1
|
Elwood P, Morgan G, Watkins J, Protty M, Mason M, Adams R, Dolwani S, Pickering J, Delon C, Longley M. Aspirin and cancer treatment: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evidence: for and against. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:3-8. [PMID: 38030748 PMCID: PMC10782022 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02506-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aspirin as a possible treatment of cancer has been of increasing interest for over 50 years, but the balance of the risks and benefits remains a point of contention. We summarise the valid published evidence 'for' and 'against' the use of aspirin as a cancer treatment and we present what we believe are relevant ethical implications. Reasons for aspirin include the benefits of aspirin taken by patients with cancer upon relevant biological cancer mechanisms. These explain the observed reductions in metastatic cancer and vascular complications in cancer patients. Meta-analyses of 118 observational studies of mortality in cancer patients give evidence consistent with reductions of about 20% in mortality associated with aspirin use. Reasons against aspirin use include increased risk of a gastrointestinal bleed though there appears to be no valid evidence that aspirin is responsible for fatal gastrointestinal bleeding. Few trials have been reported and there are inconsistencies in the results. In conclusion, given the relative safety and the favourable effects of aspirin, its use in cancer seems justified, and ethical implications of this imply that cancer patients should be informed of the present evidence and encouraged to raise the topic with their healthcare team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Elwood
- Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Gareth Morgan
- Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
| | - John Watkins
- Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Majd Protty
- Systems Immunity Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Richard Adams
- Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
- Wales Cancer Bank, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Sunil Dolwani
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Janet Pickering
- Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Metcalfe C, Davis M, Turner EL, Martin RM, Young GJ, Walsh EI, Bryant RJ, Bollina P, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Gnanapragasam V, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Paez E, Powell P, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Mason M, Catto JWF, Peters TJ, Oxley J, Williams NJ, Staffurth J, Neal DE. Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1547-1558. [PMID: 36912538 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2214122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 139.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Between 1999 and 2009 in the United Kingdom, 82,429 men between 50 and 69 years of age received a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Localized prostate cancer was diagnosed in 2664 men. Of these men, 1643 were enrolled in a trial to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments, with 545 randomly assigned to receive active monitoring, 553 to undergo prostatectomy, and 545 to undergo radiotherapy. METHODS At a median follow-up of 15 years (range, 11 to 21), we compared the results in this population with respect to death from prostate cancer (the primary outcome) and death from any cause, metastases, disease progression, and initiation of long-term androgen-deprivation therapy (secondary outcomes). RESULTS Follow-up was complete for 1610 patients (98%). A risk-stratification analysis showed that more than one third of the men had intermediate or high-risk disease at diagnosis. Death from prostate cancer occurred in 45 men (2.7%): 17 (3.1%) in the active-monitoring group, 12 (2.2%) in the prostatectomy group, and 16 (2.9%) in the radiotherapy group (P = 0.53 for the overall comparison). Death from any cause occurred in 356 men (21.7%), with similar numbers in all three groups. Metastases developed in 51 men (9.4%) in the active-monitoring group, in 26 (4.7%) in the prostatectomy group, and in 27 (5.0%) in the radiotherapy group. Long-term androgen-deprivation therapy was initiated in 69 men (12.7%), 40 (7.2%), and 42 (7.7%), respectively; clinical progression occurred in 141 men (25.9%), 58 (10.5%), and 60 (11.0%), respectively. In the active-monitoring group, 133 men (24.4%) were alive without any prostate cancer treatment at the end of follow-up. No differential effects on cancer-specific mortality were noted in relation to the baseline PSA level, tumor stage or grade, or risk-stratification score. No treatment complications were reported after the 10-year analysis. CONCLUSIONS After 15 years of follow-up, prostate cancer-specific mortality was low regardless of the treatment assigned. Thus, the choice of therapy involves weighing trade-offs between benefits and harms associated with treatments for localized prostate cancer. (Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research; ProtecT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddie C Hamdy
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Jenny L Donovan
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - J Athene Lane
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Michael Davis
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Emma L Turner
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Richard M Martin
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Grace J Young
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Eleanor I Walsh
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Richard J Bryant
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Prasad Bollina
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Andrew Doble
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Alan Doherty
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - David Gillatt
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Owen Hughes
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Howard Kynaston
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Alan Paul
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Edgar Paez
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Philip Powell
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Derek J Rosario
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Edward Rowe
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Malcolm Mason
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - James W F Catto
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Tim J Peters
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Jon Oxley
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - Naomi J Williams
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - John Staffurth
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| | - David E Neal
- From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford (F.C.H., R.J.B., D.E.N.), Population Health Sciences (J.L.D., J.A.L., C.M., M.D., E.L.T., R.M.M., G.J.Y., E.I.W., T.J.P., N.J.W.) and Bristol Trials Centre (J.A.L., C.M., G.J.Y.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, the Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute (E.R.), and the Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust (J.O.), Bristol, the Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (P.B.), the Department of Urology (A. Doble) and the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus (V.G., D.E.N.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, the Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham (A. Doherty), the Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (O.H., H.K.), and the School of Medicine (M.M.) and the Division of Cancer and Genetics (J.S.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, the Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (R.K.), the Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (A.P.), the Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (E.P., P.P.), and the Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital (D.J.R., J.W.F.C.), and the Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield (J.W.F.C.), Sheffield - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney (D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, Young GJ, Metcalfe C, Walsh EI, Davis M, Steuart-Feilding T, Blazeby JM, Avery KNL, Martin RM, Bollina P, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Gnanapragasam V, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Paez E, Powell P, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Mason M, Catto JWF, Peters TJ, Wade J, Turner EL, Williams NJ, Oxley J, Staffurth J, Bryant RJ, Neal DE. Patient-Reported Outcomes 12 Years after Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment. NEJM Evid 2023; 2:EVIDoa2300018. [PMID: 38320051 DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2300018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Outcomes after Localized Prostate Cancer TreatmentDonovan et al. present the long-term patient-reported outcomes of 1643 randomly assigned participants in the ProtecT (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment) trial. Functional and quality-of-life impacts of prostatectomy, radiotherapy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation, and active monitoring are described. Over the trial period from 7 to 12 years, generic quality-of-life scores were similar among all groups, with varying degrees of impact on urinary leakage, sexual function, and fecal leakage depending on the treatment group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny L Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - J Athene Lane
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Grace J Young
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor I Walsh
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Davis
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Steuart-Feilding
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Kerry N L Avery
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Richard M Martin
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Prasad Bollina
- Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Doble
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - David Gillatt
- Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Howard Kynaston
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Phillip Powell
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Derek J Rosario
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Malcolm Mason
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Tim J Peters
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Wade
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Emma L Turner
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi J Williams
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David E Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chidebe RCW, Leibel LL, Orjiakor TC, Shrestha A, Agha AA, Altinok Dindar D, Kisakol B, Ipiankama SC, Okoye IJ, Mason M, Auguste A, Esiaka DK. Promoting cancer prevention through World Cancer Day in Nigeria. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:319-322. [PMID: 36990607 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00692-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
|
5
|
Bagot KS, Tomko RL, Marshall AT, Hermann J, Cummins K, Ksinan A, Kakalis M, Breslin F, Lisdahl KM, Mason M, Redhead JN, Squeglia LM, Thompson WK, Wade T, Tapert SF, Fuemmeler BF, Baker FC. Youth screen use in the ABCD® study. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2022; 57:101150. [PMID: 36084446 PMCID: PMC9465320 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Adolescent screen usage is ubiquitous and influences development and behavior. Longitudinal screen usage data coupled with psychometrically valid constructs of problematic behaviors can provide insights into these relationships. We describe methods by which the screen usage questionnaire was developed in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, demonstrate longitudinal changes in screen usage via child report and describe data harmonization baseline-year 2. We further include psychometric analyses of adapted social media and video game addiction scales completed by youth. Nearly 12,000 children ages 9-10 years at baseline and their parents were included in the analyses. The social media addiction questionnaire (SMAQ) showed similar factor structure and item loadings across sex and race/ethnicities, but that item intercepts varied across both sex and race/ethnicity. The videogame addiction questionnaire (VGAQ) demonstrated the same configural, metric and scalar invariance across racial and ethnic groups, however differed across sex. Video gaming and online social activity increased over ages 9/10-11/12 (p's < 0.001). Compared with boys, girls engaged in greater social media use (p < .001) and demonstrated higher ratings on the SMAQ (p < .001). Compared with girls, boys played more video games (p < .001) and demonstrated higher ratings on the VGAQ (p < .001). Time spent playing video games increased more steeply for boys than girls from age 9/10-11/12 years (p < .001). Black youth demonstrated significantly higher SMAQ and VGAQ scores compared to all other racial/ethnic groups. These data show the importance of considering different screen modalities beyond total screen use and point towards clear demographic differences in use patterns. With these comprehensive data, ABCD is poised to address critical questions about screen usage changes across adolescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Bagot
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - R L Tomko
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - A T Marshall
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - J Hermann
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - K Cummins
- Department of Public Health, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | - A Ksinan
- RECETOX, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - M Kakalis
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - F Breslin
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - K M Lisdahl
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - M Mason
- Center for Behavioral Health Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - J N Redhead
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - L M Squeglia
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - W K Thompson
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - T Wade
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - S F Tapert
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - B F Fuemmeler
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - F C Baker
- Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tindale A, Cantor E, Cretu I, Valli H, Bhudia S, Mason M, Lane R. Optimal timing of pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: should we wait 12 days? A 5-year observational study from a UK tertiary centre. Europace 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac053.444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
Background and Purpose
Post-operative bradycardia is common but intrinsic rhythm often recovers. There is little consensus on the optimum time to wait between cardiac surgery and the implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM). Earlier device implantation may facilitate shorter length of stay. However, it may expose some patients who have no long-term pacing requirement to the risks associated with device therapy. This study aimed to understand how the number of days between cardiac surgery and PPM implantation is associated with pacing dependence and recovery of intrinsic conduction by 30 days.
Methods
We examined healthcare records of consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our centre between 01/01/2015 to 01/01/2021. The primary outcome measures were pacing dependence (PD) at 30 days and recovery of intrinsic conduction at 30 days. Recovery was defined as showing evidence of intrinsic rhythm at the 30 day check after being pacing dependent at the time of implant. Patient demographics, baseline ECG characteristics and surgical procedure were recorded. Time to pacemaker implantation and pacing indication were identified.
Pacing checks at 30 days post implant were reviewed and PD defined as no intrinsic rhythm seen over a 30 second period with base rate set at 40bpm. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression were used to determine factors significantly associated with the primary outcome measures. Subsequent receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal timing of pacemaker implantation as defined by the Youden Index. This aims to maximise sensitivity and specificity of days to implant in predicting PD and conduction recovery at 30 days.
Results
Following 5849 operations, 103 (1.8%) patients underwent PPM implantation for a new bradycardic indication. The baseline characteristics of those paced are summarised in table 1. Numerous factors were associated with pacing dependence at 30 days on univariate analysis (table 2). However, multivariate analysis showed that only PD at implant and days to implant (DTI) were significant predictors of PD at 30 days. The only significant association with conduction recovery was DTI.
ROC analysis showed that the optimal DTI is 12 days for a variety of analyses: 1.) Predicting PD at 30 days for all patients (AUC 0.620, SE 0.056, p=0.031, 95% CI 0.511-0.730) 2.) Predicting PD in patients whose PPM indication was AV nodal dysfunction (AUC 0.706, p=0.001, Youden Index (YI) 1.34). 3.) Predicting recovery of intrinsic rhythm in patients who were pacing dependent at implant (AUC 0.80, p= 0.000, YI 1.515).
Conclusions
The number of days between surgery and pacemaker implantation is the only factor significantly associated with both pacing dependence and recovery of intrinsic conduction at 30 days. The optimum time to wait is 12 days to allow time for intrinsic conduction to recover.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Tindale
- Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - E Cantor
- Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - I Cretu
- Brunel University, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - H Valli
- Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - S Bhudia
- Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - M Mason
- Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - R Lane
- Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cantor E, Butcher C, Chow JJ, Sohaib SMA, Valli H, Shun-Shin M, Shi R, Boyalla V, O’connor M, Chen Z, Haldar S, Mason M, Lane R, Francis D, Wong T. The acute haemodynamic response with endocardial biventricular pacing: comparing RV paced and LBBB patients. Europace 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac053.495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Boston Scientific
Background
A third of patients that receive cardiac resynchronisation (CRT) are non-responders. Predictors of positive response include broader QRS duration, non-ischaemic aetiology and sinus rhythm, but it is still unclear whether lead placement site determines a positive responder.
Purpose
We assessed the acute haemodynamic response of endocardial biventricular pacing in patients with intrinsic left bundle brunch block (LBBB) versus LBBB due to pre-existing right ventricular pacing (RVP).
Methods
Patients who fulfilled standard criteria for CRT implantation but had failed conventional (coronary sinus) left ventricular (LV) lead placement (primary or revision) or were deemed clinical ‘non-responders after > 6 months of conventional CRT were enrolled. The acute haemodynamic response during endocardial biventricular pacing was assessed with a roving LV lead at 9 different locations (basal and mid: septal, anterior, posterior and lateral walls and apex). Acute changes in beat-to-beat systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the left ventricle were recorded and analysed.
Results
We recruited 23 patients across 10 UK centres: 14 intrinsic LBBB and 9 dependent on RVP. Patient characteristics were comparable: age (mean 67 + 10.6 years vs. 62 + 15.4 years), ischaemic (63% vs 50%), QRS (160 + 18ms vs. 190 + 36ms, p =0.07). Of the RVP group 5/9 had septal RV leads (the remainder apically positioned).
There was no difference in the SBP improvement between the groups: change in SBP ranged from -5.25 – 19.91mmHg (median 3mmHg) in RVP patients vs -5.92 – 23.03mmHg (median 3mmHg) for intrinsic LBBB. However, the improvement in SBP was more consistent across the different segments in the patients with RVP (group A), as compared to intrinsic LBBB (group B), where the lateral wall and then non-septal walls provided the greatest haemodynamic improvement.
Figure 1: depicts SBP improvement (in mmHg) during endocardial biventricular pacing in different positions within the LV for patients with RVP (A) vs underlying intrinsic LBBB (B): 9 segment model of the LV: Ant (anterior wall), Lat (lateral wall), Post (posterior wall), Sept (septum). Outer ring represents the four basal LV locations, middle ring the mid LV locations and centre ring the apex. Scale depicts mmHg improvement in SBP.
Conclusion
When implanting an LV lead for patients who are RV pacing dependent any position within the LV provides an acute haemodynamic improvement, compared with those with intrinsic LBBB, where a targeted lateral wall approach is more important. This finding corroborates the key differences in LV activation patterns for induced versus intrinsic LBBB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Cantor
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - C Butcher
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - JJ Chow
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - S M A Sohaib
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - H Valli
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - M Shun-Shin
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - R Shi
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - V Boyalla
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - M O’connor
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - Z Chen
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - S Haldar
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - M Mason
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - R Lane
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - D Francis
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| | - T Wong
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dearnaley D, Hinder V, Hijab A, Horan G, Srihari N, Rich P, Houston G, Henry A, Gibbs S, Venkitaraman R, Cruickshank C, Hassan S, Mason M, Pedley I, Payne H, Brock S, Wade R, Robinson A, Din O, Lees K, Murray J, Parker C, Griffin C, Sohaib A, Hall E. OC-0105 PROMPTS RCT of screening MRI for spinal cord compression in prostate cancer (ISRCTN74112318). Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)02481-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
9
|
Dearnaley D, Hinder V, Hijab A, Horan G, Srihari N, Rich P, Houston JG, Henry AM, Gibbs S, Venkitaraman R, Cruickshank C, Hassan S, Miners A, Mason M, Pedley I, Payne H, Brock S, Wade R, Robinson A, Din O, Lees K, Graham J, Worlding J, Murray J, Parker C, Griffin C, Sohaib A, Hall E. Observation versus screening spinal MRI and pre-emptive treatment for spinal cord compression in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and spinal metastases in the UK (PROMPTS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:501-513. [PMID: 35279270 PMCID: PMC8960282 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00092-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early diagnosis of malignant spinal cord compression (SCC) is crucial because pretreatment neurological status is the major determinant of outcome. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, SCC is a clinically significant cause of disease-related morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether screening for SCC with spinal MRI, and pre-emptive treatment if radiological SCC (rSCC) was detected, reduced the incidence of clinical SCC (cSCC) in asymptomatic patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and spinal metastasis. METHODS We did a parallel-group, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were recruited from 45 National Health Service hospitals in the UK. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years, with an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, asymptomatic spinal metastasis, no previous SCC, and no spinal MRI in the past 12 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimisation algorithm with a random element (balancing factors were treatment centre, alkaline phosphatase [normal vs raised, with the upper limit of normal being defined at each participating laboratory], number of previous systemic treatments [first-line vs second-line or later], previous spinal treatment, and imaging of thorax and abdomen), to no MRI (control group) or screening spinal MRI (intervention group). Serious adverse events were monitored in the 24 h after screening MRI in the intervention group. Participants with screen-detected rSCC were offered pre-emptive treatment (radiotherapy or surgical decompression was recommended per treating physician's recommendation) and 6-monthly spinal MRI. All patients were followed up every 3 months, and then at month 30 and 36. The primary endpoint was time to and incidence of confirmed cSCC in the intention-to-treat population (defined as all patients randomly assigned), with the primary timepoint of interest being 1 year after randomisation. The study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN74112318, and is now complete. FINDINGS Between Feb 26, 2013, and April 25, 2017, 420 patients were randomly assigned to the control (n=210) or screening MRI (n=210) groups. Median age was 74 years (IQR 68 to 79), 222 (53%) of 420 patients had normal alkaline phosphatase, and median prostate-specific antigen concentration was 48 ng/mL (IQR 17 to 162). Screening MRI detected rSCC in 61 (31%) of 200 patients with assessable scans in the intervention group. As of data cutoff (April 23, 2020), at a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR 13 to 31), time to cSCC was not significantly improved with screening (hazard ratio 0·64 [95% CI 0·37 to 1·11]; Gray's test p=0·12). 1-year cSCC rates were 6·7% (95% CI 3·8-10·6; 14 of 210 patients) for the control group and 4·3% (2·1-7·7; nine of 210 patients) for the intervention group (difference -2·4% [95% CI -4·2 to 0·1]). Median time to cSCC was not reached in either group. No serious adverse events were reported within 24 h of screening. INTERPRETATION Despite the substantial incidence of rSCC detected in the intervention group, the rate of cSCC in both groups was low at a median of 22 months of follow-up. Routine use of screening MRI and pre-emptive treatment to prevent cSCC is not warranted in patients with asymptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with spinal metastasis. FUNDING Cancer Research UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Dearnaley
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Victoria Hinder
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Adham Hijab
- Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gail Horan
- Clinical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, King's Lynn, UK
| | - Narayanan Srihari
- Clinical Oncology, The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - Philip Rich
- Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Graeme Houston
- Imaging Science and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Ann M Henry
- Clinical Oncology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Stephanie Gibbs
- Clinical Oncology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ram Venkitaraman
- Clinical Oncology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, UK
| | - Clare Cruickshank
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Shama Hassan
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Alec Miners
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Ian Pedley
- Clinical Oncology, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Heather Payne
- Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Susannah Brock
- Clinical Oncology, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK
| | - Robert Wade
- Clinical Oncology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Angus Robinson
- Clinical Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Omar Din
- Clinical Oncology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kathryn Lees
- Clinical Oncology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK
| | - John Graham
- Clinical Oncology, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - Jane Worlding
- Oncology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Julia Murray
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Parker
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Griffin
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Aslam Sohaib
- Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emma Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beyer K, Moris L, Lardas M, Omar MI, Healey J, Tripathee S, Gandaglia G, Venderbos LD, Vradi E, van den Broeck T, Willemse PP, Antunes-Lopes T, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Monagas S, Esperto F, Flaherty S, Devecseri Z, Lam TB, Williamson PR, Heer R, Smith EJ, Asiimwe A, Huber J, Roobol MJ, Zong J, Mason M, Cornford P, Mottet N, MacLennan SJ, N'Dow J, Briganti A, MacLennan S, Van Hemelrijck M. Updating and Integrating Core Outcome Sets for Localised, Locally Advanced, Metastatic, and Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: An Update from the PIONEER Consortium. Eur Urol 2022; 81:503-514. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
11
|
Moris L, Gandaglia G, Vilaseca A, Van den Broeck T, Briers E, De Santis M, Gillessen S, Grivas N, O'Hanlon S, Henry A, Lam TB, Lardas M, Mason M, Oprea-Lager D, Ploussard G, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, van der Poel H, Wiegel T, Willemse PP, Yuan CY, Grummet JP, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, Cornford P, Mottet N. Evaluation of Oncological Outcomes and Data Quality in Studies Assessing Nerve-sparing Versus Non-Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:690-700. [PMID: 34147405 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Surgical techniques aimed at preserving the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy (RP) have been proposed to improve functional outcomes. However, it remains unclear if nerve-sparing (NS) surgery adversely affects oncological metrics. OBJECTIVE To explore the oncological safety of NS versus non-NS (NNS) surgery and to identify factors affecting the oncological outcomes of NS surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Relevant databases were searched for English language articles published between January 1, 1990 and May 8, 2020. Comparative studies for patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) treated with primary RP were included. NS and NNS techniques were compared. The main outcomes were side-specific positive surgical margins (ssPSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Risk of bias (RoB) and confounding assessments were performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Out of 1573 articles identified, 18 studies recruiting a total of 21 654 patients were included. The overall RoB and confounding were high across all domains. The most common selection criteria for NS RP identified were characteristic of low-risk disease, including low core-biopsy involvement. Seven studies evaluated the link with ssPSM and showed an increase in ssPSM after adjustment for side-specific confounders, with the relative risk for NS RP ranging from 1.50 to 1.53. Thirteen papers assessing BCR showed no difference in outcomes with at least 12 mo of follow-up. Lack of data prevented any subgroup analysis for potentially important variables. The definitions of NS were heterogeneous and poorly described in most studies. CONCLUSIONS Current data revealed an association between NS surgery and an increase in the risk of ssPSM. This did not translate into a negative impact on BCR, although follow-up was short and many men harbored low-risk PCa. There are significant knowledge gaps in terms of how various patient, disease, and surgical factors affect outcomes. Adequately powered and well-designed prospective trials and cohort studies accounting for these issues with long-term follow-up are recommended. PATIENT SUMMARY Neurovascular bundles (NVBs) are structures containing nerves and blood vessels. The NVBs close to the prostate are responsible for erections. We reviewed the literature to determine if a technique to preserve the NVBs during removal of the prostate causes worse cancer outcomes. We found that NVB preservation was poorly defined but, if applied, was associated with a higher risk of cancer at the margins of the tissue removed, even in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. The long-term importance of this finding for patients is unclear. More data are needed to provide recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Antoni Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Nikos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Hatzikosta General Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Medicine for Older People, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Thomas B Lam
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, UK
| | - Daniela Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Olivier Rouviere
- Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul Willemse
- Department of Oncological Urology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy Y Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Health Science Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center and Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Reale S, Turner RR, Sutton E, Steed L, Taylor SJC, Morrissey D, Doherty P, Greenfield DM, Collinson M, Hewison J, Brown J, Ibeggazene S, Mason M, Rosario DJ, Bourke L. Embedding supervised exercise training for men on androgen deprivation therapy into standard prostate cancer care: a feasibility and acceptability study (the STAMINA trial). Sci Rep 2021; 11:12470. [PMID: 34127735 PMCID: PMC8203669 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91876-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Lifestyle interventions involving exercise training offset the adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Yet provision of integrated exercise pathways in cancer care is sparse. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of an embedded supervised exercise training intervention into standard prostate cancer care in a single-arm, multicentre prospective cohort study. Feasibility included recruitment, retention, adherence, fidelity and safety. Acceptability of behaviourally informed healthcare and exercise professional training was assessed qualitatively. Despite the imposition of lockdown for the COVID-19 pandemic, referral rates into and adherence to, the intervention was high. Of the 45 men eligible for participation, 79% (n = 36) received the intervention and 47% (n = 21) completed the intervention before a government mandated national lockdown was enforced in the United Kingdom. Patients completed a mean of 27 min of aerobic exercise per session (SD = 3.48), at 77% heart rate maximum (92% of target dose), and 3 sets of 10 reps of 3 resistance exercises twice weekly for 12 weeks, without serious adverse event. The intervention was delivered by 26 healthcare professionals and 16 exercise trainers with moderate to high fidelity, and the intervention was deemed highly acceptable to patients. The impact of societal changes due to the pandemic on the delivery of this face-to-face intervention remain uncertain but positive impacts of embedding exercise provision into prostate cancer care warrant long-term investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Reale
- Allied Health Professionals, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rebecca R Turner
- Allied Health Professionals, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Eileen Sutton
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Liz Steed
- Institute for Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Stephanie J C Taylor
- Institute for Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Dylan Morrissey
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Diana M Greenfield
- Specialised Cancer Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Michelle Collinson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jenny Hewison
- School of Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Janet Brown
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Saïd Ibeggazene
- Allied Health Professionals, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Derek J Rosario
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK
| | - Liam Bourke
- Allied Health Professionals, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moris L, Gandaglia G, Vilaseca A, Van Den Broeck T, Briers E, De Santis M, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Henry A, Lam T, Lardas M, Mason M, Oprea-Lager D, Ploussard G, Rouvière O, Schoots I, Van Der Poel H, Wiegel T, Willemse PP, Grummet J, Tilke D, Van Den Bergh R, Cornford P, Mottet N. Evaluation of oncological outcomes and data quality in studies assessing nerve sparing versus non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy in non-metastatic prostate cancer: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(21)00684-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
14
|
Lardas M, Grivas N, Debray TPA, Zattoni F, Berridge C, Cumberbatch M, Van den Broeck T, Briers E, De Santis M, Farolfi A, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, O'Hanlon S, Henry A, Liew M, Mason M, Moris L, Oprea-Lager D, Ploussard G, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, van der Kwast T, van der Poel H, Wiegel T, Willemse PP, Yuan CY, Grummet JP, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, Lam TB, Cornford P, Mottet N. Patient- and Tumour-related Prognostic Factors for Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:674-689. [PMID: 33967010 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT While urinary incontinence (UI) commonly occurs after radical prostatectomy (RP), it is unclear what factors increase the risk of UI development. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of patient- and tumour-related prognostic factors for post-RP UI. The primary outcome was UI within 3 mo after RP. Secondary outcomes included UI at 3-12 mo and ≥12 mo after RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Databases including Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched between January 1990 and May 2020. All studies reporting patient- and tumour-related prognostic factors in univariable or multivariable analyses were included. Surgical factors were excluded. Risk of bias (RoB) and confounding assessments were performed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for all prognostic factor, where possible. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 119 studies (5 randomised controlled trials, 24 prospective, 88 retrospective, and 2 case-control studies) with 131 379 patients were included. RoB was high for study participation and confounding; moderate to high for statistical analysis, study attrition, and prognostic factor measurement; and low for outcome measurements. Significant prognostic factors for postoperative UI within 3 mo after RP were age (odds ratio [OR] per yearly increase 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.05), membranous urethral length (MUL; OR per 1-mm increase 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88), prostate volume (PV; OR per 1-ml increase 1.005, 95% CI 1.000-1.011), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI; OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.50). CONCLUSIONS Increasing age, shorter MUL, greater PV, and higher CCI are independent prognostic factors for UI within 3 mo after RP, with all except CCI remaining prognostic at 3-12 mo. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the literature to identify patient and disease factors associated with urinary incontinence after surgery for prostate cancer. We found increasing age, larger prostate volume, shorter length of a section of the urethra (membranous urethra), and lower fitness were associated with worse urinary incontinence for the first 3 mo after surgery, with all except lower fitness remaining predictive at 3-12 mo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Nikos Grivas
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Thomas P A Debray
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Medicine for Older People, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniela Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Olivier Rouviere
- Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul Willemse
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center, Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy Y Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Health Science Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, and Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Thomas B Lam
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Philip Cornford
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Van den Broeck T, Oprea-Lager D, Moris L, Kailavasan M, Briers E, Cornford P, De Santis M, Gandaglia G, Gillessen Sommer S, Grummet JP, Grivas N, Lam TBL, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason M, O'Hanlon S, Pecanka J, Ploussard G, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, van der Poel H, Wiegel T, Willemse PP, Yuan CY, Mottet N. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Caseload Volume on Oncological and Nononcological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 80:531-545. [PMID: 33962808 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for localised prostate cancer (PCa) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review on the association between surgeon or hospital volume and oncological and nononcological outcomes following RP for PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. All comparative studies for nonmetastatic PCa patients treated with RP published between January 1990 and May 2020 were included. For inclusion, studies had to compare hospital or surgeon volume, defined as caseload per unit time. Main outcomes included oncological (including prostate-specific antigen persistence, positive surgical margin [PSM], biochemical recurrence, local and distant recurrence, and cancer-specific and overall survival) and nononcological (perioperative complications including need for blood transfusion, conversion to open procedure and within 90-d death, and continence and erectile function) outcomes. Risk of bias (RoB) and confounding assessments were undertaken. Both a narrative and a quantitative synthesis were planned if the data allowed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Sixty retrospective comparative studies were included. Generally, increasing surgeon and hospital volumes were associated with lower rates of mortality, PSM, adjuvant or salvage therapies, and perioperative complications. Combining group size cut-offs as used in the included studies, the median threshold for hospital volume at which outcomes start to diverge is 86 (interquartile range [IQR] 35-100) cases per year. In addition, above this threshold, the higher the caseload, the better the outcomes, especially for PSM. RoB and confounding were high for most domains. CONCLUSIONS Higher surgeon and hospital volumes for RP are associated with lower rates of PSMs, adjuvant or salvage therapies, and perioperative complications. This association becomes apparent from a caseload of >86 (IQR 35-100) per year and may further improve hereafter. Both high- and low-volume centres should measure their outcomes, make them publicly available, and improve their quality of care if needed. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the literature to determine whether the number of prostate cancer operations (radical prostatectomy) performed in a hospital affects the outcomes of surgery. We found that, overall, hospitals with a higher number of operations per year have better outcomes in terms of cancer recurrence and complications during or after hospitalisation. However, it must be noted that surgeons working in hospitals with lower annual operations can still achieve similar or even better outcomes. Therefore, making hospital's outcome data publicly available should be promoted internationally, so that patients can make an informed decision where they want to be treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals, Liverpool, UK
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen Sommer
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Australia
| | - Nikos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Hatzikosta General Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Thomas B L Lam
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Medicine for Older People, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Olivier Rouviere
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôspital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Centre, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul Willemse
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy Y Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Health Science Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ho MW, Puglia F, Tighe D, Chiu GA, Ridout F, Hutchison I, Mason M, McMahon JM. BAOMS QOMS: findings from the pilot phase and lessons learned in the feasibility evaluation of a national quality improvement initiative. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 59:831-836. [PMID: 34272114 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The BAOMS QOMS pilot was developed and run in six England OMFS units between December 2019 - April 2020. The aims of this pilot project were: to evaluate feasibility of the questionnaires developed for the audit and how effective they were with regards to quality improvement, to test the processes associated with the data collection system and finally, to provide baseline data to support patient data collection without the requirement of prospective consent. The pilot included a series of six audits (oral and dentoalveolar [ODA], oncology, orthognathic, reconstruction, trauma, and skin). Data entry was clinician-led in five OMFS units and in one unit (EKHU), it was additionally supported by members of the clinical coding team. One hundred and twenty-eight REDCap account user details were issued and of these, 45 (35%) completed registration and 22 (17%) were active users who participated in the pilot data entry. Disproportionate focus on individual audits within QOMS was seen, though not all units offered the full range of service audited. Users suggest the skin and ODA audits were sufficiently clear, but improvement is required in the oncology and reconstruction questionnaire particularly. The pilot was successful in aiding the project team identify areas of weaknesses and strength in the design of the REDCap registry and implementation of the next phase of the initiative. The information and experience gained has to date enabled a successful application for section 251 approval from the HRA and progress for the next phase of national data collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M W Ho
- Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Clarendon Way, LS2 9LU, Leeds, UK.
| | - F Puglia
- BAOMS QOMS Project Manager, NCEPOD, Ground Floor, Abbey House, 74-76 St John Street, London, EC1M 4DZ, UK.
| | - D Tighe
- Maxillofacial Unit, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Ethelbert Rd, Canterbury CT1 3NG, UK.
| | - G A Chiu
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Haslingden Road, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK.
| | - F Ridout
- Saving Faces - The Facial Surgery Research Foundation, 71 Tonbridge Street, Kings Cross, London, WC1H 9DZ, UK.
| | - I Hutchison
- Saving Faces - The Facial Surgery Research Foundation, 71 Tonbridge Street, Kings Cross, London, WC1H 9DZ, UK.
| | - M Mason
- NCEPOD, Ground Floor, Abbey House, 74-76 St John Street, London, EC1M 4DZ, UK.
| | - J M McMahon
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, The Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, G51 4TF, Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ho MW, Puglia F, Tighe D, Chiu GA, Ridout F, Hutchison I, Mason M, McMahon JM. BAOMS QOMS (Quality and Outcomes in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery), a specialty-wide quality improvement initiative: progress since conception. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 59:619-622. [PMID: 33985849 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M W Ho
- Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Clarendon Way, LS2 9LU, Leeds, UK.
| | - F Puglia
- BAOMS QOMS Project Manager, NCEPOD, Ground Floor, Abbey House, 74-76 St John Street, London, EC1M 4DZ, UK.
| | - D Tighe
- Maxillofacial Unit, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Ethelbert Rd, Canterbury CT1 3NG, UK.
| | - G A Chiu
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Haslingden Road, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK.
| | - F Ridout
- Saving Faces - The Facial Surgery Research Foundation, 71 Tonbridge Street, Kings Cross, London, WC1H 9DZ, UK.
| | - I Hutchison
- Saving Faces - The Facial Surgery Research Foundation, 71 Tonbridge Street, Kings Cross, London, WC1H 9DZ, UK.
| | - M Mason
- NCEPOD, Ground Floor, Abbey House, 74-76 St John Street, London, EC1M 4DZ, UK.
| | - J M McMahon
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, The Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, G51 4TF, Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sutton E, Lane JA, Davis M, Walsh EI, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Mason M, Staffurth J, Martin RM, Metcalfe C, Peters TJ, Donovan JL, Wade J. Men's experiences of radiotherapy treatment for localized prostate cancer and its long-term treatment side effects: a longitudinal qualitative study. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 32:261-269. [PMID: 33394204 PMCID: PMC7870600 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-020-01380-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To investigate men’s experiences of receiving external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) for localized prostate cancer (LPCa) in the ProtecT trial. Methods A longitudinal qualitative interview study was embedded in the ProtecT RCT. Sixteen men with clinically LPCa who underwent EBRT in ProtecT were purposively sampled to include a range of socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. They participated in serial in-depth qualitative interviews for up to 8 years post-treatment, exploring experiences of treatment and its side effects over time. Results Men experienced bowel, sexual, and urinary side effects, mostly in the short term but some persisted and were bothersome. Most men downplayed the impacts, voicing expectations of age-related decline, and normalizing these changes. There was some reticence to seek help, with men prioritizing their relationships and overall health and well-being over returning to pretreatment levels of function. Some unmet needs with regard to information about treatment schedules and side effects were reported, particularly among men with continuing functional symptoms. Conclusions These findings reinforce the importance of providing universal clear, concise, and timely information and supportive resources in the short term, and more targeted and detailed information and care in the longer term to maintain and improve treatment experiences for men undergoing EBRT. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s10552-020-01380-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Sutton
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - J. A. Lane
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - M. Davis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - E. I. Walsh
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - D. E. Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - F. C. Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M. Mason
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - J. Staffurth
- Department of Oncology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - R. M. Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - C. Metcalfe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - T. J. Peters
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - J. L. Donovan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - J. Wade
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Merola J, Perez Chada L, Siegel M, Bagel J, Evans C, Lockshin B, Mason M, Guo N, McLean R, Greenberg J, Van Voorhees A. The National Psoriasis Foundation psoriasis treatment targets in real‐world patients: prevalence and association with patient‐reported outcomes in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 34:2051-2058. [DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J.F. Merola
- Department of Dermatology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA
- Department of Medicine Division of Rheumatology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA
| | - L.M. Perez Chada
- Department of Dermatology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA
| | - M. Siegel
- National Psoriasis Foundation Portland OR USA
| | - J. Bagel
- Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey East Windsor NJ USA
| | - C. Evans
- Evans Dermatology Partners Austin TX USA
| | | | | | - N. Guo
- Corrona LLC Waltham MA USA
| | | | - J.D. Greenberg
- Corrona LLC Waltham MA USA
- NYU School of Medicine New York NY USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Noble SM, Garfield K, Lane JA, Metcalfe C, Davis M, Walsh EI, Martin RM, Turner EL, Peters TJ, Thorn JC, Mason M, Bollina P, Catto JWF, Doherty A, Gnanapragasam V, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Paez E, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Oxley J, Staffurth J, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Donovan JL. The ProtecT randomised trial cost-effectiveness analysis comparing active monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2020; 123:1063-1070. [PMID: 32669672 PMCID: PMC7524753 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0978-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence relating to the cost-effectiveness of treatments for localised prostate cancer. METHODS The cost-effectiveness of active monitoring, surgery, and radiotherapy was evaluated within the Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) randomised controlled trial from a UK NHS perspective at 10 years' median follow-up. Prostate cancer resource-use collected from hospital records and trial participants was valued using UK reference-costs. QALYs (quality-adjusted-life-years) were calculated from patient-reported EQ-5D-3L measurements. Adjusted mean costs, QALYs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated; cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainty; subgroup analyses considered age and disease-risk. RESULTS Adjusted mean QALYs were similar between groups: 6.89 (active monitoring), 7.09 (radiotherapy), and 6.91 (surgery). Active monitoring had lower adjusted mean costs (£5913) than radiotherapy (£7361) and surgery (£7519). Radiotherapy was the most likely (58% probability) cost-effective option at the UK NICE willingness-to-pay threshold (£20,000 per QALY). Subgroup analyses confirmed radiotherapy was cost-effective for older men and intermediate/high-risk disease groups; active monitoring was more likely to be the cost-effective option for younger men and low-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS Longer follow-up and modelling are required to determine the most cost-effective treatment for localised prostate cancer over a man's lifetime. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297: http://isrctn.org (14/10/2002); ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (23/01/2014).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sian M Noble
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Kirsty Garfield
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - J Athene Lane
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Davis
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Richard M Martin
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emma L Turner
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanna C Thorn
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- The School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
| | - Prasad Bollina
- Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James W F Catto
- The Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- The Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge, UK
| | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Derek J Rosario
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - John Staffurth
- The School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Wade J, Noble S, Garfield K, Young G, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Blazeby J, Bryant R, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Gnanapragasam V, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Paez E, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario D, Rowe E, Neal D. Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-176. [PMID: 32773013 PMCID: PMC7443739 DOI: 10.3310/hta24370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the UK. Prostate-specific antigen testing followed by biopsy leads to overdetection, overtreatment as well as undertreatment of the disease. Evidence of treatment effectiveness has lacked because of the paucity of randomised controlled trials comparing conventional treatments. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional treatments for localised prostate cancer (active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy) in men aged 50-69 years. DESIGN A prospective, multicentre prostate-specific antigen testing programme followed by a randomised trial of treatment, with a comprehensive cohort follow-up. SETTING Prostate-specific antigen testing in primary care and treatment in nine urology departments in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Between 2001 and 2009, 228,966 men aged 50-69 years received an invitation to attend an appointment for information about the Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study and a prostate-specific antigen test; 82,429 men were tested, 2664 were diagnosed with localised prostate cancer, 1643 agreed to randomisation to active monitoring (n = 545), radical prostatectomy (n = 553) or radical radiotherapy (n = 545) and 997 chose a treatment. INTERVENTIONS The interventions were active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy. TRIAL PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE Definite or probable disease-specific mortality at the 10-year median follow-up in randomised participants. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Overall mortality, metastases, disease progression, treatment complications, resource utilisation and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for 17 prostate cancer-specific (p = 0.48) and 169 all-cause (p = 0.87) deaths. Eight men died of prostate cancer in the active monitoring group (1.5 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.0); five died of prostate cancer in the radical prostatectomy group (0.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 2.2 per 1000 person years) and four died of prostate cancer in the radical radiotherapy group (0.7 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 2.0 per 1000 person years). More men developed metastases in the active monitoring group than in the radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy groups: active monitoring, n = 33 (6.3 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 4.5 to 8.8); radical prostatectomy, n = 13 (2.4 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 4.2 per 1000 person years); and radical radiotherapy, n = 16 (3.0 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 4.9 per 1000 person-years; p = 0.004). There were higher rates of disease progression in the active monitoring group than in the radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy groups: active monitoring (n = 112; 22.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 19.0 to 27.5 per 1000 person years); radical prostatectomy (n = 46; 8.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 6.7 to 11.9 per 1000 person-years); and radical radiotherapy (n = 46; 9.0 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 6.7 to 12.0 per 1000 person years; p < 0.001). Radical prostatectomy had the greatest impact on sexual function/urinary continence and remained worse than radical radiotherapy and active monitoring. Radical radiotherapy's impact on sexual function was greatest at 6 months, but recovered somewhat in the majority of participants. Sexual and urinary function gradually declined in the active monitoring group. Bowel function was worse with radical radiotherapy at 6 months, but it recovered with the exception of bloody stools. Urinary voiding and nocturia worsened in the radical radiotherapy group at 6 months but recovered. Condition-specific quality-of-life effects mirrored functional changes. No differences in anxiety/depression or generic or cancer-related quality of life were found. At the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the probabilities that each arm was the most cost-effective option were 58% (radical radiotherapy), 32% (active monitoring) and 10% (radical prostatectomy). LIMITATIONS A single prostate-specific antigen test and transrectal ultrasound biopsies were used. There were very few non-white men in the trial. The majority of men had low- and intermediate-risk disease. Longer follow-up is needed. CONCLUSIONS At a median follow-up point of 10 years, prostate cancer-specific mortality was low, irrespective of the assigned treatment. Radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy reduced disease progression and metastases, but with side effects. Further work is needed to follow up participants at a median of 15 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20141297. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 37. See the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - J Athene Lane
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter Holding
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julia Wade
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian Noble
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Grace Young
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Davis
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emma L Turner
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mary Robinson
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Eleanor Walsh
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Prasad Bollina
- Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Doble
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Gillatt
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Howard Kynaston
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Philip Powell
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Prescott
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Derek Rosario
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - David Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Matheson L, Nayoan J, Rivas C, Brett J, Wright P, Butcher H, Jordan P, Gavin A, Glaser A, Mason M, Wagland R, Watson E. Strategies for living well with hormone-responsive advanced prostate cancer-a qualitative exploration. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:1317-1325. [PMID: 32632762 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05594-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Due to recent treatment advances, men are increasingly living longer with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). This study sought to understand men's experiences of living with and adjusting to advanced hormone-responsive PCa and how this influenced their quality of life (QoL), in order to highlight how support could be optimized. METHODS Participants were recruited through a UK wide survey-the 'Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis' study. In-depth telephone interviews were conducted with 24 men (aged 46-77 years) with advanced (stage IV) hormone-responsive PCa diagnosed 18-42 months previously. Thematic analysis was undertaken using a framework approach. RESULTS Most participants perceived their QoL to be relatively good, which was influenced by the following factors (enablers to 'living well' with PCa): a sense of connectedness to others, engagement in meaningful activities, resources (social, cognitive, financial), ability to manage uncertainty, utilization of adjustment strategies and support, communication and information from health professionals. Barriers to 'living well' with PCa were often the converse of these factors. These also included more troublesome PCa-related symptoms and stronger perceptions of loss and restriction. CONCLUSIONS In our study, men living with advanced hormone-responsive PCa often reported a good QoL. Exploring the influences on QoL in men with advanced PCa indicates how future interventions might improve the QoL of men who are struggling. Further research is required to develop and test interventions that enhance QoL for these men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Matheson
- Oxford School of Nursing and Midwifery, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0FL, UK
| | - Jo Nayoan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.,European Centre for Environment and Human Health (ECEHH), University of Exeter, Truro, TR1 3HD, UK
| | - Carol Rivas
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.,Department of Social Science, University College London (UCL), London, WC1H 0NR, UK
| | - Jo Brett
- Oxford School of Nursing and Midwifery, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0FL, UK
| | - Penny Wright
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, UK
| | - Adam Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute of Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Scool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK
| | - Richard Wagland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Eila Watson
- Oxford School of Nursing and Midwifery, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0FL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Davis M, Young GJ, Dutton SJ, Walsh EI, Martin RM, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Mason M, Bryant R, Bollina P, Catto J, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Gnanapragasam V, Holding P, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Oxley J, Paul A, Paez E, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Staffurth J, Altman DG, Hamdy FC. Erratum to 'Ten-year Mortality, Disease Progression, and Treatment-related Side Effects in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer from the ProtecT Randomised Controlled Trial According to Treatment Received' [European Urology 77 (2020) 320-330]. Eur Urol 2020; 78:e139-e143. [PMID: 32624282 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David E Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Professor Emeritus of Surgical Oncology, Universities of Cambridge and Oxford, UK.
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - J Athene Lane
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Davis
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Grace J Young
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Susan J Dutton
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Tim J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emma L Turner
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Richard Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Prasad Bollina
- Department of Urology & Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Gillatt
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- Academic Urology Group, Department of Surgery & Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter Holding
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Professor Emeritus of Surgical Oncology, Universities of Cambridge and Oxford, UK
| | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Howard Kynaston
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Derek J Rosario
- Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Doug G Altman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Professor Emeritus of Surgical Oncology, Universities of Cambridge and Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bryant RJ, Oxley J, Young GJ, Lane JA, Metcalfe C, Davis M, Turner EL, Martin RM, Goepel JR, Varma M, Griffiths DF, Grigor K, Mayer N, Warren AY, Bhattarai S, Dormer J, Mason M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Rosario DJ, Catto JW, Neal DE, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC. The ProtecT trial: analysis of the patient cohort, baseline risk stratification and disease progression. BJU Int 2020; 125:506-514. [PMID: 31900963 PMCID: PMC7187290 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that the baseline clinico-pathological features of the men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) included in the ProtecT (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment) trial who progressed (n = 198) at a 10-year median follow-up were different from those of men with stable disease (n = 1409). PATIENTS AND METHODS We stratified the study participants at baseline according to risk of progression using clinical disease stage, pathological grade and PSA level, using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS The findings showed that 34% of participants (n = 505) had intermediate- or high-risk PCa, and 66% (n = 973) had low-risk PCa. Of 198 participants who progressed, 101 (51%) had baseline International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 1, 59 (30%) Grade Group 2, and 38 (19%) Grade Group 3 PCa, compared with 79%, 17% and 5%, respectively, for 1409 participants without progression (P < 0.001). In participants with progression, 38% and 62% had baseline low- and intermediate-/high-risk disease, compared with 69% and 31% of participants with stable disease (P < 0.001). Treatment received, age (65-69 vs 50-64 years), PSA level, Grade Group, clinical stage, risk group, number of positive cores, tumour length and perineural invasion were associated with time to progression (P ≤ 0.005). Men progressing after surgery (n = 19) were more likely to have a higher Grade Group and pathological stage at surgery, larger tumours, lymph node involvement and positive margins. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that one-third of the ProtecT cohort consists of people with intermediate-/high-risk disease, and the outcomes data at an average of 10 years' follow-up are generalizable beyond men with low-risk PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J. Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular PathologyNorth Bristol NHS TrustBristolUK
| | - Grace J. Young
- Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- The Bristol Randomised Trials CollaborationUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Janet A. Lane
- Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- The Bristol Randomised Trials CollaborationUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- The Bristol Randomised Trials CollaborationUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Michael Davis
- Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | | | | | - John R. Goepel
- Department of PathologyRoyal Hallamshire HospitalSheffieldUK
| | - Murali Varma
- Department of PathologyUniversity Hospital of WalesCardiffUK
| | | | - Ken Grigor
- Department of PathologyWestern General HospitalEdinburghUK
| | - Nick Mayer
- Department of PathologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Anne Y. Warren
- Department of PathologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Selina Bhattarai
- Department of PathologyLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| | - John Dormer
- Department of PathologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | | | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and GeneticsSchool of MedicineCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Eleanor Walsh
- Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | | | | | - David E. Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Academic Urology GroupUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Jenny L. Donovan
- Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care WestUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation TrustBristolUK
| | - Freddie C. Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Davis M, Young GJ, Dutton SJ, Walsh EI, Martin RM, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Mason M, Bryant R, Bollina P, Catto J, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Gnanapragasam V, Holding P, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Oxley J, Paul A, Paez E, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Staffurth J, Altman DG, Hamdy FC. Ten-year Mortality, Disease Progression, and Treatment-related Side Effects in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer from the ProtecT Randomised Controlled Trial According to Treatment Received. Eur Urol 2020; 77:320-330. [PMID: 31771797 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ProtecT trial reported intention-to-treat analysis of men with localised prostate cancer (PCa) randomly allocated to active monitoring (AM), radical prostatectomy, and external beam radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE To determine report outcomes according to treatment received in men in randomised and treatment choice cohorts. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study focuses on secondary care. Men with clinically localised prostate cancer at one of nine UK centres were invited to participate in the treatment trial comparing AM, radical prostatectomy, and radiotherapy. INTERVENTION Two cohorts included 1643 men who agreed to be randomised; 997 declined randomisation and chose treatment. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Health-related quality of life impacts on urinary, bowel, and sexual function were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures. Analysis was carried out based on treatment received for each cohort and on pooled estimates using meta-analysis. Differences were estimated with adjustment for known prognostic factors using propensity scores. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS According to treatment received, more men receiving AM died of PCa (AM 1.85%, surgery 0.67%, radiotherapy 0.73%), whilst this difference remained consistent with chance in the randomised cohort (p=0.08); stronger evidence was found in the exploratory analyses (randomised plus choice cohort) when AM was compared with the combined radical treatment group (p=0.003). There was also strong evidence that metastasis (AM 5.6%, surgery 2.4%, radiotherapy 2.7%) and disease progression (AM 20.35%, surgery 5.87%, radiotherapy 6.62%) were more common in the AM group. Compared with AM, there were higher risks of sexual dysfunction (95% at 6mo) and urinary incontinence (55% at 6mo) after surgery, and of sexual dysfunction (88% at 6mo) and bowel dysfunction (5% at 6mo) after radiotherapy. The key limitations are the potential for bias when comparing groups defined by treatment received and outdating of the interventions being evaluated during the lengthy follow-up required in trials of screen-detected PCa. CONCLUSIONS Analyses according to treatment received showed increased rates of disease-related events and lower rates of patient-reported harms in men managed by AM compared with men managed by radical treatment, and stronger evidence of greater PCa mortality in the AM group. PATIENT SUMMARY More than 90 out of every 100 men with localised prostate cancer do not die of prostate cancer within 10yr, irrespective of whether treatment is by means of monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy. Side effects on sexual and bladder function are much better after active monitoring, but the risks of spreading of prostate cancer are more common.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - J Athene Lane
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Davis
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Grace J Young
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Susan J Dutton
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Tim J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emma L Turner
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Richard Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Prasad Bollina
- Department of Urology & Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Gillatt
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- Academic Urology Group, Department of Surgery & Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter Holding
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Howard Kynaston
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Derek J Rosario
- Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Doug G Altman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Brierley J, O'Sullivan B, Asamura H, Byrd D, Huang SH, Lee A, Piñeros M, Mason M, Moraes FY, Rösler W, Rous B, Torode J, van Krieken JH, Gospodarowicz M. Global Consultation on Cancer Staging: promoting consistent understanding and use. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019; 16:763-771. [PMID: 31388125 PMCID: PMC7136160 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-019-0253-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Disease burden is the most important determinant of survival in patients with cancer. This domain, reflected by the cancer stage and codified using the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, is a fundamental determinant of prognosis. Accurate and consistent tumour classification is required for the development and use of treatment guidelines and to enable clinical research (including clinical trials), cancer surveillance and control. Furthermore, knowledge of the extent and stage of disease is frequently important in the context of translational studies. Attempts to include additional prognostic factors in staging classifications, in order to facilitate a more accurate determination of prognosis, are often made with a lack of knowledge and understanding and are one of the main causes of the inconsistent use of terms and definitions. This effect has resulted in uncertainty and confusion, thus limiting the utility of the TNM classification. In this Position paper, we provide a consensus on the optimal use and terminology for cancer staging that emerged from a consultation process involving representatives of several major international organizations involved in cancer classification. The consultation involved several steps: a focused literature review; a stakeholder survey; and a consultation meeting. This aim of this Position paper is to provide a consensus that should guide the use of staging terminology and secure the classification of anatomical disease extent as a distinct aspect of cancer classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Brierley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - David Byrd
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anne Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Marion Piñeros
- Cancer Surveillance Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Fabio Y Moraes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Center, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Wiebke Rösler
- Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Brian Rous
- National Cancer Registration Service, London, UK
| | - Julie Torode
- Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Mary Gospodarowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Catt S, Matthews L, May S, Payne H, Mason M, Jenkins V. Patients' and partners' views of care and treatment provided for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13140. [PMID: 31475410 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Documentations of the experiences of patients with advanced prostate cancer and their partners are sparse. Views of care and treatment received for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are presented here. METHODS Structured interviews conducted within 14 days of a systemic therapy for mCRPC starting and 3 months later explored the following: treatment decisions, information provision, perceived benefits and harms of treatment, and effects of these on patients' and partners' lives. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients and 33 partners recruited from UK cancer centres participated. The majority of patients (46%) reported pain was their worst symptom and many wanted to discuss its management (baseline-50%; 3 months-33%). Patients and partners believed treatment would delay progression (>75%), improve wellbeing (33%), alleviate pain (≈12%) and extend life (15% patients, 36% partners). At 3 months, most men (42%) said fatigue was the worst treatment-related side effect (SE), 27% experienced unexpected SEs and 54% needed help with SEs. Most patients received SE information (85% written; 75% verbally); many additionally searched the Internet (33% patients; 55% partners). Only 54% of patients said nurse support was accessible. CONCLUSION Pain and other symptom management are not optimal. Increased specialist nurse provision and earlier palliative care links are needed. Dedicated clinics may be justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Catt
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Lucy Matthews
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Shirley May
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Heather Payne
- Department of Oncology, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, UK
| | - Valerie Jenkins
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gonzalez R, Lyon L, Rabbani J, Conell C, Postlethwaite D, Spaulding M, Mason M. The association of ethnicity and Hispanic acculturation status with advance directive completion among older patients in an integrated health system. Ann Epidemiol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
29
|
van der Poel H, van der Kwast T, Aben K, Mottet N, Mason M. Imaging and T Category for Prostate Cancer in the 8th Edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM Classification. Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 3:563-564. [PMID: 31307959 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Katja Aben
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Research Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Jean Monnet, St. Etienne, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Van den Broeck T, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Cornford P, Cumberbatch M, Tilki D, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gillessen S, Grummet JP, Henry AM, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason M, Moris L, Schoots IG, van der Kwast T, van der Poel H, Wiegel T, Willemse PPM, Rouvière O, Lam TB, Mottet N. Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel Recommendations. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 6:231-234. [PMID: 31248850 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 05/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer does not necessarily lead to clinically apparent progressive disease. To aid in prognostication, the European Association of Urology prostate cancer guidelines panel undertook a systematic review and successfully developed a novel BCR risk stratification system (groups with a low risk or high risk of BCR) based on disease and prostate-specific antigen characteristics. PATIENT SUMMARY: Following treatment to cure prostate cancer, some patients can develop recurrence of disease identified via a prostate-specific antigen blood test (ie, biochemical recurrence, or BCR). However, not every man who experiences BCR develops progressive disease (symptoms or evidence of disease progression on imaging). We conducted a review of the literature and developed a classification system for predicting which patients might progress to optimize treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Philip Cornford
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maria De Santis
- Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie, Manchester, UK; Department of Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | | | - Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center, Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Radiology Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas B Lam
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Patel K, Ward S, Gash K, Ferguson H, Mason M, McKay SC, Kumar B, Sudlow A, Sutton PA, Humm G, Mohan HM. Prospective cohort study of surgical trainee experience of access to gastrointestinal endoscopy training in the UK and Ireland. Int J Surg 2019; 67:113-116. [PMID: 30708061 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical trainees are reporting barriers to training in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. This snapshot survey aimed to gather data on variation in access to quality GI endoscopy training for Colorectal and Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) surgical trainees across the UK and Ireland. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online 20-point survey was designed and distributed nationally to surgical trainee members of the Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT), Dukes and The Roux Group (formerly Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland Trainees). The survey was designed in collaboration with The Roux Group for Upper GI trainees and the Dukes' Club for Colorectal trainees. RESULTS 218 responses were received, most with a Colorectal or Upper GI sub-specialty interest (colorectal 56.0%; upper GI surgery 25.7%). Only 28.6% of trainees attended a dedicated training endoscopy list at least once a week with 28.1% not attending any at all. Less than half of trainees reported having endoscopy formally timetabled on rotas (36.9%). Most trainees (88.0%) encountered difficulties in gaining endoscopy training including lack of available lists (77.2%), conflicting operative commitments (59.4%), preferential allocation of lists to gastroenterology trainees (57.9%) and resistance from endoscopy departmental leads (38.6%). Regarding JAG accreditation, 77.1% respondents felt it should be mandatory prior to CCT with 80.3% believing this would lead to better access to dedicated endoscopy training equivalent to gastroenterology trainees. 93.1% trainees felt that attaining JAG accreditation by surgical trainees was important to patient care. DISCUSSION This study demonstrates significant barriers in accessing GI endoscopy training for general surgical trainees which urgently needs to be improved. In order to meet JAG training requirements for surgical trainees, a multifaceted collaborative approach from surgical and gastroenterology training bodies, local JAG trainers and the General Surgery SAC and JCST is required. This is to ensure that endoscopy is promoted and a robust model of training is successfully designed and delivered to general surgery trainees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Patel
- The Association of Surgeons in Training(ASiT), UK
| | | | | | | | - M Mason
- The Roux Group (Formerly AUGISt), UK
| | - S C McKay
- The Roux Group (Formerly AUGISt), UK
| | - B Kumar
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - A Sudlow
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - P A Sutton
- The Association of Surgeons in Training(ASiT), UK
| | - G Humm
- The Association of Surgeons in Training(ASiT), UK
| | - H M Mohan
- The Association of Surgeons in Training(ASiT), UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Downing A, Wright P, Hounsome L, Selby P, Wilding S, Watson E, Wagland R, Kind P, Donnelly DW, Butcher H, Catto JWF, Cross W, Mason M, Sharp L, Weller D, Velikova G, McCaughan E, Mottram R, Allen M, Kearney T, McSorley O, Huws DW, Brewster DH, McNair E, Gavin A, Glaser AW. Quality of life in men living with advanced and localised prostate cancer in the UK: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:436-447. [PMID: 30713036 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30780-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of men living with advanced prostate cancer. We report population-wide functional outcomes and HRQOL in men with all stages of prostate cancer and identify implications for health-care delivery. METHODS For this population-based study, men in the UK living 18-42 months after diagnosis of prostate cancer were identified through cancer registration data. A postal survey was administered, which contained validated measures to assess functional outcomes (urinary incontinence, urinary irritation and obstruction, bowel, sexual, and vitality and hormonal function), measured with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite short form (EPIC-26), plus questions about use of interventions for sexual dysfunction) and generic HRQOL (assessed with the 5-level EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L] measuring mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression, plus a rating of self-assessed health). Log-linear and binary logistic regression models were used to compare functional outcomes and HRQOL across diagnostic stages and self-reported treatment groups. Each model included adjustment for age, socioeconomic deprivation, and number of other long-term conditions. FINDINGS 35 823 (60·8%) of 58 930 men responded to the survey. Disease stage was known for 30 733 (85·8%) of 35 823 men; 19 599 (63·8%) had stage I or II, 7209 (23·4%) stage III, and 3925 (12·8%) stage IV disease. Mean adjusted EPIC-26 domain scores were high, indicating good function, except for sexual function, for which scores were much lower. Compared with men who did not receive androgen deprivation therapy, more men who received the therapy reported moderate to big problems with hot flushes (30·7% [95% CI 29·8-31·6] vs 5·4% [5·0-5·8]), low energy (29·4% [95% CI 28·6-30·3] vs 14·7% [14·2-15·3]), and weight gain (22·5%, 21·7-23·3) vs 6·9% [6·5-7·3]). Poor sexual function was common (81·0%; 95% CI 80·6-81·5), regardless of stage, and more than half of men (n=18 782 [55·8%]) were not offered any intervention to help with this condition. Overall, self-assessed health was similar in men with stage I-III disease, and although slightly reduced in those with stage IV cancer, 23·5% of men with metastatic disease reported no problems on any EQ-5D dimension. INTERPRETATION Men diagnosed with advanced disease do not report substantially different HRQOL outcomes to those diagnosed with localised disease, although considerable problems with hormonal function and fatigue are reported in men treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Sexual dysfunction is common and most men are not offered helpful intervention or support. Service improvements around sexual rehabilitation and measures to reduce the effects of androgen deprivation therapy are required. FUNDING The Movember Foundation, in partnership with Prostate Cancer UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Penny Wright
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Luke Hounsome
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter Selby
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Wilding
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Eila Watson
- Department of Midwifery, Community and Public Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Wagland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Kind
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David W Donnelly
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Hugh Butcher
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Malcolm Mason
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Linda Sharp
- Institute for Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David Weller
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Eilis McCaughan
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK
| | - Rebecca Mottram
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Majorie Allen
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Therese Kearney
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Oonagh McSorley
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, UK
| | - Dyfed W Huws
- Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - David H Brewster
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Emma McNair
- Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Adam W Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Elwood PC, Pickering JE, Morgan G, Galante J, Weightman AL, Morris D, Longley M, Mason M, Adams R, Dolwani S, Chia W. K. J, Lanas A. Systematic review update of observational studies further supports aspirin role in cancer treatment: Time to share evidence and decision-making with patients? PLoS One 2018; 13:e0203957. [PMID: 30252883 PMCID: PMC6155524 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence is growing that low-dose aspirin used as an adjuvant treatment of cancer is associated with an increased survival and a reduction in metastatic spread. We therefore extended up to August 2017 an earlier systematic search and meta-analyses of published studies of low-dose aspirin taken by patients with a diagnosis of cancer. METHODS Searches were completed in Medline and Embase to August 2017 using a pre-defined search strategy to identify reports of relevant studies. References in all the selected papers were scanned. Two reviewers independently applied pre-determined eligibility criteria and extracted data on cause-specific cancer deaths, overall mortality and the occurrence of metastatic spread. Meta-analyses were then conducted for different cancers and heterogeneity and publication bias assessed. Sensitivity analyses and attempts to reduce heterogeneity were conducted. RESULTS Analyses of 29 studies reported since an earlier review up to April 2015 are presented in this report, and these are then pooled with the 42 studies in our earlier publication. Overall meta-analyses of the 71 studies are presented, based on a total of over 120 thousand patients taking aspirin. Ten of the studies also give evidence on the incidence of metastatic cancer spread. There are now twenty-nine observational studies describing colorectal cancer (CRC) and post-diagnostic aspirin. Pooling the estimates of reduction by aspirin which are reported as hazard ratios (HR), gives an overall HR for aspirin and CRC mortality 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.80). Fourteen observational studies have reported on aspirin and breast cancer mortality and pooling those that report the association with aspirin as a hazard ratio gives HR 0.69 (0.53-0.90). Sixteen studies report on aspirin and prostate cancer mortality and a pooled estimate yields an HR of 0.87 (95% CI 0.73-1.05). Data from 12 reports relating to other cancers are also listed. Ten studies give evidence of a reduction in metastatic spread; four give a pooled HR 0.31 (95% CI 0.18, 0.54) and five studies which reported odds ratio of metastatic spread give OR 0.79 (0.66 to 0.95). CONCLUSION Being almost entirely from observational studies, the evidence of benefit from aspirin is limited. There is heterogeneity between studies and the results are subject to important biases, only some of which can be identified. Nevertheless, the evidence would seem to merit wide discussion regarding whether or not it is adequate to justify the recommendation of low-dose therapeutic aspirin, and if it is, for which cancers?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C. Elwood
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Janet E. Pickering
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Morgan
- Hywel Dda University Health Board, Llanelli, United Kingdom
| | - Julieta Galante
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alison L. Weightman
- Specialist Unit for Review Evidence, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Delyth Morris
- Specialist Unit for Review Evidence, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Marcus Longley
- Health Policy, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, United Kingdom
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Adams
- Institute of Cancer & Genetics Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Sunil Dolwani
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - John Chia W. K.
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Angel Lanas
- University of Zaragoza, IIS Aragón, CIBERehd, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bagot KS, Matthews SA, Mason M, Squeglia LM, Fowler J, Gray K, Herting M, May A, Colrain I, Godino J, Tapert S, Brown S, Patrick K. Current, future and potential use of mobile and wearable technologies and social media data in the ABCD study to increase understanding of contributors to child health. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2018; 32:121-129. [PMID: 29636283 PMCID: PMC6447367 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Revised: 02/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mobile and wearable technologies and novel methods of data collection are innovating health-related research. These technologies and methods allow for multi-system level capture of data across environmental, physiological, behavioral, and psychological domains. In the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, there is great potential for harnessing the acceptability, accessibility, and functionality of mobile and social technologies for in-vivo data capture to precisely measure factors, and interactions between factors, that contribute to childhood and adolescent neurodevelopment and psychosocial and health outcomes. Here we discuss advances in mobile and wearable technologies and methods of analysis of geospatial, ecologic, social network and behavioral data. Incorporating these technologies into the ABCD study will allow for interdisciplinary research on the effects of place, social interactions, environment, and substance use on health and developmental outcomes in children and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Bagot
- University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| | - S A Matthews
- Penn State University, 507 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
| | - M Mason
- University of Tennessee, Henson Hall, 213 Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, 37996-3332, USA.
| | - Lindsay M Squeglia
- Medical University of South Carolina, 125 Doughty Street, Suite 190, MSC861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - J Fowler
- University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| | - K Gray
- Medical University of South Carolina, 125 Doughty Street, Suite 190, MSC861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - M Herting
- University of Southern California, 2011 N Soto St., Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
| | - A May
- University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - I Colrain
- SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
| | - J Godino
- University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| | - S Tapert
- University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| | - S Brown
- University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| | - K Patrick
- University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Varma M, Narahari K, Mason M, Oxley JD, Berney DM. Contemporary prostate biopsy reporting: insights from a survey of clinicians’ use of pathology data. J Clin Pathol 2018; 71:874-878. [DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Revised: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
AimTo determine how clinicians use data in contemporary prostate biopsy reports.MethodsA survey was circulated to members of the British Association of Urological Surgeons and the British Uro-oncology Group.ResultsResponses were received from 114 respondents (88 urologists, 26 oncologists). Ninety-seven (94%) use the number of positive cores from each side and 43 (42%) use the % number of positive cores. When determining the number and percentage of positive cores, 72 (71%) would not differentiate between targeted and non-targeted samples. If multiple Gleason Scores (GS) were included in a report, 77 (78%) would use the worst GS even if present in a core with very little tumour, 12% would use the global GS and 10% the GS in the core most involved by tumour. Fifty-five (55%) either never or rarely used perineural invasion for patient management.ConclusionsThe number of positive cores is an important parameter for patient management but may be difficult to determine in the laboratory due to core fragmentation so the biopsy taker must indicate the number of biopsies obtained. Multiple biopsies taken from a single site are often interpreted by clinicians as separate cores when determining the number of positive cores so pathologists should also report the number of sites positive. Clinicians have a non-uniform approach to the interpretation of multiple GS in prostate biopsy reports so we recommend that pathologists also include a single ‘bottom-line’ GS for each case to direct the clinician’s treatment decision.
Collapse
|
37
|
Balyasnikova S, Haboubi N, Wale A, Santiago I, Morgan M, Cunningham D, Mason M, Berho M, Brown G. Session 2: Extramural vascular invasion and extranodal deposits: should they be treated the same? Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 Suppl 1:43-48. [PMID: 29878681 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Professor Nagtegaal has already highlighted that lymph nodes are probably not responsible for the development of liver metastases. If they are not, then is there another mechanism? Professor Haboubi addresses the question of extranodal deposits - their frequency and their importance in the development of metastatic disease. The experts review the evidence and discuss whether this information will alter treatment decisions and staging systems in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - N Haboubi
- Surgical Pathology, Salford University, Manchester, UK
| | - A Wale
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I Santiago
- The Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - M Morgan
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - D Cunningham
- Clinical Research and Development, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Mason
- Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - M Berho
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL, USA
| | - G Brown
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jenkins V, Payne H, Mason M, May S, Matthews L, Catt S. EXTREQOL Identifies Ongoing Challenges in Maximising Quality of Survival in Men with Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:331-333. [PMID: 29459101 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Revised: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- V Jenkins
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
| | - H Payne
- Department of Oncology, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - M Mason
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Velindre Hospital, Cardiff, UK
| | - S May
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - L Matthews
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - S Catt
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
James N, Woods B, Sideris E, Spears MR, Dearnaley DP, Mason M, Clarke N, Parmar MKB, Sydes MR, Sculpher M. Addition of docetaxel to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): Long-term survival, quality-adjusted survival, and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
162 Background: Results from large randomised controlled trials have shown that adding docetaxel to standard of care (SOC) in men initiating hormone therapy for prostate cancer prolongs survival for those with metastatic disease and prolongs time to treatment failure for those without metastatic disease. We report on the impact of docetaxel on health related quality of life (HRQoL), resource use and cost-effectiveness for men treated in the STAMPEDE trial. Methods: Health outcomes and costs in the UK NHS were modelled using EuroQol (EQ-5D)and resource use data collected within the STAMPEDE trial (STAMPEDE enrolled men advanced prostate cancer starting first line hormone therapy. SOC was hormone therapy for ≥2 years and radiotherapy in some patients. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) was administered alongside SOC for six 3-weekly cycles with prednisolone 10 mg daily. Lifetime predictions of costs, changes in predicted survival duration, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Results: Compared to patients allocated SOC, docetaxel was estimated to extend predicted survival by an average of 0.89 years for M1 patients and 0.78 years for M0 patients. Docetaxel was estimated to extend discounted QALYs by 0.51 years in M1 patients and 0.39 years in M0 patients. QALY gains in M0 patients were driven by the beneficial effect of delayed and reduced relapse. Docetaxel was cost-effective both in M1 patients (ICER = £5,514/QALY vs. SOC) and M0 patients (higher QALYs, lower costs vs. SOC). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a very high probability ( > 99%) that docetaxel is cost-effective in both M0 and M1 patients. Docetaxel remained cost effective in M0 patients even when no survival advantage was assumed due to reductions and delays in relapse. Conclusions: Docetaxel improves overall HRQoL, delays time to, and reduces the need for, subsequent therapy, and is cost-effective, amongst patients with both non-metastatic and metastatic disease. Clinicians should consider whether the evidence is now sufficiently compelling to support docetaxel use in non-metastatic patients. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN78818544.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas James
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University Hospitals Birmingham Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Woods
- University of York Centre for Health Economics, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Melissa Ruth Spears
- Medical Research Center Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David P. Dearnaley
- Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Noel Clarke
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mahesh K B Parmar
- Medical Research Center Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Robert Sydes
- Medical Research Center Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Mason M, Purushotham A, Sullivan R, van der Meulen J. Adoption of robotic surgery: driven by market competition or a desire to improve patient care? - Authors' reply. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:e67. [PMID: 29413468 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30022-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.
| | - Daniel Lewis
- Department of Social and Environment Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Department of Social and Environment Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic therapies for metastatic cutaneous melanoma, the most aggressive of all skin cancers, remain disappointing. Few lasting remissions are achieved and the therapeutic aim remains one of palliation.Many agents are used alone or in combination with varying degrees of toxicity and cost. It is unclear whether evidence exists to support these complex regimens over best supportive care / placebo. OBJECTIVES To review the benefits from the use of systemic therapies in metastatic cutaneous melanoma compared to best supportive care/placebo, and to establish whether a 'standard' therapy exists which is superior to other treatments. SEARCH METHODS Randomised controlled trials were identified from the MEDLINE, EMBASE and CCTR/CENTRAL databases. References, conference proceedings, and Science Citation Index/Scisearch were also used to locate trials. Cancer registries and trialists were also contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of adults with histologically proven metastatic cutaneous melanoma in which systemic anti-cancer therapy was compared with placebo or supportive care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Study selection was performed by two independent reviewers. Data extraction forms were used for studies which appeared to meet the selection criteria and, where appropriate, full text articles were retrieved and reviewed independently. MAIN RESULTS No randomised controlled trials were found comparing a systemic therapy with placebo or best supportive care in metastatic cutaneous melanoma. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence from randomised controlled clinical trials to show superiority of systemic therapy over best supportive care / placebo in the treatment of malignant cutaneous melanoma.Given that patients with metastatic melanoma frequently receive systemic therapy, it is our pragmatic view that a future systematic review could compare any systemic treatment, or combination of treatments, to single agent dacarbazine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Crosby
- Velindre HospitalClinical OncologyWhitchurchCardiffUKCF4 7XL
| | - Reg Fish
- Velindre HospitalClinical OncologyWhitchurchCardiffUKCF4 7XL
| | - Bernadette Coles
- Cardiff University Library ServicesVelindre NHS TrustVelindre Cancer CentreWhitchurchCardiffUKCF14 2TL
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Velindre HospitalClinical OncologyWhitchurchCardiffUKCF4 7XL
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mason M, Valero-Sanchez I, Archer J, Smith IE. P215 Continuous positive airway pressure (cpap) versus auto-cpap (apap) for the initial treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: clinical efficacy and cost. Sleep Breath 2017. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210983.357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
43
|
Huang B, Mason M, McFarland A, Noonan P, Ross J, Sykes A. Joint testing of the 3 Tesla ST40 spherical tokamak toroidal field coil test assembly. Fusion Engineering and Design 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.04.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
44
|
Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Mason M, Purushotham A, Sullivan R, van der Meulen J. Effect of patient choice and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption within cancer surgery: a national, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:1445-1453. [PMID: 28986012 PMCID: PMC5666166 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30572-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Revised: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Background There is a scarcity of evidence about the role of patient choice and hospital competition policies on surgical cancer services. Previous evidence has shown that patients are prepared to bypass their nearest cancer centre to receive surgery at more distant centres that better meet their needs. In this national, population-based study we investigated the effect of patient mobility and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption in the National Health Service (NHS) in England, using prostate cancer surgery as a model. Methods We mapped all patients in England who underwent radical prostatectomy between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2014, according to place of residence and treatment location. For each radical prostatectomy centre we analysed the effect of hospital competition (measured by use of a spatial competition index [SCI], with a score of 0 indicating weakest competition and 1 indicating strongest competition) and the effect of being an established robotic radical prostatectomy centre at the start of 2010 on net gains or losses of patients (difference between number of patients treated in a centre and number expected based on their residence), and the likelihood of closing their radical prostatectomy service. Findings Between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2014, 19 256 patients underwent radical prostatectomy at an NHS provider in England. Of the 65 radical prostatectomy centres open at the start of the study period, 23 (35%) had a statistically significant net gain of patients during 2010–14. Ten (40%) of these 23 were established robotic centres. 37 (57%) of the 65 centres had a significant net loss of patients, of which two (5%) were established robotic centres and ten (27%) closed their radical prostatectomy service during the study period. Radical prostatectomy centres that closed were more likely to be located in areas with stronger competition (highest SCI quartile [0·87–0·92]; p=0·0081) than in areas with weaker competition. No robotic surgery centre closed irrespective of the size of net losses of patients. The number of centres performing robotic surgery increased from 12 (18%) of the 65 centres at the beginning of 2010 to 39 (71%) of 55 centres open at the end of 2014. Interpretation Competitive factors, in addition to policies advocating centralisation and the requirement to do minimum numbers of surgical procedures, have contributed to large-scale investment in equipment for robotic surgery without evidence of superior outcomes and contributed to the closure of cancer surgery units. If quality performance and outcome indicators are not available to guide patient choice, these policies could threaten health services' ability to deliver equitable and affordable cancer care. Funding National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.
| | - Daniel Lewis
- Department of Social and Environment Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Meese D, Rajbans M, Butcher C, Mattison S, McGovern I, Mason M, Wong T, Lane R. 99Temporary pacing optimisation post cardiac surgery. Are we missing a trick? Europace 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux283.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
46
|
Pottle A, Bellchambers J, Deane S, Dent N, Eggenton F, Grigg S, Hayes C, Mackay N, Mason M. P613Nurse-led pre-admission clinics for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients are beneficial and are positively evaluated by patients. Eur Heart J 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx501.p613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
47
|
Hazzard E, Barone L, Mason M, Lambert K, McMahon A. Patient-centred dietetic care from the perspectives of older malnourished patients. J Hum Nutr Diet 2017; 30:574-587. [PMID: 28543671 DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Governing organisations for health services currently recommend a patient-centred (PC) approach to practice for all health professions, including dietetics. For the vulnerable older malnourished patient, this approach needs to be prioritised to improve outcomes. The paucity of patient experience data likely limits evidence-based, patient-centred care (PCC) from being implemented effectively. The present study aimed to identify quality indicators of dietetic services from the perspectives of older malnourished patients to inform evidence-based PC dietetic care. METHODS Surveys were completed by a sample of 28 females and 28 males (mean age 81 years) who had been seen by a dietitian for malnutrition assessment. In-depth, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with a sub-sample of four females and six males (mean age 81 years). Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of transcripts and open-ended survey responses was conducted to determine patient-identified quality indicators. RESULTS Three structure indicators (continuity of care through regular contact and post-discharge dietetic follow-up; interdisciplinary coordination and collaboration; and high-quality hospital food services), five process indicators (addressing a patient's primary medical concern; involving the patient's family; providing clear and simple dietetic information; providing expert dietary knowledge; utilising interpersonal communication skills) and three outcome indicators (improvement in health status; improvement or maintenance of independence; weight gain) were identified. The experiences of older malnourished patients with dietetic services, as described in the present study, reinforce the importance of ensuring high-quality and tailored dietetic care as a key element of PC dietetic services. CONCLUSIONS The quality indicators of dietetic services identified in the present study may facilitate dietitians to provide evidence-based PCC for older malnourished patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Hazzard
- Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - L Barone
- Port Kembla Hospital, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Warrawong, NSW, Australia
| | - M Mason
- Port Kembla Hospital, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Warrawong, NSW, Australia
| | - K Lambert
- Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - A McMahon
- Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jain S, Lyons C, Walker S, McQuaid S, Hynes S, Mitchell D, Pang B, Logan G, McCavigan A, O'Rourke D, Davidson C, Knight L, Sheriff A, Berge V, Neal D, Pandha H, Watson R, Mason M, Kay E, Harkin D, James J, Salto-Tellez M, Kennedy R, O'Sullivan J, Waugh D. OC-0126: A gene expression assay to predict the risk of distant metastases in localized prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)30569-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
49
|
Sun PH, Chen G, Mason M, Jiang WG, Ye L. Dual roles of protein tyrosine phosphatase kappa in coordinating angiogenesis induced by pro-angiogenic factors. Int J Oncol 2017; 50:1127-1135. [PMID: 28259897 PMCID: PMC5363875 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2017.3884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
A potential role may be played by receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase kappa (PTPRK) in angiogenesis due to its critical function in coordinating intracellular signal transduction from various receptors reliant on tyrosine phosphorylation. In the present study, we investigated the involvement of PTPRK in the cellular functions of vascular endothelial cells (HECV) and its role in angiogenesis using in vitro assays and a PTPRK knockdown vascular endothelial cell model. PTPRK knockdown in HECV cells (HECVPTPRKkd) resulted in a decrease of cell proliferation and cell-matrix adhesion; however, increased cell spreading and motility were seen. Reduced focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and paxillin protein levels were seen in the PTPRK knockdown cells which may contribute to the inhibitory effect on adhesion. HECVPTPRKkd cells were more responsive to the treatment of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) in their migration compared with the untreated control and cells treated with VEGF. Moreover, elevated c-Src and Akt1 were seen in the PTPRK knockdown cells. The FGF-promoted cell migration was remarkably suppressed by an addition of PLCγ inhibitor compared with other small inhibitors. Knockdown of PTPRK suppressed the ability of HECV cells to form tubules and also impaired the tubule formation that was induced by FGF and conditioned medium of cancer cells. Taken together, it suggests that PTPRK plays dual roles in coordinating angiogenesis. It plays a positive role in cell proliferation, adhesion and tubule formation, but suppresses cell migration, in particular, the FGF-promoted migration. PTPRK bears potential to be targeted for the prevention of tumour associated angiogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping-Hui Sun
- Cardiff China Medical Research Collaborative Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Gang Chen
- Cardiff China Medical Research Collaborative Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Cardiff China Medical Research Collaborative Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Wen G Jiang
- Cardiff China Medical Research Collaborative Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Lin Ye
- Cardiff China Medical Research Collaborative Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Charman S, Mason M, Sullivan R, Van der Meulen J. Patient mobility for radical prostatectomy in the English NHS: its impact on service configuration and technology integration. Eur J Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(17)30677-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|