Effects of case volume on short- and long-term outcomes following cadaveric lung transplantation in Japan

Background

Despite the low number of lung transplantations (LTs) in Japan, 10 LT facilities are accredited and good outcomes have been reported. A database review was conducted to clarify the impact of case volume at LT facilities in Japan on short- and long-term outcomes.

Methods

All cadaveric LT cases treated between 2000 and 2021 in Japan were analyzed using the database of the Japanese Society of Lung and Heart-Lung Transplantation (JSLHT). The nine institutions represented were categorized into the low-volume (LV; <80 cumulative LT cases, <8 LTs/year, n=5) and high-volume (HV; ≥80 cumulative LT cases, ≥8 LTs/year, n=4) centers. Ninety-day and 1-year mortality, as well as 5- and 10-year survival data were evaluated.

Results

A total of 658 cadaveric LTs were performed at the nine institutions. The 90-day rates of mortality at the HV and LV centers were 3.5% and 3.9%, respectively (P=0.801), while the 1-year mortality rates were 9.2% and 11.5%, respectively (P=0.199). Additionally, log-rank analysis of Kaplan-Meier curves showing case volume did not reveal a significant difference in long-term survival between the HV and LV centers (P=0.272), though the LV centers had wide differences for long-term outcomes (P=0.030).

Conclusions

Case volume did not have effects on short- or long-term outcomes following LT in Japan, while there were large variations in long-term outcomes among the LV centers compared to those of the HV centers.

Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outpatient Case Volume During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic in New York and California

BACKGROUND

Inpatient total hip and total knee arthroplasty were substantially impacted by the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. We sought to characterize the transition of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to the outpatient setting in 2 large state health systems during this pandemic.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent primary elective TJA between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System and California Department of Health Care Access and Information datasets. Yearly inpatient and outpatient case volumes and patient demographics, including age, sex, race, and payer coverage, were recorded. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using descriptive statistics. Significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

In New York during 2020, TJA volume decreased 16% because 22,742 fewer inpatient TJAs were performed. Much of this lost volume (46.6%) was offset by a 166% increase in outpatient TJA. In California during 2020, TJA volume decreased 20% because 34,114 fewer inpatient TJAs were performed. Much of this lost volume (37%) was offset by a 47% increase in outpatient TJA.

CONCLUSIONS

This present study demonstrates a marked increase in the proportion of TJA being performed on an outpatient basis in both California and New York. In both states, despite a decrease in overall TJA volume in 2020, outpatient TJA volume increased markedly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Job satisfaction and practice characteristics of shoulder and elbow surgeons: a survey of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons society members

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to assess the current trends in fellowship training, career satisfaction, practice characteristics, and surgical case volume among shoulder and elbow surgeons.

METHODS

A web-based, anonymous 25-item survey was sent to the membership of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) in October of 2022. Questions posed included respondent demographics, fellowship training, career satisfaction, practice characteristics, and surgical case characteristics. Descriptive statistics were performed to report demographic information, assess job and training satisfaction rates, and evaluate practice characteristics. Chi-squared and independent samples t-tests were performed to analyze satisfaction rates, job applications, and surgical case volume with regard to years in practice and practice setting.

RESULTS

Twenty percent (243/1248) of ASES members satisfactorily completed the survey. Of the 243 ASES member respondents, 97% (236/243) stated that they would pursue their fellowship training again. Ninety-eight percent (239/243) of respondents were satisfied with their specialty choice. One-hundred percent (242/243) were satisfied with their training in shoulder. Seventy-two percent (176/243) were satisfied with their training in elbow. Seventy-four percent (179/243) were satisfied with their job availability and 85% (207/243) were satisfied with their job location. The mean total number of orthopedic surgical cases per year was 393 ± 171. The mean total number of shoulder cases per year was 253 ± 149. The mean total number of elbow cases per year was 41 ± 41. Physicians who have been in practice for 11 years or more were comparatively more satisfied (90% vs. 80%) with their job location (P value = .008) and job availability (81% vs. 64%, P value < .001). Additionally, senior surgeons completed more orthopedic (431 vs. 347, P value < .001) and shoulder (279 vs. 220, P value = .002) cases annually than surgeons earlier in their careers. Satisfaction rates, job applications, and surgical case volume did not associate with practice setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of ASES member shoulder and elbow surgeons are satisfied with their training, their case volume and complexity, and their specialty choice. Fewer surgeons are satisfied with their elbow training and overall elbow case volume remains low among shoulder and elbow surgeons. Shoulder and elbow surgeons earlier in their careers perform fewer surgical cases, are less satisfied with their job availability and location, and completed more job applications for their first job after fellowship when compared to more senior surgeons.

The Effects of COVID-19 on General Surgery Residency Programs in the United States

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted multiple aspects of surgical education. This survey delineates steps taken by general surgery residency programs to meet changing patient-care needs while continuing to provide adequate education.

Methods

A survey was administered to program directors and coordinators of all United States general surgery residency programs to assess the early effects of the pandemic on residents from March 1 through May 31, 2020.

Results

Of 303 programs contacted, 132 (43.6%) completed the survey. Residents were asked to work in areas outside of their specialty at 27.3% of programs. Residency curriculum was changed in 35.6% of programs, and 76.5% of programs changed their academic conferences. Resident schedules were altered at a majority of programs to limit resident-patient exposure, increase ICU coverage, or improve resident utilization. Surgical caseloads decreased at 93.8% of programs; 31.8% of those programs reported concerns regarding residents' achieving the minimum case numbers required to graduate.

Conclusions

These results provided insight into the restructuring of general surgery residency programs during a pandemic and may be used to establish future pandemic response plans.

The relationship between safety-net hospital status and outcomes among elderly head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The impact of safety-net status, case volume, and outcomes among geriatric head and neck cancer patients is unknown.

METHODS

Chi-square tests and Student's t tests to compare head and neck surgery outcomes of elderly patients between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. Multivariable linear regressions to determine predictors of outcome variables including mortality index, ICU stays, 30-day readmission, total direct cost, and direct cost index.

RESULTS

Compared with non-safety-net hospitals, safety-net hospitals had a higher average mortality index (1.04 vs. 0.32, p = 0.001), higher mortality rate (1% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.002), and higher direct cost index (p = 0.001). A multivariable model of mortality index found the interaction between safety-net status and medium case volume was predictive of higher mortality index (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Safety-net status is correlated with higher mortality index and cost in geriatric head and neck cancer patients. The interaction between medium volume and safety-net status is independently predictive of higher mortality index.

Volume and Variability of Foot and Ankle Case Exposure During Orthopaedic Residency: 2014-2019

BACKGROUND

Exposure to a comprehensive breadth and volume of surgical cases is a fundamental component of orthopaedic education, though standardization of case exposures across residency programs is limited to a small amount of required case minimums. Significant variability in exposure to subspecialty cases, such as foot and ankle surgeries, can create distinctly different residency experiences.

METHODS

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical case logs from 2014 to 2019 for leg/ankle and foot/toes were examined following the 2013 implementation of case minimums. Average surgical case volume across subcategories and the average volume of different residency percentiles were analyzed to assess variability.

RESULTS

The mean total volume of case exposure for graduating orthopaedic residents has increased significantly since 2014 for both leg/ankle cases (28.6%) and foot/toes (27.8%), though totals were still down compared with when ACGME reporting began in 2007. Arthrodesis exposures have increased significantly for leg/ankle (69.2%) and foot/toes (93.8%) cases since 2014, and ankle arthroscopy has increased 20.7%. Disparities in total cases between 10th and 90th percentile programs have shown a nonsignificant decrease over time, with significant differences between leg/ankle arthrodesis (8-fold), leg/ankle arthroscopy (13-fold), and foot/toe arthrodesis (3.5-fold) in 2019.

CONCLUSION

The mean volume of foot and ankle case exposures among graduating residents has continued to rise since the implementation of case minimums in 2013 but disparities in volume are present, most notably concerning arthrodesis and arthroscopy. Recognition and future attention toward addressing this variability can be meaningful in promoting a more comprehensive, standardized orthopaedics education.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

Effect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes of patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a territory-wide longitudinal observational study

Background

The utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased rapidly around the world. Being an overall low-volume high-cost form of therapy, the effectiveness of having care delivered in segregated units across a geographical locality is debatable.

Methods

All adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases admitted to public hospitals in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2019 were included. “High-volume” centers were defined as those with >20 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases in the respective calendar year, while “low-volume” centers were those with ≤20. Clinical outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation care in high-volume centers were compared with those in low-volume centers.

Results

A total of 911 patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation—297 (32.6%) veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 450 (49.4%) veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 164 (18.0%) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The overall hospital mortality was 456 (50.1%). The annual number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases in high- and low-volume centers were 29 and 11, respectively. Management in a high-volume center was not significantly associated with hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–1.21, P=0.38), or with intensive care unit mortality (adjusted OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54–1.06, P=0.10) compared with a low-volume center. Over the 10-year period, the overall observed mortality was similar to the Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation IV-predicted mortality, with no significant difference in the standardized mortality ratios between high- and low-volume centers (P=0.46).

Conclusions

In a territory-wide observational study, we observed that case volumes in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers were not associated with hospital mortality. Maintaining standards of care in low-volume centers is important and improves preparedness for surges in demand.

Resident Night Float or 24-hour Call Hospital Coverage: Impact on Training, Patient Outcome, and Length of Stay

OBJECTIVE

The impact of neurosurgical resident hospital coverage system, performed via a night float (12-hour shifts overnight) or a 24-hour call, on neurological surgery resident training and patient care is unknown.

DESIGN

Retrospective review comparing night float and 24-hour call coverage on trainee surgical experience, elective time, annual program surveys, patient outcomes, and length of stay.

SETTING

The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center Neurosurgery residency program, Columbus, Ohio.

PARTICIPANTS

The neurosurgical residents from 2016 to 2019.

RESULTS

Monthly cases performed by junior residents significantly increased after transitioning to a 24-hour call schedule (18 versus 30, p < 0.001). There were no differences for total cases among program graduates during this time (p = 0.7). Trainee elective time significantly increased after switching to 24-hour call coverage (18 versus 24 months after the transition; p = 0.004). Risk-adjusted mortality and length of stay indices were not different (0.5 versus 0.3, p = 0.1; 0.9 versus 0.9; p = 0.3). Program surveys had minimal change after the transition to 24-hour call.

CONCLUSIONS

Transitioning from a night float to a 24-hour call coverage system led to improved junior resident case volume and elective time without detrimental effect on patient-related outcomes.

The impact of hospital case volume on the outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation according to the ablation technology

INTRODUCTION

The appropriate hospital case volume for catheter ablation (CA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) according to the ablation technology has not been fully examined. This study aimed to investigate the association between the hospital case volume for AF and periprocedural complications and AF recurrence.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups, which covers almost all healthcare insurance claims data in Japan. We included patients with AF who underwent first-time CA from April 2014 to March 2020. Using mixed-effect logistic regression, we analyzed the effect of the annual case volume for AF ablation on acute periprocedural complications and 1-year success rate off antiarrhythmic drugs according to the ablation technology (radiofrequency ablation or cryoballoon ablation).

RESULTS

Among 270 116 patients, 207 839 (77%) patients underwent radiofrequency ablation and 56 648 (21%) patients underwent cryoballoon ablation. Of all patients, acute complications occurred in 5411 (2.0%) patients, and the recurrence at 1 year was 71 511 (27%). In the radiofrequency ablation group, acute complications and 1-year AF recurrence according to case volume decreased as the annual case volume increased to up to 150-200 cases/year. However, in the cryoballoon ablation group, these outcomes were similar regardless of the case volumes.

CONCLUSION

The case-volume effect was noted in the radiofrequency ablation group, but not in the cryoballoon ablation group. Our results may affect the selection of ablation technology, especially in smaller case-volume hospitals.

Effect of Radiation Treatment at a High-Volume Center on Outcomes in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of radiation treatment at a high-volume center on overall survival in men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS

From 2004-2015, 430,347 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were identified in the NCDB. Radiation case volume (RCV) of each hospital was calculated based on number of patients treated. After excluding certain patients including those with metastatic disease, our final analysis population included 116,091 intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) or radiation with androgen deprivation therapy (RT+ADT). Characteristics analyzed include age, race, distance to treatment facility, Charlson-Deyo Score (CDS), and socioeconomic factors. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). 5-year survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using multivariate analysis (MVA). Cox regression and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Median follow up was 63.5 months and estimated 5-year OS was 90.1% at high RCV centers and 88.2% at low RCV centers (p<0.0001). Treatment at high RCV facility was associated with significantly lower mortality compared to treatment at a low RCV facility on MVA and PSM analysis. The survival benefit of treatment at a high RCV facility remained when high RCV facilities were defined as those above the 80^th, 90^th, and 95^th percentile in patient volume (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment at a high radiation case volume facility is associated with improved OS in patients with radiation-treated intermediate-risk prostate cancer. This survival benefit is important to consider when choosing a treatment center for radiation therapy.

Relationship between annualized case volume and in-hospital motality in subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Studies on the relationship between hospital annualized case volume and in-hospital mortality in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) have shown conflicting results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to further examine this relationship.The authors searched the PubMed and Embase databases from inception through July 2020 to identify studies that assessed the relationship between hospital annualized SAH case volume and in-hospital SAH mortality. Studies that reported in-hospital mortality in SAH patients and an adjusted odds ratio (OR) comparing mortality between low-volume and high-volume hospitals or provided core data to calculate an adjusted OR were eligible for inclusion. No language or human subject restrictions were imposed.Five retrospective cohort studies with 46,186 patients were included for analysis. The pooled estimate revealed an inverse relationship between annualized case volume and in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.68, P < .0001). This relationship was consistent in almost all subgroup analyses and was robust in sensitivity analyses.This meta-analysis confirms an inverse relationship between hospital annualized SAH case volume and in-hospital SAH mortality. Higher annualized case volume was associated with lower in-hospital mortality.

Should I be Concerned? Surgical Training in the Time of COVID19

As the US healthcare system restructured to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic, medical training was significantly disrupted. During the peak of the crisis, three surgical trainees in different stages of their residency shared their experiences and concerns on how this pandemic affected their training. The article is intended to generate discussion on the concerns of derailment and stagnation of surgical training and difficulties faced at all levels of surgical training to perform clinical duties and fulfill academic responsibilities during the early months of the COVID pandemic.

Understanding the Trends and Variability in Procedures Performed During Orthopedic Spine Surgery Fellowship Training: An Analysis of ACGME Case Log Data

OBJECTIVE

To understand trends and variability of procedures performed by orthopedic spine surgery fellows during training.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs.

PARTICIPANTS

Fellows enrolled in ACGME-accredited "Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine" fellowships from 2010 to 2015.

RESULTS

The 2010 to 2015 ACGME fellowship case logs for "Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine" were retrieved. Spine cases in case logs are grouped into the following categories: (1) Excision, (2) Osteotomy, (3) Fracture and/or Dislocation, (4) Decompression, (5) Anterior fusion/arthrodesis, (6) Posterior fusion, (7) Deformity surgery, (8) Exploration, (9) Instrumentation, and (10) other/uncategorized. The total number of spine cases logged by each fellow increased from 821 in 2010 to 1134 in 2015 (38.2% increase). The greatest increases were noted from fracture/dislocation cases (77.9%), followed by posterior fusions (62.2%), anterior fusions (43.6%), decompressions (36.3%), and instrumentation (29.5%). The average number of deformity cases decreased from 23 in 2010 to 19 in 2016 (18.6% decrease). The average number of adult-only cases increased from 770 in 2010 to 1100 in 2015 (42.8% increase), whereas the average number of pediatric-only cases declined from 51 in 2010 to 35 in 2015 (32.1% decrease). Based on case logs from 2015, the greatest variation in case volume between the 10th centile and 90th centile of fellows was noted for deformity cases, followed by decompressions and posterior fusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though there has been a 38% increase in the overall number of spine cases performed by fellows during training, a large amount of variation in type of case exposure exists between fellowships. The findings of our study call for the establishment of minimal case volumes and/or uniformity of training spectrums across the nation to ensure appropriate surgical care is made accessible to all patients.

Can Regionalization of Care Reduce Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival?

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer patients of low socioeconomic status (SES) have worse survival than more affluent women and are also more likely to undergo surgery in low-volume facilities. Since breast cancer patients treated in high-volume facilities have better survival, regionalizing the care of low SES patients toward high-volume facilities might reduce SES disparities in survival.

OBJECTIVE

We leverage a natural experiment in New York state to examine whether a policy precluding payment for breast cancer surgery for New York Medicaid beneficiaries undergoing surgery in low-volume facilities led to reduced SES disparities in mortality.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A multivariable difference-in-differences regression analysis compared mortality of low SES (dual enrollees, Medicare-Medicaid) breast cancer patients to that of wealthier patients exempt from the policy (Medicare only) for time periods before and after the policy implementation.

SUBJECTS

A total of 14,183 Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer in 2006-2008 or 2014-2015.

MEASURES

All-cause mortality at 3 years after diagnosis and Medicaid status, determined by Medicare administrative data.

RESULTS

Both low SES and Medicare-only patients had better 3-year survival after the policy implementation. However, the decline in mortality was larger in magnitude among the low SES women than others, resulting in a 53% smaller SES survival disparity after the policy after adjustment for age, race, and comorbid illness.

CONCLUSION

Regionalization of early breast cancer care away from low-volume centers may improve outcomes and reduce SES disparities in survival.

Primary Treatment Selection for Clinically Node-Negative Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

OBJECTIVE

Merkel cell carcinoma practice guidelines recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy after wide local excision for the initial management of clinically node-negative disease without distant metastases (cN0M0). Despite guideline publication, treatment selection remains variable. We hypothesized that receipt of guideline-recommended care would be more common in patients evaluated at academic centers and institutions with high melanoma case volumes and that such therapy would be associated with improved overall survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

SETTING

The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015.

METHODS

A total of 3500 patients were included. We utilized Kaplan-Meier analysis and logistic and Cox proportional hazard regressions. Survival analysis was performed on inverse probability-weighted cohorts.

RESULTS

There has been a trend toward evaluation at academic programs at a rate of 1.58% of patients per year (95% CI, 1.06%-2.11%) since 2004. However, the percentage of patients receiving guideline-compliant primary tumor excision and lymph node evaluation has plateaued at approximately 50% since 2012. Guideline-compliant surgical management was more commonly provided to patients evaluated at academic programs than nonacademic programs but only when those institutions had a high melanoma case volume (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.62-2.48). Receipt of guideline-compliant primary tumor excision and lymph node evaluation was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64-0.76).

CONCLUSION

Facility factors affect rates of receipt of guideline-compliant initial surgical management for patients with node-negative Merkel cell carcinoma. Given the survival benefit of such treatment, patients may benefit from care at hospitals with high melanoma case volumes.

With the Incidence of Otosclerosis Declining, Should Stapedectomy Remain a Key-Indicator Case for Otolaryngology Residents?

Stapedectomy remains a joint key-indicator case with ossiculoplasty for otolaryngology residents in the United States. Yet, residents consistently report feeling inadequately prepared to perform stapes surgery following graduation. Applying recently described age- and sex-standardized incidence rates of surgically confirmed cases of otosclerosis to the US populace, upper and lower estimates of residents' case exposure to stapedectomy can be approximated. With this, uppermost projections estimate 6484 new cases of stapes surgery are performed annually nationwide. With approximately 1424 otolaryngology residents nationally, the average case exposure is 7.8 stapedectomies throughout their training, with upper and lower estimates of 17.1 and 4.2 cases, respectively. As such, proficiency in stapedectomy is no longer a realistic expectation for US graduating residents. This reality supports the removal of "stapedectomy" from the list of 14 key-indicator case requirements, leaving ossiculoplasty as its own key-indicator case, thereby reinforcing true competence in this fundamental procedure for the graduating otolaryngologist.

Cardiac surgery in North America and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Regional variability in burden and impact

Objective

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in an increase in hospital resource utilization and the need to defer nonurgent cardiac surgery procedures. The present study aims to report the regional variations of North American adult cardiac surgical case volume and case mix through the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A survey was sent to recruit participating adult cardiac surgery centers in North America. Data in regard to changes in institutional and regional cardiac surgical case volume and mix were analyzed.

Results

Our study comprises 67 adult cardiac surgery institutions with diverse geographic distribution across North America, representing annualized case volumes of 60,452 in 2019. Nonurgent surgery was stopped during the month of March 2020 in the majority of centers (96%), resulting in a decline to 45% of baseline with significant regional variation. Hospitals with a high burden of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 demonstrated similar trends of decline in total volume as centers in low burden areas. As a proportion of total surgical volume, there was a relative increase of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (high +7.2% vs low +4.2%, P = .550), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (high +2.5% vs low 0.4%, P = .328), and heart transplantation (high +2.7% vs low 0.4%, P = .090), and decline in valvular cases (high –7.6% vs low –2.6%, P = .195).

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates the impact of COVID-19 on North American cardiac surgery institutions as well as helps associate region and COVID-19 burden with the impact on cardiac surgery volumes and case mix.

Pediatric neurosurgery training during residency in the United States: a program director survey

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric neurosurgery is a core component of neurosurgical residency training. Pediatric case minimums are established by the Neurosurgery Residency Review Committee of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Case minimums, by themselves, allow for great variability in training between programs. There are no prior data on how the residency programs meet these requirements. The authors' objective was to gather information on pediatric neurosurgical education among the ACGME-accredited neurosurgery training programs in order to shape further pediatric neurosurgical educational efforts.

METHODS

A 25-question survey about pediatric neurosurgical education was created by the Education Committee of the Section on Pediatric Neurological Surgery of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons and distributed to program directors of all 111 ACGME-accredited neurosurgery training programs.

RESULTS

The response rate was 77% (86/111). In 55% of programs the residents are rotated to a responder-designated "freestanding" children's hospital, and 39% of programs rotate residents to a children's hospital within a larger adult hospital or a general hospital. There are 4 or fewer pediatric neurosurgical faculty in 91% of programs. In 12% of programs less than 100 cases are performed per year, and in 45% more than 500 are performed. In 31% of responding neurosurgery residency programs there is also a pediatric neurosurgery fellowship program supported by the same sponsoring institution. Seventy-seven percent of programs have at least one specific pediatric neurosurgery rotation, with 71% of those rotations occurring during postgraduate year 3 and 50% occurring during postgraduate year 4. The duration of pediatric rotation varies from no specific rotation to more than 1 year, with 48% of residents spending 4-6 months on a pediatric rotation and 12% spending 7-11 months. Last, 17% of programs send their residents to external sites sponsoring other residency programs for their pediatric rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is great variety between neurosurgery training programs with regard to resident education in pediatric neurosurgery. This study's data will serve as a baseline for future studies, and the authors hope the findings will guide further efforts in pediatric neurosurgical education in residency training programs.

Did a Minimum Case Requirement Improve Resident Surgical Volume for Closed Wrist and Forearm Fracture Treatment in Orthopedic Surgery?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the 2013 implementation of ACGME minimum case requirements was associated with increased documented case volume of closed manipulation of forearm and wrist fractures (CMFWF) for graduating orthopedic surgery residents.

DESIGN

We reviewed ACGME case log data for CMFWF among graduating orthopedic surgery residents from 2007 to 2016. Annual national mean, and median number of CMFWF performed by residents in the 10th, 30th, 50th, and 90th case volume percentile were evaluated. Preminimum (2007-2010) data was compared to postminimum (2013-2016) values to assess the impact of ACGME minimum requirements on resident case volume.

SETTING

Review of publically available ACMGE Orthopedic Surgery Residency Program case log data.

PARTICIPANTS

ACGME case log data for orthopedic surgery residents graduating between 2007 and 2016.

RESULTS

National mean number of CMFWF increased significantly pre- to postminimum requirement (30.0 ± 2.84 to 45.0 ± 3.36, p < 0.001). Between 2010 and 2016 there was a 1100%, 300%, 83%, and 9% increase in the median number of CMFWF within the 10th, 30th, 50th, and 90th percentiles, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ACGME's 2013 case minimum requirement corresponded to an increase in case counts for CMFWF; the greatest increase occurred in residents below the 50th percentile of case volume. Implementation of case minimum requirements may allow for more accurate depiction of resident experience and program strengths with regards to procedural exposure. However, the current case log system measures only case quantity, which may inaccurately depict mastery of given procedures. Future work should focus not only on improving case counts in underperforming residents and training sites, but also on refining metrics that ensure accurate assessment of resident skill for essential orthopedic procedures prior to graduation.

Differences in the outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer prescribed by physicians in different disciplines: a population-based study in Taiwan

OBJECTIVES

One feature unique to the Taiwanese healthcare system is the ability of physicians other than oncologists to prescribe systemic chemotherapy. This study investigated whether the care paths implemented by oncologists and non-oncologists differ with regard to patient outcomes.

SETTING

Data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Database were linked to identify patients with colon cancer who underwent colectomy as first treatment within 3 months of diagnosis and adjuvant chemotherapy between 2005 and 2009.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Postoperative patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. The exclusion criteria included patients with stage IV disease, a positive surgical margin and early disease recurrence. Among the patients presenting with multiple primary cancers, we also excluded patients who were diagnosed with colon cancer but for whom this was not the first primary cancer. The variables included sex, age, comorbidities, disease stage, chemotherapy cycle and changes in treatment regimen as well as the specialty of treatment providers and their case volume. Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to examine differences in outcomes in the matched cohorts.

RESULTS

We examined 3534 patients who were prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy by physicians from different disciplines. In terms of 5-year disease-free survival, no significant difference was observed between the groups of oncologists or surgeons among patients with stage II (90.02%vs88.99%) or stage III (77.64%vs79.99%) diseases. Patients who were subjected to changes in their chemotherapy regimens presented recurrence rates higher than those who were not.

CONCLUSIONS

The discipline of practitioners is seldom taken into account in most series. This is the first study to provide empirical evidence demonstrating that the outcomes of patients with colon cancer do not depend on the treatment path, as long as the selection criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy is appropriate. Further study will be required before making any further conclusions.

Treatment of primary nonmetastatic melanoma at high-volume academic facilities is associated with improved long-term patient survival

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of cancer care have demonstrated improved long-term patient outcomes for those treated at high-volume centers. The influence of treatment center characteristics on outcomes for primary nonmetastatic melanoma is not currently established.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the association of cancer treatment center case volume and academic affiliation with long-term patient survival for cases of primary nonmetastatic melanoma.

METHODS

Cases of melanoma diagnosed in US adults from 2004 to 2014 and included in the National Cancer Database were identified. Hospitals were grouped by yearly case-volume quartile: bottom quartile, 2 middle quartiles, and top quartile.

RESULTS

Facility case volume was significantly associated with long-term patient survival (P < .0001). The 5-year survival rates were 76.8%, 81.9%, and 86.4% for patients treated at institutions in the bottom, middle, and top quartiles of case volume, respectively. On multivariate analysis, treatment at centers in both middle quartiles (hazard ratio, 0.834; 95% confidence interval, 0.778-0.895) and in the top quartile (hazard ratio, 0.691; 95% confidence interval, 0.644-0.741) of case volume was associated with improved survival relative to that of patients treated at hospitals in the bottom quartile of case volume. Academic affiliation was associated with improved outcomes for top-quartile- but not middle-quartile-volume facilities.

LIMITATIONS

Disease-specific survival was not available.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment at a high-volume facility is associated with improved long-term patient survival for melanoma. High-volume academic centers have improved patient outcomes compared with other high-volume centers.

Variability in Foot and Ankle Case Volume in Orthopaedic Residency Training

Surgical case volume during orthopaedic surgical residency is a concern among trainees and program directors alike. With an ongoing trend toward further subspecialization and the rapid development of new techniques and devices, the breadth of procedures that residents are exposed to continues to increase. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education surgical case logs from 2009 to 2013 for graduating orthopaedic surgery residents were examined to assess the national averages of orthopaedic procedures logged by graduating orthopaedic surgery residents in the leg/ankle and foot/toes categories. This investigation revealed that there was an 8% increase in the total number of leg/ankle cases and 12% increase in foot/toes cases performed by graduating orthopaedic surgery residents, which has not significantly increased from 2009 to 2013. Across years examined in this study, significant variability existed between the 10th and 90th percentiles for total foot and ankle resident case exposure (P < .05), particularly within ankle arthroscopy, where there was a 15-fold difference in the number of arthroscopy cases performed by residents in the 90th percentile compared with the 10th percentile. The overall volume of foot and ankle cases performed by graduating orthopaedic surgery residents has increased despite not being statistically significantly from 2009 to 2013.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Cohort study.

ICU Telemedicine Program Financial Outcomes

BACKGROUND

ICU telemedicine improves access to high-quality critical care, has substantial costs, and can change financial outcomes. Detailed information about financial outcomes and their trends over time following ICU telemedicine implementation and after the addition of logistic center function has not been published to our knowledge.

METHODS

Primary data were collected for consecutive adult patients of a single academic medical center. We compared clinical and financial outcomes across three groups that differed regarding telemedicine support: a group without ICU telemedicine support (pre-ICU intervention group), a group with ICU telemedicine support (ICU telemedicine group), and an ICU telemedicine group with added logistic center functions and support for quality-care standardization (logistic center group). The primary outcome was annual direct contribution margin defined as aggregated annual case revenue minus annual case direct costs (including operating costs of ICU telemedicine and its related programs). All monetary values were adjusted to 2015 US dollars using Producer Price Index for Health-Care Facilities.

RESULTS

Annual case volume increased from 4,752 (pre-ICU telemedicine) to 5,735 (ICU telemedicine) and 6,581 (logistic center). The annual direct contribution margin improved from $7,921,584 (pre-ICU telemedicine) to $37,668,512 (ICU telemedicine) to $60,586,397 (logistic center) due to increased case volume, higher case revenue relative to direct costs, and shorter length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability of properly modified ICU telemedicine programs to increase case volume and access to high-quality critical care with improved annual direct contribution margins suggests that there is a financial argument to encourage the wider adoption of ICU telemedicine.

Can Rural Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellowships Provide Operative Experience Similar to Urban Programs?

OBJECTIVE

Operative experience in rural fellowship programs is largely unknown. The 2 of the most rural minimally invasive surgery (MIS)/bariatric fellowships are located in the upper Midwest. We hypothesized that these 2 programs would offer a similar operative experience to other U.S. programs in more urban locations.

DESIGN

The 2011 to 2012 and 2012 to 2013 fellowship case logs from 2 rural Midwest programs were compared with case logs from 23 U.S. MIS/bariatric programs. All rural Midwest fellowship graduates completed a survey describing their fellowship experience and current practice. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

SETTING

Setting included the 2 rural Midwest U.S. MIS/bariatric fellowship programs.

PARTICIPANTS

Graduates from MIS/bariatric fellowship programs participated in the study.

RESULTS

Mean volumes for bariatric, foregut, abdominal wall, small intestine, and hepatobiliary cases for rural Midwest fellows vs. other U.S. programs were 123.8 ± 23.7 vs. 150.2 ± 49.2 (p = 0.20); 44.3 ± 19.4 vs. 66.3 ± 35.5 (p = 0.18); 48.3 ± 28.0 vs. 57.9 ± 27.8 (p = 0.58); 11.3 ± 1.9 vs. 12.0 ± 8.7 (p = 0.58); and 55.0 ± 34.8 vs. 48.1 ± 42.6 (p = 0.63), respectively. Mean endoscopy volume was significantly higher among rural Midwest fellows (451.0 ± 395.2 vs. 99.7 ± 83.4; p = 0.05). All rural Midwest fellows reported an adequate number of cases as operating surgeon during fellowship. A total of 60% of fellows currently practice in a rural area. In all, 87% and 13% reported that their fellowship training was extremely or somewhat beneficial to their current practice, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Rural MIS fellowship programs offer a similar operative experience to other U.S. programs. A greater volume of endoscopy cases was observed in rural Midwest fellowships.

General Surgery Resident Case Logs: Do They Accurately Reflect Resident Experience?

INTRODUCTION

Operative experience during residency lays the foundation for independent practice and additional specialty training following general surgery residency. The aim of this study was to examine operative experience of general surgery residents and detail the results of an intervention aimed at improving resident record keeping in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case log system to better reflect their experience.

METHODS

Residents were asked to characterize variances in recorded operative experience identified through an audit of operative logs. Based on the results of the audit, an intervention was designed to prompt timely record keeping by residents. The intervention included education and discussion of survey audit results, weekly presentation of graphs detailing operative experience, and possible missed cases in the ACGME logs and addition of a first assistant column in morbidity and mortality (M&M) logs.

RESULTS

The audit of case logs identified discrepancies in 24.2% of the 636 cases examined. Chief residents were significantly more accurate (95.9%) in recording operative experience in ACGME case logs, whereas 50.3% of junior resident case logs contained variances. Residents characterized discrepancies as "forgot to log" (9.6%), "staff did the case" (5.2%), "another resident did more of the case" (3.6%), "other" (3.6%), a "more advanced resident was present for the case" (1.6%), "not present for case" (0.6%), and "left for consult" (0.3%). Over the 4-week intervention period, residents logged between 72.7% and 94.0% of cases. A month following the intervention period, we observed a 13.3% increase in recorded cases compared with the intervention period. Review of first assistant case logging following inclusion of a "first assistant" column in M&M logs demonstrated a 70.5% increase in first assistant cases logged into the ACGME system compared with the same time period a year ago.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, we found that weekly displays of cases improved resident record keeping in the ACGME case log system, especially by junior residents. We believe that the addition of first assistant column on M&M lists, periodic audits reviewed at conferences, and semiannual evaluations will help junior residents more accurately report their experience during training.

The effect of duty hour regulation on resident surgical case volume in otolaryngology

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the effect of duty hour regulation on graduating otolaryngology resident surgical case volume and analyze trends in surgical case volume for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) key indicator cases from 1996 to 2011.

STUDY DESIGN

Time-trend analysis of surgical case volume.

SETTING

Nationwide sample of otolaryngology residency programs.

SUBJECTS

Operative logs from the American Board of Otolaryngology and ACGME for otolaryngology residents graduating in the years 1996 to 2011.

METHODS

Key indicator volumes and grouped domain volumes before and after resident duty hour regulations (2003) were calculated and compared. Independent t test was performed to evaluate overall difference in operative volume. Wilcoxon rank sum test evaluated differences between procedures per time period. Linear regression evaluated trend.

RESULTS

The average total number of key indicator cases per graduating resident was 440.8 in 1996-2003 compared to 500.4 cases in 2004-2011, and overall average per number of key indicators was 31.5 and 36.2, respectively (P = .067). Four key indicator cases showed statistically significant (P < .05) increases in volume after duty hour implementation. General/pediatrics was the only grouped domain to show a significant increase. In contrast, the rate of change in operative volume decreased post duty hour for only 2 key indicators (P < .05). The year-by-year trend in average operative volume showed significant increases for 5 key indicator cases (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the 2003 duty hour regulations has not reduced total volume of key indicator cases for graduating otolaryngology residents. The overall trend in operative volume is increasing for several specific key indicators.

Operative volume in colon surgery: a matched cohort analysis

Although previous studies have suggested that higher volumes of colectomies performed by surgeons and hospitals are associated with lower mortality, less is known about the relationship between volume and resource utilization. The research team tested the association between volume, costs, complications, length of stay, and mortality using data from the National Inpatient Sample. Results suggest higher volumes for both surgeons and hospitals were associated with lower costs, fewer complications, shorter length of stay, and lower mortality. Propensity score matching showed no significant difference in mortality by surgeon volume (7.38% vs 7.46%, P=.0.842), but significantly fewer complications (45.06% vs 49.10%, P=.008), shorter length of stay (11.8 vs 13.1 days, P<.0001), and lower costs ($33,142 vs $29,578, P<.0001) for high-volume surgeons. Although the major driver of complications and mortality is burden of disease and comorbid conditions, individual surgeon volume is an important determinant of length of stay and costs.