Romosozumab or Alendronate for Fracture Prevention in Women with Osteoporosis

Correlation of serum DKK1 level with skeletal phenotype in children with osteogenesis imperfecta

PURPOSE

We aim to detect serum DKK1 level of pediatric patients with OI and to analyze its relationship with the genotype and phenotype of OI patients.

METHODS

A cohort of pediatric OI patients and age-matched healthy children were enrolled. Serum levels of DKK1 and bone turnover biomarkers were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Pathogenic mutations of OI were detected by next-generation sequencing and confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 62 OI children with mean age of 9.50 (4.86, 12.00) years and 29 healthy children were included in this study. The serum DKK1 concentration in OI children was significantly higher than that in healthy children [5.20 (4.54, 6.32) and 4.08 (3.59, 4.92) ng/mL, P < 0.001]. The serum DKK1 concentration in OI children was negatively correlated with height (r = - 0.282), height Z score (r = - 0.292), ALP concentration (r = - 0.304), lumbar BMD (r = - 0.276), BMD Z score of the lumbar spine and femoral neck (r = - 0.32; r = - 0.27) (all P < 0.05). No significant difference in serum DKK1 concentration was found between OI patients with and without vertebral compression fractures. In patients with spinal deformity (22/62), serum DKK1 concentration was positively correlated with SDI (r = 0.480, P < 0.05). No significant correlation was observed between serum DKK1 concentration and the annual incidence of peripheral fractures, genotype and types of collagen changes in OI children.

CONCLUSION

The serum DKK1 level was not only significantly elevated in OI children, but also closely correlated to their skeletal phenotype, suggesting that DKK1 may become a new biomarker and a potential therapeutic target of OI.

A practical approach for anabolic treatment of bone fragility with romosozumab

BACKGROUND

Romosozumab, a fully humanized anti-sclerostin-antibody, is a bone-builder stimulating osteoblasts and inhibiting osteoclast by activation of the canonical Wnt-beta catenin signaling. This unique mechanism of action has the potential to address unmet needs in osteoporosis management.

METHODS

The multifaceted practical clinical issues related to romosozumab are discussed, especially focusing on the rationale of employing a sclerostin inhibitor to target bone fragility as first line or second line treatment in post-menopausal osteoporosis and in males at increased risk of fractures.

RESULTS

Four randomized clinical trials with several post-hoc analyses and more than ten observational studies have consistently demonstrated that romosozumab is effective in rapidly increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and decreasing risk of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures in post-menopausal women at very-high risk of fractures. In male osteoporosis, only data on BMD are available. Noteworthy, romosozumab was shown to be more effective and rapid than teriparatide in improving BMD, bone structure and strength at the hip, especially in women already treated with anti-resorptive drugs. Interestingly, even if romosozumab displays best results in treatment-naïve patients, its favourable effects on BMD were observed even in women previously treated with teriparatide or denosumab, although to a lesser extent.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, romosozumab could be proposed as ideal drug in several clinical settings, such as non-fractured post-menopausal women at very-high risk of fractures, patients with recent hip fracture, patients non responder to bisphosphonates and short-term denosumab therapy.

PTH receptor signalling, osteocytes and bone disease induced by diabetes mellitus

Basic, translational and clinical research over the past few decades has provided new understanding on the mechanisms by which activation of the receptor of parathyroid hormone (parathyroid hormone 1 receptor (PTH1R)) regulates bone physiology and pathophysiology. A fundamental change in the field emerged upon the recognition that osteocytes, which are permanent residents of bone and the most abundant cells in bone, are targets of the actions of natural and synthetic ligands of PTH1R (parathyroid hormone and abaloparatide, respectively), and that these cells drive essential actions related to bone remodelling. Among the numerous genes regulated by PTH1R in osteocytes, SOST (which encodes sclerostin, the WNT signalling antagonist and inhibitor of bone formation) has a critical role in bone homeostasis and changes in its expression are associated with several bone pathologies. The bone fragility syndrome induced by diabetes mellitus is accompanied by increased osteocyte apoptosis and changes in the expression of osteocytic genes, including SOST. This Review will discuss advances in our knowledge of the role of osteocytes in PTH1R signalling and the new opportunities to restore bone health in diabetes mellitus by targeting the osteocytic PTH1R-sclerostin axis.

A proteomics approach to study mouse long bones: examining baseline differences and mechanical loading-induced bone formation in young-adult and old mice

With aging, bone mass declines and the anabolic effects of skeletal loading diminish. While much research has focused on gene transcription, how bone ages and loses its mechanoresponsiveness at the protein level remains unclear. We developed a novel proteomics approach and performed a paired mass spectrometry and RNA-seq analysis on tibias from young-adult (5-month) and old (22-month) mice. We report the first correlation estimate between the bone proteome and transcriptome (Spearman ρ = 0.40), which is in line with other tissues but indicates that a relatively low amount of variation in protein levels is explained by the variation in transcript levels. Of 71 shared targets that differed with age, eight were associated with bone mineral density in previous GWAS, including understudied targets Asrgl1 and Timp2. We used complementary RNA in situ hybridization to confirm that Asrgl1 and Timp2 had reduced expression in osteoblasts/osteocytes in old bones. We also found evidence for reduced TGF-beta signaling with aging, in particular Tgfb2. Next, we defined proteomic changes following mechanical loading. At the protein level, bone differed more with age than with loading, and aged bone had fewer loading-induced changes. Overall, our findings underscore the need for complementary protein-level assays in skeletal biology research.

Romosozumab versus denosumab in long-term users of glucocorticoids: A pilot randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of romosozumab (ROMO) and denosumab (DEN) in prevalent long-term glucocorticoid (GC) users.

METHODS

Adult patients receiving oral prednisolone (≥5 mg/day) with high risk of fracture were randomized to receive subcutaneous ROMO (210 mg monthly) or DEN (60 mg 6-monthly) for 12 months, followed by DEN for two more doses. The primary end point was the change in spine bone mineral density (BMD) from Months 0 to 12. Secondary end points included changes in BMD of the spine/hip/femoral neck and bone turnover markers at various time points and adverse events.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (age 62.6 ± 9.1 years; 96% women; median prednisolone dose 5.0 mg/day; duration of therapy 10.7 ± 7.4 years) were enrolled, and 63 completed the study. At Month 12, the spine BMD increased significantly in both ROMO (+7.3% ± 4.5%; p < 0.001) and DEN (+2.3% ± 3.1%; p < 0.001) groups. The absolute spine BMD gain from Months 0 to 12 was significantly greater in ROMO-treated patients (p < 0.001). Although the total hip BMD at Month 12 also increased significantly in the ROMO (+1.6% ± 3.3%; p = 0.01) and DEN groups (+1.6% ± 2.6%; p = 0.003), the absolute BMD gain was not significantly different between the groups. At Month 24, the spine BMD continued to increase in both the ROMO (+9.7% ± 4.8%; p < 0.001) and DEN group (+3.0% ± 3.0%; p < 0.001) compared to baseline, and the absolute BMD gain remained significantly greater in ROMO-treated patients. The total hip BMD continued to increase in both groups (ROMO +2.9% ± 3.7%; p < 0.001; DEN +2.2% ± 3.4%; p = 0.001), but the changes from baseline were similar. Injection site reaction was more frequently reported in ROMO-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

ROMO was superior to DEN in raising the spine BMD at Month 12 in chronic GC users. After switching to DEN, ROMO-treated patients continued to gain spine BMD to a greater extent than DEN until Month 24.

Cost-effectiveness intervention thresholds for romosozumab and teriparatide in the treatment of osteoporosis in the UK

Sequential romosozumab-to-alendronate or sequential teriparatide-to-alendronate can be a cost-effective treatment option for postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture.

PURPOSE

To estimate the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) at which sequential treatment with romosozumab or teriparatide followed by alendronate, compared with alendronate alone, becomes cost-effective in a UK setting.

METHODS

A microsimulation model with a Markov structure was used to simulate fractures, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), in women receiving sequential treatment with either romosozumab or teriparatide followed by alendronate, compared with alendronate alone. Patients aged 50 to 90 years with a recent MOF, hip or spine fracture were followed from the start of a 5-year treatment until the age of 100 years or death. The analysis had a healthcare perspective. Efficacy of romosozumab, teriparatide and alendronate was derived from phase III randomised controlled trials. Resource use and unit costs were derived from the literature. Cost-effectiveness intervention threshold (CEIT), defined as the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture at which treatment becomes cost-effective, was compared with clinically appropriate intervention thresholds for bone-forming treatment in women with very high fracture risk as recommended by the UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG).

RESULTS

The base case analysis showed that sequential romosozumab-to-alendronate treatment was cost-effective from a 10-year MOF probability of 18-35% and above depending on age and site of sentinel fracture at a willingness to pay (WTP) of £30,000. For teriparatide-to-alendronate, treatment was cost-effective at a 10-year MOF probability of 27-57%. The results were sensitive to pricing of the drugs but relatively insensitive to treatment duration, romosozumab persistence assumptions, and site of sentinel fracture. The CEITs for romosozumab-to-alendronate treatment were lower than the clinical thresholds from the age of 70 years meaning that treatment could be considered both cost-effective and aligned with the NOGG treatment guidelines. By contrast, for teriparatide-to-alendronate the CEITs were higher than the clinical thresholds irrespective of age. However, cost-effective scenarios were found in the presence of strong clinical risk factors in addition to a recent sentinel fracture.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that sequential romosozumab-to-alendronate or teriparatide-to-alendronate treatment can be a cost-effective treatment option for postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture.

Current therapeutic approach of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has emerged as one of the leading noncommunicable diseases affecting >10% of the population worldwide. Bone and mineral disorders are a common complication among patients with CKD resulting in a poor life quality, high fracture risk, increased morbidity and cardiovascular mortality. According to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes, renal osteodystrophy refers to changes in bone morphology found in bone biopsy, whereas CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) defines a complex of disturbances including biochemical and hormonal alterations, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism and extraskeletal calcification. As a result, the management of CKD-MBD should focus on the aforementioned parameters, including the treatment of hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, abnormal PTH and vitamin D levels. Regarding the bone fragility fractures, osteoporosis and renal osteodystrophy, which constitute the bone component of CKD-MBD, anti-osteoporotic agents constitute the mainstay of treatment. However, a thorough elucidation of the CKD-MBD pathogenesis is crucial for the ideal personalized treatment approach. In this paper, we review the pathology and management of CKD-MBD based on the current literature with special attention to recent advances.

Comparison of Denosumab with Romosozumab in the treatment of male osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study

We aimed to investigate the efficacy of romosozumab treatment compared with that of denosumab in especially male osteoporosis patients. This retrospective cohort study included 174 Japanese male patients receiving either denosumab or romosozumab for 12 months. Propensity score matching extracted 50 patients per treatment group for standardization of group characteristics. The endpoints include the rate of change in the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck after 12 months of treatment as well as the changes in serum bone metabolism markers. The mean 12-month percentage increase in the lumbar spine BMD from baseline was significantly greater with romosozumab (13.0% ±1.7%) than with denosumab (4.5%±0.6%) (P < 0.01). The total hip and femoral neck BMD exhibited a similar trend at 12 months; however, no significant between-group differences were observed. With denosumab, bone formation, and resorption marker levels significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months. Conversely, with romosozumab, the levels of bone formation markers increased transiently at 6 months before returning to baseline, whereas bone resorption markers significantly decreased at both time points. Romosozumab demonstrated significantly superior effects over denosumab in improving BMD, especially of the lumbar spine, suggesting that romosozumab can be used for treating male osteoporosis.

[Osteoporosis-Definition, risk assessment, diagnosis, prevention and treatment (update 2024) : Guidelines of the Austrian Society for Bone and Mineral Research]

BACKGROUND

Austria is among the countries with the highest incidence and prevalence of osteoporotic fractures worldwide. Guidelines for the prevention and management of osteoporosis were first published in 2010 under the auspices of the then Federation of Austrian Social Security Institutions and updated in 2017. The present comprehensively updated guidelines of the Austrian Society for Bone and Mineral Research are aimed at physicians of all specialties as well as decision makers and institutions in the Austrian healthcare system. The aim of these guidelines is to strengthen and improve the quality of medical care of patients with osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in Austria.

METHODS

These evidence-based recommendations were compiled taking randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as European and international reference guidelines published before 1 June 2023 into consideration. The grading of recommendations used ("conditional" and "strong") are based on the strength of the evidence. The evidence levels used mutual conversions of SIGN (1++ to 3) to NOGG criteria (Ia to IV).

RESULTS

The guidelines include all aspects associated with osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures, such as secondary causes, prevention, diagnosis, estimation of the 10-year fracture risk using FRAX®, determination of Austria-specific FRAX®-based intervention thresholds, drug-based and non-drug-based treatment options and treatment monitoring. Recommendations for the office-based setting and decision makers and institutions in the Austrian healthcare system consider structured care models and options for osteoporosis-specific screening.

CONCLUSION

The guidelines present comprehensive, evidence-based information and instructions for the treatment of osteoporosis. It is expected that the quality of medical care for patients with this clinical picture will be substantially improved at all levels of the Austrian healthcare system.

Signaling pathways associated with Lgr6 to regulate osteogenesis

Fracture management largely relies on the bone's inherent healing capabilities and, when necessary, surgical intervention. Currently, there are limited osteoinductive therapies to promote healing, making targeting skeletal stem/progenitor cells (SSPCs) a promising avenue for therapeutic development. A limiting factor for this approach is our incomplete understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing SSPCs' behavior. We have recently identified that the Leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 6 (Lgr6) is expressed in sub-populations of SSPCs, and is required for maintaining bone volume during adulthood and for proper fracture healing. Lgr family members (Lgr4-6) are markers of stem cell niches and play a role in tissue regeneration primarily by binding R-Spondin (Rspo1-4). This interaction promotes canonical Wnt (cWnt) signaling by stabilizing Frizzled receptors. Interestingly, our findings here indicate that Lgr6 may also influence cWnt-independent pathways. Remarkably, Lgr6 expression was enhanced during Bmp-mediated osteogenesis of both human and murine cells. Using biochemical approaches, RNA sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis of published single-cell data, we found that elements of BMP signaling, including its target gene, pSMAD, and gene ontology pathways, are downregulated in the absence of Lgr6. Our findings uncover a molecular interdependency between the Bmp pathway and Lgr6, offering new insights into osteogenesis and potential targets for enhancing fracture healing.

Real-world effectiveness of osteoporosis screening in older Swedish women (SUPERB)

Older women diagnosed with osteoporosis and referred to their general practitioners (GPs) exhibited significantly higher osteoporosis treatment rates and a reduced fracture risk compared to non-osteoporotic women who were not referred to their GPs.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate treatment rates and fracture outcomes in older women, from a population-based study, 1) diagnosed with osteoporosis, with subsequent referral to their general practitioner (GP), 2) women without osteoporosis, without referral to their GP.

METHODS

In total, 3028 women, 75-80 years old were included in the SUPERB cohort. At inclusion, 443 women were diagnosed with osteoporosis (bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≤ -2.5) at the lumbar spine or hip, did not have current or recent osteoporosis treatment, and were referred to their GP for evaluation (referral group). The remaining 2585 women without osteoporosis composed the control group. Sensitivity analysis was performed on subsets of the original groups. Adjusted Cox regression (hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI)) analyses were performed to investigate the risk of incident fractures and the incidence of osteoporosis treatment.

RESULTS

Cox regression models, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol, glucocorticoid use, previous fracture, parent hip fracture, secondary osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and BMD at the femoral neck, revealed that the risk of major osteoporotic fracture was significantly lower (HR = 0.81, 95 % CI [0.67-0.99]) in the referral group than in the controls. Similarly, the risk of hip fracture (HR = 0.69, [0.48-0.98]) and any fracture (HR = 0.84, [0.70-1.00]) were lower in the referral group. During follow-up, there was a 5-fold increase (HR = 5.00, [4.39-5.74]) in the prescription of osteoporosis medication in the referral group compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Screening older women for osteoporosis and referring those with osteoporosis diagnosis was associated with substantially increased treatment rates and reduced risk of any fracture, MOF, and hip fracture, compared to non-osteoporotic women.

Introduction of an order set after hip fracture improves osteoporosis medication initiation and persistence: a population-based before-after analysis

We found that a standardized order set after hip fracture increased initiation of anti-osteoporosis medication and increased persistence at 1 year, but did not reduce secondary fractures.

BACKGROUND

A treatment gap exists after osteoporosis-related fractures. Introducing standardized care can improve treatment. We evaluated the impact of a hip fracture order set (OS) on anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) initiation, persistence, and secondary fracture prevention.

METHODS

In 2015, one hospital in Manitoba, Canada, introduced a hip fracture OS including recommendations for the initiation of AOM (OS group). A control group was identified from the other hospitals in the same region. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using linked administrative health data. All individuals 50 + years with surgical treatment for low-energy hip fracture between 2010 and 2019 were included and followed for AOM initiation, medication persistence at 1 year, and secondary fractures. Between-group differences for each year were assessed using chi-square tests. Logistic regression models tested the impact of socio-demographic and clinical factors on initiation, persistence of AOM. Cox regression tested the risk of secondary fracture.

RESULTS

No baseline differences between OS group (813 patients) and control group (2150 patients) were observed in demographics, socioeconomic factors, or comorbidities. An increase in post-fracture AOM initiation was seen with OS introduction (OS group year before 16.7% versus year after 48.6%, p < 0.001). No change was seen in the control group. Persistence on AOM also increased (OS group year before 17.7% versus year after 28.4%, p < 0.001). No difference in secondary fractures was observed (OS group 19.8% versus control group 18.8%, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Introduction of a hip fracture OS significantly increased AOM initiation and persistence at 1-year post-fracture. There was no significant difference in secondary fractures.

Extending the Therapeutic Potential: Romosozumab in Osteoporosis Management

Current therapeutic approaches for osteoporosis predominantly involve antiresorptive agents, but the emergence of bone anabolic therapy, such as romosozumab, presents a promising alternative. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting sclerostin, exhibits both bone anabolic and antiresorptive effects, offering the potential to enhance bone mineral density and mitigate fracture risk. Evidence from several studies demonstrating the efficacy of romosozumab is now established in improving bone mineral density and reducing fracture rates in postmenopausal women and men. This review critically evaluates the role of romosozumab in osteoporosis management, emphasizing findings from real-world studies to facilitate its practical application in clinical settings. Adverse effects, comparative effectiveness with other osteoporotic agents, and challenges in sequential therapy are also discussed, providing insights for informed decision-making by physicians, particularly in the context of pre-treatment considerations. Additionally, the review examines global prescribing guidelines and highlights challenges associated with romosozumab utilization in special patient subgroups, aiming to optimize its clinical use.

The relationship between treatment-related changes in total hip BMD measured after 12, 18, and 24 mo and fracture risk reduction in osteoporosis clinical trials: the FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE project

There is a strong association between total hip bone mineral density (THBMD) changes after 24 mo of treatment and reduced fracture risk. We examined whether changes in THBMD after 12 and 18 mo of treatment are also associated with fracture risk reduction. We used individual patient data (n = 122 235 participants) from 22 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of osteoporosis medications. We calculated the difference in mean percent change in THBMD (active-placebo) at 12, 18, and 24 mo using data available for each trial. We determined the treatment-related fracture reductions for the entire follow-up period, using logistic regression for radiologic vertebral fractures and Cox regression for hip, non-vertebral, "all" (combination of non-vertebral, clinical vertebral, and radiologic vertebral) fractures and all clinical fractures (combination of non-vertebral and clinical vertebral). We performed meta-regression to estimate the study-level association (r2 and 95% confidence interval) between treatment-related differences in THBMD changes for each BMD measurement interval and fracture risk reduction. The meta-regression revealed that for vertebral fractures, the r2 (95% confidence interval) was 0.59 (0.19, 0.75), 0.69 (0.32, 0.82), and 0.73 (0.33, 0.84) for 12, 18, and 24 mo, respectively. Similar patterns were observed for hip: r2 = 0.27 (0.00, 0.54), 0.39 (0.02, 0.63), and 0.41 (0.02, 0.65); non-vertebral: r2 = 0.27 (0.01, 0.52), 0.49 (0.10, 0.69), and 0.53 (0.11, 0.72); all fractures: r2 = 0.44 (0.10, 0.64), 0.63 (0.24, 0.77), and 0.66 (0.25, 0.80); and all clinical fractures: r2 = 0.46 (0.11, 0.65), 0.64 (0.26, 0.78), and 0.71 (0.32, 0.83), for 12-, 18-, and 24-mo changes in THBMD, respectively. These findings demonstrate that treatment-related THBMD changes at 12, 18, and 24 mo are associated with fracture risk reductions across trials. We conclude that BMD measurement intervals as short as 12 mo could be used to assess fracture efficacy, but the association is stronger with longer BMD measurement intervals.

Goal-directed osteoporosis treatment: ASBMR/BHOF task force position statement 2024

The overarching goal of osteoporosis management is to prevent fractures. A goal-directed approach to long-term management of fracture risk helps ensure that the most appropriate initial treatment and treatment sequence is selected for individual patients. Goal-directed treatment decisions require assessment of clinical fracture history, vertebral fracture identification (using vertebral imaging as appropriate), measurement of bone mineral density (BMD), and consideration of other major clinical risk factors. Treatment targets should be tailored to each patient's individual risk profile and based on the specific indication for beginning treatment, including recency, site, number and severity of prior fractures, and BMD levels at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. Instead of first-line bisphosphonate treatment for all patients, selection of initial treatment should focus on reducing fracture risk rapidly for patients at very high and imminent risk, such as in those with recent fractures. Initial treatment selection should also consider the probability that a BMD treatment target can be attained within a reasonable period of time and the differential magnitude of fracture risk reduction and BMD impact with osteoanabolic versus antiresorptive therapy. This position statement of the ASBMR/BHOF Task Force on Goal-Directed Osteoporosis Treatment provides an overall summary of the major clinical recommendations about treatment targets and strategies to achieve those targets based on the best evidence available, derived primarily from studies in older postmenopausal women of European ancestry.

Comparative effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab versus teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis: a population-based cohort study

This study compared the effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab and teriparatide. The main finding was that there were no significant differences between the two drugs in fracture prevention and risk of major adverse cardiac events. This suggests that romosozumab and teriparatide are comparable options for treating osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the preventive effects of romosozumab versus teriparatide on fractures and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients initiating these drugs.

METHODS

We conducted an active comparator, a new user cohort design, with confounding controlled by inverse probability of treatment weighting using a Japanese administrative claims database (March 2019 to October 2022). This cohort study included 49,104 patients aged 50 years or older who initiated romosozumab (n = 16,125) or teriparatide (n = 32,979) for osteoporosis. The study exposure was the initiation of romosozumab or teriparatide. Effectiveness outcomes were nonvertebral fracture and hip fracture. The safety outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Follow-up period was 365 days.

RESULTS

The weighted incidence rate difference (IRD) for nonvertebral fracture between romosozumab versus teriparatide was -0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.34 to 0.17) events per 100 person-years (weighted hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.12]); weighted IRD for hip fracture was 0.00 (95% CI, -0.16 to 0.16) events per 100 person-years (weighted HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.29]); and weighted IRD for MACE was -0.06 (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.09) events per 100 person-years (weighted HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.19]).

CONCLUSION

In patients with osteoporosis, there was no significant difference in the prevention of nonvertebral fracture and hip fracture between romosozumab and teriparatide. In addition, the risk of MACE was comparable between the two drugs.

Osteoporosis Evaluation and Management in Spine Surgery

Osteoporosis is a global health problem affecting over 200 million people worldwide and 54 million adults in the United States. Approximately half of all postmenopausal women will have an osteoporosis-related fracture during their lifetime. In the United States, the direct medical cost related to osteoporosis is expected to exceed $25 billion by 2025. Management of osteoporosis in vertebral fractures and elective spine surgery is of the utmost concern, given the high prevalence of osteoporosis in the general population and the increased risk of complication in this population. New pharmacologic treatment options such as anabolic medications and diagnostic tools including Hounsfield unit measurements on routine computed tomography scans are available to orthopaedic and spinal surgeons to help best manage this condition. This review serves as an update to diagnosis, management, and treatment of patients with osteoporosis undergoing spinal surgery.

Interrelationships among metabolic syndrome, bone-derived cytokines, and the most common metabolic syndrome-related diseases negatively affecting bone quality

Metabolic syndrome (MetS), as a set of medical conditions including hyperglycemia, hypertension, abdominal obesity, and dyslipidemia, represents a highly prevalent disease cluster worldwide. The individual components of MetS together increase the risk of MetS-related disorders. Recent research has demonstrated that bone, as an endocrine organ, releases several systemic cytokines (osteokines), including fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), lipocalin 2 (LCN2), and sclerostin (SCL). This review not only summarizes current knowledge about MetS, osteokines and the most common MetS-related diseases with a detrimental impact on bone quality (type 2 diabetes mellitus: T2DM; cardiovascular diseases: CVDs; osteoporosis: OP), but also provides new interpretations of the relationships between osteokines and individual components of MetS, as well as between osteokines and MetS-related diseases mentioned above. In this context, particular emphasis was given on available clinical studies. According to the latest knowledge, FGF23 may become a useful biomarker for obesity, T2DM, and CVDs, as FGF23 levels were increased in patients suffering from these diseases. LCN2 could serve as an indicator of obesity, dyslipidemia, T2DM, and CVDs. The levels of LCN2 positively correlated with obesity indicators, triglycerides, and negatively correlated with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Furthermore, subjects with T2DM and CVDs had higher LCN2 levels. SCL may act as a potential biomarker predicting the incidence of MetS including all its components, T2DM, CVDs, and OP. Elevated SCL levels were noted in individuals with T2DM, CVDs and reduced in patients with OP. The aforementioned bone-derived cytokines have the potential to serve as promising predictors and prospective treatment targets for MetS and MetS-related diseases negatively affecting bone quality.

Engineering a targeted and safe bone anabolic gene therapy to treat osteoporosis in alveolar bone loss

Alveolar bone loss in elderly populations is highly prevalent and increases the risk of tooth loss, gum disease susceptibility, and facial deformity. Unfortunately, there are very limited treatment options available. Here, we developed a bone-targeted gene therapy that reverses alveolar bone loss in patients with osteoporosis by targeting the adaptor protein Schnurri-3 (SHN3). SHN3 is a promising therapeutic target for alveolar bone regeneration, because SHN3 expression is elevated in the mandible tissues of humans and mice with osteoporosis while deletion of SHN3 in mice greatly increases alveolar bone and tooth dentin mass. We used a bone-targeted recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) carrying an artificial microRNA (miRNA) that silences SHN3 expression to restore alveolar bone loss in mouse models of both postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis by enhancing WNT signaling and osteoblast function. In addition, rAAV-mediated silencing of SHN3 enhanced bone formation and collagen production of human skeletal organoids in xenograft mice. Finally, rAAV expression in the mandible was tightly controlled via liver- and heart-specific miRNA-mediated repression or via a vibration-inducible mechanism. Collectively, our results demonstrate that AAV-based bone anabolic gene therapy is a promising strategy to treat alveolar bone loss in osteoporosis.

Cardiovascular Safety of Romosozumab Compared to Commonly Used Anti-osteoporosis Medications in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the cardiovascular safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting sclerostin, has been shown to increase bone mineral density and reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. However, in previous studies, romosozumab therapy was identified as a potential risk factor for cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with predisposing cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of romosozumab versus alendronate, teriparatide, denosumab, or placebo in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Contrast-based network meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The pooled estimates are presented as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Of the 5282 articles retrieved, 25 RCTs were included in this review (n = 24,942), and 18 randomized controlled trials (n = 16,777) were included in the network meta-analysis. The results indicated no significant differences in cardiovascular mortality rate between romosozumab and placebo. Regarding the risk of major cardiovascular events, no significant differences were found in the direct evidence or the network meta-analysis with placebo as the reference.

CONCLUSION

Romosozumab might be a safe option for treating postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The cardiovascular concerns associated with this treatment seem less significant than previously suggested, although additional real-world data are required to confirm this conclusion.

Romosozumab followed by denosumab versus denosumab only: a post hoc analysis of FRAME and FRAME extension

Osteoanabolic-first treatment sequences are superior to oral bisphosphonates for fracture reduction and bone mineral density (BMD) gain. However, data comparing osteoanabolic medications, with the more potent antiresorptive, denosumab (DMAb), are limited. We analyzed FRAME and FRAME Extension data to assess BMD and fracture incidence in patients treated with romosozumab (Romo) followed by DMAb (Romo/DMAb) versus DMAb (DMAb/DMAb) for 24 months. In FRAME, women aged ≥55 years (total hip [TH] or femoral neck [FN] T-score: -2.5 to -3.5) were randomized to Romo or placebo for 12 months followed by DMAb for 12 months. In FRAME Extension, both cohorts received DMAb for another 12 months. This post hoc analysis compared BMD change and fracture incidence in patients on Romo/DMAb (months 0-24) versus DMAb/DMAb (months 12-36). Patient characteristics were balanced by propensity score weighting (PSW) and sensitivity analyses were conducted using PSW with multiple imputation (PSW-MI) and propensity score matching (PSM). Unmeasured confounding was addressed using E-values. After PSW, over 24 months, compared with DMAb/DMAb, treatment with Romo/DMAb produced significantly greater BMD increases at the lumbar spine [LS], TH, and FN (mean differences: 9.3%, 4.4%, and 4.1%, respectively; all p<0.001). At month 24, in women with a baseline T-score of -3.0, the probability of achieving a T-score > -2.5 was higher with Romo/DMAb versus DMAb/DMAb (LS: 92% versus 47%; TH: 50% versus 5%). In the Romo/DMAb versus DMAb/DMAb cohorts, new vertebral fractures were significantly reduced (0.62% versus 1.26% [odds ratio = 0.45; p=0.003]) and rates of clinical, nonvertebral, and hip fractures were lower (differences not significant). Similar BMD and fracture outcomes were observed with PSW-MI and PSM sensitivity analyses. The sequence of Romo/DMAb resulted in greater BMD gains and higher probability of achieving T-scores > -2.5, significantly reduced new vertebral fracture incidence, and numerically lowered the incidence (not significant) of clinical, nonvertebral, and hip fractures versus DMAb only through 24 months.

Treatment effects, adverse outcomes and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab - Existing worldwide data: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Romosozumab is a novel monoclonal antibody that binds to sclerostin, and has dual effects of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, giving it a unique mechanism of action. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis based on existing worldwide data on treatment effects and safety of romosozumab in randomized controlled trials.

Methods

A systematic search was carried out on four databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The keywords used for search was "(romosozumab) AND (osteoporosis OR safety)". Randomized controlled trial or post-hoc studies of the included randomized controlled trial which studied the effects and safety of romosozumab were included. The quality of selected studies was assessed with the Cochrane collaboration tool and the PEDro scale.

Results

20 studies were included for qualitative analysis. 14 studies were included for meta-analysis. In total, there were 13,507 (n = 13,507) participants with 637 men and 12,870 women from original cohorts. The overall mean difference was in favor of romosozumab treatment for lumbar spine (10.04 (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 7.51-12.57; p < 0.00001)), total hip (4.04 (95 % CI = 3.10-4.99; p < 0.00001)) and femoral neck bone mineral density (3.77 (95 % CI = 2.90-4.64; p < 0.00001)) at 12 months. There was significantly less likelihood of new vertebral fractures with romosozumab compared to control (odds ratio (OR) 0.42 (95 % CI = 0.20-0.89); p = 0.02) at 12 months of treatment. There was significantly less likelihood of new vertebral fracture at 24 months with 12 months of romosozumab followed by sequential treatment with anti-resorptive compared to control with only anti-resorptive agent use (OR 0.36 (95 % CI = 0.18-0.71); p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in serious adverse events and fatal adverse events with use of romosozumab compared with control in our meta-analyses. There were no significant differences in serious cardiovascular events in Asian population of romosozumab with control group with 12 months of romosozumab treatment followed by 24 months of anti-resorptive agent with OR 1.09 (95 % CI = 0.40-2.96; P = 0.86). There was no significant difference between romosozumab group and control group for the median time to radiographic healing. Our qualitative analysis on Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT), Finite element analysis (FEA) and bone biopsy analyses demonstrated that romosozumab improved parameters and measures in these domains as well.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study showed that romosozumab was an effective agent to treat osteoporosis with high quality evidence. There were no significant differences in the adverse events, serious adverse events, fatal adverse events identified. Further subgroup analysis of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death in the total population showed no differences either.

The translational potential of this article

Given the results, romosozumab is an effective agent to treat patients with very-high risk of osteoporotic fractures.

Efficacy and safety of romosozumab: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to comprehensively compile placebo-controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of romosozumab (210 mg, subcutaneously, once monthly) in postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant placebo-controlled trials (as of January 1, 2024). Percent change in bone mineral density (BMD), falls, fractures, and adverse events (AEs) after drug administration were collected. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Six trials (7990 patients; follow-up period, 6-12 months) were included. Compared with placebo, romosozumab significantly increased lumbar spine BMD (MD = 12.69; 95% CI 11.10-14.29), total hip BMD (MD = 4.42; 95% CI 3.03-5.80), and femoral neck BMD (MD = 3.99; 95% CI 2.42-5.57) at 12 months. Romosozumab significantly decreased falls (RR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.68-0.93) and major osteoporotic fractures (RR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.25-0.54), but increased injection-site reactions (RR = 1.83; 95% CI 1.46-2.30) within 12 months. No significant differences were observed in other AEs (including cardiovascular AEs) within 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Romosozumab treatment resulted in a significant BMD gain, reduced falls and major osteoporotic fractures. It was generally well-tolerated, including the cardiovascular aspects. However, clinicians should consider the occurrence of minor AEs (e.g., injection-site reactions).

A novel sequential treatment approach between denosumab and romosozumab in patients with severe osteoporosis

In severe osteoporosis, the optimal approach for sequential treatment between denosumab and romosozumab is unclear. We utilised a novel overlapping strategy in three patients with very-high fracture risk despite long-term denosumab which led to greater bone density improvements than previously reported with standard approaches. Larger confirmatory prospective studies are needed.

PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION

In patients with severe osteoporosis, the optimal approach for sequential treatment between denosumab and romosozumab has not been established. The ideal strategy would maximise gains in bone mineral density (BMD) with romosozumab and effectively mitigate the risk of rebound increased bone turnover when sequencing from denosumab. Limited studies exploring the sequence from denosumab to romosozumab report only modest-to-no improvement in BMD and inadequate suppression of rebound bone turnover.

METHODS

We describe three patients with severe osteoporosis and multiple fragility fractures despite long-term denosumab. A novel overlapping sequential treatment approach was utilised to maximise therapeutic benefit given these patients had a very high fracture risk. Romosozumab was commenced 3 months after the last denosumab dose. Instead of waiting until completion of romosozumab, denosumab was recommenced 6 months after commencing romosozumab in response to rising bone turnover markers.

RESULTS

Patients experienced a ~ 5-22% increase in lumbar spine BMD, and one patient had an 8% increase in total hip BMD after 12 months romosozumab. Serum bone turnover markers demonstrated an anabolic effect of romosozumab occurred despite overlapping treatment with denosumab. Recommencement of denosumab suppressed an increase in bone resorption in all cases. No new vertebral fractures occurred during this treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel overlapping sequential treatment approach between denosumab and romosozumab produced greater improvements in lumbar spine and hip BMD than previously reported with standard approaches. Larger prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish the optimal use of romosozumab in patients pre-treated with denosumab to maximise BMD gains and minimise fracture risk.

Update on Therapies and Treatments in Women's Health

This article contains noninclusive language such as "females" and "women" when those terms were used in the research and historic context we are summarizing. New therapies have become available for vasomotor symptoms, postpartum depression, contraception, osteoporosis, recurrent yeast infections, acute and recurrent urinary tract infections, and female hypoactive sexual desire disorder. These therapies meet unique patient needs and change clinical practice for select groups. As is typical for new treatments, insurance coverage and access issues limit the adoption of some therapies.

Surgical and conservative treatment outcomes of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw located at tori: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Tori and exostoses are considered risk factors for the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The aims of this study were to present the prevalence of MRONJ located at tori in the Copenhagen ONJ Cohort, evaluate the surgical treatment of MRONJ located at tori and explore trauma to tori as an additional risk factor in patients on antiresorptive medication.

METHODS

Data from a consecutive series of 506 patients with MRONJ (Copenhagen ONJ Cohort) were reviewed for the presence of tori and MRONJ located at tori. Demographic and medical data were analyzed, and healing outcomes and pain after the prophylactic removal of tori, surgical treatment of MRONJ located at tori, and conservative treatment of MRONJ located at tori were evaluated and compared using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

MRONJ located at tori was frequent and could be identified in 53% of the patients with tori, which accounts for a prevalence of 5.1% in the entire cohort. Of the 28 surgically treated patients, 27 (96.4%) healed uneventfully with no exposed bone after their first or second revision surgery. Fourteen (41.2%) patients with tori underwent therapeutic removal, eight (23.5%) underwent prophylactic removal, and six (17.6%) underwent both therapeutic and prophylactic removals. Two (33.3%) of the six conservatively treated patients healed spontaneously. Both treatment types resulted in a significant decrease in pain.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic and therapeutic surgical removal of tori are reliable treatments and should be considered if a patient's general health allows surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the Regional Scientific Ethical Committee (H-6-2013-010) on November 20, 2013, and was retrospectively registered.

Real-world effects, safety, and predictors of the effectiveness of romosozumab in primary and secondary osteoporosis: An observational study

Romosozumab is an anti-sclerostin antibody that increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption. It became available for patients at high risk of osteoporotic fractures in Japan in 2019. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical effects, safety, and predictors of the effectiveness of 12 months of romosozumab therapy. The study had an observational pre-post design and included 460 patients. Romosozumab was administered at a dose of 210 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 12 months. The incidence of new fractures, safety, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers were recorded. New fractures occurred in 11 cases (3.0 %). Nine patients (2.0 %) experienced cardiovascular events, which were fatal in 3 (0.65 %). Percent changes in BMD at the spine and total hip at 12 months from baseline were +7.7 % and +1.8 %, respectively. Romosozumab had better effects in patients with good renal function, low spine BMD, and high TRACP-5b at baseline and low TRACP-5b or high P1NP after 1 month of treatment. The percent change in spine BMD at 12 months was significantly lower in patients transitioning from denosumab than in those not previously treated with other anti-osteoporosis agents. Romosozumab is considered to be relatively safe in patients with primary osteoporosis compared to those with secondary osteoporosis. Romosozumab resulted in larger increases in spine BMD in patients with primary osteoporosis who were not previously treated with other anti-osteoporosis therapies and those with low spine BMD at the start of treatment.

Progression of multiple vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation under treatment with romosozumab. A case-report

INTRODUCTION

Denosumab (Dmab) is widely used for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Its discontinuation is sometimes accompanied by multiple vertebral fractures. Romosozumab (Rmab) has not been tested for its ability to prevent the rebound phenomenon.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 68-year-old female patient with post-menopausal osteoporosis under treatment with Rmab who presented with multiple vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation. The addition of Rmab did not prevent new-onset rebound-associated vertebral fractures. The patient discontinued Rmab and Dmab was re-initiated. After six months, no new vertebral fractures occurred, bone mineral density increased and bone turnover markers remained suppressed.

DISCUSSION

Our clinical case illustrates the ineffectiveness of Rmab to prevent the multiple vertebral fracture cascade attributable to discontinuation of Dmab. We believe that treatment with Rmab might not be enough to prevent this phenomenon. Treatment with Dmab or possibly combination treatment with Dmab and Rmab could be another treatment option.

Volumetric analysis of spontaneous bone formation after segmental mandibulectomy in patients with MRONJ

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to quantify the spontaneous new bone formation and bony bridge formation by 3-dimensional analysis of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) after segmental mandibulectomy reconstruction using an R-plate without any graft material in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).

STUDY DESIGN

15 MRONJ patients (13 females and 2 males) were selected based on the inclusion criteria. Data on new bone formation, bony bridge formation, R-plate fracture, patient age, and type and duration of medication were collected. Panoramic and CBCT scans were obtained at 1 day, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. CBCT images of each period were transferred to a personal computer using MIMICS 21.0 for volumetric analysis. After quantifying the volume of new bone formation, we calculated the percentage of the volume of new bone to the segmentally resected necrotic bone volume (%NB).

RESULTS

All patients showed spontaneous new bone formation with the average of 20.69% within a year and 28.52% within 2 years, and 80.0% showed bony bridge formation within a year.

CONCLUSIONS

The R-plate reconstruction in patients with MRONJ showed significant amount of spontaneous new bone formation within 2 years after segmental mandibulectomy.

The potential effect of romosozumab on perioperative management for instrumentation surgery

Background

Age-related changes in bone health increase the risk for complications in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Osteoporosis is a key therapeutic target that needs to be addressed to ensure successful instrumentation surgery. The effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in orthopedic surgery, particularly the new drug romosozumab, is still unknown. We aim to evaluate the effect of 3-month romosozumab treatment on biomechanical parameters related to spinal instrumentation surgery, using the Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT)-based Finite Element Method (FEM).

Methods

This open-labeled, prospective study included 81 patients aged 60 to 90 years, who met the osteoporosis criteria and were scheduled for either romosozumab or eldecalcitol treatment. Patients were assessed using blood samples, dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA), and QCT. Biomechanical parameters were evaluated using FEM at baseline and 3 months post-treatment. The primary endpoints were biomechanical parameters at 3 months, while secondary endpoints included changes in regional volumetric bone mineral density around the pedicle (P-vBMD) and vertebral body (V-vBMD).

Results

Romosozumab treatment led to significant gains in P-vBMD, and V-vBMD compared to eldecalcitol at 3 months. Notably, the romosozumab group showed greater improvements in all biomechanical parameters estimated by FEM at 3 months compared to the eldecalcitol group.

Conclusion

Romosozumab significantly increased the regional vBMD as well as biomechanical parameters, potentially offering clinical benefits in reducing post-operative complications in patients with osteoporosis undergoing orthopedic instrumentation surgery. This study highlights the novel advantages of romosozumab treatment and advocates further research on its effectiveness in perioperative management.

The effect of romosozumab on bone mineral density depending on prior treatment: a prospective, multicentre cohort study in Switzerland

This multicentre, prospective cohort study measured the effect of romosozumab for 12 months on bone mineral density, taking into account prior therapies. Prior antiresorptive therapy blunted the BMD response to romosozumab, and the duration was correlated with BMD changes at both the lumbar spine and total hip.

INTRODUCTION

In Switzerland, romosozumab is administered to high-risk osteoporosis patients. Our study aimed to assess the effect of romosozumab on bone mineral density (BMD), taking into account prior therapies.

METHODS

This multicentre, prospective cohort study measured the effect of romosozumab for 12 months in patients in a nationwide Swiss osteoporosis registry. BMD and bone turnover marker (P1NP and CTX) changes were measured and compared between pre-treated and treatment naïve patients.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients (92 women and 7 men, median age 71 years [65, 76]) were enrolled from January 2021 to December 2023. Among them, 22 had no prior treatment before romosozumab, while 77 had previous therapy (including 23 with a history of prior teriparatide therapy), with a median duration of 6 years [4, 11] of cumulative antiresorptive treatment. Over 12 months, romosozumab led to BMD changes of 10.3% [7.5, 15.5] at the lumbar spine, 3.1% [1.1, 5.8] at the total hip and 3.1% [0.5, 5.3] at the femoral neck, indicating notable variability. Significantly lower BMD responses were observed in pre-treated patients, with the duration of prior antiresorptive therapy inversely associated with BMD increases at the lumbar spine and hip. Other predictors of BMD changes at the total hip included baseline T-scores at the hip, body mass index and baseline CTX level, while the BMD response at the lumbar spine was associated with the lumbar spine T-score at baseline, age and baseline CTX level.

CONCLUSION

Prior antiresorptive therapy blunted the BMD response to romosozumab, and the duration was correlated with BMD changes at both the lumbar spine and total hip.

Research trends and hotspots on osteoporosis: a decade-long bibliometric and visualization analysis from 2014 to 2023

Background

Osteoporosis is characterized by diminished bone density and quality, compromised bone microstructure, and increased bone fragility, culminating in a heightened risk of fracture. Relatively few attempts have been made to survey the breadth of osteoporosis research using bibliometric approaches. This study aims to delineate the current landscape of osteoporosis research, offering clarity and visualization, while also identifying potential future directions for investigation.

Methods

We retrieved and filtered articles and reviews pertaining to osteoporosis from the Web of Science Core Collection database, specifically the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) edition, spanning the years 2014 to 2023. Informatics tools such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer were employed to dissect the intellectual framework, discern trends, and pinpoint focal points of interest within osteoporosis research.

Results

Our dataset comprised 33,928 osteoporosis-related publications, with a notable surge in annual publication numbers throughout the last decade. China and the United States lead in terms of research output. The University of California System contributed substantially to this body of work, with Amgen demonstrating the highest degree of centrality within the network. Cooper Cyrus emerged as a pivotal figure in the field. An analysis of highly-cited studies, co-citation networks, and keyword co-occurrence revealed that recent years have predominantly concentrated on elucidating mechanisms underlying osteoporosis, as well as its diagnosis, prevention, and treatment strategies. Burst detection analyses of citations and keywords highlighted osteoblasts, sarcopenia, gut microbiota, and denosumab as contemporary hotspots within osteoporosis research.

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis has provided a visual representation of the fundamental knowledge structure, prevailing trends, and key focal areas within osteoporosis research. The identification of osteoblasts, sarcopenia, gut microbiota, and denosumab as current hotspots may guide future research endeavors. Continued efforts directed at understanding the mechanisms, fracture outcomes, diagnostics, and therapeutics related to osteoporosis are anticipated to deepen our comprehension of this complex disease.

Study protocol for the ROLEX-DUO randomised placebo-controlled trial: ROmosozumab Loaded with EXercise - DUal effects on bone and muscle in postmenopausal Osteoporosis and Osteopenia

INTRODUCTION

Novel strategies are needed to address the rising burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. High-intensity resistance and impact (HiRIT) exercise has shown benefit in improving bone density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis/osteopenia. Whether HiRIT can enhance the therapeutic effects of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy has not been established. ROLEX-DUO is a randomised controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of romosozumab on various bone and muscle outcomes in combination with different exercise interventions in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis/osteopenia.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

ROLEX-DUO is an 8-month randomised placebo-controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral centres for patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. The study is implementing the combination of romosozumab or placebo with different forms of exercise in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis/osteopenia without recent fragility fracture (n=102). Eligible women will be randomised 1:1:1 into one of three groups: (1) romosozumab with supervised HiRIT, (2) romosozumab with unsupervised low-intensity exercise or (3) placebo with unsupervised low-intensity exercise. Co-primary outcomes are the mean percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), and mean change in five times sit-to-stand test performance (seconds) at 8 months. Secondary/exploratory outcomes include BMD changes at the femoral neck, total hip and distal radius, three-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) hip outcomes, DXA-derived lean and fat mass, serum markers of bone turnover (procollagen type 1 peptide, C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen) and bone biomarkers (dickkopf-1), serum extracellular vesicle analyses, 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) quality-of-life scores, Menopause-Specific Quality Of Life (MENQOL) Questionnaire menopause symptom burden scores, number of falls and fractures. Mixed-effects models will be performed to compare longitudinal outcome results between groups using intention-to-treat analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial was approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH01794, protocol V.8, dated 03 July 2024). Participants will provide written informed consent prior to inclusion. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and summary reports to funding bodies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12623000867695.

Streamlining the Journey of Research Into Clinical Practice: Making Your Patients and Practice Flourish Optimizing Management and Minimizing Risk of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures - Perspectives of the AO Spine KF Trauma and Infection Group Key Opinion Leaders

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review with clinical recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To highlight important studies about osteoporotic spinal fractures (OF) that may be integrated into clinical practice based on the assessment of the AO Spine KF Trauma and Infection group key opinion leaders.

METHODS

4 important studies about OF that may affect current clinical practice of spinal surgeons were selected and reviewed with the aim of providing clinical recommendations to streamline the journey of research into clinical practice. Recommendations were graded as strong or conditional following the GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

4 studies were selected. Article 1: a validation of the Osteoporotic Fracture (OF)-score to treat OF fractures. Conditional recommendation to incorporate the OF score in the management of fractures to improve clinical results. Article 2: a randomized multicenter study comparing romosozumab/alendronate vs alendronate to decrease the incidence of new vertebral fractures. Strong recommendation that the group receiving romosozumab/alendronate had a decreased risk of new OF when compared with the alendronate only group only. Article 3: a systematic literature review of spinal orthoses in the management of. Conditional recommendation to prescribe a spinal orthosis to decrease pain and improve quality of life. Article 4: post-traumatic deformity after OF. A conditional recommendation that middle column injury and pre-injury use of steroids may lead to high risk of post-traumatic deformity after OF.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of patients with OF is still complex and challenging. This review provides some recommendations that may help surgeons to better manage these patients and improve their clinical practice.

Can Bisphosphonate Therapy Reduce Overall Mortality in Patients With Osteoporosis? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

For patients with osteoporosis, bisphosphonate therapy can reduce the risk of fractures, but its effect on reducing mortality remains unclear. Previous studies on this topic have produced conflicting results and generally have been too small to definitively answer the question of whether bisphosphonate therapy reduces mortality. Therefore, a meta-analysis may help us arrive at a more conclusive answer.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a large meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we asked: (1) Does bisphosphonate use reduce mortality? (2) Is there a subgroup effect based on whether different bisphosphonate drugs were used (zoledronate, alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate), different geographic regions where the study took place (Europe, the Americas, and Asia), whether the study was limited to postmenopausal female patients, or whether the trials lasted 3 years or longer?

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review using multiple databases, including Embase, Web of Science, Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, with each database searched up to November 20, 2023 (which also was the date of our last search), following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials with participants diagnosed with osteoporosis and receiving bisphosphonate treatment. We excluded papers posted to preprint servers, other unpublished work, conference abstracts, and papers that were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov but were not yet published. We collected 2263 records. After excluding records due to study type, study content not meeting the inclusion criteria, and duplicates, our meta-analysis included 47 placebo-controlled RCTs involving 59,437 participants. Data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analyses were performed. The evaluation of randomized trials for potential bias was conducted using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This assessment encompassed factors such as sequence generation, allocation concealment, subject blinding, outcome assessor blinding, incomplete outcome data, and reporting bias. Some studies did not provide explicit details regarding random sequence generation, leading to a high risk of selection bias. A few studies, due to their open-label nature, were unable to achieve double-blind conditions for both the subjects and the researchers, resulting in intermediate performance bias. Nevertheless, the overall study quality was high. Due to the low heterogeneity among the studies, as evidenced by the low statistical heterogeneity (that is, a low I2 statistic), we opted for a fixed-effects model, indicating that the effect size is consistent across the studies. In such cases, the fixed-effects model can provide more precise estimates. According to the results of the funnel plot, we did not find evidence of publication bias.

RESULTS

The use of bisphosphonates did not reduce the overall risk of mortality in patients with osteoporosis (risk ratio 0.95 [95% CI 0.88 to 1.03]). Subgroup analyses involving different bisphosphonate drugs (zoledronate, alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate), regions (Europe, the Americas, and Asia), diverse populations (postmenopausal female patients and other patients), and trials lasting 3 years or longer revealed no associations with reduced overall mortality.

CONCLUSION

Based on our comprehensive meta-analysis, there is high-quality evidence suggesting that bisphosphonate therapy for patients with osteoporosis does not reduce the overall risk of mortality despite its effectiveness in reducing the risk of fractures. The primary consideration for prescribing bisphosphonates to individuals with osteoporosis should continue to be centered on reducing fracture risk, aligning with clinical guidelines. Long-term studies are needed to investigate potential effects on mortality during extended treatment periods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Update on Atypical Femoral Fractures

➤ Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are stress fractures between the lesser trochanter and the metaphyseal flare that are most commonly related to prolonged (3 to 5 years) antiresorptive medication use.➤ An important finding is a visible transverse line in the lateral cortex, known as the "dreaded black line." Complete fractures are transverse and have minimal comminution.➤ Prodromal symptoms including hip, groin, thigh, and knee pain are present in more than one-half of cases and are usually misdiagnosed.➤ Nonoperative treatment for all patients with AFF includes withdrawal of bisphosphonates, assessment for secondary causes of osteoporosis, and optimization of vitamin D and calcium.➤ Incomplete fractures without a visible line can initially be treated nonoperatively with protected weight-bearing.➤ Intramedullary nailing is indicated for complete fractures and incomplete fractures with a visible fracture line. Delayed healing after fixation should be anticipated.➤ Treatment with parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs (teriparatide and abaloparatide) after AFF prevents other fractures in high-risk patients, but the effect on healing of the fracture is unclear.

Fracture risk prediction in postmenopausal women with traditional and machine learning models in a nationwide, prospective cohort study in Switzerland with validation in the UK Biobank

Fracture prediction is essential in managing patients with osteoporosis and is an integral component of many fracture prevention guidelines. We aimed to identify the most relevant clinical fracture risk factors in contemporary populations by training and validating short- and long-term fracture risk prediction models in 2 cohorts. We used traditional and machine learning survival models to predict risks of vertebral, hip, and any fractures on the basis of clinical risk factors, T-scores, and treatment history among participants in a nationwide Swiss Osteoporosis Registry (N = 5944 postmenopausal women, median follow-up of 4.1 yr between January 2015 and October 2022; a total of 1190 fractures during follow-up). The independent validation cohort comprised 5474 postmenopausal women from the UK Biobank with 290 incident fractures during follow-up. Uno's C-index and the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristics curve were calculated to evaluate the performance of different machine learning models (Random survival forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting). In the independent validation set, the C-index was 0.74 [0.58, 0.86] for vertebral fractures, 0.83 [0.7, 0.94] for hip fractures, and 0.63 [0.58, 0.69] for any fractures at year 2, and these values further increased for longer estimations of up to 7 yr. In comparison, the 10-yr fracture probability calculated with FRAX Switzerland was 0.60 [0.55, 0.64] for major osteoporotic fractures and 0.62 [0.49, 0.74] for hip fractures. The most important variables identified with Shapley additive explanations values were age, T-scores, and prior fractures, while number of falls was an important predictor of hip fractures. Performances of both traditional and machine learning models showed similar C-indices. We conclude that fracture risk can be improved by including the lumbar spine T-score, trabecular bone score, numbers of falls and recent fractures, and treatment information has a significant impact on fracture prediction.

Association between P1NP value and increases in bone mineral density in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with romosozumab

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of treatment with romosozumab for 1 year and association between bone turnover markers and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

Participants were 53 treatment-naïve postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. Correlations of per cent changes (Δ) in lumbar (L) and total hip (TH) BMD 12 months after initiating romosozumab with baseline demographic factors and parameters of N-terminal propeptide of Type 1 collagen (P1NP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b at baseline and Months 1, 3, and 6 were assessed. Multiple regression analysis was performed on factors significantly correlated with ΔL-BMD and ΔTH-BMD at Month 12.

RESULTS

ΔL-BMD and ΔTH-BMD at Month 12 were 17.5% and 8.1%, respectively. Multiple regression analysis revealed that a high P1NP value at Month 3 predicted large increases in L-BMD and TH-BMD at Month 12. High total amount of P1NP values from baseline to Month 6 was associated with large increases in L-BMD and TH-BMD at Month 12 and was most strongly correlated with the P1NP value at Month 3.

CONCLUSIONS

A high P1NP value at Month 3 predicted large increases in both L-BMD and TH-BMD at Month 12 in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients treated with romosozumab.

Effects of romosozumab combined with routine therapy on pain relief, disease progression and adverse reactions in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) increases fracture risk in women. Though traditional treatments are slow to act, combining romosozumab with conventional therapy shows promise. Despite its growing use, studies on effectiveness are limited. This study aims to systematically evaluate the combined therapy's impact on pain relief, disease progression, and adverse reactions in PMOP patients.

Methods

Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception to September 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of romosozumab in PMOP. Random or fixed effect models were employed for statistical analysis. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results

Six RCTs with a total sample size of 17,985 cases were included. The incidence of vertebral fractures was compared and analyzed after 12 and 24 months of treatment. Romosozumab significantly reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures at 24 months (OR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.35-0.52) but not at 12 months (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.14-1.05). It was also associated with a decreased incidence of nonvertebral fractures (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.94) and clinical fractures at 24 months (OR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59-0.82) compared to standard therapy. Romosozumab demonstrated a significant improvement in percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) [mean difference (MD) = 10.38; 95% CI: 4.62-16.14] and in hip joint BMD (MD = 4.24; 95% CI: 2.92-5.56). There was no notable difference in adverse reactions compared to standard care (p > 0.05). Funnel plots displayed a predominantly symmetrical pattern, suggesting no evidence of publication bias in the selected literature.

Conclusion

Combining romosozumab with conventional therapy effectively treats PMOP, significantly reducing vertebral, non-vertebral, and clinical fractures while increasing BMD in the hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. However, further high-quality studies are needed for validation.

[Translated article] Evaluation, differential diagnosis and treatment of vertebral osteoporosis: How to avoid the occurrence of new fractures

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent and multifactorial disease whose main manifestation is the appearance of fragility or low-impact fractures. The most frequent locations of osteoporotic fractures occur at the vertebrae, femoral, distal end of the radius and humerus. Osteoporotic vertebral fracture deserves special mention among them due to its prevalence, importance as it often goes unnoticed and medium-long term consequences are: pain, deformity, disability and deterioration in quality of life. In this review we will focus on the classification and initial evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis, estimation of risk factors, laboratory and imaging studies for an adequate assessment using simple radiography, dual densitometry and magnetic resonance imaging. We will also address the main aspects of the differential diagnosis, treatment and prevention of vertebral fragility fracture, briefly reviewing the main therapeutic agents currently used for its prevention and treatment.

Recommendations for the optimal use of bone forming agents in osteoporosis

Bone forming agents, also known as anabolic therapies, are essential in managing osteoporosis, particularly for patients at very high-risk of fractures. Identifying candidates who will benefit the most from these treatments is crucial. For example, this group might include individuals with severe osteoporosis, multiple vertebral fractures, a recent fragility fracture or those unresponsive to antiresorptive treatments. Definitions of patients with a very high fracture risk vary across nations, are often based on fracture history, bone mineral density (BMD), and/or fracture risk calculated by FRAX® or other algorithms. However, for very high-risk patients, anabolic agents such as teriparatide, abaloparatide, or romosozumab are commonly recommended as first-line therapies due to their ability to stimulate new bone formation and improve bone microarchitecture, offering significant benefits in rapid fracture reduction over antiresorptive therapies. The cost-effectiveness of these agents is a critical consideration for decision-makers. Despite their higher costs, their effectiveness in significantly reducing fracture risk and improving quality of life can justify the investment, especially when long-term savings from reduced fracture rates and associated healthcare costs are considered. Additionally, after completing a course of anabolic therapy, transitioning to antiresorptive agents like bisphosphonates or denosumab is crucial to maintain the gains in bone density and minimize subsequent fracture risks. This sequential treatment approach ensures sustained protection and optimal resource utilization. In summary, the effective use of bone forming agents in osteoporosis requires a comprehensive strategy that includes accurate patient identification, consideration of cost-effectiveness, and implementation of appropriate sequential treatments, ultimately maximizing patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

Denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of comparative safety in randomized controlled trials

Denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis are generally well-tolerated, but their comparative safety remains unclear. We aimed to explore the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis. Databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials published in English (as of December 2023). Trials comparing adverse events (AE) between denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with primary osteoporosis were investigated. Data were pooled using a fixed- or random-effects model to determine the risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various AEs in patients treated with denosumab in comparison to patients treated with bisphosphonates. Eleven trials (5,545 patients; follow-up period: 12-24 months) were included in this meta-analysis. All trials had a risk of bias (e.g., reporting bias linked to secondary endpoints and selection bias linked to random allocation). In comparison to bisphosphonates, denosumab was significantly associated with less withdrawal due to AEs (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34-0.71), more five-point major adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.03-4.09), more cardiovascular AEs (RR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.07-2.41), more infections (RR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27), more upper respiratory tract infections (RR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.08-2.25), less vertebral fractures (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.93), and less abdominal pain (RR = 0.44;95% CI 0.22-0.87). We explored the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis, some of which could be attributed to their beneficial effects. However, all trials had a risk of bias. Further investigations are required to confirm our results.

Bone metabolism in diabetes: a clinician's guide to understanding the bone-glucose interplay

Skeletal fragility is an increasingly recognised, but poorly understood, complication of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Fracture risk varies according to skeletal site and diabetes-related characteristics. Post-fracture outcomes, including mortality risk, are worse in those with diabetes, placing these people at significant risk. Each fracture therefore represents a sentinel event that warrants targeted management. However, diabetes is a very heterogeneous condition with complex interactions between multiple co-existing, and highly correlated, factors that preclude a clear assessment of the independent clinical markers and pathophysiological drivers for diabetic osteopathy. Additionally, fracture risk calculators and routinely used clinical bone measurements generally underestimate fracture risk in people with diabetes. In the absence of dedicated prospective studies including detailed bone and metabolic characteristics, optimal management centres around selecting treatments that minimise skeletal and metabolic harm. This review summarises the clinical landscape of diabetic osteopathy and outlines the interplay between metabolic and skeletal health. The underlying pathophysiology of skeletal fragility in diabetes and a rationale for considering a diabetes-based paradigm in assessing and managing diabetic bone disease will be discussed.

Regulation of bone homeostasis: signaling pathways and therapeutic targets

As a highly dynamic tissue, bone is continuously rebuilt throughout life. Both bone formation by osteoblasts and bone resorption by osteoclasts constitute bone reconstruction homeostasis. The equilibrium of bone homeostasis is governed by many complicated signaling pathways that weave together to form an intricate network. These pathways coordinate the meticulous processes of bone formation and resorption, ensuring the structural integrity and dynamic vitality of the skeletal system. Dysregulation of the bone homeostatic regulatory signaling network contributes to the development and progression of many skeletal diseases. Significantly, imbalanced bone homeostasis further disrupts the signaling network and triggers a cascade reaction that exacerbates disease progression and engenders a deleterious cycle. Here, we summarize the influence of signaling pathways on bone homeostasis, elucidating the interplay and crosstalk among them. Additionally, we review the mechanisms underpinning bone homeostatic imbalances across diverse disease landscapes, highlighting current and prospective therapeutic targets and clinical drugs. We hope that this review will contribute to a holistic understanding of the signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms sustaining bone homeostasis, which are promising to contribute to further research on bone homeostasis and shed light on the development of targeted drugs.

Update on fracture risk assessment in osteoporosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The assessment of fracture risk is playing an ever-increasing role in osteoporosis clinical management and informing international guidelines for osteoporosis. FRAX, a fracture risk calculator that provides individualized 10-year probabilities of hip and major osteoporotic fracture, has been widely used since 2008. In this review, we recap the development and limitations of intervention thresholds and the role of absolute fracture risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is an increasing awareness of disparities and inequities in the setting of intervention thresholds in osteoporosis. The limitations of the simple use of prior fracture or the DXA-derived BMD T -score threshold are increasingly being discussed; one solution is to use fracture risk or probabilities in the setting of such thresholds. This approach also permits more objective assessment of high and very high fracture risk to enable physicians to make choices not just about the need to treat but what agents to use in individual patients.

SUMMARY

Like all clinical tools, FRAX has limitations that need to be considered, but the use of fracture risk in deciding who to treat, when to treat and what agent to use is a mechanism to target treatment equitably to those at an increased risk of fracture.

Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Strategies in Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review

Osteoporosis, a metabolic bone disorder characterized by decreased bone mass per unit volume, poses a significant global health burden due to its association with heightened fracture risk and adverse impacts on patients' quality of life. This review synthesizes the current understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying osteoporosis, with a focus on key regulatory pathways governing osteoblast and osteoclast activities. These pathways include RANK/RANKL/OPG, Wingless-int (Wnt)/β-catenin, and Jagged1/Notch1 signaling, alongside the involvement of parathyroid hormone (PTH) signaling, cytokine networks, and kynurenine in bone remodeling. Pharmacotherapeutic interventions targeting these pathways play a pivotal role in osteoporosis management. Anti-resorptive agents, such as bisphosphonates, estrogen replacement therapy/hormone replacement therapy (ERT/HRT), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), calcitonin, anti-RANKL antibodies, and cathepsin K inhibitors, aim to mitigate bone resorption. Conversely, anabolic agents, including PTH and anti-sclerostin drugs, stimulate bone formation. In addition to pharmacotherapy, nutritional supplementation with calcium, vitamin D, and vitamin K2 holds promise for osteoporosis prevention. However, despite the availability of therapeutic options, a substantial proportion of osteoporotic patients remain untreated, highlighting the need for improved clinical management strategies. This comprehensive review aims to provide clinicians and researchers with a mechanistic understanding of osteoporosis pathogenesis and the therapeutic mechanisms of existing medications. By elucidating these insights, this review seeks to inform evidence-based decision-making and optimize therapeutic outcomes for patients with osteoporosis.