Towards a better detection of patients at-risk of linezolid toxicity in clinical practice: a prospective study in three Belgian hospital centers

Introduction: Linezolid is a last-resort antibiotic for infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms. It is widely used for off-label indications and for longer than recommended treatment durations, exposing patients at higher risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), notably thrombocytopenia. This study aimed to investigate ADR incidence and risk factors, identify thrombocytopenia-related trough levels based on treatment duration, and evaluate the performance of predictive scores for ADR development. Methods: Adult in- and outpatients undergoing linezolid therapy were enrolled in three hospitals and ADRs and linezolid trough levels prospectively monitored over time. A population pharmacokinetic (pop-PK model) was used to estimate trough levels for blood samples collected at varying times. Results: A multivariate analysis based on 63 treatments identified treatment duration ≥10 days and trough levels >8 mg/L as independent risk factors of developing thrombocytopenia, with high trough values correlated with impaired renal function. Five patients treated for >28 days did not develop thrombocytopenia but maintained trough values in the target range (<8 mg/L). The Buzelé predictive score, which combines an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index with treatment duration, demonstrated 77% specificity and 67% sensitivity to predict the risk of ADR. Conclusion: Our work supports the necessity of establishing guidelines for dose adjustment in patients with renal insufficiency and the systematic use of TDM in patients at-risk in order to keep trough values ≤8 mg/L. The Buzelé predictive score (if ≥7) may help to detect these at-risk patients, and pop-PK models can estimate trough levels based on plasma samples collected at varying times, reducing the logistical burden of TDM in clinical practice.

Assessment of whole-body MRI including diffusion-weighted sequences in the initial staging of breast cancer patients at high risk of metastases in comparison with PET-CT: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the diffusion-weighted whole-body-MRI (WBMRI) in the initial staging of breast cancer at high risk of metastases in comparison with positron emission tomography (PET)-CT.

METHODS

Forty-five women were prospectively enrolled. The inclusion criteria were female gender, age >18, invasive breast cancer, an initial PET-CT, and a performance status of 0-2. The exclusion criteria were contraindication to WB-MRI and breast cancer recurrence. The primary outcome was the concordance of WB-MRI and PET-CT in the diagnosis of distant metastases, whereas secondary outcomes included their concordance for the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (LN), as well as the agreement of WB-MRI interpretation between two radiologists.

RESULTS

The mean age was 51.2 years with a median size of the primary tumor of 30 mm. Concordance between the two modalities was almost perfect for metastases staging, all sites included (k = 0.862), with excellent interobserver agreement. The accuracy of WB-MRI for detecting regional LN, distant LN, lung, liver, or bone metastases ranged from 91 to 96%. In 2 patients, WB-MRI detected bone metastases that were overlooked by PET-CT. WB-MRI showed a substantial agreement with PET-CT for staging the primary tumor, regional LN status, and stage (k = 0.766, k = 0.756, and k = 0.785, respectively) with a high interobserver agreement.

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI including DWI could be a reliable and reproducible examination in the initial staging of breast cancer patients at high risk of metastases, especially for bone metastases and therefore could be used as a surrogate to PET-CT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Whole-body-MRI including DWI is a promising technique for detecting metastases in the initial staging of breast cancer at high risk of metastases.

KEY POINTS

Whole-body-MRI (WB-MRI) was effective for detecting metastases in the initial staging of 45 breast cancer patients at high risk of metastases in comparison with PET-CT. Concordance between WB-MRI and PET-CT was almost perfect for metastases staging, all sites included, with excellent interobserver agreement. The accuracy of WB-MRI for detecting bone metastases was 92%.

Circulating DNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early stage colon cancer

BACKGROUND

While circulating tumour (ct)DNA is an indicator of minimal residual disease and negative prognostic factor in stage II-III colon cancer, no study has ever analysed the value of this biomarker in colon cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to fill this gap by using prospectively collected plasma samples from 80 stage III colon cancer patients, receiving one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX followed by surgery +/- adjuvant FOLFOX in the PePiTA trial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples were collected at baseline, 2 weeks and surgery. NPY and WIF1 were selected as universal methylation markers for ctDNA, and analysed with ddPCR technology. ROC curves were applied for cut-off points, and outcome measures included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 6-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, baseline circulating-free (cf) DNA was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 3.35, 95% CI: 1.15-9.77, p = .03), and a trend towards a similar association was observed for relative cfDNA changes between baseline and surgery (HR 2.57, 95% CI: 0.94-7.05, p = .07). Among 60 ctDNA assessable patients, 25 (42%) had detectable ctDNA at baseline. While detection of ctDNA at any pre-operative timepoint was not associated with outcome, patients with ctDNA increase (change of the worst trending methylation marker ≥11%, or mean ctDNA change of NPY and WIF1 ≥ 0%) between baseline and surgery showed a trend towards worse 5-year DFS (HR 3.66, 95% CI: 0.81-16.44, p = .09).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study of ctDNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early-stage colon cancer. Results are hypothesis-generating and should be confirmed in larger series.

Persistent emotional stress, fatigue and impaired neurocognitive function in recovered COVID-19 patients: a longitudinal prospective study

Introduction

Several surveys report that post-COVID-19 patients (pts) could be at risk of persistent emotional distress, fatigue and impaired neurocognitive function (NCF).

Objectives

The aim was to assess emotional distress, fatigue and NCF in order to provide adequate care.

Methods

Patients with persistent physical or mental symptoms, at least 8 weeks post-COVID-19, were eligible for this ongoing prospective longitudinal single center trial. Data on depression, anxiety, cognition, post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and fatigue were collected using 4 validated questionnaires at study entry (T0) and at 6 months (T1).

Results

Ninety-three pts were recruited between November 2020-March 2021. Test results from 64 eligible pts (15 male pts) were analyzed at T0; 63 pts (98%) were treated in outpatient settings. Median age was 47 years [range 27-75]). Median time since COVID-19 was 29 weeks [range 8-53]. Twenty-two pts (34%) had a history of psychiatric disorders. According to the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), 44 pts (73%) reported anxiety symptoms and 26 pts (41%) reported depressive symptoms; 48 pts (69%) reported cognitive complaints according to the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire and 29 pts (45%) suffered from PTSS, according to the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C). Fifty-five pts (86%) had an elevated score on the Fatigue Severity Scale, indicating severe fatigue. Twenty-seven pts (42%) were still on sick leaf. Diminished social support and psychiatric history were predictive factors for neurocognitive dysfunction and PTSS.

Conclusions

A majority of patients who recovered physically from COVID-19, are at risk for suffering from persistent anxiety, PTSS and neurocognitive dysfunction.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Tocilizumab-Induced Unexpected Increase of Several Inflammatory Cytokines in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: The Anti-Inflammatory Side of IL-6

Early evidence during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic indicated high levels of interleukin (IL)-6 in patients with severe COVID-19. This led to the off-label use of tocilizumab (TCZ) during the first wave of the pandemic. While the monoclonal antibody blocks IL-6 pathway, its effect on other inflammatory cytokines remains poorly described. To better understand the effect of TCZ on the biological inflammatory profile, we monitored a large panel of inflammatory cytokines in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving off-label TCZ. Twenty-three patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were included in the study, among which 15 patients received TCZ and 8 patients did not. Serum samples were collected for 8 days, before and following TCZ administration or hospital admission for the control group. Serum profile of 12 cytokines (IL-1β, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -12, -13, -17, -18, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and sIL-6R were assessed in these two groups. Although the increased IL-6 concentrations after TCZ infusion were expected, we observed an unexpected increase in IL-1β, -2, -4, -10, -12p70, -18, and sIL-6R levels in the treated patients with maximal values reaching 2 to 4 days after TCZ. In contrast, no change in cytokine levels was observed in the control group. Our results suggested that some inflammatory pathways escape IL-6R blockade and even appeared amplified. This finding highlights an old observation of the anti-inflammatory effects of IL-6 as already suggested over 20 years ago. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT04346017.

Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in predicting early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: comparison between ROI-ADC and whole-lesion-ADC measurements

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess DWI with ROI-ADC and WL-ADC measurements in early response after NAC in breast cancer.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2019, 55 women were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. MRI was performed at three time points for each patient: before treatment (MRI 1: DW and DCE MRI), after one cycle of NAC (MRI 2: noncontrast DW MRI), and after completion of NAC before surgery (MRI 3: DW and DCE MRI). ROI-ADC and WL-ADC measurements were obtained on MRI and were compared to histology findings and to the RCB class. Patients were categorized as having pCR or non-pCR.

RESULTS

Among 48 patients, 9 experienced pCR. An increase of ROI-ADC between MRI 1 and 2 of more than 47.5% had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 63.4% in predicting pCR, whereas WL-ADC did not predict pCR. An increase of ROI-ADC between MRI 1 and 2 of more than 47.5% had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 64.9% in predicting radiologic complete response. An increase of WL-ADC between MRI 1 and 2 of more than 25.5% had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 75.5% in predicting radiologic complete response.

CONCLUSION

After one cycle of NAC, a significant increase in breast tumor ROI-ADC at DWI predicted complete pathologic and radiologic responses.

KEY POINTS

• An increase of WL-ADC between MRI 1 and 2 of more than 25.5% had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 75.5% in predicting radiologic complete response. • An increase of ROI-ADC between MRI 1 and 2 of more than 47.5% had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 63.4% in predicting pCR, and a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 64.9% in predicting radiologic complete response. • A significant increase in breast tumor ROI-ADC at DWI predicted complete pathologic and radiologic responses.

Abstract 28: Prognostic value of baseline and early changes of circulating cell-free (cf)DNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early stage colon cancer (CC)

Introduction Circulating tumour (ct)DNA is an indicator of minimal residual disease and negative prognostic factor in stage II-III CC treated with surgery +/- adjuvant chemotherapy. No study, however, has ever analysed the prognostic value of this biomarker in CC patients (pts) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and early, on-treatment changes of cfDNA and ctDNA in stage II-III CC pts who were treated with one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy followed by surgery +/- adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy in the PePiTA trial.

Methods PePITA was a multicentre, single-arm, prospective phase II trial aiming to test in vivo tumour chemosensitivity as assessd by metabolic response using 18F-FDG PET/CT scan of early stage CC and to evaluate its association with survival outcome (NCT00994864). Plasma samples were prospectively collected at baseline and 2 weeks (ie, after one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy). cfDNA was isolated with the QIAmp circulating nucleic acid kit (Qiagen), and quantified with the Qubit fluorometer (Life-Technologies). cfDNA samples were bisulfite converted using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ Kit (Zymo Research), with NPY and WIF1 being selected as universal methylation markers for ctDNA and analysed with digital droplet (dd)PCR technology. Data from ddPCR were processed with the QuantaSoft V1.6 software (BioRad). The primary outcome measure was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses, Kaplan-Meier method, cox proportional hazards models and log-rank tests were used. Statistical analyses were carried out with the SPSS for MacOS version 25.0 (SPSS Inc).

Results 80 pts were included (ypStage I-II 56%, ypStage III 44%). After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, 3-year DFS was 80% (95%CI 71.2-90.8) and 5-year OS 84% (95%CI 75.2-94.9). Pts with high (≥1.2 ng/µl) baseline cfDNA level had worse 3-year DFS (48% vs 80%; HR 2.72, 95%CI 1.02-7.25; p=0.036) and 5-year OS (71% vs 90%; HR 5.36, 95%CI 1.14-25.28; p=0.017) than those with low baseline cfDNA level. In a multivariable analysis (including sex, ypStage and CEA), baseline cfDNA was the only factor showing a trend towards statistical significance (HR DFS 2.6, 95%CI 0.96-7.01; p=0.059; HR OS 4.65, 95%CI 0.97-22.32; p=0.055). Early changes of cfDNA (Δ ≥11%) after one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy failed to predict survival (HR DFS 1.08, 95%CI 0.42-2.81; p=0.873; HR OS 0.68, 95%CI 0.19-2.39; p=0.543). ctDNA analyses are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting.

Conclusions For the first time, we have shown that baseline cfDNA may predict survival outcome in early stage CC pts treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pending confirmation in larger series, testing for cfDNA at baseline could help select high-risk pts who may benefit from neoadjuvant, FOXTROT-like, treatment strategies.

Citation Format: Giacomo Bregni, Elena Trevisi, Chiara Senti, Andrea Pretta, Caroline Vandeputte, Pashalina Kehagias, Elena Acedo Reina, Amélie Deleporte, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Philippe Vergauwe, Marc Van den Eynde, Guido Deboever, Jos Janssens, Gauthier Demolin, Stephane Holbrechts, Marylene Clausse, Thierry De Grez, Marc Peeters, Lionel D'Hondt, Karen Geboes, Tatiana Besse-Hammer, Alexis Buggenhout, Françoise Rothé, Patrick Flamen, Alain Hendlisz, Francesco Sclafani. Prognostic value of baseline and early changes of circulating cell-free (cf)DNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early stage colon cancer (CC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 28.

Prognostic value of baseline and early changes of circulating-free (cf) and circulating tumor (ct) DNA in the neoadjuvant (NA) setting of early stage colon cancer (CC)

3600

Background: ctDNA is an indicator of minimal residual disease and negative prognostic factor in stage II-III CC treated with surgery +/- adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). No study, however, has ever analysed the prognostic value of this biomarker in CC patients (pts) treated with NACT. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and early changes of cf/ctDNA in stage II-III CC pts who were treated with one cycle of NA FOLFOX CT followed by surgery +/- adjuvant FOLFOX CT in the PePiTA trial. Methods: PePiTA was a multicentre, single-arm, prospective phase II trial testing in vivo tumour chemosensitivity of early stage CC (as assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT-based metabolic response to one cycle of NA FOLFOX) and its association with long-term outcome (NCT00994864). Plasma samples were prospectively collected at baseline, 2 weeks after one cycle of NA FOLFOX CT, and before surgery. NPY and WIF1 were selected as universal methylation markers for ctDNA and analysed with digital droplet (dd)PCR technology. Data from ddPCR were processed with the QuantaSoft v1.6 software (Bio-Rad). Survival outcome measures were 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 6-year overall survival (OS). ROC curve analyses, Kaplan-Meier method, cox proportional hazards models and log-rank tests were used. Statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS v25.0 (SPSS Inc.). Results: 80 pts were included (44 ypStage I-II and 36 ypStage III). After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, 5-year DFS and 6-year OS were 68% (95%CI 52-84) and 84% (95%CI 74-94), respectively. Pts with high (≥1600 ng/ml) baseline cfDNA had worse 6-year OS (HR 6.45, 95%CI 1.61-25.84; p = 0.008). Early changes of cfDNA after one cycle of NA FOLFOX CT failed to predict survival (HR DFS 0.96, 95%CI 0.38-2.43; p = 0.92; HR OS 0.62, 95%CI 0.16-2.50; p = 0.50). At baseline, 25 out of 60 (42%) ctDNA-assessable patients were positive. Detectable ctDNA at baseline (HR DFS 2.06, 95%CI 0.65-6.49; p = 0.22; HR OS 3.11, 95%CI 0.57-16.99; p = 0.19) or at any timepoint before surgery (HR DFS 1.65, 95%CI 0.54-5.04; p = 0.38; HR OS 2.80, 95%CI 0.54-14.44; p = 0.22) was not significantly associated with survival. A trend toward a significant association between ctDNA increase at surgery and 5-year DFS was found (HR 3.66, 95%CI 0.81-16.44; p = 0.09). Data on the correlation between early changes of cf/ctDNA and 18F-FDG PET/CT-based metabolic response will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: For the first time, we have shown that baseline cfDNA may predict survival outcome in early stage CC pts treated with NACT. Pending confirmation in larger series, testing for cfDNA at baseline could help select high-risk pts who may benefit from FOxTROT-like, NACT treatment strategies. While analysis of ctDNA in this setting did not appear useful to predict prognosis, these results might be secondary to the small sample size.

A score combining early detection of cytokines accurately predicts COVID-19 severity and intensive care unit transfer

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to explore cytokine profile in patients as it relates to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, and to establish a predictive cytokine score to discriminate severe from non-severe cases and provide a prognosis parameter for patients that will require intensive care unit (ICU) transfer.

METHODS

Serum samples of 63 patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection were collected early after hospital admission (day 0-3). Patients were categorized in five groups based on the clinical presentation, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and the requirement of mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

Three cytokines, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10, were markedly higher in severe forms (n = 44) than in non-severe forms (n = 19) (p < 0.005). A score combining levels of these three cytokines (IL-6*IL-8*IL-10) had the highest performance to predict severity: sensitivity of 86.4% (95% CI, 72.4-94.8) and specificity of 94.7% (95% CI, 74.0-99.9) for a cutoff value of 2068 pg/mL. Elevated levels of IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 were also found in critically ill patients. The combination of IL-6*IL-10 serum levels allowed the highest predictability for ICU transfer: AUC of 0.898 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The combinatorial IL-6*IL-8*IL-10 score at presentation was highly predictive of the progression to a severe form of the disease, and could contribute to improve patient triage and to adapt therapeutic strategy within clinical trials more accurately and efficiently.

FRI0400 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF AN INTRA-ARTICULAR INJECTION OF JTA-004, A NOVEL ENHANCED PROTEIN SOLUTION, IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS PAIN: A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED PHASE II/III STUDY

Background:

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative, chronic, and progressive joint disease. It is associated with chronic pain, joint function impairments and disabilities, causing a poorer quality of life with physical and/or mental co-morbidity. Along with population ageing and increasing obesity, the incidence of OA is rising and there is an urgent need for new treatment options.

Objectives:

JTA-004 is a novel protein solution in development for the treatment of knee OA pain. Supplemented with hyaluronic acid and clonidine, it is designed to provide a fast-acting and long-lasting pain relief. To evaluate efficacy and safety and to select the most effective formulation, single intra-articular administration of 3 JTA-004 formulations were tested and compared to Hylan G-F 20 during a 6-month period.

Methods:

In this prospective, multicentre, double-blind phase II/III trial (NCT02740231), eligible participants were 50-79-year-old men and women with primary knee OA classified with Kellgren-Lawrence grade II or III and a body mass index (BMI) under 35. 164 patients were randomly assigned to one of the three JTA-004 formulations or the reference treatment (Hylan G-F 20) in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. The three JTA-004 formulations differed in their clonidine concentration (50 or 100 µg/ml) and/or their volume of injection (2 or 4 ml) (Table 1). Patients were evaluated using Western Ontario McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) scores and Short-Form health survey (SF-12). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline at 6 months in WOMAC®VA3.1 Pain Subscale. Safety was assessed by monitoring and reporting vital signs, physical examination, adverse events and concomitant medications throughout the study.

Table 1.

Description of the three JTA-004 formulations administered

JTA-004 formulationPlasma proteinsolutionClonidineHAVolume ofConcentrationAmountConcentrationAmountConcentrationAmountinjectionJTA-100/21.02 g/ml2.04 g50 µg/ml100 µg10 mg/ml20 mg2 mlJTA-200/21.02 g/ml2.04 g100 µg/ml200 µg10 mg/ml20 mg2 mlJTA-200/41.02 g/ml4.08 g50 µg/ml200 µg10 mg/ml40 mg4 ml

Results:

At 6 months, patients in the three JTA-004 groups showed a better improvement in pain compared to patients in the reference group. The between-group difference (between each JTA-004 test group and reference group) in adjusted (adapted to difference in baseline values) mean change in WOMAC®Pain Subscale Score from baseline ranged between -9.49 mm and -11.63 mm at 6 months post-injection. Statistical superiority of each JTA-004 formulation over Hylan G-F 20 was however not demonstrated (p-value between 0.052 and 0.141) (Figure 1,JTA 200/2, 100/2 and 200/4). As the three JTA-004 formulations had a similar efficacy in terms of pain reduction, apost hocanalysis was subsequently performed between the pooled JTA-004-treated patients and the reference group. This analysis showed a 26.1 ± 2.4 (adjusted mean ± SE) mm improvement in pain in the pooled JTA-004 group vs. 15.6 ± 4.1 mm in the reference group at 6 months, demonstrating a statistically significant superiority of JTA-004 over the reference (between-group difference = -10.57; p = 0.030) (Figure 1,pooled JTA).

Figure 1.

Main and post hoc analyses.

All JTA-004 formulations were shown to be well tolerated and had a clinically acceptable safety profile. There was a trend for fewer treatment-related events in the JTA-100/2 group, notably no cases of post-injection mild and transient hypotension.

Conclusion:

This study provides a first evidence of efficacy and safety of JTA-004 in the treatment of knee OA pain.

Disclosure of Interests:

Marie Bettonville Employee of: Bone Therapeutics, Marc Leon: None declared, Joëlle Margaux: None declared, Didier Urbin-Choffray: None declared, Emilie Theunissen: None declared, Tatiana Besse-Hammer: None declared, Yves Fortems: None declared, Séverine Verlinden: None declared, Olivier Godeaux Consultant of: Bone Therapeutics, Anne-Sophie Delmarcelle Employee of: Bone Therapeutics, Jean-François Kaux Consultant of: Bone Therapeutics

Neurophysiological markers of cue reactivity and inhibition subtend a three-month period of complete alcohol abstinence

OBJECTIVE

Finding new tools for conventional management of alcohol disorders is a challenge for psychiatrists. Brain indications related to cognitive functioning could represent such an add-on tool.

METHODS

Forty alcohol-dependent inpatients undertook two cognitive event-related potential (ERP) tasks at the beginning and at the end of a 4-week detoxification program. These comprised a visual oddball task investigating cue reactivity and a Go/No-go task tagging inhibition using oddball P3d and No-go P3d ERP components. Three months after discharge, the patient group (N = 40) was split into two subgroups: patients who remained abstinent during this post-treatment period (90 days; n = 15), and patients who relapsed (mean time: 28.5 ± 26.2 days; n = 25). Pattern changes of both ERP markers (oddball P3d and No-go P3d) during the detoxification were compared to differentiate these populations.

RESULTS

Abstinent patients exhibited similar P3d responses devoted to alcohol cues in Sessions 1 and 2, but an increased No-go P3d devoted to No-go trials in alcohol-related contexts in Session 2 compared to Session 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific cue-reactivity and inhibitory neurophysiological markers subtend a further three-months of complete abstinence.

SIGNIFICANCE

Monitoring these ERP changes during detoxification may provide important clues regarding patients' future abstinence vs. relapse.

Alteration of humoral, cellular and cytokine immune response to inactivated influenza vaccine in patients with Sickle Cell Disease

Introduction

Patients suffering from Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) are at increased risk for complications due to influenza virus. Annual influenza vaccination is strongly recommended but few clinical studies have assessed its immunogenicity in individuals with SCD. The aim of this study was to explore the biological efficacy of annual influenza vaccination in SCD patients by characterizing both their humoral and cell-mediated immunity against influenza antigen. We also aimed to investigate these immunological responses among SCD individuals according to their treatment (hydroxyurea (HU), chronic blood transfusions (CT), both HU and CT or none of them).

Methods

Seventy-two SCD patients (49 receiving HU, 9 on CT, 7 with both and 7 without treatment) and 30 healthy controls were included in the study. All subjects received the tetravalent influenza α-RIX-Tetra® vaccine from the 2016–2017 or 2017–2018 season.

Results

Protective anti-influenza HAI titers were obtained for the majority of SCD patients one month after vaccination but seroconversion rates in patient groups were strongly decreased compared to controls. Immune cell counts, particularly cellular memory including memory T and memory B cells, were greatly reduced in SCD individuals. Functional activation assays confirmed a poorer CD8⁺ T cell memory. We also document an imbalance of cytokines after influenza vaccination in SCD individuals with an INFγ/IL-10 ratio (Th1-type/Treg-type response) significantly lower in the SCD cohort.

Conclusion

SCD patients undergoing CT showed altered immune regulation as compared to other treatment subgroups. Altogether, the cytokine imbalance, the high regulatory T cell levels and the low memory lymphocyte subset levels observed in the SCD cohort, namely for those on CT, suggest a poor ability of SCD patients to fight against influenza infection. Nevertheless, our serological data support current clinical practice for annual influenza vaccination, though immunogenicity to other vaccines involving immunological memory might be hampered in SCD patients and should be further investigated.

Preoperative chemosensitivity testing as predictor of treatment benefit in adjuvant stage III colon cancer: Preliminary analysis of the PePiTA study

3610

Background: Although being the standard-of-care for stage III colon cancer, no biomarkers can identify patients (pts) who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In metastatic pts, the lack of metabolic response (mR) in FDG-PET/CT after 1 chemotherapy cycle predicts the absence of treatment benefit. The PePiTA study aims to evaluate if the absence of mR after 1 cycle of pre-operative chemotherapy is predictive of recurrence in non-metastatic colon cancer pts. Herein, we report a preliminary analysis on surgical outcomes, adverse events and mR assessment after 1 cycle of pre-operative chemotherapy after completing the study accrual objective. Methods: Colon cancer pts eligible for curative resection and ECOG ≤1 received 1 cycle of mFOLFOX followed by surgery in this prospective, multicentre, non-randomized trial. FDG-PET/CT was performed at baseline and after 1 cycle of mFOLFOX. Adjuvant mFOLFOX was administered for up to 12 cycles for stage III pts, whereas for stage II pts the decision to pursue adjuvant chemotherapy was at investigator’s discretion. A decrease ≥15% in SUVmax after 1 cycle of chemotherapy was defined as mR (EORTC criteria) at central review. Results: mR was assessable on the primary tumor in 204/240 pts (85%). In 11 pts (4.6%), staging was modified by the baseline FDG-PET/CT, which detected metastatic disease or other tumors. Pre-operative mFOLFOX was administered to 218 pts, of which 14 (6%) had a grade ≥3 adverse event. Surgery was performed in 218 pts, with a median delay of 20 days (6 to 59) after chemotherapy. Surgical complications occurred in 28 (13%) pts, however no deaths occurred. The median SUVmax decrease between baseline and 2nd FDG-PET/CT was 24%. A mR was observed in 65.2% of the pts, whereas 34.8% showed no mR, including 3% who had progressive disease. Conclusions: One cycle of pre-operative mFOLFOX followed by a mR assessment has shown to be a feasible and safe strategy, raising interest on the potential of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer. The early mR assessment identified pts that may not benefit from chemotherapy and might have a worse prognosis. The substantiation of this hypothesis is expected with the study’s long-term results. Clinical trial information: NCT00994864.

Phase I study of pulsatile 3-day administration of afatinib (BIBW 2992) in combination with docetaxel in advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

A phase I study to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a short course of afatinib in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid malignancies received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 and oral afatinib once daily on days 2-4, in 3-week treatment cycles. The afatinib dose was escalated in successive cohorts of 3-6 patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The MTD cohort was expanded to 13 patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty patients were treated. Afatinib doses were escalated to 160 mg/day in combination with 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel. Three patients had drug-related DLTs during cycle 1. The MTD was defined as 90 mg/day afatinib (days 2-4) with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). The most frequent drug-related adverse events (all grades) were alopecia, diarrhea, stomatitis (all 50 %) and rash (40 %, all grade ≤ 2). Three patients had confirmed responses, two patients had unconfirmed responses and nine patients had durable stable disease >6 cycles. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed.

CONCLUSION

Afatinib 90 mg administered for 3 days after docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) is the MTD for this treatment schedule and the recommended phase II/phase III dose. This combination showed anti-tumor activity in phase I, with a manageable adverse-event profile.

A phase II trial to assess efficacy and safety of afatinib in extensively pretreated patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Afatinib (BIBW 2992) is an ErbB-family blocker that irreversibly inhibits signaling from all relevant ErbB-family dimers. Afatinib has demonstrated preclinical activity in human epidermal growth factor receptor HER2 (ErbB2)-positive and triple-negative xenograft models of breast cancer, and clinical activity in phase I studies. This was a multicenter phase II study enrolling patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer progressing following no more than three lines of chemotherapy. No prior epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy was allowed. Patients received 50-mg afatinib once daily until disease progression. Tumor assessment was performed at every other 28-day treatment course. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit (CB) for ≥4 treatment courses in triple-negative (Cohort A) metastatic breast cancer (TNBC) and objective responses measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors in patients with HER2-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer (Cohort B). Fifty patients received treatment, including 29 patients in Cohort A and 21 patients in Cohort B. No objective responses were observed in either cohort. Median progression-free survival was 7.4 and 7.7 weeks in Cohorts A and B, respectively. Three patients with TNBC had stable disease for ≥4 treatment courses, one of them for 12 courses (median 26.3 weeks; range 18.9–47.9 weeks). The most frequently observed afatinib-associated adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal and skin-related side effects, which were manageable by symptomatic treatment and dose reductions. Afatinib pharmacokinetics were comparable to those observed in previously reported phase I trials. In conclusion, afatinib had limited activity in HER2-negative breast cancer. AEs were generally manageable and mainly affected the skin and the gastrointestinal tract.

A phase I dose finding study of the 3-day administration of BIBW 2992, an irreversible dual EGFR/HER-2 inhibitor, in combination with three-weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

3556

Background: BIBW 2992 (Tovok) is a potent, irreversible, new generation TKI, an inhibitor of EGFR and HER-2 (IC50 0.5 and 14 nM, respectively). A Phase I dose finding study of BIBW 2992 with docetaxel is reported. Methods: Patients (pts) had advanced solid malignancies and received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 and oral BIBW 2992 once daily on Days 2–4, in 3-week cycles. The BIBW 2992 dose was doubled in successive cohorts of 3–6 pts until ≥Grade 2 CTC, after which dose escalation occurred in increments of ≤50%. The MTD cohort expanded to 12 pts. PK profiles were taken on Days 1 and 2 of treatment cycles 1 and 2. Results: 40 evaluable pts (17 male) were treated at the following doses of BIBW 2992: 10 mg (6), 20mg (3), 40 mg (6), 60 mg (4), 90 mg (13), 120 mg (5) and 160 mg (3). Common adverse events (AEs) (% of patients) were fatigue (62.5%), diarrhea (57.5%), anorexia and stomatitis (52.5%), alopecia (50%), rash (42.5%), nausea and pyrexia (40%), vomiting (35%), general physical health deterioration (32.5%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (30%). Two DLTs occurred: one pt had Grade 4 neutropenia (a DLT if complicated or lasting >5 or 7 days) and one had Grade 3 nausea, vomiting and diarrhea (BIBW 2992 120 mg). Both fully recovered upon treatment interruption/dose reduction (docetaxel 60 mg/m2/BIBW 2992 90 mg). The MTD was 90 mg BIBW 2992 with docetaxel 75 mg/m2. Four pts (breast cancer [2], thymoma [1], oesophageal carcinoma [1]) had a PR. One breast cancer pt had a confirmed CR. Two of these pts had prior taxane treatment. Ten pts had SD and received treatment for ≥6 courses with 4 receiving treatment for ≥9 courses. There was no deviation from dose-linearity of BIBW 2992 and docetaxel. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) plasma concentration-time profiles, Cmax and AUC0-∞ before and after BIBW 2992 dosing were comparable. Conclusions: BIBW 2992 90mg administered for 3 days after docetaxel 75 mg/m2 is well tolerated and is the recommended dose for further trials. Objective responses or durable SD (≥6 months) were seen in 15 (39%) pts. No PK interaction was observed between BIBW 2992 and docetaxel.

[Table: see text]

A dose-escalating study of XRP6258 in combination with capecitabine, in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after anthracycline and taxane therapy: Preliminary results

1053

Background: Cabazitaxel (X), a new taxoid showed activity in taxane resistant MBC. Capecitabine (C) is approved in MBC pts pretreated with anthracycline and taxane. Methods: A standard 3+3 escalation scheme explored doses of combined intravenous X (Day (D)1) with oral C twice daily (D1to14), every 3 weeks (q3w). The study objectives were the identification of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), recommended dose (RD) of the combination, assessment of safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and activity at the RD in an expanded cohort. Results: 32 MBC pts pretreated with taxane and anthracycline were enrolled and treated (15 in the dose escalation part and 17 at the RD). Data for the first 25 pts, are available so far: median age 52 [34–74], ECOG-PS 0/1: 15/10, in first or second line chemotherapy, median of 3 (1–7) organs involved (mainly: bone, liver, lymph nodes). In the escalation part, X+C were administered at 3 dose levels (DL) (Table). DL2 was defined as the RD and the expansion cohort was initiated. PK analysis did not show any drug-drug interaction with this schedule of administration. Overall, out of the 25 pts (125cy), the main Gr3–4 toxicities (N pts) were asthenia (4), hand-foot syndrome (4), neutropenia (15), febrile neutropenia (1), neutropenic infection (1), no toxic death. Efficacy was observed at each DL with a total of 1 complete response, 4 partial responses (PR) and 16 stabilizations (including 3 unconfirmed PR). Conclusions: X was safely combined to C. X at 20 mg/m2 D1 + C at 1000 mg/m2 twice a D (D1–14), q3w is the RD. Updated results for efficacy and safety will be presented.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]