1
|
Osorio RC, Haddad AF, Hart DM, Goldrich N, Badani A, Kabir AS, Juncker R, Oh JY, Carrete L, Peeran Z, Chalif EJ, Zheng AC, Braunstein S, Theodosopoulos PV, El-Sayed IH, Gurrola J, Kunwar S, Blevins LS, Aghi MK. Socioeconomic differences between medically and surgically treated prolactinomas: a retrospective review of 598 patients. J Neurosurg 2024; 140:712-723. [PMID: 37877974 DOI: 10.3171/2023.6.jns23570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Socioeconomic status (SES) is known to affect presentations and outcomes in pituitary neuroendocrine tumor resections, but there is a paucity of literature examining its impact specifically on patients with prolactinomas, who may be treated medically or surgically. The authors sought to determine whether SES was associated with differences in treatment choice or outcomes for prolactinoma patients. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed patient records at a high-volume academic pituitary center for prolactinoma diagnoses. Patients were split into medically and surgically treated cohorts. Race, ethnicity, insurance status, primary care physician (PCP) status, and zip code-based income data were collected and examined as socioeconomic covariates. Outcomes of interest included pretreatment likelihood of surgical cure, medical versus surgical treatment allocation, and posttreatment remission rates. RESULTS The authors analyzed 568 prolactinoma patients (351 medically treated and 217 surgically treated). Patients receiving surgery were more likely to have Medicaid or private insurance (p < 0.001) and have lower incomes (p < 0.001) than medically treated patients. Lower-income surgical patients were more likely to require surgical intervention for an indication such as tumor decompression than higher-income patients (p = 0.023). Surgical patients with a PCP had a higher estimated likelihood of surgical cure (p = 0.008), while no SES-based differences in surgical remission likelihood existed in the medical cohort. After surgery, surgical patients who achieved remission had significantly higher income than those who did not (p < 0.001). Other SES factors were not associated with surgical remission, and among medically treated patients, remission rates were not affected by any SES factor. Income was inversely related to prolactinoma size in both cohorts (surgical, p < 0.001; medical, p = 0.005) but was associated more prominently in surgical patients (surgical, -0.65 mm per $10,000; medical, -0.37 mm per $10,000). CONCLUSIONS While surgical prolactinoma patients were prone to income and PCP-related disparities, no SES disparities were found among medically treated patients. Income had a more pronounced association with tumor size in the surgical cohort and likely contributed to the increased need for surgical intervention seen in low-income surgical patients. Addressing socioeconomic healthcare disparities is needed among surgical prolactinoma patients to increase rates of early presentation and improve the outcomes of low-SES populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jun Y Oh
- Departments of1Neurological Surgery
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- 4Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - José Gurrola
- 4Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramesh P, Ruan D, Liu SJ, Seo Y, Braunstein S, Sheng K. Hypoxia-informed RBE-weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:2320-2333. [PMID: 38345134 PMCID: PMC10940223 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) models in treatment planning have been proposed to optimize the therapeutic ratio of proton therapy. It has been reported that proton RBE decreases with increasing tumor oxygen level, offering an opportunity to address hypoxia-related radioresistance with RBE-weighted optimization. PURPOSE Here, we obtain a voxel-level estimation of partial oxygen pressure to weigh RBE values in a single biologically informed beam orientation optimization (BOO) algorithm. METHODS Three glioblastoma patients with [18 F]-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO)-PET/CT images were selected from the institutional database. Oxygen values were derived from tracer uptake using a nonlinear least squares curve fitting. McNamara RBE, calculated from proton dose, was then weighed using oxygen enhancement ratios (OER) for each voxel and incorporated into the dose fidelity term of the BOO algorithm. The nonlinear optimization problem was solved using a split-Bregman approach, with FISTA as the solver. The proposed hypoxia informed RBE-weighted method (HypRBE) was compared to dose fidelity terms using the constant RBE of 1.1 (cRBE) and the normoxic McNamara RBE model (RegRBE). Tumor homogeneity index (HI), maximum biological dose (Dmax), and D95%, as well as OAR therapeutic index (TI = gEUDCTV /gEUDOAR ) were evaluated along with worst-case statistics after normalization to normal tissue isotoxicity. RESULTS Compared to [cRBE, RegRBE], HypRBE increased tumor HI, Dmax, and D95% across all plans by on average [31.3%, 31.8%], [48.6%, 27.1%], and [50.4%, 23.8%], respectively. In the worst-case scenario, the parameters increase on average by [12.5%, 14.7%], [7.3%,-8.9%], and [22.3%, 2.1%]. Despite increased OAR Dmean and Dmax by [8.0%, 3.0%] and [13.1%, -0.1%], HypRBE increased average TI by [22.0%, 21.1%]. Worst-case OAR Dmean, Dmax, and TI worsened by [17.9%, 4.3%], [24.5%, -1.2%], and [9.6%, 10.5%], but in the best cases, HypRBE escalates tumor coverage significantly without compromising OAR dose, increasing the therapeutic ratio. CONCLUSIONS We have developed an optimization algorithm whose dose fidelity term accounts for hypoxia-informed RBE values. We have shown that HypRBE selects bE:\Alok\aaeams better suited to deliver high physical dose to low RBE, hypoxic tumor regions while sparing the radiosensitive normal tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavitra Ramesh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - S. John Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Youngho Seo
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rudie JD, Saluja R, Weiss DA, Nedelec P, Calabrese E, Colby JB, Laguna B, Mongan J, Braunstein S, Hess CP, Rauschecker AM, Sugrue LP, Villanueva-Meyer JE. The University of California San Francisco Brain Metastases Stereotactic Radiosurgery (UCSF-BMSR) MRI Dataset. Radiol Artif Intell 2024; 6:e230126. [PMID: 38381038 PMCID: PMC10982817 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey D. Rudie
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | | | - David A. Weiss
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | - Pierre Nedelec
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | - Evan Calabrese
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | - John B. Colby
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | - Benjamin Laguna
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | - John Mongan
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | - Steve Braunstein
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | - Christopher P. Hess
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | - Andreas M. Rauschecker
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | - Leo P. Sugrue
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| | - Javier E. Villanueva-Meyer
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (J.D.R., D.A.W., P.N., E.C., J.B.C., B.L., J.M., C.P.H., A.M.R., L.P.S., J.E.V.M.) and Department of Radiation Oncology (S.B.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S-261, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego Calif (J.D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (R.S.); and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salans M, Ni L, Morin O, Ziemer B, Capaldi DPI, Raleigh DR, Vasudevan HN, Chew J, Nakamura J, Sneed PK, Boreta L, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Theodosopoulos P, Braunstein S. Adverse radiation effect versus tumor progression following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Implications of radiologic uncertainty. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:535-546. [PMID: 38316705 PMCID: PMC10876820 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04578-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse radiation effect (ARE) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is challenging to distinguish from tumor progression. This study characterizes the clinical implications of radiologic uncertainty (RU). METHODS Cases reviewed retrospectively at a single-institutional, multi-disciplinary SRS Tumor Board between 2015-2022 for RU following SRS were identified. Treatment history, diagnostic or therapeutic interventions performed upon RU resolution, and development of neurologic deficits surrounding intervention were obtained from the medical record. Differences in lesion volume and maximum diameter at RU onset versus resolution were compared with paired t-tests. Median time from RU onset to resolution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate associations between clinical characteristics and time to RU resolution were assessed with Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS Among 128 lesions with RU, 23.5% had undergone ≥ 2 courses of radiation. Median maximum diameter (20 vs. 16 mm, p < 0.001) and volume (2.7 vs. 1.5 cc, p < 0.001) were larger upon RU resolution versus onset. RU resolution took > 6 and > 12 months in 25% and 7% of cases, respectively. Higher total EQD2 prior to RU onset (HR = 0.45, p = 0.03) and use of MR perfusion (HR = 0.56, p = 0.001) correlated with shorter time to resolution; larger volume (HR = 1.05, p = 0.006) portended longer time to resolution. Most lesions (57%) were diagnosed as ARE. Most patients (58%) underwent an intervention upon RU resolution; of these, 38% developed a neurologic deficit surrounding intervention. CONCLUSIONS RU resolution took > 6 months in > 25% of cases. RU may lead to suboptimal outcomes and symptom burden. Improved characterization of post-SRS RU is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Salans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Lisa Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Olivier Morin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Benjamin Ziemer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Dante P I Capaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - David R Raleigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (DRR), San Francisco, USA
| | - Harish N Vasudevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
| | - Jessica Chew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Jean Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Penny K Sneed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Lauren Boreta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (JEVM), San Francisco, USA
| | - Philip Theodosopoulos
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rusthoven CG, Staley AW, Gao D, Yomo S, Bernhardt D, Wandrey N, El Shafie R, Kraemer A, Padilla O, Chiang V, Faramand AM, Palmer JD, Zacharia BE, Wegner RE, Hattangadi-Gluth JA, Levy A, Bernstein K, Mathieu D, Cagney DN, Chan MD, Grills IS, Braunstein S, Lee CC, Sheehan JP, Kluwe C, Patel S, Halasz LM, Andratschke N, Deibert CP, Verma V, Trifiletti DM, Cifarelli CP, Debus J, Combs SE, Sato Y, Higuchi Y, Aoyagi K, Brown PD, Alami V, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Camidge DR, Kavanagh BD, Robin TP, Serizawa T, Yamamoto M. Comparison of first-line radiosurgery for small-cell and non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (CROSS-FIRE). J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:926-936. [PMID: 37142267 PMCID: PMC10407696 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Historical reservations regarding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) brain metastases include concerns for short-interval and diffuse central nervous system (CNS) progression, poor prognoses, and increased neurological mortality specific to SCLC histology. We compared SRS outcomes for SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) where SRS is well established. METHODS Multicenter first-line SRS outcomes for SCLC and NSCLC from 2000 to 2022 were retrospectively collected (n = 892 SCLC, n = 4785 NSCLC). Data from the prospective Japanese Leksell Gamma Knife Society (JLGK0901) clinical trial of first-line SRS were analyzed as a comparison cohort (n = 98 SCLC, n = 814 NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) and CNS progression were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard and Fine-Gray models, respectively, with multivariable adjustment for cofactors including age, sex, performance status, year, extracranial disease status, and brain metastasis number and volume. Mutation-stratified analyses were performed in propensity score-matched retrospective cohorts of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive NSCLC, mutation-negative NSCLC, and SCLC. RESULTS OS was superior for patients with NSCLC compared to SCLC in the retrospective dataset (median OS = 10.5 vs 8.6 months; P < .001) and in the JLGK0901 dataset. Hazard estimates for first CNS progression favoring NSCLC were similar in both datasets but reached statistical significance in the retrospective dataset only (multivariable hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.73 to 0.92, P = .001). In the propensity score-matched cohorts, there were continued OS advantages for NSCLC patients (median OS = 23.7 [EGFR and ALK positive NSCLC] vs 13.6 [mutation-negative NSCLC] vs 10.4 months [SCLC], pairwise P values < 0.001), but no statistically significant differences in CNS progression were observed in the matched cohorts. Neurological mortality and number of lesions at CNS progression were similar for NSCLC and SCLC patients. Leptomeningeal progression was increased in patients with NSCLC compared to SCLC in the retrospective dataset only (multivariable hazard ratio = 1.61, 95% confidence interval = 1.14 to 2.26, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS After SRS, SCLC histology was associated with shorter OS compared to NSCLC. CNS progression occurred earlier in SCLC patients overall but was similar in patients matched on baseline factors. SCLC was not associated with increased neurological mortality, number of lesions at CNS progression, or leptomeningeal progression compared to NSCLC. These findings may better inform clinical expectations and individualized decision making regarding SRS for SCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alyse W Staley
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Dexiang Gao
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Shoji Yomo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Narine Wandrey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rami El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Anna Kraemer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oscar Padilla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Andrew M Faramand
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brad E Zacharia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Université Paris Saclay, France
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Daniel N Cagney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael D Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Christien Kluwe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), The University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Yasunori Sato
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Higuchi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kyoko Aoyagi
- Gamma Knife House, Chiba Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Vida Alami
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - D Ross Camidge
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Brian D Kavanagh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Tyler P Robin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Toru Serizawa
- Tokyo Gamma Unit Center, Tsukiji Neurological Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Braunstein S, Bennett NC, Voigt C, Oosthuizen MK. Differential locomotor activity responses to day-time light intensity in juvenile and adult solitary Cape mole-rats, Georychus capensis (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). Chronobiol Int 2023; 40:1084-1096. [PMID: 37667495 DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2023.2253298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
The Cape mole-rat (Georychus capensis) is a solitary, strictly subterranean rodent that is responsive to light and entrains to photic cues despite having a reduced visual system. Circadian entrainment is maintained throughout life, but age can alter the amplitude of the response and re-entrainment time. Mole-rats are long-lived for their size which raises questions regarding the robustness of their circadian rhythms and how impacts their locomotor activity rhythms. The locomotor activity rhythms of juvenile and adult Cape mole-rats were investigated. They were exposed to pre-experimental and post-experimental control cycles under fluorescent lights, six 12 h light:12 h dark cycles of decreasing intensities and a constant dark cycle (DD). All animals exhibited more activity during the dark phases of all light regimes. Juveniles were more active than adults and displayed more variable activity during both the light and dark phases. Adults exhibited relatively stable levels of activity under all experimental conditions, whereas juvenile activity decreased as the light intensity was reduced. The amplitude of Cape mole-rat rhythms was consistently low, but similar across light regimes and between adults and juveniles. Cape mole-rats have functional circadian systems, are primarily nocturnal and respond differentially to light intensity depending on their age. Light intensity does not affect the locomotor activity responses of Cape mole-rats in a predictable manner, and could indicate more complex interactions with light wavelengths. The circadian systems of juveniles appear to be more sensitive than those of adults, although the mechanism of the light response remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Braunstein
- Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - N C Bennett
- Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - C Voigt
- Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - M K Oosthuizen
- Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kowalchuk RO, Niranjan A, Hess J, Antonios JP, Zhang MY, Braunstein S, Ross RB, Pikis S, Deibert CP, Lee CC, Yang HC, Langlois AM, Mathieu D, Peker S, Samanci Y, Rusthoven CG, Chiang V, Wei Z, Lunsford LD, Trifiletti DM, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery and local control of brain metastases from triple-negative breast cancer. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:1608-1614. [PMID: 36433878 DOI: 10.3171/2022.10.jns221900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment for intracranial metastatic disease, but its role in triple-negative breast cancer requires further study. Herein, the authors report overall survival (OS) and local tumor control in a multiinstitutional cohort with triple-negative breast cancer metastases treated with SRS. METHODS Patients treated from 2010 to 2019 at 9 institutions were included in this retrospective study if they had biopsy-proven triple-negative breast cancer with intracranial metastatic lesions treated with SRS. Patients were excluded if they had undergone prior SRS, whole-brain radiation therapy, or resection of the metastatic lesions. A retrospective chart review was conducted to determine OS, local control, and treatment efficacy. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients with 315 treated lesions were assessed. Patients had a median Karnofsky Performance Status of 80 (IQR 70-90) and age of 57 years (IQR 48-67 years). Most treated patients had 5 or fewer intracranial lesions, with 34% of patients having a single lesion. Treated lesions were small, having a median volume owf 0.11 cm3 (IQR 0.03-0.60 cm3). Patients were treated with a median margin dose of 18 Gy (IQR 18-20 Gy) to the median 71% isodose line (IQR 50%-84%). Overall, patients had a 1-year OS of 43% and 2-year OS of 20%. Most patients (88%) were followed until death, by which time local tumor progression had occurred in only 7% of cases. Furthermore, 76% of the lesions demonstrated regression. Tumor volume was correlated with local tumor progression (p = 0.012). SRS was very well tolerated, and only 3 patients (5%) developed symptomatic radiation necrosis. CONCLUSIONS SRS is a safe and efficacious treatment for well-selected patients with triple-negative breast cancer, especially for those with a favorable performance status and small- to moderate-volume metastatic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman O Kowalchuk
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Judith Hess
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Joseph P Antonios
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michael Y Zhang
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Steve Braunstein
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Richard B Ross
- 5Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 9National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 9National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Anne-Marie Langlois
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Selcuk Peker
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; and
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; and
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- 5Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
| | - Veronica Chiang
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jason P Sheehan
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vargas E, Shabani S, Mummaneni PV, Park C, Rechav Ben-Natan A, Rivera JJ, Huang J, Berven S, Braunstein S, Chou D. Does surgery for metastatic spinal tumors improve functional outcomes in patients without spinal cord compression but with potentially unstable spines? J Neurosurg Spine 2023:1-8. [PMID: 37148234 DOI: 10.3171/2023.3.spine221120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the absence of spinal cord compression, it is unclear if surgery is more effective than radiation treatment for improving functional outcomes in metastatic spinal tumor patients with potentially unstable spines. The authors compared functional status outcomes assessed with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores after surgery or radiation in patients without spinal cord compression with Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) values of 7-12 indicating possible instability (SINS 7-12). METHODS A retrospective review was performed of patients with metastatic spinal tumor SINS values of 7-12 at a single institution between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into two different groups: 1) those treated with surgery and 2) those treated with radiation. Baseline clinical characteristics were measured, and KPS and ECOG scores were obtained pre- and postradiation or postsurgery. The paired, nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test and ordinal logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS A total of 162 patients met inclusion criteria; 63 patients were treated operatively and 99 patients were treated with radiation. The mean follow-up was 1.9 years, with a median of 1.1 years for the surgical cohort (ranging from 2.5 months to 13.8 years) and a mean of 2 years with a median of 0.8 years for the radiation cohort (ranging from 2 months to 9.3 years). After covariates were accounted for, the average posttreatment changes in KPS scores in the surgical cohort were 7.46 ± 17.3 and in the radiation cohort were -2 ± 13.6 (p = 0.045). No significant difference was observed in ECOG scores. KPS scores improved postoperatively in 60.3% of patients in the surgical group and postradiation in 32.3% of patients in the radiation cohort (p < 0.001). Subanalysis within the radiation cohort revealed no differences in fracture rates or local control between patients treated with external-beam radiation therapy versus stereotactic body radiation therapy. In patients initially treated with radiation, 21.2% eventually developed compression fractures at a treated level. Five of the 99 patients in the radiation cohort-all of whom had a fracture-eventually underwent either methyl methacrylate augmentation or instrumented fusion. CONCLUSIONS Patients with SINS values of 7-12 who underwent surgery had greater improvement in KPS scores-but not in ECOG scores-than patients undergoing radiation alone. In patients treated with radiation, treatment was converted to a procedural intervention such as surgery only in patients who sustained fractures. Of the patients with fractures after radiation (21 of 99), 5 patients underwent an invasive procedure and 16 did not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Steve Braunstein
- 3Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Dean Chou
- Departments of1Neurological Surgery
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Raleigh D, Chen W, Choudhury A, Youngblood M, Polley MY, Lucas CH, Mirchia K, Maas S, Suwala A, Won M, Bayley J, Harmanci A, Harmanci A, Klisch T, Nguyen M, Vasudevan H, McCortney K, Yu T, Bhave V, Lam TC, Pu J, Leung G, Chang J, Perlow H, Palmer J, Haberler C, Berghoff A, Preusser M, Nicolaides T, Mawrin C, Agnihotri S, Resnick A, Rood B, Chew J, Young J, Boreta L, Braunstein S, Schulte J, Butowski N, Santagata S, Spetzler D, Bush NAO, Villanueva-Meyer J, Chandler J, Solomon D, Rogers C, Pugh S, Mehta M, Sneed P, Berger M, Horbinski C, McDermott M, Perry A, Bi W, Patel A, Sahm F, Magill S. Targeted gene expression profiling predicts meningioma outcomes and radiotherapy responses. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-2663611. [PMID: 36993741 PMCID: PMC10055655 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2663611/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for meningioma, the most common primary intracranial tumor, but improvements in meningioma risk stratification are needed and current indications for postoperative radiotherapy are controversial. Recent studies have proposed prognostic meningioma classification systems using DNA methylation profiling, copy number variants, DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, histology, or integrated models based on multiple combined features. Targeted gene expression profiling has generated robust biomarkers integrating multiple molecular features for other cancers, but is understudied for meningiomas. Methods Targeted gene expression profiling was performed on 173 meningiomas and an optimized gene expression biomarker (34 genes) and risk score (0 to 1) was developed to predict clinical outcomes. Clinical and analytical validation was performed on independent meningiomas from 12 institutions across 3 continents (N = 1856), including 103 meningiomas from a prospective clinical trial. Gene expression biomarker performance was compared to 9 other classification systems. Results The gene expression biomarker improved discrimination of postoperative meningioma outcomes compared to all other classification systems tested in the independent clinical validation cohort for local recurrence (5-year area under the curve [AUC] 0.81) and overall survival (5-year AUC 0.80). The increase in area under the curve compared to the current standard of care, World Health Organization 2021 grade, was 0.11 for local recurrence (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07-0.17, P < 0.001). The gene expression biomarker identified meningiomas benefiting from postoperative radiotherapy (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.78, P = 0.0001) and re-classified up to 52.0% meningiomas compared to conventional clinical criteria, suggesting postoperative management could be refined for 29.8% of patients. Conclusions A targeted gene expression biomarker improves discrimination of meningioma outcomes compared to recent classification systems and predicts postoperative radiotherapy responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Minhee Won
- NRG Statistics and Data Management Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joshua Palmer
- The Ohios State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brian Rood
- Center for Cancer and Immunology Research, Children's National Research Institute
| | | | | | | | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - C Rogers
- NRG Statistics and Data Management Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu EK, Chen JJ, Braunstein S. Management of Adverse Radiation Effect Associated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis in Multiple Sclerosis. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101150. [PMID: 36691577 PMCID: PMC9860432 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
|
11
|
Coleman C, Chen K, Lu A, Seashore E, Stoller S, Davis T, Braunstein S, Gupta N, Mueller S. Interdisciplinary care of children with diffuse midline glioma. Neoplasia 2022; 35:100851. [PMID: 36410226 PMCID: PMC9676429 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2022.100851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffuse Midline Glioma (DMG) which includes Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG) is an infiltrative tumor of the midline structures of the central nervous system that demonstrates an aggressive pattern of growth and has no known curative treatment. As these tumors progress, children experience ongoing neurological decline including inability to ambulate, swallow and communicate effectively. We propose that optimal care for patients with DMG should involve a specialized team experienced in caring for the multifaceted needs of these patients and their families. Herein we review the roles and evidence to support early involvement of a specialized interdisciplinary team and outline our views on best practices for these challenging tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Coleman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Katherine Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Alex Lu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Elizabeth Seashore
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Schuyler Stoller
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Taron Davis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Nalin Gupta
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, United States,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Sabine Mueller
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, United States,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States,Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, United States,Department of Pediatrics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Corresponding author at: Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, Sandler Neuroscience Building, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94148, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vasudevan H, Delley C, Aabedi A, Shukla P, Nguyen M, Morshed RA, Young JS, Demaree B, Diwanji D, Hervey-Jumper SL, Boreta L, Fogh S, Nakamura J, Theodospoulos P, Phillips JJ, Daras M, Tsai K, Sneed P, Aghi M, Raleigh D, Braunstein S, Abate A. BIOM-02. MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS AND SINGLE CELL SEQUENCING OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES REVEALS BRAF STATUS CORRELATES WITH CLINICAL OUTCOME AND DIFFERENTIAL IMMUNE POPULATIONS. Neuro Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Understanding the molecular landscape and microenvironment of melanoma brain metastases is critical to devise improved treatments. Here, we perform bulk and single cell genomic analysis of melanoma brain metastases to identify molecular correlates of clinical outcome. 84 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection at a single institution with a histo-pathologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma brain metastasis were retrospectively identified. In 60 patients (71%) with sufficient brain metastasis tissue for targeted next generation sequencing, DNA mutations were assessed with a CLIA certified sequencing assay. Single nuclear RNA sequencing using the 10x platform was performed on n=6 samples from treatment naïve patients. Overall survival (OS) and CNS progression free survival (CNS PFS) from time of brain metastasis diagnosis were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median patient age was 62 years old (range: 25-78 years), and the median clinical follow up was 17 months. A total of 33 patients (39%) had BRAFV600E melanoma brain metastases. Multivariate analysis incorporating age, performance status, and extracranial disease revealed BRAF status was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p< 0.05). In patients undergoing targeted next generation sequencing, the most common pathogenic variant was TERT promoter mutation (n=44; 73%). With regard to TCGA molecular melanoma subgroups, NRAS mutant (n=22; 37%) brain metastases were most common followed by BRAF mutant (n=20; 33%), NF1 mutant (n=11; 18%), and triple wildtype (n=7; 12%). Evaluation of clinical outcomes in the context of next generation sequencing results revealed no differences by TERT status but demonstrated worse overall survival in the BRAF mutant molecular group (p< 0.01, log-rank test). Single nuclear sequencing of 36,115 nuclei across 6 samples revealed BRAF wildtype tumors exhibit greater infiltrating immune cell populations including microglia and T cell subtypes. Future work will require integration of these findings with different systemic therapy regimens and across larger, prospective, multi-institutional cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harish Vasudevan
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurosurgery & Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | - Jacob S Young
- University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mariza Daras
- Brain Tumor Center University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| | | | | | - Manish Aghi
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| | - David Raleigh
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Morshed RA, Saggi S, Cummins D, Young JS, Viner J, Villanueva-Meyer J, Goldschmidt E, Boreta L, Braunstein S, Chang E, McDermott M, Berger MS, Theodospoulos P, Hervey-Jumper SL, Aghi M, Daras M. SURG-05. SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING IDENTIFIES RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH LEPTOMENINGEAL DISEASE AFTER SURGICAL RESECTION OF BRAIN METASTASES. Neuro Oncol 2022. [PMCID: PMC9660687 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Predictors of postoperative leptomeningeal disease (LMD) after resection of brain metastases (BMs) are not well defined.
OBJECTIVE
This study examined rates and predictors of LMD, including subtypes, in patients who underwent resection of a BM followed by postoperative radiation.Method: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted examining overall LMD, classical LMD (cLMD), and nodular LMD (nLMD) risk. Logistic regression and a Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with LMD. Random forest models were constructed to predict LMD and differentiate cLMD versus nLMD. Accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated to evaluate the models.Result: Of the 217 patients in the cohort, 47 (21.7%) developed postoperative LMD with 19(8.8%) cLMD cases and 28(12.9%) nLMD cases . Six-, 12-, and 24-month LMD-free survival rates were 92.3%, 85.6%, and 71.4%, respectively. Patients with cLMD had worse survival outcomes from LMD diagnosis compared to nLMD (2.4 vs 6.9 mo, Log-rank p=0.02), and treatment of LMD was associated with improved survival for both cLMD and nLMD subtypes. Multivariate Cox hazard analysis identified cerebellar/insular/occipital location (HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.73-6.11, p=0.0003), absence of extracranial disease (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.27-4.88, p=0.008), and ventricle contact (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.5-5.3, p=0.001) to be associated with postoperative LMD. A predictive model using random forest analysis with an AUROC of 0.87 in a test cohort identified tumor location, systemic disease status, and tumor volume as the most important factors associated with LMD. Both regression analysis and random forest analysis identified postoperative systemic therapy exposure as the main factor differentiating cLMD from nLMD development.
CONCLUSION
Tumor location, absence of extracranial disease at the time of surgery, contact with a ventricle, and increased tumor volume are associated with LMD. Classical LMD is associated with worse prognosis compared to nLMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurosurgery & Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | | | - Jacob S Young
- University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mitchel S Berger
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | | | - Manish Aghi
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| | - Mariza Daras
- Brain Tumor Center University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jamora CW, Brie M, Bracci P, Smith E, Luks T, Phan S, Braunstein S, Villanueva-Meyer J, Gehring K, Aguilera A, Bush NAO, Butowski N, Clarke J, Daras M, de Groot J, Chang SM, Hervey-Jumper SL, Taylor J. QOL-10. NOVEL MULTIMODAL STUDY OF THREE COGNITIVE REHABILITATION INTERVENTIONS IN LOWER GRADE GLIOMA. Neuro Oncol 2022. [PMCID: PMC9661177 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Grade 2 and 3 glioma survivors (LrGG) are living longer, yet experience cognitive impairments with diminished quality of life (QOL). We present a novel multimodal study of three cognitive rehabilitation interventions in stable LrGG survivors.
METHODS
Participants were radiologically stable adult LrGG patients who were off medical treatment for ≥ 6 months with subjective and objective cognitive impairments ( >1SD in 2 or more domains). Patients were offered either In-person cognitive rehabilitation (strategy training including telehealth), or randomized to App-based cognitive rehabilitation (retraining and strategy training) versus Text messaging (strategy training). Intervention duration was 3 months. Neuropsychological testing (with parallel forms) and QOL assessments were conducted at baseline (T1), immediate post intervention (T2), and 6-month follow-up (T3), and analyzed with repeated measures regression or Wilcoxon signed rank tests.
RESULTS
Of the 33 analyzed (enrollment ongoing); 15/17 In-person, 5/8 App-based, and 8/8 Texting completed ≥ 80% or greater of interventions. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between cohorts. Median age was 48 years (range 27-63), 58% astrocytoma, 30% oligodendroglioma, 15% other (1 pilocytic astrocytoma, 4 diffuse glioma NOS), and 76% had prior radiotherapy. Rehabilitation interventions showed improvements in auditory working memory (T1-T2 In-person p= 0.02, eta2= 0.32-medium effect), verbal learning (T1-T3 App-based p= .06, eta2= 0.54-large effect; T1-T3 Texting p= .01, eta2= 0.75-large effect), and verbal memory (T1-T3 App-based p= .06, rho=0.31-medium effect).
CONCLUSION
Significant improvements in cognitive impairments were found with medium to large treatment effects within each cohort. Cognitive rehabilitation via In-person and Texting showed strongest feasibility and acceptability. In-person cognitive rehab showed earlier posttreatment improvements whereas treatment effects for App-based and Texting were noted, but took longer to realize gains. These interventions may show promise for addressing cognitive impairments in LrGG survivors and warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melissa Brie
- Brain Tumor Center University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | - Paige Bracci
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | - Ellen Smith
- Brain Tumor Center University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| | - Tracy Luks
- University of California, San Francisco , San Fracisco, CA , USA
| | - Stephanie Phan
- Brain Tumor Center University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| | | | | | - Karen Gehring
- Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden HospitalTilburg University , Tilburg , Netherlands
| | - Adrian Aguilera
- School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley , San Francisco , USA
| | | | - Nicholas Butowski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | - Jennifer Clarke
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| | - Mariza Daras
- Brain Tumor Center University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| | - John de Groot
- Brain Tumor Center University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | - Jennie Taylor
- University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Waqar M, Roncaroli F, Lehrer E, Palmer J, Villanueva-Meyer J, Braunstein S, Hall E, Aznar M, De Hamer PW, D'Urso P, Trifiletti D, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Wesseling P, Borst G. NIMG-40. RAPID EARLY PROGRESSION (REP) OF GLIOBLASTOMA IS AN INDEPENDENT NEGATIVE PROGNOSTIC FACTOR: RESULTS FROM A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Neuro Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
In patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumour regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised published data on REP to better characterise and understand it.
METHODS
Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to 21/10/21. Studies describing the incidence of REP – tumour growth between the postoperative MRI scan and pre-radiotherapy MRI scan in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma, were included. The primary outcome was REP incidence.
RESULTS
From 1590 search results, 9 studies were included with 716 patients. The median age was 56.9 years (IQR 54.0-58.8 years). There was a male predominance with a median male-to-female ratio of 1.4 (IQR 1.1-1.5). The median number of days between MRI scans was 34 days (IQR 18-45 days). The mean incidence rate of REP was 45.9% (range 19.3%-72.0%) and significantly lower in studies employing functional imaging to define REP (p< 0.001). REP/non-REP groups were comparable with respect to age (p=0.99), gender (p=0.33) and time between scans (p=0.81). REP was associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, p< 0.001), shortened progression-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, p< 0.001), subtotal resection (OR 6.96, 95% CI 4-51-10.73, p< 0.001) and IDH wildtype versus mutant tumours (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, p=0.03). MGMT promoter methylation was not associated with REP (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.28, p=0.39).
CONCLUSIONS
REP occurs in almost half of patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and has a strongly negative prognostic effect. Future studies should investigate its biology and effective treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Eric Lehrer
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SInai , New York, NY , USA
| | - Joshua Palmer
- The Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH , USA
| | | | | | - Emma Hall
- University of Manchester , Manchester , United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Pieter Wesseling
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc , Amsterdam , Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vasudevan H, Payne E, Delley C, Sale M, Liu SJ, Lastella S, Lucas CH, Eaton C, Casey-Clyde T, Magill S, Chen W, Reddy A, Braunstein S, Perry A, Jacques L, Pekmezci M, Abate A, McCormick F, Raleigh D. DDDR-06. NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TUMOR SUPPRESSORS COOPERATIVELY DRIVE TUMOR DE-DIFFERENTIATION AND MEK INHIBITOR RESISTANCE IN PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TUMORS. Neuro Oncol 2022. [PMCID: PMC9661140 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Schwann cell derived tumors comprising schwannomas, neurofibromas, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are the most common cancers of the peripheral nervous system and often arise in patients with neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF-1) or type-2 (NF-2). NF-1 is caused by loss of NF1, a negative regulator of Ras signaling, and NF-2 is caused by loss of NF2, a pleiotropic tumor suppressor with numerous functions including inhibition of PAK signaling. However, whether functional interactions exist between the NF1 and NF2 tumor suppressors remain unclear. More broadly, there are currently no effective molecular therapies for patients with Schwann cell tumors beyond the MEK inhibitor selumetinib to treat neurofibromas in patients with NF-1. Here, we integrate DNA methylation profiling, whole exome sequencing, bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing, biochemistry, and pharmacology across human samples, cell lines, and mouse xenografts to identify cellular de-differentiation as a driver of malignant transformation and selumetinib resistance. Single nuclear RNA-sequencing of human neurofibromas (n = 3) or MPNSTs (n = 3) revealed a total of 13 cell types with increased proliferating, de-differentiated tumor cell populations in MPNST samples. Single cell RNA-sequencing of MPNST mouse xenografts revealed persistence of de-differentiated cell populations in selumetinib treated samples compared to vehicle control, suggesting cellular de-differentiation underlies treatment resistance. A genome-wide CRISPRi screen for mediators of selumetinib response in NF1 deficient neurofibroma cells revealed NF2 loss drives selumetinib resistance. Consistently, NF2 suppression in NF1 deficient neurofibroma cells caused Schwann cell de-differentiation and activation of PAK, a serine threonine kinase. Translationally, a small molecule PAK inhibitor in combination with selumetinib formed an effective therapy in mouse MPNST xenografts. In sum, we elucidate a paradigm of de-differentiation driving malignant transformation and treatment resistance in Schwann cell tumors, uncovering a functional link between the NF1 and NF2 tumor suppressors that sheds light on a novel therapeutic vulnerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harish Vasudevan
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | | | | | - S John Liu
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | | | - Charlotte Eaton
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | | | - William Chen
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| | - Alyssa Reddy
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | - Arie Perry
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | - Melike Pekmezci
- University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | | | - David Raleigh
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Waqar M, Roncaroli F, Lehrer E, Palmer J, Villanueva-meyer J, Braunstein S, Hall E, Aznar M, De Hamer PW, D’Urso P, Trifiletti D, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Wesseling P, Borst G. Rapid Early Progression (REP) of Glioblastoma Is an Independent Negative Prognostic Factor: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuro Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac200.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
AIMS
In patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumour regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise published data on REP to better characterise and understand this phenomenon.
METHOD
Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to 21/10/21. Studies describing the incidence of REP – tumour growth between the postoperative MRI scan and pre-radiotherapy MRI scan in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma, were included. The primary outcome was REP incidence.
RESULTS
From 1590 search results, 9 studies were included with 716 patients. The median age was 56.9 years (IQR 54.0- 58.8 years). There was a male predominance with a median male-to-female ratio of 1.4 (IQR 1.1-1.5). The median number of days between MRI scans was 34 days (IQR 18-45 days). The mean incidence rate of REP was 45.9% (range 19.3%-72.0%) and significantly lower in studies employing functional imaging to define REP (p<0.001). REP/non-REP groups were comparable with respect to age (p=0.99), gender (p=0.33) and time between scans (p=0.81). REP was associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, p<0.001), shortened progression-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, p<0.001), subtotal resection (OR 6.96, 95% CI 4-51-10.73, p<0.001) and IDH wildtype versus mutant tumours (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, p=0.03). MGMT promoter methylation was not associated with REP (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.28, p=0.39).
CONCLUSION
REP occurs in almost half of patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and has a strongly negative prognostic effect. Future studies should investigate its biology and effective treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mueez Waqar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester
| | - Federico Roncaroli
- Neuropathology unit, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester
| | - Eric Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York
| | - Joshua Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital , Ohio
| | | | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco
| | - Emma Hall
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicines and Health, The University of Manchester , Manchester
| | - Marianne Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicines and Health, The University of Manchester , Manchester
| | - Philip Witt De Hamer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc , Amsterdam
| | - Pietro D’Urso
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester , UK
| | - Daniel Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic , Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Pieter Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc , Amsterdam
| | - Gerben Borst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Price JG, Bates JE, Mattes M, Braunstein S. Design and implementation of a radiation oncology standardized letter of evaluation (RO-SLOE) for the evaluation of medical students and radiation oncology residency applicants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
19
|
Sperduto PW, De B, Li J, Carpenter D, Kirkpatrick J, Milligan M, Shih HA, Kutuk T, Kotecha R, Higaki H, Otsuka M, Aoyama H, Bourgoin M, Roberge D, Dajani S, Sachdev S, Gainey J, Buatti JM, Breen W, Brown PD, Ni L, Braunstein S, Gallitto M, Wang TJC, Shanley R, Lou E, Shiao J, Gaspar LE, Tanabe S, Nakano T, An Y, Chiang V, Zeng L, Soliman H, Elhalawani H, Cagney D, Thomas E, Boggs DH, Ahluwalia MS, Mehta MP. Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) for Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: Initial Report of the Small Cell Lung Cancer GPA and Update of the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer GPA Including the Effect of Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Other Prognostic Factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:60-74. [PMID: 35331827 PMCID: PMC9378572 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with lung cancer and brain metastases represent a markedly heterogeneous population. Accurate prognosis is essential to optimally individualize care. In prior publications, we described the graded prognostic assessment (GPA), but a GPA for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has never been reported, and in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the effect of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was unknown. The 3-fold purpose of this work is to provide the initial report of an SCLC GPA, to evaluate the effect of PD-L1 on survival in patients with NSCLC, and to update the Lung GPA accordingly. METHODS AND MATERIALS A multivariable analysis of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival was performed on 4183 patients with lung cancer (3002 adenocarcinoma, 611 nonadenocarcinoma, 570 SCLC) with newly diagnosed brain metastases between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, using a multi-institutional retrospective database. Significant variables were used to update the Lung GPA. RESULTS Overall median survival for lung adenocarcinoma, SCLC, and nonadenocarcinoma was 17, 10, and 8 months, respectively, but varied widely by GPA from 2 to 52 months. In SCLC, the significant prognostic factors were age, performance status, extracranial metastases, and number of brain metastases. In NSCLC, the distribution of molecular markers among patients with lung adenocarcinoma and known primary tumor molecular status revealed alterations/expression in PD-L1 50% to 100%, PD-L1 1% to 49%, epidermal growth factor receptor, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase in 32%, 31%, 30%, and 7%, respectively. Median survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases with 0, 1% to 49%, and ≥50% PD-L1 expression was 17, 19, and 24 months, respectively (P < .01), confirming PD-L1 is a prognostic factor. Previously identified prognostic factors for NSCLC (epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase status, performance status, age, number of brain metastases, and extracranial metastases) were reaffirmed. These factors were incorporated into the updated Lung GPA with robust separation between subgroups for all histologies. CONCLUSIONS Survival for patients with lung cancer and brain metastases has improved but varies widely. The initial report of a GPA for SCLC is presented. For patients with NSCLC-adenocarcinoma and brain metastases, PD-L1 is a newly identified significant prognostic factor, and the previously identified factors were reaffirmed. The updated indices establish unique criteria for SCLC, NSCLC-nonadenocarcinoma, and NSCLC-adenocarcinoma (incorporating PD-L1). The updated Lung GPA, available for free at brainmetgpa.com, provides an accurate tool to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian De
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jing Li
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Helen A Shih
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | | | | | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Hokkaido Cancer Center, Hokkaido, Japan; Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Malie Bourgoin
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lisa Ni
- University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | - Emil Lou
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jay Shiao
- University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado
| | - Laurie E Gaspar
- University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado; Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Loveland, Colorado
| | | | | | - Yi An
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Liang Zeng
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Evan Thomas
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | - Minesh P Mehta
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Linkowski L, Banson K, Corrigan K, Kriegler C, Lim C, Gunther JR, Braunstein S, Ingledew PA. Cancer Careers a ROECSGXLearnOncology podcast: Increasing Accessibility to Information about Oncology Careers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
21
|
Ni L, Phuong C, Chen JJ, Chen W, Daras M, Raleigh D, Nakamura J, Boreta L, Sneed P, Braunstein S. MMAP-11 VOLUMETRIC STUDY OF BRAIN METASTASES IN EGFR-POSITIVE NSCLC TREATED WITH OSIMERTINIB WITH OR WITHOUT CNS-DIRECTED RADIATION THERAPY. Neurooncol Adv 2022. [PMCID: PMC9354225 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with brain metastases (BM) from EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), recent data indicated that treating with CNS-penetrant tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as osimertinib may enable deferring radiotherapy (RT) in select patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the radiographic response of newly diagnosed BM to osimertinib with or without stereotactic radiosurgery or whole brain radiotherapy, to identify parameters that may guide early versus delayed salvage RT. METHODS In this single-institution retrospective study, 35 patients with 186 newly diagnosed BM started on osimertinib between 2014 and 2020 were reviewed. BM with tumor volume ≥ 0.1 cm3 were included in the volumetric analyses (N=106 BM). Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariable analysis was performed using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards was used for multivariable analyses for local control (LC), distant brain failure (DBF), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of the 35 patients, 8 (23%) received osimertinib alone. Median follow-up was 29 months. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 94% and 86%. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 89% and 66%. Median time to DBF was 24 months. Patients treated with osimertinib and RT were more likely to have a significant radiographic volumetric response at early follow-up (4-12 weeks after treatment initiation) compared to osimertinib alone (median volumetric response of –80% vs. –41%, p=0.05). On per lesion analysis, early volumetric response of ≥ 80% was associated with improved LC (3-year LC 98% vs 72%, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS The combination of osimertinib and CNS RT is associated with greater early volumetric response in patients with BM from EGFR-positive NSCLC compared to osimertinib alone. BM with significant initial radiographic response remain well-controlled in the long term. Patients whose BM demonstrate limited initial volumetric response may benefit from targeted RT to provide long term control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Ni
- UCSF Department of Radiation Oncology , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | | - Jie Jane Chen
- UCSF Department of Radiation Oncology , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | - William Chen
- UCSF Department of Radiation Oncology , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | - Mariza Daras
- UCSF Department of Radiation Oncology , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | - David Raleigh
- UCSF Department of Radiation Oncology , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | - Jean Nakamura
- UCSF Department of Radiation Oncology , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | - Lauren Boreta
- UCSF Department of Radiation Oncology , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | - Penny Sneed
- UCSF Department of Radiation Oncology , San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Morshed R, Saggi S, Cummins D, Young J, Viner J, Villanueva-Meyer J, Boreta L, Braunstein S, McDermott M, Theodosopoulos P, Berger M, Hervey-Jumper S, Aghi M, Daras M. LOCL-06 SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING IDENTIFIES RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH LEPTOMENINGEAL DISEASE AFTER SURGICAL RESECTION OF BRAIN METASTASES. Neurooncol Adv 2022. [PMCID: PMC9354169 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of brain metastases (BMs) can help with local disease control, yet predictors of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) after surgery are not well defined. This study examined rates and predictors of LMD in patients who underwent resection of a BM. METHODS A retrospective, single-center study was conducted examining LMD risk for adult patients with a BM that underwent resection with postoperative adjuvant radiation. Logistic regression analyses and a supervised machine learning algorithm (Random forest) were implemented to identify factors within the cohort that were associated with LMD. RESULTS Of the 182 patients in the cohort, 43 patients (23.6%) developed LMD in the postoperative setting with 18 cases of classical LMD (9.9%) and 25 cases of nodular LMD (13.7%). Median censored time to LMD was not reached, and 6-, 12-, and 24-month LMD-free rates from surgery were 93%, 86.3%, and 71.8%, respectively. Median time from surgery to classical and nodular LMD were 13.1 and 9.5 months, respectively (Log-rank p=0.71). Patients diagnosed with classical LMD had worse survival outcomes from LMD diagnosis compared to nodular LMD (2.6 vs 9.7 mo, Log-rank p=0.02), and LMD-subtype was significantly associated with overall survival from the date of surgery (classical vs nodular vs none: 16.1 vs 20 vs 36.7 mo, p <.0001). Random forest analysis identified primary cancer type, absence of extracranial disease, and tumor volume as the top 3 factors associated with LMD. On multivariate regression analysis, absence of extracranial disease at index surgery was associated with any LMD (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.15-6.10, p=0.02). Treatment with postoperative checkpoint inhibitors, type of radiation, and performing additional craniotomies were not associated with risk of LMD. CONCLUSIONS Classical-type LMD is associated with worse prognosis compared to nodular-type LMD. Absence of extracranial disease at the time of surgery was the most consistent factor associated with LMD on follow-up.
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen K, Raleigh D, Sneed P, Fogh S, Nakamura J, Boreta L, Banerjee A, Mueller S, Auguste K, Gupta N, Braunstein S. RONC-18 Radiosurgery for Primary and Metastatic CNS Malignancies in the Pediatric Population. Neuro Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac079.672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to describe outcomes after pediatric radiosurgery for malignant CNS lesions. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for 31 pediatric patients treated at a single institution with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for primary or metastatic CNS malignancies between 2000-2020. RESULTS: 25 patients were treated with SRS for focal recurrences of primary CNS malignancies, 1 patient was treated in the adjuvant setting after initial resection, and 5 patients were treated for brain metastases. Primary CNS histologies included ependymoma (n=14), glioma (n=4), medulloblastoma (n=2), and meningioma (n=2). 65% were WHO grade 3 or 4. 71% of patients had received a prior course of involved-field external beam radiation to the brain to a median dose of 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions. Median age at SRS was 14 years (range 4-21). Radiosurgery was predominantly performed in a single fraction to a median dose of 17 Gy to a total of 42 targets among 29 patients. Two patients underwent fractionated radiosurgery to 30 Gy in 5 fractions for larger lesions. Median follow up after SRS was 44 months. 7 patients (23%) had no evidence of disease after SRS at a median follow up of 39 months. 6 patients (19%) developed local recurrence at the site of their treated lesion at a median of 13 months after SRS. 20 patients (65%) developed recurrent disease in the CNS outside of the radiosurgery field at a median of 11 months after SRS. 4 patients developed toxicity from SRS related to radiation treatment effect, all of which occurred within 1 year of SRS. CONCLUSIONS: SRS for malignant CNS lesions in the pediatric population provides effective local control and is well-tolerated. However, there remains a substantial risk of distant CNS failures given the nature of recurrent or metastatic disease in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Chen
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - David Raleigh
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Penny Sneed
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Shannon Fogh
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Jean Nakamura
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Lauren Boreta
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco , CA , USA
| | | | - Sabine Mueller
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Kurtis Auguste
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Nalin Gupta
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco , CA , USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco , CA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rogers CL, Pugh SL, Vogelbaum MA, Perry A, Ashby LS, Modi JM, Alleman AM, Barani IJ, Braunstein S, Bovi JA, de Groot JF, Whitton AC, Lindhorst SM, Deb N, Shrieve DC, Shu HK, Bloom B, Machtay M, Mishra MV, Robinson CG, Won M, Mehta MP. Low-risk meningioma: Initial outcomes from NRG Oncology/RTOG 0539. Neuro Oncol 2022; 25:137-145. [PMID: 35657335 PMCID: PMC9825319 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three- and five-year progression-free survival (PFS) for low-risk meningioma managed with surgery and observation reportedly exceeds 90%. Herewith we summarize outcomes for low-risk meningioma patients enrolled on NRG/RTOG 0539. METHODS This phase II trial allocated patients to one of three groups per World Health Organization grade, recurrence status, and resection extent. Low-risk patients had either gross total (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR) for a newly diagnosed grade 1 meningioma and were observed after surgery. The primary endpoint was 3-year PFS. Adverse events (AEs) were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3. RESULTS Among 60 evaluable patients, the median follow-up was 9.1 years. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year rates were 91.4% (95% CI, 84.2 to 98.6), 89.4% (95% CI, 81.3 to 97.5), 85.0% (95% CI, 75.3 to 94.7) for PFS and 98.3% (95% CI, 94.9 to 100), 98.3%, (95% CI, 94.9 to 100), 93.8% (95% CI, 87.0 to 100) for overall survival (OS), respectively. With centrally confirmed GTR, 3/5/10y PFS and OS rates were 94.3/94.3/87.6% and 97.1/97.1/90.4%. With STR, 3/5/10y PFS rates were 83.1/72.7/72.7% and 10y OS 100%. Five patients reported one grade 3, four grade 2, and five grade 1 AEs. There were no grade 4 or 5 AEs. CONCLUSIONS These results prospectively validate high PFS and OS for low-risk meningioma managed surgically but raise questions regarding optimal management following STR, a subcohort that could potentially benefit from adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Leland Rogers
- Corresponding Author: C. Leland Rogers, MD, GammaWest Cancer Services, 3592 West 9000 South, Suite 100, West Jordan, UT 84088, USA ()
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Arie Perry
- University of California, San Francisco, Neuropathology, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lynn S Ashby
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Neurology, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jignesh M Modi
- MidState Medical Center, Radiology, Meriden, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Igor J Barani
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Radiation Oncology, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- University of California, San Francisco, Radiation Oncology, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joseph A Bovi
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Radiation Oncology, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - John F de Groot
- University of California, San Francisco, Neuro Oncology, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Anthony C Whitton
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott M Lindhorst
- Medical University of South Carolina, Neuro Oncology, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nimisha Deb
- St. Luke’s Hospital-Anderson Campus Cancer Center, Easton, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dennis C Shrieve
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Hui-Kuo Shu
- Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Beatrice Bloom
- Northwell Health, Radiation Oncology, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark V Mishra
- University of Maryland, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Clifford G Robinson
- Washington University, Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Minhee Won
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Osorio RC, Pereira MP, Joshi RS, Donohue KC, Sneed P, Braunstein S, Theodosopoulos PV, El-Sayed IH, Gurrola J, Kunwar S, Blevins LS, Aghi MK. Socioeconomic predictors of case presentations and outcomes in 225 nonfunctional pituitary adenoma resections. J Neurosurg 2022; 136:1325-1336. [PMID: 34598141 DOI: 10.3171/2021.4.jns21907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical presentations and outcomes of nonfunctional pituitary adenoma (NFPA) resections can vary widely, and very little prior research has analyzed this variance through a socioeconomic lens. This study sought to determine whether socioeconomic status (SES) influences NFPA presentations and postoperative outcomes, as these associations could aid physicians in understanding case prognoses and complications. METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed 225 NFPA resections from 2012 to 2019 at their institution. Race, ethnicity, insurance status, estimated income, and having a primary care provider (PCP) were collected as 5 markers of SES. These markers were correlated with presenting tumor burden, presenting symptoms, surgical outcomes, and long-term clinical outcomes. RESULTS All 5 examined SES markers influenced variance in patient presentation or outcome. Insurance status's effects on patient presentations disappeared when examining only patients with PCPs. Having a PCP was associated with significantly smaller tumor size at diagnosis (effect size = 0.404, p < 0.0001). After surgery, patients with PCPs had shorter postoperative hospital lengths of stay (p = 0.043) and lower rates of readmission within 30 days of discharge (OR 0.256, p = 0.047). Despite continuing follow-up for longer durations (p = 0.0004), patients with PCPs also had lower rates of tumor recurrence (p < 0.0001). Higher estimated income was similarly associated with longer follow-up (p = 0.002) and lower rates of tumor recurrence (p = 0.013). Among patients with PCPs, income was not associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS This study found that while all 5 variables (race, ethnicity, insurance, PCP status, and estimated income) affected NFPA presentations and outcomes, having a PCP was the single most important of these socioeconomic factors, impacting hospital lengths of stay, readmission rates, follow-up adherence, and tumor recurrence. Having a PCP even protected low-income patients from experiencing increased rates of tumor recurrence. These protective findings suggest that addressing socioeconomic disparities may lead to better NFPA presentations and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Osorio
- 1School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | | | - Kevin C Donohue
- 1School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Patricia Sneed
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Steve Braunstein
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- 5Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - José Gurrola
- 5Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Sandeep Kunwar
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; and
| | - Lewis S Blevins
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; and
| | - Manish K Aghi
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; and
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Waqar M, Roncaroli F, Lehrer EJ, Palmer JD, Villanueva-Meyer J, Braunstein S, Hall E, Aznar M, De Witt Hamer PC, D’Urso PI, Trifiletti D, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Wesseling P, Borst GR. Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac075. [PMID: 35769410 PMCID: PMC9234755 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumor regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised previously published data on REP to better characterize and understand it. Methods Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to October 21, 2021. Studies describing the incidence of REP-tumor growth between the postoperative MRI scan and pre-radiotherapy MRI scan in newly diagnosed glioblastoma were included. The primary outcome was REP incidence. Results From 1590 search results, 9 studies were included with 716 patients. The median age was 56.9 years (IQR 54.0-58.8 y). There was a male predominance with a median male-to-female ratio of 1.4 (IQR 1.1-1.5). The median number of days between MRI scans was 34 days (IQR 18-45 days). The mean incidence rate of REP was 45.9% (range 19.3%-72.0%) and significantly lower in studies employing functional imaging to define REP (P < .001). REP/non-REP groups were comparable with respect to age (P = .99), gender (P = .33) and time between scans (P = .81). REP was associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, P < .001), shortened progression-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, P < .001), subtotal resection (OR 6.96, 95% CI 4.51-10.73, P < .001) and IDH wild-type versus mutant tumors (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, P = .03). MGMT promoter methylation was not associated with REP (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.28, P = .39). Conclusions REP occurs in almost half of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and has a strongly negative prognostic effect. Future studies should investigate its biology and effective treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mueez Waqar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicines and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Federico Roncaroli
- Neuropathology unit, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicines and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicines and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Emma Hall
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicines and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Marianne Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicines and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Philip C De Witt Hamer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pietro I D’Urso
- Department of Neurosurgery, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Daniel Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Pieter Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Childhood Cancer Pathology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerben R Borst
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicines and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The Christie National Health Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vasudevan H, Lastella S, Sale M, Casey-Clyde T, Demaree B, Delley C, Lucas C, Magill S, Liu J, Chen W, Braunstein S, Reddy A, Perry A, Jacques L, Pekmezci M, Abate A, McCormick F, Raleigh D. CSIG-01. EPIGENETIC REPROGRAMMING DRIVES MALIGNANT PERIPHERAL NERVE SHEATH TUMOR (MPNST) DE-DIFFERENTIATION AND TREATMENT RESISTANCE. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Schwann cell derived tumors comprising schwannomas, neurofibromas, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors are the most common malignancies of the peripheral nervous system. While schwannomas and neurofibromas are benign, MPNSTs are malignant, metastasize, and respond poorly to treatment. Neurofibromas and MPNSTs are associated with loss of NF1, a tumor suppressor that inhibits Ras/MEK signaling, and MPNSTs alone are distinguished by loss of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2), an epigenetic regulator of methylation. To understand the genomic mechanisms of Schwann cell tumorigenesis and treatment resistance, we performed DNA methylation profiling, RNA-sequencing, and whole exome sequencing of primary Schwann cell tumor resection specimens (n=119 total: n=66 schwannoma, n=13 neurofibroma, n=40 MPNSTs). Hierarchical clustering identified three epigenetic Schwann cell tumor groups with transcriptional differences in PRC2 target genes associated with Schwann cell differentiation. Integrating biochemical and genomic approaches in primary human tumor cell lines from NF1 intact peripheral nerve, NF1 mutant neurofibromas, and MPNSTs, we found MPNST and neurofibroma cell lines with CRISPR knockout SUZ12 or EZH1/2 neurofibroma cell lines demonstrated repression of Schwann cell differentiation genes and induction of Ras signaling target genes. Further, MPNST cells deficient in PRC2 and NF1 exhibited increased basal active Ras-GTP levels, and therapeutically, PRC2 deficient MPNST cell lines were more resistant to the MEK inhibitor selumetinib and radiotherapy when compared to NF1-deficient neurofibroma cells. Single cell RNA sequencing analysis suggested distinct mechanisms of selumetinib resistance in PRC2 intact neurofibroma cells compared to PRC2-deficient MPNST cells. Taken together, our data demonstrate the importance of epigenetic dysregulation in malignant Schwann cell transformation and suggest differentiation status underlies a novel mechanism of MEK inhibitor resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sydney Lastella
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Sale
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Cyrille Delley
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Calixto Lucas
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - John Liu
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - William Chen
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Alyssa Reddy
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Arie Perry
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Line Jacques
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Melike Pekmezci
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adam Abate
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Frank McCormick
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Raleigh
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chen W, Choudhury A, Vasudevan H, Lucas C, Nguyen M, Young J, Yu T, Lam TC, Pu J, Li LF, Leung G, Chan J, Oberheim-Bush NA, Villanueva-Meyer J, Schulte J, Braunstein S, Butowski N, Sneed P, Berger M, Perry A, Solomon D, McDermott M, Magill S, Raleigh D. BIOM-40. TARGETED GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING PREDICTS MENINGIOMA OUTCOMES AND RADIOTHERAPY RESPONSES. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Surgery is the mainstay of meningioma treatment, but improvements in meningioma risk stratification are needed and indications for postoperative radiotherapy are controversial. DNA methylation profiling, copy number variants (CNVs), exome sequencing, and RNA sequencing have improved understanding of meningioma biology, but have not superseded histologic grading, or revealed biomarkers for radiotherapy responses. To address these unmet needs, we optimized and validated a targeted gene expression biomarker predicting meningioma outcomes and responses to radiotherapy.
METHODS
Targeted gene expression profiling was performed on a discovery cohort of 173 meningiomas (median follow-up 8.1 years) and a validation cohort of 331 meningiomas (median follow-up 6.1 years) treated with surgery (n=504) and postoperative radiotherapy (n=73) at independent, international institutions (70% WHO grade 1, 24% WHO grade 2, 6% WHO grade 3). Optimized targeted gene expression models predicting clinical outcomes (34 genes) or radiotherapy responses (12 genes) were developed from the discovery cohort, and compared to histologic and molecular classification systems by performing DNA methylation profiling, CNV analysis, exome sequencing, and RNA sequencing on the same meningiomas.
RESULTS
Targeted gene expression profiling achieved a concordance-index of 0.75 ± 0.03 (SEM) for local freedom from recurrence (LFFR) and 0.72 ± 0.03 for overall survival (OS) in the validation cohort, outperforming WHO grade (5-year LFFR delta-AUC 0.15, 95% CI 0.076-0.229, p=0.001) and DNA methylation grouping (delta-AUC 0.075, 95% CI 0.006-0.130, p=0.01) for LFFR, disease-specific survival, and OS. The biomarker was independently prognostic after accounting for WHO grade, extent of resection, primary versus recurrent presentation, CNV status, DNA methylation group, and Ki67 labeling index, and identified meningiomas benefiting from radiotherapy (interaction p-value=0.0008), suggesting postoperative radiotherapy could be refined in 30.2% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Targeted gene expression profiling of 504 meningiomas improves discrimination of meningioma local recurrence, disease-specific survival, and overall survival, and predicts radiotherapy responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Chen
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Abrar Choudhury
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Calixto Lucas
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Minh Nguyen
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jacob Young
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Theresa Yu
- University of Maryland, San Francisco, USA
| | | | - Jenny Pu
- University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Lai-Fung Li
- University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Jason Chan
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Jessica Schulte
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Penny Sneed
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mitchel Berger
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Arie Perry
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Solomon
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - David Raleigh
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vasudevan H, Choudhury A, Hilz S, Villanueva-Meyer J, Chen W, Lucas C, Braunstein S, Oberheim-Bush NA, Butowski N, Pekmezci M, McDermott M, Perry A, Solomon D, Magill S, Raleigh D. PATH-36. INTRATUMOR HETEROGENEITY AND BIOINFORMATIC DIFFERENCES INFLUENCE MENINGIOMA MOLECULAR CLASSIFICATION. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Molecular alterations such as CDKN2A inactivation and TERT promoter mutation are new criteria for grade 3 meningiomas in the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System. However, consensus approaches to identify copy number variants (CNVs) and short somatic variants in meningiomas are lacking. Here, we performed integrated DNA methylation profiling, RNA-sequencing, and targeted DNA mutational profiling on 10 stereotactically-collected, regionally-distinct samples from 4 meningiomas. Targeted DNA sequencing revealed numerous private short somatic variants from multiple sites within individual meningiomas, including a TERT promoter mutation in only 1 of 2 samples from the same tumor. DNA methylation profiling revealed differences in biologic groups and immune cell enrichment between regionally-distinct samples within individual meningiomas. CNV status was evaluated using DNA methylation profiling and RNA sequencing on 14 stereotactically-collected, regionally-distinct samples from 2 meningiomas. Phylogenetic architectures from DNA methylation profiling and targeted DNA sequencing were highly concordant and shared 99.12% of CNVs while RNA sequencing identified only 39% of the CNVs called from DNA based approaches. Finally, CNV analysis based on single-cell RNA sequencing revealed partially overlapping CNVs across meningioma cells within an individual tumor, suggesting subclonal populations may influence CNV-based meningioma molecular classification and underlie limitations in defining CNVs from bulk RNA-sequencing. In sum, these data highlight the relative strengths and weaknesses of various approaches for molecular analysis of meningiomas complicated by intratumor heterogeneity due to non-tumor cells and subclonal populations of meningioma cells. Future efforts to incorporate molecular analysis into the diagnostic paradigm for meningiomas may require orthogonal validation across multiple platforms or image-guided meningioma sampling to select the most aggressive regions for molecular profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abrar Choudhury
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Hilz
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - William Chen
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Calixto Lucas
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Melike Pekmezci
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael McDermott
- Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Arie Perry
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Solomon
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - David Raleigh
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Luks T, Villanueva-Meyer J, Weyer-Jamora C, Brie M, Smith E, Braunstein S, Bracci P, Chang S, Hervey-Jumper S, Taylor J. NIMG-14. RESTING STATE EXECUTIVE CONTROL AND SALIENCE NETWORK CONNECTIVITY IN CLINICALLY STABLE LOWER GRADE GLIOMA COVARIES WITH COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Survival outcomes for patients with lower grade gliomas (LrGG) are improving. However, injury from tumor growth and consequences of treatment often leads to impaired cognition, particularly in cognitive domains reliant on distributed functional networks and intact white-matter tracts. Resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI) is a method of investigating the integrity of these functional networks.
METHODS
This study investigated rsfMRI connectivity in 21 patients with clinically stable LrGG compared to age- and gender-matched healthy controls, and associated imaging measures with cognitive outcomes. Data were acquired for 12 cognitive tests administered within one week of imaging. RsfMRI and T1-weighted images for 21 research controls were acquired from OpenNeuro datasets. RsfMRI data were processed and analyzed using the CONN toolbox using CONN’s standard regions of interest (ROI) for the 8 canonical networks as seeds, and cognitive test scores as covariates, with a threshold for T tests of p< .001 uncorrected.
RESULTS
Median age was 48 years old (range 27-67). There were 6 astrocytomas, IDHmut; 3 astrocytomas IDH-wt, 8 oligodendrogliomas, and 4 NOS. Thirteen had left hemisphere tumors (8 frontal, 3 parietal, 2 temporal), and 6 right (5 frontal, 1 temporal). Fourteen had previously recieved radiotherapy. There was significantly lower connectivity in frontoparietal executive control and the salience networks in LrGG patients versus controls. Within patients, lower executive control network connectivity covaried with worse performance on executive measures (FAS, Tower of London, Trails-A, Animal Naming, FrSBe), and attention and working memory measures (Digit Symbol, HVLT). Lower salience network connectivity covaried with poorer performance on executive measures (FrSBe, FAS) and attention and working memory measures (Digit Span, HVLT, WAIS-WM).
CONCLUSION
In clinically stable LrGG, rsfMRI measures of network connectivity are potentially useful markers to monitor and track, given the concordance with cognition, and could help guide cognitive assessment and rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Luks
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Melissa Brie
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ellen Smith
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Paige Bracci
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Susan Chang
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Jennie Taylor
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cummins DD, Morshed RA, Chavez MM, Avalos LN, Sudhakar V, Chung JE, Gallagher A, Saggi S, Daras M, Braunstein S, Theodosopoulos PV, McDermott MW, Aghi MK. Salvage Surgery for Local Control of Brain Metastases After Previous Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Single-Center Series. World Neurosurg 2021; 158:e323-e333. [PMID: 34740830 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although overall survival (OS) has improved in patients with brain metastases (BMs), control of recurrent BMs remains a therapeutic challenge. Salvage surgery may achieve acceptable control rates in the setting of progression after previous stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), yet it remains a question how additional adjuvant therapies may affect outcomes and how patient selection for salvage surgery may be optimized. METHODS Patients receiving salvage surgery for BM progression after previous SRS were retrospectively reviewed from a single center. Outcomes of interest included local tumor progression, leptomeningeal dissemination, and OS. Cox proportional hazard models and nominal logistic regression were applied to determine factors associated with outcomes of interest. RESULTS A total of 43 patients with 50 BMs were included. After salvage surgery, local progression was observed for 17 BMs (34%), leptomeningeal dissemination was observed in 17 patients (39.5%), and censored median OS was 17.9 months. On multivariate analysis, use of brachytherapy was associated with improved local control (hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.6; P = 0.008). For patients treated with SRS ≥4.5 months before salvage surgery, both brachytherapy (HR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.39; P = 0.002) and postoperative adjuvant SRS (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02-1.00; P = 0.05) were associated with improved local control compared with no adjuvant radiation therapy. Presence of extracranial malignancy (HR, 6.70; 95% CI, 2.58-17.42; P < 0.0001) was associated with shorter survival. Graded prognostic assessment underestimated survival in 79.1% of patients, with a mean difference of 18.9 months between graded prognostic assessment-estimated and actual OS. CONCLUSIONS In properly selected patients, salvage surgery may be an appropriate therapy for BM progression after previous SRS. Adjuvant brachytherapy and repeat SRS can offer significant benefit for local control with salvage resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Cummins
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | - Miguel M Chavez
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lauro N Avalos
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Vivek Sudhakar
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jason E Chung
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Aaron Gallagher
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Satvir Saggi
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mariza Daras
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Philip V Theodosopoulos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Manish K Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Garcia JH, Winkler EA, Morshed RA, Lu A, Ammanuel SG, Saggi S, Wang EJ, Braunstein S, Fox CK, Fullerton HJ, Kim H, Cooke DL, Hetts SW, Lawton MT, Abla AA, Gupta N. Factors associated with seizures at initial presentation in pediatric patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021:1-6. [PMID: 34560640 DOI: 10.3171/2021.6.peds21126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Children with cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can present with seizures, potentially increasing morbidity and impacting clinical management. However, the factors that lead to seizures as a presenting sign are not well defined. While AVM-related seizures have been described in case series, most studies have focused on adults and have included patients who developed seizures after an AVM rupture. To address this, the authors sought to analyze demographic and morphological characteristics of AVMs in a large cohort of children. METHODS The demographic, clinical, and AVM morphological characteristics of 189 pediatric patients from a single-center database were studied. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to test the effect of these characteristics on seizures as an initial presenting symptom in patients with unruptured brain AVMs. RESULTS Overall, 28 of 189 patients initially presented with seizures (14.8%). By univariate comparison, frontal lobe location (p = 0.02), larger AVM size (p = 0.003), older patient age (p = 0.04), and the Supplemented Spetzler-Martin (Supp-SM) grade (0.0006) were associated with seizure presentation. Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent effect of frontal lobe AVM location and higher Supp-SM grade. All patients presenting with seizures had AVMs in the cortex or subcortical white matter. CONCLUSIONS While children and adults share some risk factors for seizure presentation, their risk factor profiles do not entirely overlap. Pediatric patients with cortical AVMs in the frontal lobe were more likely to present with seizures. Additionally, the Supp-SM grade was highly associated with seizure presentation. Future clinical research should focus on the effect of therapeutic interventions targeting AVMs on seizure control in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph H Garcia
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Ethan A Winkler
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Ramin A Morshed
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Alex Lu
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Simon G Ammanuel
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Satvir Saggi
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Elaina J Wang
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Steve Braunstein
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Christine K Fox
- 3Pediatric Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Heather J Fullerton
- 3Pediatric Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Helen Kim
- 4Center for Cerebrovascular Research, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Daniel L Cooke
- 5Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Steven W Hetts
- 5Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Michael T Lawton
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.,6Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Adib A Abla
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Nalin Gupta
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.,7Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Thomas H, Ni L, Braunstein S. A Mixed-Methods Analysis of a Single-Institution Radiation Oncology Virtual Medical Student Rotation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
34
|
Nano T, Morin O, Ziemer B, Raleigh D, Boreta L, Nakamura J, Fogh S, Sneed P, Harvey-Jumper S, Theodosopoulos P, Braunstein S, Ma L. PH-0378 How to achieve the sharpest dose fall-off for hypo-fractionated radiosurgery of large brain lesions? Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07309-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
35
|
Cho N, Raleigh D, Ziemer B, Nano T, Theodosopoulos P, Sneed P, Boreta L, Braunstein S, MA L. PO-1738 Reducing Dose Hot Spots for Hypofractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery via Hundreds of Isocenters. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)08189-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
36
|
Rudie JD, Weiss DA, Colby JB, Rauschecker AM, Laguna B, Braunstein S, Sugrue LP, Hess CP, Villanueva-Meyer JE. Three-dimensional U-Net Convolutional Neural Network for Detection and Segmentation of Intracranial Metastases. Radiol Artif Intell 2021; 3:e200204. [PMID: 34136817 PMCID: PMC8204134 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and validate a neural network for automated detection and segmentation of intracranial metastases on brain MRI studies obtained for stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, 413 patients (average age, 61 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 238 women) with a total of 5202 intracranial metastases (median volume, 0.05 cm3; interquartile range, 0.02-0.18 cm3) undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery at one institution were included (January 2017 to February 2020). A total of 563 MRI examinations were performed among the patients, and studies were split into training (n = 413), validation (n = 50), and test (n = 100) datasets. A three-dimensional (3D) U-Net convolutional network was trained and validated on 413 T1 postcontrast or subtraction scans, and several loss functions were evaluated. After model validation, 100 discrete test patients, who underwent imaging after the training and validation patients, were used for final model evaluation. Performance for detection and segmentation of metastases was evaluated using Dice scores, false discovery rates, and false-negative rates, and a comparison with neuroradiologist interrater reliability was performed. RESULTS The median Dice score for segmenting enhancing metastases in the test set was 0.75 (interquartile range, 0.63-0.84). There were strong correlations between manually segmented and predicted metastasis volumes (r = 0.98, P < .001) and between the number of manually segmented and predicted metastases (R = 0.95, P < .001). Higher Dice scores were strongly correlated with larger metastasis volumes on a logarithmically transformed scale (r = 0.71). Sensitivity across the whole test sample was 70.0% overall and 96.4% for metastases larger than 6 mm. There was an average of 0.46 false-positive results per scan, with the positive predictive value being 91.5%. In comparison, the median Dice score between two neuroradiologists was 0.85 (interquartile range, 0.80-0.89), with sensitivity across the test sample being 87.9% overall and 98.4% for metastases larger than 6 mm. CONCLUSION A 3D U-Net-based convolutional neural network was able to segment brain metastases with high accuracy and perform detection at the level of human interrater reliability for metastases larger than 6 mm.Keywords: Adults, Brain/Brain Stem, CNS, Feature detection, MR-Imaging, Neural Networks, Neuro-Oncology, Quantification, Segmentation© RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
|
37
|
Aridgides P, Janssens GO, Braunstein S, Campbell S, Poppe M, Murphy E, MacDonald S, Ladra M, Alapetite C, Haas-Kogan D. Gliomas, germ cell tumors, and craniopharyngioma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28401. [PMID: 32960496 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2000] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
This report summarizes the current multimodality treatment approaches for children with low- and high-grade gliomas, germinoma, and nongerminomatous germ cell tumors, and craniopharyngiomas used in the Children's Oncology Group (COG) and the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP). Treatment recommendations are provided in the context of historical approaches regarding the roles of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Future research strategies for these tumors in both COG and SIOP are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Aridgides
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13210
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, GA, 3508, The Netherlands
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Ron Conway Family Gateway Medical Building, 1825 Fourth St. 1st floor M1215, San Francisco, CA, 94115
| | - Shauna Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue / CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195
| | - Matthew Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, 1950 Circle of Hope, Radiation Oncology, 1570, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112
| | - Erin Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Mail Code CA5, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Francis H Burr Proton Therapy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114
| | - Matthew Ladra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, 401 N. Broadway, Weinberg Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21231
| | | | - Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, D1622, 450 Brookline Ave, Brookline, MA, 02215
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sperduto PW, Mesko S, Li J, Cagney D, Aizer A, Lin NU, Nesbit E, Kruser TJ, Chan J, Braunstein S, Lee J, Kirkpatrick JP, Breen W, Brown PD, Shi D, Shih HA, Soliman H, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto W, Lou E, Everett A, Boggs DH, Masucci L, Roberge D, Remick J, Plichta K, Buatti JM, Jain S, Gaspar LE, Wu CC, Wang TJC, Bryant J, Chuong M, Yu J, Chiang V, Nakano T, Aoyama H, Mehta MP. Estrogen/progesterone receptor and HER2 discordance between primary tumor and brain metastases in breast cancer and its effect on treatment and survival. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:1359-1367. [PMID: 32034917 PMCID: PMC7523450 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer treatment is based on estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). At the time of metastasis, receptor status can be discordant from that at initial diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of discordance and its effect on survival and subsequent treatment in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). METHODS A retrospective database of 316 patients who underwent craniotomy for BCBM between 2006 and 2017 was created. Discordance was considered present if the ER, PR, or HER2 status differed between the primary tumor and the BCBM. RESULTS The overall receptor discordance rate was 132/316 (42%), and the subtype discordance rate was 100/316 (32%). Hormone receptors (HR, either ER or PR) were gained in 40/160 (25%) patients with HR-negative primary tumors. HER2 was gained in 22/173 (13%) patients with HER2-negative primary tumors. Subsequent treatment was not adjusted for most patients who gained receptors-nonetheless, median survival (MS) improved but did not reach statistical significance (HR, 17-28 mo, P = 0.12; HER2, 15-19 mo, P = 0.39). MS for patients who lost receptors was worse (HR, 27-18 mo, P = 0.02; HER2, 30-18 mo, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS Receptor discordance between primary tumor and BCBM is common, adversely affects survival if receptors are lost, and represents a missed opportunity for use of effective treatments if receptors are gained. Receptor analysis of BCBM is indicated when clinically appropriate. Treatment should be adjusted accordingly. KEY POINTS 1. Receptor discordance alters subtype in 32% of BCBM patients.2. The frequency of receptor gain for HR and HER2 was 25% and 13%, respectively.3. If receptors are lost, survival suffers. If receptors are gained, consider targeted treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology and University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shane Mesko
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jing Li
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel Cagney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ayal Aizer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric Nesbit
- Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Jason Chan
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jessica Lee
- Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | - Diana Shi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Helen A Shih
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hany Soliman
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ryan Shanley
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Emil Lou
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ashlyn Everett
- University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Laura Masucci
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jill Remick
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Supriya Jain
- University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James Yu
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Thomas N, Myall N, Sun F, Patil T, Mushtaq R, Yu C, Pollom E, Nagpal S, Camidge R, Rusthoven C, Braunstein S, Wakelee H, Mccoach C. P76.14 Time to First Progression in Patients with NSCLC with Brain Metastases Receiving 3rd Generation TKI alone vs TKI + Brain Radiation. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.01.1071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
40
|
Rusthoven CG, Yamamoto M, Bernhardt D, Smith DE, Gao D, Serizawa T, Yomo S, Aiyama H, Higuchi Y, Shuto T, Akabane A, Sato Y, Niranjan A, Faramand AM, Lunsford LD, McInerney J, Tuanquin LC, Zacharia BE, Chiang V, Singh C, Yu JB, Braunstein S, Mathieu D, Touchette CJ, Lee CC, Yang HC, Aizer AA, Cagney DN, Chan MD, Kondziolka D, Bernstein K, Silverman JS, Grills IS, Siddiqui ZA, Yuan JC, Sheehan JP, Cordeiro D, Nosaki K, Seto T, Deibert CP, Verma V, Day S, Halasz LM, Warnick RE, Trifiletti DM, Palmer JD, Attia A, Li B, Cifarelli CP, Brown PD, Vargo JA, Combs SE, Kessel KA, Rieken S, Patel S, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Kavanagh BD, Robin TP. Evaluation of First-line Radiosurgery vs Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases: The FIRE-SCLC Cohort Study. JAMA Oncol 2021; 6:1028-1037. [PMID: 32496550 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is preferred for limited brain metastases from most histologies, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has remained the standard of care for patients with small cell lung cancer. Data on SRS are limited. Objective To characterize and compare first-line SRS outcomes (without prior WBRT or prophylactic cranial irradiation) with those of first-line WBRT. Design, Setting, and Participants FIRE-SCLC (First-line Radiosurgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer) was a multicenter cohort study that analyzed SRS outcomes from 28 centers and a single-arm trial and compared these data with outcomes from a first-line WBRT cohort. Data were collected from October 26, 2017, to August 15, 2019, and analyzed from August 16, 2019, to November 6, 2019. Interventions SRS and WBRT for small cell lung cancer brain metastases. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival, time to central nervous system progression (TTCP), and central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival (PFS) after SRS were evaluated and compared with WBRT outcomes, with adjustment for performance status, number of brain metastases, synchronicity, age, sex, and treatment year in multivariable and propensity score-matched analyses. Results In total, 710 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 68.5 [62-74] years; 531 men [74.8%]) who received SRS between 1994 and 2018 were analyzed. The median overall survival was 8.5 months, the median TTCP was 8.1 months, and the median CNS PFS was 5.0 months. When stratified by the number of brain metastases treated, the median overall survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.9-13.4) for 1 lesion, 8.7 months (95% CI, 7.7-10.4) for 2 to 4 lesions, 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.4-9.6) for 5 to 10 lesions, and 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.3-7.6) for 11 or more lesions. Competing risk estimates were 7.0% (95% CI, 4.9%-9.2%) for local failures at 12 months and 41.6% (95% CI, 37.6%-45.7%) for distant CNS failures at 12 months. Leptomeningeal progression (46 of 425 patients [10.8%] with available data) and neurological mortality (80 of 647 patients [12.4%] with available data) were uncommon. On propensity score-matched analyses comparing SRS with WBRT, WBRT was associated with improved TTCP (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.55; P < .001), without an improvement in overall survival (median, 6.5 months [95% CI, 5.5-8.0] for SRS vs 5.2 months [95% CI, 4.4-6.7] for WBRT; P = .003) or CNS PFS (median, 4.0 months for SRS vs 3.8 months for WBRT; P = .79). Multivariable analyses comparing SRS and WBRT, including subset analyses controlling for extracranial metastases and extracranial disease control status, demonstrated similar results. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study suggest that the primary trade-offs associated with SRS without WBRT, including a shorter TTCP without a decrease in overall survival, are similar to those observed in settings in which SRS is already established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad G Rusthoven
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Aurora
| | | | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Derek E Smith
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Aurora
| | - Dexiang Gao
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Aurora
| | - Toru Serizawa
- Tokyo Gamma Unit Center, Tsukiji Neurological Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Yomo
- Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | | | - Yoshinori Higuchi
- Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Shuto
- Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Atsuya Akabane
- Gamma Knife Center, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasunori Sato
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew M Faramand
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - James McInerney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Leonard C Tuanquin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Brad E Zacharia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Charu Singh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Charles J Touchette
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel N Cagney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael D Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Joshua S Silverman
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Zaid A Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Justin C Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | - Diogo Cordeiro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | - Kename Nosaki
- National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takahashi Seto
- National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Samuel Day
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jewish Hospital-Mercy Health, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Albert Attia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Benjamin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John A Vargo
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Samir Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, The University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, The University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Brian D Kavanagh
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Aurora
| | - Tyler P Robin
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Zelefsky MJ, Yamada Y, Greco C, Lis E, Schöder H, Lobaugh S, Zhang Z, Braunstein S, Bilsky MH, Powell SN, Kolesnick R, Fuks Z. Phase 3 Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Single-Dose 24 Gy Radiation Therapy to a 3-Fraction SBRT Regimen in the Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:672-679. [PMID: 33422612 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This prospective phase 3 randomized trial was designed to test whether ultra high single-dose radiation therapy (24 Gy SDRT) improves local control of oligometastatic lesions compared to a standard hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy regimen (3 × 9 Gy SBRT). The secondary endpoint was to assess the associated toxicity and the impact of ablation on clinical patterns of metastatic progression. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between November 2010 and September 2015, 117 patients with 154 oligometastatic lesions (≤5/patient) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 24 Gy SDRT or 3 × 9 Gy SBRT. Local control within the irradiated field and the state of metastatic spread were assessed by periodic whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Median follow-up was 52 months. RESULTS A total of 59 patients with 77 lesions were randomized to 24 Gy SDRT and 58 patients with 77 lesions to 3 × 9 Gy SBRT. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence for SDRT-treated lesions was 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-6.5%) and 5.8% (95% CI, 0.2%-11.5%) at years 2 and 3, respectively, compared with 9.1% (95% CI, 2.6%-15.6%) and 22% (95% CI, 11.9%-32.1%) for SBRT-treated lesions (P = .0048). The 2- and 3-year cumulative incidences of distant metastatic progression in the SDRT patients were 5.3% (95% CI, 0%-11.1%), compared with 10.7% (95% CI, 2.5%-18.8%) and 22.5% (95% CI, 11.1%-33.9%), respectively, for the SBRT patients (P = .010). No differences in toxicity were observed. CONCLUSIONS The study confirms SDRT as a superior ablative treatment, indicating that effective ablation of oligometastatic lesions is associated with significant mitigation of distant metastatic progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Carlo Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Eric Lis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Stephanie Lobaugh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Mark H Bilsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard Kolesnick
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zvi Fuks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sperduto PW, Mesko S, Li J, Cagney D, Aizer A, Lin NU, Nesbit E, Kruser TJ, Chan J, Braunstein S, Lee J, Kirkpatrick JP, Breen W, Brown PD, Shi D, Shih HA, Soliman H, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto WA, Lou E, Everett A, Boggs DH, Masucci L, Roberge D, Remick J, Plichta K, Buatti JM, Jain S, Gaspar LE, Wu CC, Wang TJ, Bryant J, Chuong M, An Y, Chiang V, Nakano T, Aoyama H, Mehta MP. Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3773-3784. [PMID: 32931399 PMCID: PMC7655019 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Conventional wisdom has rendered patients with brain metastases ineligible for clinical trials for fear that poor survival could mask the benefit of otherwise promising treatments. Our group previously published the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). Updates with larger contemporary cohorts using molecular markers and newly identified prognostic factors have been published. The purposes of this work are to present all the updated indices in a single report to guide treatment choice, stratify research, and define an eligibility quotient to expand eligibility. METHODS A multi-institutional database of 6,984 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent multivariable analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival for each primary site. Significant factors were used to define the updated GPA. GPAs of 4.0 and 0.0 correlate with the best and worst prognoses, respectively. RESULTS Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis and new prognostic factors were identified. Those factors were incorporated into the updated GPA with robust separation (P < .01) between subgroups. Survival has improved, but varies widely by GPA for patients with non-small-cell lung, breast, melanoma, GI, and renal cancer with brain metastases from 7-47 months, 3-36 months, 5-34 months, 3-17 months, and 4-35 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Median survival varies widely and our ability to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases has improved. The updated GPA (available free at brainmetgpa.com) provides an accurate tool with which to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials. Instead of excluding patients with brain metastases, enrollment should be encouraged and those trials should be stratified by the GPA to ensure those trials make appropriate comparisons. Furthermore, we recommend the expansion of eligibility to allow for the enrollment of patients with previously treated brain metastases who have a 50% or greater probability of an additional year of survival (eligibility quotient > 0.50).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W. Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology and University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Jing Li
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Ayal Aizer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Jason Chan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Diana Shi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Hany Soliman
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Emil Lou
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | | | - Laura Masucci
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yi An
- Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Susko MS, Vasudevan HN, Ma L, Nakamura J, Raleigh D, Boreta L, Fogh S, Theodosopoulos P, McDermott M, Tsai K, Sneed P, Braunstein S. RADT-04. RESECTION CAVITY FAILURE OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES WHEN TREATED WITH SYSTEMIC THERAPY, WITH OR WITHOUT FOCAL RADIOTHERAPY. Neuro Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Brain metastases are a common sequelae of advanced melanoma, and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Systemic therapy, inclusive of BRAF/MEK inhibitors and immunotherapy, are increasingly being utilized for metastatic melanoma brain metastases. This study sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of resected melanoma brain metastases treated with systemic therapy, with or without focal radiotherapy.
METHODS
Patients at a single institution who underwent resection of a melanoma brain metastasis were retrospectively identified and reviewed. Patients were required to have received immunotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors in the 3-month perioperative time period. This cohort was then analyzed by receipt of focal radiotherapy, including SRS and brachytherapy, for resection cavity failure, distant CNS progression, and adverse radiation effect, using the Kaplan Meier method.
RESULTS
From 2011-2020, 43 resections for melanoma brain metastases were performed, of which 29 patients and 37 resection cavities met criteria for analysis. Median MRI follow up was 15 months (IQR: 6-38). Twenty-two (59%) lesions were treated with focal radiotherapy and systemic therapy, and 15 (41%) were treated with systemic therapy alone. 12-month freedom from local recurrence was 64.8% (95% CI: 42.1-99.8%) for systemic therapy alone, and 93.3% (95% CI: 81.5-100%) for focal radiotherapy with systemic therapy (p=0.01). 12-month CNS progression free survival was 35.7% (95% CI: 17.7-72.1%) for systemic therapy alone, and 31.8% (95% CI: 17.3-58.7%) for focal radiotherapy (p=0.51). UVA demonstrated focal radiotherapy (HR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01-0.85; p=0.04) was the only significant factor associated with reduction of risk for surgical cavity recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
Use of focal radiotherapy with systemic therapy for resected melanoma brain metastases significantly reduced surgical cavity recurrence compared to systemic therapy alone. Focal radiotherapy did not delay initiation of systemic therapy and should be the preferred treatment option for optimal local control of the surgical cavity in melanoma brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Susko
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Lijun Ma
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jean Nakamura
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Raleigh
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren Boreta
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shannon Fogh
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Michael McDermott
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katy Tsai
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Penny Sneed
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Choudhury A, Magill S, Prager B, Eaton C, Lam TC, Pu JKS, Li LF, Leung G, Vasudevan HN, Lucas CHG, Chan JW, Wendt J, Guerra G, Susko MS, Braunstein S, Villanueva-Meyer J, Bush NAO, Sneed PK, Berger M, Perry A, Solomon D, McDermott MW, Costello J, Francis S, Rich J, Raleigh D. EPCO-36. GENOMIC INSTABILITY AND TRANSCRIPTOMIC SIGNATURES UNDERLYING EPIGENETIC MENINGIOMA SUBGROUPS REVEALS MECHANISMS OF IMMUNE INFILTRATION AND THERAPEUTIC VULNERABILITIES. Neuro Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Meningioma treatments are limited due to incomplete understanding of meningioma biology. To address this, we performed multiplatform molecular profiling on 565 meningiomas with comprehensive clinical data to define genomic drivers and identify therapeutic vulnerabilities.
METHODS
DNA methylation profiling was performed on meningiomas from UCSF (n=200, discovery) and Hong Kong University (n=365, validation). Median follow-up was 5.6 years, and there were 388/142/35 WHO grade I/II/III meningiomas. Copy number variants (CNVs) were calculated for all meningiomas, and RNA sequencing was performed on UCSF meningiomas. Cell type deconvolution, metagenomics, CRISPR, and pharmacology were used for mechanistic and functional validation.
RESULTS
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of differentially methylated DNA probes revealed that meningiomas were comprised of 3 epigenetic subgroups associated with good, intermediate, and poor outcomes, with representation from all WHO grades in each subgroup. Meningiomas from the subgroup with the best outcomes (52% WHO grade I) were distinguished by recurrent gain of Chr5. Meningiomas from the subgroup with intermediate outcomes (31% WHO grade II) were distinguished by genomic stability, enrichment of innate immune genes, and immune infiltration in the setting of endogenous retroviral gene re-expression, a mechanism of immune recruitment. The most aggressive subgroup of meningiomas (57% WHO grade III) was distinguished by genomic instability, including recurrent loss of Chr22q harboring NF2, and decreased immune infiltration. Consistently, NF2 suppression in primary meningioma cells derived from immunogenic meningiomas decreased expression of innate immune genes critical for immune recruitment, suggesting a novel immunostimulatory function of NF2. The most aggressive subgroup of meningiomas were further distinguished by activation of the mitogenic FOXM1 transcriptional program, and recurrent loss of Chr9p harboring CDKN2A/B, which rendered primary meningioma cells from this subgroup susceptible to CDK4/6 inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS
Meningiomas are comprised of 3 epigenetic subgroups defined by genetic mechanisms driving immune infiltration in the tumor microenvironment and meningioma cell proliferation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrar Choudhury
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephen Magill
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Briana Prager
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Charlotte Eaton
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Gerald Leung
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | | | - Jason W Chan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jake Wendt
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Geno Guerra
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew S Susko
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Penny K Sneed
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mitchel Berger
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Arie Perry
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Solomon
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Joseph Costello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephen Francis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeremy Rich
- University of California - San Diego and Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - David Raleigh
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chen W, Vasudevan HN, Choudhury A, Lucas CHG, Magill S, Susko MS, Braunstein S, Boreta L, Nakamura J, Sneed PK, Bush NAO, Villanueva-Meyer J, Perry A, Solomon D, McDermott M, Theodosopoulos P, Raleigh D. BIOM-52. A PROGNOSTIC GENE EXPRESSION RISK SCORE FOR MENINGIOMA. Neuro Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Clinical biomarkers for identifying patients at risk for recurrence after resection of meningioma are lacking and are needed for guiding adjuvant therapy. The aim of this study was to identify a prognostic gene expression signature for meningioma.
METHODS
Targeted gene expression analysis was performed on a discovery dataset of 96 meningiomas with suitable tissue identified from a retrospective institutional biorepository. Recurrence was dichotomized based on the median time to local recurrence (TTR). With median follow-up of 6.4 years, the discovery dataset was enriched for clinical endpoints of local recurrence (58%), mortality (42%), and disease-specific mortality (49% of deaths). A 266 gene expression panel was used to interrogate the discovery dataset, and a prognostic gene signature and risk score was generated using prediction analysis for microarrays (PAM) and elastic net regression. The risk score was validated using gene expression data (GSE58037) from 56 meningiomas resected at an independent institution (20% local recurrence, 18% mortality, median follow-up 5.4 years).
RESULTS
A 36-gene signature was identified achieving an AUC of 0.86 for TTR faster than the median in the discovery cohort. A risk score between 0 and 1 based on this signature was strongly associated with shorter TTR (F-test, P< 0.0001), and on multivariate Cox regression (MVA), was independently associated with recurrence (RR 1.56 per 0.1 increase, 95% CI 1.30–1.90, P< 0.0001) and mortality (RR 1.32 per 0.1 increase, 1.07–1.64, P=0.01) after adjusting for WHO grade, age, extent of resection, and sex. Similarly, in the validation dataset, the gene risk score was correlated with shorter TTR (P=0.002) and associated with mortality on MVA (RR 1.86 per 0.1 increase, 1.19–2.88, P=0.005) after adjustment for WHO grade.
CONCLUSIONS
The prognostic meningioma gene expression risk score presented here could be useful in identifying patients at higher risk of progression after resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Chen
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Abrar Choudhury
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Stephen Magill
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew S Susko
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Lauren Boreta
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jean Nakamura
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Penny K Sneed
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Arie Perry
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Solomon
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - David Raleigh
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Vasudevan HN, Lucas CHG, Chen W, Magill S, Braunstein S, jacques L, Dahiya S, Rodriguez F, Horvai A, Perry A, Pekmezci M, Raleigh D. RADT-20. HISTOPATHOLOGIC FINDINGS IN MALIGNANT PERIPHERAL NERVE SHEATH TUMOR ARE BOTH PROGNOSTIC FOR OVERALL SURVIVAL AND PREDICTIVE FOR RESPONSE TO RADIATION THERAPY. Neuro Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is an aggressive neoplasm associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite multimodal therapy, clinical outcomes remain poor. To elucidate markers of MPNST treatment response, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of MPNST patients at a single institution and performed histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis for predictive and prognostic features.
METHODS
We identified 54 consecutive patients treated at University of California San Francisco between 1990 and 2018 that met diagnostic criteria for MPNST on pathologic review with sufficient tissue available for histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays. IHC was performed for Ki-67, EGFR, p53, H3K27me3, neurofibromin, S100, p75NTR, SOX10, p16, and SOX2. Overall survival (OS), metastasis free survival (MFS), and locoregional failure free rate (LFFR), were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test, Cox Proportional Hazards regression, and hierarchical clustering were performed in R.
RESULTS
With a median follow up of 19.2 months, the 5-year OS, MFS, and LFFR were 58%, 68%, and 66%, respectively, with no significant differences between NF1 associated (n=32) and sporadic tumors (n=22). Radiation therapy significantly improved 5-year LFFR (80% versus 49%, p=0.05), but not OS or MFS. Tumor grade was associated with worse OS by Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLCC) grading (p=0.02). Furthermore, elevated Ki-67 index was associated with worse 5-year OS (39% versus 73% for Ki-67 index ³ 60 and Ki-67 index < 60, p=0.01). Finally, hierarchical clustering of IHC data identified a predictive signature defined by elevated Ki-67 and EGFR expression associated with improved responses to radiation therapy (5-year OS 86% versus 10%, p=0.004).
CONCLUSIONS
Our data provide insights into the diagnosis and treatment of MPNST. Additional investigation is needed to understand the biologic mechanisms and generalizability of the signatures uncovered in our analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - William Chen
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephen Magill
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Line jacques
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sonika Dahiya
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Andrew Horvai
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Arie Perry
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Melike Pekmezci
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Raleigh
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gonzalez-Junca A, Reiners O, Borrero-Garcia LD, Beckford-Vera D, Lazar AA, Chou W, Braunstein S, VanBrocklin H, Franc BL, Barcellos-Hoff MH. Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Functional Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) Activity and Benefit of TGFβ Inhibition in Irradiated Intracranial Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:527-539. [PMID: 33007434 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) promotes cell survival by endorsing DNA damage repair and mediates an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Thus, TGFβ activation in response to radiation therapy is potentially targetable because it opposes therapeutic control. Strategies to assess this potential in the clinic are needed. METHODS AND MATERIALS We evaluated positron emission tomography (PET) to image 89Zr -fresolimumab, a humanized TGFβ neutralizing monoclonal antibody, as a means to detect TGFβ activation in intracranial tumor models. Pathway activity of TGFβ was validated by immunodetection of phosphorylated SMAD2 and the TGFβ target, tenascin. The contribution of TGFβ to radiation response was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of mice bearing intracranial murine tumor models GL261 and SB28 glioblastoma and brain-adapted 4T1 breast cancer (4T1-BrA) treated with TGFβ neutralizing monoclonal antibody, 1D11, and/or focal radiation (10 Gy). RESULTS 89Zr-fresolimumab PET imaging detected engineered, physiological, and radiation-induced TGFβ activation, which was confirmed by immunostaining of biological markers. GL261 glioblastoma tumors had a greater PET signal compared with similar-sized SB28 glioblastoma tumors, whereas the widespread PET signal of 4T1-BrA intracranial tumors was consistent with their highly dispersed histologic distribution. Survival of mice bearing intracranial tumors treated with 1D11 neutralizing antibody alone was similar to that of mice treated with control antibody, whereas 1D11 improved survival when given in combination with focal radiation. The extent of survival benefit of a combination of radiation and 1D11 was associated with the degree of TGFβ activity detected by PET. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that 89Zr-fresolimumab PET imaging detects radiation-induced TGFβ activation in tumors. Functional imaging indicated a range of TGFβ activity in intracranial tumors, but TGFβ blockade provided survival benefit only in the context of radiation treatment. This study provides further evidence that radiation-induced TGFβ activity opposes therapeutic response to radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Gonzalez-Junca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Oliver Reiners
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Luis D Borrero-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Denis Beckford-Vera
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Ann A Lazar
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California; Division of Oral Epidemiology, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, California; Division of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - William Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Henry VanBrocklin
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Benjamin L Franc
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California; Division of Oral Epidemiology, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Morrison MA, Mueller S, Felton E, Jakary A, Stoller S, Avadiappan S, Yuan J, Molinaro AM, Braunstein S, Banerjee A, Hess CP, Lupo JM. Rate of radiation-induced microbleed formation on 7T MRI relates to cognitive impairment in young patients treated with radiation therapy for a brain tumor. Radiother Oncol 2020; 154:145-153. [PMID: 32966846 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy (RT) is essential to the management of many brain tumors, but has been known to lead to cognitive decline and vascular injury in the form of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). PURPOSE In a subset of children, adolescents, and young adults recruited from a larger trial investigating arteriopathy and stroke risk after RT, we evaluated the prevalence of CMBs after RT, examined risk factors for CMBs and cognitive impairment, and related their longitudinal development to cognitive performance changes. METHODS Twenty-five patients (mean 17 years, range: 10-25 years) underwent 7-Tesla MRI and cognitive assessment. Nineteen patients were treated with whole-brain or focal RT 1-month to 20-years prior, while 6 non-irradiated patients with posterior-fossa tumors served as controls. CMBs were detected on 7T susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) using semi-automated software, a first use in this population. RESULTS CMB detection sensitivity with 7T SWI was higher than previously reported at lower field strengths, with one or more CMBs detected in 100% of patients treated with RT at least 1-year prior. CMBs were localized to dose-targeted brain volumes with risk factors including whole-brain RT (p = 0.05), a higher RT dose (p = 0.01), increasing time since RT (p = 0.03), and younger age during RT (p = 0.01). Apart from RT dose, these factors were associated with impaired memory performance. Follow-up data in a subset of patients revealed a proportional increase in CMB count with worsening verbal memory performance (r = -0.85, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with RT during youth is associated with the chronic development of CMBs that evolve with memory impairment over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A Morrison
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Sabine Mueller
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Erin Felton
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Angela Jakary
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Schuyler Stoller
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Sivakami Avadiappan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Justin Yuan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Annette M Molinaro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Anu Banerjee
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Christopher P Hess
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA; Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Janine M Lupo
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
McDermott MW, Sheehan J, Braunstein S. Introduction. Radiosurgery and radiotherapy for meningiomas: overview of the issue. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 46:E1. [PMID: 31153142 DOI: 10.3171/2019.3.focus19260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W McDermott
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jason Sheehan
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; and
| | - Steve Braunstein
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sperduto PW, Mesko S, Li J, Cagney D, Aizer A, Lin NU, Nesbit E, Kruser TJ, Chan J, Braunstein S, Lee J, Kirkpatrick JP, Breen W, Brown PD, Shi D, Shih HA, Soliman H, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto W, Lou E, Everett A, Boggs DH, Masucci L, Roberge D, Remick J, Plichta K, Buatti JM, Jain S, Gaspar LE, Wu CC, Wang TJC, Bryant J, Chuong M, Yu J, Chiang V, Nakano T, Aoyama H, Mehta MP. Beyond an Updated Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast GPA): A Prognostic Index and Trends in Treatment and Survival in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases From 1985 to Today. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:334-343. [PMID: 32084525 PMCID: PMC7276246 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain metastases are a common sequelae of breast cancer. Survival varies widely based on diagnosis-specific prognostic factors (PF). We previously published a prognostic index (Graded Prognostic Assessment [GPA]) for patients with breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM), based on cohort A (1985-2007, n = 642), then updated it, reporting the effect of tumor subtype in cohort B (1993-2010, n = 400). The purpose of this study is to update the Breast GPA with a larger contemporary cohort (C) and compare treatment and survival across the 3 cohorts. METHODS AND MATERIALS A multi-institutional (19), multinational (3), retrospective database of 2473 patients with breast cancer with newly diagnosed brain metastases (BCBM) diagnosed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2017, was created and compared with prior cohorts. Associations of PF and treatment with survival were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were compared with log-rank tests. PF were weighted and the Breast GPA was updated such that a GPA of 0 and 4.0 correlate with the worst and best prognoses, respectively. RESULTS Median survival (MS) for cohorts A, B, and C improved over time (from 11, to 14 to 16 months, respectively; P < .01), despite the subtype distribution becoming less favorable. PF significant for survival were tumor subtype, Karnofsky Performance Status, age, number of BCBMs, and extracranial metastases (all P < .01). MS for GPA 0 to 1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0, and 3.5-4.0 was 6, 13, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Between cohorts B and C, the proportion of human epidermal receptor 2 + subtype decreased from 31% to 18% (P < .01) and MS in this subtype increased from 18 to 25 months (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS MS has improved modestly but varies widely by diagnosis-specific PF. New PF are identified and incorporated into an updated Breast GPA (free online calculator available at brainmetgpa.com). The Breast GPA facilitates clinical decision-making and will be useful for stratification of future clinical trials. Furthermore, these data suggest human epidermal receptor 2-targeted therapies improve clinical outcomes in some patients with BCBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology & University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | | | - Jing Li
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Ayal Aizer
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jason Chan
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Steve Braunstein
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | - Diana Shi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen A Shih
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hany Soliman
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Emil Lou
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Laura Masucci
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James Yu
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|