Effect of Pembrolizumab Plus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Pathologic Complete Response in Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the Ongoing Phase 2 Adaptively Randomized I-SPY2 Trial

Next-generation combination approaches for immune checkpoint therapy

Immune checkpoint therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, leading to dramatic clinical outcomes for a subset of patients. However, many patients do not experience durable responses following immune checkpoint therapy owing to multiple resistance mechanisms, highlighting the need for effective combination strategies that target these resistance pathways and improve clinical responses. The development of combination strategies based on an understanding of the complex biology that regulates human antitumor immune responses has been a major challenge. In this Review, we describe the current landscape of combination therapies. We also discuss how the development of effective combination strategies will require the integration of small, tissue-rich clinical trials, to determine how therapy-driven perturbation of the human immune system affects downstream biological responses and eventual clinical outcomes, reverse translation of clinical observations to immunocompetent preclinical models, to interrogate specific biological pathways and their impact on antitumor immune responses, and novel computational methods and machine learning, to integrate multiple datasets across clinical and preclinical studies for the identification of the most relevant pathways that need to be targeted for successful combination strategies.

In-Breast Tumor Progression During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Impact on and Factors Influencing Distant Recurrence-Free Survival

BACKGROUND

Most patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) experience clinical benefit, however, a small proportion progress. We aimed to characterize factors predicting in-breast tumor progression and impact on distant recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed all patients with clinical stage I-III breast cancer treated with NAC in 2006-2021 at our institution. We compared in-breast progressive disease (PD), defined as ≥ 20% increase in tumor size, with stable disease (SD) or response. Distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Of 1403 patients, 70 (5%) experienced in-breast PD, 243 (17%) SD, 560 (40%) partial response (PR), and 530 (38%) breast pathologic complete response (breast pCR, ypT0/Tis). The rate of PD varied by tumor subtype (8% in HR+/HER2-, 5% TNBC, 2% HER2+, p < 0.001). With median 48 months follow-up, the rates of DRFS were significantly different according to clinical breast response as follows: PD 56%, SD 68%, PR 82%, or breast pCR 93%, p < 0.001. In patients with PD on multivariable analysis, post-NAC grade (adjusted HR 2.9, p = 0.002) and ypT3-4 category (adjusted HR 2.4, p = 0.03) were the strongest predictors of DRFS. Combining these factors, 23% had neither, 44% had one, and 33% had both, which stratified outcome in PD with 3-year DRFS of 100%, 77%, and 30%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While in-breast PD during NAC is uncommon (5%), it predicts poor survival. Among patients with in-breast PD, post-NAC tumor grade and T category predict outcomes and may be useful to guide treatment escalation.

Datopotamab-deruxtecan in early-stage breast cancer: the sequential multiple assignment randomized I-SPY2.2 phase 2 trial

Among the goals of patient-centric care are the advancement of effective personalized treatment, while minimizing toxicity. The phase 2 I-SPY2.2 trial uses a neoadjuvant sequential therapy approach in breast cancer to further these goals, testing promising new agents while optimizing individual outcomes. Here we tested datopotamab-deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in the I-SPY2.2 trial for patients with high-risk stage 2/3 breast cancer. I-SPY2.2 uses a sequential multiple assignment randomization trial design that includes three sequential blocks of biologically targeted neoadjuvant treatment: the experimental agent(s) (block A), a taxane-based regimen tailored to the tumor subtype (block B) and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (block C). Patients are randomized into arms consisting of different investigational block A treatments. Algorithms based on magnetic resonance imaging and core biopsy guide treatment redirection after each block, including the option of early surgical resection in patients predicted to have a high likelihood of pathological complete response, the primary endpoint. There are two primary efficacy analyses: after block A and across all blocks for the six prespecified breast cancer subtypes (defined by clinical hormone receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and/or the response-predictive subtypes). We report results of 103 patients treated with Dato-DXd. While Dato-DXd did not meet the prespecified threshold for success (graduation) after block A in any subtype, the treatment strategy across all blocks graduated in the hormone receptor-negative HER2-Immune-DNA repair deficiency- subtype with an estimated pathological complete response rate of 41%. No new toxicities were observed, with stomatitis and ocular events occurring at low grades. Dato-DXd was particularly active in the hormone receptor-negative/HER2-Immune-DNA repair deficiency- signature, warranting further investigation, and was safe in other subtypes in patients who followed the treatment strategy. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01042379 .

PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade in breast cancer: research insights and sensitization strategies

Immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 immune checkpoints has reshaped treatment paradigms across several cancers, including breast cancer. Combining PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with chemotherapy has shown promising efficacy in both early and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, although only a subset of patients experiences durable responses. Identifying responders and optimizing immune drug selection are therefore critical. The effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy depends on both tumor-intrinsic factors and the extrinsic cell-cell interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME). This review systematically summarizes the key findings from clinical trials of ICBs in breast cancer and examines the mechanisms underlying PD-L1 expression regulation. We also highlight recent advances in identifying potential biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and emerging evidence of TME alterations following treatment. Among these, the quantity, immunophenotype, and spatial distribution of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes stand out as promising biomarkers. Additionally, we explore strategies to enhance the effectiveness of ICBs in breast cancer, aiming to support the development of personalized treatment approaches tailored to the unique characteristics of each patient's tumor.

An estrogen receptor signaling transcriptional program linked to immune evasion in human hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

T cells are generally sparse in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, potentially due to limited antigen presentation, but the driving mechanisms of low T cell abundance remains unclear. Therefore, we defined and investigated programs ('gene modules'), related to estrogen receptor signaling (ERS) and immune signaling using bulk and single-cell transcriptome and multiplexed immunofluorescence of breast cancer tissues from multiple clinical sources and human cell lines. The ERS gene module, dominantly expressed in cancer cells, was negatively associated with immune-related gene modules TNFα/NF-κB signaling and type-I interferon (IFN-I) response, which were expressed in distinct stromal and immune cell types, but also, in part, expressed and preserved as a cancer cell-intrinsic mechanisms. Spatial analysis revealed that ERS strongly correlated with reduced T cell infiltration, potentially due to its association with suppression of TNFα/NF-κB-induced angiogenesis and IFN-I-induced HLA expression in macrophages. Preoperative endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients produced better responses in ERS-high patients, with TNFα/NF-κB expression associated with reduced ERS. Targeting these pathways may enhance T cell infiltration in HR+ breast cancer patients.

Statement of Significance

This study elucidates the immunosuppressive role of ER signaling in breast cancer, highlighting a complex interplay between cancer, stromal, and immune cells and reveals potential approaches to enhance immunogenicity in HR+ breast cancer. These findings offer crucial insights into immune evasion in breast cancer and identify strategies to enhance T cell abundance.

Multi-platform biomarkers of response to an immune checkpoint inhibitor in the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial for early-stage breast cancer

Only a subset of patients with breast cancer responds to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). To better understand the underlying mechanisms, we analyze pretreatment biopsies from patients in the I-SPY 2 trial who receive neoadjuvant ICB using multiple platforms to profile the tumor microenvironment. A variety of immune cell populations and markers of immune/cytokine signaling associate with pathologic complete response (pCR). Interestingly, these differ by breast cancer receptor subtype. Measures of the spatial distributions of immune cells within the tumor microenvironment, in particular colocalization or close spatial proximity of PD-1+ T cells with PD-L1+ cells (immune and tumor cells), are significantly associated with response in the overall cohort as well as the in the triple negative (TN) and HR+HER2- subtypes. Our findings indicate that biomarkers associated with immune cell signaling, immune cell densities, and spatial metrics are predictive of neoadjuvant ICB efficacy in breast cancer.

Systemic chemokine-modulatory regimen combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Higher cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) numbers in the tumor microenvironment (TME) predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and positive long-term outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). pCR to NAC is achieved only in 30-40% of patients. The combination of NAC with pembrolizumab increases the pCR rate but at the cost of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Based on these considerations, we tested if systemic infusion of the chemokine modulatory regimen (CKM; selective toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) agonist rintatolimod, interferon (IFN)-α2b, and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor celecoxib) regimen can be safely combined with NAC to enhance intratumoral CTL numbers and NAC effectiveness.

METHODS

Phase I study NCT04081389 evaluated nine patients with early-stage TNBC who received 3 weeks of paclitaxel with CKM (dose-escalation of IFN-α2b), followed by 9 weeks of paclitaxel alone, dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, and surgery. Primary and secondary endpoints were safety and clinical efficacy, respectively.

RESULTS

The combination treatment was well-tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities or irAEs. 5/9 patients achieved pCR and one patient had microinvasive disease (ypTmic). We observed elevated IFN signature and uniform decreases in CTL numbers (average 8.3-fold) in the blood of all treated patients. This was accompanied by reciprocal uniform increases in CD8β (overall 5.9-fold), CD8α/FoxP3 (2.11-fold), and CCL5 (4.73-fold) transcripts in TME, particularly pronounced in patients with pCR. Multiplex immunohistochemistry revealed selectively increased numbers of CTL (but not regulatory T cells) in both the epithelial and stromal tumor compartments and early decreases in the numbers of αSMA+ vascular/stromal cells in the tumors of all pCR patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined paclitaxel/CKM regimen was safe, with desirable TME changes and preliminary indications of promising pCR+ypTmic of 66%, comparable to the combination of NAC with pembrolizumab.

MAP3K1 mutations confer tumor immune heterogeneity in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer

Treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer, the most common type of breast cancer, has faced challenges such as endocrine therapy resistance and distant relapse. Immunotherapy has shown progress in treating triple-negative breast cancer, but immunological research on HR+/HER2- breast cancer is still in its early stages. Here, we performed a multi-omics analysis of a large cohort of patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer (n = 351) and revealed that HR+/HER2- breast cancer possessed a highly heterogeneous tumor immune microenvironment. Notably, the immunological heterogeneity of HR+/HER2- breast cancer was related to mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 1 (MAP3K1) mutation and we validated experimentally that a MAP3K1 mutation could attenuate CD8+ T cell-mediated antitumor immunity. Mechanistically, MAP3K1 mutation suppressed MHC-I-mediated tumor antigen presentation through promoting the degradation of antigen peptide transporter 1/2 (TAP1/2) mRNA, thereby driving tumor immune escape. In preclinical models, the postbiotic tyramine could reverse the MAP3K1 mutation-induced MHC-I reduction, thereby augmenting the efficacy of immunotherapy. Collectively, our study identified the vital biomarker driving the immunological heterogeneity of HR+/HER2- breast cancer and elucidated the underlying molecular mechanisms, which provided the promise of tyramine as what we believe to be a novel therapeutic strategy to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Immunotherapies in breast cancer: harnessing the cancer immunity cycle

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapies have found limited success in breast cancerdue to significant challenges within the tumor that block T-cell activity and function.

AREAS COVERED

The current review discusses clinically relevant immunotherapeutics and trials within the framework of the cancer-immunity cycle.

EXPERT OPINION

Current therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint blockade require proper biomarker selection, such as PD1 expression and the degree of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) infiltration to subset potential responders. HER2 and other tumor-associated antigens have served as valuable benchmarks for developing novel therapies, such as antibody engagers and CAR T-cells. However, further research is essential to identify and validate new target antigens that can enhance therapeutic efficacy and broaden the clinical applicability of these approaches.

Evolving immunotherapeutic solutions for triple-negative breast carcinoma

Triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) remains a formidable clinical hurdle owing to its high aggressiveness and scant therapeutic options. Nonetheless, the evolving landscape of immunotherapeutic strategies opens up promising avenues for tackling this hurdle. This review discusses the advancing immunotherapy for TNBC, accentuating personalized interventions due to tumor microenvironment (TME) diversity. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) hold pivotal significance, both as single-agent therapies and when administered alongside cytotoxic agents. Moreover, the concurrent inhibition of multiple immune checkpoints represents a potent approach to augment the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Synergistic effects have been observed when ICIs are combined with targeted treatments like PARP inhibitors, anti-angiogenics, and ADCs (antibody-drug conjugates). Emerging tactics include tumor vaccines, cellular immunotherapy, and oncolytic viruses, leveraging the immune system's ability for selective malignant cell destruction. This review offers an in-depth examination of the diverse landscape of immunotherapy development for TNBC, furnishing meticulous insights into various advancements within this field. In addition, immunotherapeutic interventions offer hope for TNBC, needing further research for optimization.

Rates of Pathologic Complete Response and Overall Survival in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) have worse survival compared with stage III non-IBC matched cohorts; however, the prognostic significance of achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) in the setting of IBC is not well described. We evaluated overall survival (OS) between IBC patients and non-IBC patients who achieved pCR.

METHODS

Adult females diagnosed in 2010-2018 with clinical prognostic stage III unilateral invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery were selected from the National Cancer Database. Unadjusted OS from surgery was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used to compare groups. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association of study groups with OS after adjustment for available covariates.

RESULTS

The study included 38,390 patients; n = 4600 (12.0%) IBC and n = 33,790 (88.0%) non-IBC. Overall pCR rates were lower for IBC compared with non-IBC (20.7% vs. 23.3%; p < 0.001). Among those achieving pCR, 5-year mortality was higher for IBC patients (16.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13.9-19.1%) versus non-IBC patients (9.1%, 95% CI 8.4-9.8%; log-rank p < 0.001). Among all patients achieving pCR, IBC remained associated with worse OS compared with non-IBC (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.19-1.85; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found a lower pCR rate and worse OS in IBC patients compared with non-IBC stage III patients. Despite effective systemic therapies, achieving a pCR for IBC patients may not carry the same prognostic impact compared with non-IBC stage III patients.

Integrating immunotherapy with conventional treatment regime for breast cancer patients- an amalgamation of armamentarium

Immunotherapy stands as the frontrunner in treatment strategies imparting efficient remission in various types of cancer. In fact, emerging breakthroughs with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in a spectrum of cancers have evoked interest in research related to the potential effects of immunotherapy in breast cancer patients. A major challenge with breast cancer is the molecular heterogeneity that limits the efficacy of many therapeutic regimes. Clinical trials have shown favorable clinical outcomes with immunotherapeutic options in some subtypes of breast cancer. However, ICI monotherapy may not be sufficient for all breast cancer patients, emphasizing the need for combinatorial approaches. Ongoing research is focused on untangling the interplay of ICI with established as well as novel anticancer therapeutic regimens in preclinical models of breast cancer. Our review will analyze the existing research regarding the mechanisms and clinical impact of immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. We shall evaluate the role of immune cell modulation for improved therapeutic response in breast cancer patients. This review will provide collated evidences about the current clinical trials that are testing out the implications of immunotherapy in conjunction with traditional treatment modalities in breast cancer and summarize the potential future research directions in the field. In addition, we shall underline the recent findings related to microbiota modulation as a key regulator of immune therapy response in cancer patients and its plausible applications in breast cancer.

Profiling the gut and oral microbiota of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab and eribulin

Aim: Changes in host-associated microbial communities (i.e., the microbiota) may modulate responses to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. In the KELLY phase II study (NCT03222856), we previously demonstrated that pembrolizumab [anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)] combined with eribulin (plus microtubule-targeting chemotherapy) showed encouraging antitumor activity in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who had received prior treatments. Methods: A total of 58 fecal and 67 saliva samples were prospectively collected from a subset of 28 patients at baseline (BL), after three treatment cycles, and end of treatment. Shotgun metagenomics, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and bioinformatics and statistical approaches were used to characterize fecal and oral microbiota profiles. Results: Treatment caused no substantial perturbations in gut or oral microbiota, suggesting minimal drug-related microbial toxicity. Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium were the dominant gut microbiota genera, while Prevotella and Streptococcus were present in both oral and gut samples, highlighting potential gut-oral microbial interactions. Additionally, clinical benefit (CB) appeared to be associated with gut-associated Bacteroides fragilis (B. fragilis) and a BL oral abundance of Streptococcus ≥ 30%. Notably, B. fragilis NCTC 9343 supernatant induced dose-dependent lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release from the MCF-7 (HR-positive/HER2-negative) BC cell line. Conclusion: These findings suggest that specific gut and oral microbiota may modulate the effectiveness of combinatory anti-BC therapies, potentially through the action of microbial metabolites.

Strategies for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive HER2-low breast cancer based on clinical practice: a round table discussion

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer is a newly identified targetable subset of breast tumors, and its clinical characteristics and treatment strategies are controversial. The emergence of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) has brought promising approaches for HER2-low breast cancer treatment. Several clinical trials have validated the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd) in HER2-low breast cancer at different treatment settings. The treatment timing, candidate identification, long-term management, and overcoming drug resistance are crucial questions to improve breast cancer patient survival. Here we present a clinical case of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-low breast cancer patient who experienced neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, adjuvant, and first-line endocrine therapy with limited effectiveness. After the treatment failure of CDK4/6 inhibitors, the utilization of T-Dxd brought a long-term disease response and tolerable low toxicities. In this round table discussion, we summarized opinions and recommendations from breast cancer surgeons and oncologists on treatment strategies for this patient. The discussion mainly focused on the precise diagnosis of HER2-low breast cancer, treatment design at different disease status, regimens selection according to drug response, strategies consideration for overcoming drug resistance and the management of adverse events in long-term survival. These opinions would provide critical insights to improve HER2-low breast cancer treatment and offer valuable suggestions for clinical practice.

Sustained lymphocyte decreases after treatment for early breast cancer

The role of adaptive immunity in long-term outcomes in early breast cancer is increasingly recognised. Standard (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy can have adverse effects on immune cells. We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study of full blood counts (FBC) of 200 patients receiving (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer at a single institution. FBC results at four time points from pre-treatment to 12 months post-chemotherapy were analysed. Flow cytometry was performed for patients with matched pre- and post-chemotherapy peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples. A significant decrease in absolute lymphocyte count at 12 months post-chemotherapy was observed (p < 0.01), most pronounced in pre-menopausal patients (n = 73; p < 0.01), patients receiving dose-dense chemotherapy regimens (n = 60; p < 0.01) and patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 147, p < 0.01). In pre-menopausal patients, significant changes in CD4+ T cells subsets post-chemotherapy were observed. Further investigation, including long-term clinical outcomes, is needed to meaningfully improve long-term anti-tumour immunity.

Glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 in breast invasive carcinoma: a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis and experimental validation

Background

Breast cancer, despite significant advancements in treatment, remains a major cause of cancer-related deaths among women. Immunotherapy, an emerging therapeutic strategy, offers promise for better outcomes, particularly through the modulation of immune functions. Glioma-Associated Oncogene Homolog 1 (GLI1), a transcription factor implicated in cancer biology, has shown varying roles in different cancers. However, its immunoregulatory functions in breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) remain elusive. The current study aimed to unravel the expression patterns and immune-regulatory roles of GLI1 in BRCA.

Methods

Utilizing multiple bioinformatic platforms (TIMER2.0, GEPIA2, and R packages) based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and/or Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases, we analyzed the expression of GLI1 in BRCA and its pan-cancer expression profiles. We further validated these findings by conducting qPCR and immunohistochemical staining on clinical BRCA samples. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to assess the prognostic value of GLI1. Additionally, the association between GLI1 expression and immune infiltration within the tumor immune microenvironment (TMIE) was examined.

Results

The findings reveal dysregulated expression of GLI1 in numerous cancers, with a significant decrease observed in BRCA. High GLI1 expression indicated better survival outcomes and was correlated with the age and stage of BRCA patients. GLI1 was involved in immune status, as evidenced by its strong correlations with immune and stromal scores and the infiltration levels of multiple immune cells. Meanwhile, GLI1 was co-expressed with multiple immune-related genes, and high GLI1 expression was associated with the activation of immune-related pathways, such as binding to proteasome and mismatch repair and retinol metabolism signaling pathways. Additionally, the differential expression of GLI1 may be related to the effect of immunotherapy on CTLA-4, PD-1, and other signals, and can effectively predict the immune efficacy.

Conclusion

Our study underscores the critical role of GLI1 in BRCA, both as a potential tumor suppressor and an immune regulator. The association between GLI1 expression and favorable prognosis suggests its potential as a prognostic biomarker and immunotherapeutic target in BRCA.

Targeting IGF-IR improves neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancers with low IGFBP7 expression

There has been a long-standing interest in targeting the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) signaling system in breast cancer due to its key role in neoplastic proliferation and survival. However, no IGF-1R targeting agent has shown substantial clinical benefit in controlled phase 3 trials, and no biomarker has been shown to have clinical utility in the prediction of benefit from an IGF-1R targeting agent. IGFBP7 is an atypical insulin-like growth factor binding protein as it has a higher affinity for the IGF-1R than IGF ligands. We report that low IGFBP7 gene expression identifies a subset of breast cancers for which the addition of ganitumab, an anti-IGF-1R monoclonal antibody, to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, substantially improved the pathological complete response rate compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The pCR rate in the chemotherapy plus ganitumab arm was 46.9% in patients in the lowest quartile of IGFBP7 expression, in contrast to only 5.6% in the highest quartile. Furthermore, high IGFBP7 expression predicted increased distant metastasis risk. If our findings are confirmed, decisions to halt the development of IGF-1R targeting drugs, which were based on disappointing results of prior trials that did not use predictive biomarkers, should be reviewed.

Updates in Systemic Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Hormone-receptor positive (HR +) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative early breast cancer (eBC) is a heterogeneous disease with several contributing factors for increased risk of recurrence, including tumor features, individual biomarkers, and genomic risk. The current standard approach in the management of HR + /HER2neg eBC includes chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (ET), and additional therapies based on risk profile, menopausal status, and genetics are sometimes appropriate. The risk of recurrence is more pronounced in patients with high-risk eBC including large tumor size, nodal involvement, high proliferative index, and genetic predisposition. In premenopausal patients with high-risk eBC, ovarian function suppression in combination with adjuvant ET improves survival. In postmenopausal patients, extended aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy can be considered. Recent trials have identified novel treatment approaches to reduce the risk of recurrence in high-risk HR + /HER2neg eBC including the addition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors to adjuvant ET. For patients with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, adjuvant poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been shown to improve overall survival (OS). However, despite these recent advances, the risk of recurrence remains substantial, highlighting an area of unmet need. There are several ongoing clinical trials further investigating the role of CDK 4/6 inhibitors and immunotherapy in high-risk HR + /HER2neg eBC.

Window of opportunity trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have a relatively poor clinical outcome. The immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy is the current standard of care in TNBC patients with stage II and III. Monotherapy with ICIs has not been comprehensively assessed in the neoadjuvant setting in TNBC patients, given unfavorable results in metastatic trials. ICIs, however, have been tested in the window of opportunity (WOO) before surgery or standard chemotherapy-based neoadjuvant treatment. The WOO design is well suited to assess an ICI alone or in combination with other ICIs, targeted therapy, radiotherapy or cryotherapy, and measure their pharmacodynamic and clinical effect in this treatment-naive population. Some patients show a good response to ICIs in WOO studies. Biomarkers like tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, programmed death ligand-1, and interferon-γ signature may predict activity and may identify patients likely to benefit from ICIs. Moreover, an increase in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, programmed death ligand-1 expression or T cell receptor expansion following administration of ICIs in the WOO setting could potentially inform of immunotherapy benefit, which would allow tailoring further treatment. This article reviews WOO trials that assessed immunotherapy in the early-stage TNBC population, and how these results could be translated to test de-escalation strategies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy without compromising a patient's prognosis.

Precision Oncology Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Phase II Clinical Trials with Biomarker-Driven, Adaptive Design

Novel clinical trial designs are conducted in the precision medicine era. This study aimed to evaluate biomarker-driven, adaptive phase II trials in precision oncology, focusing on infrastructure, efficacy, and safety. We systematically reviewed and analyzed the target studies. EMBASE and PubMed searches from 2015 to 2023 generated 29 eligible trials. Data extraction included infrastructure, biomarker screening methodologies, efficacy, and safety profiles. Government agencies, cancer hospitals, and academic societies with accumulated experiences led investigator-initiated precision oncology clinical trials (IIPOCTs), which later guided sponsor-initiated precision oncology clinical trials (SIPOCTs). Most SIPOCTs were international studies with basket design. IIPOCTs primarily used the central laboratory for biomarker screening, but SIPOCTs used both central and local laboratories. Most of the studies adapted next-generation sequencing and/or immunohistochemistry for biomarker screening. Fifteen studies included an independent central review committee for outcome investigation. Efficacy assessments predominantly featured objective response rate as the primary endpoint, with varying results. Nine eligible studies contributed to the United States Food and Drug Administration's marketing authorization. Safety monitoring was rigorous, but reporting formats lacked uniformity. Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes were described in some protocols but rarely reported. Our results reveal that precision oncology trials with adaptive design rapidly and efficiently evaluate anticancer drugs' efficacy and safety, particularly in specified biomarker-driven cohorts. The evolution from IIPOCT to SIPOCT has facilitated fast regulatory approval, providing valuable insights into the precision oncology landscape.

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy/adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: quality-of-life results from the randomized KEYNOTE-522 study

BACKGROUND

In KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488), neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and then adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved pathological complete response and event-free survival vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYNOTE-522.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks, plus 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin and then 4 cycles of doxorubicin (or epirubicin) plus cyclophosphamide. After surgery, patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo for up to 9 cycles. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC Breast Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23) were prespecified secondary objectives. Between-group differences in least squares (LS) mean change from baseline (day 1 of cycle 1 in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases) to the prespecified latest time point with at least 60% completion and at least 80% compliance were assessed using a longitudinal model (no alpha error assigned).

RESULTS

Week 21 (neoadjuvant phase) and week 24 (adjuvant phase) were the latest time points at which completion/compliance rates were ≥60%/80%. In the neoadjuvant phase, between-group differences (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy [n = 762] vs placebo plus chemotherapy [n = 383]) in LS mean change from baseline to week 21 in QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), emotional functioning, and physical functioning were -1.04 (95% confidence interval = -3.46 to 1.38), -0.69 (95% CI = -3.13 to 1.75), and -2.85 (95% CI = -5.11 to -0.60), respectively. In the adjuvant phase, between-group differences (pembrolizumab [n = 539] vs placebo [n = 308]) in LS mean change from baseline to week 24 were -0.41 (95% CI = -2.60 to 1.77), -0.60 (95% CI = -2.99 to 1.79), and -1.57 (95% CI = -3.36 to 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

No substantial differences in PRO assessments were observed between neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab vs neoadjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036488.

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Recent studies have investigated the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer. However, there is an ongoing debate about the optimal approach for integrating this strategy.

Objectives

To evaluate the association of neoadjuvant ICIs with pathologic complete response (pCR) across molecular phenotypes, to quantify the survival benefits of ICIs beyond pCR status, and to estimate the incidence of specific adverse events.

Data Sources

The PubMed database was searched on December 10, 2023, to identify all potential eligible studies.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed (neo)adjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data from the eligible RCTs were extracted by 2 reviewers. An extracted individual patient data meta-analysis and a trial-level random-effect meta-analysis were performed.

Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)

Outcomes were pCR, event-free survival (EFS) in patients with and without pCR, and adverse events. Hazard ratios were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results

Nine RCTs involving 5114 patients met the inclusion criteria (2097 triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC], 1924 hormone receptor-positive [HR+]/ERBB2-negative [ERBB2-], and 1115 ERBB2+ tumors). In TNBC, the addition of ICIs was associated with an improved pCR rate regardless of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status (absolute improvement, >10%). In HR+/ ERBB2- tumors, the administration of ICIs was associated with improved pCR only in the PD-L1-positive (PD-L1+) population (absolute improvement, +12.2%), whereas no benefit was observed in ERBB2+ tumors. In patients with TNBC achieving a pCR, the addition of ICIs was associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-1.00), resulting in a 5-year EFS of 92.0% with ICIs compared with 88.0% without them. In patients with residual disease, ICIs also showed better EFS (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98), resulting in a 5-year EFS of 63.3% with ICIs and 56.1% without them. Adjuvant ICI did not show numerical improvement in patients with either pCR or residual disease (all hazard ratios >1). During the neoadjuvant treatment, the incidence of grade 3 or greater immune-related adverse events with ICI was 10.3%.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that neoadjuvant ICI therapy improves efficacy outcomes in early-stage TNBC and PD-L1+ HR+/ERBB2- tumors with an acceptable safety profile; however, no benefit was observed with adjuvant ICI. Given the financial and toxicity costs associated with ICIs, future research should prioritize identifying patients most likely to benefit from the addition of ICIs to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Comprehensive Axillary Management of Clinically Node-Positive (cN+) Breast Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In breast cancer (BC) patients, axillary management has undergone major improvements over the last few years, and efforts to identify the optimal strategy for the management of axillary surgery are still ongoing.

METHODS

In current clinical practice, women with clinically node-positive (cN+) BC usually receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with the aim of reducing the extent of primary disease and, thus, allowing for axillary-conservative surgery. Remarkably, after NACT, up to one out of three patients achieves an axillary pathologic complete response, which, in turn, is associated with a more favorable prognosis than residual axillary disease. However, NACT is not without drawbacks, as NACT-associated inflammation can damage lymphatic vessels. Furthermore, varying degrees of response may occur in the axillary lymph nodes, increasing the false negative rate for sentinel biopsy.

RESULTS

At present, there is no consensus on the optimal approach in patients with cN+ BC undergoing NACT, although multidisciplinary management seems to be recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of axillary management in cN+ BC patients undergoing NACT. It uses a multidisciplinary approach that encompasses the oncological management perspectives, as well as surgical and chemotherapeutic viewpoints.

Present and Future of Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks the expression of estrogen receptors (ERs), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and progesterone receptors (PRs). TNBC has the poorest prognosis among breast cancer subtypes and is more likely to respond to immunotherapy due to its higher expression of PD-L1 and a greater percentage of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Immunotherapy has revolutionized TNBC treatment, especially with the FDA's approval of pembrolizumab (Keytruda) combined with chemotherapy for advanced cases, opening new avenues for treating this deadly disease. Although immunotherapy can significantly improve patient outcomes in a subset of patients, achieving the desired response rate for all remains an unmet clinical goal. Strategies that enhance responses to immune checkpoint blockade, including combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapy, or radiotherapy, may improve response rates and clinical outcomes. In this review, we provide a short background on TNBC and immunotherapy and explore the different types of immunotherapy strategies that are currently being evaluated in TNBC. Additionally, we review why combination strategies may be beneficial, provide an overview of the combination strategies, and discuss the novel immunotherapeutic opportunities that may be approved in the near future for TNBC.

Shifting the Paradigm: The Transformative Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer

The use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has become increasingly important in the treatment of breast cancer because of its various advantages. These include the ability to downstage tumors without compromising locoregional control and the potential to obtain valuable information about clinical and biological response to therapy with implications for individual prognoses. Surgical response assessment paves the way for response-adapted therapy, and pathological complete response (pCR; defined as ypT0/is ypN0) serves as an additional endpoint for drug development trials. Recommended NST regimens commonly consist of anthracyclines and taxane, with dose-dense anthracyclines and weekly paclitaxel often preferred, whenever feasible. For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive tumors, dual anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) is indicated together with NST in case of elevated risk of recurrence. For patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), adding carboplatin to NST correlates with improved pCR and survival rates, as does the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors. For hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative cancers, emerging data on NST including immune checkpoint inhibitors may elevate the significance of NST in high-risk luminal breast cancer. Here, we present a synthesis of the results from neoadjuvant clinical trials that aim at optimizing treatment options for patients with high-risk breast cancer.

Surgical outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with and without immunotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

Adding pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) improves pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and event-free survival. The impact of adding immunotherapy to NAC on surgical outcomes is unknown. This study compares 90-day post-surgical complications (PSCs) and time to adjuvant treatment among patients undergoing NAC for TNBC with and without immunotherapy.

METHODS

Patients treated with NAC alone or with immunotherapy (NAC-I) for stage I-III TNBC between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively identified at a single academic institution. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum and Fisher's exact tests compared patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression determined odds ratios (OR) predicting PSCs.

RESULTS

Of 54 patients, 29 received NAC alone and 25 received NAC-I. Compared to NAC patients, NAC-I patients had more advanced stage tumors (p = 0.038), and had slightly higher rates of mastectomy with reconstruction (p = 0.193). 72.0% of NAC-I patients experienced a pCR, compared with 44.8% of NAC patients (p = 0.193). There were 10 PSCs (34.5%) in NAC patients compared to 9 PSCs (36.0%) in NAC-I patients (p > 0.99). Regression analysis demonstrated no association of PSCs with NAC-I (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.19-3.60). Time to adjuvant therapy was shorter for NAC-I patients (28 days vs 36 days, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TNBC receiving NAC-I have higher pCR rates and do not appear to have added 90-day PSCs or delays to adjuvant therapy despite trending toward more extensive surgical procedures compared to NAC alone. Larger studies are needed to further evaluate the surgical safety of immunotherapy.

A hierarchically acidity-unlocking nanoSTING stimulant enables cascaded STING activation for potent innate and adaptive antitumor immunity

Rationale: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been recognized as an indispensable strategy for advanced malignancies. Nevertheless, the enhancement of overall patient survival in NAC recipients has encountered challenges due to the limited sustainability of its efficacy and the inability to prevent postoperative tumor recurrence and metastasis. Methods: We devise a hierarchically unlocking nanoSTING stimulant liposome (AUG) as a neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy agent in the debulking of tumors prior to surgery and prevention of postoperative tumor recurrence and metastasis by simultaneously activating innate and adaptive antitumor immune responses. In the weakly acidic tumor microenvironment, the hydrazone bond within AUG is initially cleaved, leading to the release of a cyclic seven-membered ring containing tertiary amine that serve to activate the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway. Following this, AUG undergoes degradation within lysosomes, facilitating the release of doxorubicin and ultimately inducing immunogenic cell death along with leakage of double-stranded DNA into the cytoplasm. Results: The hierarchically acidity-unlocking pattern enables cascaded STING activation, achieving over 90% tumor growth inhibition in subcutaneous xenograft model and preventing 75% of mice from postsurgical metastasis or recurrence when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusion: Our strategy highlights the potency of AUG as a neoadjuvant paradigm for presurgical tumor debulking and as a preventive measure against postoperative tumor recurrence and metastasis.

Learning chemical sensitivity reveals mechanisms of cellular response

Chemical probes interrogate disease mechanisms at the molecular level by linking genetic changes to observable traits. However, comprehensive chemical screens in diverse biological models are impractical. To address this challenge, we develop ChemProbe, a model that predicts cellular sensitivity to hundreds of molecular probes and drugs by learning to combine transcriptomes and chemical structures. Using ChemProbe, we infer the chemical sensitivity of cancer cell lines and tumor samples and analyze how the model makes predictions. We retrospectively evaluate drug response predictions for precision breast cancer treatment and prospectively validate chemical sensitivity predictions in new cellular models, including a genetically modified cell line. Our model interpretation analysis identifies transcriptome features reflecting compound targets and protein network modules, identifying genes that drive ferroptosis. ChemProbe is an interpretable in silico screening tool that allows researchers to measure cellular response to diverse compounds, facilitating research into molecular mechanisms of chemical sensitivity.

Associations of Immune Checkpoint Predictive Biomarkers (MHC-I and MHC-II) with Clinical and Molecular Features in a Diverse Breast Cancer Cohort

PURPOSE

Immunotherapy (IO) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has improved survival outcomes, with promising improvements in pCR rates among early high-risk hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- breast cancers. However, biomarkers are needed to select patients likely to benefit from IO. MHC-I and tumor-specific MHC-II (tsMHC-II) expression are candidate biomarkers for PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibition but existing data from clinical trials included limited racial/ethnic diversity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed multiplexed immunofluorescence assays in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS; n = 1,628, 48% Black, 52% non-Black). Intrinsic subtype and P53 mutant-like status were identified using RNA-based multigene assays. We ranked participants based on tumoral MHC-I intensity (top 33% categorized as "MHC-Ihigh") and MHC-II+ (≥5% of tumor cells as tsMHC-II+). MHC-I/II were evaluated in association with clinicopathological features by race.

RESULTS

Black participants had higher frequency of TNBC (25% vs. 12.5%, P ≤ 0.001) and basal-like (30% vs. 14%, P ≤ 0.001) tumors overall, and higher frequency of basal-like (11% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.002) and TP53 mutant tumors (26% vs. 17%, P = 0.002) among HR+/HER2-. The frequency of tsMHC-II+ was higher in HR+/HER2- Black participants (7.9% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.04). Black participants also had higher frequency of MHC-Ihigh (38.7% vs. 28.2%, P < 0.001), which was significant among HR+/HER2- (28.2% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In this diverse study population, MHC-I and MHC-II tumor cell expression were more highly expressed in HR+/HER2- tumors from Black women, underscoring the importance of diverse and equitable enrollment in future IO trials.

The use of nanomaterials as drug delivery systems and anticancer agents in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: an updated review (year 2005 to date)

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterised by the lack or low expression of estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptors. TNBC has a high recurrence rate, swiftly metastasizes, and has a high mortality rate. Subsequently, the increase in cases of TNBC has signaled the need for treatment strategies with improved drug delivery systems. New diagnostic approaches, chemical entities, formulations particular those in the nanometric range have emerged after extensive scientific research as alternative strategies for TNBC treatment. As compared to contemporary cancer therapy, nanoparticles offer peculiar tunable features namely small size, shape, electrical charge, magnetic and fluorescent properties. Specifically in targeted drug delivery, nanoparticles have been demonstrated to be highly efficient in encapsulating, functionalization, and conjugation. Presently, nanoparticles have ignited and transformed the approach in photodynamic therapy, bioimaging, use of theranostics and precision medicine delivery in breast cancer. Correspondingly, recent years have witnessed a drastic rise in literature pertaining to treatment of TNBC using nanomaterials. Subsequently, this manuscript aims to present a state-of-the-art of nanomaterials advance on TNBC treatment; the ubiquitous utility use of nanomaterials such as liposomes, dendrimers, solid lipid nanomaterials, gold nanomaterials and quantum dots as anticancer agents and drug delivery systems in TNBC.

Protein biomarkers for subtyping breast cancer and implications for future research: a 2024 update

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer subtyping is used clinically for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decisions. Subtypes are categorized by cell of origin, histomorphology, gene expression signatures, hormone receptor status, and/or protein levels. Categorizing breast cancer based on gene expression signatures aids in assessing a patient's recurrence risk. Protein biomarkers, on the other hand, provide functional data for selecting therapies for primary and recurrent tumors. We provide an update on protein biomarkers in breast cancer subtypes and their application in prognosis and therapy selection.

AREAS COVERED

Protein pathways in breast cancer subtypes are reviewed in the context of current protein-targeted treatment options. PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies between 2017 and 17 August 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

Post-translationally modified proteins and their unmodified counterparts have become clinically useful biomarkers for defining breast cancer subtypes from a therapy perspective. Tissue heterogeneity influences treatment outcomes and disease recurrence. Spatial profiling has revealed complex cellular subpopulations within the breast tumor microenvironment. Deciphering the functional relationships between and within tumor clonal cell populations will further aid in defining breast cancer subtypes and create new treatment paradigms for recurrent, drug resistant, and metastatic disease.

Recent Advances in Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Review

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women in the world, and its incidence is increasing year by year, which seriously threatens the physical and mental health of women. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a special molecular type of breast cancer in which estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 are negative. Compared with other molecular types of breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has high aggressiveness and metastasis, high recurrence rate, lack of effective therapeutic targets, and usually poor clinical treatment effect. Chemotherapy was the main therapeutic means used in the past. With the advent of the immune era, immunotherapy has made a lot of progress in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), bringing new therapeutic hope for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. This review combines the results of cutting-edge medical research, mainly summarizes the research progress of immunotherapy, and summarizes the main treatment methods of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor vaccines, adoptive immunotherapy and the application of traditional Chinese and western medicine. It provides a new idea for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Efficacy and safety of different regimens of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, her2-negative breast cancer: a network meta-analysis

Introduction

The objective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) is to assess the effectiveness and safety of various neoadjuvant treatment protocols in individuals diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, her2 negative(HR+/HER2-) breast cancer.

Materials and methods

A systematic search was conducted in four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL) from the inception of the databases to January 16, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to various neoadjuvant therapy options in patients diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. A network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pathological complete response (pCR).

Results

There were 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the analysis. These trials examined 16 different treatment regimens and involved a total of 5752 participants. The analysis revealed that the six most effective neoadjuvant treatment regimens for HR+/HER2- breast cancer were: CT(A)+olaparib (82.5%), CT(A)+nivolumab (76.5%), Com (74.9%), CT (72.1%), Mono+eribulin (72.0%), and CT(A)+pembrolizumab (70.4%).Paired meta-analysis for pathological complete response (pCR) found no statistically significant distinction between treatment regimens that included both anthracycline and immunosuppressants and regimens that relied solely on anthracycline chemotherapy(OR:1.14, 95%ci 0.79-1.64, I2 = 71%, P=0.50). Similarly, there was no significant difference between platinum-based chemotherapy and anthracycline-basedchemotherapy(OR:1.37, 95%ci 0.53- 3.56, I2 = 11%, P=0.52). With regards to safety, adverse effects of grade 3-5 were observed, which included haematological toxicity, gastrointestinal reactions, skin and mucous membrane reactions, neuropathy, hepatotoxicity, and cardiac disorders.

Conclusions

The CT(A)+Olaparib and CT(A)+nivolumab groups demonstrated superior efficacy in neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Furthermore, it is crucial to focus on effectively managing the adverse effects of the treatment plan to enhance patient's ability to tolerate it. Given the constraints of the current research, additional well-executed and suitable RCTs are necessary to validate the findings of this investigation. Although pCR is valuable in assessing the effect of neoadjuvant therapy in some cases, prognostic prediction and efficacy assessment in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer should be based on a combination of broader clinical and biological characteristics.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024534539, CRD42024501740.

Correlation and predictive value of pathological complete response and ultrasound characteristic parameters in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer ranks as one of the most prevalent malignant tumors among women, significantly endangering their health and lives. While radical surgery has been a pivotal method for halting disease progression, it alone is insufficient for enhancing the quality of life for patients.

AIM

To investigate the correlation between ultrasound characteristic parameters of breast cancer lesions and clinical efficacy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Employing a case-control study design, this research involved 178 breast cancer patients treated with NAC at our hospital from July 2019 to June 2022. According to the Miller-Payne grading system, the pathological response, i.e. efficacy, of the NAC in the initial breast lesion after NAC was evaluated. Of these, 59 patients achieved a pathological complete response (PCR), while 119 did not (non-PCR group). Ultrasound characteristics prior to NAC were compared between these groups, and the association of various factors with NAC efficacy was analyzed using univariate and multivariate approaches.

RESULTS

In the PCR group, the incidence of posterior echo attenuation, lesion diameter ≥ 2.0 cm, and Alder blood flow grade ≥ II were significantly lower compared to the non-PCR group (P < 0.05). The area under the curve values for predicting NAC efficacy using posterior echo attenuation, lesion diameter, and Alder grade were 0.604, 0.603, and 0.583, respectively. Also, rates of pathological stage II, lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, and positive Ki-67 expression were significantly lower in the PCR group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified posterior echo attenuation, lesion diameter ≥ 2.0 cm, Alder blood flow grade ≥ II, pathological stage III, vascular invasion, and positive Ki-67 expression as independent predictors of poor response to NAC in breast cancer patients (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

While ultrasound characteristics such as posterior echo attenuation, lesion diameter ≥ 2.0 cm, and Alder blood flow grade ≥ II exhibit limited predictive value for NAC efficacy, they are significantly associated with poor response to NAC in breast cancer patients.

Research hotspots and frontiers of neoadjuvant therapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis of publications between 2002 and 2023

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive type of breast cancer with poor prognosis, and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has emerged as an important component in managing advanced-stage patients by providing surgical opportunities and improving survival outcomes. A search of publications on NAT for TNBC from 2002 to 2023 was conducted through the Web of Science core collection. A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted on the data using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix. The analysis revealed a continuous and steady growth in the number of articles published in this field over the past 20 years. The United States has made significant contributions to this field, with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center publishing the most articles. Loibl, S. from Germany was found to be the most published author with 54 articles. Analysis of the journals showed that the Journal of Clinical Oncology is the most cited journal. Combined with the keyword co-occurrence analysis and clustering analysis, current research topic focuses on treatment regimens and disease prognosis. Dual-map overlay of the journals indicates that the research trend is gradually shifting from molecular biology and genetics to immunology and clinical research. Combination therapy, including immunotherapy, may be the future direction for NAT treatment of TNBC. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the current research status, latest advancements, and emerging development trend of NAT for TNBC.

Towards targeting the breast cancer immune microenvironment

The tumour immune microenvironment is shaped by the crosstalk between cancer cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells and other stromal components. Although the immune tumour microenvironment (TME) serves as a source of therapeutic targets, it is also considered a friend or foe to tumour-directed therapies. This is readily illustrated by the importance of T cells in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), culminating in the advent of immune checkpoint therapy in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy as standard of care for both early and advanced-stage TNBC, as well as recent promising signs of efficacy in a subset of hormone receptor-positive disease. In this Review, we discuss the various components of the immune TME in breast cancer and therapies that target or impact the immune TME, as well as the complexity of host physiology.

Genomics in Clinical trials for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (B.C.) still has increasing incidences and mortality rates globally. It is known that B.C. and other cancers have a very high rate of genetic heterogeneity and genomic mutations. Traditional oncology approaches have not been able to provide a lasting solution. Targeted therapeutics have been instrumental in handling the complexity and resistance associated with B.C. However, the progress of genomic technology has transformed our understanding of the genetic landscape of breast cancer, opening new avenues for improved anti-cancer therapeutics. Genomics is critical in developing tailored therapeutics and identifying patients most benefit from these treatments. The next generation of breast cancer clinical trials has incorporated next-generation sequencing technologies into the process, and we have seen benefits. These innovations have led to the approval of better-targeted therapies for patients with breast cancer. Genomics has a role to play in clinical trials, including genomic tests that have been approved, patient selection and prediction of therapeutic response. Multiple clinical trials in breast cancer have been done and are still ongoing, which have applied genomics technology. Precision medicine can be achieved in breast cancer therapy with increased efforts and advanced genomic studies in this domain. Genomics studies assist with patient outcomes improvement and oncology advancement by providing a deeper understanding of the biology behind breast cancer. This article will examine the present state of genomics in breast cancer clinical trials.

Targeting the tumor microenvironment to improve clinical outcomes in triple negative breast cancer patients and bridge the current disparity gap

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogenous disease that disproportionately affects Black women. TNBC outcomes among Black women are dismal secondary to multiple factors, such as poor healthcare accessibility resulting in delays in diagnosis, and aggressive disease biology in addition to a pro-tumor immune microenvironment (TME). Black women with breast cancer exhibit elevated levels of serum pro-inflammatory cytokines, and a pro-tumorigenic TME with higher immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs), M2 macrophages and exhausted CD8+ T cells. We have shown that the combined use of toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) ligands with interferon-α (chemokine modulation: CKM) is able to enrich the tumor with CD8+ T cells, while not increasing immunosuppressive cells. Recent clinical trials have revealed the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in rejuvenizing exhausted CD8+ T cells. We hypothesize that strategies to modulate the TME by enriching chemokines that attract CD8+T cells followed by reversal of CD8+ T cell exhaustion (ICI), when added to standard treatment, could potentially improve clinical outcomes, and mitigate the racial disparities in TNBC outcomes between Black and White Women.

Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is a disease encompassing a spectrum of molecular subtypes and clinical presentations, each with distinct prognostic implications and treatment responses. Breast cancer has traditionally been considered an immunologically "cold" tumor, unresponsive to immunotherapy. However, clinical trials in recent years have found immunotherapy to be an efficacious therapeutic option for select patients. Breast cancer is categorized into different subtypes ranging from the most common positive hormone receptor (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative type, to less frequent HER2- positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), highlighting the necessity for tailored treatment strategies aimed at maximizing patient outcomes. Despite notable progress in early detection and new therapeutic modalities, breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in the USA. Moreover, in recent decades, breast cancer incidence rates have been increasing, especially in women younger than the age of 50. This has prompted the exploration of new therapeutic approaches to address this trend, offering new therapeutic prospects for breast cancer patients. Immunotherapy is a class of therapeutic agents that has revolutionized the treatment landscape of many cancers, namely melanoma, lung cancer, and gastroesophageal cancers, amongst others. Though belatedly, immunotherapy has entered the treatment armamentarium of breast cancer, with the approval of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the neoadjuvant and advanced settings, thereby paving the path for further research and integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors in other subtypes of breast cancer. Trials exploring various combination therapies to harness the power of immunotherapy in symbiosis with various chemotherapeutic agents are ongoing in hopes of improving response rates and prolonging survival for breast cancer patients. Biomarkers and precise patient selection for the utilization of immunotherapy remain cardinal and are currently under investigation, with some biomarkers showing promise, such as Program Death Lignat-1 (PDL-1) Combined Positive Score, Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB), and Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs). This review will present the current landscape of immunotherapy, particularly checkpoint inhibitors, in different types of breast cancer.

Mature tertiary lymphoid structures: important contributors to anti-tumor immune efficacy

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) represent the ectopic aggregations of immune cells arising during chronic inflammation or tumor progression. In cancer, TLS are often associated with beneficial clinical outcomes in patients undergoing immunotherapy, underscoring their prognostic and predictive significance. Mature TLS, characterized by germinal centers and areas of T-cell and B-cell aggregation, are considered primary locations for activating and maintaining both humoral and cellular anti-tumor immune effects. Despite their recognized importance, the mechanisms driving the formation of mature TLS in cancer and their influence on the immune response within tumors remain insufficiently understood. Therefore, this review aims to comprehensively explore the structural composition, development mechanisms, maturity impact factors, immunological function, and innovative therapeutic strategies of mature TLS within the tumor microenvironment. The research summarized herein offers novel insights and considerations for therapeutic approaches to promote TLS generation and maturation in patients with cancer, representing a promising avenue for future cancer therapies.

Assessing risks and knowledge gaps on the impact of systemic therapies in early breast cancer on female fertility: A systematic review of the literature

The therapeutic landscape for early breast cancer (eBC) has expanded by introducing novel anticancer agents into clinical practice. During their reproductive years, women with eBC should be informed of the potential risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and infertility with the proposed systemic therapy. Although the topic of female fertility is becoming increasingly relevant in patients with cancer, limited information is available on the gonadotoxicity of new agents available for eBC treatment. Analyses from clinical trials and prospective data on ovarian function biomarkers are lacking. The purpose of this systematic review is to report the available preclinical and clinical data on female fertility risk with the use of the new agents that are part of clinical practice use or under development for eBC management. This review highlights the clear need to perform additional research efforts to improve our understanding on the gonoadtoxicity of new anticancer agents.

A review concerning the breast cancer-related tumour microenvironment

Breast cancer (BC) is currently the most common malignant tumour in women and one of the leading causes of their death around the world. New and increasingly personalised diagnostic and therapeutic tools have been introduced over the last few decades, along with significant advances regarding the study and knowledge related to BC. The tumour microenvironment (TME) refers to the tumour cell-associated cellular and molecular environment which can influence conditions affecting tumour development and progression. The TME is composed of immune cells, stromal cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) and signalling molecules secreted by these different cell types. Ever deeper understanding of TME composition changes during tumour development and progression will enable new and more innovative therapeutic strategies to become developed for targeting tumours during specific stages of its evolution. This review summarises the role of BC-related TME components and their influence on tumour progression and the development of resistance to therapy. In addition, an account on the modifications in BC-related TME components associated with therapy is given, and the completed or ongoing clinical trials related to this topic are presented.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer is controversial and requires a comprehensive analysis for optimal therapy assessment. Therefore, a two-step Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of different neoadjuvant regimens.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing various neoadjuvant therapies for HR+/HER2- breast cancer were included. NMA and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted using Stata (version 14), R (version 4.2.3), and Review Manager 5.4.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies (5,625 patients) were eligible. NMA of objective response rate (ORR) indicated the highest SUCRA for chemotherapy (CT) and chemotherapy with anthracycline (CT(A)). Pathologic complete response (PCR) NMA demonstrated significant PCR improvement with chemotherapy regimens containing programmed cell death protein-1 and programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors (PD-1i/PD-L1i) and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Combined analysis considering both the ORR and safety highlighted CT(A)'s efficacy and toxicity balance.

CONCLUSIONS

CT(A) and CT showed improved ORR compared with alternative regimens. CT(A) combined with PD-1/PD-L1 or PARP inhibitors significantly increased PCR rates. Comprehensive assessment of both ORR and safety indicated that CT(A) represents an optimal neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2- breast cancer, whereas AI + CDK4/6 inhibitors rank solely behind chemotherapy.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024538948. International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) registration number INPLASY202440092.

Navigating practical challenges in immunotherapy for metastatic triple negative breast cancer

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer therapy and now represents a standard of care for many tumor types, including triple-negative breast cancer. Despite the positive results that have led to the approval of immunotherapy in both early- and advanced-stage triple-negative breast cancer, pivotal clinical trials cannot address the myriad questions arising in everyday clinical practice, often falling short in delivering all the information that clinicians require. In this manuscript, we aim to address some of these practical questions, with the purpose of providing clinicians with a guide for optimizing the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of breast cancer patients and identifying opportunities for future research to clarify unresolved questions.

Efficacy and safety of a combination treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy have showed its benefits in clinical studies, and here we conducted a further evaluation on the safety and efficacy of this treatment strategy.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library to identify clinical studies on ICIs and chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. The primary efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Random or fixed effects models were used to estimate pooled Hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR) and the data of 95% confidence interval (CI) depend on the Heterogeneity. Cochrane risk assessment tool was used to assess risk of bias. We also drew forest plots and funnel plots, respectively.

RESULTS

Seven studies with intend-to-treat (ITT) population for 3255 patients were analyzed. ICIs pooled therapy showed clinical benefits compared with chemotherapy alone, improving PFS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74-0.90) of patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC), especially in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors. However, it had no effect on OS (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-1.01). Besides, mTNBC patients received pooled therapy were less frequently to have AEs (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.54). In patients with metastatic Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer, pooled therapy showed no benefit for PFS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.50-1.28) and OS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.48-1.58).

CONCLUSION

Pooled therapy had improved PFS in mTNBC patients, especially in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, and it was less likely to cause grade ≥ 3 AEs.

Peroxiporins in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Biomarker Potential and Therapeutic Perspectives

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains one of the most challenging subtypes since it is initially characterized by the absence of specific biomarkers and corresponding targeted therapies. Advances in methodology, translational informatics, genomics, and proteomics have significantly contributed to the identification of therapeutic targets. The development of innovative treatments, such as antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors, alongside chemotherapy, has now become the standard of care. However, the quest for biomarkers defining therapy outcomes is still ongoing. Peroxiporins, which comprise a subgroup of aquaporins, which are membrane pores facilitating the transport of water, glycerol, and hydrogen peroxide, have emerged as potential biomarkers for therapy response. Research on peroxiporins reveals their involvement beyond traditional channeling activities, which is also reflected in their cellular localization and roles in cellular signaling pathways. This research on peroxiporins provides fresh insights into the mechanisms of therapy resistance in tumors, offering potential avenues for predicting treatment outcomes and tailoring successful TNBC therapies.

Endocrine adverse events in patients with cancer receiving perioperative immune checkpoint blockade: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Perioperative use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) improves survival in patients with early-stage cancer. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs), frequently involve the endocrine system which may increase perioperative complications and affect quality of life.

Objective

We conducted a meta-analysis to elucidate the impact of adding ICB to conventional neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy on the incidence of endocrine AEs.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomize-controlled trials (RCTs).

Data sources and methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library was performed for RCTs comparing groups with and without the addition of ICB to conventional perioperative therapy in patients with cancer. Outcomes included all-grade and grade 3-5 thyroiditis, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, hypophysitis, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and hyperglycemia. The odds ratios (ORs) of all-grade and grade 3-5 endocrine were pooled using the random-effect model meta-analysis.

Results

Twenty-four RCTs comprising 12,199 patients were identified for meta-analysis. The addition of ICB was associated with higher incidence of thyroiditis [all grade: OR = 3.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.88-6.64)], hyperthyroidism [all-grade: 7.18 (4.30-12.01); grade 3-5: 3.93 (1.21-12.82)], hypothyroidism [all-grade: 5.39 (3.68-7.90); grade 3-5: 3.63 (1.18-11.11)], adrenal insufficiency [all-grade: 3.82 (1.88-7.79); grade 3-5: 5.91 (2.36-14.82)], hypophysitis [all-grade: 10.29 (4.97-21.3); grade 3-5: 5.80 (1.99-16.92)], and type 1 diabetes mellitus [all-grade: 2.24 (1.06-4.74); grade 3-5: 3.49 (1.21-10.08)]. The cumulative incidence of each grade 3-5 endocrine AE was low (<1.3%). No grade 5 AEs leading to death were observed.

Conclusion

The addition of neoadjuvant/adjuvant ICB to conventional therapy was associated with an increased incidence of several endocrine AEs. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of endocrinopathy from the perioperative ICB use to facilitate risk-benefit discussion with patients with early-stage cancer.

Trial registration

The protocol of this research was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022332624).