1
|
Batool S, Hansen EE, Sethi RKV, Rettig EM, Goguen LA, Annino DJ, Uppaluri R, Edwards HA, Faden DL, Schnipper JL, Dohan D, Reich AJ, Bergmark RW. Perspectives on Referral Pathways for Timely Head and Neck Cancer Care. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024:2818527. [PMID: 38753343 PMCID: PMC11099838 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.0917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Importance Timely diagnosis and treatment are of paramount importance for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) because delays are associated with reduced survival rates and increased recurrence risk. Prompt referral to HNC specialists is crucial for the timeliness of care, yet the factors that affect the referral and triage pathway remain relatively unexplored. Therefore, to identify barriers and facilitators of timely care, it is important to understand the complex journey that patients undertake from the onset of HNC symptoms to referral for diagnosis and treatment. Objective To investigate the referral and triage process for patients with HNC and identify barriers to and facilitators of care from the perspectives of patients and health care workers. Design, Participants, and Setting This was a qualitative study using semistructured interviews of patients with HNC and health care workers who care for them. Participants were recruited from June 2022 to July 2023 from HNC clinics at 2 tertiary care academic medical centers in Boston, Massachusetts. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to December 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Themes identified from the perspectives of both patients and health care workers on factors that hinder or facilitate the HNC referral and triage process. Results In total, 72 participants were interviewed including 42 patients with HNC (median [range] age, 60.5 [19.0-81.0] years; 27 [64%] females) and 30 health care workers (median [range] age, 38.5 [20.0-68.0] years; 23 [77%] females). Using thematic analysis, 4 major themes were identified: the HNC referral and triage pathway is fragmented; primary and dental care are critical for timely referrals; efficient interclinician coordination expedites care; and consistent patient-practitioner engagement alleviates patient fear. Conclusions and Relevance These findings describe the complex HNC referral and triage pathway, emphasizing the critical role of initial symptom recognition, primary and dental care, patient information flow, and interclinician and patient-practitioner communication, all of which facilitate prompt HNC referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana Batool
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elisabeth E. Hansen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston
| | - Rosh K. V. Sethi
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eleni M. Rettig
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura A. Goguen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Donald J. Annino
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ravindra Uppaluri
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Heather A. Edwards
- Department of Otolaryngology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel L. Faden
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston
- Department of Otolaryngology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit and Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Dohan
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Amanda J. Reich
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Regan W. Bergmark
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Serna MK, Yoon C, Fiskio J, Lakin JR, Schnipper JL, Dalal AK. The Association of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations With Healthcare Utilization in Hospitalized Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Analysis. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024; 41:479-485. [PMID: 37385609 PMCID: PMC10983774 DOI: 10.1177/10499091231186818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Serious Illness Conversations (SICs) conducted during hospitalization can lead to meaningful patient participation in the decision-making process affecting medical management. The aim of this study is to determine if standardized documentation of a SIC within an institutionally approved EHR module during hospitalization is associated with palliative care consultation, change in code status, hospice enrollment prior to discharge, and 90-day readmissions. Methods: We conducted retrospective analyses of hospital encounters of general medicine patients at a community teaching hospital affiliated with an academic medical center from October 2018 to August 2019. Encounters with standardized documentation of a SIC were identified and matched by propensity score to control encounters without a SIC in a ratio of 1:3. We used multivariable, paired logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards modeling to assess key outcomes. Results: Of 6853 encounters (5143 patients), 59 (.86%) encounters (59 patients) had standardized documentation of a SIC, and 58 (.85%) were matched to 167 control encounters (167 patients). Encounters with standardized documentation of a SIC had greater odds of palliative care consultation (odds ratio [OR] 60.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.45-290.08, P < .01), a documented code status change (OR 8.04, 95% CI 1.54-42.05, P = .01), and discharge with hospice services (OR 35.07, 95% CI 5.80-212.08, P < .01) compared to matched controls. There was no significant association with 90-day readmissions (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] .88, standard error [SE] .37, P = .73). Conclusions: Standardized documentation of a SIC during hospitalization is associated with palliative care consultation, change in code status, and hospice enrollment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrna K. Serna
- Division of General Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Catherine Yoon
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julie Fiskio
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua R. Lakin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anuj K. Dalal
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oche O, Murry LT, Keller MS, Pevnick JM, Schnipper JL, Nguyen AT, Ko EM, Kennelty KA. Pharmacist, nurse, and physician perspectives on the implementation of the pharmacist discharge care (pharm-dc) intervention: A qualitative study. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024:S1551-7411(24)00123-2. [PMID: 38744561 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PHARMacist Discharge Care (PHARM-DC) intervention is a pharmacist-led Transitions of Care (TOC) program intended to reduce 30-day hospital readmissions and emergency department visits which has been implemented at two hospitals in the United States. The objectives of this study were to: 1) explore perspectives surrounding the PHARM-DC program from healthcare providers, leaders, and administrators at both institutions, and 2) identify factors which may contribute to intervention success and sustainability. METHODS Focus groups and interviews were conducted with pharmacists, physicians, nurses, hospital leaders, and pharmacy administrators at two institutions in the Northeastern and Western United States. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed, with transcriptions imported into NVivo for qualitative analysis. Thematic analysis was performed using an iterative process, with two study authors independently coding transcripts to identify themes. RESULTS Overall, 37 individuals participated in ten focus groups and seven interviews. The themes identified included: 1) Organizational, Pharmacist, and Patient Factors Contributing to Transitions of Care, 2) Medication Challenges in Transitions of Care at Admission and Discharge, 3) Transitions of Care Communication and Discharge Follow-up, and 4) Opportunities for Improvement and Sustainability. The four themes were mapped to the constructs of the CFIR and RE-AIM frameworks. Some factors facilitating intervention success and sustainability were accurate medication histories collected on admission, addressing medication barriers before discharge, coordinating discharge using electronic health record discharge features, and having a structured process for intervention training and delivery. Barriers to intervention implementation and sustainability included gaps in communication with other care team members, and variable pharmacist skills for delivering the intervention. This study identified that using educational resources to standardize the TOC process addressed the issue of variations in pharmacists' skills for delivering TOC interventions. CONCLUSIONS Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, pharmacist leaders, and hospital administrators were in agreement regarding the usefulness of the PHARM-DC intervention, while acknowledging challenges in its implementation and opportunities for improvement. Future research should focus on developing training materials to standardize and scale the intervention, eliminating barriers to medication access pre-discharge, coordinating discharge across care team members, and communicating medication changes to primary care providers post-discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onyeche Oche
- The University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 180 Grand Ave Iowa City, IA 52246, United States.
| | - Logan T Murry
- The University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 180 Grand Ave Iowa City, IA 52246, United States.
| | - Michelle S Keller
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Joshua M Pevnick
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - An T Nguyen
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - EunJi Michelle Ko
- Department of Quality and Safety, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Korey A Kennelty
- The University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 180 Grand Ave Iowa City, IA 52246, United States; The University of Iowa College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carter D, Rosen A, Applebaum JR, Southern WN, Crossman DJ, Shelton RC, Auerbach A, Schnipper JL, Adelman JS. National Survey of Patient Safety Experiences in Hospital Medicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2024; 50:260-268. [PMID: 38087723 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals were caring for increasing numbers of patients with a novel and highly contagious respiratory illness, forcing adaptations in care delivery. The objective of this study was to understand the impact of these adaptations on patient safety in hospital medicine. METHODS The authors conducted a nationwide survey to understand patient safety challenges experienced by hospital medicine clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey was distributed to members of the Society of Hospital Medicine via an e-mail listserv. It consisted of closed- and open-ended questions to elicit respondents' experience in five domains: error reporting and communication, staffing, equipment, personal protective equipment (PPE) and isolation practices, and infrastructure. Quantitative questions were reported as counts and percentages; qualitative responses were coded and analyzed for relevant themes. RESULTS Of 196 total responses, 167 respondents (85.2%) were attending physicians and 85 (43.8%) practiced at teaching hospitals. Safety concerns commonly identified included nursing shortages (71.0%), limiting patient interactions to conserve PPE (61.9%), and feeling that one was practicing in a more hazardous environment (61.4%). In free-text responses, clinicians described poor outcomes and patient decompensation due to provider and equipment shortages, as well as communication lapses and diagnostic errors resulting from decreased patient contact and the need to follow isolation protocols. CONCLUSION Efforts made to accommodate shortages in staff and equipment, adapt to limited PPE, and enforce isolation policies had unintended consequences that affected patient safety and created a more hazardous environment characterized by less efficient care, respiratory decompensations, diagnostic errors, and poor communication with patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kasanagottu K, Anderson TS, Trivedi S, Ngo LH, Schnipper JL, McCarthy EP, Herzig SJ. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Opioid Prescribing on Hospital Discharge Among Older Adults: A National Retrospective Cohort Study. J Gen Intern Med 2024:10.1007/s11606-024-08687-w. [PMID: 38424348 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08687-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disparities in opioid prescribing among racial and ethnic groups have been observed in outpatient and emergency department settings, but it is unknown whether similar disparities exist at discharge among hospitalized older adults. OBJECTIVE To determine filled opioid prescription rates on hospital discharge by race/ethnicity among Medicare beneficiaries. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older discharged from hospital in 2016, without opioid fills in the 90 days prior to hospitalization (opioid-naïve). MAIN MEASURES Race/ethnicity was categorized by the Research Triangle Institute (RTI), grouped as Asian/Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic, other (American Indian/Alaska Native/unknown/other), and White. The primary outcome was an opioid prescription claim within 2 days of hospital discharge. The secondary outcome was total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) among adults with a filled opioid prescription. KEY RESULTS Among 316,039 previously opioid-naïve beneficiaries (mean age, 76.8 years; 56.2% female), 49,131 (15.5%) filled an opioid prescription within 2 days of hospital discharge. After adjustment, Black beneficiaries were 6% less likely (relative risk [RR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97) and Asian/Pacific Islander beneficiaries were 9% more likely (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.14) to have filled an opioid prescription when compared to White beneficiaries. Among beneficiaries with a filled opioid prescription, mean total MMEs were lower among Black (356.9; adjusted difference - 4%, 95% CI - 7 to - 1%), Hispanic (327.0; adjusted difference - 7%, 95% CI - 10 to - 4%), and Asian/Pacific Islander (328.2; adjusted difference - 8%, 95% CI - 12 to - 4%) beneficiaries when compared to White beneficiaries (409.7). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Black older adults were less likely to fill a new opioid prescription after hospital discharge when compared to White older adults and received lower total MMEs. The factors contributing to these differential prescribing patterns should be investigated further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koushik Kasanagottu
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA, 02246, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Timothy S Anderson
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA, 02246, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shrunjal Trivedi
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA, 02246, USA
| | - Long H Ngo
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA, 02246, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ellen P McCarthy
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA, 02246, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shoshana J Herzig
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA, 02246, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shannon EM, Fiskio J, Yoon C, Schnipper JL, Mueller SK. Investigating racial and ethnic disparities in interhospital transfer within an academic integrated healthcare system: A matched cohort study. J Hosp Med 2024. [PMID: 38411292 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
The presence of racial and ethnic disparities in interhospital transfer (IHT) within integrated healthcare systems has not been fully explored. We matched Black and Latinx patients admitted to community hospitals in our integrated healthcare system between June 2015 and December 2019 to White patients by origin hospital, age, time of year, and disease severity. We performed conditional logistic regression models to determine if race or ethnicity was associated with IHT in one of the tertiary academic medical centers in the system, adjusting for covariates. The sample contained 107,895 admissions (82.6% White, 7.8% Black, and 9.6% Latinx). Transfer rates were 2.2% versus 2.2% after the Black/White match and 1.8% versus 1.8% after the Latinx/White match. After adjusting for covariates, there was no association between race or ethnicity and IHT (Black vs. White odds ratio [OR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-1.07; Latinx vs. White OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.79-1.40). This may be due to reduced barriers to transfer with an integrated healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Michael Shannon
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Julie Fiskio
- Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Catherine Yoon
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephanie K Mueller
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chai PR, Kaithamattam JJ, Chung M, Tom JJ, Goodman GR, Hasdianda MA, Carnes TC, Vaduganathan M, Scirica BM, Schnipper JL. Formative Perceptions of a Digital Pill System to Measure Adherence to Heart Failure Pharmacotherapy: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Cardio 2024; 8:e48971. [PMID: 38358783 PMCID: PMC10905352 DOI: 10.2196/48971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure (HF) affects 6.2 million Americans and is a leading cause of hospitalization. The mainstay of the management of HF is adherence to pharmacotherapy. Despite the effectiveness of HF pharmacotherapy, effectiveness is closely linked to adherence. Measuring adherence to HF pharmacotherapy is difficult; most clinical measures use indirect strategies such as calculating pharmacy refill data or using self-report. While helpful in guiding treatment adjustments, indirect measures of adherence may miss the detection of suboptimal adherence and co-occurring structural barriers associated with nonadherence. Digital pill systems (DPSs), which use an ingestible radiofrequency emitter to directly measure medication ingestions in real-time, represent a strategy for measuring and responding to nonadherence in the context of HF pharmacotherapy. Previous work has demonstrated the feasibility of using DPSs to measure adherence in other chronic diseases, but this strategy has yet to be leveraged for individuals with HF. OBJECTIVE We aim to explore through qualitative interviews the facilitators and barriers to using DPS technology to monitor pharmacotherapy adherence among patients with HF. METHODS We conducted individual, semistructured qualitative interviews and quantitative assessments between April and August 2022. A total of 20 patients with HF who were admitted to the general medical or cardiology service at an urban quaternary care hospital participated in this study. Participants completed a qualitative interview exploring the overall acceptability of and willingness to use DPS technology for adherence monitoring and perceived barriers to DPS use. Quantitative assessments evaluated HF history, existing medication adherence strategies, and attitudes toward technology. We analyzed qualitative data using applied thematic analysis and NVivo software (QSR International). RESULTS Most participants (12/20, 60%) in qualitative interviews reported a willingness to use the DPS to measure HF medication adherence. Overall, the DPS was viewed as useful for increasing accountability and reinforcing adherence behaviors. Perceived barriers included technological issues, a lack of need, additional costs, and privacy concerns. Most were open to sharing adherence data with providers to bolster clinical care and decision-making. Reminder messages following detected nonadherence were perceived as a key feature, and customization was desired. Suggested improvements are primarily related to the design and usability of the Reader (a wearable device). CONCLUSIONS Overall, individuals with HF perceived the DPS to be an acceptable and useful tool for measuring medication adherence. Accurate, real-time ingestion data can guide adherence counseling to optimize adherence management and inform tailored behavioral interventions to support adherence among patients with HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter R Chai
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- The Koch Institute for Integrated Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
- The Fenway Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jenson J Kaithamattam
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michelle Chung
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jeremiah J Tom
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Georgia R Goodman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- The Fenway Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Muthiah Vaduganathan
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Benjamin M Scirica
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Serna MK, Yoon C, Fiskio J, Lakin JR, Schnipper JL, Dalal AK. A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024:10499091241228269. [PMID: 38334010 DOI: 10.1177/10499091241228269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analysis of documented Serious Illness Conversations (SICs) in the inpatient setting can help clinicians align management to address patient and caregiver needs. METHODS We conducted a mixed methods analysis of the first instance of standardized documentation of a SIC within a structured module among hospitalized general medicine patients from 2018 to 2019. Percentage of documentations that included a description of patient or family understanding of the patient's medical condition and use of radio buttons to answer the "prognostic information shared," "hopes," and "worries" modules are reported. Using grounded theory approach, physicians analyzed free text entries to: "What is important to the patient/family?" and "Recommendations or next steps planned." RESULTS Out of 5142 patients, 59 patients had a documented SIC. Patient or family understanding of the medical condition(s) was reported in 56 (95%). For "prognostic information shared," the most frequently selected radio buttons were: 49 (83%) incurable disease and 28 (48%) prognosis of weeks to months while those for "hopes" were: 52 (88%) be comfortable and 27 (46%) be at home and for "worries" were: 49 (83%) other physical suffering and 36 (61%) pain. Themes generated from entries to "What's important to patient/family?" included being with loved ones; comfort; mentally and physically present; and reliable care while those for "Recommendations" were coordinating support services; symptom management; and support and communication. CONCLUSIONS SIC content indicated concern about pain and reliable care suggesting the complex, intensive nature of caring for seriously ill patients and the need to consider SICs earlier in the life course of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrna Katalina Serna
- Division of General Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Catherine Yoon
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julie Fiskio
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua R Lakin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anuj K Dalal
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dalal AK, Schnipper JL, Raffel K, Ranji S, Lee T, Auerbach A. Identifying and classifying diagnostic errors in acute care across hospitals: Early lessons from the Utility of Predictive Systems in Diagnostic Errors (UPSIDE) study. J Hosp Med 2024; 19:140-145. [PMID: 37211760 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anuj K Dalal
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katie Raffel
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Sumant Ranji
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Andrew Auerbach
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Auerbach AD, Lee TM, Hubbard CC, Ranji SR, Raffel K, Valdes G, Boscardin J, Dalal AK, Harris A, Flynn E, Schnipper JL. Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Adults Who Died or Were Transferred to Intensive Care. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:164-173. [PMID: 38190122 PMCID: PMC10775080 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Importance Diagnostic errors contribute to patient harm, though few data exist to describe their prevalence or underlying causes among medical inpatients. Objective To determine the prevalence, underlying cause, and harms of diagnostic errors among hospitalized adults transferred to an intensive care unit (ICU) or who died. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective cohort study conducted at 29 academic medical centers in the US in a random sample of adults hospitalized with general medical conditions and who were transferred to an ICU, died, or both from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Each record was reviewed by 2 trained clinicians to determine whether a diagnostic error occurred (ie, missed or delayed diagnosis), identify diagnostic process faults, and classify harms. Multivariable models estimated association between process faults and diagnostic error. Opportunity for diagnostic error reduction associated with each fault was estimated using the adjusted proportion attributable fraction (aPAF). Data analysis was performed from April through September 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Whether or not a diagnostic error took place, the frequency of underlying causes of errors, and harms associated with those errors. Results Of 2428 patient records at 29 hospitals that underwent review (mean [SD] patient age, 63.9 [17.0] years; 1107 [45.6%] female and 1321 male individuals [54.4%]), 550 patients (23.0%; 95% CI, 20.9%-25.3%) had experienced a diagnostic error. Errors were judged to have contributed to temporary harm, permanent harm, or death in 436 patients (17.8%; 95% CI, 15.9%-19.8%); among the 1863 patients who died, diagnostic error was judged to have contributed to death in 121 (6.6%; 95% CI, 5.3%-8.2%). In multivariable models examining process faults associated with any diagnostic error, patient assessment problems (aPAF, 21.4%; 95% CI, 16.4%-26.4%) and problems with test ordering and interpretation (aPAF, 19.9%; 95% CI, 14.7%-25.1%) had the highest opportunity to reduce diagnostic errors; similar ranking was seen in multivariable models examining harmful diagnostic errors. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who died or were transferred to the ICU were common and associated with patient harm. Problems with choosing and interpreting tests and the processes involved with clinician assessment are high-priority areas for improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D. Auerbach
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
| | - Tiffany M. Lee
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
| | - Colin C. Hubbard
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
| | - Sumant R. Ranji
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Katie Raffel
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver
| | - Gilmer Valdes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco
| | - John Boscardin
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
| | - Anuj K. Dalal
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Levine DM, Souza J, Schnipper JL, Tsai TC, Leff B, Landon BE. Acute Hospital Care at Home in the United States: The Early National Experience. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:109-110. [PMID: 38190713 PMCID: PMC10872234 DOI: 10.7326/m23-2264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David M Levine
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Souza
- Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas C Tsai
- Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Bruce Leff
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bruce E Landon
- Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Moss CT, Schnipper JL, Levine DM. Caregiver burden in a home hospital versus traditional hospital: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:286-289. [PMID: 37789659 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David M Levine
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bann M, Manjarrez E, Kellner CP, Greysen R, Davis C, Lee T, Soleimanpour N, Tambe N, Auerbach A, Schnipper JL. Post-Hospitalization Home Monitoring Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Results from the Hospital Medicine Re-engineering Network (HOMERuN). J Gen Intern Med 2023:10.1007/s11606-023-08581-x. [PMID: 38151604 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08581-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, hospitals and healthcare systems launched innovative responses to emerging needs. The creation and use of programs to remotely follow patient clinical status and recovery after COVID-19 hospitalization has not been thoroughly described. OBJECTIVE To characterize deployment of remote post-hospital discharge monitoring programs during the COVID-19 pandemic METHODS: Electronic surveys were administered to leaders of 83 US academic hospitals in the Hospital Medicine Re-engineering Network (HOMERuN). An initial survey was completed in March 2021 with follow-up survey completed in July 2022. RESULTS There were 35 responses to the initial survey (42%) and 15 responses to the follow-up survey (43%). Twenty-two (63%) sites reported a post-discharge monitoring program, 16 of which were newly developed for COVID-19. Physiologic monitoring devices such as pulse oximeters were often provided. Communication with medical teams was often via telephone, with moderate use of apps or electronic medical record integration. Programs launched most commonly between January and June 2020. Only three programs were still active at the time of follow-up survey. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate rapid, ad hoc development of post-hospital discharge monitoring programs during the COVID-19 pandemic but with little standardization or evaluation. Additional study could identify the benefits of these programs, instruct their potential application to other disease processes, and inform further development as part of emergency preparedness for upcoming crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maralyssa Bann
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Division of GIM/Hospital Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Efren Manjarrez
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | | | - Ryan Greysen
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Clark Davis
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tiffany Lee
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Neal Tambe
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Auerbach
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schnipper JL, Raffel KE, Keniston A, Burden M, Glasheen J, Ranji S, Hubbard C, Barish P, Kantor M, Adler-Milstein J, Boscardin WJ, Harrison JD, Dalal AK, Lee T, Auerbach A. Achieving diagnostic excellence through prevention and teamwork (ADEPT) study protocol: A multicenter, prospective quality and safety program to improve diagnostic processes in medical inpatients. J Hosp Med 2023; 18:1072-1081. [PMID: 37888951 PMCID: PMC10964432 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few hospitals have built surveillance for diagnostic errors into usual care or used comparative quantitative and qualitative data to understand their diagnostic processes and implement interventions designed to reduce these errors. OBJECTIVES To build surveillance for diagnostic errors into usual care, benchmark diagnostic performance across sites, pilot test interventions, and evaluate the program's impact on diagnostic error rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Achieving diagnostic excellence through prevention and teamwork (ADEPT) is a multicenter, real-world quality and safety program utilizing interrupted time-series techniques to evaluate outcomes. Study subjects will be a randomly sampled population of medical patients hospitalized at 16 US hospitals who died, were transferred to intensive care, or had a rapid response during the hospitalization. Surveillance for diagnostic errors will occur on 10 events per month per site using a previously established two-person adjudication process. Concurrent reviews of patients who had a qualifying event in the previous week will allow for surveys of clinicians to better understand contributors to diagnostic error, or conversely, examples of diagnostic excellence, which cannot be gleaned from medical record review alone. With guidance from national experts in quality and safety, sites will report and benchmark diagnostic error rates, share lessons regarding underlying causes, and design, implement, and pilot test interventions using both Safety I and Safety II approaches aimed at patients, providers, and health systems. Safety II approaches will focus on cases where diagnostic error did not occur, applying theories of how people and systems are able to succeed under varying conditions. The primary outcome will be the number of diagnostic errors per patient, using segmented multivariable regression to evaluate change in y-intercept and change in slope after initiation of the program. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board (IRB), which is serving as the single IRB. Intervention toolkits and study findings will be disseminated through partners including Vizient, The Joint Commission, and Press-Ganey, and through national meetings, scientific journals, and publications aimed at the general public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katie E. Raffel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Quality, Safety, and Efficiency, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Angela Keniston
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Marisha Burden
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jeffrey Glasheen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Quality, Safety, and Efficiency, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sumant Ranji
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Colin Hubbard
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Peter Barish
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Molly Kantor
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Julia Adler-Milstein
- Center for Clinical Informatics and Improvement Research (CLIIR), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - W. John Boscardin
- Department of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - James D. Harrison
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Anuj K. Dalal
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tiffany Lee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Andrew Auerbach
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mueller S, Murray M, Goralnick E, Kelly C, Fiskio JM, Yoon C, Schnipper JL. Implementation of a standardised accept note to improve communication during inter-hospital transfer: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:e002518. [PMID: 37899076 PMCID: PMC10619021 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The transfer of patients between hospitals (interhospital transfer, IHT), exposes patients to communication errors and gaps in information exchange. OBJECTIVE To design and implement a standardised accept note to improve communication during medical service transfers, and evaluate its impact on patient outcomes. DESIGN Prospective interventional cohort study. SETTING A 792-bed tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS All patient transfers from any acute care hospital to the general medicine, cardiology, oncology and intensive care unit (ICU) services between August 2020 and June 2022. INTERVENTIONS A standardised accept note template was developed over a 9-month period with key stakeholder input and embedded in the electronic health record, completed by nurses within the hospital's Access Centre. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome was clinician-reported medical errors collected via surveys of admitting clinicians within 72 hours after IHT patient admission. Secondary outcomes included clinician-reported failures in communication; presence and 'timeliness' of accept note documentation; patient length of stay (LOS) after transfer; rapid response or ICU transfer within 24 hours and in-hospital mortality. All outcomes were analysed postintervention versus preintervention, adjusting for patient demographics, diagnosis, comorbidity, illness severity, admitting service, time of year, hospital COVID census and census of admitting service and admitting team on date of admission. RESULTS Of the 1004 and 654 IHT patients during preintervention and postintervention periods, surveys were collected on 735 (73.2%) and 462 (70.6%), respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar among patients in each time period and between survey responders and non-responders. Adjusted analyses demonstrated a 27% reduction in clinician-reported medical error rates postimplementation versus preimplementation (11.5 vs 15.8, adjusted OR (aOR) 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99). Secondary outcomes demonstrated lower adjusted odds of clinician-reported failures in communication (aOR 0.88; 0.78 to 0.98) and rapid response/ICU transfer (aOR 0.57; 0.34 to 0.97), and improved presence (aOR 2.30; 1.75 to 3.02) and timeliness (-21.4 hours vs -8.7 hours, p<0.001) of accept note documentation. There were no significant differences in LOS or mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among 1658 medical patient transfers, implementing a standardised accept note was associated with improved presence and timeliness of accept note documentation, clinician-reported medical errors, failures in communication and clinical decline following transfer, suggesting that improving communication during IHT can improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Mueller
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maria Murray
- Patient Transfer and Access Center, MassGeneral Brigham Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric Goralnick
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Caitlin Kelly
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Julie M Fiskio
- MassGeneral Brigham HealthCare System Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cathy Yoon
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Atkinson MK, Wazir M, Barkoudah E, Khalil H, Mani S, Harrison JD, Yao-Cohen E, Weiss R, To C, Bambury EA, Cimino J, Mora R, Maru J, Curatola N, Juergens N, Schnipper JL. Inpatient Understanding of Their Care Team and Receipt of Mixed Messages: a Two-Site Cross-Sectional Study. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:2703-2709. [PMID: 36973573 PMCID: PMC10042424 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08178-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient understanding of their care, supported by physician involvement and consistent communication, is key to positive health outcomes. However, patient and care team characteristics can hinder this understanding. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess inpatients' understanding of their care and their perceived receipt of mixed messages, as well as the associated patient, care team, and hospitalization characteristics. DESIGN We administered a 30-item survey to inpatients between February 2020 and November 2021 and incorporated other hospitalization data from patients' health records. PARTICIPANTS Randomly selected inpatients at two urban academic hospitals in the USA who were (1) admitted to general medicine services and (2) on or past the third day of their hospitalization. MAIN MEASURES Outcome measures include (1) knowledge of main doctor and (2) frequency of mixed messages. Potential predictors included mean notes per day, number of consultants involved in the patient's care, number of unit transfers, number of attending physicians, length of stay, age, sex, insurance type, and primary race. KEY RESULTS A total of 172 patients participated in our survey. Most patients were unaware of their main doctor, an issue related to more daily interactions with care team members. Twenty-three percent of patients reported receiving mixed messages at least sometimes, most often between doctors on the primary team and consulting doctors. However, the likelihood of receiving mixed messages decreased with more daily interactions with care team members. CONCLUSIONS Patients were often unaware of their main doctor, and almost a quarter perceived receiving mixed messages about their care. Future research should examine patients' understanding of different aspects of their care, and the nature of interactions that might improve clarity around who's in charge while simultaneously reducing the receipt of mixed messages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Krikorian Atkinson
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Mohammed Wazir
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ebrahim Barkoudah
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hassan Khalil
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sampathkumar Mani
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James D Harrison
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Erin Yao-Cohen
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rachel Weiss
- Department of General Internal Medicine, UVA Health, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - C To
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Bambury
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jenica Cimino
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rosa Mora
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Johsias Maru
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nicole Curatola
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nathan Juergens
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mendez-Pino L, Villela-Franyutti D, Schnipper JL, Urman RD, Corey S, Collins PW, Jamison RN. Spanish translation and cultural linguistic validation of the Current Opioid Misuse Measurement (COMM-S). Pain Med 2023; 24:1119-1121. [PMID: 36882167 PMCID: PMC10695418 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Mendez-Pino
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Diego Villela-Franyutti
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Sarah Corey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Patrick W Collins
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robert N Jamison
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Pain Management Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Suzuki J, Martin B, Loguidice F, Smelson D, Liebschutz JM, Schnipper JL, Weiss RD. A Peer Recovery Coach Intervention for Hospitalized Patients with Opioid Use Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Addict Med 2023; 17:604-607. [PMID: 37788617 PMCID: PMC10544697 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) are increasingly being hospitalized for acute medical illnesses. Despite initiation of medications for OUD (MOUDs), many discontinue treatment after discharge. To evaluate whether a psychosocial intervention can improve MOUD retention after hospitalization, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of a peer recovery coach intervention. METHODS An existing peer recovery coach intervention was adapted for this trial. Hospitalized adults with OUD receiving MOUD treatment were randomized to receive either a recovery coach intervention or treatment-as-usual. For those in the intervention arm, the coach guided the participant to complete a relapse prevention plan, maintained contact throughout the 6-month follow-up period, encouraged MOUD continuation, and helped to identify community resources. Those receiving treatment-as-usual were discharged with a referral to outpatient treatment. Primary outcome was retention in MOUD treatment at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants readmitted to the hospital and the number of days until treatment discontinuation and to hospital readmission. RESULTS Twenty-five individuals who provided consent and randomized to the recovery coach intervention (n = 13) or treatment-as-usual (n = 12) were included in the analysis. No significant differences were found in the proportion of participants retained in MOUD treatment at 6 months (38.5% vs 41.7%, P = 0.87), proportion of participants readmitted at 6 months (46.2% vs 41.2%, P = 0.82), or the time to treatment discontinuation (log-rank P = 0.92) or readmission (log-rank P = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS This pilot trial failed to demonstrate that a recovery coach intervention improved MOUD treatment retention compared with treatment-as-usual among hospitalized individuals with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joji Suzuki
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
| | - Bianca Martin
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Frank Loguidice
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston MA
| | - David Smelson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Jane M. Liebschutz
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Roger D. Weiss
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- McLean Hospital, Belmont MA 02478
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schnipper JL, Reyes Nieva H, Yoon C, Mallouk M, Mixon AS, Rennke S, Chu ES, Mueller SK, Smith GR, Williams MV, Wetterneck TB, Stein J, Dalal AK, Labonville S, Sridharan A, Stolldorf DP, Orav EJ, Gresham M, Goldstein J, Platt S, Nyenpan CT, Howell E, Kripalani S. What works in medication reconciliation: an on-treatment and site analysis of the MARQUIS2 study. BMJ Qual Saf 2023; 32:457-469. [PMID: 36948542 PMCID: PMC11046420 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The second Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study demonstrated a marked reduction in medication discrepancies per patient. The aim of the current analysis was to determine the association of patient exposure to each system-level intervention and receipt of each patient-level intervention on these results. METHODS This study was conducted at 17 North American Hospitals, the study period was 18 months per site, and sites typically adopted interventions after 2-5 months of preintervention data collection. We conducted an on-treatment analysis (ie, an evaluation of outcomes based on patient exposure) of system-level interventions, both at the category level and at the individual component level, based on monthly surveys of implementation site leads at each site (response rate 65%). We then conducted a similar analysis of patient-level interventions, as determined by study pharmacist review of documented activities in the medical record. We analysed the association of each intervention on the adjusted number of medication discrepancies per patient in admission and discharge orders, based on a random sample of up to 22 patients per month per site, using mixed-effects Poisson regression with hospital site as a random effect. We then used a generalised linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) decision tree to determine which patient-level interventions explained the most variance in discrepancy rates. RESULTS Among 4947 patients, patient exposure to seven of the eight system-level component categories was associated with modest but significant reductions in discrepancy rates (adjusted rate ratios (ARR) 0.75-0.97), as were 15 of the 17 individual system-level intervention components, including hiring, reallocating and training personnel to take a best possible medication history (BPMH) and training personnel to perform discharge medication reconciliation and patient counselling. Receipt of five of seven patient-level interventions was independently associated with large reductions in discrepancy rates, including receipt of a BPMH in the emergency department (ED) by a trained clinician (ARR 0.40, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.43), admission medication reconciliation by a trained clinician (ARR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.64) and discharge medication reconciliation by a trained clinician (ARR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.73). In GLMM decision tree analyses, patients who received both a BPMH in the ED and discharge medication reconciliation by a trained clinician experienced the lowest discrepancy rates (0.08 per medication per patient). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Patient-level interventions most associated with reductions in discrepancies were receipt of a BPMH of admitted patients in the ED and admission and discharge medication reconciliation by a trained clinician. System-level interventions were associated with modest reduction in discrepancies for the average patient but are likely important to support patient-level interventions and may reach more patients. These findings can be used to help hospitals and health systems prioritise interventions to improve medication safety during care transitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harry Reyes Nieva
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Catherine Yoon
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Meghan Mallouk
- Center for Quality Improvement, Society of Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amanda S Mixon
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Stephanie Rennke
- UCSF Health and Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Eugene S Chu
- Parkland Health and Hospital System and Hospital Medicine Service, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Stephanie K Mueller
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - G Randy Smith
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mark V Williams
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Tosha B Wetterneck
- Department of Medicine, Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison College of Engineering, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jason Stein
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Emory University Hospital and 1Unit, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Anuj K Dalal
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephanie Labonville
- Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anirudh Sridharan
- Department of Medicine, Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, Maryland, USA
| | - Deonni P Stolldorf
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Endel John Orav
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marcus Gresham
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jenna Goldstein
- Center for Quality Improvement, Society of Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sara Platt
- Center for Quality Improvement, Society of Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Eric Howell
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Society of Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sunil Kripalani
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Osuagwu C, Khinkar RM, Zheng A, Wien M, Decopain J, Desai S, McElrath E, Hinchey E, Mueller SK, Schnipper JL, Boxer R, Shannon EM. A Public Health Critical Race Praxis Informed Congestive Heart Failure Quality Improvement Initiative on Inpatient General Medicine. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:2236-2244. [PMID: 36849864 PMCID: PMC9970115 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08086-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior evaluation at our hospital demonstrated that, compared to White patients, Black and Latinx patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) were less likely to be admitted to the cardiology service rather than the general medicine service (GMS). Patients admitted to GMS (compared to cardiology) had inferior rates of cardiology follow-up and 30-day readmission. OBJECTIVE To develop and test the feasibility and impacts of using quality improvement (QI) methods, in combination with the Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) framework, to engage stakeholders in developing an intervention for ensuring guideline-concordant inpatient CHF care across all patient groups. METHODS We compared measures for all patients admitted with CHF to GMS between September 2019 and March 2020 (intervention group) to CHF patients admitted to GMS in the previous year (pre-intervention group) and those admitted to cardiology during the pre-intervention and intervention periods (cardiology group). Our primary measures were 30-day readmissions and 14- and 30-day post-discharge cardiology follow-up. RESULTS There were 79 patients admitted with CHF to GMS during the intervention period, all of whom received the intervention. There were similar rates of Black and Latinx patients across the three groups. Compared to pre-intervention, intervention patients had a significantly lower 30-day readmission rate (18.9% vs. 24.8%; p=0.024), though the cardiology group also had a decrease in 30-day readmissions from the pre-intervention to intervention period. Compared to pre-intervention, intervention patients had significantly higher 14-day and 30-day post-discharge follow-up visits scheduled with cardiology (36.7% vs. 24.8%, p=0.005; 55.7% vs. 42.3%, p=0.0029), but no improvement in appointment attendance. CONCLUSION This study provides a first test of applying the PHCRP framework within a stakeholder-engaged QI initiative for improving CHF care across races and ethnicities. Our study design cannot evaluate causation. However, the improvements in 30-day readmission, as well as in processes of care that may affect it, provide optimism that inclusion of a racism-conscious framework in QI initiatives is feasible and may enhance QI measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chidinma Osuagwu
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Roaa M Khinkar
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amy Zheng
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Wien
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Decopain
- School of Nursing, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Sonali Desai
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Quality and Safety, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erin McElrath
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily Hinchey
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephanie K Mueller
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert Boxer
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evan Michael Shannon
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, 1100 Glendon Ave, Suite 850, Room, Los Angeles, CA, 812, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Garber A, Garabedian P, Wu L, Lam A, Malik M, Fraser H, Bersani K, Piniella N, Motta-Calderon D, Rozenblum R, Schnock K, Griffin J, Schnipper JL, Bates DW, Dalal AK. Developing, pilot testing, and refining requirements for 3 EHR-integrated interventions to improve diagnostic safety in acute care: a user-centered approach. JAMIA Open 2023; 6:ooad031. [PMID: 37181729 PMCID: PMC10172040 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To describe a user-centered approach to develop, pilot test, and refine requirements for 3 electronic health record (EHR)-integrated interventions that target key diagnostic process failures in hospitalized patients. Materials and Methods Three interventions were prioritized for development: a Diagnostic Safety Column (DSC) within an EHR-integrated dashboard to identify at-risk patients; a Diagnostic Time-Out (DTO) for clinicians to reassess the working diagnosis; and a Patient Diagnosis Questionnaire (PDQ) to gather patient concerns about the diagnostic process. Initial requirements were refined from analysis of test cases with elevated risk predicted by DSC logic compared to risk perceived by a clinician working group; DTO testing sessions with clinicians; PDQ responses from patients; and focus groups with clinicians and patient advisors using storyboarding to model the integrated interventions. Mixed methods analysis of participant responses was used to identify final requirements and potential implementation barriers. Results Final requirements from analysis of 10 test cases predicted by the DSC, 18 clinician DTO participants, and 39 PDQ responses included the following: DSC configurable parameters (variables, weights) to adjust baseline risk estimates in real-time based on new clinical data collected during hospitalization; more concise DTO wording and flexibility for clinicians to conduct the DTO with or without the patient present; and integration of PDQ responses into the DSC to ensure closed-looped communication with clinicians. Analysis of focus groups confirmed that tight integration of the interventions with the EHR would be necessary to prompt clinicians to reconsider the working diagnosis in cases with elevated diagnostic error (DE) risk or uncertainty. Potential implementation barriers included alert fatigue and distrust of the risk algorithm (DSC); time constraints, redundancies, and concerns about disclosing uncertainty to patients (DTO); and patient disagreement with the care team's diagnosis (PDQ). Discussion A user-centered approach led to evolution of requirements for 3 interventions targeting key diagnostic process failures in hospitalized patients at risk for DE. Conclusions We identify challenges and offer lessons from our user-centered design process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Garber
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Pamela Garabedian
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lindsey Wu
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alyssa Lam
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maria Malik
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hannah Fraser
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kerrin Bersani
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nicholas Piniella
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel Motta-Calderon
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ronen Rozenblum
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kumiko Schnock
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David W Bates
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anuj K Dalal
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Auerbach AD, Astik GJ, O'Leary KJ, Barish PN, Kantor MA, Raffel KR, Ranji SR, Mueller SK, Burney SN, Galinsky J, Gershanik EF, Goyal A, Chitneni PR, Rastegar S, Esmaili AM, Fenton C, Virapongse A, Ngov LK, Burden M, Keniston A, Patel H, Gupta AB, Rohde J, Marr R, Greysen SR, Fang M, Shah P, Mao F, Kaiksow F, Sterken D, Choi JJ, Contractor J, Karwa A, Chia D, Lee T, Hubbard CC, Maselli J, Dalal AK, Schnipper JL. Prevalence and Causes of Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Patients Under Investigation for COVID-19. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:1902-1910. [PMID: 36952085 PMCID: PMC10035474 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08176-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic required clinicians to care for a disease with evolving characteristics while also adhering to care changes (e.g., physical distancing practices) that might lead to diagnostic errors (DEs). OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency of DEs and their causes among patients hospitalized under investigation (PUI) for COVID-19. DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Eight medical centers affiliated with the Hospital Medicine ReEngineering Network (HOMERuN). TARGET POPULATION Adults hospitalized under investigation (PUI) for COVID-19 infection between February and July 2020. MEASUREMENTS We randomly selected up to 8 cases per site per month for review, with each case reviewed by two clinicians to determine whether a DE (defined as a missed or delayed diagnosis) occurred, and whether any diagnostic process faults took place. We used bivariable statistics to compare patients with and without DE and multivariable models to determine which process faults or patient factors were associated with DEs. RESULTS Two hundred and fifty-seven patient charts underwent review, of which 36 (14%) had a diagnostic error. Patients with and without DE were statistically similar in terms of socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, risk factors for COVID-19, and COVID-19 test turnaround time and eventual positivity. Most common diagnostic process faults contributing to DE were problems with clinical assessment, testing choices, history taking, and physical examination (all p < 0.01). Diagnostic process faults associated with policies and procedures related to COVID-19 were not associated with DE risk. Fourteen patients (35.9% of patients with errors and 5.4% overall) suffered harm or death due to diagnostic error. LIMITATIONS Results are limited by available documentation and do not capture communication between providers and patients. CONCLUSION Among PUI patients, DEs were common and not associated with pandemic-related care changes, suggesting the importance of more general diagnostic process gaps in error propagation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Auerbach
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Gopi J Astik
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kevin J O'Leary
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter N Barish
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Molly A Kantor
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katie R Raffel
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sumant R Ranji
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie K Mueller
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Esteban F Gershanik
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Abhishek Goyal
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pooja R Chitneni
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Armond M Esmaili
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cynthia Fenton
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anunta Virapongse
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Li-Kheng Ngov
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marisha Burden
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Angela Keniston
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Hemali Patel
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ashwin B Gupta
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Division of Hospital Medicine, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeff Rohde
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ruby Marr
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - S Ryan Greysen
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michele Fang
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pranav Shah
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Frances Mao
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Farah Kaiksow
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, WI, Madison, USA
| | - David Sterken
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, WI, Madison, USA
| | - Justin J Choi
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jigar Contractor
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Abhishek Karwa
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Chia
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany Lee
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Colin C Hubbard
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Judith Maselli
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anuj K Dalal
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Piniella NR, Fuller TE, Smith L, Salmasian H, Yoon CS, Lipsitz SR, Schnipper JL, Dalal AK. Early Expected Discharge Date Accuracy During Hospitalization: A Multivariable Analysis. J Med Syst 2023; 47:63. [PMID: 37171484 PMCID: PMC10175905 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-023-01952-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Accurate estimation of an expected discharge date (EDD) early during hospitalization impacts clinical operations and discharge planning. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of patients discharged from six general medicine units at an academic medical center in Boston, MA from January 2017 to June 2018. We retrieved all EDD entries and patient, encounter, unit, and provider data from the electronic health record (EHR), and public weather data. We excluded patients who expired, discharged against medical advice, or lacked an EDD within the first 24 h of hospitalization. We used generalized estimating equations in a multivariable logistic regression analysis to model early EDD accuracy (an accurate EDD entered within 24 h of admission), adjusting for all covariates and clustering by patient. We similarly constructed a secondary multivariable model using covariates present upon admission alone. RESULTS Of 3917 eligible hospitalizations, 890 (22.7%) had at least one accurate early EDD entry. Factors significantly positively associated (OR > 1) with an accurate early EDD included clinician-entered EDD, admit day and discharge day during the work week, and teaching clinical units. Factors significantly negatively associated (OR < 1) with an accurate early EDD included Elixhauser Comorbidity Index ≥ 11 and length of stay of two or more days. C-statistics for the primary and secondary multivariable models were 0.75 and 0.60, respectively. CONCLUSIONS EDDs entered within the first 24 h of admission were often inaccurate. While several variables from the EHR were associated with accurate early EDD entries, few would be useful for prospective prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas R Piniella
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, USA.
| | - Theresa E Fuller
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura Smith
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hojjat Salmasian
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cathy S Yoon
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anuj K Dalal
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Maitra A, Schnipper JL, Bain PA, Mueller SK. A scoping review of intimate partner violence in hospitalized patients. J Hosp Med 2023. [PMID: 36999751 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the high prevalence and significant health effects of intimate partner violence (IPV), little is known about its associations with hospitalization. OBJECTIVE To perform a scoping review of how IPV impacts hospitalization rates, characteristics, and outcomes in adult patients. DATA SOURCES A search of four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL) using a combination of terms including hospitalized patients and IPV revealed 1608 citations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION One reviewer determined eligibility based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, which a second reviewer independently verified. Data were extracted and organized a posteriori into three categories based on research aim: (1) comparative studies of hospitalization risk associated with recent IPV exposure, (2) comparative studies of hospitalization outcomes by IPV exposure, and (3) descriptive studies of hospitalizations for IPV. RESULTS Of the 12 included studies, 7 were comparative studies of hospitalization risk associated with IPV, 2 were comparative studies of hospitalization outcomes by IPV, and 3 were descriptive studies of hospitalizations for IPV. Nine out of 12 studies focused on specific patient populations. All but one study demonstrated that IPV was associated with increased risk of hospitalization and/or worse hospitalization outcomes. Six of the seven comparative studies showed a positive association between recent IPV and hospitalization risk. CONCLUSION This review suggests that IPV exposure increases the risk of hospitalization and/or worsens inpatient outcomes in specific patient populations. Additional work is needed to characterize hospitalization rates and outcomes for persons who have experienced IPV in a broader, nontrauma population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amrapali Maitra
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul A Bain
- Countway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephanie K Mueller
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Keller MS, Carrascoza-Bolanos J, Breda K, Kim LY, Kennelty KA, Leang DW, Murry LT, Nuckols TK, Schnipper JL, Pevnick JM. Identifying barriers and facilitators to deprescribing benzodiazepines and sedative hypnotics in the hospital setting using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) Model: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066234. [PMID: 36813499 PMCID: PMC9950911 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Geriatric guidelines strongly recommend avoiding benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine sedative hypnotics in older adults. Hospitalisation may provide an important opportunity to begin the process of deprescribing these medications, particularly as new contraindications arise. We used implementation science models and qualitative interviews to describe barriers and facilitators to deprescribing benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine sedative hypnotics in the hospital and develop potential interventions to address identified barriers. DESIGN We used two implementation science models, the Capability, Opportunity and Behaviour Model (COM-B) and the Theoretical Domains Framework, to code interviews with hospital staff, and an implementation process, the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW), to codevelop potential interventions with stakeholders from each clinician group. SETTING Interviews took place in a tertiary, 886-bed hospital located in Los Angeles, California. PARTICIPANTS Interview participants included physicians, pharmacists, pharmacist technicians, and nurses. RESULTS We interviewed 14 clinicians. We found barriers and facilitators across all COM-B model domains. Barriers included lack of knowledge about how to engage in complex conversations about deprescribing (capability), competing tasks in the inpatient setting (opportunity), high levels of resistance/anxiety among patients to deprescribe (motivation), concerns about lack of postdischarge follow-up (motivation). Facilitators included high levels of knowledge about the risks of these medications (capability), regular rounds and huddles to identify inappropriate medications (opportunity) and beliefs that patients may be more receptive to deprescribing if the medication is related to the reason for hospitalisation (motivation). Potential modes of delivery included a seminar aimed at addressing capability and motivation barriers in nurses, a pharmacist-led deprescribing initiative using risk stratification to identify and target patients at highest need for deprescribing, and the use of evidence-based deprescribing education materials provided to patients at discharge. CONCLUSIONS While we identified numerous barriers and facilitators to initiating deprescribing conversations in the hospital, nurse- and pharmacist-led interventions may be an appropriate opportunity to initiate deprescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle S Keller
- Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Health Policy and Management, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Kathleen Breda
- Orthopedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Linda Y Kim
- Nursing, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Korey A Kennelty
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Donna W Leang
- Pharmacy, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Logan T Murry
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Teryl K Nuckols
- Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joshua M Pevnick
- Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schnock KO, Garber A, Fraser H, Carnie M, Schnipper JL, Dalal AK, Bates DW, Rozenblum R. Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Diagnostic Errors in the Acute Care Setting. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2023; 49:89-97. [PMID: 36585316 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic errors (DEs) have been studied extensively in ambulatory care, but less work has been done in the acute care setting. In this study, the authors examined health care providers' and patients' perspectives about the classification of DEs, the main causes and scope of DEs in acute care, the main gaps in current systems, and the need for innovative solutions. METHODS A qualitative mixed methods study was conducted, including semistructured interviews with health care providers and focus groups with patient advisors. Using grounded theory approach, thematic categories were derived from the interviews and focus groups. RESULTS The research team conducted interviews with 17 providers and two focus groups with seven patient advisors. Both providers and patient advisors struggled to define and describe DEs in acute care settings. Although participants agreed that DEs pose a significant risk to patient safety, their perception of the frequency of DEs was mixed. Most participants identified communication failures, lack of comfort with diagnostic uncertainty, incorrect clinical evaluation, and cognitive load as key causes of DEs. Most respondents believed that non-information technology (IT) tools and processes (for example, communication improvement strategies) could significantly reduce DEs. CONCLUSION The study findings represent an important supplement to our understanding of DEs in acute care settings and the advancement of a culture of patient safety in the context of patient-centered care and patient engagement. Health care organizations should consider the key factors identified in this study when trying to create a culture that engages clinicians and patients in reducing DEs.
Collapse
|
27
|
Starmer AJ, Spector ND, O’Toole JK, Bismilla Z, Calaman S, Campos ML, Coffey M, Destino LA, Everhart JL, Goldstein J, Graham DA, Hepps JH, Howell EE, Kuzma N, Maynard G, Melvin P, Patel SJ, Popa A, Rosenbluth G, Schnipper JL, Sectish TC, Srivastava R, West DC, Yu CE, Landrigan CP. Implementation of the I-PASS handoff program in diverse clinical environments: A multicenter prospective effectiveness implementation study. J Hosp Med 2023; 18:5-14. [PMID: 36326255 PMCID: PMC10964397 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.12979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Handoff miscommunications are a leading source of medical errors. Harmful medical errors decreased in pediatric academic hospitals following implementation of the I-PASS handoff improvement program. However, implementation across specialties has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE To determine if I-PASS implementation across diverse settings would be associated with improvements in patient safety and communication. DESIGN Prospective Type 2 Hybrid effectiveness implementation study. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS Residents from diverse specialties across 32 hospitals (12 community, 20 academic). INTERVENTION External teams provided longitudinal coaching over 18 months to facilitate implementation of an enhanced I-PASS program and monthly metric reviews. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES Systematic surveillance surveys assessed rates of resident-reported adverse events. Validated direct observation tools measured verbal and written handoff quality. RESULTS 2735 resident physicians and 760 faculty champions from multiple specialties (16 internal medicine, 13 pediatric, 3 other) participated. 1942 error surveillance reports were collected. Major and minor handoff-related reported adverse events decreased 47% following implementation, from 1.7 to 0.9 major events/person-year (p < .05) and 17.5 to 9.3 minor events/person-year (p < .001). Implementation was associated with increased inclusion of all five key handoff data elements in verbal (20% vs. 66%, p < .001, n = 4812) and written (10% vs. 74%, p < .001, n = 1787) handoffs, as well as increased frequency of handoffs with high quality verbal (39% vs. 81% p < .001) and written (29% vs. 78%, p < .001) patient summaries, verbal (29% vs. 78%, p < .001) and written (24% vs. 73%, p < .001) contingency plans, and verbal receiver syntheses (31% vs. 83%, p < .001). Improvement was similar across provider types (adult vs. pediatric) and settings (community vs. academic).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy J. Starmer
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy D. Spector
- Section of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Pediatrics and Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer K. O’Toole
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Zia Bismilla
- Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon Calaman
- Section of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maria-Lucia Campos
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maitreya Coffey
- Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lauren A. Destino
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Everhart
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jenna Goldstein
- Society for Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dionne A. Graham
- Program for Patient Safety and Quality, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer H. Hepps
- Department of Pediatrics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Eric E. Howell
- Society for Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nicholas Kuzma
- Section of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Greg Maynard
- Society for Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Patrice Melvin
- Program for Patient Safety and Quality, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shilpa J. Patel
- Department of Pediatrics, Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children/University of Hawai’i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Alina Popa
- Department of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Glenn Rosenbluth
- Department of Pediatrics, Benioff Children’s Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Theodore C. Sectish
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rajendu Srivastava
- Department of Pediatrics, Primary Children’s Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Healthcare Delivery Institute, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah, USA
| | - Daniel C. West
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Clifton E. Yu
- Department of Pediatrics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Christopher P. Landrigan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nuckols TK, Berdahl CT, Henreid AJ, Schnipper JL, Rauf A, Ko EM, Nguyen AT, Co Z, Fanikos J, Kim JH, Leang DW, Matta L, Mulligan K, Ray A, Shane R, Wassef K, Pevnick JM. Comprehensive Pharmacist-led Transitions-of-care Medication Management around Hospital Discharge Adds Modest Cost Relative to Usual Care: Time-and-Motion Cost Analysis. Inquiry 2023; 60:469580231218625. [PMID: 38146178 PMCID: PMC10752096 DOI: 10.1177/00469580231218625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
Optimal medication management is important during hospitalization and at discharge because post-discharge adverse drug events (ADEs) are common, often preventable, and contribute to patient harms, healthcare utilization, and costs. Conduct a cost analysis of a comprehensive pharmacist-led transitions-of-care medication management intervention for older adults during and after hospital discharge. Twelve intervention components addressed medication reconciliation, medication review, and medication adherence. Trained, experienced pharmacists delivered the intervention to older adults with chronic comorbidities at 2 large U.S. academic centers. To quantify and categorize time spent on the intervention, we conducted a time-and-motion analysis of study pharmacists over 36 sequential workdays (14 519 min) involving 117 patients. For 40 patients' hospitalizations, we observed all intervention activities. We used the median minutes spent and pharmacist wages nationally to calculate cost per hospitalization (2020 U.S. dollars) from the hospital perspective, relative to usual care. Pharmacists spent a median of 66.9 min per hospitalization (interquartile range 46.1-90.1), equating to $101 ($86 to $116 in sensitivity analyses). In unadjusted analyses, study site was associated with time spent (medians 111 and 51.8 min) while patient primary language, discharge disposition, number of outpatient medications, and patient age were not. In this cost analysis, comprehensive medication management around discharge cost about $101 per hospitalization, with variation across sites. This cost is at least an order of magnitude less than published costs associated with ADEs, hospital readmissions, or other interventions designed to reduce readmissions. Work is ongoing to assess the current intervention's effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrew J. Henreid
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | | | - Asad Rauf
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
| | - EunJi M. Ko
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - An T. Nguyen
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Zoe Co
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ji-Hyun Kim
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Lina Matta
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Avik Ray
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rita Shane
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hernandez C, Tukpah AMC, Mitchell HM, Rosario NA, Boxer RB, Morris CA, Schnipper JL, Levine DM. Hospital-Level Care at Home for Patients With Acute Respiratory Disease: A Descriptive Analysis. Chest 2022; 163:891-901. [PMID: 36372302 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Home hospital (HH) care is hospital-level substitutive care delivered at home for acutely ill patients who traditionally would be cared for in the hospital. Despite HH care programs operating successfully for years and scientific evidence of similar or better outcomes compared with bricks-and-mortar care, HH care outcomes in the United States for respiratory disease have not been evaluated. RESEARCH QUESTION Do outcomes differ between patients admitted to HH care with acute respiratory illness vs those with other acute general medical conditions? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This was a retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data of patients admitted to HH care (2017-2021). We compared patients requiring admission with respiratory disease (asthma exacerbation [26%], acute exacerbation of COPD [33%], and non-COVID-19 pneumonia [41%]) to all other patients admitted to HH care. During HH care, patients received two nurse and one physician visit daily, IV medications, advanced respiratory therapies, and continuous heart and respiratory rate monitoring. Main outcomes were acute and postacute health care use and safety. RESULTS We analyzed 1,031 patients; 24% were admitted for respiratory disease. Patients with and without respiratory disease were similar: mean age, 68 ± 17 years, 62% women, and 48% White. Patients with respiratory disease more often were active smokers (21% vs 9%; P < .001). Eighty percent of patients showed an FEV1 to FVC ratio of ≤ 70; 28% showed a severe or very severe obstructive pattern (n = 118). During HH care, patients with respiratory disease showed less health care use: length of stay (mean, 3.4 vs 4.6 days), laboratory orders (median, 0 vs 2), IV medication (43% vs 73%), and specialist consultation (2% vs 7%; P < .001 for all). Ninety-six percent of patients completed the full admission at home with no mortality in the respiratory group. Within 30 days of discharge, both groups showed similar readmission, ED presentation, and mortality rates. INTERPRETATION HH care is as safe and effective for patients with acute respiratory disease as for those with other acute general medical conditions. If scaled, it can generate significant high-value capacity for health systems and communities, with opportunities to advance the complexity of care delivered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carme Hernandez
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Home Hospitalization, Medical and Nursing Direction, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ann-Marcia C Tukpah
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Henry M Mitchell
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nicole A Rosario
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Robert B Boxer
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Charles A Morris
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David M Levine
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Malik MA, Motta-Calderon D, Piniella N, Garber A, Konieczny K, Lam A, Plombon S, Carr K, Yoon C, Griffin J, Lipsitz S, Schnipper JL, Bates DW, Dalal AK. A structured approach to EHR surveillance of diagnostic error in acute care: an exploratory analysis of two institutionally-defined case cohorts. Diagnosis (Berl) 2022; 9:446-457. [PMID: 35993878 PMCID: PMC9651987 DOI: 10.1515/dx-2022-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To test a structured electronic health record (EHR) case review process to identify diagnostic errors (DE) and diagnostic process failures (DPFs) in acute care. METHODS We adapted validated tools (Safer Dx, Diagnostic Error Evaluation Research [DEER] Taxonomy) to assess the diagnostic process during the hospital encounter and categorized 13 postulated e-triggers. We created two test cohorts of all preventable cases (n=28) and an equal number of randomly sampled non-preventable cases (n=28) from 365 adult general medicine patients who expired and underwent our institution's mortality case review process. After excluding patients with a length of stay of more than one month, each case was reviewed by two blinded clinicians trained in our process and by an expert panel. Inter-rater reliability was assessed. We compared the frequency of DE contributing to death in both cohorts, as well as mean DPFs and e-triggers for DE positive and negative cases within each cohort. RESULTS Twenty-seven (96.4%) preventable and 24 (85.7%) non-preventable cases underwent our review process. Inter-rater reliability was moderate between individual reviewers (Cohen's kappa 0.41) and substantial with the expert panel (Cohen's kappa 0.74). The frequency of DE contributing to death was significantly higher for the preventable compared to the non-preventable cohort (56% vs. 17%, OR 6.25 [1.68, 23.27], p<0.01). Mean DPFs and e-triggers were significantly and non-significantly higher for DE positive compared to DE negative cases in each cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We observed substantial agreement among final consensus and expert panel reviews using our structured EHR case review process. DEs contributing to death associated with DPFs were identified in institutionally designated preventable and non-preventable cases. While e-triggers may be useful for discriminating DE positive from DE negative cases, larger studies are required for validation. Our approach has potential to augment institutional mortality case review processes with respect to DE surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A. Malik
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Motta-Calderon
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas Piniella
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alison Garber
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Konieczny
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alyssa Lam
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Savanna Plombon
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin Carr
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Catherine Yoon
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Stuart Lipsitz
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W. Bates
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anuj K. Dalal
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Serna MK, Fiskio J, Yoon C, Plombon S, Lakin JR, Schnipper JL, Dalal AK. Who Gets (and Who Should Get) a Serious Illness Conversation in the Hospital? An Analysis of Readmission Risk Score in an Electronic Health Record. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2022:10499091221129602. [PMID: 36154485 DOI: 10.1177/10499091221129602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Serious Illness Conversations (SICs) explore patients' prognostic awareness, hopes, and worries, and can help establish priorities for their care during and after hospitalization. While identifying patients who benefit from an SIC remains a challenge, this task may be facilitated by use of validated prediction scores available in most commercial electronic health records (EHRs), such as Epic's Readmission Risk Score (RRS). We identified the RRS on admission for all hospital encounters from October 2018 to August 2019 and measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve to determine whether RRS could accurately discriminate post discharge 6-month mortality. For encounters with standardized SIC documentation matched in a 1:3 ratio to controls by sex and age (±5 years), we constructed a multivariable, paired logistic regression model and measured the odds of SIC documentation per every 10% absolute increase in RRS. RRS was predictive of 6-month mortality with acceptable discrimination (AUROC .71) and was significantly associated with SIC documentation (adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.24-1.63). An RRS >28% used to identify patients with post discharge 6-month mortality had a high specificity (89.0%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (97.0%), but low sensitivity (25.2%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (7.9%). RRS may serve as a practical EHR-based screen to exclude patients not requiring an SIC, thereby leaving a smaller cohort to be further evaluated for SIC needs using other validated tools and clinical assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrna K Serna
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julie Fiskio
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Catherine Yoon
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Savanna Plombon
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua R Lakin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, 1855Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anuj K Dalal
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, 1861Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schnipper JL. Web Exclusive. Annals for Hospitalists Inpatient Notes - Improving Medication Reconciliation in Hospitals. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175:HO2-HO3. [PMID: 35969870 DOI: 10.7326/m22-1954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Levine DM, Paz M, Burke K, Beaumont R, Boxer RB, Morris CA, Britton KA, Orav EJ, Schnipper JL. Remote vs In-home Physician Visits for Hospital-Level Care at Home: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2229067. [PMID: 36040741 PMCID: PMC9428739 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Home hospital care is the substitutive provision of home-based acute care services usually associated with a traditional inpatient hospital. Many home hospital models require a physician to see patients at home daily, which may hinder scalability. Whether remote physician visits can safely substitute for most in-home visits is unknown. OBJECTIVE To compare remote and in-home physician care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial assessed 172 adult patients at an academic medical center and community hospital who required hospital-level care for select acute conditions, including infection, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma, between August 3, 2019, and March 26, 2020; follow-up ended April 26, 2020. INTERVENTIONS All patients received acute care at home, including in-home nurse or paramedic visits, intravenous medications, remote monitoring, and point-of-care testing. Patients were randomized to receive physician care remotely (initial in-home visit followed by daily video visit facilitated by the home hospital nurse) vs in-home care (daily in-home physician visit). In the remote care group, the physician could choose to see the patient at home beyond the first visit if it was felt to be medically necessary. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the number of adverse events, compared using multivariable Poisson regression at a noninferiority threshold of 10 events per 100 patients. Adverse events included a fall, pressure injury, and delirium. Secondary outcomes included the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire 15 score (scale of 0-15, with 0 indicating worst patient experience and 15 indicating best patient experience) and 30-day readmission rates. RESULTS A total of 172 patients (84 receiving remote care and 88 receiving in-home physician care [control group]) were randomized; enrollment was terminated early because of COVID-19. The mean (SD) age was 69.3 (18.0) years, 97 patients (56.4%) were female, 77 (45.0%) were White, and 42 (24.4%) lived alone. Mean adjusted adverse event count was 6.8 per 100 patients for remote care patients vs 3.9 per 100 patients for control patients, for a difference of 2.8 (95% CI, -3.3 to 8.9), supporting noninferiority. For remote care vs control patients, the mean adjusted Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire 15 score difference was -0.22 (95% CI, -1.00 to 0.56), supporting noninferiority. The mean adjusted 30-day readmission absolute rate difference was 2.28% (95% CI, -3.23% to 7.79%), which was inconclusive. Of patients in the remote group, 16 (19.0%) required in-home visits beyond the first visit. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, remote physician visits were noninferior to in-home physician visits during home hospital care for adverse events and patient experience, although in-home physician care was necessary to support many patients receiving remote care. Our findings may allow for a more efficient, scalable home hospital approach but require further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04080570.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. Levine
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary Paz
- MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Ryan Beaumont
- Northeastern University Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert B. Boxer
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles A. Morris
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathryn A. Britton
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - E. John Orav
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Parks AL, Auerbach AD, Schnipper JL, Bertram A, Jeon SY, Boyle B, Fang MC, Gadrey SM, Siddiqui ZK, Brotman DJ. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention and diagnosis in COVID-19: Practice patterns and outcomes at 33 hospitals. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266944. [PMID: 35511940 PMCID: PMC9071149 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Early reports of increased thrombosis risk with SARS-CoV-2 infection led to changes in venous thromboembolism (VTE) management. Real-world data on the prevalence, efficacy and harms of these changes informs best practices. Objective Define practice patterns and clinical outcomes related to VTE diagnosis, prevention, and management in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) using a multi-hospital US sample. Methods In this retrospective cross-sectional study of 1121 patients admitted to 33 hospitals, exposure was dose of anticoagulant prescribed for VTE prophylaxis (standard, intensified, therapeutic), and primary outcome was VTE (pulmonary embolism [PE] and deep vein thrombosis [DVT]); secondary outcomes were PE, DVT, arterial thromboembolism (ATE), and bleeding events. Multivariable logistic regression models accounting for clustering by site and adjusted for risk factors were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs). Inverse probability weighting was used to account for confounding by indication. Results 1121 patients (mean age 60 ± 18, 47% female) admitted with COVID-19 between February 2, 2020 and December 31, 2020 to 33 US hospitals were included. Pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was prescribed in 86%. Forty-seven patients (4.2%) had PE, 51 (4.6%) had DVT, and 23 (2.1%) had ATE. Forty-six patients (4.1%) had major bleeding and 46 (4.1%) had clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Compared to standard prophylaxis, adjusted odds of VTE were 0.67 (95% CI 0.21–2.1) with no prophylaxis, 1.0 (95% CI 0.06–17) with intensified, and 3.0 (95% CI 0.89–10) with therapeutic. Adjusted odds of bleeding with no prophylaxis were 5.6 (95% CI 3.0–11) and 5.3 (95% CI 3.0–10) with therapeutic (no events on intensified dosing). Conclusions Therapeutic anticoagulation was associated with a 3-fold increased odds of VTE and 5-fold increased odds of bleeding. While higher bleeding rates with high-intensity prophylaxis were likely due to full-dose anticoagulation, we conclude that high thrombosis rates were due to clinical concern for thrombosis before formal diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna L. Parks
- Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Andrew D. Auerbach
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Amanda Bertram
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Sun Y. Jeon
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Bridget Boyle
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Margaret C. Fang
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Shrirang M. Gadrey
- Division of General, Geriatric, Palliative and Hospital Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America
| | - Zishan K. Siddiqui
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Daniel J. Brotman
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schnipper JL, Reyes Nieva H, Mallouk M, Mixon A, Rennke S, Chu E, Mueller S, Smith GRR, Williams MV, Wetterneck TB, Stein J, Dalal A, Labonville S, Sridharan A, Stolldorf DP, Orav EJ, Levin B, Gresham M, Yoon C, Goldstein J, Platt S, Nyenpan CT, Howell E, Kripalani S. Effects of a refined evidence-based toolkit and mentored implementation on medication reconciliation at 18 hospitals: results of the MARQUIS2 study. BMJ Qual Saf 2022; 31:278-286. [PMID: 33927025 PMCID: PMC10964422 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement (QI) Study (MARQUIS1) demonstrated that mentored implementation of a medication reconciliation best practices toolkit decreased total unintentional medication discrepancies in five hospitals, but results varied by site. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of a refined toolkit on a larger group of hospitals. METHODS We conducted a pragmatic quality improvement study (MARQUIS2) at 18 North American hospitals or hospital systems from 2016 to 2018. Incorporating lessons learnt from MARQUIS1, we implemented a refined toolkit, offering 17 system-level and 6 patient-level interventions. One of eight physician mentors coached each site via monthly calls and performed one to two site visits. The primary outcome was number of unintentional medication discrepancies in admission or discharge orders per patient. Time series analysis used multivariable Poisson regression. RESULTS A total of 4947 patients were sampled, including 1229 patients preimplementation and 3718 patients postimplementation. Both the number of system-level interventions adopted per site and the proportion of patients receiving patient-level interventions increased over time. During the intervention, patients experienced a steady decline in their medication discrepancy rate from 2.85 discrepancies per patient to 0.98 discrepancies per patient. An interrupted time series analysis of the 17 sites with sufficient data for analysis showed the intervention was associated with a 5% relative decrease in discrepancies per month over baseline temporal trends (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 0.95, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.97, p<0.001). Receipt of patient-level interventions was associated with decreased discrepancy rates, and these associations increased over time as sites adopted more system-level interventions. CONCLUSION A multicentre medication reconciliation QI initiative using mentored implementation of a refined best practices toolkit, including patient-level and system-level interventions, was associated with a substantial decrease in unintentional medication discrepancies over time. Future efforts should focus on sustainability and spread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Brigham Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harry Reyes Nieva
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meghan Mallouk
- Center for Quality Improvement, Society of Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amanda Mixon
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stephanie Rennke
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eugene Chu
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Parkland Health and Hospital System and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Stephanie Mueller
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Brigham Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gregory Randy R Smith
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark V Williams
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Tosha B Wetterneck
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Anuj Dalal
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Brigham Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - E John Orav
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian Levin
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marcus Gresham
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cathy Yoon
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jenna Goldstein
- Center for Quality Improvement, Society of Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sara Platt
- Center for Quality Improvement, Society of Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Eric Howell
- Society of Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sunil Kripalani
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Levine DM, Cueva MA, Shi S, Limaj I, Wambolt B, Grabowski DC, Schnipper JL, Pu CT. Skilled Nursing Facility Care at Home for Adults Discharged From the Hospital: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Appl Gerontol 2022; 41:1585-1594. [PMID: 35266835 DOI: 10.1177/07334648221077092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The ability to deliver SNF-level care at home is unclear. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of rehabilitation at home (RAH) via a pilot randomized controlled trial. METHODS Daily care from a home health aide, certified nursing assistant, nurse, and physician. Core technologies included remote PT, automated medication dispensing, and continuous monitoring. Primary outcome: episode cost. RESULTS We randomized 10 patients. Home patients' episode cost a median $8404 (IQR, $2697) versus $9215 (IQR, $5702). LOS for both was 14 days. Home patients' ADLs improved between admission and 30-days post-discharge by median 4 (IQR, 5) versus 1 (IQR, 2). Home patients' median Picker patient experience score was 12/14 (IQR, 2) versus 7/14 (IQR, 3). DISCUSSION A RAH pilot compared favorably to traditional SNF, with trends toward lower cost, greater functional status improvement, and better patient experience. This delivery innovation could reimagine how we deliver post-acute care but requires replication. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NCT04048590.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Levine
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, 370908Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary A Cueva
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, 370908Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sandra Shi
- 1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Idriz Limaj
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, 370908Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - David C Grabowski
- 1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Health Care Policy, 1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, 370908Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles T Pu
- 1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Palliative Care & Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Mass General Brigham Center for Population Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schnipper JL. Improving care transitions: Is readmission reduction possible? Or even desirable? J Hosp Med 2022; 17:229-230. [PMID: 35504590 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.12786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ciersten A Burks
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit and Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shannon EM, Cauley M, Vitale M, Wines L, Chopra V, Greysen SR, Herzig SJ, Kripalani S, O'Leary KJ, Vasilevskis EE, Williams MV, Auerbach AD, Mueller SK, Schnipper JL. Patterns of utilization and evaluation of advanced practice providers on academic hospital medicine teams: A national survey. J Hosp Med 2022; 17:186-191. [PMID: 35504577 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.12788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
This survey study aimed to provide a contemporary appraisal of advanced practice provider (APP) practice and to summarize perceptions of the benefits and challenges of integrating APPs into adult academic hospital medicine (HM) groups. We surveyed leaders of academic HM groups. We received responses from 43 of 86 groups (50%) surveyed. Thirty-four (79%) reported that they employed APPs. In most groups (85%), APPs were reported to perform daily tasks of patient care, including rounding and documentation. Less than half of the groups reported that APPs had completed HM-specific postgraduate training. The reported benefits of APPs included improved perceived quality of care and greater volume of patients that could be seen. Reported challenges included training requirements and support for new hires. Further investigation is needed to determine which APP team structures deliver the highest quality care. There may be a role for expanding standardized competency-based postgraduate training for APPs planning to practice HM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Shannon
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marissa Cauley
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Vitale
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leanne Wines
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vineet Chopra
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - S Ryan Greysen
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Division of General Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shoshana J Herzig
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of General Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sunil Kripalani
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kevin J O'Leary
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Eduard E Vasilevskis
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Tennessee Valley, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mark V Williams
- Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Andrew D Auerbach
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Stephanie K Mueller
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Murry LT, Keller MS, Pevnick JM, Schnipper JL, Kennelty KA, Nguyen AT, Henreid A, Wisniewski J, Amer K, Armbruster C, Conti N, Guan J, Wu S, Leang DW, Llamas-Sandoval R, Phung E, Rosen O, Rosen SL, Salandanan A, Shane R, Ko EJM, Moriarty D, Muske AM, Matta L, Fanikos J. A qualitative dual-site analysis of the pharmacist discharge care (PHARM-DC) intervention using the CFIR framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:186. [PMID: 35151310 PMCID: PMC8840769 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07583-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Older adults face several challenges when transitioning from acute hospitals to community-based care. The PHARMacist Discharge Care (PHARM-DC) intervention is a pharmacist-led Transitions of Care (TOC) program intended to reduce 30-day hospital readmissions and emergency department visits at two large hospitals. This study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework to evaluate pharmacist perceptions of the PHARM-DC intervention.
Methods
Intervention pharmacists and pharmacy administrators were purposively recruited by study team members located within each participating institution. Study team members located within each institution coordinated with two study authors unaffiliated with the institutions implementing the intervention to conduct interviews and focus groups remotely via telecommunication software. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, with transcriptions imported into NVivo for qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was performed using an iterative process to identify “a priori” constructs based on CFIR domains (intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation) and to create overarching themes as identified during coding.
Results
In total, ten semi-structured interviews and one focus group were completed across both hospitals. At Site A, six interviews were conducted with intervention pharmacists and pharmacists in administrative roles. Also at Site A, one focus group comprised of five intervention pharmacists was conducted. At Site B, interviews were conducted with four intervention pharmacists and pharmacists in administrative roles. Three overarching themes were identified: PHARM-DC and Institutional Context, Importance of PHARM-DC Adaptability, and Recommendations for PHARM-DC Improvement and Sustainability. Increasing pharmacist support for technical tasks and navigating pharmacist-patient language barriers were important to intervention implementation and delivery. Identifying cost-savings and quantifying outcomes as a result of the intervention were particularly important when considering how to sustain and expand the PHARM-DC intervention.
Conclusion
The PHARM-DC intervention can successfully be implemented at two institutions with considerable variations in TOC initiatives, resources, and staffing. Future implementation of PHARM-DC interventions should consider the themes identified, including an examination of institution-specific contextual factors such as the roles that pharmacy technicians may play in TOC interventions, the importance of intervention adaptability to account for patient needs and institutional resources, and pharmacist recommendations for intervention improvement and sustainability.
Trial registration
NCT04071951.
Collapse
|
41
|
Levine DM, Paz M, Burke K, Schnipper JL. Predictors and Reasons Why Patients Decline to Participate in Home Hospital: a Mixed Methods Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:327-331. [PMID: 33954888 PMCID: PMC8811077 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06833-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute care at home ("home hospital") compared to traditional hospital care has been shown to lower cost, utilization, and readmission and improve patient experience and physical activity. Despite these benefits, many patients decline to enroll in home hospital. OBJECTIVE Describe predictors and reasons why patients decline home hospital. DESIGN Mixed methods evaluation of a randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS Patients in the emergency department who required admission and were accepted for home hospital by the home hospital attending, but ultimately declined to enroll. INTERVENTION Home hospital care, including nurse and physician home visits, intravenous medications, remote monitoring, video communication, and point-of-care testing. APPROACH We conducted a thematic content analysis of verbatim reasons for decline. We performed bivariate comparisons then multivariable logistic regression to identify patient characteristics associated with declining participation. KEY RESULTS Two hundred forty-eight patients were eligible to enroll, and 157 (63%) declined enrollment. Patients who declined and enrolled were of similar age (median age, 74 vs 75 years old; p = 0.27), sex (32% vs 36% female; p = 0.49), and race/ethnicity (p = 0.26). In multivariable analysis, patients were significantly more likely to decline if they initially presented at the community hospital compared to the academic medical center (53% vs 42%; adjusted OR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2 to 4.2]) and if single (37% v 24%; adjusted OR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.2 to 5.1]). We formulated 10 qualitative categories describing reasons patients ultimately declined. Many patients declined because they felt it was easier to remain in the hospital (20%) or felt safer in the hospital than in their home (20%). CONCLUSIONS Patients who declined to enroll in a home hospital intervention had similar sociodemographic characteristics as enrollees except partner status and declined most often for perceptions surrounding safety at home and the ease of remaining in the hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03203759.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Levine
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Mary Paz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kimberly Burke
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Magny-Normilus C, Nolido N, Samal L, Thompson R, Crevensten G, Schnipper JL. Clinicians' Attitudes and System Capacity Regarding Transitional Care Practices Within a Health System: Survey Results From the Partners-PCORI Transitions Study. J Patient Saf 2021; 17:e727-e731. [PMID: 32175956 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Successful efforts to improve transitional care depend in part on local attitudes, workload, and training. Before implementing a multifaceted transitions intervention within an Accountable Care Organization, an understanding of contextual factors among providers involved in care transitions in inpatient and outpatient settings was needed. METHODS As part of the Partners-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Transitions Study, we purposefully sampled inpatient and outpatient providers within the Accountable Care Organization. Survey questions focused on training and feedback on transitional tasks and opinions on the quality of care transitions. We also surveyed unit- and practice-level leadership on current transitional care practices. Results are presented using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Among 387 providers surveyed, 220 responded (response rate = 57%) from 15 outpatient practices and 26 inpatient units. A large proportion of respondents reported to have never received training (50%) or feedback (68%) on key transitional care activities, and most (58%) reported insufficient time to complete these tasks. Respondents on average reported transitions processes led to positive outcomes some to most of the time (mean scores = 4.70-5.16 on a 1-7 scale). Surveys of leadership showed tremendous variation by unit and by practice in the performance of various transitional care activities. CONCLUSIONS Many respondents felt that training, feedback, and time allotted to key transitional care activities were inadequate. Satisfaction with the quality of the transitions process was middling. Understanding these results, especially variation by location, was important to customizing implementation of the intervention and will be key to understanding variation in the success of the intervention across locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nyryan Nolido
- From the Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although existing data suggest marked variability in interhospital transfer (IHT), little is known about specific factors that may impact the quality and safety of this care transition. We aimed to explore transferred patients' and involved physicians' experience with IHT to better understand the components of the transfer continuum and identify potential targets for improvement. METHODS We performed a qualitative study using individual interviews of adult patients recently transferred to cardiology, general medicine, and oncology services at a tertiary care academic medical center, as well as their transferring physician, accepting attending physician, and accepting/admitting resident physician. We conducted a thematic analysis, using an inductive approach and an a priori framework from pre-established domains. RESULTS Participants included 10 hospitalized adults (6 cardiology, 2 general medicine, and 2 oncology), 9 accepting attending physicians, 12 accepting and/or admitting resident physicians, and 5 transferring physicians (N = 36). Emergent themes demonstrated that participants held a shared understanding of the reason for transfer (most commonly access to more specialized care), and relayed a general dissatisfaction regarding the timing and lack of advanced notification of transfer. We also found distinct differences in IHT experience by stakeholder group: physician participants relayed discontent with intrahospital chains of communication and interhospital information exchange, and patient participants focused more readily on the physical aspects of IHT. CONCLUSIONS This study offers insight into IHT from the perspective of those most affected by this process, thereby identifying potential targets in addressing the quality and safety of this transition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Evan Shannon
- From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Levine DM, Mitchell H, Rosario N, Boxer RB, Morris CA, Britton KA, Schnipper JL. Acute Care at Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge in Boston. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:3644-3646. [PMID: 34379282 PMCID: PMC8356691 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07052-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David Michael Levine
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Henry Mitchell
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicole Rosario
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert B Boxer
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles A Morris
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn A Britton
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Harrison JD, Weiss R, Radhakrishnan NS, Hanson C, Carnie MB, Evans P, Banta J, Symczak G, Ziegler G, Holmes D, Michel-Leconte SJ, Rogers B, Wurst M, Alikhaani J, Davis C, Lee T, Schnipper JL, Auerbach AD, Romond J. A Patient-Centered Environmental Scan of Inpatient Visitor Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Patient Exp 2021; 8:23743735211049646. [PMID: 34712784 PMCID: PMC8547154 DOI: 10.1177/23743735211049646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Researchers and patients conducted an environmental scan of policy documents and public-facing websites and abstracted data to describe COVID-19 adult inpatient visitor restrictions at 70 academic medical centers. We identified variations in how centers described and operationalized visitor policies. Then, we used the nominal group technique process to identify patient-centered information gaps in visitor policies and provide key recommendations for improvement. Recommendations were categorized into the following domains: 1) provision of comprehensive, consistent, and clear information; 2) accessible information for patients with limited English proficiency and health literacy; 3) COVID-19 related considerations; and 4) care team member methods of communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D Harrison
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rachel Weiss
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Catherine Hanson
- Office of Patient Experience, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA.,Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Martha B Carnie
- Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA.,Center for Patient & Families, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patricia Evans
- Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jim Banta
- Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gina Symczak
- Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Georgiann Ziegler
- Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - D'Anna Holmes
- Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA.,Astellas Pharma Inc, Northbrook, IL, USA
| | - Safia J Michel-Leconte
- Office of Patient Experience, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA.,Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Beverly Rogers
- Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Melissa Wurst
- Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jacqueline Alikhaani
- Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient & Family Advisory Council (PFAC), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Clark Davis
- Brigham Health Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tiffany Lee
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Brigham Health Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew D Auerbach
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John Romond
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schnipper JL. Medication Reconciliation-Too Much or Not Enough? JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2125272. [PMID: 34529070 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Griffin JA, Carr K, Bersani K, Piniella N, Motta-Calderon D, Malik M, Garber A, Schnock K, Rozenblum R, Bates DW, Schnipper JL, Dalal AK. Analyzing diagnostic errors in the acute setting: a process-driven approach. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 9:77-88. [PMID: 34420276 DOI: 10.1515/dx-2021-0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We describe an approach for analyzing failures in diagnostic processes in a small, enriched cohort of general medicine patients who expired during hospitalization and experienced medical error. Our objective was to delineate a systematic strategy for identifying frequent and significant failures in the diagnostic process to inform strategies for preventing adverse events due to diagnostic error. METHODS Two clinicians independently reviewed detailed records of purposively sampled cases identified from established institutional case review forums and assessed the likelihood of diagnostic error using the Safer Dx instrument. Each reviewer used the modified Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy, revised for acute care (41 possible failure points across six process dimensions), to characterize the frequency of failure points (FPs) and significant FPs in the diagnostic process. RESULTS Of 166 cases with medical error, 16 were sampled: 13 (81.3%) had one or more diagnostic error(s), and a total of 113 FPs and 30 significant FPs were identified. A majority of significant FPs (63.3%) occurred in "Diagnostic Information and Patient Follow-up" and "Patient and Provider Encounter and Initial Assessment" process dimensions. Fourteen (87.5%) cases had a significant FP in at least one of these dimensions. CONCLUSIONS Failures in the diagnostic process occurred across multiple dimensions in our purposively sampled cohort. A systematic analytic approach incorporating the modified DEER taxonomy, revised for acute care, offered critical insights into key failures in the diagnostic process that could serve as potential targets for preventative interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin Carr
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Maria Malik
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ronen Rozenblum
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W Bates
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anuj K Dalal
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure of safe care transitions after hospital discharge results in unnecessary worsening of symptoms, extended period of illness or readmission to the hospital. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to add to the understanding of the working of care transition interventions between hospital and home through unraveling the contextual elements and mechanisms that may have played a role in the success of these interventions, and by developing a conceptual model of how these components relate to each other. RESEARCH DESIGN This was a qualitative study using in-person, semi-structured interviews, based on realist evaluation methods. SUBJECTS A total of 26 researchers, designers, administrators, and/or practitioners of both current "leading" care transitions interventions and of less successful care transition intervention studies or practices. MEASURES The contextual elements and working mechanisms of the different care transition intervention studies or practices. RESULTS Three main contextual factors (internal environment, external environment, and patient population) and 7 working mechanisms (simplifiying, verifiying, connecting, translating, coaching, monitoring, and anticipating) were found to be relevant to the outcome of care transition interventions. Context, Intervention, Mechanism, and Outcome (CIMO) configurations revealed that, in response to these contextual factors, care transition interventions triggered one or several of the mechanisms, in turn generating outcomes, including a safer care transition. CONCLUSION We developed a conceptual model which explains the working of care transition interventions within different contexts, and believe it can help support future successful implementation of care transition interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorien L.M. Zwart
- Harkness Fellowship Program in Health Care Policy and Practice, The Commonwealth Fund, New York, NY
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Clinical Research, Hospital Medicine Unit, Brigham Health
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
| | - Debbie Vermond
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - David W. Bates
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the patterns of potentially avoidable readmissions due to adverse drug events (ADEs) to identify the most appropriate risk reduction interventions. METHODS In this observational study, we analyzed a random sample of 534 potentially avoidable 30-day readmissions from 10,275 consecutive discharges from the medical department of an academic hospital. Readmissions due to ADEs were reviewed to identify the causative drugs and the severity and interventions to prevent them. RESULTS Seventy cases (13.1%) of readmission were partially or predominantly due to ADEs, of which, 58 (82.9%) were serious ADEs. Overall, 65 (92.9%) of the ADEs have been confirmed to be preventable. Inappropriate prescribing was identified as the cause of ADE in 34 cases (48.6%) mainly involving diuretics, analgesics, or antithrombotics: misprescribing n = 19 (27.1%), underprescribing n = 8 (11.4%), and overprescribing n = 7 (10.0%). The remaining half of preventable ADEs (n = 36; 51.4%) were related to suboptimal patient monitoring/education, such as adherence issues (n = 6; 8.6%) or lack of monitoring (n = 31; 44.3%). In 64 cases (91.4%), the readmission could have been potentially prevented by better monitoring for drug efficacy/disease control, or for predictable side effect. Thirty-three (97.1%) of the 34 ADEs due to inappropriate prescribing could have also been prevented by better monitoring. CONCLUSIONS Adverse drug events accounted for approximately 13% of 30-day preventable readmissions. A half were due to prescription errors involving mainly diuretics, analgesics, or antithrombotics, and the other half were due to suboptimal patient monitoring/education, most frequently with antineoplastics. Both these avoidable causes may represent opportunities to reduce the total drug-related adverse events.
Collapse
|
50
|
Gesell SB, Prvu Bettger J, Lawrence RH, Li J, Hoffman J, Lutz BJ, Grudzen C, Johnson AM, Krishnan JA, Hsu LL, Zwart D, Williams MV, Schnipper JL. Implementation of Complex Interventions: Lessons Learned From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Transitional Care Portfolio. Med Care 2021; 59:S344-S354. [PMID: 34228016 PMCID: PMC8263141 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the well-documented risks to patient safety associated with transitions from one care setting to another, health care organizations struggle to identify which interventions to implement. Multiple strategies are often needed, and studying the effectiveness of these complex interventions is challenging. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to present lessons learned in implementing and evaluating complex transitional care interventions in routine clinical care. RESEARCH DESIGN Nine transitional care study teams share important common lessons in designing complex interventions with stakeholder engagement, implementation, and evaluation under pragmatic conditions (ie, using only existing resources), and disseminating findings in outlets that reach policy makers and the people who could ultimately benefit from the research. RESULTS Lessons learned serve as a guide for future studies in 3 areas: (1) Delineating the function (intended purpose) versus form (prespecified modes of delivery of the intervention); (2) Evaluating both the processes supporting implementation and the impact of adaptations; and (3) Engaging stakeholders in the design and delivery of the intervention and dissemination of study results. CONCLUSION These lessons can help guide future pragmatic studies of care transitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina B. Gesell
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy
- Department of Implementation Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem
| | - Janet Prvu Bettger
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Roybal Center on Aging, Durham, NC
| | - Raymona H. Lawrence
- Department Health Policy and Community Health, Jiann Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Health Services Research (CHSR), University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Jeanne Hoffman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Barbara J. Lutz
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Wilmington, NC
| | - Corita Grudzen
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Anna M. Johnson
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jerry A. Krishnan
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Design, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs
| | - Lewis L. Hsu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Dorien Zwart
- Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark V. Williams
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY
| | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Brigham Health Hospital Medicine Unit and Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|