High-dose non-sedating antihistamines are used insufficiently in chronic urticaria patients treated with omalizumab

BACKGROUND

The lifetime prevalence of chronic urticaria (CU) is 0.5%-1%. In some patients with CU, symptomatic control is not achieved with non-sedating second-generation H1 antihistamines (nsAH1) alone, even with quadrupled standard doses as recommended in international guidelines. In these cases, biological treatment with omalizumab can be added. Since omalizumab is expensive compared to antihistamines, lack of adherence to guidelines for high dose nsAH1 (up to four-fold standard dose per day) may be associated with substantial unnecessary costs. The aim was to measure the use nsAH1 before and during omalizumab use for the first time in an omalizumab treated CU population.

METHODS

We identified all Danish patients with CU who initiated omalizumab from March 2014 to December 2018 and evaluated new and ongoing nsAH1 treatments using the Danish nationwide registries.

RESULTS

A total of 955 CU patients initiated treatment with omalizumab within the study period (median age 40 years [IQR 28-50], 74.5% females). During the 12 months prior to omalizumab initiation, 95.6% of the patients filled at least one prescription with nsAH1 at some point, while 84.7% filled at least one prescription during the three months before omalizumab. From 3 months before omalizumab initiation till 3 months after, the proportions of users of high-dose nsAH1 was maximum 31.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Omalizumab was usually administered before sufficient nsAH1 treatment was tried. In despite of the labelling that omalizumab should be co-administered with high dose nsAH1, this does not happen This may lead to substantial unnecessary costs.

Omalizumab for successful chemotherapy desensitisation: What we know so far

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity reactions induced by chemotherapeutic drugs may influence the course of the oncologic disease by preventing doctors from prescribing first-line therapy. In order to prevent another hypersensitivity reaction to the culprit chemotherapeutic agent, the physician can decide between two possibilities: premedication or desensitisation protocols. Rapid drug desensitisation showed successful results for most patients, but some of them may develop symptoms. Although omalizumab is not licensed as premedication or adjuvant therapy in chemotherapy desensitisation protocols, there have been published some case reports and small sample size studies that indicated promising results.

METHODS

We reviewed all the published literature regarding the use of omalizumab during chemotherapy desensitisation protocols.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We found a great heterogeneity between the doses and the interval between omalizumab injections and chemotherapy - rapid drug desensitisation, but most of the studies showed promising results. As a corollary, we propose a dose regimen of omalizumab administered before the first desensitisation protocol. Then, omalizumab should be administered one day before every chemotherapy regimen. Omalizumab might be used as an adjuvant therapy and might be a solution for a hopeless situation.

[In vitro study on the individual binding ability of omalizumab with free IgE]

Objective:To investigate the individual binding ability of omalizumab to free IgE and its effect on omalizumab action. Methods:A total of 28 serum samples were collected from patients with allergic rhinitis and divided into groups with high, medium and low concentrations of free IgE. Different doses of omalizumab were administered in vitro for inhibitory binding. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect changes in serum free IgE after inhibition. The inhibition constant of omalizumab on serum free IgE was calculated. At the same time, the binding ability of omalizumab and individual free IgE was analyzed. Results:In general, when 100% serum free IgE was inhibited, the omalizumab required was positively correlated with the original serum free IgE concentration（9.500±7.207, 8.636±7.375, and 0.786±0.857 for the high, medium, and low IgE concentration groups, respectively）. The dose of omalizumab required for inhibition of 50% free IgE in serum was significantly lower（0.049±0.071, 0.046±0.077, 0.048±0.048 in the high, medium, and low IgE concentrations groups, respectively）. The 100% and 50% inhibition constants of serum free IgE in different individuals were different to some extent. Conclusion:Overall, the amount of omalizumab required to achieve the same inhibitory effect is proportional to the IgE concentration. In some sensitive patients, partial binding inhibition of free IgE can occur even when omalizumab is administered at less than the recommended dose. The binding ability of serum free IgE and omalizumab was different in different individuals. If this factor is used as a reference for the individual dose of omalizumab in clinical medicine, it is possible to achieve the expected efficacy more accurately.

Assessing the Risk of Omalizumab Add-on Therapy for Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Amid the current COVID-19 pandemic, there is concern for increased risk of infection while on immunomodulatory therapy. Omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody, is an add-on therapy for the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) when first line therapy alone fails to achieve appropriate response. Current understanding of the response to COVID-19 infection is largely varied and actively under investigation. In the context of a pandemic, it is important to consider the safety profile of omalizumab as it modulates the immune system. We reviewed data from pivotal Phase III clinical trials investigating omalizumab use in CIU patients with a focus on reported respiratory-related adverse events (AEs) to assess these risks. Results from three phase III trials show that omalizumab adjunct therapy does not significantly increase infection risk and severity.

Exploring Machine Learning Techniques to Predict the Response to Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Background: Omalizumab is the best treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Machine learning (ML) approaches can be used to predict response to therapy and the effectiveness of a treatment. No studies are available on the use of ML techniques to predict the response to Omalizumab in CSU. Methods: Data from 132 CSU outpatients were analyzed. Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7) and treatment efficacy were assessed. Clinical and demographic characteristics were used for training and validating ML models to predict the response to treatment. Two methodologies were used to label the data based on the response to treatment (UAS7 ≥ 6): (A) at 1, 3 and 5 months; (B) classifying the patients as early responders (ER), late responders (LR) or non-responders (NR) (ER: UAS 7 ≥ 6 at first month, LR: UAS 7 ≥ 6 at third month, NR: if none of the previous conditions occurred). Results: ER were predominantly characterized by hypertension, while LR mainly suffered from asthma and hypothyroidism. A slight positive correlation (R² = 0.21) was found between total IgE levels and UAS7 at 1 month. Variable Importance Analysis (VIA) reported D-dimer and C-reactive proteins as the key blood tests for the performance of learning techniques. Using methodology (A), SVM (specificity of 0.81) and k-NN (sensitivity of 0.8) are the best models to predict LR at the third month. Conclusion: k-NN plus the SVM model could be used to identify the response to treatment. D-dimer and C-reactive proteins have greater predictive power in training ML models.

Novel Targets for Drug Use in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis

Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by medium and small vessels inflammation. Cardiac vasculitic involvement is one of the most severe manifestations with a significant impact on patients' long-term prognosis: anyway, a specific therapeutic approach for heart involvement in EGPA has not been explored yet. Current regimen consists of a long-term therapy with high dose of glucocorticoids, causing the well-known related-adverse events; immunosuppressive drugs are used in patients with severe manifestations, with some limitations. New therapeutic approaches are needed for patients with refractory disease or contraindications to conventional therapies. The quest for the ideal therapy is going toward a more and more personalized approach: on the one hand, efforts are made to use already existing therapies in the most appropriate way; on the other hand, new insights into EGPA pathogenesis allow the discovery of new targets, as demonstrated by mepolizumab and rituximab, targeting eosinophils, and B-cell compartments. This review summarizes the emerging therapies used in EGPA, focusing on the most recent studies on biologics and analyzing their efficacy and safety.

Safety Evaluation of an Expedited Omalizumab Home Self-Administration Pathway

Introduction

The Northern Ireland Regional Immunology Service (NIRIS) has developed an expedited omalizumab home self-administration pathway to reduce face-to-face clinic attendance during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This audit evaluates the safety of this pathway with a particular focus on anaphylaxis.

Objectives

This study aimed to retrospectively audit the records of 39 patients undertaking expedited home self-administration at NIRIS for complications, particularly emergency department attendance for anaphylaxis. The target was for 100% of patients to complete a six-month course without experiencing anaphylaxis related to omalizumab administration.

Materials and methods

A total of 39 records of patients who underwent expedited omalizumab self-administration were audited by a single reviewer. They were prospectively collected between March 2020 and August 2021. Clinical data were collected from the Northern Ireland Electronic Care Record (NIECR).

Results

Hundred percent of patients were in the process of completing or had completed a six-dose course without anaphylaxis. During the course of omalizumab, 7.6% of patients attended the emergency department. Zero percent of patients have experienced anaphylaxis triggered by omalizumab. The target of 100% patients completing the expedited pathway without omalizumab-related anaphylaxis was met.

Conclusion

Home self-administration of omalizumab is preferred by patients and clinicians for reducing expense, travel, and unnecessary clinical contact during the COVID-19 pandemic. An expedited omalizumab home self-administration training pathway appears to be safe in a population of Northern Irish patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). More research is needed to determine whether the expedited pathway should become the standard of care post-pandemic

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Omalizumab for Severe Allergic Asthma in Japan Using Real-World Evidence

OBJECTIVES

Omalizumab is a recommended add-on therapy for patients with severe allergic asthma who remain uncontrolled despite treatment with standard of care (SoC). This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of omalizumab compared with SoC applying real-world clinical outcomes in adult patients with severe allergic asthma in Japan.

METHODS

A validated Markov model was adapted for Japan and compared the cost-effectiveness of omalizumab as an add-on therapy to SoC versus SoC alone using the most recently updated price of omalizumab. A Japanese real-world postmarketing surveillance and a pivotal randomized clinical trial were used as inputs for clinical effectiveness. Japanese life tables and literature were accessed for mortality data and unit costs were extracted from a Japanese insurance claims database. Quality of life data were retrieved from the clinical trial.

RESULTS

In the base case, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for omalizumab add-on therapy was ¥2.85 million per quality-adjusted life-year gained (approximately €21 000; 1€ = ¥133.26) compared with SoC alone. The model appeared to be most sensitive to changes in clinically significant severe exacerbation fatality, day-to-day asthma symptom utilities for SoC, discount rates for benefits, day-to-day asthma symptom utilities for omalizumab responders, time horizon, and the annual cost of omalizumab. The results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of omalizumab being cost-effective was 93% to 98% at a threshold of ¥5 to ¥6 million (willingness-to-pay for 1 quality-adjusted life-year).

CONCLUSIONS

Omalizumab add-on therapy is cost-effective compared with SoC alone in Japan in severe allergic asthma population who are uncontrolled with high-dose inhaled corticosteroid and other controllers.

Sustained safety and efficacy of ligelizumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: A one-year extension study

BACKGROUND

Ligelizumab, a next-generation, humanized anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody is in development as a treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria, whose symptoms are inadequately controlled with standard-of-care therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term safety and re-treatment efficacy of ligelizumab 240 mg in patients who completed the core study and extension study.

METHODS

This open-label, single-arm, long-term Phase 2b extension study was designed to assess patients who were previously administered various doses of ligelizumab, omalizumab or placebo in the Phase 2b, dose-finding core study and who presented with active disease after Week 32. In the extension study, patients received ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, for 52 weeks and were monitored post-treatment for 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Overall, ligelizumab was well-tolerated with no newly identified safety signals. A total of 95.4% (226/237) screened patients received ligelizumab 240 mg in the extension study; 84.1% (190/226) of patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Most reported events were mild (41.6%) or moderate (35.8%) and mostly unrelated to the study treatment. At Week 12, 46.5% of patients had a complete response increasing to 53.1% after 52 weeks. Following 52 weeks of extension study treatment, 75.8% (95% confidence interval, 69.9, 81.3) of patients had cumulative complete responses. The median time to relapse in complete responders was 38 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The long-term safety profile of ligelizumab 240 mg in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria was consistent with the core study and re-treatment efficacy was shown.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477332 and NCT02649218.

An update to the 2013-2014 American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) guidelines for the pharmacological management of atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis is a common dermatologic condition that affects millions of people worldwide, and a standardized approach to treatment was published by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) in 2013-14. Since 2014, new FDA-approved treatment options such as dupilumab and crisaborole have changed the landscape of AD management, and future therapies such as JAK inhibitors and anti-interleukin 13 and 31 antibodies appear effective, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review to give clinicians an updated toolbox to aid in pharmacologic management.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors explore the updated efficacy and safety data on established therapeutic options for AD including topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine, azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil. In addition, the authors also explore trial data and studies on dupilumab, crisaborole, omalizumab, tofacitinib, ruxolinitib, abrocitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, delgocitinib, nemoliuzumab, and tralokinumab.

EXPERT OPINION

The AAD guidelines must be updated in the future to include several new treatment modalities that have revolutionized the pharmacologic management of patients with AD, including dupilumab and crisaborole. The future of AD treatment is also extremely bright, as JAK inhibitors and Il-13/31 antibodies have shown convincing results in the improvement of AD patients' lives in various trials and studies that have been examined in this paper.

The course of COVID-19 in patients with severe asthma receiving biological treatment

OBJECTIVE

In order to decrease the use of systemic corticosteroids and prevent asthma exacerbations, EAACI and GINA made recommendations in favor of severe asthma patients continuing the use of biologicals during the pandemic. However, the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection remains uncertain, especially in patients taking biological therapy for severe asthma. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the clinical course of COVID-19 in severe asthmatic patients receiving biological treatment.

METHODS

A total of 75 patients under the care of a tertiary level allergy clinic and receiving omalizumab or mepolizumab, which are the approved biologicals for severe asthma in Turkey, were included in the survey between April 1 and December 31, 2020. A questionnaire was administered via a telephone call by one of the treating physicians.

RESULTS

Of the total patients, 46 (61%) were receiving mepolizumab and 29 (39%) omalizumab. Of the patients, 14 (19%) had COVID-19, 9 (64%) had pneumonia, 4 (29%) were hospitalized. A total of 12 (16%) patients interrupted biological treatments because they did not want to attend hospital for injections during the pandemic. The incidence of COVID-19 was higher in patients who have interrupted biological treatment (p < 0.001). In addition, the risk of having COVID-19 was higher in the ones who have interrupted their biological treatment (Relative risk:2.71; 95% Confidence interval:1.21-6.06). Asthma control was better in patients attending regular injections (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Severe asthma itself seems to be a risk factor for COVID-19, whether biological treatment has a role in the disease course needs further research.

Successful management of severe allergic reactions to platelet transfusion with omalizumab: A case report

RATIONALE

An allergic transfusion reaction is a common side effect of transfusions of red blood cells. Using washed red blood cells is the most effective method for preventing such a reaction. However, the availability of other washed transfusion components, including platelets, is limited.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 69-year-old patient with acute myeloid leukemia progressed from myelodysplastic syndrome and was treated with azacitidine. She experienced a minor reaction to platelet transfusion that initially responded to the administration of corticosteroids and antihistamines. However, she worsened even after subsequent preventive treatments and was referred to the emergency department due to anaphylaxis. The patient developed hypotension, chest pain, and dyspnea 10 minutes after the initiation of platelet transfusion.

DIAGNOSES

She was diagnosed with platelet-induced anaphylaxis.

INTERVENTIONS

In an attempt to prevent anaphylaxis, 150 mg of omalizumab was prescribed 1 week prior to transfusion. However, she experienced anaphylaxis again and was administered intramuscular epinephrine. For the following transfusion, we treated her with a 300 mg dose of omalizumab 24 hours before the transfusion.

OUTCOMES

She tolerated well and continued to receive further chemotherapy and platelet transfusion with premedication.

LESSONS

This case suggests that omalizumab is a good candidate for the management of severe allergic transfusion reactions.

Country-based report: the safety of omalizumab treatment in pregnant patients with asthma

BACKGROUND/AIM

We aimed to report outcomes of pregnant patients with asthma under omalizumab treatment and their infants in our country.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with asthma who received omalizumab for at least 6 months and at least one dose during their pregnancy were retrospectively evaluated using a questionnaire regarding their disease and therapy and the health of their infants.

RESULTS

Twenty pregnant patients and their 23 infant’s data were analyzed. The mean delivery age was 31.8 ± 7.4 years. They received omalizumab for 28.9 ± 21.8 months. Eight (36.4%) patients showed exacerbation of the disease during pregnancy. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and asthma control test (ACT) scores at the starting time of omalizumab administration, first month of the pregnancy, and after delivery were 71 ± 18%, 83.4 ± 10.5%, and 80.5 ± 13% (FEV1), and 11.9 ± 4.9, 20.2 ± 2.6, and 20.4 ± 2.2 (ACT), respectively. One patient gave birth to twin infants, two patients to two infants each in different years, and 17 to one infant each. Three (13%) infants had low birth weight and five (21.7%) were born prematurely. No congenital anomalies were detected. Seven (30.4%) infants presented atopic diseases during their life.

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab treatment during pregnancy seems to be safe for both patients and their infants.

Clinical improvement in Job syndrome following administration of co-trimoxazole, omalizumab and inhaled tobramycin

Established treatment regimens for the autosomal dominant hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome, denominated Job syndrome, are lacking. Thus, Job syndrome still exerts a dramatic impact on patients' quality of life. Our aim was to present safety and effectiveness of a regimen including co-trimoxazole, omalizumab and inhaled tobramycin in Job syndrome. A 26-year-old woman diagnosed with Job syndrome since infancy through sequencing revealing G342D mutation in STAT3 gene was initiated in the above mentioned treatment regimen; she was followed for 6 months, and to date, none recurrent pulmonary or skin infection was noticed. Furthermore, a considerable improvement in skin lesions was observed. A combination of anti-IgE and longitudinal use of inhaled antibiotics seems well-founded in Job syndrome.

Omalizumab-induced aspirin tolerance in N-ERD patients is independent of atopic sensitization

BACKGROUND

NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) comprises the triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma and intolerance to inhibitors of the cyclooxygenase-1-enzyme. The impact of omalizumab on prevention of aspirin-induced hypersensitivity in N-ERD patients with and without atopic sensitization has not been thoroughly addressed.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of omalizumab treatment on aspirin tolerance in atopic and non-atopic N-ERD patients.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective trial evaluated overall omalizumab-induced aspirin tolerability in N-ERD patients by performing aspirin challenge testing before and after 6 months of anti-IgE therapy. The impact of omalizumab on CRSwNP, asthma as well as serum and tissue biomarkers in patients with and without comorbid atopic sensitizations was further analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 33 patients included in the study, 56% developed complete aspirin tolerance and 18% tolerated higher dosages after 24 weeks. Polyp size and disease-specific symptoms (NPS:-1.9±0.3,p<0.001;SNOT-20:-16.7±3.7,p<0.001;ACT:+3.2±0.7,p<0.001) improved in all patients irrespective of atopic sensitization. Effectiveness of omalizumab was accompanied by an increase in mean total serum IgE (307.8±42kU/L,p<0.001) and a decrease in ECP (-10.6±6.7 μg/L ) and in relative eosinophilia (-2.5±0.7%, p<0.01). While there was a significant reduction of tissue IgE (p<0.05) in all patients after 4 weeks, the number of local eosinophils decreased only in atopic individuals (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab induced complete aspirin tolerance in the majority (56%) of patients independent of atopic sensitization and demonstrated clinical efficacy in the treatment of CRSwNP and asthma. Inhibition of IgE can therefore be a promising treatment option in preventing NSAID hypersensitivity reactions in N-ERD patients.

Omalizumab effectiveness in patients with a previously failed oral immunotherapy for severe milk allergy

Background

Some studies addressed the issue of omalizumab (OML) effectiveness in children starting their first oral immunotherapy (OIT) attempt but no study investigated the possible role of OML in the setting of patients with persisting milk allergy after a failed OIT attempt.

Methods

Single‐center, prospective, observational study in a selected group of patients with a persisting and severe cow milk (CM) allergy associated with moderate allergic asthma, in which a previous OIT attempt had already failed. We performed an open oral food challenge (OFC) to identify patients who tolerated less than 173 mg of cow's milk protein. At the end of the recruitment, we have found four patients with a mean age of 16.25 years (8–24) who had suspended a previous OIT attempt and still reacted to an amount of CM equal or below 173 mg. Enrolled patients, after an 8‐week course of OML along with a CM avoiding diet, underwent again an open OFC with CM to re‐evaluate their threshold. Eventually, a new OIT course was started using the same OIT protocol of the previous attempt, maintaining cotreatment with OML for the first 12 months. For each patient, we documented: the threshold of CM at OFC, level of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and IgG4 for milk, and quality of life (QoL).

Results

During OIT the four patients experienced no reactions or extremely mild ones (oral itching, transient mild abdominal pain). All increased their threshold of CM in OML if compared with the baseline and maintained it long after that biologic therapy had discontinued. Specific milk proteins IgG4 levels significantly increased in all.

Conclusion

In this series, OML was effective in patients with severe CM allergy who had previously failed OIT, allowing milk intake without adverse reactions and improving the QoL.

The effect of COVID-19 on patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria treated with omalizumab and antihistamines: A cross-sectional, comparative study

Introduction

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is defined as recurrent attacks of urticaria present for more than six weeks. The monoclonal anti‐immunoglobulin E antibody, omalizumab, was approved for the treatment of CSU in patients who remain refractory to H1‐antihistamines. Biologic agents are shown not to increase the risk of COVID‐19 infection in different studies.

Objective

In the present study, we aimed to determine the prevalance of COVID‐19 infection in relation to the age, gender, presence of other comorbidities, and treatment given for CSU.

Methods

We conducted a descriptive cross‐sectional study of 233 patients diagnosed with CSU in a tertiary referral hospital. Demographical data, treatment given for CSU, the presence of COVID‐19‐related symptoms, history of close contact to a person with COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 real‐time polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) results were determined via a telephone survey and checked from medical data records.

Results

One hundred sixty patients were female; whereas 73 were male. The mean age was 44.76. Out of 233 patients with chronic urticaria, 125 had symptoms related to COVID‐19 infection. RT‐PCR testing for COVID‐19 was performed in 156 patients. Of 156 patients with COVID‐19 RT‐PCR test, RT‐PCR result was positive in 15 cases.

Conclusions

No statistically significant relationship was found between COVID‐19 RT‐PCR positivity and the type of treatment administered for chronic urticaria when the patients are divided into omalizumab ± oral antihistamines and only oral antihistamines treatment groups (p = 0.150). Omalizumab seems to be safe in the era of COVID‐19.

Omalizumab for prevention of anaphylactic episodes in a patient with severe mosquito allergy

Anaphylaxis after mosquito bite is rare, but life threatening. No approved preventive therapy is available to date, but omalizumab could be a promising therapeutic option for reducing risk and improving quality of life in these patients.

Omalizumab Effectiveness in Severe Allergic Asthma with Multiple Allergic Comorbidities: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the STELLAIR Study

Background

Immunoglobulin (Ig) E-mediated pathophysiological mechanisms are common in allergic diseases including severe allergic asthma (SAA). The anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab may be particularly beneficial for patients with SAA and multiple allergic comorbidities (AC) including perennial/seasonal rhinitis, conjunctivitis, atopic dermatitis (AD), and food allergy.

Methods

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the patients from the STELLAIR study (n=872, 149 minors and 723 adults). The patients were classified based on the presence of multiple AC (≥3 AC or <3 AC) or AD as assessed by questionnaire. Response to omalizumab was assessed after 4-6 months (T_4-6) and after 12 months (T₁₂). Asthma response at T_4-6 was based on global evaluation of treatment effectiveness, reduction of ≥40% in annual exacerbation rate, and a combination of both. Asthma response at T₁₂ was based on change in yearly exacerbation and hospitalization rates. AC improvement at T₁₂ was based on patient perception.

Results

Patients with ≥3 AC demonstrated a higher combined response to omalizumab (74.7% vs 58.3%) at T_4-6 and had reduced yearly exacerbation and hospitalization rates (88.9% vs 77.4% and -94.0% vs -70.5%, respectively). Patients with ≥3 AC were more likely to show an improvement in their AC (85.3% vs 51.9%) at T₁₂. Results were similar in minors and adults. The presence of AD was associated with greater omalizumab effectiveness at T_4-6 and a greater AC improvement at T₁₂. Improvement of AD and food allergies at T₁₂ were 73.2% and 38.7%, respectively, in the population overall.

Conclusion

This post-hoc analysis of the STELLAIR study shows that omalizumab is beneficial for all SAA patients and especially for patients with multiple AC or AD. In patients with ≥3 AC, omalizumab also improved AC outcomes.

Predictors of treatment response in chronic spontaneous urticaria

The current therapeutic algorithm for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), endorsed by the international guideline, entails treatment escalation from second-generation H₁ -antihistamines (sgAHs) to omalizumab and cyclosporine until complete response is achieved. Recently, several predictors of response to these treatment options have been described. Here, we discuss the most promising predictors of response and nonresponse to these treatments in CSU. A systematic search was performed by two independent researchers using the MEDLINE/PubMed database with specific keywords and 73 studies included in the review. Levels of evidence were categorized as strong (robust predictors), weak (emerging predictors) or no association, based on the outcome and number of studies available. High disease activity, high levels of C-reactive protein and D-dimer are robust predictors for a poor or no response to sgAHs. Poor or no response to omalizumab is robustly predicted by low serum levels of total IgE. A good response to cyclosporine is robustly predicted by a positive basophil histamine release assay, whereas low total IgE is an emerging predictor. The response to treatment with sgAHs, omalizumab and cyclosporine can be predicted by the use of markers that are readily available in routine clinical practice. Further studies are needed to confirm these predictors.

Real-life Cretan asthma registry focused on severe asthma: On behalf of 'The Cretan registry of the use of Biologics in Severe Asthma'

Asthma diagnosis and management remains a challenging task for the medical community. The aim of the present study was to present the functional and inflammatory profiles of patients with difficult-to-treat asthma in a real-life clinical setting referred to the specialized asthma clinic at the University Hospital of Heraklion. The registry included a cohort of 267 patients who were referred to the severe asthma clinic. Patients were assessed with emphasis on the history of allergies, nasal polyposis or other comorbidities. Blood testing for eosinophils counts and total and specific IgE, and pulmonary function tests were performed at baseline. The median age of patients with asthma was 55 years old, 68.5% were women and 58.3% were never smokers. The vast majority presented with late onset asthma (75.7%), whereas eight (3%) patients were on oral corticosteroids. The median number of exacerbations during the last 12 months was 1 (0-3). Furthermore, 50.7% of patients had a positive serum allergy test, the median eosinophil count was 300 (188-508.5) cells/µl of blood and median total IgE level was 117.5 (29.4-360.5) IU/ml. Patients were retrospectively grouped in the following categories: Group 1, mild-moderate asthma; group 2, patients prescribed a step 4 or 5 asthma therapy according to Global Initiative for Asthma; and group 3, patients on biologic agents. Group 1 had significantly higher FEV1% than groups 2 and 3 (93.4 vs. 79.9 and 79.4%, respectively; P<0.001). Finally, the median Asthma Control Questionnaire 7 (ACQ7) score was 1.14, with patients from groups 2 and 3 presenting higher ACQ7 scores compared with group 1 patients as expected (1.1 and 2.1 vs. 0.7, respectively; P<0.001). To the best of our knowledge, this was the first real-life asthma study in Crete that demonstrated that severe asthmatics predominantly have late-onset asthma with airflow obstruction and uncontrolled symptoms.

Comparative efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies and aspirin desensitization for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is an inflammatory condition of the upper airways. Optimal management is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effects of mAbs and aspirin desensitization (ASA-D) for treatment of CRSwNP.

METHODS

We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, US Food and Drug Administration, and the European Medicines Agency databases from inception to August 4, 2021, for randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of mAbs and ASA-D for CRSwNP. We conducted network meta-analysis of sinusitis symptoms, heath-related quality of life, rescue oral corticosteroids and surgery, endoscopic and radiologic scores, and adverse events. We used the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess certainty of evidence. PROSPERO CRD42020177334.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine randomized controlled trials evaluating 8 treatments (n = 3461) were included in the network meta-analysis. Compared to placebo, moderate to high certainty evidence showed that health-related quality of life (SNOT-22) improved with dupilumab (mean difference [MD] -19.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) -22.50, -17.32]), omalizumab (MD -16.09 [95% CI -19.88, -12.30]), mepolizumab (MD -12.89 [95% CI -16.58, -9.19], ASA-D (MD -10.61 [95% CI -14.51, -6.71]), and benralizumab (MD -7.68 [95% CI -12.09, -3.27]). The risk of rescue nasal polyp surgery likely decreased with dupilumab (risk difference [RD] -16.35% [95% CI -18.13, -13.48]), omalizumab (RD -7.40% [95% CI -11.04, -2.43]), mepolizumab (RD -12.33% [95% CI -15.56, -7.22]), and ASA-D (RD -16.00% [95% CI -19.79, 0.21]; all moderate certainty). Comparisons among agents show with moderate to high certainty that dupilumab ranks among the most beneficial for 7 of 7 outcomes, omalizumab for 2 of 7, mepolizumab for 1 of 7, and ASA-D for 1 of 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple biologics and ASA-D credibly improve patient-important outcomes, with clinically important differences in effects among agents; dupilumab uniquely ranks among the most beneficial for all outcomes studied.

Cryptococcosis in the Vocal Cords, Trachea, and Bronchi

Laryngeal and endobronchial cryptococcosis are rare conditions, and to our knowledge, there have been only 23 cases of laryngeal cryptococcosis, and 18 cases of endobronchial cryptococcosis previously reported in the English literature. We herein report an extremely rare case of cryptococcosis with simultaneous laryngeal and endobronchial involvement. This case highlights the importance of paying close attention to possible occurrence of cryptococcosis of the airway tract in patients with asthma treated with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

Long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab for nasal polyposis in an open-label extension study

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) frequently remains uncontrolled despite maximal medical therapy and sinonasal surgery, presenting several unmet needs and challenges. Omalizumab previously demonstrated efficacy in CRSwNP in duplicate phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (POLYP 1, POLYP 2).

OBJECTIVE

This open-label extension evaluated the continued efficacy, safety, and durability of response of omalizumab in adults with CRSwNP who completed POLYP 1 or 2.

METHODS

After 24 weeks of omalizumab or placebo in POLYP 1 and 2, patients (n = 249) received open-label omalizumab plus background nasal mometasone therapy for 28 weeks and were subsequently followed for 24 weeks after omalizumab discontinuation. Efficacy end points assessed change from baseline for the coprimary end points, Nasal Polyp Score and Nasal Congestion Score, and the secondary end points of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22, Total Nasal Symptom Score and its components, and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test scores. Safety objectives included incidence of adverse events and adverse events leading to omalizumab discontinuation.

RESULTS

Patients who continued omalizumab experienced further improvements across coprimary end points and secondary end points through 52 weeks. Patients who switched from placebo to omalizumab experienced favorable responses across end points through week 52 that were similar to POLYP 1 and 2 at week 24. After omalizumab discontinuation, scores gradually worsened over the 24-week follow-up, but remained improved from pretreatment levels for both groups. The safety profile was similar to previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety profile from this study supports extended omalizumab treatment up to 1 year for CRSwNP with inadequate response to nasal corticosteroids.

Cost-utility of omalizumab for the treatment of uncontrolled moderate-to-severe persistent pediatric allergic asthma in a middle-income country

OBJECTIVES

Although several randomized clinical trials performed in children 6 years and older with Omalizumab as add-on therapy have reported improvements in diverse clinical outcomes, the evidence regarding its cost effectiveness is not sufficient, especially in less-affluent countries, where the clinical and economic burden of the disease is the greatest. The aim of the present study was to perform a cost-utility analysis of adding omalizumab to standard treatment for treating pediatric patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma in Colombia, a middle-income country (MIC).

METHODS

A Markov-type model was developed to estimate costs and health outcomes of a simulated cohort of pediatric patients with persistent asthma treated over a 5-year period. The effectiveness data and transition probabilities were obtained from various sources, including systematic reviews with meta-analysis. Cost data were obtained from official databases provided by the Colombian Ministry of Health. The study was carried out from the perspective of the national healthcare system in Colombia. The main outcome was the variable ''quality-adjusted life-years'' (QALYs).

RESULTS

For the base-case analysis, the cost-utility analysis showed that compared with the standard treatment strategy, the omalizumab strategy involved higher costs (US$72,142.3 vs. $20,243.4 average cost per patient) and greater gain in QALYs (0.8718 vs. 0.8222 QALYs on average per patient). The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of omalizumab compared with standard treatment was US$82,748.1 per QALY CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that in Colombia, an MIC, compared with standard treatment, omalizumab is not a cost-effective strategy for treating pediatric patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma.

Biologics Beyond Boundaries: Innovative Use of Biologics in Dermatology

Several biologic agents have been approved for use in dermatology and other disciplines of medicine. However, based on the mechanism of action and a track record of the response, these agents are being increasingly used for off-label purposes to garner control of more remote and difficult disease processes. Herein, we present three difficult to treat patients where innovative uses of biologics beyond their approved indications have yielded good responses. Our first patient was a case of bullous pemphigoid, who showed excellent response to omalizumab. The second case was a patient of lepromatous leprosy with tenosynovitis and erythema nodosum leprosum, who was treated effectively with infliximab. Our third case was a treatment-resistant pyoderma gangrenosum, where infliximab showed a very good response. In the present study, we report the cases to highlight the usefulness of biologics that can expand much beyond the routine FDA approved indications.

Real-Life Benefit of Omalizumab in Improving Control of Bronchial Asthma During COVID-19 Pandemic

Biologic therapy is recommended by Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines in asthma patients not controlled with maximal inhaled therapy corresponding to GINA step 4. Omalizumab is an anti- immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody and the first biological available for the add-on treatment of severe allergic asthma, approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2003. Diagnosing and managing asthma patients during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic since early 2020 has been challenging, mainly due to the risk of contracting COVID-19 disease and to the limited access to hospital care and pulmonary function tests. We report a case of a 52-year-old female patient, diagnosed with adult-onset asthma in 2018, who was first referred to the Allergy Department of our hospital in January 2019 for dyspnea, wheezing, and worsening cough. Despite continuous inhaled therapy and good inhalation technique, she had frequent asthma symptoms, requiring short courses of oral corticosteroids (CS). Physical examination and pulmonary function tests on admission revealed broncho-obstructive syndrome and laboratory tests showed mild inflammation and high total serum IgE. She continued to have two moderate-severe exacerbations after stepping up to maximal inhaled therapy plus oral montelukast and theophylline, according to GINA step 4. By the end of 2019, we additionally started omalizumab, which resulted in prompt clinical benefits and resolution of asthma symptoms. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic limiting in-person visits, virtual follow-ups indicated adequate control of his symptoms, as proved by asthma control test and no need for hospital presentation.

Roles of IgE and Histamine in Mast Cell Maturation

Mast cells are activated upon immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated antigen stimulation, and release a wide variety of mediators, including histamine to trigger inflammatory responses. The surface expression levels of Fcε receptor I (FcεRI), a high affinity receptor of IgE, were found to be positively regulated by IgE. IgE could protect murine cultured mast cells from apoptotic cell death induced by the deprivation of interleukin-3 and a certain kind of IgE could activate immature mast cells in the absence of antigens, leading to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and a transient increase in histamine synthesis. Histamine synthesis in mast cells was found to be required for the maturation of murine connective tissue-type mast cells, raising the possibility that IgE indirectly modulates local mast cell maturation. Although it remains controversial to what extent this concept of "monomeric IgE effects" could have relevance in the modulation of human mast cell functions, the therapeutic effects of anti-IgE antibodies might be accounted for in terms of the decreased serum IgE concentrations. Because drastic increases in serum IgE concentrations are often observed in patients with atopic dermatitis and chronic urticaria, a close investigation of the roles of IgE in mast cell maturation should contribute to development of novel therapeutic approaches for these inflammatory diseases.

Acceptance and Results of Therapy with Omalizumab in Real world Kerala setting - Reports from the ARTWORK study, Kerala, South India

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of effective medications, only a minority of asthma patients achieve guideline defined asthma control. Treatment success depends on patient concurrence to the prescribed drug and adherence to treatment. It is therefore crucial to identify the patient preferences as well as attitudes towards asthma medications. Omalizumab is recommended as a preferred option in step five of asthma therapy. There have been few studies to address patient perspectives on omalizumab therapy in India.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Patients with inadequate asthma control were considered for the study. Systematic evaluation was done to identify and correct modifiable factors that can worsen asthma control. Patients with persisting poor asthma control who were deemed suitable to receive this agent were evaluated with their attitudes towards acceptance or refusal and the reasons for opting out were noted. The patients who received omalizumab were followed up to determine the results of treatment and duration of adherence to therapy.

RESULTS

35 patients out of 51 patients chose to avoid this drug. The reasons for opting out included erroneous perception of optimal asthma control, cost of therapy, and concern about adverse effects. Patients took omalizumab for a median duration of 6 months. Improved asthma control and decreased frequency of exacerbation was noted in all patients which persisted during the six month follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Majority of patients needing step five therapy opt out of omalizumab. Cost of drug, duration of therapy and erroneous perception of good asthma control account for refusing treatment. Omalizumab affords excellent clinical benefits to patients who receive it, and the benefits extend beyond the duration of therapy.

Effectiveness and Safety Studies of Omalizumab in Children and Adolescents With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab is currently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe allergic asthma in patients 6 years and older.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous omalizumab as an add-on therapy option for moderate-severe allergic asthma in patients aged 6-20 years old.

METHODS

The studies published from July, 1970 to May, 2021 were searched from the electronic databases which followed keywords: ("anti-IgE" OR "anti-immunoglobulin E" OR "anti-IgE antibody" OR "omalizumab" OR "rhuMAb-E25" OR "Xolair") AND "asthma" AND ("child" OR "children" OR "adolescents" OR "youth" OR "teenager" OR "kids" OR "pediatric"). Thirteen studies were pooled to determine the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab. Efficacy endpoints were evaluated using a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model depending on heterogeneity. Safety endpoints were evaluated by odds ratio.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included. In this meta-analysis, our results showed that fractional exhaled nitric oxide and asthma control test scores were significantly improved with omalizumab treatment. Serum immunoglobulin E was also decreased in children with moderate-to-severe asthma after treatment with omalizumab. The analysis found that there was no significant difference between pre-and post-treatment in forced expiratory volume in one second/ forced vital capacity ratio, forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of vital capacity, or FEV1. Overall, more adverse events occurred with omalizumab compared to placebo. However, the degree was mild to moderate.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicates that omalizumab is safe and effective to treat children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Updates in the Diagnosis and Management of Linear IgA Disease: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: Linear IgA disease (LAD) is a rare autoimmune blistering disease with linear IgA deposits along the basement membrane zone. Direct immunofluorescence remains the gold standard for diagnosis, but other diagnostic measures reported in recent literature have proven useful in the setting of inconclusive preliminary results. Dapsone is a commonly used treatment, but many therapeutic agents have emerged in recent years. The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of updates on the diagnosis and management of LAD. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted from May to June of 2021 for articles published in the last 5 years that were related to the diagnosis and management of LAD. Results: False-negative results in cases of drug-induced LAD and the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies on immunofluorescence studies were reported. Serration pattern analysis has been reported to be useful in distinguishing LAD from sublamina densa-type LAD. Rituximab, omalizumab, etanercept, IVIg, sulfonamides, topical corticosteroids, and others have been used successfully in adult and pediatric patients with varying disease severity. Topical corticosteroids were preferred for pediatric patients while rituximab and IVIg were used in adults with recalcitrant LAD. Sulfonamides were utilized in places without access to dapsone. Conclusion: In cases where preliminary biopsy results are negative and clinical suspicion is high, repeat biopsy and additional diagnostic studies should be used. Patient factors such as age, medical comorbidities, and disease severity play a role in therapeutic selection.

Defining the Efficacy of Omalizumab in Nasal Polyposis: A POLYP 1 and POLYP 2 Subgroup Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease with variable underlying pathophysiologies. Numerous patient factors have been linked to differences in disease severity, control, and response to treatment, including asthma status, aspirin sensitivity, previous sinonasal surgery, and blood eosinophil levels.

OBJECTIVE

The present study examines the efficacy of the anti-immunoglobulin E therapy, omalizumab, versus placebo in patients with CRSwNP from the replicate POLYP 1 (NCT03280550) and POLYP 2 (NCT03280537) trials, grouped by inherent patient characteristics to determine the response to therapy.

METHODS

Patients in prespecified subgroups from POLYP 1 and POLYP 2 (studies pooled for analysis) were examined. Subgroups included blood eosinophil count at baseline (>300 or ≤300 cells/μL), previous sinonasal surgery (yes or no), asthma status (yes or no), and aspirin sensitivity status (yes or no). Subgroups were examined for subgroup-specific adjusted mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) (omalizumab-placebo) in change from baseline at week 24 in Nasal Congestion Score (NCS), Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT).

RESULTS

Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) (omalizumab-placebo) in NCS, NPS, SNOT-22, TNSS, and UPSIT change from baseline at week 24 consistently favored omalizumab treatment over placebo in patients with blood eosinophil count >300 and ≤300 cells/μL, with or without previous sinonasal surgery, asthma, and aspirin sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Together, these data suggest broad efficacy of omalizumab across clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with CRSwNP, independent of the underlying patient factors examined, including those with high eosinophil levels and those who have undergone previous surgery, which are associated with high recurrence.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: POLYP 1: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03280550 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280550); POLYP 2: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03280537 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280537).

The role of omalizumab in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitits with nasal polyposis

Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) poses a significant healthcare challenge, with diminished quality of life for patients and high costs and resource utilization for disease management. The understanding of CRSwNP pathophysiology has progressed with identification of various inflammatory biomarkers and subsequent development of monoclonal antibodies that target the underlying mechanisms of inflammation.Areas covered: Omalizumab is a biologic agent for CRSwNP treatment that targets immunoglobulin (Ig)-E. The US FDA has approved the use of omalizumab as an add-on biologic therapy for nasal polyposis in December 2020. Two Phase III clinical trials, POLYP 1 and POLYP 2, have shown that omalizumab improves both subjective patient-reported outcomes and objective physician-evaluated metrics for CRSwNP. Ongoing studies are still exploring the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of biologics for CRSwNP.Expert opinion: Biologics will continue develop as a viable management option for CRSwNP. Omalizumab is regarded as a promising addition to current treatment strategies for refractory disease.

Reduction/elimination of blood eosinophils in severe asthma: should there be a safety consideration?

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophils play a central role in the inflammation of asthma and are the target of new biologic treatments for patients with severe asthma. Biologics targeting the IL-5 pathway have been shown to reduce asthma exacerbations, improve lung function, reduce oral corticosteroid use, and improve quality of life, accompanied by reduced or even eliminated blood eosinophils. Eosinophils have been associated with host protection and tumor growth, raising potential concerns about the consequences of these long-term therapies that reduce or eliminate them.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we explore the current safety profile of biologics regarding the impact they may have on blood eosinophils, trying to answer the question about any safety consideration.

EXPERT OPINION

Eosinophils have been associated with host protection and tumor growth, raising potential concerns about the consequences of long-term therapies that reduce or eliminate these blood cells.

Therapeutic potential of biologics in prurigo nodularis

INTRODUCTION

Prurigo nodularis (PN) or chronic prurigo of nodular type (CNPG) is a subtype of chronic prurigo with severe pruritus and neuroimmune underlying pathophysiology occurring in a plethora of dermatological, systemic, neurologic, and psychiatric conditions.

AREAS COVERED 

We review the increasing repertoire of biologics in the treatment of CNPG focusing on those targeting interleukins 4, 13, 31, oncostatin M and IgE. Presented information is based on a database research on current clinical trials (clinicaltrials.gov, European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), US clinical trial registry ICH-GCP) and a PubMed search for latest publications conducted with the combinations of the terms 'chronic prurigo,' 'prurigo nodularis,' 'pathophysiology,' 'treatment,' 'therapy', and 'biologics.'

EXPERT OPINION

CNPG gets more and more attention as new therapeutic targets have been revealed in recent years, thus allowing the use of targeted approaches. The off-label advent of dupilumab offered advanced insight into the pathogenesis of CNPG and showed an impressive relief of pruritus in the vast majority of patients. New therapies including biologics (e.g. nemolizumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab), small molecules (e.g. neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, janus kinase inhibitors) as well as mu-opioid receptor antagonists and nalbuphine, a μ-antagonist/κ-agonist, are in the pipeline and offer new hope for an improved future patient care.

Acute Interstitial Nephritis: A Rare and Unusual Side Effect of Omalizumab

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a relatively common cause of acute kidney injury with etiologies that include drug therapy, infections, and systemic diseases. Of these etiologies, drug therapy accounts for ~70% of AIN cases. Although any drug can cause AIN, there are no reported cases of AIN caused by omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits circulating immunoglobulin E. In this article, we share the first reported case of AIN following administration of omalizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe persistent asthma.

Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A systematic review for the EAACI guidelines

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of biologicals for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) compared with the standard of care. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs. Critical and important CRSwNP-related outcomes were considered. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. RCTs evaluated (dupilumab-2, omalizumab-4, mepolizumab-2, and reslizumab-1) included 1236 adults, with follow-up of 20-64 weeks. Dupilumab reduces the need for surgery (NFS) or oral corticosteroid (OCS) use (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.20-0.39, moderate certainty) and improves with high certainty smell evaluated with UPSIT score (mean difference (MD) +10.54; 95% CI +9.24 to +11.84) and quality of life (QoL) evaluated with SNOT-22 (MD -19.14; 95% CI -22.80 to -15.47), with fewer treatment-related adverse events (TAEs) (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.89-1.02, moderate certainty). Omalizumab reduces NFS (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.78-0.92, high certainty), decreases OCS use (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.10-1.38, moderate certainty), and improves high certainty smell (MD +3.84; 95% CI +3.64 to +4.04) and QoL (MD -15.65; 95% CI -16.16 to -15.13), with increased TAE (RR 1.73; 95% CI 0.60-5.03, moderate certainty). There is low certainty for mepolizumab reducing NFS (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.64-0.94) and improving QoL (MD -13.3; 95% CI -23.93 to -2.67) and smell (MD +0.7; 95% CI -0.48 to +1.88), with increased TAEs (RR 1.64; 95% CI 0.41-6.50). The evidence for reslizumab is very uncertain.

Oral immunotherapy in severe cow's milk allergic patients treated with omalizumab: Real life survey from a Spanish registry

BACKGROUND

Oral immunotherapy is a frequent treatment for the management of food allergies, but adverse events (AE) are common. This study assessed the outcome of cow's milk oral immunotherapy (MOIT) in severe cow`s milk-allergic patients treated with omalizumab in a real-life setting.

METHODS

OmaBASE was a national, multicenter, open, and observational registry that collected clinical, immunologic, and treatment from patients with food allergy receiving omalizumab.

RESULTS

Data derived from 58 patients aged 10.3 years (IQR 6.3-13.2) and median milk-specific IgE 100 kU_A /L at the start of omalizumab treatment. Most had experienced anaphylaxis by accidental exposures (70.7%) and had asthma (81.0%). Omalizumab in monotherapy induced tolerance to ≥6000 mg of cow's milk protein (CMP) to 34.8% of patients tested by oral food challenge. Omalizumab combined with MOIT conferred desensitization to ≥6000 mg of CMP to 83.0% of patients. Omalizumab withdrawal triggered more AE (P = .013) and anaphylaxis (P = .001) than no discontinuation. Anaphylaxis was observed in 36.4% of patients who discontinued omalizumab, and more in those with sudden (50.0%) rather than progressive (12.5%) discontinuation. At database closure, 40.5% of patients who had completed follow-up tolerated CMP without omalizumab (7.2% 1500-4500 mg; 33.3% ≥6000 mg).

CONCLUSION

Milk oral immunotherapy initiated under omalizumab allows the desensitization of subjects with severe cow's milk allergy even after omalizumab discontinuation. However, discontinuation of omalizumab can lead to severe AE and should be carefully monitored.

Effectiveness of omalizumab in children and adolescents with uncontrolled allergic asthma: a case series from Poland

Introduction

Omalizumab has been successfully used as a supplementary therapy to improve asthma control in children aged ≥ 6 years with moderate or severe persistent allergic asthma.

Aim

To evaluate effectiveness ofomalizumab in children and adolescents with uncontrolled allergic asthma.

Material and methods

Seventeen children and adolescents aged 8–16, treated with omalizumab from 2011 until now, were enrolled into the retrospective, open, uncontrolled, observational study. The effectiveness of therapy, asthma control, quality of life, exacerbation rate, corticosteroid use, were assessed after 16, 52 and 104 weeks of treatment and after omalizumab cessation.

Results

The response to treatment was assessed as excellent (9 patients) and good (6 patients), according to global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE). A statistically significant decrease in use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) was observed. The doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) decreased significantly (the mean dose of ICS converted to a dose of budesonide before treatment was 1503.53 μg/day versus 903.53 μg after discontinuation). The mean asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) value decreased from 2.10 to 0.84 points and the mean mini asthma quality of life questionnaire (miniAQLQ) outcome increased from 4.37 to 6.1 points. The mean number of exacerbations decreased from 5.59 to 0.53 per year.

Conclusions

Our results are supportive of the existing evidence that omalizumab therapy improves asthma control, reduces OCS and ICS use, decreases exacerbations in children and adolescents with severe/moderate uncontrolled allergic asthma.

Tuning IgE: IgE-Associating Molecules and Their Effects on IgE-Dependent Mast Cell Reactions

The recent emergence of anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) drugs and their candidates for humans has endorsed the significance of IgE-dependent pathways in allergic disorders. IgE is distributed locally in the tissues or systemically to confer a sensory mechanism in a domain of adaptive immunity to the otherwise innate type of effector cells, namely, mast cells and basophils. Bound on the high-affinity IgE receptor FcεRI, IgE enables fast memory responses against revisiting threats of venoms, parasites, and bacteria. However, the dysregulation of IgE-dependent reactions leads to potentially life-threatening allergic diseases, such as asthma and anaphylaxis. Therefore, reactivity of the IgE sensor is fine-tuned by various IgE-associating molecules. In this review, we discuss the mechanistic basis for how IgE-dependent mast cell activation is regulated by the IgE-associating molecules, including the newly developed therapeutic candidates.

Systemic and local evidence for complement involvement in chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background

The pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), including the mechanism of action of omalizumab, remain unclear. We hypothesized complement system involvement given the often fast clinical response induced by treatment, including omalizumab. Therefore, we assessed the role of various complement factors surrounding omalizumab treatment.

Methods

Thirty CSU patients (median age 42 [range 21-70]; 73 % female) with a median once daily Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7) score at baseline of 31.5 points were enrolled. Treatment consisted of six administrations of 300 mg omalizumab every 4 weeks succeeded by a follow-up period of 12 weeks. Four punch skin biopsies were taken per patient; at baseline from lesional skin, at baseline from nonlesional skin, and after 1 and 7 days from formerly lesional skin. Complement activity, including C1q, C3, C3bc/C3, C4, C4bc/C4, C5a, and Membrane Attack Complex in peripheral blood were analyzed and complement activation in the skin was determined by the analysis of C4d deposition. Results were related to the clinical response to omalizumab.

Results

Fifteen patients showed a UAS7 score of 6 or lower (median 0) at Week 24, 15 patients did not (median 16). Lesional skin biopsies at baseline revealed complement deposition (C4d) in blood vessels in the papillary dermis of 53% (16/30) of the patients, which suggests involvement of immune complexes in the pathogenesis of urticaria. Moreover, indication of increased complement activation in CSU was substantiated by increased C5a levels in peripheral blood compared to healthy controls (p = 0.010). The clinical effect of omalizumab could not be linked to the variation of complement components.

Conclusions

Both C4d deposition in lesional skin and elevated C5a levels in peripheral blood indicate the involvement of complement activation in the pathogenesis of CSU. No correlation was found between omalizumab and activation of complement indicative of independent processes in the immunopathogenesis of CSU.