A1 receptor deficiency causes increased insulin and glucagon secretion in mice

Adenosine influences metabolism and the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine decreases the risk of type 2 diabetes. In this study the metabolic role of one adenosine receptor subtype, the adenosine A(1)R, was evaluated in mice lacking this receptor [A(1)R (-/-)]. The HbA1c levels and body weight were not significantly different between wild type [A(1)R (+/+)] and A(1)R (-/-) mice (3-4 months) fed normal lab chow. At rest, plasma levels of glucose, insulin and glucagon were similar in both genotypes. Following glucose injection, glucose tolerance was not appreciably altered in A(1)R (-/-) mice. Glucose injection induced sustained increases in plasma insulin and glucagon levels in A(1)R (-/-) mice, whereas A(1)R (+/+) control mice reacted with the expected transient increase in insulin and decrease in glucagon levels. Pancreas perfusion experiments showed that A(1)R (-/-) mice had a slightly higher basal insulin secretion than A(1)R (+/+) mice. The first phase insulin secretion (initiated with 16.7 mM glucose) was of the same magnitude in both genotypes, but the second phase was significantly enhanced in the A(1)R (-/-) pancreata compared with A(1)R (+/+). Insulin- and contraction-mediated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle were not significantly different between in A(1)R (-/-) and A(1)R (+/+) mice. All adenosine receptors were expressed at mRNA level in skeletal muscle in A(1)R (+/+) mice and the mRNA A(2A)R, A(2B)R and A(3)R levels were similar in A(1)R (-/-) and A(1)R (+/+) mice. In conclusion, the A(1)R minimally affects muscle glucose uptake, but is important in regulating pancreatic islet function.

1,3,7-trimethylxanthine (caffeine) may exacerbate acute inflammatory liver injury by weakening the physiological immunosuppressive mechanism

The genetic elimination of A2A adenosine receptors (A2AR) was shown to disengage the critical immunosuppressive mechanism and cause the dramatic exacerbation of acute inflammatory tissue damage by T cells and myeloid cells. This prompted the evaluation of the proinflammatory vs the anti-inflammatory effects of the widely consumed behavioral drug caffeine, as the psychoactive effects of caffeine are mediated largely by its antagonistic action on A2AR in the brain. Because caffeine has other biochemical targets besides A2AR, it was important to test whether the consumption of caffeine during an acute inflammation episode would lead to the exacerbation of immune-mediated tissue damage. We examined acute and chronic treatment with caffeine for its effects on acute liver inflammation. It is shown that caffeine at lower doses (10 and 20 mg/kg) strongly exacerbated acute liver damage and increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Because caffeine did not enhance liver damage in A2AR-deficient mice, we suggest that the potentiation of liver inflammation was mediated by interference with the A2AR-mediated tissue-protecting mechanism. In contrast, a high dose of caffeine (100 mg/kg) completely blocked both liver damage and proinflammatory cytokine responses through an A2AR-independent mechanism. Furthermore, caffeine administration exacerbated liver damage even when mice consumed caffeine chronically, although the extent of exacerbation was less than in "naive" mice that did not consume caffeine before. This study suggests an unappreciated "man-made" immunological pathogenesis whereby consumption of the food-, beverage-, and medication-derived adenosine receptor antagonists may modify an individual's inflammatory status and lead to excessive organ damage during acute inflammation.

Modulation of glial cell functions by adenosine receptors

Adenosine is an endogenous neuromodulator, acting on four distinctive G-protein-coupled receptors, the A1, A2A, A2B and A3 adenosine receptors. Increased neuronal activity and, hypoxia or ischemia, result in elevated levels of adenosine reflecting changes of the metabolic state. This increases activation of the adenosine receptors. It is well appreciated that adenosine has a neuroprotective role in brain injuries. Although adenosine effects have been explained mainly by actions on nerve cells, modulation of glial functions by adenosine is likely to be important as discussed in this minireview. Thus, in astrocytes adenosine receptors modulate inter alia glycogen metabolism, glutamate transporters, astrogliosis and astrocyte swelling. Microglial cells appear to be important in regulating adenosine formation from ATP and adenosine can affect many microglial signaling pathways. Adenosine receptors on oligodendrocytes regulate white matter development.

Aspects of the general biology of adenosine A2A signaling

Many of our current hopes of finding better ways to treat Parkinson's disease or to stop its progression rely on studies of adenosine A2A receptors in the brain. Yet any drug targeting central receptors will also potentially affect receptors in other sites. Furthermore, several fundamental aspects of adenosine receptor biology must be taken into account. For these reasons the "Targeting adenosine A2A receptors in Parkinson's disease and other CNS disorders" meeting in Boston included selected aspects of the general biology of adenosine A2A receptor signaling. Some of the presentations from this part of the meeting are summarized in this first chapter. As will be apparent to the reader, these different parts do not form an integrated whole, but they do indicate areas the organizers felt might illuminate remaining questions regarding the roles of adenosine A2A receptors. The contributors to this part of the meeting have summarized some of the key questions below.

Diabetes-induced hyperfiltration in adenosine A(1)-receptor deficient mice lacking the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism

AIMS

Glomerular hyperfiltration is commonly found in diabetic patients early after the onset of disease. This is one of the first indications of the development of progressive diabetic nephropathy. It has been proposed that glomerular hyperfiltration is caused by decreased delivery of electrolytes to the macula densa due to the increased sodium and glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule, which would increase the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) via the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) mechanism. In this study, we investigated the role of TGF in diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration by inducing diabetes in adenosine A(1)-receptor knockout (A1AR(-/-)) mice known to lack a functional TGF mechanism.

METHODS

Diabetes was induced by alloxan (75 mg kg(-1) bw) injected into the tail vein. The 24-hour urinary electrolyte excretion was measured in metabolic cages, the GFR determined by inulin clearance under isoflurane-anaesthesia, and histological changes evaluated.

RESULTS

All alloxan-treated animals developed hyperglycaemia (> or =20 mm). Normoglycaemic animals had a similar GFR independent of genotype (A1AR(+/+) 9.3 +/- 0.5 vs. A1AR(-/-) 10.1 +/- 0.8 microL min(-1)g(-1) bw) and diabetes resulted in similar glomerular hyperfiltration in both groups (A1AR(+/+) 14.0 +/- 1.7, n = 9 vs. A1AR(-/-) 15.3 +/- 1.9 microL min(-1)g(-1) bw). Diabetic animals had a similar tendency to develop interstitial fibrosis, whereas the glomerular volume was similar in both genotypes, and unaltered by diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the A1AR(-/-) mice develop diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration, demonstrating that the TGF mechanism is not the major cause of the development of hyperfiltration. Furthermore, the hyperfiltration in the present study was not related to alterations in the glomerular filtration area.

A1 adenosine receptors play an essential role in protecting the embryo against hypoxia

Embryos can be exposed to environmental factors that induce hypoxia. Currently, our understanding of the effects of hypoxia on early mammalian development is modest. Potential mediators of hypoxia action include the nucleoside adenosine, which acts through A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)ARs) and mediates adverse effects of hypoxia on the neonatal brain. We hypothesized that A(1)ARs may also play a role in mediating effects of hypoxia on the embryo. When pregnant dams were exposed to hypoxia (10% O(2)) beginning at embryonic day (E) 7.5 or 8.5 and continued for 24-96 h, A(1)AR+/+ embryos manifested growth inhibition and a disproportionate reduction in heart size, including thinner ventricular walls. Yet, when dams were exposed to hypoxia, embryos lacking A(1)ARs (A(1)AR-/-) had much more severe growth retardation than A(1)AR+/+ or +/- embryos. When levels of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF1alpha) were examined, A(1)AR-/- embryos had less stabilized HIF1alpha protein than A(1)AR+/- littermates. Normal patterns of cardiac gene expression were also disturbed in A(1)AR-/- embryos exposed to hypoxia. These results show that short periods of hypoxia during early embryogenesis can result in intrauterine growth retardation. We identify adenosine and A(1)ARs as playing an essential role in protecting the embryo from hypoxia.

Eliminating the antilipolytic adenosine A1 receptor does not lead to compensatory changes in the antilipolytic actions of PGE2 and nicotinic acid

AIM

We examined whether compensatory changes after adenosine A(1) receptor knockout [A(1)R (-/-)] eliminate the antilipolytic actions mediated by this receptor.

METHODS

Lipolysis experiments were performed on adipocytes prepared from the wild type A(1)R (+/+), A(1)R (-/-) and heterozygous mice. Gene expression was assayed with cDNA microarray technique and real-time PCR; protein expression with immunoblotting.

RESULTS

The A(1)R was the only adenosine receptor involved in lipolysis. The effects of adenosine deaminase and 2-chloroadenosine were abolished in A(1)R (-/-) mice. The IC(50) value of 2-chloroadenosine doubled from 16.6 to 33.6 nm when half of the A(1)Rs were eliminated. Adrenergic alpha(2) agonists had no effects on lipolysis. Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) inhibited lipolysis with an IC(50) value of 5.8 nm (4.7-7.2 nm) in the A(1)R (+/+) mice and 10.6 nm (9.0-12.6 nm) in the A(1)R (-/-) mice. Nicotinic acid inhibited lipolysis with an IC(50) value of 0.30 microm (0.19-0.46 microm) in the A(1)R (+/+) mice and 0.24 microm (0.16-0.37 microm) in the A(1)R (-/-) mice. G(i)alpha(1) mRNA was significantly up-regulated in adipose tissue from A(1)R (-/-) mice. However, immunoblotting showed that G(ialpha1) was not up-regulated at the protein level.

CONCLUSION

The A(1)R mediates the antilipolytic actions of adenosine. Deletion of the A(1)R in mice does not result in compensatory increases in G-protein-mediated antilipolytic actions of PGE(2) or nicotinic acid.

G-protein-coupled receptors: an update

The receptors that couple to G proteins (GPCR) and which span the cell membranes seven times (7-TM receptors) were the focus of a symposium in Stockholm 2006. The ensemble of GPCR has now been mapped in several animal species. They remain a major focus of interest in drug development, and their diverse physiological and pathophysiological roles are being clarified, i.a. by genetic targeting. Recent developments hint at novel levels of complexity. First, many, if not all, GPCRs are part of multimeric ensembles, and physiology and pharmacology of a given GPCR may be at least partly guided by the partners it was formed together with. Secondly, at least some GPCRs may be constitutively active. Therefore, drugs that are inverse agonists may prove useful. Furthermore, the level of activity may vary in such a profound way between cells and tissues that this could offer new ways of achieving specificity of drug action. Finally, it is becoming increasingly clear that some of these receptors can signal via novel types of pathways, and hence that 'GPCRs' may not always be G-protein-coupled. Thus there are many challenges for the basic scientist and the drug industry.

Sex differences in mouse heart rate and body temperature and in their regulation by adenosine A1 receptors

AIM

To examine cardiac function, body temperature and locomotor behaviour in the awake adenosine A(1) receptor knock out mouse of both sexes.

METHODS

Male and female A(1)R (+/+) and (-/-) mice, instrumented with telemetric devices, were recorded during basal conditions and after drug administration.

RESULTS

Female mice had higher heart rate, body temperature and locomotion, both during daytime and during the night. Awake A(1)R (-/-) mice had a slightly elevated heart rate, and this was more clear-cut in males. Heart rate was also higher in Langendorff-perfused denervated A(1)R (-/-) hearts. Body temperature was higher in A(1)R (-/-) males and females; locomotor activity was higher in A(1)R (-/-) females, but not in males. The adenosine receptor agonist R-PIA (0.2 mg kg(-1)) decreased heart rate and body temperature, but less in A(1)R (-/-) animals than in A(1)R (+/+) mice (P < 0.001 in both parameters). The unselective adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine had a minor stimulatory effect on heart rate in lower doses, but depressed it at a dose of 75 mg kg(-1). Body temperature was increased after a low dose (7.5 mg kg(-1)) of caffeine in both sexes and genotypes, and markedly reduced after a high dose (75 mg kg(-1)) of caffeine. An intermediary dose of caffeine 30 mg kg(-1) increased or decreased body temperature depending on genotype and sex. Locomotor responses to caffeine were variable depending both on genotype and sex.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the adenosine A(1) receptor is involved in the regulation of heart rate, body temperature and locomotor activity, but the magnitude of the involvement is different in males and females.

Adenosine, an endogenous distress signal, modulates tissue damage and repair

Adenosine is formed inside cells or on their surface, mostly by breakdown of adenine nucleotides. The formation of adenosine increases in different conditions of stress and distress. Adenosine acts on four G-protein coupled receptors: two of them, A(1) and A(3), are primarily coupled to G(i) family G proteins; and two of them, A(2A) and A(2B), are mostly coupled to G(s) like G proteins. These receptors are antagonized by xanthines including caffeine. Via these receptors it affects many cells and organs, usually having a cytoprotective function. Joel Linden recently grouped these protective effects into four general modes of action: increased oxygen supply/demand ratio, preconditioning, anti-inflammatory effects and stimulation of angiogenesis. This review will briefly summarize what is known and what is not in this regard. It is argued that drugs targeting adenosine receptors might be useful adjuncts in many therapeutic approaches.

G protein-independent neuromodulatory action of adenosine on metabotropic glutamate signalling in mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells

Adenosine receptors (ARs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediating the neuromodulatory actions of adenosine that influence emotional, cognitive, motor, and other functions in the central nervous system (CNS). Previous studies show complex formation between ARs and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in heterologous systems and close colocalization of ARs and mGluRs in several central neurons. Here we explored the possibility of intimate functional interplay between G(i/o) protein-coupled A(1)-subtype AR (A1R) and type-1 mGluR (mGluR1) naturally occurring in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Using a perforated-patch voltage-clamp technique, we found that both synthetic and endogenous agonists for A1R induced continuous depression of a mGluR1-coupled inward current. A1R agonists also depressed mGluR1-coupled intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization monitored by fluorometry. A1R indeed mediated this depression because genetic depletion of A1R abolished it. Surprisingly, A1R agonist-induced depression persisted after blockade of G(i/o) protein. The depression appeared to involve neither the cAMP-protein kinase A cascade downstream of the alpha subunits of G(i/o) and G(s) proteins, nor cytoplasmic Ca(2+) that is suggested to be regulated by the beta-gamma subunit complex of G(i/o) protein. Moreover, A1R did not appear to affect G(q) protein which mediates the mGluR1-coupled responses. These findings suggest that A1R modulates mGluR1 signalling without the aid of the major G proteins. In this respect, the A1R-mediated depression of mGluR1 signalling shown here is clearly distinguished from the A1R-mediated neuronal responses described so far. These findings demonstrate a novel neuromodulatory action of adenosine in central neurons.

Toxic effects of cobalt in primary cultures of mouse astrocytes

Cobalt is suspected to cause memory deficit in humans and was reported to induce neurotoxicity in animal models. We have studied the effects of cobalt in primary cultures of mouse astrocytes. CoCl(2) (0.2-0.8mM) caused dose-dependent ATP depletion, apoptosis (cell shrinkage, phosphatidylserine externalization and chromatin rearrangements) and secondary necrosis. The mitochondria appeared to be a main target of cobalt toxicity, as shown by the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsi(m)) and release from the mitochondria of apoptogenic factors, e.g. apoptosis inducing factor (AIF). Pre-treatment with bongkrekic acid reduced ATP depletion, implicating the involvement of the mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) pore. Cobalt increased the generation of oxygen radicals, but antioxidants did not prevent toxicity. There was also an impaired response to ATP stimulation, evaluated as a lower raise in intracellular calcium. Similarly to hypoxia and dymethyloxallyl glycine (DMOG), cobalt triggered stabilization of the alpha-subunit of hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1 (HIF-1alpha). This early event was followed by an increased expression of HIF-1 regulated genes, e.g. stress protein HO-1, pro-apoptotic factor Nip3 and iNOS. Although all of the three stimuli activated the HIF-1alpha pathway and decreased ATP levels, the downstream effects were different. DMOG only inhibited cell proliferation, whereas the other two conditions caused cell death by apoptosis and necrosis. This points to cobalt and hypoxia not only inducing HIF-1alpha regulated genes but also affecting similarly other cellular functions, including metabolism.

Contribution of adenosine receptors in the control of arteriolar tone and adenosine–angiotensin II interaction

Adenosine (Ado) mediates vasoconstriction via A(1)-Ado receptors and vasodilation via A(2)-Ado receptors in the kidney. It interacts with angiotensin II (Ang II), which is important for renal hemodynamics and tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF). The aim was to investigate the function of Ado receptors in the Ado-Ang II interaction in mouse microperfused, afferent arterioles. Ado (10(-11)-10(-4) mol/l) caused a biphasic response: arteriolar diameters were reduced (-7%) at Ado 10(-11)-10(-9) mol/l and returned to control values at higher concentrations. Treatment with Ang II (10(-10) mol/l) transformed the response into a concentration-dependent constriction. N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (A(1)-Ado receptor agonist) reduced diameters (12% at 10(-6) mol/l). Application of CGS21680 (10(-12)-10(-4) mol/l, A(2A) receptor agonist) increased the diameter by 13%. Pretreatment with ZM241385 (A(2A)-Ado receptor antagonist) alone or in combination with MRS1706 (A(2B)-Ado receptor antagonist) resulted in a pure constriction upon Ado, whereas 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT) (A(1)-Ado receptor antagonist) inhibited the constrictor response. Afferent arterioles of mice lacking A(1)-Ado receptor did not show constriction upon Ado. Treatment with Ado (10(-8) mol/l) increased the response upon Ang II, which was blocked by CPT. Ado (10(-5) mol/l) did not influence the Ang II response, but an additional blockade of A(2)-Ado receptors enhanced it. The action of Ado on constrictor A(1)-Ado receptors and dilatory A(2)-Ado receptors modulates the interaction with Ang II. Both directions of Ado-Ang II interaction, which predominantly leads to an amplification of the contractile response, are important for the operation of the TGF.

Adenosine A1 receptors are crucial in keeping an epileptic focus localized

Adenosine is an endogenous neuromodulator with anticonvulsant and neuroprotective properties presumably mediated by activation of adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs). To study the involvement of A1Rs in neuroprotection during epileptogenesis, we induced status epilepticus by a unilateral intrahippocampal kainic acid (KA) injection (1 nmol) in wild-type C57BL/6 and homozygous adenosine A1R knock out (A1R-KO) mice of the same genetic background. Whereas the KA injection caused non-convulsive status epilepticus in wild-type mice, in A1R-KO mice KA induced status epilepticus with severe convulsions and subsequent death of the animals within 5 days. 24 h after KA injection, brains from wild-type C57BL/6 mice were characterized by slight neuronal cell loss confined to the immediate location of the KA injection. In contrast, KA-injected A1R-KO mice displayed massive neuronal cell loss in the ipsilateral hippocampus, and, importantly, the contralateral hippocampus was also affected with significant cell loss in the hilus and in the CA1 region of the pyramidal cell layer. We conclude that activation of A1 receptors by ambient adenosine is crucial in keeping epileptic foci localized. These results open up a new dimension of the A1 receptor's role in controlling excitotoxic cell death and further demonstrate its importance in preventing the progression of status epilepticus to lethal consequences.

NMDA depresses glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the striatum through the activation of adenosine A1 receptors: evidence from knockout mice

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors play several essential roles in the physiology and pathophysiology of the brain. Their activation results in long-term changes in glutamatergic synaptic transmission in several brain areas, but excessive activation of these receptors induces neurotoxicity. Some of NMDA-mediated actions are critically dependent on functional interactions with the neuromodulator adenosine. In the present study, we have examined whether pharmacological activation of NMDA receptors induces long-term changes in synaptic strength in the striatum. We found that NMDA depressed the amplitude of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential/population spike (fEPSP/PS) recorded in corticostriatal mouse brain slices in a concentration-dependent manner. Inhibition of synaptic transmission was more pronounced at room temperature (22 degrees C) than at 32 degrees C and long lasting (> 2 h) depression of the fEPSP/PS was observed only at room temperature. NMDA-induced depression of the fEPSP/PS was reduced or abolished in the presence of an A1 receptor antagonist and in A1 receptor knockout mice. In addition, exogenous application of adenosine depressed fEPSP/PS amplitude in wild-type mice, but not in A1 receptor knockout mice, in a concentration-dependent manner. Our results demonstrate that NMDA depresses synaptic transmission in a concentration- and temperature-dependent manner via release of adenosine and activation of adenosine A1 receptors.

Effect of acute and chronic administration of caffeine on pain-like behaviors in rats with partial sciatic nerve injury

Caffeine, used in many pain medications as an adjuvant analgesic, is an adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonist. Here we examined the effects of acute or chronic caffeine administration in rats after partial sciatic nerve injury. The hindpaw response to mechanical or cold stimulation was assessed following photochemically induced sciatic nerve injury which leads to hypersensitivity to these stimuli. Caffeine was administered i.p. acutely or in the drinking water chronically. The mechanical and cold hypersensitivity of sciatic nerve-injured rats was dose-dependently alleviated by acute systemic administration of caffeine (10-80 mg/kg). The effect of caffeine was, however, associated with side effects including locomotor stimulation or depression. Chronic oral administration (average daily doses 27.5 mg/kg/day or 61.5 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks) of caffeine starting at the time of nerve injury did not significantly affect the development of pain-like behaviors. Thus, acute, but not long term, caffeine intake reduced neuropathic pain state in nerve-injured rats, but only at very high doses. The potential hyperalgesic effect of chronic A1 adenosine receptor blockade may have been compensated for by an antinociceptive effect of caffeine through antagonism of A2A receptors and tolerance development.

Activation and Inhibition of Human Muscular and Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors by Succinylcholine

Background

Succinylcholine is one of the most widely used muscle relaxants in clinical anesthesia and emergency medicine. Although the clinical advantages and cardiovascular side effects are well known, its mechanism of action within the human nicotinic cholinergic receptor system remains to be understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of succinylcholine on human muscle and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtypes.

Methods

Xenopus laevis oocytes were injected with human messenger RNA for muscle and neuronal nAChR subunits. Receptor activation, desensitization, and inhibition induced by the natural ligand acetylcholine or by succinylcholine was studied using a multichannel two-electrode voltage clamp setup. Responses were measured as peak current and net charge.

Results

Succinylcholine concentration-dependently activated the muscle-type nAChR with an EC50 value of 10.8 microm (95% confidence interval, 9.8-11.9 microm), and after the initial activation, succinylcholine desensitized the muscle-type nAChR. Succinylcholine did not activate the neuronal nAChR subtypes alpha3beta2, alpha3beta4, alpha4beta2, or alpha7 at concentrations up to 1 mm and was a poor inhibitor at these receptor subtypes, with IC50 values above 100 microm.

Conclusion

Succinylcholine activates the muscle-type nAChR followed by desensitization. The observation that succinylcholine does not inhibit the presynaptic alpha3beta2 autoreceptor at clinically relevant concentrations provides a possible mechanistic explanation for the typical lack of tetanic fade in succinylcholine-induced neuromuscular blockade. Finally, cardiovascular side effects (e.g., tachyarrhythmias) of succinylcholine are not mediated via direct activation of the autonomic ganglionic alpha3beta4 subtype because succinylcholine does not activate the neuronal nAChRs.

Effect of modulating cardiac A1adenosine receptor expression on protection with ischemic preconditioning

Activation of A1adenosine receptors (A1ARs) may be a crucial step in protection against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury; however, the use of pharmacological A1AR antagonists to inhibit myocardial protection has yielded inconclusive results. In the current study, we have used mice with genetically modified A1AR expression to define the role of A1AR in intrinsic protection and ischemic preconditioning (IPC) against I/R injury. Normal wild-type (WT) mice, knockout mice with deleted (A1KO−/−) or single-copy (A1KO+/−) A1AR, and transgenic mice (A1TG) with increased cardiac A1AR expression underwent 45 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion, followed by 60 min of reperfusion. Subsets of each group were preconditioned with short durations of ischemia (3 cycles of 5 min of occlusion and 5 min of reperfusion) before index ischemia. Infarct size (IF) in WT, A1KO+/−, and A1KO−/−mice was (in % of risk region) 58 ± 3, 60 ± 4, and 61 ± 2, respectively, and was less in A1TG mice (39 ± 4, P < 0.05). A strong correlation was observed between A1AR expression level and response to IPC. IF was significantly reduced by IPC in WT mice (35 ± 3, P < 0.05 vs. WT), A1KO+/−+ IPC (48 ± 4, P < 0.05 vs. A1KO+/−), and A1TG + IPC mice (24 ± 2, P < 0.05 vs. A1TG). However, IPC did not decrease IF in A1KO−/−+ IPC mice (63 ± 2). In addition, A1KO−/−hearts subjected to global I/R injury demonstrated diminished recovery of developed pressure and diastolic function compared with WT controls. These findings demonstrate that A1ARs are critical for protection from myocardial I/R injury and that cardioprotection with IPC is relative to the level of A1AR gene expression.

The role of extracellular adenosine in regulating mossy fiber synaptic plasticity

Hippocampal mossy fiber synapses show unique molecular features and dynamic range of plasticity. A recent paper proposed that the defining features of mossy fiber synaptic plasticity are caused by a local buildup of extracellular adenosine (Moore et al., 2003). In this study, we reassessed the role of ambient adenosine in regulating mossy fiber synaptic plasticity in mouse and rat hippocampal slices. Synaptic transmission was highly sensitive to activation of presynaptic adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs), which reduced transmitter release by >75%. However, most of A1Rs were not activated by ambient adenosine. Field potentials increased only by 20-30% when A1Rs were fully blocked with the A1R antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) (1 microM). Moreover, blocking A1Rs hardly altered paired-pulse facilitation, frequency facilitation, or posttetanic potentiation. Frequency facilitation was similar in A1R-/- mice and when measured with NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs in CA3 pyramidal cells in the presence of DPCPX. Additional experiments suggested that the results obtained by Moore et al. (2003) can partially be explained by their usage of a submerged recording chamber and elevated divalent cation concentrations. In conclusion, a reduction of the basal release probability by ambient adenosine does not underlie presynaptic forms of plasticity at mossy fiber synapses.

Cannabinoid action depends on phosphorylation of dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa at the protein kinase A site in striatal projection neurons

Herbal cannabis, smoked in the form of marihuana or hashish, is the most common illicit drug consumed in the Western world. In the brain, cannabinoids interact with neuronal CB1 receptors, thereby producing a marked reduction of motor activity. Here, we report that the motor depressant effect produced by the cannabinoid receptor agonist (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol (CP55,940) is attenuated by genetic inactivation of the dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa (DARPP-32), which is abundantly expressed in the medium spiny neurons of the striatum. Point mutation of Thr34, the protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylation site of DARPP-32, produces a similar reduction in the effect of the CB1 agonist. In contrast, point mutation of Thr75, a site on DARPP-32 specifically phosphorylated by cyclin-dependent kinase 5, does not affect the behavioral response to CP55,940. Activation of CB1 receptors, either by an agonist or by inhibition of reuptake of endogenous cannabinoids, stimulates phosphorylation at Thr34, thereby converting DARPP-32 into an inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1. Genetic inactivation either of dopamine D2 receptors or of adenosine A2A receptors reduces the phosphorylation of DARPP-32 at Thr34 and the motor depression produced by CP55,940. Our data indicate that a considerable proportion of the psychomotor effect of cannabinoids can be accounted for by a signaling cascade in striatal projection neurons involving PKA-dependent phosphorylation of DARPP-32, achieved via modulation of dopamine D2 and adenosine A2A transmission.

Combination of adenosine A1 and A2A receptor blocking agents induces caffeine-like locomotor stimulation in mice

The spontaneous locomotor activity of C57BL/6J mice was examined, using an automated detection system based on infra-red beams, after administration of caffeine (3-30 mg/kg, i.p.), the adenosine A(2A) receptor selective antagonist SCH 58261 (0.312-2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) and the A(1) selective antagonist DPCPX (1.25-5 mg/kg, i.p.). SCH 58261 failed to influence motor activity in mice habituated to the test environment. DPCPX produced a small increase in motility and locomotion (significant at the dose of 5.0 mg/kg), much weaker than that produced by caffeine. Combined administration of DPCPX (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) and SCH 58261 (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) produced stimulation of motility and locomotion comparable with the effect of caffeine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). In contrast to motility and locomotion, rearing counts were not significantly influenced by DPCPX, SCH 58261, their combination, or by caffeine. Caffeine (15 mg/kg, i.p.) caused an increase in NGFI-A mRNA (an immediate early gene was chosen as an index of neuronal activation) in the piriform cortex 4 h after injection. This effect was reproduced by the combination of A(1) and A(2A) receptor antagonist. It is hypothesised that the stimulatory effect of low doses of caffeine in C57BL/6J mice is due to concomitant blockade of both A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors.

Influence of the adenosine A1 receptor on blood pressure regulation and renin release

The present study was performed to investigate the role of adenosine A1 receptors in regulating blood pressure in conscious mice. Adenosine A1-receptor knockout (A1R-/-) mice and their wild-type (A1R+/+) littermates were placed on standardized normal-salt (NS), high-salt (HS), or salt-deficient (SD) diets for a minimum of 10 days before telemetric blood pressure and urinary excretion measurements in metabolic cages. On the NS diet, daytime and nighttime mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was 7-10 mmHg higher in A1R-/- than in A1R+/+ mice. HS diet did not affect the MAP in A1R-/- mice, but the daytime and nighttime MAP of the A1R+/+ mice increased by approximately 10 mmHg, to the same level as that in the A1R-/-. On the SD diet, day- and nighttime MAP decreased by approximately 6 mmHg in both A1R-/- and A1R+/+ mice, although the MAP remained higher in A1R-/- than in A1R+/+ mice. Although plasma renin levels decreased with increased salt intake in both genotypes, the A1R-/- mice had an approximately twofold higher plasma renin concentration on all diets compared with A1R+/+ mice. Sodium excretion was elevated in the A1R-/- compared with the A1R+/+ mice on the NS diet. There was no difference in sodium excretion between the two genotypes on the HS diet. Even on the SD diet, A1R-/- mice had an increased sodium excretion compared with A1R+/+ mice. An abolished tubuloglomerular feedback response and reduced tubular reabsorption can account for the elevated salt excretion found in A1R-/- animals. The elevated plasma renin concentrations found in the A1R-/- mice could also result in increased blood pressure. Our results confirm that adenosine, acting through the adenosine A1 receptor, plays an important role in regulating blood pressure, renin release, and sodium excretion.

Differences between A 68930 and SKF 82958 could suggest synergistic roles of D1 and D5 receptors

The isochroman A 68930 and the benzazepine SKF 82958 are two full dopamine D1 receptor agonists. Responses to these compounds are different in several important aspects. When given to rats in a novel environment, A 68930 caused a dose-dependent (0.019-4.9 mg/kg) suppression of locomotion. SKF 82958 had no such effect at any dose studied (0.051-3.3 mg/kg). In animals habituated to the environment, A 68930 had no effect but SKF 82958 increased locomotor activity. Both A 68930 and SKF 82958 caused a decrease in core temperature at early time points. Both agonists increased c-fos and NGFI-A expression in caudate putamen but only SKF 82958 did so in the accumbens nucleus (at 1.6 mg/kg). Quantitative receptor autoradiography showed that A 68930 is 9-13 times more potent than SKF 82958 at displacing the selective dopamine D1 antagonist [3H]SCH 23390. This difference agrees with the difference observed when the agonists were used to stimulate cAMP formation in cells transfected with the D1 receptor. In contrast, SKF 82958 was 5 times more potent than A 68930 in cells transfected with the D5 receptor. We suggest that the balance between signaling via dopamine D1 and D5 receptors determines the functional effects of agonists at D1/D5 receptors.