AB0538 POOLED SAFETY RESULTS FROM TWO PHASE-3 TRIALS OF GUSELKUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS THROUGH 1 YEAR

Background:

DISCOVER 1 & 2, two double-blind, phase-3, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) trials of guselkumab (GUS, an IL-23 inhibitor), demonstrated significant improvement with GUS vs placebo (PBO) in signs and symptoms of PsA, with good tolerability, at week (w) 24 during the PBO-controlled period.1,2 Beyond w24, all patients (pts) switched to GUS. Continued treatment maintained efficacy through w52.3,4

Objectives:

To describe pooled safety results from the DISCOVER 1 & 2 trials through 1-year of GUS treatment.

Methods:

Adults with active PsA (DISCOVER 1: ≥3 tender/swollen joints and C-Reactive protein [CRP] ≥0.3 mg/dL; DISCOVER 2: ≥5 tender/swollen joints and CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL) were randomized to subcutaneous GUS 100 mg at w0, w4, then every 8 w (q8w); GUS 100 mg q4w; or PBO. At w24, PBO pts switched to GUS 100 mg q4w. Pts were biologic naive except ~30% pts in DISCOVER 1. Safety was reported through w60 in DISCOVER 1 and through w52 in DISCOVER 2.

Results:

Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups in the pooled studies. Through w24 and 1 year, numbers of pts per 100 patient years with ≥1 event were similar among treatment groups for adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, infections, serious infections, and discontinuations due to AE (Table 1). At 1 year, there were no cases of active tuberculosis, opportunistic infections (including candida), or inflammatory bowel disease in GUS-treated pts; 2 deaths in PBO pts; and low incidences that were similar across treatment groups for malignancy, major adverse cardiac events, and injection-site reactions. Incidence of anti-GUS antibodies was 4.5%, and most were not neutralizing. Mild elevations in serum hepatic transaminases and decreases in neutrophil counts were consistent at 1 year with the results at w24 (Table 1).

Conclusion:

GUS regimens of q8w and q4w were well tolerated in PsA pts through 1 year of treatment in the phase-3 DISCOVER trials, consistent with the w24 results. No meaningful differences between incidences of AEs were reported in the q8w and q4w groups. The safety profile of GUS in PsA pts is generally comparable with the previously established safety profile of GUS.

References:

[1]Deodhar A et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115

[2]Mease P et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1126

[3]Ritchlin C et al. EULAR 2020 # SAT0397

[4]McInnes I et al. EULAR 2020 # SAT0402

Table 1.

Number of Patients with AEs per 100 PY and Incidence of AEs of Interest

Time Period24 Weeks1 Year*Treatment GroupPBOGUS SC 100 mgPBO to GUS‡GUS SC 100 mgDosing ScheduleMatchingq8wq4wGUSCombined†q4wq8wq4wGUSCombined‡ N3723753737483523753731100Total PY Follow-Up173173172346204384385589Patients with AEs per 100 PY, n (95% CI)≥1 AE143 (123, 166)148 (127, 171)154 (132, 178)151 (136, 167)92 (77, 108)114 (100, 130)115 (101, 131)109 (100, 117)≥1 Serious AE7.1 (3.7, 12)4.1 (1.6, 8.4)4.7 (2.0, 9.3)4.4 (2.5, 7.3)7.0 (3.8, 11.8)4.8 (2.9, 7.6)4.0 (2.2, 6.6)4.9 (3.6, 6.6)≥1 Infection50 (39, 62)47 (37, 59)52 (42, 65)49 (42, 58)39 (31, 49)41 (34, 48)38 (31, 45)39 (35, 44)≥1 Serious Infection1.7 (0.4, 5.1)0.6 (0.0, 3.2)1.8 (0.4, 5.1)1.2 (0.3, 3.0)2.5 (0.8, 5.8)1.3 (0.4, 3.1)0.8 (0.2, 2.3)1.3 (0.7, 2.3)Discontinued due to AE4.1 (1.6, 8.4)2.9 (1.0, 6.8)4.7 (2.0, 9.3)3.8 (2.0, 6.5)3.5 (1.4, 7.1)2.1 (0.9, 4.1)2.6 (1.3, 4.8)2.6 (1.7, 3.8)AEs of Interest§, n (%)Death2 (0.5)0000000Malignancy1 (0.3)2 (0.5)02 (0.3)1 (0.3)2 (0.5)03 (0.3)Major Adverse Cardiac Events1 (0.3)01 (0.3)1 (0.1)001 (0.3)1 (0.1)Opportunistic Infections00000000Tuberculosis00000000Inflammatory Bowel Disease1 (0.3)0000000Injection-Site Reaction1 (0.3)5 (1.3)4 (1.1)9 (1.2)4 (1.1)6 (1.6)9 (2.4)19 (1.7)Anti-GUS Antibody+-6/373 (1.6)9/371 (2.4)15/744 (2.0)14/350 (4.0)18/373 (4.8)17/371 (4.6)49/1094 (4.5)

*Through w60 for DISCOVER 1 and w52 for DISCOVER 2; †Combined GUS q8w and q4w; ‡For patients who switched from PBO to GUS, only data on and after first GUS administration were included in this group; §PBO N=370.

AE, adverse event; CI, confidence interval; GUS, guselkumab; PBO, placebo; PY, patient year; q4w, every 4 weeks; q8w, every 8 weeks; SC, subcutaneous; w, week

Disclosure of Interests:

Christopher T. Ritchlin Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from UCB Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, consultation fees from UCB Pharma, Amgen, AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead, Janssen, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: Received speakers fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Janssen and Novartis, consultation fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer., Philip Helliwell Consultant of: Consultation fees paid to charity (AbbVie, Amgen, Pfizer, UCB) or himself (Celgene, Galapagos), Grant/research support from: Received grants/research support paid to charity (AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis), Wolf-Henning Boehncke Consultant of: Received consultation fees from Janssen, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Iain McInnes Consultant of: Received consultation fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Alice B Gottlieb Speakers bureau: Received speakers fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB, Consultant of: Received consultation fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB, Shelly Kafka Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Prasheen Agarwal Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Bei Zhou Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Paraneedharan Ramachandran Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: Received speakers fees from Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau, Consultant of: Received consultation fees from Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB.

POS0909 IXEKIZUMAB IMPROVES SIGNS, SYMPTOMS AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS IN PATIENTS IRRESPECTIVE OF HLA-B27 STATUS: POOLED RESULTS FROM THE COAST-V AND COAST-W TRIALS

Background:

Human leukocyte antigen-B27 (HLA-B27) is found in most patients (pts) with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Although a subset of pts with AS are HLA-B27 negative (NEG), ensuring treatment efficacy in this subpopulation is important.

Objectives:

This analysis evaluated the efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody selectively targeting interleukin-17A, in AS pts who are either HLA-B27 positive (POS) or NEG.

Methods:

COAST-V (NCT02696785) and COAST-W (NCT02696798) were 2 phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled trials investigating the efficacy of 80-mg IXE administered every 4 weeks (Q4W) and every 2 weeks (Q2W) in pts naïve to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs; COAST-V) and in those who were inadequate responders or intolerant to 1 or 2 tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi; COAST-W). Only data from pts randomized at baseline to PBO, IXE Q4W or Q2W in both trials who met per protocol eligibility criteria were integrated and stratified based on HLA-B27 status (POS, NEG) for an ad hoc subgroup analysis. Efficacy was assessed using the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) and Short Form 36 Physical Component Scores (SF-36 PCS). Missing data were imputed by non-responder imputation (NRI) for binary measure and by modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF). Data from PBO was reported up to Week 16 and for pooled IXE Q4W and Q2W up to Week 52.

Results:

This analysis includes pts with AS who are HLA-B27 POS (N=453; PBO=155, IXE=298) or NEG (N=62, PBO=21, IXE=41). Overall, more pts were male (82.6%, POS; 77.4%, NEG), and for IXE treated pts, the duration of disease since r-axSpA diagnosis was 10.3 (SD=9.1) and 6.9 (SD=5.6) years, among POS and NEG pts respectively (Table 1). Among IXE treated patients, the mean age of HLA-B27 NEG pts was approximately 7-8 years older than HLA-B27 POS pts. At Week 16, 39.6% (n=118/298) of HLA-B27 POS and 29.3% (n=12/41) of HLA-B27 NEG pts achieved ASAS40, and 34.6% (n=103) of HLA-B27 POS and 17.1% (n=7) of HLA-B27 NEG pts achieved BASDAI50; improvements were seen as early as Week 1 and sustained or improved up to Week 52. The mean baseline SF-36 PCS was 33.2 (SD=7.63) for HLA-B27 POS and 31.4 (SD=7.67) for HLA-B27 NEG pts. At Week 16, the mean change from baseline in SF-36 PCS was 7.3 (SD 7.6) for HLA-B27 POS and 3.7 (SD=6.83) for HLA-B27 NEG pts. Improvements were sustained to Week 52 (Figure 1).

Conclusion:

IXE improves signs, symptoms, patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life in HLA-B27 POS and NEG pts with AS, however the HLA-B27 POS pts have a faster and more robust response than HLA-B27 NEG pts.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics by HLA-B27 Positive and Negative Status

Positive HLA-B27Negative HLA-B27PBO (N=155)IXE (N=298)PBO (N=21)IXE (N=41)Male, n (%)133 (85.8)241 (80.9)18 (85.7)30 (73.2)Age of r-axSpA onset (yr), mean (SD)25.2 (9.28)26.3 (8.38)35.4 (8.43)‡34.6 (10.32)‡Duration of symptoms since r-axSpA onset (yr)18.7 (11.82)17.1 (10.38)16.0 (9.69)15.9 (12.40)C-Reactive protein (mg/L), mean (SD)16.7 (22.43)16.9 (25.50)18.1 (21.69)13.7 (14.38)ASDAS score, mean (SD)4.0 (0.78)4.0 (0.83)4.3 (0.76)4.1 (0.73)BASDAI score, mean (SD)7.1 (1.25)7.2 (1.37)7.6 (1.31)*7.4 (1.41)SF-36 PCS, mean (SD)33.7 (7.50)33.2 (7.63)34.1 (8.28)31.4 (7.67)

Abbreviations: ASDAS, Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; HLA-B27, Human leukocyte antigen-B27; IXE, pooled ixekizumab every 2 weeks and every 4 weeks; N, total number of patients in group; n, number of patients in category/subgroup; PBO, placebo; r-axSpA, axial spondyloarthritis; SD, standard deviation; SF-36 PCS, Short Form 36 Physical Component Scores; yr, years.

p-value: vs. HLA-B27 positive: *≤0.05,‡<0.0001

Figure 1.

Comparisons done using t-test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables.

Disclosure of Interests:

John D Reveille Consultant of: UCB (Union Chimique Belge), Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Janssen 2018; Eli Lilly 2020, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbot, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis, David Sandoval Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Talia Muram Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Rebecca Bolce Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, So Young Park Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Martin Rudwaleit Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Chugai, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD (Merck Sharp and Dohme), Novartis, Pfizer, UCD (Union Chimique Belge), Consultant of: AbbVie, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB (Union Chimique Belge)

AB0557 ACHIEVING TREATMENT TARGETS IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS WITH APREMILAST IN CANADIAN PRACTICE: REAL WORLD RESULTS FROM APPRAISE

Background:

Real-world evidence on achieving treatment targets with apremilast (APR) in patients (pts) with PsA is limited. In the phase 3 PALACE trials, pts reached remission (REM)/low disease activity (LDA) targets at 52 wks most frequently when early APR treatment was initiated and pts were in moderate disease activity, as measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA) score. In APPRAISE, we assessed APR effectiveness/tolerability in pts with PsA in routine clinical practice in Canada.

Objectives:

This interim efficacy analysis focused on the available data on APR effectiveness measuring rate of achieving cDAPSA REM or LDA at 12 mos and Pt Acceptable Symptom Status (PASS) results.

Methods:

The prospective, multicenter, observational APPRAISE study assessed APR effectiveness/tolerability in adults with active PsA in routine clinical care enrolled from July 2018-March 2020. Pts were followed from treatment initiation to 12 mos, with visits suggested every 4 mos. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the rate of achieving at least LDA (cDAPSA <14) at 12 mos. Pt-reported outcome measures were assessed. Data reported are as observed in pts continuing APR treatment.

Results:

In total, 101 pts were enrolled in APPRAISE. Mean age was 52 yrs; 56% were women. Mean (SD) PsA duration at baseline (BL) was 6 (8) yrs. Oligoarticular disease (≤4 joint involvement) was most common (41%), followed by polyarticular (35%). Most pts (92%) received prior conventional DMARDs and 17% received prior biologic therapy; concomitant MTX was reported in 41% at BL. By 12 mos, 41/101 enrolled pts discontinued, 35 reached 12 mos follow-up (4 mos: n=92; 8 mos: n=61), and 25 have yet to reach 12 mos. The majority (92%) of discontinuations due to lack/loss of effectiveness or AEs occurred within 4-8 mos. AEs were primarily GI related early in treatment. The proportion of pts with continued APR achieving cDAPSA REM/LDA treatment targets increased significantly over time (Figure 1). Significant reductions were seen over 12 mos in swollen/tender joint counts and plaque psoriasis, with reduced mean (SD) body surface area of −4% (9%) (Table 1). Prevalence of dactylitis/enthesitis at BL, 4, 8, and 12 mos was 17%/33%, 9%/24%, 5%/19%, and 0%/21%, respectively. Pain assessment (VAS) significantly improved over time. The proportion of pts achieving PASS with continued APR increased significantly over 12 mos (BL: 27%; 12 mos: 65%) (Figure 1). COVID restrictions impacted in-office assessment visits, necessitating reliance on virtual visits.

Conclusion:

Pts with PsA receiving APR were assessed at regular intervals in routine clinical care in Canada. This interim analysis revealed a greater number of pts receiving APR (66%) who completed the 12-mo follow-up achieved REM or LDA, as measured by cDAPSA over 12 mos. A majority of pts (65%) reported satisfaction with their disease state, as measured by PASS. No new safety signals were observed.

Table 1.

Change in Clinical Parameters and Pt-Reported Outcomes From BL to 4, 8, and 12 Mos

Outcome Measure*, Mean (SD)BL (n = 101)4 Mos (n = 92)8 Mos (n = 61)12 Mos (n = 35)Disease/Clinical Parameters Tender joint count (0-68)7.5 (6.7)−2.5 (6.3)*−3.9 (5.2)*−2.2 (6.4) Swollen joint count (0-66)5.4 (5.4)−3.0 (4.5)*−3.1 (4.3)*−3.1 (4.4)* PhGA42.9 (18.8)−19.0 (24.6)*−24.2 (24.2)*−21.2 (26.3)* Body surface area, %3.1 (6.1)−2.2 (6.0)*−2.7 (7.5)*−4.2 (9.1)* cDAPSA22.2 (13.3)−7.9 (12.1)*−10.1 (13.5)*−6.9 (12.0)*Pt-Reported Outcomes PtGA, mm50.0 (24.6)−10.2 (27.5)*−9.1 (31.9)*−3.6 (39.7) Pain, mm48.3 (25.3)−9.5 (26.2)*−12.2 (28.7)*−7.3 (26.0) HAQ-DI0.9 (0.7)−0.13 (0.5)*−0.15 (0.6)−0.1 (0.7)

*Denotes significant change from BL (P<0.05) from paired-sample t-tests; note that mean change from BL may be greater than the mean BL value when improvements of large magnitude, for pts with relatively elevated BL values, are observed in samples with lower n’s. HAQ-DI = Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; PhGA = Physician’s Global Assessment; PtGA = Patient’s Global Assessment.

Acknowledgements:

This study was funded by Celgene and Amgen Inc. Writing support was funded by Amgen Inc. and provided by Kristin Carlin, RPh, MBA, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company.

Disclosure of Interests:

Vinod Chandran Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Louis Bessette Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, UCB, Carter Thorne Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Consultant of: Centocor, Medexus/Medac, Merck, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, Maqbool Sheriff Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Sandoz, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Dafna D Gladman Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Sabeen Anwar Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Pfizer, Jennifer Jelley Employee of: Amgen Canada Inc., Anne-Julie Gaudreau Employee of: Amgen Canada Inc., Manprit Chohan Employee of: Amgen Canada Inc., John S. Sampalis Employee of: JSS Medical Research.

POS1026 GUSELKUMAB PROVIDES SUSTAINED IMPROVEMENTS IN WORK PRODUCTIVITY AND NON-WORK ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: RESULTS THROUGH 1 YEAR OF A PHASE 3 TRIAL

Background:

DISCOVER-2 was a Phase 3 trial of the first-in-class anti-IL-23-specific mAb guselkumab (GUS) in patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). PsA impacts patients’ productivity at work and in daily activity.1

Objectives:

To evaluate the effect of GUS on work productivity and daily activity in DISCOVER-2 through 1 year using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: PsA (WPAI- PsA).

Methods:

Bio-naïve adults with active PsA despite nonbiologic DMARDs &/or NSAIDs received subcutaneous GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg W0, W4, then Q8W; or placebo (PBO). At W24, PBO pts crossed over to GUS 100 mg Q4W. WPAI-PsA assesses PsA-related work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism), impaired overall work productivity (absenteeism + presenteeism), and daily activity during the previous week. A shift analysis evaluated proportions of pts employed vs unemployed (regardless of desire to work) over time. Among pts working at baseline, least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline in WPAI-PsA domains were determined using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures analysis, whereby mean changes in WPAI-PsA domains were calculated for each multiple imputation (MI) dataset using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA); the reported LSmean is the average of all MI datasets. Also, among pts employed at baseline, indirect savings from improved overall work productivity were estimated using 2020 EU mean yearly wage estimate (all occupations).2

Results:

In pts working at baseline, significant improvement in work productivity and non-work activity vs PBO was observed at W24. Productivity gains seen with GUS at W24 continued to improve through 1 year (Table 1). Shift analysis showed relatively stable employment in pts employed at baseline (62% of shift analysis cohort) through 1 year of GUS (>91% continued to work when assessed at W16, W24, and W52 [data not shown]). For those unemployed at baseline (38% of cohort), the proportion of pts working increased by ~10% following 1 year of GUS (Figure 1). Potential yearly indirect savings from improved overall work productivity were: €7409 GUS Q4W and €7039 GUS Q8W vs €4075 PBO at W24 and were €8520 GUS Q4W, €9632 GUS Q8W, and €6668 PBO→GUS Q4W at W52.

Conclusion:

Improvement in work productivity and non-work activity was greater with GUS vs PBO among pts with active PsA through W52. Improvements demonstrated may result in reduction in PsA costs associated with work productivity.

References:

[1]Tillett W et al. Rheumatol (Oxford). 2012;51:275–83.

[2]OECD (2020). Average wages (indicator). https://data.oecd.org/earnwage/average-wages.htm

Table 1.

Model-based estimates of LSmean changea (95% CI) from baseline in WPAI-PsA domains among pts working at baseline and with an observed change through W24 (N=474) and W52 (N=475)

Change from baselineGUS 100mg Q4WGUS 100mg Q8WPBO(W0-24)PBO → GUS 100 mg Q4W (W24-52)VisitW24W52W24W52W24W52Absenteeism, N145145147147162163LSmean-3.4 (-6.5,-0.3)-4.1 (-6.8,-1.5)-3.0 (-6.0,0.1)-4.0 (-6.6,-1.3)-3.0 (-6.0, 0.04)-3.0 (-5.5,-0.4)Diff vs. PBO-0.4 (-4.6,3.8)-0.01 (-4.2, 4.2)Presenteeism, N145145147147162163LSmean-20.1 (-23.7,-16.6)-22.4 (-26.3,-18.6)-19.6 (-23.2,-16.1)-25.7 (-29.5,-21.8)-10.5 (-13.9,-7.0)-18.5 (-22.2,-14.7)Diff vs PBO-9.7* (-14.4,-5.0)-9.2* (-13.9,-4.5)Work productivity, N145145147147162163LSmean-20.1 (-24.1,-16.1)-22.6 (-26.8,-18.3)-19.2 (-23.1,-15.2)-25.9 (-30.0,-21.7)-10.6 (-14.4,-6.8)-17.6 (-21.7,-13.6)Diff vs PBO-9.5* (-14.8,-4.2)-8.6* (-13.9,-3.3)Non-work Activity, N242242246246245245LSmean-20.5 (-23.3,-17.7)-25.7 (-28.6,-22.7)-21.2 (-23.9,-18.4)-25.4 (-28.4,-22.5)-9.9 (-12.6,-7.1)-22.3 (-25.3,-19.4)Diff vs PBO-10.6* (-14.4,-6.8)-11.3* (-15.1,-7.5)

CI=Confidence interval

a. LSmean for each MI dataset is calculated based on an ANCOVA model for the change from baseline at W24/W52. The combined LSmean, which is the average of the LSmean, taken over all the MI datasets, is presented.

*p<0.05

Disclosure of Interests:

Jeffrey Curtis Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corrona, Janssen, Lilly, Myriad, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corrona, Janssen, Lilly, Myriad, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and UCB, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Steve Peterson Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Prasheen Agarwal Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Feifei Yang Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Chenglong Han Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, William Tillett Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer Inc, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB, Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim and GlaxoSmithKline, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, and UCB, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis.

POS0405 GENETIC VARIANTS WITHIN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS (PsA)-WEIGHTED GENES FBXL19 AND HLA-B*39 MAY SERVE AS A POTENTIAL LINK BETWEEN PsA AND OBESITY

Background:

PsA patients have been observed to have a higher body mass index (BMI) compared to individuals with a similar disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) or healthy controls1. Approximately 45% of PsA patients are considered obese with BMI’s exceeding 30 kg/m2, and these patients have more severe articular disease and lower response to therapy2. A recent mendelian randomization study noted that higher BMI leads to higher risk of psoriasis when using genetic variants as instrumental variables for BMI3.

Objectives:

To determine if known PsA-weighted genetic variants are overrepresented in an obese population.

Methods:

696 samples were identified from a previous genetic study in obesity where each patient was systematically examined with BMI and other related anthropometric measures were recorded. No patients had psoriasis, inflammatory arthritis or any extra-articular manifestations of spondyloarthritis. Samples were genotyped using a PsA-weighted single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel, representing genetic variants associated with PsA. The cohort consisted of 73% female with an average age of 49 years ± 15. The average BMI of the group was 35± 8 kg/m2, ranging from 17 to 67 kg/m2. The PsA SNP panel consists of 42 SNPs associated with PsA including IL23R, 5q31, PTPN22, TNFAIP3, HLA-C, TNFRSF9, LCE3A, ADAMTS9-MAGI1, HLA-B, IL13, MICA, IL12B, ZNF8816A, TRAF3IP2, KIR2DS2, FBXL19, REL, IL23R, IL23A, TNIP1, and TYK2. DNA (10ng/uL) was used to prepare a PCR, followed by SAP, and extension reaction with Agena iPLEX Pro kit using Agena MassARRAY. Quantitative trait analysis was performed to obtain the association between BMI and genotype of the 42 SNPs using a linear regression model. Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. The factors of age, gender, smoking and height also have been adjusted in the analysis (Table 1).

Table 1.

Regression analysis between BMI and 2 significant SNPs

SNPCHRAllele 1Allele 2BETASETP (Genotype Only)P (adjusted with factors)*rs31313826TC2.2270.72073.170.0015965.40E-05rs1078200116GA1.5840.43473.6440.000290.0007524Genotypes of FBXL19 and HLA-B*3905 SNPs with mean BMISNPrs3131382rs10782001GenotypesTTTCCCGGGAAASample Counts69957575324246Genotype Frequency0.00880.150.840.110.500.38Mean BMI47.1736.7335.4637.2936.3634.43SD16.076.647.127.687.406.83

*Adjusted for age, sex, height, and smoking

Results:

Linear regression analysis with and without clinical factors for the two significant SNPs are presented in Table 1. Genotypes of two SNPs (rs10782001 and rs3131382) showed a difference with BMI (Table 1). The rs10782001 variant is within FBXL19 and the average BMI in the presence of GG genotype was 37.2 vs 34.3 for the AA genotype (p=0.0007). The rs3131382 variant is within HLA-B*39:05 and the average BMI with TT genotype was 47.1 vs 35.4 for the CC genotype (p=0.00005). Both SNPs maintained significance after correction for multiple testing (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

Homozygotes for the minor allele of SNPs within HLA-B*39 and FBXL19 have shown to have an increased BMI, suggesting a potential genetic link between these genes and PsA and obesity. Interestingly, it has been recently noted that miR-26 suppresses adipocyte progenitor differentiation and fat production by targeting FBXL19, leading to possible biologic possibility regarding the link between PsA-weighted genetic variants and obesity4.

References:

[1]Bhole VM et al., Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Mar;51(3):552-6.

[2]Klingberg E et al., Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):17.

[3]Budu-Aggrey A et al., PLoS Med. 2019 Jan 31;16(1):e1002739.

[4]Acharya A et al., Fbxl19. Genes Dev. 2019;33(19-20):1367-1380. doi:10.1101/gad.328955.119

Disclosure of Interests:

Cassidy Welsh: None declared, Tanya Burry: None declared, Quan Li: None declared, Amanda Dohey: None declared, Dianne Codner: None declared, Vinod Chandran Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lily, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lily, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lily, Employee of: Spousal Employment Eli Lilly, Dafna D Gladman Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lily, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lily, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UC, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Darren O’Rielly: None declared, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: Amgen, Abbott, AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lily, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, UCB, Consultant of: Amgen, Abbott, AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lily, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, UCB, Grant/research support from: Janssen, Novartis

POS0901 IXEKIZUMAB SHOWS A DISTINCT PATTERN OF PAIN IMPROVEMENT BEYOND INFLAMMATION IN RADIOGRAPHIC AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

Background:

The efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE) in biologic-naïve patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) has been previously presented using traditional axSpA outcome measures, such as BASDAI and ASAS.

Objectives:

In patients with active r-axSpA, to assess the analgesic efficacy of IXE as it relates to patient-reported and objective measures of inflammation.

Methods:

The Phase III COAST-V (NCT02696785) multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled and active reference arm with adalimumab (ADA) trial investigated the efficacy of IXE in 341 patients (pts) with active r-axSpA for 52 weeks (W). Pts were initially randomized to IXEQ4W, IXEQ2W, PBO, and ADAQ2W. At W16, pts assigned to PBO and ADA were re-randomized to IXEQ2W or Q4W. Changes in spinal pain at night (SP-N) and spinal pain were measured at each study visit and analysed while controlling for CRP levels or mean of BASDAI questions 5 & 6 (Q5: Duration and Q6: Intensity of morning stiffness). Observed data analyses are presented for each group stratified by treatment arm and compared to PBO. In the initial analysis, pts were categorized into 2 sub-groups defined as “Sustained” and “Fluctuating” depending on: CRP <5 mg/L W4-16 vs. CRP ≥5 mg/L at any point beyond W4 between weeks 4-16 respectively. In a second analysis, pts were categorized based on BASDAI Q5/6 improvement: “Sustained” if ≥2-pt improvement W12-16 vs. “Fluctuating” if <2-pt improvement at any point beyond W12 between W12-16.

Results:

Between W0 and W16, pts treated (tx) with IXEQ4W experienced greater reduction in SP-N than pts tx with ADA, in both CRP sustained and fluctuating groups (Fig 1a). Pts in the IXEQ4W and ADA arms showed different trajectories of pain improvement in the CRP fluctuating groups. For the pts with a fluctuating CRP ≥5 mg/L, pts in IXEQ4W arm demonstrated a greater reduction in SP-N compared to pts in PBO arm (p < .001) at W16, whereas pts in ADA arm did not experience a reduction in SP-N compared to PBO (p = .416). For the pts with a sustained CRP <5mg/L, IXEQ4W and ADA treatments both significantly demonstrated reduction in SP-N compared to PBO at W16 (IXEQ4W: p = .002; ADA: p = .02), with IXEQ4W treatment showing a greater level of reduction (Fig 1a). The pts randomized to ADA and re-randomized to IXEQ2W or Q4W (ADA/IXE) experienced further improvement in SP-N. This effect was sustained over the 52-wk period (Fig 1b). The same pattern of improvement in SP-N was observed when controlling for the BASDAI Q5/6; the SP-N improvement was greater in pts with a sustained BASDAI Q5/6 compared to pts with a fluctuating BASDAI Q5/6, regardless of treatment (Table 1). In the fluctuating BASDAI Q5/6, for pts in ADA/IXE arm, further reduction of both spinal pain and SP-N were observed (Table 1).

Table 1.

Change in Pain Outcome at baseline, week 16 and week 52 by Inflammation Status as assessed by BASDAI or CRP levels for patients receiving placebo (PBO), adalimumab (ADA), and ixekizumab every 4 weeks (IXE Q4W)

Change from baselinePBOADAIXEQ4WbaselineWeek 16(as observed)Week 52PBO/IXE(as observed)baselineWeek 16(as observed)Week 52ADA/IXE(as observed)baselineWeek 16(as observed)Week 52(as observed)Spinal painBASDAI Q5/6 sustained7.54-3.33-4.657.21-4.07-4.57.4-4.52-4.94BASDAI Q5/6 fluctuating7.37-1.32-2.826.76-1.2-2.246.97-1.3-2.52CRP sustained7-1.53-1.936.83-2.9-3.67.23-3.57-4.21CRP fluctuating7.51-1.96-3.637.28-2-2.897.24-2.91-3.93Spinal pain at nightBASDAI Q5/6 sustained7.12-3.21-4.617.26-4.63-4.927.12-4.73-4.91BASDAI Q5/6 fluctuating7.05-1.15-2.886.6-1.2-2.497.03-2.17-2.92CRP sustained7.2-1.87-2.276.76-3.2-3.856.89-3.8-4.12CRP fluctuating7.04-1.69-3.67.24-2.21-3.397.35-3.68-4.38

Conclusion:

IXE reduced SP-N and spinal pain irrespective of CRP or morning stiffness. Additionally, pts treated with ADA re-randomized to IXE experienced a further reduction in SP-N and spinal pain. Collectively, these results support the additive benefits of IXE in reducing pain above measurable effects on inflammation.

Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to thank Eglantine Julle-Daniere for writing and editorial contributions

Disclosure of Interests:

Kurt de Vlam Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Paid instructor for: Celgene, Amgen, Consultant of: Elil Lillyn Novartis, UCB, Galapagos, Sandoz, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Celgene, Gaia Gallo Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: Janssen, Novartis, Venkatesh Krishnan Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, David Sandoval Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Chen-Yen Lin Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Rebecca Bolce Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Philip G Conaghan Consultant of: personal fees from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Flexion Therapeutics, Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer

Identifying Aspects of Public Attitudes Toward Whole Genome Sequencing to Inform the Integration of Genomics into Care

INTRODUCTION

The growth of global sequencing initiatives and commercial genomic test offerings suggests the public will increasingly be confronted with decisions about sequencing. Understanding public attitudes can assist efforts to integrate sequencing into care and inform the development of public education and outreach strategies.

METHODS

A 48-item online survey was advertised on Facebook in Eastern Canada and hosted on SurveyMonkey in late 2018. The survey measured public interest in whole genome sequencing and attitudes toward various aspects of sequencing using vignettes, scaled, and open-ended items.

RESULTS

While interest in sequencing was high, critical attitudes were observed. In particular, items measuring features of patient control and choice regarding genomic data were strongly endorsed by respondents. Majority wanted to specify upfront how their data could be used, retain the ability to withdraw their sample at a later date, sign a written consent form, and speak to a genetic counselor prior to sequencing. Concerns about privacy and unauthorized access to data were frequently observed. Education level was the sociodemographic variable most often related to attitude statements such that those with higher levels of education generally displayed more critical attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Attitudes identified here could be used to inform the development of implementation strategies for genomic medicine. Findings suggest health systems must address patient concerns about privacy, consent practices, and the strong desire to control what happens to their genomic data through public outreach and education. Specific oversight procedures and policies that are clearly communicated to the public will be required.

Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements

Background

Limitations in spinal mobility are a characteristic feature of Axial Spondyloarthritis. Current clinical measurements of spinal mobility have shown low criterion-concurrent validity. This study sought to evaluate criterion-concurrent validity for a clinically feasible measurement method of measuring spine mobility using tri-axial accelerometers.

Methods

Fifteen radiographic-Spondyloarthritis patients were recruited for this study. Two postural reference radiographs, followed by three trials in forward, left and right lateral bending were taken. For all trials, three measurements were collected: tape (Original Schober’s, Modified Schober’s, Modified-Modified Schober’s, Lateral Spinal Flexion Test and Domjan Test), followed immediately by synchronized radiograph and accelerometer measurements at end range of forward and bilateral lateral flexion. The criterion-concurrent validity of all measurement methods was compared to the radiographic measures using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to assess agreement.

Results

In forward bending, the accelerometer method (r = 0.590, p = 0.010) had a stronger correlation to the radiographic measures than all tape measures. In lateral bending, the Lateral Spinal Flexion tape measure (r = 0.743, p = 0.001) correlated stronger than the accelerometer method (r = 0.556, p = 0.016). The Domjan test of bilateral bending (r = 0.708, p = 0.002) had a stronger correlation to the radiographic measure than the accelerometer method.

Conclusions

Accelerometer measures demonstrated superior criterion-concurrent validity compared to current tape measures of spinal mobility in forward bending. While a moderate correlation exists between accelerometer and radiographs in lateral bending, the Lateral Spinal Flexion Test and Domjan Test were found to have the best criterion-concurrent validity of all tests examined in this study.

Clinical and molecular significance of genetic loci associated with psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is caused by a combination of environmental and multiple genetic factors, with clear evidence for a strong genetic basis. The remarkable accumulation of knowledge gained from genetic, pharmacogenetic, and therapeutic response of biologic agents in PsA has fundamentally changed and advanced our understanding of disease pathogenesis and has identified key signalling pathways. However, only one-quarter of the genetic contribution of PsA has been accounted for; and dissecting the genetic contributors of the cutaneous disease from those that would identify joint disease has been challenging. More importantly, the clinical utility of multiple proposed loci is unclear. In this review, we summarize the potential clinical relevance from established genetic associations and provide insight on the proposed molecular pathways that arise from these associations.

Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, 52-week phase IIb study

Objectives

To evaluate efficacy and safety of the anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody tildrakizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb study, patients with active PsA were randomised 1:1:1:1:1 to tildrakizumab 200 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); tildrakizumab 200, 100 or 20 mg Q12W; or placebo Q4W. Patients receiving tildrakizumab 20 mg or placebo switched to tildrakizumab 200 mg Q12W at W24; treatment continued to W52. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients with ACR20 response (≥20% improvement by American College of Rheumatology criteria) at W24. Secondary efficacy endpoints were assessed without adjustment for multiplicity. Safety was evaluated from treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results

391/500 patients screened were randomised and treated. At W24, 71.4%–79.5% of tildrakizumab-treated versus 50.6% of placebo-treated patients achieved ACR20 (all p<0.01). Patients receiving tildrakizumab versus placebo generally achieved higher rates of ACR50, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C reactive protein <3.2, minimal disease activity and 75%/90%/100% improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index responses at W24 and through W52. Improvement in dactylitis and enthesitis was not observed; results were mixed for other outcomes. Responses in patients switched to tildrakizumab 200 mg at W24 were consistent with treatment from baseline. TEAEs and serious TEAEs occurred in 64.5% and 3.3%, respectively, of all patients through W52 and were comparable among treatment arms.

Conclusions

Tildrakizumab treatment significantly improved joint and skin manifestations of PsA other than dactylitis and enthesitis. Treatment was generally well tolerated through W52. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02980692.

Continuing versus withdrawing ixekizumab treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis who achieved remission: efficacy and safety results from a placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal study (COAST-Y)

Objectives

The objective of COAST-Y was to evaluate the effect of continuing versus withdrawing ixekizumab (IXE) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who had achieved remission.

Methods

COAST-Y is an ongoing, phase III, long-term extension study that included a double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, randomised withdrawal-retreatment period (RWRP). Patients who completed the originating 52-week COAST-V, COAST-W or COAST-X studies entered a 24-week lead-in period and continued either 80 mg IXE every 2 (Q2W) or 4 weeks (Q4W). Patients who achieved remission (an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)<1.3 at least once at week 16 or week 20, and <2.1 at both visits) were randomly assigned equally at week 24 to continue IXE Q4W, IXE Q2W or withdraw to PBO in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of flare-free patients (flare: ASDAS≥2.1 at two consecutive visits or ASDAS>3.5 at any visit) after the 40-week RWRP, with time-to-flare as a major secondary endpoint.

Results

Of 773 enrolled patients, 741 completed the 24-week lead-in period and 155 entered the RWRP. Forty weeks after randomised withdrawal, 83.3% of patients in the combined IXE (85/102, p<0.001), IXE Q4W (40/48, p=0.003) and IXE Q2W (45/54, p=0.001) groups remained flare-free versus 54.7% in the PBO group (29/53). Continuing IXE significantly delayed time-to-flare versus PBO, with most patients remaining flare-free for up to 20 weeks after IXE withdrawal.

Conclusions

Patients with axSpA who continued treatment with IXE were significantly less likely to flare and had significantly delayed time-to-flare compared with patients who withdrew to PBO.

Pooled Safety Results Through 1 Year of 2 Phase III Trials of Guselkumab in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the safety of guselkumab (monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin [IL]-23p19) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) through 1 year (1Y) of the phase III DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 trials.

METHODS

Patients with active PsA (n = 1120; biologic-naïve except 118 patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in DISCOVER-1) were randomized to subcutaneous guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or at Week 0, Week 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo. At Week 24, patients in the placebo group switched to guselkumab 100 mg Q4W. Treatment continued through 1Y and 2 years for DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2, respectively. In this pooled analysis, patients with ≥ 1 adverse event (AE) through 1Y were standardized for 100 patient-years [100 PYs] of follow-up.

RESULTS

Through Week 24, adverse events (AEs) were consistent between patients treated with placebo and guselkumab (Q4W + Q8W). AEs were 142.8/100 PYs and 150.6/100 PYs, serious AEs were 7.1/100 PYs and 4.4/100 PYs, and AEs leading to study agent discontinuation were 4.1/100 PYs and 3.8/100 PYs, respectively. Through 1Y in patients treated with guselkumab, no uveitis, active tuberculosis, opportunistic infections, or inflammatory bowel disease were observed, and low rates of malignancy and major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events were observed. Injection-site reactions occurred in 1.7%, and antibodies to guselkumab in 4.5% of patients treated with guselkumab through 1Y; the vast majority of antibodies to guselkumab were nonneutralizing. Serum hepatic transaminase elevations (more common with Q4W than Q8W dosing) and decreased neutrophil counts were generally mild, transient, and did not require treatment discontinuation, with minimal change from Week 24 to 1Y.

CONCLUSION

Guselkumab 100 mg Q4W and Q8W were well tolerated in patients with PsA, with no new safety concerns through 1Y of the phase III DISCOVER trials. Guselkumab safety through 1Y in patients with PsA is consistent with that established in patients with psoriasis who were treated with guselkumab.

Association Between Epidemiological Factors and Nonresponders to Total Joint Replacement Surgery in Primary Osteoarthritis Patients

BACKGROUND

While total joint replacement (TJR) is the most effective treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA), one-third of patients do not experience clinically important improvement in pain or function following the surgery. Thus, it is important to identify factors for nonresponders and develop strategies to improve TJR outcomes.

METHODS

Study participants were patients who underwent TJR (hip/knee) due to OA and completed the WOMAC before and on average 4 years after surgery. Nonresponders (pain nonresponders, function nonresponders, pain and function nonresponders) were determined using the WOMAC change score from baseline to follow-up under two previously reported criteria. Eighty-eight self-reported factors collected by a general health questionnaire were examined for associations with nonresponders.

RESULTS

A total of 601 patients (30.8% hip and 69.2% knee replacement) were included; 18% of them were found to be either pain or function nonresponders. Nine factors were identified in the univariable analyses to be associated with nonresponders, and 5 of them (clinical depression, multisite musculoskeletal pain [MSMP], younger age, golfer's elbow, and driving more than 4 hours on average per working day) remained significant in the multivariable analyses in at least one of six categories. Clinical depression, having MSMP, and younger age were the major factors to be independently associated with nonresponders across five categories. In addition, two factors (age at menopause and age at hysterectomy) were significantly associated with female nonresponders.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggested potential roles of pain perception, widespread pain sensitization, patient expectations, and early menopause in females in TJR outcomes, warranting further investigation.

P194 Response to ixekizumab by C-reactive protein level in patients with aadiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results from the COAST-V (biological-naïve) and COAST-W (TNF-α inhibitor-experienced) trials at 52 weeks

Background/Aims 

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) are effective treatments for radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA), but may be less effective in patients (pts) without elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). This study evaluated the efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody selectively targeting interleukin-17A, in pts with r-axSpA at 52 weeks (wks) with nonelevated (≤5mg/L) and elevated (&gt;5mg/L) baseline (BL) CRP.

Methods 

COAST-V (NCT02696785) and COAST-W (NCT02696798) were phase 3, multicenter, randomised, double-blind, PBO-controlled trials investigating efficacy of 80-mg IXE every 4 wks and every 2 wks in pts who met ASAS criteria for raxSpA, had radiographic sacroiliitis according to mNY criteria, and were biological diseasemodifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARDs)-naïve (COAST-V) or TNFiexperienced (COAST-W). Data from 157 COAST-V pts and 188 COAST-W pts treated with IXE from Wk0 to 52 were analyzed. Patients were stratified based on nonelevated (≤5mg/L) vs elevated (&gt;5 mg/L) BL CRP. Additional analysis was done with BL CRP ≤10.0mg/L vs &gt; 10.0mg/L. Efficacy was assessed by ASAS40, ≥50% improvement in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI50), and change in Short Form 36 physical component summary (SF36 PCS) score. Missing data were imputed by nonresponder imputation for binary measures and modified BL observation carried forward for continuous measure. Week 16 data are presented for comparison.

Results 

Of pts treated with IXE through Wk52, 34.4% had CRP ≤5.0mg/L, 65.6% had CRP &gt;5.0mg/L, 61.8% had CRP ≤10.0mg/L, and 38.2% had CRP &gt;10.0mg/L at BL in COASTV and 33.0% had CRP ≤5.0mg/L, 67.0% had CRP &gt;5.0mg/L, 55.9% had CRP ≤10.0mg/L, and 44.1% had CRP &gt;10.0mg/L at BL in COAST-W.At Wk16, the proportion of pts achieving ASAS40 in COAST-V was numerically higher with IXE in the ≤5mg/L group and significantly higher with IXE in the &gt;5mg/L group vs PBO, as previously shown, and was significantly higher with IXE in the ≤10mg/L and &gt;10mg/L groups vs PBO. Results were similar in COAST-W and significant in the &gt;5mg/L and ≤10mg/L groups vs PBO. At Wk52, greater than 45% of COAST-V pts and greater than 35% of COAST-W pts treated with IXE achieved an ASAS40 response, greater than 40% of COAST-V pts and greater than 25% of COAST-W patients treated with IXE achieved a BASDAI50 response, and change from baseline in SF-36 PCS score in patients treated with IXE was greater than 5 points in both studies regardless of the BL CRP cutoffs evaluated.

Conclusion 

A higher proportion of ASAS40 responders was observed in IXE treated arms versus PBO among bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-experienced pts with r-axSpA when the CRP cutoff of 10mg/L was evaluated, and the responses were consistent through Wk52. Furthermore, similar proportions of pts achieved BASDAI50 and SF-36 responses within each patient population regardless of the BL CRP cutoff evaluated.

Disclosure 

J.D. Reveille: None. P. Rahman: None. D.M. Sandoval Calderon: Shareholder/stock ownership; D. Sandoval Calderon is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. T. Muram: Shareholder/stock ownership; T. Muram is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. A. Kronbergs: Shareholder/stock ownership; A. Kronbergs is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. R. Bolce: Shareholder/stock ownership; R.Bolce is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. V. Geneus: Shareholder/stock ownership; V. Geneus is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. T. Hunter: Shareholder/stock ownership; T. Hunter is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. S. Liu-Leage: Shareholder/stock ownership; S.L. League is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. M. Rudwaleit: None. J.A. Maldonado-Cocco: None. F. van den Bosch: None.

Resolution of Enthesitis by Guselkumab and Relationships to Disease Burden: 1-Year Results of Two Phase-3 Psoriatic Arthritis Studies

Objective

To further characterize the effect of guselkumab, a selective IL-23p19-subunit inhibitor approved for PsA, on enthesitis and assess relationships between enthesitis resolution and patient status/outcomes.

Methods

Adults with active PsA despite standard therapies in the phase 3 DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 studies were randomized 1:1:1 to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, week 4, Q8W; or placebo through week 20 followed by guselkumab 100 mg Q4W. Independent assessors evaluated enthesitis using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI; total score 0–6). Enthesitis findings through week 24 were pre-specified to be pooled across studies; post hoc and week 52 analyses also employed pooled data.

Results

Among 1118 randomized, treated patients in DISCOVER-1 and 2 who had ≥1 LEI site evaluated, 65% had enthesitis at baseline. These patients exhibited numerically more swollen and tender joints, systemic inflammation and impaired physical function than patients without enthesitis. Guselkumab Q4W and Q8W were superior to placebo in resolving pre-existing enthesitis at week 24 (45 and 50% vs 29%; both adjusted P = 0.0301). Enthesitis resolution rates continued to rise; 58% of guselkumab-randomized patients achieved resolution at week 52, including patients with mild (LEI = 1; 70–75%), moderate (LEI = 2; 69–73%) or severe (LEI = 3–6; 42–44%) enthesitis at baseline. Among guselkumab-randomized patients with resolved enthesitis at week 24, 42% achieved minimal disease activity at week 52, vs 17% of patients with unresolved enthesitis.

Conclusion

Guselkumab resulted in higher proportions of PsA patients with resolved enthesitis by week 24, with maintenance of resolution rates through 1 year. As enthesitis confers greater disease burden, sustained resolution could portend better patient outcomes.

Clinical trial registration

DISCOVER 1 (NCT03162796) and DISCOVER 2 (NCT03158285)

Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab, an Interleukin-23p19-Specific Monoclonal Antibody, Through One Year in Biologic-Naive Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis

Objective

Guselkumab, a human monoclonal antibody specific to interleukin‐23p19, demonstrated efficacy and safety versus placebo through week 24 of the phase III DISCOVER‐2 trial in biologic‐naive patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here we report 1‐year DISCOVER‐2 findings.

Methods

Adults with active PsA (≥5 swollen and ≥5 tender joints; C‐reactive protein level ≥0.6 mg/dl) despite standard nonbiologic treatment were randomized to receive subcutaneous injections of guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks, guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, week 4 and every 8 weeks thereafter, or placebo with crossover to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks at week 24. We primarily evaluated clinical efficacy through week 52 by imputing missing data (nonresponse for categorical end points; no change/using multiple imputation for continuous end points). Observed radiographic scores and adverse events (AEs) were summarized.

Results

Of 739 randomized, treated patients, 93% completed week 52. The proportions of patients in whom a ≥20% improvement from baseline in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) was achieved were maintained after week 24, reaching 71% (173 of 245) and 75% (185 of 248) for patients randomized to receive treatment every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks, respectively, by week 52. The proportions of patients in whom ACR50/ACR70 and skin responses, minimal or very low disease activity, and dactylitis or enthesitis resolution were achieved at week 24 were also maintained through week 52. Further, low levels of radiographic progression, along with improvements in physical function and health‐related quality of life, were sustained through week 52 with continued guselkumab treatment. Few patients experienced serious infections through week 52, with no evidence of a dosing regimen response or increase from weeks 0–24 (4 of 493 [0.8%]) to weeks 24–52 (3 of 493 [0.6%]) among guselkumab‐randomized patients. No patient developed an opportunistic infection or died.

Conclusion

In biologic‐naive PsA patients, guselkumab provided sustained improvements across diverse manifestations and maintained a favorable risk–benefit profile through week 52.

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor may play a protective role in osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent form of arthritis and the major cause of disability and overall diminution of quality of life in the elderly population. Currently there is no cure for OA, partly due to the large gaps in our understanding of its underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a procytokine that mediates pleiotropic inflammatory effects in inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, data on the role of MIF in OA is limited with conflicting results. We undertook this study to investigate the role of MIF in OA by examining MIF genotype, mRNA expression, and protein levels in the Newfoundland Osteoarthritis Study.

METHODS

One hundred nineteen end-stage knee/hip OA patients, 16 RA patients, and 113 healthy controls were included in the study. Two polymorphisms in the MIF gene, rs755622, and -794 CATT_5-8, were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and PCR followed by automated capillary electrophoresis, respectively. MIF mRNA levels in articular cartilage and subchondral bone were measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Plasma concentrations of MIF, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

rs755622 and -794 CATT_5-8 genotypes were not associated with MIF mRNA or protein levels or OA (all p ≥ 0.19). MIF mRNA level in cartilage was lower in OA patients than in controls (p = 0.028) and RA patients (p = 0.004), while the levels in bone were comparable between OA patients and controls (p = 0.165). MIF protein level in plasma was lower in OA patients than in controls (p = 3.01 × 10^-10), while the levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β in plasma were all significantly higher in OA patients than in controls (all p ≤ 0.0007). Multivariable logistic regression showed lower MIF and higher IL-1β protein levels in plasma were independently associated with OA (OR per SD increase = 0.10 and 8.08; 95% CI = 0.04-0.19 and 4.42-16.82, respectively), but TNF-α and IL-6 became non-significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced MIF mRNA and protein expression in OA patients suggested MIF might have a protective role in OA and could serve as a biomarker to differentiate OA from other joint disorders.

Metabolomic analysis coupled with extreme phenotype sampling identified that lysophosphatidylcholines are associated with multisite musculoskeletal pain

ABSTRACT

Musculoskeletal pain often occurs simultaneously at multiple anatomical sites. The aim of the study was to identify metabolic biomarkers for multisite musculoskeletal pain (MSMP) by metabolomics with an extreme phenotype sampling strategy. The study participants (n = 610) were derived from the Newfoundland Osteoarthritis Study. Musculoskeletal pain was assessed using a self-reported pain questionnaire where painful sites were circled on a manikin by participants and the total number of painful sites were calculated. Targeted metabolomic profiling on fasting plasma samples was performed using the Biocrates AbsoluteIDQ p180 kit. Plasma cytokine concentrations including tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, interleukin-1β, and macrophage migration inhibitory factor were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Data on blood cholesterol profiles were retrieved from participants' medical records. Demographic, anthropological, and clinical information was self-reported. The number of reported painful sites ranged between 0 and 21. Two hundred and five participants were included in the analysis comprising 83 who had ≥7 painful sites and 122 who had ≤1 painful site. Women and younger people were more likely to have MSMP (P ≤ 0.02). Multisite musculoskeletal pain was associated with a higher risk of having incontinence, worse functional status and longer period of pain, and higher levels of low-density lipoprotein and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (all P ≤ 0.03). Among the 186 metabolites measured, 2 lysophosphatidylcholines, 1 with 26 carbons with no double bond and 1 with 28 carbons with 1 double bond, were significantly and positively associated with MSMP after adjusting for multiple testing with the Bonferroni method (P ≤ 0.0001) and could be considered as novel metabolic markers for MSMP.

Phenylalanine Is a Novel Marker for Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis Progression: The MOST Study

OBJECTIVE

To identify plasma markers associated with an increased risk of radiographic knee osteoarthritis(OA) progression using a metabolomics approach.

METHODS

Study participants were from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) and were categorized into 2 groups based on the presence of baseline radiographic OA. Subjects in group 1 had unilateral knee OA and subjects in group 2 had bilateral knee OA. Progression was defined as a half-grade or greater worsening in joint space width at 30-month follow-up. For group 1, a participant progressed when their OA knee showed radiographic progression and the contralateral knee developed OA; for group 2, a participant progressed when both knees with OA showed radiographic progression. Metabolomic profiling was performed on plasma samples collected at baseline and logistic regression was performed to test the association between each metabolite and knee OA progression after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, and clinic site. Significance was defined as P ≤ 0.0003 in the combined analysis.

RESULTS

There were 234 progressors (57 in group 1 and 177 in group 2) and 322 nonprogressors (206 in group 1 and 116 in group 2) included in the analyses. Among 157 metabolites studied, we found that odds of progression were 1.46 times higher per SD increase of phenylalanine level (95% CI 1.20-1.77, P = 0.0001) in the combined analysis. Sex-specific analysis showed that an association was seen in women (P = 0.0002) but not in men.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that phenylalanine might be a novel plasma marker for higher risk of bilateral radiographic knee OA progression in women.

Rho-GTPase pathways may differentiate treatment response to TNF-alpha and IL-17A inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis

Biological therapies have dramatically improved the therapeutic landscape of psoriatic arthritis (PsA); however, 40–50% of patients are primary non-responders with response rates declining significantly with each successive biological therapy. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop a coherent strategy for effective initial and subsequent selection of biologic agents. We interrogated 40 PsA patients initiating either tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or interleukin-17A inhibitors (17Ai) for active PsA. Patients achieving low disease activity according to the Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA) at 3 months were classified as responders. Baseline and 3-month CD4⁺ transcript profiling were performed, and novel signaling pathways were identified using a multi-omics profiling and integrative computational analysis approach. Using transcriptomic data at initiation of therapy, we identified over 100 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that differentiated IL-17Ai response from non-response and TNFi response from non-response. Integration of cell-type-specific DEGs with protein–protein interactions and further comprehensive pathway enrichment analysis revealed several pathways. Rho GTPase signaling pathway exhibited a strong signal specific to IL-17Ai response and the genes, RAC1 and ROCKs, are supported by results from prior research. Our detailed network and pathway analyses have identified the rewiring of Rho GTPase pathways as potential markers of response to IL17Ai but not TNFi. These results need further verification.

Ixekizumab Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results from the Coast-X Trial

Introduction

Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A antibody, has shown efficacy in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). The objectives of this analysis were (a) to measure improvement in ixekizumab-treated patients in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) response domains and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and (b) to determine how ASAS responses were associated with changes in patient global disease activity (PtGA), spinal pain, function, stiffness, fatigue, and spinal pain at night.

Methods

COAST-X was a phase 3, 52-week multicenter, randomized, controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of 80-mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) and every 4 weeks (Q4W) in patients with active nr-axSpA. Changes from baseline in PROs were analyzed via mixed-effects models for repeated measures. Association analyses for ASAS responses used analysis of covariance with Scheffé’s method.

Results

Patients treated with ixekizumab Q2W and Q4W reported significantly greater improvements in PtGA, spinal pain, function, and stiffness at week 1, when these measures were first assessed, compared with placebo (p < 0.05). ASAS40 responders, in comparison to ASAS20 non-responders, had the highest correlations with improvements in all response domains (PtGA, spinal pain, function, and stiffness) as well as fatigue and spinal pain at night (p < 0.001). ASAS40 responses were associated with 3.5- to 48.0-fold greater improvements in these PROs, with the highest values for PtGA and function, compared to ASAS20 non-achievement.

Conclusions

As early as week 1, patients with nr-axSpA treated with ixekizumab reported significant improvements in PtGA, spinal pain, function, and stiffness compared with those taking placebo. ASAS40 responders reported significantly greater improvements in all ASAS response domains (PtGA, spinal pain, function, and stiffness) as well as fatigue and spinal pain at night than ASAS20 non-responders. Improvements in PtGA and function appear to be major drivers in achieving ASAS40 response in patients with nr-axSpA.

Trial Registration

NCT02757352.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00254-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impact of Ixekizumab on Work Productivity in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Results from the COAST-V and COAST-W Trials at 52 Weeks

INTRODUCTION

Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are burdened with symptoms impacting work productivity measured by presenteeism, absenteeism, overall work impairment, and activity impairment. Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody selectively targeting interleukin-17A, has been demonstrated to improve disease signs and symptoms in two phase 3 trials of AS. This study investigated for 52 weeks the effect of ixekizumab treatment on work productivity in patients with active AS.

METHODS

COAST-V (NCT02696785) and COAST-W (NCT02696798) were phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials investigating the efficacy of ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and every 2 weeks (Q2W) in patients with AS naïve to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs; COAST-V) or who were inadequate responders or intolerant to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi; COAST-W). Work productivity was measured with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Spondyloarthritis at weeks 16 and 52. Absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall work impairment were assessed for patients reporting paid work. Activity impairment was assessed regardless of work status.

RESULTS

At baseline, 66.2% (434/656) of patients reported paid work. At week 16, bDMARD-naïve patients treated with both ixekizumab dose regimens and TNFi-experienced patients treated with ixekizumab Q2W reported significant improvements in activity impairment (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). TNFi-experienced patients treated with ixekizumab showed significant improvements versus placebo in presenteeism and overall work impairment (p < 0.05); bDMARD-naïve patients had numeric improvements. After week 16, patients initially on placebo switched to ixekizumab and patients already treated with ixekizumab continued treatment. Improvements in work productivity and daily activity were sustained through week 52 for both bDMARD-experienced and -naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

Both bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-experienced patients with AS had greater improvements in work productivity and activity impairment when receiving ixekizumab compared to placebo at week 16. Improvements in work productivity and activity impairment achieved at week 16 were sustained through week 52 with ixekizumab treatment.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of infliximab and golimumab in ankylosing spondylitis patients from a Canadian prospective observational registry

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to describe the profile of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients treated with either infliximab (IFX) or subcutaneous golimumab (GLM) treatment in Canadian routine care setting along with assessing long-term effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

AS patients who were eligible for treatment with IFX or subcutaneous GLM as per their respective Canadian product monographs were enrolled into the BioTRAC registry from 2005 to 2017. The study visits occurred at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Effectiveness was assessed by changes in clinical outcomes and acute phase reactants. Safety was evaluated by assessing the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and drug survival rates.

RESULTS

A total of 389 IFX- and 421 GLM-treated patients were enrolled. A significant decrease in disease duration at baseline was observed in the IFX cohort, from a median of 8.0 in 2005-2008 to 1.0 years in 2009-2015 (p < 0.001). A reduction in baseline BASFI score (p = 0.011) and proportion of patients in ASDAS very high disease activity (p = 0.004) was also observed over time. Meanwhile, in the GLM cohort, most disease parameters remained similar from 2010 to 2017. Treatment with both agents significantly improved all disease parameters over time with similar efficacy between the two agents. The incidence of AEs and SAEs were 136 and 131 events/100 PYs and 10.5 and 8.45 events/100 PYs for IFX- and GLM-treated patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both IFX and GLM treatment in AS significantly reduced disease activity in most outcome measures in a similar fashion and were well tolerated in Canadian routine care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00741793 .

Long-term effectiveness and safety of infliximab, golimumab and golimumab-IV in rheumatoid arthritis patients from a Canadian prospective observational registry

BACKGROUND

Long-term clinical registries are essential tools to evaluate new therapies in a patient population that differs from those in randomized clinical trials. The objectives are to describe the profile of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with anti-TNF agents in Canadian routine care.

METHODS

RA patients eligible for treatment with Infliximab (IFX), golimumab (GLM) or intravenous golimumab (GLM-IV) as per their respective Canadian product monographs were enrolled into the BioTRAC registry between 2002 and 2017. Study visits occurred at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Effectiveness was assessed by changes in disease activity. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and drug survival.

RESULTS

Of the 890 IFX-, 530 GLM- and 157 GLM-IV-treated patients, the proportion of females ranged from 77.0-86.6%, the mean ages from 55.8-57.7 and the mean disease duration from 6.5-8.6 years. A significant decrease in baseline disease duration and disease activity parameters (DAS, TJC, SJC, HAQ, AM stiffness, MDGA, PtGA, CRP, ESR) was observed over time. Treatment with IFX, GLM- and GLM-IV significantly improved all disease parameters over time. The incidence of AEs was 105, 113 and 82.6 /100 PYs and the incidence of SAEs was 11.7, 11.2 and 4.68 /100 PYs for IFX, GLM- and GLM-IV-treated patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Differences in baseline characteristics between patients treated with an anti-TNFs over time shows the evolution of treatment modalities over time. All treatments significantly reduced disease activity and improved functionality in a similar fashion. The incidence of adverse events was consistent with the safety profiles of IFX and GLM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00741793 (Retrospectively registered on August 26, 2008).

Is it safe to lift COVID-19 travel bans? The Newfoundland story

A key strategy to prevent a local outbreak during the COVID-19 pandemic is to restrict incoming travel. Once a region has successfully contained the disease, it becomes critical to decide when and how to reopen the borders. Here we explore the impact of border reopening for the example of Newfoundland and Labrador, a Canadian province that has enjoyed no new cases since late April, 2020. We combine a network epidemiology model with machine learning to infer parameters and predict the COVID-19 dynamics upon partial and total airport reopening, with perfect and imperfect quarantine conditions. Our study suggests that upon full reopening, every other day, a new COVID-19 case would enter the province. Under the current conditions, banning air travel from outside Canada is more efficient in managing the pandemic than fully reopening and quarantining 95% of the incoming population. Our study provides quantitative insights of the efficacy of travel restrictions and can inform political decision making in the controversy of reopening.