Guidelines for Antenatal and Preoperative care in Cesarean Delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 1)

The role of supraglottic airway devices in obstetric anaesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the role of supraglottic airway devices as rescue and primary airway devices in pregnant patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

General anaesthesia in pregnant patients is associated with increased incidence of difficult and failed intubation, especially when performed for caesarean deliveries. The Difficult Airway Society and the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association guidelines for the management of failed intubation recommend the use of second-generation supraglottic airway devices as a rescue airway strategy when failed intubation occurs. This practice is now widely accepted and embedded in routine teaching and clinical practice. On the other hand, there is little but growing evidence describing the use of supraglottic airway devices as the primary airway device and an alternative to endotracheal intubation for patients undergoing elective and emergency caesarean deliveries under general anaesthesia. Most of the published research supporting this practice was done on carefully selected patients who were nonobese and who did not have gastroesophageal reflux or anticipated difficult airway. Despite demonstrating high insertion success rates and low complication rates, these studies were underpowered and have thus far, failed to provide robust data on the true risk of aspiration in this setting.

SUMMARY

Based on current scientific data, the evidence for the safe use of supraglottic airway devices as primary airway devices during general anaesthesia for caesarean deliveries is not compelling. However, their use as rescue airway devices remains a well established strategy supported by international guidelines.

Prehabilitation in elective surgical interventions - what must the general and abdominal surgeon know

Objectives

For years, many efforts have been invested to prepare patients, in particular, those with reduced physical and psychic status, much better to provide and finally achieve better outocme if there is time available to provide several beneficial measures.

Methods

Therefore, the objective was to illustrate the concept and various single elements of a complex prehabilitation concept based on (i) selective references from the medical literature and (ii) own clinical experiences from clinical practice in general and abdominal surgery.

Results

Prehabiliation can be considered the solution of the efforts to improve preoperative status for patients in a disadvantageous status for almost all types of surgery and all other operative and/or interventional procedures. It is the targeted process to improve individual functionality and organ function before a planned (elective) surgical intervention; P. comprises basically nutritional, physical and psychological measures; P. focusses especially onto the elderly, frail and malnourished patients before a planned surgical intervention; the overall aim is to significantly improve final outcome characterized by shorter length of stay, lower complication rate and mortality as well as cost efficiency; P. is especially important in cancer surgery, in which the beneficial effects can be particularly implemented; P. programs and/or "Standard Operating Protocols" (SOP) may help to establish and materialize its single aspects and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). There is still further potential to reliably establish and to utilize the options of prehabilitation measures as listed above.

Conclusions

Prehabiliation is an indispensable aspect in today's preparation for elective surgery, which needs to become obligatory part of the preparation measures to planned surgical interventions, which can further contribute to a better final outcome and ERAS as well as, in addtion, needs to be further developed and accomplished.

Detoxification treatment in Gynecology using a modified molded sorbent

Postpartum endometritis is a common complication of cesarean section, the progression of which often leads to the loss of the uterus and the patient's fertility. We evaluated a detoxification therapy for treating patients with postpartum endometritis using an intrauterine application of a modified molded sorbent containing polyvinylpyrrolidone. A retrospective, controlled study included 124 patients with postpartum endometritis. The study group, n = 63, was composed of puerperae with postpartum endometritis after cesarean section, receiving antibacterial therapy in combination with the intrauterine application of a molded modified sorbent containing polyvinylpyrrolidone (FSMP) for 24 h daily for 5 days. The control group, n = 61, was composed of puerperae with postpartum endometritis after cesarean section, receiving antibacterial treatment only. The uterine cavity was infected by coccal flora (Enterococcus faecalis (26.6%), Staphylococcus spp. (21.3%), E. faecium (14.3%), and Gram-negative Escherichia coli (9.6%). A combination of these microorganisms was present in 40.5% of crops. Antibiotic resistance was detected in 53.6%-68.3% of the cases. In the study group, we observed: a faster and higher decrease in neutrophils (p < 0.05); a lower uterine concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines: interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) - 4.0 and 3.2 times, respectively, compared with the control group (p < 0.05); and a significant decrease in the uterus volume and cavity (M-echo). Using a newly modified sorbent associated with antibiotic treatment in patients with postpartum endometritis, compared with antibiotics alone, we showed a sharp reduction of inflammatory parameters, residual microorganism growth, and faster uterine volume involution. Moreover, the frequency of hysterectomy decreased by 14.4 times.

Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Section (ERAC): Where are We in Austria?

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations for cesarean section (ERAC), likely the most common reason for laparotomy in women, were issued in 2018-19. We examined how current perioperative management at cesarean section in Austrian hospitals aligns with ERAS recommendations.

STUDY DESIGN

We surveyed the 21 largest public obstetric units in Austria for alignment with 20 of the 31 strong ERAS recommendations regarding perioperative maternal care at cesarean section. We also looked at how the German-language clinical guideline for cesarean section (AWMF Guideline Sectio caesarea) aligns with ERAS recommendations.

RESULTS

The 21 obstetric units cared for about 51% of all births in Austria in 2019. Cesarean section rates ranged from 17.7% to 50.4%. All 21 units implemented the five strong recommendations regarding patient information and counselling, regional anesthesia, euvolemia and multimodal analgesia. The least implemented strong recommendation was the one for the use of pneumatic compression stockings to prevent thromboembolic disease (0/21 units). Overall, all 21 units implemented ≥11 and 13 (62%) implemented ≥15 (≥75%) of the 20 strong recommendations; no unit implemented all 20 strong recommendations. There were no differences in the implementation of strong recommendations according to hospital volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the absence of formal adoption of ERAS program for cesarean section many perioperative ERAS recommendations are already implemented in Austria. The least implemented recommendations were the use of pneumatic compression stockings (0 of 21 units) and immediate catheter removal (4 of 21 units). Only 10 of the 20 ERAS recommendations we looked at are included in the current German-language clinical guideline for cesarean section.

Variation in Opioid Prescribing After Vaginal and Cesarean Birth: A Statewide Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Our aim was to evaluate variation in opioid prescribing rates and prescription size following childbirth across providers and hospitals.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed claims data from a single-payer Preferred Provider Organization from June 2014 to May 2019 in 84 hospitals in a statewide quality collaborative. All patients aged 12-55 years, undergoing childbirth, with continuous enrollment in pregnancy were included. The primary outcome was the predicted rate of postpartum opioid fills from 7 days before birth to 3 days after discharge. Secondary outcomes included postpartum opioid prescription size in oral morphine equivalents, a standardized measure that includes the number of pills prescribed times the strength of the medication. Multilevel regression models accounted for clustering. We calculated attributable variation in opioid fills using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Of 41,427 births, 15,459 patients (37.2%) filled a postpartum opioid prescription (vaginal, 4,624/27,536 [16.8%]; cesarean, 10,835/13,891 [78.0%]). The median postpartum prescription size was 150 oral morphine equivalents (interquartile range [IQR], 30) (vaginal, 135; [IQR, 45]; cesarean, 150 [IQR, 75]). In adjusted models, the rates of opioid prescribing after vaginal birth differed from cesarean birth (vaginal median, 12.1% [range, 1.1%-60.0%]; cesarean median, 80.4% [range, 43.6%-90.2%]). More variation in postpartum opioid fills was attributable to providers and hospitals for vaginal (provider, 29%; hospital, 24%) than cesarean birth (provider, 8%; hospital, 6%). Variation in prescription size was driven by providers for vaginal birth (provider, 27%; hospital, 6%) and providers and hospitals for cesarean birth (provider, 29%; hospital, 21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Across a statewide quality collaborative, variation in postpartum opioid prescribing is attributable to providers and hospitals. Future efforts at the provider and hospital levels are needed to implement best practices for postpartum opioid prescribing.

Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review

Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery is a protocolized approach to perioperative care, with the aim to optimize maternal recovery after surgery. It is associated with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes, including decreased length of hospital stay, opioid consumption, pain scores, complications, increased maternal satisfaction, and increased breastfeeding success. However, the pace and enthusiasm of adoption of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery internationally has not yet been matched with high-quality evidence demonstrating its benefit, and current studies provide low- to very low-quality evidence in support of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. This article provides a summary of current measures of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery success, and optimal measures of inpatient and outpatient postpartum recovery. We summarize outcomes from 22 published enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery implementation studies and 2 meta-analyses. A variety of disparate metrics have been used to measure enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery success, including process measures (length of hospital stay, bundle compliance, preoperative fasting time, time to first mobilization, time to urinary catheter removal), maternal outcomes (patient-reported outcome measures, complications, opioid consumption, satisfaction), neonatal outcomes (breastfeeding success, Apgar scores, maternal-neonatal bonding), cost savings, and complication rates (maternal readmission rate, urinary recatheterization rate, neonatal readmission rate). A core outcome set for use in enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery studies has been developed through Delphi consensus, involving stakeholders including obstetricians, anesthesiologists, patients, and a midwife. Fifteen measures covering key aspects of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery adoption are recommended for use in future enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery implementation studies. The use of these outcome measures could improve the quality of evidence surrounding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. Using evidence-based evaluation guidelines developed by the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) group, the Obstetric Quality of Recovery score (ObsQoR) was identified as the best patient-reported outcome measure for inpatient postpartum recovery. Advances in our understanding of postpartum recovery as a multidimensional and dynamic construct have opened new avenues for the identification of optimum patient-reported outcome measures in this context. The use of standardized measures such as these will facilitate pooling of data in future studies and improve overall levels of evidence surrounding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. Larger studies with optimal study designs, using recommended outcomes including patient-reported outcome measures, will reduce variation and improve data quality to help guide future recommendations.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for cesarean delivery on postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize perioperative care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to holistically investigate the effect of implementing an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for all cesarean deliveries on postoperative pain experience.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prepost study comparing subjective and objective measures of postoperative pain before and after the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for cesarean delivery. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway was developed by a multidisciplinary team and included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative components, with emphasis on preoperative preparation, hemodynamic optimization, early mobilization, and multimodal analgesia. All individuals undergoing cesarean delivery, whether scheduled, urgent, or emergent, were included. Demographic, delivery, and inpatient pain management data were obtained through medical record review. Of note, 2 weeks after discharge, patients were surveyed about their delivery experience, analgesic usage, and complications. The primary outcome was inpatient opioid use.

RESULTS

The study included 128 individuals, 56 in the preimplementation cohort and 72 in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery cohort. Baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were similar. The survey response rate was 73% (94/128). Opioid use in the first 48 hours postoperatively was significantly lower in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group than the preimplementation group (9.4 vs 21.4 morphine milligram equivalents 0-24 hours after delivery [P<.001]; 14.1 vs 25.4 morphine milligram equivalents 24-48 hours after delivery [P<.001]) with no increase in either average or maximum postoperative pain scores. Individuals in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group used fewer opioid pills after discharge (10 vs 20; P<.001). Patient satisfaction and complication rates did not change after the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for all cesarean deliveries decreased both inpatient and outpatient postpartum opioid use without increasing pain scores or decreasing patient satisfaction.

The research frontier of cesarean section recovery: A bibliometric analysis

Background

Cesarean section (CS) has become an effective means to solve dystocia and some obstetric complications, and to save the lives of women and perinatal women. Disparities in quality obstetric care and rehabilitation in CS result from differences in health care systems across regions, and more scientific and reasonable rehabilitation programmes and management measures will benefit more parturient and newborns worldwide who must take CS. In this study, we performed a bibliometric analysis to collect a graphical representation of the CS recovery.

Methods

A total of 995 documents of CS recovery were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) on December 31, 2021, and then VOS viewer 1.6.18 was used for visual analysis.

Results

Over the last 20 years, the researches of CS recovery have gradually increased and it will continue to grow in the next period. Anesthesia and Analgesia is the most popular journal in CS recovery. Most of the representative achievements are concentrated in the relevant institutions of European and American countries, Brendan Carvalho and Ian J. Wrench are among the outstanding scholars in this field, but the overall outcome is limited by limited regional work and lack of broad cooperation and representation. "CS," "surgery," "management," "recovery," "enhanced recovery," and "risk factors" are high frequency keywords, and there is a close relationship between "management" and "enhanced recovery" around the CS and they also become one of the key factors to regulate the condition of patients.

Conclusion

This work firstly analyzed the research condition of CS recovery by a bibliometric analysis. According to the practice guideline, it produces some outstanding representative productions, which involves enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and will continue to be the focus of researchers. More substantive research articles and large-scale clinical studies may greatly enhance the scientific value, and it is necessary to strengthen the ERAS guideline and cooperation between researchers, generate broader consensus and results, and ultimately provide help for CS recovery.

Spontaneous versus manual placental delivery during cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Standardized techniques have been established for cesarean delivery to reduce cesarean delivery complication rates. Current recommendations suggest against manual removal of the placenta. The purpose of the present meta-analysis is to evaluate published data and provide a summary of the evidence.

METHODS

For the purposes of this systematic review, we searched Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception till June 2021 for relevant randomized controlled trials. Effect sizes were calculated in R.

RESULTS

Overall, 19 studies were included that involved 5797 parturient. We did not detect significant differences in the mean intraoperative blood loss among the two techniques (MD = 149.18 ml, 95% CI = -32.55, 330.92). Similarly, intraoperative duration was comparable among the two groups (MD = -0.89 min, 95% CI = -2.34, 0.57). The risk of intraoperative hemorrhage was comparable among the two groups (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 0.48, 6.36), although the provided result is based on underpowered sample size. Consequently, the need of transfusion was not increased (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.71, 2.44). Neither postpartum endometritis (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.94, 2.40) nor infectious morbidity (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 0.94, 3.52) increased with manual placental extraction.

CONCLUSION

The findings of our study suggest that cephalad-caudad blunt expansion of the uterine incision may be safe; however, more data are needed to evaluate its impact on post-partum infectious morbidity as well as its safety in cases at increased risk of perioperative bleeding.

Methodological quality in guidelines for enhanced recovery after surgery was suboptimal

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to appraise the methodological quality of existing guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument and to identify the concordance of different recommendations.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and clinical practice guideline websites were systematically searched. Four reviewers independently assessed the guidelines using the AGREE II instrument. The mean score of each AGREE II item, number of recommendations, strength of recommendation, and level of evidence were calculated. Agreement among reviewers was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

We identified 23 guidelines from 7,127 records. The overall agreement among reviewers was considered good (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.96). The mean scores of the six AGREE domains were scope and purpose, 60.1% (95% CI, 55.9-64.1); stakeholder involvement, 40.7% (95% CI, 35.4-46.0); rigor of development, 44.7% (95% CI, 42.2-47.2); clarity and presentation, 69.8% (95% CI, 65.3-74.3); applicability, 37.2% (95% CI, 31.8-42.6); and editorial independence, 47.8% (95% CI, 39.0-56.7). Only 2/23 ERAS guidelines were considered applicable without modifications.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological quality of the ERAS management guidelines varied and was generally low. Future guideline development should adhere to the use of the AGREE II instrument and the GRADE system to better guide clinical practice and improve individualized treatment strategies.

Cesarean delivery using an ERAS-CD process for nonopioid anesthesia and analgesia drug/medication management

Cesarean delivery (CD) is a surgical delivery of a neonate with surgical access through the maternal abdominal and uterine structures. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a standardized perioperative care program and surgery quality improvement process that has had global spread across numerous surgical disciplines. The medical and surgical use of opioids for pain management and the nonmedical opioid use, over the last three decades, have significantly increased the prevalence of abuse and addiction to opioids. This review summarizes pain, pregnancy substance use, and ERAS-directed analgesia and anesthesia for opioid use reduction or elimination in the operative and postoperative periods. Enhanced recovery (quality and safety) in the surgical CD context requires collaboration, consensus, and appropriate clinical prioritization to allow for the identification of 'the right patient, in the right clinical situation, with the right informed consent, and the right clinical care team and health system'.

Enhanced recovery for cesarean delivery leads to no difference in length of stay, decreased opioid use and lower infection rates

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to report surgical outcomes for cesarean delivery (CD) patients following the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway based on the ERAS Society recommendations. The primary outcome for which the study was powered was the length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

This IRB-approved cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary-care labor and delivery unit and utilized a pre-post intervention design. Our ERAS for CD protocol was designed using the ERAS Society recommendations and implemented globally for every patient admitted to the labor and delivery unit including both scheduled and unscheduled cases. The study was designed to have at least 85% power to detect a 6-h difference in length of stay (LOS) between the pre-intervention and post-intervention cohorts, assuming a standard deviation of 18 h. A total of 339 records were included for data analysis, 170 in the pre-intervention cohort and 169 in the post-intervention cohort. To assess the difference between groups with respect to the primary outcome of LOS, linear regression was used with and without adjusting for covariates. Differences in dichotomous secondary outcomes were assessed using binary logistic regression. Differences in continuous secondary outcomes were assessed via a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Individual components of protocol adherence were compared using chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Mean LOS was 80.5 ± 22.9 h and 82.3 ± 28.0 h, pre- and post-intervention respectively. There was no difference in LOS between the 2 cohorts (difference of means = 1.8 h; 95% confidence interval (CI): (-3.7, 7.3); p = .51). Cesarean procedure infection decreased from 11.8% pre-intervention to 5.3% post-intervention, corresponding to a 58% decrease in odds of cesarean procedure infection (odds ratio (OR)=0.42; 95% CI: (0.19, 0.96); p = .04). Inpatient opioid use also significantly decreased in the post-intervention cohort with a median MME per 12 h-period of 5.1 (25^th percentile = 2.2, 75^th percentile = 7.8) pre-intervention and 3.3 (25^th percentile = 1.0, 75^th percentile = 7.6) post-intervention (p = .04).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study support the implementation of an ERAS for CD protocol based on ERAS Society recommendations as evidenced by the statistically significant decrease observed in both procedure-related infection rates and inpatient opioid use. We did not find a significant difference in LOS, which leaves room for further investigation into factors that impact LOS after CD.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol to Improve Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Postcesarean Pain Management

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and determine its effect on racial/ethnic disparities in postcesarean pain management.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study of scheduled cesarean deliveries before and after ERAS implementation at a single urban academic institution. Pre-ERAS, all analgesic medications were given postoperatively on patient request. The ERAS protocol included preoperative acetaminophen and celecoxib. Postoperatively, patients received scheduled nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen. Oral oxycodone was available as needed, and opioid patient-controlled analgesia was eliminated from the standard order set. The primary outcome was total opioid use in the first 48 hours after cesarean, pre- and post-ERAS, reported in total milliequivalents of intravenous morphine (MME). A secondary analysis of opioid use and pain scores by racial groups was also performed. Chi-square, independent t-tests, analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used depending on variable and data normality.

RESULTS

Pre-ERAS and post-ERAS groups included 100 women each. Post-ERAS, total opioid use in 48 hours was less (40.8 vs. 8.6 MME, p < 0.001) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were lower on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and 2 (POD2) (POD1 maximum at rest: 6.7 vs. 5.3, p < 0.001). Pre-ERAS pain scores differed by race with non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients reporting the highest mean and max VAS pain scores POD1 and POD2 (POD1, maximum VAS at rest: NHB-7.4, non-Hispanic White-6.6, Hispanic-5.8, Asian-4.4, p = 0.006). Post-ERAS, there were no differences in postoperative pain scores between groups with movement on POD1 and POD2.

CONCLUSION

A standardized ERAS protocol for postcesarean pain decreases opioid use and may improve some racial disparities in postcesarean pain control.

KEY POINTS

· ERAS protocols improve postoperative pain control and lower postoperative opioid use.. · Studies show that there are racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum pain control.. · Protocols standardize care and may decrease the effects of provider implicit bias..

Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery for elective cesarean deliveries on neonatal outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of initiation of an enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) protocol for elective cesarean delivery (CD) on neonatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective analysis of elective CD at ≥39 weeks gestational age between September 2014 and August 2018 at a single institution before and after ERAC protocol implementation. Our primary outcome was composite neonatal complication rate and secondary outcome was rate of breastfeeding. We performed univariate analyses to detect differences in outcomes between the pre-ERAC and post-ERAC groups.

RESULTS

We included 362 neonates born via elective CD before (n = 135) and after (n = 227) ERAC implementation. The post-ERAC group experienced fewer composite neonatal complications (33.0% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.009) and greater breastfeeding rates (80.2% vs. 67.4%, p = 0.009) compared to the pre-ERAC group.

CONCLUSION

ERAC protocol implementation does not negatively impact neonates and may benefit both mother and baby.

Practice towards perioperative care of cesarean delivery in Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North Central Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study

Background

Perioperative obstetric care is vital in clinical practice to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. The standardized practice of perioperative obstetrics care service has a great role in the reduction of both expected and unexpected adverse outcomes. So, the purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of perioperative obstetric care services based on standards of Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Delivery and the Society of Anesthesiology and Perinatology.

Method and materials

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 161 mothers with an elective cesarean delivery from August 10, 2021, to May 15, 2022. The standard of this study was taken from evidence-based practice guidelines of perioperative practice for an elective cesarean delivery. Informed consent was taken from all study participants. The data was collected through direct observation using a standard checklist changed to standardized question forms with two checking components (“Yes”, and “No”), and data were entered into SPSS version 20 for analysis and interpretation. Descriptive analysis was done and the results were expressed in numbers and percentages using a table.

Results

A total of 161 elective cesarean sections were involved to identify the level of perioperative care. Administration of first-generation antibiotics prophylaxis, aqueous povidone-iodine solution-based skin preparations, and preparation for immediate neonatal resuscitation were fully performed based on the standards.

Conclusions

The majority of elective caesarian deliveries were carried out below the recommended level as per the checklists for perioperative practice. So, added interventions are needed to improve perioperative obstetrics care services on those standards which are not totally applied and partially performed.

•

The overall practice of perioperative obstetrics care was poor.

•

Added intervention is needed for those standards performed bellow standards.

•

Practice guidelines and standards are required in practice area.

Correlation between pleth variability index and ultrasonic inferior vena cava-collapsibility index in parturients with twin pregnancies undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND

To explore the correlation and consistency of non-invasive pleth variability index (PVI) combined with ultrasonic measurement of inferior vena cava-collapsibility index (IVC-CI) in parturients with twin pregnancies undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

Forty-seven twin pregnancies women undergoing elective cesarean section were selected. The ASA score was rated as I-II, aged from 18 to 45 years. Spinal anesthesia was performed at L3-4. PVI and IVC-CI, general data (BMI, gestational weeks, operation duration, blood loss), MAP, temperature sensory block level and adverse reactions were recorded at baseline (T1) and completion of testing the level of spinal anesthesia (T2).

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient analysis of baseline IVC-CI% and PVI revealed that the Pearson's coefficient was 0.927, > 0.4. Thus, pre-anesthesia IVC-CI% had a strong correlation with PVI, with R2 of 85.69%. The correlation coefficient analysis of post-anesthesia IVC-CI% and PVI revealed that the Pearson's coefficient was 0.904, > 0.4. Thus, post-anesthesia IVC-CI% had a strong correlation with PVI, with R2 of 81.26%.

CONCLUSION

PVI is strongly consistent with ultrasound measurement of IVC-CI twin pregnancies, which can be used as a valuable index for predicting the volume in parturients with twin pregnancies undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Trial registration This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with clinical trial registration number of ChiCTR2200055364 (08/01/2022).

The prevalence of perioperative iron deficiency anaemia in women undergoing caesarean section-a retrospective cohort study

Background

Caesarean section is a common surgery, with almost 23 million procedures performed globally each year. Postpartum haemorrhage, in association with caesarean section surgery, is a leading global cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Perioperative iron deficiency anaemia is a risk factor for intraoperative bleeding. Therefore, anaemia is an important and modifiable risk factor for bleeding during caesarean section surgery. Recent recommendations advise that all preoperative patients with anaemia (defined as haemoglobin concentration (Hb) < 130 g/L), regardless of sex, be assessed and treated to normalise haemoglobin levels. It is unclear how this recommendation translates to pregnant women where the World Health Organization (WHO) defines anaemia at a much lower threshold (Hb < 110 g/L). We aimed to determine the prevalence, and characterization, of Hb levels < 130 g/L perioperatively in women undergoing caesarean section.

Method

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 489 consecutive women who underwent caesarean section over a 12-week period, in a single-centre tertiary referral maternity unit in Australia. We calculated the proportion of women who were anaemic (Hb < 130 g/L) at four time points—first hospital appointment, third trimester, preoperatively and on discharge from hospital. The proportion of women who were iron deficient (ferritin level < 30 μg/L) at their first hospital appointment was determined.

Results

Haemoglobin was measured in 479 women. Ferritin was measured in 437 of these women. The mean (SD) Hb at the first hospital appointment, third trimester, preoperatively, and postoperatively on discharge was 126.7 (11.4) g/L, 114.6 (10.6) g/L, 124.1 (12.4) g/L, and 108.0 (13.6) g/L respectively. Iron deficiency was present in 148 (33.9%) women at their first hospital appointment; 107 of 248 (43.1%) women with anaemia and 41 of 189 (21.7%) with no anaemia. 29 women were found to have moderate anaemia (Hb 80−109 g/L) with 18 of these 29 (62.1%) women having iron deficiency. Only 68 (45.9%) women with iron deficiency at their first hospital appointment received treatment. The prevalence of anaemia classified as Hb < 130 g/L versus the WHO classification of Hb < 110 g/L from all causes was 57.4% versus 6.1% at first hospital appointment, 94% versus 26.1% in third trimester, and 66.0% versus 12.2% preoperatively. Postoperatively at least 40% of women had Hb < 130 g/L on hospital discharge versus at least 23% of women using WHO definition of Hb < 110 g/L. Of the 112 women with hospital discharge Hb < 110 g/L, 35 (31.3%) women were iron deficient at their first hospital appointment.

Conclusion

Over one in three women were iron deficient at their first hospital appointment. 62% of women with moderate anaemia (Hb 80–109 g/L) also had iron deficiency. At least four in 10 women were anaemic (Hb < 130 g/L) on hospital discharge. Less than half of the women with anaemia were treated. Our data suggests that 30% of postoperative anaemia may be prevented with intensive treatment of iron deficiency in early pregnancy. Large prospective studies, are needed to determine outcomes after caesarean section in women, stratified by preoperative Hb and ferritin levels. The prevalence of anaemia in our data suggests it is a moderate public health problem.

Vaginal preparation with different antiseptic solutions before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the effect of various vaginal wash solutions on reducing risks of post-cesarean endometritis, wound infections, fever, and hospital stay duration.

METHODS

Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized clinical trials that compared different vaginal wash solutions to each other or to "no vaginal cleaning"; without restriction on the age of parturients or site where trials were conducted. We analyzed this frequentist network meta-analysis using the netmeta package in R software version 4.1.2; synthesized data as mean difference or risk ratio with their 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Our network meta-analysis included 29 RCTs with a total sample size of 9311 women undergoing CS. Regarding post-cesarean endometritis, we found that povidone-iodine had the highest significant risk reduction compared to "no vaginal cleaning" (RR = 0.08, 95% CI [0.01, 0.69]). While regarding post-cesarean reduction of wound infection, fever, and hospital stay duration, we found that chlorhexidine 4% (RR = 0.17, 95% CI [0.05, 0.65]), saline 0.9% (RR = 0.12, 95% CI [0.03; 0.48]), and saline 0.9% (MD = -1.29, 95% CI [-2.18; -0.39]), respectively, had the highest significant risk reduction compared to "no vaginal cleaning."

CONCLUSION

Vaginal wash solutions were associated with a significant reduction of post-cesarean endometritis, wound infection, fever, and hospital stay duration. Since povidone-iodine had the highest significant reduction of post-cesarean endometritis, we recommend setting povidone-iodine as the standard practice as pre cesarean vaginal wash solution; consistent practice guidelines of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS).

Multimodal opioid-sparing pain management for emergent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia: a quality improvement project

BACKGROUND

Opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic approach has been shown to provide effective postoperative pain relief and reduce postoperative opioid consumption and opioid-associated adverse effects. While many studies have evaluated analgesic strategies for elective cesarean delivery, few studies have investigated analgesic approaches in emergent cesarean deliveries under general anesthesia. The primary aim of this quality improvement project is to evaluate opioid consumption with the use of a multimodal opioid-sparing pain management pathway in patients undergoing emergent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia.

METHODS

Seventy-two women (age > 16 years) undergoing emergent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia before (n = 36) and after (n = 36) implementation of a multimodal opioid-sparing pain management pathway were included. All patients received a standardized general anesthetic. Prior to implementation of the pathway, postoperative pain management was primarily limited to intravenous patient-controlled opioid administration. The new multimodal pathway included scheduled acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications and ultrasound-guided classic lateral transversus abdominis plane blocks with postoperative opioids reserved only for rescue analgesia. Data obtained from electronic records included demographics, intraoperative opioid use, and pain scores and opioid consumption upon arrival to the recovery room, at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patients receiving multimodal opioid sparing analgesia (AFTER group) had lower opioid use for 72 h, postoperatively. Only 2 of the 36 patients (5.6%) in the AFTER group required intravenous opioids through patient-controlled analgesia while 30 out of 36 patients (83.3%) in the BEFORE group required intravenous opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia is associated with reduced postoperative opioid consumption after emergent cesarean delivery.

The effect of preoperative oral carbohydrate on the time to colostrum and amount of vaginal bleeding after elective cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of oral carbohydrate at 2 h before elective cesarean section on postoperative recovery indicators such as the time to colostrum and vaginal bleeding.

METHODS

Women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal-epidural anesthesia, aged 20-40 years, with a body mass index (BMI) of 19-30 kg/m² and an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score of II were randomized to the oral carbohydrate group (the OC group), the oral placebo group (the OP group), or the control group (the C group). The OC group underwent oral carbohydrate preloading (300 mL/bottle), the OP group orally consumed 300 mL of distilled water, and the C group was forbidden from drinking or eating on the day of the operation. The time to colostrum, vaginal bleeding, time to exhaust, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 38 participants in the OC group, 37 in the OP group, and 37 in the C group completed the study. Compared with the OP group and the C group, the OC group produced colostrum significantly earlier, had a lower amount of 24-h vaginal bleeding, and had a higher 24-h consumption of analgesics. Compared with OP and OC groups, the C group took longer to exhaust. No significant intergroup difference was observed for any other indicator.

CONCLUSION

Oral carbohydrates loading 2 h before elective cesarean section significantly reduces the time to produce colostrum and the amount of vaginal bleeding, which contributes to postoperative recovery.

Quality improvement initiative to address bed shortage in the maternity ward at the National Referral Hospital

Background and Aims

The shortage of beds at the maternity ward is ever increasing with an increasing trend in total birth and cesarean section deliveries thereby increasing the daily number of obstetric patients awaiting admission. This quality improvement (QI) project was conducted to mitigate the problem of bed shortage by implementing modified enhanced recovery after surgery in low-risk cesarean section mothers. We aimed to increase the process measure of second day postoperative discharge in low-risk cesarean section mothers admitted in the maternity ward from 0% to 25% over 2 months period. Simultaneously, the outcome measure of daily number of obstetric patients awaiting admission was assessed.

Methods

The study was conducted at the maternity ward, Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Thimphu Bhutan. Fishbone analysis was used to analyze problems leading to delayed discharge. Interventions were discussed, implemented, and reviewed using Plan, Do, Study, and Act (PDSA) cycle over 8 week period from June 1 to July 31, 2021. Data were collected using the EXCEL sheet and analyzed using STATA 13. Process and outcome measures during the pre and postintervention period were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to express the results. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to determine the statistical significance at p < 0.05.

Results

The postintervention second day postoperative discharge increased to a median value of 65.5% (interquartile range [IQR]: 45-80) compared to the preintervention value of zero. The number of daily waiting obstetric patients decreased from the preintervention median value of 6.0 (IQR: 0-7) to the postintervention median value of 1.0 (IQR: 0-2) which was statistically significant at p = 0.0001.

Conclusion

QI initiative can address bed shortages by increasing the early postoperative discharge, thereby reducing the number of obstetric patients awaiting admissions. The outcome of this QI initiative can be used to provide evidence to modify the existing Standard Operating Procedures in our setup.

Prediction model for prolonged hospitalization following cesarean delivery

INTRODUCTION

A rise in the rate of cesarean delivery (CD) has been found to be associated with a higher length of hospital stay, making it a public health concern. We aimed to evaluate risk factors for prolonged hospitalization following CD.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study, in a single tertiary medical center, was conducted (2011-2019). Cesarean deliveries were categorized into three groups according to the postpartum length of stay (a) up to 3 days (the routine post cesarean hospital stay in our center, reference group) (b) 4-9 days, and (c) 10 days or above (prolonged hospitalization). Risk factors were examined using univariate analysis as well as multivariate logistic regression. A specific risk prediction score was developed to predict the need for prolonged hospitalization and ROC curve was assessed utilizing the performance of our model.

RESULTS

Overall, 87,424 deliveries occurred during the study period. Of them, 19,732 (22.5%) were cesarean deliveries. Hospitalization period was distributed as follows: 10,971 (55.6%) women were hospitalized for up to 3 days, 7,576 (38.4%) stayed for 4-9 days and 1,185 (6%) had a prolonged hospitalization period (≥10 days). Using multivariate analysis, multiple pregnancy (OR = 1.29, 95%CI 1.05-1.58), preterm delivery < 37 weeks (OR = 8.32, 95%CI 6.7-10.2), Apgar score < 7 (OR = 1.41, 95%CI 1.11-1.78) and non-elective CD (OR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.15-1.8) were identified as independent risk factors for prolonged hospitalization. Antenatal thrombocytopenia (PLT < 100 K) was found to be a protective factor (OR = 0.51, 95%CI 0.28-0.92). Our score model included antenatal risk factors and was found to be predicting the outcome, with an AUC of 0.845 (95%CI 0.83-0.86, p-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A prediction score model for prolonged hospitalization after CD may be beneficial for risk assessment and post-partum management.

Development and validation of a Portuguese version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10-Portuguese)

BACKGROUND

We aimed to develop and validate a Portuguese version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10-Portuguese) patient-reported outcome measure and evaluate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

After ethical approval, we recruited term pregnant women undergoing uncomplicated elective cesarean delivery in a single Brazilian institution. Women were invited to complete the translated ObsQoR-10-Portuguese and EuroQoL (EQ-5D) questionnaires (including a global health visual analog scale [GHVAS]) at 24 h (±6 h) following delivery, and a subset of women an hour later. We assessed validity and reliability of ObsQoR-10-Portuguese.

RESULTS

One hundred thirteen enrolled women completed the surveys at 24 h and 29 women at 25 h (100% response rate).

VALIDITY

(i) convergent validity: ObsQoR-10-Portuguese correlated moderately with EuroQoL score (r = -0.587) and GHVAS score (r = 0.568) at 24 h. (ii) Discriminant validity: ObsQoR-10 discriminated well between good versus poor recovery (GHVAS score ≥ 70 versus < 70; difference in mean scores 14.2; p < 0.001). (iii) Hypothesis testing: 24-h ObsQoR-10-Portuguese scores correlated with gestational age (r = 0.191; p = 0.043). (iv) Cross-cultural validity: differential item functioning analysis suggested bias in 2 items. Reliability: (i) internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82 and inter-item correlation = 0.31). (ii) Split-half reliability was very good (Spearman-Brown Prophesy Reliability Estimate = 0.80). (iii) Test re-test reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.87). (iv) Floor and ceiling effects: < 5% women scored either 0 or 100 (lowest and highest scores, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ObsQoR-10-Portuguese is valid and reliable, and should be considered for use in Portuguese-speaking women to assess their quality of inpatient recovery following cesarean delivery.

Quality Improvement Project to Reduce Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Birth

After observing the effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for gynecological surgery patients, an interdisciplinary team initiated a quality improvement project with an ERAS protocol to minimize opioid use of patients undergoing elective cesarean birth. Secondary outcomes during the three-month project included decreasing the patient's length of stay and inpatient care costs. We used the Lean Six Sigma methodology and measured aggregated patient outcomes of opioid use, length of hospital stay, and total cost. In addition, we incorporated the ERAS protocol into the electronic health record. Results showed a reduction use of morphine milligram equivalents of opioids, a slight decrease in length of hospital stay, and no change in the inpatient costs. The team recognized that implementation of an ERAS protocol is a best practice to reduce opioid use in patients undergoing a cesarean birth and decided to permanently include it in patient care processes.

A comparison of acute pain management strategies after cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

There are approximately 1.2 million cesarean deliveries performed each year in the United States alone. While traditional postoperative pain management strategies previously relied heavily on opioids, practitioners are now moving toward opioid-sparing protocols using multiple classes of nonnarcotic analgesics. Multimodal pain management systems have been adopted by other surgical specialties including gynecology, although the data regarding their use for postoperative cesarean delivery pain management remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a multimodal pain management regimen after cesarean delivery reduces the required number of morphine milligram equivalents (a unit of measurement for opioids) compared with traditional morphine patient-controlled analgesia while adequately controlling postoperative pain.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study of postoperative pain management for women undergoing cesarean delivery at a large county hospital. It was conducted during a transition from a traditional morphine patient-controlled analgesia regimen to a multimodal regimen that included scheduled nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, with opioids used as needed. The data were collected for a 6-week period before and after the transition. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid use defined as morphine milligram equivalents in the first 48 hours. The secondary outcomes included serial pain scores, time to discharge, and exclusive breastfeeding rates. Women who required general anesthesia or had a history of substance abuse disorder were excluded. The statistical analyses included the Student t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and Hodges-Lehman shift, with a P value <.05 being considered significant.

RESULTS

During the study period, 877 women underwent cesarean delivery and 778 met the inclusion criteria-378 received the traditional morphine patient-controlled analgesia and 400 received the multimodal regimen. The implementation of a multimodal regimen resulted in a significant reduction in the morphine milligram equivalent use in the first 48 hours (28 [14-41] morphine milligram equivalents vs 128 [86-174] morphine milligram equivalents; P<.001). Compared with the traditional group, more women in the multimodal group reported a pain score ≤4 by 48 hours (88% vs 77%; P<.001). There was no difference in the time to discharge (P=.32). Of the women who exclusively planned to breastfeed, fewer used formula before discharge in the multimodal group than in the traditional group (9% vs 12%; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Transition to a multimodal pain management regimen for women undergoing cesarean delivery resulted in a decrease in opioid use while adequately controlling postoperative pain. A multimodal regimen was associated with early successful exclusive breastfeeding.

Validation and Clinical Utility of the Korean Version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) Following Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

The Obstetric Quality of Recovery (ObsQoR-11) score is a new scoring tool that assesses maternal recovery after cesarean section (CS). We aimed to validate the translated Korean version of ObsQoR-11 (ObsQoR-11K) after elective CS. We validated ObsQoR-11K between March 2021 to August 2021. Validity (convergent, discriminant, and construct), reliability (Cronbach’s α, inter-item, split-half, and test-retest correlation), responsiveness, and clinical feasibility (recruitment rate and time for ObsQoR-11K completion) of ObsQoR-11K were evaluated. One hundred and twenty women completed the ObsQoR-11K 24 h after CS, and 24 women repeated it 25 h after CS. We found good convergent validity between the ObsQoR-11K score and the global health numerical rating scale (NRS) (ρ = 0.73 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.81); p < 0.001). The ObsQoR-11K score discriminated well between good (NRS ≥ 70 mm, n = 68, 69.6 ± 13.7) and poor recovery (NRS < 70 mm, n = 52, 50.6 ± 12.6, p < 0.001). The ObsQoR-11K score showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.78), split-half reliability (0.89), intra-class correlation > 0.4, and no floor or ceiling effect. Of the participants, 100% completed the ObsQoR-11K and median (IQR) time for ObsQoR-11K completion was 81 s (66–97.5 s). ObsQoR-11K is a valid and reliable scoring tool for assessing maternal recovery after elective CS in Korean women.

Enhanced recovery after scheduled cesarean delivery: a prospective pre-post intervention study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether an early recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway after scheduled cesarean delivery was associated with a reduction in postoperative length of stay compared with standard perioperative care.

METHODS

This was a prospective pre- and post-intervention study. Women were included if they were between 18 and 45 years of age and delivered a singleton, term, non-anomalous fetus via scheduled cesarean delivery by a provider within an academic practice. The ERAS pathway consisted of 23 evidence-based components regarding preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care. The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative length of stay of 3 or more days. Secondary outcomes included total postoperative narcotic use, postoperative complications, 30-day hospital readmission rates, and quality of recovery questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

A total of 116 women were included. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the pre- and post-implementation groups in the post-implementation group, surgery time was longer (78.3 ± 27.8 vs 59.1 ± 19.2 min, p < .001) and blood loss volume was higher (910.3 ± 405.1 vs 729.1 ± 202.0, p = .003), compared to pre-implementation group. An ERAS pathway was not associated in a significant reduction in postoperative length of stay of 3 or more days (70.7% vs 75.9%, p = .529). It was also not significantly associated with a difference in postoperative narcotic use, maximum pain score, transfusion, postoperative complications or hospital readmission rates.

CONCLUSION

An early recovery after surgery pathway after scheduled cesarean delivery was not associated with a reduction in postoperative length of stay or narcotic use, though the recovery scores were better after implementation.

Maternal perceptions of cesarean birth care: A qualitative study to inform ERAS guideline development

BACKGROUND

Cesarean birth (CB) is the most common inpatient surgical procedure, and until recently, there were no internationally accepted, standardized clinical guidelines available. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS^® ) program aims to improve outcomes through the development of international guidelines (IGs). As an ERAS IG for CB was being developed, this qualitative study was conducted to explore and consolidate women's experiences with CB.

METHODS

Qualitative methods were used to assess the patient experience with current evidence-based CB protocols across operative phases. Twelve women who experienced CB at a single center in Canada were interviewed using an open-ended, semi-structured interview guide at six weeks postpartum. Two researchers coded the emerging themes separately and compared findings.

RESULTS

Women described feeling informed, but felt they did not have a choice. Presurgery, women wanted more information about the risks of CB. Preoperatively, women expressed confusion with the procedures, but felt informed about local anesthesia and thermoregulation. Post-CB, women felt informed about pain and nausea control; however, urinary catheter removal was delayed when compared to the ERAS recommendations. Information about postpartum infant care was not well communicated, as many women were uninformed about delayed cord clamping and infant thermoregulation.

CONCLUSIONS

This qualitative study provides opportunities to improve communication, the patient-practitioner relationship, and the overall satisfaction throughout the CB process. The findings support the implementation of patient decision aids and training with the shared decision model. The improved procedures recommended in the ERAS IG for CB have the potential to deliver significant improvements to patient care and patient satisfaction.

The Association between Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Pathway with Standardized Discharge Prescriptions and Opioid Use and Pain Experience after Cesarean Delivery

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to evaluate opioid use after cesarean delivery (CD) and to assess implementation of an enhanced recovery after CD (ERAS-CD) pathway and its association with inpatient and postdischarge pain control and opioid use.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a baseline survey of women who underwent CD from January to March 2017 at a single, urban academic hospital. Patients were called 5 to 8 days after discharge and asked about their pain and postdischarge opioid use. An ERAS-CD pathway was implemented as a quality improvement initiative, including use of nonopioid analgesia and standardization of opioid discharge prescriptions to ≤25 tablets of oxycodone of 5 mg. From November to January 2019, a postimplementation survey was conducted to assess the association between this initiative and patients' pain control and postoperative opioid use, both inpatient and postdischarge.

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 152 women preimplementation (PRE) and 137 women post-implementation (POST); complete survey data were obtained from 102 women PRE and 98 women POST. The median inpatient morphine milligram equivalents consumed per patient decreased significantly from 141 [range: 90-195] PRE to 114 [range: 45-168] POST (p = 0.002). On a 0- to 10-point scale, median patient-reported pain scores at discharge decreased significantly (PRE: 7 [range: 5-8] vs. POST 5 [range: 3-7], p < 0.001). The median number of pills consumed after discharge also decreased significantly (PRE: 25 [range: 16-30] vs. POST 17.5 [range: 4-25], p = 0.001). The number of pills consumed was significantly associated with number prescribed (p < 0.001). The median number of leftover pills and number of refills did not significantly differ between groups. Median patient-reported pain scores at the week after discharge were lower in the POST group (PRE: 4 [range: 2-6] vs. POST 3[range: 1-5], p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Implementing an ERAS-CD pathway was associated with a significant decrease in inpatient and postdischarge opioid consumption while improving pain control. Our data suggest that even fewer pills could be prescribed for some patients.

KEY POINTS

· An ERAS-CD pathway was associated with decreased opioid use.. · Outpatient opioid consumption after cesarean warrants further study.. · Physician prescribing drives patients' opioid consumption..

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Surgical safety checklists for cesarean delivery

The routine use of surgical safety checklists can reduce perioperative complications. Generic surgical safety checklists are insufficient for cesarean delivery because each cesarean delivery involves 2 patients (the mother and the fetus or newborn), each with separate care teams and health and safety considerations. To address the added complexity of care coordination and communication inherent in cesarean delivery, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine presents sample standard surgical safety checklists for cesarean delivery that include elements of care for both the mother and newborn. In addition, we present an alternative checklist for time-critical emergency cesarean deliveries in which there is no time to safely perform the standard checklist and a sample preoperative checklist for use before moving the patient to the operating room. We also recommend steps for implementation of the checklists at individual facilities.

The impact of oral carbohydrate-rich supplement taken two hours before caesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal perioperative outcomes -- a randomized clinical trial

Background

To evaluate the impact of oral carbohydrate-rich (Ch-R) supplement taken 2 hours before an elective caesarean delivery (CD) on maternal and neonatal perioperative outcomes.

Methods

Ninety pregnant women undergoing elective CD were randomized into the Ch-R group, placebo group and fasting group equally. Participants’ blood was drawn at three time points, before intervention, immediately after and 1 day after the surgery to measure maternal and neonatal biochemical indices. Meanwhile women’s perioperative symptoms and signs were recorded.

Results

Eighty-eight pregnant women were finally included in the study. Women who had drunk Ch-R supplement had lower postoperative insulin level (β = − 3.50, 95% CI − 5.45 to − 1.56), as well as postoperative HOMA-IR index (β = − 0.74, 95% CI − 1.15 to − 0.34), compared with women who had fasted. Additionally, neonates of mothers who were allocated in the Ch-R group also had a higher glucose level, compared with neonates of mothers in the fasting group (β = 0.40, CI 0.17 to 0.62).

Conclusion

Oral Ch-R solution administered 2 hours before an elective CD may not only alleviate maternal postoperative insulin resistance, but also comfort women’s preoperative thirst and hunger, compared to fasting. Additionally, it may increase neonatal glucose level as well.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000033163.

Data of Registration: 2020-5-22.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04155-z.

Impact of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery on maternal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis explores the impact of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) on maternal outcomes.

METHODS

We searched 4 databases (Web of Science, Embase, PubMed and CINAHL) in October 2020 without date limiters, for studies quantitatively comparing ERAC implementation to a control group. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay and secondary outcomes included time to mobilization and time to urinary catheter removal, opioid consumption, readmission rates and cost savings. Mean differences and odds ratios (MD and OR with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated. Levels of evidence were assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 17,607 patients (9693 without ERAC and 7914 with ERAC) were included. ERAC was associated with reduced: length of hospital stay (MD -0.51 days [-0.94, -0.09]; p = 0.018; I2 = 99%), time to first mobilization (MD -11.05 h [-18.64, -3.46]; p = 0.004; I2 = 98%), time to urinary catheter removal (MD -13.19 h [-17.59, -8.79]; p < 0.001; I2 = 97%) and opioid consumption (MD -21.85 mg morphine equivalents [-33.19, -10.50]; p = < 0.001; I2 = 91%), with no difference in maternal readmission rate (OR 1.23 [0.96, 1.57]; p = 0.10; I2 = 0%). Three studies reported cost savings associated with ERAC. The GRADE levels of evidence were rated as low or very low quality for all study outcomes.

CONCLUSION

ERAC is associated with reduction in length of stay, times to first mobilization and urinary catheter removal and opioid consumption. ERAC does not significantly affect maternal hospital readmission rates following discharge. Further studies are required to determine which ERAC interventions to implement and which outcomes best determine ERAC efficacy.

The successful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program among caesarean deliveries in Bhutan to reduce the postoperative length of hospital stay

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary perioperative care program to optimize and enhance postoperative recovery. It has a beneficial role in decreasing the length of hospital stay and improving the quality of care. This study aims to observe the successful implementation of ERAS in reducing the length of hospital stay (LOS) among caesarean deliveries.

METHODS

A pre-and post-implementation study of ERAS protocol was conducted, among cohort of women who underwent caesarean deliveries from January to December 2020 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mongar Regional Referral hospital. Data collected retrospectively and analyzed in SPSS (IBM SPSS trial version); and comparison of length of hospital stay between the two groups were tested by t-test.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-one patients were included in the study: 87 in the pre-ERAS and 84 in the post-ERAS cohort. Post implementation, LOS decreased by an average of 21.0 (CI 16.11-24.64; p-value < 0.001) hours in the postoperative period. A greater proportion of patients were discharged on day-2 (2.3% in pre-ERAS and 81% in ERAS; p-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of ERAS protocol can significantly decrease the postoperative length of hospital stay without increasing the complications and readmission rates.

Implementation Process and Evolution of a Laparotomy-Assisted 2-Port Fetoscopic Spina Bifida Closure Program

INTRODUCTION

Prenatal closure of open spina bifida via open fetal surgery improves neurologic outcomes for infants in selected pregnancies. Fetoscopic techniques that are minimally invasive to the uterus aim to provide equivalent fetal benefits while minimizing maternal morbidities, but the optimal technique is undetermined. We describe the development, evolution, and feasibility of the laparotomy-assisted 2-port fetoscopic technique for prenatal closure of fetal spina bifida in a newly established program.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women consented for laparotomy-assisted fetoscopic closure of isolated fetal spina bifida. Inclusion and exclusion criteria followed the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS). Team preparation involved observation at the originating center, protocol development, ancillary staff training, and surgical rehearsal using patient-matched models through simulation prior to program implementation. The primary outcome was the ability to complete the repair fetoscopically. Secondary maternal and fetal outcomes to assess performance of the technique were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Of 57 women screened, 19 (33%) consented for laparotomy-assisted 2-port fetoscopy between February 2017 and December 2019. Fetoscopic closure was completed in 84% (16/19) cases. Over time, the technique was modified from a single- to a multilayer closure. In utero hindbrain herniation improved in 86% (12/14) of undelivered patients at 6 weeks postoperatively. Spontaneous rupture of membranes occurred in 31% (5/16) of fetoscopic cases. For completed cases, median gestational age at birth was 37 (range 27-39.6) weeks and 50% (8/16) of women delivered at term. Vaginal birth was achieved in 56% (9/16) of patients. One newborn had a cerebrospinal fluid leak that required postnatal surgical repair.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a laparotomy-assisted 2-port fetoscopic spina bifida closure program through rigorous preparation and multispecialty team training may accelerate the learning curve and demonstrates favorable obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

A standardized post-cesarean analgesia regimen reduces postpartum opioid use

BACKGROUND

Optimal post-cesarean pain control is important. With the rising opioid epidemic it is imperative to maximize non-opioid based primary approaches to post-cesarean pain control. In 2018, we implemented a standardized post-cesarean analgesia regimen.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if implementation of a standardized postoperative analgesic regimen decreases opioid use following cesarean birth.

STUDY DESIGN

A standardized postoperative analgesia protocol was implemented in June 2018, which included scheduled oral acetaminophen (975 mg every 6 h) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (ketorolac 15 mg IV every 6 h for 5 doses followed by ibuprofen 600 mg oral every 6 h) with opioids available for breakthrough pain. There was no prior standardized protocol. A before-and-after study design was used to compare oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for nine months prior to and nine months after this protocol was implemented, excluding the two month period of protocol rollout. Women with opioid use disorder or postoperative intubation were excluded. The primary outcome was the cumulative MME used in the first 72 h postoperatively. Total dose at 12, 24, and 48 h were also compared.

RESULTS

Of 2340 women who underwent cesarean birth during the study period (1 July 2017 - 30 April 2019), 2001 women met inclusion criteria (914 before 10 April 2018 (pre-protocol) and 1087 after 17 June 2018 (post-protocol)). Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, including gestational age at delivery, maternal body mass index (BMI), planned versus unplanned cesarean birth, and type of intraoperative anesthesia used. The cumulative opioid dose in the first 72 h postoperatively was 216.3 ± 84.3 MME prior to implementation compared to 171.5 ± 91.5 MME following implementation (p < .001). The average cumulative MME use was higher in the pre-protocol period compared to post-protocol at all time periods: 12 h (57.3 ± 23.8 vs 48.6 ± 26.2 MME, p < .001), 24 h (98.1 ± 34.1 vs 82.1 ± 38.8 MME, p < .001), and 48 h (165.8 ± 58.3 vs 134.9 ± 66.2 MME, p < .001). The average pain scores were lower in the pre-protocol group (3 vs 3.3, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Scheduled administration of acetaminophen and NSAIDs following cesarean birth significantly decreased the cumulative dose of opioids used in the first 72 h postoperatively.

The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been adopted in some maternity units and studied extensively in cesarean section (CS) in the last years, showing encouraging results in clinic practice. However, the present evidence assessing the effectiveness of ERAS for CS remains weak, and there is a paucity in the published literature, especially in improving maternal outcomes. Our study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols for CS. Methods: A systematic literature search using Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library was carried out up to October 2020. The appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies applying ERAS for patients undergoing CS were included in this study, comparing the effect of ERAS protocols with conventional care on length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission rate, incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid use, and cost of hospitalization. All statistical analyses were conducted with the RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Ten studies (four RCTs and six observational studies) involving 16,391 patients were included. ERAS was associated with a decreased LOS (WMD -7.47 h, 95% CI: -8.36 to -6.59 h, p < 0.00001) and lower incidence of postoperative complications (RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.68, p < 0.00001). Moreover, pooled analysis showed that postoperative pain score (WMD: -1.23, 95% CI: -1.32 to -1.15, p < 0.00001), opioid use (SMD: -0.46, 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.34, p < 0.00001), and hospital cost (SMD:-0.54, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.45, p < 0.00001) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the conventional care group. No significant difference was observed with regard to readmission rate (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.54, p = 0.62). Conclusions: The available evidence suggested that ERAS applying to CS significantly reduced postoperative complications, lowered the postoperative pain score and opioid use, shortened the hospital stay, and potentially reduced hospital cost without compromising readmission rates. Therefore, protocols implementing ERAS in CS appear to be effective and safe. However, the results should be interpreted with caution owing to the limited number and methodological quality of included studies; hence, future large, well-designed, and better methodological quality studies are needed to enhance the body of evidence.

Opportunities and Challenges for the Next Phase of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review

Importance

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a global surgical quality improvement initiative now firmly entrenched within the field of perioperative care. Although ERAS is associated with significant clinical outcome improvements and cost savings in numerous surgical specialties, several opportunities and challenges deserve further discussion.

Observations

Uptake and implementation of ERAS Society guidelines, together with ERAS-related research, have increased exponentially since the inception of the ERAS movement. Opportunities to further improve patient outcomes include addressing frailty, optimizing nutrition, prehabilitation, correcting preoperative anemia, and improving uptake of ERAS worldwide, including in low- and middle-income countries. Challenges facing enhanced recovery today include implementation, carbohydrate loading, reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and bowel preparation. The COVID-19 pandemic poses both a challenge and an opportunity for ERAS.

Conclusions and Relevance

To date, ERAS has achieved significant benefit for patients and health systems; however, improvements are still needed, particularly in the areas of patient optimization and systematic implementation. During this time of global crisis, the ERAS method of delivering care is required to take surgery and anesthesia to the next level and bring improvements in outcomes to both patients and health systems.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Cesarean Delivery Decreases Length of Hospital Stay and Opioid Consumption: A Quality Improvement Initiative

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a resident-led enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for scheduled prelabor cesarean deliveries on hospital length of stay and postpartum opioid consumption.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent scheduled prelabor cesarean deliveries before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol at a single academic tertiary care institution. The primary outcome was length of stay following cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included protocol adherence, inpatient opioid consumption, and patient-centered outcomes. The protocol included multimodal analgesia and antiemetic medications, expedited urinary catheter removal, early discontinuation of maintenance intravenous fluids, and early ambulation.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients were included in the study: 122 in the pre-ERAS cohort and 128 in the post-ERAS cohort. There were no differences in baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, or cesarean delivery characteristics between the two groups. Following protocol implementation, hospital length of stay decreased by an average of 7.9 hours (pre-ERAS 82.1 vs. post-ERAS 74.2, p < 0.001). There was 89.8% adherence to the entire protocol as written. Opioid consumption decreased by an average of 36.5 mg of oxycodone per patient, with no significant differences in pain scores from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 4 (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A resident-driven quality improvement project was associated with decreased length of hospital stay, decreased opioid consumption, and unchanged visual analog pain scores at the time of hospital discharge. Implementation of this ERAS protocol is feasible and effective.

KEY POINTS

· Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles can be effectively applied to cesarean delivery with excellent protocol adherence.. · Patients who participated in the ERAS pathway had significant decreases in hospital length of stay and opioid pain medication consumption with unchanged visual analog pain scores postoperative days 1 through 4.. · Resident-driven quality improvement projects can make a substantial impact in patient care for both process measures (e.g., protocol adherence) and outcome measures (e.g., opioid use)..

Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway to Reduce Inpatient Opioid Consumption after Cesarean Delivery

OBJECTIVE

 Opioid prescription after cesarean delivery is excessive and can lead to chronic opioid use disorder. We assessed the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway on inpatient opioid consumption after cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

 An ERAS pathway was implemented as a quality improvement initiative in December 2019. Preintervention (PRE) data were collected from March to May 2019 to assess baseline opioid consumption. Postintervention (POST) data were collected from January to March 2020. The primary outcome was inpatient postoperative opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included the consumption of any opioids, postpartum length of stay, and opioid prescription at discharge.

RESULTS

 A total of 92 women were in the PRE group and 91 were in the POST group. Inpatient opioid consumption decreased by 87.3% from PRE to POST, from 124.7 (interquartile range [IQR]: 10-181.6) MME to 15.8 (IQR: 0-75) MME (p < 0.001). There was no difference in median postpartum length of stay (3.4 days PRE vs. 3.3 days POST; p = 0.12). The proportion of women who did not consume any opioids increased by 75.4% from PRE to POST (p = 0.02). The proportion of women discharged with an opioid prescription decreased by 25.6% from PRE to POST (p = 0.007), despite no formal change to prescribing practices. After adjustment for differences in race/ethnicity and gravidity, there was still a reduction in total inpatient opioid consumption (p < 0.001) and an increase in the proportion of women not consuming any opioids (adjusted relative risk (RR): 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-3.87), but the difference in rate of prescription of opioids at discharge was no longer statistically significant (adjusted RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48-1.02).

CONCLUSION

 Adoption of an ERAS pathway for cesarean delivery resulted in a marked reduction in inpatient opioid consumption. Such a pathway can be implemented across institutions and may be a powerful tool in combating the opioid epidemic.

KEY POINTS

· ERAS after cesarean reduces inpatient opioid consumption.. · ERAS after cesarean increases the proportion of women not consuming any opioids.. · This pathway can be feasibly adopted elsewhere..

Levels of Evidence Supporting the North American and European Perioperative Care Guidelines for Anesthesiologists between 2010 and 2020: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Although there are thousands of published recommendations in anesthesiology clinical practice guidelines, the extent to which these are supported by high levels of evidence is not known. This study hypothesized that most recommendations in clinical practice guidelines are supported by a low level of evidence.

METHODS

A registered (Prospero CRD42020202932) systematic review was conducted of anesthesia evidence-based recommendations from the major North American and European anesthesiology societies between January 2010 and September 2020 in PubMed and EMBASE. The level of evidence A, B, or C and the strength of recommendation (strong or weak) for each recommendation was mapped using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification system or the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The outcome of interest was the proportion of recommendations supported by levels of evidence A, B, and C. Changes in the level of evidence over time were examined. Risk of bias was assessed using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II.

RESULTS

In total, 60 guidelines comprising 2,280 recommendations were reviewed. Level of evidence A supported 16% (363 of 2,280) of total recommendations and 19% (288 of 1,506) of strong recommendations. Level of evidence C supported 51% (1,160 of 2,280) of all recommendations and 50% (756 of 1,506) of strong recommendations. Of all the guidelines, 73% (44 of 60) had a low risk of bias. The proportion of recommendations supported by level of evidence A versus level of evidence C (relative risk ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.18 to 4.74; P = 0.933) or level of evidence B versus level of evidence C (relative risk ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.72 to 3.72; P = 0.243) did not increase in guidelines that were revised. Year of publication was also not associated with increases in the proportion of recommendations supported by level of evidence A (relative risk ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.23; P = 0.340) or level of evidence B (relative risk ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.15; P = 0.283) compared to level of evidence C.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the recommendations in anesthesiology clinical practice guidelines are based on a low level of evidence, and this did not change over time. These findings highlight the need for additional efforts to increase the quality of evidence used to guide decision-making in anesthesiology.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Post-Cesarean Opioid Use after Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is associated with lower maternal opioid use after cesarean delivery (CD).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a pre- and postimplementation (PRE and POST, respectively) study of an ERAS protocol for cesarean deliveries. ERAS is a multimodal, multidisciplinary perioperative approach. The four pillars of our protocol include education, pain management, nutrition, and early ambulation. Patients were counseled by their outpatient providers and given an educational booklet. Pain management included gabapentin and acetaminophen immediately prior to spinal anesthesia. Postoperatively patients received scheduled acetaminophen and ibuprofen. Oxycodone was initiated as needed 24 hours after spinal analgesia. Preoperative diet consisted of clear carbohydrate drink consumed 2 hours prior to scheduled operative time with advancement as tolerated immediately postoperation. Women with a body mass index (BMI) <40 kg/m² and scheduled CD were eligible for ERAS. PRE patients were randomly selected from repeat cesarean deliveries (RCDs) at a single site from October 2017 to September 2018, BMI <40 kg/m², without trial of labor. The POST cohort included women who participated in ERAS from October 2018 to June 2019. PRE and POST demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. Primary outcome was total postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and maximum postoperative day 2 (POD2) pain score.

RESULTS

All women in PRE (n = 70) had RCD compared with 66.2% (49/74) in POST. Median total postoperative MMEs were 140.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 87.5-182.5) in PRE compared with 0.0 (IQR: 0.0-72.5) in POST (p < 0.001). Median LOS in PRE was 4.02 days (IQR: 3.26-4.27) compared with 2.37 days (IQR: 2.21-3.26) in POST (p < 0.001). Mean maximum POD2 pain score was 5.28 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.86) in PRE compared with 4.67 (SD = 1.63) in POST (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

ERAS protocol was associated with decreased postoperative opioid use, shorter LOS, and decreased pain after CD.

KEY POINTS

· ERAS protocol was associated with decreased postoperative opioid use after CD.. · ERAS protocol was associated with shorter length of stay after CD.. · ERAS protocol was associated with decreased postoperative pain after CD..