151
|
Pega F, Liu SY, Walter S, Pabayo R, Saith R, Lhachimi SK. Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11:CD011135. [PMID: 29139110 PMCID: PMC6486161 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011135.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unconditional cash transfers (UCTs; provided without obligation) for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities (e.g. orphanhood, old age or HIV infection) are a type of social protection intervention that addresses a key social determinant of health (income) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The relative effectiveness of UCTs compared with conditional cash transfers (CCTs; provided so long as the recipient engages in prescribed behaviours such as using a health service or attending school) is unknown. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of UCTs for improving health services use and health outcomes in vulnerable children and adults in LMICs. Secondary objectives are to assess the effects of UCTs on social determinants of health and healthcare expenditure and to compare to effects of UCTs versus CCTs. SEARCH METHODS We searched 17 electronic academic databases, including the Cochrane Public Health Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (the Cochrane Library 2017, Issue 5), MEDLINE and Embase, in May 2017. We also searched six electronic grey literature databases and websites of key organisations, handsearched key journals and included records, and sought expert advice. SELECTION CRITERIA We included both parallel group and cluster-randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, cohort and controlled before-and-after (CBAs) studies, and interrupted time series studies of UCT interventions in children (0 to 17 years) and adults (18 years or older) in LMICs. Comparison groups received either no UCT or a smaller UCT. Our primary outcomes were any health services use or health outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently screened potentially relevant records for inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We tried to obtain missing data from study authors if feasible. For cluster-RCTs, we generally calculated risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes from crude frequency measures in approximately correct analyses. Meta-analyses applied the inverse variance or Mantel-Haenszel method with random effects. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 21 studies (16 cluster-RCTs, 4 CBAs and 1 cohort study) involving 1,092,877 participants (36,068 children and 1,056,809 adults) and 31,865 households in Africa, the Americas and South-East Asia in our meta-analyses and narrative synthesis. The 17 types of UCTs we identified, including one basic universal income intervention, were pilot or established government programmes or research experiments. The cash value was equivalent to 1.3% to 53.9% of the annualised gross domestic product per capita. All studies compared a UCT with no UCT, and three studies also compared a UCT with a CCT. Most studies carried an overall high risk of bias (i.e. often selection and/or performance bias). Most studies were funded by national governments and/or international organisations.Throughout the review, we use the words 'probably' to indicate moderate-quality evidence, 'may/maybe' for low-quality evidence, and 'uncertain' for very low-quality evidence. UCTs may not have impacted the likelihood of having used any health service in the previous 1 to 12 months, when participants were followed up between 12 and 24 months into the intervention (risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.09, P = 0.07, 5 cluster-RCTs, N = 4972, I² = 2%, low-quality evidence). At one to two years, UCTs probably led to a clinically meaningful, very large reduction in the likelihood of having had any illness in the previous two weeks to three months (odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.93, 5 cluster-RCTs, N = 8446, I² = 57%, moderate-quality evidence). Evidence from five cluster-RCTs on food security was too inconsistent to be combined in a meta-analysis, but it suggested that at 13 to 24 months' follow-up, UCTs could increase the likelihood of having been food secure over the previous month (low-quality evidence). UCTs may have increased participants' level of dietary diversity over the previous week, when assessed with the Household Dietary Diversity Score and followed up 24 months into the intervention (mean difference (MD) 0.59 food categories, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.01, 4 cluster-RCTs, N = 9347, I² = 79%, low-quality evidence). Despite several studies providing relevant evidence, the effects of UCTs on the likelihood of being moderately stunted and on the level of depression remain uncertain. No evidence was available on the effect of a UCT on the likelihood of having died. UCTs probably led to a clinically meaningful, moderate increase in the likelihood of currently attending school, when assessed at 12 to 24 months into the intervention (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.09, 6 cluster-RCTs, N = 4800, I² = 0%, moderate-quality evidence). The evidence was uncertain for whether UCTs impacted livestock ownership, extreme poverty, participation in child labour, adult employment or parenting quality. Evidence from six cluster-RCTs on healthcare expenditure was too inconsistent to be combined in a meta-analysis, but it suggested that UCTs may have increased the amount of money spent on health care at 7 to 24 months into the intervention (low-quality evidence). The effects of UCTs on health equity (or unfair and remedial health inequalities) were very uncertain. We did not identify any harms from UCTs. Three cluster-RCTs compared UCTs versus CCTs with regard to the likelihood of having used any health services, the likelihood of having had any illness or the level of dietary diversity, but evidence was limited to one study per outcome and was very uncertain for all three. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This body of evidence suggests that unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) may not impact a summary measure of health service use in children and adults in LMICs. However, UCTs probably or may improve some health outcomes (i.e. the likelihood of having had any illness, the likelihood of having been food secure, and the level of dietary diversity), one social determinant of health (i.e. the likelihood of attending school), and healthcare expenditure. The evidence on the relative effectiveness of UCTs and CCTs remains very uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Pega
- University of OtagoPublic Health23A Mein Street, NewtownWellingtonNew Zealand6242
| | - Sze Yan Liu
- Harvard UniversityHarvard Center for Population and Development StudiesCambridgeMAUSA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell UniversityHealthcare Policy and ResearchNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Stefan Walter
- University of California, San FranciscoEpidemiology and Biostatistics185 Berry StSan FranciscoCAUSA94107
| | - Roman Pabayo
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public HealthSocial and Behavioral Sciences677 Huntington AvenueBostonMAUSA02215
- University of AlbertaSchool of Public HealthEdmontonAlbertaCanada
| | - Ruhi Saith
- New DelhiOxford Policy ManagementNew DelhiIndia
| | - Stefan K Lhachimi
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and EpidemiologyResearch Group for Evidence‐Based Public HealthAchterstr. 30BremenGermany28359
| | | |
Collapse
|
152
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous exposure injuries from devices used for blood collection or for injections expose healthcare workers to the risk of blood borne infections such as hepatitis B and C, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Safety features such as shields or retractable needles can possibly contribute to the prevention of these injuries and it is important to evaluate their effectiveness. OBJECTIVES To determine the benefits and harms of safety medical devices aiming to prevent percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel versus no intervention or alternative interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, NHSEED, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Nioshtic, CISdoc and PsycINFO (until 11 November 2016). SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCT), controlled before and after studies (CBA) and interrupted time-series (ITS) designs of the effect of safety engineered medical devices on percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare staff. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two of the authors independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data. We synthesized study results with a fixed-effect or random-effects model meta-analysis where appropriate. MAIN RESULTS We included six RCTs with 1838 participants, two cluster-RCTs with 795 participants and 73,454 patient days, five CBAs with approximately 22,000 participants and eleven ITS with an average of 13.8 data points. These studies evaluated safe modifications of blood collection systems, intravenous (IV) systems, injection systems, multiple devices, sharps containers and legislation on the implementation of safe devices. We estimated the needlestick injury (NSI) rate in the control groups to be about one to five NSIs per 1000 person-years. There were only two studies from low- or middle-income countries. The risk of bias was high in 20 of 24 studies. Safe blood collection systems:We found one RCT that found a safety engineered blood gas syringe having no considerable effect on NSIs (Relative Risk (RR) 0.2, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 0.01 to 4.14, 550 patients, very low quality evidence). In one ITS study, safe blood collection systems decreased NSIs immediately after the introduction (effect size (ES) -6.9, 95% CI -9.5 to -4.2) but there was no further decrease over time (ES -1.2, 95% CI -2.5 to 0.1, very low quality evidence). Another ITS study evaluated an outdated recapping shield, which we did not consider further. Safe Intravenous systemsThere was very low quality evidence in two ITS studies that NSIs were reduced with the introduction of safe IV devices, whereas one RCT and one CBA study provided very low quality evidence of no effect. However, there was moderate quality evidence produced by four other RCT studies that these devices increased the number of blood splashes when the safety system had to be engaged actively (relative risk (RR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.36). In contrast there was low quality evidence produced by two RCTs of passive systems that showed no effect on blood splashes. Yet another RCT produced low quality evidence that a different safe active IV system also decreased the incidence of blood leakages. Safe injection devicesThere was very low quality evidence provided by one RCT and one CBA study showing that introduction of safe injection devices did not considerably change the NSI rate. One ITS study produced low quality evidence showing that the introduction of safe passive injection systems had no effect on NSI rate when compared to safe active injection systems. Multiple safe devicesThere was very low quality evidence from one CBA study and two ITS studies. According to the CBA study, the introduction of multiple safe devices resulted in a decrease in NSI,whereas the two ITS studies found no change. Safety containersOne CBA study produced very low quality evidence showing that the introduction of safety containers decreased NSI. However, two ITS studies evaluating the same intervention found inconsistent results. LegislationThere was low to moderate quality evidence in two ITS studies that introduction of legislation on the use of safety-engineered devices reduced the rate of NSIs among healthcare workers. There was also low quality evidence which showed a decrease in the trend over time for NSI rates.Twenty out of 24 studies had a high risk of bias and the lack of evidence of a beneficial effect could be due to both confounding and bias. This does not mean that these devices are not effective. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS For safe blood collection systems, we found very low quality evidence of inconsistent effects on NSIs. For safe passive intravenous systems, we found very low quality evidence of a decrease in NSI and a reduction in the incidence of blood leakage events but moderate quality evidence that active systems may increase exposure to blood. For safe injection needles, the introduction of multiple safety devices or the introduction of sharps containers the evidence was inconsistent or there was no clear evidence of a benefit. There was low to moderate quality evidence that introduction of legislation probably reduces NSI rates.More high-quality cluster-randomised controlled studies that include cost-effectiveness measures are needed, especially in countries where both NSIs and blood-borne infections are highly prevalent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viraj K Reddy
- Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthCochrane Work Review GroupNeulaniementie 4KuopioFinland70101
| | - Marie‐Claude Lavoie
- University of Maryland Baltimore110 South Paca Street4th Floor, RM 4‐100BaltimoreMarylandUSA21201
| | - Jos H Verbeek
- Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthCochrane Work Review GroupNeulaniementie 4KuopioFinland70101
| | - Manisha Pahwa
- University of TorontoDalla Lana School of Public Health155 College Street, 6th floorTorontoONCanadaM5T 3M7
| | | |
Collapse
|
153
|
Benmiloud F, Rebaudet S, Varoquaux A, Penaranda G, Bannier M, Denizot A. Impact of autofluorescence-based identification of parathyroids during total thyroidectomy on postoperative hypocalcemia: a before and after controlled study. Surgery 2017; 163:23-30. [PMID: 29122325 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical impact of intraoperative autofluorescence-based identification of parathyroids using a near-infrared camera remains unknown. METHODS In a before and after controlled study, we compared all patients who underwent total thyroidectomy by the same surgeon during Period 1 (January 2015 to January 2016) without near-infrared (near-infrared- group) and those operated on during Period 2 (February 2016 to September 2016) using a near-infrared camera (near-infrared+ group). In parallel, we also compared all patients who underwent surgery without near-infrared during those same periods by another surgeon in the same unit (control groups). Main outcomes included postoperative hypocalcemia, parathyroid identification, autotransplantation, and inadvertent resection. RESULTS The near-infrared+ group displayed significantly lower postoperative hypocalcemia rates (5.2%) than the near-infrared- group (20.9%; P < .001). Compared with the near-infrared- patients, the near-infrared+ group exhibited an increased mean number of identified parathyroids and reduced parathyroid autotransplantation rates, although no difference was observed in inadvertent resection rates. Parathyroids were identified via near-infrared before they were visualized by the surgeon in 68% patients. In the control groups, parathyroid identification improved significantly from Period 1 to Period 2, although autotransplantation, inadvertent resection and postoperative hypocalcemia rates did not differ. CONCLUSION Near-infrared use during total thyroidectomy significantly reduced postoperative hypocalcemia, improved parathyroid identification and reduced their autotransplantation rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fares Benmiloud
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Hôpital Européen de Marseille, Marseilles, France.
| | - Stanislas Rebaudet
- Internal Medicine Unit, Hôpital Européen de Marseille, Marseilles, France
| | - Arthur Varoquaux
- Radiology Unit, Hôpital La Timone, Hospital-APHM, Marseilles, France
| | | | - Marie Bannier
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseilles, France
| | - Anne Denizot
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Hôpital Européen de Marseille, Marseilles, France
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Whittington MD, Bradley CJ, Atherly AJ, Campbell JD, Lindrooth RC. Value of Public Health Funding in Preventing Hospital Bloodstream Infections in the United States. Am J Public Health 2017; 107:1764-1769. [PMID: 28933936 PMCID: PMC5637659 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2017.303987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the association of 1 activity of the Prevention and Public Health Fund with hospital bloodstream infections and calculate the return on investment (ROI). METHODS The activity was funded for 1 year (2013). A difference-in-differences specification evaluated hospital standardized infection ratios (SIRs) before funding allocation (years 2011 and 2012) and after funding allocation (years 2013 and 2014) in the 15 US states that received the funding compared with hospital SIRs in states that did not receive the funding. We estimated the association of the funded public health activity with SIRs for bloodstream infections. We calculated the ROI by dividing cost offsets from infections averted by the amount invested. RESULTS The funding was associated with a 33% (P < .05) reduction in SIRs and an ROI of $1.10 to $11.20 per $1 invested in the year of funding allocation (2013). In 2014, after the funding stopped, significant reductions were no longer evident. CONCLUSIONS This activity was associated with a reduction in bloodstream infections large enough to recoup the investment. Public health funding of carefully targeted areas may improve health and reduce health care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie D Whittington
- Melanie D. Whittington, Cathy J. Bradley, Adam J. Atherly, and Richard C. Lindrooth are with the Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. Melanie D. Whittington and Jonathan D. Campbell are with the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Cathy J Bradley
- Melanie D. Whittington, Cathy J. Bradley, Adam J. Atherly, and Richard C. Lindrooth are with the Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. Melanie D. Whittington and Jonathan D. Campbell are with the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Adam J Atherly
- Melanie D. Whittington, Cathy J. Bradley, Adam J. Atherly, and Richard C. Lindrooth are with the Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. Melanie D. Whittington and Jonathan D. Campbell are with the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Jonathan D Campbell
- Melanie D. Whittington, Cathy J. Bradley, Adam J. Atherly, and Richard C. Lindrooth are with the Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. Melanie D. Whittington and Jonathan D. Campbell are with the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Richard C Lindrooth
- Melanie D. Whittington, Cathy J. Bradley, Adam J. Atherly, and Richard C. Lindrooth are with the Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. Melanie D. Whittington and Jonathan D. Campbell are with the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Calatayud FM, Calatayud B, Gallego JG, González-Martín C, Alguacil LF. Effects of Mediterranean diet in patients with recurring colds and frequent complications. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2017; 45:417-424. [PMID: 27939720 DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2016.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In recent years, traditional diets enriched with fresh plant-based foods have been gradually abandoned, increasing the consumption of animal foods and highly processed food. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a nutritional intervention with a Traditional Mediterranean Diet in patients with recurring colds (RC) and frequent inflammatory complications (IC). METHODS Prospective before-after comparison study of 63 girls and 65 boys aged 1-5 years were included over a year in the nutritional programme "Learning to eat from the Mediterranean". We studied clinical and therapeutic variables and various anthropometric parameters. RESULTS All the studied indicators (number of catarrhal episodes CB, degree of intensity, emergency and hospital admissions) showed a positive and statistically significant evolution, evidenced from the first weeks of starting treatment, until the end of the year, after which 53.9% of patients had no CB, 25% had only one, and 16.4% had two episodes, compared to the 4.64 episodes on average in the previous year. Antibiotic use decreased by 87.4%, from 3.85±1.27 times/patient/year to 0.49±0.79 (p<0.001). Symptomatic treatment decreased by 56.7%, from 7.03±2.76 to 3.05±1.69 (p<0.001). The satisfaction of the families was very high. The Kidmed index, which assesses the quality of the Mediterranean Diet, increased from 7.8 to 10.9 points. CONCLUSION The adoption of a Traditional Mediterranean Diet could be a major contribution to the improvement of patients with recurring colds and frequent inflammatory complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F M Calatayud
- Pediatra en Clínica infanto-juvenil "La Palma", C/Palma 17, bajo A, Ciudad Real, DP: 13001, Spain.
| | - B Calatayud
- Nutricionista en Clínica infanto-juvenil "La Palma", C/Palma 17, bajo A, Ciudad Real, DP: 13001, Spain
| | - J G Gallego
- Médico de familia en Centro de Salud n° 1 de Ciudad Real, Plaza de la Provincia 4, 3° A, Ciudad Real, DP: 13001, Spain
| | - C González-Martín
- Profesora de Toxicología, Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Urb. Montepríncipe, Boadilla, DP: 28668, Spain
| | - L F Alguacil
- Catedrático de Farmacología, Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Urb. Montepríncipe, Boadilla, DP: 28668, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Häske D, Beckers SK, Hofmann M, Lefering R, Grützner PA, Stöckle U, Papathanassiou V, Münzberg M. Subjective safety and self-confidence in prehospital trauma care and learning progress after trauma-courses: part of the prospective longitudinal mixed-methods EPPTC-trial. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2017; 25:79. [PMID: 28806988 PMCID: PMC5557465 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-017-0426-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehospital trauma care is stressful and requires multi-professional teamwork. A decrease in the number of accident victims ultimately affects the routine and skills and underlines the importance of effective training. Standardized courses, like PHTLS, are established for health care professionals to improve the prehospital care of trauma patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the subjective safety in prehospital trauma care and learning progress by paramedics in a longitudinal analysis. METHODS This was a prospective intervention trial and part of the mixed-method longitudinal EPPTC-trial, evaluating subjective and objective changes among participants and real patient care as a result of PHTLS courses. Participants were evaluated with pre/post questionnaires as well as one year after the course. RESULTS We included 236 datasets. In the pre/post comparison, an increased performance could be observed in nearly all cases. The result shows that the expectations of the participants of the course were fully met even after one year (p = 0.002). The subjective safety in trauma care is significantly better even one year after the course (p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that (ABCDE)-structure is decisive (p = 0.036) as well as safety in rare and common skills (both p < 0.001). Most skills are also rated better after one year. Knowledge and specific safety are assessed as worse after one year. CONCLUSION The courses meet the expectations of the participants and increase the subjective safety in the prehospital care of trauma patients. ABCDE-structure and safety in skills are crucial. In the short term, both safety in skills and knowledge can be increased, but the courses do not have the power to maintain knowledge and specific subjective safety issues over a year. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00004713 , registered 14. February 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Häske
- Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stefan K. Beckers
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Emergency Medical Service, Fire Department, City of Aachen, 52057 Aachen, Germany
| | - Marzellus Hofmann
- Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Rolf Lefering
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Paul A. Grützner
- Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, BG Hospital Ludwigshafen, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, D-67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Stöckle
- Department of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Vassilios Papathanassiou
- Institute of Medical Psychology, University Hospital of the Saarland and Medical Faculty of the University of Saarland, /Saar, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Münzberg
- Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, BG Hospital Ludwigshafen, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, D-67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Cadilhac DA, Andrew NE, Stroil Salama E, Hill K, Middleton S, Horton E, Meade I, Kuhle S, Nelson MR, Grimley R. Improving discharge care: the potential of a new organisational intervention to improve discharge after hospitalisation for acute stroke, a controlled before-after pilot study. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016010. [PMID: 28780550 PMCID: PMC5629649 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Revised: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Provision of a discharge care plan and prevention therapies is often suboptimal. Our objective was to design and pilot test an interdisciplinary, organisational intervention to improve discharge care using stroke as the case study using a mixed-methods, controlled before-after observational study design. SETTING Acute care public hospitals in Queensland, Australia (n=15). The 15 hospitals were ranked against a benchmark based on a composite outcome of three discharge care processes. Clinicians from a 'top-ranked' hospital participated in a focus group to elicit their success factors. Two pilot hospitals then participated in the organisational intervention that was designed with experts and consumers. PARTICIPANTS Hospital clinicians involved in discharge care for stroke and patients admitted with acute stroke or transient ischaemic attack. INTERVENTION A four-stage, multifaceted organisational intervention that included data reviews, education and facilitated action planning. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Three discharge processes collected in Queensland hospitals within the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry were used to select study hospitals: (1) discharge care plan; (2) antihypertensive medication prescription and (3) antiplatelet medication prescription (ischaemic events only). Primary measure: composite outcome. Secondary measures: individual adherence changes for each discharge process; sensitivity analyses. The performance outcomes were compared 3 months before the intervention (preintervention), 3 months postintervention and at 12 months (sustainability). RESULTS Data from 1289 episodes of care from the two pilot hospitals were analysed. Improvements from preintervention adherence were: antiplatelet therapy (88%vs96%, p=0.02); antihypertensive prescription (61%vs79%, p<0.001); discharge planning (72%vs94%, p<0.001); composite outcome (73%vs89%, p<0.001). There was an insignificant decay effect over the 12-month sustainability period (composite outcome: 89% postintervention vs 85% sustainability period, p=0.08). CONCLUSION Discharge care in hospitals may be effectively improved and sustained through a staged and peer-informed, organisational intervention. The intervention warrants further application and trialling on a larger scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique A Cadilhac
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Nadine E Andrew
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Enna Stroil Salama
- Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre (QCPRRC), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Sandy Middleton
- Nursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Australia (Sydney) and Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eleanor Horton
- School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia
| | - Ian Meade
- Acute Stroke Unit, The Townsville Hospital, Townsville, Australia
| | | | - Mark R Nelson
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Rohan Grimley
- Sunshine Coast Clinical School, The University of Queensland, Nambour, Australia
- Queensland Department of Health, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the second update of a Cochrane Review originally published in 2009. Millions of workers worldwide are exposed to noise levels that increase their risk of hearing disorders. There is uncertainty about the effectiveness of hearing loss prevention interventions. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions for preventing occupational noise exposure or occupational hearing loss compared to no intervention or alternative interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched the CENTRAL; PubMed; Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; BIOSIS Previews; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; and OSH UPDATE to 3 October 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCT), controlled before-after studies (CBA) and interrupted time-series (ITS) of non-clinical interventions under field conditions among workers to prevent or reduce noise exposure and hearing loss. We also collected uncontrolled case studies of engineering controls about the effect on noise exposure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data. We categorised interventions as engineering controls, administrative controls, personal hearing protection devices, and hearing surveillance. MAIN RESULTS We included 29 studies. One study evaluated legislation to reduce noise exposure in a 12-year time-series analysis but there were no controlled studies on engineering controls for noise exposure. Eleven studies with 3725 participants evaluated effects of personal hearing protection devices and 17 studies with 84,028 participants evaluated effects of hearing loss prevention programmes (HLPPs). Effects on noise exposure Engineering interventions following legislationOne ITS study found that new legislation in the mining industry reduced the median personal noise exposure dose in underground coal mining by 27.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval (CI) -36.1 to -19.3 percentage points) immediately after the implementation of stricter legislation. This roughly translates to a 4.5 dB(A) decrease in noise level. The intervention was associated with a favourable but statistically non-significant downward trend in time of the noise dose of -2.1 percentage points per year (95% CI -4.9 to 0.7, 4 year follow-up, very low-quality evidence). Engineering intervention case studiesWe found 12 studies that described 107 uncontrolled case studies of immediate reductions in noise levels of machinery ranging from 11.1 to 19.7 dB(A) as a result of purchasing new equipment, segregating noise sources or installing panels or curtains around sources. However, the studies lacked long-term follow-up and dose measurements of workers, and we did not use these studies for our conclusions. Hearing protection devicesIn general hearing protection devices reduced noise exposure on average by about 20 dB(A) in one RCT and three CBAs (57 participants, low-quality evidence). Two RCTs showed that, with instructions for insertion, the attenuation of noise by earplugs was 8.59 dB better (95% CI 6.92 dB to 10.25 dB) compared to no instruction (2 RCTs, 140 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Administrative controls: information and noise exposure feedbackOn-site training sessions did not have an effect on personal noise-exposure levels compared to information only in one cluster-RCT after four months' follow-up (mean difference (MD) 0.14 dB; 95% CI -2.66 to 2.38). Another arm of the same study found that personal noise exposure information had no effect on noise levels (MD 0.30 dB(A), 95% CI -2.31 to 2.91) compared to no such information (176 participants, low-quality evidence). Effects on hearing loss Hearing protection devicesIn two studies the authors compared the effect of different devices on temporary threshold shifts at short-term follow-up but reported insufficient data for analysis. In two CBA studies the authors found no difference in hearing loss from noise exposure above 89 dB(A) between muffs and earplugs at long-term follow-up (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.03 ), very low-quality evidence). Authors of another CBA study found that wearing hearing protection more often resulted in less hearing loss at very long-term follow-up (very low-quality evidence). Combination of interventions: hearing loss prevention programmesOne cluster-RCT found no difference in hearing loss at three- or 16-year follow-up between an intensive HLPP for agricultural students and audiometry only. One CBA study found no reduction of the rate of hearing loss (MD -0.82 dB per year (95% CI -1.86 to 0.22) for a HLPP that provided regular personal noise exposure information compared to a programme without this information.There was very-low-quality evidence in four very long-term studies, that better use of hearing protection devices as part of a HLPP decreased the risk of hearing loss compared to less well used hearing protection in HLPPs (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.69). Other aspects of the HLPP such as training and education of workers or engineering controls did not show a similar effect.In three long-term CBA studies, workers in a HLPP had a statistically non-significant 1.8 dB (95% CI -0.6 to 4.2) greater hearing loss at 4 kHz than non-exposed workers and the confidence interval includes the 4.2 dB which is the level of hearing loss resulting from 5 years of exposure to 85 dB(A). In addition, of three other CBA studies that could not be included in the meta-analysis, two showed an increased risk of hearing loss in spite of the protection of a HLPP compared to non-exposed workers and one CBA did not. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is very low-quality evidence that implementation of stricter legislation can reduce noise levels in workplaces. Controlled studies of other engineering control interventions in the field have not been conducted. There is moderate-quality evidence that training of proper insertion of earplugs significantly reduces noise exposure at short-term follow-up but long-term follow-up is still needed.There is very low-quality evidence that the better use of hearing protection devices as part of HLPPs reduces the risk of hearing loss, whereas for other programme components of HLPPs we did not find such an effect. The absence of conclusive evidence should not be interpreted as evidence of lack of effectiveness. Rather, it means that further research is very likely to have an important impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Tikka
- Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthCochrane Work Review GroupTYÖTERVEYSLAITOSFinlandFI‐70032
| | - Jos H Verbeek
- Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthCochrane Work Review GroupTYÖTERVEYSLAITOSFinlandFI‐70032
| | | | - Thais C Morata
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)CincinnatiOHUSA
| | - Wouter A Dreschler
- Academic Medical CentreClinical & Experimental AudiologyMeibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1105 AZ
| | - Silvia Ferrite
- Universidade Federal da BahiaDepartment of Speech and Hearing SciencesAv Reitor Miguel Calmon, snInstituto de Ciencias da Saude, Vale do CanelaSalvadorBahiaBrazil40110‐902
| | | |
Collapse
|
159
|
Marx R, Tanner‐Smith EE, Davison CM, Ufholz L, Freeman J, Shankar R, Newton L, Brown RS, Parpia AS, Cozma I, Hendrikx S. Later school start times for supporting the education, health, and well-being of high school students. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 7:CD009467. [PMID: 28670711 PMCID: PMC6483483 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009467.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A number of school systems worldwide have proposed and implemented later school start times as a means of avoiding the potentially negative impacts that early morning schedules can have on adolescent students. Even mild sleep deprivation has been associated with significant health and educational concerns: increased risk for accidents and injuries, impaired learning, aggression, memory loss, poor self-esteem, and changes in metabolism. Although researchers have begun to explore the effects of delayed school start time, no one has conducted a rigorous review of evidence to determine whether later school start times support adolescent health, education, and well-being. OBJECTIVES We aimed to assess the effects of a later school start time for supporting health, education, and well-being in high school students.Secondary objectives were to explore possible differential effects of later school start times in student subgroups and in different types of schools; to identify implementation practices, contextual factors, and delivery modes associated with positive and negative effects of later start times; and to assess the effects of later school start times on the broader community (high school faculty and staff, neighborhood, and families). SEARCH METHODS We conducted the main search for this review on 28 October 2014 and updated it on 8 February 2016. We searched CENTRAL as well as 17 key electronic databases (including MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts), current editions of relevant journals and organizational websites, trial registries, and Google Scholar. SELECTION CRITERIA We included any randomized controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series studies with sufficient data points that pertained to students aged 13 to 19 years and that compared different school start times. Studies that reported either primary outcomes of interest (academic outcomes, amount or quality of sleep, mental health indicators, attendance, or alertness) or secondary outcomes (health behaviors, health and safety indicators, social outcomes, family outcomes, school outcomes, or community outcomes) were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently determined inclusion and exclusion decisions through screening titles, abstracts, and full-text reports. Two review authors independently extracted data for all eligible studies. We presented findings through a narrative synthesis across all studies. When two or more study samples provided sufficient information to permit effect size calculations, we conducted random-effects meta-analyses to synthesize effects across studies. MAIN RESULTS Our search located 17 eligible records reporting on 11 unique studies with 297,994 participants; the studies examined academic outcomes, amount and quality of sleep, mental health indicators, attendance, and student alertness. Overall, the quality of the body of evidence was very low, as we rated most studies as being at high or unclear risk of bias with respect to allocation, attrition, absence of randomization, and the collection of baseline data. Therefore, we cannot be confident about the effects of later school start times.Preliminary evidence from the included studies indicated a potential association between later school start times and academic and psychosocial outcomes, but quality and comparability of these data were low and often precluded quantitative synthesis. Four studies examined the association between later school start times and academic outcomes, reporting mixed results. Six studies examined effects on total amount of sleep and reported significant, positive relationships between later school start times and amount of sleep. One study provided information concerning mental health outcomes, reporting an association between decreased depressive symptoms and later school start times. There were mixed results for the association between later school start times and absenteeism. Three studies reported mixed results concerning the association between later school start times and student alertness. There was limited indication of potential adverse effects on logistics, as the qualitative portions of one study reported less interaction between parents and children, and another reported staffing and scheduling difficulties. Because of the insufficient evidence, we cannot draw firm conclusions concerning adverse effects at this time.It is important to note the limitations of this evidence, especially as randomized controlled trials and high-quality primary studies are difficult to conduct; school systems are often unwilling or unable to allow researchers the necessary control over scheduling and data collection. Moreover, this evidence does not speak to the process of implementing later school starts, as the included studies focused on reporting the effects rather than exploring the process. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This systematic review on later school start times suggests several potential benefits for this intervention and points to the need for higher quality primary studies. However, as a result of the limited evidence base, we could not determine the effects of later school start times with any confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Marx
- Vanderbilt UniversityDepartment of Human and Organizational Development, Peabody College of Education and Human DevelopmentNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Emily E Tanner‐Smith
- Vanderbilt UniversityPeabody Research InstituteBox 0181 GPC230 Appleton PlaceNashvilleTNUSA37215
| | - Colleen M Davison
- Queen's UniversityDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Kingston General Hospital Research CentreCarruthers Hall62 Fifth Field Company LaneKingstonONCanada
| | - Lee‐Anne Ufholz
- University of OttawaHealth Sciences Library451 Smyth RoadOttawaONCanadaK1H 8M5
| | - John Freeman
- Queen's UniversitySocial Program and Evaluation GroupDuncan McArthur Hall‐ Room B164KingstonONCanadaK7L 3N6
| | - Ravi Shankar
- Manipal UniversityDepartment of StatisticsManipalKarnatakaIndia576104
| | - Lisa Newton
- Toronto District School BoardResearch and Information Services1 Civic Centre Court, Lower LevelEtobicokeONCanadaM9C 2B3
| | - Robert S Brown
- Toronto District School BoardResearch and Information Services1 Civic Centre Court, Lower LevelEtobicokeONCanadaM9C 2B3
| | - Alyssa S Parpia
- Queen's UniversityDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Kingston General Hospital Research CentreCarruthers Hall62 Fifth Field Company LaneKingstonONCanada
| | - Ioana Cozma
- Queen's UniversityDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Kingston General Hospital Research CentreCarruthers Hall62 Fifth Field Company LaneKingstonONCanada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
160
|
Wang JH, Abdel-Aty M, Wang L. Examination of the reliability of the crash modification factors using empirical Bayes method with resampling technique. Accid Anal Prev 2017; 104:96-105. [PMID: 28494260 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Revised: 04/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
There have been plenty of studies intended to use different methods, for example, empirical Bayes before-after methods, to get accurate estimation of CMFs. All of them have different assumptions toward crash count if there was no treatment. Additionally, another major assumption is that multiple sites share the same true CMF. Under this assumption, the CMF at an individual intersection is randomly drawn from a normally distributed population of CMFs at all intersections. Since CMFs are non-zero values, the population of all CMFs might not follow normal distributions, and even if it does, the true mean of CMFs at some intersections may be different from that at others. Therefore, a bootstrap method based on before-after empirical Bayes theory was proposed to estimate CMFs, but it did not make distributional assumptions. This bootstrap procedure has the added benefit of producing a measure of CMF stability. Furthermore, based on the bootstrapped CMF, a new CMF precision rating method was proposed to evaluate the reliability of CMFs. This study chose 29 urban four-legged intersections as treated sites, and their controls were changed from stop-controlled to signal-controlled. Meanwhile, 124 urban four-legged stop-controlled intersections were selected as reference sites. At first, different safety performance functions (SPFs) were applied to five crash categories, and it was found that each crash category had different optimal SPF form. Then, the CMFs of these five crash categories were estimated using the bootstrap empirical Bayes method. The results of the bootstrapped method showed that signalization significantly decreased Angle+Left-Turn crashes, and its CMF had the highest precision. While, the CMF for Rear-End crashes was unreliable. For KABCO, KABC, and KAB crashes, their CMFs were proved to be reliable for the majority of intersections, but the estimated effect of signalization may be not accurate at some sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung-Han Wang
- Department of Civil, Environmental Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, 4000 Central Florida Blvd, Orlando, FL 32816, United States.
| | - Mohamed Abdel-Aty
- Department of Civil, Environmental Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, 4000 Central Florida Blvd, Orlando, FL 32816, United States.
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Civil, Environmental Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, 4000 Central Florida Blvd, Orlando, FL 32816, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Wood JS, Donnell ET. Causal inference framework for generalizable safety effect estimates. Accid Anal Prev 2017; 104:74-87. [PMID: 28486151 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 05/01/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
This study integrates a causal inference framework to the Empirical Bayes (EB) before-after method to develop generalizable safety effect estimates (i.e., crash modification factor (CMF)). The method considers approaches to estimate the average treatment effect for the treated (ATT), average treatment effect for the untreated (ATU), and average treatment effect (ATE). The current EB method is shown to estimate ATT while ATE is what is typically desired in traffic safety research. Modifications to the current EB method to estimate ATU and ATE are provided. The method is then applied to a dataset with a "no-treatment" scenario where the treatments were: 1) randomly selected and 2) selected based on crash history. Given the "no-treatment" outcome, it is known that the CMFs should have a value of 1 in order to be considered accurate. The standard negative binomial and mixed effects negative binomial regression models were applied in the analysis. It was found that, of the two regression methods, the ATE CMFs developed using the standard negative binomial were the most accurate. Finally, potential sources of bias in the EB method are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S Wood
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State University, Crothers Engineering Hall 132, Box 2219, Brookings, SD 57007, United States.
| | - Eric T Donnell
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 231 Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Ferreras Amez JM, Arribas Entrala B, Sarrat Torres MA, García Noain A, Caudevilla Martínez A, Colás Oros C, Aladrén Pérez B, Rodero Álvarez F. [Before-after study of the effect of implementing a sepsis code for emergency departments in the community of Aragon]. Emergencias 2017; 29:154-160. [PMID: 28825234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the effect of an emergency department sepsis code on the degree of compliance with measures recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and short-term mortality in the Spanish Autonomous Community of Aragon. MATERIAL AND METHODS Quasi-experimental study of 2 case cohorts, one including of cases before implementation of the sepsis code and one included cases managed afterwards. We extracted retrospectively data from hospital records for infectious processes and organ failures between December 2012 and January 2013 for the pre-code group and between December 2014 and January 2015 for the post-code group. Staff training sessions on the campaign recommendations were provided and the code, which specified clinical pathways, was activated electronically on inputting clinical variables at the moment of triage. Outcome measures were the percentage of compliance with the campaign's recommendations in the first 3 hours after a patient's arrival at the emergency department in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS A total of 222 cases were included in each group. Compliance with the following campaign recommendations improved after implementation of the sepsis code: antibiotic therapy in the first hour (P=.100), extractions for blood cultures (P 001), lactic acid measurement (P 001), and recommended fluid loading (P 001). In-hospital mortality was 31.1% in the pre-code cohort and 20.7% post-code; 30-day mortality rates were 30.1% and 19.8%, respectively (P=.016, all comparisons). CONCLUSION Use of a sepsis code led to short-term improvement in how often the measures recommended by a sepsis survival campaign were put into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José María Ferreras Amez
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza. Grupo de Trombosis SEMES Aragón, España
| | - Belén Arribas Entrala
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza. Grupo de Trombosis SEMES Aragón, España
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
163
|
Marik PE, Khangoora V, Rivera R, Hooper MH, Catravas J. Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C, and Thiamine for the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Before-After Study. Chest 2017; 151:1229-1238. [PMID: 27940189 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 589] [Impact Index Per Article: 84.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Revised: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global burden of sepsis is estimated as 15 to 19 million cases annually, with a mortality rate approaching 60% in low-income countries. METHODS In this retrospective before-after clinical study, we compared the outcome and clinical course of consecutive septic patients treated with intravenous vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine during a 7-month period (treatment group) with a control group treated in our ICU during the preceding 7 months. The primary outcome was hospital survival. A propensity score was generated to adjust the primary outcome. RESULTS There were 47 patients in both treatment and control groups, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The hospital mortality was 8.5% (4 of 47) in the treatment group compared with 40.4% (19 of 47) in the control group (P < .001). The propensity adjusted odds of mortality in the patients treated with the vitamin C protocol was 0.13 (95% CI, 0.04-0.48; P = .002). The Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment score decreased in all patients in the treatment group, with none developing progressive organ failure. All patients in the treatment group were weaned off vasopressors, a mean of 18.3 ± 9.8 h after starting treatment with the vitamin C protocol. The mean duration of vasopressor use was 54.9 ± 28.4 h in the control group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the early use of intravenous vitamin C, together with corticosteroids and thiamine, are effective in preventing progressive organ dysfunction, including acute kidney injury, and in reducing the mortality of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Additional studies are required to confirm these preliminary findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul E Marik
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA.
| | - Vikramjit Khangoora
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - Racquel Rivera
- Department of Pharmacy, Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk, VA
| | - Michael H Hooper
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - John Catravas
- School of Medical Diagnostic & Translational Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA; Department of Medicine and Department of Physiological Sciences, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Ogbuanya TC, Eseadi C, Orji CT, Ohanu IB, Bakare J, Ede MO. Effects of rational emotive behavior coaching on occupational stress and work ability among electronics workshop instructors in Nigeria. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e6891. [PMID: 28489795 PMCID: PMC5428629 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000006891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE This study examined the effectiveness of rational emotive behavior coaching (REBC) on occupational stress and work ability in a sample of electronics workshop instructors in Nigeria. METHODS A pretest-posttest control group design was used. The participants were 108 electronics workshop instructors in technical colleges in the south-east of Nigeria who met the study inclusion criteria. Data were collected using 3 questionnaires and analyzed using a repeated measure analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS REBC led to a significant reduction in occupational stress experienced by the electronics workshop instructors in the REBC group compared to their counterparts in the waitlist control group. Furthermore, the scores for occupation-related irrational beliefs of the instructors in the REBC group were significantly lower than those in the waitlist control group at the end of the coaching intervention. The work ability of the REBC group was significantly better than that of the waitlist control group. Finally, the effects in the REBC group were significantly sustained at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION REBC is a time-efficient and solution-focused therapeutic modality for assisting occupationally stressed employees in a Nigerian setting. REBC can be used for improving and maintaining work ability of workers. The researchers hope that occupational health professionals and health counselors would extend this approach to tackle psychological issues limiting employees' effectiveness and performance in the Nigerian work environment and in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa C. Ogbuanya
- Department of Industrial Technical Education, Faculty of Vocational and Technical Education
| | - Chiedu Eseadi
- Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Chibueze T. Orji
- Department of Industrial Technical Education, Faculty of Vocational and Technical Education
| | - Ifeanyi B. Ohanu
- Department of Industrial Technical Education, Faculty of Vocational and Technical Education
| | - Jimoh Bakare
- Department of Industrial Technical Education, Faculty of Vocational and Technical Education
| | - Moses O. Ede
- Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Ogbuanya TC, Eseadi C, Orji CT, Ede MO, Ohanu IB, Bakare J. Effects of rational emotive occupational health therapy intervention on the perceptions of organizational climate and occupational risk management practices among electronics technology employees in Nigeria. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e6765. [PMID: 28471971 PMCID: PMC5419917 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000006765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving employees' perception of organizational climate, and coaching them to remain steadfast when managing occupational risks associated with their job, might have an important effect on their psychosocial wellbeing and occupational health. This study examined the effects of a rational emotive occupational health therapy intervention program on the perceptions of organizational climate and occupational risk management practices. METHODS The participants were 77 electronics technology employees in the south-east of Nigeria. The study used a pretest-posttest control group design. RESULTS The rational emotive occupational health therapy intervention program significantly improved perceptions of the organizational climate for the people in the treatment group compared to those in the waitlist control group at post-intervention and follow-up assessments. Occupational risk management practices of the employees in the treatment group were also significantly better than those in the waitlist control group at the same 2 assessments. CONCLUSIONS Corporate application of a rational emotive behavior therapy as an occupational health therapy intervention program is essential for improving the perceptions of organizational climate and promoting the adoption of feasible occupational risk management strategies in the workplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Chinyere Ogbuanya
- Department of Industrial Technical Education, Faculty of Vocational and Technical Education, University of Nigeria
| | - Chiedu Eseadi
- Department of Educational Foundations (Guidance & Counseling Unit), Faculty of Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Chibueze Tobias Orji
- Department of Industrial Technical Education, Faculty of Vocational and Technical Education, University of Nigeria
| | - Moses Onyemaechi Ede
- Department of Educational Foundations (Guidance & Counseling Unit), Faculty of Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Ifeanyi Benedict Ohanu
- Department of Industrial Technical Education, Faculty of Vocational and Technical Education, University of Nigeria
| | - Jimoh Bakare
- Department of Industrial Technical Education, Faculty of Vocational and Technical Education, University of Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Saillour-Glénisson F, Duhamel S, Fourneyron E, Huiart L, Joseph JP, Langlois E, Pincemail S, Ramel V, Renaud T, Roberts T, Sibé M, Thiessard F, Wittwer J, Salmi LR. Protocole of a controlled before-after evaluation of a national health information technology-based program to improve healthcare coordination and access to information. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:297. [PMID: 28431579 PMCID: PMC5399879 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2199-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2016] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improvement of coordination of all health and social care actors in the patient pathways is an important issue in many countries. Health Information (HI) technology has been considered as a potentially effective answer to this issue. The French Health Ministry first funded the development of five TSN ("Territoire de Soins Numérique"/Digital health territories) projects, aiming at improving healthcare coordination and access to information for healthcare providers, patients and the population, and at improving healthcare professionals work organization. The French Health Ministry then launched a call for grant to fund one research project consisting in evaluating the TSN projects implementation and impact and in developing a model for HI technology evaluation. METHODS EvaTSN is mainly based on a controlled before-after study design. Data collection covers three periods: before TSN program implementation, during early TSN program implementation and at late TSN program implementation, in the five TSN projects' territories and in five comparison territories. Three populations will be considered: "TSN-targeted people" (healthcare system users and people having characteristics targeted by the TSN projects), "TSN patient users" (people included in TSN experimentations or using particular services) and "TSN professional users" (healthcare professionals involved in TSN projects). Several samples will be made in each population depending on the objective, axis and stage of the study. Four types of data sources are considered: 1) extractions from the French National Heath Insurance Database (SNIIRAM) and the French Autonomy Personalized Allowance database, 2) Ad hoc surveys collecting information on knowledge of TSN projects, TSN program use, ease of use, satisfaction and understanding, TSN pathway experience and appropriateness of hospital admissions, 3) qualitative analyses using semi-directive interviews and focus groups and document analyses and 4) extractions of TSN implementation indicators from TSN program database. DISCUSSION EvaTSN is a challenging French national project for the production of evidenced-based information on HI technologies impact and on the context and conditions of their effectiveness and efficiency. We will be able to support health care management in order to implement HI technologies. We will also be able to produce an evaluation toolkit for HI technology evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02837406 , 08/18/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Saillour-Glénisson
- ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service d’Information Médicale, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Sylvie Duhamel
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo Saignat 33076, Bordeaux, Cedex France
| | - Emmanuelle Fourneyron
- Institut de Santé Publique d’Epidémiologie et de Développement, Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo Saignat 33076, Cedex F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Laetitia Huiart
- CHU, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique, Saint-Denis, F-97400 France
- Groupe Hospitalier Est Réunion, Route Nationale 3 30, 97470, Saint-Benoît-de-Carmaux, France
| | - Jean Philippe Joseph
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo Saignat 33076, Bordeaux, Cedex France
| | - Emmanuel Langlois
- University Bordeaux/Sciences Po Bordeaux, Centre Emile Durkheim, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- Centre Emile Durkheim, Science Politique et Sociologie Comparatives, Université de Bordeaux, 3Ter, Place de la Victoire 33076, Bordeaux, Cedex France
| | - Stephane Pincemail
- Institut de Santé Publique d’Epidémiologie et de Développement, Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo Saignat 33076, Cedex F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Viviane Ramel
- ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Thomas Renaud
- ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Tamara Roberts
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo Saignat 33076, Bordeaux, Cedex France
- University Bordeaux/Sciences Po Bordeaux, Centre Emile Durkheim, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Matthieu Sibé
- ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Frantz Thiessard
- ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Jerome Wittwer
- ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Louis Rachid Salmi
- ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service d’Information Médicale, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - for the EvaTSN Research group
- ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service d’Information Médicale, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo Saignat 33076, Bordeaux, Cedex France
- Institut de Santé Publique d’Epidémiologie et de Développement, Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo Saignat 33076, Cedex F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- CHU, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique, Saint-Denis, F-97400 France
- University Bordeaux/Sciences Po Bordeaux, Centre Emile Durkheim, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
- Groupe Hospitalier Est Réunion, Route Nationale 3 30, 97470, Saint-Benoît-de-Carmaux, France
- Centre Emile Durkheim, Science Politique et Sociologie Comparatives, Université de Bordeaux, 3Ter, Place de la Victoire 33076, Bordeaux, Cedex France
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Risør BW, Casper SD, Andersen LL, Sørensen J. A multi-component patient-handling intervention improves attitudes and behaviors for safe patient handling and reduces aggression experienced by nursing staff: A controlled before-after study. Appl Ergon 2017; 60:74-82. [PMID: 28166902 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2015] [Revised: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 10/16/2016] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluated an intervention for patient-handling equipment aimed to improve nursing staffs' use of patient handling equipment and improve their general health, reduce musculoskeletal problems, aggressive episodes, days of absence and work-related accidents. As a controlled before-after study, questionnaire data were collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up among nursing staff at intervention and control wards at two hospitals. At 12-month follow-up, the intervention group had more positive attitudes towards patient-handling equipment and increased use of specific patient-handling equipment. In addition, a lower proportion of nursing staff in the intervention group had experienced physically aggressive episodes. No significant change was observed in general health status, musculoskeletal problems, days of absence or work-related accidents. The intervention resulted in more positive attitudes and behaviours for safe patient-handling and less physically aggressive episodes. However, this did not translate into improved health of the staff during the 12-month study period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Wulff Risør
- Centre for Health Economics Research (COHERE), Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløwsvej 9B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Louis Andersen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Physical Activity and Human Performance Group, SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jan Sørensen
- Centre for Health Economics Research (COHERE), Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløwsvej 9B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Asehnoune K, Mrozek S, Perrigault PF, Seguin P, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Lasocki S, Pujol A, Martin M, Chabanne R, Muller L, Hanouz JL, Hammad E, Rozec B, Kerforne T, Ichai C, Cinotti R, Geeraerts T, Elaroussi D, Pelosi P, Jaber S, Dalichampt M, Feuillet F, Sebille V, Roquilly A. A multi-faceted strategy to reduce ventilation-associated mortality in brain-injured patients. The BI-VILI project: a nationwide quality improvement project. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43:957-970. [PMID: 28315940 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4764-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We assessed outcomes in brain-injured patients after implementation of a multi-faceted approach to reduce respiratory complications in intensive care units. METHODS Prospective nationwide before-after trial. Consecutive adults with acute brain injury requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥24 h in 20 French intensive care units (ICUs) were included. The management of invasive ventilation in brain-injured patients admitted between 1 July 2013 and 31 October 2013 (4 months) was monitored and analysed. After the baseline period (1 November 2013-31 December 2013), ventilator settings and decision to extubate were selected as targets to hasten weaning from invasive ventilation. During the intervention period, low tidal volume (≤7 ml/kg), moderate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP, 6-8 cm H2O) and an early extubation protocol were recommended. The primary endpoint was the number of days free of invasive ventilation at day 90. Comparisons were performed between the two periods and between the compliant and non-compliant groups. RESULTS A total of 744 patients from 20 ICUs were included (391 pre-intervention; 353 intervention). No difference in the number of invasive ventilation-free days at day 90 was observed between the two periods [71 (0-80) vs. 67 (0-80) days; P = 0.746]. Compliance with the complete set of recommendations increased from 8 (2%) to 52 (15%) patients after the intervention (P < 0.001). At day 90, the number of invasive ventilation-free days was higher in the 60 (8%) patients whose care complied with recommendations than in the 684 (92%) patients whose care deviated from recommendations [77 (66-82) and 71 (0-80) days, respectively; P = 0.03]. The mortality rate was 10% in the compliant group and 26% in the non-compliant group (P = 0.023). Both multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.41-2.26; P < 0.001] and propensity score-adjusted analysis (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.56-3.26, P < 0.001) revealed that compliance was an independent factor associated with the reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to recommendations for low tidal volume, moderate PEEP and early extubation seemed to increase the number of ventilator-free days in brain-injured patients, but inconsistent adoption limited their impact. Trail registration number: NCT01885507.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Asehnoune
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Hôtel Dieu-HME-University Hospital of Nantes , Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France.
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU de Nantes, 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes Cedex 1, France.
| | - Ségolène Mrozek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre François Perrigault
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Gui Chauliac University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Philippe Seguin
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Pontchaillou-University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Claire Dahyot-Fizelier
- Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Sigismond Lasocki
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Anne Pujol
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Mathieu Martin
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Créteil-CHU Henri Mondor, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Russel Chabanne
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Laurent Muller
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Nimes, Nimes, France
| | - Jean Luc Hanouz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | - Emmanuelle Hammad
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Bertrand Rozec
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Laennec-University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Thomas Kerforne
- Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Carole Ichai
- Intensive Care Unit , Pasteur 2-University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Raphael Cinotti
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Hôtel Dieu-HME-University Hospital of Nantes , Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Thomas Geeraerts
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Djillali Elaroussi
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST National Cancer Research Institute, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Samir Jaber
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Saint Eloi University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Dalichampt
- Plateforme de Biométrie, Département Promotion de la Recherche Clinique, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Fanny Feuillet
- EA 4275, MethodS for Patients-centered Outcomes and HEalth REsearch (SPHERE), UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques, Nantes University, Nantes, France
| | - Véronique Sebille
- Plateforme de Biométrie, Département Promotion de la Recherche Clinique, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
- EA 4275, MethodS for Patients-centered Outcomes and HEalth REsearch (SPHERE), UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques, Nantes University, Nantes, France
| | - Antoine Roquilly
- Intensive Care Unit, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Hôtel Dieu-HME-University Hospital of Nantes , Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Fuller BM, Ferguson IT, Mohr NM, Drewry AM, Palmer C, Wessman BT, Ablordeppey E, Keeperman J, Stephens RJ, Briscoe CC, Kolomiets AA, Hotchkiss RS, Kollef MH. Lung-Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department (LOV-ED): A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 70:406-418.e4. [PMID: 28259481 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Revised: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE We evaluated the efficacy of an emergency department (ED)-based lung-protective mechanical ventilation protocol for the prevention of pulmonary complications. METHODS This was a quasi-experimental, before-after study that consisted of a preintervention period, a run-in period of approximately 6 months, and a prospective intervention period. The intervention was a multifaceted ED-based mechanical ventilator protocol targeting lung-protective tidal volume, appropriate setting of positive end-expiratory pressure, rapid oxygen weaning, and head-of-bed elevation. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to evaluate the primary outcome, which was the composite incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome and ventilator-associated conditions. RESULTS A total of 1,192 patients in the preintervention group and 513 patients in the intervention group were included. Lung-protective ventilation increased by 48.4% in the intervention group. In the propensity score-matched analysis (n=490 in each group), the primary outcome occurred in 71 patients (14.5%) in the preintervention group compared with 36 patients (7.4%) in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31 to 0.71). There was an increase in ventilator-free days (mean difference 3.7; 95% CI 2.3 to 5.1), ICU-free days (mean difference 2.4; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.7), and hospital-free days (mean difference 2.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.6) associated with the intervention. The mortality rate was 34.1% in the preintervention group and 19.6% in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.63). CONCLUSION Implementing a mechanical ventilator protocol in the ED is feasible and is associated with significant improvements in the delivery of safe mechanical ventilation and clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Fuller
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
| | - Ian T Ferguson
- School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nicholas M Mohr
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Anne M Drewry
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Christopher Palmer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Brian T Wessman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Enyo Ablordeppey
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Jacob Keeperman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Robert J Stephens
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Angelina A Kolomiets
- School of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Richard S Hotchkiss
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Marin H Kollef
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Herling SF, Møller AM, Palle C, Grynnerup A, Thomsen T. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer. Dan Med J 2017; 64:A5343. [PMID: 28260596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) has become a widely used approach for women with endometrial cancer and has replaced laparotomy. It has been questioned if the increased costs are justified by superior surgical outcomes. The aim of the present study was to examine the frequency, types and severity of post-operative complications after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and RALH using the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical outcomes. METHODS A non-randomised, controlled before and after study of 360 women was conducted; 202 underwent RALH and 158 TAH (historical controls). RESULTS RALH had significant advantages compared with TAH: fewer and less severe post-operative complications and a shorter length of hospital stay. The absolute risk reduction for post-operative complications was 13% (95% confidence interval: 4.29-20.87%). Women treated with TAH had significantly more severe complications (grade ≥ 3) than those treated with RALH; 12% versus 3% (p = 0.001). Infections (urinary and port site) were the most frequent post-operative complications overall. The duration of RALH in the operation theatre was longer, while the duration of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit was shorter for patients undergoing RALH. CONCLUSIONS RALH appears advantageous for women treated for endometrial cancer in terms of post-operative complications. We recommend the use of the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical outcomes for quality assessment. FUNDING departmental only. TRIAL REGISTRATION Danish Health Authority (3-2013-111/1/KAHO).
Collapse
|
171
|
Smith SM, Cousins G, Clyne B, Allwright S, O'Dowd T. Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2:CD004910. [PMID: 28230899 PMCID: PMC6473196 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004910.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared care has been used in the management of many chronic conditions with the assumption that it delivers better care than primary or specialty care alone; however, little is known about the effectiveness of shared care. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of shared care health service interventions designed to improve the management of chronic disease across the primary/specialty care interface. This is an update of a previously published review.Secondary questions include the following:1. Which shared care interventions or portions of shared care interventions are most effective?2. What do the most effective systems have in common? SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library to 12 October 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA One review author performed the initial abstract screen; then two review authors independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series analyses (ITS) evaluating the effectiveness of shared care interventions for people with chronic conditions in primary care and community settings. The intervention was compared with usual care in that setting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data from the included studies, evaluated study quality and judged the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We conducted a meta-analysis of results when possible and carried out a narrative synthesis of the remainder of the results. We presented the results in a 'Summary of findings' table, using a tabular format to show effect sizes for all outcome types. MAIN RESULTS We identified 42 studies of shared care interventions for chronic disease management (N = 18,859), 39 of which were RCTs, two CBAs and one an NRCT. Of these 42 studies, 41 examined complex multi-faceted interventions and lasted from six to 24 months. Overall, our confidence in results regarding the effectiveness of interventions ranged from moderate to high certainty. Results showed probably few or no differences in clinical outcomes overall with a tendency towards improved blood pressure management in the small number of studies on shared care for hypertension, chronic kidney disease and stroke (mean difference (MD) 3.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68 to 5.25)(based on moderate-certainty evidence). Mental health outcomes improved, particularly in response to depression treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.62; six studies, N = 1708) and recovery from depression (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.57 to 4.26; 10 studies, N = 4482) in studies examining the 'stepped care' design of shared care interventions (based on high-certainty evidence). Investigators noted modest effects on mean depression scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.29, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.20; six studies, N = 3250). Differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), processes of care and participation and default rates in shared care services were probably limited (based on moderate-certainty evidence). Studies probably showed little or no difference in hospital admissions, service utilisation and patient health behaviours (with evidence of moderate certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that shared care improves depression outcomes and probably has mixed or limited effects on other outcomes. Methodological shortcomings, particularly inadequate length of follow-up, may account in part for these limited effects. Review findings support the growing evidence base for shared care in the management of depression, particularly stepped care models of shared care. Shared care interventions for other conditions should be developed within research settings, with account taken of the complexity of such interventions and awareness of the need to carry out longer studies to test effectiveness and sustainability over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Smith
- RCSI Medical SchoolHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice123 St Stephens GreenDublinIreland
| | - Gráinne Cousins
- Royal College of Surgeons in IrelandSchool of Pharmacy123 St. Stephens GreenDublinIrelandDublin 2
| | - Barbara Clyne
- RCSI Medical SchoolHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice123 St Stephens GreenDublin 2Ireland
| | - Shane Allwright
- Trinity College Centre for Health SciencesDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareDublinIreland
| | - Tom O'Dowd
- Trinity College Centre for Health SciencesDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareDublinIreland
| | | |
Collapse
|
172
|
Hommel I, Wollersheim H, Tack CJ, Mulder J, van Gurp PJ, Hulscher MEJL. Impact of a multifaceted strategy to improve perioperative diabetes care. Diabet Med 2017; 34:278-285. [PMID: 27087429 DOI: 10.1111/dme.13130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To assess the impact of a multifaceted strategy to improve perioperative diabetes care throughout the hospital care pathway. METHODS We conducted a controlled before-and-after study in six hospitals. The purpose of the strategy was to target four predominant barriers that obstruct optimal care delivery. We provided feedback on baseline indicator performance, developed a multidisciplinary protocol and patient information, and provided professional education. After a 6-month intervention, we determined the performance changes against three outcome indicators and nine process indicators using data on 811 patients with diabetes who underwent major surgery. The progress of the interventions was monitored closely. RESULTS Two process indicators improved significantly in the intervention hospitals: the proportion of patients for whom glycaemic control had been evaluated preoperatively increased by 9% (P < 0.002) and the proportion of patients with blood glucose measurements within 1 h after surgery increased by 29% (P < 0.0001). Four other process indicators and all three outcome indicators improved more in the intervention hospitals than in the control hospitals, but the differences were not statistically significant. These included the proportion of patients with all glucose values at 6-10 mmol/l (+3%) and the proportion of patients with hyperglycaemia (-8%). The implementation of the multidisciplinary protocol was still ongoing after the 6-month intervention period. CONCLUSIONS The multifaceted improvement strategy had a limited impact on the quality of perioperative diabetes care. This study demonstrates the complexity of improving perioperative diabetes care throughout the multiprofessional hospital care pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Hommel
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H Wollersheim
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C J Tack
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Mulder
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P J van Gurp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M E J L Hulscher
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bullying has been identified as one of the leading workplace stressors, with adverse consequences for the individual employee, groups of employees, and whole organisations. Employees who have been bullied have lower levels of job satisfaction, higher levels of anxiety and depression, and are more likely to leave their place of work. Organisations face increased risk of skill depletion and absenteeism, leading to loss of profit, potential legal fees, and tribunal cases. It is unclear to what extent these risks can be addressed through interventions to prevent bullying. OBJECTIVES To explore the effectiveness of workplace interventions to prevent bullying in the workplace. SEARCH METHODS We searched: the Cochrane Work Group Trials Register (August 2014); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library 2016, issue 1); PUBMED (1946 to January 2016); EMBASE (1980 to January 2016); PsycINFO (1967 to January 2016); Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL Plus; 1937 to January 2016); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS; 1951 to January 2016); Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA; 1987 to January 2016); ABI Global (earliest record to January 2016); Business Source Premier (BSP; earliest record to January 2016); OpenGrey (previously known as OpenSIGLE-System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe; 1980 to December 2014); and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised and cluster-randomised controlled trials of employee-directed interventions, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time-series studies of interventions of any type, aimed at preventing bullying in the workplace, targeted at an individual employee, a group of employees, or an organisation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three authors independently screened and selected studies. We extracted data from included studies on victimisation, perpetration, and absenteeism associated with workplace bullying. We contacted study authors to gather additional data. We used the internal validity items from the Downs and Black quality assessment tool to evaluate included studies' risk of bias. MAIN RESULTS Five studies met the inclusion criteria. They had altogether 4116 participants. They were underpinned by theory and measured behaviour change in relation to bullying and related absenteeism. The included studies measured the effectiveness of interventions on the number of cases of self-reported bullying either as perpetrator or victim or both. Some studies referred to bullying using common synonyms such as mobbing and incivility and antonyms such as civility. Organisational/employer level interventionsTwo studies with 2969 participants found that the Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workforce (CREW) intervention produced a small increase in civility that translates to a 5% increase from baseline to follow-up, measured at 6 to 12 months (mean difference (MD) 0.17; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.28).One of the two studies reported that the CREW intervention produced a small decrease in supervisor incivility victimisation (MD -0.17; 95% CI -0.33 to -0.01) but not in co-worker incivility victimisation (MD -0.08; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.08) or in self-reported incivility perpetration (MD -0.05 95% CI -0.15 to 0.05). The study did find a decrease in the number of days absent during the previous month (MD -0.63; 95% CI -0.92 to -0.34) at 6-month follow-up. Individual/job interface level interventionsOne controlled before-after study with 49 participants compared expressive writing with a control writing exercise at two weeks follow-up. Participants in the intervention arm scored significantly lower on bullying measured as incivility perpetration (MD -3.52; 95% CI -6.24 to -0.80). There was no difference in bullying measured as incivility victimisation (MD -3.30 95% CI -6.89 to 0.29).One controlled before-after study with 60 employees who had learning disabilities compared a cognitive-behavioural intervention with no intervention. There was no significant difference in bullying victimisation after the intervention (risk ratio (RR) 0.55; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.25), or at the three-month follow-up (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.21 to 1.15), nor was there a significant difference in bullying perpetration following the intervention (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.27 to 1.54), or at the three-month follow-up (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.81). Multilevel InterventionsA five-site cluster-RCT with 1041 participants compared the effectiveness of combinations of policy communication, stress management training, and negative behaviours awareness training. The authors reported that bullying victimisation did not change (13.6% before intervention and 14.3% following intervention). The authors reported insufficient data for us to conduct our own analysis.Due to high risk of bias and imprecision, we graded the evidence for all outcomes as very low quality. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is very low quality evidence that organisational and individual interventions may prevent bullying behaviours in the workplace. We need large well-designed controlled trials of bullying prevention interventions operating on the levels of society/policy, organisation/employer, job/task and individual/job interface. Future studies should employ validated and reliable outcome measures of bullying and a minimum of 6 months follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia A Gillen
- Ulster UniversityInstitute of Nursing and Health ResearchJordanstownNewtownabbeyNorthern IrelandUKBT37 0QB
- Southern Health and Social Care TrustNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research and Development68 Lurgan RoadPortadownUKBT63 5QQ
| | - Marlene Sinclair
- Ulster UniversityInstitute of Nursing and Health ResearchJordanstownNewtownabbeyNorthern IrelandUKBT37 0QB
| | - W George Kernohan
- Ulster UniversityInstitute of Nursing and Health ResearchJordanstownNewtownabbeyNorthern IrelandUKBT37 0QB
| | - Cecily M Begley
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing and Midwifery24 D'Olier StreetDublinIreland
- The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of GothenburgInstitute of Health and Care SciencesGothenburgSweden
| | - Ans G Luyben
- University of LiverpoolInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society1‐5 Brownlow StreetBlock B Waterhouse BldsLiverpoolUKL69 3GL
| | | |
Collapse
|
174
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 1879, the year of the first documented medical telephone consultation, the ability to consult by telephone has become an integral part of modern patient-centred healthcare systems. Nowadays, upwards of a quarter of all care consultations are conducted by telephone. Studies have quantified the impact of medical telephone consultation on clinicians' workload and detected the need for quality improvement. While doctors routinely receive training in communication and consultation skills, this does not necessarily include the specificities of telephone communication and consultation. Several studies assessed the short-term effect of interventions aimed at improving clinicians' telephone consultation skills, but there is no systematic review reporting patient-oriented outcomes or outcomes of interest to clinicians. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of training interventions for clinicians' telephone consultation skills and patient outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, five other electronic databases and two trial registers up to 19 May 2016, and we handsearched references, checked citations and contacted study authors to identify additional studies and data. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating training interventions compared with any control intervention, including no intervention, for improving clinicians' telephone consultation skills with patients and their impact on patient outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies using standard Cochrane and EPOC guidance and the certainty of evidence using GRADE. We contacted study authors where additional information was needed. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane for data analysis. MAIN RESULTS We identified one very small controlled before-after study performed in 1989: this study used a validated tool to assess the effects of a training intervention on paediatric residents' history-taking and case management skills. It reported no difference compared to no intervention, but authors did not report any quantitative analyses and could not supply additional data. We rated this study as being at high risk of bias. Based on GRADE, we assessed the certainty of the evidence as very low, and consequently it is uncertain whether this intervention improves clinicians' telephone skills.We did not find any study assessing the effect of training interventions for improving clinicians' telephone communication skills on patient primary outcomes (health outcomes measured by validated tools or biomedical markers or patient behaviours, patient morbidity or mortality, patient satisfaction, urgency assessment accuracy or adverse events). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Telephone consultation skills are part of a wider set of remote consulting skills whose importance is growing as more and more medical care is delivered from a distance with the support of information technology. Nevertheless, no evidence specifically coming from telephone consultation studies is available, and the training of clinicians at the moment has to be guided by studies and models based on face-to-face communication, which do not consider the differences between these two communicative dimensions. There is an urgent need for more research assessing the effect of different training interventions on clinicians' telephone consultation skills and their effect on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Vaona
- Azienda ULSS 20 ‐ VeronaPrimary CareOspedale di MarzanaPiazzale Ruggero Lambranzi 1VeronaItaly37142
| | - Yannis Pappas
- University of BedfordshireInstitute for Health ResearchPark SquareLutonBedfordUKLU1 3JU
| | - Rumant S Grewal
- Imperial College LondonGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public HealthThe Reynolds Building, Charing Cross CampusSt Dunstans RoadLondonLondonUKW6 8RP
| | - Mubasshir Ajaz
- University of BedfordshireInstitute for Health ResearchPark SquareLutonBedfordUKLU1 3JU
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Imperial College LondonDepartment of Primary Care and Public HealthThe Reynolds Building, Charing Cross CampusSt Dunstan's RoadLondonUKW6 8RP
| | - Josip Car
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological UniversityCentre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS)3 Fusionopolis Link, #03‐08Nexus@one‐northSingaporeSingapore138543
- University of LjubljanaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of MedicineLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | |
Collapse
|
175
|
Orton E, Whitehead J, Mhizha‐Murira J, Clarkson M, Watson MC, Mulvaney CA, Staniforth JUL, Bhuchar M, Kendrick D. School-based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 12:CD010246. [PMID: 28026877 PMCID: PMC6473192 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010246.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unintentional injuries are the leading cause of death in children aged four to 18 years and are a major cause of ill health. The school setting offers the opportunity to deliver preventive interventions to a large number of children and has been used to address a range of public health problems. However, the effectiveness of the school setting for the prevention of different injury mechanisms in school-aged children is not well understood. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of school-based educational programmes for the prevention of injuries in children and evaluate their impact on improving children's safety skills, behaviour and practices, and knowledge, and assess their cost-effectiveness. SEARCH METHODS We ran the most recent searches up to 16 September 2016 for the following electronic databases: Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations; Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R); Embase and Embase Classic (Ovid); ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded; ISI Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science; ISI Web of Science: Social Sciences Citation Index; ISI Web of Science: Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Sciences & Humanities; and the 14 October 2016 for the following electronic databases: Health Economics Evaluations Database (HEED); Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA); CINAHL Plus (EBSCO); ZETOC; LILACS; PsycINFO; ERIC; Dissertation Abstracts Online; IBSS; BEI; ASSIA; CSA Sociological Abstracts; Injury Prevention Web; SafetyLit; EconLit (US); PAIS; UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio; Open Grey; Index to Theses in the UK and Ireland; Bibliomap and TRoPHI. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (non-RCTs), and controlled before-and-after (CBA) studies that evaluated school-based educational programmes aimed at preventing a range of injury mechanisms. The primary outcome was self-reported or medically attended unintentional (or unspecified intent) injuries and secondary outcomes were observed safety skills, observed behaviour, self-reported behaviour and safety practices, safety knowledge, and health economic outcomes. The control groups received no intervention, a delayed injury-prevention intervention or alternative school-based curricular activities. We included studies that aimed interventions at primary or secondary prevention of injuries from more than one injury mechanism and were delivered, in part or in full, in schools catering for children aged four to 18 years. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors identified relevant trials from title and abstracts of studies identified in searches and two review authors extracted data from the included studies and assessed risk of bias. We grouped different types of interventions according to the outcome assessed and the injury mechanism targeted. Where data permitted, we performed random-effects meta-analyses to provide a summary of results across studies. MAIN RESULTS The review included 27 studies reported in 30 articles. The studies had 73,557 participants with 12 studies from the US; four from China; two from each of Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and the UK; and one from each of Israel, Greece and Brazil. Thirteen studies were RCTs, six were non-RCTs and eight were CBAs. Of the included studies, 18 provided some element of the intervention in children aged four to 11 years, 17 studies included children aged 11 to 14 years and nine studies included children aged 14 to 18 years.The overall quality of the results was poor, with the all studies assessed as being at high or unclear risks of bias across multiple domains, and varied interventions and data collection methods employed. Interventions comprised information-giving, peer education or were multi-component.Seven studies reported the primary outcome of injury occurrence and only three of these were similar enough to combine in a meta-analysis, with a pooled incidence rate ratio of 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 1.08; 2073 children) and substantial statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 63%). However, this body of evidence was low certainty, due to concerns over this heterogeneity (inconsistency) and imprecision. This heterogeneity may be explained by the non-RCT study design of one of the studies, as a sensitivity analysis with this study removed found stronger evidence of an effect and no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%).Two studies report an improvement in safety skills in the intervention group. Likewise, the four studies measuring observed safety behaviour reported an improvement in the intervention group relative to the control. Thirteen out of 19 studies describing self-reported behaviour and safety practices showed improvements, and of the 21 studies assessing changes in safety knowledge, 19 reported an improvement in at least one question domain in the intervention compared to the control group. However, we were unable to pool data for our secondary outcomes, so our conclusions were limited, as they were drawn from highly diverse single studies and the body of evidence was low (safety skills) or very low (behaviour, safety knowledge) certainty. Only one study reported intervention costs but did not undertake a full economic evaluation (very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is insufficient evidence to determine whether school-based educational programmes can prevent unintentional injuries. More high-quality studies are needed to evaluate the impact of educational programmes on injury occurrence. There is some weak evidence that such programmes improve safety skills, behaviour/practices and knowledge, although the evidence was of low or very low quality certainty. We found insufficient economic studies to assess cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Orton
- University of NottinghamDivision of Primary CareRoom 1313, Tower BuildingUniversity ParkNottinghamUKNG7 2RD
| | - Jessica Whitehead
- University of NottinghamDivision of Primary CareRoom 1313, Tower BuildingUniversity ParkNottinghamUKNG7 2RD
| | - Jacqueline Mhizha‐Murira
- University of NottinghamDivision of Primary CareRoom 1313, Tower BuildingUniversity ParkNottinghamUKNG7 2RD
| | - Mandy Clarkson
- University of NottinghamDivision of Primary CareRoom 1313, Tower BuildingUniversity ParkNottinghamUKNG7 2RD
| | - Michael C Watson
- The University of NottinghamSchool of Health SciencesB Floor, South Block LinkQueens Medical CentreNottinghamUKNG7 2HA
| | - Caroline A Mulvaney
- Lancaster UniversityLancaster Health HubLancasterUKLA1 4YR
- University of NottinghamFaculty of Medicine & Health SciencesNottinghamUK
| | - Joy UL Staniforth
- University of NottinghamDivision of Primary CareRoom 1313, Tower BuildingUniversity ParkNottinghamUKNG7 2RD
| | - Munish Bhuchar
- University of NottinghamDivision of Primary CareRoom 1313, Tower BuildingUniversity ParkNottinghamUKNG7 2RD
| | - Denise Kendrick
- The University of NottinghamDivision of Primary Care, School of MedicineFloor 13, Tower BuildingUniversity ParkNottinghamUKNG7 2RD
| | | |
Collapse
|
176
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respiratory hazards are common in the workplace. Depending on the hazard and exposure, the health consequences may include: mild to life-threatening illnesses from infectious agents, acute effects ranging from respiratory irritation to chronic lung conditions, or even cancer from exposure to chemicals or toxins. Use of respiratory protective equipment (RPE) is an important preventive measure in many occupational settings. RPE only offers protection when worn properly, when removed safely and when it is either replaced or maintained regularly. The effectiveness of behavioural interventions either directed at employers or organisations or directed at individual workers to promote RPE use in workers remains an important unanswered question. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of any behavioural intervention either directed at organisations or at individual workers on observed or self-reported RPE use in workers when compared to no intervention or an alternative intervention. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Work Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 07), MEDLINE (1980 to 12 August 2016), EMBASE (1980 to 20 August 2016) and CINAHL (1980 to 12 August 2016). SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled before and after (CBA) studies and interrupted time-series (ITS) comparing behavioural interventions versus no intervention or any other behavioural intervention to promote RPE use in workers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Four authors independently selected relevant studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted investigators to clarify information. We pooled outcome data from included studies where the studies were sufficiently similar. MAIN RESULTS We included 14 studies that evaluated the effect of training and education on RPE use, which involved 2052 participants. The included studies had been conducted with farm, healthcare, production line, office and coke oven workers as well as nursing students and people with mixed occupations. All included studies reported the effects of interventions as use of RPE, as correct use of RPE or as indirect measures of RPE use. We did not find any studies where the intervention was delivered and assessed at the whole organization level or in which the main focus was on positive or negative incentives. We rated the quality of the evidence for all comparisons as low to very low. Training versus no trainingOne CBA study in healthcare workers compared training with and without a fit test to no intervention. The study found that the rate of properly fitting respirators was not considerably different in the workers who had received training with a fit test (RR 1.17, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.97 to 1.10) or training without a fit test (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.42) compared to those who had no training. Two RCTs that evaluated training did not contribute to the analyses because of lack of data. Conventional training plus additions versus conventional training aloneOne cluster-randomised trial compared conventional training plus RPE demonstration versus training alone and reported no significant difference in appropriate use of RPE between the two groups (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.07).One RCT compared interactive training with passive training, with an information screen, and an information book. The mean RPE performance score for the active group was not different from that of the passive group (MD 2.10, 95% CI -0.76 to 4.96). However, the active group scored significantly higher than the book group (MD 4.20, 95% CI 0.89 to 7.51) and the screen group (MD 7.00, 95% CI 4.06 to 9.94).One RCT compared computer-simulation training with conventional personal protective equipment (PPE) training but reported only results for donning and doffing full-body PPE. Education versus no educationOne RCT found that a multifaceted educational intervention increased the use of RPE (risk ratio (RR) 1.69, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.58) at three years' follow-up when compared to no intervention. However, there was no difference between intervention and control at one year's, two years' or four years' follow-up. Two RCTs did not report enough data to be included in the analysis.Four CBA studies evaluated the effectiveness of education interventions and found no effect on the frequency or correctness of RPE use, except in one study for the use of an N95 mask (RR 4.56, 95% CI 1.84 to 11.33, 1 CBA) in workers. Motivational interviewing versus traditional lecturesOne CBA study found that participants given motivational group interviewing-based safety education scored higher on a checklist measuring PPE use (MD 2.95, 95% CI 1.93 to 3.97) than control workers given traditional educational sessions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is very low quality evidence that behavioural interventions, namely education and training, do not have a considerable effect on the frequency or correctness of RPE use in workers. There were no studies on incentives or organisation level interventions. The included studies had methodological limitations and we therefore need further large RCTs with clearer methodology in terms of randomised sequence generation, allocation concealment and assessor blinding, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of behavioural interventions for improving the use of RPE at both organisational and individual levels. In addition, further studies should consider some of the barriers to the successful use of RPE, such as experience of health risk, types of RPE and the employer's attitude to RPE use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao Yen Luong Thanh
- Faculty of Public Health, Hue University of Medicine and PharmacyDepartment of Biostatistics ‐ Demography ‐ Reproductive Health06 Ngo QuyenHueThua Thien HueVietnam47000
| | - Malinee Laopaiboon
- Khon Kaen UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health123 Mitraparb RoadAmphur MuangKhon KaenThailand40002
| | - David Koh
- National University of SingaporeSSH School of Public HealthMD3 Medical DriveSingaporeSingaporeSingapore117597
- Universiti Brunei DarussalamPAPRSB Institute of Health SciencesJalan Tungku LinkGadongBrunei DarussalamBE1410
| | - Pornpun Sakunkoo
- Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen UniversityDepartment of Environmental Health Science123 Mitraparp RoadKhon KaenMuang DistrictThailand40002
| | - Hla Moe
- University of MedicineDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine30th Street, Between 73rd and 74th StreetsMandalayMyanmar
| | | |
Collapse
|
177
|
Saito H, Tanaka K, Kanemoto A, Nakano T, Abe E, Aoyama H. Factors Affecting the Baseline and Post-Treatment Scores on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Japanese Version before and after Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:ijms17111834. [PMID: 27827891 PMCID: PMC5133835 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17111834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2016] [Revised: 10/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Our objectives were to (1) investigate the feasibility of the use of the Japanese version of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R); (2) identify the clinical factors influencing the HVLT-R scores of patients undergoing whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT); and (3) compare the neurocognitive function (NCF) after WBRT in different dose fractionation schedules. We administered the HVLT-R (Japanese version) before (baseline) and at four and eight months after WBRT in 45 patients who received either therapeutic (35Gy-in-14, n = 16; 30Gy-in-10, n = 18) or prophylactic (25Gy-in-10, n = 11) WBRT. Sixteen patients dropped out before the eight-month examination, due mostly to death from cancer. The Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) 80–100 group had significantly higher baseline total recall (TR) scores (p = 0.0053), delayed recall (DR) scores (p = 0.012), and delayed recognition (DRecog) scores (p = 0.0078). The patients aged ≤65 years also had significantly higher TR scores (p = 0.030) and DRecog scores (p = 0.031). The patients who underwent two examinations (worse-prognosis group) had significantly decreased DR scores four months after WBRT compared to the baseline (p = 0.0073), and they were significantly more likely to have declined individual TR scores (p = 0.0017) and DR scores (p = 0.035) at four months. The eight-month HVLT-R scores did not significantly decline regardless of the WBRT dose fractionation. The baseline NCF was determined by age and KPS, and the early decline in NCF is characteristic of the worse-prognosis group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirotake Saito
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
| | - Kensuke Tanaka
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
| | - Ayae Kanemoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, 2-15-3 Kawagishi-cho, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8566, Japan.
| | - Toshimichi Nakano
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
| | - Eisuke Abe
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Patnode CD, Henninger ML, Senger CA, Perdue LA, Whitlock EP. Primary Care Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2016; 316:1694-1705. [PMID: 27784101 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.8882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although 80% of infants in the United States start breastfeeding, only 22% are exclusively breastfed up to around 6 months as recommended by a number of professional organizations. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the evidence on the benefits and harms of breastfeeding interventions to support the US Preventive Services Task Force in updating its 2008 recommendation. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PubMed, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO for studies published in the English language between January 1, 2008, and September 25, 2015. Studies included in the previous review were re-evaluated for inclusion. Surveillance for new evidence in targeted publications was conducted through January 26, 2016. STUDY SELECTION Review of randomized clinical trials and before-and-after studies with concurrent controls conducted in a developed country that evaluated a primary care-relevant breastfeeding intervention among mothers of full- or near-term infants. Of 211 full-text articles reviewed, 52 studies met inclusion criteria. Thirty-one studies were newly identified, and 21 studies were carried forward from the previous review. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Independent critical appraisal of all provisionally included studies. Data were independently abstracted by one reviewer and confirmed by another. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Child and maternal health outcomes, rates and duration of breastfeeding, and harms related to interventions as prespecified before data collection. RESULTS Fifty-two studies (n = 66 757) in 57 publications were included. Six trials (n = 2219) reported inconsistent effects of the interventions on infant health outcomes; no studies reported maternal health outcomes. Pooled estimates based on random-effects meta-analyses using the DerSimonian and Laird method indicated beneficial associations between individual-level breastfeeding interventions and any breastfeeding for less than 3 months (risk ratio [RR], 1.07 [95% CI, 1.03-1.11]; 26 studies [n = 11 588]), at 3 to less than 6 months (RR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.04-1.18]; 23 studies [n = 8942]), and for exclusive breastfeeding for less than 3 months (RR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.11-1.33]; 22 studies [n = 8246]), 3 to less than 6 months (RR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.05-1.38]; 18 studies [n = 7027]), and at 6 months (RR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.02-1.32]; 17 studies [n = 7690]). Absolute differences in the rates of any breastfeeding ranged from 14.1% in favor of the control group to 18.4% in favor of the intervention group. There was no significant association between interventions and breastfeeding initiation (RR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99-1.02]; 14 studies [n = 9428]). There was limited mixed evidence of an association between system-level interventions and rates of breastfeeding from well-controlled studies as well as for harms related to breastfeeding interventions, including maternal anxiety scores, decreased confidence, and concerns about confidentiality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The updated evidence confirms that breastfeeding support interventions are associated with an increase in the rates of any and exclusive breastfeeding. There are limited well-controlled studies examining the effectiveness of system-level policies and practices on rates of breastfeeding or child health and none for maternal health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie D Patnode
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Michelle L Henninger
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Caitlyn A Senger
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Leslie A Perdue
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Evelyn P Whitlock
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon2Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Russell K, Hutchison MG, Selci E, Leiter J, Chateau D, Ellis MJ. Academic Outcomes in High-School Students after a Concussion: A Retrospective Population-Based Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0165116. [PMID: 27764223 PMCID: PMC5072608 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many concussion symptoms, such as headaches, vision problems, or difficulty remembering or concentrating may deleteriously affect school functioning. Our objective was to determine if academic performance was lower in the academic calendar year that students sustain a concussion compared to the previous year when they did not sustain a concussion. METHODS Using Manitoba Health and Manitoba Education data, we conducted a population-based, controlled before-after study from 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 academic years. Grade 9-12 students with an ICD9/10 code for concussion were matched to non-concussed controls. Overall changes in grade point average (GPA) were compared for the academic year prior to the concussion to the academic year the concussion occurred (or could have occurred among non-concussed matched students). RESULTS Overall, 8240 students (1709 concussed, 6531 non-concussed students) were included. Both concussed and non-concussed students exhibited a lower overall GPA from one year to the next. Having sustained a concussion resulted in a -0.90% (95% CI: -1.88, 0.08) reduction in GPA. Over the same period, non-concussed matched students' GPA reduced by -0.57% (95% CI: -1.32, 0.19). Students who sustained a concussion during high school were just as likely to graduate within four years as their non-concussed peers (ORadj: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.02). CONCLUSIONS We found that, at a population level, a concussion had minimal long-term effects on academic performance during high school. While academic accommodations and Return-to-Learn programs are an important component of pediatric concussion management, research is needed to identify risk factors for poor academic performance after a concussion and who should receive these programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Russell
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Canada North Concussion Network, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Michael G. Hutchison
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin Selci
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Jeff Leiter
- Canada North Concussion Network, Winnipeg, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Daniel Chateau
- Manitoba Center for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Michael J. Ellis
- Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Canada North Concussion Network, Winnipeg, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Section of Neurosurgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Auer R, Gencer B, Tango R, Nanchen D, Matter CM, Lüscher TF, Windecker S, Mach F, Cornuz J, Humair JP, Rodondi N. Uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before-after study with parallel group comparisons. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e011520. [PMID: 27650761 PMCID: PMC5051401 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy of a proactive approach with a reactive approach to offer intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing (MI). DESIGN Before-after comparison in 2 academic hospitals with parallel comparisons in 2 control hospitals. SETTING Academic hospitals in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS Smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). INTERVENTION In the intervention hospitals during the intervention phase, a resident physician trained in MI systematically offered counselling to all smokers admitted for ACS, followed by 4 telephone counselling sessions over 2 months by a nurse trained in MI. In the observation phase, the in-hospital intervention was offered only to patients whose clinicians requested a smoking cessation intervention. In the control hospitals, no intensive smoking cessation intervention was offered. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES The primary outcome was 1 week smoking abstinence (point prevalence) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the number of smokers who received the in-hospital smoking cessation intervention and the duration of the intervention. RESULTS In the intervention centres during the intervention phase, 87% of smokers (N=193/225) received a smoking cessation intervention compared to 22% in the observational phase (p<0.001). Median duration of counselling was 50 min. During the intervention phase, 78% received a phone follow-up for a median total duration of 42 min in 4 sessions. Prescription of nicotine replacement therapy at discharge increased from 18% to 58% in the intervention phase (risk ratio (RR): 3.3 (95% CI 2.4 to 4.3; p≤0.001). Smoking cessation at 12-month increased from 43% to 51% comparing the observation and intervention phases (RR=1.20, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.46; p=0.08; 97% with outcome assessment). In the control hospitals, the RR for quitting was 1.02 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.25; p=0.8, 92% with outcome assessment). CONCLUSIONS A proactive strategy offering intensive smoking cessation intervention based on MI to all smokers hospitalised for ACS significantly increases the uptake of smoking cessation counselling and might increase smoking abstinence at 12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reto Auer
- Department of Ambulatory and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Baris Gencer
- Faculty of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rodrigo Tango
- Faculty of Medicine, Division of Primary Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - David Nanchen
- Department of Ambulatory and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Christian M Matter
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Stephan Windecker
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - François Mach
- Faculty of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jacques Cornuz
- Department of Ambulatory and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Paul Humair
- Faculty of Medicine, Division of Primary Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Sacchi E, Sayed T, El-Basyouny K. A full Bayes before-after study accounting for temporal and spatial effects: Evaluating the safety impact of new signal installations. Accid Anal Prev 2016; 94:52-58. [PMID: 27249403 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Revised: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 05/15/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Recently, important advances in road safety statistics have been brought about by methods able to address issues other than the choice of the best error structure for modeling crash data. In particular, accounting for spatial and temporal interdependence, i.e., the notion that the collision occurrence of a site or unit times depend on those of others, has become an important issue that needs further research. Overall, autoregressive models can be used for this purpose as they can specify that the output variable depends on its own previous values and on a stochastic term. Spatial effects have been investigated and applied mostly in the context of developing safety performance functions (SPFs) to relate crash occurrence to highway characteristics. Hence, there is a need for studies that attempt to estimate the effectiveness of safety countermeasures by including the spatial interdependence of road sites within the context of an observational before-after (BA) study. Moreover, the combination of temporal dynamics and spatial effects on crash frequency has not been explored in depth for SPF development. Therefore, the main goal of this research was to carry out a BA study accounting for spatial effects and temporal dynamics in evaluating the effectiveness of a road safety treatment. The countermeasure analyzed was the installation of traffic signals at unsignalized urban/suburban intersections in British Columbia (Canada). The full Bayes approach was selected as the statistical framework to develop the models. The results demonstrated that zone variation was a major component of total crash variability and that spatial effects were alleviated by clustering intersections together. Finally, the methodology used also allowed estimation of the treatment's effectiveness in the form of crash modification factors and functions with time trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Sacchi
- The University of British Columbia, Department of Civil Engineering, 2002-6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| | - Tarek Sayed
- The University of British Columbia, Department of Civil Engineering, 2002-6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| | - Karim El-Basyouny
- University of Alberta, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2W2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Kar P, Plummer MP, Bellomo R, Jenkins AJ, Januszewski AS, Chapman MJ, Jones KL, Horowitz M, Deane AM. Liberal Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: An Exploratory Study. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:1695-703. [PMID: 27315191 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000001815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The optimal blood glucose target in critically ill patients with preexisting diabetes and chronic hyperglycemia is unknown. In such patients, we aimed to determine whether a " liberal" approach to glycemic control would reduce hypoglycemia and glycemic variability and appear safe. DESIGN Prospective, open-label, sequential-period exploratory study. SETTING Medical-surgical ICU. PATIENTS During sequential 6-month periods, we studied 83 patients with preexisting type 2 diabetes and chronic hyperglycemia (glycated hemoglobin, ≥ 7.0% at ICU admission). INTERVENTION During the "standard care" period, 52 patients received insulin to treat blood glucose concentrations greater than 10 mmol/L whereas during the "liberal" period, 31 patients received insulin to treat blood glucose concentrations greater than 14 mmol/L. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Time-weighted mean glucose concentrations and the number and duration of moderate (< 4.0 mmol/L) and severe (≤ 2.2 mmol/L) hypoglycemic episodes were recorded, with moderate and severe hypoglycemic episodes grouped together. Glycemic variability was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variability for each patient. Safety was evaluated using clinical outcomes and plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation, glucose-turnover, and oxidative stress. Mean glucose (TWglucoseday 0-7, standard care: 9.3 [1.8] vs liberal: 10.3 [2.1] mmol/L; p = 0.02) and nadir blood glucose (4.4 [1.5] vs 5.5 [1.6] mmol/L; p < 0.01) were increased during the liberal period. There was a signal toward reduced risk of moderate-severe hypoglycemia (relative risk: liberal compared with standard care: 0.47 [95% CI, 0.19-1.13]; p = 0.09). Ten patients (19%) during the standard period and one patient (3%) during the liberal period had recurrent episodes of moderate-severe hypoglycemia. Liberal therapy reduced glycemic variability (coefficient of variability, 33.2% [12.9%] vs 23.8% [7.7%]; p < 0.01). Biomarker data and clinical outcomes were similar. CONCLUSIONS In critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic hyperglycaemia, liberal glycemic control appears to attenuate glycemic variability and may reduce the prevalence of moderate-severe hypoglycemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Palash Kar
- 1Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.2Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.3Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.4School of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.5Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.6National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.7National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence (CRE) in the Translation of Nutritional Science into Good Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.8Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
183
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Corruption is the abuse or complicity in abuse, of public or private position, power or authority to benefit oneself, a group, an organisation or others close to oneself; where the benefits may be financial, material or non-material. It is wide-spread in the health sector and represents a major problem. OBJECTIVES Our primary objective was to systematically summarise empirical evidence of the effects of strategies to reduce corruption in the health sector. Our secondary objective was to describe the range of strategies that have been tried and to guide future evaluations of promising strategies for which there is insufficient evidence. SEARCH METHODS We searched 14 electronic databases up to January 2014, including: CENTRAL; MEDLINE; EMBASE; sociological, economic, political and other health databases; Human Resources Abstracts up to November 2010; Euroethics up to August 2015; and PubMed alerts from January 2014 to June 2016. We searched another 23 websites and online databases for grey literature up to August 2015, including the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Transparency International, healthcare anti-fraud association websites and trial registries. We conducted citation searches in Science Citation Index and Google Scholar, and searched PubMed for related articles up to August 2015. We contacted corruption researchers in December 2015, and screened reference lists of articles up to May 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA For the primary analysis, we included randomised trials, non-randomised trials, interrupted time series studies and controlled before-after studies that evaluated the effects of an intervention to reduce corruption in the health sector. For the secondary analysis, we included case studies that clearly described an intervention to reduce corruption in the health sector, addressed either our primary or secondary objective, and stated the methods that the study authors used to collect and analyse data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS One review author extracted data from the included studies and a second review author checked the extracted data against the reports of the included studies. We undertook a structured synthesis of the findings. We constructed a results table and 'Summaries of findings' tables. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS No studies met the inclusion criteria of the primary analysis. We included nine studies that met the inclusion criteria for the secondary analysis.One study found that a package of interventions coordinated by the US Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Justice recovered a large amount of money and resulted in hundreds of new cases and convictions each year (high certainty of the evidence). Another study from the USA found that establishment of an independent agency to investigate and enforce efforts against overbilling might lead to a small reduction in overbilling, but the certainty of this evidence was very low. A third study from India suggested that the impacts of coordinated efforts to reduce corruption through increased detection and enforcement are dependent on continued political support and that they can be limited by a dysfunctional judicial system (very low certainty of the evidence).One study in South Korea and two in the USA evaluated increased efforts to investigate and punish corruption in clinics and hospitals without establishing an independent agency to coordinate these efforts. It is unclear whether these were effective because the evidence is of very low certainty.One study from Kyrgyzstan suggested that increased transparency and accountability for co-payments together with reduction of incentives for demanding informal payments may reduce informal payments (low certainty of the evidence).One study from Germany suggested that guidelines that prohibit hospital doctors from accepting any form of benefits from the pharmaceutical industry may improve doctors' attitudes about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on their choice of medicines (low certainty of the evidence).A study in the USA, evaluated the effects of introducing a law that required pharmaceutical companies to report the gifts they gave to healthcare workers. Another study in the USA evaluated the effects of a variety of internal control mechanisms used by community health centres to stop corruption. The effects of these strategies is unclear because the evidence was of very low certainty. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is a paucity of evidence regarding how best to reduce corruption. Promising interventions include improvements in the detection and punishment of corruption, especially efforts that are coordinated by an independent agency. Other promising interventions include guidelines that prohibit doctors from accepting benefits from the pharmaceutical industry, internal control practices in community health centres, and increased transparency and accountability for co-payments combined with reduced incentives for informal payments. The extent to which increased transparency alone reduces corruption is uncertain. There is a need to monitor and evaluate the impacts of all interventions to reduce corruption, including their potential adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhal Gaitonde
- Umeå UniversityDepartment of Public Health and Clinical MedicineUmeåSweden
- Indian Institute of Technology – MadrasCentre of Technology and PolicyChennaiIndia
| | - Andrew D Oxman
- Norwegian Institute of Public HealthP.O. Box 4404, NydalenOsloNorwayN‐0403
| | - Peter O Okebukola
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthDepartment of Health Policy and Management615 North Wolfe StreetBaltimoreMarylandUSA21205
| | - Gabriel Rada
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDepartment of Internal Medicine and Evidence‐Based Healthcare Program, Faculty of MedicineLira 44, Decanato Primer pisoSantiagoChile
| | | |
Collapse
|
184
|
Weston KL, Azevedo LB, Bock S, Weston M, George KP, Batterham AM. Effect of Novel, School-Based High-Intensity Interval Training (HIT) on Cardiometabolic Health in Adolescents: Project FFAB (Fun Fast Activity Blasts) - An Exploratory Controlled Before-And-After Trial. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0159116. [PMID: 27486660 PMCID: PMC4972319 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 06/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Low-volume high-intensity interval training holds promise for cardiometabolic health promotion in adolescents, but sustainable interventions must be practical and engaging. We examined the effect of a school-based multi-activity low-volume high-intensity interval training intervention on adolescents’ cardiometabolic health. Methods In an exploratory controlled before-and-after design, 101 adolescents (mean age ± standard deviation [SD] 14.0 ± 0.3 years) were recruited from four schools; two were designated as intervention sites (n = 41), and two as control (n = 60). The intervention comprised 4 to 7 repetitions of 45 s maximal effort exercise (basketball, boxing, dance and soccer drills) interspersed with 90-s rest, thrice weekly for 10 weeks. Outcomes were non-fasting blood lipids and glucose, waist circumference, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, resting blood pressure, physical activity, twenty-metre shuttle-run test performance and carotid artery intima-media thickness. The difference in the change from baseline (intervention minus control) was estimated for each outcome. Using magnitude-based inferences, we calculated the probability that the true population effect was beneficial, trivial, and harmful against a threshold for the minimum clinically important difference of 0.2 between-subject SDs. Results and Discussion Mean (± SD) attendance for the intervention (expressed as percentage of available intervention sessions [n = 30]) was 77 ± 13%. Post-intervention, there were likely beneficial effects for triglycerides (-26%; 90% confidence interval -46% to 0%), waist circumference (-3.9 cm; -6.1 cm to -1.6 cm) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (+16 min; -5 to 38 min), and a possibly beneficial effect for twenty-metre shuttle-run test performance (+5 shuttles; -1 to 11 shuttles) in intervention participants (vs controls). The role of elevated triglycerides and waist circumference in cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome development underlines the importance of our findings. We also demonstrated that school-based low-volume high-intensity interval training can be delivered as intended, thus representing a novel and scalable means of improving aspects of adolescents’ cardiometabolic health. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02626767
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn L. Weston
- Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Liane B. Azevedo
- Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Bock
- School of Applied Social Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Weston
- School of Social Sciences, Business & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Keith P. George
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moore’s University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Alan M. Batterham
- Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than 7.5 million children younger than age five living in low- and middle-income countries die every year. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy to reduce mortality and morbidity and to improve quality of care by improving the delivery of a variety of curative and preventive medical and behavioral interventions at health facilities, at home, and in the community. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of programs that implement the IMCI strategy in terms of death, nutritional status, quality of care, coverage with IMCI deliverables, and satisfaction of beneficiaries. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015, Issue 3), including the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Specialised Register; MEDLINE; EMBASE, Ovid; the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EbscoHost; the Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Virtual Health Library (VHL); the WHO Library & Information Networks for Knowledge Database (WHOLIS); the Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index, Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science; Population Information Online (POPLINE); the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP); and the Global Health, Ovid and Health Management, ProQuest database. We performed searches until 30 June 2015 and supplemented these by searching revised bibliographies and by contacting experts to identify ongoing and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We sought to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled before-after (CBA) studies with at least two intervention and two control sites evaluating the generic IMCI strategy or its adaptation in children younger than age five, and including at minimum efforts to improve health care worker skills for case management. We excluded studies in which IMCI was accompanied by other interventions including conditional cash transfers, food supplementation, and employment. The comparison group received usual health services without provision of IMCI. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened searches, selected trials, and extracted, analysed and tabulated data. We used inverse variance for cluster trials and an intracluster co-efficient of 0.01 when adjustment had not been made in the primary study. We used the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) approach to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS Two cluster-randomised trials (India and Bangladesh) and two controlled before-after studies (Tanzania and India) met our inclusion criteria. Strategies included training of health care staff, management strengthening of health care systems (all four studies), and home visiting (two studies). The two studies from India included care packages targeting the neonatal period.One trial in Bangladesh estimated that child mortality may be 13% lower with IMCI, but the confidence interval (CI) included no effect (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.10; 5090 participants; low-certainty evidence). One CBA study in Tanzania gave almost identical estimates (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.05; 1932 participants).One trial in India examined infant and neonatal mortality by implementing the integrated management of neonatal and childhood illness (IMNCI) strategy including post-natal home visits. Neonatal and infant mortality may be lower in the IMNCI group compared with the control group (infant mortality hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.94; neonatal mortality HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03; one trial, 60,480 participants; low-certainty evidence).We estimated the effect of IMCI on any mortality measured by combining infant and child mortality in the one IMCI and the one IMNCI trial. Mortality may be reduced by IMCI (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93; two trials, 65,570 participants; low-certainty evidence).Two trials (India, Bangladesh) evaluated nutritional status and noted that there may be little or no effect on stunting (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.06; 5242 participants, two trials; low-certainty evidence) and there is probably little or no effect on wasting (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.25; two trials, 4288 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).The Tanzania CBA study showed similar results.Investigators measured quality of care by observing prescribing for common illnesses at health facilities (727 observations, two studies; very low-certainty evidence) and by observing prescribing by lay health care workers (1051 observations, three studies; very low-certainty evidence). We could not confirm a consistent effect on prescribing at health facilities or by lay health care workers, as certainty of the evidence was very low.For coverage of IMCI deliverables, we examined vaccine and vitamin A coverage, appropriate care seeking, and exclusive breast feeding. Two trials (India, Bangladesh) estimated vaccine coverage for measles and reported that there is probably little or no effect on measles vaccine coverage (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.05; two trials, 4895 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with similar effects seen in the Tanzania CBA study. Two studies measured the third dose of diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus vaccine; and two measured vitamin A coverage, all providing little or no evidence of increased coverage with IMCI.Four studies (2 from India, and 1 each from Tanzania and Bangladesh) reported appropriate care seeking and derived information from careful questioning of mothers about recent illness. Some studies on effects of IMCI may report better care seeking behavior, but others do not report this.All four studies recorded maternal responses on exclusive breast feeding. They provided mixed results and very low-certainty evidence. Therefore, we do not know whether IMCI impacts exclusive breast feeding.No studies reported on the satisfaction of mothers and service users. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The mix of interventions examined in research studies evaluating the IMCI strategy varies, and some studies include specific inputs to improve neonatal health. Most studies were conducted in South Asia. Implementing the integrated management of childhood illness strategy may reduce child mortality, and packages that include interventions for the neonatal period may reduce infant mortality. IMCI may have little or no effect on nutritional status and probably has little or no effect on vaccine coverage. Maternal care seeking behavior may be more appropriate with IMCI, but study results have been mixed, providing evidence of very low certainty about whether IMCI has effects on adherence to exclusive breast feeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarun Gera
- SL Jain HospitalDepartment of PediatricsB‐256 Derawala NagarDelhiDelhiIndia110009
| | - Dheeraj Shah
- University College of Medical Sciences (University of Delhi)Department of PediatricsDilshad GardenNew DelhiDelhiIndia110095
| | - Paul Garner
- Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical SciencesPembroke PlaceLiverpoolMerseysideUKL3 5QA
| | - Marty Richardson
- Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineCochrane Infectious Diseases GroupPembroke PlaceLiverpoolUKL3 5QA
| | - Harshpal S Sachdev
- Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and ResearchDepartment of Pediatrics and Clinical EpidemiologyB‐16 Qutab Institutional AreaNew DelhiIndia110016
| | | |
Collapse
|
186
|
Manniën J, van Kasteren MEE, Nagelkerke NJ, Gyssens IC, Kullberg BJ, Wille JC, de Boer AS. Effect of Optimized Antibiotic Prophylaxis on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 27:1340-6. [PMID: 17152032 DOI: 10.1086/509842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2005] [Accepted: 12/05/2005] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective.To compare the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) before and after an intervention period in which an optimized policy for antibiotic prophylaxis was implemented. To demonstrate that a more prudent, restrictive policy would not have a detrimental effect on patient outcomes.Design.Before-after trial with prospective SSI surveillance in the Dutch nosocomial surveillance network (Preventie Ziekenhuisinfecties door Surveillance [PREZIES]), using the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control, including postdischarge surveillance for up to 1 year.Methods.During a preintervention period and a postintervention period (both 6-13 months), 12 Dutch hospitals collected data on antimicrobial prophylaxis and SSI rates. The study was limited to commonly performed surgical procedures in 4 specialties: vascular, intestinal, gynecological and orthopedic surgery. Selected risk factors for analysis were sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, wound contamination class, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay before surgery, and urgency of surgery (elective or acute).Results.A total of 3,621 procedures were included in the study, of which 1,668 were performed before the intervention and 1,953 after. The overall SSI rate decreased from 5.4% to 4.5% (P = .22). Among the procedures included in the study, the largest proportion (55%) were total hip arthroplasty, and the smallest proportion (2%) were replacement of the head of the femur. SSI rates varied from 0% for vaginal hysterectomy to 21.1% for femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass surgery. Crude and adjusted odds ratios showed that there were no significant changes in procedure-specific SSI rates after the intervention (P>.1).Conclusions.An optimized and restrictive antibiotic prophylaxis policy had no detrimental effect on the outcome of clean and clean contaminated surgery, as measured by SSI rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Manniën
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Center for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
187
|
Gomez MI, Acosta-Gnass SI, Mosqueda-Barboza L, Basualdo JA. Reduction in Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Expenditure and the Rate of Surgical Site Infection by Means of a Protocol That Controls the Use of Prophylaxis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 27:1358-65. [PMID: 17152035 DOI: 10.1086/509845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2005] [Accepted: 01/27/2006] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Objective.To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on training and the use of a protocol with an automatic stop of antimicrobial prophylaxis to improve hospital compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.Design.An interventional study with a before-after trial was conducted in 3 stages: a 3-year initial stage (January 1999 to December 2001), during which a descriptive-prospective survey was performed to evaluate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections; a 6-month second stage (January to June 2002), during which an educational intervention was performed regarding the routine use of a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis request form that included an automatic stop of prophylaxis (the “automatic-stop prophylaxis form”); and a 3-year final stage (July 2002 to June 2005), during which a descriptive-prospective survey of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections was again performed.Setting.An 88-bed teaching hospital in Entre Ríos, Argentina.Patients.A total of 3,496 patients who underwent surgery were included in the first stage of the study and 3,982 were included in the final stage.Results.Comparison of the first stage of the study with the final stage revealed that antimicrobial prophylaxis was given at the appropriate time to 55% and 88% of patients, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.25-0.30]; P < .01); the antimicrobial regimen was adequate in 74% and 87% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45-0.55]; P < .01); duration of the prophylaxis was adequate in 44% and 55% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.77-0.84]; P < .01); and the surgical site infection rates were 3.2% and 1.9%, respectively (RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79]; P < .01). Antimicrobial expenditure was US$10,678.66 per 1,000 patient-days during the first stage and US$7,686.05 per 1,000 patient-days during the final stage (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.86-0.89]; P<.01).Conclusion.The intervention based on training and application of a protocol with an automatic stop of prophylaxis favored compliance with the hospital's current surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines before the intervention, achieving significant reductions of surgical site infection rates and substantial savings for the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisa I Gomez
- Sanatorio Adventista del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud de la Universidad Adventista del Plata, Libertador San Martín, Entre Ríos, Argentina
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
188
|
Østergaard ML, Ewertsen C, Konge L, Albrecht-Beste E, Bachmann Nielsen M. Simulation-Based Abdominal Ultrasound Training - A Systematic Review. Ultraschall Med 2016; 37:253-261. [PMID: 26882483 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-100452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim is to provide a complete overview of the different simulation-based training options for abdominal ultrasound and to explore the evidence of their effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines and Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was searched. Articles were divided into three categories based on study design (randomized controlled trials, before-and-after studies and descriptive studies) and assessed for level of evidence using the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) system and for bias using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias assessment tool. RESULTS Seventeen studies were included in the analysis: four randomized controlled trials, eight before-and-after studies with pre- and post-test evaluations, and five descriptive studies. No studies scored the highest level of evidence, and 14 had the lowest level. Bias was high for 11 studies, low for four, and unclear for two. No studies used a test with established evidence of validity or examined the correlation between obtained skills on the simulators and real-life clinical skills. Only one study used blinded assessors. CONCLUSION The included studies were heterogeneous in the choice of simulator, study design, participants, and outcome measures, and the level of evidence for effect was inadequate. In all studies simulation training was equally or more beneficial than other instructions or no instructions. Study designs had significant built-in bias and confounding issues; therefore, further research should be based on randomized controlled trials using tests with validity evidence and blinded assessors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L Østergaard
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hosital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen OE, Denmark
| | - C Ewertsen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hosital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen OE, Denmark
| | - L Konge
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E Albrecht-Beste
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen OE, Denmark
| | - M Bachmann Nielsen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hosital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen OE, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking bans or restrictions can assist in eliminating nonsmokers' exposure to the dangers of secondhand smoke and can reduce tobacco consumption amongst smokers themselves. Evidence exists identifying the impact of tobacco control regulations and interventions implemented in general workplaces and at an individual level. However, it is important that we also review the evidence for smoking bans at a meso- or organisational level, to identify their impact on reducing the burden of exposure to tobacco smoke. Our review assesses evidence for meso- or organisational-level tobacco control bans or policies in a number of specialist settings, including public healthcare facilities, higher education and correctional facilities. OBJECTIVES To assess the extent to which institutional smoking bans may reduce passive smoke exposure and active smoking, and affect other health-related outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of identified studies. We contacted authors to identify completed or ongoing studies eligible for inclusion in this review. We also checked websites of state agencies and organisations, such as trial registries. Date of latest searches was 22nd June 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered studies that reported the effects of tobacco bans or policies, whether complete or partial, on reducing secondhand smoke exposure, tobacco consumption, smoking prevalence and other health outcomes, in public healthcare, higher educational and correctional facilities, from 2005 onwards.The minimum standard for inclusion was having a settings-level policy or ban implemented in the study, and a minimum of six months follow-up for measures of smoking behaviour. We included quasi-experimental studies (i.e. controlled before-and-after studies), interrupted time series as defined by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group, and uncontrolled pre- and post-ban data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two or more review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion in the review. Due to variation in the measurement of outcomes we did not conduct a meta-analysis for all of the studies included in this review, but carried out a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect meta-analysis, pooling 11 of the included studies. We evaluated all studies using a qualitative narrative synthesis. MAIN RESULTS We included 17 observational studies in this review. We found no randomized controlled trials. Twelve studies are based in hospitals, three in prisons and two in universities. Three studies used a controlled before-and-after design, with another site used for comparison. The remaining 14 studies used an uncontrolled before-and-after study design. Five studies reported evidence from two participant groups, including staff and either patients or prisoners (depending on specialist setting), with the 12 remaining studies investigating only one participant group.The four studies (two in prisons, two in hospitals) providing health outcomes data reported an effect of reduced secondhand smoke exposure and reduced mortality associated with smoking-related illnesses. No studies included in the review measured cotinine levels to validate secondhand smoke exposure. Eleven studies reporting active smoking rates with 12,485 participants available for pooling, but with substantial evidence of statistical heterogeneity (I² = 72%). Heterogeneity was lower in subgroups defined by setting, and provided evidence for an effect of tobacco bans on reducing active smoking rates. An analysis exploring heterogeneity within hospital settings showed evidence of an effect on reducing active smoking rates in both staff (risk ratio (RR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval ( CI) 0.64 to 0.78) and patients (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.98), but heterogeneity remained in the staff subgroup (I² = 76%). In prisons, despite evidence of reduced mortality associated with smoking-related illnesses in two studies, there was no evidence of effect on active smoking rates (1 study, RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.16).We judged the quality of the evidence to be low, using the GRADE approach, as the included studies are all observational. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found evidence of an effect of settings-based smoking policies on reducing smoking rates in hospitals and universities. In prisons, reduced mortality rates and reduced exposure to secondhand smoke were reported. However, we rated the evidence base as low quality. We therefore need more robust studies assessing the evidence for smoking bans and policies in these important specialist settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Frazer
- School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
190
|
Tzortziou Brown V, Underwood M, Mohamed N, Westwood O, Morrissey D. Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016:CD007495. [PMID: 27150167 PMCID: PMC10523188 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007495.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal conditions require particular management skills. Identification of interventions which are effective in equipping general practitioners (GPs) with such necessary skills could translate to improved health outcomes for patients and reduced healthcare and societal costs. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of professional interventions for GPs that aim to improve the management of musculoskeletal conditions in primary care. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), 2010, Issue 2; MEDLINE, Ovid (1950 - October 2013); EMBASE, Ovid (1980 - Ocotber 2013); CINAHL, EbscoHost (1980 - November 2013), and the EPOC Specialised Register. We conducted cited reference searches using ISI Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar; and handsearched selected issues of Arthritis and Rheumatism and Primary Care-Clinics in Office Practice. The latest search was conducted in November 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before-and-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series (ITS) studies of professional interventions for GPs, taking place in a community setting, aiming to improve the management (including diagnosis and treatment) of musculoskeletal conditions and reporting any objective measure of GP behaviour, patient or economic outcomes. We considered professional interventions of any length, duration, intensity and complexity compared with active or inactive controls. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently abstracted all data. We calculated the risk difference (RD) and risk ratio (RR) of compliance with desired practice for dichotomous outcomes, and the mean difference (MD) and standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes. We investigated whether the direction of the targeted behavioural change affects the effectiveness of interventions. MAIN RESULTS Thirty studies met our inclusion criteria.From 11 studies on osteoporosis, meta-analysis of five studies (high-certainty evidence) showed that a combination of a GP alerting system on a patient's increased risk of osteoporosis and a patient-directed intervention (including patient education and a reminder to see their GP) improves GP behaviour with regard to diagnostic bone mineral density (BMD) testing and osteoporosis medication prescribing (RR 4.44; (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.54 to 5.55; 3 studies; 3,386 participants)) for BMD and RR 1.71 (95% CI 1.50 to 1.94; 5 studies; 4,223 participants) for osteoporosis medication. Meta-analysis of two studies showed that GP alerting on its own also probably improves osteoporosis guideline-consistent GP behaviour (RR 4.75 (95% CI 3.62 to 6.24; 3,047 participants)) for BMD and RR 1.52 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.84; 3.047 participants) for osteoporosis medication) and that adding the patient-directed component probably does not lead to a greater effect (RR 0.94 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.09; 2,995 participants)) for BMD and RR 0.93 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.10; 2,995 participants) for osteoporosis medication.Of the 10 studies on low back pain, seven showed that guideline dissemination and educational opportunities for GPs may lead to little or no improvement with regard to guideline-consistent GP behaviour. Two studies showed that the combination of guidelines and GP feedback on the total number of investigations requested may have an effect on GP behaviour and result in a slight reduction in the number of tests, while one of these studies showed that the combination of guidelines and GP reminders attached to radiology reports may result in a small but sustained reduction in the number of investigation requests.Of the four studies on osteoarthritis, one study showed that using educationally influential physicians may result in improvement in guideline-consistent GP behaviour. Another study showed slight improvements in patient outcomes (pain control) after training GPs on pain management.Of three studies on shoulder pain, one study reported that there may be little or no improvement in patient outcomes (functional capacity) after GP education on shoulder pain and injection training.Of two studies on other musculoskeletal conditions, one study on pain management showed that there may be worse patient outcomes (pain control) after GP training on the use of validated assessment scales.The 12 remaining studies across all musculoskeletal conditions showed little or no improvement in GP behaviour and patient outcomes.The direction of the targeted behaviour (i.e. increasing or decreasing a behaviour) does not seem to affect the effectiveness of an intervention. The majority of the studies did not investigate the potential adverse effects of the interventions and only three studies included a cost-effectiveness analysis.Overall, there were important methodological limitations in the body of evidence, with just a third of the studies reporting adequate allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessments. While our confidence in the pooled effect estimate of interventions for improving diagnostic testing and medication prescribing in osteoporosis is high, our confidence in the reported effect estimates in the remaining studies is low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is good-quality evidence that a GP alerting system with or without patient-directed education on osteoporosis improves guideline-consistent GP behaviour, resulting in better diagnosis and treatment rates.Interventions such as GP reminder messages and GP feedback on performance combined with guideline dissemination may lead to small improvements in guideline-consistent GP behaviour with regard to low back pain, while GP education on osteoarthritis pain and the use of educationally influential physicians may lead to slight improvement in patient outcomes and guideline-consistent behaviour respectively. However, further studies are needed to ascertain the effectiveness of such interventions in improving GP behaviour and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Tzortziou Brown
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry.Centre for Primary Care and Public HealthLondonUK
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of LondonCentre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, William Harvey Research Institute,LondonUKE1 4DG
| | - Martin Underwood
- Warwick Medical SchoolWarwick Clinical Trials UnitCoventryWarwickshireUKCV4 7AL
| | | | - Olwyn Westwood
- Warwick Medical School, The University of WarwickGibbet Hall CampusCoventryUKCV4 7AL
| | - Dylan Morrissey
- Queen Mary University of LondonSport and Exercise MedicineLondonUK
- Barts Health NHS TrustPhysiotherapy DepartmentLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
191
|
Doblecki-Lewis S, Chang A, Jiddou-Yaldoo R, Tomashek KM, Stanek D, Anil L, Lichtenberger P. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Florida physicians regarding dengue before and after an educational intervention. BMC Med Educ 2016; 16:124. [PMID: 27112138 PMCID: PMC4845440 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0647-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to recognize and appropriately manage dengue early in the clinical course may result in late initiation of supportive treatment for severe disease. In Florida, travel-related and autochthonous dengue occur and are likely under-recognized. The objective of this study was to evaluate physician knowledge of dengue and its management before and after an educational intervention in Florida. METHODS From 2012-13 we conducted 14 grand-rounds style lectures on dengue clinical management attended by 413 physicians, and analyzed data from the pre- and post-tests. RESULTS Of those attending, 231 and 220 completed the pre-and post-tests, respectively. Overall, the mean pre-test score for knowledge-based questions was 74.3 and average post-test score was 94.2%, indicating a mean increase of 19.9% (P < 0.0001, 95% CI 17.7-22.4). Reported confidence in dengue recognition and management also increased. Non-US trained physicians and those who had treated more than ten dengue cases performed significantly better in the pre-test. Post-test scores did not differ by subgroup. CONCLUSIONS The train-the-trainer approach with grand-rounds style presentations appear to be an effective intervention to improve knowledge of dengue among physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Doblecki-Lewis
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, #850 (R-21), Miami, FL, 33155, USA.
| | - Aileen Chang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave NW Room 5-419, Washington, DC, 20037, USA
| | - Renee Jiddou-Yaldoo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Beaumont Health Grosse Pointe, 468 Cadieux Rd, Grosse Pointe, MI, 48230, USA
| | - Kay M Tomashek
- Dengue Branch, Division of Vector-borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA
| | - Danielle Stanek
- Florida Department of Health, Division of Disease Control and Health Protection, Zoonotic and Vectorborne Disease, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A12, Tallahassee, FL, 32399-1712, USA
| | - Leena Anil
- Division of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Bureau for Public Health, West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources, 350 Capitol St. Rm. 125, Charleston, WV, 25301, USA
| | - Paola Lichtenberger
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, #864 (R-21), Miami, FL, 33155, USA
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Office work has changed considerably over the previous couple of decades and has become sedentary in nature. Physical inactivity at workplaces and particularly increased sitting has been linked to increase in cardiovascular disease, obesity and overall mortality. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of workplace interventions to reduce sitting at work compared to no intervention or alternative interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, OSH UPDATE, PsycINFO, Clinical trials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal up to 2 June, 2015. We also screened reference lists of articles and contacted authors to find more studies to include. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-randomised controlled trials (cRCTs), and quasi-randomised controlled trials of interventions to reduce sitting at work. For changes of workplace arrangements, we also included controlled before-and-after studies (CBAs) with a concurrent control group. The primary outcome was time spent sitting at work per day, either self-reported or objectively measured by means of an accelerometer-inclinometer. We considered energy expenditure, duration and number of sitting episodes lasting 30 minutes or more, work productivity and adverse events as secondary outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles for study eligibility. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We contacted authors for additional data where required. MAIN RESULTS We included 20 studies, two cross-over RCTs, 11 RCTs, three cRCTs and four CBAs, with a total of 2180 participants from high income nations. The studies evaluated physical workplace changes (nine studies), policy changes (two studies), information and counselling (seven studies) and interventions from multiple categories (two studies). One study had both physical workplace changes and information and counselling components. We did not find any studies that had investigated the effect of periodic breaks or standing or walking meetings. Physical workplace changesA sit-stand desk alone compared to no intervention reduced sitting time at work per workday with between thirty minutes to two hours at short term (up to three months) follow-up (six studies, 218 participants, very low quality evidence). In two studies, sit-stand desks with additional counselling reduced sitting time at work in the same range at short-term follow-up (61 participants, very low quality evidence). One study found a reduction at six months' follow-up of -56 minutes (95% CI -101 to -12, very low quality evidence) compared to no intervention. Also total sitting time at work and outside work decreased with sit-stand desks compared to no intervention (MD -78 minutes, 95% CI -125 to -31, one study) as did the duration of sitting episodes lasting 30 minutes or more (MD -52 minutes, 95% CI -79 to -26, two studies). This is considerably less than the two to four hours recommended by experts. Sit-stand desks did not have a considerable effect on work performance, musculoskeletal symptoms or sick leave. It remains unclear if standing can repair the harms of sitting because there is hardly any extra energy expenditure.The effects of active workstations were inconsistent. Treadmill desks combined with counselling reduced sitting time at work (MD -29 minutes, 95% CI -55 to -2, one study) compared to no intervention at 12 weeks' follow-up. Pedalling workstations combined with information did not reduce inactive sitting at work considerably (MD -12 minutes, 95% CI -24 to 1, one study) compared to information alone at 16 weeks' follow-up. The quality of evidence was low for active workstations. Policy changesTwo studies with 443 participants provided low quality evidence that walking strategies did not have a considerable effect on workplace sitting time at 10 weeks' (MD -16 minutes, 95% CI -54 to 23) or 21 weeks' (MD -17 minutes, 95% CI -58 to 25) follow-up respectively. Information and counsellingCounselling reduced sitting time at work (MD -28 minutes, 95% CI -52 to -5, two studies, low quality evidence) at medium term (three months to 12 months) follow-up. Mindfulness training did not considerably reduce workplace sitting time (MD -2 minutes, 95% CI -22 to 18) at six months' follow-up and at 12 months' follow-up (MD -16 minutes, 95% CI -45 to 12, one study, low quality evidence). There was no considerable increase in work engagement with counselling.There was an inconsistent effect of computer prompting on sitting time at work. One study found no considerable effect on sitting at work (MD -17 minutes, 95% CI -48 to 14, low quality evidence) at 10 days' follow-up, while another study reported a significant reduction in sitting at work (MD -55 minutes, 95% CI -96 to -14, low quality evidence) at 13 weeks' follow-up. Computer prompts to stand reduced sitting at work by 14 minutes more (95% CI 10 to 19, one study) compared to computer prompts to step at six days' follow-up. Computer prompts did not change the number of sitting episodes that last 30 minutes or longer. Interventions from multiple categories Interventions combining multiple categories had an inconsistent effect on sitting time at work, with a reduction in sitting time at 12 weeks' (25 participants, very low quality evidence) and six months' (294 participants, low quality evidence) follow-up in two studies but no considerable effect at 12 months' follow-up in one study (MD -47.98, 95% CI -103 to 7, 294 participants, low quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS At present there is very low to low quality evidence that sit-stand desks may decrease workplace sitting between thirty minutes to two hours per day without having adverse effects at the short or medium term. There is no evidence on the effects in the long term. There were no considerable or inconsistent effects of other interventions such as changing work organisation or information and counselling. There is a need for cluster-randomised trials with a sufficient sample size and long term follow-up to determine the effectiveness of different types of interventions to reduce objectively measured sitting time at work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nipun Shrestha
- Health Research and Social Development ForumThapathaliKathmanduNepal24133
| | | | - Jos H Verbeek
- Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthCochrane Work Review GroupPO Box 310KuopioFinland70101
| | - Sharea Ijaz
- Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthCochrane Work Review GroupPO Box 310KuopioFinland70101
| | - Veerle Hermans
- Vrije Universiteit BrusselFaculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & PharmacyPleinlaan 2BrusselsBelgium1050
| | | |
Collapse
|
193
|
Singh R, Bemelman FJ, Hodiamont CJ, Idu MM, Ten Berge IJM, Geerlings SE. The impact of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis on the occurrence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infections among renal allograft recipients: a retrospective before-after study. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16:90. [PMID: 26912326 PMCID: PMC4766656 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1432-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2015] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The international guidelines recommend the administration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) as Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis for six months after transplantation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of TMP-SMX prophylaxis on the occurrence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) as cystitis and allograft pyelonephritis (AGPN) and its impact on the antimicrobial resistance pattern of causative microorganisms. METHODS We have conducted a retrospective before-after study in adult renal allograft recipients with one year follow-up after transplantation. We compared the ("after") group that received TMP-SMX as PJP prophylaxis to the ("before") group that did not receive it. RESULTS In total, 343 renal allograft recipients were analysed, of whom 212 (61.8 %) received TMP-SMX as PJP prophylaxis. In this study, 63 (18.4 %) did only develop ASB without UTI, 26 (7.6 %) developed cystitis and 43 (12.5 %) developed AGPN. The remaining 211 (61.5 %) renal allograft recipients did not develop any bacteriuria at all. Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis indicated that TMP-SMX as PJP prophylaxis was not associated with reduced prevalence of ASB (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52, 95 % CI = 0.79-2.94, p = 0.213), nor with reduced incidence of cystitis (HR = 2.21, 95 % CI = 0.76-6.39, p = 0.144), nor AGPN (HR = 1.12, 95 % CI = 0.57-2.21, p = 0.751). Among the group receiving TMP-SMX as PJP prophylaxis there was a trend was observed in increase of both amoxicillin (86 % versus 70 %) and TMP-SMX (89 % versus 48 %) resistance which already appeared within the first 30 days after TMP-SMX exposure. CONCLUSIONS Among renal allograft recipients, administration of TMP-SMX as PJP prophylaxis does not prevent ASB nor UTI, however it is associated with tendency towards increased amoxicillin and TMP-SMX resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramandeep Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Renal transplant Unit, Division of Nephrology, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, PO box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Renal transplant Unit, Division of Nephrology, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, PO box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Caspar J Hodiamont
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, PO box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mirza M Idu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, PO box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ineke J M Ten Berge
- Department of Internal Medicine, Renal transplant Unit, Division of Nephrology, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, PO box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Suzanne E Geerlings
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Center-University of Amsterdam, PO box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Frazer K, Callinan JE, McHugh J, van Baarsel S, Clarke A, Doherty K, Kelleher C. Legislative smoking bans for reducing harms from secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2:CD005992. [PMID: 26842828 PMCID: PMC6486282 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005992.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking bans have been implemented in a variety of settings, as well as being part of policy in many jurisdictions to protect the public and employees from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke (SHS). They also offer the potential to influence social norms and the smoking behaviour of those populations they affect. Since the first version of this review in 2010, more countries have introduced national smoking legislation banning indoor smoking. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of legislative smoking bans on (1) morbidity and mortality from exposure to secondhand smoke, and (2) smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and reference lists of included studies. We also checked websites of various organisations. Date of most recent search; February 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered studies that reported legislative smoking bans affecting populations. The minimum standard was having an indoor smoking ban explicitly in the study and a minimum of six months follow-up for measures of smoking behaviour. Our search included a broad range of research designs including: randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies (i.e. non-randomized controlled studies), controlled before-and-after studies, interrupted time series as defined by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, and uncontrolled pre- and post-ban data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS One author extracted characteristics and content of the interventions, participants, outcomes and methods of the included studies and a second author checked the details. We extracted health and smoking behaviour outcomes. We did not attempt a meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity in design and content of the studies included. We evaluated the studies using qualitative narrative synthesis. MAIN RESULTS There are 77 studies included in this updated review. We retained 12 studies from the original review and identified 65 new studies. Evidence from 21 countries is provided in this update, an increase of eight countries from the original review. The nature of the intervention precludes randomized controlled trials. Thirty-six studies used an interrupted time series study design, 23 studies use a controlled before-and-after design and 18 studies are before-and-after studies with no control group; six of these studies use a cohort design. Seventy-two studies reported health outcomes, including cardiovascular (44), respiratory (21), and perinatal outcomes (7). Eleven studies reported national mortality rates for smoking-related diseases. A number of the studies report multiple health outcomes. There is consistent evidence of a positive impact of national smoking bans on improving cardiovascular health outcomes, and reducing mortality for associated smoking-related illnesses. Effects on respiratory and perinatal health were less consistent. We found 24 studies evaluating the impact of national smoke-free legislation on smoking behaviour. Evidence of an impact of legislative bans on smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption is inconsistent, with some studies not detecting additional long-term change in existing trends in prevalence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Since the first version of this review was published, the current evidence provides more robust support for the previous conclusions that the introduction of a legislative smoking ban does lead to improved health outcomes through reduction in SHS for countries and their populations. The clearest evidence is observed in reduced admissions for acute coronary syndrome. There is evidence of reduced mortality from smoking-related illnesses at a national level. There is inconsistent evidence of an impact on respiratory and perinatal health outcomes, and on smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Frazer
- University College DublinSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Health SystemsHealth Sciences CentreBelfieldDublin 4Ireland
| | - Joanne E Callinan
- Milford Care CentreLibrary & Information Service, Education, Research & Quality DepartmentPlassey Park RoadCastletroyLimerickIreland000
| | - Jack McHugh
- University College DublinSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports ScienceBelfieldDublin 4Ireland
| | - Susan van Baarsel
- University College DublinSchool of Medicine and Medical ScienceDublinIreland
| | - Anna Clarke
- National Immunisation OfficeManor StreetDublin 7Ireland
| | - Kirsten Doherty
- Education and Research CentreDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health PromotionSt Vincent's University HospitalElm ParkDublin 4Ireland
| | - Cecily Kelleher
- University College DublinSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports ScienceBelfieldDublin 4Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
195
|
Ahmad M, Sleiman NH, Thomas M, Kashani N, Ditmyer MM. Use of High-Definition Audiovisual Technology in a Gross Anatomy Laboratory: Effect on Dental Students' Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction. J Dent Educ 2016; 80:128-132. [PMID: 26834129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Laboratory cadaver dissection is essential for three-dimensional understanding of anatomical structures and variability, but there are many challenges to teaching gross anatomy in medical and dental schools, including a lack of available space and qualified anatomy faculty. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of high-definition audiovisual educational technology in the gross anatomy laboratory in improving dental students' learning outcomes and satisfaction. Exam scores were compared for two classes of first-year students at one U.S. dental school: 2012-13 (no audiovisual technology) and 2013-14 (audiovisual technology), and section exams were used to compare differences between semesters. Additionally, an online survey was used to assess the satisfaction of students who used the technology. All 284 first-year students in the two years (2012-13 N=144; 2013-14 N=140) participated in the exams. Of the 140 students in the 2013-14 class, 63 completed the survey (45% response rate). The results showed that those students who used the technology had higher scores on the laboratory exams than those who did not use it, and students in the winter semester scored higher (90.17±0.56) than in the fall semester (82.10±0.68). More than 87% of those surveyed strongly agreed or agreed that the audiovisual devices represented anatomical structures clearly in the gross anatomy laboratory. These students reported an improved experience in learning and understanding anatomical structures, found the laboratory to be less overwhelming, and said they were better able to follow dissection instructions and understand details of anatomical structures with the new technology. Based on these results, the study concluded that the ability to provide the students a clear view of anatomical structures and high-quality imaging had improved their learning experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha Ahmad
- Dr. Ahmad is Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Dr. Sleiman is Instructor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Ms. Thomas is a dental student, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Dr. Kashani is Chairperson and Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; and Dr. Ditmyer is a Vice President, Academy for Academic Leadership, Atlanta, GA, and Emerita Associate Professor, Biomedical Sciences Department, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Dental Medicine.
| | - Naama H Sleiman
- Dr. Ahmad is Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Dr. Sleiman is Instructor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Ms. Thomas is a dental student, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Dr. Kashani is Chairperson and Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; and Dr. Ditmyer is a Vice President, Academy for Academic Leadership, Atlanta, GA, and Emerita Associate Professor, Biomedical Sciences Department, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Dental Medicine
| | - Maureen Thomas
- Dr. Ahmad is Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Dr. Sleiman is Instructor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Ms. Thomas is a dental student, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Dr. Kashani is Chairperson and Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; and Dr. Ditmyer is a Vice President, Academy for Academic Leadership, Atlanta, GA, and Emerita Associate Professor, Biomedical Sciences Department, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Dental Medicine
| | - Nahid Kashani
- Dr. Ahmad is Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Dr. Sleiman is Instructor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Ms. Thomas is a dental student, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Dr. Kashani is Chairperson and Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; and Dr. Ditmyer is a Vice President, Academy for Academic Leadership, Atlanta, GA, and Emerita Associate Professor, Biomedical Sciences Department, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Dental Medicine
| | - Marcia M Ditmyer
- Dr. Ahmad is Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Dr. Sleiman is Instructor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Ms. Thomas is a dental student, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; Dr. Kashani is Chairperson and Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry; and Dr. Ditmyer is a Vice President, Academy for Academic Leadership, Atlanta, GA, and Emerita Associate Professor, Biomedical Sciences Department, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Dental Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Moorthy A, Alkadhimi AF, Stassen LF, Duncan HF. Prospective audit of postoperative instructions to patients undergoing root canal treatment in the DDUH and re-audit following introduction of a written patient information sheet. J Ir Dent Assoc 2016; 62:55-59. [PMID: 27169268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Concerns were expressed that postoperative written instructions following endodontic treatment are not available in the Dublin Dental University Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data was collected in three phases: retrospective analysis of clinical notes for evidence of the delivery of postoperative instructions; a randomly distributed questionnaire to patients undergoing root canal treatment prior to the introduction of a written postoperative advice sheet; and, another survey following introduction of the advice sheet. RESULTS Some 56% of patients' charts documented that postoperative advice was given. Analysis of phase two revealed that patients were not consistently informed of any key postoperative messages. In phase 3 analysis, the proposed benchmarks were met in four out of six categories. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative advice after root canal treatment in the DDUH is both poorly recorded and inconsistently delivered. A combination of oral postoperative instructions and written postoperative advice provided the most effective delivery of patient information.
Collapse
|
197
|
Weiner CK, Skålén M, Harju-Jeanty D, Heymann R, Rosén A, Fors U, Lund B. Implementation of a Web-Based Patient Simulation Program to Teach Dental Students in Oral Surgery. J Dent Educ 2016; 80:133-140. [PMID: 26834130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate a web-based simulation of patients (Web-SP) program on learning skills in clinical reasoning and patient evaluation in the oral surgery education of third-year dental students. A secondary aim was to investigate the program's effect on students' learning, knowledge, and attitudes towards virtual patient simulations. Authentic virtual oral surgery patient cases were created at a dental school in Sweden using the Web-SP platform. The Web-SP program was introduced in a two-hour seminar. A 20-minute pre-seminar test (test A) was administered to assess the students' knowledge of oral surgery prior to experiencing the Web-SP program. Ten days after the seminar, another test (test B) was administered to evaluate the increase in oral surgery knowledge as a result of using the program, and an emailed survey of the students was conducted. Of 70 students in the course, 67 (95.7%) agreed to participate in the study and took test A; of these, 59 (88%) took test B. Of the 59 students who took both tests, 28 (42%) completed the survey. The results of the two tests showed a statistically significant increase in knowledge, which was in accordance with the learning goals (p<0.0001). The survey results showed that the students had a positive attitude towards the teaching method. In this study, Web-SP was found to be a valuable tool for teaching clinical reasoning and patient evaluation in an undergraduate oral surgery education setting by improving learning outcomes in comparison with traditional teaching alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Kruger Weiner
- Dr. Weiner is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Skålén is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Harju-Jeanty is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Heymann is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Rosén is Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Dr. Fors is Professor, Department of Computer and Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; and Dr. Lund is Associate Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
| | - Maya Skålén
- Dr. Weiner is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Skålén is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Harju-Jeanty is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Heymann is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Rosén is Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Dr. Fors is Professor, Department of Computer and Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; and Dr. Lund is Associate Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Dick Harju-Jeanty
- Dr. Weiner is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Skålén is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Harju-Jeanty is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Heymann is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Rosén is Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Dr. Fors is Professor, Department of Computer and Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; and Dr. Lund is Associate Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Robert Heymann
- Dr. Weiner is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Skålén is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Harju-Jeanty is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Heymann is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Rosén is Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Dr. Fors is Professor, Department of Computer and Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; and Dr. Lund is Associate Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Annika Rosén
- Dr. Weiner is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Skålén is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Harju-Jeanty is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Heymann is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Rosén is Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Dr. Fors is Professor, Department of Computer and Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; and Dr. Lund is Associate Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Uno Fors
- Dr. Weiner is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Skålén is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Harju-Jeanty is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Heymann is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Rosén is Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Dr. Fors is Professor, Department of Computer and Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; and Dr. Lund is Associate Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Bodil Lund
- Dr. Weiner is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Skålén is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Harju-Jeanty is in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dr. Heymann is Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Dr. Rosén is Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Dr. Fors is Professor, Department of Computer and Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; and Dr. Lund is Associate Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Schönwetter DJ, Gareau-Wilson N, Cunha RS, Mello I. Assessing the Impact of Voice-Over Screen-Captured Presentations Delivered Online on Dental Students' Learning. J Dent Educ 2016; 80:141-148. [PMID: 26834131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The traditional lecturing method is still one of the most common forms of delivering content to students in dental education, but innovative learning technologies have the potential to improve the effectiveness and quality of teaching dental students. What challenges instructors is the extent to which these learning tools have a direct impact on student learning outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a voice-over screen-captured learning tool by identifying a positive, nil, or negative impact on student learning as well as student engagement (affective, behavioral, and cognitive) when compared to the traditional face-to-face lecture. Extraneous variables thought to impact student learning were controlled by the use of baseline measures as well as random assignment of second-year dental students to one of two teaching conditions: voice-over screen-captured presentation delivered online and the traditional classroom lecture. A total of 28 students enrolled in the preclinical course in endodontics at a Canadian dental school participated in the study, 14 in each of the two teaching conditions. The results showed that, in most cases, the students who experienced the online lecture had somewhat higher posttest scores and perceived satisfaction levels than those in the face-to-face lecture group, but the differences did not achieve statistical significance except for their long-term recognition test scores. This study found that the students had comparable learning outcomes whether they experienced the face-to-face or the online lecture, but that the online lecture had a more positive impact on their long-term learning. The controls for extraneous variables used in this study suggest ways to improve research into the comparative impact of traditional and innovative teaching methods on student learning outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dieter J Schönwetter
- Dr. Schönwetter is Associate Professor and Director of Educational Resources and Faculty Development, College of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Ms. Gareau-Wilson is Master of Education student, Department of Educational Administration, Foundations, and Psychology, Faculty of Education, and Academic Advisor, Student Academic Success, University of Manitoba; Dr. Cunha is Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; and Dr. Mello is Associate Professor, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University.
| | - Nicole Gareau-Wilson
- Dr. Schönwetter is Associate Professor and Director of Educational Resources and Faculty Development, College of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Ms. Gareau-Wilson is Master of Education student, Department of Educational Administration, Foundations, and Psychology, Faculty of Education, and Academic Advisor, Student Academic Success, University of Manitoba; Dr. Cunha is Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; and Dr. Mello is Associate Professor, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University
| | - Rodrigo Sanches Cunha
- Dr. Schönwetter is Associate Professor and Director of Educational Resources and Faculty Development, College of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Ms. Gareau-Wilson is Master of Education student, Department of Educational Administration, Foundations, and Psychology, Faculty of Education, and Academic Advisor, Student Academic Success, University of Manitoba; Dr. Cunha is Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; and Dr. Mello is Associate Professor, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University
| | - Isabel Mello
- Dr. Schönwetter is Associate Professor and Director of Educational Resources and Faculty Development, College of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Ms. Gareau-Wilson is Master of Education student, Department of Educational Administration, Foundations, and Psychology, Faculty of Education, and Academic Advisor, Student Academic Success, University of Manitoba; Dr. Cunha is Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; and Dr. Mello is Associate Professor, Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many employers and other stakeholders believe that health examinations of job applicants prevent occupational diseases and sickness absence. This is an update of the original Cochrane review (Mahmud 2010). OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of pre-employment examinations of job applicants in preventing occupational injury, disease and sick leave compared to no intervention or alternative interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PEDro (up to 31 March 2015). We did not impose any restrictions on date, language or publication type. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled before-after (CBA) studies, and interrupted time-series (ITS) studies of health examinations to prevent occupational diseases and injuries in job applicants in comparison to no intervention or alternative interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS All five review authors independently selected studies from the updated search for inclusion. We retrieved two new studies with the updated search from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2015, resulting in a total of eleven studies. MAIN RESULTS We included two RCTs, seven CBA studies and two ITS studies. Nine studies with 7820 participants evaluated the screening process of pre-employment examinations as a whole, and two studies with 2164 participants evaluated the measures to mitigate the risks found following the screening process. The studies were too heterogeneous for statistical pooling of results. We rated the quality of the evidence for all outcomes as very low quality. The two new CBA studies both used historical controls and both had a high risk of bias.Of those studies that evaluated the screening process, there is very low quality evidence based on one RCT that a general examination for light duty work may not reduce the risk for sick leave (mean difference (MD) -0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.47 to 0.29). For army recruits, there is very low quality evidence based on one CBA study that there is a positive effect on fitness for duty after 12 months follow-up (odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.85).We found inconsistent evidence of an effect of job-focused pre-employment examinations on the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in comparison with general or no pre-employment examination based on one RCT with high risk of bias, and four CBA studies. There is very low quality evidence based on one ITS study that incorporation of a bronchial challenge test may decrease occupational asthma (trend change -2.6, 95% CI -3.6 to -1.5) compared to a general pre-employment examination with lung function tests.Pre-employment examinations may also result in a rejection of the applicant for the new job. In six studies, the rates of rejecting job applicants increased because of the studied examinations , on average, from 2% to 35%, but not in one study.There is very low quality evidence based on two CBA studies that risk mitigation among applicants considered not fit for work at the pre-employment examination may result in a similar risk of work-related musculoskeletal injury during follow-up compared to workers considered fit for work at the health examination. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is very low quality evidence that a general examination for light duty work may not reduce the risk for sick leave, but may have a positive effect on fitness for duty for army recruits after 12 months follow-up.There is inconsistent evidence of an effect of job-focused pre-employment examinations on the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in comparison with general or no pre-employment examination. There is very low quality evidence that incorporation of a bronchial challenge test may decrease occupational asthma compared to a general pre-employment examination with lung function tests. Pre-employment examinations may result in an increase of rejecting job applicants in six out of seven studies. Risk mitigation based on the result of pre-employment examinations may be effective in reducing an increased risk for occupational injuries based on very low quality evidence. This evidence supports the current policy to restrict pre-employment examinations to only job-specific examinations. Better quality evaluation studies on pre-employment examinations are necessary, including the evaluation of the benefits of risk mitigation, given the effect on health and on the financial situation for those employees who do not pass the pre-employment examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederieke G Schaafsma
- VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ InstituteDepartment of Public and Occupational HealthVan der Boechorststraat 7 ‐ room A524Postbus 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | - Norashikin Mahmud
- Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaProgram of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of ManagementJohor Bahru CampusSkudaiJohorMalaysia81310
| | - Michiel F Reneman
- University Medical Center GroningenCenter of RehabilitationGroningenNetherlands
| | - Jean‐Baptiste Fassier
- Université Claude Bernard ‐ Lyon 1UMRESTTE ‐ UMR 9405Domaine RockefellerCedex 08LyonFrance69373
| | - Franciscus HW Jungbauer
- University Medical Hospital GroningenOccupational Health departmentHanzeplein 1GroningenNetherlands9800RB
| | | |
Collapse
|
200
|
Horner K, Shelley AM. Preoperative radiological evaluation of missing single teeth: A review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2016; 9 Suppl 1:S69-S88. [PMID: 27314113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Missing single teeth can be treated in several ways and preoperative radiological evaluation varies accordingly. The main area of controversy relates to the need for cross-sectional imaging in the context of implant treatment. In this context, the aim of the systematic component of this review was to determine whether the use of additional cross-sectional imaging has any impact on diagnostic thinking, treatment planning or outcome, compared with conventional imaging alone. An additional aim was to present information relating to diagnostic efficacy, dose of radiation, economic aspects of imaging and selection criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed/MEDLINE, OVID/Embase and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched up to and including June 2015. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared the impact of conventional and cross-sectional imaging when placing implants. Quality assessment of studies was performed. Synthesis was qualitative. RESULTS Twelve studies were included, all of which had a 'before-after' design. Only three of these were limited to single implant treatments with none limited to immediate implants. There were methodological problems with most of the studies and results were sometimes contradictory regarding the impact of cross-sectional imaging. CONCLUSIONS It is tentatively suggested that cross-sectional imaging may not be required in straightforward, unchallenging, cases of missing single teeth being considered for implant treatment. Beyond this, no strong evidence exists to inform the choice of imaging. Existing guidelines on preoperative imaging for missing single teeth are not unanimous in their recommendations, either for implant or non-implant treatments.
Collapse
|