In-vitro and in-vivo assessment of nirmatrelvir penetration into CSF, central nervous system cells, tissues, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Three years after SARS-CoV-2 emerged as a global infectious threat, the virus has become endemic. The neurological complications such as depression, anxiety, and other CNS complications after COVID-19 disease are increasing. The brain, and CSF have been shown as viral reservoirs for SARS-CoV-2, yielding a potential hypothesis for CNS effects. Thus, we investigated the CNS pharmacology of orally dosed nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMR/RTV). Using both an in vitro and an in vivo rodent model, we investigated CNS penetration and potential pharmacodynamic activity of NMR. Through pharmacokinetic modeling, we estimated the median CSF penetration of NMR to be low at 18.11% of plasma with very low accumulation in rodent brain tissue. Based on the multiples of the 90% maximal effective concentration (EC90) for SARS-CoV-2, NMR concentrations in the CSF and brain do not achieve an exposure level similar to that of plasma. A median of only 16% of all the predicted CSF concentrations in rats were > 3xEC90 (unadjusted for protein binding). This may have implications for viral persistence and neurologic post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 if increased NMR penetration in the CNS leads to decreased CNS viral loads and decreased CNS inflammation.

Antimicrobial Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in critically ill adult patients -an international perspective on access, utilisation, and barriers

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an effective method for individualizing antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients. The 2021 ADMIN-ICU survey studied a wide range of intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians worldwide to gain their perspectives on antimicrobial TDM. This paper reports the responses from this survey relating to TDM access, utilisation, barriers, and clinical value.

METHODS

An online survey consisted of multiple-choice questions and 5-point Likert scales. The survey examined respondent's access to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results, drug assays and dosing software, as well as barriers to TDM.

RESULTS

The survey included 538 clinicians from 409 hospitals in 45 countries, with 71% physicians and 29% pharmacists. Despite most respondents having access to assays, 21% and 26% of respondents lacked access to vancomycin and aminoglycosides, respectively. In lower-income countries, almost 40% reported no access. Delayed drug assay turnaround time was the most significant barrier to TDM, particularly in lower-income countries. Routine access to MIC results was unavailable for 41% of respondents, with 25% of lower-income country respondents having no access to MIC or susceptibility reports.

CONCLUSIONS

This global survey indicated that consistent TDM usage is hindered by assay access in some sites, and timeliness of assay results in others. Addressing barriers to TDM, particularly in low-income countries, should be a priority to ensure equitable access to affordable TDM.

Cefadroxil and cephalexin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in children with musculoskeletal infections

Cephalexin, a first-generation cephalosporin, is the first-line oral therapy for children with musculoskeletal infections due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Cefadroxil, a similar first-generation cephalosporin, is an attractive alternative to cephalexin given its longer half-life. In this study, we describe the comparative pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cephalexin and cefadroxil in children with musculoskeletal infections. Children aged 6 months to 18 years with a musculoskeletal infection were enrolled in a prospective, open-label, crossover PK study and given single oral doses of cefadroxil (50-75 mg/kg up to 2,000 mg) and cephalexin (50 mg/kg up to 1,375 mg). Population PK models were developed and used for dosing simulations. Our primary PD target was the achievement of free antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT >MIC) for 40% of the day for MICs ≤ 4 mg/L. PK of cephalexin (n = 15) and cefadroxil (n = 14) were best described using a one-compartment, first-order absorption model, with a lag time component for cefadroxil. PK parameters were notable for cefadroxil's longer half-life (1.61 h) than cephalexin's (1.10 h). For pediatric weight bands, our primary PD target was achieved by cephalexin 25 mg/kg/dose, maximum 750 mg/dose, administered three times daily and cefadroxil 40 mg/kg/dose, maximum 1,500 mg/dose, administered twice daily. More aggressive dosing was required to achieve higher PD targets. Among children with musculoskeletal infections, oral cephalexin and cefadroxil achieved PD targets for efficacy against MSSA. Given less frequent dosing, twice-daily cefadroxil should be further considered as an alternative to cephalexin for oral step-down therapy for serious infections due to MSSA.

Impact of humanized vancomycin infusion on kidney function and kidney injury in a translational rat model

Allometric dose scaling aims to create isometric exposures between animals and humans and is often employed in preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models. Bolus-administration with allometric scaling is the most simple and commonly used strategy in pre-clinical kidney injury studies; however, it is possible to humanize drug exposures. Currently, it is unknown if dose-matched, bolus-administration with allometric scaling results in similar outcomes compared to humanized infusions in the vancomycin induced kidney injury model. We utilized a preclinical Sprague-Dawley rat model to compare traditional allometrically-scaled, dose-matched, bolus-administration of vancomycin to an infusion-pump controlled, humanized infusion scheme to assess for differences in iohexol-measured kidney function and urinary kidney injury biomarkers. Following 24 h of vancomycin administration, rats in the humanized infusion group had equivalent area under the curve exposures to animals in the dose-matched bolus group (93.7 mg·h/L [IQR 90.2-97.2] vs. 99.5 mg·h/L [IQR 95.1-104.0], P = 0.07). No significant differences in iohexol-measured kidney function nor meaningful differences in urinary kidney injury biomarkers, kidney injury molecule-1, clusterin, and osteopontin, were detected. Administration of intravenous vancomycin as either a humanized infusion or dose-matched bolus resulted in similar vancomycin exposures. No differences in iohexol-measured GFR nor meaningful differences in urinary kidney injury biomarkers were observed among male Sprague-Dawley rats.

Flucloxacillin worsens while imipenem-cilastatin protects against vancomycin-induced kidney injury in a translational rat model

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Vancomycin is one of the most common clinical antibiotics, yet acute kidney injury is a major limiting factor. Common combinations of antibiotics with vancomycin have been reported to worsen and improve vancomycin-induced kidney injury. We aimed to study the impact of flucloxacillin and imipenem-cilastatin on kidney injury when combined with vancomycin in our translational rat model.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Male Sprague-Dawley rats received allometrically scaled (1) vancomycin, (2) flucloxacillin, (3) vancomycin + flucloxacillin, (4) vancomycin + imipenem-cilastatin or (5) saline for 4 days. Kidney injury was evaluated via drug accumulation and urinary biomarkers including urinary output, kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), clusterin and osteopontin. Relationships between vancomycin accumulation in the kidney and urinary kidney injury biomarkers were explored.

KEY RESULTS

Urinary output increased every study day for vancomycin + flucloxacillin, but after the first dose only in the vancomycin group. In the vancomycin + flucloxacillin group, urinary KIM-1 increased on all days compared with vancomycin. In the vancomycin + imipenem-cilastatin group, urinary KIM-1 was decreased on Days 1 and 2 compared with vancomycin. Similar trends were observed for clusterin. More vancomycin accumulated in the kidney with vancomycin + flucloxacillin compared with vancomycin and vancomycin + imipenem-cilastatin. The accumulation of vancomycin in the kidney tissue correlated with increasing urinary KIM-1.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Vancomycin + flucloxacillin caused more kidney injury compared with vancomycin alone and vancomycin + imipenem-cilastatin in a translational rat model. The combination of vancomycin + imipenem-cilastatin was nephroprotective.

Bioanalysis of six antibiotics from volumetric microsamples: a new tool for precision dosing in critically ill children

Background: Volumetric absorptive microsamples (VAMS) can support pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic studies. We present the bioanalytical method development for the simultaneous quantification of ampicillin, cefepime, ceftriaxone, meropenem, piperacillin, tazobactam, and vancomycin from VAMS. Methods & results: Optimal extraction, chromatographic, and mass spectrometry conditions were identified. Maximum extraction recoveries included 100 μl of water for rehydration and methanol for protein precipitation. Chromatographic separation used Phenomenex Kinetex™ Polar C18 column with a mobile phase comprising water/acetonitrile with formic acid and was fully validated. Hematocrit effects were only observed for vancomycin. Samples were stable for 90 days at -80°C except for meropenem, which was stable for 60 days. Conclusion: Multiple antibiotics can be assayed from a single VAMS sample to facilitate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies.

Individual meropenem epithelial lining fluid and plasma PK/PD target attainment

It is unclear whether plasma is a reliable surrogate for target attainment in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF). The objective of this study was to characterize meropenem target attainment in plasma and ELF using prospective samples. The first 24-hour T>MIC was evaluated vs 1xMIC and 4xMIC targets at the patient (i.e., fixed MIC of 2 mg/L) and population [i.e., cumulative fraction of response (CFR) according to EUCAST MIC distributions] levels for both plasma and ELF. Among 65 patients receiving ≥24 hours of treatment, 40% of patients failed to achieve >50% T>4xMIC in plasma and ELF, and 30% of patients who achieved >50% T>4xMIC in plasma had <50% T>4xMIC in ELF. At 1xMIC and 4xMIC targets, 3% and 25% of patients with >95% T>MIC in plasma had <50% T>MIC in ELF, respectively. Those with a CRCL >115 mL/min were less likely to achieve >50%T>4xMIC in ELF (P < 0.025). In the population, CFR for Escherichia coli at 1xMIC and 4xMIC was >97%. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, CFR was ≥90% in plasma and ranged 80%-85% in ELF at 1xMIC when a loading dose was applied. CFR was reduced in plasma (range: 75%-81%) and ELF (range: 44%-60%) in the absence of a loading dose at 1xMIC. At 4xMIC, CFR for P. aeruginosa was 60%-86% with a loading dose and 18%-62% without a loading dose. We found that plasma overestimated ELF target attainment inup to 30% of meropenem-treated patients, CRCL >115 mL/min decreased target attainment in ELF, and loading doses increased CFR in the population.

Impact of Various Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations on the Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem in Critically Ill Adults

IMPORTANCE

Meropenem dosing is typically guided by creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), but creatinine is a suboptimal GFR marker in the critically ill.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop and qualify a population pharmacokinetic model for meropenem in critically ill adults and to determine which eGFR equation based on creatinine, cystatin C, or both biomarkers best improves model performance.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This single-center study evaluated adults hospitalized in an ICU who received IV meropenem from 2018 to 2022. Patients were excluded if they had acute kidney injury, were on kidney replacement therapy, or were treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Two cohorts were used for population pharmacokinetic modeling: a richly sampled development cohort (n = 19) and an opportunistically sampled qualification cohort (n = 32).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A nonlinear mixed-effects model was developed using parametric methods to estimate meropenem serum concentrations.

RESULTS

The best-fit structural model in the richly sampled development cohort was a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. The final model included time-dependent weight normalized to a 70-kg adult as a covariate for volume of distribution (Vd) and time-dependent eGFR for clearance. Among the eGFR equations evaluated, eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C expressed in mL/min best-predicted meropenem clearance. The mean (se) Vd in the final model was 18.2 (3.5) liters and clearance was 11.5 (1.3) L/hr. Using the development cohort as the Bayesian prior, the opportunistically sampled cohort demonstrated good accuracy and low bias.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Contemporary eGFR equations that use both creatinine and cystatin C improved meropenem population pharmacokinetic model performance compared with creatinine-only or cystatin C-only eGFR equations in adult critically ill patients.

Population pharmacokinetic model of cefepime for critically ill adults: a comparative assessment of eGFR equations

Cefepime exhibits highly variable pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to develop and qualify a population pharmacokinetic model for use in the critically ill and investigate the impact of various estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations using creatinine, cystatin C, or both on model parameters. This was a prospective study of critically ill adults hospitalized at an academic medical center treated with intravenous cefepime. Individuals with acute kidney injury or on kidney replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded. A nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic model was developed using data collected from 2018 to 2022. The 120 included individuals contributed 379 serum samples for analysis. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination best described the data. The population mean parameters (standard error) in the final model were 7.84 (0.24) L/h for CL1 and 15.6 (1.45) L for V1. Q was fixed at 7.09 L/h and V2 was fixed at 10.6 L, due to low observed interindividual variation in these parameters. The final model included weight as a covariate for volume of distribution and the eGFRcr-cysC (mL/min) as a predictor of drug clearance. In summary, a population pharmacokinetic model for cefepime was created for critically ill adults. The study demonstrated the importance of cystatin C to prediction of cefepime clearance. Cefepime dosing models which use an eGFR equation inclusive of cystatin C are likely to exhibit improved accuracy and precision compared to dosing models which incorporate an eGFR equation with only creatinine.

Adequacy of cefepime concentrations in the early phase of critical illness: A case for precision pharmacotherapy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

In critically ill patients, adequacy of early antibiotic exposure has been incompletely evaluated. This study characterized factors associated with inadequate cefepime exposure in the first 24 h of critical illness.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Critically ill adults treated with cefepime. Patients with acute kidney injury or treated with kidney replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS

A nonlinear mixed-effects pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed to estimate cefepime concentrations for each patient over time. The percentage of time the free drug concentration exceeded 8 mg/L during the first 24 h of therapy was calculated (%ƒT>8; appropriate for the susceptible breakpoint for Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Factors predictive of low %ƒT>8 were explored with multivariable regression.

MAIN RESULTS

In the 100 included patients, a one-compartment PK model was developed with first-order elimination with covariates for weight and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRSCr-CysC). The median (interquartile range) %ƒT>8 for cefepime in the first 24 h of therapy based on this model was 85% (66%, 100%). Less than 100% ƒT>8 during first 24 h of therapy occurred in 70 (70%) individuals. Lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p = 0.032) and higher eGFRSCr-CysC (p < 0.001) predicted a lower %ƒT>8. Central nervous system infection source was protective (i.e., associated with a higher %ƒT>8; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

During early critical illness, cefepime concentrations were inadequate in a significant proportion of patients. Antimicrobial optimization is needed to improve the precision of pharmacotherapy in the critically ill patients.

Priorities and Progress in Gram-positive Bacterial Infection Research by the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group: A Narrative Review

The Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) has prioritized infections caused by gram-positive bacteria as one of its core areas of emphasis. The ARLG Gram-positive Committee has focused on studies responding to 3 main identified research priorities: (1) investigation of strategies or therapies for infections predominantly caused by gram-positive bacteria, (2) evaluation of the efficacy of novel agents for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and (3) optimization of dosing and duration of antimicrobial agents for gram-positive infections. Herein, we summarize ARLG accomplishments in gram-positive bacterial infection research, including studies aiming to (1) inform optimal vancomycin dosing, (2) determine the role of dalbavancin in MRSA bloodstream infection, (3) characterize enterococcal bloodstream infections, (4) demonstrate the benefits of short-course therapy for pediatric community-acquired pneumonia, (5) develop quality of life measures for use in clinical trials, and (6) advance understanding of the microbiome. Future studies will incorporate innovative methodologies with a focus on interventional clinical trials that have the potential to change clinical practice for difficult-to-treat infections, such as MRSA bloodstream infections.

Making the case for precision dosing: visualizing the variability of cefepime exposures in critically ill adults

OBJECTIVE

To investigate and describe the variability in cefepime exposures among 'real-world', critically ill patients by using population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulations, and with translation of these findings to visualizations.

METHODS

A cohort of adult medical ICU patients who received cefepime with therapeutic drug monitoring was studied. Two compartment models were developed to estimate cefepime clearance (Model 1) and simulate cefepime exposures among 1000 patients, each with identical creatinine clearance of 60 mL/min and receiving a regimen of cefepime 1 gram IV over 30 minutes, every 8 hours (Model 2). Variability in the relationship between cefepime clearance and creatinine clearance (CrCL) was visualized, and a random, representative sample of 10 simulated patients was utilized to illustrate variability in cefepime exposures.

RESULTS

A total of 75 adult medical ICU patients (52% female) and 98 serum cefepime samples were included in the study. Population parameter estimates for cefepime displayed a wide range of variation in Model 1 (CV: 45% to 95%), with low bias at the individual level at 0.226 mg/L but high bias in the population model 10.6 mg/L. Model 2 displayed similar fits, demonstrating that correcting for individual patient creatinine clearance slightly improves the bias of the population model (bias = 4.31 mg/L). Among 10 simulated patients that a clinician would deem similar from a dosing perspective (i.e. equivalent creatinine clearance), maximum concentrations after three simulated doses varied more than 8-fold from 41.2 to 339 mg/L at the 5th and 95th percentiles, and clearance profiles were highly different.

CONCLUSION

Creatinine clearance estimates alone are inadequate for predicting cefepime exposures. Wide variations in cefepime exposure exist among ICU patients, even for those with similar kidney function estimates. Current population adjustment schemes based solely on creatinine clearance will result in unintended high and low exposures leading to safety and efficacy concerns, respectively.

A population pharmacokinetic model of polymyxin B based on prospective clinical data to inform dosing in hospitalized patients

OBJECTIVES

To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model with data from the largest polymyxin B-treated patient population studied to date to optimize its dosing in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients receiving intravenous polymyxin B for ≥48 hours were enrolled. Blood samples were collected at steady state and drug concentrations were analysed by liquid chromotography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Population PK analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA).

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-two patients received intravenous polymyxin B (1.33-6 mg/kg/day), providing 681 plasma samples. Twenty-four patients were on renal replacement therapy, including 13 on continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). A 2-compartment model adequately described the PK with body weight as a covariate on the volume of distribution that affected Cmax, but it did not impact clearance or exposure. Creatinine clearance was a statistically significant covariate on clearance, although clinically relevant variations of dose-normalized drug exposure were not observed across a wide creatinine clearance range. The model described higher clearance in CVVHDF patients than in non-CVVHDF patients. Maintenance doses of ≥2.5 mg/kg/day or ≥150 mg/day had a PTA ≥90% (for non-pulmonary infections target) at a steady state for minimum inhibitory concentrations ≤2 mg/L. The PTA at a steady state for CVVHDF patients was lower.

DISCUSSION

Fixed loading and maintenance doses of polymyxin B seemed to be more appropriate than weight-based dosing regimens in patients weighing 45-90 kg. Higher doses may be needed in patients on CVVHDF. Substantial variability in polymyxin B clearance and volume of distribution was found, suggesting that therapeutic drug monitoring may be indicated.

Iohexol-Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate and Urinary Biomarker Changes between Vancomycin and Vancomycin Plus Piperacillin-Tazobactam in a Translational Rat Model

Recent clinical studies have reported additive nephrotoxicity with the combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. However, preclinical models have failed to replicate this finding. This study assessed differences in iohexol-measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary injury biomarkers among rats receiving this antibiotic combination. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received either intravenous vancomycin, intraperitoneal piperacillin-tazobactam, or both for 96 h. Iohexol-measured GFR was used to quantify real-time kidney function changes. Kidney injury was evaluated with the urinary biomarkers kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), clusterin, and osteopontin. Compared to the control, rats that received vancomycin had numerically lower GFRs after drug dosing on day 3. Rats in this group also had elevations in urinary KIM-1 on experimental days 2 and 4. Increasing urinary KIM-1 was found to correlate with decreasing GFR on experimental days 1 and 3. Rats that received vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam (vancomycin+piperacillin-tazobactam) did not exhibit worse kidney function or injury biomarkers than rats receiving vancomycin alone. The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam does not cause additive nephrotoxicity in a translational rat model. Future clinical studies investigating this antibiotic combination should employ more sensitive biomarkers of kidney function and injury, similar to those utilized in this study.

International consensus recommendations for the use of prolonged-infusion beta-lactam antibiotics: Endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists

Intravenous β-lactam antibiotics remain a cornerstone in the management of bacterial infections due to their broad spectrum of activity and excellent tolerability. β-lactams are well established to display time-dependent bactericidal activity, where reductions in bacterial burden are directly associated with the time that free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen during the dosing interval. In an effort to take advantage of these bactericidal characteristics, prolonged (extended and continuous) infusions (PIs) can be applied during the administration of intravenous β-lactams to increase time above the MIC. PI dosing regimens have been implemented worldwide, but implementation is inconsistent. We report consensus therapeutic recommendations for the use of PI β-lactams developed by an expert international panel with representation from clinical pharmacy and medicine. This consensus guideline provides recommendations regarding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, therapeutic drug-monitoring considerations, and the use of PI β-lactam therapy in the following patient populations: severely ill and nonseverely ill adult patients, pediatric patients, and obese patients. These recommendations provide the first consensus guidance for the use of β-lactam therapy administered as PIs and have been reviewed and endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF), the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP).

International consensus recommendations for the use of prolonged-infusion beta-lactam antibiotics: Endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists: An executive summary

Intravenous β-lactam antibiotics remain a cornerstone in the management of bacterial infections due to their broad spectrum of activity and excellent tolerability. β-lactams are well established to display time-dependent bactericidal activity, where reductions in bacterial burden are directly associated with the time that free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen during the dosing interval. In an effort to take advantage of these bactericidal characteristics, prolonged (extended and continuous) infusions (PI) can be applied during the administration of intravenous β-lactams to increase time above the MIC. PI dosing regimens have been implemented worldwide, but implementation is inconsistent. We report consensus therapeutic recommendations for the use of β-lactam PI developed by an expert international panel with representation from clinical pharmacy and medicine. This consensus guideline provides recommendations regarding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, therapeutic drug monitoring considerations, and the use of PI β-lactam therapy in the following patient populations: severely ill and nonseverely ill adult patients, pediatric patients, and obese patients. These recommendations provide the first consensus guidance for the use of β-lactam therapy administered as PIs and have been reviewed and endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF), the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP).

Why is the Implementation of Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for the Critically Ill Falling Short? A Multicenter Mixed-Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (BL TDM; drug level testing) can facilitate improved outcomes in critically ill patients. However, only 10%-20% of hospitals have implemented BL TDM. This study aimed to characterize provider perceptions and key considerations for successfully implementing BL TDM.

METHODS

This was a sequential mixed-methods study from 2020 to 2021 of diverse stakeholders at 3 academic medical centers with varying degrees of BL TDM implementation (not implemented, partially implemented, and fully implemented). Stakeholders were surveyed, and a proportion of participants completed semistructured interviews. Themes were identified, and findings were contextualized with implementation science frameworks.

RESULTS

Most of the 138 survey respondents perceived that BL TDM was relevant to their practice and improved medication effectiveness and safety. Integrated with interview data from 30 individuals, 2 implementation themes were identified: individual internalization and organizational features. Individuals needed to internalize, make sense of, and agree to BL TDM implementation, which was positively influenced by repeated exposure to evidence and expertise. The process of internalization appeared more complex with BL TDM than with other antibiotics (ie, vancomycin). Organizational considerations relevant to BL TDM implementation (eg, infrastructure, personnel) were similar to those identified in other TDM settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Broad enthusiasm for BL TDM among participants was found. Prior literature suggested that assay availability was the primary barrier to implementation; however, the data revealed many more individual and organizational attributes, which impacted the BL TDM implementation. Internalization should particularly be focused on to improve the adoption of this evidence-based practice.

Contemporary pharmacologic treatments of MRSA for hospitalized adults: rationale for vancomycin versus non-vancomycin therapies as first line agents

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains an important pathogen in the hospital setting and causes significant morbidity and mortality each year. Since the initial discovery over 60 years ago, vancomycin has remained a first-line treatment for many different types of MRSA infections. However, significant concerns related to target attainment and nephrotoxicity have spurred efforts to develop more effective agents in the last two decades.

AREAS COVERED

Newer anti-MRSA antibiotics that have been approved since 2000 include linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftaroline. As clinical evidence has accumulated, these newer agents have become more frequently used, and some are now recommended as co-first-line options (along with vancomycin) in clinical practice guidelines. For this review, a scoping review of the literature was conducted to support our findings and recommendations.

EXPERT OPINION

Vancomycin remains an important standard of care for MRSA infections but is limited with respect to nephrotoxicity and rapid target attainment. Newer agents such as linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftaroline have specific indications for treating different types of MRSA infections; however, newer agents also have unique attributes which require consideration during therapy.

Development and validation of a population pharmacokinetic model to guide perioperative tacrolimus dosing after lung transplantation

Background

Tacrolimus therapy is standard of care for immunosuppression after lung transplantation. However, tacrolimus exposure variability during the early postoperative period may contribute to poor outcomes in this population. Few studies have examined tacrolimus pharmacokinetics (PK) during this high-risk time period.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective pharmacokinetic study in lung transplant recipients at the University of Pennsylvania who were enrolled in the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group (LTOG) cohort. We derived a model in 270 patients using NONMEM (version 7.5.1) and examined validity in a separate cohort of 114 patients. Covariates were examined with univariate analysis and multivariable analysis was developed using forward and backward stepwise selection. Performance of the final model in the validation cohort was examined with calculation of mean prediction error (PE).

Results

We developed a one-compartment base model with a fixed rate absorption constant. Significant covariates in multivariable analysis were postoperative day, hematocrit, transplant type, CYP3A5 genotype, total body weight, and time-varying postoperative day, hematocrit, and CYP inhibitor drugs. The strongest predictor of tacrolimus clearance was postoperative day, with median predicted clearance increasing more than threefold over the 14 day study period. In the validation cohort, the final model showed a mean PE of 36.4% (95%CI 30.8%-41.9%) and a median PE of 7.2% (IQR -29.3%-70.53%).

Conclusion

Postoperative day was the strongest predictor of tacrolimus exposure in the early post-lung transplant period. Future multicenter studies employing intensive sampling to examine a broad set of variables related to critical illness physiology are needed to understand determinants of clearance, volume of distribution and absorption in this population.

International survey of antibiotic dosing and monitoring in adult intensive care units

BACKGROUND

In recent years, numerous dosing studies have been conducted to optimize therapeutic antibiotic exposures in patients with serious infections. These studies have led to the inclusion of dose optimization recommendations in international clinical practice guidelines. The last international survey describing dosing, administration and monitoring of commonly prescribed antibiotics for critically ill patients was published in 2015 (ADMIN-ICU 2015). This study aimed to describe the evolution of practice since this time.

METHODS

A cross-sectional international survey distributed through professional societies and networks was used to obtain information on practices used in the dosing, administration and monitoring of vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem and aminoglycosides.

RESULTS

A total of 538 respondents (71% physicians and 29% pharmacists) from 409 hospitals in 45 countries completed the survey. Vancomycin was mostly administered as an intermittent infusion, and loading doses were used by 74% of respondents with 25 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg the most favoured doses for intermittent and continuous infusions, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem were most frequently administered as an extended infusion (42% and 51%, respectively). Therapeutic drug monitoring was undertaken by 90%, 82%, 43%, and 39% of respondents for vancomycin, aminoglycosides, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem, respectively, and was more frequently performed in high-income countries. Respondents rarely used dosing software to guide therapy in clinical practice and was most frequently used with vancomycin (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed numerous changes in practice since the ADMIN-ICU 2015 survey was conducted. Beta-lactams are more commonly administered as extended infusions, and therapeutic drug monitoring use has increased, which align with emerging evidence.

Pharmacokinetic and Biomarker Quantification Studies on Vancomycin-Loaded PEGylated Liposomes and Its Potential to Reduce Vancomycin-Induced Kidney Injury: A Rat Study

Vancomycin is a commonly used antibiotic in hospital settings, especially against Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). One of the major adverse events of vancomycin use in adults is kidney injury. The drug concentration, specifically the area under the concentration curve, predicts kidney injury in adults receiving vancomycin. To attempt to reduce vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity, we have successfully encapsulated vancomycin in polyethylene glycol-coated liposomes (PEG-VANCO-lipo). We have previously carried out in vitro cytotoxicity studies on kidney cells using PEG-VANCO-lipo and found it to be minimally toxic compared to the standard vancomycin. In this study, we have dosed male adult rats with PEG-VANCO-lipo or vancomycin HCl and compared plasma vancomycin concentrations and KIM-1 as an injury biomarker in rat urine. Male Sprague Dawley rats (350 ± 10 g) were administered vancomycin (n = 6) or PEG-VANCO-lipo (n = 6) 150 mg/kg/day for three days using an IV infusion in the left jugular vein catheter. Blood was collected for plasma at 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 1440 min after the first and the last IV dose. Urine was collected 0-2, 2-4, 4-8, and 8-24 h after the first and the last IV infusions using metabolic cages. The animals were observed for three days after the last compound administration. Vancomycin was quantified in plasma by LC-MS/MS. Urinary KIM-1 analysis was done by using an ELISA kit. Three days after the last dose, under terminal anesthesia with IP ketamine (65-100 mg/kg) and xylazine (7-10 mg/kg), rats were euthanized. Vancomycin urine and kidney concentrations and KIM-1 were lower on day three in the PEG-Vanco-lipo group compared to the vancomycin group (p < 0.05, ANOVA and/or t-test). There was a significant reduction in plasma vancomycin concentration on day one and day three (p < 0.05, t-test) in the vancomycin group compared to the PEG-VANCO-lipo group. Vancomycin-loaded PEGylated liposomes resulted in lower levels of kidney injury, as noted by a decrease in KIM-1 values. Moreover, longer circulation in plasma with increased concentration in plasma as opposed to the kidney was observed with the PEG-VANCO-lipo group. The results indicate the high potential of PEG-VANCO-lipo in decreasing the nephrotoxicity of vancomycin clinically.

A novel 4-cell in-vitro blood-brain barrier model and its characterization by confocal microscopy and TEER measurement

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a protective cellular anatomical layer with a dynamic micro-environment, tightly regulating the transport of materials across it. To achieve in-vivo characteristics, an in-vitro BBB model requires the constituent cell types to be layered in an appropriate order. A cost-effective in-vitro BBB model is desired to facilitate central nervous system (CNS) drug penetration studies. Enhanced integrity of tight junctions observed during the in-vitro BBB establishment and post-experiment is essential in these models. We successfully developed an in-vitro BBB model mimicking the in-vivo cell composition and a distinct order of seeding primary human brain cells. Unlike other in-vitro BBB models, our work avoids the need for pre-coated plates for cell adhesion and provides better cell visualization during the procedure. We found that using bovine collagen-I coating, followed by bovine fibronectin coating and poly-L-lysine coating, yields better adhesion and layering of cells on the transwell membrane compared to earlier reported use of collagen and poly-L-lysine only. Our results indicated better cell visibility and imaging with the polyester transwell membrane as well as point to a higher and more stable Trans Endothelial Electrical Resistance values in this plate. In addition, we found that the addition of zinc induced higher claudin 5 expressions in neuronal cells. Dolutegravir, a drug used in the treatment of HIV, is known to appear in moderate concentrations in the CNS. Thus, dolutegravir was used to assess the functionality of the final model and cells. Using primary cells and an in-house coating strategy substantially reduces costs and provides superior imaging of cells and their tight junction protein expression. Our 4-cell-based BBB model is a suitable experimental model for the drug screening process.

Risk Factors for Nephrotoxicity in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CAMERA2 Trial

BACKGROUND

Clinical risk factors for nephrotoxicity in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia remain largely undetermined, despite its common occurrence and clinical significance. In an international, multicentre, prospective clinical trial (CAMERA2), which compared standard therapy (vancomycin monotherapy) to combination therapy (adding an anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam) for methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteraemia, significantly more people in the combination therapy arm experienced acute kidney injury compared with those in the monotherapy arm (23% vs 6%).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this post hoc analysis was to explore in greater depth the risk factors for acute kidney injury from the CAMERA2 trial.

METHODS

Among participants of the CAMERA2 trial, demographic-related, infection-related and treatment-related risk factors were assessed for their relationship with acute kidney injury by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Acute kidney injury was defined by a modified-KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria (not including urinary output).

RESULTS

Of the 266 participants included, age (p = 0.04), randomisation to combination therapy (p = 0.002), vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve (p = 0.03) and receipt of (flu)cloxacillin as the companion beta-lactam (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with acute kidney injury. On a multivariable analysis, concurrent use of (flu)cloxacillin increased the risk of acute kidney injury over four times compared with the use of cefazolin or no beta-lactam. The association of vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve with acute kidney injury also persisted in the multivariable model.

CONCLUSIONS

For participants receiving vancomycin for S. aureus bacteraemia, use of (flu)cloxacillin and increased vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve were risk factors for acute kidney injury. These represent potentially modifiable risk factors for nephrotoxicity and highlight the importance of avoiding the use of concurrent nephrotoxins.

Cefazolin in the treatment of central nervous system infections: A narrative review and recommendation

Infections of the central nervous system (CNS) are complex to treat and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Historically, antistaphylococcal penicillins such as nafcillin were recommended for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible staphylococcal CNS infections. However, the use of antistaphylococcal penicillins presents challenges, such as frequent dosing administration and adverse events with protracted use. This narrative reviews available clinical and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data for cefazolin in CNS infections and produces a recommendation for use. Based on the limited available evidence analyzed, dose optimized cefazolin is likely a safe and effective alternative to antistaphylococcal penicillins for a variety of CNS infections due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Given the site of infection and wide therapeutic index of cefazolin, practitioners may consider dosing cefazolin regimens of 2 g IV every 6 h or a continuous infusion of 8-10 g daily instead of 2 g IV every 8 h to optimize PK/PD properties.

Use of therapeutic drug monitoring to characterize cefepime-related neurotoxicity

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Data evaluating cefepime thresholds associated with neurotoxicity remain limited. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the incidence of cefepime-related neurotoxicity (CRN) in patients with plasma cefepime concentrations, assess the relationship between cefepime exposure and CRN, investigate clinical factors associated with CRN, and describe electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities in CRN.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of adult inpatients admitted between 2016 and 2018 who received cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Potential CRN cases were identified utilizing a standard definition. The primary outcomes of the study were to determine the incidence of CRN and evaluate the relationship between cefepime trough concentrations, the average daily AUC, and neurotoxicity. Bayesian posteriors were generated for each patient using a cefepime pharmacokinetic (PK) model, and the mean daily area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated. Multiple regression was performed to assess the association between CRN, cefepime PK, and clinical predictors of neurotoxicity.

MAIN RESULTS

Four hundred eighty-one patients with 503 hospital encounters received cefepime TDM and were included in the analysis. The incidence of CRN was 4.4% (22/503). Patients with CRN had a higher incidence of renal dysfunction, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus compared to patients without CRN (non-NT). The mean cefepime trough concentration was significantly greater in the CRN patients than in the non-NT group (61.8 ± 33.7 vs. 30 ± 27.7 mg/L, respectively, p = 0.0002). Cefepime trough concentration and renal dysfunction were independently associated with increased risk of CRN in the adjusted multiple regression model. Moderate generalized slowing of the background rhythm was the most common EEG pattern associated with CRN. Delaying cefepime TDM greater than 72 h after the initiation of cefepime was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of CRN.

CONCLUSION

Cefepime should be used cautiously in hospitalized patients with renal dysfunction due to the risk of neurotoxicity. Dose optimization utilizing TDM early in cefepime treatment may minimize adverse effects and improve patient safety.

743. Implementation of Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Programs in the Critically Ill: A Multicenter Mixed-Methods Study

Background

Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (BL TDM; drug level testing) can facilitate improved outcomes in critically ill patients. Yet less than 20% of hospitals have implemented BL TDM. The purpose of this study was to characterize provider perceptions and key considerations for successful implementation of BL TDM.

Methods

This was a sequential mixed methods study from 2020 to 2021 of stakeholders at three academic medical centers with varying degrees of BL TDM implementation - Mayo Clinic (BL TDM not implemented), University of Florida Health Shands (partially implemented), and Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (fully implemented). Stakeholders completed a survey to characterize their knowledge, perceptions, and experience with BL TDM. A diverse group of 30 respondents were then purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. Results from the two strands were integrated, themes were identified, and findings were situated within implementation science frameworks.

Results

Among the 138 survey respondents (22% response rate), the majority were physicians (38%) and pharmacists (33%). 71% practiced in critical care and 21% in infectious diseases. The majority of respondents felt BL TDM was relevant to their practice and improved medication effectiveness and safety (Figure 1). Two implementation themes were identified: individual internalization and organizational features. Individuals needed to internalize, make sense of, and agree to BL TDM implementation which was positively influenced by repeated exposure to evidence and expertise. The process of internalization seemed more complex with BL TDM than with other antibiotics (i.e., vancomycin). Organizational considerations relevant to BL TDM implementation included adequate physical and informational infrastructure, access to trained personnel, supportive governance/leadership, and robust process and workflow development.

Conclusion

We found broad enthusiasm about the relevance and potential benefits of BL TDM among stakeholders. Prior literature suggested the primary barrier to implementation was assay availability, but we identified many more individual and organizational attributes which impacted the scale and spread of BL TDM.

Disclosures

Sara Ausman, PharmD, Gilead: Honoraria Christina G. Rivera, PharmD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Honoraria|Insmed: Honoraria Jason Roberts, BPharm(Hons), PhD, FSHP, FISAC, British Society of Chemotherapy: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Honoraria|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Honoraria|Pfizer: Board Member|Pfizer: Honoraria|Qpex: Grant/Research Support|Sandoz: Board Member|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Wolters Kluwer: Advisor/Consultant Marc H. Scheetz, PharmD, MSc, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Allecra: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Nevakar: Advisor/Consultant|Nevakar: Grant/Research Support|Premier Healthcare Solutions: Honoraria|Spero: Advisor/Consultant|SuperTrans Medical: Advisor/Consultant|SuperTrans Medical: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Third Pole Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant.

967. Safety Outcomes of a Hospital-wide β-Lactam Graded Challenge Allergy Protocol

Background

Up to 15% of hospitalized patients report a penicillin allergy, but most can tolerate a β-lactam (BL). Use of second-line non-BL antibiotics poses untoward health consequences. Assessing for true penicillin allergies includes penicillin skin testing (PST) and a direct amoxicillin challenge, each with their own limitations in hospitalized patients. For inpatients, a graded challenge (GC) with the desired BL offers a streamlined approach for many who could benefit from a first-line BL agent. In 2019, a hospital-wide BL Allergy Assessment and Clinical Pathway was implemented, including a BL GC protocol for low-risk patients. This study aimed to assess the safety of the GC procedure in hospitalized patients.

Methods

A retrospective, observational cohort study of adult inpatients who completed a GC procedure between Sept 2019 – Sept 2021 was conducted. Primary objective: determine the incidence of a significant hypersensitivity reaction from a BL GC. Secondary objectives: 1) determine the incidence of a non-hypersensitivity reaction and 2) identify antimicrobial stewardship interventions in those tolerant to a BL GC (e.g. antibiotic switch to a BL with completion of treatment course and de-labeling of penicillin allergy).

Results

Fifty-one patients completed a GC procedure. Most (78%) had a reported allergy to penicillin vs. other BL antibiotics. Reported allergic reactions stratified by risk for a serious hypersensitivity episode were: low/reaction &gt; 10 yrs ago – 33%; moderate-high/reaction &gt; 10 yrs ago – 47%, and moderate-high/reaction &lt; 5 yrs ago – 19.6%. A PST prior to a GC was performed in 75% of patients. Common GC agents included amoxicillin-clavulanate (16%), amoxicillin (12%) and ceftriaxone (12%). One patient experienced a hypersensitivity reaction managed with diphenhydramine and another patient had a non-hypersensitivity reaction. Both cases were non-life-threatening. Of the 49 patients who tolerated a GC, 76% were switched to a BL with completion of treatment course, and 84% of documented penicillin allergies were de-labeled or clarified in the electronic medical record.

Conclusion

The GC procedure in our hospitalized patients was generally well tolerated including those with an allergy history concerning for a moderate-high risk hypersensitivity reaction.

Disclosures

Nathaniel J. Rhodes, PharmD, MSc, American Academy of Colleges of Pharmacy: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Third Pole Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant Marc H. Scheetz, PharmD, MSc, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Allecra: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Nevakar: Advisor/Consultant|Nevakar: Grant/Research Support|Premier Healthcare Solutions: Honoraria|Spero: Advisor/Consultant|SuperTrans Medical: Advisor/Consultant|SuperTrans Medical: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Third Pole Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant.

Individual target pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic attainment rates among meropenem-treated patients admitted to the ICU with hospital-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

Critical illness reduces β-lactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) attainment. We sought to quantify PK/PD attainment in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia.

METHODS

Meropenem plasma PK data (n = 70 patients) were modelled, PK/PD attainment rates were calculated for empirical and definitive targets, and between-patient variability was quantified [as a coefficient of variation (CV%)].

RESULTS

Attainment of 100% T&gt;4×MIC was variable for both empirical (CV% = 92) and directed (CV% = 33%) treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualization is required to achieve suggested PK/PD targets in critically ill patients.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime

Cefepime is a broad-spectrum fourth-generation cephalosporin with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. It is generally administered as an infusion over 30-60 min or as a prolonged infusion with infusion times from 3 h to continuous administration. Cefepime is widely distributed in biological fluids and tissues with an average volume of distribution of ~ 0.2 L/kg in healthy adults with normal renal function. Protein binding is relatively low (20%), and elimination is mainly renal. About 85% of the dose is excreted unchanged in the urine, with an elimination half-life of 2-2.3 h. The pharmacokinetics of cefepime is altered under certain pathophysiological conditions, resulting in high inter-individual variability in cefepime volume of distribution and clearance, which poses challenges for population dosing approaches. Consequently, therapeutic drug monitoring of cefepime may be beneficial in certain patients including those who are critically ill, have life-threatening infections, or are infected with more resistant pathogens. Cefepime is generally safe and efficacious, with a goal exposure target of 70% time of the free drug concentration over the minimum inhibitory concentration for clinical efficacy. In recent years, reports of neurotoxicity have increased, specifically in patients with impaired renal function. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicodynamics of cefepime contemporarily in the setting of increasing cefepime exposures. We explore the potential benefits of extended or continuous infusions and therapeutic drug monitoring in special populations.

Does calculation method matter for targeting vancomycin area under the curve?

OBJECTIVES

To assess differences in vancomycin AUC estimates from two common, clinically applied first-order pharmacokinetic equation methods compared with Bayesian estimates.

METHODS

A cohort of patients who received vancomycin and therapeutic drug monitoring was studied. First-order population pharmacokinetic equations were used to guide initial empirical dosing. After receipt of the first dose, patients had peak and trough serum levels drawn and steady-state AUC was estimated using first-order pharmacokinetic equations as standard care. We subsequently created a Bayesian model and used individual Empirical Bayes Estimates to precisely calculate vancomycin AUC24-48, AUC48-72 and AUC72-96 in this cohort. AUC at steady state (AUCSS) differences from the first-order methods were compared numerically and categorically (i.e. below, within or above 400-600 mg·h/L) to Bayesian AUCs, which served as the gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 65 adult inpatients with 409 plasma samples were included in this analysis. A two-compartment intravenous infusion model with first-order elimination fit the data well. The mean of Bayesian AUC24-48 was not significantly different from AUC estimates from the two first-order pharmacokinetic equation methods (P = 0.68); however, Bayesian AUC48-72 and Bayesian AUC72-96 were both significantly different when compared with both first-order pharmacokinetic equation methods (P < 0.01 for each). At the patient level, categorical classifications of AUC estimates from the two first-order pharmacokinetic equation methods differed from categorizations derived from the Bayesian calculations. Categorical agreement was ∼50% between first-order and Bayesian calculations, with declining categorical agreement observed with longer treatment courses. Differences in categorical agreement between calculation methods could potentially result in different dose recommendations for the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Bayesian-calculated AUCs between 48-72 and 72-96 h intervals were significantly different from first-order pharmacokinetic method-estimated AUCs at steady state. The various calculation methods resulted in different categorical classification, which could potentially lead to erroneous dosing adjustments in approximately half of the patients.

Urinary Metabolomics from a Dose-Fractionated Polymyxin B Rat Model of Acute Kidney Injury

BACKGROUND

Polymyxin B treatment is limited by kidney injury. We sought to identify Polymyxin B related urinary metabolomic profile modifications for early detection of polymyxin-associated nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

Samples were obtained from a previously conducted study. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received dose-fractionated polymyxin B (12mg/kg/day) once daily (QD), twice daily (BID), and thrice daily (TID) for three days with urinary biomarkers and kidney histopathology scores determined. Daily urine was analysed for metabolites via 1H NMR. Principal Components Analyses identified spectral data trends with orthogonal Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis applied to classify metabolic differences. Metabolomes were compared across groups (i.e., those receiving QD, BID, TID, and control) using a mixed-effects models. Spearman correlation was performed for injury biomarkers and the metabolome.

RESULTS

A total of 25 rats were treated with Polymyxin B, and n=2 received saline, contributing 77 urinary samples. Pre-dosing samples clustered well, characterized by higher amounts of citrate, 2-oxoglutarate, and hippurate. Day 1 samples showed higher taurine; day 3 samples had higher lactate, acetate, and creatine. Taurine was the only metabolite significantly increased in both BID and TID compared to QD group. Day 1 taurine correlated with increasing histopathology scores (rho=0.4167, P=0.038) and KIM-1 (rho =0.4052, P=0.036); whereas KIM-1 on day one and day 3 did not reach significance with histopathology (rho=0.3248, P=0.11 and rho=0.3739, P=0.066).

CONCLUSIONS

Polymyxin B causes increased amounts of urinary taurine on day 1 which then normalizes to baseline concentrations. Taurine may provide one of the earlier signals of acute kidney damage caused by polymyxin B.

A Translational Rat Model to Assess Glomerular Function Changes with Vancomycin

Vancomycin (VAN) causes acute kidney injury as defined by serum creatinine (SCr) increase. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the gold standard for defining kidney function, and SCr is often used as a GFR surrogate; however, SCr changes can lag behind acute functional decline. We sought to define the rate and extent of GFR change for VAN in a translational rat model. Male Sprague Dawley rats received VAN 150 mg/kg/day intravenously (n = 6) or saline (n = 5) once daily followed by an intravenous injection of fluorescein isothiocyanate-sinistrin (FITC-sinistrin) for 3 days. FITC-sinistrin fluorescence was monitored transdermally prior to VAN administration and daily during treatment. GFR was calculated from FITC-sinistrin clearance. A mixed-effects model compared urinary biomarkers and GFRs between treatments and across days of dosing. Urinary biomarkers for injury and GFR were compared between treatment groups and correlated with VAN kidney accumulation. Mean GFR for saline-treated animals was 1.07, 1.20, 1.15 and 1.24 mL/min/100g body weight (b.w.) pre-treatment and at Days 1-3, respectively. VAN-treated rats had lower GFR after treatment (0.457, 0.584 and 0.759 mL/min/100g b.w. on Days 1-3, respectively; P ≤ 0.05). KIM-1 and clusterin were elevated on Day 1 for VAN-treated animals. The relationship between VAN accumulation in the kidney with GFR and biomarkers followed a four-parameter Hill slope (R² = 0.6 and R² = 0.9, respectively). Rats receiving VAN had a significant decline in GFR immediately following the first dose, which correlated with increasing VAN concentrations in the kidney and urinary biomarkers.

Glomerular Function and Urinary Biomarker Changes between Vancomycin and Vancomycin plus Piperacillin-Tazobactam in a Translational Rat Model

Clinical studies have reported additive nephrotoxicity associated with the combination of vancomycin (VAN) and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). This study assessed differences in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary biomarkers between rats receiving VAN and those receiving VAN + TZP. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 26) were randomized to receive 96 h of intravenous VAN at 150 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal TZP at 1,400 mg/kg/day, or VAN + TZP. Kidney function was evaluated using fluorescein-isothiocyanate sinistrin and a transdermal sensor to estimate real-time glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Kidney injury was evaluated via urinary biomarkers, including kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), clusterin, and osteopontin. Compared to a saline control, only rats in the VAN group showed significant declines in GFR by day 4 (-0.39 mL/min/100 g body weight; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.68 to -0.10; P = 0.008). When the VAN + TZP and VAN alone treatment groups were compared, significantly higher urinary KIM-1 marginal linear predictions were observed in the VAN alone group on day 1 (18.4 ng; 95% CI, 1.4 to 35.3; P = 0.03), day 2 (27.4 ng; 95% CI, 10.4 to 44.3; P = 0.002), day 3 (18.8 ng; 95% CI, 1.9 to 35.8; P = 0.03), and day 4 (23.2 ng; 95% CI, 6.3 to 40.2; P = 0.007). KIM-1 was the urinary biomarker that most correlated with decreasing GFR on day 3 (Spearman's rho, -0.45; P = 0.022) and day 4 (Spearman's rho, -0.41; P = 0.036). Kidney function decline and increased KIM-1 were observed among rats that received VAN only but not those that received TZP or VAN + TZP. The addition of TZP to VAN does not worsen kidney function or injury in our translational rat model.

1090. Does calculation method matter for targeting vancomycin AUC?

Background

Recent vancomycin (VAN) guidelines recommend targeting an area under the curve (AUC) concentration of 400-600 for treatment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Multiple strategies for calculating AUC exist, including first order pharmacokinetic (foPK) equations and Bayesian models. Most clinical applications of foPK assume unchanged patient status and project ideal administration times to estimate exposure. Bayesian modeling provides the best estimate of true drug exposure and can incorporate changing patient covariates and exact doses. We compared two commonly used foPK methods to Bayesian estimates of VAN AUC.

Graphs depict calculated AUCs using the three different methods: 1) Population PK estimated (foPOPPK) 2) Two-level first dose estimated (foFDPK) 3) Bayesian estimated.

Methods

First order equations were performed using population PK estimates (foPOPPK) to estimate steady state (SS) AUC and initial doses. Two concentrations after first dose were used to estimate SS AUC (foFDPK). A 2-compartment Bayesian model allometrically scaled for weight and adjusted for creatinine clearance was used to determine 24-48 hour AUCs. Differences between AUCs were compared using a mixed-effects analysis, and correlation of foPK equations to Bayesian estimates was described using Spearman’s correlation. Patient results from each method were classified as below (< 400), within (400-600), or above ( >600) targets.

Results

65 adult patients were included. The median and IQR for calculated AUCs using foPOPPK, foFDPK, and Bayesian methods were 495.6 (IQR: 76.6), 498.2 (IQR: 107.4), and 472.1 (IQR: 177.9), respectively with p >0.65 for both foPK methods vs. the Bayesian method. AUCs predicted by foPK equations were poorly correlated with Bayesian AUCs (Spearman’s rho= -0.08, p=0.55), while AUCs from foFDPK better correlated with Bayesian AUCs (Spearman’s rho= 0.48, p=0.00). AUCs were within, above, and below target for 54%, 20%, and 26% for the Bayesian model; 95%, 5% and 0% for foPOPPK; and 74%, 12%, and 14% for foFDPK. foPK AUC estimates concurred with Bayesian estimates only 52% of the time.

Conclusion

AUCs calculated by the three methods did not differ on average, but dosing recommendations for foPK at the patient level varied substantially compared to the Bayesian method. This difference is because Bayesian estimation incorporates actual patient exposures while foPK equations rely on idealized dose timing to predict AUCs.

Disclosures

Kimberly C. Claeys, PharmD, GenMark (Speaker’s Bureau) Marc H. Scheetz, PharmD, MSc, Nevakar (Grant/Research Support)SuperTrans Medical (Consultant)US Patent #10688195B2 (Other Financial or Material Support, Patent holder)

Impact of early antimicrobial stewardship intervention in patients with positive blood cultures: results from a randomized comparative study: Impact of stewardship on BSI outcomes

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship intervention (ASI) appears necessary to realize the full benefits of rapid diagnostic technologies in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between early ASI paired with MALDI-TOF compared to MALDI-TOF with standard of care (SOC) reporting in patients with positive blood cultures.

METHODS

Adult patients with positive blood cultures and organism speciation via MALDI-TOF admitted between 2/2015 and 9/2015 were randomized to ASI or SOC in a 1:1 fashion. Patients admitted for at least 48 hours following positive culture were included in analyses. ASI was defined as a clinical assessment by a stewardship team member with non-binding treatment recommendations offered to the primary team. The primary outcome was time to definitive therapy. Secondary outcomes included post-culture length of stay (LOS), time to first change in antibiotics, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were included in analyses (76 in the ASI group and 73 in the SOC group). ASI and SOC arms did not differ according to age, sex, comorbidities, or severity of illness. Gram-positive organisms were common in both SOC and ASI arms (74.0 vs 61.8%, p=0.11). Time-to-definitive therapy was reduced, on average, by 30.3 hours in the ASI group (71.6 vs. 41.3 hours, p=0.01). Hospital LOS following the first positive blood culture was significantly shorter in the ASI group (8.7 vs. 11.2 days, p=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

ASI combined with MALDI-TOF reduced the time to definitive therapy, time to first change in antibiotics, and was associated with a shorter post-culture LOS.

Assessing the predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models for intravenous polymyxin B in critically ill patients

Polymyxin B (PMB) has reemerged as a last‐line therapy for infections caused by multidrug‐resistant gram‐negative pathogens, but dosing is challenging because of its narrow therapeutic window and pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. Population PK (POPPK) models based on suitably powered clinical studies with appropriate sampling strategies that take variability into consideration can inform PMB dosing to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity and resistance. Here we reviewed published PMB POPPK models and evaluated them using an external validation data set (EVD) of patients who are critically ill and enrolled in an ongoing clinical study to assess their utility. Seven published POPPK models were employed using the reported model equations, parameter values, covariate relationships, interpatient variability, parameter covariance, and unexplained residual variability in NONMEM (Version 7.4.3). The predictive ability of the models was assessed using prediction‐based and simulation‐based diagnostics. Patient characteristics and treatment information were comparable across studies and with the EVD (n = 40), but the sampling strategy was a main source of PK variability across studies. All models visually and statistically underpredicted EVD plasma concentrations, but the two‐compartment models more accurately described the external data set. As current POPPK models were inadequately predictive of the EVD, creation of a new POPPK model based on an appropriately powered clinical study with an informed PK sampling strategy would be expected to improve characterization of PMB PK and identify covariates to explain interpatient variability. Such a model would support model‐informed precision dosing frameworks, which are urgently needed to improve PMB treatment efficacy, limit resistance, and reduce toxicity in patients who are critically ill.

Precision dosing of vancomycin: in defence of AUC-guided therapy in children

In 2020, new vancomycin guidelines were released, recommending the transition from trough-based to AUC24 monitoring for adult and paediatric patients. Given the resources required to achieve this transition, there has been debate about the costs and benefits of AUC24-based monitoring. A recent narrative review of vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring in paediatrics claims to have uncovered the methodological weaknesses of the data that informed the guidelines and advises against premature adoption of AUC24-guided monitoring. In this article, we present supporting arguments for AUC24-guided monitoring in children, which include that: (i) troughs alone are inadequate surrogates for AUC24; (ii) vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity has significant consequences that warrant optimization of dosing; (iii) a substantial portion of children receiving vancomycin are at high risk for poor outcomes and deserve targeted monitoring; and (iv) limited efficacy data in support of AUC24 is not a justification to revert to a less supported monitoring approach.

The case for precision dosing: medical conservatism does not justify inaction

The need for precision dosing has been challenged on the basis of insufficient evidence. Herein, we argue that adequate evidence exists to conduct therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and precisely target antibiotic exposures. While achievement of any antibiotic concentration does not guarantee efficacy sans toxicity for any single patient, stochastic control optimizes the probability of achieving favourable responses across patients. We argue that variability in targets (such as the organism's MIC) can be considered with models. That is, complexity alone does not relegate the decision-making framework to 'clinician intuition'. We acknowledge the exposure-response relationships are modified by patient-specific factors (other drugs, baseline organ functional status etc.) and describe how precision dosing can inform clinical decision making rather than protocolize it. Finally, we call for randomized, controlled trials; however, we suggest that these trials are not necessary to make TDM standard of care for multiple classes of antibiotics.

Lack of synergistic nephrotoxicity between vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam in a rat model and a confirmatory cellular model

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam are reported in clinical studies to increase acute kidney injury (AKI). However, no clinical study has demonstrated synergistic toxicity, only that serum creatinine increases.

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the potential for synergistic toxicity between vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam treatments by quantifying kidney injury in a translational rat model of AKI and using cell studies.

METHODS

(i) Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 32) received saline, vancomycin 150 mg/kg/day intravenously, piperacillin/tazobactam 1400 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally or vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam for 3 days. Urinary biomarkers and histopathology were analysed. (ii) Cellular injury was assessed in NRK-52E cells using alamarBlue®.

RESULTS

Urinary output increased from Day -1 to Day 1 with vancomycin but only after Day 2 for vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam-treated rats. Plasma creatinine was elevated from baseline with vancomycin by Day 2 and only by Day 4 for vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam. Urinary KIM-1 and clusterin were increased with vancomycin from Day 1 versus controls (P < 0.001) and only on Day 3 with vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam (P < 0.001, KIM-1; P < 0.05, clusterin). The histopathology injury score was elevated only in the vancomycin group when compared with piperacillin/tazobactam as a control (P = 0.04) and generally not so with vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam. In NRK-52E cells, vancomycin induced cell death with high doses (IC50 48.76 mg/mL) but piperacillin/tazobactam did not, and vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam was similar to vancomycin.

CONCLUSIONS

All groups treated with vancomycin demonstrated AKI; however, vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam was not worse than vancomycin. Histopathology suggested that piperacillin/tazobactam did not worsen vancomycin-induced AKI and may even be protective.

β-Lactam pharmacodynamics in Gram-negative bloodstream infections in the critically ill

OBJECTIVES

To determine the β-lactam exposure associated with positive clinical outcomes for Gram-negative blood stream infection (BSI) in critically ill patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pooled data of critically ill patients with mono-microbial Gram-negative BSI treated with β-lactams were collected from two databases. Free minimum concentrations (fCmin) of aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin (co-administered with tazobactam) and meropenem were interpreted in relation to the measured MIC for targeted bacteria (fCmin/MIC). A positive clinical outcome was defined as completion of the treatment course or de-escalation, without other change of antibiotic therapy, and with no additional antibiotics commenced within 48 h of cessation. Drug exposure breakpoints associated with positive clinical outcome were determined by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 98 patients were included. Meropenem (46.9%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (36.7%) were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. The most common pathogens were Escherichia coli (28.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.3%). In all patients, 87.8% and 71.4% achieved fCmin/MIC ≥1 and fCmin/MIC >5, respectively. Seventy-eight patients (79.6%) achieved positive clinical outcome. Two drug exposure breakpoints were identified: fCmin/MIC >1.3 for all β-lactams (predicted difference in positive outcome 84.5% versus 15.5%, P < 0.05) and fCmin/MIC >4.95 for meropenem, aztreonam or ceftriaxone (predicted difference in positive outcome 97.7% versus 2.3%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A β-lactam fCmin/MIC >1.3 was a significant predictor of a positive clinical outcome in critically ill patients with Gram-negative BSI and could be considered an antibiotic dosing target.

Stability and Validation of a High-Throughput LC-MS/MS Method for the Quantification of Cefepime, Meropenem, and Piperacillin and Tazobactam in Serum

BACKGROUND

The class of antibiotics known as β-lactams are a commonly used due to their effectiveness and safety. Therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed but requires an accurate assay along with well-characterized preanalytic stability, as β-lactams are known to be relatively unstable.

METHODS

A high-throughput LC-MS/MS assay validation and stability study was performed for cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin and tazobactam in serum. Patient samples, standards, and QCs were crashed with acetonitrile containing internal standard. Following centrifugation, an aliquot of the supernatant was diluted with clinical laboratory reagent water and analyzed by LC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

The assay showed linearity between 0.5 and 60 µg/mL for each analyte. The intra- and interassay reproducibility at 3 different concentrations (approximately 2, 25, and 40 µg/mL) was <5% for each analyte. Accuracy studies for each analyte were compared using linear regression and demonstrated: slope = 1.0 ± 0.1; r2 ≥ 0.980; and y intercept 95% CI that included zero. Minimal ion suppression or enhancement was observed, and no significant carryover was observed up to 500 µg/mL of each analyte. Stability studies demonstrated significant loss in serum for each analyte at ambient and refrigerated temperatures (2-8 °C) and at -20 °C over days or weeks. In contrast, when stored at -80 °C, no significant loss was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The LC-MS/MS assay showed acceptable performance characteristics for quantitation of β-lactams. With well-characterized stability, this assay can be used with residual specimens for pharmacokinetic modeling, which may lead to individualized dosing and improved patient care.

Microsampling Assays for Pharmacokinetic Analysis and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antimicrobial Drugs in Children: A Critical Review

BACKGROUND

With the increasing prevalence of multidrug resistant organisms, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has become a common tool for assuring the safety and efficacy of antimicrobial drugs at higher doses. Microsampling techniques, including dried blood spotting (DBS) and volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), are attractive tools for TDM and pediatric clinical research. For microsampling techniques to be a useful tool for TDM, it is necessary to establish the blood-plasma correlation and the therapeutic window of antimicrobial drugs in the blood.

METHODS

DBS involves the collection of small volumes of blood (30-50 µL per spot) on a filter paper, whereas VAMS allows the accurate and precise collection of a fixed volume of blood (10-30 µL) with microsampling devices. One of the major advantages of VAMS is that it reduces or eliminates the volumetric blood hematocrit (HCT) bias associated with DBS. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for the accurate quantification of antimicrobial drugs from small volumes of blood specimens.

RESULTS

This review summarizes the recent liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry assays that have used DBS and VAMS approaches for quantifying antimicrobial drugs. Sample collection, extraction, validation outcomes, including the interassay and intra-assay accuracy and precision, recovery, stability, and matrix effect, as well as the clinical application of these assays and their potential as tools of TDM are discussed herein.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsampling techniques, such as VAMS, provide an alternative approach to traditional plasma sample collection for TDM.

Provider perspectives on beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring programs in the critically ill: a protocol for a multicenter mixed-methods study

Background

Beta-lactams (i.e., penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams) are the most widely used class of antibiotics in critically ill patients. There is substantial interpatient variability in beta-lactam pharmacokinetics which renders their effectiveness and safety largely unpredictable. One strategy to ensure achievement of therapeutic concentrations is drug level testing (“therapeutic drug monitoring”; TDM). While studies have suggested promise with beta-lactam TDM, it is not yet widely available or implemented. This protocol presents a mixed-methods study designed to examine healthcare practitioners’ perspectives on the use and implementation of beta-lactam TDM in the critically ill.

Methods

An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design will be used [QUANT → qual]. First, quantitative data will be collected through a web-based questionnaire directed at clinicians at three academic medical centers at different phases of beta-lactam TDM implementation (not yet implemented, partially implemented, fully implemented). The sampling frame will include providers from a variety of disciplines that interact with drug level testing and interpretation in the critical care environment including pharmacists, intensivists, infectious diseases experts, medical/surgical trainees, and advanced practice providers. Second, approximately 30 individuals will be purposively sampled from survey respondents to conduct in-depth qualitative interviews to explain and expand upon the results from the quantitative strand. Normalization Process Theory and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science will be used to guide data analysis.

Discussion

These data will be used to answer two specific questions: “What are ICU practitioners’ perspectives on implementing beta-lactam TDM?” and “What factors contribute to the success of beta-lactam TDM program implementation?” Results of this study will be used to design future implementation strategies for beta-lactam TDM programs in the critically ill.

Trial registration

NCT04755777.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00134-9.

A Critical Appraisal of the Effects of Anesthetics on Immune-system Modulation in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19

Purpose

The aim of the present article was to briefly summarize current knowledge about the immunomodulatory effects of general anesthetics and the possible clinical effects of this immunomodulation in patients with COVID-19.

Methods

The PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were comprehensively searched for relevant studies.

Findings

The novel coronavirus causes a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, with a large absolute number of patients experiencing severe pneumonia and rapid progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. In these patients, the equilibrium of the inflammatory response is a major determinant of survival. The impact of anesthetics on immune-system modulation may vary and includes both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects.

Implications

Inhibition of the development of severe inflammation and/or the enhancement of inflammation resolution by anesthetics may limit organ damage and improve outcomes in patients with COVID-19.