731925 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We estimated the effect of early initiation of dual therapy vs monotherapy on drug administration and related outcomes in mechanically ventilated, critically ill children. METHODS We used the electronic medical record at a single tertiary medical center to conduct an active comparator, new user cohort study. We included children <18 years of age who were exposed to a sedative or analgesic within 6 hours of intubation. We used stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for confounding at baseline. We estimated the average effect of initial dual therapy vs monotherapy on outcomes including cumulative opioid, benzodiazepine, and dexmedetomidine dosing; sedation scores; time to double the opioid or benzodiazepine infusion rate; initiation of neuromuscular blockade within the first 7 days of follow-up; time to extubation; and 7-day all-cause in-hospital death. RESULTS The cohort included 640 patients. Children receiving dual therapy received 0.03 mg/kg (95% CI, 0.02-0.04) more dexmedetomidine over the first 7 days after initiation of mechanical ventilation than did monotherapy patients. Dual therapy patients had similar sedation scores, time to double therapy, initiation of neuromuscular blockade, and time to extubation as monotherapy patients. Dual therapy patients had a lower incidence of death. CONCLUSIONS In this study, initial dual therapy compared with monotherapy does not reduce overall drug administration during mechanical ventilation. The identified effect of dual therapy on mortality deserves further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute (KOZ, DKB), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Pediatrics (KOZ, DKB, DT), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Epidemiology (KOZ, DW, MJF, TS), Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Daniel Westreich
- Department of Epidemiology (KOZ, DW, MJF, TS), Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michele Jonsson Funk
- Department of Epidemiology (KOZ, DW, MJF, TS), Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute (KOZ, DKB), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Pediatrics (KOZ, DKB, DT), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - David Turner
- Department of Pediatrics (KOZ, DKB, DT), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Til Stürmer,
- Department of Epidemiology (KOZ, DW, MJF, TS), Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sauder KA, Cohen CC, Mueller NT, Hockett CW, Switkowski KM, Maldonado LE, Lyall K, Kerver JM, Dabelea D, O'Connor TG, Glueck DH, Melough MM, Couzens GL, Catellier DJ, Smith PB, Newby KL, Benjamin DK. Identifying Foods That Optimize Intake of Key Micronutrients During Pregnancy. J Nutr 2023; 153:3012-3022. [PMID: 37604382 PMCID: PMC10613721 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most pregnant women in the United States are at risk of inadequate intake of vitamin A, vitamin D, folic acid, calcium, iron, and omega-3 fatty acids from foods alone. Very few United States dietary supplements provide sufficient doses of all 6 nutrients without inducing excess intake. OBJECTIVE We aimed to identify energy-efficient foods that provide sufficient doses of these nutrients and could be consumed in lieu of dietary supplements to achieve the recommended intake in pregnancy. METHODS In a previous analysis of 2,450 pregnant women, we calculated the range of additional intake needed to shift 90% of participants to intake above the estimated average requirement and keep 90% below the tolerable upper level for these 6 nutrients. Here, we identified foods and beverages from the 2019 to 2020 Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies that provide target levels of these nutrients without exceeding the additional energy intake recommended for pregnancy beginning in the second trimester (340 kilocalories). RESULTS We identified 2358 candidate foods meeting the target intake range for at least one nutrient. No candidate foods provided target amounts of all 6 nutrients. Seaweed (raw or cooked without fat) provided sufficient vitamin A, folate, calcium, iron, and omega-3s (5 of 6 nutrients) but would require an intake of >5 cups/d. Twenty-one other foods/beverages (mainly fish, vegetables, and beverages) provided target amounts of 4 of the 6 nutrients. Few foods met targets for vitamin D (n = 54) or iron (n = 93). CONCLUSIONS Results highlight the difficulty in meeting nutritional requirements from diet alone and imply that dietary supplements are likely necessary to meet vitamin D and iron targets in pregnancy, as well as omega-3 fatty acid targets for individuals who do not consume fish products. Other foods could be added in limited amounts to help meet intake targets without exceeding caloric recommendations or nutrient safety limits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Sauder
- Lifecourse Epidemiology of Adiposity and Diabetes (LEAD) Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
| | - Catherine C Cohen
- Lifecourse Epidemiology of Adiposity and Diabetes (LEAD) Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Noel T Mueller
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Christine W Hockett
- Avera Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | - Karen M Switkowski
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Luis E Maldonado
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Kristen Lyall
- AJ Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jean M Kerver
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Dana Dabelea
- Lifecourse Epidemiology of Adiposity and Diabetes (LEAD) Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Thomas G O'Connor
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Deborah H Glueck
- Lifecourse Epidemiology of Adiposity and Diabetes (LEAD) Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Melissa M Melough
- Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
| | - G Lance Couzens
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | | | - P B Smith
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - K L Newby
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - D K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Foote HP, Benjamin DK, Greenberg RG, Clark RH, Hornik CP. Use of vasopressors for septic shock in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2023; 43:1274-1280. [PMID: 37055478 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01667-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe outcomes for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit with septic shock based on the vasopressor administered. METHODS This is a multicenter cohort study of infants with an episode of septic shock. We evaluated the primary outcomes of mortality and pressor-free days alive in the first week after shock using multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions. RESULTS We identified 1592 infants. Mortality was 50%. Dopamine was the most used vasopressor (92% of episodes) and hydrocortisone was co-administered with a vasopressor in 38% of episodes. Compared to infants treated with dopamine alone, adjusted odds of mortality were significantly higher for those treated with epinephrine alone (aOR 4.7 [95% CI: 2.3-9.2]). Adjuvant hydrocortisone was associated with significantly lower adjusted odds of mortality (aOR 0.60 [0.42-0.86]) CONCLUSIONS: The use of epinephrine as either a solo agent or in combination therapy was associated with significantly worse outcomes, while adjuvant hydrocortisone was associated with decreased mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry P Foote
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Christoph P Hornik
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Coggins SA, Willis Z, Benjamin DK, Mukhopadhyay S, Laughon M, Greenberg RG, Clark RH, Puopolo KM. Early antibiotic exposure in very-low birth weight infants and infection risk at 3-7 days after birth. J Perinatol 2023; 43:1158-1165. [PMID: 37491474 PMCID: PMC10529484 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01737-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine rates of late-onset infection (LOI) during postnatal days 3-7 among preterm infants, based on antibiotic exposure during days 0-2. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of infants born <1500 grams and ≤30 weeks gestation, 2005-2018. We analyzed the incidence and microbiology of LOI at days 3-7 based on antibiotic exposure during postnatal days 0-2. RESULTS The cohort included 88,574 infants, of whom 85% were antibiotic-exposed. Fewer antibiotic-exposed compared to unexposed infants developed LOI (1.5% vs. 2.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.28, 95% CI 0.24-0.33). Among antibiotic-exposed compared to unexposed infants, Gram-negative (38% vs. 28%, p = 0.002) and fungal (11% vs. 1%, p < 0.001) species were more commonly isolated, and gram-positive organisms (49% vs. 70%, p < 0.001) were less commonly isolated. CONCLUSIONS We observed low overall rates of LOI at days 3-7 after birth, but antibiotic exposure from birth was associated with lower rates, and with differing microbiology, compared to no exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Coggins
- Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Clinical Futures, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Zachary Willis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Sagori Mukhopadhyay
- Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Clinical Futures, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew Laughon
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Reese H Clark
- The MEDNAX Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety, Sunrise, FL, USA
| | - Karen M Puopolo
- Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Clinical Futures, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
O’Halloran JA, Ko ER, Anstrom KJ, Kedar E, McCarthy MW, Panettieri RA, Maillo M, Nunez PS, Lachiewicz AM, Gonzalez C, Smith PB, de Tai SMT, Khan A, Lora AJM, Salathe M, Capo G, Gonzalez DR, Patterson TF, Palma C, Ariza H, Lima MP, Blamoun J, Nannini EC, Sprinz E, Mykietiuk A, Alicic R, Rauseo AM, Wolfe CR, Witting B, Wang JP, Parra-Rodriguez L, Der T, Willsey K, Wen J, Silverstein A, O’Brien SM, Al-Khalidi HR, Maldonado MA, Melsheimer R, Ferguson WG, McNulty SE, Zakroysky P, Halabi S, Benjamin DK, Butler S, Atkinson JC, Adam SJ, Chang S, LaVange L, Proschan M, Bozzette SA, Powderly WG. Abatacept, Cenicriviroc, or Infliximab for Treatment of Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023; 330:328-339. [PMID: 37428480 PMCID: PMC10334296 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.11043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance Immune dysregulation contributes to poorer outcomes in COVID-19. Objective To investigate whether abatacept, cenicriviroc, or infliximab provides benefit when added to standard care for COVID-19 pneumonia. Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial using a master protocol to investigate immunomodulators added to standard care for treatment of participants hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. The results of 3 substudies are reported from 95 hospitals at 85 clinical research sites in the US and Latin America. Hospitalized patients 18 years or older with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 14 days and evidence of pulmonary involvement underwent randomization between October 2020 and December 2021. Interventions Single infusion of abatacept (10 mg/kg; maximum dose, 1000 mg) or infliximab (5 mg/kg) or a 28-day oral course of cenicriviroc (300-mg loading dose followed by 150 mg twice per day). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was time to recovery by day 28 evaluated using an 8-point ordinal scale (higher scores indicate better health). Recovery was defined as the first day the participant scored at least 6 on the ordinal scale. Results Of the 1971 participants randomized across the 3 substudies, the mean (SD) age was 54.8 (14.6) years and 1218 (61.8%) were men. The primary end point of time to recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia was not significantly different for abatacept (recovery rate ratio [RRR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.98-1.28]; P = .09), cenicriviroc (RRR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.86-1.18]; P = .94), or infliximab (RRR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.99-1.28]; P = .08) compared with placebo. All-cause 28-day mortality was 11.0% for abatacept vs 15.1% for placebo (odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.41-0.94]), 13.8% for cenicriviroc vs 11.9% for placebo (OR, 1.18 [95% CI 0.72-1.94]), and 10.1% for infliximab vs 14.5% for placebo (OR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39-0.90]). Safety outcomes were comparable between active treatment and placebo, including secondary infections, in all 3 substudies. Conclusions and Relevance Time to recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia among hospitalized participants was not significantly different for abatacept, cenicriviroc, or infliximab vs placebo. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04593940.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily R. Ko
- Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cynthia Gonzalez
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - P. Brian Smith
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Akram Khan
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Christopher Palma
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | | | | | | | | | - Eduardo Sprinz
- Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre HCPA, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Radica Alicic
- Providence Medical Research Center, Spokane, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tatyana Der
- Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Jun Wen
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Adam Silverstein
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sean M. O’Brien
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Hussein R. Al-Khalidi
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | - Steven E. McNulty
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Pearl Zakroysky
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Susan Halabi
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sandra Butler
- Technical Resources International (TRI), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jane C. Atkinson
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Stacey J. Adam
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Soju Chang
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Michael Proschan
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Samuel A. Bozzette
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zimmerman KO, Benjamin DK. Lessons Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic in K-12 Education. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2023060352O. [PMID: 37394505 PMCID: PMC10312278 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-060352o] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Uthappa DM, Pak J, McGann KA, Brookhart MA, McKinzie K, Abdelbarr M, Cockrell J, Hickerson J, Armstrong S, D’Agostino EM, Weber DJ, Kalu IC, Benjamin DK, Zimmerman KO, Boutzoukas AE. In-Person Instruction and Educational Outcomes of K-8 Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2022060352L. [PMID: 37394499 PMCID: PMC10312276 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352l] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Quantify the relationship between district policy permitting in-person instruction and educational outcomes during the 2020 to 2021 academic year for kindergarten through eighth grade students. METHODS An ecological, repeated cross-sectional analysis of grade-level proficiency of students enrolled in public school districts in North Carolina (n = 115 school districts) was conducted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the proportion of the school year a district spent in-person and 2020 to 2021 end-of-year student proficiency in the district. We then fit a multivariable linear regression model, weighted by district size, and adjusted for district-level 2018 to 2019 proficiency and district-level factors (rural or urban, area deprivation). RESULTS Compared to 2018 to 2019, there was a 12.1% decrease (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.8-19.3) in mathematics and an 18.1% decrease (95% CI: 10.8-13.4) in reading proficiency across the state at the end of 2020 to 2021. Compared to a district that remained entirely remote for the 2020 to 2021 school year, a district offering full in-person instruction had 12% (95% CI: 11%-12.9%) and 4.1% (95% CI: 3.5%-4.8%) more students achieve grade-level proficiency in mathematics and reading, respectively. In-person instruction was associated with greater increases in mathematics proficiency than reading, and greater increases in elementary-level students' proficiency than middle school-level. CONCLUSIONS The proportion of students achieving grade-level proficiency in 2020 to 2021 fell below prepandemic levels at each evaluated time point in the academic year. Increased time spent in-person by a school district was associated with an increased proportion of students achieving grade-level end-of-grade proficiency in both mathematics and reading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joyce Pak
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Kaylee McKinzie
- Student, Trinity School of Arts & Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mariam Abdelbarr
- Student, North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jed Cockrell
- Yadkin County Schools, Yadkinville, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Emily M. D’Agostino
- Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David J. Weber
- Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schuster JE, Erickson TR, Goldman JL, Benjamin DK, Brookhart MA, Dewhurst S, Fist A, Foxe J, Godambe M, Gwynn L, Kiene SM, Keener Mast D, McDaniels-Davidson C, Newland JG, Oren E, Selvarangan R, Shinde N, Walsh T, Watterson T, Zand M, Zimmerman KO, Kalu IC. Utilization and Impact of Symptomatic and Exposure SARS-CoV-2 Testing in K-12 Schools. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2022060352I. [PMID: 37394504 PMCID: PMC10312273 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352i] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that schools can offer severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostic (on-demand) testing for students and staff with coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms or exposures. Data related to the uptake, implementation, and effect of school-associated on-demand diagnostic testing have not been described. METHODS The Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics Underserved Populations Return to School program provided resources to researchers to implement on-demand SARS-CoV-2 testing in schools. This study describes the strategies used and uptake among the different testing programs. Risk of positivity was compared for symptomatic and exposure testing during the δ and ο variant periods. We estimated the number of school absence days saved with school-based diagnostic testing. RESULTS Of the 16 eligible programs, 7 provided school-based on-demand testing. The number of persons that participated in these testing programs is 8281, with 4134 (49.9%) receiving >1 test during the school year. Risk of positivity was higher for symptomatic testing compared with exposure testing and higher during the ο variant predominant period compared with the δ variant predominant period. Overall, access to testing saved an estimated 13 806 absent school days. CONCLUSIONS School-based on-demand SARS-CoV-2 testing was used throughout the school year, and nearly half the participants accessed testing on more than 1 occasion. Future studies should work to understand participant preferences around school-based testing and how these strategies can be used both during and outside of pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maya Godambe
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Lisa Gwynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Susan M. Kiene
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | | | - Corinne McDaniels-Davidson
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Jason G. Newland
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Eyal Oren
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Rangaraj Selvarangan
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Nidhi Shinde
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Tyler Walsh
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Treymayne Watterson
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Martin Zand
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Uthappa DM, Mann TK, Goldman JL, Schuster JE, Newland JG, Anderson WB, Dozier A, Inkelas M, Foxe JJ, Gwynn L, Gurnett CA, McDaniels-Davidson C, Walsh T, Watterson T, Holden-Wiltse J, Potts JM, D’Agostino EM, Zandi K, Corbett A, Spallina S, DeMuri GP, Wu YP, Pulgaron ER, Kiene SM, Oren E, Allison-Burbank JD, Okihiro M, Lee RE, Johnson SB, Stump TK, Coller RJ, Mast DK, Haroz EE, Kemp S, Benjamin DK, Zimmerman KO. Common Data Element Collection in Underserved School Communities: Challenges and Recommendations. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2022060352N. [PMID: 37394503 PMCID: PMC10312277 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352n] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide recommendations for future common data element (CDE) development and collection that increases community partnership, harmonizes data interpretation, and continues to reduce barriers of mistrust between researchers and underserved communities. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative and quantitative evaluation of mandatory CDE collection among Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics-Underserved Populations Return to School project teams with various priority populations and geographic locations in the United States to: (1) compare racial and ethnic representativeness of participants completing CDE questions relative to participants enrolled in project-level testing initiatives and (2) identify the amount of missing CDE data by CDE domain. Additionally, we conducted analyses stratified by aim-level variables characterizing CDE collection strategies. RESULTS There were 15 study aims reported across the 13 participating Return to School projects, of which 7 (47%) were structured so that CDEs were fully uncoupled from the testing initiative, 4 (27%) were fully coupled, and 4 (27%) were partially coupled. In 9 (60%) study aims, participant incentives were provided in the form of monetary compensation. Most project teams modified CDE questions (8/13; 62%) to fit their population. Across all 13 projects, there was minimal variation in the racial and ethnic distribution of CDE survey participants from those who participated in testing; however, fully uncoupling CDE questions from testing increased the proportion of Black and Hispanic individuals participating in both initiatives. CONCLUSIONS Collaboration with underrepresented populations from the early study design process may improve interest and participation in CDE collection efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diya M. Uthappa
- Duke University School of Medicine, Doctor of Medicine Program
| | - Tara K. Mann
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Jennifer L. Goldman
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Jennifer E. Schuster
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | | | | | | | - Moira Inkelas
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Los Angeles, California
| | - John J. Foxe
- The Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience and The Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York
| | - Lisa Gwynn
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida USA
| | - Christina A. Gurnett
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Tyler Walsh
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gregory P. DeMuri
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Yelena P. Wu
- Department of Dermatology
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Susan M. Kiene
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Eyal Oren
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | | | - May Okihiro
- Department of Pediatrics, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Rebecca E. Lee
- Edson College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Senior Global Futures Scientist, Julie Ann Wrigley Global Futures Laboratory, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sara B. Johnson
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tammy K. Stump
- Department of Dermatology
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Ryan J. Coller
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Emily E. Haroz
- Department of International Health & Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Steven Kemp
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Goldman JL, Kalu IC, Schuster JE, Erickson T, Mast DK, Zimmerman K, Benjamin DK, Kalb LG, Gurnett C, Newland JG, Sherby M, Godambe M, Shinde N, Watterson T, Walsh T, Foxe J, Zand M, Dewhurst S, Coller R, DeMuri GP, Archuleta S, Ko LK, Inkelas M, Manuel V, Lee R, Oh H, Murugan V, Kramer J, Okihiro M, Gwynn L, Pulgaron E, McCulloh R, Broadhurst J, McDaniels-Davidson C, Kiene S, Oren E, Wu Y, Wetter DW, Stump T, Brookhart MA, Fist A, Haroz E. Building School-Academic Partnerships to Implement COVID-19 Testing in Underserved Populations. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2022060352C. [PMID: 37394512 PMCID: PMC10312280 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In April 2021, the US government made substantial investments in students' safe return to school by providing resources for school-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mitigation strategies, including COVID-19 diagnostic testing. However, testing uptake and access among vulnerable children and children with medical complexities remained unclear. METHODS The Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics Underserved Populations program was established by the National Institutes of Health to implement and evaluate COVID-19 testing programs in underserved populations. Researchers partnered with schools to implement COVID-19 testing programs. The authors of this study evaluated COVID-19 testing program implementation and enrollment and sought to determine key implementation strategies. A modified Nominal Group Technique was used to survey program leads to identify and rank testing strategies to provide a consensus of high-priority strategies for infectious disease testing in schools for vulnerable children and children with medical complexities. RESULTS Among the 11 programs responding to the survey, 4 (36%) included prekindergarten and early care education, 8 (73%) worked with socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, and 4 focused on children with developmental disabilities. A total of 81 916 COVID-19 tests were performed. "Adapting testing strategies to meet the needs, preferences, and changing guidelines," "holding regular meetings with school leadership and staff," and "assessing and responding to community needs" were identified as key implementation strategies by program leads. CONCLUSIONS School-academic partnerships helped provide COVID-19 testing in vulnerable children and children with medical complexities using approaches that met the needs of these populations. Additional work is needed to develop best practices for in-school infectious disease testing in all children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Goldman
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Ibukunoluwa C. Kalu
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer E. Schuster
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Tyler Erickson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Kanecia Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Luther G. Kalb
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Christina Gurnett
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Jason G. Newland
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Michael Sherby
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Maya Godambe
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Nidhi Shinde
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Treymayne Watterson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Tyler Walsh
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - John Foxe
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 31 Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Martin Zand
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 31 Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen Dewhurst
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 31 Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ryan Coller
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Gregory P. DeMuri
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Shannon Archuleta
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Linda K. Ko
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Los Angeles, California
| | - Moira Inkelas
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Vladimir Manuel
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Hyunsung Oh
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, ASU Biodesign Clinical Testing Laboratory, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Vel Murugan
- Division of Primary, Complex, and Adolescent Medicine, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - May Okihiro
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Lisa Gwynn
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | - Russell McCulloh
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Diego State University School of Public Health, San Diego, California
| | - Jana Broadhurst
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Diego State University School of Public Health, San Diego, California
| | | | - Susan Kiene
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Eyal Oren
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Yelena Wu
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - David W. Wetter
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tammy Stump
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Alex Fist
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Emily Haroz
- Johns Hopkins Center for Indigenous Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lane K, Palm ME, Marion E, Kay MT, Thompson D, Stroud M, Boyle H, Hillery S, Nanni A, Hildreth M, Nelson S, Burr JS, Edwards T, Poole L, Waddy SP, Dunsmore SE, Harris P, Wilkins C, Bernard GR, Dean JM, Dwyer J, Benjamin DK, Selker HP, Hanley DF, Ford DE. Approaches for enhancing the informativeness and quality of clinical trials: Innovations and principles for implementing multicenter trials from the Trial Innovation Network. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e131. [PMID: 37396815 PMCID: PMC10308427 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
One challenge for multisite clinical trials is ensuring that the conditions of an informative trial are incorporated into all aspects of trial planning and execution. The multicenter model can provide the potential for a more informative environment, but it can also place a trial at risk of becoming uninformative due to lack of rigor, quality control, or effective recruitment, resulting in premature discontinuation and/or non-publication. Key factors that support informativeness are having the right team and resources during study planning and implementation and adequate funding to support performance activities. This communication draws on the experience of the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Trial Innovation Network (TIN) to develop approaches for enhancing the informativeness of clinical trials. We distilled this information into three principles: (1) assemble a diverse team, (2) leverage existing processes and systems, and (3) carefully consider budgets and contracts. The TIN, comprised of NCATS, three Trial Innovation Centers, a Recruitment Innovation Center, and 60+ CTSA Program hubs, provides resources to investigators who are proposing multicenter collaborations. In addition to sharing principles that support the informativeness of clinical trials, we highlight TIN-developed resources relevant for multicenter trial initiation and conduct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Lane
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marisha E. Palm
- Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eve Marion
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marie T. Kay
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Dixie Thompson
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mary Stroud
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Helen Boyle
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Shannon Hillery
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Angeline Nanni
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meghan Hildreth
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sarah Nelson
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jeri S. Burr
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Terri Edwards
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lori Poole
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Salina P. Waddy
- Division of Clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sarah E. Dunsmore
- Division of Clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul Harris
- Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Consuelo Wilkins
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gordon R. Bernard
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - J. Michael Dean
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jamie Dwyer
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Harry P. Selker
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
- Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel F. Hanley
- Acute Care Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel E. Ford
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Scott Z, Uthappa DM, Mann TK, Kim H, Brookhart MA, Edwards L, Rak Z, Benjamin DK, Zimmerman KO. Test-to-Stay in Kindergarten Through 12th Grade Schools After Household Exposure to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. J Sch Health 2023; 93:360-369. [PMID: 36404728 PMCID: PMC10261908 DOI: 10.1111/josh.13283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Test-to-stay (TTS) is a strategy to limit school exclusion following an exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We evaluated the use of TTS within universally masked kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) school settings following household SARS-CoV-2 exposure. METHODS Three hundred twenty-two participants were enrolled. Serial rapid antigen testing was performed up to 15 days post-exposure. Analysis-eligible participants completed the 15-day testing protocol, tested positive any time during the testing window, or received a negative test on or after day 9. Primary outcomes included within-school tertiary attack rate (TAR) (test positivity among close contacts of positive TTS participants), and school days saved among TTS participants. RESULTS Seventy-three of 265 analysis-eligible participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (secondary attack rate of 28% [95% CI: 16-63%]). Among 77 within-school close contacts, 2 were positive (TAR = 3% [95% CI: 1-5%]). Participant absences were limited to 338 days, resulting in 82% of 1849 school days saved. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY TTS facilitates continued in-person learning and can greatly reduce the number of missed school days. CONCLUSIONS Within universally masked K-12 schools, TTS is a safe alternative to school exclusion following household SARS-CoV-2 exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeni Scott
- Duke University Pediatric Pulmonary Division and Fellowship Program, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 104013 DUMC, Durham, NC, 27710
| | - Diya M Uthappa
- Doctor of Medicine Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27701
| | - Tara K Mann
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27522
| | - Hwasoon Kim
- Duke Clinical Research Institute-Statistics, Duke University, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27522
| | - M A Brookhart
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27701
| | - Laura Edwards
- Duke Clinical Research Institute - Statistics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Zsolt Rak
- Duke Clinical Research Institute-Statistics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Co-Chair, The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham Centre Suite 800, 300 W. Morgan St., Durham, NC, 27701-7044
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Co-Chair, The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham Centre Suite 800, 300 W. Morgan St., Durham, NC, 27701-7044
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Eisenstein EL, Zozus MN, Garza MY, Lanham HJ, Adagarla B, Walden A, Benjamin DK, Zimmerman KO, Kumar KR. Assessing clinical site readiness for electronic health record (EHR)-to-electronic data capture (EDC) automated data collection. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 128:107144. [PMID: 36898625 PMCID: PMC10164080 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND eSource software is used to automatically copy a patient's electronic health record data into a clinical study's electronic case report form. However, there is little evidence to assist sponsors in identifying the best sites for multi-center eSource studies. METHODS We developed an eSource site readiness survey. The survey was administered to principal investigators, clinical research coordinators, and chief research information officers at Pediatric Trial Network sites. RESULTS A total of 61 respondents were included in this study (clinical research coordinator, 22; principal investigator, 20; and chief research information officer, 19). Clinical research coordinators and principal investigators ranked medication administration, medication orders, laboratory, medical history, and vital signs data as having the highest priority for automation. While most organizations used some electronic health record research functions (clinical research coordinator, 77%; principal investigator, 75%; and chief research information officer, 89%), only 21% of sites were using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources standards to exchange patient data with other institutions. Respondents generally gave lower readiness for change ratings to organizations that did not have a separate research information technology group and where researchers practiced in hospitals not operated by their medical schools. CONCLUSIONS Site readiness to participate in eSource studies is not merely a technical problem. While technical capabilities are important, organizational priorities, structure, and the site's support of clinical research functions are equally important considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meredith N Zozus
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
| | - Maryam Y Garza
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
| | - Holly J Lanham
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
| | | | - Anita Walden
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA..
| | | | | | - Karan R Kumar
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Moorthy GS, Boutzoukas AE, Benjamin DK, Polgreen PM, Beekmann SE, Bradley JS, Dehority W. Defining Variability in Evaluation and Management of Children with Chronic Osteomyelitis. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:226-229. [PMID: 36688512 PMCID: PMC10146934 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Pediatric chronic osteomyelitis is a rare, debilitating condition lacking management guidelines. In a national survey of 162 pediatric infectious disease physicians through the Emerging Infections Network, tremendous variability in diagnostic approaches and management was noted, highlighting a need for a prospective study to better define the spectrum of pathogens and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganga S Moorthy
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angelique E Boutzoukas
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Philip M Polgreen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Susan E Beekmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - John S Bradley
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA and Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Walter Dehority
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Corneli A, McKenna K, Dombeck C, Molokwu N, Taylor J, Vergara L, Benjamin DK, Zimmerman KO. Caregivers of Black and Latino/a/x Students and School Personnel Perspectives on School-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Implications for Testing and Test-to-Stay Programs in K-12 Schools. J Sch Health 2023; 93:186-196. [PMID: 36510666 PMCID: PMC9877910 DOI: 10.1111/josh.13263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND "Test-to-stay" (TTS) is an effective approach for keeping students in school post-exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). To prepare for school-based SARS-CoV-2 testing, we implemented formative research to gather perspectives on school-based testing among school personnel, as well as caregivers of Black and Latino/a/x students given systemic racism, existing school inequalities, and the disproportionate effect of COVID-19 on Black and Latino/a/x populations. METHODS We conducted in-depth interviews with caregivers of K-12 grade Black and Latino/a/x students and focus group discussions with K-12 school personnel. We described the forthcoming school-based SARS-CoV-2 testing program and explored potential benefits and concerns, including concerns about testing-related stigma and discrimination, particularly toward Black and Latino/a/x students, and implementation recommendations. RESULTS Perceived testing benefits included school community reassurance and preventing school outbreaks. Concerns included potential student anxiety, classroom disruption, inaccurate results, and limited information for caregivers. Some participants mentioned that testing-related stigma and discrimination could happen based on the testing selection process or results but not due to race or ethnicity. Participants provided numerous testing recommendations, including suggestions to prevent negative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Participants believed that stigma and discrimination from SARS-CoV-2 testing is possible, although differential treatment based on race or ethnicity was not anticipated. Participants' narratives provide support for school-based testing and the testing component of TTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Corneli
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research InstituteDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNC
| | - Kevin McKenna
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNC
| | - Carrie Dombeck
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNC
| | - Nneka Molokwu
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNC
| | - Jamilah Taylor
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNC
| | - Lorraine Vergara
- Duke Office of Clinical ResearchDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNC
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious DiseasesDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Co‐Chair, The ABC Science CollaborativeDurhamNC
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical CareDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Co‐Chair, The ABC Science CollaborativeDurhamNC
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kalu IC, Zimmerman KO, Goldman JL, Keener Mast D, Blakemore AM, Moorthy G, Boutzoukas AE, Campbell MM, Uthappa D, DeLaRosa J, Potts JM, Edwards LJ, Selvarangan R, Benjamin DK, Mann TK, Schuster JE. SARS-CoV-2 Screening Testing Programs for Safe In-person Learning in K-12 Schools. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:64-72. [PMID: 36412278 PMCID: PMC9969331 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piac119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) screening testing is a recommended mitigation strategy for schools, although few descriptions of program implementation are available. METHODS Kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) students and staff practicing universal masking during the delta and omicron variant waves from five schools in Durham, North Carolina and eight schools in Kansas City, Missouri participated; Durham's program was structured as a public health initiative facilitated by school staff, and Kansas City's as a research study facilitated by a research team. Tests included school-based rapid antigen or polymerase chain reaction testing, at-home rapid antigen testing, and off-site nucleic acid amplification testing. RESULTS We performed nearly 5700 screening tests on more than 1600 K-12 school students and staff members. The total cost for the Durham testing program in 5 public charter K-12 schools, each with 500-1000 students, was $246 587 and approximately 752 h per semester; cost per test was $70 and cost per positive result was $7076. The total cost for the Kansas City program in eight public K-12 schools was $292 591 and required approximately 537 h in personnel time for school-based testing; cost per test was $132 and cost per positive result was $4818. SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates were generally lower (0-16.16%) than rates in the community (2.7-36.47%) throughout all testing weeks. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Voluntary screening testing programs in K-12 schools are costly and rarely detect asymptomatic positive persons, particularly in universally masked settings. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04831866.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibukunoluwa C Kalu
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Dana Keener Mast
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Ashley M Blakemore
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ganga Moorthy
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angelique E Boutzoukas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melissa M Campbell
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Diya Uthappa
- Duke University School of Medicine, Doctor of Medicine Program, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jesse DeLaRosa
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Laura J Edwards
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rangaraj Selvarangan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tara K Mann
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer E Schuster
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Boutzoukas AE, Olson R, Sellers MA, Fischer G, Hornik CD, Alibrahim O, Iheagwara K, Abulebda K, Bass AL, Irby K, Subbaswamy A, Zivick EE, Sweney J, Stormorken AG, Barker EE, Lutfi R, McCrory MC, Costello JM, Ackerman KG, Munoz Pareja JC, Dean JM, Abdelsamad N, Hanley DF, Mould WA, Lane K, Stroud M, Feger BJ, Greenberg RG, Smith PB, Benjamin DK, Hornik CP, Zimmerman KO, Becker ML. Mechanisms to expedite pediatric clinical trial site activation: The DOSE trial experience. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 125:107067. [PMID: 36577492 PMCID: PMC9918704 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely trial start-up is a key determinant of trial success; however, delays during start-up are common and costly. Moreover, data on start-up metrics in pediatric clinical trials are sparse. To expedite trial start-up, the Trial Innovation Network piloted three novel mechanisms in the trial titled Dexmedetomidine Opioid Sparing Effect in Mechanically Ventilated Children (DOSE), a multi-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in the pediatric intensive care setting. METHODS The three novel start-up mechanisms included: 1) competitive activation; 2) use of trial start-up experts, called site navigators; and 3) supplemental funds earned for achieving pre-determined milestones. After sites were activated, they received a web-based survey to report perceptions of the DOSE start-up process. In addition to perceptions, metrics analyzed included milestones met, time to start-up, and subsequent enrollment of subjects. RESULTS Twenty sites were selected for participation, with 19 sites being fully activated. Across activated sites, the median (quartile 1, quartile 3) time from receipt of regulatory documents to site activation was 82 days (68, 113). Sites reported that of the three novel mechanisms, the most motivating factor for expeditious activation was additional funding available for achieving start-up milestones, followed by site navigator assistance and then competitive site activation. CONCLUSION Study start-up is a critical time for the success of clinical trials, and innovative methods to minimize delays during start-up are needed. Milestone-based funds and site navigators were preferred mechanisms by sites participating in the DOSE study and may have contributed to the expeditious start-up timeline achieved. CLINICALTRIALS gov #: NCT03938857.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique E Boutzoukas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rachel Olson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Gwenyth Fischer
- University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Chi D Hornik
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Kamal Abulebda
- Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Andora L Bass
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jill Sweney
- Primary Children's Medical Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | - Riad Lutfi
- Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel F Hanley
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - W Andrew Mould
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Karen Lane
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mary Stroud
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - P Brian Smith
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christoph P Hornik
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mara L Becker
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Commander SJ, Benjamin DK, Wu H, Thompson EJ, Lane M, Clark RH, Greenberg RG, Hornik CP. Exposure-response Relationships of Metronidazole in Infants: Integration of Electronic Health Record Data With Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling-derived Exposure Simulation. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2023; 42:27-31. [PMID: 36201670 PMCID: PMC9742159 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infants frequently receive metronidazole at variable doses and duration for surgical site infection prophylaxis and treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Seizures are a rare (but potentially devastating) side effect of metronidazole, yet the prevalence of seizures in infants, as well as the relationship with metronidazole dose and exposure, are unknown. METHODS We examined the Pediatrix Clinical Data Warehouse for infants in neonatal intensive care units from 1997 to 2018 who received at least 1 dose of metronidazole during their first 120 days of life. We used an existing population pharmacokinetic model to simulate exposure parameters, estimating multivariable associations between metronidazole dosing and exposure parameters, and the occurrence of seizure. RESULTS There were 19,367 intravenous doses of metronidazole given to 1546 infants, and 31 experienced a seizure. Infants with a seizure had a longer median (interquartile values) duration of metronidazole exposure than those without (11 days [6, 15] vs. 7 [4, 11], P = 0.01). Each added day of metronidazole (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10), and each standard deviation increase in cumulative area under the plasma concentration-time curve (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11-1.45) were associated with increased odds of seizure. Higher simulated maximum plasma concentration was associated with lower odds of seizure (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96). CONCLUSIONS Longer metronidazole exposure and higher cumulative exposure could be associated with increased odds of infant seizures. Using a large observational dataset allowed us to identify a rare adverse event, but prospective studies are needed to validate this finding and further characterize metronidazole dose- and exposure-safety relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Jane Commander
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Huali Wu
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Elizabeth J. Thompson
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Morgan Lane
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Reese H. Clark
- The MEDNAX Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Rachel G. Greenberg
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christoph P. Hornik
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Campbell MM, Benjamin DK, Mann TK, Fist A, Blakemore A, Diaz KS, Kim H, Edwards LJ, Rak Z, Brookhart MA, Moore Z, Tilson EC, Kalu I, Boutzoukas AE, Moorthy GS, Uthappa D, Scott Z, Weber DJ, Shane AL, Bryant KA, Zimmerman KO. Test-to-Stay After SARS-CoV-2 Exposure: A Mitigation Strategy for Optionally Masked K-12 Schools. Pediatrics 2022; 150:e2022058200. [PMID: 35971240 PMCID: PMC9647593 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-058200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated the impact of a test-to-stay (TTS) program on within-school transmission and missed school days in optionally masked kindergarten through 12th grade schools during a period of high community severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission. METHODS Close contacts of those with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection were eligible for enrollment in the TTS program if exposure to a nonhousehold contact occurred between November 11, 2021 and January 28, 2022. Consented participants avoided school exclusion if they remained asymptomatic and rapid antigen testing at prespecified intervals remained negative. Primary outcomes included within-school tertiary attack rate (test positivity among close contacts of positive TTS participants) and school days saved among TTS participants. We estimated the number of additional school-acquired cases resulting from TTS and eliminating school exclusion. RESULTS A total of 1675 participants tested positive or received at least 1 negative test between days 5 and 7 and completed follow-up; 92% were students and 91% were exposed to an unmasked primary case. We identified 201 positive cases. We observed a tertiary attack rate of 10% (95% confidence interval: 6%-19%), and 7272 (89%) of potentially missed days were saved through TTS implementation. We estimated 1 additional school-acquired case for every 21 TTS participants remaining in school buildings during the entire study period. CONCLUSIONS Even in the setting of high community transmission, a TTS strategy resulted in substantial reduction in missed school days in optionally masked schools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Department of Pediatrics
- Co-Chair, The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zack Moore
- North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina
| | | | - Ibukun Kalu
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Department of Pediatrics
| | | | | | - Diya Uthappa
- Doctor of Medicine Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - David J. Weber
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Kristina A. Bryant
- University of Louisville and Norton Children’s Hospital, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Department of Pediatrics
- Co-Chair, The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
O'Halloran JA, Kedar E, Anstrom KJ, McCarthy MW, Ko ER, Nunez PS, Boucher C, Smith PB, Panettieri RA, de Tai SMT, Maillo M, Khan A, Mena Lora AJ, Salathe M, Capo G, Gonzalez DR, Patterson TF, Palma C, Ariza H, Lima MP, Lachiewicz AM, Blamoun J, Nannini EC, Sprinz E, Mykietiuk A, Alicic R, Rauseo AM, Wolfe CR, Witting B, Benjamin DK, McNulty SE, Zakroysky P, Halabi S, Butler S, Atkinson J, Adam SJ, Melsheimer R, Chang S, LaVange L, Proschan M, Bozzette SA, Powderly WG. Infliximab for Treatment of Adults Hospitalized with Moderate or Severe Covid-19. medRxiv 2022:2022.09.22.22280245. [PMID: 36172138 PMCID: PMC9516856 DOI: 10.1101/2022.09.22.22280245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Immune dysregulation contributes to poorer outcomes in severe Covid-19. Immunomodulators targeting various pathways have improved outcomes. We investigated whether infliximab provides benefit over standard of care. Methods We conducted a master protocol investigating immunomodulators for potential benefit in treatment of participants hospitalized with Covid-19 pneumonia. We report results for infliximab (single dose infusion) versus shared placebo both with standard of care. Primary outcome was time to recovery by day 29 (28 days after randomization). Key secondary endpoints included 14-day clinical status and 28-day mortality. Results A total of 1033 participants received study drug (517 infliximab, 516 placebo). Mean age was 54.8 years, 60.3% were male, 48.6% Hispanic or Latino, and 14% Black. No statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint was seen with infliximab compared with placebo (recovery rate ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.29; p=0.063). Median (IQR) time to recovery was 8 days (7, 9) for infliximab and 9 days (8, 10) for placebo. Participants assigned to infliximab were more likely to have an improved clinical status at day 14 (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05-1.66). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 10.1% with infliximab versus 14.5% with placebo, with 41% lower odds of dying in those receiving infliximab (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.90). No differences in risk of serious adverse events including secondary infections. Conclusions Infliximab did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement in time to recovery. It was associated with improved 14-day clinical status and substantial reduction in 28- day mortality compared with standard of care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04593940 ).
Collapse
|
35
|
Ko ER, Anstrom KJ, Panettieri RA, Lachiewicz AM, Maillo M, O'Halloran JA, Boucher C, Smith PB, McCarthy MW, Segura Nunez P, Mendivil Tuchia de Tai S, Khan A, Mena Lora AJ, Salathe M, Kedar E, Capo G, Rodríguez Gonzalez D, Patterson TF, Palma C, Ariza H, Patelli Lima M, Blamoun J, Nannini EC, Sprinz E, Mykietiuk A, Wang JP, Parra-Rodriguez L, Der T, Willsey K, Benjamin DK, Wen J, Zakroysky P, Halabi S, Silverstein A, McNulty SE, O'Brien SM, Al-Khalidi HR, Butler S, Atkinson J, Adam SJ, Chang S, Maldonado MA, Proscham M, LaVange L, Bozzette SA, Powderly WG. Abatacept for Treatment of Adults Hospitalized with Moderate or Severe Covid-19. medRxiv 2022:2022.09.22.22280247. [PMID: 36203544 PMCID: PMC9536071 DOI: 10.1101/2022.09.22.22280247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated whether abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, provides additional benefit when added to standard-of-care for patients hospitalized with Covid-19. METHODS We conducted a master protocol to investigate immunomodulators for potential benefit treating patients hospitalized with Covid-19 and report results for abatacept. Intravenous abatacept (one-time dose 10 mg/kg, maximum dose 1000 mg) plus standard of care (SOC) was compared with shared placebo plus SOC. Primary outcome was time-to-recovery by day 28. Key secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality. RESULTS Between October 16, 2020 and December 31, 2021, a total of 1019 participants received study treatment (509 abatacept; 510 shared placebo), constituting the modified intention-to-treat cohort. Participants had a mean age 54.8 (SD 14.6) years, 60.5% were male, 44.2% Hispanic/Latino and 13.7% Black. No statistically significant difference for the primary endpoint of time-to-recovery was found with a recovery-rate-ratio of 1.14 (95% CI 1.00-1.29; p=0.057) compared with placebo. We observed a substantial improvement in 28-day all-cause mortality with abatacept versus placebo (11.0% vs. 15.1%; odds ratio [OR] 0.62 [95% CI 0.41- 0.94]), leading to 38% lower odds of dying. Improvement in mortality occurred for participants requiring oxygen/noninvasive ventilation at randomization. Subgroup analysis identified the strongest effect in those with baseline C-reactive protein >75mg/L. We found no statistically significant differences in adverse events, with safety composite index slightly favoring abatacept. Rates of secondary infections were similar (16.1% for abatacept; 14.3% for placebo). CONCLUSIONS Addition of single-dose intravenous abatacept to standard-of-care demonstrated no statistically significant change in time-to-recovery, but improved 28-day mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04593940 ).
Collapse
|
36
|
Randell RL, Benjamin DK, Greenberg RG. An Innovative Approach to Building an Effective and Efficient Pediatric Trial Network. Hosp Pediatr 2022; 12:e309-e311. [PMID: 35989348 PMCID: PMC9558054 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L Randell
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Le J, Greenberg RG, Yoo Y, Clark RH, Benjamin DK, Zimmerman KO, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Wade KC. Ampicillin dosing in premature infants for early-onset sepsis: exposure-driven efficacy, safety, and stewardship. J Perinatol 2022; 42:959-964. [PMID: 35210541 PMCID: PMC9262754 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-022-01344-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Define optimal ampicillin dosing for empiric early-onset sepsis (EOS) therapy in preterm neonates. STUDY DESIGN We simulated ampicillin concentrations in newborns (birthweight < 1500 g; gestational age 22-27 weeks), summarizing three 48 h regimens: high 100 mg/kg Q8hr, medium 100 mg/kg Q12hr, and standard 50 mg/kg Q12hr. Concentration data were analyzed for concentration above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), below neurotoxicity threshold (Cmax ≤ 140 mcg/mL), and duration limited to 48 h. RESULTS Among 34,689 newborns, all dosing regimens provided concentrations above MIC through 48 h, but Cmax exceeded the neurotoxicity threshold. With the 4-dose standard regimen, >90% maintained concentrations >MIC beyond 48 h. With the 2-dose regimen, newborns maintained the mean concentration >MIC within the 48 h culture window and below neurotoxicity level. Infants 22-24 weeks' gestation had higher drug concentrations and more prolonged exposure duration than 25-27 weeks' gestation. CONCLUSIONS For EOS in preterm infants, two ampicillin doses (50 mg/kg) provided optimal bactericidal exposures, while minimizing potential toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Le
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Rachel G Greenberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - YoungJun Yoo
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kelly C Wade
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ericson JE, Benjamin DK, Boakye-Agyeman F, Cotten CM, Adler-Shohet F, Laughon M, Poindexter B, Harper B, Payne EH, Kaneshige K, Smith PB, Smith PB. Exposure-safety relationship for acyclovir in the treatment of neonatal herpes simplex virus disease. Early Hum Dev 2022; 170:105616. [PMID: 35763957 PMCID: PMC9645023 DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2022.105616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) disease has been treated with high-dose (20 mg/kg/dose) acyclovir since 1991. AIMS Determine the safety of acyclovir in infants with neonatal HSV treated with high-dose acyclovir; examine the association between acyclovir dose and exposure with adverse events (AEs). STUDY DESIGN We obtained demographic information and acyclovir dosing via medical records. Acyclovir exposure was calculated using an established pharmacokinetic model. SUBJECTS Infants <120 days of age with neonatal HSV discharged from four academic children's hospitals. OUTCOME MEASURES We identified clinical and laboratory adverse events (AEs). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS We identified 49 infants with neonatal HSV treated with acyclovir; 42 infants had complete 21-day dosing information. Median mean daily dose was 59 mg/kg/day. Clinical AEs were common among all gestational and postnatal age groups. Rash was the most common clinical AE (37 %). Mild laboratory AEs occurred in 2-37 % of infants. The median maximum doses (mg/kg/day) were higher among infants with hypokalemia, elevated blood urea nitrogen, and thrombocytosis. For all other laboratory AEs, the median maximum doses for infants without events were higher or equal to the median maximum dose of infants with the AE. The odds of experiencing any clinical or laboratory AE did not differ by predicted acyclovir exposure for either area under the curve (AUC) or maximum concentration (Cmax) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.00 [0.98, 1.03] and OR = 1.01 [0.93, 1.12], respectively). Although AEs were common with high-dose acyclovir exposure, severe AEs were rare. Acyclovir exposure was not associated with AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC,Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Felix Boakye-Agyeman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - C. Michael Cotten
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC,Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Matthew Laughon
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Barrie Harper
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - P. Brian Smith
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - P Brian Smith
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lang JE, Hornik CP, Elliott C, Silverstein A, Hornik C, Al-Uzri A, Bosheva M, Bradley JS, Borja-Tabora CFC, John DD, Echevarria AM, Ericson JE, Friedel D, Gonczi F, Isidro MGD, James LP, Kalocsai K, Koutroulis I, Laki I, Ong-Lim ALT, Nad M, Simon G, Syed S, Szabo E, Benjamin DK, Cohen-Wolkowiez M. Solithromycin in Children and Adolescents With Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2022; 41:556-562. [PMID: 35675525 PMCID: PMC9199591 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solithromycin is a new macrolide-ketolide antibiotic with potential effectiveness in pediatric community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Our objective was to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in children with CABP. METHODS This phase 2/3, randomized, open-label, active-control, multicenter study randomly assigned solithromycin (capsules, suspension or intravenous) or an appropriate comparator antibiotic in a 3:1 ratio (planned n = 400) to children 2 months to 17 years of age with CABP. Primary safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and AE-related drug discontinuations. Secondary effectiveness endpoints included clinical improvement following treatment without additional antimicrobial therapy. RESULTS Unrelated to safety, the sponsor stopped the trial prior to completion. Before discontinuation, 97 participants were randomly assigned to solithromycin (n = 73) or comparator (n = 24). There were 24 participants (34%, 95% CI, 23%-47%) with a treatment-emergent AE in the solithromycin group and 7 (29%, 95% CI, 13%-51%) in the comparator group. Infusion site pain and elevated liver enzymes were the most common related AEs with solithromycin. Study drug was discontinued due to AEs in 3 subjects (4.3%) in the solithromycin group and 1 (4.2%) in the comparator group. Forty participants (65%, 95% CI, 51%-76%) in the solithromycin group achieved clinical improvement on the last day of treatment versus 17 (81%, 95% CI, 58%-95%) in the comparator group. The proportion achieving clinical cure was 60% (95% CI, 47%-72%) and 68% (95% CI, 43%-87%) for the solithromycin and comparator groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Intravenous and oral solithromycin were generally well-tolerated and associated with clinical improvement in the majority of participants treated for CABP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason E. Lang
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christoph P. Hornik
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Carrie Elliott
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Adam Silverstein
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chi Hornik
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amira Al-Uzri
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - John S. Bradley
- Rady Children’s Hospital and the University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - David Di John
- Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Ana Mendez Echevarria
- Pediatric Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - David Friedel
- Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Ferenc Gonczi
- University of Debrecen Clinical Center Infectology Clinic, Debrecen, Hungary
| | | | - Laura P. James
- Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Krisztina Kalocsai
- Dél-pesti Centrumkórház Országos Hematológiai és Infektológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | | | - Marta Nad
- Kanizsai Dorottya Hospital, Nagykanizsa, Hungary
| | - Gabor Simon
- Fejér County Szent György University Teaching Hospital, Székesfehérvár, Hungary
| | - Salma Syed
- East Carolina University, Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Eva Szabo
- Csolnoky Ferenc Hospital, Veszprém, Hungary
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Boutzoukas AE, Benjamin DK. Author Response: Other Factors Potentially Contributing to the Number of Secondary Infections. Pediatrics 2022; 150:188361. [PMID: 35765961 PMCID: PMC10103786 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-057636b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique E Boutzoukas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University School of Medicine Durham, NC.,Department of Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham, NC
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University School of Medicine Durham, NC.,Department of Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham, NC.,The ABC Science Collaborative Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Boutzoukas AE, Zimmerman KO, Inkelas M, Brookhart MA, Benjamin DK, Butteris S, Koval S, DeMuri GP, Manuel VG, Smith MJ, McGann KA, Kalu IC, Weber DJ, Falk A, Shane AL, Schuster JE, Goldman JL, Hickerson J, Benjamin V, Edwards L, Erickson TR, Benjamin DK. School Masking Policies and Secondary SARS-CoV-2 Transmission. Pediatrics 2022; 149:e2022056687. [PMID: 35260896 PMCID: PMC9647584 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-056687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, masking has been a widely used mitigation practice in kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) school districts to limit within-school transmission. Prior studies attempting to quantify the impact of masking have assessed total cases within schools; however, the metric that more optimally defines effectiveness of mitigation practices is within-school transmission, or secondary cases. We estimated the impact of various masking practices on secondary transmission in a cohort of K-12 schools. METHODS We performed a multistate, prospective, observational, open cohort study from July 26, 2021 to December 13, 2021. Districts reported mitigation practices and weekly infection data. Districts that were able to perform contact tracing and adjudicate primary and secondary infections were eligible for inclusion. To estimate the impact of masking on secondary transmission, we used a quasi-Poisson regression model. RESULTS A total of 1 112 899 students and 157 069 staff attended 61 K-12 districts across 9 states that met inclusion criteria. The districts reported 40 601 primary and 3085 secondary infections. Six districts had optional masking policies, 9 had partial masking policies, and 46 had universal masking. In unadjusted analysis, districts that optionally masked throughout the study period had 3.6 times the rate of secondary transmission as universally masked districts; and for every 100 community-acquired cases, universally masked districts had 7.3 predicted secondary infections, whereas optionally masked districts had 26.4. CONCLUSIONS Secondary transmission across the cohort was modest (<10% of total infections) and universal masking was associated with reduced secondary transmission compared with optional masking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Departments of Pediatrics
- Co-Chair, The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Moira Inkelas
- Fielding School of Public Health
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - M. Alan Brookhart
- Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Sabrina Butteris
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Maddison, Wisconsin
| | - Shawn Koval
- University of Wisconsin Health, Healthy Kids Collaborative, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Gregory P. DeMuri
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Maddison, Wisconsin
| | - Vladimir G. Manuel
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- University of California David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | - David J. Weber
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Amy Falk
- Department of Pediatrics, Aspirus Doctors Clinic, Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
| | - Andi L. Shane
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jennifer E. Schuster
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Jennifer L. Goldman
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Departments of Pediatrics
- Co-Chair, The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zimmerman KO, Perry B, Hanlen‐Rosado E, Nsonwu A, Lane MD, Benjamin DK, Becker M, Corneli A. Developing lay summaries and thank you notes in paediatric pragmatic clinical trials. Health Expect 2022; 25:1029-1037. [PMID: 35246906 PMCID: PMC9122399 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Better transparency of research results and participant engagement may help address poor participant accrual in paediatric clinical research. We conducted formative research to assess the acceptability of lay summaries and thank you notes, as well as to refine and expand guidance on participant and family engagement in Pediatric Trials Network's (PTN) pragmatic paediatric clinical research. METHODS Informed by draft PTN guidance, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with adolescent clinical trial participants and caregivers of paediatric participants in four trials conducted by PTN across eight sites. Participants were shown multiple versions of mock lay summaries and thank you notes and asked questions on their preferences for content and layout, and on trial communications. We used applied thematic analysis to analyse the data. RESULTS We interviewed 27 individuals engaged in PTN research: 24 caregivers and 3 adolescents. During a trial, participants want regular updates on study progress, reminders of the study purpose and reassurances of data confidentiality. After the trial, participants want to learn the aggregated results, particularly medication effectiveness. Participants reported that lay summaries should include a review of the study's purpose, methods and length, and that they expect to learn individual-level results. Participants stated that thank you notes must be of sufficient length to be meaningful. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to describe stakeholder preferences for thank you note content and layout. Using these findings, we finalized PTN's trial communication guidance for use in future PTN trials. Research is needed to determine the effect of lay summaries and thank you notes on improving public transparency regarding clinical trials and paediatric trial recruitment and completion. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION By design, stakeholders (adolescent trial participants and caregivers of pediatric trial participants) contributed to PTN's guidance on the content and layout of lay summaries and thank you notes through their participation in the in-depth interviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
- Department of PediatricsDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Brian Perry
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Emily Hanlen‐Rosado
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Adora Nsonwu
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Morgan D. Lane
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
- Department of PediatricsDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Mara Becker
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
- Department of PediatricsDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Amy Corneli
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gerhart JG, Carreño FO, Ford JL, Edginton A, Perrin EM, Watt KM, Muller WJ, Atz AM, Al‐Uzri A, Delmore P, Gonzalez D, Benjamin DK, Hornik C, Zimmerman K, Kennel P, Beci R, Dang Hornik C, Kearns GL, Laughon M, Paul IM, Sullivan J, Wade K, Delmore P, Taylor‐Zapata P, Lee J, Anand R, Sharma G, Simone G, Kaneshige K, Taylor L, Al‐Uzri A, Hornik C, Sokol G, Speicher D, Sullivan J, Mourani P, Mendley S, Meyer M, Atkins R, Flynn J, Vaughns J, Sherwin C, Delmore P, Goldstein S, Rathore M, Melloni C, Muller W, Delmore P, Tremoulet A, James L, Mendley S, Blackford M, Atz A, Adu‐Darko M, Mourani P, Watt K, Hornik C, Al‐Uzri A, Sullivan J, Laughon M, Brian Smith P, Watt K, Cheifetz I, Atz A, Bhatt‐Mehta V, Fernandez A, Lowry J. Use of
physiologically‐based
pharmacokinetic modeling to inform dosing of the opioid analgesics fentanyl and methadone in children with obesity. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2022; 11:778-791. [PMID: 35491971 PMCID: PMC9197535 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Obesity is an increasingly alarming public health threat, with nearly 20% of children classified as obese in the United States today. Children with obesity are commonly prescribed the opioids fentanyl and methadone, and accurate dosing is critical to reducing the risk of serious adverse events associated with overexposure. However, pharmacokinetic studies in children with obesity are challenging to conduct, so there is limited information to guide fentanyl and methadone dosing in these children. To address this clinical knowledge gap, physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic models of fentanyl and methadone were developed in adults and scaled to children with and without obesity to explore the interplay of obesity, age, and pharmacogenomics. These models included key obesity‐induced changes in physiology and pharmacogenomic effects. Model predictions captured observed concentrations in children with obesity well, with an overall average fold error of 0.72 and 1.08 for fentanyl and methadone, respectively. Model simulations support a reduced fentanyl dose (1 vs. 2 μg/kg/h) starting at an earlier age (6 years) in virtual children with obesity, highlighting the importance of considering both age and obesity status when selecting an infusion rate most likely to achieve steady‐state concentrations within the target range. Methadone dosing simulations highlight the importance of considering genotype in addition to obesity status when possible, as cytochrome P450 (CYP)2B6*6/*6 virtual children with obesity required half the dose to match the exposure of wildtype children without obesity. This physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic modeling approach can be applied to explore dosing of other critical drugs in children with obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline G. Gerhart
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, The University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
| | - Fernando O. Carreño
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, The University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
| | - Jennifer L. Ford
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, The University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
| | | | - Eliana M. Perrin
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and School of Nursing Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Kevin M. Watt
- Division of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA
| | - William J. Muller
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
| | - Andrew M. Atz
- Medical University of South Carolina Children's Hospital Charleston South Carolina USA
| | - Amira Al‐Uzri
- Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA
| | | | - Daniel Gonzalez
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, The University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Campbell MM, Benjamin DK, Mann T, Fist A, Kim H, Edwards L, Rak Z, Brookhart MA, Anstrom K, Moore Z, Tilson EC, Kalu IC, Boutzoukas AE, Moorthy GS, Uthappa D, Scott Z, Weber DJ, Shane AL, Bryant KA, Zimmerman KO. Test-to-Stay After Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in K-12 Schools. Pediatrics 2022; 149:e2021056045. [PMID: 35437593 PMCID: PMC10084405 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-056045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a test-to-stay program for unvaccinated students and staff who experienced an unmasked, in-school exposure to someone with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Serial testing instead of quarantine was offered to asymptomatic contacts. We measured secondary and tertiary transmission rates within participating schools and in-school days preserved for participants. METHODS Participating staff or students from universally masked districts in North Carolina underwent rapid antigen testing at set intervals up to 7 days after known exposure. Collected data included location or setting of exposure, participant symptoms, and school absences up to 14 days after enrollment. Outcomes included tertiary transmission, secondary transmission, and school days saved among test-to-stay participants. A prespecified interim safety analysis occurred after 1 month of enrollment. RESULTS We enrolled 367 participants and completed 14-day follow-up on all participants for this analysis. Nearly all (215 of 238, 90%) exposure encounters involved an unmasked index case and an unmasked close contact, with most (353 of 366, 96%) occurring indoors, during lunch (137 of 357, 39%) or athletics (45 of 357, 13%). Secondary attack rate was 1.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.6%-4.7%) based on 883 SARS-CoV-2 serial rapid antigen tests with results from 357 participants; no tertiary cases were identified, and 1628 (92%) school days were saved through test-to-stay program implementation out of 1764 days potentially missed. CONCLUSION After unmasked in-school exposure to SARS-CoV-2, even in a mostly unvaccinated population, a test-to-stay strategy is a safe alternative to quarantine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Departments of Pediatrics
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zack Moore
- North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | - Diya Uthappa
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - David J Weber
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Andi L Shane
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kristina A Bryant
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville and Norton Children's Hospital, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Departments of Pediatrics
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Thakkar PV, Zimmerman KO, Benjamin DK, Kalu IC. SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Incidence at a North Carolina Pre-Kindergarten-12 School During In-Person Education: August 2020 to January 2021. J Sch Health 2022; 92:461-468. [PMID: 35170767 PMCID: PMC9115208 DOI: 10.1111/josh.13148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND School closures were initially believed to mitigate SARS-CoV-2, but instead may have had a limited role in reducing community SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We describe a single school's experience with in-person education during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS From August 17, 2020 through January 23, 2021, we conducted a prospective study at a private pre-kindergarten through 12th grade (PreK-12) school in North Carolina. The school employed numerous SARS-CoV-2 mitigation measures, including mandatory masking and physical distancing without mandated laboratory screening tests. We analyzed de-identified contact tracing data collected by the school. RESULTS Seventy-five primary cases were reported among the 2110 students, faculty, and staff during the study period. Twenty-one (28%) of the primary cases were on-campus during their infectious periods; however, no classroom close-contacts subsequently reported a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result. Two secondary cases likely resulted from unmasked exposure at a school athletic event. There was no correlation between community incidence and secondary transmission in the school. CONCLUSIONS Despite high rates of SARS-CoV-2 community incidence during the study period, routine mitigation practices including daily health screenings, mandatory face coverings, and efficient contact tracing contributed to minimal secondary SARS-CoV-2 transmission within an urban PreK-12 school. The limited school-associated transmission occurred when masks were not used during athletic events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavan V. Thakkar
- ABC Science Collaborative, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham Centre Suite 800300 W. Morgan StreetDurhamNC27701USA
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham Centre Suite 800300 W. Morgan StreetDurhamNC27701‐7044USA
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham Centre Suite 800300 W. Morgan StreetDurhamNC27701‐7044USA
| | - Ibukunoluwa C. Kalu
- Pediatric Infection Prevention, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, DUMC 3499DurhamNC27710USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Thakkar PV, Zimmerman KO, Brookhart MA, Erickson TR, Benjamin DK, Kalu IC. COVID-19 Incidence Among Sixth Through Twelfth Grade Students by Vaccination Status. Pediatrics 2022; 149:e2022056230. [PMID: 35190835 PMCID: PMC9647573 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-056230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pavan V. Thakkar
- ABC Science Collaborative, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Departments of Pediatrics, Divisions of Critical Care
| | - M. Alan Brookhart
- Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sanderson K, Warady B, Carey W, Tolia V, Boynton MH, Benjamin DK, Jackson W, Laughon M, Clark RH, Greenberg RG. Mortality Risk Factors among Infants Receiving Dialysis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Pediatr 2022; 242:159-165. [PMID: 34798078 PMCID: PMC8882152 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify risk factors associated with mortality for infants receiving dialysis in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN In this retrospective cohort study, we extracted data from the Pediatrix Clinical Data Warehouse on all infants who received dialysis in the NICU from 1999 to 2018. Using a Cox proportional hazards model with robust SEs we estimated the mortality hazard ratios associated with demographics, birth details, medical complications, and treatment exposures. RESULTS We identified 273 infants who received dialysis. Median gestational age at birth was 35 weeks (interquartile values 33-37), median birth weight was 2570 g (2000-3084), 8% were small for gestational age, 41% white, and 72% male. Over one-half of the infants (59%) had a kidney anomaly; 71 (26%) infants died before NICU hospital discharge. Factors associated with increased risk of dying after dialysis initiation included lack of kidney anomalies, Black race, gestational age of <32 weeks, necrotizing enterocolitis, dialysis within 7 days of life, and receipt of paralytics or vasopressors (all P < .05). CONCLUSION In this cohort of infants who received dialysis in the NICU over 2 decades, more than 70% of infants survived. The probability of death was greater among infants without a history of a kidney anomaly and those with risk factors consistent with greater severity of illness at dialysis initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keia Sanderson
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bradley Warady
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
| | - William Carey
- Division of Neonatal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Veeral Tolia
- The MEDNAX Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety, Sunrise, FL,Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Marcella H. Boynton
- Department of Medicine-Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC,North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Wesley Jackson
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Matthew Laughon
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Reese H. Clark
- The MEDNAX Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety, Sunrise, FL,Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC
| | - Rachel G. Greenberg
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Boutzoukas AE, Zimmerman KO, Benjamin DK, DeMuri GP, Kalu IC, Smith MJ, McGann KA, Koval S, Brookhart MA, Butteris SM. Secondary Transmission of COVID-19 in K-12 Schools: Findings From 2 States. Pediatrics 2022; 149:e2021054268K. [PMID: 34737171 PMCID: PMC9647774 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-054268k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated the impact of distancing practices on secondary transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and the degree of sports-associated secondary transmission across a large diverse cohort of schools during spring 2021. METHODS Participating districts in North Carolina and Wisconsin and North Carolina charter schools offering in-person instruction between March 15, 2021 and June 25, 2021 reported on distancing policies, community- and school-acquired infections, quarantines, and infections associated with school-sponsored sports. We calculated the ratio of school-acquired to community-acquired infection, secondary attack rates, and the proportion of secondary transmission events associated with sports. To estimate the effect of distancing and bus practices on student secondary transmission, we used a quasi-Poisson regression model with the number of primary student cases as the denominator. RESULTS During the study period, 1 102 039 students and staff attended in-person instruction in 100 North Carolina school districts, 13 Wisconsin school districts, and 14 North Carolina charter schools. Students and staff had 7865 primary infections, 386 secondary infections, and 48 313 quarantines. For every 20 community-acquired infections, there was 1 within-school transmission event. Secondary transmissions associated with school sports composed 46% of secondary transmission events in middle and high schools. Relaxed distancing practices (<3 ft, 3 ft) and increased children per bus seat were not associated with increased relative risk of secondary transmission. CONCLUSIONS With universal masking, in-person education was associated with low rates of secondary transmission, even with less stringent distancing and bus practices. Given the rates of sports-associated secondary transmission, additional mitigation may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Departments of Pediatrics
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Departments of Pediatrics
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gregory P. DeMuri
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | | | | | | | - Shawn Koval
- Healthy Kids Collaborative, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - M. Alan Brookhart
- Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sabrina M. Butteris
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Boutzoukas AE, Zimmerman KO, Benjamin DK, Chick KJ, Curtiss J, Høeg TB. Quarantine Elimination for K-12 Students With Mask-on-Mask Exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Pediatrics 2022; 149:e2021054268L. [PMID: 34737181 PMCID: PMC9647775 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-054268l] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES With layered mitigation strategies, there are low rates of secondary transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; therefore, quarantine after close-contact exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in the kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) setting further disrupts in-person learning with uncertain benefit. We explored the impact of eliminating quarantine for students with mask-on-mask exposures to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on associated secondary transmission in schools. METHODS This observational study was conducted in a large K-12 public school district in Omaha, Nebraska (August 1, 2020, to March 15, 2021). We assessed primary and secondary COVID-19 infections in teachers and staff, frequency of quarantine for students and staff, and the impact of eliminating quarantine on secondary transmission in mask-on-mask exposure settings. RESULTS A total of 18 632 and 19 604 students and 2855 staff attended in-person learning in the fall and spring semesters, respectively; 1856 primary infections were among students and staff. Despite 3947 student quarantines in the fall and 1689 student quarantines in the first 10 weeks of spring semester instruction, there were only 2 cases of secondary transmission. A local policy change removed quarantine requirements for students with mask-on-mask exposure to COVID-19. Required quarantines in the spring semester reduced by 41% per primary infection compared with the fall; no student who qualified to avoid quarantine developed a secondary infection. CONCLUSIONS School-based COVID-19 transmission was exceptionally low in this large K-12 Nebraska school district. Elimination of student quarantine after masked exposure to COVID-19 within school was not associated with secondary transmission. Elimination of unnecessary quarantine elimination may help maximize in-person learning in the 2021-2022 school year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique E. Boutzoukas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Tracy Beth Høeg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Goldman JL, Schuster JE, Maier VF, Anand R, Hill EE, Butteris SM, DeMuri GP, Omidfar SA, Brookhart MA, Pak J, Benjamin DK, Zimmerman KO. Urban Classification, Not COVID-19 Community Rates, Was Associated With Modes of Learning in US K-12 Schools? Pediatrics 2022; 149:e2021054268M. [PMID: 34737176 PMCID: PMC9647778 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-054268m] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify factors associated with the decision to provide in-person, hybrid, and remote learning in kindergarten through 12th grade school districts during the 2020-2021 school year. METHODS We performed a retrospective study evaluating school district mode of learning and community coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) incidence and percentage positivity rates at 3 time points during the pandemic: (1) September 15, 2020 (the beginning of the school year, before Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance); (2) November 15, 2020 (midsemester after the release of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance and an increase of COVID-19 cases); and (3) January 15, 2021 (start of the second semester and peak COVID-19 rates). Five states were included in the analysis: Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, and Wisconsin. The primary outcome was mode of learning in elementary, middle, and high schools during 3 time points. The measures included community COVID-19 incidence and percentage positivity rates, school and student demographics, and county size classification of school location. RESULTS No relationship between mode of learning and community COVID-19 rates was observed. County urban classification of school location was associated with mode of learning with school districts in nonmetropolitan and small metropolitan counties more likely to be in-person. CONCLUSIONS Community COVID-19 rates did not appear to influence the decision of when to provide in-person learning. Further understanding of factors driving the decisions to bring children back into the classroom are needed. Standardizing policies on how schools apply national guidance to local decision-making may decrease disparities in emergent crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Goldman
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri– Kansas City
| | - Jennifer E. Schuster
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri– Kansas City
| | | | - Rohit Anand
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Elizabeth E. Hill
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | - Joyce Pak
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- School of Medicine
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- The ABC Science Collaborative
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- School of Medicine
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- The ABC Science Collaborative
| |
Collapse
|