1
|
Yang X, Zhang J, Chen S, Liu Z, Poland GA, Olatosi B, Weissman S, Li X. COVID-19 Breakthrough Infections Among People With HIV: A Statewide Cohort Analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2024; 97:107-116. [PMID: 39250644 PMCID: PMC11386905 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000003475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to identify COVID-19 breakthrough infections among people with HIV (PWH) across different phases of the pandemic and explore whether differential immune dysfunctions are associated with breakthrough infections. DESIGN AND METHODS This retrospective population-based cohort study used data from an integrated electronic health record (EHR) database in South Carolina (SC). Breakthrough infection was defined as the first COVID-19 diagnosis documented in the state agency after the date an individual was fully vaccinated (ie, 2 doses of Pfizer/BNT162b2 or Moderna/mRNA-1273, or 1 dose of Janssen/Ad26.COV2.S) through June 14, 2022. We analyzed the risk and associated factors of the outcome using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Among 7596 fully vaccinated PWH, the overall rate of breakthrough infections was 118.95 cases per 1000 person-years. When compared with the alpha-dominant period, the breakthrough infection rate was higher during both delta-dominant (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.81) and omicron-dominant (HR: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.73 to 4.73) periods. Individuals who received a booster dose had a lower likelihood of breakthrough infections (HR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.24). There was no association of breakthrough infections with degree of HIV viral suppression, but a higher CD4 count was significantly associated with fewer breakthroughs among PWH (>500 vs <200 cells/mm3: HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.94). CONCLUSIONS In our PWH population, the incidence of breakthrough infections was high (during both delta-dominant and omicron-dominant periods) and mainly associated with the absence of a booster dose in patients older than 50 years, with comorbidities and low CD4 count.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueying Yang
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
- Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Jiajia Zhang
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Shujie Chen
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Ziang Liu
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Gregory A Poland
- Mayo Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Bankole Olatosi
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; and
| | - Sharon Weissman
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Xiaoming Li
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
- Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang W, Volkow ND, Berger NA, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Association of semaglutide with reduced incidence and relapse of cannabis use disorder in real-world populations: a retrospective cohort study. Mol Psychiatry 2024; 29:2587-2598. [PMID: 38486046 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02498-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024]
Abstract
Cannabis is the most frequently used illicit drug in the United States with more than 45 million users of whom one-third suffer from a cannabis use disorder (CUD). Despite its high prevalence, there are currently no FDA-approved medications for CUD. Patients treated with semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) approved for treating type 2 diabetes (T2D) and for weight management have reported reduced desire to drink and smoke. Preclinical studies have shown that semaglutide decreased nicotine and alcohol consumption. Preclinical and preliminary clinical evidence of semaglutide's potential beneficial effects on various substance use disorders led us to evaluate if it pertained to CUD. In this retrospective cohort study of electronic health records (EHRs) from the TriNetX Analytics Network, a global federated health research network of approximately 105.3 million patients from 61 large healthcare organizations in the US, we aimed to assess the associations of semaglutide with both incident and recurrent CUD diagnosis compared to non-GLP-1RA anti-obesity or anti-diabetes medications. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of incident and recurrent CUD were calculated for 12-month follow-up by comparing propensity-score matched patient cohorts. The study population included 85,223 patients with obesity who were prescribed semaglutide or non-GLP-1RA anti-obesity medications, with the findings replicated in 596,045 patients with T2D. In patients with obesity (mean age 51.3 years, 65.6% women), semaglutide compared with non-GLP-1RA anti-obesity medications was associated with lower risk for incident CUD in patients with no prior history CUD (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.42-0.75), and recurrent CUD diagnosis in patients with a prior history CUD (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84). Consistent reductions were seen for patients stratified by gender, age group, race and in patients with and without T2D. Similar findings were replicated in the study population with T2D when comparing semaglutide with non-GLP-1RA anti-diabetes medications for incident CUD (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.29-0.56) and recurrent CUD (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.42-1.03). While these findings provide preliminary evidence of the potential benefit of semaglutide in CUD in real-world populations, further preclinical studies are warranted to understand the underlying mechanism and randomized clinical trials are needed to support its use clinically for CUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nora D Volkow
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Nathan A Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang W, Volkow ND, Berger NA, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Association of Semaglutide With Tobacco Use Disorder in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes : Target Trial Emulation Using Real-World Data. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:1016-1027. [PMID: 39074369 DOI: 10.7326/m23-2718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reports of reduced desire to smoke in patients treated with semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity, have raised interest about its potential benefit for tobacco use disorders (TUDs). OBJECTIVE To examine the association of semaglutide with TUD-related health care measures in patients with comorbid T2DM and TUD. DESIGN Emulation target trial based on a nationwide population-based database of patient electronic health records. SETTING United States, 1 December 2017 to 31 March 2023. PARTICIPANTS Seven target trials were emulated among eligible patients with comorbid T2DM and TUD by comparing the new use of semaglutide versus 7 other antidiabetes medications (insulins, metformin, dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and other GLP-1RAs). MEASUREMENTS The TUD-related health care measures (medical encounter for diagnosis of TUD, smoking cessation medication prescriptions, and smoking cessation counseling) that occurred within a 12-month follow-up were examined using Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS The study compared 222 942 new users of antidiabetes medications including 5967 of semaglutide. Semaglutide was associated with a significantly lower risk for medical encounters for TUD diagnosis compared with other antidiabetes medications, and was strongest compared with insulins (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.74]) and weakest but statistically significant compared with other GLP-1RAs (HR, 0.88 [CI, 0.81 to 0.96]). Semaglutide was associated with reduced smoking cessation medication prescriptions and counseling. Similar findings were observed in patients with and without a diagnosis of obesity. For most of the group comparisons, the differences occurred within 30 days of prescription initiation. LIMITATION Documentation bias, residual confounding, missing data on current smoking behavior, body mass index, and medication adherence. CONCLUSION Semaglutide was associated with lower risks for TUD-related health care measures in patients with comorbid T2DM and TUD compared with other antidiabetes medications including other GLP-1Ras, primarily within 30 days of prescription. These findings suggest the need for clinical trials to evaluate semaglutide's potential for TUD treatment. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (W.W., N.A.B.)
| | - Nora D Volkow
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (N.D.V.)
| | - Nathan A Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (W.W., N.A.B.)
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (P.B.D.)
| | - David C Kaelber
- Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio (D.C.K.)
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (R.X.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang L, Xu R, Kaelber DC, Berger NA. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and 13 Obesity-Associated Cancers in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2421305. [PMID: 38967919 PMCID: PMC11227080 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Thirteen human malignant neoplasms have been identified as obesity-associated cancers (OACs), ie, the presence of excess body fat is associated with increased risk of developing cancer and worse prognosis in patients with these specific tumors. The glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) class of pharmaceuticals are effective agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and for achieving weight loss, but the association of GLP-1RAs with the incident risk of 13 OACs is unclear. Objective To compare the incident risk of each of the 13 OACs in patients with T2D who were prescribed GLP-1RAs vs insulins or metformin. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was based on a nationwide multicenter database of electronic health records (EHRs) of 113 million US patients. The study population included 1 651 452 patients with T2D who had no prior diagnosis of OACs and were prescribed GLP-1RAs, insulins, or metformin during March 2005 to November 2018. Data analysis was conducted on April 26, 2024. Exposures Prescription of GLP-1RAs, insulins, or metformin. Main Outcomes and Measures Incident (first-time) diagnosis of each of the 13 OACs occurring during a 15-year follow-up after the exposure was examined using Cox proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with censoring applied. Hazard ratios (HRs), cumulative incidences, and 95% CIs were calculated. All models were adjusted for confounders at baseline by propensity-score matching baseline covariates. Results In the study population of 1 651 452 patients with T2D (mean [SD] age, 59.8 [15.1] years; 827 873 [50.1%] male and 775 687 [47.0%] female participants; 5780 [0.4%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 65 893 [4.0%] Asian, 281 242 [17.0%] Black, 13 707 [0.8%] Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and 1 000 780 [60.6%] White participants), GLP-1RAs compared with insulin were associated with a significant risk reduction in 10 of 13 OACs, including in gallbladder cancer (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83), meningioma (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.74), pancreatic cancer (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.50), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36-0.61), ovarian cancer (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.03-0.74), colorectal cancer (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.46-0.64), multiple myeloma (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.77), esophageal cancer (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42-0.86), endometrial cancer (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.91), and kidney cancer (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.91). Although not statistically significant, the HR for stomach cancer was less than 1 among patients who took GLP-1RAs compared with those who took insulin (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51-1.03). GLP-1RAs were not associated with a reduced risk of postmenopausal breast cancer or thyroid cancer. Of those cancers that showed a decreased risk among patients taking GLP-1RAs compared with those taking insulin, HRs for patients taking GLP-1RAs vs those taking metformin for colorectal and gallbladder cancer were less than 1, but the risk reduction was not statistically significant. Compared with metformin, GLP-1RAs were not associated with a decreased risk of any cancers, but were associated with an increased risk of kidney cancer (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.27-1.87). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, GLP-1RAs were associated with lower risks of specific types of OACs compared with insulins or metformin in patients with T2D. These findings provide preliminary evidence of the potential benefit of GLP-1RAs for cancer prevention in high-risk populations and support further preclinical and clinical studies for the prevention of certain OACs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David C. Kaelber
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Population and Quantitative Health Sciences and the Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nathan A. Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tabernacki T, Wang L, Kaelber DC, Xu R, Berger NA. Non-Insulin Antidiabetic Agents and Lung Cancer Risk in Drug-Naive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2377. [PMID: 39001440 PMCID: PMC11240387 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer (LC) is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer deaths in the U.S. Insulin therapy, a key treatment for managing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), is associated with increased LC risk. The impact of non-insulin antidiabetic drugs, particularly GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), on LC risk is not well understood. This study evaluated LC risk in T2DM patients, comparing seven non-insulin antidiabetic agents to insulin. Using the TriNetX Analytics platform, we analyzed the de-identified electronic health records of 1,040,341 T2DM patients treated between 2005 and 2019, excluding those with prior antidiabetic use or LC diagnoses. We calculated hazard ratios and confidence intervals for LC risk and used propensity score matching to control for confounding factors. All non-insulin antidiabetic drugs, except alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, were associated with significantly reduced LC risk compared to insulin, with GLP-1RAs showing the greatest reduction (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.59). GLP-1RAs were consistently associated with lowered LC risk across all histological types, races, genders, and smoking statuses. These findings suggest that non-insulin antidiabetic drugs, particularly GLP-1RAs, may be preferable for managing T2DM while reducing LC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Tabernacki
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Lindsey Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - David C. Kaelber
- Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Nathan A. Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang W, Volkow ND, Berger NA, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Associations of semaglutide with incidence and recurrence of alcohol use disorder in real-world population. Nat Commun 2024; 15:4548. [PMID: 38806481 PMCID: PMC11133479 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48780-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Alcohol use disorders are among the top causes of the global burden of disease, yet therapeutic interventions are limited. Reduced desire to drink in patients treated with semaglutide has raised interest regarding its potential therapeutic benefits for alcohol use disorders. In this retrospective cohort study of electronic health records of 83,825 patients with obesity, we show that semaglutide compared with other anti-obesity medications is associated with a 50%-56% lower risk for both the incidence and recurrence of alcohol use disorder for a 12-month follow-up period. Consistent reductions were seen for patients stratified by gender, age group, race and in patients with and without type 2 diabetes. Similar findings are replicated in the study population with 598,803 patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings provide evidence of the potential benefit of semaglutide in AUD in real-world populations and call for further randomized clinicl trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nora D Volkow
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Nathan A Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee HE, Jeong NY, Park M, Lim E, Kim JA, Won H, Kim CJ, Park SM, Choi NK. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against severe outcomes in cancer patients: Real-world evidence from self-controlled risk interval and retrospective cohort studies. J Infect Public Health 2024; 17:854-861. [PMID: 38554591 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines is generally reduced in cancer patients compared to the general population. However, there are only a few studies that compare the relative risk of breakthrough infections and severe COVID-19 outcomes in fully vaccinated cancer patients versus their unvaccinated counterparts. METHODS To assess the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in cancer patients, we employed (1) a self-controlled risk interval (SCRI) design, and (2) a retrospective matched cohort design. A SCRI design was used to compare the risk of breakthrough infection in vaccinated cancer patients during the period immediately following vaccination ("control window") and the period in which immunity is achieved ("exposure windows"). The retrospective matched cohort design was used to compare the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated cancer patients. For both studies, data were extracted from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID-19-National Health Insurance Service cohort, including demographics, medical history, and vaccination records of all individuals confirmed with COVID-19. We used conditional Poisson regression to calculate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for breakthrough infection and Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for severe outcomes. RESULTS Of 14,448 cancer patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between October 2020 and December 2021, a total of 217 and 3996 cancer patients were included in the SCRI and cohort study respectively. While the risk of breakthrough infections, measured by the incidence rate in the control and exposure windows, did not show statistically significant difference in vaccinated cancer patients (IRR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.64-1.22), the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes was significantly lower in vaccinated cancer patients compared to those unvaccinated (HR=0.27, 95% CI: 0.22-0.34). CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccines significantly reduce the risk of severe outcomes in cancer patients, though their efficacy against breakthrough infections is less evident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Eon Lee
- Graduate School of Industrial Pharmaceutical Science, College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760 Republic of Korea
| | - Na-Young Jeong
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Minah Park
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunsun Lim
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Ah Kim
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Heehyun Won
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Chung-Jong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, 260, Gonghang-daero, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Min Park
- Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam-Kyong Choi
- Graduate School of Industrial Pharmaceutical Science, College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760 Republic of Korea; Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Coschi CH, Dodbiba L, Guerry D. Oncology: What You May Have Missed in 2023. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:S57-S70. [PMID: 38621244 DOI: 10.7326/m24-0520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in oncology treatment methods have improved outcomes and quality of life for patients with cancer. However, care of these patients can be complex, and the contribution of physicians from different specialties is crucial. This article highlights important publications from 2023 on topics across a wide spectrum relating to the management of oncology patients. The literature was screened for significant new evidence that is relevant to internal medicine specialists and subspecialists whose focus is not oncology. Two articles address the importance of social interventions targeting end-of-life care for low-income and minority patients and the well-being of caregivers. Two additional articles address screening considerations in patients at risk for colorectal and lung cancer. Two more articles address safe use of hormone-related therapies to treat symptoms of menopause and prevent disease recurrence or progression in patients diagnosed with noninvasive breast neoplasia. Finally, several articles were included on topics related to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer, use of cannabinoids for cancer pain control, chronic autoimmune adverse effects related to use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the incidence of second primary neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney H Coschi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.H.C., L.D.)
| | - Lorin Dodbiba
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.H.C., L.D.)
| | - DuPont Guerry
- Associate Editor, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Emeritus Professor of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alsakarneh S, Jaber F, Qasim H, Massad A, Alzghoul H, Abboud Y, Dahiya DS, Bilal M, Shaukat A. Increased Risk of Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Propensity-Matched Analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2495. [PMID: 38731022 PMCID: PMC11084503 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between colorectal cancer (CRC) and the risk of breakthrough respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in vaccinated patients with CRC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX research network to identify vaccinated patients with CRC. Patients were matched using propensity score matching (PSM) and divided into patients with CRC and control (without history of CRC) groups. The primary outcome was the risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 in vaccinated patients. The secondary outcome was a composite of all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalization, and death during the follow-up period after the diagnosis of COVID-19. Results: A total of 15,416 vaccinated patients with CRC were identified and propensity matched with 15,416 vaccinated patients without CRC. Patients with CRC had a significantly increased risk for breakthrough infections compared to patients without CRC (aOR = 1.78; [95% CI: 1.47-2.15]). Patients with CRC were at increased risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after two doses (aOR = 1.71; [95% CI: 1.42-2.06]) and three doses (aOR = 1.36; [95% CI: 1.09-1.69]) of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Vaccinated patients with CRC were at a lower risk of COVID-19 infection than unvaccinated CRC patients (aOR = 0.342; [95% CI: 0.289-0.404]). The overall composite outcome (all-cause ED visits, all-cause hospitalization, and all-cause death) was 51.6% for breakthrough infections, which was greater than 44.3% for propensity score-matched patients without CRC (aOR = 1.79; [95% CI: 1.29-2.47]). Conclusions: This cohort study showed significantly increased risks for breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated patients with CRC. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients with CRC were associated with significant and substantial risks for hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saqr Alsakarneh
- Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA; (F.J.); (H.Q.)
| | - Fouad Jaber
- Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA; (F.J.); (H.Q.)
| | - Hana Qasim
- Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA; (F.J.); (H.Q.)
| | - Abdallah Massad
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA;
| | - Hamza Alzghoul
- Department of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA;
| | - Yazan Abboud
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers University School of Medicine, Newark, NJ 07103, USA;
| | - Dushyant Singh Dahiya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA;
| | - Mohammad Bilal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine and Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ellsworth CR, Wang C, Katz AR, Chen Z, Islamuddin M, Yang H, Scheuermann SE, Goff KA, Maness NJ, Blair RV, Kolls JK, Qin X. Natural Killer Cells Do Not Attenuate a Mouse-Adapted SARS-CoV-2-Induced Disease in Rag2-/- Mice. Viruses 2024; 16:611. [PMID: 38675952 PMCID: PMC11054502 DOI: 10.3390/v16040611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This study investigates the roles of T, B, and Natural Killer (NK) cells in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19, utilizing mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2-MA30 (MA30). To evaluate this MA30 mouse model, we characterized MA30-infected C57BL/6 mice (B6) and compared them with SARS-CoV-2-WA1 (an original SARS-CoV-2 strain) infected K18-human ACE2 (K18-hACE2) mice. We found that the infected B6 mice developed severe peribronchial inflammation and rapid severe pulmonary edema, but less lung interstitial inflammation than the infected K18-hACE2 mice. These pathological findings recapitulate some pathological changes seen in severe COVID-19 patients. Using this MA30-infected mouse model, we further demonstrate that T and/or B cells are essential in mounting an effective immune response against SARS-CoV-2. This was evident as Rag2-/- showed heightened vulnerability to infection and inhibited viral clearance. Conversely, the depletion of NK cells did not significantly alter the disease course in Rag2-/- mice, underscoring the minimal role of NK cells in the acute phase of MA30-induced disease. Together, our results indicate that T and/or B cells, but not NK cells, mitigate MA30-induced disease in mice and the infected mouse model can be used for dissecting the pathogenesis and immunology of severe COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calder R Ellsworth
- Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Health Sciences Campus, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA; (C.R.E.); (C.W.); (Z.C.); (M.I.); (S.E.S.); (K.A.G.); (N.J.M.); (R.V.B.)
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Chenxiao Wang
- Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Health Sciences Campus, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA; (C.R.E.); (C.W.); (Z.C.); (M.I.); (S.E.S.); (K.A.G.); (N.J.M.); (R.V.B.)
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Alexis R Katz
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Center for Translational Research in Infection and Inflammation, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; (A.R.K.); (H.Y.); (J.K.K.)
| | - Zheng Chen
- Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Health Sciences Campus, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA; (C.R.E.); (C.W.); (Z.C.); (M.I.); (S.E.S.); (K.A.G.); (N.J.M.); (R.V.B.)
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Mohammad Islamuddin
- Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Health Sciences Campus, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA; (C.R.E.); (C.W.); (Z.C.); (M.I.); (S.E.S.); (K.A.G.); (N.J.M.); (R.V.B.)
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Haoran Yang
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Center for Translational Research in Infection and Inflammation, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; (A.R.K.); (H.Y.); (J.K.K.)
- Department of Pulmonary Critical Care and Environmental Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Sarah E Scheuermann
- Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Health Sciences Campus, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA; (C.R.E.); (C.W.); (Z.C.); (M.I.); (S.E.S.); (K.A.G.); (N.J.M.); (R.V.B.)
| | - Kelly A Goff
- Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Health Sciences Campus, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA; (C.R.E.); (C.W.); (Z.C.); (M.I.); (S.E.S.); (K.A.G.); (N.J.M.); (R.V.B.)
| | - Nicholas J Maness
- Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Health Sciences Campus, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA; (C.R.E.); (C.W.); (Z.C.); (M.I.); (S.E.S.); (K.A.G.); (N.J.M.); (R.V.B.)
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Robert V Blair
- Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Health Sciences Campus, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA; (C.R.E.); (C.W.); (Z.C.); (M.I.); (S.E.S.); (K.A.G.); (N.J.M.); (R.V.B.)
| | - Jay K Kolls
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Center for Translational Research in Infection and Inflammation, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; (A.R.K.); (H.Y.); (J.K.K.)
- Department of Pulmonary Critical Care and Environmental Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Xuebin Qin
- Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Health Sciences Campus, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA; (C.R.E.); (C.W.); (Z.C.); (M.I.); (S.E.S.); (K.A.G.); (N.J.M.); (R.V.B.)
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nagaraja N, Ballur Narayana Reddy V. Prevalence of Concomitant Neurological Disorders and Long-Term Outcome of Patients Hospitalized for Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Versus without Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy. Neurocrit Care 2024; 40:486-494. [PMID: 37258986 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-023-01753-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) are at increased risk of developing epilepsy and cognitive disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and vascular dementia. In a retrospective cohort observation study of patients hospitalized for ICH with CAA versus ICH without CAA, we evaluated the prevalence of neurological comorbidities at admission and the risk of new diagnosis of epilepsy, relevant cognitive disorders, and mortality at 1 year. METHODS In the TriNetX health research network, adult patients aged ≥ 55 years hospitalized with a diagnosis of ICH were stratified based on presence or absence of concomitant CAA diagnosis. Demographics and medical comorbidities were compared by using χ2 test and Student's t-test. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 1-year survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. The 1-year risk of new diagnosis of epilepsy, AD, MCI, vascular dementia, and dementia unspecified was assessed with Cox proportional hazards estimate. RESULTS The study included a total of 1757 patients with ICH and CAA and 53,364 patients with ICH without CAA. Patients with CAA were older compared with those without CAA (74.1 ± 7.5 vs. 69.8 ± 8.8 years, p ≤ 0.001). Compared with ICH without CAA, patients with ICH and CAA had higher baseline prevalence of cerebral infarction (30% vs. 20%), nontraumatic ICH (36% vs. 7%), nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (14% vs. 5%), epilepsy (11% vs. 6%), and AD (5% vs. 2%) with significance at p < 0.001. After propensity score matching, a total of 1746 patients were included in both cohorts. In the matched cohorts, compared with patients with ICH without CAA, patients with ICH and CAA had lower 1-year all-cause mortality (479 [27%] vs. 563 [32%]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.90) and higher risk of new diagnosis of epilepsy (280 [18%] vs. 167 [11%]; HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.40-2.06), AD (101 [6%] vs. 38 [2%]; HR 2.62; 95% CI 1.80-3.80), MCI (85 [5%] vs. 35 [2%]; HR 2.39; 95% CI 1.61-3.54), vascular dementia (117 [7%] vs. 60 [4%]; HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.41-2.62), and dementia unspecified (245 [16%] vs. 150 [9%]; HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.39-2.08). CONCLUSIONS Among patients admitted for ICH, patients with CAA have lower mortality but have 2-3 times more risk of diagnosis of epilepsy and dementia at 1 year, compared with those without CAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandakumar Nagaraja
- Department of Neurology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, 30 Hope Drive EC037, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
| | - Varalakshmi Ballur Narayana Reddy
- Department of Neurology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, 30 Hope Drive EC037, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bytyci J, Ying Y, Lee LYW. Immunocompromised individuals are at increased risk of COVID-19 breakthrough infection, hospitalization, and death in the post-vaccination era: A systematic review. Immun Inflamm Dis 2024; 12:e1259. [PMID: 38661301 PMCID: PMC11044684 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.1259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immunocompromised individuals have been shown to mount a reduced response to vaccination, resulting in reduced vaccine effectiveness in this cohort. Therefore, in the postvaccination era, immunocompromised individuals remain at high risk of breakthrough infection and COVID-19 related hospitalization and death, which persist despite vaccination efforts. There has been a marked paucity of systematic reviews evaluating existing data describing the clinical measures of efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination, specifically in immunocompromised populations. In particular, there is a scarcity of comprehensive evaluations exploring breakthrough infections and severe COVID-19 in this patient population. METHODS To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review which aimed to provide a summary of current clinical evidence of the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in the immunocompromised population. Using PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a literature search on PubMed and the Cochrane database published between January 1, 2021 to September 1, 2022. RESULTS Our findings demonstrated that despite vaccination, immunocompromised patients remained at high risk of new breakthrough COVID-19 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes compared to the general population. We found increased average relative risk (RR) of breakthrough infections in the immunocompromised population, including patients with cancer (RR = 1.4), HIV (RR = 1.92), chronic kidney disease (RR = 2.26), immunodeficiency (RR = 2.55), and organ transplant recipients (RR = 6.94). These patients are also at greater risk for hospitalizations and death following COVID-19 breakthrough infection. We found that the RR of hospitalization and death in Cancer patients was 1.08 and 2.82, respectively. CONCLUSION This demonstrated that vaccination does not offer an adequate level of protection in these groups, necessitating further measures such as Evusheld and further boosters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jola Bytyci
- Oxford Medical SchoolUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Yuxin Ying
- Oxford Medical SchoolUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Lennard Y. W. Lee
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic 22 SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Department of OncologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bertini CD, Khawaja F, Sheshadri A. Coronavirus Disease-2019 in the Immunocompromised Host. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2024; 38:213-228. [PMID: 38280765 DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
Immunocompromised hosts, which encompass a diverse population of persons with malignancies, human immunodeficiency virus disease, solid organ, and hematologic transplants, autoimmune diseases, and primary immunodeficiencies, bear a significant burden of the morbidity and mortality due to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Immunocompromised patients who develop COVID-19 have a more severe illness, higher hospitalization rates, and higher mortality rates than immunocompetent patients. There are no well-defined treatment strategies that are specific to immunocompromised patients and vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma are variably effective. This review focuses on the specific impact of COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients and the gaps in knowledge that require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher D Bertini
- Department of Internal Medicine, UTHealth Houston McGovern Medical School, 6431 Fannin, MSB 1.150, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Fareed Khawaja
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1469, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ajay Sheshadri
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street Unit 1462, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang L, Wang W, Kaelber DC, Xu R, Berger NA. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Drug-Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, With and Without Overweight/Obesity. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:256-258. [PMID: 38060218 PMCID: PMC10704339 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
This cohort study compares glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) with 7 non–GLP-1RA antidiabetics among drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - William Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David C. Kaelber
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Population and Quantitative Health Sciences and the Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nathan A. Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yang X, Zhang J, Liu Z, Chen S, Olatosi B, Poland GA, Weissman S, Li X. COVID-19 breakthrough infections among people living with and without HIV: A statewide cohort analysis. Int J Infect Dis 2024; 139:21-27. [PMID: 38013151 PMCID: PMC10842358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to characterize and compare COVID-19 breakthrough infections between people living with and without HIV across different phases of the pandemic. METHODS Using statewide HIV cohort data, the study population included adult residents in South Carolina (SC) (>18 years old) who were fully vaccinated between January 02, 2021 and April 14, 2022 when Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants were circulating in SC. We used the Cox proportional hazard model to investigate the association between HIV infection and breakthrough infection, adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS Among 2,144,415 vaccinated individuals, 8,335 were people living with HIV (PLWH) and 2,136,080 were people without HIV (PWoH). After propensity score matching, HIV infection was not significantly associated with breakthrough infection rate. However, when comparing breakthrough infections among individuals without any booster dose, PLWH had a higher risk of breakthrough infections (adjusted Hazard Ration: 1.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.39). Compared to PWoH, PLWH with high levels of clusters of differentiation 4 (CD4) count or viral suppression were not associated with breakthrough infections. CONCLUSIONS Our findings do not support a broad conclusion that COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness is lower among PLWH, while we did find that PLWH had a higher risk of breakthrough infection compared to PWoH if they did not receive a booster dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueying Yang
- Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA; South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
| | - Jiajia Zhang
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Ziang Liu
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Shujie Chen
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Bankole Olatosi
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA; Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Gregory A Poland
- Mayo Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, USA
| | - Sharon Weissman
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Xiaoming Li
- Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA; South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Meyerowitz EA, Scott J, Richterman A, Male V, Cevik M. Clinical course and management of COVID-19 in the era of widespread population immunity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2024; 22:75-88. [PMID: 38114838 DOI: 10.1038/s41579-023-01001-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
The clinical implications of COVID-19 have changed since SARS-CoV-2 first emerged in humans. The current high levels of population immunity, due to prior infection and/or vaccination, have been associated with a vastly decreased overall risk of severe disease. Some people, particularly those with immunocompromising conditions, remain at risk for severe outcomes. Through the course of the pandemic, variants with somewhat different symptom profiles from the original SARS-CoV-2 virus have emerged. The management of COVID-19 has also changed since 2020, with the increasing availability of evidence-based treatments in two main classes: antivirals and immunomodulators. Selecting the appropriate treatment(s) for patients with COVID-19 requires a deep understanding of the evidence and an awareness of the limitations of applying data that have been largely based on immune-naive populations to patients today who most likely have vaccine-derived and/or infection-derived immunity. In this Review, we provide a summary of the clinical manifestations and approaches to caring for adult patients with COVID-19 in the era of vaccine availability and the dominance of the Omicron subvariants, with a focus on the management of COVID-19 in different patient groups, including immunocompromised, pregnant, vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Meyerowitz
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jake Scott
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Aaron Richterman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Victoria Male
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Muge Cevik
- Division of Infection and Global Health Research, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Song NJ, Chakravarthy KB, Jeon H, Bolyard C, Reynolds K, Weller KP, Reisinger S, Wang Y, Li A, Jiang S, Ma Q, Barouch DH, Rubinstein MP, Shields PG, Oltz EM, Chung D, Li Z. mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 induce divergent antigen-specific T-cell responses in patients with lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e007922. [PMID: 38177076 PMCID: PMC10773442 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant is highly transmissible and evades pre-established immunity. Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination against ancestral strain spike protein can induce intact T-cell immunity against the Omicron variant, but efficacy of booster vaccination in patients with late-stage lung cancer on immune-modulating agents including anti-programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has not yet been elucidated. METHODS We assessed T-cell responses using a modified activation-induced marker assay, coupled with high-dimension flow cytometry analyses. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were stimulated with various viral peptides and antigen-specific T-cell responses were evaluated using flow cytometry. RESULTS Booster vaccines induced CD8+ T-cell response against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and Omicron variant in both non-cancer subjects and patients with lung cancer, but only a marginal induction was detected for CD4+ T cells. Importantly, antigen-specific T cells from patients with lung cancer showed distinct subpopulation dynamics with varying degrees of differentiation compared with non-cancer subjects, with evidence of dysfunction. Notably, female-biased T-cell responses were observed. CONCLUSION We conclude that patients with lung cancer on immunotherapy show a substantial qualitative deviation from non-cancer subjects in their T-cell response to mRNA vaccines, highlighting the need for heightened protective measures for patients with cancer to minimize the risk of breakthrough infection with the Omicron and other future variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- No-Joon Song
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Karthik B Chakravarthy
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Hyeongseon Jeon
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Chelsea Bolyard
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kelsi Reynolds
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin P Weller
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Sarah Reisinger
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Yi Wang
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Anqi Li
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Sizun Jiang
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Qin Ma
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Dan H Barouch
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mark P Rubinstein
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Peter G Shields
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Eugene M Oltz
- Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Dongjun Chung
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Zihai Li
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang W, Volkow ND, Berger NA, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Association of semaglutide with risk of suicidal ideation in a real-world cohort. Nat Med 2024; 30:168-176. [PMID: 38182782 PMCID: PMC11034947 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02672-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Concerns over reports of suicidal ideation associated with semaglutide treatment, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP1R) agonist medication for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and obesity, has led to investigations by European regulatory agencies. In this retrospective cohort study of electronic health records from the TriNetX Analytics Network, we aimed to assess the associations of semaglutide with suicidal ideation compared to non-GLP1R agonist anti-obesity or anti-diabetes medications. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident and recurrent suicidal ideation were calculated for the 6-month follow-up by comparing propensity score-matched patient groups. The study population included 240,618 patients with overweight or obesity who were prescribed semaglutide or non-GLP1R agonist anti-obesity medications, with the findings replicated in 1,589,855 patients with T2DM. In patients with overweight or obesity (mean age 50.1 years, 72.6% female), semaglutide compared with non-GLP1R agonist anti-obesity medications was associated with lower risk for incident (HR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.200.32-0.600.36) and recurrent (HR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.32-0.60) suicidal ideation, consistent across sex, age and ethnicity stratification. Similar findings were replicated in patients with T2DM (mean age 57.5 years, 49.2% female). Our findings do not support higher risks of suicidal ideation with semaglutide compared with non-GLP1R agonist anti-obesity or anti-diabetes medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nora D Volkow
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Nathan A Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Suarez Arbelaez MC, Nackeeran S, Shah K, Blachman-Braun R, Bronson I, Towe M, Bhat A, Marcovich R, Ramasamy R, Shah HN. Association between body mass index, metabolic syndrome and common urologic conditions: a cross-sectional study using a large multi-institutional database from the United States. Ann Med 2023; 55:2197293. [PMID: 37036830 PMCID: PMC10088970 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2197293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The study aims to determine whether body mass index (BMI), metabolic syndrome (MS) or its individual components (primary hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemias) are risk factors for common urological diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cross-sectional study with data collected on February 28, 2022 from the TriNetX Research Network. Patients were divided in cohorts according to their BMI, presence of MS (BMI > 30 kg/m2, type 2 diabetes mellitus, primary hypertension and disorders of lipoprotein metabolism) and its individual components and its association with common urological conditions was determined. For each analysis, odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Statistical significance was assessed at p < .05. RESULTS BMI > 30 kg/m2 was associated with increased risk of lithiasis, kidney cancer, overactive bladder, male hypogonadism, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and erectile dysfunction (p < .05). On the contrary, BMI was inversely associated with ureteral, bladder and prostate cancer (p < .05). In all urological diseases, MS was the strongest risk factor, with prostate cancer (OR = 2.53) showing the weakest and male hypogonadism the strongest (OR = 13.00) associations. CONCLUSIONS MS and its individual components were significant risk factors for common urological conditions. Hence holistic approaches with lifestyle modification might prevent common urological disease.Key messagesOverall, metabolic syndrome is the strongest risk factor for all the analysed urological diseases.Abnormally high body mass index can be a risk or protective factor depending on the threshold and urological disease that are being evaluated.Metabolic syndrome and increased BMI should be considered important factors associated to the prevalence of common urological diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sirpi Nackeeran
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Khushi Shah
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ruben Blachman-Braun
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Isaac Bronson
- UMass Chann Medical School, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Maxwell Towe
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Abhishek Bhat
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Robert Marcovich
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ranjith Ramasamy
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Hemendra N. Shah
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wang L, Volkow ND, Berger NA, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Cardiac and mortality outcome differences between methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone prescriptions in patients with an opioid use disorder. J Clin Psychol 2023; 79:2869-2883. [PMID: 37584532 DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE More than 109,000 Americans died of drug overdose in 2022, with 81,231 overdose deaths involving opioids. Methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone are the most widely used medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) and the most effective intervention for preventing overdose deaths. However, there is a concern that methadone results in long QT syndrome, which increases the risk for fatal cardiac arrythmias. Currently few studies have systematically evaluated both the short-term and long-term differences in cardiac and mortality outcomes between MOUD. OBJECTIVES To compare the risks of cardiac arrythmias, long QT syndrome and overall mortality between patients with opioid use disorders (OUD) who were prescribed methadone, buprenorphine or naltrexone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter and nationwide database of electronic health records (EHRs) in the United States. The study population was comprised of 144,141 patients who had medical encounters for OUD in 2016-2022, were prescribed MOUD within 1 month following a medical encounter for OUD diagnosis and had no diagnosis of cardiac arrythmias or long QT syndrome before any MOUD prescription. The study population was divided into three cohorts: (1) Methadone cohort (n = 40,938)-who were only prescribed methadone. (2) Buprenorphine cohort (n = 80,055)-who were only prescribed buprenorphine. (3) Naltrexone cohort (n = 5,738)-who were only prescribed naltrexone. EXPOSURES methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cardiac arrythmias, long QT syndrome, and death. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of outcomes at six different follow-up time frames (1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year) by comparing propensity-score matched cohorts using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS Patients with OUD who were prescribed methadone had significantly higher risks of cardiac arrhythmias, long QT syndrome and death compared with propensity-score matched patients with OUD who were prescribed buprenorphine or naltrexone. For the 1-month follow-up, the overall risk for cardiac arrythmias was 1.03% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.87% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39); The overall risk for long QT syndrome was 0.35% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.15% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.75-3.28); The overall mortality was 0.59% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.41% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.21-1.81). The increased risk persisted for 5 years: cardiac arrhythmias (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.23-1.38), long QT syndrome (HR: 3.14, 95% CI: 2.76-3.58), death (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.41-1.59). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Methadone was associated with a significantly higher risk for cardiac and mortality outcomes than buprenorphine and naltrexone. These findings are relevant to the development of guidelines for medication selection when initiating MOUD treatment and inform future medication development for OUD that minimizes risks while maximizing benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nora D Volkow
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Nathan A Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- The Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Khawaja F, Angelidakis G, Feldman A, Ravi V, Woodman E, Bhatti M, Ariza‐Heredia E, Elhajj P, Spallone A, Jiang Y, Chemaly RF. COVID-19 in cancer patients: The impact of vaccination on outcomes early in the pandemic. Cancer Med 2023; 12:22006-22022. [PMID: 38063366 PMCID: PMC10757141 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the rapid evolution of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, the development of effective and safe vaccines was of utmost importance to protect vulnerable individuals, including cancer patients. Studies comparing the clinical outcomes of cancer patients with or without vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not demonstrated clear benefit. We aimed to determine the protective effects of COVID-19 vaccination by comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated cancer patients after the initial phase of vaccine roll-out and to identify risk factors associated with hospitalization, severe COVID-19, and 30-day COVID-19 attributable mortality. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of cancer patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction on nasal swabs between January 1, 2021 and July 30, 2021. Outcomes of interest included hospitalization, severe COVID-19, and 30-day COVID-19 attributable mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes, using vaccination status as a variable of interest in all models. RESULTS Key risk factors, such as age ≥ 60 years; comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and lung diseases; and specific cancer types (leukemia and lymphoma) were independently associated with hospital admission for COVID-19, severe COVID-19, and 30-day COVID-19 attributable mortality in cancer patients regardless of their vaccination status. Vaccinated patients were protected against severe COVID-19 but with no impact on hospitalization or mortality due to COVID-19. CONCLUSION Our study highlights a significant benefit of COVID-19 vaccination for cancer patients-specifically its protection against severe COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fareed Khawaja
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee HealthThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Georgios Angelidakis
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee HealthThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Adina Feldman
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee HealthThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Vinod Ravi
- Data‐Driven Determinants for COVID‐19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) TeamThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer MedicineThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Eric Woodman
- Data‐Driven Determinants for COVID‐19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) TeamThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer MedicineThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Micah Bhatti
- Department of Laboratory MedicineThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Ella Ariza‐Heredia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee HealthThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Peter Elhajj
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee HealthThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Amy Spallone
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee HealthThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Ying Jiang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee HealthThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Roy F. Chemaly
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee HealthThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gorenflo MP, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Ischemic stroke after COVID-19 bivalent vaccine administration in patients aged 65 years and older in the United States. NPJ Vaccines 2023; 8:180. [PMID: 37996515 PMCID: PMC10667491 DOI: 10.1038/s41541-023-00777-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced in January 2023 a potential connection between administration of the Pfizer novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) bivalent vaccine booster and ischemic stroke (IS). A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the hazard of IS in patients aged 65 years and over administered the Pfizer bivalent booster versus those administered the Pfizer/Moderna monovalent or Moderna bivalent boosters. De-identified patient electronic health data were collected from TriNetX, a cloud-based analytics platform that includes data from over 90 million unique patients in the United States. Patients aged 65 years and over at the time of administration of a Pfizer bivalent, Moderna bivalent, or Pfizer/Moderna monovalent booster were included for analysis. Cohorts were propensity-score matched. The hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for IS between matched cohorts at 1-21 and 22-42 days after booster administration were calculated. There was reduced hazard of IS in the Pfizer bivalent cohort compared to the monovalent cohort at both timepoints: 1-21 days after vaccination (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.47-0.62), and 22-42 days after vaccination (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.54-0.72) (n = 79,036 patients per cohort). There was reduced hazard of IS in the Pfizer bivalent cohort compared to the Moderna bivalent cohort at 1-21 days after vaccination (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58-0.96) (n = 26,962 patients per cohort). This analysis provides no evidence that the Pfizer bivalent vaccine is associated with increased hazard of IS compared to the monovalent or Moderna bivalent vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria P Gorenflo
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, and Department of Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Laracy JC, Yan J, Steiger SN, Tan CA, Cohen N, Robilotti EV, Fender J, Cohen S, Korde N, Lee-Teh M, Noy A, Oved JH, Roeker LE, Shah G, Babady NE, Kamboj M, Seo SK. Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron breakthrough infection after receipt of AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab) for pre-exposure prophylaxis among hematologic malignancy patients. Haematologica 2023; 108:3058-3067. [PMID: 37345467 PMCID: PMC10620572 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab) is a combination of two human monoclonal antibodies for pre-exposure prophylaxis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among high-risk patients who do not mount a reliable vaccine response. Foremost among these are hematologic malignancy patients with limited clinical trial or realworld experience to assess the effectiveness of this combination treatment since the emergence of Omicron and its subvariants. We performed a retrospective study of 892 high-risk hematologic malignancy patients who received AZD7442 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City from January 1, 2022 to July 31, 2022. We evaluated demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics and performed regression analyses to evaluate risk factors for breakthrough infection. We also evaluated the impact of updated AZD7442 dosing regimens on the risk of breakthrough infection. Among 892 patients, 98 (10.9%) had a breakthrough infection during the study period. A majority received early outpatient treatment (82%) and eventually eight (8.2%) required hospitalization for management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), with a single instance of severe COVID-19 and death. Patients who received a repeat dose or a higher firsttime dose of AZD7442 had a lower incidence of breakthrough infection. Univariate analyses did not reveal any significant predictors of breakthrough infection. While AZD7442 is effective at reducing SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in patients with hematologic malignancies, no risk factors reliably predicted risk of infection. Patients who received updated dosing regimens as per Food and Drug Administration guidelines had better protection against breakthrough infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin C Laracy
- Infection Control, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| | - Judy Yan
- Infection Control, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samantha N Steiger
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Carrie A Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nina Cohen
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elizabeth V Robilotti
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Jerome Fender
- Infection Control, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Digital Informatics and Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sara Cohen
- Digital Informatics and Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Neha Korde
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Melissa Lee-Teh
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ariela Noy
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joseph H Oved
- Department of Pediatric Transplant and Cell Therapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lindsey E Roeker
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Leukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gunjan Shah
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - N Esther Babady
- Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Clinical Microbiology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mini Kamboj
- Infection Control, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Susan K Seo
- Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang L, Davis PB, Berger N, Kaelber DC, Volkow N, Xu R. Association of COVID-19 with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections in children aged 0-5 years in the USA in 2022: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Fam Med Community Health 2023; 11:e002456. [PMID: 37832975 PMCID: PMC10582888 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether COVID-19 infection was associated with increased risk for incident respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections and associated diseases among young children that might have contributed to the 2022 surge of severe paediatric RSV cases in the USA. DESIGN This is a retrospective population-based cohort study. Five outcomes were examined, including overall RSV infection, positive lab test-confirmed RSV infection, clinically diagnosed RSV diseases, RSV-associated bronchiolitis and unspecified bronchiolitis. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI of the outcomes that occurred during the 2022 and 2021 RSV seasons were calculated by comparing propensity-score matched cohorts. SETTING Nationwide multicentre database of electronic health records (EHRs) of 61.4 million patients in the USA including 1.7 million children 0-5 years of age, which was accessed through TriNetX Analytics that provides web-based and secure access to patient EHR data from hospitals, primary care and specialty treatment providers. PARTICIPANTS The study population consisted of 228 940 children of 0-5 years with no prior RSV infection who had medical encounters in October 2022. Findings were replicated in a separate study population of 370 919 children of 0-5 years with no prior RSV infection who had medical encounters in July 2021-August 2021 during a non-overlapping time period. RESULTS For the 2022 study population (average age 2.4 years, 46.8% girls, 61% white, 16% black), the risk for incident RSV infection during October 2022-December 2022 was 6.40% for children with prior COVID-19 infection, higher than 4.30% for the matched children without COVID-19 (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.55); and among children aged 0-1 year, the overall risk was 7.90% for those with prior COVID-19 infection, higher than 5.64% for matched children without (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.62). For the 2021 study population (average age 2.2 years, 46% girls, 57% white, 20% black), the risk for incident RSV infection during July 2021-December 2021 was 4.85% for children with prior COVID-19 infection, higher than 3.68% for the matched children without COVID-19 (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.56); and 7.30% for children aged 0-1 year with prior COVID-19 infection, higher than 4.98% for matched children without (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.82). CONCLUSION COVID-19 was associated with a significantly increased risk for RSV infections among children aged 0-5 years in 2022. Similar findings were replicated for a study population of children aged 0-5 years in 2021. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 contributed to the 2022 surge of RSV cases in young children through the large buildup of COVID-19-infected children and the potential long-term adverse effects of COVID-19 on the immune and respiratory system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nathan Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- The Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education and the Departments ofInternal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nora Volkow
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for AI in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nelli F, Giannarelli D, Fabbri A, Virtuoso A, Giron Berrios JR, Marrucci E, Fiore C, Schirripa M, Signorelli C, Chilelli MG, Primi F, Panichi V, Topini G, Silvestri MA, Ruggeri EM. Immune-related adverse events and disease outcomes after the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2023; 72:3217-3228. [PMID: 37428196 PMCID: PMC10992090 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-023-03489-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical implications of the third dose of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently unknown. We performed a prospective analysis of the Vax-On-Third study to investigate the effects of antibody response on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and disease outcomes. METHODS Recipients of the booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine who had received at least one course of an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment before vaccination for an advanced solid malignancy were eligible. RESULTS The current analysis included 56 patients with metastatic disease (median age: 66 years; male: 71%), most of whom had a lung cancer diagnosis and were being treated with pembrolizumab- or nivolumab-based regimens. The optimal cut-point antibody titer of 486 BAU/mL allowed a dichotomization of recipients into low-responders (Low-R, < 486 BAU/mL) or high-responders (High-R, ≥ 486 BAU/mL). After a median follow-up time of 226 days, 21.4% of patients experienced moderate to severe irAEs without any recrudescence of immune toxicities preceding the booster dose. The frequencies of irAE before and after the third dose did not differ, but an increase in the cumulative incidence of immuno-related thyroiditis was observed within the High-R subgroup. On multivariate analysis, an enhanced humoral response correlated with a better outcome in terms of durable clinical benefit, which resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of disease control loss but not mortality. CONCLUSIONS Our findings would strengthen the recommendation not to change anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment plans based on current or future immunization schedules, implying that all these patients should be closely monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Nelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Agnese Fabbri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Antonella Virtuoso
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Julio Rodrigo Giron Berrios
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marrucci
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Cristina Fiore
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Marta Schirripa
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Carlo Signorelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Mario Giovanni Chilelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Francesca Primi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Valentina Panichi
- Microbiology and Virology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Topini
- Microbiology and Virology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Maria Assunta Silvestri
- Microbiology and Virology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Enzo Maria Ruggeri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang L, Berger N, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Volkow N, Xu R. Time trend and seasonality in medically attended respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections in US children aged 0-5 years, January 2010-January 2023. Fam Med Community Health 2023; 11:e002453. [PMID: 37844966 PMCID: PMC10582996 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The long-term time trend and seasonality variations of first-time medically attended respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections among young children are unknown. We aim to examine the time trend of medically attended first-time RSV infections among young children in the USA from January 2010 through January 2023. DESIGN This is a population-based cohort study using electronic health records (EHRs). Monthly incidence rate of medically attended first-time RSV infection (cases per 10 000 000 person-days). A time-series regression model was used to model and predict time trends and seasonality. SETTING Multicenter and nationwide TriNetX Network in the USA. PARTICIPANTS The study population comprised children aged 0-5 years who had medical visits during the period of January 2010 to January 2023. RESULTS The data included 29 013 937 medical visits for children aged 0-5 years (46.5% girls and 53.5% boys) from January 2010 through January 2023. From 2010 through 2019, the monthly incidence rate of first-time medically attended RSV infection in children aged 0-5 years followed a consistent seasonal pattern. Seasonal patterns of medically attended RSV infections were significantly disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020, the seasonal variation disappeared with a peak incidence rate of 20 cases per 1 000 000 person-days, a decrease of 97.4% from the expected peak rate (rate ratio or RR: 0.026, 95% CI 0.017 to 0.040). In 2021, the seasonality returned but started 4 months earlier, lasted for 9 months, and peaked in August at a rate of 753 cases per 1 000 000 person-days, a decrease of 9.6% from the expected peak rate (RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99). In 2022, the seasonal pattern is similar to prepandemic years but reached a historically high rate of 2182 cases per 10 000 000 person-days in November, an increase of 143% from the expected peak rate (RR: 2.43, 95% CI 2.25 to 2.63). The time trend and seasonality of the EHR-based medically attended RSV infections are consistent with those of RSV-associated hospitalisations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) survey-based surveillance system. CONCLUSION The findings show the disrupted seasonality during the COVID-19 pandemic and a historically high surge of paediatric RSV cases that required medical attention in 2022. Our study demonstrates the potential of EHRs as a cost-effective alternative for real-time pathogen and syndromic surveillance of unexpected disease patterns including RSV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nathan Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- The Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education and the Departments ofInternal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nora Volkow
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Potter AL, Vaddaraju V, Venkateswaran S, Mansur A, Bajaj SS, Kiang MV, Jena AB, Yang CFJ. Deaths Due to COVID-19 in Patients With Cancer During Different Waves of the Pandemic in the US. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1417-1422. [PMID: 37651113 PMCID: PMC10472259 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Importance With the ongoing relaxation of guidelines to prevent COVID-19 transmission, particularly in hospital settings, medically vulnerable groups, such as patients with cancer, may experience a disparate burden of COVID-19 mortality compared with the general population. Objective To evaluate COVID-19 mortality among US patients with cancer compared with the general US population during different waves of the pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database to examine COVID-19 mortality among US patients with cancer and the general population from March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022. The number of deaths due to COVID-19 during the 2021 to 2022 winter Omicron surge was compared with deaths during the preceding year's COVID-19 winter surge (when the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 variant was predominant) using mortality ratios. Data were analyzed from July 21 through August 31, 2022. Exposures Pandemic wave during which the wild-type variant (December 2020 to February 2021), Delta variant (July 2021 to November 2021), or Omicron variant (December 2021 to February 2022) was predominant. Main Outcomes and Measures Number of COVID-19 deaths per month. Results The sample included 34 350 patients with cancer (14 498 females [42.2%] and 19 852 males [57.8%]) and 628 156 members of the general public (276 878 females [44.1%] and 351 278 males [55.9%]) who died from COVID-19 when the wild-type (December 2020-February 2021), Delta (July 2021-November 2021), and winter Omicron (December 2021-February 2022) variants were predominant. Among patients with cancer, the greatest number of COVID-19 deaths per month occurred during the winter Omicron period (n = 5958): at the peak of the winter Omicron period, there were 18% more deaths compared with the peak of the wild-type period. In contrast, among the general public, the greatest number of COVID-19 deaths per month occurred during the wild-type period (n = 105 327), and at the peak of the winter Omicron period, there were 21% fewer COVID-19 deaths compared with the peak of the wild-type period. In subgroup analyses by cancer site, COVID-19 mortality increased the most, by 38%, among patients with lymphoma during the winter Omicron period vs the wild-type period. Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that patients with cancer had a disparate burden of COVID-19 mortality during the winter Omicron wave compared with the general US population. With the emergence of new, immune-evasive SARS-CoV-2 variants, many of which are anticipated to be resistant to monoclonal antibody treatments, strategies to prevent COVID-19 transmission should remain a high priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra L. Potter
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Vedha Vaddaraju
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Shivaek Venkateswaran
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Arian Mansur
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Simar S. Bajaj
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Mathew V. Kiang
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Anupam B. Jena
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gao Z, Winhusen TJ, Gorenflo M, Ghitza UE, Nunes E, Saxon AJ, Korthuis T, Brady K, Luo SX, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Potential effect of antidepressants on remission from cocaine use disorder - A nationwide matched retrospective cohort study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 251:110958. [PMID: 37703770 PMCID: PMC10556849 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a significant public health issue for which there is no Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacotherapy. Depressive disorders are common psychiatric comorbidity amongst individuals with CUD. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 161,544 patients diagnosed with CUD and depression to evaluate the effectiveness of 13 antidepressants on CUD remission. For any antidepressant found to be associated with CUD remission that had an additional indication, we conducted an additional analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the candidate drug in patients with CUD with that indication. We then analyzed publicly genomic and functional databases to identify potential explanatory mechanisms of action of the candidate drug in the treatment of CUD. RESULTS Among these antidepressants, bupropion was associated with higher rates of CUD remission compared to propensity-score matched patients prescribed other antidepressants: hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57 (95% CI: 1.27-1.94). Bupropion is also approved for smoking cessation. We identified CUD patients with co-occurring nicotine dependence and observed that patients prescribed bupropion displayed a higher rate of CUD remission compared to matched individuals prescribed other drugs for nicotine dependence: 1.38 (95% CI: 1.11-1.71). Genetic and functional analyses revealed that bupropion interacts with four protein-encoding genes (COMT, DRD2, SLC6A3, and SLC6A4) which are also associated with CUD and targets CUD-associated pathways including serotonergic synapses, cocaine addiction, and dopaminergic synapses. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that bupropion might be considered a treatment for improving CUD remission in patients with CUD and co-occurring depression or nicotine dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenxiang Gao
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - T John Winhusen
- Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| | - Maria Gorenflo
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Udi E Ghitza
- Center for the Clinical Trials Network (CCTN), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Edward Nunes
- Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Saxon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Todd Korthuis
- Addiction Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kathleen Brady
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sean X Luo
- Columbia University Division on Substance Use Disorders, and Research Scientist, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The Metro Health System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Li JX, Liao PL, Wei JCC, Hsu SB, Yeh CJ. A chronological review of COVID-19 case fatality rate and its secular trend and investigation of all-cause mortality and hospitalization during the Delta and Omicron waves in the United States: a retrospective cohort study. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1143650. [PMID: 37799149 PMCID: PMC10548482 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1143650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused more than 690 million deaths worldwide. Different results concerning the death rates of the Delta and Omicron variants have been recorded. We aimed to assess the secular trend of case fatality rate (CFR), identify risk factors associated with mortality following COVID-19 diagnosis, and investigate the risks of mortality and hospitalization during Delta and Omicron waves in the United States. Methods This study assessed 2,857,925 individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 in the United States from January 2020, to June 2022. The inclusion criterion was the presence of COVID-19 diagnostic codes in electronic medical record or a positive laboratory test of the SARS-CoV-2. Statistical analysis was bifurcated into two components, longitudinal analysis and comparative analysis. To assess the discrepancies in hospitalization and mortality rates for COVID-19, we identified the prevailing periods for the Delta and Omicron variants. Results Longitudinal analysis demonstrated four sharp surges in the number of deaths and CFR. The CFR was persistently higher in males and older age. The CFR of Black and White remained higher than Asians since January 2022. In comparative analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality and hospitalization were higher in Delta wave compared to the Omicron wave. Risk of all-cause mortality was found to be greater 14-30 days after a COVID-19 diagnosis, while the likelihood of hospitalization was higher in the first 14 days following a COVID-19 diagnosis in Delta wave compared with Omicron wave. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the cumulative probability of mortality was approximately 2-fold on day 30 in Delta than in Omicron cases (log-rank p < 0.001). The mortality risk ratio between the Delta and Omicron variants was 1.671 (95% Cl 1.615-1.729, log-rank p < 0.001). Delta also had a significantly increased mortality risk over Omicron in all age groups. The CFR of people aged above 80 years was extremely high as 17.33%. Conclusion Male sex and age seemed to be strong and independent risk factors of mortality in COVID-19. The Delta variant appears to cause more hospitalization and death than the Omicron variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing-Xing Li
- Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Laboratory Sciences and Medical Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Lun Liao
- Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - James Cheng-Chung Wei
- Department of Nursing, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Bai Hsu
- College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Jung Yeh
- Department of Public Health, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ying Y, Bytyci J, Lee LYW. Exiting the pandemic together: achieving global immunity and equity. Oncoscience 2023; 10:36-37. [PMID: 37663200 PMCID: PMC10473133 DOI: 10.18632/oncoscience.585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxin Ying
- Correspondence to:Yuxin Ying, Oxford Medical School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK email:
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ulanja MB, Beutler BD, Asafo‐Agyei KO, Governor SB, Edusa S, Antwi‐Amoabeng D, Ulanja RN, Nteim GB, Amankwah M, Neelam V, Rahman GA, Djankpa FT, Mabrouk T, Alese OB. The impact of COVID-19 on mortality, length of stay, and cost of care among patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: A propensity score-matched analysis. Cancer Med 2023; 12:17365-17376. [PMID: 37519127 PMCID: PMC10501239 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pandemic have had a lasting impact on the care of cancer patients. The impact on patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies remains incompletely understood. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost of care among patients with GI malignancies, and identify differences in outcomes based on primary tumor site. METHODS We analyzed discharge encounters collected from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between March 2020 and December 2020 using propensity score matching (PSM) and COVID-19 as the treatment effect. RESULTS Of the 87,684 patient discharges with GI malignancies, 1892 were positive for COVID-19 (C+) and eligible for matching in the PSM model. Following PSM analysis, C+ with GI tumors demonstrated increased incidence of mortality compared to their COVID-19-negative (C-) counterparts (21.3% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001). C+ patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) had significantly higher mortality compared to those who were C- (40% vs. 24%; p = 0.035). In addition, C+ patients with GI tumors had a longer mean LOS (9.4 days vs. 6.9 days; p < 0.001) and increased cost of care ($26,048.29 vs. $21,625.2; p = 0.001) compared to C- patients. C+ patients also had higher odds of mortality secondary to myocardial infarction relative to C- patients (OR = 3.54, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS C+ patients with GI tumors face approximately double the odds of mortality, increased LOS, and increased cost of care compared to their C- counterparts. Outcome disparities were most pronounced among patients with CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark B. Ulanja
- CHRISTUS Ochsner St. Patrick HospitalLake CharlesLouisianaUSA
| | - Bryce D. Beutler
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Reginald N. Ulanja
- Department of Physiology, School of Medical SciencesUniversity of Cape CoastCape CoastGhana
| | - Grace B. Nteim
- Department of Physiology, School of Medical SciencesUniversity of Cape CoastCape CoastGhana
| | - Millicent Amankwah
- Department of Hematology OncologyFeist‐Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health ShreveportShreveportLouisianaUSA
| | - Vijay Neelam
- CHRISTUS Ochsner St. Patrick HospitalLake CharlesLouisianaUSA
| | - Ganiyu A. Rahman
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical SciencesUniversity of Cape CoastCape CoastGhana
| | - Francis T. Djankpa
- Department of Physiology, School of Medical SciencesUniversity of Cape CoastCape CoastGhana
| | - Tarig Mabrouk
- CHRISTUS Ochsner St. Patrick HospitalLake CharlesLouisianaUSA
| | - Olatunji B. Alese
- Department of Hematology and OncologyWinship Cancer Institute, Emory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gao Z, Winhusen TJ, Gorenflo M, Ghitza UE, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Repurposing ketamine to treat cocaine use disorder: integration of artificial intelligence-based prediction, expert evaluation, clinical corroboration and mechanism of action analyses. Addiction 2023; 118:1307-1319. [PMID: 36792381 PMCID: PMC10631254 DOI: 10.1111/add.16168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a significant public health issue for which there is no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medication. Drug repurposing looks for new cost-effective uses of approved drugs. This study presents an integrated strategy to identify repurposed FDA-approved drugs for CUD treatment. DESIGN Our drug repurposing strategy combines artificial intelligence (AI)-based drug prediction, expert panel review, clinical corroboration and mechanisms of action analysis being implemented in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN). Based on AI-based prediction and expert knowledge, ketamine was ranked as the top candidate for clinical corroboration via electronic health record (EHR) evaluation of CUD patient cohorts prescribed ketamine for anesthesia or depression compared with matched controls who received non-ketamine anesthesia or antidepressants/midazolam. Genetic and pathway enrichment analyses were performed to understand ketamine's potential mechanisms of action in the context of CUD. SETTING The study utilized TriNetX to access EHRs from more than 90 million patients world-wide. Genetic- and functional-level analyses used DisGeNet, Search Tool for Interactions of Chemicals and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes databases. PARTICIPANTS A total of 7742 CUD patients who received anesthesia (3871 ketamine-exposed and 3871 anesthetic-controlled) and 7910 CUD patients with depression (3955 ketamine-exposed and 3955 antidepressant-controlled) were identified after propensity score-matching. MEASUREMENTS EHR analysis outcome was a CUD remission diagnosis within 1 year of drug prescription. FINDINGS Patients with CUD prescribed ketamine for anesthesia displayed a significantly higher rate of CUD remission compared with matched individuals prescribed other anesthetics [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.42-2.78]. Similarly, CUD patients prescribed ketamine for depression evidenced a significantly higher CUD remission ratio compared with matched patients prescribed antidepressants or midazolam (HR = 4.39, 95% CI = 2.89-6.68). The mechanism of action analysis revealed that ketamine directly targets multiple CUD-associated genes (BDNF, CNR1, DRD2, GABRA2, GABRB3, GAD1, OPRK1, OPRM1, SLC6A3, SLC6A4) and pathways implicated in neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, cAMP signaling and cocaine abuse/dependence. CONCLUSIONS Ketamine appears to be a potential repurposed drug for treatment of cocaine use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenxiang Gao
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - T. John Winhusen
- Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Maria Gorenflo
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Udi E. Ghitza
- Center for the Clinical Trials Network (CCTN), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pamela B. Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C. Kaelber
- Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The Metro Health System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
O'Reilly S, Kathryn Carroll H, Murray D, Burke L, McCarthy T, O'Connor R, Kilty C, Lynch S, Feighan J, Cloherty M, Fitzpatrick P, Falvey K, Murphy V, Jane O'Leary M, Gregg S, Young L, McAuliffe E, Hegarty J, Gavin A, Lawler M, Kavanagh P, Spillane S, McWade T, Heffron M, Ryan K, Kelly PJ, Murphy A, Corrigan M, Redmond HP, Redmond P, Walsh PM, Tierney P, Zhang M, Bennett K, Mullooly M. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care in Ireland - Perspectives from a COVID-19 and Cancer Working Group. J Cancer Policy 2023; 36:100414. [PMID: 36841473 PMCID: PMC9951610 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
Upon the COVID-19 pandemic onset in Ireland, cancer service disruptions occurred due to prioritisation of COVID-19 related care, redeployment of staff, initial pausing of screening, diagnostic, medical and surgical oncology procedures, staff shortages due to COVID-19 infection and impacts on the physical and mental health of cancer healthcare workers. This was coupled with reluctance among people with symptoms suspicious for cancer to attend for clinical evaluation, due to concerns of contracting the virus. This was further compounded by a cyber-attack on national health service IT systems on May 14th 2021. The Irish Cancer Society, a national cancer charity with a role in advocacy, research and patient supports, convened a multi-disciplinary stakeholder group (COVID-19 and Cancer Working Group) to reflect on and understand the impact of the pandemic on cancer patients and services in Ireland, and discuss potential mitigation strategies. Perspectives on experiences were gathered across domains including timeliness of data acquisition and its conversion into intelligence, and the resourcing of cancer care to address cancer service impacts. The group highlighted aspects for future research to understand the long-term pandemic impact on cancer outcomes, while also highlighting potential strategies to support cancer services, build resilience and address delayed diagnosis. Additional measures include the need for cancer workforce recruitment and retention, increased mental health supports for both patients and oncology professionals, improvements to public health messaging, a near real-time multimodal national cancer database, and robust digital and physical infrastructure to mitigate impacts of the current pandemic and future challenges to cancer care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seamus O'Reilly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital and Cancer Research@UCC, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Hailey Kathryn Carroll
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital and Cancer Research@UCC, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Deirdre Murray
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland
| | - Louise Burke
- Department of Pathology, Cork University Hospital and University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | | | | | - Sonya Lynch
- PPI Contributor c/o Cancer Research, UCC University College Cork, T12 DCA4 Cork, Ireland
| | - Jennifer Feighan
- Irish Nutrition & Dietetic Institute, Airfield Estate, Overend Ave, Dundrum, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maeve Cloherty
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital and Cancer Research@UCC, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Patricia Fitzpatrick
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Mary Jane O'Leary
- Palliative Medicine, Marymount University Hospital and Hospice, Cork, Ireland
| | - Sophie Gregg
- Palliative Medicine, Marymount University Hospital and Hospice, Cork, Ireland
| | - Leonie Young
- Endocrine Oncology Research Group, Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eilish McAuliffe
- UCD IRIS Centre, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Mark Lawler
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK; DATA-CAN, the UK's Health Data Research Hub for Cancer, UK
| | - Paul Kavanagh
- National Health Intelligence Unit, Strategy and Research, Jervis House, Jervis St, Health Service Executive, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | - Susan Spillane
- Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Terry McWade
- Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Karen Ryan
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and St Francis Hospice Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paul J Kelly
- Bon Secours Radiotherapy Centre, Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; UPMC Hillman Cancer Centre, Cork, Ireland
| | - Aileen Murphy
- Department of Economics, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Mark Corrigan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - H Paul Redmond
- Department of Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Patrick Redmond
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Mengyang Zhang
- School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kathleen Bennett
- School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maeve Mullooly
- School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Montoya A, Wen K, Travers JL, Rivera-Hernandez M, White E, Mor V, Berry SD. Resident Factors Associated With Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Infections. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2023; 24:901-905. [PMID: 36965506 PMCID: PMC9977610 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine incidence of and resident characteristics associated with breakthrough infections (BTIs) and severe illness among residents with 2 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccinations. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Nursing home (NH) residents who completed their primary series of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination by March 31, 2021. METHODS Electronic health records and Minimum Data Set assessments from a multistate NH data consortium were used to identify BTI and severe illness (a composite measure of hospitalization and/or death within 30 days of BTI) occurring prior to November 24, 2021. A t test for differences in means was used to compare covariates for residents with and without BTI. Finally, we estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for BTI with 95% CIs using a modified Poisson regression approach, comparing residents with BTI vs residents without. We adjusted for facility fixed effects in our model. RESULTS Our sample included 23,172 residents from 984 NHs who were at least 14 days past their second mRNA vaccine dose. Of those, 1173 (5%) developed an incident COVID-19 BTI (mean follow-up time: 250 days). Among residents with BTI, 8.6% were hospitalized or died within 30 days of BTI diagnosis. Factors associated with severe illness included age ≥85 years (IRR 2.08, 95% CI 1.08-4.02, reference age <65 years), bowel incontinence (IRR 1.73, 95% CI 1.01-2.99), coronary artery disease (IRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.31-2.94), chronic kidney disease (IRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.07-2.54), and schizophrenia (IRR 2.38, 95% CI 1.19-4.75). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Among vaccinated NH residents, BTIs and associated severe illness are rare. Residents aged ≥85 years and with certain comorbidities appear to be the most vulnerable. Given that the pandemic continues and testing policies have relaxed, these data provide prognostic information for NH facilities faced with continued outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Montoya
- Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Katherine Wen
- Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jasmine L Travers
- Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Elizabeth White
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Vincent Mor
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Sarah D Berry
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine & Harvard Medical Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Immunocompromised hosts, which encompass a diverse population of persons with malignancies, human immunodeficiency virus disease, solid organ, and hematologic transplants, autoimmune diseases, and primary immunodeficiencies, bear a significant burden of the morbidity and mortality due to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Immunocompromised patients who develop COVID-19 have a more severe illness, higher hospitalization rates, and higher mortality rates than immunocompetent patients. There are no well-defined treatment strategies that are specific to immunocompromised patients and vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma are variably effective. This review focuses on the specific impact of COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients and the gaps in knowledge that require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher D Bertini
- Department of Internal Medicine, UTHealth Houston McGovern Medical School, 6431 Fannin, MSB 1.150, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Fareed Khawaja
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1469, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ajay Sheshadri
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street Unit 1462, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tagliamento M, Gennari A, Lambertini M, Salazar R, Harbeck N, Del Mastro L, Aguilar-Company J, Bower M, Sharkey R, Dalla Pria A, Plaja A, Jackson A, Handford J, Sita-Lumsden A, Martinez-Vila C, Matas M, Miguel Rodriguez A, Vincenzi B, Tonini G, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Pedrazzoli P, D'Avanzo F, Biello F, Sinclair A, Lee AJ, Rossi S, Rizzo G, Mirallas O, Pimentel I, Iglesias M, Sanchez de Torre A, Guida A, Berardi R, Zambelli A, Tondini C, Filetti M, Mazzoni F, Mukherjee U, Diamantis N, Parisi A, Aujayeb A, Prat A, Libertini M, Grisanti S, Rossi M, Zoratto F, Generali D, Saura C, Lyman GH, Kuderer NM, Pinato DJ, Cortellini A. Pandemic Phase-Adjusted Analysis of COVID-19 Outcomes Reveals Reduced Intrinsic Vulnerability and Substantial Vaccine Protection From Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2800-2814. [PMID: 36720089 PMCID: PMC10414724 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although representing the majority of newly diagnosed cancers, patients with breast cancer appear less vulnerable to COVID-19 mortality compared with other malignancies. In the absence of patients on active cancer therapy included in vaccination trials, a contemporary real-world evaluation of outcomes during the various pandemic phases, as well as of the impact of vaccination, is needed to better inform clinical practice. METHODS We compared COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among patients with breast cancer across prevaccination (February 27, 2020-November 30, 2020), Alpha-Delta (December 1, 2020-December 14, 2021), and Omicron (December 15, 2021-January 31, 2022) phases using OnCovid registry participants (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04393974). Twenty-eight-day case fatality rate (CFR28) and COVID-19 severity were compared in unvaccinated versus double-dosed/boosted patients (vaccinated) with inverse probability of treatment weighting models adjusted for country of origin, age, number of comorbidities, tumor stage, and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS By the data lock of February 4, 2022, the registry counted 613 eligible patients with breast cancer: 60.1% (n = 312) hormone receptor-positive, 25.2% (n = 131) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and 14.6% (n = 76) triple-negative. The majority (61%; n = 374) had localized/locally advanced disease. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 51-74 years). A total of 193 patients (31.5%) presented ≥ 2 comorbidities and 69% (n = 330) were never smokers. In total, 392 (63.9%), 164 (26.8%), and 57 (9.3%) were diagnosed during the prevaccination, Alpha-Delta, and Omicron phases, respectively. Analysis of CFR28 demonstrates comparable estimates of mortality across the three pandemic phases (13.9%, 12.2%, 5.3%, respectively; P = .182). Nevertheless, a significant improvement in outcome measures of COVID-19 severity across the three pandemic time periods was observed. Importantly, when reported separately, unvaccinated patients from the Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases achieved comparable outcomes to those from the prevaccination phase. Of 566 patients eligible for the vaccination analysis, 72 (12.7%) were fully vaccinated and 494 (87.3%) were unvaccinated. We confirmed with inverse probability of treatment weighting multivariable analysis and following a clustered robust correction for participating center that vaccinated patients achieved improved CFR28 (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40), hospitalization (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.69), COVID-19 complications (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.45), and reduced requirement of COVID-19-specific therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.63) and oxygen therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67) compared with unvaccinated controls. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight a consistent reduction of COVID-19 severity in patients with breast cancer during the Omicron outbreak in Europe. We also demonstrate that even in this population, a complete severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination course is a strong determinant of improved morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Medical Oncology Department, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Ramon Salazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO L'Hospitalet, Oncobell Program (IDIBELL), CIBERONC, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and Gynecological Cancer Center and CCC Munich, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Medical Oncology Department, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Juan Aguilar-Company
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
- Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mark Bower
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Sharkey
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alessia Dalla Pria
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Plaja
- Medical Oncology Department, B-ARGO Group, IGTP, Catalan Institute of Oncology-Badalona, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Jasmine Handford
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ailsa Sita-Lumsden
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Bruno Vincenzi
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Alexia Bertuzzi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Joan Brunet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Paolo Pedrazzoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca D'Avanzo
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Federica Biello
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Alasdair Sinclair
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alvin J.X. Lee
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sabrina Rossi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Oriol Mirallas
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Pimentel
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Annalisa Guida
- Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Tondini
- Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | - Uma Mukherjee
- Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alessandro Parisi
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Avinash Aujayeb
- Respiratory Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, United Kingdom
| | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michela Libertini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Maura Rossi
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera “SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo,” Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Generali
- Multidisciplinary Breast Pathology and Translational Research Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Cristina Saura
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gary H. Lyman
- Public Health Sciences Division and Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
- Divisions of Public Health Science and Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - David J. Pinato
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gao Z, Gorenflo M, Kaelber DC, Monnier VM, Xu R. Drug repurposing for reducing the risk of cataract extraction in patients with diabetes mellitus: integration of artificial intelligence-based drug prediction and clinical corroboration. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1181711. [PMID: 37274099 PMCID: PMC10232753 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1181711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the incidence of age-related cataracts. Currently, no medication is approved or known to delay clinical cataract progression. Using a novel approach based on AI, we searched for drugs with potential cataract surgery-suppressing effects. We developed a drug discovery strategy that combines AI-based potential candidate prediction among 2650 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs with clinical corroboration leveraging multicenter electronic health records (EHRs) of approximately 800,000 cataract patients from the TriNetX platform. Among the top-10 AI-predicted repurposed candidate drugs, we identified three DM diagnostic ICD code groups, such as cataract patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), or hyperglycemia, and conducted retrospective cohort analyses to evaluate the efficacy of these candidate drugs in reducing the risk of cataract extraction. Aspirin, melatonin, and ibuprofen were associated with a reduced 5-, 10-, and 20-year cataract extraction risk in all types of diabetes. Acetylcysteine was associated with a reduced 5-, 10-, and 20-year cataract extraction risk in T2DM and hyperglycemia but not in T1DM patient groups. The suppressive effects of aspirin, acetylcysteine, and ibuprofen waned over time, while those of melatonin became stronger in both genders. Thus, the four repositioned drugs have the potential to delay cataract progression in both genders. All four drugs share the ability to directly or indirectly inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), an enzyme that is increased by multiple cataractogenic stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenxiang Gao
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Maria Gorenflo
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - David C. Kaelber
- The Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The Metro Health System, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Vincent M. Monnier
- Department of Pathology and Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nelli F, Fabbri A, Virtuoso A, Giannarelli D, Giron Berrios JR, Marrucci E, Fiore C, Schirripa M, Signorelli C, Chilelli MG, Primi F, Pessina G, Natoni F, Silvestri MA, Ruggeri EM. Effects of Antibody Response after Booster Vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infections and Disease Outcomes in Advanced Cancer Patients: A Prospective Analysis of the Vax-on-Third Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5103-5115. [PMID: 37232844 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30050386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The clinical implications of COVID-19 outbreaks following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in immunocompromised recipients are a worldwide concern. Cancer patients on active treatment remain at an increased risk of developing breakthrough infections because of waning immunity and the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants. There is a paucity of data on the effects of COVID-19 outbreaks on long-term survival outcomes in this population. (2) Methods: We enrolled 230 cancer patients who were on active treatment for advanced disease and had received booster dosing of an mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine as part of the Vax-On-Third trial between September 2021 and October 2021. Four weeks after the third immunization, IgG antibodies against the spike receptor domain of SARS-CoV-2 were tested in all patients. We prospectively evaluated the incidence of breakthrough infections and disease outcomes. The coprimary endpoints were the effects of antibody titers on the development of breakthrough infections and the impact of COVID-19 outbreaks on cancer treatment failure. (3) Results: At a median follow-up of 16.3 months (95% CI 14.5-17.0), 85 (37%) patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hospitalization was required in 11 patients (12.9%) and only 2 (2.3%) deaths related to COVID-19 outbreaks were observed. Median antibody titers were significantly lower in breakthrough cases than in non-cases (291 BAU/mL (95% CI 210-505) vs. 2798 BAU/mL (95% CI 2323-3613), p < 0.001). A serological titer cut-off below 803 BAU/mL was predictive of breakthrough infection. In multivariate testing, antibody titers and cytotoxic chemotherapy were independently associated with an increased risk of outbreaks. Time-to-treatment failure after booster dosing was significantly shorter in patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.1 months (95% CI 2.3-3.6) vs. 16.2 months (95% CI 14.3-17.0), p < 0.001) and had an antibody level below the cut-off (3.6 months (95% CI 3.0-4.5) vs. 14.6 months (95% CI 11.9-16.3), p < 0.001). A multivariate Cox regression model confirmed that both covariates independently had a worsening effect on time-to-treatment failure. (4) Conclusions: These data support the role of vaccine boosters in preventing the incidence and severity of COVID-19 outbreaks. Enhanced humoral immunity after the third vaccination significantly correlates with protection against breakthrough infections. Strategies aimed at restraining SARS-CoV-2 transmission in advanced cancer patients undergoing active treatment should be prioritized to mitigate the impact on disease outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Nelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Agnese Fabbri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Antonella Virtuoso
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Julio Rodrigo Giron Berrios
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marrucci
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Cristina Fiore
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Marta Schirripa
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Carlo Signorelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Mario Giovanni Chilelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Francesca Primi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Gloria Pessina
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Molecular Biology and Covid Diagnostics, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Federica Natoni
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Molecular Biology and Covid Diagnostics, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Maria Assunta Silvestri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Microbiology and Virology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Enzo Maria Ruggeri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wang L, Davis PB, Berger NA, Kaelber DC, Volkow ND, Xu R. Disrupted seasonality and association of COVID-19 with medically attended respiratory syncytial virus infections among young children in the US: January 2010-January 2023. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.05.12.23289898. [PMID: 37292931 PMCID: PMC10246033 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.12.23289898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections and hospitalizations surged sharply in 2022 among young children. To assess whether COVID-19 contributed to this surge, we leveraged a real-time nation-wide US database of electronic health records (EHRs) using time series analysis from January 1, 2010 through January 31, 2023, and propensity-score matched cohort comparisons for children aged 0-5 years with or without prior COVID-19 infection. Seasonal patterns of medically attended RSV infections were significantly disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The monthly incidence rate for first-time medically attended cases, most of which were severe RSV-associated diseases, reached a historical high rate of 2,182 cases per 1,0000,000 person-days in November 2022, corresponding to a related increase of 143% compared to expected peak rate (rate ratio: 2.43, 95% CI: 2.25-2.63). Among 228,940 children aged 0-5 years, the risk for first-time medically attended RSV during 10/2022-12/2022 was 6.40% for children with prior COVID-19 infection, higher than 4.30% for the matched children without COVID-19 (risk ratio or RR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.27-1.55); and among 99,105 children aged 0-1 year, the overall risk was 7.90% for those with prior COVID-19 infection, higher than 5.64% for matched children without (RR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.21-1.62). These data provide evidence that COVID-19 contributed to the 2022 surge of severe pediatric RSV cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pamela B. Davis
- The Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nathan A. Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C. Kaelber
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Population and Quantitative Health Sciences and the Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nora D. Volkow
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Li JX, Wang YH, Bair H, Hsu SB, Chen C, Wei JCC, Lin CJ. Risk assessment of retinal vascular occlusion after COVID-19 vaccination. NPJ Vaccines 2023; 8:64. [PMID: 37130882 PMCID: PMC10153772 DOI: 10.1038/s41541-023-00661-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are associated with several ocular manifestations. Emerging evidence has been reported; however, the causality between the two is debatable. We aimed to investigate the risk of retinal vascular occlusion after COVID-19 vaccination. This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX global network and included individuals vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines between January 2020 and December 2022. We excluded individuals with a history of retinal vascular occlusion or those who used any systemic medication that could potentially affect blood coagulation prior to vaccination. To compare the risk of retinal vascular occlusion, we employed multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models after performing a 1:1 propensity score matching between the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts. Individuals with COVID-19 vaccination had a higher risk of all forms of retinal vascular occlusion in 2 years after vaccination, with an overall hazard ratio of 2.19 (95% confidence interval 2.00-2.39). The cumulative incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was significantly higher in the vaccinated cohort compared to the unvaccinated cohort, 2 years and 12 weeks after vaccination. The risk of retinal vascular occlusion significantly increased during the first 2 weeks after vaccination and persisted for 12 weeks. Additionally, individuals with first and second dose of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 had significantly increased risk of retinal vascular occlusion 2 years following vaccination, while no disparity was detected between brand and dose of vaccines. This large multicenter study strengthens the findings of previous cases. Retinal vascular occlusion may not be a coincidental finding after COVID-19 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing-Xing Li
- Department of General Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Laboratory Sciences and Medical Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsun Wang
- Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Henry Bair
- Department of Ophthalmology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Shu-Bai Hsu
- College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Connie Chen
- Department of Optometry, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Optometry, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - James Cheng-Chung Wei
- Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
- Department of Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
- Institute of Integrated Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
| | - Chun-Ju Lin
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
- Department of Ophthalmology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
- Department of Optometry, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chen TYT, Wang SI, Hung YM, Hartman JJ, Chang R, Wei JCC. Recent Human Papillomavirus Vaccination is Associated with a Lower Risk of COVID-19: A US Database Cohort Study. Drugs 2023; 83:621-632. [PMID: 37162705 PMCID: PMC10170435 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-023-01867-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the association between human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Specifically, our study aimed to test the hypothesis that HPV vaccination may also induce trained immunity, which would potentially reduce the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and improve clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND Several vaccines have been reported to trigger non-specific immune reactions that could offer protection from heterologous infections. A recent case report showed that verruca vulgaris regressed after COVID-19, suggesting a possible negative association between COVID-19 and HPV infection. METHODS We enrolled 57,584 women with HPV vaccination and compared them with propensity score-matched controls who never received HPV vaccination in relation to the risk of COVID-19 incidence. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was conducted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses stratified by age, race, comorbid asthma, and obesity were performed. RESULTS The risk of COVID-19 incidence was significantly lower in those who had recently received the HPV vaccine (within 1 year after HPV vaccination, aHR: 0.818, 95% CI 0.764-0.876; within 1-2 years after HPV vaccination, aHR: 0.890, 95% CI 0.824-0.961). Several limitations were recognized in this study, including residual confounding, problems of misclassification due to the use of electronic health record data, and that we were unable to keep track of the patients' HPV infection status and the HPV antibody levels in those who had received the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS Recent HPV vaccination was associated with a lower risk of incident COVID-19 and hospitalization. Based on the promising protective effect of HPV vaccine shown in this study, these findings should be replicated in an independent dataset. Further studies are needed to provide a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and the differences in risks among 2-, 4-, or 9-valent HPV vaccine recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Yen-Ting Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| | - Shiow-Ing Wang
- Center for Health Data Science, Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Jen-Teh Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Miaoli County, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Min Hung
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taitung Branch, Taitung City, Taiwan
- Master Program in Biomedicine, College of Science and Engineering, National Taitung University, Taitung, Taiwan
- College of Health and Nursing, Meiho University, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | | | - Renin Chang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, No. 386, Dazhong First Rd., Zuoying District, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- Department of Recreation and Sports Management, Tajen University, Pintung, Taiwan
| | - James Cheng-Chung Wei
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd., South District, Taichung City, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mair MJ, Mitterer M, Buratti T, Berchtold L, Fong D, Preusser M. Timely course of SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccinations in patients with hemato-oncological diseases: analysis of a real-life cohort. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101559. [PMID: 37196399 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has particularly impacted patients with hemato-oncological malignancies, as they showed not only a higher propensity for severe courses but also weaker immune responses after vaccination. Still, data on the influence of pandemic waves and vaccinations on outcomes are rare. This study aimed to analyze the timely course of infections and vaccinations in a real-life cohort of patients with hemato-oncological diseases. METHODS In this cohort study, 1817 patients with hemato-oncological diseases from 1 February 2020 to 15 December 2022 at the 'Franz Tappeiner' Hospital in Merano/Meran, Italy, were followed for SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccinations. RESULTS Of 1817 patients with hemato-oncological malignancies, 735 (40.5%) were infected at least once with SARS-CoV-2, and 1614 (88.8%) received one or more doses of the approved vaccinations. Patients receiving antineoplastic treatment had a lower SARS-CoV-2 infection rate [35.1% versus 41.0%; odds ratio (OR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.95], but higher risk of hospitalization (13.4% versus 6.9%; OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.25-3.69) compared with untreated patients. Overall, the case fatality rate (CFR) was 3.4%. Unvaccinated patients were more prone to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) courses requiring hospitalization (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.25-4.36) and had a higher CFR (7.3% versus 1.6%; OR 4.98, 95% CI 2.16-12.98) than their vaccinated counterparts. In the Delta wave, patients with two vaccinations had a lower infection risk (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.10-0.35) and tendentially lower hospitalization rates (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.05-1.29) than unvaccinated patients. In the Omicron wave, 345/1198 (28.8%) patients with three or more vaccinations had breakthrough infections, resulting in a similar risk for infection (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.60-1.30) but numerically lower risk for hospitalization (24/345, 7.0%) than unvaccinated individuals (4/40, 10.0%). Scheduled visits were postponed in 128/335 (38.2%) patients due to COVID-19, and deferrals correlated with pandemic wave (P = 0.002) and vaccination status (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS SARS-CoV-2 infections and outcomes differ between distinct phases of the pandemic. Vaccination with variant-specific vaccines should be prioritized as general protective measures are increasingly lifted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Mair
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. https://twitter.com/MedUni_Wien
| | - M Mitterer
- Hemato-Oncological Day Hospital Unit, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Meran/Merano, Italy
| | - T Buratti
- Hemato-Oncological Day Hospital Unit, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Meran/Merano, Italy
| | - L Berchtold
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - D Fong
- Hemato-Oncological Day Hospital Unit, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Meran/Merano, Italy
| | - M Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gong IY, Vijenthira A, Powis M, Calzavara A, Patrikar A, Sutradhar R, Hicks LK, Wilton D, Singh S, Krzyzanowska MK, Cheung MC. Association of COVID-19 Vaccination With Breakthrough Infections and Complications in Patients With Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:386-394. [PMID: 36580318 PMCID: PMC10020872 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.6815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Importance Patients with cancer are known to have increased risk of COVID-19 complications, including death. Objective To determine the association of COVID-19 vaccination with breakthrough infections and complications in patients with cancer compared to noncancer controls. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective population-based cohort study using linked administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, in residents 18 years and older who received COVID-19 vaccination. Three matched groups were identified (based on age, sex, type of vaccine, date of vaccine): 1:4 match for patients with hematologic and solid cancer to noncancer controls (hematologic and solid cancers separately analyzed), 1:1 match between patients with hematologic and patients with solid cancer. Exposures Cancer diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes occurring 14 days after receipt of second COVID-19 vaccination dose: primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection; secondary outcomes were emergency department visit, hospitalization, and death within 4 weeks of SARS-CoV-2 infection (end of follow-up March 31, 2022). Multivariable cumulative incidence function models were used to obtain adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% CIs. Results A total of 289 400 vaccinated patients with cancer (39 880 hematologic; 249 520 solid) with 1 157 600 matched noncancer controls were identified; the cohort was 65.4% female, and mean (SD) age was 66 (14.0) years. SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection was higher in patients with hematologic cancer (aHR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.20-1.46; P < .001) but not in patients with solid cancer (aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.05; P = .87). COVID-19 severe outcomes (composite of hospitalization and death) were significantly higher in patients with cancer compared to patients without cancer (aHR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.42-1.63; P < .001). Risk of severe outcomes was higher among patients with hematologic cancer (aHR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.21-2.85; P < .001) than patients with solid cancer (aHR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.24-1.64; P < .001). Patients receiving active treatment had a further heightened risk for COVID-19 severe outcomes, particularly those who received anti-CD20 therapy. Third vaccination dose was associated with lower infection and COVID-19 complications, except for patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy. Conclusions and Relevance In this large population-based cohort study, patients with cancer had greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and worse outcomes than patients without cancer, and the risk was highest for patients with hematologic cancer and any patients with cancer receiving active treatment. Triple vaccination was associated with lower risk of poor outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inna Y. Gong
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abi Vijenthira
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Powis
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQuaL), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Calzavara
- ICES (formerly Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aditi Patrikar
- ICES (formerly Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- ICES (formerly Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa K. Hicks
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, St Michael’s Hospital–Unity Health, Toronto Ontario, Canada
| | - Drew Wilton
- ICES (formerly Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simron Singh
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES (formerly Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika K. Krzyzanowska
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQuaL), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES (formerly Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew C. Cheung
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES (formerly Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Choueiri TK, Labaki C, Bakouny Z, Hsu CY, Schmidt AL, de Lima Lopes G, Hwang C, Singh SR, Jani C, Weissmann LB, Griffiths EA, Halabi S, Wu U, Berg S, O'Connor TE, Wise-Draper TM, Panagiotou OA, Klein EJ, Joshi M, Yared F, Dutra MS, Gatson NTN, Blau S, Singh H, Nanchal R, McKay RR, Nonato TK, Quinn R, Rubinstein SM, Puc M, Mavromatis BH, Vikas P, Faller B, Zaren HA, Del Prete S, Russell K, Reuben DY, Accordino MK, Singh H, Friese CR, Mishra S, Rivera DR, Shyr Y, Farmakiotis D, Warner JL. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections among patients with cancer following two and three doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: a retrospective observational study from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. AMERICAS 2023; 19:100445. [PMID: 36818595 PMCID: PMC9925160 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Background Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections following vaccination against COVID-19 are of international concern. Patients with cancer have been observed to have worse outcomes associated with COVID-19 during the pandemic. We sought to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer who developed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after 2 or 3 doses of mRNA vaccines. Methods We evaluated the clinical characteristics of patients with cancer who developed breakthrough infections using data from the multi-institutional COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19; NCT04354701). Analysis was restricted to patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnosed in 2021 or 2022, to allow for a contemporary unvaccinated control population; potential differences were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model after inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for potential baseline confounding variables. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, with key secondary endpoints of hospitalization and ICU and/or mechanical ventilation (ICU/MV). Findings The analysis included 2486 patients, of which 564 and 385 had received 2 or 3 doses of an mRNA vaccine prior to infection, respectively. Hematologic malignancies and recent receipt of systemic anti-neoplastic therapy were more frequent among vaccinated patients. Vaccination was associated with improved outcomes: in the primary analysis, 2 doses (aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0.88) and 3 doses (aOR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11-0.36) were associated with decreased 30-day mortality. There were similar findings for the key secondary endpoints of ICU/MV (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.82 and 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24-0.58) and hospitalization (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.75 and 0.35, 95% CI: 0.26-0.46) for 2 and 3 doses, respectively. Importantly, Black patients had higher rates of hospitalization (aOR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.12-1.92), and Hispanic patients presented with higher rates of ICU/MV (aOR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.06-2.44). Interpretation Vaccination against COVID-19, especially with additional doses, is a fundamental strategy in the prevention of adverse outcomes including death, among patients with cancer. Funding This study was partly supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute grant number P30 CA068485 to C-YH, YS, SM, JLW; T32-CA236621 and P30-CA046592 to C.R.F; CTSA 2UL1TR001425-05A1 to TMW-D; ACS/FHI Real-World Data Impact Award, P50 MD017341-01, R21 CA242044-01A1, Susan G. Komen Leadership Grant Hunt to MKA. REDCap is developed and supported by Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant support (UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ziad Bakouny
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chih-Yuan Hsu
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Clara Hwang
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Sunny R.K. Singh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Chinmay Jani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Lisa B. Weissmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ulysses Wu
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Stephanie Berg
- Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Timothy E. O'Connor
- Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | | | - Orestis A. Panagiotou
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Elizabeth J. Klein
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Fares Yared
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Sibel Blau
- Northwest Medical Specialties, PLLC, Puyallup, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Rana R. McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Taylor K. Nonato
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ryann Quinn
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Praveen Vikas
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Bryan Faller
- Missouri Baptist Medical Center Cancer Center/Heartland NCORP, St Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Karen Russell
- Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | | | - Melissa K. Accordino
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Harpreet Singh
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Sanjay Mishra
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Yu Shyr
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Dimitrios Farmakiotis
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jeremy L. Warner
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Validation and Establishment of the SARS-CoV-2 Lentivirus Surrogate Neutralization Assay as a Prescreening Tool for the Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11:e0378922. [PMID: 36602312 PMCID: PMC9927366 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03789-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Neutralization assays are important for understanding and quantifying neutralizing antibody responses toward severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The SARS-CoV-2 lentivirus surrogate neutralization assay (SCLSNA) can be used in biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) laboratories and has been shown to be a reliable alternative approach to the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). In this study, we optimized and validated the SCLSNA to assess its ability as a comparator and prescreening method to support the PRNT. Comparability between the PRNT and SCLSNA was determined through clinical sensitivity and specificity evaluations. Clinical sensitivity and specificity assays produced acceptable results, with 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94% to 100%) specificity and 100% (95% CI, 94% to 100%) sensitivity against ancestral Wuhan spike-pseudotyped lentivirus. The sensitivity and specificity against B.1.1.7 spike-pseudotyped lentivirus were 88.3% (95% CI, 77.8% to 94.2%) and 100% (95% CI, 94% to 100%), respectively. Assay precision measuring intra-assay variability produced acceptable results for high (50% PRNT [PRNT50], 1:≥640), mid (PRNT50, 1:160), and low (PRNT50, 1:40) antibody titer concentration ranges based on the PRNT50, with coefficients of variation (CVs) of 14.21%, 12.47%, and 13.28%, respectively. Intermediate precision indicated acceptable ranges for the high and mid concentrations, with CVs of 15.52% and 16.09%, respectively. However, the low concentration did not meet the acceptance criteria, with a CV of 26.42%. Acceptable ranges were found in the robustness evaluation for both intra-assay and interassay variability. In summary, the validation parameters tested met the acceptance criteria, making the SCLSNA method fit for its intended purpose, which can be used to support the PRNT. IMPORTANCE Neutralization studies play an important role in providing guidance and justification for vaccine administration and helping prevent the spread of diseases. The neutralization data generated in our laboratory have been included in the decision-making process of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) in Canada. During the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) has been the gold standard for determining neutralization of SARS-CoV-2. We validated a SARS-CoV-2 lentivirus surrogate neutralization assay (SCLSNA) as an alternative method to help support the PRNT. The advantages of using the SCLSNA is that it can process more samples, is less tedious to perform, and can be used in laboratories with a lower biosafety level. The use of the SCLSNA can further expand our capabilities to help fulfill the requirements for NACI and other important collaborations.
Collapse
|
46
|
Gorenflo MP, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Ischemic stroke after COVID-19 bivalent vaccine administration in patients aged 65 years and older: analysis of nation-wide patient electronic health records in the United States. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.02.11.23285801. [PMID: 36824915 PMCID: PMC9949210 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.11.23285801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Importance The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced in January 2023 that they were investigating a potential connection between administration of the Pfizer novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) bivalent vaccine booster and ischemic stroke (IS). Objective To explore the relationship between Pfizer bivalent booster administration and IS in older patients in the United States and compare it to other COVID-19 vaccines. Design A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare hazard of IS among patients aged 65 years or over who received the Pfizer bivalent, Moderna bivalent, or Pfizer/Moderna monovalent COVID-19 booster vaccine 1-21 and 22-42 days after vaccination. Setting Patient data were collected from TriNetX, a cloud-based analytics platform that includes electronic health record data from over 90 million unique patients in the United States. Participants Patients in the United States aged 65 years or over at the time of administration of a Pfizer bivalent (n = 43,216), Moderna bivalent (n = 4,267), or Pfizer/Moderna monovalent (n = 100,583) booster were included for analysis. Cohorts were propensity-score matched by demographic factors and risk factors for IS and severe COVID-19. Exposures Pfizer bivalent, Moderna bivalent, or Pfizer/Moderna monovalent COVID-19 booster administration. Main outcomes The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for IS in the cohorts at 1-21 and 22-42 days after administration. Results After matching, the Pfizer bivalent cohort included 4,267 patients, with an average age of 73.7 years (44.43% male, 76.59% white). The Moderna bivalent cohort included 4,267 patients, with an average age of 74.0 years (44.08% male, 77.39% white). There was no significant difference in the hazard of IS encounters between the Pfizer bivalent versus Moderna bivalent cohorts at 1-21- or 22-42-days post-administration: HR = 0.59 (0.31, 1.11), 0.73 (0.33, 1.60). The hazard for IS was lower in the Pfizer bivalent cohort than in the Pfizer/Moderna monovalent cohort at both timepoints: HR = 0.24 (0.19, 0.29), 0.25 (0.20, 0.31). Conclusions and relevance Older adults administered the Pfizer bivalent booster had similar hazard for IS encounters compared to those administered the Moderna bivalent booster vaccine, but lower hazard than those administered the Pfizer/Moderna monovalent boosters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria P. Gorenflo
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pamela B. Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C. Kaelber
- The Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Manciulli T, Spinicci M, Rossetti B, Antonello RM, Lagi F, Barbiero A, Chechi F, Formica G, Francalanci E, Alesi M, Gaggioli S, Modi G, Modica S, Paggi R, Costa C, Morea A, Paglicci L, Rancan I, Amadori F, Tamborrino A, Tilli M, Bandini G, Pignone AM, Valoriani B, Montagnani F, Tumbarello M, Blanc P, Di Pietro M, Galli L, Aquilini D, Vincenti A, Sani S, Nencioni C, Luchi S, Tacconi D, Zammarchi L, Bartoloni A. Safety and Efficacy of Outpatient Treatments for COVID-19: Real-Life Data from a Regionwide Cohort of High-Risk Patients in Tuscany, Italy (the FEDERATE Cohort). Viruses 2023; 15:v15020438. [PMID: 36851654 PMCID: PMC9967010 DOI: 10.3390/v15020438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Early COVID-19 treatments can prevent progression to severe disease. However, real-life data are still limited, and studies are warranted to monitor the efficacy and tolerability of these drugs. We retrospectively enrolled outpatients receiving early treatment for COVID-19 in 11 infectious diseases units in the Tuscany region of Italy between 1 January and 31 March 2022, when Omicron sublineages BA.1 and BA.2 were circulating. Eligible COVID-19 patients were treated with sotrovimab (SOT), remdesivir (RMD), nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NRM/r), or molnupiravir (MOL). We gathered demographic and clinical features, 28-day outcomes (hospitalization or death), and drugs tolerability. A total of 781 patients (median age 69.9, 66% boosted for SARS-CoV-2) met the inclusion criteria, of whom 314 were treated with SOT (40.2%), 205 with MOL (26.3%), 142 with RMD (18.2%), and 120 with NRM/r (15.4%). Overall, 28-day hospitalization and death occurred in 18/781 (2.3%) and 3/781 (0.3%), respectively. Multivariable Cox regression showed that patients receiving SOT had a reduced risk of meeting the composite outcome (28-day hospitalization and/or death) in comparison to the RMD cohort, while no significant differences were evidenced for the MOL and NRM/r groups in comparison to the RMD group. Other predictors of negative outcomes included cancer, chronic kidney disease, and a time between symptoms onset and treatment administration > 3 days. All treatments showed good safety and tolerability, with only eight patients (1%) whose treatment was interrupted due to intolerance. In the first Italian multicenter study presenting real-life data on COVID-19 early treatments, all regimens demonstrated good safety and efficacy. SOT showed a reduced risk of progression versus RMD. No significant differences of outcome were observed in preventing 28-day hospitalization and death among patients treated with RMD, MOL, and NRM/r.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Manciulli
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
| | - Michele Spinicci
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- SOD Malattie Infettive e Tropicali, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Firenze, Italy
| | - Barbara Rossetti
- UOC Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Misericordia, 58100 Grosseto, Italy
| | - Roberta Maria Antonello
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
| | - Filippo Lagi
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- SOD Malattie Infettive e Tropicali, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Firenze, Italy
| | - Anna Barbiero
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
| | - Flavia Chechi
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- SOC Malattie Infettive, Ospedale San Jacopo, 51100 Pistoia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Formica
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
| | - Emanuela Francalanci
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- UO Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Santo Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy
| | - Mirco Alesi
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- UO Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Santo Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy
| | - Samuele Gaggioli
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
| | - Giulia Modi
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- UO Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, 50012 Firenze, Italy
| | - Sara Modica
- SOC Malattie Infettive ed Epatologia, Ospedale San Luca, 55100 Lucca, Italy
| | - Riccardo Paggi
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- SOC Malattie Infettive, Ospedale San Jacopo, 51100 Pistoia, Italy
| | - Cecilia Costa
- UO Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, 50012 Firenze, Italy
| | - Alessandra Morea
- UO Malattie Infettive, Ospedali Riuniti di Livorno, 57124 Livorno, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Rancan
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | | | - Agnese Tamborrino
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy
| | - Marta Tilli
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- UO Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, 50012 Firenze, Italy
| | - Giulia Bandini
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
| | - Alberto Moggi Pignone
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Montagnani
- Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
- UOC Malattie Infettive e Tropicali, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Senese, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Mario Tumbarello
- Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
- UOC Malattie Infettive e Tropicali, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Senese, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Blanc
- SOC Malattie Infettive, Ospedale San Jacopo, 51100 Pistoia, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Pietro
- UO Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, 50012 Firenze, Italy
| | - Luisa Galli
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy
- UO Malattie Infettive, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria “Meyer”, 50139 Firenze, Italy
| | | | | | - Spartaco Sani
- UO Malattie Infettive, Ospedali Riuniti di Livorno, 57124 Livorno, Italy
| | - Cesira Nencioni
- UOC Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Misericordia, 58100 Grosseto, Italy
| | - Sauro Luchi
- SOC Malattie Infettive ed Epatologia, Ospedale San Luca, 55100 Lucca, Italy
| | - Danilo Tacconi
- UO Malattie Infettive, Ospedale San Donato, 52100 Arezzo, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Zammarchi
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- SOD Malattie Infettive e Tropicali, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Firenze, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bartoloni
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
- SOD Malattie Infettive e Tropicali, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Firenze, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wang L, Volkow ND, Berger NA, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Association of COVID-19 with endocarditis in patients with cocaine or opioid use disorders in the US. Mol Psychiatry 2023; 28:543-552. [PMID: 36510003 PMCID: PMC9918660 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01903-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of endocarditis in the US is increasing, driven in part by the rise in intravenous drug use, mostly opioids and stimulant drugs (cocaine and methamphetamine). Recent reports have documented that individuals with COVID-19 are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases. However, it is unknown whether COVID-19 is associated with increased risk for endocarditis in patients with opioid or stimulant use disorders. This is a retrospective cohort study based on a nationwide database of electronic health records (EHRs) of 109 million patients in the US, including 736,502 patients with a diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD) and 379,623 patients with a diagnosis of cocaine use disorder (CocaineUD). Since Metamphetamine use disorder is not coded we could not analyze it. We show that the incidence rate of endocarditis among patients with OUD or CocaineUD significantly increased from 2011 to 2022 with acceleration during 2021-2022. COVID-19 was associated with increased risk of new diagnosis of endocarditis among patients with OUD (HR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.92-2.60) and with CocaineUD (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.79-2.80). Clinically diagnosed COVID-19 was associated with higher risk of endocarditis than lab-test confirmed COVID-19 without clinical diagnosis. Hospitalization within 2 weeks following COVID-19 infection was associated with increased risk of new diagnosis of endocarditis. The risk for endocarditis did not differ between patients with and without EHR-recorded vaccination. There were significant racial and ethnic differences in the risk for COVID-19 associated endocarditis, lower in blacks than in whites and lower in Hispanics than in non-Hispanics. Among patients with OUD or CocaineUD, the 180-day hospitalization risk following endocarditis was 67.5% in patients with COVID-19, compared to 58.7% in matched patients without COVID-19 (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.35). The 180-day mortality risk following the new diagnosis of endocarditis was 9.2% in patients with COVID-19, compared to 8.0% in matched patients without COVID-19 (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.83-1.61). This study shows that COVID-19 is associated with significantly increased risk for endocarditis in patients with opioid or cocaine use disorders. These results highlight the need for endocarditis screening and for linkage to infectious disease and addiction treatment in patients with opioid or cocaine use disorders who contracted COVID-19. Future studies are needed to understand how COVID-19 damages the heart and the vascular endothelium among people who misuse opioids or cocaine (presumably also methamphetamines).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Wang
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nora D Volkow
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Nathan A Berger
- Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- The Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gorenflo MP, Davis PB, Kendall EK, Olaker VR, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Association of Aspirin Use with Reduced Risk of Developing Alzheimer's Disease in Elderly Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Alzheimers Dis 2023; 91:697-704. [PMID: 36502331 PMCID: PMC11388024 DOI: 10.3233/jad-220901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently there are no effective therapies to prevent or halt the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Multiple risk factors are involved in AD, including ischemic stroke (IS). Aspirin is often prescribed following IS to prevent blood clot formation. Observational studies have shown inconsistent findings with respect to the relationship between aspirin use and the risk of AD. OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between aspirin therapy after IS and the new diagnosis of AD in elderly patients. METHODS This retrospective cohort study leveraged a large database that contains over 90 million electronic health records to compare the hazard rates of AD after IS in elderly patients prescribed aspirin versus those not prescribed aspirin after propensity-score matching for relevant confounders. RESULTS At 1, 3, and 5 years after first IS, elderly patients prescribed aspirin were less likely to develop AD than those not prescribed aspirin: Hazard Ratio = 0.78 [0.65,0.94], 0.81 [0.70,0.94], and 0.76 [0.70,0.92]. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that aspirin use may prevent AD in patients with IS, a subpopulation at high risk of developing the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria P Gorenflo
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pamela B Davis
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ellen K Kendall
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Veronica R Olaker
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- The Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rong Xu
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Breakthrough COVID-19 in vaccinated patients with hematologic malignancies: results from the EPICOVIDEHA survey. Blood 2022; 140:2773-2787. [PMID: 36126318 PMCID: PMC9492383 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022017257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Limited data are available on breakthrough COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancy (HM) after anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Adult patients with HM, ≥1 dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and breakthrough COVID-19 between January 2021 and March 2022 were analyzed. A total of 1548 cases were included, mainly lymphoid malignancies (1181 cases, 76%). After viral sequencing in 753 cases (49%), the Omicron variant was prevalent (517, 68.7%). Most of the patients received ≤2 vaccine doses before COVID-19 (1419, 91%), mostly mRNA-based (1377, 89%). Overall, 906 patients (59%) received COVID-19-specific treatment. After 30-day follow-up from COVID-19 diagnosis, 143 patients (9%) died. The mortality rate in patients with the Omicron variant was 7.9%, comparable to other variants, with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate than in the prevaccine era (31%). In the univariable analysis, older age (P < .001), active HM (P < .001), and severe and critical COVID-19 (P = .007 and P < .001, respectively) were associated with mortality. Conversely, patients receiving monoclonal antibodies, even for severe or critical COVID-19, had a lower mortality rate (P < .001). In the multivariable model, older age, active disease, critical COVID-19, and 2-3 comorbidities were correlated with a higher mortality, whereas monoclonal antibody administration, alone (P < .001) or combined with antivirals (P = .009), was protective. Although mortality is significantly lower than in the prevaccination era, breakthrough COVID-19 in HM is still associated with considerable mortality. Death rate was lower in patients who received monoclonal antibodies, alone or in combination with antivirals.
Collapse
|