151
|
Fisch P, Holub M, Zenobi-Wong M. Improved accuracy and precision of bioprinting through progressive cavity pump-controlled extrusion. Biofabrication 2020; 13. [PMID: 33086207 DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/abc39b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
3D bioprinting has seen a tremendous growth in recent years in a variety of fields such as tissue engineering, drug testing and regenerative medicine, which has led researchers and manufacturers to continuously advance and develop novel bioprinting techniques and materials. Although new bioprinting methods are emerging (e.g. contactless and volumetric bioprinting), micro-extrusion bioprinting remains the most widely used method. Micro-extrusion bioprinting, however, is still largely dependent on the conventional pneumatic extrusion process, which relies heavily on homogenous biomaterial inks and bioinks to maintain a constant material flow rate. Augmenting the functionality of the bioink with the addition of nanoparticles, cells or biopolymers can induce inhomogeneities resulting in uneven material flow during printing and/or clogging of the nozzle, leading to defects in the printed construct. In this work, we evaluated a novel extrusion technique based on a miniaturized progressive cavity pump which allows precise control over the volumetric flow rate by positive displacement. We compared the accuracy and precision of this system to the pneumatic extrusion system and tested both systems for their effect on cell viability after extrusion. The progressive cavity pump achieved a significantly higher accuracy and precision compared to the pneumatic system, while maintaining good viability. These improvements were independent of the bioink composition, printing speed or nozzle size. This study demonstrates the merit of precise extrusion-process control in bioprinting by progressive cavity pumps and investigates their influence on process-induced cell damage. Progressive cavity pumps are a promising tool for bioprinting and could help provide standardized and validated bioprinted constructs while leaving the researcher more freedom in the design of the bioinks.
Collapse
|
152
|
Kim J, Kong JS, Han W, Kim BS, Cho DW. 3D Cell Printing of Tissue/Organ-Mimicking Constructs for Therapeutic and Drug Testing Applications. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E7757. [PMID: 33092184 PMCID: PMC7589604 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of artificial tissue/organs with the functional maturity of their native equivalents is one of the long-awaited panaceas for the medical and pharmaceutical industries. Advanced 3D cell-printing technology and various functional bioinks are promising technologies in the field of tissue engineering that have enabled the fabrication of complex 3D living tissue/organs. Various requirements for these tissues, including a complex and large-volume structure, tissue-specific microenvironments, and functional vasculatures, have been addressed to develop engineered tissue/organs with native relevance. Functional tissue/organ constructs have been developed that satisfy such criteria and may facilitate both in vivo replenishment of damaged tissue and the development of reliable in vitro testing platforms for drug development. This review describes key developments in technologies and materials for engineering 3D cell-printed constructs for therapeutic and drug testing applications.
Collapse
|
153
|
Tian Y, Liu M, Liu Y, Shi C, Wang Y, Liu T, Huang Y, Zhong P, Dai J, Liu X. The performance of 3D bioscaffolding based on a human periodontal ligament stem cell printing technique. J Biomed Mater Res A 2020; 109:1209-1219. [PMID: 33021062 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Bone tissue plays an important role in supporting and protecting the structure and function of the human body. Bone defects are a common source of injury and there are many reconstruction challenges in clinical practice. However, 3D bioprinting of scaffolds provides a promising solution. Hydrogels have emerged as biomaterials with good biocompatibility and are now widely used as cell-loaded materials for bioprinting. This study involved three steps: First, sodium alginate (SA), gelatin (Gel), and nano-hydroxyapatite (na-HA) were mixed into a hydrogel and its rheological properties assessed to identify the optimum slurry for printing. Second, SA/Gel/na-HA bioscaffolds were printed using 3D bioprinting technology and their physical properties characterized for surface morphology, swelling, and mechanical properties. Finally, human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs) were mixed with SA/Gel/na-HA printing slurry to create a "bioink" to prepare SA/Gel/na-HA/ hPDLSCs cell bioscaffolds. These were tested for biocompatibility and osteogenic differentiation performance using live/dead cell staining, cell adhesion, cell proliferation, and alkaline phosphatase activity. The SA/Gel/na-HA hydrogel exhibited shear-thinning behavior. The equilibrium swelling of the bioscaffold was 125.9%, the compression stress was 0.671 MPa, and the compression elastic modulus was 8.27 MPa. The SA/Gel/na-HA/hPDLSCs cell bioscaffolds caused effective stimulation of cell survival, proliferation, and osteoblast differentiation. Therefore, the SA/Gel/na-HA/hPDLSCs cell bioscaffolds displayed potential as a material for bone defect reconstruction.
Collapse
|
154
|
Gillispie GJ, Han A, Uzun-Per M, Fisher J, Mikos AG, Niazi MKK, Yoo JJ, Lee SJ, Atala A. The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes. Tissue Eng Part A 2020; 26:1349-1358. [PMID: 32928068 DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Bioink printability persists as a limiting factor toward many bioprinting applications. Printing parameter selection is largely user-dependent, and the effect of cell density on printability has not been thoroughly investigated. Recently, methods have been developed to give greater insight into printing outcomes. This study aims to further advance those methods and apply them to study the effect of printing parameters (feedrate and flowrate) and cell density on printability. Two printed structures, a crosshatch and five-layer tube, were established as printing standards and utilized to determine the printing outcomes. Acellular bioinks were printed using a testing matrix of feedrates of 37.5, 75, 150, 300, and 600 mm/min and flowrates of 21, 42, 84, 168, and 336 mm3/min. Structures were also printed with cell densities of 5, 10, 20, and 40 × 106 cell/mL at 150 mm/min and 84 mm3/min. Only speed ratios (defined as flowrate divided by feedrate) from 0.07 to 2.24 mm2 were suitable for analysis. Increasing speed ratio dramatically increased the height, width, and wall thickness of tubular structures, but did not influence radial accuracy. For crosshatch structures, the area of pores and the frequency of broken filaments were decreased without impacting pore shape (Pr). Within speed ratios, feedrate and flowrate had negligible, inconsistent effects. Cell density did not affect any printing outcomes despite slight rheological changes. Printing outcomes were dominated by the speed ratio, with feedrate, flowrate, and cell density having little impact on printing outcomes when controlling for speed ratio within the ranges tested. The relevance of these results to other bioinks and printing conditions requires continued investigation by the bioprinting community, as well as highlight speed ratio as a key variable to report and suggest that rheology is a more sensitive measure than printing outcomes.
Collapse
|
155
|
Sanz-Garcia A, Sodupe-Ortega E, Pernía-Espinoza A, Shimizu T, Escobedo-Lucea C. A Versatile Open-Source Printhead for Low-Cost 3D Microextrusion-Based Bioprinting. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2346. [PMID: 33066265 PMCID: PMC7602012 DOI: 10.3390/polym12102346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting promises to be essential in tissue engineering for solving the rising demand for organs and tissues. Some bioprinters are commercially available, but their impact on the field of Tissue engineering (TE) is still limited due to their cost or difficulty to tune. Herein, we present a low-cost easy-to-build printhead for microextrusion-based bioprinting (MEBB) that can be installed in many desktop 3D printers to transform them into 3D bioprinters. We can extrude bioinks with precise control of print temperature between 2-60 °C. We validated the versatility of the printhead, by assembling it in three low-cost open-source desktop 3D printers. Multiple units of the printhead can also be easily put together in a single printer carriage for building a multi-material 3D bioprinter. Print resolution was evaluated by creating representative calibration models at different temperatures using natural hydrogels such as gelatin and alginate, and synthetic ones like poloxamer. Using one of the three modified low-cost 3D printers, we successfully printed cell-laden lattice constructs with cell viabilities higher than 90% after 24-h post printing. Controlling temperature and pressure according to the rheological properties of the bioinks was essential in achieving optimal printability and great cell viability. The cost per unit of our device, which can be used with syringes of different volume, is less expensive than any other commercially available product. These data demonstrate an affordable open-source printhead with the potential to become a reliable alternative to commercial bioprinters for any laboratory.
Collapse
|
156
|
Rizwan M, Chan SW, Comeau PA, Willett TL, Yim EK. Effect of sterilization treatment on mechanical properties, biodegradation, bioactivity and printability of GelMA hydrogels. Biomed Mater 2020; 15:065017. [PMID: 32640427 PMCID: PMC7733554 DOI: 10.1088/1748-605x/aba40c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel scaffolds and GelMA-based bioinks are widely used in tissue engineering and bioprinting due to their ability to support cellular functions and new tissue development. Unfortunately, while terminal sterilization of the GelMA is a critical step for translational tissue engineering applications, it can potentially cause thermal or chemical modifications of GelMA. Thus, understanding the effect of terminal sterilization on GelMA properties is an important, though often overlooked, aspect of material design for translational tissue engineering applications. To this end, we characterized the effects of FDA-approved terminal sterilization methods (autoclaving, ethylene oxide treatment, and gamma (γ)-irradiation) on GelMA prepolymer (bioink) and GelMA hydrogels in terms of the relevant properties for biomedical applications, including mechanical strength, biodegradation rate, cell culture in 2D and 3D, and printability. Autoclaving and ethylene oxide treatment of the GelMA decreased the stiffness of the hydrogel, but the treatments did not modify the biodegradation rate of the hydrogel; meanwhile, γ-irradiation increased the stiffness, reduced the pore size and significantly slowed the biodegradation rate. None of the terminal sterilization methods changed the 2D fibroblast or endothelial cell adhesion and spreading. However, ethylene oxide treatment significantly lowered the fibroblast viability in 3D cell culture. Strikingly, γ-irradiation led to significantly reduced ability of the GelMA prepolymer to undergo sol-gel transition. Furthermore, printability studies showed that the bioinks prepared from γ-irradiated GelMA had significantly reduced printability as compared to the GelMA bioinks prepared from autoclaved or ethylene oxide treated GelMA. These results reveal that the choice of the terminal sterilization method can strongly influence important properties of GelMA bioink and hydrogel. Overall, this study provides further insight into GelMA-based material design with consideration of the effect of terminal sterilization.
Collapse
|
157
|
Theus AS, Ning L, Hwang B, Gil C, Chen S, Wombwell A, Mehta R, Serpooshan V. Bioprintability: Physiomechanical and Biological Requirements of Materials for 3D Bioprinting Processes. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2262. [PMID: 33019639 PMCID: PMC7599870 DOI: 10.3390/polym12102262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an additive manufacturing process that utilizes various biomaterials that either contain or interact with living cells and biological systems with the goal of fabricating functional tissue or organ mimics, which will be referred to as bioinks. These bioinks are typically hydrogel-based hybrid systems with many specific features and requirements. The characterizing and fine tuning of bioink properties before, during, and after printing are therefore essential in developing reproducible and stable bioprinted constructs. To date, myriad computational methods, mechanical testing, and rheological evaluations have been used to predict, measure, and optimize bioinks properties and their printability, but none are properly standardized. There is a lack of robust universal guidelines in the field for the evaluation and quantification of bioprintability. In this review, we introduced the concept of bioprintability and discussed the significant roles of various physiomechanical and biological processes in bioprinting fidelity. Furthermore, different quantitative and qualitative methodologies used to assess bioprintability will be reviewed, with a focus on the processes related to pre, during, and post printing. Establishing fully characterized, functional bioink solutions would be a big step towards the effective clinical applications of bioprinted products.
Collapse
|
158
|
T. Somasekharan L, Kasoju N, Raju R, Bhatt A. Formulation and Characterization of Alginate Dialdehyde, Gelatin, and Platelet-Rich Plasma-Based Bioink for Bioprinting Applications. Bioengineering (Basel) 2020; 7:bioengineering7030108. [PMID: 32916945 PMCID: PMC7552778 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering7030108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Layer-by-layer additive manufacturing process has evolved into three-dimensional (3D) "bio-printing" as a means of constructing cell-laden functional tissue equivalents. The process typically involves the mixing of cells of interest with an appropriate hydrogel, termed as "bioink", followed by printing and tissue maturation. An ideal bioink should have adequate mechanical, rheological, and biological features of the target tissues. However, native extracellular matrix (ECM) is made of an intricate milieu of soluble and non-soluble extracellular factors, and mimicking such a composition is challenging. To this end, here we report the formulation of a multi-component bioink composed of gelatin and alginate -based scaffolding material, as well as a platelet-rich plasma (PRP) suspension, which mimics the insoluble and soluble factors of native ECM respectively. Briefly, sodium alginate was subjected to controlled oxidation to yield alginate dialdehyde (ADA), and was mixed with gelatin and PRP in various volume ratios in the presence of borax. The formulation was systematically characterized for its gelation time, swelling, and water uptake, as well as its morphological, chemical, and rheological properties; furthermore, blood- and cytocompatibility were assessed as per ISO 10993 (International Organization for Standardization). Printability, shape fidelity, and cell-laden printing was evaluated using the RegenHU 3D Discovery bioprinter. The results indicated the successful development of ADA-gelatin-PRP based bioink for 3D bioprinting and biofabrication applications.
Collapse
|
159
|
Liang R, Gu Y, Wu Y, Bunpetch V, Zhang S. Lithography-Based 3D Bioprinting and Bioinks for Bone Repair and Regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2020; 7:806-816. [PMID: 33715367 DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The fabrication of scaffolds that precisely mimic the natural structure and physiochemical properties of bone is still one of the most challenging tasks in bone tissue engineering. 3D printing techniques have drawn increasing attention due to their ability to fabricate scaffolds with complex structures and multiple bioinks. For bone tissue engineering, lithography-based 3D bioprinting is frequently utilized due to its printing speed, mild printing process, and cost-effective benefits. In this review, lithography-based 3D bioprinting technologies including SLA and DLP are introduced; their typical applications in biological system and bioinks are also explored and summarized. Furthermore, we discussed possible evolution of the hardware/software systems and bioinks of lithography-based 3D bioprinting, as well as their future applications.
Collapse
|
160
|
Mancha Sánchez E, Gómez-Blanco JC, López Nieto E, Casado JG, Macías-García A, Díaz Díez MA, Carrasco-Amador JP, Torrejón Martín D, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Pagador JB. Hydrogels for Bioprinting: A Systematic Review of Hydrogels Synthesis, Bioprinting Parameters, and Bioprinted Structures Behavior. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020; 8:776. [PMID: 32850697 PMCID: PMC7424022 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, bioprinting is rapidly evolving and hydrogels are a key component for its success. In this sense, synthesis of hydrogels, as well as bioprinting process, and cross-linking of bioinks represent different challenges for the scientific community. A set of unified criteria and a common framework are missing, so multidisciplinary research teams might not efficiently share the advances and limitations of bioprinting. Although multiple combinations of materials and proportions have been used for several applications, it is still unclear the relationship between good printability of hydrogels and better medical/clinical behavior of bioprinted structures. For this reason, a PRISMA methodology was conducted in this review. Thus, 1,774 papers were retrieved from PUBMED, WOS, and SCOPUS databases. After selection, 118 papers were analyzed to extract information about materials, hydrogel synthesis, bioprinting process, and tests performed on bioprinted structures. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze materials used and their influence on the bioprinting parameters that ultimately generate tridimensional structures. Furthermore, a comparison of mechanical and cellular behavior of those bioprinted structures is presented. Finally, some conclusions and recommendations are exposed to improve reproducibility and facilitate a fair comparison of results.
Collapse
|
161
|
Davoodi E, Sarikhani E, Montazerian H, Ahadian S, Costantini M, Swieszkowski W, Willerth S, Walus K, Mofidfar M, Toyserkani E, Khademhosseini A, Ashammakhi N. Extrusion and Microfluidic-based Bioprinting to Fabricate Biomimetic Tissues and Organs. ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES 2020; 5:1901044. [PMID: 33072855 PMCID: PMC7567134 DOI: 10.1002/admt.201901044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Next generation engineered tissue constructs with complex and ordered architectures aim to better mimic the native tissue structures, largely due to advances in three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting techniques. Extrusion bioprinting has drawn tremendous attention due to its widespread availability, cost-effectiveness, simplicity, and its facile and rapid processing. However, poor printing resolution and low speed have limited its fidelity and clinical implementation. To circumvent the downsides associated with extrusion printing, microfluidic technologies are increasingly being implemented in 3D bioprinting for engineering living constructs. These technologies enable biofabrication of heterogeneous biomimetic structures made of different types of cells, biomaterials, and biomolecules. Microfluiding bioprinting technology enables highly controlled fabrication of 3D constructs in high resolutions and it has been shown to be useful for building tubular structures and vascularized constructs, which may promote the survival and integration of implanted engineered tissues. Although this field is currently in its early development and the number of bioprinted implants is limited, it is envisioned that it will have a major impact on the production of customized clinical-grade tissue constructs. Further studies are, however, needed to fully demonstrate the effectiveness of the technology in the lab and its translation to the clinic.
Collapse
|
162
|
Scognamiglio C, Soloperto A, Ruocco G, Cidonio G. Bioprinting stem cells: building physiological tissues one cell at a time. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2020; 319:C465-C480. [PMID: 32639873 DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00124.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Bioprinting aims to direct the spatial arrangement in three dimensions of cells, biomaterials, and growth factors. The biofabrication of clinically relevant constructs for the repair or modeling of either diseased or damaged tissues is rapidly advancing, resulting in the ability to three-dimensional (3D) print biomimetic platforms which imitate a large number of tissues in the human body. Primary tissue-specific cells are typically isolated from patients and used for the fabrication of 3D models for drug screening or tissue repair purposes. However, the lack of resilience of these platforms, due to the difficulties in harnessing, processing, and implanting patient-specific cells can limit regeneration ability. The printing of stem cells obviates these hurdles, producing functional in vitro models or implantable constructs. Advancements in biomaterial science are helping the development of inks suitable for the encapsulation and the printing of stem cells, promoting their functional growth and differentiation. This review specifically aims to investigate the most recent studies exploring innovative and functional approaches for the printing of 3D constructs to model disease or repair damaged tissues. Key concepts in tissue physiology are highlighted, reporting stem cell applications in biofabrication. Bioprinting technologies and biomaterial inks are listed and analyzed, including recent advancements in biomaterial design for bioprinting applications, commenting on the influence of biomaterial inks on the encapsulated stem cells. Ultimately, most recent successful efforts and clinical potentials for the manufacturing of functional physiological tissue substitutes are reported here, with a major focus on specific tissues, such as vasculature, heart, lung and airways, liver, bone and muscle.
Collapse
|
163
|
Park JH, Gillispie GJ, Copus JS, Zhang W, Atala A, Yoo JJ, Yelick PC, Lee SJ. The effect of BMP-mimetic peptide tethering bioinks on the differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in 3D bioprinted dental constructs. Biofabrication 2020; 12:035029. [PMID: 32428889 PMCID: PMC7641314 DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab9492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this study was to use 3D bioprinting technology to create a bioengineered dental construct containing human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). To accomplish this, we first developed a novel bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) peptide-tethering bioink formulation and examined its rheological properties, its printability, and the structural stability of the bioprinted construct. Second, we evaluated the survival and differentiation of hDPSCs in the bioprinted dental construct by measuring cell viability, proliferation, and gene expression, as well as histological and immunofluorescent analyses. Our results showed that the peptide conjugation into the gelatin methacrylate-based bioink formulation was successfully performed. We determined that greater than 50% of the peptides remained in the bioprinted construct after three weeks in vitro cell culture. Human DPSC viability was >90% in the bioprinted constructs immediately after the printing process. Alizarin Red staining showed that the BMP peptide construct group exhibited the highest calcification as compared to the growth medium, osteogenic medium, and non-BMP peptide construct groups. In addition, immunofluorescent and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analyses showed robust expression of dentin sialophosphoprotein and osteocalcin in the BMP peptide dental constructs. Together, these results strongly suggested that BMP peptide-tethering bioink could accelerate the differentiation of hDPSCs in 3D bioprinted dental constructs.
Collapse
|
164
|
Klak M, Bryniarski T, Kowalska P, Gomolka M, Tymicki G, Kosowska K, Cywoniuk P, Dobrzanski T, Turowski P, Wszola M. Novel Strategies in Artificial Organ Development: What Is the Future of Medicine? MICROMACHINES 2020; 11:E646. [PMID: 32629779 PMCID: PMC7408042 DOI: 10.3390/mi11070646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The technology of tissue engineering is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field of science that elevates cell-based research from 2D cultures through organoids to whole bionic organs. 3D bioprinting and organ-on-a-chip approaches through generation of three-dimensional cultures at different scales, applied separately or combined, are widely used in basic studies, drug screening and regenerative medicine. They enable analyses of tissue-like conditions that yield much more reliable results than monolayer cell cultures. Annually, millions of animals worldwide are used for preclinical research. Therefore, the rapid assessment of drug efficacy and toxicity in the early stages of preclinical testing can significantly reduce the number of animals, bringing great ethical and financial benefits. In this review, we describe 3D bioprinting techniques and first examples of printed bionic organs. We also present the possibilities of microfluidic systems, based on the latest reports. We demonstrate the pros and cons of both technologies and indicate their use in the future of medicine.
Collapse
|
165
|
Liu X, Gaihre B, George MN, Miller AL, Xu H, Waletzki BE, Lu L. 3D bioprinting of oligo(poly[ethylene glycol] fumarate) for bone and nerve tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2020; 109:6-17. [PMID: 32418273 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
3D bioprinting is a promising new tissue restoration technique that enables the precise deposition of cells and growth factors in order to more closely mimic the structure and function of native organs. In this study, we report the development of a new bioink using oligo(poly[ethylene glycol] fumarate) (OPF), a photo-crosslinkable, and biodegradable polymer, for 3D bioprinting. In addition to OPF, a small portion of gelatin was also incorporated into the bioink to make it bio-printable. After immersion in the cell medium, gelatin was eluted away to create a bioprinted scaffold of pure OPF. Excellent cell viability, spreading, and long-term proliferation of encapsulated cells was observed using both bone and nerve cells as examples. These results demonstrate that OPF bioink has great potential in future 3D bioprinting applications that aim to replicate complex, layered tissues, and/or organs.
Collapse
|
166
|
Hafezi F, Shorter S, Tabriz AG, Hurt A, Elmes V, Boateng J, Douroumis D. Bioprinting and Preliminary Testing of Highly Reproducible Novel Bioink for Potential Skin Regeneration. Pharmaceutics 2020; 12:pharmaceutics12060550. [PMID: 32545741 PMCID: PMC7356948 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12060550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is considered as a novel approach in biofabricating cell-laden constructs that could potentially be used to promote skin regeneration following injury. In this study, a novel crosslinked chitosan (CH)–genipin (GE) bioink laden with keratinocyte and human dermal fibroblast cells was developed and printed successfully using an extruder-based bioprinter. By altering the composition and degree of CH–GE crosslinking, bioink printability was further assessed and compared with a commercial bioink. Rheological analysis showed that the viscosity of the optimised bioink was in a suitable range that facilitated reproducible and reliable printing by applying low pressures ranging from 20–40 kPa. The application of low printing pressures proved vital for viability of cells loaded within the bioinks. Further characterisation using MTT assay showed that cells were still viable within the printed construct at 93% despite the crosslinking, processing and after subjecting to physiological conditions for seven days. The morphological study of the printed cells showed that they were mobile within the bioink. Furthermore, the multi-layered 3D printed constructs demonstrated excellent self-supportive structures in a consistent manner.
Collapse
|
167
|
Advances in the Research of Bioinks Based on Natural Collagen, Polysaccharide and Their Derivatives for Skin 3D Bioprinting. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12:polym12061237. [PMID: 32485901 PMCID: PMC7362214 DOI: 10.3390/polym12061237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The skin plays an important role in protecting the human body, and wound healing must be set in motion immediately following injury or trauma to restore the normal structure and function of skin. The extracellular matrix component of the skin mainly consists of collagen, glycosaminoglycan (GAG), elastin and hyaluronic acid (HA). Recently, natural collagen, polysaccharide and their derivatives such as collagen, gelatin, alginate, chitosan and pectin have been selected as the matrix materials of bioink to construct a functional artificial skin due to their biocompatible and biodegradable properties by 3D bioprinting, which is a revolutionary technology with the potential to transform both research and medical therapeutics. In this review, we outline the current skin bioprinting technologies and the bioink components for skin bioprinting. We also summarize the bioink products practiced in research recently and current challenges to guide future research to develop in a promising direction. While there are challenges regarding currently available skin bioprinting, addressing these issues will facilitate the rapid advancement of 3D skin bioprinting and its ability to mimic the native anatomy and physiology of skin and surrounding tissues in the future.
Collapse
|
168
|
Dubey N, Ferreira JA, Malda J, Bhaduri SB, Bottino MC. Extracellular Matrix/Amorphous Magnesium Phosphate Bioink for 3D Bioprinting of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Tissue. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES 2020; 12:23752-23763. [PMID: 32352748 PMCID: PMC7364626 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c05311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Bioprinting, a promising field in regenerative medicine, holds great potential to create three-dimensional, defect-specific vascularized bones with tremendous opportunities to address unmet craniomaxillofacial reconstructive challenges. A cytocompatible bioink is a critical prerequisite to successfully regenerate functional bone tissue. Synthetic self-assembling peptides have a nanofibrous structure resembling the native extracellular matrix (ECM), making them an excellent bioink component. Amorphous magnesium phosphates (AMPs) have shown greater levels of resorption while maintaining high biocompatibility, osteoinductivity, and low inflammatory response, as compared to their calcium phosphate counterparts. Here, we have established a novel bioink formulation (ECM/AMP) that combines an ECM-based hydrogel containing 2% octapeptide FEFEFKFK and 98% water with AMP particles to realize high cell function with desirable bioprintability. We analyzed the osteogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) encapsulated in the bioink, as well as in vivo bone regeneration, to define the potential of the formulated bioink as a growth factor-free bone-forming strategy. Cell-laden AMP-modified bioprinted constructs showed an improved cell morphology but similar cell viability (∼90%) compared to their AMP-free counterpart. In functional assays, the cell-laden bioprinted constructs modified with AMP exhibited a high level of mineralization and osteogenic gene expression without the use of growth factors, thus suggesting that the presence of AMP-triggered DPSCs' osteogenic differentiation. Cell-free ECM-based bioprinted constructs were implanted in vivo. In comparison with the ECM group, bone volume per total volume for ECM/1.0AMP was approximately 1.7- and 1.4-fold higher at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. Further, a significant increase in the bone density was observed in ECM/1.0AMP from 4 to 8 weeks. These results demonstrate that the presence of AMP in the bioink significantly increased bone formation, thus showing promise for in situ bioprinting strategies. We foresee significant potential in translating this innovative bioink toward the regeneration of patient-specific bone tissue for regenerative dentistry.
Collapse
|
169
|
Wang X, Wang Q, Xu C. Nanocellulose-Based Inks for 3D Bioprinting: Key Aspects in Research Development and Challenging Perspectives in Applications-A Mini Review. Bioengineering (Basel) 2020; 7:E40. [PMID: 32365578 PMCID: PMC7355978 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering7020040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Nanocelluloses have emerged as a catalogue of renewable nanomaterials for bioink formulation in service of 3D bioprinting, thanks to their structural similarity to extracellular matrices and excellent biocompatibility of supporting crucial cellular activities. From a material scientist's viewpoint, this mini-review presents the key research aspects of the development of the nanocellulose-based bioinks in 3D (bio)printing. The nanomaterial properties of various types of nanocelluloses, including bacterial nanocellulose, cellulose nanofibers, and cellulose nanocrystals, are reviewed with respect to their origins and preparation methods. Different cross-linking strategies to integrate into multicomponent nanocellulose-based bioinks are discussed in terms of regulating ink fidelity in direct ink writing as well as tuning the mechanical stiffness as a bioactive cue in the printed hydrogel construct. Furthermore, the impact of surface charge and functional groups on nanocellulose surface on the crucial cellular activities (e.g., cell survival, attachment, and proliferation) is discussed with the cell-matrix interactions in focus. Aiming at a sustainable and cost-effective alternative for end-users in biomedical and pharmaceutical fields, challenging aspects such as biodegradability and potential nanotoxicity of nanocelluloses call for more fundamental comprehension of the cell-matrix interactions and further validation in in vivo models.
Collapse
|
170
|
Duarte Campos DF, Lindsay CD, Roth JG, LeSavage BL, Seymour AJ, Krajina BA, Ribeiro R, Costa PF, Blaeser A, Heilshorn SC. Bioprinting Cell- and Spheroid-Laden Protein-Engineered Hydrogels as Tissue-on-Chip Platforms. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020; 8:374. [PMID: 32411691 PMCID: PMC7198818 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Human tissues, both in health and disease, are exquisitely organized into complex three-dimensional architectures that inform tissue function. In biomedical research, specifically in drug discovery and personalized medicine, novel human-based three-dimensional (3D) models are needed to provide information with higher predictive value compared to state-of-the-art two-dimensional (2D) preclinical models. However, current in vitro models remain inadequate to recapitulate the complex and heterogenous architectures that underlie biology. Therefore, it would be beneficial to develop novel models that could capture both the 3D heterogeneity of tissue (e.g., through 3D bioprinting) and integrate vascularization that is necessary for tissue viability (e.g., through culture in tissue-on-chips). In this proof-of-concept study, we use elastin-like protein (ELP) engineered hydrogels as bioinks for constructing such tissue models, which can be directly dispensed onto endothelialized on-chip platforms. We show that this bioprinting process is compatible with both single cell suspensions of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and spheroid aggregates of breast cancer cells. After bioprinting, both cell types remain viable in incubation for up to 14 days. These results demonstrate a first step toward combining ELP engineered hydrogels with 3D bioprinting technologies and on-chip platforms comprising vascular-like channels for establishing functional tissue models.
Collapse
|
171
|
Bioprinted Three-Dimensional Cell-Laden Hydrogels to Evaluate Adipocyte-Breast Cancer Cell Interactions. Gels 2020; 6:gels6010010. [PMID: 32214026 PMCID: PMC7151014 DOI: 10.3390/gels6010010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, although still in its infancy as a fabrication tool, has the potential to effectively mimic many biological environments. Cell-laden 3D printed structures have demonstrated to be an improvement from the widely used monolayer platforms, largely because of recapitulation of native tissue architecture with the 3D structures. Thus, 3D in vitro models have been increasingly investigated for improved modeling of cell and disease systems, such as for breast cancer. In the present work, multicellular cell-laden hydrogels comprised of adipocytes and breast cancer cells were bioprinted and evaluated. An ideal bioink of 3:2 5% alginate was determined to mimic the tissue stiffness observed in a physiological breast cancer tumor environment. Rheological characterization and degradation studies were performed to verify the stability of the artificial breast hydrogel environment. It was found that both the breast cancer cells and adipocytes remained viable directly after printing and throughout the 10-day culture period within the printed hydrogels. Direct printing of the cells in co-culture resulted in morphology changes and variations in cell localization within printed structures. Overall, the feasibility of efficiently fabricating multicellular cell-laden bioprinted models of the breast tumor microenvironment was established.
Collapse
|
172
|
Shin JY, Yeo YH, Jeong JE, Park SA, Park WH. Dual-crosslinked methylcellulose hydrogels for 3D bioprinting applications. Carbohydr Polym 2020; 238:116192. [PMID: 32299570 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Thermo-sensitive methylcellulose (MC) hydrogel has been widely used as a scaffold material for biomedical applications. However, due to its poor mechanical properties, the MC-based hydrogel has rarely been employed in 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering scaffolds. In this study, the dual crosslinkable tyramine-modified MC (MC-Tyr) conjugate was prepared via a two-step synthesis, and its hydrogel showed excellent mechanical properties and printability for 3D bioprinting applications. The MC-Tyr conjugate formed a dual-crosslinked hydrogel by modulating the temperature and/or visible light. A combination of reversible physical crosslinking (thermal crosslinking) and irreversible chemical crosslinking (photocrosslinking) was used in this dual crosslinked hydrogel. Also, the photocrosslinking of MC-Tyr solution was facilitated by visible light exposure in the presence of biocompatible photoinitiators (riboflavin, RF and riboflavin 5'-monophophate, RFp). The RF and RFp were used to compare the cytotoxicity and salting-out effect of MC-Tyr hydrogel, as well as the initiation ability, based on the difference in chemical structure. Also, the influence of the printing parameters on the printed MC hydrogel was investigated. Finally, the cell-laden MC-Tyr bioink was successfully extruded into stable 3D hydrogel constructs with high resolution via a dual crosslinking strategy. Furthermore, the MC-Tyr scaffolds showed excellent cell viability and proliferation.
Collapse
|
173
|
Ahlfeld T, Cubo-Mateo N, Cometta S, Guduric V, Vater C, Bernhardt A, Akkineni AR, Lode A, Gelinsky M. A Novel Plasma-Based Bioink Stimulates Cell Proliferation and Differentiation in Bioprinted, Mineralized Constructs. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES 2020; 12:12557-12572. [PMID: 32092249 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c00710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Extrusion-based bioprinting, also known as 3D bioplotting, is a powerful tool for the fabrication of tissue equivalents with spatially defined cell distribution. Even though considerable progress has been made in recent years, there is still a lack of bioinks which enable a tissue-like cell response and are plottable at the same time with good shape fidelity. Herein, we report on the development of a bioink which includes fresh frozen plasma from full human blood and thus a donor/patient-specific protein mixture. By blending of the plasma with 3 w/v% alginate and 9 w/v% methylcellulose, a pasty bioink (plasma-alg-mc) was achieved, which could be plotted with high accuracy and furthermore allowed bioplotted mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) and primary osteoprogenitor cells to spread within the bioink. In a second step, the novel plasma-based bioink was combined with a plottable self-setting calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to fabricate bone-like tissue constructs. The CPC/plasma-alg-mc biphasic constructs revealed open porosity over the entire time of cell culture (35 d), which is crucial for bone tissue engineered grafts. The biphasic structures could be plotted in volumetric and clinically relevant dimensions and complex shapes could be also generated, as demonstrated for a scaphoid bone model. The plasma bioink potentiated that bioplotted MSC were not harmed by the setting process of the CPC. Latest after 7 days, MSC migrated from the hydrogel to the CPC surface, where they proliferated to 20-fold of the initial cell number covering the entire plotted constructs with a dense cell layer. For bioplotted and osteogenically stimulated osteoprogenitor cells, a significantly increased alkaline phosphatase activity was observed in CPC/plasma-alg-mc constructs in comparison to plasma-free controls. In conclusion, the novel plasma-alg-mc bioink is a promising new ink for several forms of bioprinted tissue equivalents and especially gainful for the combination with CPC for enhanced, biofabricated bone-like constructs.
Collapse
|
174
|
Deo KA, Singh KA, Peak CW, Alge DL, Gaharwar AK. Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A 2020; 26:318-338. [PMID: 32079490 PMCID: PMC7480731 DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
3D bioprinting is an additive manufacturing technique that recapitulates the native architecture of tissues. This is accomplished through the precise deposition of cell-containing bioinks. The spatiotemporal control over bioink deposition permits for improved communication between cells and the extracellular matrix, facilitates fabrication of anatomically and physiologically relevant structures. The physiochemical properties of bioinks, before and after crosslinking, are crucial for bioprinting complex tissue structures. Specifically, the rheological properties of bioinks determines printability, structural fidelity, and cell viability during the printing process, whereas postcrosslinking of bioinks are critical for their mechanical integrity, physiological stability, cell survival, and cell functions. In this review, we critically evaluate bioink design criteria, specifically for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting techniques, to fabricate complex constructs. The effects of various processing parameters on the biophysical and biochemical characteristics of bioinks are discussed. Furthermore, emerging trends and future directions in the area of bioinks and bioprinting are also highlighted. Graphical abstract [Figure: see text] Impact statement Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting is an emerging additive manufacturing approach for fabricating cell-laden tissue engineered constructs. This review critically evaluates bioink design criteria to fabricate complex tissue constructs. Specifically, pre- and post-printing evaluation approaches are described, as well as new research directions in the field of bioink development and functional bioprinting are highlighted.
Collapse
|
175
|
Duarte Campos DF, Zhang S, Kreimendahl F, Köpf M, Fischer H, Vogt M, Blaeser A, Apel C, Esteves-Oliveira M. Hand-held bioprinting for de novo vascular formation applicable to dental pulp regeneration. Connect Tissue Res 2020; 61:205-215. [PMID: 31284786 DOI: 10.1080/03008207.2019.1640217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Aim of the study: Deep carious lesions may cause irreversible pulpitis and the current endodontic treatment typically removes the whole dental pulp tissue, which finally reduces lifespan of the teeth. Nowadays, the most frequent treatment is based on removing the infected tissue and filling the root canal with inert synthetic materials. Tissue engineering approaches are important alternatives to the current treatment, because they can potentially maintain the biological function of the tooth instead of sacrificing it.Materials and Methods: In this study, we propose a tissue engineering approach based on a hand-held in situ bioprinting strategy. Our approach enabled bioprinting of cell-loaded collagen-based bioinks with suitable rheological, structural and biological properties, which allowed for vasculogenesis in the root canal.Results: The rheological properties of the bioprintable bioink were measured by oscillatory amplitude sweep testing and were corroborated by macroscopic evaluation after in vitro culture, in which printed bioinks maintained their original form without contraction. Moreover, we showed evidence for successful vasculogenesis in bioprintable bioinks with comparable quality and quantity to control fibrin and collagen non-bioprintable hydrogels.Conclusions: We conclude that hand-held bioprinting holds potential for in situ treatment of dental diseases with successful evidence for vascular tube formation, as an asset for maintenance of the biological function of the tooth.
Collapse
|
176
|
Abstract
Silk is a natural polymer sourced mainly from spiders and silkworms. Due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and mechanical properties, it has been heavily investigated for biomedical applications. It can be processed into a number of formats, such as scaffolds, films, and nanoparticles. Common methods of production create constructs with limited complexity. 3D printing allows silk to be printed into more intricate designs, increasing its potential applications. Extrusion and inkjet printing are the primary ways silk has been 3D printed, though other methods are beginning to be investigated. Silk has been integrated into bioink with other polymers, both natural and synthetic. The addition of silk is primarily done to offer more desirable viscosity characteristics and mechanical properties for printing. Silk-based bioinks have been used to fabricate medical devices and tissues. This article discusses recent research and printing parameters important for 3D printing with silk.
Collapse
|
177
|
Yang X, Mohseni M, Bas O, Meinert C, New EJ, Castro NJ. Type II Photoinitiator and Tuneable Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Based Materials Library for Visible Light Photolithography. Tissue Eng Part A 2020; 26:292-304. [PMID: 31910098 DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereolithography (SL) has several advantages over traditional biomanufacturing techniques such as fused deposition modeling, including increased speed, accuracy, and efficiency. While SL has been broadly used in tissue engineering for the fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds that can mimic the in vivo environment for cell growth and tissue regeneration, lithographic printing is usually performed on single-component materials cured with ultraviolet light, severely limiting the versatility and cytocompatibility of such systems. In this study, we report a highly tunable, low-cost photoinitiator system that we used to establish a systematic library of crosslinked materials based on low molecular weight poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate. We assessed the physicochemical properties, photocrosslinking efficiency, cost performance, and biocompatibility to demonstrate the capability of manufacturing a multimaterial complex tissue scaffold. [Figure: see text] Impact statement Stereolithography (SL) has advantages over traditional biomanufacturing techniques, including accuracy and efficiency. While SL has been broadly used for fabricating three-dimensional scaffolds that can mimic the in vivo environment for cell growth and tissue regeneration, lithographic printing is usually performed on single-component materials cured with ultraviolet light, severely limiting the versatility and cytocompatibility of such systems. In this study, we report a highly tunable photoinitiator system and establish a systematic library of crosslinked materials based on poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate. We assessed the physicochemical properties, photocrosslinking efficiency and biocompatibility to demonstrate the capability of manufacturing a multimaterial complex tissue scaffold.
Collapse
|
178
|
Gillispie G, Prim P, Copus J, Fisher J, Mikos AG, Yoo JJ, Atala A, Lee SJ. Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability. Biofabrication 2020; 12:022003. [PMID: 31972558 PMCID: PMC7039534 DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Extrusion-based bioprinting is one of the leading manufacturing techniques for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Its primary limitation is the lack of materials, known as bioinks, which are suitable for the bioprinting process. The degree to which a bioink is suitable for bioprinting has been described as its 'printability.' However, a lack of clarity surrounding the methodologies used to evaluate a bioink's printability, as well as the usage of the term itself, have hindered the field. This article presents a review of measures used to assess the printability of extrusion-based bioinks in an attempt to assist researchers during the bioink development process. Many different aspects of printability exist and many different measurements have been proposed as a consequence. Researchers often do not evaluate a new bioink's printability at all, while others simply do so qualitatively. Several quantitative measures have been presented for the extrudability, shape fidelity, and printing accuracy of bioinks. Different measures have been developed even within these aspects, each testing the bioink in a slightly different way. Additionally, other relevant measures which had little or no examples of quantifiable methods are also to be considered. Looking forward, further work is needed to improve upon current assessment methodologies, to move towards a more comprehensive view of printability, and to standardize these printability measurements between researchers. Better assessment techniques will naturally lead to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms which affect printability and better comparisons between bioinks. This in turn will help improve upon the bioink development process and the bioinks available for use in bioprinting.
Collapse
|
179
|
Maloney E, Clark C, Sivakumar H, Yoo K, Aleman J, Rajan SAP, Forsythe S, Mazzocchi A, Laxton AW, Tatter SB, Strowd RE, Votanopoulos KI, Skardal A. Immersion Bioprinting of Tumor Organoids in Multi-Well Plates for Increasing Chemotherapy Screening Throughput. MICROMACHINES 2020; 11:E208. [PMID: 32085455 PMCID: PMC7074680 DOI: 10.3390/mi11020208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The current drug development pipeline takes approximately fifteen years and $2.6 billion to get a new drug to market. Typically, drugs are tested on two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures and animal models to estimate their efficacy before reaching human trials. However, these models are often not representative of the human body. The 2D culture changes the morphology and physiology of cells, and animal models often have a vastly different anatomy and physiology than humans. The use of bioengineered human cell-based organoids may increase the probability of success during human trials by providing human-specific preclinical data. They could also be deployed for personalized medicine diagnostics to optimize therapies in diseases such as cancer. However, one limitation in employing organoids in drug screening has been the difficulty in creating large numbers of homogeneous organoids in form factors compatible with high-throughput screening (e.g., 96- and 384-well plates). Bioprinting can be used to scale up deposition of such organoids and tissue constructs. Unfortunately, it has been challenging to 3D print hydrogel bioinks into small-sized wells due to well-bioink interactions that can result in bioinks spreading out and wetting the well surface instead of maintaining a spherical form. Here, we demonstrate an immersion printing technique to bioprint tissue organoids in 96-well plates to increase the throughput of 3D drug screening. A hydrogel bioink comprised of hyaluronic acid and collagen is bioprinted into a viscous gelatin bath, which blocks the bioink from interacting with the well walls and provides support to maintain a spherical form. This method was validated using several cancerous cell lines, and then applied to patient-derived glioblastoma (GBM) and sarcoma biospecimens for drug screening.
Collapse
|
180
|
Antill-O'Brien N, Bourke J, O'Connell CD. Layer-By-Layer: The Case for 3D Bioprinting Neurons to Create Patient-Specific Epilepsy Models. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2019; 12:E3218. [PMID: 31581436 PMCID: PMC6804258 DOI: 10.3390/ma12193218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The ability to create three-dimensional (3D) models of brain tissue from patient-derived cells, would open new possibilities in studying the neuropathology of disorders such as epilepsy and schizophrenia. While organoid culture has provided impressive examples of patient-specific models, the generation of organised 3D structures remains a challenge. 3D bioprinting is a rapidly developing technology where living cells, encapsulated in suitable bioink matrices, are printed to form 3D structures. 3D bioprinting may provide the capability to organise neuronal populations in 3D, through layer-by-layer deposition, and thereby recapitulate the complexity of neural tissue. However, printing neuron cells raises particular challenges since the biomaterial environment must be of appropriate softness to allow for the neurite extension, properties which are anathema to building self-supporting 3D structures. Here, we review the topic of 3D bioprinting of neurons, including critical discussions of hardware and bio-ink formulation requirements.
Collapse
|
181
|
Dzobo K, Motaung KSCM, Adesida A. Recent Trends in Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioinks for 3D Printing: An Updated Review. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:E4628. [PMID: 31540457 PMCID: PMC6788195 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20184628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 09/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The promise of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering is founded on the ability to regenerate diseased or damaged tissues and organs into functional tissues and organs or the creation of new tissues and organs altogether. In theory, damaged and diseased tissues and organs can be regenerated or created using different configurations and combinations of extracellular matrix (ECM), cells, and inductive biomolecules. Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering can allow the improvement of patients' quality of life through availing novel treatment options. The coupling of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering with 3D printing, big data, and computational algorithms is revolutionizing the treatment of patients in a huge way. 3D bioprinting allows the proper placement of cells and ECMs, allowing the recapitulation of native microenvironments of tissues and organs. 3D bioprinting utilizes different bioinks made up of different formulations of ECM/biomaterials, biomolecules, and even cells. The choice of the bioink used during 3D bioprinting is very important as properties such as printability, compatibility, and physical strength influence the final construct printed. The extracellular matrix (ECM) provides both physical and mechanical microenvironment needed by cells to survive and proliferate. Decellularized ECM bioink contains biochemical cues from the original native ECM and also the right proportions of ECM proteins. Different techniques and characterization methods are used to derive bioinks from several tissues and organs and to evaluate their quality. This review discusses the uses of decellularized ECM bioinks and argues that they represent the most biomimetic bioinks available. In addition, we briefly discuss some polymer-based bioinks utilized in 3D bioprinting.
Collapse
|
182
|
Hsieh CT, Hsu SH. Double-Network Polyurethane-Gelatin Hydrogel with Tunable Modulus for High-Resolution 3D Bioprinting. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES 2019; 11:32746-32757. [PMID: 31407899 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b10784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a technology to print materials (bioink) with cells into customized tissues for regeneration or organoids for drug screening applications. Herein, a series of biodegradable polyurethane (PU)-gelatin hydrogel with tunable mechanical properties and degradation rates were developed as the bioink. The PU-gelatin hydrogel demonstrated good printability in 24-31 °C and could print a complicated structure such as the nose-shaped construct. Due to the excellent shear thinning and fast strain recovery properties, the PU-gelatin hydrogel also had long working windows for bioprinting (over 24 h), stacking ability (up to 80 layers), and feasibility for high-resolution printing (through an 80 μm nozzle). The structure stability of the PU-gelatin hydrogel was maintained by two-stage double-network formation through Ca2+ chelation and thermal gelation at 37 °C without any toxic cross-linking reagent. The compressive modulus of printed PU-gelatin hydrogel constructs increased in about 3-fold by the treatment of CaCl2 solution for 15 min and enhanced further after incubation because of the thermal sensitivity of PU at 37 °C. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) printed with the PU-gelatin hydrogel through the 80 μm nozzle showed good viability, high mobility, and ∼200% proliferation ratio (or an ∼300% proliferation ratio through a 200 μm nozzle) in 10 days. Furthermore, the MSC-laden PU-gelatin constructs containing small molecular drug Y27632 underwent chondrogenesis in 10 days. The novel series of PU-gelatin hydrogels with tunable modulus, long working window, convenient bioprinting process, and high-resolution printing possibilities may serve as new bioink for 3D bioprinting of various tissues.
Collapse
|
183
|
Chen N, Zhu K, Zhang YS, Yan S, Pan T, Abudupataer M, Yu G, Alam MF, Wang L, Sun X, Yu Y, Wang C, Zhang W. Hydrogel Bioink with Multilayered Interfaces Improves Dispersibility of Encapsulated Cells in Extrusion Bioprinting. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES 2019; 11:30585-30595. [PMID: 31378063 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b09782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
One of the challenges for extrusion bioprinting using low-viscosity bioinks is the fast gravity-driven sedimentation of cells. Cells in a hydrogel bioink that features low viscosity tend to settle to the bottom of the bioink reservoir, and as such, their bioprintability is hindered by association with the inhomogeneous cellularized structures that are deposited. This is particularly true in cases where longer periods are required to print complex or larger tissue constructs. Increasing the bioink's viscosity efficiently retards sedimentation but gives rise to cell membranolysis or functional disruption due to increased shear stress on the cells during the extrusion process. Inspired by the rainbow cocktail, we report the development of a multilayered modification strategy for gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) bioink to manipulate multiple liquid interfaces, providing interfacial retention to retard cell sedimentation in the bioink reservoir. Indeed, the interfacial tension in our layer-by-layer bioink system, characterized by the pendant drop method, was found to be exponentially higher than the sedimental pull (ΔGravity-Buoyancy = ∼10-9 N) of cells, indicating that the interfacial retention is crucial for preventing cell sedimentation across the adjacent layers. It was demonstrated that the encapsulated cells displayed better dispersibility in constructs bioprinted using the multilayered GelMA bioink system than that of pristine GelMA where the index of homogeneity of the cell distribution in the multilayered bioink was 4 times that of the latter.
Collapse
|
184
|
Bioink Composition and Printing Parameters for 3D Modeling Neural Tissue. Cells 2019; 8:cells8080830. [PMID: 31387210 PMCID: PMC6721723 DOI: 10.3390/cells8080830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are a broad class of pathologies characterized by the progressive loss of neurons in the central nervous system. The main problem in the study of NDs is the lack of an adequate realistic experimental model to study the pathogenic mechanisms. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) partially overcome the problem, with their capability to differentiate into almost every cell types; even so, these cells alone are not sufficient to unveil the mechanisms underlying NDs. 3D bioprinting allows to control the distribution of cells such as neurons, leading to the creation of a realistic in vitro model. In this work, we analyzed two biomaterials: sodium alginate and gelatin, and three different cell types: a neuroblastoma cell line (SH-SY5Y), iPSCs, and neural stem cells. All cells were encapsulated inside the bioink, printed and cultivated for at least seven days; they all presented good viability. We also evaluated the maintenance of the printed shape, opening the possibility to obtain a reliable in vitro neural tissue combining 3D bioprinting and iPSCs technology, optimizing the study of the degenerative processes that are still widely unknown.
Collapse
|
185
|
Miri AK, Mirzaee I, Hassan S, Mesbah Oskui S, Nieto D, Khademhosseini A, Zhang YS. Effective bioprinting resolution in tissue model fabrication. LAB ON A CHIP 2019; 19:2019-2037. [PMID: 31080979 PMCID: PMC6554720 DOI: 10.1039/c8lc01037d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Recent advancements in bioprinting techniques have enabled convenient fabrication of micro-tissues in organ-on-a-chip platforms. In a sense, the success of bioprinted micro-tissues depends on how close their architectures are to the anatomical features of their native counterparts. The bioprinting resolution largely relates to the technical specifications of the bioprinter platforms and the physicochemical properties of the bioinks. In this article, we compare inkjet, extrusion, and light-assisted bioprinting technologies for fabrication of micro-tissues towards construction of biomimetic organ-on-a-chip platforms. Our theoretical analyses reveal that for a given printhead diameter, surface contact angle dominates inkjet bioprinting resolution, while nozzle moving speed and the nonlinearity of viscosity for bioinks regulate extrusion bioprinting resolution. The resolution of light-assisted bioprinting is strongly affected by the photocrosslinking behavior and light characteristics. Our tutorial guideline for optimizing bioprinting resolution would potentially help model the complex microenvironment of biological tissues in organ-on-a-chip platforms.
Collapse
|
186
|
Midha S, Dalela M, Sybil D, Patra P, Mohanty S. Advances in three-dimensional bioprinting of bone: Progress and challenges. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2019; 13:925-945. [PMID: 30812062 DOI: 10.1002/term.2847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Several attempts have been made to engineer a viable three-dimensional (3D) bone tissue equivalent using conventional tissue engineering strategies, but with limited clinical success. Using 3D bioprinting technology, scientists have developed functional prototypes of clinically relevant and mechanically robust bone with a functional bone marrow. Although the field is in its infancy, it has shown immense potential in the field of bone tissue engineering by re-establishing the 3D dynamic micro-environment of the native bone. Inspite of their in vitro success, maintaining the viability and differentiation potential of such cell-laden constructs overtime, and their subsequent preclinical testing in terms of stability, mechanical loading, immune responses, and osseointegrative potential still needs to be explored. Progress is slow due to several challenges such as but not limited to the choice of ink used for cell encapsulation, optimal cell source, bioprinting method suitable for replicating the heterogeneous tissues and organs, and so on. Here, we summarize the recent advancements in bioprinting of bone, their limitations, challenges, and strategies for future improvisations. The generated knowledge will provide deep insights on our current understanding of the cellular interactions with the hydrogel matrices and help to unravel new methodologies for facilitating precisely regulated stem cell behaviour.
Collapse
|
187
|
Wang Q, Han G, Yan S, Zhang Q. 3D Printing of Silk Fibroin for Biomedical Applications. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2019; 12:E504. [PMID: 30736388 PMCID: PMC6384667 DOI: 10.3390/ma12030504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is regarded as a critical technological-evolution in material engineering, especially for customized biomedicine. However, a big challenge that hinders the 3D printing technique applied in biomedical field is applicable bioink. Silk fibroin (SF) is used as a biomaterial for decades due to its remarkable high machinability and good biocompatibility and biodegradability, which provides a possible alternate of bioink for 3D printing. In this review, we summarize the requirements, characteristics and processabilities of SF bioink, in particular, focusing on the printing possibilities and capabilities of bioink. Further, the current achievements of cell-loading SF based bioinks were comprehensively viewed from their physical properties, chemical components, and bioactivities as well. Finally, the emerging issues and prospects of SF based bioink for 3D printing are given. This review provides a reference for the programmable and multiple processes and the further improvement of silk-based biomaterials fabrication by 3D printing.
Collapse
|
188
|
Gao G, Kim BS, Jang J, Cho DW. Recent Strategies in Extrusion-Based Three-Dimensional Cell Printing toward Organ Biofabrication. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2019; 5:1150-1169. [PMID: 33405637 DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Reconstructing human organs is one of the ultimate goals of the medical industry. Organ printing utilizing three-dimensional cell printing technology to fabricate artificial living organ equivalents has shed light on the advancement of this field into a new era. Among three currently applied techniques (inkjet, laser-assisted, and extrusion-based), extrusion-based cell printing (ECP) has evoked the majority of interest due to its low cost, wide range of applicable materials, and ease of spatial and depositional controllability. Major challenges in organ reconstruction include difficulties in precisely fabricating complex structural features, creating perfusable and functional vasculatures, and mimicking biophysical and biochemical characteristics in the printed constructs. In this review, we describe the merits and limitations of ECP for organ fabrication and discuss its recent advances aimed at overcoming these challenges. In addition, we delineate the expected future techniques for printing live tissue or organ substitutes.
Collapse
|
189
|
Swaminathan S, Hamid Q, Sun W, Clyne AM. Bioprinting of 3D breast epithelial spheroids for human cancer models. Biofabrication 2019; 11:025003. [PMID: 30616234 PMCID: PMC7731635 DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aafc49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
3D human cancer models provide a better platform for drug efficacy studies than conventional 2D culture, since they recapitulate important aspects of the in vivo microenvironment. While biofabrication has advanced model creation, bioprinting generally involves extruding individual cells in a bioink and then waiting for these cells to self-assemble into a hierarchical 3D tissue. This self-assembly is time consuming and requires complex cellular interactions with other cell types, extracellular matrix components, and growth factors. We therefore investigated if we could directly bioprint pre-formed 3D spheroids in alginate-based bioinks to create a model tissue that could be used almost immediately. Human breast epithelial cell lines were bioprinted as individual cells or as pre-formed spheroids, either in monoculture or co-culture with vascular endothelial cells. While individual breast cells only spontaneously formed spheroids in Matrigel-based bioink, pre-formed breast spheroids maintained their viability, architecture, and function after bioprinting. Bioprinted breast spheroids were more resistant to paclitaxel than individually printed breast cells; however, this effect was abrogated by endothelial cell co-culture. This study shows that 3D cellular structure bioprinting has potential to create tissue models that quickly replicate the tumor microenvironment.
Collapse
|
190
|
Gill AS, Deol PK, Kaur IP. An Update on the Use of Alginate in Additive Biofabrication Techniques. Curr Pharm Des 2019; 25:1249-1264. [PMID: 31020933 DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666190423155835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid free forming (SFF) technique also called additive manufacturing process is immensely popular for biofabrication owing to its high accuracy, precision and reproducibility. METHOD SFF techniques like stereolithography, selective laser sintering, fused deposition modeling, extrusion printing, and inkjet printing create three dimension (3D) structures by layer by layer processing of the material. To achieve desirable results, selection of the appropriate technique is an important aspect and it is based on the nature of biomaterial or bioink to be processed. RESULT & CONCLUSION Alginate is a commonly employed bioink in biofabrication process, attributable to its nontoxic, biodegradable and biocompatible nature; low cost; and tendency to form hydrogel under mild conditions. Furthermore, control on its rheological properties like viscosity and shear thinning, makes this natural anionic polymer an appropriate candidate for many of the SFF techniques. It is endeavoured in the present review to highlight the status of alginate as bioink in various SFF techniques.
Collapse
|
191
|
Kim YS, Majid M, Melchiorri AJ, Mikos AG. Applications of decellularized extracellular matrix in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Bioeng Transl Med 2019; 4:83-95. [PMID: 30680321 PMCID: PMC6336671 DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Revised: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Regenerative therapies for bone and cartilage injuries are currently unable to replicate the complex microenvironment of native tissue. There are many tissue engineering approaches attempting to address this issue through the use of synthetic materials. Although synthetic materials can be modified to simulate the mechanical and biochemical properties of the cell microenvironment, they do not mimic in full the multitude of interactions that take place within tissue. Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) has been established as a biomaterial that preserves a tissue's native environment, promotes cell proliferation, and provides cues for cell differentiation. The potential of dECM as a therapeutic agent is rising, but there are many limitations of dECM restricting its use. This review discusses the recent progress in the utilization of bone and cartilage dECM through applications as scaffolds, particles, and supplementary factors in bone and cartilage tissue engineering.
Collapse
|
192
|
Kim H, Park MN, Kim J, Jang J, Kim HK, Cho DW. Characterization of cornea-specific bioink: high transparency, improved in vivo safety. J Tissue Eng 2019; 10:2041731418823382. [PMID: 30719272 PMCID: PMC6348552 DOI: 10.1177/2041731418823382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Corneal transplantation is a typical surgical procedure for severe corneal diseases. However, the waiting time for a donor cornea has gradually increased due to a decrease in supply caused by an aging population and increased cases of laser-based surgeries. Artificial corneas were developed to meet the increase in demand; however, these approaches have suffered from material deterioration resulted by the limited tissue integration. Here, we introduce a cornea-derived decellularized extracellular matrix (Co-dECM) as a bioink for corneal regeneration. The developed Co-dECM bioink had similar quantitative measurement results for collagen and GAGs compared with that of the native cornea and also had the proper transparency for vision. The differentiation potential of human turbinate-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hTMSCs) to a keratocyte lineage was only observed in the Co-dECM group. Moreover, the developed bioink did not have any cytotoxic effect on encapsulated cells for three-dimensional (3D) culture and has great biocompatibility evident by the xeno-implantation of the Co-dECM gel into mice and rabbits for two and one month, respectively. An in vivo safety similar to clinical-grade collagen was seen with the Co-dECM, which helped to maintain the keratocyte-specific characteristics in vivo, compared with collagen. Taken together, the Co-dECM bioink has the potential to be used in various types of corneal diseases based on its corneal-specific ability and design flexibility through 3D cell printing technology.
Collapse
|
193
|
Zhang X, Kim GJ, Kang MG, Lee JK, Seo JW, Do JT, Hong K, Cha JM, Shin SR, Bae H. Marine Biomaterial-Based Bioinks for Generating 3D Printed Tissue Constructs. Mar Drugs 2018; 16:E484. [PMID: 30518062 PMCID: PMC6315353 DOI: 10.3390/md16120484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2018] [Revised: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Biologically active materials from marine sources have been receiving increasing attention as they are free from the transmissible diseases and religious restrictions associated with the use of mammalian resources. Among various other biomaterials from marine sources, alginate and fish gelatin (f-gelatin), with their inherent bioactivity and physicochemical tunability, have been studied extensively and applied in various biomedical fields such as regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, and pharmaceutical products. In this study, by using alginate and f-gelatin's chemical derivatives, we developed a marine-based interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) hydrogel consisting of alginate and f-gelatin methacryloyl (f-GelMA) networks via physical and chemical crosslinking methods, respectively. We then evaluated their physical properties (mechanical strength, swelling degree, and degradation rate) and cell behavior in hydrogels. Our results showed that the alginate/f-GelMA hydrogel displayed unique physical properties compared to when alginate and f-GelMA were used separately. These properties included high mechanical strength, low swelling and degradation rate, and an increase in cell adhesive ability. Moreover, for the first time, we introduced and optimized the application of alginate/f-GelMA hydrogel in a three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting system with high cell viability, which breaks the restriction of their utilization in tissue engineering applications and suggests that alginate/f-GelMA can be utilized as a novel bioink to broaden the uses of marine products in biomedical fields.
Collapse
|
194
|
Ying GL, Maharjan S, Yin YX, Chai RR, Cao X, Yang JZ, Miri AK, Hassan S, Zhang YS. Aqueous Two-Phase Emulsion Bioink-Enabled 3D Bioprinting of Porous Hydrogels. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2018; 30:e1805460. [PMID: 30345555 PMCID: PMC6402588 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201805460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
3D bioprinting technology provides programmable and customizable platforms to engineer cell-laden constructs mimicking human tissues for a wide range of biomedical applications. However, the encapsulated cells are often restricted in spreading and proliferation by dense biomaterial networks from gelation of bioinks. Herein, a cell-benign approach is reported to directly bioprint porous-structured hydrogel constructs by using an aqueous two-phase emulsion bioink. The bioink, which contains two immiscible aqueous phases of cell/gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) mixture and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), is photocrosslinked to fabricate predesigned cell-laden hydrogel constructs by extrusion bioprinting or digital micromirror device-based stereolithographic bioprinting. The porous structure of the 3D-bioprinted hydrogel construct is formed by subsequently removing the PEO phase from the photocrosslinked GelMA hydrogel. Three different cell types (human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, human umbilical vein endothelial cells, and NIH/3T3 mouse embryonic fibroblasts) within the 3D-bioprinted porous hydrogel patterns show enhanced cell viability, spreading, and proliferation compared to the standard (i.e., nonporous) hydrogel constructs. The 3D bioprinting strategy is believed to provide a robust and versatile platform to engineer porous-structured tissue constructs and their models for a variety of applications in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, drug development, and personalized therapeutics.
Collapse
|
195
|
Laternser S, Keller H, Leupin O, Rausch M, Graf-Hausner U, Rimann M. A Novel Microplate 3D Bioprinting Platform for the Engineering of Muscle and Tendon Tissues. SLAS Technol 2018; 23:599-613. [PMID: 29895208 PMCID: PMC6249648 DOI: 10.1177/2472630318776594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures do not reflect the in vivo situation, and thus it is important to develop predictive three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models with enhanced reliability and robustness for drug screening applications. Treatments against muscle-related diseases are becoming more prominent due to the growth of the aging population worldwide. In this study, we describe a novel drug screening platform with automated production of 3D musculoskeletal-tendon-like tissues. With 3D bioprinting, alternating layers of photo-polymerized gelatin-methacryloyl-based bioink and cell suspension tissue models were produced in a dumbbell shape onto novel postholder cell culture inserts in 24-well plates. Monocultures of human primary skeletal muscle cells and rat tenocytes were printed around and between the posts. The cells showed high viability in culture and good tissue differentiation, based on marker gene and protein expressions. Different printing patterns of bioink and cells were explored and calcium signaling with Fluo4-loaded cells while electrically stimulated was shown. Finally, controlled co-printing of tenocytes and myoblasts around and between the posts, respectively, was demonstrated followed by co-culture and co-differentiation. This screening platform combining 3D bioprinting with a novel microplate represents a promising tool to address musculoskeletal diseases.
Collapse
|
196
|
Raddatz L, Lavrentieva A, Pepelanova I, Bahnemann J, Geier D, Becker T, Scheper T, Beutel S. Development and Application of an Additively Manufactured Calcium Chloride Nebulizer for Alginate 3D-Bioprinting Purposes. J Funct Biomater 2018; 9:E63. [PMID: 30423908 PMCID: PMC6306849 DOI: 10.3390/jfb9040063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D)-bioprinting enables scientists to mimic in vivo micro-environments and to perform in vitro cell experiments under more physiological conditions than is possible with conventional two-dimensional (2D) cell culture. Cell-laden biomaterials (bioinks) are precisely processed to bioengineer tissue three-dimensionally. One primarily used matrix material is sodium alginate. This natural biopolymer provides both fine mechanical properties when gelated and high biocompatibility. Commonly, alginate is 3D bioprinted using extrusion based devices. The gelation reaction is hereby induced by a CaCl₂ solution in the building chamber after material extrusion. This established technique has two main disadvantages: (1) CaCl₂ can have toxic effects on the cell-laden hydrogels by oxygen diffusion limitation and (2) good printing resolution in the CaCl₂ solution is hard to achieve, since the solution needs to be removed afterwards and substituted by cell culture media. Here, we show an innovative approach of alginate bioprinting based on a CaCl₂ nebulizer. The device provides CaCl₂ mist to the building platform inducing the gelation. The necessary amount of CaCl₂ could be decreased as compared to previous gelation strategies and limitation of oxygen transfer during bioprinting can be reduced. The device was manufactured using the MJP-3D printing technique. Subsequently, its digital blueprint (CAD file) can be modified and additive manufactured easily and mounted in various extrusion bioprinters. With our approach, a concept for a more gentle 3D Bioprinting method could be shown. We demonstrated that the concept of an ultrasound-based nebulizer for CaCl₂ mist generation can be used for 3D bioprinting and that the mist-induced polymerization of alginate hydrogels of different concentrations is feasible. Furthermore, different cell-laden alginate concentrations could be used: Cell spheroids (mesenchymal stem cells) and single cells (mouse fibroblasts) were successfully 3D printed yielding viable cells and stable hydrogels after 24 h cultivation. We suggest our work to show a different and novel approach on alginate bioprinting, which could be useful in generating cell-laden hydrogel constructs for e.g., drug screening or (soft) tissue engineering applications.
Collapse
|
197
|
Sasmal P, Datta P, Wu Y, Ozbolat IT. 3D bioprinting for modelling vasculature. MICROPHYSIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2018; 2:9. [PMID: 30931432 PMCID: PMC6436836 DOI: 10.21037/mps.2018.10.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Though in vivo models provide the most physiologically-relevant environment for studying tissue development and function, an in vitro substitute is being offered by the advancement of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology, which is a reproducible and scalable fabrication strategy providing precise 3D control compared to conventional microfluidic tissue fabrication methods. In this review, vasculature models printed using extrusion-, droplet-, and laser-based bioprinting techniques are summarized and compared. Besides bioprinting of hydrogels as bioinks, an alternative method to obtain vascular models by bioprinting is to use exogenous biomaterial-free cell aggregates such as tissue spheroids and cell pellet, which has also been discussed here. In addition, there have been efforts to fabricate micro-vasculature constructs (e.g., capillaries) to overcome the practical limitations of bioprinting of large scale vascular networks. At the end of the review, limitations and prospective of bioprinting in vasculature modelling has also been expounded.
Collapse
|
198
|
Abstract
Tissue engineering has progressed tremendously over recent decades through the generation of functional tissue analogs. Traditional approaches based on seeding cells into scaffold are limited in their capacity to produce tissues with precise biomimetic properties. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is one kind of fabrication technology used to precisely dispense cell-laden biomaterials for the construction of functional tissues or organs. In recent years, much research progress has been made in 3D bioprinting technology and its application in generating tissue analogs, including skin, heart valves, blood vessels, bone, and cardiac tissue. However, it still faces many technical challenges. In this review, we introduce the current progress in 3D bioprinting technology and focus on biomaterials and their potential applications in regenerative medicine and drug discovery. Current challenges are also discussed.
Collapse
|
199
|
Roseti L, Cavallo C, Desando G, Parisi V, Petretta M, Bartolotti I, Grigolo B. Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Cartilage by the Use of Stem Cells: A Strategy to Improve Regeneration. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2018; 11:E1749. [PMID: 30227656 PMCID: PMC6164915 DOI: 10.3390/ma11091749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Cartilage lesions fail to heal spontaneously, leading to the development of chronic conditions which worsen the life quality of patients. Three-dimensional scaffold-based bioprinting holds the potential of tissue regeneration through the creation of organized, living constructs via a "layer-by-layer" deposition of small units of biomaterials and cells. This technique displays important advantages to mimic natural cartilage over traditional methods by allowing a fine control of cell distribution, and the modulation of mechanical and chemical properties. This opens up a number of new perspectives including personalized medicine through the development of complex structures (the osteochondral compartment), different types of cartilage (hyaline, fibrous), and constructs according to a specific patient's needs. However, the choice of the ideal combination of biomaterials and cells for cartilage bioprinting is still a challenge. Stem cells may improve material mimicry ability thanks to their unique properties: the immune-privileged status and the paracrine activity. Here, we review the recent advances in cartilage three-dimensional, scaffold-based bioprinting using stem cells and identify future developments for clinical translation. Database search terms used to write this review were: "articular cartilage", "menisci", "3D bioprinting", "bioinks", "stem cells", and "cartilage tissue engineering".
Collapse
|
200
|
Zhu K, Chen N, Liu X, Mu X, Zhang W, Wang C, Zhang YS. A General Strategy for Extrusion Bioprinting of Bio-Macromolecular Bioinks through Alginate-Templated Dual-Stage Crosslinking. Macromol Biosci 2018; 18:e1800127. [PMID: 29943499 PMCID: PMC6467480 DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The recently developed 3D bioprinting technology has greatly improved the ability to generate biomimetic tissues that are structurally and functionally relevant to their human counterparts. The selection of proper biomaterials as the bioinks is a key step toward successful bioprinting. For example, viscosity of a bioink is an important rheological parameter to determine the flexibility in deposition of free-standing structures and the maintenance of architectural integrity following bioprinting. This requirement, however, has greatly limited the selection of bioinks, especially for those naturally derived due to their commonly low mechanical properties. Here the generalization of a mechanism for extrusion bioprinting of bio-macromolecular components, mainly focusing on collagen and its derivatives including gelatin and gelatin methacryloyl, is reported. Specifically, a templating strategy is adopted using a composite bioink containing both the desired bio-macromolecular component and a polysaccharide alginate. The physically crosslinkable alginate component serves as the temporal structural support to stabilize the shape of the construct during bioprinting; upon subsequent chemical or physical crosslinking of the bio-macromolecular component, alginate can be selectively removed to leave only the desired bio-macromolecule. It is anticipated that this strategy is general, and can be readily expanded for use of a wide variety of other bio-macromolecular bioinks.
Collapse
|