101
|
Busch AB, Kennedy-Hendricks A, Schilling C, Stuart EA, Hollander M, Meiselbach MK, Barry CL, Huskamp HA, Eisenberg MD. Measurement Approaches to Estimating Methadone Continuity in Opioid Use Disorder Care. Med Care 2023; 61:314-320. [PMID: 36917776 PMCID: PMC10377507 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (OUD), including methadone, is lifesaving. There has been little examination of how to measure methadone continuity in claims data. OBJECTIVES To develop an approach for measuring methadone continuity in claims data, and compare estimates of methadone versus buprenorphine continuity. RESEARCH DESIGN Observational cohort study using de-identified commercial claims from OptumLabs Data Warehouse (January 1, 2017-June 30, 2021). SUBJECTS Individuals diagnosed with OUD, ≥1 methadone or buprenorphine claim and ≥180 days continuous enrollment (N=29,633). MEASURES OUD medication continuity: months with any use, days of continuous use, and proportion of days covered. RESULTS 5.4% (N=1607) of the study cohort had any methadone use. Ninety-seven percent of methadone claims (N=160,537) were from procedure codes specifically used in opioid treatment programs. Place of service and primary diagnosis codes indicated that several methadone procedure codes were not used in outpatient OUD care. Methadone billing patterns indicated that estimating days-supply based solely on dates of service and/or procedure codes would yield inaccurate continuity results and that an approach incorporating the time between service dates was more appropriate. Among those using methadone, mean [s.d.] months with any use, days of continuous use, and proportion of days covered were 4.8 [1.8] months, 79.7 [73.4] days, and 0.64 [0.36]. For buprenorphine, the corresponding continuity estimates were 4.6 [1.9], 80.7 [70.0], and 0.73 [0.35]. CONCLUSIONS Estimating methadone continuity in claims data requires a different approach than that for medications largely delivered by prescription fills, highlighting the importance of consistency and transparency in measuring methadone continuity across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alisa B. Busch
- Mailstop 226, 115 Mill St., McLean Hospital, Belmont MA 02478
- 180 Longwood Ave, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Alene Kennedy-Hendricks
- 624 N. Broadway, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205
| | - Cameron Schilling
- 624 N. Broadway, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205
| | - Elizabeth A. Stuart
- 615 N. Wolfe St., Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205
| | - Mara Hollander
- 624 N. Broadway, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205
| | - Mark K. Meiselbach
- 624 N. Broadway, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205
| | - Colleen L. Barry
- Cornell Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, 2301G Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, 37 Forest Home Drive, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - Haiden A. Huskamp
- 180 Longwood Ave, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Matthew D. Eisenberg
- 624 N. Broadway, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
MacLean RR, Heapy AA, Waters AJ, Wolkowicz N, Szollosy SK, Meyerovich J, Sofuoglu M. Integrating cognitive bias modification for pain and opioid cues into medication for opioid use disorder clinical care: Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary results. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 246:109857. [PMID: 37004461 PMCID: PMC10189744 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite high co-occurrence, chronic pain is often unaddressed in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) and little is known about mechanisms that may underlie associations between pain and opioid use. Using an attentional bias (AB) task with both pain and opioid cues, we evaluated a cognitive bias modification (CBM) task administered during regularly scheduled medications for OUD (mOUD) dosing visits. The current study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the CBM task. Outcomes for AB tasks used traditional mean-based score and trial-level bias scores (TLBS). METHODS In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 28 individuals with OUD and chronic pain engaged in mOUD were randomized to either CBM or an AB control condition and completed up to three tasks per week for four weeks. Standard AB task was completed at baseline and post-treatment. Participants completed feasibility and acceptability measures, and preliminary efficacy (i.e., change in AB) was assessed using ANOVA models. RESULTS Participants attended 83.3% of scheduled sessions and generally reported the task was enjoyable, credible, and easy to complete. Preliminary results demonstrated a condition by time interaction highlighting a reduction in AB in the CBM group but not the control group in opioid TLBS variability (F[1,26]=5.01, p = .034) and pain TLBS towards (F[1,26]=6.42, p = .018) and pain TLBS variability (F[1,26]=5.24, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS The current study supports integrating brief, computer-based tasks designed to reduce AB into mOUD clinical care. The preliminary results suggest that TLBS outcomes may be more sensitive to capture changes in AB; however, larger studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ross MacLean
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Alicia A Heapy
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Andrew J Waters
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Noah Wolkowicz
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Julia Meyerovich
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mehmet Sofuoglu
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Chao CR, Perez Yordan J, Roberts M, Ma X, Holbrook B, Rayburn W, Bakhireva LN. Effects of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) on fetal brain and cranial measurements. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2023; 97:107177. [PMID: 37084853 PMCID: PMC10198957 DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2023.107177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use and misuse of opioids, as well as opioid use disorder (OUD) have increased remarkably among reproductive-aged and pregnant women. As many as 25% of pregnant women who report non-medical opioid use in the past month also report concurrent alcohol use. While teratogenic effects of alcohol are well established, there are limited studies evaluating fetal intracranial effects associated with medications for OUD (MOUD) and concurrent use of MOUD and alcohol during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of MOUD, with and without concomitant alcohol use, on fetal intracranial measurements. The type of maternal MOUD therapy (methadone vs. buprenorphine) was also examined. METHODS This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study among participants (n = 196) assigned into three groups (MOUD [n = 94], MOUD+Alcohol [n = 47], and unexposed controls [n = 55]). Co-exposure with either methamphetamines or cocaine were exclusionary criteria; other co-exposures were carefully characterized with prospective repeated self-report measures and biomarkers. Fetal ultrasound measurements at 18-22 weeks (2nd trimester) and 28-32 weeks (early 3rd trimester) were compared among study groups. In addition to standard morphometrics, we performed specialized intracranial measurements of caval-calvarial distance (CCD), frontal lobe width (FLW), frontal lobe length (FLL), and fronto-thalamic distance (FTD). RESULTS Brain and cranial measurements between MOUD, with or without alcohol co-exposure, and unexposed controls were generally not significantly different in multivariable analyses. Subjects in the MOUD groups had earlier gestational age at delivery and lower birth weight and birth weight percentile compared to unexposed controls with differences driven primarily by the methadone subgroup. Significant differences in standard and specialized intracranial indices at both second and third trimester as well as differences in the change of HC percentile over time were observed in the methadone subgroup compared to controls, while no differences between buprenorphine subgroup and controls were observed for any measures. CONCLUSION Patients receiving methadone therapy might require closer monitoring during pregnancy; however, detailed imaging of the fetal brain other than the standard measurements might not be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conrad R Chao
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America
| | - Jose Perez Yordan
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America
| | - Melissa Roberts
- College of Pharmacy Substance Use Research and Education Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America
| | - Xingya Ma
- College of Pharmacy Substance Use Research and Education Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America
| | - Bradley Holbrook
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Community Medical Center, Missoula, MT, United States of America
| | - William Rayburn
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America
| | - Ludmila N Bakhireva
- College of Pharmacy Substance Use Research and Education Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Bremer W, Plaisance K, Walker D, Bonn M, Love JS, Perrone J, Sarker A. Barriers to opioid use disorder treatment: A comparison of self-reported information from social media with barriers found in literature. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1141093. [PMID: 37151596 PMCID: PMC10158842 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1141093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Medications such as buprenorphine and methadone are effective for treating opioid use disorder (OUD), but many patients face barriers related to treatment and access. We analyzed two sources of data-social media and published literature-to categorize and quantify such barriers. Methods In this mixed methods study, we analyzed social media (Reddit) posts from three OUD-related forums (subreddits): r/suboxone, r/Methadone, and r/naltrexone. We applied natural language processing to identify posts relevant to treatment barriers, categorized them into insurance- and non-insurance-related, and manually subcategorized them into fine-grained topics. For comparison, we used substance use-, OUD- and barrier-related keywords to identify relevant articles from PubMed published between 2006 and 2022. We searched publications for language expressing fear of barriers, and hesitation or disinterest in medication treatment because of barriers, paying particular attention to the affected population groups described. Results On social media, the top three insurance-related barriers included having no insurance (22.5%), insurance not covering OUD treatment (24.7%), and general difficulties of using insurance for OUD treatment (38.2%); while the top two non-insurance-related barriers included stigma (47.6%), and financial difficulties (26.2%). For published literature, stigma was the most prominently reported barrier, occurring in 78.9% of the publications reviewed, followed by financial and/or logistical issues to receiving medication treatment (73.7%), gender-specific barriers (36.8%), and fear (31.5%). Conclusion The stigma associated with OUD and/or seeking treatment and insurance/cost are the two most common types of barriers reported in the two sources combined. Harm reduction efforts addressing barriers to recovery may benefit from leveraging multiple data sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney Bremer
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States
| | - Karma Plaisance
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Drew Walker
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Matthew Bonn
- Canadian Association of People Who Use Drugs, Dartmouth, NS, Canada
| | - Jennifer S. Love
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jeanmarie Perrone
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Abeed Sarker
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
D’Onofrio G, Edelman EJ, Hawk KF, Chawarski MC, Pantalon MV, Owens PH, Martel SH, Rothman R, Saheed M, Schwartz RP, Cowan E, Richardson L, Salsitz E, Lyons MS, Freiermuth C, Wilder C, Whiteside L, Tsui JI, Klein JW, Coupet E, O’Connor PG, Matthews AG, Murphy SM, Huntley K, Fiellin DA. Implementation Facilitation to Promote Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e235439. [PMID: 37017967 PMCID: PMC10077107 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) is underused. Objective To evaluate whether provision of ED-initiated buprenorphine with referral for OUD increased after implementation facilitation (IF), an educational and implementation strategy. Design, Setting, and Participants This multisite hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation nonrandomized trial compared grand rounds with IF, with pre-post 12-month baseline and IF evaluation periods, at 4 academic EDs. The study was conducted from April 1, 2017, to November 30, 2020. Participants were ED and community clinicians treating patients with OUD and observational cohorts of ED patients with untreated OUD. Data were analyzed from July 16, 2021, to July 14, 2022. Exposure A 60-minute in-person grand rounds was compared with IF, a multicomponent facilitation strategy that engaged local champions, developed protocols, and provided learning collaboratives and performance feedback. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were the rate of patients in the observational cohorts who received ED-initiated buprenorphine with referral for OUD treatment (primary implementation outcome) and the rate of patients engaged in OUD treatment at 30 days after enrollment (effectiveness outcome). Additional implementation outcomes included the numbers of ED clinicians with an X-waiver to prescribe buprenorphine and ED visits with buprenorphine administered or prescribed and naloxone dispensed or prescribed. Results A total of 394 patients were enrolled during the baseline evaluation period and 362 patients were enrolled during the IF evaluation period across all sites, for a total of 756 patients (540 [71.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 39.3 [11.7] years), with 223 Black patients (29.5%) and 394 White patients (52.1%). The cohort included 420 patients (55.6%) who were unemployed, and 431 patients (57.0%) reported unstable housing. Two patients (0.5%) received ED-initiated buprenorphine during the baseline period, compared with 53 patients (14.6%) during the IF evaluation period (P < .001). Forty patients (10.2%) were engaged with OUD treatment during the baseline period, compared with 59 patients (16.3%) during the IF evaluation period (P = .01). Patients in the IF evaluation period who received ED-initiated buprenorphine were more likely to be in treatment at 30 days (19 of 53 patients [35.8%]) than those who did not 40 of 309 patients (12.9%; P < .001). Additionally, there were increases in the numbers of ED clinicians with an X-waiver (from 11 to 196 clinicians) and ED visits with provision of buprenorphine (from 259 to 1256 visits) and naloxone (from 535 to 1091 visits). Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter effectiveness-implementation nonrandomized trial, rates of ED-initiated buprenorphine and engagement in OUD treatment were higher in the IF period, especially among patients who received ED-initiated buprenorphine. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03023930.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail D’Onofrio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - E. Jennifer Edelman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kathryn F. Hawk
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Marek C. Chawarski
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michael V. Pantalon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Patricia H. Owens
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shara H. Martel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Richard Rothman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mustapha Saheed
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Ethan Cowan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Lynne Richardson
- Institute for Health Equity Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Edwin Salsitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Michael S. Lyons
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Caroline Freiermuth
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Christine Wilder
- Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Lauren Whiteside
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Judith I. Tsui
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jared W. Klein
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Edouard Coupet
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Patrick G. O’Connor
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | - David A. Fiellin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Xu KY, Jones HE, Schiff DM, Martin CE, Kelly JC, Carter EB, Bierut LJ, Grucza RA. Initiation and Treatment Discontinuation of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnant People Compared With Nonpregnant People. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:845-853. [PMID: 36897142 PMCID: PMC10201921 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between pregnancy and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) initiation and discontinuation among reproductive-aged people receiving treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) in the United States. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of people with gender recorded as female, aged 18-45 years, in the Merative TM MarketScan ® Commercial and Multi-State Medicaid Databases (2006-2016). Opioid use disorder and pregnancy status were identified based on inpatient or outpatient claims for established International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision diagnosis and procedure codes. The main outcomes were buprenorphine and methadone initiation and discontinuation, determined by using pharmacy and outpatient procedure claims. Analyses were conducted at the treatment episode level. Adjusting for insurance status, age, and co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders, we used logistic regression to estimate MOUD initiation and used Cox regression to estimate MOUD discontinuation. RESULTS Our sample included 101,772 reproductive-aged people with OUD, encompassing 155,771 treatment episodes (mean age 30.8 years, 64.4% Medicaid insurance, 84.1% White), of whom 2,687 (3.2%, encompassing 3,325 episodes) were pregnant. In the pregnant group, 51.2% of treatment episodes (1,703/3,325) involved psychosocial treatment without MOUD, in comparison with 61.1% (93,156/152,446) in the nonpregnant comparator group. In adjusted analyses assessing likelihood of initiation for individual MOUD, pregnancy status was associated with an increase in buprenorphine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.57, 95% CI 1.44-1.70) and methadone initiation (aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.82-2.27). Discontinuation rates of MOUD at 270 days were high for both buprenorphine (72.4% for nonpregnant episodes vs 59.9% for pregnant episodes) and methadone (65.7% for nonpregnant episodes vs 54.1% for pregnant episodes). Pregnancy was associated with a decreased likelihood of discontinuation at 270 days for both buprenorphine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.76) and methadone (aHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.75), in comparison with nonpregnant status. CONCLUSION Although a minority of reproductive-aged people with OUD in the United States are initiated on MOUD, pregnancy is associated with a significant increase in treatment initiation and a reduced risk of medication discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Y Xu
- Health and Behavior Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Hendrée E Jones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Davida M Schiff
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Mass General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caitlin E Martin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and VCU Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jeannie C Kelly
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and the Division of Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ebony B Carter
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and the Division of Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Laura J Bierut
- Health and Behavior Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Richard A Grucza
- Health and Behavior Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Departments of Family and Community Medicine and Health and Outcomes Research, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Gunstad J, Disabato D, Shrestha R, Sanborn V, Mistler CB, Copenhaver MM. Latent profile analysis of data from the brief inventory of neurocognitive impairment (BINI) to develop neuro-cognitive profiles among opioid-dependent patients in drug treatment. J Addict Dis 2023; 41:120-127. [PMID: 35615880 PMCID: PMC9699904 DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2022.2080626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurocognitive dysfunction is common among individuals with opioid use disorders (OUD) and can impede a range of treatment outcomes. We developed the 57-item Brief Inventory of Neuro-cognitive Impairment (BINI) to help detect and monitor neurocognitive dysfunction in the context of drug treatment settings. To date, no study has examined the possible presence of BINI subgroups among OUD patients, which could enhance our ability to tailor intervention strategies to meet individual treatment needs. The purpose of this study was to conduct a latent profile analysis to identify BINI subgroups that differ in terms of their reported and objective neurocognitive dysfunction. We hypothesized that subgroups would emerge, suggesting the potential benefit of implementing tailored strategies for optimal treatment outcomes. METHODS Latent profile analyses included data from opioid-dependent patients (N = 177) enrolled in a methadone maintenance treatment program between July 2018 and October 2019. RESULTS We found three profiles of self-reported neurocognitive symptoms, including those with 1) minimal concerns 2) moderate concerns, and 3) many concerns across multiple domains. CONCLUSIONS If these results are confirmed, the BINI may be used to rapidly identify persons who require specific accommodation strategies to improve their drug treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Gunstad
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA
| | - David Disabato
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA
| | - Roman Shrestha
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Victoria Sanborn
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA
| | - Colleen B. Mistler
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
108
|
Faude S, Delgado MK, Perrone J, McFadden R, Xiong RA, O'Donnell N, Wood C, Solomon G, Lowenstein M. Variability in opioid use disorder clinical presentations and treatment in the emergency department: A mixed-methods study. Am J Emerg Med 2023; 66:53-60. [PMID: 36706482 PMCID: PMC10038883 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is strong evidence for emergency department (ED)-initiated treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). However, implementation is variable, and ED management of OUD may differ by clinical presentation. Our aim was to use mixed methods to explore variation in ED-based OUD care by patient clinical presentation and understand barriers and facilitators to ED implementation of OUD treatment across scenarios. METHODS We analyzed treatment outcomes in OUD-related visits within three urban, academic EDs from 12/2018 to 7/2020 following the implementation of interventions to increase ED-initiated OUD treatment. We assessed differences in treatment with medications for OUD (MOUDs) by clinical presentation (overdose, withdrawal, others). These data were integrated with results from 5 focus groups conducted with 28 ED physicians and nurses January to April 2020 to provide a richer understanding of clinician perspectives on caring for ED patients with OUD. RESULTS Of the 1339 total opioid-related visits, there were 265 (20%) visits for overdose, 123 (9%) for withdrawal, and 951 (71%) for other OUD-related conditions. 23% of patients received MOUDs during their visit or at discharge. Treatment with MOUDs was least common in overdose presentations (6%) and most common in withdrawal presentations (69%, p < 0.001). Buprenorphine was prescribed at discharge in 15% of visits, including 42% of withdrawal visits, 14% of other OUD-related visits, and 5% of overdose visits (p < 0.001). In focus groups, clinicians highlighted variation in ED presentations among patients with OUD. Clinicians also highlighted key aspects necessary for successful treatment initiation including perceived patient receptivity, provider confidence, and patient clinical readiness. CONCLUSIONS ED-based treatment of OUD differed by clinical presentation. Clinician focus groups identified several areas where targeted guidance or novel approaches may improve current practices. These results highlight the need for tailored clinical guidance and can inform health system and policy interventions seeking to increase ED-initiated treatment for OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Faude
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - M Kit Delgado
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Jeanmarie Perrone
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Rachel McFadden
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Ruiying Aria Xiong
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Nicole O'Donnell
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. Nicole.O'
| | - Christian Wood
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Gabrielle Solomon
- School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Margaret Lowenstein
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Molfenter T, Kim H, Kim JS, Kisicki A, Knudsen HK, Horst J, Brown R, Madden LM, Toy A, Haram E, Jacobson N. Enhancing Use of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Through External Coaching. Psychiatr Serv 2023; 74:265-271. [PMID: 36196533 PMCID: PMC10836327 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This randomized controlled trial tested whether external coaching influences addiction treatment providers' utilization of medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUDs). METHODS This study recruited 75 unique clinical sites in Florida, Ohio, and Wisconsin, including 61 sites in specialty treatment agencies and 14 behavioral health sites within health systems. The trial used external coaching to increase use of MOUDs in the context of a learning collaborative and compared it with no coaching and no learning collaborative (control condition). Outcome measures of MOUD capacity and utilization were monthly tabulations of licensed buprenorphine slots (i.e., the number of patients who could be treated based on the buprenorphine waiver limits of the site's providers), buprenorphine use, and injectable naltrexone administration. RESULTS The coaching and control arms showed no significant difference at baseline. Although buprenorphine slots increased in both arms during the 30-month trial, growth increased twice as fast at the coaching sites, compared with the control sites (average monthly rate of 6.1% vs. 3.0%, respectively, p<0.001). Buprenorphine use showed a similar pattern; the monthly growth rate in the coaching arm was more than twice the rate in the control arm (5.3% vs. 2.4%, p<0.001). Coaching did not have an impact on injectable naltrexone, which grew less than 1% in both arms over the trial period. CONCLUSIONS External coaching can increase organizational capacity for and growth of buprenorphine use. Future research should explore the dimensions of coaching practice, dose, and delivery modality to better understand and enhance the coaching function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd Molfenter
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| | - Hanna Kim
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| | - Jee-Seon Kim
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| | - Abby Kisicki
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| | - Hannah K Knudsen
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| | - Julie Horst
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| | - Randy Brown
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| | - Lynn M Madden
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| | - Alex Toy
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| | - Eric Haram
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| | - Nora Jacobson
- (Molfenter, Kisicki, Horst, Toy), Department of Educational Psychology (H. Kim, J.-S. Kim), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (Brown), Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing (Jacobson), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison; Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Knudsen); APT Foundation and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Madden); Haram Consulting, Bowdoinham, Maine (Haram)
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Thakrar AP, Uritsky TJ, Christopher C, Winston A, Ronning K, Sigueza AL, Caputo A, McFadden R, Olenik JM, Perrone J, Delgado MK, Lowenstein M, Compton P. Safety and preliminary outcomes of short-acting opioid agonist treatment (sOAT) for hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2023; 18:13. [PMID: 36829242 PMCID: PMC9951406 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-023-00368-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently leave the hospital as patient directed discharges (PDDs) because of untreated withdrawal and pain. Short-acting opioids can complement methadone, buprenorphine, and non-opioid adjuvants for withdrawal and pain, however little evidence exists for this approach. We described the safety and preliminary outcomes of short-acting opioid agonist treatment (sOAT) for hospitalized patients with OUD at an academic hospital in Philadelphia, PA. METHODS From August 2021 to March 2022, a pharmacist guided implementation of a pilot sOAT protocol consisting of escalating doses of oxycodone or oral hydromorphone scheduled every four hours, intravenous hydromorphone as needed, and non-opioid adjuvants for withdrawal and pain. All patients were encouraged to start methadone or buprenorphine treatment for OUD. We abstracted data from the electronic health record into a secure platform. The primary outcome was safety: administration of naloxone, over-sedation, or a fall. Secondary outcomes were PDDs and respective length of stay (LOS), discharges on methadone or buprenorphine, and discharges with naloxone. We compared secondary outcomes to hospitalizations in the 12 months prior to the index hospitalization among the same cohort. RESULTS Of the 23 cases, 13 (56.5%) were female, 19 (82.6%) were 40 years or younger, and 22 (95.7%) identified as White. Twenty-one (91.3%) regularly injected opioids and four (17.3%) were enrolled in methadone or buprenorphine prior to hospitalization. sOAT was administered at median doses of 200-320 morphine milligram equivalents per 24-h period. Naloxone administration was documented once in the operating room, over-sedation was documented once after unsanctioned opioid use, and there were no falls. The PDD rate was 44% with median LOS 5 days (compared to PDD rate 69% with median LOS 3 days for prior admissions), 65% of sOAT cases were discharged on buprenorphine or methadone (compared to 33% for prior admissions), and 65% of sOAT cases were discharged with naloxone (compared to 19% for prior admissions). CONCLUSIONS Pilot implementation of sOAT was safe. Compared to prior admissions in the same cohort, the PDD rate was lower, LOS for PDDs was longer, and more patients were discharged on buprenorphine or methadone and with naloxone, however efficacy for these secondary outcomes remains to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish P Thakrar
- National Clinician Scholars Program at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
- Center for Addiction Medicine & Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
| | - Tanya J Uritsky
- Center for Addiction Medicine & Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Cara Christopher
- Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Anna Winston
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Kaitlin Ronning
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Anna Lee Sigueza
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Anne Caputo
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Rachel McFadden
- Center for Addiction Medicine & Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Jennifer M Olenik
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Jeanmarie Perrone
- Center for Addiction Medicine & Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - M Kit Delgado
- Center for Addiction Medicine & Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Margaret Lowenstein
- Center for Addiction Medicine & Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Peggy Compton
- Center for Addiction Medicine & Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Childers R, Castillo EM, Cronin AO, Swee S, Lasoff D. Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine Treatment in a Population with a High Rate of Homelessness: An Observational Study. J Emerg Med 2023; 64:129-135. [PMID: 36806434 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Buprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid use disorders. A previous randomized trial comparing emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine to standard care showed dramatic improvement in follow-up. This is encouraging, but must be replicated to understand the generalizability of buprenorphine treatment. OBJECTIVES Evaluate the efficacy of an ED-initiated buprenorphine protocol similar to a previous randomized trial in a different population. METHODS This ED-based descriptive study described the results of a project implementing an opioid use disorder treatment protocol that included buprenorphine. Patients with opioid use disorder were offered treatment with buprenorphine, a buprenorphine prescription whenever possible, and a follow-up visit to a clinic providing addiction treatment. The primary outcome was engagement in formal addiction treatment 30 days after the index visit. RESULTS Of the 210 patients who accepted referral for outpatient medication-assisted treatment, 95 (45.2%) achieved the primary outcome. Two-thirds of these patients received a buprenorphine prescription at discharge; 40% were homeless. A regression analysis revealed one statistically significant predictor of the primary outcome: patients who were housed were 2.49 times more likely to engage in opioid use disorder treatment than patients who were homeless (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In this descriptive study of an ED-initiated buprenorphine protocol, follow-up was less than that reported in a previous randomized controlled trial. Two important differences between our study and the randomized trial are the high rate of homelessness and the fact that not every patient received a prescription for buprenorphine. The efficacy of ED-initiated treatment may depend on certain population characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Childers
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Edward M Castillo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Alexandrea O Cronin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Steven Swee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Daniel Lasoff
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Nong T, Hodgkin D, Trang NT, Shoptaw SJ, Li MJ, Hai Van HT, Le G. A review of factors associated with methadone maintenance treatment adherence and retention in Vietnam. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 243:109699. [PMID: 36603363 PMCID: PMC9851667 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Starting in 2008, Vietnam's national MMT program expanded quickly, but it is struggling with increasing attrition rates and poor adherence among patients. Several studies have reported on MMT retention and adherence, but no overview has yet been published. The objective of this study is to fill that gap and to review factors associated with retention and adherence in MMT in Vietnam. METHODS A systematic search was conducted using databases of literature - Pubmed, Cochrane, Scopus, Academic search premiere, and SoINDEX. Peer-reviewed empirical studies with full text in English discussing retention attrition and adherence regarding MMT in Vietnam were selected. The results were synthesized using qualitative methods. RESULTS Adherence and retention rates varied among the 11 included studies. In general, patients in mountainous provinces had lower adherence and retention rates than those in big cities. Retention rates decreased with the studies' follow-up period and had a downward trend over time. Factors associated with adherence and retention can be classified into three groups: individual, community, and institutional factors. Important individual factors areage, education, awareness of MMT and HIV, and co-occurring disorders and comorbidities. Stigma is the major community risk factor, and methadone daily dose, the distance between home and clinic, and clinic's service hours are the three most important institutional factors. CONCLUSIONS The literature reviewed identifies important factors associated with MMT adherence and retention in Vietnam. The findings suggest further research exploring both subjective and objective factors and more policies to remove social and structural barriers to enhance treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuong Nong
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South St, Waltham, MA 02453, the United States of America.
| | - Dominic Hodgkin
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South St, Waltham, MA 02453, the United States of America
| | - Nguyen Thu Trang
- Center for Training and Research on Substance Abuse and HIV, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Steven J Shoptaw
- Center for Behavioral and Addiction Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, the United States of America
| | - Michael J Li
- Center for Behavioral and Addiction Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, the United States of America
| | | | - Giang Le
- Center for Training and Research on Substance Abuse and HIV, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Chen Z, Tang X, Xu C, Wang C, Ling L. Exploring factors jointly associated with recurrent relapse and dropout of methadone maintenance treatment clients in Guangdong, China: A retrospective cohort study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 243:109739. [PMID: 36535097 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clients receiving methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) may experience multiple relapses, which may lead to dropout. However, previous studies mostly only explored the influencing factors of relapse or dropout separately. In this study, we investigated the influencing factors jointly associated with both recurrent relapse and dropout. METHODS This study was conducted in 16 MMT clinics in Guangdong, China. Data on the clients' demographic characteristics; drug-related behavior; HIV, HCV, and urine morphine test results; and daily methadone doses were collected. The outcomes were time to recurrent relapse and time to dropout. A joint frailty model was used to explore factors jointly associated with recurrent relapse and dropout. The hazard ratios (HRs) of the covariates in the multivariable model were adjusted, with HR > 1 indicating a faster time to recurrent relapse and dropout. RESULTS Among 1539 clients, 39.5% had ≥ 2 relapse events, and 90.8% of the clients dropped out. A high attendance rate was protective for recurrent relapse (HR50-80%=0.63, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.79; HR>80%=0.35, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.44) and dropout (HR50-80%=0.56, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.68; HR>80%=0.27, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.33). Being married (HR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.96), having a fair relationship with family (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.93) and drug injection (HR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.96) were also protective for recurrent relapse. Female (HR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.82) and a high methadone dose (≥60 ml/day; HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.96) were protective for dropout, and a longer traveling time to the clinic (>60 min; HR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.10) was associated with an increased risk of dropout. CONCLUSIONS It is common for clients to experience recurrent relapse and dropout. The findings suggest that MMT clinics should provide holistic interventions and appropriate methadone doses for clients to improve treatment compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zouxiang Chen
- Department of Medical Statistics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120 , PR China
| | - Xijia Tang
- Department of Medical Statistics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120 , PR China
| | - Chaofan Xu
- Department of Medical Statistics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120 , PR China
| | - Chijie Wang
- Department of Medical Statistics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120 , PR China
| | - Li Ling
- Department of Medical Statistics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120 , PR China; Clinical Research Design Division, Clinical Research Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Affiliation(s)
- Traci C Green
- COBRE on Opioids and Overdose at Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Rachel Serafinski
- COBRE on Opioids and Overdose at Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Seth A Clark
- COBRE on Opioids and Overdose at Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Josiah D Rich
- COBRE on Opioids and Overdose at Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | | |
Collapse
|
115
|
Rossom RC, Crain AL, O'Connor PJ, Wright E, Haller IV, Hooker SA, Sperl-Hillen JM, Olson A, Romagnoli K, Solberg L, Dehmer SP, Haapala J, Borgert-Spaniol C, Tusing L, Muegge J, Allen C, Ekstrom H, Huntley K, McCormack J, Bart G. Design of a pragmatic clinical trial to improve screening and treatment for opioid use disorder in primary care. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 124:107012. [PMID: 36402275 PMCID: PMC9839646 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-related deaths continue to rise in the U.S. A shared decision-making (SDM) system to help primary care clinicians (PCCs) identify and treat patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) could help address this crisis. METHODS In this cluster-randomized trial, primary care clinics in three healthcare systems were randomized to receive or not receive access to an OUD-SDM system. The OUD-SDM system alerts PCCs and patients to elevated risk of OUD and supports OUD screening and treatment. It includes guidance on OUD screening and diagnosis, treatment selection, starting and maintaining patients on buprenorphine for waivered clinicians, and screening for common comorbid conditions. The primary study outcome is, of patients at high risk for OUD, the percentage receiving an OUD diagnosis within 30 days of index visit. Additional outcomes are, of patients at high risk for or with a diagnosis of OUD, (a) the percentage receiving a naloxone prescription, or (b) the percentage receiving a medication for OUD (MOUD) prescription or referral to specialty care within 30 days of an index visit, and (c) total days covered by a MOUD prescription within 90 days of an index visit. RESULTS The intervention started in April 2021 and continues through December 2023. PCCs and patients in 90 clinics are included; study results are expected in 2024. CONCLUSION This protocol paper describes the design of a multi-site trial to help PCCs recognize and treat OUD. If effective, this OUD-SDM intervention could improve screening of at-risk patients and rates of OUD treatment for people with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca C Rossom
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - A Lauren Crain
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - Patrick J O'Connor
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - Eric Wright
- Geisinger Health, 100 North Academy Ave., Danville, PA 17822, United States of America.
| | - Irina V Haller
- Essentia Institute of Rural Health, 502 E 2nd St, Duluth, MN 55805, United States of America.
| | - Stephanie A Hooker
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - Anthony Olson
- Essentia Institute of Rural Health, 502 E 2nd St, Duluth, MN 55805, United States of America.
| | - Katrina Romagnoli
- Geisinger Health, 100 North Academy Ave., Danville, PA 17822, United States of America.
| | - Leif Solberg
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - Steven P Dehmer
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - Jacob Haapala
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - Caitlin Borgert-Spaniol
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - Lorraine Tusing
- Geisinger Health, 100 North Academy Ave., Danville, PA 17822, United States of America.
| | - Jule Muegge
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - Clayton Allen
- Essentia Institute of Rural Health, 502 E 2nd St, Duluth, MN 55805, United States of America.
| | - Heidi Ekstrom
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, United States of America.
| | - Kristen Huntley
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, Center for the Clinical Trials Network, 16071 Industrial Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, United States of America.
| | - Jennifer McCormack
- The Emmes Company, 401 N Washington St # 700, Rockville, MD 20850, United States of America.
| | - Gavin Bart
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, 825 8th St S, Minneapolis, MN 55404, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Carter M, Boyd J, Bennett T, Baus A. Medication Assisted Treatment Program Policies: Opinions of People in Treatment. J Prim Care Community Health 2023; 14:21501319231195606. [PMID: 37635696 PMCID: PMC10467182 DOI: 10.1177/21501319231195606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medication assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder (OUD) saves lives and enhances quality of life for people in recovery. However, only a small percentage of people eligible for MAT in the United States receive treatment, and among those who do seek treatment, retention is a challenge. This study aims to understand factors that help individuals enter and stay in MAT from the perspective of those in recovery. The patient perspective is vital in efforts to improve care delivery and best support individuals in treatment. METHODS Survey development was driven by a review of current peer-reviewed literature plus information gained through 3 semi-structured interviews and follow-up discussions with 5 individuals who have lived experience in MAT, termed Participant Advisors. Survey questions focused in part on MAT participants' opinions relating to program policies such as drug testing, relapse protocols, duration of treatment, participant use of anti-anxiety medications and marijuana, and requirements for attendance in peer recovery groups such as Narcotics Anonymous and Alcoholics Anonymous. Responses were collected from West Virginia-based MAT programs from February through August 2021, with 1700 surveys distributed to 21 MAT programs. RESULTS At the close of data collection, 225 survey responses, including over 500 free-text comments, were received (13.2% response rate). Most (n = 207, 95%) were currently in a MAT program and most (n = 187, 88.6%) reported using buprenorphine/naloxone for MAT, though participants reported having used other medications for treatment of OUD as well. Questions about how long a person should have MAT prescribed, how long they should be able to stay in treatment, whether they can use marijuana or anti-anxiety drugs while in treatment, and whether they should use a 12-step program generated mixed opinions. Findings strongly support consideration of individual situations and shared decision-making with providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Carter
- West Virginia Alliance for Creative Health Solutions, Inc, Culloden, WV, USA
| | - Jennifer Boyd
- West Virginia Alliance for Creative Health Solutions, Inc, Culloden, WV, USA
| | - Trey Bennett
- West Virginia Alliance for Creative Health Solutions, Inc, Culloden, WV, USA
| | - Adam Baus
- West Virginia Alliance for Creative Health Solutions, Inc, Culloden, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Hassan AN, Bozinoff N, Jutras-Aswad D, Socias ME, Stewart SH, Lim R, Le Foll B. Patient Satisfaction With Standard Methadone and Flexible Buprenorphine/Naloxone Models of Care: Results From a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Addict Med 2023; 17:e49-e56. [PMID: 35916430 PMCID: PMC9984203 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient satisfaction is a critical measure of quality of care across health disciplines because it may affect clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine longitudinal patient satisfaction in individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) randomized to receive either standard methadone or flexible buprenorphine/naloxone models of care, its predictors, and association with dropout/illicit drug use. METHODS This study assessed patient satisfaction, using the 8-item version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), as a secondary outcome of a large phase IV pragmatic randomized controlled trial (OPTIMA). The effectiveness of standard methadone model of care was compared with flexible take-home buprenorphine/naloxone dispensation model of care in patients with prescription-type OUD. Of 272 participants recruited and followed up for 24 weeks, 183 were eligible for this study. RESULTS Throughout the study, patients were "satisfied" with their treatment. The average CSQ score was not significantly different between weeks 4, 12, and 24 in the total sample (χ 2 = 0.35; P = 0.84). There was no significant difference in CSQ based on treatment assignment (methadone vs flexible buprenorphine/naloxone) either overall ( z = 0.87; P = 0.38) or over time (χ 2 = 0.65; P = 0.72). High levels of depression at baseline and decreased depressive symptoms over the follow-up period predicted positive changes in patient satisfaction ( P = 0.03 and P = <0.01, respectively). Satisfaction was significantly associated with treatment retention but not illicit drug use. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that patients with OUD on either standard methadone or flexible buprenorphine were generally satisfied with their treatment, with no difference in patient satisfaction based on treatment allocation. Given the ongoing opioid crisis, strategies to improve patient satisfaction should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed N Hassan
- From the Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (ANH, NB, BLF); Department of Psychiatry, King AbdulAziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (ANH); Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (ANH, BLF); Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (ANH, BLF); Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (ANH, BLF); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (NB, BLF); Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (DJ-A); Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (DJ-A); British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (MES); Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (MES); Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (SHS); Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Life Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (SHS); Department of Medicine and Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (RL); Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, Ontario, Canada (BLF)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
118
|
Quaye A, Silvia K, Richard J, Ibrahim Y, Craig WY, Rosen C. A prospective, randomized trial of the effect of buprenorphine continuation versus dose reduction on pain control and post-operative opioid use. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e32309. [PMID: 36595741 PMCID: PMC9794322 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An increasing number of individuals are taking buprenorphine for management of opioid use disorder (OUD). Pain control can be challenging when these patients develop acute pain requiring supplemental analgesia. Buprenorphine's pharmacokinetic profile can render supplemental opioid-based analgesia ineffective. There is limited guidance on the optimal management of buprenorphine when acute pain is anticipated. Although there is growing acceptance that the risk of OUD relapse with buprenorphine discontinuation overshadows the risks of increased opioid utilization and difficult pain control with buprenorphine continuation, perioperative courses comparing buprenorphine dose reduction and full dose buprenorphine continuation have yet to be investigated. Here, we describe the protocol for our randomized controlled, prospective trial investigating the effect of buprenorphine continuation compared to buprenorphine dose reduction on pain control, post-operative opioid use, and OUD symptom management in patients on buprenorphine scheduled for elective surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a single institution, randomized trial that aims to enroll 80 adults using 12 mg buprenorphine or greater for treatment of OUD, scheduled for elective surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive 8mg of buprenorphine on the day of surgery onwards until postsurgical pain subsides or to have their buprenorphine formulation continued at full dose perioperatively. Primary outcome will be a clinically significant difference in pain scores 24 hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes will be opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively, opioid dispensing up to 30 days following surgery, changes in mood and withdrawal symptoms, opioid cravings, relapse of opioid misuse, and continued use of buprenorphine treatment postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurora Quaye
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
- Spectrum Healthcare Partners, South Portland, ME
- * Correspondence: Aurora Quaye, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall St, Portland, ME 04102 (e-mail: )
| | - Kristen Silvia
- Division of Addiction Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | - Janelle Richard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | - Yussr Ibrahim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
119
|
Warren D, Marashi A, Siddiqui A, Eijaz AA, Pradhan P, Lim D, Call G, Dras M. Using machine learning to study the effect of medication adherence in Opioid Use Disorder. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278988. [PMID: 36520864 PMCID: PMC9754174 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) and opioid overdose (OD) impose huge social and economic burdens on society and health care systems. Research suggests that Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) is effective in the treatment of OUD. We use machine learning to investigate the association between patient's adherence to prescribed MOUD along with other risk factors in patients diagnosed with OUD and potential OD following the treatment. METHODS We used longitudinal Medicaid claims for two selected US states to subset a total of 26,685 patients with OUD diagnosis and appropriate Medicaid coverage between 2015 and 2018. We considered patient age, sex, region level socio-economic data, past comorbidities, MOUD prescription type and other selected prescribed medications along with the Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) as a proxy for adherence to MOUD as predictive variables for our model, and overdose events as the dependent variable. We applied four different machine learning classifiers and compared their performance, focusing on the importance and effect of PDC as a variable. We also calculated results based on risk stratification, where our models separate high risk individuals from low risk, to assess usefulness in clinical decision-making. RESULTS Among the selected classifiers, the XGBoost classifier has the highest AUC (0.77) closely followed by the Logistic Regression (LR). The LR has the best stratification result: patients in the top 10% of risk scores account for 35.37% of overdose events over the next 12 month observation period. PDC score calculated over the treatment window is one of the most important features, with better PDC lowering risk of OD, as expected. In terms of risk stratification results, of the 35.37% of overdose events that the predictive model could detect within the top 10% of risk scores, 72.3% of these cases were non-adherent in terms of their medication (PDC <0.8). Targeting the top 10% outcome of the predictive model could decrease the total number of OD events by 10.4%. CONCLUSIONS The best performing models allow identification of, and focus on, those at high risk of opioid overdose. With MOUD being included for the first time as a factor of interest, and being identified as a significant factor, outreach activities related to MOUD can be targeted at those at highest risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amir Marashi
- Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Pooja Pradhan
- Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
| | - David Lim
- Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
| | - Gary Call
- Gainwell Technologies, Tysons, VA, United States of America
| | - Mark Dras
- Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Krawczyk N, Rivera BD, Jent V, Keyes KM, Jones CM, Cerdá M. Has the treatment gap for opioid use disorder narrowed in the U.S.?: A yearly assessment from 2010 to 2019". Int J Drug Policy 2022; 110:103786. [PMID: 35934583 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The United States overdose crisis continues unabated. Despite efforts to increase capacity for treating opioid use disorder (OUD) in the U.S., how actual treatment receipt compares to need remains unclear. In this cross-sectional study, we estimate progress in addressing the gap between OUD prevalence and OUD treatment receipt at the national and state levels from 2010 to 2019. METHODS We estimated past-year OUD prevalence rates based on the U.S. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), using adjustment methods that attempt to account for OUD underestimation in national household surveys. We used data from specialty substance use treatment records and outpatient pharmacy claims to estimate the gap between OUD prevalence and number of persons receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during the past decade. RESULTS Adjusted estimates suggest past-year OUD affected 7,631,804 individuals in the U.S. in (2,773 per 100,000 adults 12+), relative to only 1,023,959 individuals who received MOUD (365 per 100,000 adults 12+). This implies approximately 86.6% of individuals with OUD nationwide who may benefit from MOUD treatment do not receive it. MOUD receipt increased across states over the past decade, but most regions still experience wide gaps between OUD prevalence and MOUD receipt. CONCLUSIONS Despite some progress in expanding access to MOUD, a substantial gap between OUD prevalence and treatment receipt highlights the critical need to increase access to evidence-based services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Krawczyk
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Bianca D Rivera
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Victoria Jent
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Katherine M Keyes
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, United States
| | - Christopher M Jones
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Magdalena Cerdá
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Burns M, Tang L, Chang CCH, Kim JY, Ahrens K, Allen L, Cunningham P, Gordon AJ, Jarlenski MP, Lanier P, Mauk R, McDuffie MJ, Mohamoud S, Talbert J, Zivin K, Donohue J. Duration of medication treatment for opioid-use disorder and risk of overdose among Medicaid enrollees in 11 states: a retrospective cohort study. Addiction 2022; 117:3079-3088. [PMID: 35652681 PMCID: PMC10683938 DOI: 10.1111/add.15959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduces harms associated with opioid use disorder (OUD), including risk of overdose. Understanding how variation in MOUD duration influences overdose risk is important as health-care payers increasingly remove barriers to treatment continuation (e.g. prior authorization). This study measured the association between MOUD continuation, relative to discontinuation, and opioid-related overdose among Medicaid beneficiaries. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using landmark survival analysis. We estimated the association between treatment continuation and overdose risk at 5 points after the index, or first, MOUD claim. Censoring events included death and disenrollment. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Medicaid programs in 11 US states: Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin. A total of 293 180 Medicaid beneficiaries aged 18-64 years with a diagnosis of OUD and had a first MOUD claim between 2016 and 2017. MEASUREMENTS MOUD formulations included methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone. We measured medically treated opioid-related overdose within claims within 12 months of the index MOUD claim. FINDINGS Results were consistent across states. In pooled results, 5.1% of beneficiaries had an overdose, and 67% discontinued MOUD before an overdose or censoring event within 12 months. Beneficiaries who continued MOUD beyond 60 days had a lower relative overdose hazard ratio (HR) compared with those who discontinued by day 60 [HR = 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.36-0.42; P < 0.0001]. MOUD continuation was associated with lower overdose risk at 120 days (HR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.31-0.37; P < 0.0001), 180 days (HR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.29-0.34; P < 0.0001), 240 days (HR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.26-0.31; P < 0.0001) and 300 days (HR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.24-0.32; P < 0.0001). The hazard of overdose was 10% lower with each additional 60 days of MOUD (95% CI = 0.88-0.92; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Continuation of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in US Medicaid beneficiaries was associated with a substantial reduction in overdose risk up to 12 months after the first claim for MOUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite Burns
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Lu Tang
- Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Chung-Chou H. Chang
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Joo Yeon Kim
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Katherine Ahrens
- Public Health Program, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME
| | - Lindsay Allen
- Health Policy, Management, and Leadership Department, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| | - Peter Cunningham
- Health Behavior and Policy Department, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Adam J. Gordon
- Department of Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Marian P. Jarlenski
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Paul Lanier
- School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Rachel Mauk
- Government Resource Center, Ohio Colleges of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Mary Joan McDuffie
- Center for Community Research & Service, Biden School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
| | - Shamis Mohamoud
- The Hilltop Institute, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jeffery Talbert
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Kara Zivin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Julie Donohue
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Suarez EA, Huybrechts KF, Straub L, Hernández-Díaz S, Jones HE, Connery HS, Davis JM, Gray KJ, Lester B, Terplan M, Mogun H, Bateman BT. Buprenorphine versus Methadone for Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:2033-2044. [PMID: 36449419 PMCID: PMC9873239 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2203318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid agonist therapy is strongly recommended for pregnant persons with opioid use disorder. Buprenorphine may be associated with more favorable neonatal and maternal outcomes than methadone, but existing data are limited. METHODS We conducted a cohort study involving pregnant persons who were enrolled in public insurance programs in the United States during the period from 2000 through 2018 in which we examined outcomes among those who received buprenorphine as compared with those who received methadone. Exposure to the two medications was assessed in early pregnancy (through gestational week 19), late pregnancy (gestational week 20 through the day before delivery), and the 30 days before delivery. Risk ratios for neonatal and maternal outcomes were adjusted for confounders with the use of propensity-score overlap weights. RESULTS The data source for the study consisted of 2,548,372 pregnancies that ended in live births. In early pregnancy, 10,704 pregnant persons were exposed to buprenorphine and 4387 to methadone. In late pregnancy, 11,272 were exposed to buprenorphine and 5056 to methadone (9976 and 4597, respectively, in the 30 days before delivery). Neonatal abstinence syndrome occurred in 52.0% of the infants who were exposed to buprenorphine in the 30 days before delivery as compared with 69.2% of those exposed to methadone (adjusted relative risk, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 0.75). Preterm birth occurred in 14.4% of infants exposed to buprenorphine in early pregnancy and in 24.9% of those exposed to methadone (adjusted relative risk, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.62); small size for gestational age in 12.1% and 15.3%, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.80); and low birth weight in 8.3% and 14.9% (adjusted relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.63). Delivery by cesarean section occurred in 33.6% of pregnant persons exposed to buprenorphine in early pregnancy and 33.1% of those exposed to methadone (adjusted relative risk, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.08), and severe maternal complications developed in 3.3% and 3.5%, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.13). Results of exposure in late pregnancy were consistent with results of exposure in early pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS The use of buprenorphine in pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of adverse neonatal outcomes than methadone use; however, the risk of adverse maternal outcomes was similar among persons who received buprenorphine and those who received methadone. (Funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Suarez
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Krista F Huybrechts
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Loreen Straub
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Sonia Hernández-Díaz
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Hendrée E Jones
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Hilary S Connery
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Jonathan M Davis
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Kathryn J Gray
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Barry Lester
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Mishka Terplan
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Helen Mogun
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| | - Brian T Bateman
- From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine (E.A.S., K.F.H., L.S., H.M.), and the Department of Psychiatry (H.S.C.), Harvard Medical School, the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (S.H.-D.), and the Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (J.M.D.), Boston, and the Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont (H.S.C.) - all in Massachusetts; UNC Horizons and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (H.E.J.); the Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women and Infants Hospital - both in Providence, RI (B.L.); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore (M.T.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (B.T.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Berro LF, Zamarripa CA, Talley JT, Freeman KB, Rowlett JK. Effects of methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone on actigraphy-based sleep-like parameters in male rhesus monkeys. Addict Behav 2022; 135:107433. [PMID: 35901553 PMCID: PMC9495253 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Opioid use disorder (OUD) has been associated with the emergence of sleep disturbances. Although effective treatments for OUD exist, evidence suggests that these treatments also may be associated with sleep impairment. The extent to which these effects are an effect of OUD treatment or a result of chronic opioid use remains unknown. We investigated the acute effects of methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone on actigraphy-based sleep-like parameters in non-opioid-dependent male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta, n = 5). Subjects were fitted with actigraphy monitors attached to primate collars to measure sleep-like parameters. Actigraphy recordings were conducted under baseline conditions, or following acute injections of vehicle, methadone (0.03-1.0 mg/kg, i.m.), buprenorphine (0.01-1.0 mg/kg, i.m.), or naltrexone (0.03-1.0 mg/kg, i.m.) in the morning (4 h after "lights on") or in the evening (1.5 h before "lights off"). Morning and evening treatments with methadone or buprenorphine significantly increased sleep latency and decreased sleep efficiency. The effects of buprenorphine on sleep-like measures resulted in a biphasic dose-response function, with the highest doses not disrupting actigraphy-based sleep. Buprenorphine induced a much more robust increase in sleep latency and decrease in sleep efficiency compared to methadone, particularly with evening administration, and detrimental effects of buprenorphine on sleep-like measures were observed up to 25.5 h after drug injection. Treatment with naltrexone, on the other hand, significantly improved sleep-like measures, with evening treatments improving both sleep latency and sleep efficiency. The currently available pharmacotherapies for OUD significantly alter sleep-like parameters in non-opioid-dependent monkeys, and opioid-dependent mechanisms may play a significant role in sleep-wake regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lais F Berro
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
| | - C Austin Zamarripa
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Joseph T Talley
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Kevin B Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - James K Rowlett
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Kelley AT, Incze MA, Baylis JD, Calder SG, Weiner SJ, Zickmund SL, Jones AL, Vanneman ME, Conroy MB, Gordon AJ, Bridges JF. Patient-centered quality measurement for opioid use disorder: Development of a taxonomy to address gaps in research and practice. Subst Abus 2022; 43:1286-1299. [PMID: 35849749 PMCID: PMC9703846 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2022.2095082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: Evidence-based treatment is provided infrequently and inconsistently to patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Treatment guidelines call for high-quality, patient-centered care that meets individual preferences and needs, but it is unclear whether current quality measures address individualized aspects of care and whether measures of patient-centered OUD care are supported by evidence. Methods: We conducted an environmental scan of OUD care quality to (1) evaluate patient-centeredness in current OUD quality measures endorsed by national agencies and in national OUD treatment guidelines; and (2) review literature evidence for patient-centered care in OUD diagnosis and management, including gaps in current guidelines, performance data, and quality measures. We then synthesized these findings to develop a new quality measurement taxonomy that incorporates patient-centered aspects of care and identifies priority areas for future research and quality measure development. Results: Across 31 endorsed OUD quality measures, only two measures of patient experience incorporated patient preferences and needs, while national guidelines emphasized providing patient-centered care. Among 689 articles reviewed, evidence varied for practices of patient-centered care. Many practices were supported by guidelines and substantial evidence, while others lacked evidence despite guideline support. Our synthesis of findings resulted in EQuIITable Care, a taxonomy comprised of six classifications: (1) patient Experience and engagement, (2) Quality of life; (3) Identification of patient risks; (4) Interventions to mitigate patient risks; (5) Treatment; and (6) Care coordination and navigation. Conclusions: Current quality measurement for OUD lacks patient-centeredness. EQuIITable Care for OUD provides a roadmap to develop measures of patient-centered care for OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Taylor Kelley
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Vulnerable Veteran Innovative Patient-aligned Care Team (VIP), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Michael A. Incze
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jacob D. Baylis
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Vulnerable Veteran Innovative Patient-aligned Care Team (VIP), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Spencer G. Calder
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Vulnerable Veteran Innovative Patient-aligned Care Team (VIP), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Saul J. Weiner
- Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Jesse Brown VA Chicago Health Care System, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Division of Academic Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, The University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Susan L. Zickmund
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Audrey L. Jones
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Vulnerable Veteran Innovative Patient-aligned Care Team (VIP), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Megan E. Vanneman
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of Health System Innovation and Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Molly B. Conroy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Adam J. Gordon
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Vulnerable Veteran Innovative Patient-aligned Care Team (VIP), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - John F.P. Bridges
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Bazazi AR, Culbert GJ, Wegman MP, Heimer R, Kamarulzaman A, Altice FL. Impact of prerelease methadone on mortality among people with HIV and opioid use disorder after prison release: results from a randomized and participant choice open-label trial in Malaysia. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:837. [PMID: 36368939 PMCID: PMC9652918 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07804-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mortality is elevated after prison release and may be higher in people with HIV and opioid use disorder (OUD). Maintenance with opioid agonist therapy (OAT) like methadone or buprenorphine reduces mortality in people with OUD and may confer benefits to people with OUD and HIV leaving prison. Survival benefits of OAT, however, have not been evaluated prospectively in people with OUD and HIV leaving prison. METHODS This study prospectively evaluated mortality after prison release and whether methadone initiated before release increased survival after release in a sample of men with HIV and OUD (n = 291). We linked national death records to data from a controlled trial of prerelease methadone initiation conducted from 2010 to 2014 with men with HIV and OUD imprisoned in Malaysia. Vital statistics were collected through 2015. Allocation to prerelease methadone was by randomization (n = 64) and participant choice (n = 246). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate treatment effects of prerelease methadone on postrelease survival. RESULTS Overall, 62 deaths occurred over 872.5 person-years (PY) of postrelease follow-up, a crude mortality rate of 71.1 deaths per 1000 PY (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.5-89.4). Most deaths were of infectious etiology, mostly related to HIV. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, the impact of prerelease methadone on postrelease mortality was consistent with a null effect in unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.6-3.1) and covariate-adjusted (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.5-2.8) models. Predictors of mortality were educational level (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.8), pre-incarceration alcohol use (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.9), and lower CD4+ T-lymphocyte count (HR 0.8 per 100-cell/mL increase, 95% CI 0.7-1.0). CONCLUSIONS Postrelease mortality in this sample of men with HIV and OUD was extraordinarily high, and most deaths were likely of infectious etiology. No effect of prerelease methadone on postrelease mortality was observed, which may be due to study limitations or an epidemiological context in which inadequately treated HIV, and not inadequately treated OUD, is the main cause of death after prison release. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02396979. Retrospectively registered 24/03/2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander R. Bazazi
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, Yale School of Medicine, 135 College Street, Suite 323, New Haven, CT 06510-228 USA
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT USA
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Gabriel J. Culbert
- grid.185648.60000 0001 2175 0319Population Health Nursing Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Martin P. Wegman
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, Yale School of Medicine, 135 College Street, Suite 323, New Haven, CT 06510-228 USA
| | - Robert Heimer
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Adeeba Kamarulzaman
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, Yale School of Medicine, 135 College Street, Suite 323, New Haven, CT 06510-228 USA
- grid.10347.310000 0001 2308 5949Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Excellence for Research in AIDS (CERiA), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Frederick L. Altice
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, Yale School of Medicine, 135 College Street, Suite 323, New Haven, CT 06510-228 USA
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT USA
- grid.10347.310000 0001 2308 5949Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Excellence for Research in AIDS (CERiA), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Pedersen MH, Danø A, Gibbons C, Jensen R. Administration and patient-incurred costs associated with opioid agonist treatment in Norway. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38:1959-1965. [PMID: 36172758 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2129230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Opioid use disorder is associated with high rates of mortality and has become an escalating global health issue. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) with oral methadone or daily sublingual buprenorphine hydrochloride, either administered separately or in combination with naloxone hydrochloride (SL-BPN, SL-BPN/NX), is supervised by a healthcare professional experienced in treating opioid use disorder to ensure proper dosing and prevent misuse. For that reason, there may be substantial direct and indirect costs associated with OAT. Recently, weekly and monthly subcutaneous depot formulations of buprenorphine (SC-BPN) have been approved. This study aimed to estimate management and patient-incurred costs associated with the most commonly used OATs compared to the cost of weekly and monthly SC-BPN. METHODS We conducted a cost-minimisation analysis comparing the monthly costs of OAT treatment with oral formulations, i.e. oral methadone, SL-BPN, SL-BPN/NX and SC-BPN. The analysis assessed treatment acquisition costs and costs associated with management, supervision and administration of therapy, patients' transportation costs and the indirect costs associated with patients' time-use. The model was set up to reflect the Norwegian medically assisted rehabilitation system and considered the costs of a stable maintenance OAT regimen given continuously to patients already initiated and titrated on the therapy. RESULTS OAT management with monthly formulation of SC-BPN was associated with a reduction in monthly costs of €605, €586, and €411 per month compared to SL-BPN, SL-BPN/NX and oral methadone, respectively. Similar results were estimated when comparing to the weekly formulation of SC-BPN. CONCLUSION The analysis showed that the monthly formulation of SC-BPN was the cost-minimising alternative, followed by the weekly formulation, when considering all cost components.
Collapse
|
127
|
David AR, Sian CR, Gebel CM, Linas BP, Samet JH, Sprague Martinez LS, Muroff J, Bernstein JA, Assoumou SA. Barriers to accessing treatment for substance use after inpatient managed withdrawal (Detox): A qualitative study. J Subst Abuse Treat 2022; 142:108870. [PMID: 36084559 PMCID: PMC10084712 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Access to and uptake of evidence-based treatment for substance use disorder, specifically opioid use disorder (OUD), are limited despite the high death toll from drug overdose in the United States in recent years. Patient perceived barriers to evidence-based treatment after completion of short-term inpatient medically managed withdrawal programs (detox) have not been well studied. The purpose of the current study is to elicit patients' perspectives on challenges to transition to treatment, including medications for OUD (MOUD), after detox and potential solutions. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews (N = 24) at a detox center (2018-2019) to explore patients' perspectives on obstacles to treatment. The study managed the data in NVivo and we used content analysis to identify themes. RESULTS Patients' characteristics included the following: 54 % male; mean age 37 years; self-identified as White 67 %, Black 13 %, Latinx 8 %, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 4 %, and other 8 %; heroin use in the past 3 months 67 %; and ever injecting drugs 71 %. Patients identified the following barriers: 1) lack of continuity of care; 2) limited number of detox and residential treatment program beds; 3) unstable housing; and 4) lack of options when choosing a treatment pathway. Solutions proposed by participants included: 1) increase low-barrier access to community MOUD; 2) add case managers at the detox center to establish continuity of care after discharge; 3) increase assistance with housing; and 4) encourage patient participation in treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS Patients identified lack of continuity of care, especially care coordination, as a major barrier to substance use treatment. Increasing treatment utilization, including MOUD, necessitates a multimodal approach to continuity of care, low-barrier access to MOUD, and support to address unstable housing. Patients want care that incorporates options and respect for. individualized preferences and needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison R David
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 72 East Concord Street, Evans 124, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America.
| | - Carlos R Sian
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave., Crosstown Center, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America.
| | - Christina M Gebel
- Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave., Crosstown Center, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America
| | - Benjamin P Linas
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave., Crosstown Center, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America; Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave., Crosstown Center, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America; Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave., Crosstown Center, 2(nd) Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America.
| | - Jeffrey H Samet
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 72 East Concord Street, Evans 124, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America; Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave., Crosstown Center, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America.
| | - Linda S Sprague Martinez
- Boston University School of Social Work, 264 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Jordana Muroff
- Boston University School of Social Work, 264 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
| | - Judith A Bernstein
- Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave., Crosstown Center, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America.
| | - Sabrina A Assoumou
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave., Crosstown Center, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America; Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave., Crosstown Center, 2(nd) Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Liberman AR, Bromberg DJ, Litz T, Kurmanalieva A, Galvez S, Rozanova J, Azbel L, Meyer JP, Altice FL. Interest without uptake: A mixed-methods analysis of methadone utilization in Kyrgyz prisons. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0276723. [PMID: 36282864 PMCID: PMC9595522 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
HIV incidence continues to increase in Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA), in large part due to non-sterile injection drug use, especially within prisons. Therefore, medication-assisted therapy with opioid agonists is an evidence-based HIV-prevention strategy. The Kyrgyz Republic offers methadone within its prison system, but uptake remains low. Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is a framework for identifying people who would potentially benefit from methadone, intervening to identify OUD as a problem and methadone as a potential solution, and providing referral to methadone treatment. Using an SBIRT framework, we screened for OUD in Kyrgyz prisons among people who were within six months of returning to the community (n = 1118). We enrolled 125 people with OUD in this study, 102 of whom were not already engaged in methadone treatment. We conducted a pre-release survey followed by a brief intervention (BI) to address barriers to methadone engagement. Follow-up surveys immediately after the intervention and at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after prison release assessed methadone attitudes and uptake. In-depth qualitative interviews with 12 participants explored factors influencing methadone utilization during and after incarceration. Nearly all participants indicated favorable attitudes toward methadone both before and after intervention in surveys; however, interest in initiating methadone treatment remained very low both before and after the BI. Qualitative findings identified five factors that negatively influence methadone uptake, despite expressed positive attitudes toward methadone: (1) interpersonal relationships, (2) interactions with the criminal justice system, (3) logistical concerns, (4) criminal subculture, and (5) health-related concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda R. Liberman
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Daniel J. Bromberg
- Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America
- Yale Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Taylor Litz
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Ainura Kurmanalieva
- AIDS Foundation East-West (AFEW) in the Kyrgyz Republic, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic
| | - Samy Galvez
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
- Yale Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Julia Rozanova
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Lyu Azbel
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Jaimie P. Meyer
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
- Yale Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Frederick L. Altice
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
- Yale Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Rudolph KE, Williams NT, Goodwin ATS, Shulman M, Fishman M, Díaz I, Luo S, Rotrosen J, Nunes EV. Buprenorphine & methadone dosing strategies to reduce risk of relapse in the treatment of opioid use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 239:109609. [PMID: 36075154 PMCID: PMC9741946 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although there is consensus that having a "high-enough" dose of buprenorphine (BUP-NX) or methadone is important for reducing relapse to opioid use, there is debate about what this dose is and how it should be attained. We estimated the extent to which different dosing strategies would affect risk of relapse over 12 weeks of treatment, separately for BUP-NX and methadone. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of three comparative effectiveness trials. We examined four dosing strategies: 1) increasing dose in response to participant-specific opioid use, 2) increasing dose weekly until some minimum dose (16 mg BUP, 100 mg methadone) was reached, 3) increasing dose weekly until some minimum and increasing dose in response to opioid use thereafter (referred to as the "hybrid strategy"), and 4) keeping dose constant after the first 2 weeks of treatment. We used a longitudinal sequentially doubly robust estimator to estimate contrasts between dosing strategies on risk of relapse. RESULTS For BUP-NX, increasing dose following the hybrid strategy resulted in the lowest risk of relapse. For methadone, holding dose constant resulted in greatest risk of relapse; the other three strategies performed similarly. For example, the hybrid strategy reduced week 12 relapse risk by 13 % (RR: 0.87, 95 %CI: 0.83-0.95) and by 20 % (RR: 0.80, 95 %CI: 0.71-0.90) for BUP-NX and methadone respectively, as compared to holding dose constant. CONCLUSIONS Doses should be targeted toward minimum thresholds and, in the case of BUP-NX, raised when patients continue to use opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara E Rudolph
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Nicholas T Williams
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alicia T Singham Goodwin
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matisyahu Shulman
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc Fishman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, and Maryland Treatment Centers, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Iván Díaz
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean Luo
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Rotrosen
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edward V Nunes
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Adams JW, Savinkina A, Fox A, Behrends CN, Madushani RWMA, Wang J, Chatterjee A, Walley AY, Barocas JA, Linas BP. Modeling the cost-effectiveness and impact on fatal overdose and initiation of buprenorphine-naloxone treatment at syringe service programs. Addiction 2022; 117:2635-2648. [PMID: 35315148 PMCID: PMC9951221 DOI: 10.1111/add.15883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM To estimate the number of treatment initiations, averted fatal opioid overdoses and the cost-effectiveness associated with offering buprenorphine-naloxone (buprenorphine) treatment on-site within existing syringe service programs (SSPs) in Massachusetts, USA. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS This was a cohort-based mathematical model and cost-effectiveness analysis. We derived model inputs from state and national surveillance data, clinical trials and observational cohort studies. We compared an intervention scenario where 30% of SSP clients initiated buprenorphine treatment on-site at least once annually to a status quo scenario where no buprenorphine was available on-site among community treatment providers in Massachusetts, 2020-30. In individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) we assumed that 80% of SSP clients had recently injected drugs and that treatment within SSPs would have similar or improved retention compared with standard-of-care buprenorphine programs, but higher rates of active opioid use while in treatment. MEASUREMENTS Number of treatment initiations (i.e. individuals began treatment on a medication for opioid use disorder or entered medically managed withdrawal), averted fatal opioid overdoses, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-time discounted costs from a health sector and a limited societal perspective. FINDINGS The status quo scenario resulted in 23 051 fatal overdoses and 1 511 613 treatment initiations over a 10-year simulation period. An intervention scenario with on-site SSP buprenorphine treatment averted 4797 (-20.8%) fatal opioid overdoses and resulted in 129 359 (+8.6%) additional treatment initiations compared with the status quo. The intervention scenario was the dominating scenario: providing OUD treatment through Massachusetts SSPs cost less (-$3612 per person) with patients accumulating more QALYs (0.2 per person) compared with the status quo scenario. CONCLUSIONS Offering buprenorphine treatment on-site within syringe service programs has the potential to decrease fatal overdoses substantially, improve treatment engagement and save on costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joëlla W. Adams
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center (BMC), Boston, MA, USA
- RTI International, Research Triangle, NC, USA
| | - Alexandra Savinkina
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center (BMC), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aaron Fox
- Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Czarina N. Behrends
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | - Jianing Wang
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center (BMC), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Avik Chatterjee
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Y. Walley
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua A. Barocas
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Benjamin P. Linas
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center (BMC), Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Suen LW, Lee TG, Silva M, Walton P, Coffin PO, Geier M, Soran CS. Rapid Overlap Initiation Protocol Using Low Dose Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in an Outpatient Setting: A Case Series. J Addict Med 2022; 16:534-540. [PMID: 35149614 PMCID: PMC11006272 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Fear and risk of precipitated withdrawal are barriers for initiating buprenorphine in individuals with opioid use disorder, particularly among those using fentanyl. A buprenorphine rapid overlap initiation (ROI) protocol (also knownas "rapidmicro-dosing") utilizing small, escalating doses of buprenorphine can overcome this barrier, reaching therapeutic doses in 3 to 4 days. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a buprenorphine ROI protocol for buprenorphine initiation in the outpatient setting. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients prescribed an outpatient ROI protocol at the Office-based Buprenorphine Induction Clinic from October to December 2020. The ROI protocol utilizes divided doses of sublingual buprenorphine tablets and blister packaging for easier dosing. Patients were not required to stop other opioid use and were advised to follow up on day 4 of initiation. RESULTS Twelve patients were included, of whom eleven (92%) were using fentanyl at intake. Eleven patients picked up their prescription. Seven patients returned for follow-up (58%), and all 7 completed the ROI protocol. One patient reported any withdrawal symptoms, which were mild. At 30 days, 7 patients (58%) were retained in care, and 5 (42%) were still receiving buprenorphine treatment, 4 (33%) of whom had been abstinent from nonprescribed opioid use for ≥2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS The ROI protocol was successful in initiating buprenorphine treatment for patients in our outpatient clinic, many of whom were using fentanyl. The ROI protocol may offer a safe alternative to traditional buprenorphine initiation and warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie W Suen
- From the National Clinician Scholars Program, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy, University of California, San Francisco, CA (LWS); San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA (LWS); San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA (TGL, PC, MG); Division of Substance Abuse and Addiction Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA (MS, PW, CSS); Division of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA (CSS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
132
|
Manza P, Kroll D, McPherson KL, Johnson A, Dennis E, Hu L, Tai B, Volkow ND. Sex differences in weight gain during medication-based treatment for opioid use disorder: A meta-analysis and retrospective analysis of clinical trial data. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 238:109575. [PMID: 35868182 PMCID: PMC9444983 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Side effects of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) such as weight gain contribute to their stigma. Substantial evidence suggests that women have a more severe side effect profile to MOUD than men, and concerns about weight gain during treatment are prevalent. However, the few studies reporting sex differences in weight gain during treatment show conflicting results and are restricted to methadone. In addition, little is known about possible sex differences in weight gain to buprenorphine, which is the most commonly prescribed MOUD in the United States. METHODS To address these issues, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the few studies reporting longitudinal data on sex differences in body mass index (BMI) gain during methadone treatment (Study 1). In a separate study, we also re-analyzed data from trial CTN-0030 of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trial Network (NIDA CTN), which involved a 12-week buprenorphine treatment regimen (Study 2; n = 360; 209 Male, 151 Female). RESULTS For Study 1, across all papers reporting longitudinal data (k = 4, n = 362 OUD patients), there were BMI increases that ranged from 2.2 to 5.4 BMI after at least one year of methadone treatment, but there were no significant sex differences in BMI increases (Standardized Mean Difference, Female > Male = 0.352, SE =0.270; 95 % CI = [-0.18 0.88]; p = .193). Study 2 showed no significant differences in weight before and after 12 weeks of buprenorphine treatment nor did it show sex differences in weight change with treatment (β = 2.34, p = .511). CONCLUSION These analyses corroborate evidence of weight gain with methadone treatment but did not observe a sex-based disparity in weight gain with methadone or buprenorphine treatment for OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Manza
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Danielle Kroll
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Katherine L McPherson
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Allison Johnson
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Evan Dennis
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lianne Hu
- Center for Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Betty Tai
- Center for Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nora D Volkow
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Naren T, Silkoff D, Forsythe M, Cook J. Case series on treatment of dependence to Kamini Vidrawan Ras with opioid substitution therapy. Drug Alcohol Rev 2022; 41:1408-1411. [PMID: 35711156 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A cohort of clients was recognised attending an addiction medicine clinic with similar presentations of opioid dependence from use of a rarely known Ayurvedic medication in a specific ethnic community. This retrospective case series was completed to promote wider recognition and further understanding of dependence on Kamini Vidrawan Ras (Kamini). METHODS A retrospective file audit of the electronic medical record for clients of an addiction medicine outpatient clinic with a history of dependent use of Kamini identified 12 clients meeting inclusion criteria. RESULTS All 12 clients were male, aged 27-41 years, all but one of north Indian origin, predominantly employed and predominantly (but not exclusively) without significant other substance use history. All 12 clients were treated with opioid substitution therapy. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS This case series highlights an opioid dependence syndrome resulting from use of an Ayurvedic medicine by men from a specific area of India, highlighting a potential adverse effect of traditional medicines in ongoing use by migrant and ethnic populations that have emigrated to Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Silkoff
- Drug Health Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Jon Cook
- Drug Health Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Schiff DM, Work EC, Muftu S, Partridge S, MacMillan KDL, Gray JR, Hoeppner BB, Kelly JF, Greenfield SF, Jones HE, Wilens TE, Terplan M, Bernstein J. "You have to take this medication, but then you get punished for taking it:" lack of agency, choice, and fear of medications to treat opioid use disorder across the perinatal period. J Subst Abuse Treat 2022; 139:108765. [PMID: 35341614 PMCID: PMC9187596 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) during pregnancy and in the postpartum period remain underutilized. A need exists to enhance our understanding of modifiable factors, facilitators, and barriers to MOUD utilization and adherence in the perinatal period to improve maternal and child outcomes. METHODS The study conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with recently pregnant people with opioid use disorder (OUD) to explore experiences as a pregnant and/or parenting person with OUD, perceptions of enabling factors and barriers to treatment utilization, incentivizing factors for maintaining adherence, and acceptability of ongoing supports to sustain treatment adherence. The study team used constant comparative methods to analyze transcripts and develop the codebook. The team double coded the transcripts, with an overall kappa coefficient of 0.88. RESULTS The study team interviewed twenty-six women on average 10.1 months after delivery. All women had some prior experience using MOUD. Four unique themes emerged as barriers to medication utilization and adherence in the perinatal period: 1) Lack of agency and autonomy surrounding medication decisions because pregnancy or parenting status affected treatment adherence; 2) Hesitancy to use MOUD to minimize risk of newborn withdrawal; 3) Concern about increased scrutiny and potential loss of custody due to mandated child protective services reporting for opioid-exposure at delivery in Massachusetts; and 4) Perception that treatment environments, particularly methadone clinics, did not provide gender-responsive or equitable care, and standardized, inflexible visit regulations were particularly difficult to comply with in the early postpartum period. CONCLUSIONS Women with OUD experienced a double bind when making perinatal treatment decisions, describing pressure to use MOUD with negative consequences after delivery. Key areas for possible intervention emerged from interviews. These areas include improving uptake of shared decision-making to increase patient autonomy and agency, particularly among those in the earliest stages of recovery during pregnancy; ongoing education around perinatal MOUD safety and efficacy; detangling MOUD and neonatal withdrawal signs from mandated child protective services reporting; and improving gender-responsive and equitable care in substance use disorder treatment programs, including incorporating the utilization of home visiting services for dosing assessments and administration in the early postpartum period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davida M Schiff
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, 125 Nashua St Suite 860, Boston, MA, 02114, United States of America.
| | - Erin C Work
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, 125 Nashua St Suite 860, Boston, MA, 02114, United States of America
| | - Serra Muftu
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, 125 Nashua St Suite 860, Boston, MA, 02114, United States of America
| | - Shayla Partridge
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, 125 Nashua St Suite 860, Boston, MA, 02114, United States of America
| | - Kathryn Dee L MacMillan
- Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, United States of America
| | - Jessica R Gray
- Division General of Internal Medicine, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, 02114, United States of America; Department of Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, 02114, United States of America
| | - Bettina B Hoeppner
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, United States of America
| | - John F Kelly
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, United States of America
| | - Shelly F Greenfield
- Division of Women's Mental Health and Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St, Belmont, MA 02478, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America
| | - Hendrée E Jones
- UNC Horizons and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 410 North Greensboro St., Carrboro, NC, United States of America
| | - Timothy E Wilens
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| | - Mishka Terplan
- Friends Research Institute, 1040 Park Ave, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States of America
| | - Judith Bernstein
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Stafford C, Marrero WJ, Naumann RB, Lich KH, Wakeman S, Jalali MS. Identifying key risk factors for premature discontinuation of opioid use disorder treatment in the United States: A predictive modeling study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 237:109507. [PMID: 35660221 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), particularly medication for OUD, is highly effective; however, retention in OUD treatment is a significant challenge. We aimed to identify key risk factors for premature exit from OUD treatment. METHODS We analyzed 2,381,902 cross-sectional treatment episodes for individuals in the U.S., discharged between Jan/1/2015 and Dec/31/2019. We developed classification models (Random Forest, Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Bagged CART, and Boosted CART), and analyzed 31 potential risk factors for premature treatment exit, including treatment characteristics, substance use history, socioeconomic status, and demographic characteristics. We stratified our analysis based on length of stay in treatment and service setting. Models were compared using cross-validation and the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC). RESULTS Random Forest outperformed other methods (ROC-AUC: 74%). The most influential risk factors included characteristics of service setting, geographic region, primary source of payment, and referral source. Race, ethnicity, and sex had far weaker predictive impacts. When stratified by treatment setting and length of stay, employment status and delay (days waited) to enter treatment were among the most influential factors. Their importance increased as treatment duration decreased. Notably, importance of referral source increased as the treatment duration increased. Finally, age and age of first use were important factors for lengths of stay of 2-7 days and in detox treatment settings. CONCLUSIONS The key factors of OUD treatment attrition identified in this analysis should be more closely explored (e.g., in causal studies) to inform targeted policies and interventions to improve models of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia Stafford
- MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Wesley J Marrero
- MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
| | - Rebecca B Naumann
- Department of Epidemiology and Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Kristen Hassmiller Lich
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Sarah Wakeman
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Mohammad S Jalali
- MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Williams AR, Mauro CM, Feng T, Wilson A, Cruz A, Olfson M, Crystal S, Samples H, Chiodo L. Non-prescribed buprenorphine preceding treatment intake and clinical outcomes for opioid use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat 2022; 139:108770. [PMID: 35337715 PMCID: PMC9187606 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Successful retention on buprenorphine improves outcomes for opioid use disorder (OUD); however, we know little about associations between use of non-prescribed buprenorphine (NPB) preceding treatment intake and clinical outcomes. METHODS The study conducted observational retrospective analysis of abstracted electronic health record (EHR) data from a multi-state nationwide office-based opioid treatment program. The study observed a random sample of 1000 newly admitted patients with OUD for buprenorphine maintenance (2015-2018) for up to 12 months following intake. We measured use of NPB by mandatory intake drug testing and manual EHR coding. Outcomes included hazards of treatment discontinuation and rates of opioid use. RESULTS Compared to patients testing negative for buprenorphine at intake, those testing positive (59.6%) had lower hazards of treatment discontinuation (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.60, p < 0.01). Results were little changed following adjustment for baseline opioid use and other patient characteristics (aHR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.70, p < 0.01). Risk of discontinuation did not significantly differ between patients by buprenorphine source: prescribed v. NPB (reference) at admission (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.46). Opioid use was lower in the buprenorphine positive group at admission (25.0% vs. 53.1%, p < 0.0001) and throughout early months of treatment but converged after 7 months for those remaining in care (17.1% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.89). CONCLUSION NPB preceding treatment intake was associated with decreased hazards of treatment discontinuation and lower opioid use. These findings suggest use of NPB may be a marker of treatment readiness and that buprenorphine testing at intake may have predictive value for clinical assessments regarding risk of early treatment discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Robin Williams
- Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, United States of America.
| | - Christine M Mauro
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032, United States of America
| | - Tianshu Feng
- Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, United States of America
| | - Amanda Wilson
- Addiction Research and Education Foundation, 46 Sovereign Way, Florence, MA, 01062, United States of America; North-Star Care, Inc., 4810 Point Fosdick Dr. Suite #92, Gig Harbor, WA 98335, United States of America
| | - Angelo Cruz
- Addiction Research and Education Foundation, 46 Sovereign Way, Florence, MA, 01062, United States of America
| | - Mark Olfson
- Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, United States of America
| | - Stephen Crystal
- Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, 112 Paterson St., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States of America
| | - Hillary Samples
- Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, 112 Paterson St., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States of America
| | - Lisa Chiodo
- Addiction Research and Education Foundation, 46 Sovereign Way, Florence, MA, 01062, United States of America; North-Star Care, Inc., 4810 Point Fosdick Dr. Suite #92, Gig Harbor, WA 98335, United States of America; University of Massachusetts Amherst, School of Nursing, 651 N Pleasant St, Amherst, MA 01003, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Hasan MM, Noor-E-Alam M, Shi J, Young LD, Young GJ. Long-term patient outcomes following buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid use disorder: a retrospective analysis in a commercially insured population. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2022; 48:481-491. [PMID: 35670828 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2022.2065638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Background: While buprenorphine/naloxone (buprenorphine) has been demonstrated to be an effective medication for treating opioid use disorder (OUD), an important question exists about how long patients should remain in treatment.Objective: To examine the relationship between treatment duration and patient outcomes for individuals with OUD who have been prescribed buprenorphine.Methods: We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study using the Massachusetts All Payer Claims Database, 2013 to 2017. The study comprised over 2,500 patients, approximately one-third of whom were female, who had been prescribed buprenorphine for OUD. The outcomes were hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits at 36 months following treatment initiation and 12 months following treatment discontinuation. Patients were classified into four groups based on treatment duration and medication adherence: poor adherence, duration <12 months; good adherence, duration <6 months; good adherence, duration 6 to 12 months, and good adherence, duration >12 months. We conducted analyses at the patient level of the relationship between duration and outcomes.Results: Better outcomes were observed for patients whose duration was greater than 12 months. Patients in the other groups had higher odds of hospitalization at 36 months following treatment initiation: poor adherence (2.71), <6 months (1.53), and 6 to 12 months (1.42). They also had higher odds of ER visits: poor adherence (1.69), <6 months (1.51), and 6 to 12 months (1.30). Similar results were observed following treatment discontinuation.Conclusions: OUD treatment with buprenorphine should be continued for at least 12 months to reduce hospitalizations and ED visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md Mahmudul Hasan
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Center for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Md Noor-E-Alam
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Center for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jiesheng Shi
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leonard D Young
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Prescription Monitoring Program, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gary J Young
- School of Business, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Center for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, Northeastern UniversityD'Amore-McKim, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Andraka-Christou B, Saloner B, Gordon AJ, Totaram R, Randall-Kosich O, Golan M, Stein BD. Laws for expanding access to medications for opioid use disorder: a legal analysis of 16 states & Washington D.C. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2022; 48:492-503. [PMID: 35772010 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2022.2082301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Background: Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) are the gold standard for OUD treatment but are underused. To our knowledge, no published study has systematically identified and categorized state policy innovations for expanding MOUD utilization.Objective: We sought to identify and categorize state MOUD policy innovations.Methods: Within a stratified random sample of 16 U.S. states and Washington D.C. we searched for 2019 state statutes and regulations related to MOUD in Westlaw legal database. We then identified laws that appeared designed to increase MOUD utilization and categorized them using a template analysis approach.Results: We found 82 laws with one or more MOUD expansion policies. We identified six high-level MOUD expansion policy categories: 1) policies expanding the availability of waivered buprenorphine providers; 2) needs assessments and policies increasing public MOUD awareness; 3) criminal justice system policies; 4) Substance use disorder (SUD) treatment and sober living facility policies; 5) insurance policies; and 6) hospital policies. SUD treatment and housing facility policies, as well as insurance policies, were most common.Conclusions: Multipronged approaches are being pursued by several states to increase MOUD access. Our results can inform policymakers of MOUD expansion approaches in other jurisdictions. Policy categories can serve as the basis for policy variables for future analyses of policy effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Andraka-Christou
- School of Global Health Management & Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine (Secondary Joint Appointment), University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Brendan Saloner
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care SystemInformatics, Decision-Enhancement, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Rachel Totaram
- School of Global Health Management & Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
139
|
Cabello-De la Garza A, Harless C, Ostrach B, Fagan B. Increasing North Carolina's Workforce Capacity for Prescribing Buprenorphine Products. N C Med J 2022; 83:288-293. [PMID: 35817448 DOI: 10.18043/ncm.83.4.288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inadequate access to opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment is a public health concern. Rates of opioid-related poisoning deaths are increasing in North Carolina and access to OUD treatment is especially sparse in rural areas. DEA-X-waivered providers that can prescribe buprenorphine as a medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) play an essential role in treating OUD. Increased workforce capacity to treat OUD in an evidence-based, equitable, and patient-centered way is needed. Gaps persist in continuing professional education and academic training.METHODS Description of an interdisciplinary training team effort to engage medical residencies and advanced practice provider (APP) programs across North Carolina in a set of subsidized trainings about substance use disorder treatment and medication-assisted treatment (MAT), with the goal of increasing capacity to administer MOUD, based on each program's needs. Uptake was independently evaluated.RESULTS Engagement exceeded initial goals: 72 unique trainings related to MAT were administered to 1512 providers from 30 residency and 7 APP programs. By the end of the grant period, 902 participants completed a training required to obtain a DEA-X waiver. Evaluation of training uptake identified facilitators and barriers specific to residents and APP trainees.LIMITATIONS Limitations included difficulty coordinating training with existing didactic and clinical schedules during the project time frame and challenges identifying implementation leaders at training sites.CONCLUSION This project highlights a successful and potentially replicable approach to offering structured MAT capacity-building training in combination with technical assistance (TA) within medical education programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Cabello-De la Garza
- Department of Community and Public Health Sciences, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
| | - Chase Harless
- Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, North Carolina
| | - Bayla Ostrach
- Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Blake Fagan
- Department of Family Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Asheville, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Melnick ER, Nath B, Dziura JD, Casey MF, Jeffery MM, Paek H, Soares WE, Hoppe JA, Rajeevan H, Li F, Skains RM, Walter LA, Patel MD, Chari SV, Platts-Mills TF, Hess EP, D'Onofrio G. User centered clinical decision support to implement initiation of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in the emergency department: EMBED pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2022; 377:e069271. [PMID: 35760423 PMCID: PMC9231533 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of a user centered clinical decision support tool versus usual care on rates of initiation of buprenorphine in the routine emergency care of individuals with opioid use disorder. DESIGN Pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (EMBED). SETTING 18 emergency department clusters across five healthcare systems in five states representing the north east, south east, and western regions of the US, ranging from community hospitals to tertiary care centers, using either the Epic or Cerner electronic health record platform. PARTICIPANTS 599 attending emergency physicians caring for 5047 adult patients presenting with opioid use disorder. INTERVENTION A user centered, physician facing clinical decision support system seamlessly integrated into user workflows in the electronic health record to support initiating buprenorphine in the emergency department by helping clinicians to diagnose opioid use disorder, assess the severity of withdrawal, motivate patients to accept treatment, and complete electronic health record tasks by automating clinical and after visit documentation, order entry, prescribing, and referral. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rate of initiation of buprenorphine (administration or prescription of buprenorphine) in the emergency department among patients with opioid use disorder. Secondary implementation outcomes were measured with the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework. RESULTS 1 413 693 visits to the emergency department (775 873 in the intervention arm and 637 820 in the usual care arm) from November 2019 to May 2021 were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 5047 patients with opioid use disorder (2787 intervention arm, 2260 usual care arm) under the care of 599 attending physicians (340 intervention arm, 259 usual care arm) for analysis. Buprenorphine was initiated in 347 (12.5%) patients in the intervention arm and in 271 (12.0%) patients in the usual care arm (adjusted generalized estimating equations odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 2.43, P=0.58). Buprenorphine was initiated at least once by 151 (44.4%) physicians in the intervention arm and by 88 (34.0%) in the usual care arm (1.83, 1.16 to 2.89, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS User centered clinical decision support did not increase patient level rates of initiating buprenorphine in the emergency department. Although streamlining and automating electronic health record workflows can potentially increase adoption of complex, unfamiliar evidence based practices, more interventions are needed to look at other barriers to the treatment of addiction and increase the rate of initiating buprenorphine in the emergency department in patients with opioid use disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03658642.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward R Melnick
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Bidisha Nath
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - James D Dziura
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Martin F Casey
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Molly M Jeffery
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hyung Paek
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - William E Soares
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Jason A Hoppe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Fangyong Li
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Rachel M Skains
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Lauren A Walter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Mehul D Patel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Srihari V Chari
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Erik P Hess
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gail D'Onofrio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Clifton D, Ivey N, Poley S, O'Regan A, Raman SR, Frascino N, Hamilton S, Setji N. Implementation of a comprehensive hospitalist-led initiative to improve care for patients with opioid use disorder. J Hosp Med 2022; 17:427-436. [PMID: 35535562 PMCID: PMC9321616 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.12837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As opioid-related hospitalizations rise, hospitals must be prepared to evaluate and treat patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). We implemented a hospitalist-led program, Project Caring for patients with Opioid Misuse through Evidence-based Treatment (COMET) to address gaps in care for hospitalized patients with OUD. OBJECTIVE Implement evidence-based treatment for inpatients with OUD and refer to postdischarge care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Project COMET launched in July 2019 at Duke University Hospital (DUH), an academic medical center in Durham, NC. INTERVENTION, MAIN OUTCOMES, AND MEASURES We engaged key stakeholders, performed a needs assessment, and secured health system funding. We developed protocols to standardize OUD treatment and employed a social worker to facilitate postdischarge care. Electronic health records were utilized for data analysis. RESULTS COMET evaluated 512 patients for OUD during their index hospitalization from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. Seventy-one percent of patients received medication for OUD (MOUD) during admission. Of those who received buprenorphine during admission, 64% received a discharge prescription. Of those who received methadone during admission, 83% of eligible patients were connected to a methadone clinic. Among all patients at DUH with OUD, MOUD use during hospitalization and at discharge increased in the post-COMET period compared to the pre-COMET period (p < .001 for both). CONCLUSION Our program is one of the first to demonstrate successful implementation of a hospitalist-led, comprehensive approach to caring for hospitalized patients with OUD and can serve as an example to other institutions seeking to implement life-saving, evidence-based treatment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Clifton
- Department of MedicineDivision of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
- Department of PediatricsDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Noel Ivey
- Department of MedicineDivision of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Stephanie Poley
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Amy O'Regan
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Sudha R. Raman
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Nicole Frascino
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Shavone Hamilton
- Clinical Social Work, Duke University HospitalDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Noppon Setji
- Department of MedicineDivision of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Dorgay CE, Bromberg DJ, Doltu S, Litz T, Galvez S, Polonsky M, Dvoryak S, Altice FL. A pilot implementation study to scale-up methadone in incarcerated persons with opioid use disorder and retain them on treatment after release in Moldova. Int J Drug Policy 2022; 104:103683. [PMID: 35417790 PMCID: PMC9827420 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eastern Europe and Central Asia have intertwined HIV and incarceration epidemics, concentrated in people who inject drugs. Moldova is one of the few countries in this region that offers methadone within prisons, but uptake and post-release retention remains suboptimal. Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) procedures are a potential implementation strategy to address this problem. METHODS From June 1, 2017 to March 3, 2018, we conducted a 2-stage SBIRT strategy in nine prisons and four pre-trial detention facilities in Moldova among incarcerated persons with opioid use disorder (OUD; N = 121) and within 90 days of release. Survey results were analyzed to evaluate the effect of the SBIRT strategy on the uptake of and post-release retention on methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). RESULTS Among the 121 screened with OUD, 27 were on MMT at baseline within the prison and this number increased to 41 after the two-step SBIRT intervention, reflecting a 51.9% increase over baseline. Eleven (78.6%) of the 14 participants that newly started MMT did so only after completing both SBIRT sessions. The brief intervention did not significantly improve knowledge about methadone but did improve attitudes towards it. Among the 41 participants who received methadone during this trial, 40 (97.6%) were retained 6 months after release; the one participant not retained was on methadone at the time of the intervention and had planned to taper off. CONCLUSION The SBIRT strategy significantly improved participant attitudes, but treatment initiation mostly occurred after completing both sessions, including soon after release, but remained low overall. Work within the Moldovan prison subculture to dispel negative myths and misinformation is needed to further scale-up OAT in Moldova.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coriann E Dorgay
- Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, 60 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
| | - Daniel J Bromberg
- Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, 60 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States; Yale Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University, 135 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
| | - Svetlana Doltu
- Act For Involvement, 7A Varșovia street, Chișinău, 2060, Republic of Moldova
| | - Taylor Litz
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 135 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
| | - Samy Galvez
- Yale Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University, 135 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States; Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 135 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
| | - Maxim Polonsky
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 135 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
| | - Sergey Dvoryak
- Ukrainian Institute on Public Health Policy, 5 Biloruska Str. Office 20, 27, Kyiv, 04050 Ukraine
| | - Frederick L Altice
- Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, 60 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States; Yale Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University, 135 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States; Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 135 College Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States; University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Welsh JW, Mataczynski MJ, Passetti LL, Hunter BD, Godley MD. Attitudes and beliefs among Georgia addiction treatment staff about medication for opioid use disorder in adolescents, young adults, and adults: a multi-mixed methods study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2022; 48:347-355. [PMID: 35416739 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2022.2043335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Background: Adverse consequences, including non-fatal overdose and death, are prevalent in adolescents and young adults with opioid use disorder (OUD). Barriers toward medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) have been identified in adult populations but are poorly understood in youth.Objective: This exploratory multi-mixed methods study examines beliefs and attitudes of addiction treatment program staff about the use of MOUD in youth.Methods: A 40-item survey was distributed electronically to 299 addiction treatment programs in Georgia from May 2020 to January 2021. Participant (N = 215; 74% female) attitudes regarding the use of MOUD in three age groups (adolescents (aged 16-17), young adults (aged 18-25), and adults (aged 26+) on a 6-point Likert scale were compared using paired samples t-tests. A series of one-way ANOVA analyses examined differences in attitudes and beliefs across participant characteristics. Verbatim responses to qualitative survey questions were analyzed using a coding reliability approach to thematic analysis.Results: Participants were less likely to support MOUD in adolescents (M = 3.68, SD 1.5) compared with young (M = 4.38, SD 1.36, t = 8.19, p < .001, d = .51) and older adults (M = 4.64, SD 1.3, t = 9.83, p < .001 d = .74). Participants endorsed higher response rates for the use of both naltrexone and buprenorphine over methadone in young adults. A total of 1,412 text responses were reviewed. Participants highlighted barriers to acceptance and use of MOUD in adolescents including safety concerns and impact on brain development.Conclusions: The results support a comprehensive approach to reducing the barriers to using medications to treat OUDs in adolescent populations. Formal and focused continuing education to correct attitudes and beliefs about MOUD treatment for adolescents is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine W Welsh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maggie J Mataczynski
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
144
|
Lanham HJ, Papac J, Olmos DI, Heydemann EL, Simonetti N, Schmidt S, Potter JS. Survey of Barriers and Facilitators to Prescribing Buprenorphine and Clinician Perceptions on the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 Waiver. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2212419. [PMID: 35552721 PMCID: PMC9099423 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE As opioid-related deaths continue to climb, methods to reduce barriers to prescribing buprenorphine for individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) are needed. Recent conversations by state and federal authorities targeting low-threshold buprenorphine aim to reduce some barriers to prescribing buprenorphine; however, what remains unclear is whether removal of the requirement to obtain a waiver for prescribing buprenorphine through the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (an X-waiver) will be enough to increase access to buprenorphine. OBJECTIVE To assess barriers and facilitators of obtaining an X-waiver and prescribing buprenorphine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This mixed-method survey study was conducted between September and December 2020; 607 office-based Texas clinicians were surveyed after they attended a buprenorphine X-waiver training course. All attendees between March 2, 2019, and February 28, 2020, were eligible to receive this survey; 126 responses were received (20% response rate: 81 physicians, 37 nurse practitioners, and 8 physician assistants). Data analysis was performed October 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Surveys measured the extent to which clinicians experienced 9 previously identified barriers during the waiver process and in prescribing buprenorphine. The survey included open-ended items assessing facilitating factors to obtaining a waiver and to prescribing buprenorphine for OUD. The barriers were analyzed using χ2 tests of homogeneity. Qualitative data were analyzed using a constant comparative method. RESULTS Among 126 clinicians who responded, 61 (48.4%) had received an X-waiver; of these waivered clinicians, 22 (36%) were prescribing buprenorphine and 39 (64%) were not. "Complexity of X-waiver process," "Perceived lack of professional support and referral network," and "Getting started" were significantly different barriers among waivered and nonwaivered clinicians. Significant differences in barriers experienced between prescribers and nonprescribers were "Getting started" and "Accessing reimbursement for treatment." The most frequently mentioned facilitators involved changes to the waiver training and the need for networks connecting experienced clinicians with those in the initial stages of readiness for prescribing buprenorphine for OUD. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This survey study's results contribute new understanding of facilitators to obtaining the X-waiver and to prescribing buprenorphine. Furthermore, these findings suggest that to increase access to compassionate evidence-based treatment for OUD, clinicians need ongoing support and mentorship from experienced and knowledgeable clinicians. Interventions aimed at improving access to buprenorphine should focus on facilitating such networks to increase the number of clinicians who obtain an X-waiver and prescribe buprenorphine for OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly J. Lanham
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Jennifer Papac
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Daniela I. Olmos
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Emily L. Heydemann
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Nathalia Simonetti
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Susanne Schmidt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| | - Jennifer S. Potter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Given that COVID-19 and recent natural disasters exacerbated the shortage of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) services and were associated with increased opioid overdose mortality, it is important to examine how a community's ability to respond to natural disasters and infectious disease outbreaks is associated with MOUD access. OBJECTIVE To examine the association of community vulnerability to disasters and pandemics with geographic access to each of the 3 MOUDs and whether this association differs by urban, suburban, or rural classification. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study of zip code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) in the continental United States excluding Washington, DC, conducted a geospatial analysis of 2020 treatment location data. EXPOSURES Social vulnerability index (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention measure of vulnerability to disasters or pandemics). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Drive time in minutes from the population-weighted center of the ZCTA to the ZCTA of the nearest treatment location for each treatment type (buprenorphine, methadone, and extended-release naltrexone). RESULTS Among 32 604 ZCTAs within the continental US, 170 within Washington, DC, and 20 without an urban-rural classification were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 32 434 ZCTAs. Greater social vulnerability was correlated with longer drive times for methadone (correlation, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.11), but it was not correlated with access to other MOUDs. Among rural ZCTAs, increasing social vulnerability was correlated with shorter drive times to buprenorphine (correlation, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.12 to -0.08) but vulnerability was not correlated with other measures of access. Among suburban ZCTAs, greater vulnerability was correlated with both longer drive times to methadone (correlation, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.24) and extended-release naltrexone (correlation, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.17). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, communities with greater vulnerability did not have greater geographic access to MOUD, and the mismatch between vulnerability and medication access was greatest in suburban communities. Rural communities had poor geographic access regardless of vulnerability status. Future disaster preparedness planning should match the location of services to communities with greater vulnerability to prevent inequities in overdose deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J. Joudrey
- Program in Addiction Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Marynia Kolak
- Healthy Regions & Policies Lab, Center for Spatial Data Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Qinyun Lin
- Healthy Regions & Policies Lab, Center for Spatial Data Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Susan Paykin
- Healthy Regions & Policies Lab, Center for Spatial Data Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vidal Anguiano
- Healthy Regions & Policies Lab, Center for Spatial Data Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Emily A. Wang
- Program in Addiction Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- SEICHE Center for Health and Justice, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Button D, Hartley J, Robbins J, Levander XA, Smith NJ, Englander H. Low-dose Buprenorphine Initiation in Hospitalized Adults With Opioid Use Disorder: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Addict Med 2022; 16:e105-e111. [PMID: 34001775 PMCID: PMC8595358 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) can initiate buprenorphine without requiring a withdrawal period through a low-dose (sometimes referred to as "micro-induction") approach. Although there is growing interest in low-dose buprenorphine initiation, current evidence is limited to case reports and small case series. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with OUD seen by a hospital-based addiction medicine consult service who underwent low-dose buprenorphine initiation starting during hospital admission. We then integrated our practice-based experiences with results from the existing literature to create practice considerations. RESULTS Sixty-eight individuals underwent 72 low-dose buprenorphine initiations between July 2019 and July 2020. Reasons for low-dose versus standard buprenorphine initiation included co-occurring pain (91.7%), patient anxiety around the possibility of withdrawal (69.4%), history of precipitated withdrawal (9.7%), opioid withdrawal intolerance (6.9%), and other reason/not specified (18.1%). Of the 72 low-dose buprenorphine initiations, 50 (69.4%) were completed in the hospital, 9 (12.5%) transitioned to complete as an outpatient, and 13 (18.1%) were terminated early. We apply our experiences and findings from literature to recommendations for varied clinical scenarios, including acute illness, co-occurring pain, opioid withdrawal intolerance, transition from high dose methadone to buprenorphine, history of precipitated withdrawal, and rapid hospital discharge. We share a standard low-dose initiation protocol with potential modifications based on above scenarios. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose buprenorphine initiation offers a well-tolerated and versatile approach for hospitalized patients with OUD. We share lessons from our experiences and the literature, and provide practical considerations for providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Button
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | | | - Jonathan Robbins
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Ximena A. Levander
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Natashia J. Smith
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Honora Englander
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L F Cooper
- Hannah L. F. Cooper and David H. Cloud are with the Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Laura C. Fanucchi, Michelle Lofwall, and April M. Young are with the Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Laura C. Fanucchi is also with the Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. Michelle Lofwall is also with the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. April M. Young is also with the Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington
| | - David H Cloud
- Hannah L. F. Cooper and David H. Cloud are with the Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Laura C. Fanucchi, Michelle Lofwall, and April M. Young are with the Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Laura C. Fanucchi is also with the Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. Michelle Lofwall is also with the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. April M. Young is also with the Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington
| | - Laura C Fanucchi
- Hannah L. F. Cooper and David H. Cloud are with the Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Laura C. Fanucchi, Michelle Lofwall, and April M. Young are with the Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Laura C. Fanucchi is also with the Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. Michelle Lofwall is also with the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. April M. Young is also with the Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington
| | - Michelle Lofwall
- Hannah L. F. Cooper and David H. Cloud are with the Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Laura C. Fanucchi, Michelle Lofwall, and April M. Young are with the Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Laura C. Fanucchi is also with the Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. Michelle Lofwall is also with the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. April M. Young is also with the Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington
| | - April M Young
- Hannah L. F. Cooper and David H. Cloud are with the Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Laura C. Fanucchi, Michelle Lofwall, and April M. Young are with the Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Laura C. Fanucchi is also with the Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. Michelle Lofwall is also with the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington. April M. Young is also with the Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Padmanathan P, Forbes H, Redaniel MT, Gunnell D, Lewer D, Moran P, Watson B, Degenhardt L, Hickman M. Self-harm and suicide during and after opioid agonist treatment among primary care patients in England: a cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry 2022; 9:151-159. [PMID: 34921800 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00392-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first 4 weeks after initiation and cessation of opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence are associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and overdose. We aimed to investigate whether the rate of self-harm and suicide among people who were prescribed opioid agonist treatment differs during initiation, cessation, and the remainder of time on and off treatment. METHODS We did a retrospective cohort study and used health-care records from UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to mortality and hospital admission data, for adults (age 18-75 years at cohort entry) who were prescribed opioid agonist treatment at least once in primary care in England between Jan 2, 1998, and Nov 30, 2018. We estimated rates and adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) of hospital admissions for self-harm and death by suicide, comparing time during and after treatment, as well as comparing stable periods of time on treatment with treatment initiation, cessation, and the remaining time off treatment. FINDINGS Between Jan 2, 1998, and Nov 30, 2018, 8070 patients (5594 [69·3%] men and 2476 [30·7%] women) received 17 004 episodes of opioid agonist treatment over 40 599 person-years. Patients were mostly of White ethnicity (7006 [86·8%] patients). 807 episodes of self-harm (1·99 per 100 person-years) and 46 suicides (0·11 per 100 person-years) occurred during the study period. The overall age-standardised and sex-standardised mortality ratio for suicide was 7·5 times (95% CI 5·5-10·0) higher in the study cohort than in the general population. Opioid agonist treatment was associated with a reduced risk of self-harm (aRR in periods off treatment 1·50 [95% CI 1·21-1·88]), but was not significantly associated with suicide risk (aRR in periods off treatment 1·21 [0·64-2·28]). Risk of self-harm (aRR 2·60 [95% CI 1·83-3·70]) and suicide (4·68 [1·63-13·42]) were both elevated in the first 4 weeks after stopping opioid agonist treatment compared with stable periods on treatment. INTERPRETATION Stable periods of opioid agonist treatment are associated with reduced risk of self-harm, emphasising the importance of improving retention of patients in treatment. The first month following cessation of opioid agonist treatment is a period of increased risk of suicide and self-harm, during which additional psychosocial support is required. FUNDING Medical Research Council.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prianka Padmanathan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Bristol Specialist Drug and Alcohol Service, Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bath, UK.
| | - Harriet Forbes
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Maria Theresa Redaniel
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West, Bristol, UK
| | - David Gunnell
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals, Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Dan Lewer
- Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Moran
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West, Bristol, UK; National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals, Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ben Watson
- Bristol Specialist Drug and Alcohol Service, Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Louisa Degenhardt
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew Hickman
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals, Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Dale RC, Metcalf CL, Bockman C, Langford DJ, Fong CT, Peperzak KA. Comparison of PACU length of stay and opioid requirements of patients maintained on buprenorphine or methadone for opioid use disorder. J Opioid Manag 2022; 18:7-15. [PMID: 35238008 DOI: 10.5055/jom.2022.0689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Literature supporting best practice of perioperative buprenorphine management for opioid use disorder is evolving with more recent studies trending toward maintenance of home dose. To guide treatment protocols at our institution, we evaluated patients taking medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) undergoing similar surgeries. Patients were maintained on either their outpatient buprenorphine or methadone. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS Data were collected on 46 patients maintained on buprenorphine MOUD who underwent surgery. A subset of these patients (n = 24) was compared with 24 patients maintained on methadone MOUD, matched on surgical procedure, admission date, age, and sex. DESIGN This is a retrospective matched control study. SETTING An academic, tertiary, Level 1 trauma center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were post-operative opioid use and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay. RESULTS No significant differences in demographic characteristics, physical status, comorbid psychiatric diagnoses, or illicit substance use history were observed between patient groups. A higher proportion of patients taking methadone was admitted due to infection (41.7 percent vs 16.7 percent, p = 0.031) and underwent nonelective surgery (75.0 percent vs 45.8 percent, p = 0.039). No significant differences were observed between patients taking buprenorphine versus methadone with respect to PACU length of stay, post-operative opioid consumption, time-to-transition to oral opioids, or discharge opioid prescriptions. Patients taking buprenorphine were more likely to receive intravenous lidocaine (25.0 percent vs 0.0 percent, p = 0.031) and ketamine (83.3 percent vs 54.2 percent, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION Findings from this study support accumulating evidence that patients should be maintained on buprenorphine MOUD throughout the perioperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca C Dale
- Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4378-002X
| | - Carol L Metcalf
- Clinical Nurse Practitioner, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
150
|
Hickey T, Abelleira A, Acampora G, Becker WC, Falker CG, Nazario M, Weimer MB. Perioperative Buprenorphine Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Med Clin North Am 2022; 106:169-185. [PMID: 34823729 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Buprenorphine formulations (including buprenorphine/naloxone) are effective treatments of pain and opioid use disorder (OUD). Historically, perioperative management of patients prescribed buprenorphine involved abstinence from buprenorphine sufficient to allow for unrestricted mu-opioid receptor availability to full agonist opioid (FAO) treatment. Evidence is mounting that a multimodal analgesic strategy, including simultaneous administration of buprenorphine and FAO, nonopioid adjuncts such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and regional anesthesia, is a safe and effective perioperative strategy for the patient prescribed long-term buprenorphine treatment of OUD. This strategy will likely simplify management and more seamlessly provide continuous buprenorphine treatment of OUD after hospital discharge.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Acetaminophen/administration & dosage
- Acetaminophen/therapeutic use
- Aged
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use
- Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage
- Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology
- Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods
- Buprenorphine/administration & dosage
- Buprenorphine/pharmacology
- Buprenorphine/therapeutic use
- Combined Modality Therapy/methods
- Drug Compounding/methods
- Female
- Humans
- Interdisciplinary Communication
- Male
- Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods
- Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy
- Pain/drug therapy
- Pain Management/methods
- Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control
- Perioperative Care/methods
- Receptors, Opioid, mu/drug effects
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hickey
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven, CT 06516, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
| | - Audrey Abelleira
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
| | - Gregory Acampora
- MGH/Harvard Center for Addiction Medicine, Pain Management Center at MGH, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - William C Becker
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System; Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine
| | - Caroline G Falker
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
| | - Mitchell Nazario
- National PBM Clinical Program Manager, VHA Pharmacy Benefits Management (12PBM), 1st Avenue - 1 Block North of Cermak (Building 37), Hines, IL 60141, USA
| | - Melissa B Weimer
- Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine; Yale School of Public Health
| |
Collapse
|