Human amniotic epithelial cell transplantation is safe and well tolerated in patients with compensated cirrhosis: a first-in-human trial

Placenta-derived human amniotic epithelial cells (hAEC) exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects in cirrhosis models. We conducted a first-in-human phase I clinical trial to assess the safety and tolerability of hAEC in adults with compensated cirrhosis. We examined increasing and repeated doses of hAEC in 9 patients in 3 cohorts. Cohort 1 patients received 0.5 × 106/kg hAEC in one IV infusion. Cohort 2 patients received 1 × 106/kg hAEC in one IV infusion. The patients in cohort 3 received 1 × 106/kg hAEC on days 0 and 28. Here, we report follow-up to post-infusion day 56 (D56), during which no serious adverse events occurred. Six patients experienced no study-related adverse events, while 3 patients reported mild (grade 1) headaches that were possibly infusion-related. A transient decrease in serum platelet count occurred in all patients, which returned to baseline screening values by day 5. FIB-4 values to assess fibrosis were significantly lower at D56. Although not statistically significant, serum AST levels and liver stiffness measurements at D56 were lower than those at baseline. The hepatic venous pressure gradient, a measure of portal hypertension, declined in 4 patients, did not change in 3 patients, and increased in 2 patients. In conclusion, intravenous infusion of allogeneic hAEC in patients with compensated cirrhosis at the doses used in this study was safe and well tolerated, with no difference observed between 1 and 2 doses. Decreased hepatic inflammation, liver stiffness, and portal hypertension support larger studies aimed at identifying patients who may benefit from this therapy. Clinical Trial registration: The trial was prospectively entered on the Australian Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR12616000437460).

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and immunogenicity profiles of Exendin-4-IgG4-Fc in healthy subjects: A phase 1, single-centre, randomized, double-blind, dose escalation study

AIM

Novel long-acting drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus may optimize patient compliance and glycaemic control. Exendin-4-IgG4-Fc (E4F4) is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. This first-in-human study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and immunogenicity profiles of a single subcutaneous injection of E4F4 in healthy subjects.

METHODS

This single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 clinical trial included 96 subjects in 10 sequential cohorts that were provided successively higher doses of E4F4 (0.45, 0.9, 1.8, 3.15, 4.5, 6.3, 8.1, 10.35, 12.6 and 14.85 mg) or placebo (ChinaDrugTrials.org.cn: ChiCTR2100049732). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of E4F4. Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and immunogenicity profiles of E4F4. Safety data to day 15 after the final subject in a cohort had been dosed were reviewed before commencing the next dose level.

RESULTS

E4F4 was safe and well tolerated among healthy Chinese participants in this study. There was no obvious dose-dependent relationship between frequency, severity or causality of treatment-emergent adverse events. Cmax and area under the curve of E4F4 were dose proportional over the 0.45-14.85 mg dose range. Median Tmax and t1/2 ranged from 146 to 210 h and 199 to 252 h, respectively, across E4F4 doses, with no dose-dependent trends. For the intravenous glucose tolerance test, area under the curve of glucose in plasma from time 0 to 180 min showed a dose-response relationship in the 1.8-10.35 mg dose range, with an increased response at the higher doses.

CONCLUSION

E4F4 exhibited an acceptable safety profile and linear pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. The recommended phase 2 dose is 4.5-10.35 mg once every 2 weeks.

A Phase I Dose-Escalation Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Knee Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common degenerative joint disease. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are promising cell-based therapy for OA. However, there is still a need for additional randomized, dose-dependent studies to determine the optimal dose and tissue source of MSC for improved clinical outcomes. Here, we performed a dose-dependant evaluation of umbilical cord (UC)-derived MSC (Celllistem) in a murine model and in knee OA patients. For the preclinical study, a classical dose (200.000 cells) and a lower dose (50.000 cells) of Cellistem were intra-articularly injected into the mice knee joints. The results showed a dose efficacy response effect of Cellistem associated with a decreased inflammatory and degenerative response according to the Pritzker OARSI score. Following the same approach, the dose-escalation phase I clinical trial design included 3 sequential cohorts: low-dose group (2 × 106 cells), medium-dose group (20 × 106), and high-dose group (80 × 106). All the doses were safe, and no serious adverse events were reported. Nonetheless, 100% of the patients injected with the high-dose experienced injection-related swelling in the knee joint. According to WOMAC total outcomes, patients treated with all doses reported significant improvements in pain and function compared with baseline after 3 and 6 months. However, the improvements were higher in patients treated with both medium and low dose as compared to high dose. Therefore, our data demonstrate that the intra-articular injection of different doses of Cellistem is both safe and efficient, making it an interesting therapeutic alternative to treat mild and symptomatic knee OA patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03810521.

Safety and dose-finding trial of tadalafil administered for fetus in labor: A phase I clinical study

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of tadalafil in protecting the fetus from hypoxic stress caused by repeated labor pains during delivery and preventing fetal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

METHODS

The study used a three-case cohort approach. Three patients were administered 10 mg tadalafil and monitored for serious adverse events. In the absence of serious tadalafil-associated adverse events as assessed by the Safety Evaluation Committee, three new patients were added to the study and treated with 20 mg/dose. The blood levels of tadalafil were recorded before and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 h of administration and 2 h after delivery.

RESULTS

A total of seven patients were enrolled, and after excluding one patient who delivered before 37 weeks, tadalafil was administered to six patients. Maternal adverse events were considered acceptable from the maternal perspective, with grade 1 headache, anorexia, and myalgia and no obstetrical complications after delivery at both doses. No serious neonatal adverse events were associated with tadalafil. Tadalafil blood levels remained stable at both doses. In addition, the level of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 did not alter, while that of the placental growth factor differed significantly before and after tadalafil administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed the safety of tadalafil administration during delivery for both mothers and newborns. The stable tadalafil blood levels confirmed the efficacy of the tested administration regime at 12 h interval. These findings would assist in conducting phase II trials to further verify the optimal dose and safety of tadalafil.

A study protocol for an open-label, single-arm, single-center phase I clinical study on tolerability, safety, and efficacy of dalpiciclib combined with apatinib in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma is very poor, and a new strategy for patients who fail systemic treatment is urgently required. Apatinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2, which can exert an antitumor effect by blocking downstream PI3K/AKT and VEGFR2/STAT3 signaling pathways of sarcoma. Dysregulation of the cyclin D (CCND)-cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6)-retinoblastoma 1 (Rb) pathway is highly prevalent in sarcoma. Thus, blocking VEGFR2 and CDK4/6 may exert a synergistic effect. We hypothesize that a combination of apatinib and dalpiciclib, an oral, highly effective, and selective small molecule CDK4/6 inhibitor, may result in higher antitumor efficacy in patients with refractory sarcoma.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, single-center phase I trial, participants diagnosed with sarcoma who failed standard systemic treatment will be enrolled. Dose escalation will be conducted into three groups according to traditional 3 + 3 principle: dose 1, dalpiciclib 100 mg once daily oral d1-21+ apatinib 250 mg once daily oral d1-28, every 28 days as one cycle; dose 2, dalpiciclib 100 mg d1-21+ apatinib 500 mg d1-28; dose 3, dalpiciclib 150 mg d-21+ apatinib 500 mg d1-28. The primary endpoint is the safety and tolerability of combined treatment. The secondary endpoint is to evaluate the initial efficacy, including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), and progression-free survival (PFS).

DISCUSSION

This trial will provide evidence of the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of dalpiciclib in combination with apatinib in metastatic sarcoma patients who have failed first-line systemic treatment.

Phase Ib study of HSP90 inhibitor, onalespib (AT13387), in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer

Background

Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone required for stabilization of client proteins over-activated in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Over-expression of HSP90 client proteins has been implicated in paclitaxel resistance. Onalespib (AT13387) is a potent inhibitor of HSP90 that could improve paclitaxel efficacy when administered in combination.

Design

This phase Ib trial administered onalespib with paclitaxel in patients with advanced TNBC to assess safety and establish a recommended phase II dose (RP2D).

Objectives

The primary objectives were determining the dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of combination therapy. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and determination of overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Methods

Patients with advanced TNBC were treated with standard dose intravenous paclitaxel in combination with intravenous onalespib at doses ranging from 120 to 260 mg/m2 administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle using a standard 3 + 3 design. A total of 15 patients were enrolled to dose expansion cohort at RP2D to confirm safety profile.

Results

Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the study, of which over 90% had received prior taxane therapy. Paclitaxel was given for metastatic disease in 23% of patients. Adverse events (AEs) included anemia (grade 3: 20%), lymphopenia (grade 3: 17%), and neutropenia (grade 3: 33%, grade 4: 4%). The most frequent grade ⩾3 non-hematologic AE was diarrhea (7%). The established RP2D was 260 mg/m2 onalespib when given with paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2. PK analysis revealed a modest drug interaction profile for onalespib in the combination regimen. ORR was 20%. Three patients achieved complete responses, all of whom had received prior taxane therapy. Median DOR was 5.6 months; median PFS was 2.9 months.

Conclusion

Combination treatment with onalespib and paclitaxel had an acceptable toxicity profile and RP2D was determined to be 260 mg/m2 of onalespib. Combination therapy showed antitumor activity in patients with advanced TNBC.

Trial registration

Onalespib and paclitaxel in treating patients with advanced TNBC https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02474173.

First-in-Human Dose-Escalation Study of the Novel Oral Depsipeptide Class I-Targeting HDAC Inhibitor Bocodepsin (OKI-179) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

(1) Background: Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play a critical role in epigenetic signaling in cancer; however, available HDAC inhibitors have limited therapeutic windows and suboptimal pharmacokinetics (PK). This first-in-human phase I dose escalation study evaluated the safety, PK, pharmacodynamics (PDx), and efficacy of the oral Class I-targeting HDAC inhibitor bocodepsin (OKI-179). (2) Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 34) with advanced solid tumors were treated with OKI-179 orally once daily in three schedules: 4 days on 3 days off (4:3), 5 days on 2 days off (5:2), or continuous in 21-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Single-patient escalation cohorts followed a standard 3 + 3 design. (3) Results: The mean duration of treatment was 81.2 (range 11-447) days. The most frequent adverse events in all patients were nausea (70.6%), fatigue (47.1%), and thrombocytopenia (41.2%). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of OKI-179 was 450 mg with 4:3 and 200 mg with continuous dosing. Dose-limiting toxicities included decreased platelet count and nausea. Prolonged disease control was observed, including two patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Systemic exposure to the active metabolite exceeded the preclinical efficacy threshold at doses lower than the MTD and was temporally associated with increased histone acetylation in circulating T cells. (4) Conclusions: OKI-179 has a manageable safety profile at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 300 mg daily on a 4:3 schedule with prophylactic oral antiemetics. OKI-179 is currently being investigated with the MEK inhibitor binimetinib in patients with NRAS-mutated melanoma in the phase 2 Nautilus trial.

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Re-irradiation and Anti-PDL1 Durvalumab Combination in Recurrent Glioblastoma: STERIMGLI Phase I Results

BACKGROUND

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hFSRT) is a salvage option for recurrent glioblastoma (GB) which may synergize anti-PDL1 treatment. This phase I study evaluated the safety and the recommended phase II dose of anti-PDL1 durvalumab combined with hFSRT in patients with recurrent GB.

METHODS

Patients were treated with 24 Gy, 8 Gy per fraction on days 1, 3, and 5 combined with the first 1500 mg Durvalumab dose on day 5, followed by infusions q4weeks until progression or for a maximum of 12 months. A standard 3 + 3 Durvalumab dose de-escalation design was used. Longitudinal lymphocytes count, cytokines analyses on plasma samples, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were collected.

RESULTS

Six patients were included. One dose limiting toxicity, an immune-related grade 3 vestibular neuritis related to Durvalumab, was reported. Median progression-free interval (PFI) and overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 16.7 months, respectively. Multi-modal deep 
learning-based analysis including MRI, cytokines, and lymphocytes/neutrophil ratio isolated the patients presenting pseudoprogression, the longest PFI and those with the longest OS, but statistical significance cannot be established considering phase I data only.

CONCLUSION

Combination of hFSRT and Durvalumab in recurrent GB was well tolerated in this phase I study. These encouraging results led to an ongoing randomized phase II. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02866747).

A new era of the Asian clinical research network: a report from the ATLAS international symposium

This report summarizes the presentations and discussions in the first Asian Clinical Trials Network for Cancers (ATLAS) international symposium that was held on 24 April 2022, in Bangkok, Thailand, and hosted by the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH), co-hosted by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), Clinical Research Malaysia (CRM) and the Thai Society of Clinical Oncology (TSCO), and supported by Embassy of Japan in Thailand. Since 2020, the NCCH has conducted the ATLAS project to enhance research environments and infrastructures to facilitate international clinical research and cancer genomic medicine in the Asian region. The purpose of the symposium was to discuss what we can achieve under the ATLAS project, to share the latest topics and common issues in cancer research and to facilitate mutual understanding. Invitees included stakeholders from academic institutions, mainly at ATLAS collaborative sites, as well as Asian regulatory authorities. The invited speakers discussed ongoing collaborative research, regulatory perspectives to improve new drug access in Asia, the status of phase I trials in Asia, the introduction of research activities at the National Cancer Center (NCC) and the implementation of genomic medicine. As the next steps after this symposium, the ATLAS project will foster increased cooperation between investigators, regulatory authorities and other stakeholders relevant to cancer research, and establish a sustainable pan-Asian cancer research group to increase the number of clinical trials and deliver novel drugs to patients with cancer in Asia.

Development and validation of LC-MS/MS method for quantitation of sodium oligomannate in human plasma, urine and feces

Background: Sodium oligomannate was approved for marketing by the National Medical Products Administration of China in 2019 for improving cognitive functions in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease patients. Method: LC-MS/MS methods were established and validated for the quantitation of sodium oligomannate in human plasma, urine and feces to support clinical development studies. Samples were prepared using liquid-liquid extraction and analyzed by ion-pair reversed-phase LC-MS/MS with calibration standard curve ranges of 25.0-5000 ng/ml, 0.500-100 μg/ml and 100-10,000 μg/g in plasma, urine and feces, respectively. Results & conclusion: All validation parameters met the respective acceptance criteria established by US FDA and International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Human Use guidelines. The validated methods were applied to a pharmacokinetics and excretion study in healthy Chinese subjects.

Phase 1 study of DS-1205c combined with gefitinib for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), but responses are not durable as tumors develop resistance. DS-1205c is a novel, specific, orally bioavailable, small-molecule AXL receptor TKI. In preclinical studies, DS-1205c restored TKI antitumor activity in a TKI acquired-resistance EGFR-mutant NSCLC tumor xenograft model.

METHODS

This first-in-human, multicenter, open-label Phase 1 study (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03599518) primarily evaluated the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with DS-1205c and gefitinib in Japanese patients with metastatic or unresectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC and tumor progression during treatment with EGFR-TKIs. Patients (n = 20) received DS-1205c monotherapy (200-1200 mg twice daily [BID]) in a 7-day safety monitoring period before combination DS-1205c/gefitinib (250 mg once daily) in 21-day cycles.

RESULTS

The observed common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were increased aspartate aminotransferase (35%), increased alanine aminotransferase (30%), rash maculo-papular (30%), and diarrhea (25%). No serious TEAEs were reported. Plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of DS-1205a (free form of DS-1205c) were unaffected by concomitant administration of gefitinib. No patient achieved a complete or partial response and 5 patients (25%) had stable disease.

CONCLUSION

DS-1205c was generally safe and well tolerated at all dose levels, but the safety profile of ≤800 mg BID was more favorable than 1200 mg BID. The recommended dose for dose-expansion cohorts of DS-1205c in combination therapy with gefitinib was 800 mg BID.

Metabolic Effect of Blocking Sodium-Taurocholate Co-Transporting Polypeptide in Hypercholesterolemic Humans with a Twelve-Week Course of Bulevirtide-An Exploratory Phase I Clinical Trial

Bile acids (BA) play an important role in cholesterol metabolism and possess further beneficial metabolic effects as signalling molecules. Blocking the hepatocellular uptake of BA via sodium-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) with the first-in-class drug bulevirtide, we expected to observe a decrease in plasma LDL cholesterol. In this exploratory phase I clinical trial, volunteers with LDL cholesterol > 130 mg/dL but without overt atherosclerotic disease were included. Thirteen participants received bulevirtide 5 mg/d subcutaneously for 12 weeks. The primary aim was to estimate the change in LDL cholesterol after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included changes in total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), inflammatory biomarkers, and glucose after 12 weeks. In addition, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was performed at four time points. BA were measured as biomarkers of the inhibition of hepatocellular uptake. After 12 weeks, LDL cholesterol decreased not statistically significantly by 19.6 mg/dL [−41.8; 2.85] (Hodges−Lehmann estimator with 95% confidence interval). HDL cholesterol showed a significant increase by 5.5 mg/dL [1.00; 10.50]. Lipoprotein(a) decreased by 1.87 mg/dL [−7.65; 0]. Inflammatory biomarkers, glucose, and cardiac function were unchanged. Pre-dose total BA increased nearly five-fold (from 2026 nmol/L ± 2158 (mean ± SD) at baseline to 9922 nmol/L ± 7357 after 12 weeks of treatment). Bulevirtide was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being administration site reactions. The exploratory nature of the trial with a limited number of participants allows the estimation of potential effects, which are crucial for future pharmacological research on bile acid metabolism in humans.

First-in-Humans PET Imaging of Tissue Factor in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Cancers Using 18F-labeled Active-Site Inhibited Factor VII (18F-ASIS): Potential as Companion Diagnostic

Tissue factor (TF) expression in cancers correlates with poor prognosis. Recently, the first TF-targeted therapy was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for cervical cancer. To unfold the potential of TF-targeted therapies, correct stratification and selection of patients eligible for treatments may become important for optimization of patient outcomes. TF-targeted PET imaging based on ¹⁸F-radiolabeled active-site inhibited versions of the TF natural ligand coagulation factor VII (¹⁸F-ASIS) has in preclinical models convincingly demonstrated its use for noninvasive quantitative measurements of TF expression in tumor tissue. ¹⁸F-ASIS PET imaging thus has the potential to act as a diagnostic companion for TF-targeted therapies in the clinical setting. Methods: In this first-in-humans trial, we included 10 cancer patients (4 pancreatic, 3 breast, 2 lung, and 1 cervical cancer) for ¹⁸F-ASIS PET imaging. The mean and SD of administered ¹⁸F-ASIS activity was 157 ± 35 MBq (range, 93-198 MBq). PET/CT was performed after 1, 2, and 4 h. The primary objectives were to establish the safety, biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and dosimetry of ¹⁸F-ASIS. Secondary objectives included quantitative measurements of SUVs in tumor tissue with PET and evaluation of the correlation (Pearson correlation) between tumor SUV_max and ex vivo TF expression in tumor tissue. Results: Administration of ¹⁸F-ASIS was safe, and no adverse events were observed. No clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, or blood parameters were observed after injection of ¹⁸F-ASIS. Mean ¹⁸F-ASIS plasma half-life was 3.2 ± 0.6 h, and the radiotracer was predominantly excreted in the urine. For injection activity of 200 MBq of ¹⁸F-ASIS, effective whole-body dose was 4 mSv and no prohibitive organ-specific absorbed doses were found. Heterogeneous radiotracer uptake was observed across patients and within tumors. We found a trend of a positive correlation between tumor SUV_max and ex vivo TF expression (r = 0.84, P = 0.08, n = 5). Conclusion: ¹⁸F-ASIS can be safely administered to cancer patients for PET imaging of TF expression in tumors. The trial marks the first test of a TF-targeted PET radiotracer in humans (first-in-class). The findings represent important first steps toward clinical implementation of ¹⁸F-ASIS PET imaging of TF expression.

Safety of the 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: A phase I clinical trial

To evaluate the safety of the 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15 (by LvZhu & Co. Ltd)) in healthy infants aged 2 months (minimum to 6 weeks) and 3 months old. This phase I clinical trial enrolled 80 subjects in Laishui County, Hebei Province, China. The total population was divided into 4 age groups on average: 20 adults (≥18 years) and 20 children (1-5 years) all received one vaccine dose; 20 infants (3 months) received the vaccine according to a 3-dose schedule at 0, 1, and 2 months. Twenty infants (2 months, minimum of 6 weeks old) received the vaccine according to a 3-dose schedule of 0, 2, and 4 months. The adverse events (AEs) until 30 days after each dose and serious adverse events (SAEs) until 6 months after the whole dose were reported. The solicited and unsolicited AE frequencies and laboratory indices were similar among the treatment groups. No vaccine-related SAEs were reported. Most vaccine-related adverse events consisting of systemic and local reactions were fever and pain. One hypersensitivity manifested as systemic urticaria that occurred on the third day after the second dose in the 2-month group. The 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was generally well tolerated in infants.

Clinical development of anticancer drugs can be enhanced using efficacy data of small population clinical trials

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Although there are accelerated approval pathways based on data of small populations and surrogate endpoints, the concern that these pathways authorize the use of inefficacious drugs based on limited data from earlier phase clinical trials remains. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of anticancer drugs, which were approved or whose development was terminated in small and large clinical trials, and verified whether small clinical trials could reflect the results for efficacy in large clinical trials.

METHODS

All anticancer drugs approved in Japan or whose development was terminated from 2015 to 2019 were searched. The median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rates (ORR) between small clinical trials (sample size ≤100) and large clinical trials (sample size >100) with identical target populations and treatment settings were compared. Simple linear regression analysis, Spearman's correlation analysis, and paired sample t-test were performed.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 61 comparable small and large clinical trials were identified. For all endpoints, statistically significant linear trends and correlation were detected (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the median PFS and ORR between small and large clinical trials. The mean differences of both clinical trials were -0.102 months and -1.531%, respectively.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Even when the sample size of the clinical trial was increased, the efficacy data of anticancer drugs could not be changed significantly. These results supported the accelerated approval pathway based on the promising efficacy data of small populations in anticancer drug development.

Pharmacogenomics Testing in Phase I Oncology Clinical Trials: Constructive Criticism Is Warranted

Simple Summary

Phase I clinical trials are a cornerstone of pharmaceutical development in oncology. Many studies have now attempted to incorporate pharmacogenomics into phase I studies; however, many of these studies have fundamental flaws that that preclude interpretation and application of their findings. Study populations are often small and heterogeneous with multiple disease states, multiple dose levels, and prior therapies. Genetic testing typically includes few variants in candidate genes that do no encapsulate the full range of phenotypic variability in protein function. Moreover, a plurality of these studies do not present scientifically robust clinical or preclinical justification for undertaking pharmacogenomics studies. A significant amount of progress in understanding pharmacogenomic variability has occurred since pharmacogenomics approaches first began appearing in the literature. This progress can be immediately leveraged for the vast majority of Phase I studies. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current literature pertaining to Phase I incorporation of pharmacogenomics studies, analyze potential flaws in study design, and suggest approaches that can improve design of future scientific efforts.

Abstract

While over ten-thousand phase I studies are published in oncology, fewer than 1% of these studies stratify patients based on genetic variants that influence pharmacology. Pharmacogenetics-based patient stratification can improve the success of clinical trials by identifying responsive patients who have less potential to develop toxicity; however, the scientific limits imposed by phase I study designs reduce the potential for these studies to make conclusions. We compiled all phase I studies in oncology with pharmacogenetics endpoints (n = 84), evaluating toxicity (n = 42), response or PFS (n = 32), and pharmacokinetics (n = 40). Most of these studies focus on a limited number of agent classes: Topoisomerase inhibitors, antimetabolites, and anti-angiogenesis agents. Eight genotype-directed phase I studies were identified. Phase I studies consist of homogeneous populations with a variety of comorbidities, prior therapies, racial backgrounds, and other factors that confound statistical analysis of pharmacogenetics. Taken together, phase I studies analyzed herein treated small numbers of patients (median, 95% CI = 28, 24–31), evaluated few variants that are known to change phenotype, and provided little justification of pharmacogenetics hypotheses. Future studies should account for these factors during study design to optimize the success of phase I studies and to answer important scientific questions.

Phase I study using crenolanib to target PDGFR kinase in children and young adults with newly diagnosed DIPG or recurrent high-grade glioma, including DIPG

Background

Platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) signaling has been directly implicated in pediatric high-grade gliomagenesis. This study evaluated the safety and tolerability of crenolanib, a potent, selective inhibitor of PDGFR-mediated phosphorylation, in pediatric patients with high-grade glioma (HGG).

Methods

We used a rolling-6 design to study the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of once-daily crenolanib administered during and after focal radiation therapy in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) (stratum A) or with recurrent/progressive HGG (stratum B). Pharmacokinetics were studied during the first cycle at the first dose and at steady state (day 28). Alterations in PDGFRA were assessed by Sanger or exome sequencing and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization or single nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Results

Fifty evaluable patients were enrolled in the 2 strata, and an MTD of 170 mg/m² was established for both. Dose-limiting toxicities were primarily liver enzyme elevations and hematologic count suppression in both strata. Crenolanib AUC_0-48h and C _MAX did not differ significantly for crushed versus whole-tablet administration. Overall, PDGFRA alterations were observed in 25% and 30% of patients in stratum A and B, respectively. Neither crenolanib therapy duration nor survival outcomes differed significantly by PDGFRA status, and overall survival of stratum A was similar to that of historical controls.

Conclusions

Children tolerate crenolanib well at doses slightly higher than the established MTD in adults, with a toxicity spectrum generally similar to that in adults. Studies evaluating intratumoral PDGFR pathway inhibition in biomarker-enriched patients are needed to evaluate further the clinical utility of crenolanib in this population.

Tolerance and Pharmacokinetics of Recombinant Human Endostatin Administered as Single-Dose or Multiple-Dose Infusions in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Clinical Trial

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the tolerance and pharmacokinetic characteristics of recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin) administered as single-dose or multiple-dose infusions in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This phase I trial was designed as a single-center, single-arm, nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation study. The trial consisted of 2 parts: a single-dose part and a multiple-dose part, each with 3 dose comparison groups. Rh-endostatin was administered as an intravenous injection only once at a dose of 5 mg/m², 7.5 mg/m², or 10 mg/m² in the single-dose part and as a daily intravenous injection for 14 days at the same doses in the multiple-dose part. The serum pharmacokinetics, toxicity and immunogenicity of rh-endostatin were evaluated. Results: Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was not observed in any group. A few patients developed cardiotoxicity, such as QT prolongation or narrow arrhythmia. Other adverse events were slight coagulation abnormalities and haematological abnormalities. For rh-endostatin doses of 5 mg/m², 7.5 mg/m², and 10 mg/m², the mean C_max values in the single-dose part were 344 ± 38.7 ng/mL, 524 ± 157 ng/mL, and 800 ± 201 ng/mL, respectively, and the average AUC_0-t values were 3290 ± 3790 ng•h/mL, 4940 ± 4380 ng•h/mL, and 5050 ± 3980 ng•h/mL, respectively. The C_{max ss} values of the 3 doses in the multiple-dose part were 575 ± 270 ng/mL, 531 ± 106 ng/mL, and 864 ± 166 ng/mL, respectively, and the AUC_0-τ values were 3610 ± 1040 ng•h/mL, 3290 ± 1090 ng•h/mL, and 5180 ± 1210 ng•h/mL, respectively. The C_max of a single-dose regimen showed linear kinetic characteristics. The patients in the single-dose group were negative for serum antibodies against rh-endostatin, while one patient in the multiple-dose group was positive. Conclusions: Rh-endostatin as a daily intravenous injection for 14 days in patients with advanced solid tumors is safe and well tolerated, without DLT, at doses of 5 mg/m², 7.5 mg/m², and 10 mg/m². Serum antibodies against rh-endostatin were very low after multiple infusions. For phase II trials, the recommended rh-endostatin dose is 10 mg/m² as a daily intravenous injection for 14 days.

Quantitative Multiplex Immunofluorescence Evaluation of the Tumor Microenvironment in Pretreatment Tumors of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer and Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Treated with Liposomal Eribulin

Eribulin inhibits microtubule polymerization and suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Conventional pathology approaches have not identified a precise predictive biomarker for Eribulin. We performed qmIF on pre-treatment tissue from 11 patients (6 TNBC, 5 HGSOC) treated with Eribulin-LF. T-lymphocytes were the dominant immune-subset in TME, with higher levels detected in stroma vs tumor (9% vs 2%). Greater density of CD3+ (p = 0.01) and CD3 + CD8+ (p = 0.03) cells and closer proximity between CD3 + CD8+ and tumor cells was observed in the patients with disease control (PR + SD) vs. progressive disease. QmIF identified an association between TIL infiltration and Eribulin-LF sensitivity, which should be evaluated further in prospective studies.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of milademetan, a MDM2 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with solid tumors: A phase I study

Milademetan (DS‐3032, RAIN‐32) is an orally available mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) antagonist with potential antineoplastic activity owing to increase in p53 activity through interruption of the MDM2‐p53 interaction. This phase I, dose‐escalating study assessed the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of milademetan in 18 Japanese patients with solid tumors who relapsed after or were refractory to standard therapy. Patients aged ≥ 20 years received oral milademetan once daily (60 mg, n = 3; 90 mg, n = 11; or 120 mg, n = 4) on days 1 to 21 in a 28‐day cycle. Dose‐limiting toxicities, safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and recommended dose for phase II were determined. The most frequent treatment‐emergent adverse events included nausea (72.2%), decreased appetite (61.1%), platelet count decreased (61.1%), white blood cell count decreased (50.0%), fatigue (50.0%), and anemia (50.0%). Dose‐limiting toxicities (three events of platelet count decreased and one nausea) were observed in the 120‐mg cohort. The plasma concentrations of milademetan increased in a dose‐dependent manner. Stable disease was observed in seven out of 16 patients (43.8%). Milademetan was well tolerated and showed modest antitumor activity in Japanese patients with solid tumors. The recommended dose for phase II was considered to be 90 mg in the once‐daily 21/28‐day schedule. Future studies would be needed to further evaluate the potential safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of milademetan in patients with solid tumors and lymphomas. The trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.jp: JapicCTI‐142693.

Regulatory considerations for developing a phase I investigational new drug application for autologous induced pluripotent stem cells-based therapy product

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC)-based therapies have been hailed as the future of regenerative medicine because of their potential to provide treatment options for most degenerative diseases. A key promise of iPSC-based therapies is the possibility of an autologous transplant that may engraft better in the longer-term due to its compatibility with the patient's immune system. Despite over a decade of research, clinical translation of autologous iPSC-based therapies has been slow-partly due to a lacking pre-defined regulatory path. Here, we outline regulatory considerations for developing an autologous iPSC-based product and challenges associated with the clinical manufacturing of autologous iPSCs and their derivatives. These challenges include donor tissue source, reprogramming methods, heterogeneity of differentiated cells, controls for the manufacturing process, and preclinical considerations. A robust manufacturing process with appropriate quality controls and well-informed, prospectively designed preclinical studies provide a path toward successful approval of autologous iPSC-based therapies.

Selinexor (KPT-330), an Oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, in Combination with FOLFOX in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) - Final Results of the Phase I Trial SENTINEL

BACKGROUND

Selinexor is an oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export compound that specifically blocks Chromosomal Region Maintenance protein 1.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of selinexor plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.

METHODS

In this multicenter phase I trial, mCRC patients, eligible for oxaliplatin-based treatment, were enrolled to receive oral selinexor on days 1, 3, and 8 plus mFOLFOX6 every two weeks. Primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, overall response rate, progression free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 patients were enrolled, who had prior treatment with oxaliplatin (6/10), irinotecan (8/10), bevacizumab (6/10) or anti-EGFR therapy (5/10). Four consecutive patients received 40 mg selinexor plus mFOLFOX6. All four experienced dose-limiting toxicities and withdrew from the study after a median of two cycles. Thus, this dose level was regarded as toxic and no further patients were evaluated at this dose. Six patients were enrolled with 20 mg selinexor plus mFOLFOX6. Despite better tolerability, four patients withdrew (patient wish) after the first cycle and only two patients continued until disease progression. Most commonly reported treatment emergent adverse events were nausea (80%), diarrhea (70%), vomiting (60%), fatigue (60%), anorexia (40%), and impaired vision (40%). Due to the short treatment exposure, no relevant clinical activity was observed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, selinexor on this dose schedule plus mFOLFOX6 was not tolerable. Other dosing schedules or combinations may be evaluated. Clinical trial identifier NCT02384850.

Radiation Dose-escalated Chemoradiotherapy Using Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Thoracic Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-institution Phase I Study

AIMS

About 80% of cases of locally advanced unresectable thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma recur within the irradiation fields after chemoradiotherapy. Radiation dose escalation using advanced radiotherapy techniques is expected to improve clinical outcomes by reducing local and regional recurrence. The current study aimed to determine the recommended escalated radiation dose for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced unresectable thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma with good performance status underwent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with elective nodal irradiation. SIB-IMRT was delivered in five fractions per week. The radiation dose to the unresectable gross tumour was escalated from 66 Gy to a planned maximum dose of 72 Gy in 3 Gy increments in a standard 3 + 3 design. The doses to the resectable component, superficial tumours and elective nodal regions were fixed as 60, 51 and 48 Gy, respectively. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil were concurrently administered. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as acute grade 3 oesophagitis, grade 2 pneumonitis, grade 2 cardiac toxicity and a failure to complete planned radiotherapy within 60 days. Locoregional control and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Nine patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

DLTs occurred in one of six and two of three patients at doses of 66 and 69 Gy, respectively. All DLTs were grade 3 oesophagitis. The recommended dose was determined as 66 Gy delivered in 30 fractions based on the predefined criteria. With a median follow-up period of 23 months, the 1-year locoregional control and overall survival rates were 67 (95% confidence interval = 19-90) and 78% (95% confidence interval = 36-94), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The recommended radiation dose in chemoradiotherapy using SIB-IMRT with elective nodal irradiation was 66 Gy delivered in 30 fractions.

A surface-free design for phase I dual-agent combination trials

In oncology, there is a growing number of therapies given in combination. Recently, several dose-finding designs for Phase I dose-escalation trials for combinations were proposed. The majority of novel designs use a pre-specified parametric model restricting the search of the target combination to a surface of a particular form. In this work, we propose a novel model-free design for combination studies, which is based on the assumption of monotonicity within each agent only. Specifically, we parametrise the ratios between each neighbouring combination by independent Beta distributions. As a result, the design does not require the specification of any particular parametric model or knowledge about increasing orderings of toxicity. We compare the performance of the proposed design to the model-based continual reassessment method for partial ordering and to another model-free alternative, the product of independent beta design. In an extensive simulation study, we show that the proposed design leads to comparable or better proportions of correct selections of the target combination while leading to the same or fewer average number of toxic responses in a trial.

Improving safety of the continual reassessment method via a modified allocation rule

This article proposes a novel criterion for the allocation of patients in phase I dose-escalation clinical trials, aiming to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Conventionally, using a model-based approach, the next patient is allocated to the dose with the toxicity estimate closest (in terms of the absolute or squared distance) to the maximum acceptable toxicity. This approach, however, ignores the uncertainty in point estimates and ethical concerns of assigning a lot of patients to overly toxic doses. In fact, balancing the trade-off between how accurately the MTD can be estimated and how many patients would experience adverse events is one of the primary challenges in phase I studies. Motivated by recent discussions in the theory of estimation in restricted parameter spaces, we propose a criterion that allows to balance these explicitly. The criterion requires a specification of one additional parameter only that has a simple and intuitive interpretation. We incorporate the proposed criterion into the one-parameter Bayesian continual reassessment method and show, using simulations, that it can result in similar accuracy on average as the original design, but with fewer toxic responses on average. A comparison with other model-based dose-escalation designs, such as escalation with overdose control and its modifications, demonstrates that the proposed design can result in either the same mean accuracy as alternatives but fewer toxic responses or in a higher mean accuracy but the same number of toxic responses. Therefore, the proposed design can provide a better trade-off between the accuracy and the number of patients experiencing adverse events, making the design a more ethical alternative over some of the existing methods for phase I trials.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of the inverse retinoic acid-related orphan receptor γ agonist AZD0284

AIMS

Retinoic acid-related orphan receptor γ (RORγ), a master regulator of T-helper 17 (Th17) cell function and differentiation, is an attractive target for treatment of Th17-driven diseases. This first-in-human study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of the inverse RORγ agonist AZD0284.

METHODS

We conducted a phase I, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, two-part, first-in-human study with healthy subjects receiving single (4-238 mg) or multiple (12-100 mg) oral doses of AZD0284 or placebo after overnight fasting. Subjects in the one single dose cohort additionally received a single dose of AZD0284 after a high-calorie meal. AZD0284 plasma concentrations, as well as inhibition of ex vivo-stimulated interleukin (IL)-17A release in whole blood, were frequently measured after both single and multiple dosing.

RESULTS

Eighty-three men participated in the study. AZD0284 was absorbed rapidly into plasma after oral dosing and exhibited a terminal half-life of 13-16 hours. Both the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (C_max ) increased subproportionally with increasing dose (95% confidence intervals of slope parameter were 0.71-0.84 and 0.72-0.88 for AUC and C_max , respectively). Food intake delayed the absorption of AZD0284 but did not affect the overall exposure or half-life. AZD0284 showed dose-dependent reduction of ex vivo-stimulated IL-17A release after both single and multiple doses. No significant safety concerns were identified in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

AZD0284 was well tolerated, rapidly and dose-dependently absorbed, and reduced stimulated IL-17A release after single and multiple dosing. The results of this study support further clinical development of AZD0284.

Phase I Dose Escalation Study with Expansion Cohort of the Addition of Nab-Paclitaxel to Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CapOx) as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma (ACTION Study)

First-line triplet chemotherapy including a taxane may prolong survival in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer. The added toxicity of the taxane might be minimized by using nab-paclitaxel. The aim of this phase I study was to determine the feasibility of combining nab-paclitaxel with the standard of care in the Netherlands, capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx). Patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma received oxaliplatin 65 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 1000 mg/m² bid on days 1-14 in a 21-day cycle, with nab-paclitaxel on days 1 and 8 at four dose levels (60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m², respectively), using a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation phase, followed by a safety expansion cohort. Baseline tissue and serum markers for activated tumor stroma were assessed as biomarkers for response and survival. Twenty-six patients were included. The first two dose-limiting toxicities (i.e., diarrhea and dehydration) occurred at dose level 3. The resulting maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of 80 mg/m² was used in the expansion cohort, but was reduced to 60 mg/m² after three out of eight patients experienced diarrhea grade 3. The objective response rate was 54%. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival were 8.0 and 12.8 months, respectively. High baseline serum ADAM12 was associated with a significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.011). In conclusion, albeit that the addition of nab-paclitaxel 60 mg/m² to CapOx may be better tolerated than other taxane triplets, relevant toxicity was observed. There is a rationale for preserving taxanes for later-line treatment. ADAM12 is a potential biomarker to predict survival, and warrants further investigation.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and effect on serum uric acid of the myeloperoxidase inhibitor AZD4831 in a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I study in healthy volunteers

Aims

Myeloperoxidase activity can contribute to impaired vascular endothelial function and fibrosis in chronic inflammation‐related cardiovascular disease. Here, we investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the myeloperoxidase inhibitor, AZD4831.

Methods

In this randomized, single‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase I, first‐in‐human study, healthy men in five sequential cohorts were randomized 3:1 to receive a single oral dose of AZD4831 (5, 15, 45, 135 or 405 mg) or placebo, after overnight fasting. After at least 7 days' washout, one cohort additionally received AZD4831 45 mg after a high‐calorie meal.

Results

Forty men participated in the study (eight per cohort: AZD4831, n = 6; placebo, n = 2). AZD4831 distributed rapidly into plasma, with a half‐life of 38.2–50.0 hours. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) increased proportionally with dose (AUC_0–∝ slope estimate 1.060; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9943, 1.127). Increases in maximum plasma concentration were slightly more than dose proportional (slope estimate 1.201; 95% CI 1.071, 1.332). Food intake reduced AZD4831 absorption rate but did not substantially affect overall exposure or plasma half‐life (n = 4). Serum uric acid concentrations decreased by 71.77 (95% CI 29.15, 114.39) and 84.42 (58.90, 109.94) μmol L⁻¹ with AZD4831 135 mg and 405 mg, respectively. Maculopapular rash (moderate intensity) occurred in 4/30 participants receiving AZD4831 (13.3%). No other safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions

AZD4831 was generally well tolerated, rapidly absorbed, had a long plasma half‐life and lowered uric acid concentrations after single oral doses in healthy men. These findings support the further clinical development of AZD4831.

Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

If patients are to reap the benefits of continued drug development, an understanding of why healthy participants take part in phase I clinical trials is imperative. The current study aimed to explore the nature of these underlying motivations which may, in turn, improve the overall participant experience and assist in the development of more effective recruitment and retention strategies.

DESIGN

This study used a qualitative design based on the theory of planned behaviour. Specifically, it explored healthy participants' underlying behavioural, control and normative beliefs which influence their participation in phase I clinical trials.

SETTING

This study took place at a company that specialises in conducting phase I and phase II clinical trials in the Australian state of Queensland.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (n=31) were either currently undergoing a phase I clinical trial or had previously taken part in a phase I clinical trial.

RESULTS

Results showed that the motivations were varied and not solely centred on financial gains. Reported advantages of participation included altruism, while inconvenience was most often reported as a disadvantage. Friends were reported as those most likely to approve, while one's mother was reported as most likely to disapprove. Having a suitable time frame/flexible scheduling and feeling comfortable taking part in the trial were both the most commonly reported facilitators, while inflexible scheduling/time commitment was the most commonly reported barrier.

CONCLUSIONS

Practical implications included the need for organisations involved in clinical trials to be mindful of inflexible scheduling and exploring the possibility of making educational materials available to family members who may be concerned about the risks associated with participation. Overall, it is anticipated that the results of this study will improve the understanding of factors that influence phase I clinical trial participation which may, ultimately, help develop new therapeutics to improve patient health.

Healthy Volunteers' Perceptions of the Benefits of Their Participation in Phase I Clinical Trials

Other than the financial motivations for enrolling in Phase I trials, research on how healthy volunteers perceive the benefits of their trial participation is scant. Using qualitative interviews conducted with 178 U.S. healthy volunteers enrolled in Phase I trials, we investigated how participants described the benefits of their study involvement, including, but not limited to, the financial compensation, and we analyzed how these perceptions varied based on participants' sociodemographic characteristics and clinical trial history. We found that participants detailed economic, societal, and noneconomic personal benefits. We also found differences in participants' perceived benefits based on gender, age, ethnicity, educational attainment, employment status, and number of clinical trials completed. Our study indicates that many healthy volunteers believe they gain more than just the financial compensation when they accept the risks of Phase I participation.

An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles

Phase I designs traditionally use the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), a binary endpoint from the first treatment cycle, to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) assuming a monotonically increasing relationship between dose and efficacy. In this article, we establish a general framework for a multi-stage adaptive design where we jointly model a continuous efficacy outcome and continuous/quasi-continuous toxicity endpoints from multiple treatment cycles. The normalized Total Toxicity Profile (nTTP) is used as an illustration for quasi-continuous toxicity endpoints, and we replace DLT with nTTP to take into account multiple grades and types of toxicities. In addition, the proposed design accommodates non-monotone dose-efficacy relationships, and longitudinal toxicity data in effort to capture the adverse events from multiple cycles. Stage 1 of our design uses toxicity data to perform dose-escalation and identify a set of initially allowable (safe) doses; stage 2 of our design incorporates an efficacy outcome to update the set of allowable doses for each new cohort and randomizes the new cohort of patients to the allowable doses with emphasis towards those with higher predicted efficacy. Stage 3 uses all data from all treated patients at the end of the trial to make final recommendations. Simulations showed that the design had a high probability of making the correct dose selection and good overdose control across various dose-efficacy and dose-toxicity scenarios. In addition, the proposed design allows for early termination when all doses are too toxic. To our best knowledge, the proposed dual-endpoint dose-finding design is the first such study to incorporate multiple cycles of toxicities and a continuous efficacy outcome.

Dose-finding study of the checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor, prexasertib, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Prexasertib is a novel inhibitor of checkpoint kinase 1. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate prexasertib tolerability in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. This nonrandomized single-arm open-label phase 1 study of prexasertib consisted of 2 dose levels, 80 mg/m² and the global-recommended dose based on a US study of 105 mg/m² , administered intravenously once every 14 days (n = 6 for each dose). Transition to the higher dose proceeded if the frequency of dose-limiting toxicity observed in cycle 1 was <33% at the lower dose. Safety measures, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity were assessed. A total of 12 patients were treated. Two patients, one in each dose group, experienced dose-limiting toxicities of febrile neutropenia, one grade 4 and the other grade 3; both patients recovered and continued the study treatment. The grade 4 treatment-emergent adverse events related to study treatment were neutropenia (6 patients [50.0%]), leukopenia (4 patients [33.3%]), and 1 instance each (8.3%) of anemia, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia was generally transient and reversible; 11 patients (91.7%) required granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment during the study. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events or deaths. The prexasertib pharmacokinetics displayed dose-independent and time-independent behavior across both dose levels, similar to the profile observed in the US-based phase 1 study. Eight patients had a best overall response of stable disease. These data are consistent with the known safety profile for prexasertib and confirm its tolerability in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Phase I study of vorinostat in combination with isotretinoin in patients with refractory/recurrent neuroblastoma: A new approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy (NANT) trial

BACKGROUND

Vorinostat combined with retinoids produces additive antitumor effects in preclinical studies of neuroblastoma. Higher systemic exposures of vorinostat than achieved in pediatric phase I trials with continuous daily dosing are necessary for in vivo increased histone acetylation and cytotoxic activity. We conducted a phase I trial in children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat on an interrupted schedule, escalating beyond the previously identified pediatric MTD.

METHODS

Isotretinoin (cis-13-retinoic acid) 80 mg/m² /dose was administered by mouth twice daily on days 1-14 in combination with escalating doses of daily vorinostat up to 430 mg/m² /dose (days 1-4; 8-11) in each 28-day cycle using the standard 3 + 3 design. Vorinostat pharmacokinetic testing and histone acetylation assays were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma were enrolled and 28 were evaluable for dose escalation decisions. Median number of cycles completed was two (range 1-15); 11 patients received four or more cycles. Three patients experienced cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities. A total of 18 patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities related to study therapy. The maximum intended dose of vorinostat (430 mg/m² /day, days 1-4; 8-11) was tolerable and led to increased histone acetylation in surrogate tissues when compared to lower doses of vorinostat (P = 0.009). No objective responses were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased dose vorinostat (430 mg/m² /day) on an interrupted schedule is tolerable in combination with isotretinoin. This dose led to increased vorinostat exposures and demonstrated increased histone acetylation. Prolonged stable disease in patients with minimal residual disease warrants further investigation.

Sulfatinib, a novel kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a phase I study

Sulfatinib is a small molecule kinase inhibitor that targets tumor angiogenesis and immune modulation. This phase I study (NCT02133157) investigated the safety, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of sulfatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. The study included a dose-escalation phase (50-350 mg/day, 28-day cycle) with a Fibonacci (3+3) design, and a tumor-specific expansion phase investigating the tumor response to treatment. Two sulfatinib formulations were assessed: formulation 1 (5, 25, and 50 mg capsules) and formulation 2 (50 and 200 mg capsules). Seventy-seven Chinese patients received oral sulfatinib; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Dose-limiting toxicities included abnormal hepatic function and coagulation tests, and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The most common treatment-related adverse events were proteinuria, hypertension and diarrhea. Among 34 patients receiving sulfatinib formulation 2, one patient with hepatocellular carcinoma and eight with neuroendocrine tumors exhibited a partial response; 15 had stable disease. The objective response rate was 26.5% (9/34) and the disease control rate was 70.6% (24/34). Pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy data supported continuous oral administration of sulfatinib at 300 mg as the recommended phase II dose. Sulfatinib exhibited an acceptable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, particularly neuroendocrine tumors.

DNX-2401, an Oncolytic Virus, for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas: A Case Report

Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) are aggressive glial brain tumors that primarily affect children, for which there is no curative treatment. Median overall survival is only one year. Currently, the scientific focus is on expanding the knowledge base of the molecular biology of DIPG, and identifying effective therapies. Oncolytic adenovirus DNX-2401 is a replication-competent, genetically modified virus capable of infecting and killing glioma cells, and stimulating an anti-tumor immune response. Clinical trials evaluating intratumoral DNX-2401 in adults with recurrent glioblastoma have demonstrated that the virus has a favorable safety profile and can prolong survival. Subsequently, these results have encouraged the transition of this biologically active therapy from adults into the pediatric population. To this aim, we have designed a clinical Phase I trial for newly diagnosed pediatric DIPG to investigate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of delivering DNX-2401 into tumors within the pons following biopsy. This case report presents a pediatric patient enrolled in this ongoing Phase I trial for children and adolescents with newly diagnosed DIPG. The case involves an 8-year-old female patient with radiologically diagnosed DIPG who underwent stereotactic tumor biopsy immediately followed by intratumoral DNX-2401 in the same biopsy track. Because there were no safety concerns or new neurological deficits, the patient was discharged 3 days after the procedures. To our knowledge, this is the first report of intratumoral DNX-2401 for a patient with DIPG in a clinical trial. We plan to demonstrate that intratumoral delivery of an oncolytic virus following tumor biopsy for pediatric patients with DIPG is a novel and feasible approach and that DNX-2401 represents an innovative treatment for the disease.

Clinical Outcome of Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer in a Dedicated Phase I Unit

AIMS

Advanced biliary tract carcinomas (ABC) are malignancies with limited effective therapies for advanced disease. There is little published evidence of outcomes of ABC patients participating in phase I clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient characteristics, treatment details and outcomes of ABC patients treated at a dedicated phase I unit were captured and analysed from case and trial records.

RESULTS

In total, 123 ABC patients were included in the study, of which 48 patients participated in 41 different phase I trials; 75 (61%) did not participate due to rapid disease progression or patient choice. Molecular characterisation of tumours using a targeted panel was conducted in 15 (31%), yielding several potentially actionable mutations, including BRCA, PIK3CA, FGFR, AKT and PTEN loss. Of the 39 evaluable patients there was one exceptional responder. Eighteen (46%) other patients achieved stable disease as their best response, with a clinical benefit rate at 4 months of 10%. Treatment was generally well tolerated with grade 3 or 4 adverse events only observed in eight patients (17 %), of which six were drug related and led to trial discontinuation in one (3%), with no toxicity-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Carefully selected ABC patients have been found to tolerate experimental phase I clinical trials without excess toxicity. The aggressive nature of this disease warrants consideration of early referral to a phase I unit. Future work will require comprehensive molecular profiling in an attempt to understand the biology underlying the exceptional responders and to match patients in real-time to targeted therapies.

Bayesian dose-finding phase I trial design incorporating historical data from a preceding trial

We consider the problem of incorporating historical data from a preceding trial to design and conduct a subsequent dose-finding trial in a possibly different population of patients. In oncology, for example, after a phase I dose-finding trial is completed in Caucasian patients, investigators often conduct a further phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose in Asian patients. This may be due to concerns about possible differences in treatment tolerability between populations. In this study, we propose to adaptively incorporate historical data into prior distributions assumed in a new dose-finding trial. Our proposed approach aims to appropriately borrow strength from a previous trial to improve the maximum tolerated dose determination in another patient population. We define a "historical-to-current (H-C)" parameter representing the degree of borrowing based on a retrospective analysis of previous trial data. In simulation studies, we examine the operating characteristics of the proposed method in comparison with 3 alternative approaches and assess how the H-C parameter functions across a variety of realistic settings.

The effects of single- and multiple-dose administration of bococizumab (RN316/PF-04950615), a humanized IgG2Δa monoclonal antibody binding proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, in hypercholesterolemic subjects treated with and without atorvastatin: Results from four phase I studies

AIMS

Three single-dose and one multiple-dose phase I studies were conducted in subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of bococizumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor.

METHODS

The dosing schedules for hypercholesterolemic subjects randomized in the four phase I studies were (1) ascending, single, intravenous (IV) bococizumab (0.3, 1, 3, 6, 12, or 18 mg/kg), or placebo (N = 48; baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] ≥130 mg/dL); (2) single, IV bococizumab (0.5 or 4 mg/kg; no placebo) added to ongoing atorvastatin 40 mg/day (N = 24); (3) single, fixed, subcutaneous (SC) bococizumab (100 or 200 mg), or IV bococizumab (200 mg; no placebo; N = 49; baseline LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL); and (4) weekly IV bococizumab (0.25, 0.5, 1, or 1.5 mg/kg) or placebo for 4 weeks (N = 67; baseline LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL).

RESULTS

Bococizumab pharmacokinetics were well characterized following single IV or SC doses and following multiple IV doses. Exposure to single-dose bococizumab increased slightly greater than dose-proportionally and clearance decreased with increasing dose. In the single-dose studies, maximal mean percent reductions from baseline in LDL-C ranged from 43% (0.3 mg/kg) to 84% (18 mg/kg) in bococizumab-treated subjects, compared with 2% for placebo. For the multiple-dose study, maximal reductions in LDL-C ranged from 55% (0.25 mg/kg) to 66% (1 mg/kg) in bococizumab-treated subjects, compared with 9% for placebo. In all studies, adverse events were infrequent, transient, and not dose-related.

CONCLUSIONS

Bococizumab was generally safe and well tolerated. Bococizumab lowered LDL-C levels substantially in all four studies.

A comparative pharmacokinetic and tolerability analysis of the novel orotic acid salt form of tenofovir disoproxil and the fumaric acid salt form in healthy subjects

A novel orotic acid salt form of tenofovir disoproxil (DA-2802) was developed and is expected to replace the fumaric acid salt form. The pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and tolerability profiles of DA-2802 were compared to those of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, Viread^®) in healthy subjects. A randomized, open-label, single-dose study was conducted in 36 healthy subjects using a two-treatment, two-period, and two-sequence crossover design. Subjects received a single oral dose of 319 mg DA-2802 or 300 mg TDF, during each period, with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples were collected pre-dosing and up to 72 hours post-dosing in each period, for determination of serum tenofovir concentration, which was measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A non-compartmental method was used to obtain PK parameters of tenofovir. For comparison between the two tenofovir disoproxil salts, the 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) of geometric mean ratios of DA-2802 to TDF for the maximum concentration (C_max) and the area under the concentration–time curve to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0–t) were determined. The tolerability profiles of tenofovir were assessed by evaluation of adverse events and vital signs, physical examination, ECG, and clinical laboratory tests. The serum tenofovir concentration–time profiles of DA-2802 or TDF were comparable in 32 subjects who completed the study. In both profiles, a two-compartmental elimination with first-order elimination kinetics in the terminal phase was reported in a few subjects, showing a secondary peak in the initial phase of elimination. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) of DA-2802 to TDF was 0.898 (0.815–0.990) for C_max and 0.904 (0.836–0.978) for AUC_0–t. There were no clinically significant findings in the tolerability assessments. DA-2802 showed comparable PK characteristics and tolerability profiles to TDF.

Understanding Treatment Burden and Quality of Life Impact of Participating in an Early-Phase Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

Early-phase clinical trials (EPTs) have led to new, more effective treatment options for children with cancer. Despite the extensive use of EPTs in pediatric oncology, little is known about parent and child experiences during EPT participation. The purposes of this pilot study were to assess the feasibility and preliminary results of having children with cancer and their parents complete measures of treatment burden and quality of life (QOL) concurrent with EPT participation.

METHODS

In this descriptive, longitudinal, pilot study, parents and children were followed for the first 60 days of an EPT. Feasibility was assessed by participant enrollment and retention and completion of measures. Measures completed included the following: demographic form (completed at baseline); Diary of Trial Experiences to capture treatment burden (completed ongoing); and PedsQL™ Quality of Life Inventories, Cancer Modules, and Family Impact Module (completed at baseline, post-first disease evaluation, and off-study). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Feasibility goals of enrollment, retention, and measure completion were partially met. Preliminary treatment burden and QOL results are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

While QOL assessments may provide insight into EPT experiences, future studies need to be conducted at multiple sites and enrollment goals must account for participant attrition.

Phase I Trial of Triapine-Cisplatin-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy for Advanced Stage or Metastatic Solid Tumor Cancers

Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) is an enzyme involved in the de novo synthesis of deoxyribonucleotides, which are critical for DNA replication and DNA repair. Triapine is a small-molecule RNR inhibitor. A phase I trial studied the safety of triapine in combination with cisplatin–paclitaxel in patients with advanced stage or metastatic solid tumor cancers in an effort to capitalize on disrupted DNA damage repair. A total of 13 patients with various previously treated cancers were given a 96-h continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion of triapine (40–120 mg/m²) on day 1, and then 3-h i.v. paclitaxel (80 mg/m²) followed by 1-h i.v. cisplatin (50–75 mg/m²) on day 3. This combination regimen was repeated every 21 days. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for each agent was identified to be triapine (80 mg/m²), cisplatin (50 mg/m²), and paclitaxel (80 mg/m²). Common grade 3 or 4 toxicities included reversible anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or electrolyte abnormalities. The combination regimen of triapine–cisplatin–paclitaxel resulted in no objective responses; however, five (83%) of six patients treated at the MTD had stable disease between 1 and 8 months duration. This phase I study showed that the combination regimen of triapine–cisplatin–paclitaxel was safe and provides a rational basis for a follow-up phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and progression-free survival in women with metastatic or recurrent uterine cervix cancer.

Survival of patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experience

Advanced stage leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is incurable with current systemic antitumor therapies. Therefore, there is clinical interest in exploring novel therapeutic regimens to treat LMS. We reviewed the medical records of 75 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed metastatic LMS, who had been referred to the Clinical Center for Targeted Therapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center. To lay the foundation for potential phase I trials for the treatment of advanced LMS, we analyzed tumor response and survival outcome data. The frequent hotspot gene aberrations that we observed were the TP53 mutation (65%) and RB1 loss/mutation (45%) detected by Sequenom or next-generation sequencing. Among patients treated with gene aberration-related phase I trial therapy, the median progression-free survival was 5.8 months and the median overall survival was 15.9 months, significantly better than in patients without therapy (1.9 months, P = 0.001; and 8.7 months, P = 0.013, respectively). Independent risk factors that predicted shorter overall survival included hemoglobin <10 g/dL, body mass index <30 kg/m2 , serum albumin <3.5 g/dL, and neutrophil above upper limit of normal. The median survivals were 19.9, 7.6, and 0.9 months for patients with 0, 1 or 2, and ≥3 of the above risk factors, respectively (P < 0.001). A prognostic scoring system that included four independent risk factors might predict survival in patients with metastatic LMS who were treated in a phase I trial. Gene aberration-related therapies led to significantly better clinical benefits, supporting that further exploration with novel mechanism-driven therapeutic regimens is warranted.

Patients' perceived tolerance of side effects in phase I cancer clinical trials: A qualitative study

This qualitative study aimed to explore cancer patients' perceived tolerance of side effects in phase I drug trials. Patients with solid tumours receiving molecularly targeted agents with/without chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion. In-depth semi-structured interviews were carried out with 17 patients with a median [range] age of 63 [41-72] years. Treatment was discontinued in seven patients. Verbatim transcripts of the audio-taped interviews were analysed using a constructivist grounded theory approach. Four conceptual categories emerged from data analysis, labelled "suffering from side effects" comprising a range of symptoms, psychosocial or role disturbances; "striving to cope with side effects" reflecting psychological strategies for managing side effects; "hoping" reflecting expectations about treatment efficacy and relief from side effects; and "appraisal of care." Among patients remaining in the trial, treatment was currently perceived as fairly tolerable. For most respondents, whether still in a trial or not, treatment discontinuation could not be justified by the non-tolerance of treatment side effects. These results question the adequacy of patient-perceived tolerance reports to determine an optimal drug dose for phase II trials. Confronted with patients' hopes and inappropriate beliefs, communication is challenging in phase I trials and could benefit from facilitating psychosocial interventions.

A phase I dose-escalation study of apatorsen (OGX-427), an antisense inhibitor targeting heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27), in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and other advanced cancers

BACKGROUND

Heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27) is a chaperone protein that regulates cell survival via androgen receptor and other signaling pathways, thereby mediating cancer progression. Apatorsen (OGX-427) is a 2'-methoxyethyl-modified antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits Hsp27 expression. This study evaluated the safety profile and recommended phase II dosing of apatorsen in patients with advanced cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with castration-resistant prostate (CRPC), breast, ovary, lung, or bladder cancer were enrolled to this phase I dose-escalation study. Apatorsen was administered i.v. weekly in 21-day cycles following 3 loading doses and over 5 dose levels (200-1000 mg). Apatorsen plasma concentrations, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and CTC Hsp27 expression, and serum Hsp27 levels were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were accrued, of which 52% had CRPC. Patients were heavily pretreated, with 57% having had ≥3 prior chemotherapy regimens. During the loading dose/cycle 1 and overall study period, 93% and 100% of patients (N = 42) experienced treatment-related adverse events, respectively; most were grade 1-2 and included chills, pruritus, flushing, prolonged aPTT, lymphopenia, and anemia. One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity at the 600 mg dose level (intracranial hemorrhage in a previously undiagnosed brain metastasis). A maximum tolerated dose was not defined. Apatorsen Cmax increased proportionally with dose. Decreases in tumor markers and declines in CTCs were observed, with a prostate-specific antigen decline >%50% occurring in 10% of patients with CRPC; 29/39 assessable patients (74%) had reductions from ≥5 CTC/7.5 ml at baseline to <5 CTC/7.5 ml post-treatment. Twelve patients had stable measurable disease as best response.

CONCLUSIONS

Apatorsen was tolerated at the highest dose evaluated (1000 mg). Single-agent activity was suggested by changes in tumor markers, CTC, and stable measurable disease. Phase II studies evaluating apatorsen are underway.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV ID

NCT00487786.

A product of independent beta probabilities dose escalation design for dual-agent phase I trials

Dual-agent trials are now increasingly common in oncology research, and many proposed dose-escalation designs are available in the statistical literature. Despite this, the translation from statistical design to practical application is slow, as has been highlighted in single-agent phase I trials, where a 3 + 3 rule-based design is often still used. To expedite this process, new dose-escalation designs need to be not only scientifically beneficial but also easy to understand and implement by clinicians. In this paper, we propose a curve-free (nonparametric) design for a dual-agent trial in which the model parameters are the probabilities of toxicity at each of the dose combinations. We show that it is relatively trivial for a clinician's prior beliefs or historical information to be incorporated in the model and updating is fast and computationally simple through the use of conjugate Bayesian inference. Monotonicity is ensured by considering only a set of monotonic contours for the distribution of the maximum tolerated contour, which defines the dose-escalation decision process. Varied experimentation around the contour is achievable, and multiple dose combinations can be recommended to take forward to phase II. Code for R, Stata and Excel are available for implementation.

Tolerance of platelet concentrates treated with UVC-light only for pathogen reduction--a phase I clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The THERAFLEX UV-Platelets pathogen reduction system for platelet concentrates (PCs) operates with ultraviolet C light (UVC; 254 nm) only without addition of photosensitizers. This phase I study evaluated safety and tolerability of autologous UVC-irradiated PCs in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Eleven volunteers underwent two single (series 1 and 2) and one double apheresis (series 3). PCs were treated with UVC, stored for 48 h and retransfused in a dose-escalation scheme: 12·5, 25% and 50% of a PC (series 1); one complete PC (series 2); two PCs (series 3). Platelet counts, fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, D-dimer, standard haematology, temperature, heart rate, blood pressure and clinical chemistry parameters were measured. One- and 24-h corrected count increments were determined in series 2 and 3. Platelet-specific antibodies were assessed before and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

Neither adverse reactions related to transfusions nor antibodies against UVC-treated platelets were observed. Corrected count increments did not differ between series 2 and 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated transfusions of autologous UVC-treated PCs were well tolerated and did not induce antibody responses in all volunteers studied. EudraCT No. 2010-023404-26.

Melatonin as a potential therapy for sepsis: a phase I dose escalation study and an ex vivo whole blood model under conditions of sepsis

Sepsis is a massive inflammatory response mediated by infection, characterized by oxidative stress, release of cytokines, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Melatonin accumulates in mitochondria, and both it and its metabolites have potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities and may be useful in sepsis. We undertook a phase I dose escalation study in healthy volunteers to assess the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of 20, 30, 50, and 100 mg oral doses of melatonin. In addition, we developed an ex vivo whole blood model under conditions mimicking sepsis to determine the bioactivity of melatonin and the major metabolite 6-hydroxymelatonin at relevant concentrations. For the phase I trial, oral melatonin was given to five subjects in each dose cohort (n = 20). Blood and urine were collected for measurement of melatonin and 6-hydroxymelatonin, and symptoms and physiological measures were assessed. Validated sleep scales were completed. No adverse effects after oral melatonin, other than mild transient drowsiness with no effects on sleeping patterns, were seen, and no symptoms were reported. Melatonin was rapidly cleared at all doses with a median [range] elimination half-life of 51.7 [29.5-63.2] min across all doses. There was considerable variability in maximum melatonin levels within each dose cohort, but 6-hydoxymelatonin sulfate levels were less variable and remained stable for several hours. For the ex vivo study, blood from 20 volunteers was treated with lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan plus a range of concentrations of melatonin/6-hydroxymelatonin. Both melatonin and 6-hydroxymelatonin had beneficial effects on sepsis-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and cytokine responses at concentrations similar to those achieved in vivo.

Outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in a phase I study of everolimus in combination with lenalidomide

Everolimus, an oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, has been studied in multiple myeloma (MM) but lacks significant single agent activity. Based on preclinical studies showing synergistic activity of mTOR inhibitors with lenalidomide, we studied the combination of lenalidomide and everolimus in relapsed or refractory MM in a phase I clinical trial. We assessed patient samples using gene expression, Western blotting and immunohistochemistry to probe the mTOR pathway. Twenty-six patients were evaluable for toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The maximum tolerated dose was lenalidomide 15 mg and everolimus 5 mg for 21 d with a 7 d rest period. Grade 3/4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (35%) and neutropenia (42%). The overall response rate was 65% (1 complete response + 4 partial response + 10 minimal response). The median progression-free survival was 5·5 months and median overall survival was 29·5 months. Biomarker data demonstrated downregulation of phosphorylated p70S6K. Gene expression profiling suggested activation of mTOR in responders versus non-responders. The combination of lenalidomide and everolimus was well tolerated with predictable toxicities and showed responses in a heavily pretreated population. When confirmed with larger patient numbers, this analysis may guide patient selection for future clinical trials of mTOR inhibition in MM.

Synergistic effects of E2MATE and norethindrone acetate on steroid sulfatase inhibition: a randomized phase I proof-of-principle clinical study in women of reproductive age

The combination of a progestin such as norethindrone acetate (NETA) reducing the ovarian estrogen production with a steroid sulfatase (STS) inhibitor (STS-I) decreasing the local estrogen production could result in a new treatment option for endometriosis. The study reported was a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study to investigate the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the STS-I PGL2001 (E2MATE) and NETA. A total of 24 healthy women of reproductive age were treated with weekly doses of PGL2001 or daily doses of NETA or a combination of both compounds for 4 weeks. Four weeks of treatment with PGL2001 or PGL2001 + NETA reduced the STS activity in the endometrium by 91% (±3%) and 96% (±4%), respectively, and comparable values were observed 1 month after the treatment was stopped. The combined treatment of PGL2001 + NETA led to significantly higher STS inhibition at both times (P < .01 and P < .05, respectively). This study showed that administration of PGL2001 alone at 4 mg/week or combined with NETA to healthy women of reproductive age led to STS inhibition and changes in functional STS biomarkers in the endometrium, resulting in synergistic effects of PGL2001 and NETA on STS activity.

Modulation of circulating protein biomarkers following TRC105 (anti-endoglin antibody) treatment in patients with advanced cancer

TRC105 is an endoglin-targeting drug that possesses anti-angiogenic and antitumor potential. Analysis of the initial phase I trial of TRC105 demonstrated good tolerability and efficacy in cancer patients. In this report, we analyzed multiple circulating biomarkers at baseline, cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1), and end of study (EOS) for each patient. The baseline level and the fold change from baseline to both C2D1 and EOS for each marker were statistically analyzed. At C2D1, seven markers were significantly downregulated (angiopoietin-2 [Ang-2], insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 [IGFBP-3], plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI-1] total, platelet-derived growth factor [PDGF]-AA, PDGF-BB, thrombospondin-1 [TSP-1], and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]-D). Meanwhile, seven markers were upregulated by C2D1 (E-Cadherin, soluble Endoglin [sEnd], E-Selectin, interleukin-6 [IL-6], osteopontin [OPN], TSP-2, and von Willebrand factor [vWF]). At EOS, seven markers were upregulated including Ang-2, C-reactive protein (CRP), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), IGFBP-1, IL-6, TSP-2, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1). A statistical trend was also seen for increases of VEGF-A and placenta growth factor (PlGF) at EOS. Throughout treatment, sEnd levels significantly increased, an observation that was recapitulated in cultured endothelial cells. This is the first report of plasma-based biomarkers in patients receiving TRC105. TRC105 treatment by C2D1 was associated with decreases in several angiogenic factors, including Ang-2, PDGF isoforms, and VEGF isoforms, offering insight into the mechanisms underlying TRC105's anti-angiogenic, antitumor function. Increases in sEnd were the most significant of all observed biomarker changes and may reflect direct drug effects. Additionally, biomarker changes in response to TRC105 are distinct from those seen in patients treated with VEGF-targeting drugs, suggesting the possible utility of combining these two classes of angiogenesis inhibitors in patients.