Paroxetine in human milk

AIMS

The primary aims of the study were to estimate the exposure of infants to paroxetine via breast milk and to determine the maternal milk:plasma ratio (M/P) of paroxetine. Secondary aims were to compare single point and area under the curve (AUC) estimates of M/P, to assess variability of M/P in fore and hind milk, and to compare the observed M/P with that predicted by a model.

METHODS

Two studies were performed. In one study, six nursing mothers who were being treated with paroxetine were studied over a 24 h dose interval at steady-state. The total amount of paroxetine in the milk was measured, which represented the 'dose' to the infant. The M/PAUC was calculated and compared with a predicted value. In the second study, four nursing mothers who were being treated with paroxetine, were studied at steady-state, around a normal infant feeding time. A single plasma sample and a prefeed milk sample were taken approximately 3 h after the morning dose of paroxetine, and a postfeed milk sample taken around 1 h later. The dose received by the infant was estimated from the average milk concentrations of the pre and postfeed samples using standard assumptions, and M/P calculated directly. Plasma concentrations of paroxetine were measured in 8 of the 10 infants in the two studies.

RESULTS

The mean dose of paroxetine received by the infants in the first study was 1.13% (range 0.5-1.7) of the weight adjusted maternal dose. The mean M/PAUC was 0.39 (range 0.32-0.51). The predicted M/P was 0.22. The mean dose of paroxetine received by the infants in the second study was 1.25% (range 0.38-2.24) of the weight adjusted maternal dose. The mean M/P was 0.96 (range 0.31-3.33) and did not differ between fore and hind milk. The drug was not detected in the plasma of seven of the infants studied and was detected but not quantifiable (<4 microg l-1 ) in one infant. No adverse effects were observed in any of the infants.

CONCLUSIONS

Measured M/P and estimated infant dose were similar in the two studies, although the range was wider for the single point study. Paroxetine can be considered 'safe' during breast feeding because the dose transferred to the infant is well below the recommended safety limit of 10% of the weight adjusted maternal dose, concentrations in the infants were generally undetectable, and no adverse effects were reported.

Excretion of paroxetine into breast milk

BACKGROUND

The study was carried out to quantify the excretion of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine in breast milk.

METHOD

In 6 lactating women, the concentrations of paroxetine in breast milk and serum were studied at the times for assumed minimum (24 hours after dose intake) and maximum (4-7 hours after dose intake) drug levels in milk. Moreover, a seventh subject was studied with frequent and regular sampling throughout a dose interval of 24 hours at 2 different dose levels.

RESULTS

The mean milk/serum concentration ratios in the first 6 subjects ranged from 0.39 to 1.11 (overall mean +/- SD = 0.69 +/- 0.29), and the mean estimated dose to the infants ranged from 0.7% to 2.9% (overall mean +/- SD = 1.4% +/- 0.79%) of the weight-adjusted maternal dose. Based on area-under-the-curve data from the seventh subject, the milk/serum concentration ratio was 0.69 at a dose of 20 mg/day and 0.72 at a dose of 40 mg/day; the estimated relative doses to the infant were 1.0% and 2.0%, respectively. The mean increase in milk paroxetine concentrations from assumed minimum to assumed maximum was 61% (range, 4%-172%; p < .01). The mean paroxetine concentration in hindmilk was 78% higher than in foremilk (range, 16%-169%; p < .01), an increase that was parallel to the increase in milk triglyceride levels (r = 0.83, p = .005). No adverse drug reactions or unusual behaviors were reported in the infants.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that the relative dose to a suckling infant for paroxetine is lower than that reported for fluoxetine and citalopram and higher than that reported for sertraline and fluvoxamine.

Determination of paroxetine in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography for bioequivalence studies

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method is described for the determination of paroxetine in human plasma. Dibucaine was used as the internal standard. Paroxetine was isolated by solid phase extraction using a Bond-Elut C18 extraction column. Separation was obtained using a reversed-phase column under isocratic conditions with fluorescence detection. The sample volume was 500 microliters of plasma. The intra- and inter-assay accuracy and precision, determined as relative error and relative standard deviation, respectively, were less than 10%. The lower limit of quantitation, based on standards with acceptable relative error and relative standard deviation, was 10 ng ml-1. No endogenous compounds were found to interfere. The linearity was assessed in the range 5-100 ng ml-1. Stability of paroxetine during processing (autosampler) and in plasma was checked. This method proved suitable for bioequivalence studies following multiple doses in healthy volunteers.

Genetic variation in the serotonin transporter promoter region affects serotonin uptake in human blood platelets

The human serotonin transporter (5-HTT), encoded by a single gene on chromosome 17q11.2, is expressed in brain and blood cells. 5-HTT is implicated in mood and anxiety regulation, and is where antidepressant and antianxiety drugs initially act in the brain. A 5-HTT-linked promoter region (5-HTTLPR) insertion/deletion polymorphism with long (l) and short (s) forms affects transporter expression and function. The s variant reduced 5-HTT gene transcription in a reporter gene construct and human lymphoblasts, resulting in reduced transporter levels and 5-HT uptake, acting as a dominant allele. In this study, we investigated the expression and function of 5-HTT in platelets from healthy male volunteers. The l variant was associated with more rapid initial platelet 5-HT uptake (Vmax), the index of platelet 5-HTT function most clearly heritable, while the s allele was dominant. The 5-HTTLPR genotype had no effect on platelet [3H]paroxetine binding (Bmax), affinity for [3H]5-HT or [3H]paroxetine, or 5-HT content. The 5-HT uptake findings support a functional difference in the two 5-HTTLPR variants, reinforcing their attractiveness as candidate genes in neuropsychiatric research.

Lack of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between rizatriptan and paroxetine

Rizatriptan is a potent, oral 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist with a rapid onset of action being investigated for the acute treatment of migraine. This study examined the clinical and pharmacolinetic interaction between rizatriptan and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine. In this two-period crossover study, 12 healthy young subjects (6 males and 6 females) received 1 mg rizatriptan following 14 days of treatment with placebo or paroxetine (20 mg once daily). Plasma was sampled for rizatriptan and N-monodesmethyl rizatriptan, a minor but active metabolite of rizatriptan. Safety evaluations included monitoring for adverse events, vital signs, and visual analog scale assessment of mood. Plasma levels of rizatriptan and N-monodesmethyl rizatriptan were not altered when rizatriptan was administered with paroxetine compared to the placebo. Clinically, coadministration of rizatriptan with paroxetine was well tolerated. Blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature changes during the observation period did not differ to a clinically significant degree when rizatriptan was administered with paroxetine compared to the placebo. No effects on mood occurred following treatment with the combination compared to rizatriptan alone. Adverse events following rizatriptan administration with paroxetine were similar to those reported when rizatriptan was given with the placebo.

Serotonergic and noradrenergic markers of post-traumatic stress disorder with and without major depression

Some studies have suggested that disorders in the peripheral and central metabolism of serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NE) may play roles in the pathophysiology of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This study examines (1) the availability of plasma total tryptophan, the precursor of 5-HT, and tyrosine, the precursor of NE; and (2) the platelet 5-HT transporter and alpha 2-adrenoceptor (alpha 2-AR) binding sites in patients with PTSD and healthy volunteers. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was employed to measure plasma tryptophan and tyrosine as well as amino acids known to compete with the same cerebral transport system; that is, valine, leucine, phenylalanine, and isoleucine. The maximum number of binding sites (Bmax) and their affinity (Kd) for binding to [3H]-paroxetine and [3H]-rauwolscine, a selective alpha 2-AR antagonist, were determined. [3H]-paroxetine and [3H]-rauwolscine binding Kd values were significantly higher in patients with PTSD than in healthy volunteers. [3H]-rauwolscine binding Kd values were significantly higher in patients with PTSD and concurrent major depression (MD) than in PTSD patients without MD and healthy volunteers. Plasma tyrosine concentrations and the ratio of tyrosine/valine + leucine + isoleucine + phenylalanine + tryptophan were significantly higher in PTSD patients with MD than in those without MD and healthy volunteers. The results show that PTSD is accompanied by lower affinity of paroxetine binding sites and that PTSD with concurrent MD is accompanied by lower affinity of alpha 2-ARs and increased plasma tyrosine availability to the brain. The results suggest that (1) serotonergic mechanisms, such as defects in the 5-HT transporter system, may play a role in the pathophysiology of PTSD; and (2) that catecholaminergic mechanisms, such as increased precursor availability and lowered affinity of alpha 2-ARs, may play a role in the pathophysiology of PTSD with concurrent MD.

Altered [3H]imipramine and 5-HT2 but not [3H]paroxetine binding sites in platelets from depressed patients

BACKGROUND

Serotonergic system alterations were studied in 51 depressed patients classified according to DSM-III-R criteria for major depression with melancholia compared to 31 healthy controls.

METHOD

[3H]Imipramine and [3H]paroxetine binding sites and the 5HT2 receptor were simultaneously determined in blood platelet membranes.

RESULTS

A significantly lower maximum binding in [3H]imipramine binding was observed in depressed patients compared to controls (1134+/-74 vs. 1712+/-106 fmol/mg protein, P<0.0001) without changes in the equilibrium dissociation constant (1.10+0.05 vs. 1.25-/+0.09 nM). [3H]Paroxetine binding did not differ between the two groups (Bmax, 1441+/-55 vs. 1280+/-81 fmol/mg protein; Kd, 0.060+/-0.002 vs. 0.062+/-0.002 nM). The K(d) value of 5HT2 binding was lower in depressed patients than controls (0.95+/-0.04 vs. 1.15+/-0.09 nM, P<0.039) without changes in maximum binding (140+/-11 vs. 127+/-14 fmol/mg protein).

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results suggest that [3H]imipramine and 5HT2 receptors may be good biological markers for serotonergic dysfunction in depressive disorders.

Reduced brain serotonin transporter availability in major depression as measured by [123I]-2 beta-carbomethoxy-3 beta-(4-iodophenyl)tropane and single photon emission computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Prior research has suggested reductions in the density of serotonin transporter (SERT) binding sites in blood platelets and post-mortem brain tissue of depressed patients. We sought to determine whether patients with unipolar major depression have diminished SERT availability as assessed by both brainstem [123I] beta-CIT SPECT and platelet [3H]paroxetine binding.

METHODS

Drug-free depressed and healthy subjects were injected with 211 +/- 22 MBq [123I] beta-CIT and imaged 24 +/- 2 h later under equilibrium conditions. A ratio of specific to nonspecific brain uptake (V3" = (brainstem-occipital)/occipital), a measure proportional to the binding potential (Bmax/Kd), was used for all comparisons.

RESULTS

Results showed a statistically significant reduction in brainstem V3" values in depressed as compared to healthy subjects (3.1 +/- .9 vs. 3.8 +/- .8, p = .02). Platelet [3H]paroxetine binding was not altered (Bmax = 2389 +/- 484 vs. 2415 +/- 538 fmol/mg protein, p = .91) and was not significantly correlated with brainstem [123I] beta-CIT binding (r = -0.14, p = .48).

CONCLUSIONS

These data are the first to suggest reductions in the density of brain SERT binding sites in living depressed patients. These findings provide further support for a preeminent role for alterations in serotonergic neurons in the pathophysiology of depression.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of buspirone in combination with an SSRI in patients with treatment-refractory depression

BACKGROUND

Case reports and open studies have reported beneficial therapeutic effects of adding buspirone to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) in the management of treatment-refractory depression. This is the first placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination.

METHOD

One hundred nineteen patients (82 women, 37 men) who fulfilled criteria for a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV and who had failed to respond to a minimum of 4 weeks (mean = 211 days) of treatment with citalopram or paroxetine were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with an SSRI plus buspirone (N = 58) or an SSRI plus placebo (N = 61). In addition, 97 patients participated in an optional open-label poststudy treatment phase with the SSRI plus buspirone for 2 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the score on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale.

RESULTS

A total of 50.9% of patients in the buspirone group and 46.7% in the placebo group responded after 4 weeks of treatment. The difference in response rate was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in the frequency of adverse events. At the follow-up of the open SSRI plus buspirone treatment, 69.4% of patients had responded.

CONCLUSION

Adding buspirone to an SSRI is a safe and well-tolerated drug regimen. This study failed to demonstrate any difference in efficacy between buspirone or placebo augmentation of an SSRI. It could be argued, however, that the study was inconclusive due to the unusually high placebo response.

Rapid simple high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of paroxetine in human plasma

A rapid, simple method for the measurement of paroxetine in human plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection is described. This method includes only one-step extraction of paroxetine and dibucaine, an internal standard, with chloroform. Their recoveries were around 90%. The mobile phase, 10 mM phosphate buffer-acetonitrile (40:60, v/v) was eluted isocratically. Between- and within-day coefficients of variation were in the range of 1.9-9.4% and 2.3-13.3%, respectively. The detection limit was 0.2 ng/ml. The method we describe can be easily applied to the measurement of plasma paroxetine concentration for pharmacokinetic studies as well as for therapeutic drug monitoring in patients taking paroxetine.

Serum anticholinergicity in elderly depressed patients treated with paroxetine or nortriptyline

OBJECTIVE

The authors' goal was to compare serum anticholinergicity of 61 elderly depressed patients randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with paroxetine (N=31) or nortriptyline (N=30).

METHOD

Both antidepressants were titrated in a standardized manner, and plasma was sampled weekly for measurement of paroxetine and nortriptyline and its hydroxy metabolite concentrations. Serum anticholinergicity was measured at baseline and after 1, 4, and 6 weeks of treatment. Side effects were assessed by using a validated scale.

RESULTS

After correcting for pretreatment anticholinergicity, the authors found that mean serum anticholinergicity for the nortriptyline-treated patients was significantly greater than that for the paroxetine group at all weeks assessed. Serum anticholinergicity was significantly correlated with nortriptyline but not with paroxetine plasma levels. Complaints of dry mouth and tachycardia were significantly more frequent and severe in the nortriptyline group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that, at therapeutic plasma concentrations, paroxetine has approximately one-fifth the anticholinergic potential of nortriptyline in older patients.

Simultaneous determination of human plasma levels of citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, and their metabolites by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method is presented which allows the simultaneous determination of the plasma concentrations of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, and their pharmacologically active N-demethylated metabolites (desmethylcitalopram, didesmethylcitalopram, and desmethylsertraline) after derivatization with the reagent N-methyl-bis(trifluoroacetamide). No interferences from endogenous compounds are observed following the extraction of plasma samples from six different human subjects. The standard curves are linear over a working range of 10-500 ng/mL for citalopram, 10-300 ng/mL for desmethylcitalopram, 5-60 ng/mL for didesmethylcitalopram, 20-400 ng/mL for sertraline and desmethylsertraline, and 10-200 ng/mL for paroxetine. Recoveries measured at three concentrations range from 81 to 118% for the tertiary amines (citalopram and the internal standard methylmaprotiline), 73 to 95% for the secondary amines (desmethylcitalopram, paroxetine and sertraline), and 39 to 66% for the primary amines (didesmethylcitalopram and desmethylsertraline). Intra- and interday coefficients of variation determined at three concentrations range from 3 to 11% for citalopram and its metabolites, 4 to 15% for paroxetine, and 5 to 13% for sertraline and desmethylsertraline. The limits of quantitation of the method are 2 ng/mL for citalopram and paroxetine, 1 ng/mL for sertraline, and 0.5 ng/mL for desmethylcitalopram, didesmethylcitalopram, and desmethylsertraline. No interferences are noted from 20 other psychotropic drugs. This sensitive and specific method can be used for single-dose pharmacokinetics. It is also useful for therapeutic drug monitoring of these three drugs and could possibly be adapted for the quantitation of the two other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the market, namely fluoxetine and fluvoxamine.

Determinants of interindividual variability and extent of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 inhibition by paroxetine and fluvoxamine in vivo

Major depression may require antidepressant treatment for several years. This necessitates consideration of the long-term effects of antidepressants on multiple clinical endpoints. The antidepressants paroxetine and fluvoxamine are potent in vitro inhibitors of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 isozymes, respectively. CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 are important for the clearance of 30 or more frequently used medications. Moreover, CYP1A2 also contributes to metabolism of 17beta-estradiol and metabolic activation of environmental procarcinogens (e.g., arylamines in cigarette smoke). The aim of this study was to assess the determinants of interindividual variability and extent of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 inhibition during paroxetine and fluvoxamine treatment. Healthy volunteers and patients received caffeine (100 mg) and dextromethorphan (30 mg) at baseline and at steady state of paroxetine (10-20 mg/day, 5-74 days, N = 13) or fluvoxamine (50-100 mg/day, 5-43 days, N = 8). The caffeine metabolic ratio (CMR) and the log O-demethylation ratio (ODMR) of dextromethorphan in overnight urine were used as in vivo indices of the CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 isozyme activities, respectively. All subjects had an extensive metabolizer phenotype for CYP2D6. After fluvoxamine treatment, baseline CMR 5.1 +/- 1.4 (mean +/- SD) decreased to 2.7 +/- 1.1 (p < 0.01). Paroxetine did not have a significant effect on CMR (p > 0.05). In seven of eight subjects in the fluvoxamine group, posttreatment CMR was comparable with the minimum CMR value (2.0) attainable in nonsmoking healthy volunteers. After paroxetine treatment, log ODMR changed from a baseline value of -2.28 +/- 0.37 to -1.13 +/- 0.44, indicating significant inhibition of CYP2D6 (p < 0.001). Subjects' CYP2D6 phenotype did not change after paroxetine treatment. Fluvoxamine had no significant effect on log ODMR (p > 0.05). The extent of inhibition of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 by paroxetine and fluvoxamine, respectively, displayed a positive correlation with baseline enzyme activity (p < 0.05). In addition, a negative association was found between the plasma paroxetine concentration and the CYP2D6 activity after paroxetine treatment (r = -0.47, p < 0.05). These data indicate that paroxetine and fluvoxamine treatment with minimum clinically effective doses significantly inhibit CYP2D6 and CYP1A2, respectively. The extent of inhibition of CYP2D6 by paroxetine and of CYP1A2 by fluvoxamine is dependent in part on the baseline enzyme activity. The interindividual variability in CYP2D6 inhibition by paroxetine can also be explained by variability in plasma paroxetine concentration. Most patients treated with fluvoxamine (50-100 mg/day) will reach population minimums for CYP1A2 activity. These results have potential implications for interindividual variability in the risk for drug-drug interactions mediated by CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 as well as for the disposition of 17beta-estradiol and environmental procarcinogens.

Selective alteration of personality and social behavior by serotonergic intervention

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to test the causal hypothesis that serotonergic function modulates aspects of the normal spectrum of individual differences in affective experience and social behavior in humans.

METHOD

A selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), paroxetine, 20 mg/day (N = 26), or placebo (N = 25) was administered to normal volunteers in a double-blind manner for 4 weeks, and personality variables and social behavior were assessed at baseline and at weeks 1 and 4 of treatment.

RESULTS

Relative to placebo, SSRI administration reduced focal indices of hostility through a more general decrease in negative affect, yet did not alter indices of positive affect. In addition, SSRI administration increased a behavioral index of social affiliation. Changes in both negative affect and affiliative behavior were significantly related to volunteers' plasma SSRI levels at the end of the experiment.

CONCLUSIONS

Central serotonergic function may modulate a dimension of normal personality characterized by reduced negative affective experience and increased affiliative behavior. SSRI administration has significant and detectable effects on these measures even in the absence of baseline clinical depression or other psychopathology.

An uncommon fatality due to moclobemide and paroxetine

A young man was found shivering and incoherent at home. He was placed in bed and was observed having seizures some time later. About four hours after he was initially found, he suffered a full cardiac arrest. Paramedics found his jaw unusually stiff and were unable to open his mouth in order to intubate him. Resuscitation attempts were unsuccessful. The autopsy findings were unremarkable, but toxicology testing revealed the following: moclobemide (subclavian blood, 18.5 mg/L; liver, 28.5 mg/kg; gastric contents, 77 mg/69 g) and paroxetine (subclavian blood, 1.58 mg/L; liver, 15.3 mg/kg; gastric contents, 0.7 mg/69 g). The cause of death was attributed to the combined toxicity of moclobemide and paroxetine. Deaths attributed primarily to these drugs are extremely rare because both are considerably less toxic than older monoamine oxidase and tricyclic antidepressant drugs. Based on the history of the case and pharmacology of the drugs involved, the most likely mechanism of death was severe "serotonin syndrome" resulting from the overdose.

Platelet [3H]imipramine and [3H]paroxetine binding in depressed patients

[3H]Paroxetine and [3H]imipramine binding to blood platelet membranes was simultaneously measured in 63 control subjects and 18 patients with DSM-III-R criteria for major depression with melancholia. Both binding sites showed significantly different (p < 0.001) maximum binding (Bmax) and equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) values. Age was not correlated with either [3H]imipramine Bmax or Kd values, but a negative correlation was found between [3H]paroxetine Bmax and age in healthy controls. Furthermore, depressed patients showed significantly lower [3H]imipramine Bmax values (p < 0.001) and higher Kd values (p < 0.001) in comparison to the control group. No differences were observed in [3H]paroxetine Bmax and Kd values between the two groups.

Quantitative determination of paroxetine in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography and ultraviolet detection

An accurate, reliable procedure was developed for kinetic and therapeutic monitoring of paroxetine in human plasma. Steady-state plasma levels of paroxetine were measured for 18 geriatric patients (mean age 75) in a double-blinded study. Paroxetine doses ranged from 10 to 40 mg/day. The assay was suitable for patients on concurrent medications, and a small sample volume (1 ml) of patient plasma was used with sufficient sensitivity and specificity. After extraction and separation on a Beckman, Ultrasphere 5-microm C18 column (150x2 mm I.D.), the recovery (mean+/-S.D.) for paroxetine was determined to be 86.5+/-5.2%. The limit of quantitation for paroxetine in this assay was 5 ng/ml. Inter-assay reproducibility (C.V.) for the patient samples and quality controls ranged from 3.7 to 7.6%.

Analytical methods for the quantitative determination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes in patients

Five selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been introduced recently: citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine and sertraline. Although no therapeutic window has been defined for SSRIs, in contrast to tricyclic antidepressants, analytical methods for therapeutic drug monitoring of SSRIs are useful in several instances. SSRIs differ widely in their chemical structure and in their metabolism. The fact that some of them have N-demethylated metabolites, which are also SSRIs, requires that methods be available which allow therapeutic drug monitoring of the parent compounds and of these active metabolites. most procedures are based on prepurification of the SSRIs by liquid-liquid extraction before they are submitted to separation by chromatographic procedures (high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, thin layer chromatography) and detection by various detectors (UV, fluorescence, electrochemical detector, nitrogen-phosphorus detector, mass spectrometry). This literature review shows that most methods allow quantitative determination of SSRIs in plasma, in the lower ng/ml range, and that they are, therefore, suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes of this category of drugs.

Cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and monoaminergic responses to psychological stressors: possible differences between remitted panic disorder patients and healthy controls

Both clinical symptomatology and stress research suggest that panic attacks might be partially attributable to exaggerated psychophysiological responses to environmental stressors. In the present study, we aimed to explicitly test this idea by measuring the physiological responses to a mild psychological stressor in both healthy controls (n = 8) and fully remitted, medication-free panic disorder patients (n = 8). One hour before the stressor, former patients, compared to healthy controls, exhibited higher diastolic blood pressure. From a blood sample taken 30 min before the stressor, patients, compared to controls, had lower paroxetine platelet binding site densities. During the stressor, patients, compared to controls, had greater increases in plasma levels of cortisol. These preliminary findings suggest that remitted panic disorder patients might have disturbed physiological responses to mild psychological stressors. These disturbances might be related to the development of future episodes.

Liposomes bearing platelet proteins: a model for surface functions studies

An improved procedure for the direct transfer of membrane proteins from human platelets to liposomes involving the treatment of platelets with linolenic acid was developed. The transfer of platelet proteins to liposomes prepared from the mixture of L-alpha-dimyristoyl-phosphatidylcholine/sphingomyelin in the molar ratio 80/20 appeared to be significantly enhanced compared with liposomes prepared from the same components mixed in other ratios. A wide range of platelet proteins was transferred, the most important being GPIb (170 kDa), GPIIb/IIIa (135 and 110 kDa). GPIV (90 kDa), GPIX (24 kDa) and the serotonin transporter (68 kDa). The recognition interactions between these proteoliposomes and specific protein antibodies clearly indicate that the non-invasive procedure used in this study ensured the reproducible transfer of platelet proteins without essentially altering their original conformation. The obtained results reveal also that the affinity of proteoliposomes to bind paroxetin was virtually the same as that of the native serotonin transporter. These results provide an indication of the possible use of such proteoliposomes as models to study at the molecular level the interaction of these proteins with their ligands.

Seasonal variation in platelet [3H]paroxetine binding in healthy volunteers. Relationship to climatic variables

Recently, our laboratory has reported significant seasonal differences in [3H]paroxetine binding to platelets in depressed subjects. This study aimed to examine the seasonal variation in [3H]paroxetine binding to platelets and the relationships between [3H]paroxetine binding and climatic variables in healthy volunteers. We took monthly blood samples during one calendar year from 26 healthy volunteers for assay of [3H]paroxetine binding and analyzed the data by means of univariate and multivariate spectral and cosinor analyses. There was a statistically highly significant seasonal pattern in [3H]paroxetine binding to platelets with significant annual, 4-monthly, and bimonthly rhythms, which were expressed as a group phenomenon. [3H]Paroxetine binding to platelets was significantly lower in fall and summer than in winter and spring; lows occurred in summer and peaks in spring. The peak-trough difference in this yearly variation, expressed as a percentage of the mean, was as large as 83.7%. A large part of the variance, that is, 32.5%, in [3H]paroxetine binding could be explained by weather variables, such as ambient temperature, relative humidity, and air pressure. Highly significant common annual rhythms were expressed in [3H]paroxetine binding and ambient temperature or humidity (both inversely related) and changes in temperature the 2 weeks preceding blood samplings (positively related).

Paroxetine shifts imipramine metabolism

The combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with tricyclic antidepressants has proven useful in treatment-resistant depression but has the potential for adverse drug-drug interactions. In the present study, the metabolism of a single dose of imipramine was studied before and after treatment with paroxetine. Paroxetine induced significant elevations of approximately 50% in half-life, area under the curve, and Cmax of imipramine and decreased clearance twofold. The effects on desipramine pharmacokinetics were even more pronounced. These findings indicate a significant interaction of paroxetine with the CYP2D6 isoenzyme.

Platelet binding characteristics distinguish placebo responders from nonresponders in depression

To determine whether there are characteristics distinguishing placebo responders from nonresponders, we studied 37 outpatients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for depression who were enrolled in controlled drug trials and 14 control subjects. Clinical data and blood samples were collected on admission and after a 7- to 10-day placebo washout. All patients experiencing a 40% drop in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) at the time of the second evaluation were considered placebo responders. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in clinical variables. Platelet markers distinguished the groups: Most notably, placebo nonresponders had the lowest 5-HT uptake site density values, placebo responders had intermediate values, and normal controls had the highest values. Placebo responders and placebo nonresponders had higher 5-HT uptake affinity values. No significant differences were observed among the groups in platelet 5-HT2 receptor site density or affinity values. These results suggest that platelet serotonin characteristics, but not common clinical characteristics, may distinguish depressed patients who do and do not respond to placebo.