Lung transplant waitlist outcomes among ABO blood groups vary based on disease severity

BACKGROUND

Blood group O candidates have lower lung transplantation rates despite having the most common blood group. We postulated that waitlist outcomes among these candidates and those with other blood types vary with disease severity and lung allocation score (LAS).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 32,772 waitlist candidates using the United Network of Organ Sharing registry from May 2005 to 2020. After identifying an interaction between blood group and LAS, we evaluated the association between blood group and waitlist outcomes within LAS quartiles using unadjusted and adjusted competing risk models.

RESULTS

In the lowest LAS quartile, blood group O had a 20% reduced transplantation rate (SHR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.75-0.85) and higher waitlist death/removal (1.33, 95%CI: 1.15-1.55) compared with group A. Blood group AB had a 52% higher transplantation rate (SHR: 1.52, 95%CI: 1.34-1.73) in the lowest LAS quartile compared with group A. In the highest LAS quartile, there was no difference in transplantation rates between groups O and A. In contrast, group B had a 19% reduced transplantation rate (SHR, 0.81 95%CI: 0.73-0.89) and AB had a 28% reduced transplantation rate (SHR: 0.72, 95%CI: 0.61-0.86) in the highest LAS quartile. Additionally, groups B and AB had increased risk of waitlist death/removal in the highest LAS quartile compared with A (SHR: 1.27, 95%CI: 1.08-1.48; SHR: 1.31, 95%CI: 1.00-1.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Waitlist outcomes among ABO blood groups vary depending on illness severity, which is represented by LAS. Blood group O has lower transplantation rates at low LAS while groups B and AB have lower transplantation rates at high LAS.

Correlates of psychological distress among undergraduate women engaged in remote learning through a New York City college during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

The study's objective is to explore psychological distress (PD) among remote learners during COVID-19.

PARTICIPANTS

Female undergraduates matriculated at an NYC college in Winter 2020.

METHODS

Using the Kessler-6 scale, we defined PD as no/low (LPD), mild/moderate (MPD), and severe (SPD) and assessed if residing in/near NYC modified associations.

RESULTS

PD was common (MPD: 34.1%, SPD: 38.9%). Students identifying as Other/Multiracial had lower MPD odds (aOR = 0.39 [0.17-0.88]). SPD was associated with identifying as White (aOR = 2.02 [1.02-3.99]), unbalanced meals (aOR = 2.59 [1.06-6.30]), violence experience (aOR = 1.77 [1.06-2.94]), no social support (aOR = 3.24 [1.37-7.64]), and loneliness (aOR = 2.52 [1.29-4.95]). Among students in/near NYC, moderate/high drug use (aOR = 2.76 [1.15-6.61]), no social support (aOR = 3.62 [1.10-1.19]), and loneliness (aOR = 2.92 [1.11-7.63]) were SPD correlates.

CONCLUSIONS

PD was high and associated with food insecurity, violence experience, no social support, and loneliness. Living in/near NYC modified drug use, loneliness, and social support associations. Mental health initiatives should address modifiable risk factors to ameliorate pandemic-associated PD.

Antimicrobial Use in US Hospitals: Comparison of Results From Emerging Infections Program Prevalence Surveys, 2015 and 2011

BACKGROUND

In the 2011 US hospital prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use 50% of patients received antimicrobial medications on the survey date or day before. More hospitals have since established antimicrobial stewardship programs. We repeated the survey in 2015 to determine antimicrobial use prevalence and describe changes since 2011.

METHODS

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program sites in 10 states each recruited ≤25 general and women's and children's hospitals. Hospitals selected a survey date from May-September 2015. Medical records for a random patient sample on the survey date were reviewed to collect data on antimicrobial medications administered on the survey date or day before. Percentages of patients on antimicrobial medications were compared; multivariable log-binomial regression modeling was used to evaluate factors associated with antimicrobial use.

RESULTS

Of 12 299 patients in 199 hospitals, 6084 (49.5%; 95% CI, 48.6-50.4%) received antimicrobials. Among 148 hospitals in both surveys, overall antimicrobial use prevalence was similar in 2011 and 2015, although the percentage of neonatal critical care patients on antimicrobials was lower in 2015 (22.8% vs 32.0% [2011]; P = .006). Fluoroquinolone use was lower in 2015 (10.1% of patients vs 11.9% [2011]; P < .001). Third- or fourth-generation cephalosporin use was higher (12.2% vs 10.7% [2011]; P = .002), as was carbapenem use (3.7% vs 2.7% [2011]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall hospital antimicrobial use prevalence was not different in 2011 and 2015; however, differences observed in selected patient or antimicrobial groups may provide evidence of stewardship impact.

Assessment of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Use in US Hospitals

IMPORTANCE

Hospital antimicrobial consumption data are widely available; however, large-scale assessments of the quality of antimicrobial use in US hospitals are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the appropriateness of antimicrobial use for hospitalized patients treated for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) or urinary tract infection (UTI) present at admission or for patients who had received fluoroquinolone or intravenous vancomycin treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study included data from a prevalence survey of hospitalized patients in 10 Emerging Infections Program sites. Random samples of inpatients on hospital survey dates from May 1 to September 30, 2015, were identified. Medical record data were collected for eligible patients with 1 or more of 4 treatment events (CAP, UTI, fluoroquinolone treatment, or vancomycin treatment), which were selected on the basis of common infection types reported and antimicrobials given to patients in the prevalence survey. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2017, to May 31, 2020.

EXPOSURE

Antimicrobial treatment for CAP or UTI or with fluoroquinolones or vancomycin.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The percentage of antimicrobial use that was supported by medical record data (including infection signs and symptoms, microbiology test results, and antimicrobial treatment duration) or for which some aspect of use was unsupported. Unsupported antimicrobial use was defined as (1) use of antimicrobials to which the pathogen was not susceptible, use in the absence of documented infection signs or symptoms, or use without supporting microbiologic data; (2) use of antimicrobials that deviated from recommended guidelines; or (3) use that exceeded the recommended duration.

RESULTS

Of 12 299 patients, 1566 patients (12.7%) in 192 hospitals were included; the median age was 67 years (interquartile range, 53-79 years), and 864 (55.2%) were female. A total of 219 patients (14.0%) were included in the CAP analysis, 452 (28.9%) in the UTI analysis, 550 (35.1%) in the fluoroquinolone analysis, and 403 (25.7%) in the vancomycin analysis; 58 patients (3.7%) were included in both fluoroquinolone and vancomycin analyses. Overall, treatment was unsupported for 876 of 1566 patients (55.9%; 95% CI, 53.5%-58.4%): 110 of 403 (27.3%) who received vancomycin, 256 of 550 (46.6%) who received fluoroquinolones, 347 of 452 (76.8%) with a diagnosis of UTI, and 174 of 219 (79.5%) with a diagnosis of CAP. Among patients with unsupported treatment, common reasons included excessive duration (103 of 174 patients with CAP [59.2%]) and lack of documented infection signs or symptoms (174 of 347 patients with UTI [50.1%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings suggest that standardized assessments of hospital antimicrobial prescribing quality can be used to estimate the appropriateness of antimicrobial use in large groups of hospitals. These assessments, performed over time, may inform evaluations of the effects of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives nationally.

Antimicrobial resistance and recurrent bacterial urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients following kidney transplantation: A single-center experience

PURPOSE

The burden of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and risk factors for developing infections with multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) post-kidney transplantation (KT) are poorly understood.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort study (January 2015-December 2017) evaluating first and recurrent episodes of bacteriuria and subsequent analysis of episodes caused by MDROs up to 6 months post-KT. Donor and recipient variables were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 743 adults underwent single KT during the study period, and 106 patients were hospitalized with bacteriuria. 45% were asymptomatic in their first episode. 73.6% had a single episode, and 26.4% had 2 or more episodes. A total of 28 patients had recurrent episodes; 64.3% had an MDRO on the first episode and 78.6% on the second episode. Escherichia coli was the most common organism isolated, 88.5% were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), 9.3% were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers, and 38.1% were MDROs. Body mass index ≥30 was significantly associated with the presence of MDROs in both univariate and multivariate analyses (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.88; OR 3.26, CI 1.29-8.25). A total of 12 donors had bacteremia or bacteriuria and 6 (50%) with E coli. A total of 10 KT recipients received antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent donor-derived infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a significant proportion of patients develop recurrent bacteriuria post-transplantation; of those, more than half caused by MDROs. There is a possible association between obesity and MDROs in KT recipients that merits further investigation. With the global crisis in antimicrobial resistance, innovative strategies are needed to prevent and treat UTIs in KT patients.

2327. Microbiology and Prognostic Significance of Blood Stream Infections in Necrotizing Enterocolitis

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Disclosures

Changes in Prevalence of Health Care-Associated Infections in U.S. Hospitals

BACKGROUND

A point-prevalence survey that was conducted in the United States in 2011 showed that 4% of hospitalized patients had a health care-associated infection. We repeated the survey in 2015 to assess changes in the prevalence of health care-associated infections during a period of national attention to the prevention of such infections.

METHODS

At Emerging Infections Program sites in 10 states, we recruited up to 25 hospitals in each site area, prioritizing hospitals that had participated in the 2011 survey. Each hospital selected 1 day on which a random sample of patients was identified for assessment. Trained staff reviewed medical records using the 2011 definitions of health care-associated infections. We compared the percentages of patients with health care-associated infections and performed multivariable log-binomial regression modeling to evaluate the association of survey year with the risk of health care-associated infections.

RESULTS

In 2015, a total of 12,299 patients in 199 hospitals were surveyed, as compared with 11,282 patients in 183 hospitals in 2011. Fewer patients had health care-associated infections in 2015 (394 patients [3.2%; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.9 to 3.5]) than in 2011 (452 [4.0%; 95% CI, 3.7 to 4.4]) (P<0.001), largely owing to reductions in the prevalence of surgical-site and urinary tract infections. Pneumonia, gastrointestinal infections (most of which were due to Clostridium difficile [now Clostridioides difficile]), and surgical-site infections were the most common health care-associated infections. Patients' risk of having a health care-associated infection was 16% lower in 2015 than in 2011 (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95; P=0.005), after adjustment for age, presence of devices, days from admission to survey, and status of being in a large hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of health care-associated infections was lower in 2015 than in 2011. To continue to make progress in the prevention of such infections, prevention strategies against C. difficile infection and pneumonia should be augmented. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).

Zika Virus Testing and Outcomes during Pregnancy, Florida, USA, 2016

Zika virus infection during pregnancy can lead to congenital Zika syndrome. Implementation of screening programs and interpretation of test results can be particularly challenging during ongoing local mosquitoborne transmission. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 2,327 pregnant women screened for Zika virus in Miami–Dade County, Florida, USA, during 2016. Of these, 86 had laboratory evidence of Zika virus infection; we describe 2 infants with probable congenital Zika syndrome. Delays in receipt of laboratory test results (median 42 days) occurred during the first month of local transmission. Odds of screening positive for Zika virus were higher for women without health insurance or who did not speak English. Our findings indicate the increase in screening for Zika virus can overwhelm hospital and public health systems, resulting in delayed receipt of results of screening and confirmatory tests and the potential to miss cases or delay diagnoses.

Reduction in the Prevalence of Healthcare-Associated Infections in U.S. Acute Care Hospitals, 2015 vs 2011

Background

A 2011 prevalence survey conducted by CDC and the Emerging Infections Program (EIP) showed that 1 in 25 hospital patients had ≥1 healthcare-associated infection (HAI). We repeated the survey in 2015 to assess changes in HAI prevalence.​

Methods

In EIP sites (CA, CO, CT, GA, MD, MN, NM, NY, OR, TN) hospitals that participated in the 2011 survey were recruited for the 2015 survey. Hospitals selected 1 day from May–September 2015 on which a random patient sample was identified from the morning census. Trained EIP staff reviewed patient medical records using comparable methods and the same National Healthcare Safety Network HAI definitions used in 2011. Proportions of patients with HAIs were compared using chi-square tests; patient characteristics were compared using chi-square or median tests (OpenEpi 3.01, SAS 9.3).

Results

Data were available from 143 hospitals that participated in both surveys; data from 8954 patients in the 2011 survey were compared with preliminary data from 8833 patients in the 2015 survey. Patient characteristics such as median age, days from admission to survey, and critical care location were similar. Urinary catheter prevalence was lower in 2015 (1,589/8,833, 18.0%) compared with 2011 (2,052/8,954, 22.9%, P < 0.0001), as was central line prevalence (2015: 1,539/8,833, 17.4%, vs. 2011: 1,687/8,954, 18.8%, P = 0.02). The proportion of patients with HAIs was lower in 2015 (284/8,833, 3.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9–3.6%) than in 2011 (362/8,954, 4.0%, 95% CI 3.7–4.5%, P = 0.003). Of 309 HAIs in 2015, pneumonia (PNEU) and Clostridium difficileinfections (CDI) were most common (Figure); proportions of patients with PNEU and/or CDI were similar in 2015 (130/8833, 1.5%) and 2011 (133/8954, 1.5%, P = 0.94). A lower proportion of patients had surgical site (SSI) and/or urinary tract infections (UTI) in 2015 (77/8833, 0.9%) vs. 2011 (136/8954, 1.5%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

HAI prevalence was significantly lower in 2015 compared with 2011. This is partially explained by fewer SSI and UTI, suggesting national efforts to prevent SSI, reduce catheter use and improve UTI diagnosis are succeeding. By contrast, there was no change in the prevalence of the most common HAIs in 2015, PNEU and CDI, indicating a need for increased prevention efforts in hospitals.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Outcomes of women with laboratory evidence of Zika infection in pregnancy

Background

Zika virus (ZIKV) infection in pregnancy is a global health concern. With onset of local transmission, obstetricians in Miami-Dade County, FL, United States, are now in the unique position of providing care to both pregnant women with locally-transmitted and travel-associated ZIKV infections. This study provides data regarding the testing and pregnancy outcomes of women with laboratory evidence of ZIKV infection in pregnancy.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted using laboratory records of ZIKV testing (PCR and IgM) completed from January through December 2016 at multiple tertiary care centers located in Miami-Dade County. Testing was based on CDC guidelines at time of testing, leading to heterogeneity in tests performed. Data was extracted from charts of women with positive ZIKV PCR in serum and/or urine or positive ZIKV IgM with confirmatory, pending, or insufficient PRNT results. Routine obstetrics parameters and the presence of fetal or neonatal abnormalities were recorded.

Results

Of the 2327 pregnant women screened for ZIKV, 88 (3.8%) screened positive with PCR and/or IgM in serum or urine. Of those women with positive ZIKV testing, 53 (60%) had no documented ZIKV symptoms and 40 (45%) had no known travel history outside of Miami-Dade County during their pregnancy. Sixty-six women had antenatal ultrasounds, 14 (21%) of which ever had a head circumference or biparetial diameter measurement less than the third percentile, but none showed evidence of intracranial calcifications. Fifty-four women with positive testing have delivered: 46 at term and 8 preterm. Fifty-four infants have been born to women with positive ZIKV testing; 2 infants (1.98%) had documented congenital abnormalities. One infant was born with clinically-defined microcephaly (1.9%) and intracranial calcifications and the other had only intracranial calcifications. Ninety-four positive IgM tests were sent to the CDC for confirmatory plaque reduction neutralization testing (PRNT). 49 PRNT tests returned positive (ZIKV titer ≥10), while 28 returned negative (ZIKV titer < 10), representing a false-positive rate of 30.4%.

Conclusion

As this epidemic persists, data from this unique cohort of pregnant women with both local and travel-associated ZIKV exposure contributes to the growing knowledge base regarding implications of ZIKV in pregnancy.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Challenges of Zika Virus Testing in Pregnancy in the Setting of Local Mosquito-Borne Transmission

Background

Zika Virus (ZIKV) infection in pregnancy is a major clinical concern. The CDC recommended that pregnant women living in an area with a ZIKV travel notice undergo ZIKV screening in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. This study investigated the consequences of this screening on clinical management.

Methods

An IRB approved retrospective chart review was conducted using laboratory records of ZIKV testing on pregnant patients from January through December 2016 at multiple tertiary care centers in Miami, FL. Serum and/or urine samples were collected, based on CDC guidelines at the time, and evaluated for PCR and/or IgM evidence of ZIKV infection. Positive ZIKV PCR results indicated acute phase of infection. Previous infection was suggested by positive IgM antibody, but required confirmatory ZIKV plaque reduction neutralization testing (PRNT) testing due to IgM antibody cross reactivity with other flaviviruses.

Results

During 2016, 2,327 pregnant women were screened for ZIKV infection. At the peak in August 2016, 607 (26%) patients were tested and only 31 (5.1%) tests resulted within the month. Of those screened, 113 (4.85%) women tested positive for ZIKV PCR and/or IgM. In October 2016, 40 (35.4%) positive screening tests were received, the most positives resulting in a month. Confirmatory ZIKV PRNT testing was performed on those who were ZIKV IgM positive and PCR negative, with a total of 92 results received. Eighty-eight women were considered positive, 49 confirmed with positive titers (≥10). There were 28 women with negative titers (< 10), thus a false positive ZIKV screening rate of 30.4%, and 15 results were pending. Of women with false positive IgM screening, a median of 1 (range 0–4) additional ultrasound was done between receipt of the initial positive ZIKV screening and the subsequent receipt of the negative PRNT testing. Delays of results led to 21 (24%) positive tests reported after delivery and hospital discharge. Additionally, 18 (20.5%) women who tested PRNT positive had their originating sample drawn during admission for delivery with results available only after discharge.

Conclusion

Both delays in ZIKV testing results and false positive screening with ZIKV IgM led to challenges in counseling and clinical care of pregnant women living in an area of ongoing ZIKV transmission.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.