1
|
Abstract
New work reports that both derepressed and hyper-repressed chromatin states in animals can be transmitted to progeny for many generations. Transmission depends on genomic architecture and histone modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kahn TG, Dorafshan E, Schultheis D, Zare A, Stenberg P, Reim I, Pirrotta V, Schwartz YB. Interdependence of PRC1 and PRC2 for recruitment to Polycomb Response Elements. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:10132-10149. [PMID: 27557709 PMCID: PMC5137424 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 07/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic repressors essential for control of development and cell differentiation. They form multiple complexes of which PRC1 and PRC2 are evolutionary conserved and obligatory for repression. The targeting of PRC1 and PRC2 is poorly understood and was proposed to be hierarchical and involve tri-methylation of histone H3 (H3K27me3) and/or monoubiquitylation of histone H2A (H2AK118ub). Here, we present a strict test of this hypothesis using the Drosophila model. We discover that neither H3K27me3 nor H2AK118ub is required for targeting PRC complexes to Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). We find that PRC1 can bind PREs in the absence of PRC2 but at many PREs PRC2 requires PRC1 to be targeted. We show that one role of H3K27me3 is to allow PcG complexes anchored at PREs to interact with surrounding chromatin. In contrast, the bulk of H2AK118ub is unrelated to PcG repression. These findings radically change our view of how PcG repression is targeted and suggest that PRC1 and PRC2 can communicate independently of histone modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatyana G Kahn
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden
| | - Eshagh Dorafshan
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden
| | - Dorothea Schultheis
- Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Department of Biology, Division of Developmental Biology, Erlangen, D-91058, Germany
| | - Aman Zare
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden
| | - Per Stenberg
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden.,Division of CBRN Defense and Security, Swedish Defense Research Agency, FOI, Umeå, 906 21, Sweden
| | - Ingolf Reim
- Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Department of Biology, Division of Developmental Biology, Erlangen, D-91058, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Yuri B Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Germline stem cells divide asymmetrically, producing a self-renewing stem cell and a differentiating progenitor. Xie et al. now show that this depends on two asymmetric events that together partition a genome copy, carrying the old histones to the stem cell daughter and a copy with new, unmarked histones to the differentiating daughter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Epigenomics has grown exponentially, providing a better understanding of the mechanistic aspects of new and old phenomena originally described through genetics, as well as providing unexpected insights into the way chromatin modulates the genomic information. In this overview, some of the advances are selected for discussion and comment under six topics: (1) histone modifications, (2) weak interactions, (3) interplay with external inputs, (4) the role of RNA molecules, (5) chromatin folding and architecture, and, finally, (6) a view of the essential role of chromatin transactions in regulating the access to genomic DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Polycomb complexes are found in most cells, but they must be targeted to specific genes in specific cell types in order to regulate pluripotency and differentiation. The recruitment of Polycomb complexes to specific targets has been widely thought to occur in two steps: first, one complex, PRC2, produces histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27) trimethylation at a specific gene, and then the PRC1 complex is recruited by its ability to bind to H3K27me3. Now, three new articles turn this model upside-down by showing that binding of a variant PRC1 complex and subsequent H2A ubiquitylation of surrounding chromatin is sufficient to trigger the recruitment of PRC2 and H3K27 trimethylation. These studies also show that ubiquitylated H2A is directly sensed by PRC2 and that ablation of PRC1-mediated H2A ubiquitylation impairs genome-wide PRC2 binding and disrupts mouse development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri B Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Byggnad 6L, NUS, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee HG, Kahn TG, Simcox A, Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V. Genome-wide activities of Polycomb complexes control pervasive transcription. Genome Res 2015; 25:1170-81. [PMID: 25986499 PMCID: PMC4510001 DOI: 10.1101/gr.188920.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2014] [Accepted: 05/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Polycomb group (PcG) complexes PRC1 and PRC2 are well known for silencing specific developmental genes. PRC2 is a methyltransferase targeting histone H3K27 and producing H3K27me3, essential for stable silencing. Less well known but quantitatively much more important is the genome-wide role of PRC2 that dimethylates ∼70% of total H3K27. We show that H3K27me2 occurs in inverse proportion to transcriptional activity in most non-PcG target genes and intergenic regions and is governed by opposing roaming activities of PRC2 and complexes containing the H3K27 demethylase UTX. Surprisingly, loss of H3K27me2 results in global transcriptional derepression proportionally greatest in silent or weakly transcribed intergenic and genic regions and accompanied by an increase of H3K27ac and H3K4me1. H3K27me2 therefore sets a threshold that prevents random, unscheduled transcription all over the genome and even limits the activity of highly transcribed genes. PRC1-type complexes also have global roles. Unexpectedly, we find a pervasive distribution of histone H2A ubiquitylated at lysine 118 (H2AK118ub) outside of canonical PcG target regions, dependent on the RING/Sce subunit of PRC1-type complexes. We show, however, that H2AK118ub does not mediate the global PRC2 activity or the global repression and is predominantly produced by a new complex involving L(3)73Ah, a homolog of mammalian PCGF3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hun-Goo Lee
- Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
| | - Tatyana G Kahn
- Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA; Molecular Biology, Umeå University, NUS, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Amanda Simcox
- Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Yuri B Schwartz
- Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA; Molecular Biology, Umeå University, NUS, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kahn TG, Stenberg P, Pirrotta V, Schwartz YB. Combinatorial interactions are required for the efficient recruitment of pho repressive complex (PhoRC) to polycomb response elements. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004495. [PMID: 25010632 PMCID: PMC4091789 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2014] [Accepted: 05/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic repressors that control metazoan development and cell differentiation. In Drosophila, PcG proteins form five distinct complexes targeted to genes by Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). Of all PcG complexes PhoRC is the only one that contains a sequence-specific DNA binding subunit (PHO or PHOL), which led to a model that places PhoRC at the base of the recruitment hierarchy. Here we demonstrate that in vivo PHO is preferred to PHOL as a subunit of PhoRC and that PHO and PHOL associate with PREs and a subset of transcriptionally active promoters. Although the binding to the promoter sites depends on the quality of recognition sequences, the binding to PREs does not. Instead, the efficient recruitment of PhoRC to PREs requires the SFMBT subunit and crosstalk with Polycomb Repressive Complex 1. We find that human YY1 protein, the ortholog of PHO, binds sites at active promoters in the human genome but does not bind most PcG target genes, presumably because the interactions involved in the targeting to Drosophila PREs are lost in the mammalian lineage. We conclude that the recruitment of PhoRC to PREs is based on combinatorial interactions and propose that such a recruitment strategy is important to attenuate the binding of PcG proteins when the target genes are transcriptionally active. Our findings allow the appropriate placement of PhoRC in the PcG recruitment hierarchy and provide a rationale to explain why YY1 is unlikely to serve as a general recruiter of mammalian Polycomb complexes despite its reported ability to participate in PcG repression in flies. Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic repressors essential for development and cell differentiation. PcG proteins form five complexes targeted to specific genes by Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). How PcG complexes are recruited to PREs is poorly understood. Here we investigate the recruitment of PhoRC, a seemingly simple case of a complex that contains a sequence-specific DNA binding subunit: PHO (or the related protein PHOL). Unexpectedly, we find that the sequence specific binding of PHO is not a primary determinant for recruitment of PhoRC to PRE, which depends on the non-DNA binding subunit SFMBT and cross-talk with another PcG complex, PRC1. The binding of PhoRC is helped by PRC1 and, in turn, may stabilize the binding of PRC1. We propose that the recruitment based on combinatorial interactions enables the conditional binding of PcG proteins, which is important for switching the state of the target genes from repressed to active. The critical role of the cross-talk between PhoRC and PRC1 is further supported by the finding that in mammals, where the protein domains linking the two complexes are missing, the PHO ortholog YY1 has no implication in PcG repression, despite 100% conservation between DNA binding domains of YY1 and PHO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatyana G. Kahn
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Per Stenberg
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Computational Life Science Cluster (CLiC), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
- * E-mail: (VP); (YBS)
| | - Yuri B. Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
- * E-mail: (VP); (YBS)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
A new study proposes an integrated framework to improve our understanding of the multiple functions of insulator elements, and their architectural role in the genome. See related research; http://genomebiology.com/2014/15/6/R82
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic repressors that are essential for the transcriptional control of cell differentiation and development. PcG-mediated repression is associated with specific post-translational histone modifications and is thought to involve both biochemical and physical modulation of chromatin structure. Recent advances show that PcG complexes comprise a multiplicity of variants and are far more biochemically diverse than previously thought. The importance of these new PcG complexes for normal development and disease, their targeting mechanisms and their shifting roles in the course of differentiation are now the subject of investigation and the focus of this Review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri B Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Byggnad 6L, Norrlands University Hospital, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li HB, Ohno K, Gui H, Pirrotta V. Insulators target active genes to transcription factories and polycomb-repressed genes to polycomb bodies. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003436. [PMID: 23637616 PMCID: PMC3630138 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2012] [Accepted: 02/21/2013] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Polycomb bodies are foci of Polycomb proteins in which different Polycomb target genes are thought to co-localize in the nucleus, looping out from their chromosomal context. We have shown previously that insulators, not Polycomb response elements (PREs), mediate associations among Polycomb Group (PcG) targets to form Polycomb bodies. Here we use live imaging and 3C interactions to show that transgenes containing PREs and endogenous PcG-regulated genes are targeted by insulator proteins to different nuclear structures depending on their state of activity. When two genes are repressed, they co-localize in Polycomb bodies. When both are active, they are targeted to transcription factories in a fashion dependent on Trithorax and enhancer specificity as well as the insulator protein CTCF. In the absence of CTCF, assembly of Polycomb bodies is essentially reduced to those representing genomic clusters of Polycomb target genes. The critical role of Trithorax suggests that stable association with a specialized transcription factory underlies the cellular memory of the active state. We have studied the nuclear localization of genes that are regulated by Polycomb mechanisms. The genomes of higher eukaryotes contain hundreds of genes that are regulated by Polycomb mechanisms. Once repressed by Polycomb complexes, they tend to stay repressed; but, when activated, they bind Trithorax protein and tend to maintain the active state epigenetically. Polycomb repression has been reported to make these genes associate in the nucleus to form “Polycomb bodies.” We find that this association is not caused by Polycomb complexes but by insulator elements accompanying the genes. We show that, when these genes are in the active state, the binding of Trithorax targets them to other nuclear regions where transcription occurs, so-called transcription factories. In these nuclear re-positionings the insulator provides the associative power while the state of activity determines whether a gene goes to a Polycomb body or to a transcription factory. The strong effect of Trithorax suggests the possibility that the stable association with a transcription factory it produces may account for the epigenetic memory of the active state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua-Bing Li
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Katsuhito Ohno
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Hongxing Gui
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Several mechanisms are used by cells to maintain specific histone modifications and gene activity through successive cell divisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schwartz YB, Linder-Basso D, Kharchenko PV, Tolstorukov MY, Kim M, Li HB, Gorchakov AA, Minoda A, Shanower G, Alekseyenko AA, Riddle NC, Jung YL, Gu T, Plachetka A, Elgin SCR, Kuroda MI, Park PJ, Savitsky M, Karpen GH, Pirrotta V. Nature and function of insulator protein binding sites in the Drosophila genome. Genome Res 2012; 22:2188-98. [PMID: 22767387 PMCID: PMC3483548 DOI: 10.1101/gr.138156.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Chromatin insulator elements and associated proteins have been proposed to partition eukaryotic genomes into sets of independently regulated domains. Here we test this hypothesis by quantitative genome-wide analysis of insulator protein binding to Drosophila chromatin. We find distinct combinatorial binding of insulator proteins to different classes of sites and uncover a novel type of insulator element that binds CP190 but not any other known insulator proteins. Functional characterization of different classes of binding sites indicates that only a small fraction act as robust insulators in standard enhancer-blocking assays. We show that insulators restrict the spreading of the H3K27me3 mark but only at a small number of Polycomb target regions and only to prevent repressive histone methylation within adjacent genes that are already transcriptionally inactive. RNAi knockdown of insulator proteins in cultured cells does not lead to major alterations in genome expression. Taken together, these observations argue against the concept of a genome partitioned by specialized boundary elements and suggest that insulators are reserved for specific regulation of selected genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri B Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alekseyenko AA, Ho JWK, Peng S, Gelbart M, Tolstorukov MY, Plachetka A, Kharchenko PV, Jung YL, Gorchakov AA, Larschan E, Gu T, Minoda A, Riddle NC, Schwartz YB, Elgin SCR, Karpen GH, Pirrotta V, Kuroda MI, Park PJ. Sequence-specific targeting of dosage compensation in Drosophila favors an active chromatin context. PLoS Genet 2012; 8:e1002646. [PMID: 22570616 PMCID: PMC3343056 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2011] [Accepted: 02/22/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The Drosophila MSL complex mediates dosage compensation by increasing transcription of the single X chromosome in males approximately two-fold. This is accomplished through recognition of the X chromosome and subsequent acetylation of histone H4K16 on X-linked genes. Initial binding to the X is thought to occur at “entry sites” that contain a consensus sequence motif (“MSL recognition element” or MRE). However, this motif is only ∼2 fold enriched on X, and only a fraction of the motifs on X are initially targeted. Here we ask whether chromatin context could distinguish between utilized and non-utilized copies of the motif, by comparing their relative enrichment for histone modifications and chromosomal proteins mapped in the modENCODE project. Through a comparative analysis of the chromatin features in male S2 cells (which contain MSL complex) and female Kc cells (which lack the complex), we find that the presence of active chromatin modifications, together with an elevated local GC content in the surrounding sequences, has strong predictive value for functional MSL entry sites, independent of MSL binding. We tested these sites for function in Kc cells by RNAi knockdown of Sxl, resulting in induction of MSL complex. We show that ectopic MSL expression in Kc cells leads to H4K16 acetylation around these sites and a relative increase in X chromosome transcription. Collectively, our results support a model in which a pre-existing active chromatin environment, coincident with H3K36me3, contributes to MSL entry site selection. The consequences of MSL targeting of the male X chromosome include increase in nucleosome lability, enrichment for H4K16 acetylation and JIL-1 kinase, and depletion of linker histone H1 on active X-linked genes. Our analysis can serve as a model for identifying chromatin and local sequence features that may contribute to selection of functional protein binding sites in the genome. The genomes of complex organisms encompass hundreds of millions of base pairs of DNA, and regulatory molecules must distinguish specific targets within this vast landscape. In general, regulatory factors find target genes through sequence-specific interactions with the underlying DNA. However, sequence-specific factors typically bind only a fraction of the candidate genomic regions containing their specific target sequence motif. Here we identify potential roles for chromatin environment and flanking sequence composition in helping regulatory factors find their appropriate binding sites, using targeting of the Drosophila dosage compensation complex as a model. The initial stage of dosage compensation involves binding of the Male Specific Lethal (MSL) complex to a sequence motif called the MSL recognition element [1]. Using data from a large chromatin mapping effort (the modENCODE project), we successfully identify an active chromatin environment as predictive of selective MRE binding by the MSL complex. Our study provides a framework for using genome-wide datasets to analyze and predict functional protein–DNA binding site selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artyom A. Alekseyenko
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Joshua W. K. Ho
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Shouyong Peng
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Marnie Gelbart
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Michael Y. Tolstorukov
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Annette Plachetka
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Peter V. Kharchenko
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Youngsook L. Jung
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Andrey A. Gorchakov
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Erica Larschan
- Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| | - Tingting Gu
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Aki Minoda
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, California, United States of America
| | - Nicole C. Riddle
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | | | - Sarah C. R. Elgin
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Gary H. Karpen
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Mitzi I. Kuroda
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- * E-mail: (MIK); (PJP)
| | - Peter J. Park
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- * E-mail: (MIK); (PJP)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Park SY, Schwartz YB, Kahn TG, Asker D, Pirrotta V. Regulation of Polycomb group genes Psc and Su(z)2 in Drosophila melanogaster. Mech Dev 2012; 128:536-47. [PMID: 22289633 DOI: 10.1016/j.mod.2012.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2011] [Revised: 01/08/2012] [Accepted: 01/11/2012] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Certain Polycomb group (PcG) genes are themselves targets of PcG complexes. Two of these constitute the Drosophila Psc-Su(z)2 locus, a region whose chromatin is enriched for H3K27me3 and contains several putative Polycomb response elements (PREs) that bind PcG proteins. To understand how PcG mechanisms regulate this region, the repressive function of the PcG protein binding sites was analyzed using reporter gene constructs. We find that at least two of these are functional PREs that can silence a reporter gene in a PcG-dependent manner. One of these two can also display anti-silencing activity, dependent on the context. A PcG protein binding site near the Psc promoter behaves not as a silencer but as a down-regulation module that is actually stimulated by the Pc gene product but not by other PcG products. Deletion of one of the PREs increases the expression level of Psc and Su(z)2 by twofold at late embryonic stages. We present evidence suggesting that the Psc-Su(z)2 locus is flanked by insulator elements that may protect neighboring genes from inappropriate silencing. Deletion of one of these regions results in extension of the domain of H3K27me3 into a region containing other genes, whose expression becomes silenced in the early embryo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Yeon Park
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are concentrated in nuclear foci called PcG bodies. Although some of these foci are due to the tendency of PcG binding sites in the genome to occur in linear clusters, distant PcG sites can contact one another and in some cases congregate in the same PcG body when they are repressed. Experiments using transgenes containing PcG binding sites reveal that co-localization depends on the presence of insulator elements rather than of Polycomb Response Elements (PREs) and that it can occur also when the transgenes are in the active state. A model is proposed according to which insulator proteins mediate shuttling of PcG target genes between PcG bodies when repressed to transcription factories when transcriptionally active.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Riddle NC, Minoda A, Kharchenko PV, Alekseyenko AA, Schwartz YB, Tolstorukov MY, Gorchakov AA, Jaffe JD, Kennedy C, Linder-Basso D, Peach SE, Shanower G, Zheng H, Kuroda MI, Pirrotta V, Park PJ, Elgin SC, Karpen GH. Plasticity in patterns of histone modifications and chromosomal proteins in Drosophila heterochromatin. Genome Res 2011; 21:147-63. [PMID: 21177972 PMCID: PMC3032919 DOI: 10.1101/gr.110098.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2010] [Accepted: 12/08/2010] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes are packaged in two basic forms, euchromatin and heterochromatin. We have examined the composition and organization of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin in different cell types using ChIP-array analysis of histone modifications and chromosomal proteins. As anticipated, the pericentric heterochromatin and chromosome 4 are on average enriched for the "silencing" marks H3K9me2, H3K9me3, HP1a, and SU(VAR)3-9, and are generally depleted for marks associated with active transcription. The locations of the euchromatin-heterochromatin borders identified by these marks are similar in animal tissues and most cell lines, although the amount of heterochromatin is variable in some cell lines. Combinatorial analysis of chromatin patterns reveals distinct profiles for euchromatin, pericentric heterochromatin, and the 4th chromosome. Both silent and active protein-coding genes in heterochromatin display complex patterns of chromosomal proteins and histone modifications; a majority of the active genes exhibit both "activation" marks (e.g., H3K4me3 and H3K36me3) and "silencing" marks (e.g., H3K9me2 and HP1a). The hallmark of active genes in heterochromatic domains appears to be a loss of H3K9 methylation at the transcription start site. We also observe complex epigenomic profiles of intergenic regions, repeated transposable element (TE) sequences, and genes in the heterochromatic extensions. An unexpectedly large fraction of sequences in the euchromatic chromosome arms exhibits a heterochromatic chromatin signature, which differs in size, position, and impact on gene expression among cell types. We conclude that patterns of heterochromatin/euchromatin packaging show greater complexity and plasticity than anticipated. This comprehensive analysis provides a foundation for future studies of gene activity and chromosomal functions that are influenced by or dependent upon heterochromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole C. Riddle
- Department of Biology, Washington University St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA
| | - Aki Minoda
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley and Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Peter V. Kharchenko
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School and Informatics Program, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Artyom A. Alekseyenko
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Yuri B. Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08901, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umea University, 90187 Umea, Sweden
| | - Michael Y. Tolstorukov
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School and Informatics Program, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Andrey A. Gorchakov
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Jacob D. Jaffe
- Proteomics Group, The Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Cameron Kennedy
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley and Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Daniela Linder-Basso
- Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08901, USA
| | - Sally E. Peach
- Proteomics Group, The Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Gregory Shanower
- Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08901, USA
| | - Haiyan Zheng
- Biological Mass Spectrometry Resource, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, University of Dentistry and Medicine of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
| | - Mitzi I. Kuroda
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08901, USA
| | - Peter J. Park
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School and Informatics Program, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Sarah C.R. Elgin
- Department of Biology, Washington University St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA
| | - Gary H. Karpen
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley and Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Roy S, Ernst J, Kharchenko PV, Kheradpour P, Negre N, Eaton ML, Landolin JM, Bristow CA, Ma L, Lin MF, Washietl S, Arshinoff BI, Ay F, Meyer PE, Robine N, Washington NL, Di Stefano L, Berezikov E, Brown CD, Candeias R, Carlson JW, Carr A, Jungreis I, Marbach D, Sealfon R, Tolstorukov MY, Will S, Alekseyenko AA, Artieri C, Booth BW, Brooks AN, Dai Q, Davis CA, Duff MO, Feng X, Gorchakov AA, Gu T, Henikoff JG, Kapranov P, Li R, MacAlpine HK, Malone J, Minoda A, Nordman J, Okamura K, Perry M, Powell SK, Riddle NC, Sakai A, Samsonova A, Sandler JE, Schwartz YB, Sher N, Spokony R, Sturgill D, van Baren M, Wan KH, Yang L, Yu C, Feingold E, Good P, Guyer M, Lowdon R, Ahmad K, Andrews J, Berger B, Brenner SE, Brent MR, Cherbas L, Elgin SCR, Gingeras TR, Grossman R, Hoskins RA, Kaufman TC, Kent W, Kuroda MI, Orr-Weaver T, Perrimon N, Pirrotta V, Posakony JW, Ren B, Russell S, Cherbas P, Graveley BR, Lewis S, Micklem G, Oliver B, Park PJ, Celniker SE, Henikoff S, Karpen GH, Lai EC, MacAlpine DM, Stein LD, White KP, Kellis M. Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 2010; 330:1787-97. [PMID: 21177974 PMCID: PMC3192495 DOI: 10.1126/science.1198374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 899] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
To gain insight into how genomic information is translated into cellular and developmental programs, the Drosophila model organism Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (modENCODE) project is comprehensively mapping transcripts, histone modifications, chromosomal proteins, transcription factors, replication proteins and intermediates, and nucleosome properties across a developmental time course and in multiple cell lines. We have generated more than 700 data sets and discovered protein-coding, noncoding, RNA regulatory, replication, and chromatin elements, more than tripling the annotated portion of the Drosophila genome. Correlated activity patterns of these elements reveal a functional regulatory network, which predicts putative new functions for genes, reveals stage- and tissue-specific regulators, and enables gene-expression prediction. Our results provide a foundation for directed experimental and computational studies in Drosophila and related species and also a model for systematic data integration toward comprehensive genomic and functional annotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sushmita Roy
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Jason Ernst
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Peter V. Kharchenko
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Pouya Kheradpour
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Nicolas Negre
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Matthew L. Eaton
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jane M. Landolin
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Christopher A. Bristow
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Lijia Ma
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Michael F. Lin
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Stefan Washietl
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Bradley I. Arshinoff
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, 27 King’s College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Ferhat Ay
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Patrick E. Meyer
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Machine Learning Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP212, Brussels 1050, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Robine
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Luisa Di Stefano
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Eugene Berezikov
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Christopher D. Brown
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Rogerio Candeias
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Joseph W. Carlson
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Adrian Carr
- Department of Genetics and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Irwin Jungreis
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Daniel Marbach
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Rachel Sealfon
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Michael Y. Tolstorukov
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Sebastian Will
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Artyom A. Alekseyenko
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Carlo Artieri
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Benjamin W. Booth
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Angela N. Brooks
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Qi Dai
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Carrie A. Davis
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
| | - Michael O. Duff
- Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, 263 Farmington, CT 06030–6403, USA
| | - Xin Feng
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Andrey A. Gorchakov
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Tingting Gu
- Department of Biology CB-1137, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Jorja G. Henikoff
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Renhua Li
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Heather K. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - John Malone
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Aki Minoda
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | | | - Katsutomo Okamura
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Marc Perry
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Sara K. Powell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Nicole C. Riddle
- Department of Biology CB-1137, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Akiko Sakai
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Anastasia Samsonova
- Department of Genetics and Drosophila RNAi Screening Center, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jeremy E. Sandler
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Yuri B. Schwartz
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Noa Sher
- White-head Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Rebecca Spokony
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - David Sturgill
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Marijke van Baren
- Center for Genome Sciences, Washington University, 4444 Forest Park Boulevard, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Kenneth H. Wan
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, 263 Farmington, CT 06030–6403, USA
| | - Charles Yu
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Elise Feingold
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Peter Good
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Mark Guyer
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Rebecca Lowdon
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Kami Ahmad
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Justen Andrews
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - Bonnie Berger
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Steven E. Brenner
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Michael R. Brent
- Center for Genome Sciences, Washington University, 4444 Forest Park Boulevard, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Lucy Cherbas
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
- Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - Sarah C. R. Elgin
- Department of Biology CB-1137, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Thomas R. Gingeras
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
- Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA
| | - Robert Grossman
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Roger A. Hoskins
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Thomas C. Kaufman
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - William Kent
- Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Mitzi I. Kuroda
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Norbert Perrimon
- Department of Genetics and Drosophila RNAi Screening Center, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - James W. Posakony
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Bing Ren
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Steven Russell
- Department of Genetics and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Peter Cherbas
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
- Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - Brenton R. Graveley
- Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, 263 Farmington, CT 06030–6403, USA
| | - Suzanna Lewis
- Genome Sciences Division, LBNL, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Gos Micklem
- Department of Genetics and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Brian Oliver
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Peter J. Park
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Susan E. Celniker
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Steven Henikoff
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Gary H. Karpen
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Eric C. Lai
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - David M. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Lincoln D. Stein
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Kevin P. White
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Manolis Kellis
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kharchenko PV, Alekseyenko AA, Schwartz YB, Minoda A, Riddle NC, Ernst J, Sabo PJ, Larschan E, Gorchakov AA, Gu T, Linder-Basso D, Plachetka A, Shanower G, Tolstorukov MY, Luquette LJ, Xi R, Jung YL, Park RW, Bishop EP, Canfield TK, Sandstrom R, Thurman RE, MacAlpine DM, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Kellis M, Elgin SCR, Kuroda MI, Pirrotta V, Karpen GH, Park PJ. Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 2010; 471:480-5. [PMID: 21179089 PMCID: PMC3109908 DOI: 10.1038/nature09725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 647] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2010] [Accepted: 12/06/2010] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Chromatin is composed of DNA and a variety of modified histones and non-histone proteins, which have an impact on cell differentiation, gene regulation and other key cellular processes. Here we present a genome-wide chromatin landscape for Drosophila melanogaster based on eighteen histone modifications, summarized by nine prevalent combinatorial patterns. Integrative analysis with other data (non-histone chromatin proteins, DNase I hypersensitivity, GRO-Seq reads produced by engaged polymerase, short/long RNA products) reveals discrete characteristics of chromosomes, genes, regulatory elements and other functional domains. We find that active genes display distinct chromatin signatures that are correlated with disparate gene lengths, exon patterns, regulatory functions and genomic contexts. We also demonstrate a diversity of signatures among Polycomb targets that include a subset with paused polymerase. This systematic profiling and integrative analysis of chromatin signatures provides insights into how genomic elements are regulated, and will serve as a resource for future experimental investigations of genome structure and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter V Kharchenko
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schwartz YB, Kahn TG, Pirrotta V. Polycomb and Trithorax control genome expression by determining the alternative chromatin epigenetic states for key developmental regulators. RUSS J GENET+ 2010. [DOI: 10.1134/s1022795410100261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
20
|
Shvarts IB, Kahn TG, Pirrotta V. [Polycomb and trithorax control genome expression by determining the alternative epigenetic states of chromatin for key developmental regulators]. Genetika 2010; 46:1413-1416. [PMID: 21254568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
The Polycomb (PcG) and Trithorax (TrxG) group proteins are essential for development in all multicellular organisms. Mutations of the PcG and TrxG genes act as early embryonic lethals, while their overexpression correlates with malignancies. Comparative genome analysis showed that PcG and TrxG form a binary regulatory system that functions as an epigenetic rheostat to determine the threshold levels of extracellular signals affecting the expression levels of key developmental genes.
Collapse
|
21
|
Schwartz YB, Kahn TG, Stenberg P, Ohno K, Bourgon R, Pirrotta V. Alternative epigenetic chromatin states of polycomb target genes. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1000805. [PMID: 20062800 PMCID: PMC2799325 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2009] [Accepted: 12/09/2009] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Polycomb (PcG) regulation has been thought to produce stable long-term gene silencing. Genomic analyses in Drosophila and mammals, however, have shown that it targets many genes, which can switch state during development. Genetic evidence indicates that critical for the active state of PcG target genes are the histone methyltransferases Trithorax (TRX) and ASH1. Here we analyze the repertoire of alternative states in which PcG target genes are found in different Drosophila cell lines and the role of PcG proteins TRX and ASH1 in controlling these states. Using extensive genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis, RNAi knockdowns, and quantitative RT-PCR, we show that, in addition to the known repressed state, PcG targets can reside in a transcriptionally active state characterized by formation of an extended domain enriched in ASH1, the N-terminal, but not C-terminal moiety of TRX and H3K27ac. ASH1/TRX N-ter domains and transcription are not incompatible with repressive marks, sometimes resulting in a "balanced" state modulated by both repressors and activators. Often however, loss of PcG repression results instead in a "void" state, lacking transcription, H3K27ac, or binding of TRX or ASH1. We conclude that PcG repression is dynamic, not static, and that the propensity of a target gene to switch states depends on relative levels of PcG, TRX, and activators. N-ter TRX plays a remarkable role that antagonizes PcG repression and preempts H3K27 methylation by acetylation. This role is distinct from that usually attributed to TRX/MLL proteins at the promoter. These results have important implications for Polycomb gene regulation, the "bivalent" chromatin state of embryonic stem cells, and gene expression in development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri B. Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Nelson Laboratories, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Tatyana G. Kahn
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Nelson Laboratories, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Per Stenberg
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Computational Life Science Cluster, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Katsuhito Ohno
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Nelson Laboratories, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Richard Bourgon
- European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Nelson Laboratories, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Margueron R, Justin N, Ohno K, Sharpe ML, Son J, Drury WJ, Voigt P, Martin S, Taylor WR, De Marco V, Pirrotta V, Reinberg D, Gamblin SJ. Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks. Nature 2009; 461:762-7. [PMID: 19767730 PMCID: PMC3772642 DOI: 10.1038/nature08398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 859] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2009] [Accepted: 08/13/2009] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Polycomb group proteins have an essential role in the epigenetic maintenance of repressive chromatin states. The gene-silencing activity of the Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) depends on its ability to trimethylate lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27) by the catalytic SET domain of the EZH2 subunit, and at least two other subunits of the complex: SUZ12 and EED. Here we show that the carboxy-terminal domain of EED specifically binds to histone tails carrying trimethyl-lysine residues associated with repressive chromatin marks, and that this leads to the allosteric activation of the methyltransferase activity of PRC2. Mutations in EED that prevent it from recognizing repressive trimethyl-lysine marks abolish the activation of PRC2 in vitro and, in Drosophila, reduce global methylation and disrupt development. These findings suggest a model for the propagation of the H3K27me3 mark that accounts for the maintenance of repressive chromatin domains and for the transmission of a histone modification from mother to daughter cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Margueron
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, New York University Medical School, 522 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Neil Justin
- MRC National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
| | - Katsuhito Ohno
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Nelson Laboratories, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Miriam L Sharpe
- MRC National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
| | - Jinsook Son
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, New York University Medical School, 522 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - William J Drury
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, New York University Medical School, 522 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Philipp Voigt
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, New York University Medical School, 522 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Stephen Martin
- MRC National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
| | - William R. Taylor
- MRC National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
| | - Valeria De Marco
- MRC National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Nelson Laboratories, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA,Co-corresponding authors: VP (), DR () and SJG ()
| | - Danny Reinberg
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, New York University Medical School, 522 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA,Co-corresponding authors: VP (), DR () and SJG ()
| | - Steven J. Gamblin
- MRC National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK,Co-corresponding authors: VP (), DR () and SJG ()
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Schaaf CA, Misulovin Z, Sahota G, Siddiqui AM, Schwartz YB, Kahn TG, Pirrotta V, Gause M, Dorsett D. Regulation of the Drosophila Enhancer of split and invected-engrailed gene complexes by sister chromatid cohesion proteins. PLoS One 2009; 4:e6202. [PMID: 19587787 PMCID: PMC2703808 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2009] [Accepted: 06/16/2009] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The cohesin protein complex was first recognized for holding sister chromatids together and ensuring proper chromosome segregation. Cohesin also regulates gene expression, but the mechanisms are unknown. Cohesin associates preferentially with active genes, and is generally absent from regions in which histone H3 is methylated by the Enhancer of zeste [E(z)] Polycomb group silencing protein. Here we show that transcription is hypersensitive to cohesin levels in two exceptional cases where cohesin and the E(z)-mediated histone methylation simultaneously coat the entire Enhancer of split and invected-engrailed gene complexes in cells derived from Drosophila central nervous system. These gene complexes are modestly transcribed, and produce seven of the twelve transcripts that increase the most with cohesin knockdown genome-wide. Cohesin mutations alter eye development in the same manner as increased Enhancer of split activity, suggesting that similar regulation occurs in vivo. We propose that cohesin helps restrain transcription of these gene complexes, and that deregulation of similarly cohesin-hypersensitive genes may underlie developmental deficits in Cornelia de Lange syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheri A. Schaaf
- Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Ziva Misulovin
- Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Gurmukh Sahota
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Akbar M. Siddiqui
- Microarray Core Facility, Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Yuri B. Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Tatyana G. Kahn
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Maria Gause
- Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Dale Dorsett
- Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V. Polycomb Complexes and the Role of Epigenetic Memory in Development. Epigenomics 2008. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9187-2_13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
26
|
Golovnin A, Biryukova I, Romanova O, Silicheva M, Parshikov A, Savitskaya E, Pirrotta V, Georgiev P. An endogenous Su(Hw) insulator separates the yellow gene from the Achaete-scute gene complex in Drosophila. Development 2008. [DOI: 10.1242/dev.020263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
27
|
Misulovin Z, Schwartz YB, Li XY, Kahn TG, Gause M, MacArthur S, Fay JC, Eisen MB, Pirrotta V, Biggin MD, Dorsett D. Association of cohesin and Nipped-B with transcriptionally active regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Chromosoma 2008; 117:89-102. [PMID: 17965872 PMCID: PMC2258211 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-007-0129-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2007] [Revised: 10/02/2007] [Accepted: 10/04/2007] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The cohesin complex is a chromosomal component required for sister chromatid cohesion that is conserved from yeast to man. The similarly conserved Nipped-B protein is needed for cohesin to bind to chromosomes. In higher organisms, Nipped-B and cohesin regulate gene expression and development by unknown mechanisms. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we find that Nipped-B and cohesin bind to the same sites throughout the entire non-repetitive Drosophila genome. They preferentially bind transcribed regions and overlap with RNA polymerase II. This contrasts sharply with yeast, where cohesin binds almost exclusively between genes. Differences in cohesin and Nipped-B binding between Drosophila cell lines often correlate with differences in gene expression. For example, cohesin and Nipped-B bind the Abd-B homeobox gene in cells in which it is transcribed, but not in cells in which it is silenced. They bind to the Abd-B transcription unit and downstream regulatory region and thus could regulate both transcriptional elongation and activation. We posit that transcription facilitates cohesin binding, perhaps by unfolding chromatin, and that Nipped-B then regulates gene expression by controlling cohesin dynamics. These mechanisms are likely involved in the etiology of Cornelia de Lange syndrome, in which mutation of one copy of the NIPBL gene encoding the human Nipped-B ortholog causes diverse structural and mental birth defects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziva Misulovin
- Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63104, USA
| | - Yuri B. Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Xiao-Yong Li
- Berkeley Drosophila Transcription Network Project, Genomics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Tatyana G. Kahn
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Maria Gause
- Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63104, USA
| | - Stewart MacArthur
- Berkeley Drosophila Transcription Network Project, Genomics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Justin C. Fay
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Michael B. Eisen
- Center for Integrative Genomics, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Berkeley Drosophila Transcription Network Project, Genomics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Mark D. Biggin
- Berkeley Drosophila Transcription Network Project, Genomics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Dale Dorsett
- Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63104, USA, e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ohno K, McCabe D, Czermin B, Imhof A, Pirrotta V. ESC, ESCL and their roles in Polycomb Group mechanisms. Mech Dev 2008; 125:527-41. [PMID: 18276122 DOI: 10.1016/j.mod.2008.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2007] [Revised: 11/30/2007] [Accepted: 01/03/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The Drosophila esc gene is a Polycomb Group (PcG) gene whose product is essential for histone H3 K27 methylation and PcG silencing yet genetic analysis indicated that its product was needed only in the very early embryo. We know now that escl, a close homologue of esc exists in the Drosophila genome. In contrast with earlier studies, we find that both esc and escl are expressed at all stages of development. We show that three major differences between the two genes are in the transcriptional control, which allows esc to make a much stronger maternal contribution; in the splicing efficiency, which makes a major difference in the early escl function; and in the lower participation of ESCL in the PRC2 complex and lower enzymatic activity of the resulting complex. Both genes can sustain normal development in the absence of the other except for the critical role provided by maternal esc product in early embryonic development. Finally, using zygotic mutations in both genes, we show that the gradual loss of function of PRC2 activity leads first to a loss of histone H3 K27 methylation and only at a later stage to a gradual loss of PRC1 binding to chromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuhito Ohno
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Nelson Laboratories, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Konev AY, Tribus M, Park SY, Podhraski V, Lim CY, Emelyanov AV, Vershilova E, Pirrotta V, Kadonaga JT, Lusser A, Fyodorov DV. CHD1 motor protein is required for deposition of histone variant H3.3 into chromatin in vivo. Science 2007; 317:1087-90. [PMID: 17717186 PMCID: PMC3014568 DOI: 10.1126/science.1145339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
The organization of chromatin affects all aspects of nuclear DNA metabolism in eukaryotes. H3.3 is an evolutionarily conserved histone variant and a key substrate for replication-independent chromatin assembly. Elimination of chromatin remodeling factor CHD1 in Drosophila embryos abolishes incorporation of H3.3 into the male pronucleus, renders the paternal genome unable to participate in zygotic mitoses, and leads to the development of haploid embryos. Furthermore, CHD1, but not ISWI, interacts with HIRA in cytoplasmic extracts. Our findings establish CHD1 as a major factor in replacement histone metabolism in the nucleus and reveal a critical role for CHD1 in the earliest developmental instances of genome-scale, replication-independent nucleosome assembly. Furthermore, our results point to the general requirement of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-utilizing motor proteins for histone deposition in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Y Konev
- Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Polycomb group complexes, which are known to regulate homeotic genes, have now been found to control hundreds of other genes in mammals and insects. First believed to progressively assemble and package chromatin, they are now thought to be localized, but induce a methylation mark on histone H3 over a broad chromatin domain. Recent progress has changed our view of how these complexes are recruited, and how they affect chromatin and repress gene activity. Polycomb complexes function as global enforcers of epigenetically repressed states, balanced by an antagonistic state that is mediated by Trithorax. These epigenetic states must be reprogrammed when cells become committed to differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri B Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Nelson Laboratories, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Golovnin A, Mazur A, Kopantseva M, Kurshakova M, Gulak PV, Gilmore B, Whitfield WGF, Geyer P, Pirrotta V, Georgiev P. Integrity of the Mod(mdg4)-67.2 BTB domain is critical to insulator function in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 27:963-74. [PMID: 17101769 PMCID: PMC1800699 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00795-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Drosophila gypsy insulator contains binding sites for the Suppressor of Hairy-wing [Su(Hw)] protein. Enhancer and silencer blocking require Su(Hw) recruitment of Mod(mdg4)-67.2, a BTB/POZ domain protein that interacts with Su(Hw) through a carboxyl-terminal acidic domain. Here we conducted mutational analyses of the Mod(mdg4)-67.2 BTB domain. We demonstrate that this domain is essential for insulator function, in part through direction of protein dimerization. Our studies revealed the presence of a second domain (DD) that contributes to Mod(mdg4)-67.2 dimerization when the function of the BTB domain is compromised. Additionally, we demonstrate that mutations in amino acids of the charged pocket in the BTB domain that retain dimerization of the mutated protein cause a loss of insulator function. In these cases, the mutant proteins failed to localize to chromosomes, suggesting a role for the BTB domain in chromosome association. Interestingly, replacement of the Mod(mdg4)-67.2 BTB domain with the GAF BTB domain produced a nonfunctional protein. Taken together, these data suggest that the Mod(mdg4)-67.2 BTB domain confers novel activities to gypsy insulator function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Golovnin
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow 119334, Russia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Kahn TG, Schwartz YB, Dellino GI, Pirrotta V. Polycomb complexes and the propagation of the methylation mark at the Drosophila ubx gene. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:29064-75. [PMID: 16887811 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m605430200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Polycomb group proteins are transcriptional repressors that control many developmental genes. The Polycomb group protein Enhancer of Zeste has been shown in vitro to methylate specifically lysine 27 and lysine 9 of histone H3 but the role of this modification in Polycomb silencing is unknown. We show that H3 trimethylated at lysine 27 is found on the entire Ubx gene silenced by Polycomb. However, Enhancer of Zeste and other Polycomb group proteins stay primarily localized at their response elements, which appear to be the least methylated parts of the silenced gene. Our results suggest that, contrary to the prevailing view, the Polycomb group proteins and methyltransferase complexes are recruited to the Polycomb response elements independently of histone methylation and then loop over to scan the entire region, methylating all accessible nucleosomes. We propose that the Polycomb chromodomain is required for the looping mechanism that spreads methylation over a broad domain, which in turn is required for the stability of the Polycomb group protein complex. Both the spread of methylation from the Polycomb response elements, and the silencing effect can be blocked by the gypsy insulator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatyana G Kahn
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schwartz YB, Kahn TG, Nix DA, Li XY, Bourgon R, Biggin M, Pirrotta V. Genome-wide analysis of Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 2006; 38:700-5. [PMID: 16732288 DOI: 10.1038/ng1817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 457] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2006] [Accepted: 05/01/2006] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Polycomb group (PcG) complexes are multiprotein assemblages that bind to chromatin and establish chromatin states leading to epigenetic silencing. PcG proteins regulate homeotic genes in flies and vertebrates, but little is known about other PcG targets and the role of the PcG in development, differentiation and disease. Here, we determined the distribution of the PcG proteins PC, E(Z) and PSC and of trimethylation of histone H3 Lys27 (me3K27) in the D. melanogaster genome. At more than 200 PcG target genes, binding sites for the three PcG proteins colocalize to presumptive Polycomb response elements (PREs). In contrast, H3 me3K27 forms broad domains including the entire transcription unit and regulatory regions. PcG targets are highly enriched in genes encoding transcription factors, but they also include genes coding for receptors, signaling proteins, morphogens and regulators representing all major developmental pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri B Schwartz
- Rutgers University, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Polycomb complexes, best known for their role in the epigenetic silencing of homeotic genes, are now known to regulate a large number of functions in organisms from flies to man. They control transcription activators, pattern-forming genes, maintenance of stem cells and are implicated in cell proliferation and oncogenesis. Our understanding of Polycomb mechanisms derives principally from the study of homeotic genes in Drosophila, where they act in an all-or-none fashion to silence expression in inappropriate parts of the organism. This review summarizes what has been learned from homeotic genes and examines the possible extensions of Polycomb mechanisms to allow for dynamic regulatory behavior and the reprogramming of silenced chromatin states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Chromosome organization inside the nucleus is not random but rather is determined by a variety of factors, including interactions between chromosomes and nuclear components such as the nuclear envelope or nuclear matrix. Such interactions may be critical for proper nuclear organization, chromosome partitioning during cell division, and gene regulation. An important, but poorly documented subset, includes interactions between specific chromosomal regions. Interactions of this type are thought to be involved in long-range promoter regulation by distant enhancers or locus control regions and may underlie phenomena such as transvection. Here, we used an in vivo microscopy assay based on Lac Repressor/operator recognition to show that Mcp, a polycomb response element from the Drosophila bithorax complex, is able to mediate physical interaction between remote chromosomal regions. These interactions are tissue specific, can take place between multiple Mcp elements, and seem to be stable once established. We speculate that this ability to interact may be part of the mechanism through which Mcp mediates its regulatory function in the bithorax complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio Vazquez
- Division of Shared Resources, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Transcriptional silencing in budding yeast and fruit fly is mediated by fundamentally unrelated proteins that assemble very different chromatin structures. Surprisingly, the repressive mechanisms evolved from these very different materials have similar features, including an epigenetic mode of inheritance and a block to transcription based on interference with the assembly or function of the promoter complex rather than with the binding of gene-specific activators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kolesnikova TD, Makunin IV, Volkova EI, Pirrotta V, Belyaeva ES, Zhimulev IF. Functional dissection of the Suppressor of UnderReplication protein of Drosophila melanogaster: identification of domains influencing chromosome binding and DNA replication. Genetica 2005; 124:187-200. [PMID: 16134332 DOI: 10.1007/s10709-005-1167-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The Suppressor of UnderReplication (SuUR) gene controls the DNA underreplication in intercalary and pericentric heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster salivary gland polytene chromosomes. In the present work, we investigate the functional importance of different regions of the SUUR protein by expressing truncations of the protein in an UAS-GAL4 system. We find that SUUR has at least two separate chromosome-binding regions that are able to recognize intercalary and pericentric heterochromatin specifically. The C-terminal part controls DNA underreplication in intercalary heterochromatin and partially in pericentric heterochromatin regions. The C-terminal half of SUUR suppresses endoreplication when ectopically expressed in the salivary gland. Ectopic expression of the N-terminal fragments of SUUR depletes endogenous SUUR from polytene chromosomes, causes the SuUR- phenotype and induces specific swellings in heterochromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T D Kolesnikova
- Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics, Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Lavrentyev Ave. 10, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Two papers in this issue of Cell describe two roles of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in modulating chromatin structure: as a structural component replacing linker histone (Kim et al., 2004) and as a constituent of a corepressor complex poised to dismiss repression upon receipt of an activating signal (Ju et al., 2004).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Nelson Laboratories, Rutgers University, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Chromatin cross-linking is widely used for mapping the distribution of chromosomal proteins by immunoprecipitation, but our knowledge of the physical properties of chromatin complexes remains rudimentary. Density gradients have been long used to separate fragments of cross-linked chromatin with their bound proteins from free protein or free DNA. We find that the association of DNA fragments with very-high-molecular-weight protein complexes shifts their buoyant density to values much lower then that of bulk chromatin. We show that in a CsCl gradient, Polycomb response elements, promoters of active genes, and insulator or boundary elements are found at buoyant densities similar to those of free protein and are depleted from the bulk chromatin fractions. In these regions, the low density is associated with the presence of large protein complexes and with high sensitivity to sonication. Our results suggest that separation of different chromatin regions according to their buoyant density may bias chromatin immunoprecipitation results. Density centrifugation of cross-linked chromatin may provide a simple approach to investigate the properties of large chromatin complexes in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri B Schwartz
- Rutgers University, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Nelson Laboratories, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dellino GI, Schwartz YB, Farkas G, McCabe D, Elgin SCR, Pirrotta V. Polycomb silencing blocks transcription initiation. Mol Cell 2004; 13:887-93. [PMID: 15053881 DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00128-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 224] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2003] [Revised: 01/26/2004] [Accepted: 02/09/2004] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Polycomb (PcG) complexes maintain the silent state of target genes. The mechanism of silencing is not known but has been inferred to involve chromatin packaging to block the access of transcription factors. We have studied the effect of PcG silencing on the hsp26 heat shock promoter. While silencing does decrease the accessibility of some restriction enzyme sites to some extent, it does not prevent the binding of TBP, RNA polymerase, or the heat shock factor to the hsp26 promoter, as shown by chromatin immunoprecipitation. However, we find that in the repressed state, the RNA polymerase cannot initiate transcription. We conclude that, rather than altering chromatin structure to block accessibility, PcG silencing in this construct targets directly the activity of the transcriptional machinery at the promoter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano I Dellino
- Department of Zoology, University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Affiliation(s)
- Y B Schwartz
- Department of Zoology, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Svensson MJ, Chen JD, Pirrotta V, Larsson J. The ThioredoxinT and deadhead gene pair encode testis- and ovary-specific thioredoxins in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 2003; 112:133-43. [PMID: 14579129 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-003-0253-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2003] [Revised: 08/05/2003] [Accepted: 08/05/2003] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
So far, two thioredoxin proteins, DHD and Trx-2, have been biochemically characterized in Drosophila melanogaster. Here, with the cloning and characterization of TrxT we describe an additional thioredoxin with testis-specific expression. TrxT and dhd are arranged as a gene pair, transcribed in opposite directions and sharing a 471 bp regulatory region. We show that this regulatory region is sufficient for correct expression of the two genes. This gene pair makes a good model for unraveling how closely spaced promoters are differentially regulated by a short common control region. Both TrxT and DHD proteins are localized within the nuclei in testes and ovaries, respectively. Use of a transgenic construct expressing TrxT fused to Enhanced Yellow Fluorescent Protein reveals a clear association of TrxT with the Y chromosome lampbrush loops ks-1 and kl-5 in primary spermatocytes. The association is lost in the absence of the Y chromosome. Our results suggest that nuclear thioredoxins may have regulatory functions in the germline.
Collapse
|
44
|
Golovnin A, Biryukova I, Birukova I, Romanova O, Silicheva M, Parshikov A, Savitskaya E, Pirrotta V, Georgiev P. An endogenous Su(Hw) insulator separates the yellow gene from the Achaete-scute gene complex in Drosophila. Development 2003; 130:3249-58. [PMID: 12783795 DOI: 10.1242/dev.00543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The best characterized chromatin insulator in Drosophila is the Suppressor of Hairy wing binding region contained within the gypsy retrotransposon. Although cellular functions have been suggested, no role has been found yet for the multitude of endogenous Suppressor of Hairy wing binding sites. Here we show that two Suppressor of Hairy wing binding sites in the intergenic region between the yellow gene and the Achaete-scute gene complex form a functional insulator. Genetic analysis shows that at least two proteins, Suppressor of Hairy wing and Modifier of MDG4, required for the activity of this insulator, are involved in the transcriptional regulation of Achaete-scute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Golovnin
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117334, Russia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Polycomb complexes assemble at their target sites and silence neighboring genes when these are not actively transcribed. The action of these complexes and of Trithorax complexes bound to the Polycomb Response Element establish alternative silent or derepressed states that are remembered through cell division and maintained for the rest of development. Recent results that may help explain the properties of these states are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Zoology, University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest Ansermet, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zhimulev IF, Belyaeva ES, Makunin IV, Pirrotta V, Volkova EI, Alekseyenko AA, Andreyeva EN, Makarevich GF, Boldyreva LV, Nanayev RA, Demakova OV. Influence of the SuUR gene on intercalary heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes. Chromosoma 2003; 111:377-98. [PMID: 12644953 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-002-0218-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2002] [Revised: 10/02/2002] [Accepted: 10/15/2002] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Salivary gland polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster have a reproducible set of intercalary heterochromatin (IH) sites, characterized by late DNA replication, underreplicated DNA, breaks and frequent ectopic contacts. The SuUR mutation has been shown to suppress underreplication, and wild-type SuUR protein is found at late-replicating IH sites and in pericentric heterochromatin. Here we show that the SuUR gene influences all four IH features. The SuUR mutation leads to earlier completion of DNA replication. Using transgenic strains with two, four or six additional SuUR(+) doses (4-8xSuUR(+)) we show that wild-type SuUR is an enhancer of DNA underreplication, causing many late-replicating sites to become underreplicated. We map the underreplication sites and show that their number increases from 58 in normal strains (2xSuUR(+)) to 161 in 4-8xSuUR(+) strains. In one of these new sites (1AB) DNA polytenization decreases from 100% in the wild type to 51%-85% in the 4xSuUR (+) strain. In the 4xSuUR(+) strain, 60% of the weak points coincide with the localization of Polycomb group (PcG) proteins. At the IH region 89E1-4 (the Bithorax complex), a typical underreplication site, the degree of underreplication increases with four doses of SuUR(+) but the extent of the underreplicated region is the same as in wild type and corresponds to the region containing PcG binding sites. We conclude that the polytene chromosome regions known as IH are binding sites for SuUR protein and in many cases PcG silencing proteins. We propose that these stable silenced regions are late replicated and, in the presence of SuUR protein, become underreplicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I F Zhimulev
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zhimulev IF, Belyaeva ES, Makunin IV, Pirrotta V, Semeshin VF, Alekseyenko AA, Belyakin SN, Volkova EI, Koryakov DE, Andreyeva EN, Demakova OV, Kotlikova IV, Kolesnikova TD, Boldyreva LV, Nanayev RA. Intercalary heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes and the problem of genetic silencing. Genetica 2003; 117:259-70. [PMID: 12723705 DOI: 10.1023/a:1022912716376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The morphological characteristics of intercalary heterochromatin (IH) are compared with those of other types of silenced chromatin in the Drosophila melanogaster genome: pericentric heterochromatin (PH) and regions subject to position effect variegation (PEV). We conclude that IH regions in polytene chromosomes are binding sites of silencing complexes such as PcG complexes and of SuUR protein. Binding of these proteins results in the appearance of condensed chromatin and late replication of DNA, which in turn may result in DNA underreplication. IH and PH as well as regions subject to PEV have in common the condensed chromatin appearance, the localization of specific proteins, late replication, underreplication in polytene chromosomes, and ectopic pairing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor F Zhimulev
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentyev Ave., 10, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Zoology, University of Geneva, CH 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Splicing is an efficient and precise mechanism that removes noncoding regions from a single primary RNA transcript. Cutting and rejoining of the segments occurs on nascent RNA. Trans-splicing between small specialized RNAs and a primary transcript has been known in some organisms but recent papers show that trans-splicing between two RNA molecules containing different coding regions is the normal mode in a Drosophila gene. The mod(mdg4) gene produces 26 different mRNAs encoding as many protein isoforms. The differences lie in alternative 3' exons encoded by different transcriptional units and spliced to the 5' common region by a surprising trans-splicing mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Zoology, University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest Ansermet, CH1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Gene expression in C. elegans germline cells is subject to strict controls. A set of MES proteins, including SET domain proteins and two homologs of Polycomb group proteins, establish an epigenetically transmitted silenced state that affects X chromosome gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Zoology, University of Geneva, CH1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|