Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening-Results from the randomized German LUSI trial

Strong association between reduction of late-stage cancers and reduction of cancer-specific mortality in meta-regression of randomized screening trials across multiple cancer types

BACKGROUND

Late-stage cancer incidence has been proposed as an early surrogate for mortality in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cancer screening; however, its validity has not been systematically evaluated across screening RCTs of different cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-regression analysis of cancer screening RCTs that reported both late-stage cancer incidence and cancer mortality. Based on a systematic literature review, we included 33 RCTs of screening programs targeting seven cancer types, including lung (n = 12), colorectal (n = 8), breast (n = 5), and prostate (n = 4), among others. We regressed the relative reduction of cancer mortality on the relative reduction of late-stage cancer incidence, inversely weighted for each RCT by the variance of estimated mortality reduction.

RESULTS

Across cancer types, the relative reduction of late-stage cancer incidence was linearly associated with the relative reduction of cancer mortality. Specifically, we observed this association for lung (R2 = 0.79 and 0.996 in three recent large trials), breast (R2 = 0.94), prostate (R2 = 0.98), and colorectal cancer (R2 = 0.75 for stage III/IV cancers and 0.93 for stage IV cancers). Trials with a 20% or greater reduction in late-stage cancers were more likely to achieve a significant reduction in cancer mortality. Our results also showed that no reduction of late-stage cancer incidence was associated with no or minimal reduction in cancer mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-regression of historical screening RCTs showed a strong linear association between reductions in late-stage cancer incidence and cancer mortality.

Strengthening lung cancer screening in Europe: fostering participation, improving outcomes, and addressing health inequalities through collaborative initiatives in the SOLACE consortium

The Strengthening the Screening of Lung Cancer in Europe (SOLACE) initiative, supported by Europe's Beating Cancer Plan, is dedicated to advancing lung cancer screening. This initiative brings together the most extensive pan-European network of respiratory and radiology experts, involving 37 partners from 15 countries. SOLACE aims to enhance equitable access to lung cancer screening by developing targeted recruitment strategies for underrepresented and high-risk populations. Through comprehensive work packages, SOLACE integrates scientific research, pilot studies, and sustainability efforts to bolster regional and national screening efforts across EU member states. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The SOLACE project aims to facilitate the optimization and implementation of equitable lung cancer screening programs across the heterogeneous healthcare landscape in EU member states. KEY POINTS: The effectiveness of lung cancer screening is supported by both scientific evidence and now increasing legislative support. SOLACE aims to develop, test, and disseminate tools to facilitate the realization of lung cancer screening at both a national and regional level. Previously underrepresented populations in lung cancer screening will be targeted by tailored recruitment strategies. SOLACE forms the first pan-European network of experts poised to drive real-world implementation of lung cancer screening.

Lung cancer screening by low-dose CT scan in France: final results of the DEP KP80 study after three rounds

BACKGROUND

In prior randomised controlled trials, lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality and overall mortality. Despite these results, organised screening in France remains a challenge. This study assessed the feasibility and efficacy of lung cancer screening within a real-life context in a French administrative territory.

METHODS

DEP KP80 was a single-arm prospective study. Participants aged between 55 and 74 years, smokers or former smokers of ≥30 pack-years, were recruited. An annual LDCT scan was scheduled and three rounds were performed. Subjects were selected by general practitioners or pulmonologists, who checked the inclusion criteria and prescribed the CT scan.

FINDINGS

Between March 2016 and February 2020, 1254 participants were enrolled. Overall, 945 (75.4%) participants underwent baseline LDCT (T0), 376 (42.8%) completed the first round (T1) and 270 (31%) the second (T2) one. Forty-two lung cancers were diagnosed, 30 cancers (71.4%) were stage I or II and 34 cancers (80.9%) were treated surgically. In this study, the overall positive predictive value for a positive screening was 48% (95% CI 37-59) and the negative predictive value 100% (95% CI 100-100).

INTERPRETATION

This study demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of lung cancer screening in a real-life context with most lung cancers diagnosed at an early stage and surgically removed. Our results also highlighted the importance of participation in each round, underlining the fact that optimising organisation is a major goal.

FUNDING

Agence Régionale de Santé de Picardie, La Ligue contre le cancer, le Conseil Départemental de la Somme, and AstraZeneca.

Lung Nodule Management in Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Lessons from the NELSON Trial

Screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) in a high-risk population, as defined by age and smoking behavior, reduces lung cancer-related mortality. However, LDCT screening presents a major challenge. Numerous, mostly benign, nodules are seen in the lungs during screening. The question is how to distinguish the malignant from the benign nodules. Various studies use different protocols for nodule management. The Dutch-Belgian NELSON (Nederlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek) trial, the largest European lung cancer screening trial, used distinctions based on nodule volumetric assessment and growth rate. This review discusses key findings from the NELSON study regarding the characteristics of screening-detected nodules, including nodule size and its volumetric assessment, growth rate, subtype, and their associated malignancy risk. These results are compared with findings from other screening studies and current recommendations for lung nodule management. By examining differences in nodule management strategies and providing a comprehensive overview of outcomes specific to lung cancer screening, this review aims to contribute to the broader discussion on optimizing lung nodule management in screening programs.

Biomarker trajectory for earlier detection of lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To determine whether an algorithm based on repeated measurements of a panel of four circulating protein biomarkers (4 MP) for lung cancer risk assessment results in improved performance over a single time measurement.

METHODS

We conducted data analysis of the 4 MP consisting of the precursor form of surfactant protein B, cancer antigen 125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cytokeratin-19 fragment in pre-diagnostic sera from 2483 ever-smoker participants (389 cases and 2094 randomly selected non-cases) in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, Ovarian (PLCO) Study who had at least two sequential blood collections over 6 years. A parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) algorithm, which incorporates participant biomarker history at each time point, was compared to a single-threshold (ST) method.

FINDINGS

Among ever-smoker participants, the PEB approach yielded an additional 4% improvement in the AUC compared to the ST approach (P-value: 0.009). When considering an ≥10 PY smoking history and at a fixing the specificity corresponding to 1% 6-year lung cancer risk, PEB resulted in significant improvement in the sensitivity (SenPEB:96.3% vs SenST:91.0%; P-value: 6.7e-3). The PEB algorithm identified 17 of the 35 cases that remained ST negative, at an average of 1.26 years before diagnosis. Ten case individuals who were positive based on ST at an average of 1.03 years prior to diagnosis were identified earlier by PEB, at an average of 2.70 years.

INTERPRETATION

An algorithm based on repeated measurements of the 4 MP improves sensitivity and results in an earlier detection of lung cancer compared to a single-threshold method.

FUNDING

This study was supported by NIH Grant Nos. U01CA271888, U01CA194733, U01CA213285, NCI EDRN U01 CA200468, P30CA016672, and U24CA086368; the Cancer Prevention & Research Institute of Texas RP180505 and RP160693; the SPORE P50CA140388; the CCTS TR000371; and the generous philanthropic contributions to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots Program and the Lyda Hill Foundation.

Precision patient selection for improved detection of circulating genetically abnormal cells in pulmonary nodules

Circulating genetically abnormal cells (CACs) have emerged as a promising biomarker for the early diagnosis of lung cancer, particularly in patients with pulmonary nodules. However, their performance may be suboptimal in certain patient populations. This study aimed to refine patient selection to improve the detection of CACs in pulmonary nodules. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 241 patients with pulmonary nodules who had undergone pathological diagnosis through surgical tissue specimens. Utilizing consensus clustering analysis, the patients were categorized into three distinct clusters. Cluster 1 was characterized by older age, larger nodule size, and a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes. Notably, the diagnostic efficacy of CACs in Cluster 1 surpassed that of the overall patient population (AUC: 0.855 vs. 0.689, P = 0.044). Moreover, for Cluster 1, an integrated diagnostic model was developed, incorporating CACs, sex, maximum nodule type, and maximum nodule size, resulting in a further improved AUC of 0.925 (95% CI 0.846-1.000). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that CACs detection shows better diagnostic performance in aiding the differentiation between benign and malignant nodules in older patients with larger pulmonary nodules and comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension. Further research and validation are needed to explore how to better integrate CACs detection into clinical practice.

Non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most frequent cancer types and is responsible for the majority of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The management of NSCLC has improved considerably, especially in the past 10 years. The systematic screening of populations at risk with low-dose CT, the implementation of novel surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques and a deeper biological understanding of NSCLC that has led to innovative systemic treatment options have improved the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. In non-metastatic NSCLC, the combination of various perioperative strategies and adjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced disease seem to enhance cure rates. In metastatic NSCLC, the implementation of novel drugs might prolong disease control together with preserving quality of life. The further development of predictive clinical and genetic markers will be essential for the next steps in individualized treatment concepts.

The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: Lung cancer in women

Lung cancer in women is a modern epidemic and represents a global health crisis. Cigarette smoking remains the most important risk factor for lung cancer in all patients and, among women globally, rates of smoking continue to increase. Although some data exist supporting sex-based differences across the continuum of lung cancer, there is currently a dearth of research exploring the differences in risk, biology, and treatment outcomes in women. Consequently, the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable recognizes the urgent need to promote awareness and future research that will close the knowledge gaps regarding lung cancer in women. To this end, the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable Task Group on Lung Cancer in Women convened a summit undertaking the following to: (1) summarize existing evidence and identify knowledge gaps surrounding the epidemiology, risk factors, biologic differences, and outcomes of lung cancer in women; (2) develop and prioritize research topics and questions that address research gaps and advance knowledge to improve quality of care of lung cancer in women; and (3) propose strategies for future research. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in women, and, despite comparatively lower exposures to occupational and environmental carcinogens compared with men, disproportionately higher lung cancer rates in women who ever smoked and women who never smoked call for increased awareness and research that will close the knowledge gaps regarding lung cancer in women.

A Method for Real-Time Lung Nodule Instance Segmentation Using Deep Learning

Lung screening is really crucial in the early detection and management of masses, with particular regard to cancer. Studies have shown that lung cancer screening, can reduce lung cancer mortality by 20-30% in high-risk populations. In recent times, the advent of deep learning, with particular regard to computer vision, demonstrated the ability to effectively detect and locate objects from video streams and also (medical) images. Considering these aspects, in this paper, we propose a method aimed to perform instance segmentation, i.e., by providing a mask for each lung mass instance detected, allowing for the identification of individual masses even if they overlap or are close to each other by classifying the detected masses into (generic) nodules, cancer or adenocarcinoma. In this paper, we considered the you-only-look-once model for lung nodule segmentation. An experimental analysis, performed on a set of real-world lung computed tomography images, demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method not only in the detection of lung masses but also in lung mass segmentation, thus providing a helpful way not only for radiologist to conduct automatic lung screening but also for discovering very small masses not easily recognizable to the naked eye and that may deserve attention. As a matter of fact, in the evaluation of a dataset composed of 3654 lung scans, the proposed method obtains an average precision of 0.757 and an average recall of 0.738 in the classification task. Additionally, it reaches an average mask precision of 0.75 and an average mask recall of 0.733. These results indicate that the proposed method is capable of not only classifying masses as nodules, cancer, and adenocarcinoma, but also effectively segmenting the areas, thereby performing instance segmentation.

Effects of low dose computed tomography (LDCT) on lung cancer screening on incidence and mortality in regions with high tuberculosis prevalence: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a strategy for early-stage diagnosis. The implementation of LDCT screening in countries with a high prevalence/incidence of tuberculosis (TB) is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to identify whether LCS using LDCT increases early-stage diagnosis and decreases mortality, as well as the false-positive rate, in regions with a high prevalence of TB.

METHODS/DESIGN

Studies were identified by searching BVS, PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. RCT and cohort studies (CS) that show the effects of LDCT in LC screening on mortality and secondary outcomes were eligible. Two independent reviewers evaluated eligibility and a third judged disagreements. We used the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR+) to extract the metadata and record decisions. The analyses were stratified by study design and incidence of TB. We used the Cochrane "Risk of bias" assessment tool.

RESULTS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) were used. Thirty-seven papers were included, referring to 22 studies (10 RCTs and 12 cohorts). Few studies were from regions with a high incidence of TB (One RCT and four cohorts). Nonetheless, the evidence is compatible with European and USA studies. RCTs and CS also had consistent results. There is an increase in early-stage (I-II) diagnoses and reduced LC mortality in the LCDT arm compared to the control. Although false-positive rates varied, they stayed within the 20 to 30% range.

DISCUSSION

This is the first meta-analysis of LDCT for LCS focused on its benefits in regions with an increased incidence/prevalence of TB. Although the specificity of Lung-RADS was higher in participants without TB sequelae than in those with TB sequelae, our findings point out that the difference does not invalidate implementing LDCT LCS in these regions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Systematic review registration Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42022309581.

The Effect of COVID-19 on Lung Cancer Screening

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, many hospitals suspended non-essential medical procedures to reduce transmission and prioritize personal protective equipment (PPE) for COVID-19 patients. Hospitals that continued these procedures faced uncertainty about patient attendance. Multiple factors could explain a decline in patient attendance during the pandemic, including patients' reluctance to risk COVID-19 exposure in the hospital or their own illness requiring self-isolation. This study aimed to compare attendance rates of lung cancer screenings (LCS) before and during the pandemic. Unlike previous studies conducted on this research topic, the current study documents that the John B. Amos Cancer Center continued LCS throughout the pandemic. The alternative hypothesis was that there would be a decrease in the percentage of LCS performed during the pandemic period due to fear of nosocomial transmission. Materials and methods Data for 2,582 scheduled LCS were retrospectively analyzed on Microsoft Excel 2022 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington) from 2018 to 2021. For analysis purposes, 2018 and 2019 were considered pre-COVID years, while 2020 and 2021 were considered COVID years. The average percentage attended was calculated for each year and the standard deviation of that year's percentage. The percentage of patients seen each month was averaged during pre-COVID and COVID years. The p-value was calculated by comparing the average attendance percentage for each month in the pre-COVID and COVID years. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results From 2018 to 2021, over 300 more people were scheduled during the COVID years. Although the percentage seen remained consistent throughout the years, there was an increase in both patients scheduled and seen. The results revealed an insignificant difference in LCS attendance between pre-COVID and COVID years, confirming the importance of their continuation. Conclusion The alternative hypothesis was rejected due to no significant difference in attendance percentage between the pre-COVID and COVID years. Further direction of this study may include monitoring the trend of LCS attendance during post-pandemic years as the transmission rates continue to change.

Evaluation of risk prediction models to select lung cancer screening participants in Europe: a prospective cohort consortium analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer risk prediction models might efficiently identify individuals who should be offered lung cancer screening. However, their performance has not been comprehensively evaluated in Europe. We aimed to externally validate and evaluate the performance of several risk prediction models that predict lung cancer incidence or mortality in prospective European cohorts.

METHODS

We analysed 240 137 participants aged 45-80 years with a current or former smoking history from nine European countries in four prospective cohorts from the pooled database of the Lung Cancer Cohort Consortium: the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study (Finland), the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (Norway), CONSTANCES (France), and the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (Denmark, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Norway). We evaluated ten lung cancer risk models, which comprised the Bach, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial 2012 model (PLCOm2012), the Lung Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (LCRAT), the Lung Cancer Death Risk Assessment Tool (LCDRAT), the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT), the Optimized Early Warning Model for Lung Cancer Risk (OWL), the University College London-Death (UCLD), the University College London-Incidence (UCLI), the Liverpool Lung Project version 2 (LLP version 2), and the Liverpool Lung Project version 3 (LLP version 3) models. We quantified model calibration as the ratio of expected to observed cases or deaths and discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). For each model, we also identified risk thresholds that would screen the same number of individuals as each of the US Preventive Services Task Force 2021 (USPSTF-2021), the US Preventive Services Task Force 2013 (USPSTF-2013), and the Nederlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek (NELSON) criteria.

FINDINGS

Among the participants, 1734 lung cancer cases and 1072 lung cancer deaths occurred within five years of enrolment. Most models had reasonable calibration in most countries, although the LLP version 2 overpredicted risk by more than 50% in eight countries (expected to observed ≥1·50). The PLCOm2012, LCDRAT, LCRAT, Bach, HUNT, OWL, UCLD, and UCLI models showed similar discrimination in most countries, with AUCs ranging from 0·68 (95% CI 0·59-0·77) to 0·83 (0·78-0·89), whereas the LLP version 2 and LLP version 3 showed lower discrimination, with AUCs ranging from 0·64 (95% CI 0·57-0·72) to 0·78 (0·74-0·83). When pooling data from all countries (but excluding the HUNT cohort), 33·9% (73 313 of 216 387) of individuals were eligible by USPSTF-2021 criteria, which included 74·8% (1185) of lung cancers and 76·3% (730) of lung cancer deaths occurring over 5 years. Fewer individuals were selected by USPSTF-2013 and NELSON criteria. After applying thresholds to select a population of equal size to USPSTF-2021, the PLCOm2012, LCDRAT, LCRAT, Bach, HUNT, OWL, UCLD, and UCLI, models identified 77·6%-79·1% of future cases, although they selected slightly older individuals compared with USPSTF-2021 criteria. Results were similar for USPSTF-2013 and NELSON.

INTERPRETATION

Several lung cancer risk prediction models showed good performance in European countries and might improve the efficiency of lung cancer screening if used in place of categorical eligibility criteria.

FUNDING

US National Cancer Institute, l'Institut National du Cancer, Cancer Research UK.

Deaths averted: An unbiased alternative to rate ratios for measuring the performance of cancer screening programs

INTRODUCTION

Screening trials and meta-analyses emphasize the ratio of cancer death rates in screening and control arms. However, this measure is diluted by the inclusion of deaths from cancers that only became detectable after the end of active screening.

METHODS

We review traditional analysis of cancer screening trials and show that ratio estimates are inevitably biased to the null, because follow-up (FU) must continue beyond the end of the screening period and thus includes cases only becoming detectable after screening ends. But because such cases are expected to occur in equal numbers in the two arms, calculation of the difference between the number of cancer deaths in the screening and control arms avoids this dilutional bias. This difference can be set against the number of invitations to screening; we illustrate by reanalyzing data from all trials of tomography screening of lung cancer (LC) using this measure.

RESULTS

In nine trials of LC screening from 2000 to 2013, a total of 94,441 high-risk patients were invited to be in screening or control groups, with high participation rates (average 95%). In the older trials comparing computed tomography to chest X-ray, 88,285 invitations averted 83 deaths (1068 per death averted (DA)). In the six more recent trials with no screening in the control group, 69,976 invitations averted 121 deaths (577 invitations per DA).

DISCUSSION

Screens per DA is an undiluted measure of screening's effect and it is unperturbed by the arbitrary duration of FU. This estimate can be useful for program planning and informed consent.

Risk Factors and Preventive Measures for Lung Cancer in the European Union

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is worldwide one of the most common types of cancer with still very high mortality rates. The aim of this study was to identify and demonstrate correlations between lung cancer mortality rates and potential influencing factors in EU countries.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated the connections between the mortality rates in the EU countries (n = 28) and potential influencing factors. The significant factors from the correlation analysis were identified using a stepwise multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

The most important factors for both genders are the incidence of lung cancer, the price of tobacco, and the number of doctors per 100,000 inhabitants.

CONCLUSION

Lung cancer is a significant global health challenge. The study identified potential strategies for reducing the mortality rate from lung cancer. These strategies include an increase in the number of physicians, enhanced accessibility to cutting-edge antineoplastic medications, and state-funded coverage of the associated costs. It would be beneficial for politicians to consider implementing LDCT screening for the early detection of the disease. The implementation of uniform healthcare system optimization across the EU, combined with improvements in socio-economic conditions, has the potential to mitigate the risk of developing lung cancer.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of non-high-risk patients with incidental stage T1 lung cancer: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

There is currently no evidence documenting the clinical characteristics and prognosis of non-high-risk patients with incidental stage T1 lung cancer (LC). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of non-high-risk patients with incidental stage T1 LC.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included patients with incidental stage T1 LC who were diagnosed pathologically at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between 1st Jan 2019 and 31st Dec 2023. The follow-up time for all participants concluded on 31st Jan 2024, or upon death. All included patients were divided into non-high-risk (observation) and high-risk (control) groups based on the 2021 US preventative services task force recommendations. The primary outcomes were overall survival probability and LC-specific survival probability. The secondary outcomes were clinical characteristics, including demographic variables, histological types and TNM staging.

RESULTS

We studied 1876 patients with incidental stage T1 LC. Of these, 1491 (79.48%) non-high-risk patients were included in the observation group, and the remaining 385 (20.52%) high-risk patients composed the control group. The follow-up interval was between 0 and 248 months for all participants, with a median time of 41.64 ± 23.85 months. The patients in the observation group were younger and had smaller tumors, more adenocarcinomas, and earlier disease stages than those in the control group (p ≤ 0.001). The overall survival probability (HR = 0.23, [95% CI: 0.18, 0.31], p < 0.001) and the LC-specific survival probability (HR = 0.23, [95% CI: 0.17, 0.31], p < 0.001) for the patients in the observation group were also both higher than those in the control group. The results appeared to be consistent across important subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In this study, non-high-risk patients with incidental stage T1 LC were younger, had smaller tumors, had more adenocarcinomas, had a lower probability of metastasis, and had longer survival than did high-risk patients.

Urinary Metabolite Diagnostic and Prognostic Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Nonsmokers and Tobacco Smokers

PURPOSE

Nonsmokers account for 10% to 13% of all lung cancer cases in the United States. Etiology is attributed to multiple risk factors including exposure to secondhand smoking, asbestos, environmental pollution, and radon, but these exposures are not within the current eligibility criteria for early lung cancer screening by low-dose CT (LDCT).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Urine samples were collected from two independent cohorts comprising 846 participants (exploratory cohort) and 505 participants (validation cohort). The cancer urinary biomarkers, creatine riboside (CR) and N-acetylneuraminic acid (NANA), were analyzed and quantified using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to determine if nonsmoker cases can be distinguished from sex and age-matched controls in comparison with tobacco smoker cases and controls, potentially leading to more precise eligibility criteria for LDCT screening.

RESULTS

Urinary levels of CR and NANA were significantly higher and comparable in nonsmokers and tobacco smoker cases than population controls in both cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for combined CR and NANA levels in nonsmokers of the exploratory cohort resulted in better predictive performance with the AUC of 0.94, whereas the validation cohort nonsmokers had an AUC of 0.80. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that high levels of CR and NANA were associated with increased cancer-specific death in nonsmokers as well as tobacco smoker cases in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring CR and NANA in urine liquid biopsies could identify nonsmokers at high risk for lung cancer as candidates for LDCT screening and warrant prospective studies of these biomarkers.

CT-guided percutaneous marking of small pulmonary nodules with [99mTc]Tc-Macrosalb is very accurate and allows minimally invasive lung-sparing resection: a single-centre quality control

PURPOSE

The detection of small lung nodules in thoracoscopic procedure is difficult when the lesions are not located within the outer border of the lung. In the case of ground-glass opacities, it is often impossible to palpate the lesion. Marking lung nodules using a radiotracer is a known technique. We analysed the accuracy and safety of the technique and the potential benefits of operating in a hybrid operating room.

METHODS

57 patients, including 33 (58%) females with a median age of 67 years (range 21-82) were included. In 27 patients, we marked and resected the lesion in a hybrid room. In 30 patients, the lesion was marked at the department of radiology the day before resection. [99mTc]Tc-Macrosalb (Pulmocis®) was used at an activity of 1 MBq in the hybrid room and at an activity of 3 MBq the day before to get technical feasible results. Radioactivity was detected using the Neoprobe® detection system.

RESULTS

Precise detection and resection of the nodules was possible in 95% of the lesions and in 93% of the patients. Complete thoracoscopic resection was possible in 90% of the patients. Total conversion rate was 10%, but conversion due to failure of the marking of the nodule was observed in only 5% of the patients. Histology revealed 28 (37%) primary lung cancers, 24 (32%) metastases and 21 (28%) benign lesions. In 13 (23%) patients, minor complications were observed. None of them required additional interventions.

CONCLUSION

The radio-guided detection of small pulmonary nodules is very accurate and safe after CT-guided injection of [99mTc]Tc-Macrosalb. Performing the operation in a hybrid room has several logistic advantages and allows using lower technetium-99m activities. The technique allows minimally invasive lung sparing resection and prevents overtreatment of benign and metastatic lesions.

Shall We Screen Lung Cancer with Volume Computed Tomography in Austria? A Cost-Effectiveness Modelling Study

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a lung cancer screening (LCS) program using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in Austria. An existing decision tree with an integrated Markov model was used to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LCS versus no screening from a healthcare payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. A simulation was conducted to model annual LCS for an asymptomatic high-risk population cohort aged 50-74 with a smoking history using the Dutch-Belgian Lung Cancer Screening Study (NEderlands-Leuvens Longkanker ScreeningsONderzoek, NELSON) screening outcomes. The principal measure utilized to assess cost-effectiveness was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were employed to determine uncertainties surrounding the key model inputs. At an uptake rate of 50%, 300,277 eligible individuals would participate in the LCS program, yielding 56,122 incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 84,049 life years gained compared to no screening, with an ICER of EUR 24,627 per QALY gained or EUR 16,444 per life-year saved. Additionally, LCS led to the detection of 25,893 additional early-stage lung cancers and averted 11,906 premature lung cancer deaths. It was estimated that LCS would incur EUR 945 million additional screening costs and EUR 386 million additional treatment costs. These estimates were robust in sensitivity analyses. Implementation of annual LCS with LDCT for a high-risk population, using the NELSON screening outcomes, is cost-effective in Austria, at a threshold of EUR 50,000 per QALY.

The pros and cons of lung cancer screening

Several trials have shown that low-dose computed tomography-based lung cancer screening (LCS) allows a substantial reduction in lung cancer-related mortality, carrying the potential for other clinical benefits. There are, however, some uncertainties to be clarified and several aspects to be implemented to optimize advantages and minimize the potential harms of LCS. This review summarizes current evidence on LCS, discussing some of the well-established and potential benefits, including lung cancer (LC)-related mortality reduction and opportunity for smoking cessation interventions, as well as the disadvantages of LCS, such as overdiagnosis and overtreatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Different perspectives are provided on LCS based on the updated literature. KEY POINTS: Lung cancer is a leading cancer-related cause of death and screening should reduce associated mortality. This review summarizes current evidence related to LCS. Several aspects need to be implemented to optimize benefits and minimize potential drawbacks of LCS.

Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST) pathway navigation study: a protocol for a nested randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a pathway navigation intervention on lung cancer screening uptake

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death globally. In 2022 the UK National Screening Committee recommended the implementation of a national targeted lung cancer screening programme, aiming to improve early diagnosis and survival rates. Research studies and services internationally consistently observe socioeconomic and smoking-related inequalities in screening uptake. Pathway navigation (PN) is a process through which a trained pathway navigator guides people to overcome barriers to accessing healthcare services, including screening. This nested randomised controlled trial aims to determine whether a PN intervention results in more individuals participating in lung cancer screening compared with the usual written invitation within a previous non-responder population as part of the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A two-arm randomised controlled trial and process evaluation nested within the YLST. Participants aged 55-80 (inclusive) who have not responded to previous postal invitations to screening will be randomised by household to receive PN or usual care (a further postal invitation to contact the screening service for a lung health check) between March 2023 and October 2024. The PN intervention includes a postal appointment notification and prearranged telephone appointment, during which a pathway navigator telephones the participant, following a four-step protocol to introduce the offer and conduct an initial risk assessment. If eligible, participants are invited to book a low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening scan. All pathway navigators receive training from behavioural psychologists on motivational interviewing and communication techniques to elicit barriers to screening attendance and offer solutions.

COPRIMARY OUTCOMES

The number undergoing initial telephone assessment of lung cancer risk. The number undergoing an LDCT screening scan.Secondary outcomes include demographic, clinical and risk parameters of people undergoing telephone risk assessment; the number of people eligible for screening following telephone risk assessment; the number of screen-detected cancers diagnosed; costs and a mixed-methods process evaluation.Descriptive analyses will be used to present numbers, proportions and quantitative components of the process evaluation. Primary comparisons of differences between groups will be made using logistic regression. Applied thematic analysis will be used to interpret qualitative data within a conceptual framework based on the COM-B framework. A health economic analysis of the PN intervention will also be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is approved by the Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (18-NW-0012) and the Health Research Authority following the Confidentiality Advisory Group review. Results will be shared through peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations and on the YLST website.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ISRCTN42704678 and NCT03750110.

Different clinicopathological features between young and older patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma and ground-glass opacity

After the recommendation of computed tomography as a routine procedure for lung cancer screening, an increasing number of young adults have been diagnosed with pulmonary ground-glass opacity (GGO). Up to 63% of pulmonary nodules with a GGO component can be malignant. Since young cancer patients have limited exposure to environmental mutagens, they have special characteristics and needs. This study sought to compare the clinicopathological characteristics of young and old patients with GGO-associated lung adenocarcinoma (GGO-LUAD). Clinicopathological data from 203 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery between January 2018 and April 2020 for pulmonary GGO component nodules were reviewed. Lung nonmucinous adenocarcinoma patients younger than 40 years old and older than 40 years old were enrolled: 103 patients ≤ 40 years old and 100 patients > 40 years old. The relevant clinicopathological features, including sex, smoking status, tumor size, pathological characteristics, radiographic features and prognosis of pulmonary nodules, were evaluated. Univariate analyses were applied for comparisons between groups. The differences in baseline characteristics (sex, smoking status, tumor location) between the different age groups were not significant. Young patients were more likely to have tumors < 1 cm in size, while older patients predominantly had tumors > 2 cm in size. The mean percentage of invasive adenocarcinoma was greater in the elderly group. Young and older patients seemed to have similar subtypes of adenocarcinoma (p > 0.05) but had different degrees of differentiation (p < 0.001). The 3-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the young group were 100% and 99.03%, respectively, while the 3-years OS and RFS of the older group were 99% and 98%, respectively. Our work revealed that young patients with malignant pulmonary nodules and GGOs have distinct pathological subtypes. Patients with GGOs of different ages have different clinicopathological characteristics. The 3-year prognosis of young patients with malignant pulmonary nodules with GGOs is satisfactory.

Willingness to participate in combination screening for lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease in four European countries

OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer screening (LCS), using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), can be more efficient by simultaneously screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD), the Big-3 diseases. This study aimed to determine the willingness to participate in (combinations of) Big-3 screening in four European countries and the relative importance of amendable participation barriers.

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey aimed at (former) smokers aged 50-75 years elicited the willingness of individuals to participate in Big-3 screening and used analytical hierarchy processing (AHP) to determine the importance of participation barriers.

RESULTS

Respondents were from France (n = 391), Germany (n = 338), Italy (n = 399), and the Netherlands (n = 342), and consisted of 51.2% men. The willingness to participate in screening was marginally influenced by the diseases screened for (maximum difference of 3.1%, for Big-3 screening (73.4%) vs. lung cancer and COPD screening (70.3%)) and by country (maximum difference of 3.7%, between France (68.5%) and the Netherlands (72.3%)). The largest effect on willingness to participate was personal perceived risk of lung cancer. The most important barriers were the missed cases during screening (weight 0.19) and frequency of screening (weight 0.14), while diseases screened for (weight 0.11) ranked low.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in willingness to participate in LCS showed marginal increase with inclusion of more diseases and limited variation between countries. A marginal increase in participation might result in a marginal additional benefit of Big-3 screening. The amendable participation barriers are similar to previous studies, and the new criterion, diseases screened for, is relatively unimportant.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Adding diseases to combination screening modestly improves participation, driven by personal perceived risk. These findings guide program design and campaigns for lung cancer and Big-3 screening. Benefits of Big-3 screening lie in long-term health and economic impact, not participation increase.

KEY POINTS

• It is unknown whether or how combination screening might affect participation. • The addition of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease to lung cancer screening resulted in a marginal increase in willingness to participate. • The primary determinant influencing individuals' engagement in such programs is their personal perceived risk of the disease.

Screening for lung cancer using thin-slice low-dose computed tomography in southwestern China: a population-based real-world study

OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors threatening human life and health. At present, low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for the high-risk population to achieve early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer has become the first choice recommended by many authoritative international medical organizations. To further optimize the lung cancer screening method, we conducted a real-world study of LDCT lung cancer screening in a large sample of a healthy physical examination population, comparing differences in lung nodules and lung cancer detection between thin and thick-slice LDCT scanning.

METHODS

A total of 29 296 subjects who underwent low-dose thick-slice CT scanning (5 mm thickness) from January 2015 to December 2015 and 28 058 subjects who underwent low-dose thin-slice CT scanning (1 mm thickness) from January 2018 to December 2018 in West China Hospital were included. The positive detection rate, detection rate of lung cancer, pathological stage of lung cancer, and mortality rate of lung cancer were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The positive rate of LDCT screening in the thin-slice scanning group was significantly higher than that in the thick-slice scanning group (20.1% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001). In addition, the lung cancer detection rate in the thin-slice LDCT screening positive group was significantly higher than that in the thick-slice scanning group (78.0% vs. 52.9%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The screening positive rate of low-dose thin-slice CT scanning is higher and more early-stage lung cancer (IA1 stage) can be detected in the screen-positive group.

Artificial intelligence-driven computer aided diagnosis system provides similar diagnosis value compared with doctors' evaluation in lung cancer screening

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the consistency between doctors and artificial intelligence (AI) software in analysing and diagnosing pulmonary nodules, and assess whether the characteristics of pulmonary nodules derived from the two methods are consistent for the interpretation of carcinomatous nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analysed participants aged 40-74 in the local area from 2011 to 2013. Pulmonary nodules were examined radiologically using a low-dose chest CT scan, evaluated by an expert panel of doctors in radiology, oncology, and thoracic departments, as well as a computer-aided diagnostic(CAD) system based on the three-dimensional(3D) convolutional neural network (CNN) with DenseNet architecture(InferRead CT Lung, IRCL). Consistency tests were employed to assess the uniformity of the radiological characteristics of the pulmonary nodules. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. Logistic regression analysis is utilized to determine whether the two methods yield the same predictive factors for cancerous nodules.

RESULTS

A total of 570 subjects were included in this retrospective study. The AI software demonstrated high consistency with the panel's evaluation in determining the position and diameter of the pulmonary nodules (kappa = 0.883, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) = 0.809, p = 0.000). The comparison of the solid nodules' attenuation characteristics also showed acceptable consistency (kappa = 0.503). In patients diagnosed with lung cancer, the area under the curve (AUC) for the panel and AI were 0.873 (95%CI: 0.829-0.909) and 0.921 (95%CI: 0.884-0.949), respectively. However, there was no significant difference (p = 0.0950). The maximum diameter, solid nodules, subsolid nodules were the crucial factors for interpreting carcinomatous nodules in the analysis of expert panel and IRCL pulmonary nodule characteristics.

CONCLUSION

AI software can assist doctors in diagnosing nodules and is consistent with doctors' evaluations and diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.

Combined Breast and Lung Cancer Screening Among Dual-Eligible Women: A Descriptive Study

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is consistently the leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States, yet lung cancer screening (LCS) rates remain low. By contrast, screening mammography rates are reliably high, suggesting that screening mammography can be a "teachable moment" to increase LCS uptake among dual-eligible women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective survey study conducted at two academic institutions. Patients undergoing screening mammography were evaluated for LCS eligibility and offered enrollment in a pilot dual-cancer screening program. A series of surveys was administered to characterize participants' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes about LCS before and after undergoing dual screening. Data were descriptively summarized.

RESULTS

Between August 2022 and July 2023, 54 LCS-eligible patients were enrolled. The study cohort was 100% female and predominantly White (81%), with a median age of 57 y and median of 36 pack-y of smoking. Survey results showed that 98% felt they were at risk for lung cancer, with most (80%) motivated by early detection of potential cancer. Regarding screening barriers, 58% of patients lacked knowledge about LCS eligibility and 47% reported concerns about screening cost. Prior to undergoing LCS, 87% of patients expressed interest in combined breast and lung screening. Encouragingly, after LCS, 84% were likely or very likely to undergo dual screening again and 93% found the shared decision-making visit helpful or very helpful.

CONCLUSIONS

Pairing breast and LCS is a feasible, acceptable intervention that, along with increasing patient and provider education about LCS, can increase LCS uptake and reduce lung cancer mortality.

Stage I and II nonsmall cell lung cancer treatment options

Chest radiography, computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT are required for staging nonsmall cell lung cancers. Stage I cancers may be up to 4 cm in maximal diameter, with stage IA tumours being up to 3 cm and stage IB up to 4 cm. A lung cancer becomes stage II if the tumour is between 4 and ≤5 cm (stage IIA), or it spreads to ipsilateral peribronchial or hilar lymph nodes (stage IIB). Stage IA tumours should be surgically resected, ideally using minimally invasive methods. Lobectomy is usually performed, although some studies have shown good outcomes for sublobar resections. If surgery is not possible, stereotactic body radiotherapy is a good alternative. This involves delivering a few high-dose radiation treatments at very high precision. For stage IB to IIB disease, combinations of surgery, chemotherapy or immunotherapy and radiotherapy are used. There is evidence that neoadjuvant treatment (immunotherapy with nivolumab and chemotherapy for stage IB and II) optimises outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy with a platinum-based doublet (typically cisplatin+vinorelbine) should be offered for resected stage IIB tumours and considered for resected IIA tumours. Adjuvant pembrolizumab is used for stage IB-IIIA following resection and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Osimertinib may be used for resected stage IB to IIIA cancers which have relevant mutations (epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution). There are no fixed guidelines for follow-up, but most centres recommend 6-monthly CT scanning for the first 2-3 years after definitive treatment, followed by annual scans.

Harnessing Opportunity: Pilot Intervention to Improve Lung Cancer Screening for Women Undergoing Breast Screening Mammography

Introduction

The screening mammogram could be a "teachable moment" to improve lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake. The aim of our project was to combine patient self-referral with eligibility identification by providers as a two-pronged approach to increase rates of LCS among eligible women.

Methods

LCS education materials were created to stimulate patient education and encourage self-referral. Chart review of patients scheduled for screening mammography was performed to identify patients who met LCS criteria. The primary outcome was rate of acceptance of targeted interventions as measured by qualitative survey material and rate of LCS uptake.

Results

Between August 2022 and August 2023, 116 patients were identified by providers for potential eligibility for LCS and 34 patients (29.3%) deemed eligible based on the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force 2021 guidelines. There were 19 patients (56%) who completed LCS with three patients (16%) with screen-detected nodules that led to further workup. Post-implementation qualitative survey results reveal that 100% of the participants rated their shared decision-making visit experience as "very helpful" and 67% responded "very likely" to seek simultaneous breast and LCS in the future. Informational materials were rated as 80% favorable among all respondents; however, the rate of self-referral alone was 0%. The combined rates of eligible patients lost to follow-up or refusal was 24%.

Conclusion

The self-referral aspect of the intervention revealed that patients are unlikely to self-refer for LCS. Nevertheless, patients undergoing screening mammograms individually identified for LCS were very responsive to learning more about dual screening.

[Lung cancer screening: new frontiers]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In early, asymptomatic stages, curative treatment is possible, but the disease is often diagnosed too late.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) helps to detect potentially malignant lesions in early stages and to reduce lung cancer mortality.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms enables a more precise analysis of LDCT scans.

PERFORMANCE

A meta-analysis of eight LCS studies revealed a statistically significant 12% relative reduction in lung cancer mortality.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Based on strong scientific evidence, a recommendation for a structured lung cancer screening program using LDCT for the high-risk population in Germany was issued.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The holistic LCS program requires a clear definition of the high-risk population, individual risk assessment, qualified personnel for conducting and reading examinations, verification of all diagnostic and therapeutic steps, central documentation and quality assurance, as well as the integration of tobacco cessation programs.

Incidental pulmonary nodules - current guidelines and management

BACKGROUND

 Due to the greater use of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging, the number of incidental pulmonary nodules detected each year is increasing. Although the vast majority of incidental pulmonary nodules are benign, many early lung carcinomas could be diagnosed with consistent follow-up. However, for a variety of reasons, the existing recommendations are often not implemented correctly. Therefore, potential for improvement with respect to competence, communication, structure, and process is described.

METHODS

 This article presents the recommendations for incidental pulmonary nodules from the current S3 guideline for lung cancer (July 2023). The internationally established recommendations (BTS guidelines and Fleischner criteria) are compared and further studies on optimized management were included after a systematic literature search in PubMed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

 In particular, AI-based software solutions are promising, as they can be used in a support capacity on several levels at once and can lead to simpler and more automated management. However, to be applicable in routine clinical practice, software must fit well into the radiology workflow and be integrated. In addition, "Lung Nodule Management" programs or clinics that follow a high-quality procedure for patients with incidental lung nodules or nodules detected by screening have been established in the USA. Similar structures might also be implemented in Germany in a future screening program in which patients with incidental pulmonary nodules could be included.

KEY POINTS

  · Incidental pulmonary nodules are common but are often not adequately managed. · The updated S3 guideline for lung cancer now includes recommendations for incidental pulmonary nodules. · Competence, communication, structure, and process levels offer significant potential for improvement.

CITATION FORMAT

· Glandorf J, Vogel-Claussen J, . Incidental pulmonary nodules - current guidelines and management. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 582 - 590.

Validation of a Blood-Based Protein Biomarker Panel for a Risk Assessment of Lethal Lung Cancer in the Physicians' Health Study

This study aimed to assess a four-marker protein panel (4MP)'s performance, including the precursor form of surfactant protein B, cancer antigen 125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cytokeratin-19, for predicting lung cancer in a cohort enriched with never- and ever-smokers. Blinded pre-diagnostic plasma samples collected within 2 years prior to a lung cancer diagnosis from 25 cases and 100 sex-, age-, and smoking-matched controls were obtained from the Physicians' Health Study (PHS). The 4MP yielded AUC performance estimates of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61-0.92) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56-0.82) for predicting lung cancer within one year and within two years of diagnosis, respectively. When stratifying into ever-smokers and never-smokers, the 4MP had respective AUCs of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63-0.92) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.17-1.00) for a 1-year risk of lung cancer. The AUCs of the 4MP for predicting metastatic lung cancer within one year and two years of the blood draw were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.87-1.00) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.62-0.94), respectively. Our findings indicate that a blood-based biomarker panel may be useful in identifying ever- and never-smokers at high risk of a diagnosis of lung cancer within one-to-two years.

Attention pyramid pooling network for artificial diagnosis on pulmonary nodules

The development of automated tools using advanced technologies like deep learning holds great promise for improving the accuracy of lung nodule classification in computed tomography (CT) imaging, ultimately reducing lung cancer mortality rates. However, lung nodules can be difficult to detect and classify, from CT images since different imaging modalities may provide varying levels of detail and clarity. Besides, the existing convolutional neural network may struggle to detect nodules that are small or located in difficult-to-detect regions of the lung. Therefore, the attention pyramid pooling network (APPN) is proposed to identify and classify lung nodules. First, a strong feature extractor, named vgg16, is used to obtain features from CT images. Then, the attention primary pyramid module is proposed by combining the attention mechanism and pyramid pooling module, which allows for the fusion of features at different scales and focuses on the most important features for nodule classification. Finally, we use the gated spatial memory technique to decode the general features, which is able to extract more accurate features for classifying lung nodules. The experimental results on the LIDC-IDRI dataset show that the APPN can achieve highly accurate and effective for classifying lung nodules, with sensitivity of 87.59%, specificity of 90.46%, accuracy of 88.47%, positive predictive value of 95.41%, negative predictive value of 76.29% and area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.914.

Cancer literacy differences of basic knowledge, prevention, early detection, treatment and recovery: a cross-sectional study of urban and rural residents in Northeast China

Background

Cancer literacy as a potential health intervention tool directly impacted the success of cancer prevention and treatment initiatives. This study aimed to evaluate the cancer literacy in Northeast China, and explore the factors contributing to urban-rural disparities.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 14 cities across Liaoning Province, China, from August to October 2021, using the multistage probability proportional to size sampling (PPS) method. The survey comprised 4,325 participants aged 15-69 and encompassed 37 core knowledge-based questions spanning five dimensions. Associations between sociodemographic factors and the cancer literacy rate were evaluated using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression model.

Results

The overall cancer literacy rate was 66.9% (95% CI: 65.6-68.2%). In the primary indicators, cancer literacy were highest in treatment (75.8, 95% CI: 74.2-77.4%) and early detection (68.2, 95% CI: 66.8-69.6%), followed by basic knowledge (67.2, 95% CI: 65.8-68.6%), recovery (62.6, 95% CI: 60.7-64.5%) and prevention (59.7, 95% CI: 58.2-61.3%). Regarding secondary indicators, the awareness rates regarding cancer-related risk factors (54.7, 95% CI: 52.8-56.5%) and early diagnosis of cancer (54.6, 95% CI: 52.7-56.6%) were notably inadequate. Rural participates exhibited lower cancer literacy across all dimensions compared to urban. Multi-factor analysis showed that factors such as advanced age, limited education or low household income were barriers to health literacy in rural areas.

Conclusion

Strengthening awareness concerning prevention and early detection, particularly among key populations, and bridging the urban-rural cancer literacy gap are imperative steps toward achieving the Healthy China 2030 target.

HUNCHEST-II contributes to a shift to earlier-stage lung cancer detection: final results of a nationwide screening program

OBJECTIVES

The introduction of low-dose CT (LDCT) altered the landscape of lung cancer (LC) screening and contributed to the reduction of mortality rates worldwide. Here we report the final results of HUNCHEST-II, the largest population-based LDCT screening program in Hungary, including the screening and diagnostic outcomes, and the characteristics of the LC cases.

METHODS

A total of 4215 high-risk individuals aged between 50 and 75 years with a smoking history of at least 25 pack-years were assigned to undergo LDCT screening. Screening outcomes were determined based on the volume, growth, and volume doubling time of pulmonary nodules or masses. The clinical stage distribution of screen-detected cancers was compared with two independent practice-based databases consisting of unscreened LC patients.

RESULTS

The percentage of negative and indeterminate tests at baseline were 74.2% and 21.7%, respectively, whereas the prevalence of positive LDCT results was 4.1%. Overall, 76 LC patients were diagnosed throughout the screening rounds (1.8% of total participants), out of which 62 (1.5%) patients were already identified in the first screening round. The overall positive predictive value of a positive test was 58%. Most screen-detected malignancies were stage I LCs (60.7%), and only 16.4% of all cases could be classified as stage IV disease. The percentage of early-stage malignancies was significantly higher among HUNCHEST-II screen-detected individuals than among the LC patients in the National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology's archive or the Hungarian Cancer Registry (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HUNCHEST-II demonstrates that LDCT screening for LC facilitates early diagnosis, thus arguing in favor of introducing systematic LC screening in Hungary.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

HUNCHEST-II is the so-far largest population-based low-dose CT screening program in Hungary. A positive test's overall positive predictive value was 58%, and most screen-detected malignancies were early-stage lesions. These results pave the way for expansive systematic screening in the region.

KEY POINTS

• Conducted in 18 medical facilities, HUNCHEST-II is the so far largest population-based low-dose CT screening program in Hungary. • The vast majority of screen-detected malignancies were early-stage lung cancers, and the overall positive predictive value of a positive test was 58%. • HUNCHEST-II facilitates early diagnosis, thus arguing in favor of introducing systematic lung cancer screening in Hungary.

Oncology: What You May Have Missed in 2023

Advances in oncology treatment methods have improved outcomes and quality of life for patients with cancer. However, care of these patients can be complex, and the contribution of physicians from different specialties is crucial. This article highlights important publications from 2023 on topics across a wide spectrum relating to the management of oncology patients. The literature was screened for significant new evidence that is relevant to internal medicine specialists and subspecialists whose focus is not oncology. Two articles address the importance of social interventions targeting end-of-life care for low-income and minority patients and the well-being of caregivers. Two additional articles address screening considerations in patients at risk for colorectal and lung cancer. Two more articles address safe use of hormone-related therapies to treat symptoms of menopause and prevent disease recurrence or progression in patients diagnosed with noninvasive breast neoplasia. Finally, several articles were included on topics related to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer, use of cannabinoids for cancer pain control, chronic autoimmune adverse effects related to use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the incidence of second primary neoplasms.

Lung cancer statistics, 2023

Despite decades of declining mortality rates, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. This article examines lung cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, survival, and mortality using population-based data from the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Over the past 5 years, declines in lung cancer mortality became considerably greater than declines in incidence among men (5.0% vs. 2.6% annually) and women (4.3% vs. 1.1% annually), reflecting absolute gains in 2-year relative survival of 1.4% annually. Improved outcomes likely reflect advances in treatment, increased access to care through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and earlier stage diagnosis; for example, compared with a 4.6% annual decrease for distant-stage disease incidence during 2013-2019, the rate for localized-stage disease rose by 3.6% annually. Localized disease incidence increased more steeply in states with the highest lung cancer screening prevalence (by 3%-5% annually) than in those with the lowest (by 1%-2% annually). Despite progress, disparities remain. For example, Native Americans have the highest incidence and the slowest decline (less than 1% annually among men and stagnant rates among women) of any group. In addition, mortality rates in Mississippi and Kentucky are two to three times higher than in most western states, largely because of elevated historic smoking prevalence that remains. Racial and geographic inequalities highlight longstanding opportunities for more concerted tobacco-control efforts targeted at high-risk populations, including improved access to smoking-cessation treatments and lung cancer screening, as well as state-of-the-art treatment.

Perspective on Management of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Findings on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Examinations for Lung Cancer Screening. From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Detection and Screening Committee

Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) carefully implemented has been found to reduce deaths from lung cancer. Optimal management starts with selection of eligibility criteria, counseling of screenees, smoking cessation, selection of the regimen of screening which specifies the imaging protocol, and workup of LDCT findings. Coordination of clinical, radiologic, and interventional teams and ultimately treatment of diagnosed lung cancers under screening determine the benefit of LDCT screening. Ethical considerations of who should be eligible for LDCT screening programs are important to provide the benefit to as many people at risk of lung cancer as possible. Unanticipated diseases identified on LDCT may offer important benefits through early detection of leading global causes of death, such as cardiovascular diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as the latter may result from conditions such as emphysema and bronchiectasis, which can be identified early on LDCT. This report identifies the key components of the regimen of LDCT screening for lung cancer which include the need for a management system to provide data for continuous updating of the regimen and provides quality assurance assessment of actual screenings. Multidisciplinary clinical management is needed to maximize the benefit of early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Different regimens have been evolving throughout the world as the resources and needs may be different, for countries with limited resources. Sharing of results, further knowledge, and incorporation of technologic advances will continue to accelerate worldwide improvements in the diagnostic and treatment approaches.

[Modern individualized diagnostics and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer]

Approximately one half of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at resectable tumor stages (I-IIIA), which can potentially be curatively treated. In the early tumor stages (tumor diameter ≤2 cm) sublobar resection (segmentectomy or atypical wedge resection) leads to a 5‑year long-term survival comparable to lobectomy. The use of immunotherapy, especially within the framework of neoadjuvant treatment, is anticipated to change the surgical treatment of NSCLC in the future. With the introduction of lung cancer screening for certain risk groups in Germany planned for 2024, lung tumors can be expected to be diagnosed at earlier stages and more frequently curatively treated. This article provides an overview of the potential impact of lung cancer screening, modern minimally invasive surgical techniques and neoadjuvant treatment concepts for the surgical treatment of NSCLC.

Cardiac troponin I as predictor for cardiac and other mortality in the German randomized lung cancer screening trial (LUSI)

Cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) could be used to identify individuals at elevated risk of cardiac death in lung cancer (LC) screening settings. In a population-based, randomized LC screening trial in Germany ("LUSI" study) serum cTnI was measured by high-sensitivity assay in blood samples collected at baseline, and categorized into unquantifiable/low (< 6 ng/L), intermediate (≥ 6-15 ng/L), and elevated (≥ 16 ng/L). Cox proportional-hazard models were used to estimate risk of all-cause and cardiac mortality with cTnI levels. After exclusion criteria, 3653 participants were included for our analyses, of which 82.4% had low, 12.8% intermediate and 4.8% elevated cTnI, respectively. Over a median follow up of 11.87 years a total of 439 deaths occurred, including 67 caused by cardiac events. Within the first 5 years after cTnI measurement, intermediate or elevated cTnI levels showed approximately 1.7 (HR = 1.69 [95% CI 0.57-5.02) and 4.7-fold (HR = 4.66 [1.73-12.50]) increases in risk of cardiac death relative to individuals with unquantifiable/low cTnI, independently of age, sex, smoking and other risk factors. Within this time interval, a risk model based on age, sex, BMI, smoking history and cTnI showed a combined area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 73.6 (58.1-87.3), as compared to 70.4 (53.3-83.5) for a model without cTnI. Over the time interval of > 5-10 years after blood donation, the relative risk associations with cTnI and were weaker. cTnI showed no association with mortality from any other (non-cardiac) cause. Our findings show that cTnI may be of use for identifying individuals at elevated risk specifically of short-term cardiac mortality in the context of LC screening.

Lung cancer screening in Brazil: recommendations from the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, Brazilian Thoracic Association, and Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging

Although lung cancer (LC) is one of the most common and lethal tumors, only 15% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage. Smoking is still responsible for more than 85% of cases. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT (LDCT) reduces LC-related mortality by 20%, and that reduction reaches 38% when LCS by LDCT is combined with smoking cessation. In the last decade, a number of countries have adopted population-based LCS as a public health recommendation. Albeit still incipient, discussion on this topic in Brazil is becoming increasingly broad and necessary. With the aim of increasing knowledge and stimulating debate on LCS, the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, the Brazilian Thoracic Association, and the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging convened a panel of experts to prepare recommendations for LCS in Brazil. The recommendations presented here were based on a narrative review of the literature, with an emphasis on large population-based studies, systematic reviews, and the recommendations of international guidelines, and were developed after extensive discussion by the panel of experts. The following topics were reviewed: reasons for screening; general considerations about smoking; epidemiology of LC; eligibility criteria; incidental findings; granulomatous lesions; probabilistic models; minimum requirements for LDCT; volumetric acquisition; risks of screening; minimum structure and role of the multidisciplinary team; practice according to the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System; costs versus benefits of screening; and future perspectives for LCS.

Diagnosis of benign and malignant peripheral lung lesions based on a feature model constructed by the random forest algorithm for grayscale and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Rationale and objectives

To construct a predictive model for benign and malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) using a random forest algorithm based on grayscale ultrasound and ultrasound contrast, and to evaluate its diagnostic value.

Materials and methods

We selected 254 patients with PPLs detected using chest lung computed tomography between October 2021 and July 2023, including 161 malignant and 93 benign lesions. Relevant variables for judging benign and malignant PPLs were screened using logistic regression analysis. A model was constructed using the random forest algorithm, and the test set was verified. Correlations between these relevant variables and the diagnosis of benign and malignant PPLs were evaluated.

Results

Age, lesion shape, size, angle between the lesion border and chest wall, boundary clarity, edge regularity, air bronchogram, vascular signs, enhancement patterns, enhancement intensity, homogeneity of enhancement, number of non-enhancing regions, non-enhancing region type, arrival time (AT) of the lesion, lesion-lung AT difference, AT difference ratio, and time to peak were the relevant variables for judging benign and malignant PPLs. Consequently, a model and receiver operating characteristic curve were constructed with an AUC of 0.92 and an accuracy of 88.2%. The test set results showed that the model had good predictive ability. The index with the highest correlation for judging benign and malignant PPLs was the AT difference ratio. Other important factors were lesion size, patient age, and lesion morphology.

Conclusion

The random forest algorithm model constructed based on clinical data and ultrasound imaging features has clinical application value for predicting benign and malignant PPLs.

The insufficiency of CT examination in early detection of central lung squamous cell carcinoma and squamous epithelial precancerous lesions

BACKGROUND

CT examination for lung cancer has been carried out for more than 20 years and great achievements have been made in the early detection of lung cancer. However, in the clinical work, a large number of advanced central lung squamous cell carcinoma are still detected through bronchoscopy. Meanwhile, a part of CT-occult central lung squamous cell carcinoma and squamous epithelial precancerous lesions are also accidentally detected through bronchoscopy.

METHODS

This study retrospectively collects the medical records of patients in the bronchoscopy room of the Endoscopy Department of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. The inclusion criteria for patients includes: 1.Patient medical records completed, 2.Without history of lung cancer before the diagnosis and first pathological diagnosis of primary lung cancer, 3.Have the lung CT data of the same period, 4.Have the bronchoscopy records and related pathological diagnosis, 5.The patients undergoing radical surgical treatment must have a complete postoperative pathological diagnosis. Finally, a total of 10,851 patients with primary lung cancer are included in the study, including 7175 males and 3676 females, aged 22-98 years. Firstly, 130 patients with CT-occult lesions are extracted and their clinical features are analyzed. Then, 604 cases of single central squamous cell carcinoma and 3569 cases of peripheral adenocarcinoma are extracted and compares in postoperative tumor diameter and lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

115 cases of CT-occult central lung squamous cell carcinoma and 15 cases of squamous epithelial precancerous lesions are found. In the total lung cancer, the proportion of CT-occult lesions is 130/10,851 (1.20%). Meanwhile, all these patients are middle-aged and elderly men with a history of heavy smoking. There are statistically significant differences in postoperative median tumor diameter (3.65 cm vs.1.70 cm, P < 0.0001) and lymph node metastasis rate (50.99% vs.13.06%, P < 0.0001) between 604 patients with operable single central lung squamous cell carcinoma and 3569 patients with operable peripheral lung adenocarcinoma. Of the 604 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 96.52% (583/604) are male with a history of heavy smoking and aged 40-82 years with a median age of 64 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the current lung CT examination of lung cancer is indeed insufficiency for the early diagnosis of central squamous cell carcinoma and squamous epithelial precancerous lesions. Further bronchoscopy in middle-aged and elderly men with a history of heavy smoking can make up for the lack of routine lung CT examination.

Lung Nodule Detection With Modern Low-Field MRI (0.55 T) in Comparison to CT

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of modern low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for lung nodule detection and to correlate nodule size measurement with computed tomography (CT) as reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2020 and July 2021, a prospective clinical trial using low-field MRI at 0.55 T was performed in patients with known pulmonary nodules from a single academic medical center. Every patient underwent MRI and CT imaging on the same day. The primary aim was to evaluate the detection accuracy of pulmonary nodules using MRI with transversal periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction in combination with coronal half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin-echo MRI sequences. The secondary outcome was the correlation of the mean lung nodule diameter with CT as reference according to the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis were applied to analyze the results.

RESULTS

A total of 46 participants (mean age ± SD, 66 ± 11 years; 26 women) were included. In a blinded analysis of 964 lung nodules, the detection accuracy was 100% for those ≥6 mm (126/126), 80% (159/200) for those ≥4-<6 mm, and 23% (147/638) for those <4 mm in MRI compared with reference CT. Spearman correlation coefficient of MRI and CT size measurement was r = 0.87 ( P < 0.001), and the mean difference was 0.16 ± 0.9 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Modern low-field MRI shows excellent accuracy in lesion detection for lung nodules ≥6 mm and a very strong correlation with CT imaging for size measurement, but could not compete with CT in the detection of small nodules.

Barriers to Timely Lung Cancer Care in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Impact on Patient Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Optimal time to treatment for early-stage lung cancer is uncertain. We examined causes of delays in care for Veterans who presented with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and whether workup time was associated with increased upstaging or all-cause mortality.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of Veterans referred to our facility with radiographic stage I or II NSCLC between January 2013 to December 2017, with follow-up through October 2021. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, time intervals of care, and reasons for delays were collected. Guideline concordance (GC) was defined as treatment within 14 weeks of abnormal image. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine association between delays in care, survival, and upstaging.

RESULTS

Data from 203 Veterans were analyzed. Median time between abnormal imaging to treatment was 17.7 weeks (IQR 12.7-26.6). Only 33% of Veterans received GC care. Most common patient-related delays were: intercurrent hospitalization/comorbidity (23%), no-shows (16%) and inability to reach Veteran (17%). Most common system-related delay: lack of scheduling availability (25%). Delays associated with upstaging: transportation issues, request for coordination of appointments, and unforeseen appointment changes. Rates of upstaging did not differ between GC and discordant groups (P = .6). GC care was not an independent predictor of mortality. Post-hoc, treatment within 8 weeks was associated with lower rates of upstaging (P = .05).

CONCLUSION

Although GC care did not impact survival or upstaging for early-stage NSCLC, shorter timeframes may be beneficial. Modifiable delays in care exist which may be addressed at an institutional level to improve timeliness of care.

Effectiveness of a single low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: A population-based perspective cohort study in China

The purpose of this perspective cohort study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer in China. This study was conducted under the China Urban Cancer Screening Program (CanSPUC). The analysis was based on participants aged 40 to 74 years from 2012 to 2019. A total of 255 569 eligible participants were recruited in the study. Among the 58 136 participants at high risk of lung cancer, 20 346 (35.00%) had a single LDCT scan (defined as the screened group) and 37 790 (65.00%) not (defined as the non-screened group). Overall, 1162 participants were diagnosed with lung cancer at median follow-up time of 5.25 years. The screened group had the highest cumulative incidence of lung cancer and the non-screened group had the highest cumulative lung cancer mortality and all-cause cumulative mortality. We performed inverse probability weighting (IPW) to account for potential imbalances, and Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the weighted association between mortality and LDCT scans. After IPW adjusted with baseline characteristics, the lung cancer incidence density was significantly increased (37.0% increase) (HR1.37 [95%CI 1.12-1.69]), lung cancer mortality was decreased (31.0% decrease) (HR0.69 [95%CI 0.49-0.97]), and the all-cause mortality was significantly decreased (23.0% lower) (HR0.77 [95% CI 0.68-0.87]) in the screened group. In summary, a single LDCT for lung cancer screening will reduce the mortality of lung cancer and all-cause mortality in China.

[Statement Paper on the Implementation of a National Organized Program in Germany for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer in Risk Populations Using Low-dose CT Screening Including Management of Screening Findings]

The process of implementing early detection of lung cancer with low-dose CT (LDCT) in Germany has gained significant momentum in recent years. It is expected that the ordinance of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) on early detection of lung cancer, which has been commented on by the professional societies, will come into effect by the end of 2023. Based on this regulation, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) will set up a program for early lung cancer detection with LDCT in the near future. In this position paper, the specialist societies involved in lung cancer screening present concrete cornerstones for a uniform, structured and quality-assured early detection program for lung cancer in Germany to make a constructive contribution to this process.

[Statement paper on the implementation of a national organized program in Germany for the early detection of lung cancer in risk populations using low-dose CT screening including management of screening findings]

The process of implementing early detection of lung cancer with low-dose CT (LDCT) in Germany has gained significant momentum in recent years. It is expected that the ordinance of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) on the early detection of lung cancer, which has been commented on by the professional societies, will come into effect by the end of 2023. Based on this regulation, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) will set up a program for early lung cancer detection with LDCT in the near future. In this position paper, the specialist societies involved in lung cancer screening present key points for a uniform, structured and quality-assured early detection program for lung cancer in Germany to make a constructive contribution to this process. CITATION FORMAT: · Vogel-Claussen J, Blum TG, Andreas S et al. Position paper on the implementation of a nationally organized program in Germany for the early detection of lung cancer in high-risk populations using low-dose CT screening including the management of screening findings requiring further workup. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: DOI 10.1055/a-2178-2846.

Comparison of different classification systems for pulmonary nodules: a multicenter retrospective study in China

BACKGROUND

To compare the diagnostic performance of Lung-RADS (lung imaging-reporting and data system) 2022 and PNI-GARS (pulmonary node imaging-grading and reporting system).

METHODS

Pulmonary nodules (PNs) were selected at four centers, namely, CQ Center (January 1, 2018-December 31, 2021), HB Center (January 1, 2021-June 30, 2022), SC Center (September 1, 2021-December 31, 2021), and SX Center (January 1, 2021-December 31, 2021). PNs were divided into solid nodules (SNs), partial solid nodules (PSNs) and ground-glass nodules (GGNs), and they were then classified by the Lung-RADS and PNI-GARS. The sensitivity, specificity and agreement rate were compared between the two systems by the χ2 test.

RESULTS

For SN and PSN, the sensitivity of PNI-GARS and Lung-RADS was close (SN 99.8% vs. 99.4%, P < 0.001; PSN 99.9% vs. 98.4%, P = 0.015), but the specificity (SN 51.2% > 35.1%, PSN 13.3% > 5.7%, all P < 0.001) and agreement rate (SN 81.1% > 74.5%, P < 0.001, PSN 94.6% > 92.7%, all P < 0.05) of PNI-GARS were superior to those of Lung-RADS. For GGN, the sensitivity (96.5%) and agreement rate (88.6%) of PNI-GARS were better than those of Lung-RADS (0, 18.5%, P < 0.001). For the whole sample, the sensitivity (98.5%) and agreement rate (87.0%) of PNI-GARS were better than Lung-RADS (57.5%, 56.5%, all P < 0.001), whereas the specificity was slightly lower (49.8% < 53.4%, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

PNI-GARS was superior to Lung-RADS in diagnostic performance, especially for GGN.

Integrative Multianalytical Model Based on Novel Plasma Protein Biomarkers for Distinguishing Lung Adenocarcinoma and Benign Pulmonary Nodules

Given the pressing clinical problem of making a decision in diagnosis for subjects with pulmonary nodules, we aimed to discover novel plasma protein biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and benign pulmonary nodules (BPNs) and then develop an integrative multianalytical model to guide the clinical management of LUAD and BPN patients. Through label-free quantitative plasma proteomic analysis (data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD046731), 12 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in LUAD and BPN were screened. The diagnostic abilities of DEPs were validated in two independent validation cohorts. The results showed that the levels of three candidate proteins (PRDX2, PON1, and APOC3) were lower in the plasma of LUAD than in BPN. The three candidate proteins were combined with three promising computed tomography indicators (spiculation, vascular notch sign, and lobulation) and three traditional markers (CEA, CA125, and CYFRA21-1) to construct an integrative multianalytical model, which was effective in distinguishing LUAD from BPN, with an AUC of 0.904, a sensitivity of 81.44%, and a specificity of 90.14%. Moreover, the model possessed impressive diagnostic performance between early LUADs and BPNs, with the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.868, 65.63%, 90.14%, and 82.52%, respectively. This model may be a useful auxiliary diagnostic tool for LUAD and BPN by achieving a better balance of sensitivity and specificity.