Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: a comprehensive research synthesis

Expert Canadian consensus suggestions on the rational, clinical use of ziprasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders

Many atypical antipsychotic medications are becoming available for clinical use. Ziprasidone is a recent addition to this group and is expected to become available for clinical use in Canada in 2005. Ziprasidone has some significant differences compared with other atypicals currently available in Canada. Clinicians need to understand the benefits and risks associated with each of the antipsychotic medications available for the treatment of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders to ensure their most appropriate utilization. At the suggestion of Professor Stan Kutcher (chair) and as part of an ongoing commitment to provide independent education pertaining to the utility of new psychotropic compounds to health professionals, a panel of Canadian experts in the treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders was convened to provide consensus suggestions for the appropriate clinical use of ziprasidone. The consultations regarding the development of these recommendations were organized by Brainworks International (BWI) with arms-length funding from Pfizer Canada. This paper describes the experts' consensus views on the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone, their suggestions on which patients may be suitable for ziprasidone treatment, and how to initiate treatment (including how to switch from other antipsychotic medications), manage side effects, and monitor patients in long-term therapy. These suggestions are those of the authors only and are not endorsed by or necessarily reflect the opinions of BWI or Pfizer Canada.

Risk factors for coronary heart disease among inpatients who have mild intellectual disability and mental illness

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the UK. The aim of this study was to screen inpatients with mild or borderline intellectual disability, many of whom also have mental illness, for risk factors for CHD.

METHODS

Cross sectional survey. Participants were interviewed, measured and had blood samples taken.

RESULTS

Of the 53 participants, 20 (37.7%) were overweight and 18 (34.0%) obese. The mean body mass index (BMI) of those participants prescribed regular antipsychotics was higher than those who were not. Nine (20.9%) had waist circumference measurements placing them at increased risk of CHD and 21 (48.8%) were at substantially increased risk. Twenty-eight (52.8%) were current smokers. Of the 49 participants who had their blood pressure measured, 3 (6.1%) had readings above the reference range. Of the 19 participants who had random blood tests, one (5.3%) had an elevated cholesterol level.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population there was a high prevalence of two risk factors for CHD (obesity and smoking), requiring ongoing monitoring and long-term measures to reduce risk.

Add-on topiramate reduces weight in overweight patients with affective disorders: a clinical case series

BACKGROUND

The weight-gain caused by many psychotropic drugs is a major cause for poor compliance with such medications and could also increase cardio-vascular morbidity among psychiatric patients. Recent reports have shown that the anticonvulsant topiramate causes weight loss in various patient groups. The drug has also shown effectiveness in open trials as a mood stabilizer in patients with affective disorders, but not in controlled trials in the acute treatment of mania. We used topiramate to treat 12 patients with affective disorders who had a body-mass index > 30 kg/m2.

METHODS

Topiramate was prescribed as part of our routine clinical practice, as an add-on medication, or as a replacement of a mood stabilizer. Patients' weight was recorded in 1 to 2 monthly intervals. Patients were followed up for between 6 and 12 months. The final dose of topiramate varied from 200 to 600 mg/day.

RESULTS

Topiramate was effective in reducing the weight in 10 out of the 12 patients. At six months the 12 patients had lost a mean of 7.75 kg (SD = 6.9 kg, p < 0.001) and at 12 months 9 patients had lost a mean of 9.61 kg (SD = 6.7 kg, p = 0.003). Three patients stopped the treatment: one due to side effects, one due to possible side effects, and one suffered a manic relapse and showed no sustained weight loss. There were no other clear changes in the course of illness of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The evidence of a strong weight-reducing potential of topiramate is indisputable and clinically significant. Topiramate could be considered in the treatment of bipolar patients who are overweight, or whose concerns about weight gain compromise their compliance with long-term prophylactic medication. So far there is no evidence that topiramate has anti-manic effect and it should not be used as monotherapy.

Aripiprazole: a novel atypical antipsychotic drug with a uniquely robust pharmacology

Aripiprazole (Abilify) is an atypical antipsychotic drug that has been recently introduced for clinical use in the treatment of schizophrenia. Aripiprazole has a unique pharmacologic profile that includes partial agonism at several G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) [especially dopamine (D2) and 5-HT1A] and antagonistic action at others (especially 5-HT2A). Clinical trials indicate that aripiprazole is effective in treating the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. In short-term studies rapid onset of action (within one week) has been demonstrated. Preliminary data indicate that aripiprazole may also be effective in the treatment of manic symptoms of bipolar disorder. At recommended doses, aripiprazole appears to be safe and well tolerated in most adult patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. There is only limited information available on the use of aripiprazole in children and adolescents, and pilot data suggest that a revised dosing strategy, based on weight, is indicated in this population. In the long-term studies, the use of aripiprazole was associated with continued efficacy, good compliance and increased time-to-relapse. Aripiprazole represents the first functionally selective atypical antipsychotic drug.

Review of the use of Topiramate for treatment of psychiatric disorders

BACKGROUND: Topiramate is a new antiepileptic drug, originally designed as an oral hypoglycaemic subsequently approved as anticonvulsant. It has increasingly been used in the treatment of numerous psychiatric conditions and it has also been associated with weight loss potentially relevant in reversing weight gain induced by psychotropic medications. This article reviews pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of topiramate, its biological putative role in treating psychiatric disorders and its relevance in clinical practice. METHODS: A comprehensive search from a range of databases was conducted and papers addressing the topic were selected. RESULTS: Thirty-two published reports met criteria for inclusion, 4 controlled and 28 uncontrolled studies. Five unpublished controlled studies were also identified in the treatment of acute mania. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate lacks efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Increasing evidence, based on controlled studies, supports the use of topiramate in binge eating disorders, bulimia nervosa, alcohol dependence and possibly in bipolar disorders in depressive phase. In the treatment of rapid cycling bipolar disorders, as adjunctive treatment in refractory bipolar disorder in adults and children, schizophrenia, posttraumatic stress disorder, unipolar depression, emotionally unstable personality disorder and Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome the evidence is entirely based on open label studies, case reports and case series. Regarding weight loss, findings are encouraging and have potential implications in reversing increased body weight, normalisation of glycemic control and blood pressure. Topiramate was generally well tolerated and serious adverse events were rare.

Acute weight gain, gender, and therapeutic response to antipsychotics in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Previous research indicated that women are more vulnerable than men to adverse psychological consequences of weight gain. Other research has suggested that weight gain experienced during antipsychotic therapy may also psychologically impact women more negatively. This study assessed the impact of acute treatment-emergent weight gain on clinical and functional outcomes of patients with schizophrenia by patient gender and antipsychotic treatment (olanzapine or haloperidol).

METHODS

Data were drawn from the acute phase (first 6-weeks) of a double-blind randomized clinical trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of 1296 men and 700 women with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. The associations between weight change and change in core schizophrenia symptoms, depressive symptoms, and functional status were examined post-hoc for men and women and for each medication group. Core schizophrenia symptoms (positive and negative) were measured with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), depressive symptoms with the BPRS Anxiety/Depression Scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and functional status with the mental and physical component scores on the Medical Outcome Survey-Short Form 36. Statistical analysis included methods that controlled for treatment duration.

RESULTS

Weight gain during 6-week treatment with olanzapine and haloperidol was significantly associated with improvements in core schizophrenia symptoms, depressive symptoms, mental functioning, and physical functioning for men and women alike. The conditional probability of clinical response (20% reduction in core schizophrenia symptom), given a clinically significant weight gain (at least 7% of baseline weight), showed that about half of the patients who lost weight responded to treatment, whereas three-quarters of the patients who had a clinically significant weight gain responded to treatment. The positive associations between therapeutic response and weight gain were similar for the olanzapine and haloperidol treatment groups. Improved outcomes were, however, more pronounced for the olanzapine-treated patients, and more olanzapine-treated patients gained weight.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of significant relationships between treatment-emergent weight gain and improvements in clinical and functional status at 6-weeks suggest that patients who have greater treatment-emergent weight gain are more likely to benefit from treatment with olanzapine or haloperidol regardless of gender.

Mental health policy and psychotropic drugs

The pace of innovation in psychotropic drugs has been rapid over the past 15 years. There also have been unprecedented increases in spending on prescription drugs generally and psychotropic medications specifically. Psychotropic medications are playing a more central role in treatment. They also are receiving close scrutiny from health insurers, state budget makers, and ordinary citizens. Public policy actions regarding prescription drugs have the potential to significantly affect clinical care for mental disorders, the costs of this care to individuals and society at large, and the prospects for future scientific advances. This article outlines the policy issues related to psychotropic drugs with respect to their role in determining access to mental health treatment and the cost and quality of mental health care.

Atypicality of atypical antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE

To review the current definition of atypicality, discuss the unique features of each atypical antipsychotic, and determine whether the available drugs in this class really meet the classical definition of atypicality.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was conducted to identify literature on the subject of this review, supported by additional articles based on the author's clinical knowledge and experience.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant references were extracted and summarized in order to meet the objective of the article.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Atypical antipsychotics are considered a major advance over conventional antipsychotics, primarily because they offer effective treatment alternatives that are relatively free of extrapyramidal symptoms. In fact, the term atypicality was originally used to describe antipsychotic agents with a minimal risk of causing extrapyramidal symptoms. However, over the years the definition has been modified such that there is currently no consensus on a true definition of atypicality for these agents. Each of the atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole) commercially available in the United States is unique in terms of its pharmacologic profile, differing with respect to receptor-binding affinity, mechanism of action, and adverse events. Of the available atypical antipsychotics, clozapine and quetiapine have shown the lowest propensity to cause extrapyramidal symptoms. Although the risk of extra-pyramidal symptoms is lower with risperidone and olanzapine than with conventional antipsychotics, risk increases with dose escalation. Data for ziprasidone indicate that the risk of extrapyramidal symptoms may be similar to that of risperidone and olanzapine. There is a concern of akathisia with aripiprazole; however, more experience with this agent is needed before definitive conclusions are made.

CONCLUSION

If the definition of "atypical" antipsychotic is considered to be freedom from extrapyramidal symptoms, then, based on a comprehensive review of available data and clinical experience, clozapine and quetiapine appear to be the only true atypicals.

Diabetes, psychotic disorders and antipsychotic therapy: a consensus statement

Psychotic illness and its treatment are associated with an increased rate of diabetes and worsening blood sugar control, Australia. The newer, second-generation antipsychotic agents are more likely to produce this effect than the first-generation agents, but both contribute to the problem. The effect is usually related to insulin resistance through weight gain, but other mechanisms may exist. Diabetic ketoacidosis is rare. Management of psychosis takes priority over concerns about the potential metabolic sequelae of treatment, but the prevalence of the latter requires that all patients taking antipsychotic agents be actively screened and treated. Patients treated with antipsychotic agents need baseline and regular checks, including weight, blood glucose and lipid levels and blood pressure. Management of psychosis with its attendant medical problems requires a multidisciplinary approach, with primary health practitioners playing a central role. Mortality and medical morbidity is higher in those with psychosis than expected; preventive measures, combined with early detection and treatment of hyperglycaemia and other metabolic problems, is a key public health issue.

Characterizing coronary heart disease risk in chronic schizophrenia: high prevalence of the metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence and characteristics of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

METHOD

We compared individual CHD risk factors and Framingham risk predictions in a group of 240 patients with a large national sample (Canadian Heart Health Survey) matched for age and sex. In addition, we compared rates of the metabolic syndrome (syndrome X) with recently published rates in the US adult population.

RESULTS

Compared with the reference population, Framingham 10-year risk of myocardial infarction was greater in the male patients (t3091 = 4.35, P < 0.001) but not in the female patients. Prevalence rates of the metabolic syndrome in the patients (42.6% of men and 48.5% of women) were approximately 2 times published rates in the US adult population. Further, the syndrome appears to occur at a younger age than in the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

These long-term patients have increased CHD risks best captured by the metabolic syndrome conceptualization coupled with a high rate of cigarette smoking. This characterization is consistent with increased cardiovascular morbidity and decreased life expectancy in both men and women. We underscore the importance of both screening for and treating potentially reversible CHD risk factors in schizophrenia patients.

Retrospective Study of Olanzapine in Depressive and Anxious States in Primary Care

CONTEXT: Bipolar spectrum and treatment-resistant unipolar mood disorders are increasingly identified in primary care settings. Olanzapine demonstrates efficacy in the treatment of acute mania and bipolar depression and in bipolar maintenance therapy. Olanzapine-fluoxetine combination therapy shows efficacy in treatment-resistant depression. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and tolerability profile of olanzapine in various difficult-to-treat depressive and/or anxious states in primary care outpatients. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all identifiable patients prescribed olanzapine for mood disorders (DSM-IV) during a 3-year period (July 1998-July 2001), utilizing clinician and nurse recall, sampling of general continuity clinic records, and a hand search of mood disorder clinic records. MAIN AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Initial and final scores on the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale, duration of therapy, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were identified as having received treatment with olanzapine; 3 were referred to the mental health specialty sector at the time of treatment initiation, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Of the 32 patients receiving ongoing treatment by primary care clinicians, most were female (N = 23; 72%) and all were white (100%). Most were diagnosed with a mental illness in the bipolar spectrum (N = 25; 78%) and demonstrated treatment resistance with antidepressants and/or mood stabilizers (mean number of previous psychotropic medications = 3.7). In the group completing therapy (24 patients [75%]; mean duration of treatment = 242 days), GAF scores demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant improvement (mean initial GAF score = 59 +/- 9; mean final GAF score = 76 +/- 11; p < .0001). Twenty (83%) of these 24 patients demonstrated sustained improvement in their GAF scores. In the group that discontinued therapy (8 patients [25%]; mean duration of treatment = 123 days), GAF scores also demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant improvement (mean initial GAF score = 51 +/- 15; mean final GAF score = 70 +/- 11; p < .0001). Six (75%) of these 8 patients demonstrated sustained improvement in their GAF scores. For all patients, observed adverse effects included weight gain (25 patients [86%]; mean = 3.63 kg), sedation (6 patients [19%]), and dry mouth (1 patient [3%]). CONCLUSION: Olanzapine shows promise as an effective pharmacotherapeutic agent for primary care patients with mood disorders that lie along the bipolar spectrum or that are resistant to treatment with antidepressant monotherapies, but is associated with mild-to-moderate weight gain.

Guidelines for prevention and treatment of adverse effects of antipsychotic drugs on glucose-insulin homeostasis and lipid metabolism

RATIONALE

With the antipsychotic drugs available today, especially with some of the newer, atypical antipsychotics, metabolic side effects, such as weight gain, diabetes mellitus and lipid abnormalities, have become a complication to the drug therapy that have to be recognized and treated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to suggest guidelines for prevention and treatment of adverse effects of antipsychotics on glucose-insulin homeostasis and lipid metabolism, whereas strategies for management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain are summarized elsewhere.

METHOD

The guidelines are based on results of experimental and clinical studies presented in the article, as well as on a recently published review of 180 articles in the field.

RESULTS

Both conventional and atypical antipsychotics can indirectly, by causing obesity, promote development of insulin resistance and type-2 diabetes. In addition, some atypical agents probably directly induce hyperinsulinemia, followed by weight gain, insulin resistance and drug-induced, sometimes insulin-dependent, diabetes.

CONCLUSION

In this article, guidelines for the management of adverse metabolic effects of antipsychotics are described.

Pharmacogenetics of antipsychotic-induced weight gain

RATIONALE

Antipsychotic medications have been associated with considerable weight gain. The degree of inter-individual variability and known genetic contributions to obesity suggest a combination of genetic and environmental factors. In the absence of established mechanisms and valid predictors for this relevant adverse effect, pharmacogenetic studies may provide the basis for the development of individualized treatment and preventive interventions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present review is to analyze the theoretical and empirical knowledge base for the selection of the most promising target genes that may contribute to antipsychotic-induced weight gain.

METHODS

Examination of the preclinical and clinical literature that can inform the rational choice of target genes that may play a role in the development of adverse changes in body composition associated with antipsychotic treatment.

RESULTS

Theoretically, candidate gene selection can be guided by knowledge about molecular pathways associated with obesity, receptors modulated by antipsychotic drugs, and enzymes implicated in their metabolism and bioavailability. While most available data relate to the general mechanisms of obesity and few studies have directly examined the genetic contributions to antipsychotic-induced weight gain, several genes warrant further investigation. These include the 5-HT(2C), pro-opiomelanocortin, leptin, ghrelin, tumor necrosis factor alpha, adiponectin, dopamine D(2) receptor, histamine-H(1) receptor, and alpha(1), beta(2) and beta(3) adrenergic receptor genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacogenetic studies can provide powerful tools for the pre-treatment identification of individuals at high risk for antipsychotic-induced weight gain, to uncover biological mechanisms that may even generalize to non-drug-induced weight gain, and to isolate novel targets for treatments of weight gain and obesity. To enhance power, future studies should pay close attention to population selection and avoidance/control of confounds, particularly past treatment exposure.

Treatment of the metabolic disturbances caused by antipsychotic drugs: focus on potential drug interactions

The risk of excessive bodyweight gain, glucose dysregulation and hyperlipidaemia is differentially increased by conventional and atypical antipsychotic drugs. Switching or combining agents may be sufficient in some cases, but in many instances additional drug treatment will be required. This includes oral antidiabetics, insulin and agents to treat hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and platelet dysfunction, among others. Numerous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with the antipsychotics are possible, although few have been tested in formal studies. After reviewing the literature, the authors provide preliminary guidelines to assist clinicians in drug selection for this complex and fragile clinical population.

Hyperglycemia with antipsychotic treatment

Diabetes and mental disorders are common chronic illnesses in the United States. Recently, the introduction of a new class of atypical antipsychotic medications has been a major treatment advance for patients with mental disorders. Because of increased use of atypical antipsychotic medications, new and unanticipated side effects have often appeared. Treatment-emergent diabetes has been described for conventional and atypical antipsychotics. People with schizophrenia may be at increased risk for type 2 diabetes because of the side effects of antipsychotic medication, underlying predisposition, and less healthy lifestyles.

Relationship between levels of insulin or triglycerides and serum concentrations of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine in patients on treatment with therapeutic doses

RATIONALE

Recent results suggest that treatment with the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine is associated with increased insulin and lipid levels.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate potential relationships between insulin or other hormones related to glucose-insulin homeostasis or lipids and steady-state serum concentrations of clozapine or olanzapine in patients on therapeutic doses.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients, diagnosed with schizophrenia or related psychoses according to the DSM-IV criteria and treated with clozapine ( n=18) or olanzapine ( n=16), were studied. Median treatment time with the antipsychotics was 5.3 years (range 0.5-16.3 years). Fasting blood samples for insulin, C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor I, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, leptin, glucose and lipids were analyzed and investigated in relation to the patients' drug serum concentrations.

RESULTS

Hyperinsulinemia was found in 30-60% of the patients, hyperglycemia in 10-30%, hyperlipidemia in 40-60% and hyperleptinemia in 10-20%. Moreover, levels of insulin, C-peptide and triglycerides correlated positively to the clozapine serum concentration and to the ratio of olanzapine to N-desmethylolanzapine concentrations. In contrast, levels of C-peptide, leptin and blood glucose were inversely correlated to the serum concentration of the metabolite N-desmethylolanzapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic abnormalities (i.e. hyperinsulinemia, hyperlipidemia and hyperleptinemia) and insulin resistance were associated with both clozapine and olanzapine treatments. Levels of insulin and triglycerides increased by increasing clozapine serum concentration and by increasing ratio of olanzapine to N-desmethylolanzapine; the last due to the metabolite N-desmethylolanzapine probably having an inverse effect to the main compound olanzapine. Thus, the metabolic abnormalities induced by these two drugs are clozapine-concentration dependent in clozapine-treated patients, and ratio of olanzapine to N-desmethylolanzapine-concentration dependent in olanzapine-treated patients.

Treatment of psychosis in Parkinson's disease: safety considerations

Psychosis only rarely occurs in patients with untreated Parkinson's disease. Much more commonly, psychosis is induced by drug therapy for Parkinson's disease and is the strongest known risk factor for nursing home placement. Delusions are less frequent than hallucinations, but are more concerning as they are often paranoid in nature. Treatment begins with a search for correctable infectious, toxic, and metabolic aetiologies. If symptoms persist, anti-Parkinson's disease medications are slowly reduced. However, withdrawal of these drugs usually worsens parkinsonism and is often not tolerated. Certain atypical antipsychotics can be used to treat psychosis without compromising motor function. The choice of atypical antipsychotic is largely based on ease of use and adverse effect profile as most have comparable efficacy in improving psychosis. Currently, there are five marketed atypical drugs - clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone. Ziprasidone is the only agent whose adverse effect profile has not been reported in Parkinson's disease. The most common adverse effects of clozapine in Parkinson's disease are sedation, orthostatic hypotension and sialorrhoea. Sedation is generally helpful since these patients are frequently awake at night and tend to have worse behavioural problems then. Clozapine does not induce deterioration of motor function, but it has the potential to cause agranulocytosis, which is idiosyncratic and not dose-related. In risperidone-treated Parkinson's disease patients, reported adverse effects include somnolence, sialorrhoea, dizziness, palpitations, constipation, delirium, fatigue, leg cramps, depression, urinary incontinence and hypotension. Although in some Parkinson's disease studies, risperidone has been well tolerated, others have shown that many patients are unable to tolerate the drug due to deterioration of motor function. While an initial study of olanzapine in Parkinson's disease psychosis showed the drug to be effective without deterioration of motor function, succeeding reports demonstrated a deleterious effect of the drug on motor functioning. The most common adverse effects of quetiapine in Parkinson's disease patients are sedation and orthostatic hypotension. There is a lack of double-blind trials; however, cumulative reports involving >200 Parkinson's disease patients strongly suggest that quetiapine is well tolerated and effective. Unlike clozapine, it does not improve tremor and may induce mild deterioration of motor function. Recently, cholinesterase inhibitors have been reported to alleviate psychosis in Parkinson's disease. Although ondansetron, an antiemetic with antiserotonergic properties, has been reported to relieve psychosis in Parkinson's disease, its prohibitive cost has prevented further study in this population. Electroconvulsive treatment is generally reserved for the patient with psychotic depression who is unable to tolerate any pharmacological therapy.

Ziprasidone in the management of schizophrenia : the QT interval issue in context

Ziprasidone is a new atypical antipsychotic recently marketed in a number of countries. Its main advantage over other atypical and typical drugs is its low propensity for causing weight gain. However, ziprasidone has been shown to prolong to some extent the cardiac corrected QT (QTc) interval, a property shared by a number of other antipsychotics. Prolongation of the QTc interval is linked to the ventricular tachyarrhythmia torsade de pointes, which is occasionally fatal, although the precise association between QTc changes and risk of sudden cardiac death has not been determined. QTc prolongation is certainly linked in some way to an increased risk of sudden cardiac death, and this may explain the recent, somewhat preliminary, reports of increased risk associated with use of some antipsychotics. Ziprasidone prolongs QTc to a moderate degree, though to a greater extent than quetiapine, risperidone, olanzapine and haloperidol. There is also preliminary evidence that ziprasidone blocks the delayed potassium rectifier channel in cardiac cells. Because of this, and despite the fact that no increased risk of arrhythmia or sudden death has been demonstrated for ziprasidone, some caution is required. Ziprasidone should be avoided in patients with some types of cardiac disease and with uncontrolled electrolyte disturbance. Coprescription of ziprasidone with other drugs that prolong the QT interval should be avoided where possible. When cross-tapering with other antipsychotics, care should be taken to avoid high total load of antipsychotics, and cross-tapering with drugs known to prolong QT interval at normal clinical doses should be avoided. Under most clinical circumstances, however, ziprasidone may be safely used without ECG monitoring or other special precautions. Its effect on QT interval and possible effect on risk of arrhythmia should be balanced with the observation that the drug has a more favourable effect on bodyweight and glucose homeostasis (and so perhaps cardiac risk) than many other antipsychotics.

Effects of clozapine, olanzapine and haloperidol on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour in the rat

RATIONALE

Antipsychotic drugs, particularly the newer atypical compounds, have been associated with rapid weight gain in a clinical setting. However, there are few reported animal models producing reliable hyperphagia correlating with the human weight gain liability of these drugs.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of the classic neuroleptic haloperidol with the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour in rats.

METHODS

Male hooded Lister rats drank a palatable high-calorie fat emulsion (10% Intralipid) during 30-min test sessions and microstructural analyses were made following administration of each drug over a range of doses.

RESULTS

Clozapine (0.3 mg/kg) and olanzapine (0.1, 0.3, 1 mg/kg) significantly increased intake, whilst haloperidol (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/kg) significantly decreased drinking. No significant changes in the latency to the first lick were observed following any of the drugs tested. Median interlick intervals showed small, dose-related increases after clozapine (3.0 mg/kg), olanzapine (0.3, 1.0 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.1, 0.2 mg/kg). Olanzapine (1.0 mg/kg) significantly elevated the number of clusters of licking (bouts of licking separated by pauses greater than 500 ms), whilst clozapine and haloperidol did not. Mean cluster size (licks per cluster) was not affected by clozapine or olanzapine, but haloperidol (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/kg) produced marked, significant decreases in cluster size.

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine and olanzapine increased fat intake whereas haloperidol did not, and this resembles the greater weight gain liability of atypical antipsychotics in humans. A delay or reduction of the post-ingestive satiety signal combined with preserved palatability appears to be the mechanism responsible for fat hyperphagia in rats treated with clozapine and olanzapine. Conversely, haloperidol leaves satiety unaffected but reduces the palatability of the fat emulsion resulting in reduced intake.

Weight gain in first-episode psychosis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the extent of weight gain in the first year of treatment in an early psychosis program.

METHOD

Subjects were 114 individuals who had experienced a first episode of psychosis and had completed 1 year in a comprehensive first-episode program. Weight and body mass index were calculated on entry to the program and at 6 and 12 months. Most of the subjects were all being prescribed second-generation antipsychotics.

RESULTS

Significant increases in mean weight were observed in these young individuals over the course of the first year of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

If we are to work toward optimum treatment for first-episode subjects then potential weight gain needs to be addressed at the beginning of treatment and monitored during treatment.

Antipsychotic-induced venous thromboembolism: a review of the evidence

Psychiatric disorders themselves and treatment with conventional antipsychotic medications have in a number of early studies been associated with venous thromboembolism. In general, information on the relationship between antipsychotics and this possible adverse effect is in the form of case reports and open cross-sectional studies. However, recently the association between conventional antipsychotics and venous thrombosis has been strengthened as a result of the publication of a large, nested, case-control study. In this study, low-potency antipsychotic drugs were more strongly associated with venous thrombosis than high-potency drugs. In addition, recent epidemiological data support an association between the atypical antipsychotic agent clozapine and venous thromboembolism. The risk for venous thromboembolism seems to be highest during the initial months of treatment with antipsychotics. The biological mechanisms responsible for this possible adverse drug reaction are unknown, but a number of hypotheses have been suggested. The increased risk may be the result of drug-induced sedation, obesity, hyperleptinaemia, antiphospholipid antibodies and increased activity in the coagulation system. The association could also be related to underlying risk factors present in patients with psychosis such as smoking. Despite the limitations of present knowledge, clinicians should be aware of this possible adverse drug reaction and should consider interrupting or changing the antipsychotic regimen in patients in whom this reaction is suspected. More studies are needed in order to further elucidate this adverse effect, particularly to determine the incidence rate, possible predisposing factors and the biological mechanisms involved.

Metabolic Issues With Atypical Antipsychotics in Primary Care: Dispelling the Myths

BACKGROUND: Recently, much attention has been focused on the increased rate of metabolic syndrome componen ts among psychiatric patients, including glucose intolerance, hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and weight gain. Various reports have identified cases of newly diagnosed diabetes during treatment with atypical antipsychotic agents. However, the question remains whether there is a relationship between atypical antipsychotic use and the metabolic syndrome or whether there is a higher risk in this population irrespective of medication use. METHOD: Many articles on antipsychotics and metabolic issues are reviews of case reports or small, cross-sectional laboratory studies highlighting the suspected potential for differing rates of new-onset diabetes cases. We conducted a retrospective review of the literature from 1998 through 2002, using the MEDLINE database, and recent studies presented at major psychiatric medical conferences to create a broader perspective on the metabolic issues. RESULTS: We identified over 70 abstracts and published manuscripts, including case reports; cross-sectional lab studies; retrospective analyses of head-to-head, controlled clinical studies; retrospective database studies; pharmacoepidemiology studies; and prospective head-to-head studies presented in the past 4 years. Studies assessed differences in fasting plasma glucose, oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), modified OGTT, frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance, odds or hazard ratios, prevalence, and incidence, as well as other elements of the metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSION: Data from this large body of scientific evidence indicate that the psychiatric patient population may be at a higher risk for the development of obesity, glucose homeostasis dysregulation, and hyperlipidemia compared with the general population. The available data do not demonstrate a consistent or clinically significant difference in the risk of new-onset diabetes during treatment with the various atypical antipsychotic agents.

Metabolic consequences of atypical antipsychotic drugs

Atypical antipsychotic drugs have become the treatment of choice for psychotic disorders. However, these medications, though certainly superior in many respects to the more traditional medications, have been shown to have a number of untoward consequences. Understanding of the metabolic consequences of these medications is essential for the psychiatrist. The possible development of diabetes, weight gain, and hypertriglyceridemia in patients taking atypical antipsychotics makes it imperative that the prescribing physician regularly monitor patients on these agents. One possible monitoring scheme is outlined and recommendations for treatment are discussed.

Gene expression profiling with DNA microarrays: advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders

DNA microarray transcriptome profiling of the postmortem brain opens novel horizons in understanding molecular changes associated with complex psychiatric disorders. With careful analysis and interpretation of microarray data we are uncovering previously unknown, expression patterns that maybe subject-specific and pivotal in understanding the disease process. In our recent studies, analyses of the prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia and matched controls uncovered complex changes in the expression of genes related to presynaptic secretory release, GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission, metabolic pathways, myelination, as well as cAMP and phosphoinositol second messenger systems. Our goal will be to integrate this expression data within the context of the relevant anatomical, biochemical, molecular, imaging and clinical findings.

Are leptin and cytokines involved in body weight gain during treatment with antipsychotic drugs?

OBJECTIVE

To critically review published literature on the causal association between leptin, cytokines, and excessive body weight gain (BWG) induced by antipsychotic drugs (APs).

METHODS

We completed a Medline search using the words leptin, cytokines, antipsychotic drugs, neuroleptics, psychotropic drugs, weight gain, and obesity. We also included our empirical research on this topic in the discussion. We examined the relation between leptin, cytokines (mainly tumour necrosis factor alpha [TNF-alpha] and its soluble receptors), and AP-induced BWG, using the biological sciences' current theories of causality.

RESULTS

In the general field of weight regulation, there is scarce experimental evidence that leptin or TNF-alpha by themselves can induce obesity. Serum levels of leptin and TNF-alpha rather increase simultaneously as BWG occurs. This has also been reported during AP-induced BWG, with the equivocal exception of a study with clozapine. Some researchers have suggested that the absence of the expected correlation between leptin and body mass index (BMI) or serum insulin levels, and the lack of sex-related differences in leptin levels in AP-treated patients, may point to a causal relation. This contention requires more experimental support. In addition, future clinical studies must carefully control for sex and BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

No conclusive evidence has been provided that leptin or TNF-alpha may induce obesity either in drug-free subjects or in AP-treated patients. In most cases, the elevated serum levels of these hormones appear to be a consequence rather than a cause of obesity. That does not mean that such an elevation is innocuous, since it may impair blood pressure and also carbohydrate and lipid metabolism regulation. Hence, all efforts should be made to prevent or attenuate BWG during treatment with APs.

Differential activation of orexin neurons by antipsychotic drugs associated with weight gain

Weight gain is one side effect of many antipsychotic drugs (APDs). A small number of lateral hypothalamic/perifornical area (LH/PFA) neurons express the orexins, peptides that are critically involved in body weight regulation and arousal. We examined the ability of APDs to activate orexin neurons, as reflected by induction of Fos. APDs with significant weight gain liability increased Fos expression in orexin neurons, but APDs with low or absent weight gain liability did not. The weight gain liability of APDs was correlated with the degree of Fos induction in orexin neurons of the lateral LH/PFA. In contrast, amphetamine, which causes weight loss, increased Fos expression in orexin neurons of the medial but not lateral LH/PFA. We compared the effects of amphetamine and clozapine, an APD with weight gain liability, on orexin neurons innervating the prefrontal cortex. Clozapine induced Fos in 75% of the orexin neurons that project to the cortex, but amphetamine induced Fos in less than a third of these cells. These data suggest that APD-induced weight gain is associated with activation of distinct orexin neurons and emphasize the presence of anatomically and functionally heterogeneous populations of orexin neurons.

Relapse and rehospitalisation rates in patients with schizophrenia: effects of second generation antipsychotics

Recent studies suggest that the risk of relapse in patients with schizophrenia is approximately 3.5% per month. Predictors of more frequent relapses include poor compliance with antipsychotic drug treatment, severe residual psychopathology, poor insight into the illness and the need for treatment, comorbid substance abuse, and poor relationships between patients, families and care providers. Although conventional antipsychotic drugs, such as haloperidol and fluphenazine, are effective in preventing relapse, second generation antipsychotic drugs, such as clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine, appear to be superior in preventing relapse and improving the patient's quality of life. The development of adverse events can undermine treatment response and relapse prevention. Minimising adverse effects thus helps to improve treatment compliance and prevent relapse. Second generation antipsychotic drugs tend to have fewer adverse effects than conventional agents, especially pseudoparkinsonism and akathisia. The societal costs of treating patients with schizophrenia can be lessened by employing strategies that decrease relapse and the need for rehospitalisation, the most costly treatment alternative.

Assessment of independent effect of olanzapine and risperidone on risk of diabetes among patients with schizophrenia: population based nested case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the association between olanzapine and diabetes.

DESIGN

Population based nested case-control study.

SETTING

United Kingdom based General Practice Research Database comprising 3.5 million patients followed between 1987 and 2000.

PARTICIPANTS

19 637 patients who had been diagnosed as having and treated for schizophrenia. 451 incident cases of diabetes were matched with 2696 controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnosis and treatment of diabetes.

RESULTS

Patients taking olanzapine had a significantly increased risk of developing diabetes than non-users of antipsychotics (odds ratio 5.8, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 16.7) and those taking conventional antipsychotics (4.2, 1.5 to 12.2). Patients taking risperidone had a non-significant increased risk of developing diabetes than non-users of antipsychotics (2.2, 0.9 to 5.2) and those taking conventional antipsychotics (1.6, 0.7 to 3.8).

CONCLUSION

Olanzapine is associated with a clinically important and significant increased risk of diabetes.

Advances in atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: new formulations and new agents

Innovation in atypical antipsychotic agents continues with new preparations of available drugs as well as novel agents. In this article, we provide an update on these novel products by reviewing information from a computerised literature search, recent abstracts and discussions with industry representatives. A generic formulation of clozapine is now available. It may be less well absorbed and/or less effective than Clozaril, although evidence is conflicting. A fatty acid amide derivative of clozapine is in early development. A liquid formulation of risperidone is currently available, which may be a useful treatment for psychotic agitation as well as a preferable alternative to tablets for some patients. A depot formulation is in development for the long-term management of psychosis. An orally disintegrating tablet formulation of olanzepine is a useful alternative to standard tablets. A short-acting injectable formulation of the drug is in development for psychotic agitation. Sachets and slow-release formulations of quetiapine are in development. Ziprasidone, a recently launched agent, is available in tablet form for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, psychotic depression and mania. A short-acting injectable formulation is in development for psychotic agitation. Aripiprazole (tablets) and iloperidone (tablets and depot injection) are two antipsychotics in development for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (available information regarding iloperidone is very limited). These new formulations and agents should broaden options for the treatment of psychosis.

Receipt of nutrition and exercise counseling among medical outpatients with psychiatric and substance use disorders

OBJECTIVE

Mentally ill persons represent a population that is potentially vulnerable to receiving a poorer quality of medical care. This study examines the relationship between mental disorders and the likelihood of receiving recommended nutrition and exercise counseling.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study combining chart-review data and administrative database records.

SETTING

One hundred forty-seven Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers nationwide.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

The sample included 90,240 patients with obesity and/or hypertension who had >/=3 medical outpatient visits in the previous year.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The outcomes of interest were chart-documented receipt of nutrition counseling and receipt of exercise counseling in the past 2 years. This chart information was merged with VA inpatient and outpatient administrative databases, which were used to identify persons with diagnosed mental disorders. Most patients received nutrition counseling (90.4%), exercise counseling (88.5%), and counseling for both (85.7%) in the past 2 years. The rates of counseling differed significantly but modestly by mental health status. The lowest rates were found among patients dually diagnosed with comorbid psychiatric and substance use disorders; however, the magnitude of the disparities was small, ranging from 2% to 4% across outcomes. These results were unchanged after controlling for demographics, health status, and facility characteristics using multivariable generalized estimating equation modeling.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients engaged in active medical treatment, rates of nutrition and exercise counseling were high at VA medical centers, and the diagnosis of mental illness was not a substantial barrier to such counseling. More work is needed to determine whether these findings generalize to non-VA settings and to understand the potential role that integrated systems such as the VA can play in reducing disparities for vulnerable populations.

Amisulpride: a review of its use in the management of schizophrenia

Amisulpride, a substituted benzamide derivative, is a second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic. At low doses, it enhances dopaminergic neurotransmission by preferentially blocking presynaptic dopamine D2/D3 autoreceptors. At higher doses, amisupride antagonises postsynaptic dopamine D2 and D3 receptors, preferentially in the limbic system rather than the striatum, thereby reducing dopaminergic transmission. In patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia, the recommended dosage of amisulpride is 400 to 800 mg/day, although dosages < or =1200 mg/day may be administered. In comparative trials, amisulpride administered within this range (400 to 1200 mg/day) was as effective as haloperidol 5 to 40 mg/day, flupenthixol 25 mg/day and risperidone 8 mg/day in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia with predominantly positive symptoms. Amisulpride was more effective than haloperidol but equally effective as risperidone in controlling negative symptoms. Amisulpride 400 to 800 mg/day was more effective than haloperidol, risperidone and flupenthixol in controlling affective symptoms in these patients. In randomised, double-blind trials involving patients with predominantly negative symptoms of schizophrenia, amisulpride 50 to 300 mg/day was more effective than placebo. Amisulpride is effective as maintenance therapy in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Long-term treatment with amisulpride was associated with improvements in quality of life and social functioning. Amisulpride is generally well tolerated. In well-controlled trials, the neurological tolerability profile (including ratings on extrapyramidal symptom scales) of amisulpride 400 to 1200 mg/day was superior to that of the conventional antipsychotics (haloperidol or flupenthixol), but was similar to that of the atypical antipsychotic risperidone. At low dosages of amisulpride (< or =300 mg/day), the incidence of adverse events (including extrapyramidal symptoms) reported with amisulpride was similar to that with placebo.

CONCLUSION

In comparative trials, amisulpride 400 to 1200 mg/day showed efficacy in reducing overall symptomatology and positive symptoms similar to that of conventional antipsychotics and newer atypical antipsychotics in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. Moreover, its effective alleviation of negative and affective symptoms, its lower association with extrapyramidal symptoms and loss of cognitive function than conventional antipsychotics and its long-term efficacy justifies consideration of the use of higher dosages of amisulpride in this group of patients. Consequently, the dosage of amisulpride that is recommended in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia is 400 to 800 mg/day, although dosages < or =1200 mg/day may be administered. Lower dosages of amisulpride (50 to 300 mg/day) should be considered for the management of patients with negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Amisulpride is a first-line treatment option in the management of schizophrenia in the acute phase and for the maintenance of treatment response.

Bodyweight gain associated with atypical antipsychotics: epidemiology and therapeutic implications

Atypical antipsychotic medications are associated with different adverse effects and efficacy profiles compared with conventional antipsychotics (i.e. less extrapyramidal symptoms, improved-efficacy against negative symptoms and cognitive deficits, and most often a greater ability to improve patients' quality of life). However, the atypical antipsychotics may be associated with clinically significant bodyweight gain, increasing the risk of medical comorbidity, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and hyperlipidaemia. This literature review assesses the various bodyweight gain liabilities associated with atypical antipsychotics, as well as the effects of bodyweight gain on quality of life. The issue of prevention and management of this often neglected adverse effect is also examined. Most studies reviewed indicate that clozapine and olanzapine are associated with more bodyweight gain than the other atypical antipsychotics. There are potential factors that place certain patients at greater risk for bodyweight gain, including low pretreatment body mass index, young age and being of female gender. Furthermore, bodyweight gain associated with the use of atypical antipsychotics has been reported to be associated with clinical improvement, although this has not been substantiated widely. It is unclear whether increased medical comorbidity, including diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease and/or elevated triglyceride levels, is secondary to the bodyweight gain associated with atypical antipsychotics, or the result of the agents themselves. A patient's quality of life may be greatly affected by excessive bodyweight gain; either by increased comorbid medical illness, an increased relapse rate associated with noncompliance, or the social stigma associated with being obese. However, most studies reveal that treatment with atypical antipsychotic medications is associated with improved quality of life compared with that achieved with conventional antipsychotic medications. Because bodyweight is an important health risk associated with atypical antipsychotics, prevention and effective management of bodyweight are paramount in preventing comorbid medical illness, relapse and possible noncompliance.

Safety and tolerability: how do newer generation "atypical" antipsychotics compare?

Previously, clinicians worked with antipsychotic drugs that almost invariably caused extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) at the dose at which they were clinically effective. By definition, all newer generation atypical antipsychotic agents are significantly better than conventional agents with regard to EPS; i.e., they are clinically effective at doses at which they do not cause EPS. This EPS advantage of atypical antipsychotics translates into several important clinical benefits, including better negative symptom efficacy, lesser dysphoria, less impaired cognition, and a lower risk of tardive dyskinesia; in fact, this "EPS advantage" is the principal basis of the many clinical advantages provided by the class of atypical antipsychotics. While all atypical agents share this "EPS advantage," there are important differences between these agents with regard to the ease and consistency with which this EPS advantage can be realized. Pharmacologically, different atypical antipsychotics differ; these differences translate into differences in their side effect profiles. Five atypical antipsychotics are currently available: clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone. Meaningful differences between these agents with regard to weight gain, sedation, anticholinergic side effects, cardiovascular issues, endocrine side effects, hepatic and sexual issues, will be considered and their clinical implications discussed.

Ziprasidone: A New Atypical Antipsychotic Agent

Objective:

To evaluate ziprasidone for the treatment of schizophrenia with respect to its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse effect profiles, and drug interaction potential.

Data Source:

A MEDLINE search (1966-May 2001) was conducted for primary and secondary sources focusing on atypical antipsychotics and ziprasidone.

Study Selection:

All of the articles identified from the data source were evaluated and all information deemed relevant was included.

Data Synthesis:

Like other atypical antipsychotics, ziprasidone works by blocking serotonin and dopamine receptors in the mesolimbic and mesocortical regions of the brain. Ziprasidone is equally effective as haloperidol in treating schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders. A proposed advantage of ziprasidone over other atypical antipsychotics is lower incidence of weight gain. As with a number of other psychotropic agents such as thioridazine, prolongation of the QTc interval should be monitored for patients receiving ziprasidone.

Conclusions:

Based on adverse effect profiles and relatively fewer drug interactions, ziprasidone is recommended for patients who are elderly and taking multiple medications.

Antipsychotic drugs and obesity: is prolactin involved?

OBJECTIVES

To correlate the anthropometric indexes (Body Mass Index [BMI] and Waist-Hip ratio [WHR]) with the serum prolactin levels in a heterogeneous population of patients treated with typical antipsychotic (AP) drugs.

METHODS

We evaluated BMI, WHR, and fasting serum prolactin of inpatients (n = 105) and outpatients (n = 122) treated with APs, in outpatients receiving other psychotropic drugs (OPDs) (n = 77), and in drug-free subjects (n = 33). Outpatients had free access to food, whereas the inpatient sample comprised people with a monotonous diet of approximately 2000 Kcal daily.

RESULTS

Prolactin correlated positively with the BMI in the whole group of AP-treated outpatient men (P = 0.03) and with the WHR in AP-treated inpatient men (P = 0.053). Regarding treatment duration, prolactin and BMI correlated positively in men consecutively treated for more than 1 year (P = 0.023). By contrast, a trend toward a negative correlation between prolactin and BMI was observed in AP-treated outpatient women (P = 0.08). No significant correlation, or even a trend, was observed in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolactin may be involved in AP-induced weight gain, particularly in men. Future studies should characterize the period of maximal prolactin impact on body weight during AP treatment. Specific populations particularly sensitive to hyperprolactinemia might be identified as well. The negative correlation between prolactin and BMI detected in AP-treated women resembles the dampened prolactin response observed in severe primary obesity.

A Perspective on the Primary Care of Patients With Behavior, Mood, and Thought Disturbances: Clinical Applications of Olanzapine

Primary care practitioners are in an ideal position to initiate treatment for patients with behavior, mood, and thought disturbances. It is believed that early identification and treatment of these symptomatic features of primary or secondary central nervous system disorders may significantly reduce morbidity and benefit the patient, his/her family, and involved caregivers, including the primary care physician. A broad list of central nervous system-active medications are utilized by family physicians to treat patients who exhibit symptoms of agitation, altered mood, and disordered thought. Some medications have demonstrated superiority over placebo or active medicines in reported clinical trials. This article is a brief overview of the safety and efficacy from reported studies of the use of medications frequently used to treat symptoms related to behavior, mood, and thought disturbances, with a specific focus on the clinical applicability of olanzapine.

Ziprasidone

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary® Monograph Service receive five to six researched monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late Phase III trials. The monographs are targeted to your Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. The monographs are published in printed form and on diskettes that allow customization. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board called The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X). All topics pertinent to clinical pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The June 2001 Formulary monographs are on pantoprazole IV, darbepoetin, voriconazole, bimatoprost ophthalmic solution, and prasterone. The DUE is on pantoprazole.

Bodyweight gain with atypical antipsychotics. A comparative review

The atypical antipsychotics have been shown to have superior efficacy compared with typical antipsychotics such as haloperidol, particularly in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Furthermore, they induce less extrapyramidal effects. However, following clinical use, marked bodyweight gain has been frequently observed with some of the atypical antipsychotic drugs. In order to examine and compare the frequency, amount and conditions of bodyweight gain during treatment with atypical antipsychotics, studies concerning bodyweight gain with these agents were identified through a MEDLINE search from 1966 to March 2000. Although comparison is limited by the different designs and recruitment procedures of the reviewed studies, the available data support the notion that the frequency as well as the amount of bodyweight gain is high in patients treated with olanzapine (average bodyweight gain 2.3 kg/month), clozapine (1.7 kg/month), quetiapine (1.8 kg/month), and possibly also zotepine (2.3 kg/month). Moderate changes in bodyweight have been observed in the treatment with risperidone (average bodyweight gain 1.0 kg/month). Ziprasidone seems to induce only slight bodyweight changes (0.8 kg/month). Bodyweight gain most frequently occurs in the first 12 weeks of treatment. Patients who were underweight at the beginning of treatment are at highest risk of gaining bodyweight. The underlying pathomechanism still remains largely unclear. The relative receptor affinities of the atypical antipsychotics for histamine H1 receptors as well as the ratio of their affinity for serotonin 5-HT2 and dopamine D2 receptors appear to be the most robust correlate of bodyweight gain. Furthermore, the induction of leptin secretion may have an important impact on bodyweight gain in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Although many questions concerning the pathogenesis of bodyweight gain remain unresolved, this adverse effect has to be taken into consideration when prescribing the atypical antipsychotics, particularly in view its affect on compliance during long term treatment and the long term effects of obesity on mortality and morbidity.

Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: systematic overview and meta-regression analysis

OBJECTIVE

To develop an evidence base for recommendations on the use of atypical antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia.

DESIGN

Systematic overview and meta-regression analyses of randomised controlled trials, as a basis for formal development of guidelines.

SUBJECTS

12 649 patients in 52 randomised trials comparing atypical antipsychotics (amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and sertindole) with conventional antipsychotics (usually haloperidol or chlorpromazine) or alternative atypical antipsychotics.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall symptom scores. Rate of drop out (as a proxy for tolerability) and of side effects, notably extrapyramidal side effects.

RESULTS

For both symptom reduction and drop out, there was substantial heterogeneity between the results of trials, including those evaluating the same atypical antipsychotic and comparator drugs. Meta-regression suggested that dose of conventional antipsychotic explained the heterogeneity. When the dose was

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear evidence that atypical antipsychotics are more effective or are better tolerated than conventional antipsychotics. Conventional antipsychotics should usually be used in the initial treatment of an episode of schizophrenia unless the patient has previously not responded to these drugs or has unacceptable extrapyramidal side effects.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Amisulpride
• Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use
• Benzodiazepines
• Clozapine/therapeutic use
• Dibenzothiazepines/therapeutic use
• Drug Costs
• Humans
• Imidazoles
• Indoles
• Olanzapine
• Pirenzepine/analogs & derivatives
• Pirenzepine/therapeutic use
• Quetiapine Fumarate
• Regression Analysis
• Risperidone/therapeutic use
• Schizophrenia/drug therapy
• Sulpiride/analogs & derivatives
• Sulpiride/therapeutic use

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

J Geddes Department of Psychiatry University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX.
N Freemantle
P Harrison
P Bebbington

Collapse

Topiramate in Bipolar and Schizoaffective Disorders: Weight Loss and Efficacy

BACKGROUND: Although useful in bipolar disorder, mood stabilizers, such as lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine, can cause significant weight gain. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 5 patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder who were treated with topiramate as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy. RESULTS: All 5 patients had a good response to treatment at a mean topiramate dose of 195 mg/day (range, 100-375 mg/day). All patients lost a substantial amount of weight on topiramate treatment. The average weight loss was 22 lb (10 kg; range, 8-56 lb [4-25 kg]). None of the patients discontinued topiramate because of side effects. CONCLUSION: Topiramate may represent a valuable alternative to existing mood stabilizers, either as an adjunct or as monotherapy in patients with bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder.